Posted in Exposition

KING JOSIAH OF JUDAH – BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Amit, Y., 2006. Essays on Ancient Israel in its Near Eastern Context: A Tribute to Nadav Na’aman. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns

Barrick, W. B., 2002. The King And The Cemeteries: Toward A New Understanding Of Josiah’s Reform. Leiden: Brill

Barton, J. and Muddiman, J., 2007. The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Beacon, R., 1892. Thoughts on 2 Chronicles, Addison, IL: Bible Truth Publishers

Blenkinsopp, J., 1986. Prophecy and Canon: A Contribution to the Study of Jewish Origins, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press

Bright, J., 2000. A History Of Israel. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press

Brueggemann, W., 2000. 1 & 2 Kings. Macon: GE: Smyth & Helwys Publishing

Day, J., 2010. Prophecy and the Prophets in Ancient Israel: Proceedings of the Oxford Old Testament Seminar, London: T & T Clark

Finegan, J., 1999. Handbook Of Biblical Chronology: Principles Of Time Reckoning In The Ancient World And Problems Of Chronology In The Bible. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson.

Gabriel, R. A., 2003. The Military History Of Ancient Israel. Westport, Conn.: Praeger

Goldingay, J. and Allen, L., 2007. Uprooting And Planting: Essays On Jeremiah For Leslie Allen. New York: T & T Clark

Grabbe, L. and Nissinen, M., 2011. Constructs of Prophecy in the Former and Latter Prophets and Other Texts, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature

Graham, M., Knoppers, G. and McKenzie, S., 2003. The Chronicler as Theologian. London: T & T Clark International

Gray, R., 1833. Josiah and Cyrus, Two Great Objects of Divine Notice, in the Scheme of Revelation. London: J. G. & F. Rivington

Harrison, R. K., 2009. Jeremiah And Lamentations. Nottingham, England: Inter-Varsity Press.

Jones, F. N., 1993. The Chronology Of The Old Testament: A Return To The Basics. The Woodlands Texas: KingsWord Press

Knapp, C., 1983. The Kings Of Judah And Israel. Neptune, N.J.: Loizeaux Brothers

Kratz, R. G. and Kurtz, P. M., 2015. Historical And Biblical Israel. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press

Lemche, N., 1998. The Israelites In History And Tradition. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

Liverani, M., Peri, C. and Davies, P., 2007. Israel’s History And The History Of Israel. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Longman, T., Enns, P. and Strauss, M., 2013. The Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Publishing Group

Lundbom, J., 2004. ‘Jeremiah’, in The Anchor Bible, New York, NY: Doubleday

Lundbom, J., 2013. Jeremiah Closer Up. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press

Monroe, L. A. S., 2011. Josiah’s Reform and the Dynamics of Defilement. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press

Porter, S., 2009. Dictionary Of Biblical Criticism And Interpretation. London: Routledge

Prosic, T., 2004. The Development and Symbolism of Passover until 70 CE. London: T & T Clark International

Rawlinson, G., 1879. ‘1 & 2 Chronicles’, in Student’s Commentary On The Bible: Old Testament Vol II Joshua -Esther. London: John Murray

Rawlinson, G., 1879. ‘1 & 2 Kings’, in Student’s Commentary On The Bible: Old Testament Vol II Joshua -Esther. London: John Murray

Rossier, H., 1993. Meditations On The Second Book Of Chronicles. Sunbury, Pa.: Believers Bookshelf, Inc.

Venema, G. J., 2004. Reading Scripture in the Old Testament, Leiden: Brill

Voegelin, E., Sandoz, E., Weiss, G. and Petropulos, W., 2001. The Collected Works Of Eric Voegelin: Volume 14: Order And History, Volume I, Israel And Revelation, Columbia: Missouri University Press

Walton, J., Matthews, V. and Chavalas, M., 2004. The IVP Bible Background Commentary. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press

Wolfendale, J., 1892. The Preacher’s Complete Homiletic Commentary on the First and Second Books of the Chronicles. New York: Funk & Wagnalls

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Ahlström, G., 1981. King Josiah and the dwd of Amos vi. 10. Journal of Semitic Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.7-9

Avioz, M., 2007. Josiah’s Death in the Book of Kings. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, Vol. 83, No.4, pp.359-36

Ben-Dov, J., 2008. Writing as Oracle and as Law: New Contexts for the Book-Find of King Josiah. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 127 , No. 2 (Summer, 2008), pp.223-239

Claburn, W., 1973. The Fiscal Basis of Josiah’s Reforms. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp.11-22

Delamarter, S., 2004. The Death of Josiah in Scripture and Tradition: Wrestling with the Problem of Evil? Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp.29-60

Galil, G., 1993. Geba’-Ephraim and the Northern Boundary of Judah in the days of Josiah, Revue Biblique, Vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 358-367

Glatt-Gilad, D., 1996, The Role of Huldah’s Prophecy in the Chronicler’s Portrayal of Josiah’s Reform, Biblica, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp.16-31

Hamori, E., 2013. The Prophet and the Necromancer: Women’s Divination for Kings. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 132, No. 4, pp.827-843

Hasegawa, S., 2017. Josiah’s Death: Its Reception History as Reflected in the Books of Kings and Chronicles. Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, Vol. 129, No. 4, pp.522-535

Heltzer, M., 2000. Some Questions Concerning the Economic Policy of Josiah, King of Judah. Israel Exploration Journal, Vol. 50 (1/2), pp.105-108

Janzen, D., 2013. The Sins of Josiah and Hezekiah: A Synchronic Reading of the Final Chapters of Kings. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.349-370

Jonker, L. C., 2012. Huldah’s Oracle: The Origin of the Chronicler’s Typical Style, Verbum et Ecclesia, Vol. 33, No.1, pp.1-7

Leuchter, M., 2009. »The Prophets« and »The Levites« in Josiah’s Covenant Ceremony. Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, Vol. 121, No.1, pp.31-47

Malamat, A., 1950. The Last Wars of the Kingdom of Judah, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.218-227

Markl, D., 2014. No Future without Moses: The Disastrous End of 2 Kings 22–25 and the Chance of the Moab Covenant (Deuteronomy 29–30). Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 133, No. 4, pp.711-728

Na’aman, N., 2011. The “Discovered Book” and the Legitimation of Josiah’s Reform. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp.47-62

Na’aman, N., 2013, Notes on the Temple ‘Restorations’ of Jehoash and Josiah. Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp.640-651

Mitchell, C, 2006. The Ironic Death of Josiah in 2 Chronicles. CBQ, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp.421-435

Paton, L. B., 1898. The Religion of Judah from Josiah to Ezra, The Biblical World, Vol. 11, No.6, pp.410-421.

Talshir, Z., 1996. The Three Deaths of Josiah and the Strata of Biblical Historiography (2 Kings XXIII 29-30; 2 Chronicles XXXV 20-5; 1 Esdras 1 23-31), Vetus Testamentum, 46 (Fasc. 2, (Apr.,1996), pp.213-236

Wilson, A. M., 1892. The Character and Work of Josiah, The Old and New Testament Student, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp.276-284

Yadin, Y., 1976. Beer-sheba: The High Place Destroyed by King Josiah. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, Vol. 222 (April), pp.5-17

See my posts:

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Chronicles

The Death of King Josiah of Judah

Posted in General

THE DEATH OF KING JOSIAH OF JUDAH (640-609 BCE)

THE UNEXPECTED END OF A GOOD KING

Since King Josiah of Judah (640-609 BCE) is unknown in secular history, records of his death are only to be found in three religious texts. These are the canonical books 2 Kings (23:29-30) and 2 Chronicles (35:20-25) plus the deuterocanonical book 1 Esdras (1:25-32). The accounts differ in some details but all agree that Josiah met his end as the result of an encounter with Pharaoh Neco of Egypt.

The biblical record of Josiah concentrates mainly on internal affairs and gives us neither the big picture as regards geopolitics, nor a summary of Josiah’s foreign policy and his manoeuvres in response to the power plays between the superpowers of Assyria, Egypt and Bablylonia. One therefore has to form a conjecture of the sequence of events from information about the period available in external historical sources.

The might of the Assyrian empire had been declining for many years, certainly since before Josiah came to the throne. The Egyptians, the Elamites, the Arabian tribes and others had all revolted, and internal power struggles further weakened the massive empire. Under Ashurbanipal (669-631 BCE) the Assyrians had some success in quelling revolts but things worsened after his death. By the end of Josiah’s reign the Babylonians, under Cyaxares the Mede (625-585 BCE) and the Chaldean Nabopolassar (626-605 BCE), father of Nebuchadnezzar, were coming into ascendancy. It would seem that the Egyptians under their new Pharaoh Neco, although traditionally hostile towards their Assyrians overlords, preferred a weak Assyria to a strong Babylonia, and had committed themselves to helping the Assyrians against the Babylonians.

‘While Josiah was king, Pharaoh Necho king of Egypt went up to the Euphrates River to help the king of Assyria. ‘ 2 Kgs 23:29a (NIV)

NB. There has been ongoing controversy over the translation of this verse. The KJV has ‘went up against’ while modern translations like the NIV and ESV say ‘went up to.’ For a technical discussion arguing for a retention of the KJV translation and maintaining that Egypt did not help Assyria see F. N. Jones, 1993, The Chronology of the Old Testament:
A Return to the Basics pp. 184-188. He contends that ‘the king of Assyria’ refers to the Neo-Babylonian Nabopolassar (‘the new possessor of the title “King of Assyria” p.188) who had recently defeated the Assyrians. This article, however, proceeds on the basis that Neco went up to help the Assyrians against the Babylonians, as per the modern translations.

The Babylonian Chronicle for 609 BCE confirms the information given in 2 Kings 23:29 that an Egyptian army crossed the River Euphrates in order to help the Assyrians under Asshur-uballit fight a last ditch attempt to retake Haran from the Babylonians. The Babylonians had taken and destroyed Nineveh, capital of the Assyrian empire in 612 BCE. The Assyrians had set up a refugee government in the town of Haran (in modern day Turkey) but had fled from there when it too was captured by the Babylonians in 610. They needed an Egypto-Assyrian victory in order to survive.

It is probable that Josiah, who is thought to have been an unwilling vassal of Egypt for some years before then, had foreseen that the Babylonians would emerge the superior power and had thrown in his lot with them. Some reckon that he therefore went to Megiddo with the express intention of engaging in military action against Neco and the Egyptian army in order to detain them on their way north to help the Assyrians retake Haran. The delay Josiah intended to cause would hinder the progress of the Egyptian reinforcements towards the Assyrians and make a Babylonian victory more likely.

‘King Josiah marched out to meet him in battle, but Necho faced him and killed him at Megiddo.’ 2 Kgs 23:29b (NIV)

2 Chronicles makes no mention of the Assyrians but does say that Neco was heading for Carchemish in great haste (2 Chron 35:20-21).

Some scholars think that Josiah had been summoned to Megiddo by Neco. Neco had ascended the Egyptian throne just the previous year (610 BCE) and may have wished to meet and receive homage from his Judaean vassal. This type of request was standard procedure (e.g. Ahaz’s trip to Damascus to meet Tiglath-pileser, 2 Kgs 16:10) and, as Neco assured Josiah, was not an occasion for hostilities (2 Chron 25:31; 1 Esdras 1:26-27)

Whatever the motive, Josiah went to Megiddo with war in mind. Various reasons have been proposed:

a) he was filled with religious and nationalistic fervour as a result of his reforms. He was so keen to fight the old enemy, Egypt, that he was blind to reason.

b) he overestimated his military capabilities.

C) as has already been suggested, he calculated that there would be a change in the balance of international power in favour of the Babylonians and hoped to curry favour by obstructing the Egyptian armed forces on their way to assist the Assyrians.

According to 2 Kings 23:29-30 Josiah was killed at Megiddo and his dead body transferred from there by chariot to Jerusalem for burial.

According to 2 Chronicles 35:23-24 archers shot and mortally wounded him at Megiddo. His officers transferred him into another chariot which brought him to Jerusalem, where he died and was buried.

According to 1 Esdras 1:30-31 he was not injured or killed in battle but was overcome by a weakness, transferred to a second chariot and taken to Jerusalem, where he died and was buried: ‘The king said to his servants, “Take me away from the battle, for I am very weak.” And immediately his servants took him out of the line of battle. He got into his second chariot; and after he was brought back to Jerusalem he died, and was buried in the tomb of his ancestors.’ 1 Esdras 1:30-31

Pharaoh Neco went on to the Euphrates to help with the assault on Haran. Near Carchemish his forces were routed by the Babylonians. Neco and his army retreated and, on his way back to Egypt some three months later, Neco summoned Josiah’s son and successor Jehoahaz to his camp at Riblah on the Orontes (near Lebanon). He took Jehoahaz captive and transported him to Egypt, installing his brother Jehoiakim as an Egyptian puppet and vassal. Although he paid dearly for it, Josiah’s delaying action may have successfully caused Neco’s failure to save Assyria.

One might wonder how Josiah’s untimely demise squares with the oracle of Huldah the prophetess which appeared to promise him a good death (2 Kgs 22:20; 2 Chron 34:28). Upon closer inspection, however, Huldah’s prophecy only promised him a peaceful burial (‘thou shalt be gathered into thy grave in peace’ ) i.e. his country would not be at war.

Huldah’s prophecy provides one of the explanations given in the Bible for Josiah’s unexpected death. In those days in Judah the death of a king in battle would not have been regarded as heroic. Nor would it have been attributed to bad decision-making on his part or just plain ‘bad luck’. It would have been regarded as part of a chain of cause and effect. Evil behaviour resulted in punishment, righteous living was rewarded with prosperity and long life. According to this system of retribution Josiah must have done wrong! How could such a thing have happened to a righteous and godly young man whose life was marked by ‘goodness’ (2 Chron 35:26) and warranted the glowing assessment of 2 Kgs 23:25?

‘And like unto him was there no king before him, that turned to the Lord with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might, according to all the law of Moses; neither after him arose there any like him’

Three possible explanations (reading between the lines) were given:

1) Josiah did not listen to the word of God spoken through a foreign king – Pharaoh Neco.

‘Nevertheless Josiah would not turn his face from him, but disguised himself, that he might fight with him, and hearkened not unto the words of Necho from the mouth of God, and came to fight in the valley of Megiddo’ 2 Chron 35:22

2) Josiah died because of his grandfather Manasseh’s sins.

‘Because they have forsaken me, and have burned incense unto other gods, that they might provoke me to anger with all the works of their hands; therefore my wrath shall be kindled against this place, and shall not be quenched.’ 2 Kings 22:17

‘Notwithstanding the LORD turned not from the fierceness of his great wrath, wherewith his anger was kindled against Judah, because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked him withal.’ 2 Kgs 23:26

3) Josiah’s death was a mercy.

According to Huldah’s prophecy (2 Kgs 22:20; 2 Chron 34:28) Josiah would have a peaceful burial. His country was not on a war footing and he was spared the distress of the forthcoming Babylonian invasion.


LESSONS:

a. Do not involve yourself in conflicts that do not concern the Lord’s people. Neco’s battle was with Babylon, not Judah.

b. Be open to the prompting and leading of the Lord through personal circumstances. Josiah died because he failed to recognize and heed God’s word through Pharoah Neco. Often God prompts through people and circumstances as well as through his written word.

See my posts:

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Chronicles

King Josiah of Judah – Bibliography

Posted in Exposition

KING JOSIAH OF JUDAH in 2 Chronicles

READING: 2 Chronicles chapters 34-35

DIVISION

34:1-2 Opening Formula

34:3-5 Josiah’s religious purification of Jerusalem and Judah in his 12th regnal year

34:6-7 The extension of his activities to the northern tribal areas of Manasseh, Ephraim, Simeon, Naphtali, all Israel

34:8-18 Temple repairs and the finding of a torah scroll

34:19-28 Huldah’s oracle

34:29-32 Covenant-making

34:33 A summary verse

35:1-19 The Passover Celebration

35:20-27 The Death of King Josiah

THE JOSIAH ACCOUNT IN 2 CHRONICLES 34-35

34:1-2 Opening Formula

As in 2 Kings this introductory formula introduces the king and profiles his reign. Josiah was eight years old when he began to reign and the length of his reign was thirty-one years (640-609 BCE). He is commended for doing what was right in the sight of YHWH and like 2 Kgs 22:2 his name is linked with that of his ancestor David. The opening formula in 2 Kings gives us three facts; 1) his age at accession 2) the number of years he reigned 3) his mother’s name. The latter piece of information is not mentioned by the Chronicler. In both 2 Kings 22:2 and 2 Chron 34:2 Josiah is said to have deviated ‘neither to the right hand, nor to the left.’ Both formulae therefore immediately link Josiah to the book of Deuteronomy, where it is said that the model king should make a copy of the torah and read it all his life so that ‘he turn not aside from the commandment, to the right hand, or to the left.’

See my post: ‘King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings

34:3-5 Josiah’s religious purification of Jerusalem and Judah in his 12th year

Unlike the Kings account which seems unconcerned with chronology and telescopes the main events of Josiah’s career into just one year (his eighteenth), the Chronicler is at pains to emphasize that his reforms were a step-by-step process. According to 2 Chronicles 34:3 he had a religious awakening during his eighth regnal year (633/2 BCE) while he was still young (about 16 years of age). It was then that he began to seek YHWH. It does not seem that his advisers, whoever they were, during the early part of his reign were concerned to guide him in the ways of the Lord. Presumably, for the first sixteen years of his life, those advising him were pro-Assyrian, and his religious policies would therefore have been similar to those pursued by his father Amon. We are not told why it took him four years of ‘seeking after’ the Lord before launching his campaign to rid the land of idolatry in the twelth year of his reign. 2 Kings has the purge initiated following the discovery of a torah scroll in the Temple in his eighteenth year (621 BCE). Here in 2 Chronicles the reforms begin in his twelth year – a full six years before the discovery of the law-book. This sequence of events is the most noticeable difference between the accounts of 2 Kgs 22-23 and 2 Chron 34-35.

In his twelth year (c. 628 BCE), at age twenty, he began a purge aimed at ridding Judah and Jerusalem of the high places, the groves, the carved idols and the cast images and restoring the pure worship of YHWH. Verses 3b-5 give a fuller explanation of what he did in Jerusalem and Judah. He personally supervised the destruction of places of idolatry, of the images themselves and of objects related to their worship. The high places must have been those which his grandfather Manasseh had rebuilt but at which the people only sacrificed to YHWH (33:3, 17). Verse 4 clearly states that the altars of the Baals were destroyed by him and that, as part of the same event, so were the images that were located high above them. It is not clear what these images were, possibly they had something to do with sun worship. The Chronicler does not record him purging the Jerusalem Temple, this had already been done by Manasseh ( 33:15-16). The purification of the temple mentioned in v. 8 would have been to sanctify it again through rituals after the completion of restoration works.

Verses 4b and 5 tell us that Josiah desecrated the graves of the idolatrous priests and burned their bones upon their altars. This was a crime for which the prophet Amos had denounced the king of Moab (Amos 2:1), yet the Chronicler passes no comment upon it. (cp. another passage about the disrespectful treatment of bones Jer 8:1-3). Perhaps this was seen as posthumous punishment for the idolaters, cremation being the punishment meted out to those regarded as false priests in Num16:35. Cremation is also prescribed as a punishment in Lev 20:14; 21:9 and Josh 7:25.

34:6-7 The extension of Josiah’s activities to the northern tribal areas of Manasseh, Ephraim, Simeon, Naphtali, all Israel

Taking advantage of Assyrian weakness at that time Josiah extended his campaign against idolatry into the territory that had been the Northern kingdom of Israel but was then part of the Assyrian empire. Although the Bible says little about his military exploits Josiah must have been strong enough to act independently and recover this territory from Assyrian control. The religious purge he conducted there was just as thorough as that in Judah:

‘In the towns of Manasseh, Ephraim and Simeon, as far as Naphtali, and in the ruins around them, he tore down the altars and the Asherah poles and crushed the idols to powder and cut to pieces all the incense altars throughout Israel. Then he went back to Jerusalem.’ 2 Chron 34:6-7 (NIV)

Thus Josiah set out on a personal, fanatical crusade against idolatry which, as clarified in 2 Kings 23:4-20, was implemented in three stages; 1) Judah and Jerusalem 2) Bethel 3) the towns of Samaria. Apart from the plural subject (they) at the beginning of v.4, the Chronicler, in 34:3-7, portrays Josiah himself as the one who toured the country systematically demolishing and burning;

he began to purge, he cut down, he broke..made dust, strewed, he burnt, so did he, when he had broken.’

2 Chron 34:4 and 2 Kgs 23:16 actually place him on site supervising the destruction.

34:8-18 Temple repairs and the finding of a torah scroll

The Chronicler comes now to the eighteenth year of Josiah which features so prominently in the 2 Kings account of his reign and relates the story of the finding of ‘a book of the law of the Lord given by Moses’ during restoration work on the Temple. Before this work by Josiah there seems to have been few changes made to the Temple since its construction by Solomon more than three hundred years earlier except;

* Some repairs by King Jehoash (2 Kgs 12:5-17).

* King Jotham built the upper gate of the temple (2 Kgs 15:35)

* King Ahaz made some structural changes on account of the king of Assyria (2 Kgs 16:17-18)

When money that had been given by people visiting the temple was brought out Hilkiah the priest found the law-book. This money appears to have been collected in large collection chests situated near the altar and watched over (2 Kgs 12:10; 22:4) by the ‘keepers of the threshold’ (Levites stationed at the door). Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan the scribe who told Josiah about it while reporting on the finances of the Temple restoration project. Shaphan then read ‘out of it’ to the king who was greatly affected by what he heard and instructed a committee to inquire of the Lord concerning the book.

34:19-28 Huldah’s oracle and 34:29-32 Covenant-making

For comments on the above topics see my post: ‘King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings

34:33 A summary verse

This verse emphasizes the role of the king in the religious purges and emphasizes that he ‘made’ the people serve the Lord. Compelled by Josiah, the commitment of the people to YHWH was superficial, there had been no inner change; they were still idolators at heart. Is it any wonder that his reforms had no permanent results, but died along with him? The Chronicler adds a comment of his own: ‘And all his days they departed not from following the Lord, the God of their fathers.’ There was no open idolatry for the rest of Josiah’s reign.

35:1-19 The Passover Celebration see also 1 Esdras 1:1-22

This Passover celebration, expressing renewed commitment to YHWH, is given prominence in the Chronicles account whereas it is mentioned but briefly in 2 Kings 23:21-23. Prior to this families would have observed the Passover in their own homes. This Passover, however was a public celebration in Jerusalem (35:1), in accordance with Deut 16:1-5. According to the Chronicler, there had never been a Passover like it (35:18). Much the same was said of Hezekiah’s Passover (2 Chron 30:26). From v.1 we learn that Josiah held it on the 14th day of the first month (Nisan). That was the correct date; Hezekiah’s celebration had been held a month later, on the 14th of the second month (2 Chron 30:15), and had lasted for two weeks rather than one (2 Chron 30:23).

By way of preparation for the great Passover Josiah set in motion the Temple service. For some reason he had to ‘urge’ the priests to take up their duties. He also organised the Levites, changing their responsibilities since they no longer carried the ark, see point a). They were to assist the priests in the Temple worship and in flaying the sacrificial animals. They are identified in v. 3 as teachers in Israel, a role formerly fulfilled by the priests (Jer 18:18; Hos 4:6) The obligations of the Levites are listed as:

a) To take the Ark of the Covenant back to its place in the Temple (35:3). It must have been stored elsewhere while the renovations were ongoing. It would no longer be a burden upon their shoulders i.e. its location in the Temple would be permanent so other duties would be allocated to them (35:11).

b) To serve the Lord their God and his people Israel (35:3).

c) To arrange themselves by families into divisions as appointed and decreed by David and Solomon (35:4)

d) To stand in the holy place in groups representing the subdivisions of each family(35:5)

e) To slaughter the Passover lambs (35:6)

f) To consecrate themselves (35:6)

g) To prepare the lambs for their fellow-Israelites (35:6).

THE SACRIFICIAL ANIMALS

The king, representing the nation and as the leading worshipper of YHWH, the national God, was the major supplier of animals for sacrifice. For this Passover he is said to have contributed 30,000 flock animals (lambs and kids) and 3000 bullocks.

2600 small animals and 300 oxen were willingly supplied by three men ( Hilkiah, Zechariah, Jehiel) who, all at the one time, shared the title ‘chief of the Temple.’ In other references to this position only one official bore the title (1 Chron 9:11; 2 Chron 31:13; Neh 11;11).

Other chiefs (named in v.9) donated 5000 small animals and 500 oxen. The sacrificial victims therefore numbered 41,400; 37,600 small animals and 3800 large animals.

35:10-19 With the priests and Levites in appointed stations the Passover began. The Levites slaughtered the sacrificial animals and passed the blood on to the priests who sprinkled it upon the altar. As this was a public Passover the blood could not be sprinkled on the side posts and upper door posts of family homes (Ex 12:7). The Levites butchered the cattle and prepared the pieces for the burnt offerings. They also roasted the Passover and boiled the consecrated offerings – distributing the cooked meat among the people. Since the priests were busy with the burnt offerings they and the Levites did not partake until later. The musicians and doorkeepers (Temple security) participated without having to leave their posts. Th Chronicler gives an extravagantly positive assessment of the occasion saying that there was never a Passover like it.

It is interesting to read, compare and contrast the major biblical Passovers:

1. In Egypt – at the Exodus. Exod 12;1-51

2. At Sinai. Num 9:1-5

3. In Canaan. Josh 5:10-12

4. Hezekiah’s Passover. 2 Chron 30:1-27

5. Josiah’s Passover 2 Kgs 23:21-23; 2 Chron 35:1-19

6. After the return from exile. Ezra 6:19-21

35:20-27 The Death of King Josiah

We are told nothing about the final thirteen years of King Josiah’s life. His death as a result of a confrontation with Pharaoh Neco at Megiddo is recorded. He was buried in one of the royal tombs and mourned by all Judah and Jerusalem, including the prophet Jeremiah who wrote a lament for him. In 2 Chronicles Jeremiah is mentioned here (35;25) and also in 36:12, 22, and 22. We know from an oracle pronounced against Shallum (Jehoahaz), a son of Josiah, that Jeremiah considered Josiah to be a just man:

‘Shalt thou reign, because thou closest thyself in cedar? did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice, and then it was well with him? He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well with him: was not this to know me? saith the LORD.’ Jer 22:15-16

See my posts:

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings

The Death of King Josiah of Judah

King Josiah of Judah – Bibliography

Posted in Exposition

KING JOSIAH OF JUDAH in 2 Kings

READINGS:

2 Kings 22:1 – 23:30;

2 Chronicles 33:25 – 35:27;

See also: 1 Esdras 1:1-33

INTRODUCTION

Although unknown to secular history, King Josiah of Judah is one of the most significant figures in the Old Testament. He figures prominently in 2 Kings (22:1-23:30) and in 2 Chronicles (chps 34-35). The author of the Book of Kings is particularly enthusiastic about him and his achievements: ‘Neither before nor after Josiah was there a king like him who turned to the LORD as he did—with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his strength, in accordance with all the Law of Moses’ (2 Kgs 23:25). As well as the two accounts of Josiah’s career in the canonical books of 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles there is a third in the deuterocanonical book 1 Esdras (1:1-33). These three accounts differ from one another, most noticeably in the details surrounding Josiah’s death.

EARLY LIFE

Scant details are given in 2 Kings of the first seventeen years of Josiah’s life. He was the son of King Amon (642-640 BCE) of Judah (2 Kgs 21:26) by Jedidiah, daughter of Adaiah of Bozkath (2 Kgs 22:1). He probably remembered his grandfather Manasseh who, after a long reign (2 Kgs 21:1), died when Josiah was six years old.

His father Amon reigned for just two years before being assassinated by his own courtiers (2 Kgs 21:23). The biblical accounts do not give us the course of events leading up to the coup d’état that toppled Amon but it is thought that he continued the pro-Assyrian policies of his father Manasseh who had been a loyal vassal of Assyria for more than fifty years. Manasseh had not only tolerated but also encouraged pagan cults and practices, including divination, magic, sacred prostitution and human sacrifice. He even set up altars to the astral deities in the Temple of YHWH at Jerusalem (2 Kings 21:2-7; Zeph 1:4-6). According to the Chronicler, Amon was even more devoted to Assyrian religious practices than his father had been:

‘But he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, as did Manasseh his father: for Amon sacrificed unto all the carved images which Manasseh his father had made, and served them; And humbled not himself before the LORD, as Manasseh his father had humbled himself; but Amon trespassed more and more.’ 2 Chron 33:22-23

Those who conspired to kill Amon must have been anti-Assyrian and thought it a good time to rebel against the weakening Assyrian empire. It was struggling to quell uprisings in various parts of the empire at that time. Egypt was trying to gain control of Assyrian territory in Palestine and c. 639 laid siege to Ashdod, capital of Philistia, a province belonging to Assyria. The Arabian tribes and Acre and Ushu (mainland Tyre) revolted as did Elam. That Ashurbanipal brutally quelled these rebellions makes it seem likely that ‘the people of the land’, wishing to avoid military conflict with Assyria and the reprisals that would follow, successfully launched a counter-revolution. They executed those responsible for the regicide and installed Amon’s underage son Josiah as king. The status quo was thus restored and Assyria took no punitive action.

The child-king Josiah must have had a regent and/or a body of advisors but no details are given in the biblical record. The following officials are mentioned in the Josiah story and it may be that one or more of them acted on Josiah’s behalf.

Shaphan the scribe, son of Azaliah, the son of Meshullam  2 Kgs 22:3

Ahikam the son of Shaphan  2 Kgs 22:12,14; 2 Chron 34:20

Maaseiah the governor of the city   2 Chron 34:8

Joah the son of Joahaz the recorder  2 Chron 34:8

Achbor the son of Michaiah   2 Kgs 22:12,14

Abdon the son of Micah  2 Chron 34:20

Hilkiah the High Priest   2 Kgs 22:4, 8,10,12;  2 Chron 34:9,14, 15,18, 20

THE JOSIAH ACCOUNT IN 2 KINGS 22:1-23:30

22:1-2 Introductory Formula

22:3-10 The Temple and the Torah scroll

22:11-13 King Josiah’s response to the scroll

22:14-20 Huldah’s oracle

23:1-3 Making a covenant

23:4-20, 24 Purging Judah’s worship

23:21-23 The Passover

23:25 A positive verdict on Josiah

23:26-27 A negative verdict on Jerusalem

23:28-30 Josiah’s death

22:1-2 Introductory Formula

This tells us that Josiah began to reign at age eight and was on the throne for a period of thirty-one years (640-609 BCE). His mother was Jedidah, daughter of Adaiah of Boscath. It also gives a glowing introductory assessment based on his devotion to YHWH, Israel’s God.

‘And he did that which was right in the sight of the LORD, and walked in all the way of David his father, and turned not aside to the right hand or to the left.’

This is essentially repeated in the closing verdict on Josiah given in 2 Kgs 23:25:

‘And like unto him was there no king before him, that turned to the Lord with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might, according to all the law of Moses; neither after him arose there any like him.’

A similar assessment was made of King Hezekiah in chapter 18:

‘He trusted in the LORD God of Israel; so that after him was none like him among all the kings of Judah, nor any that were before him. For he cleaved to the LORD, and departed not from following him, but kept his commandments, which the LORD commanded — Moses.’ 2 Kgs 18:5-6

There is, however, a difference of emphasis in the assessment of the two kings. The author of Kings is acclaiming Hezekiah’s trust but he applauds Josiah’s repentance.

22:3-10 The Temple and the Torah scroll

In the eighteenth year of Josiah’s reign (621 BCE) a programme of temple refurbishment was launched. Shaphan the scribe was appointed by the king to manage the project. His main responsibilities were the management of the finances for the building work and the payment of the tradesmen. He is the first of two main characters who feature in this section. The other is Hilkiah the High Priest. He reported to Shaphan his find of a torah scroll (the book of the law) in the temple (22:8). It must have lain in storage for years, the implication is that it had been long forgotten. Shaphan, in an audience with the king, unemotionally reported two main facts:

a) the financial arrangements had been carried out as required and the workmen had been paid.

b) the High Priest Hilkiah had found a scroll in the Temple.

The scroll was then read to King Josiah.

22:11-13 King Josiah’s response to the scroll

‘When the king had heard the words of the book of the law…he rent his clothes.’ The verb ‘to hear (šāma) has the idea of not just literally hearing but of also obeying. The most familiar passage in which the word is used is probably in Deut 6:4, where the instruction is not only to hear but also to do:

‘Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.’

THE BOOK

It is generally reckoned that ‘the book’ that was found in the Temple was a scroll of Deuteronomy. It is called ‘the book of the law’ (2 Kgs 22:8, 11), ‘the book of the covenant’ (2 Kgs 23:2; 21) and ‘a book of the law of the Lord given by Moses’ (2 Chron 34:14). That it certainly contained threats (for Josiah’s reaction was extreme) strongly suggests Deuteronomy (Deut 27:15-25; 28:15-68). Josiah found it unsettling that Judah’s indifference meant that the Lord was angry with the nation (v13).

Josiah’s response was to rend (tear) his clothes. This was a dramatic expression of either grief ( Gen 37:29; Job 1:20) or repentance (1 Kgs 21:27). In Josiah’s case it probably represented both. His response to the reading of the torah (law) scroll stands in marked contrast to the later reaction of King Jehoiakim to a scroll containing words of the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 36:23). He cut it up with a scribe’s knife and burned it. ‘Rent (tore)’ in 2 Kings 22:11 and ‘cut’ in Jeremiah 36:23 translate the same Hebrew word (qāra). Josiah was willing to listen and respond positively to the word of the Lord that he heard. He tore his clothes in distress and repentance, Jehoiakim cut the scroll in rejection of its message.

Josiah then arranged for a committee composed of five of his top advisors (Hilkiah the priest, Ahikam the son of Shaphan, Achbor the son of Michaiah, Shaphan the scribe, Asahiah the king’s attendant) to ‘inquire of the Lord’ concerning the contents of the book. ‘Inquire’ seems to have meant to seek oracular guidance from a prophet (1 Kgs 22:5-6; 2 Kgs 3:11).

22:14-20 Huldah’s oracle

The delegation went to see Huldah the prophetess. She was the wife of Shallum the keeper of the wardrobe (in the Temple or the palace?) and was therefore well-connected and well-known at the court. She is one of several female prophets in the Old Testament, the others being: Miriam (Ex 15:20), Deborah (Judg 4:4), Noadiah (Neh 6:14) and Isaiah’s wife (Isa 8:3). It is strange that the commissioners did not consult Jeremiah, whose ministry had begun five years earlier in the thirteenth year of Josiah (Jer 1:2).

Huldah’s oracle falls into two parts ( 2 Kgs 22:16-17, 19-20) , each preceded by an instruction that what followed was to be communicated to Josiah:

22:15 ‘And she said unto them, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Tell the man that sent you to me.’

22:18 ‘But to the king of Judah which sent — you to inquire of — the LORD, thus shall ye say to him, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, As touching the words which thou hast heard’

She begins by describing Josiah as ‘the man that sent you.’ Perhaps this was a reminder to the Near Eastern despot that in the sight of the Lord he was just ‘a man.’

Public Fate

The first part of the oracle deals with Jerusalem and the people of Judah. First, Jerusalem and its inhabitants are given notice that because they have not exclusively worshipped YHWH then the curses that are found in the book (Deut 27 & 28) will come upon them. There is no call for repentance in order that disaster might be averted. Their worship of other gods has provoked the anger of YHWH to such an extent that the judgement is certain. There will be no escape. God’s wrath ‘shall not be quenched.’

Personal Future

The second part of the oracle addresses King Josiah. He is given an assurance (introduced by ‘therefore’ 22:20) that because his heart is tender and that he has humbled himself before YHWH, has torn his clothes and wept and has ‘heard’ (listened and acted upon’) the message of coming destruction, he will be gathered into his grave in peace. Although not explicitly stated it seems likely, from subsequent events, that Huldah advised Josiah that should he lead the people back to obedience to YHWH then there would be a temporary stay of judgement. Joshua therefore went on to initiate national reform in the knowledge that it would not stop the inevitable judgement and on the understanding that it would not fall during his lifetime; he would have a peaceful death before it came to pass. This seems to contradict the violence of his death as recorded in 2 Kgs 23:29-30.

See my post ‘The Death of King Josiah of Judah

Josiah had sent the delegation to the respected prophetess Huldah in order that she might authenticate the scroll. This she did by a word from YHWH. It seems that from this point forward the written word assumes greater importance. The importance of the temple and its rituals seems to recede (23:27b), it will be of no use during the exile anyhow. Brueggemann (2000, p.550) observes:

‘…it is clear that Huldah’s prophetic function is to enhance and reinforce the Torah scroll. Everything turns on “the words of the scroll” (22:16). The threat against the city, she pro-
claims, is rooted in the scroll and is simply articulated by Huldah. The assurance to the king is because of “the words you have heard,” words of Torah (22:18). Clearly Huldah as a prophetess has no autonomous function or voice, but is dependent on the Torah…’

23:1-3 Making a covenant

Josiah called the elders of Judah and organised a great assembly at the Temple at which all the inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem, both ‘small and great’ were present. It is not known exactly what function the ‘elders’ (tribal and family heads) had during the monarchy but they must have had a degree of authority in their communities and involvement in local issues.

During the assembly the torah scroll which had turned up in the Temple was read aloud. The public reading of documents was important in the ancient Near East where many people were illiterate. In view of the whole nation Josiah stood near a pillar in the ‘house of YHWH’, probably on a platform, and made a covenant before YHWH, to follow his commands, statutes and decrees with all his heart and soul. The people pledged obedience also. Thus Josiah officiated at a public religious act that did not involve Temple liturgy or sacrifice.

N. B. Covenant-making was a familiar concept in ancient Israel. In the Old Testament we read that God made covenants with individuals (Adam, Abraham, Moses, Aaron, David and Phinehas) and also with his special people, Israel. The most famous were the Mosaic covenants at Sinai (Exod 24:1-8) and Moab (Deut 29:1). There was also covenant-making by Joshua (Josh 24:1-28), Jehoiada/ King Jehoash (2 Kgs 11:17) and now by Josiah. In the Old Testament three types of relationships are called covenants: friendship (1 Sam 18:1-4), marriage (Mal 2:14) and international treaties (1 Kgs 5:12; Ezek 17:14). It is the latter type of covenant that is in view as regards the relationship between Israel and its national God YHWH.

23:4-20, 24 Purging Judah’s worship

2 Kgs 23:4-20 gives a catalogue of activities carried out by Josiah. It lists a series of extreme measures aimed at wiping out any religious practice that did not conform to the covenantal Yahwism of the book of Deuteronomy. 2 Kings gives the impression that these activities were influenced by the torah scroll that was found in the Temple (23:24). It is likely, however, that vv. 4-20 are a parenthesis giving details of religious cleansing that had already taken place long before the finding of the scroll in the eighteenth year of Josiah’s reign. According to the 2 Chron 34:3-7 account it was ‘in the twelfth year he began to purge Judah and Jerusalem…’ (34:3).

This inventory in 2 Kgs 23:4-20 falls into two parts; a) vv. 4-14 – purges in Judah and Jerusalem b) vv. 15-20 – purges in Samaria (the territory of the former Northern kingdom of Israel)

It is startling to read the wide range of idolatrous practices present in Judah until at that time and which were tolerated even in the temple and its precincts. They included worship of Baal, Asherah, Molech, the sun, astral deities and also three deities that in 23:13 are said to have been introduced by Solomon; Ashtoreth, Chemosh and Milcom. Equally startling is the passion and zeal, along with the ruthlessness and efficiency, with which Josiah eliminated these cults and their functionaries (23:7). He even entered the territory of the former state of Israel (ended 722 BCE) which was officially part of the Assyrian empire, then in decline.

23:21-23 The Passover

Until this point the author of 2 Kings has been reporting negative activities of Josiah under the influence of the torah scroll found in the Temple. These verses briefly note the only positive act of of reform by Josiah in the 2 Kings account of his life. This was a celebration of the Passover held at Jerusalem in Josiah’s eighteenth year. Much greater detail is given in 2 Chronicles chapter 35. According to 23:22 no such Passover had been observed in the days of the judges or of the kings of Israel and Judah. In fact, the previous occasion on which a Passover was celebrated is recorded in Josh 5:10.

23:25 A positive verdict on Josiah

After a further summary of Josiah’s purges (v24) which are said to have been in accordance with what was written in the law-book the author proceeds to give a glowing verdict on Josiah. He views him as the model king, there was none before like him, neither will there ever be another after him. Similar things were said of King Hezekiah (2 Kgs 18:3-6) and of Moses (Deut 34:10-12). Josiah ‘turned to the LORD with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might’ (23:25). That seems fairly close to fulfilling the initial obligations of the Shema in Deut 6:5: ‘And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.’

23:26-27 A negative verdict on Jerusalem

The narrator has bad news for us. In spite of all the good that Josiah did, and the esteem in which he was held by the Lord, these were not sufficient to outweigh the harm done by one man, his grandfather Manasseh (2 Kgs 21:1-18). The disobedience to God’s law and the sins that he instigated have been so serious that nothing, not even Josiah’s piety and merits, can reverse the destruction that will come upon Jerusalem and Judah.

23:28-30 Josiah’s death

Josiah intercepted an Egyptian force at Megiddo and was mortally injured in battle.

See my posts:

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Chronicles

The Death of King Josiah of Judah

King Josiah of Judah – Bibliography

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER  – CHRISTIAN HOPE IN TIME OF TRIAL.


1:1-2 GREETING

Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.

1:1

The letter begins with a standard Graeco-Roman introduction which falls into three parts:

Superscription – names the sender
Ascription – names the recipients
Salutation – conveys best wishes or a blessing

THE WRITER

The writer introduces himself as ‘Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ.’ This establishes that the letter not only carries apostolic authority but also the ultimate authority of Jesus Christ himself, as Peter was his apostle (messenger).

Everything that we know about the apostle Peter comes from his two letters and also, as Harmon (1898, p.32) observes, from:

‘Paul’s references to Peter in the Epistle to the Galatians, certain speeches in Acts that are credited to Peter, some brief character sketches in the Gospels….and, finally, the second Gospel, whose material, form, and motive are generally believed to be due to Peter’s preaching.’

For information on the life and ministry of Peter see my post: 1 PETER  – INTRODUCTION

There is no mention of Peter in the Acts of the Apostles after the time of the Jerusalem Council (see ‘The Jerusalem Council’ in my post ‘SILVANUS‘) but it seems that he was later active in ministry at Antioch (Gal 2:11). Since he addressed his letter to Christians in Asia Minor he may have preached there too.

Peter reached Rome (5:13) c. 63 CE and after preaching there for a short time he was, according to tradition, crucified with his head downwards in 64 or 65 CE. For a refutation of Roman Catholic teaching on the primacy of Peter or that he was Bishop of Rome see ‘A Treatise of the Pope’s Supremacy‘ by Isaac Barrow (1630-1677).

THE READERS

The letter is addressed to Christians in five districts ‘Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia.’ These made up the four Roman provinces in Asia Minor at the time. They are all referred to elsewhere in the New Testament.

PONTUS Acts 2:9; 18:2.

GALATIA Acts 16:6; 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1; Gal 1:2; 2 Tim 4:10.

CAPPADOCIA Acts 2:9

ASIA Acts 2:9; 6:9; 16:6; 19:10, 22, 26, 27; 20:4, 16, 18; 21:27; 24:18; 27:2; 1 Cor 16:19; 2 Cor 1:8; 2 Tim 1:15; Rev 1:4, 11.

BITHYNIA Acts 16:7

Peter describes these believers as ‘temporary residents (exiles) of the dispersion (scattering).’ These descriptions were traditionally applied to Jews dispersed as a result of the Babylonian Captivity (598-538 BCE). A parepídēmos (‘stranger’ or ‘exile’) was someone who had temporarily settled down in a foreign country. The word also occurs in Heb 11:13 and 1 Pet 2:11.

We thus learn that the early Christians were misunderstood and stigmatized by society, which treated them as outsiders. This aligns them with those who were called by God in the Old Testament and became ‘strangers’ as a result (Gen 17:8; 23:4; 28:4; 36:7; 37:1; Lev 25:23; Psa 119:19; 1 Chron 29:15). Note also that Levi called his eldest son Gershon meaning ‘refugee’ or ‘exile’ (Gen 46:11).

Diasporá referred to the scattered state of the Jewish exiles who, after the Captivity, settled mainly in Persia, Syria and Asia Minor. The word is used of these diaspora Jews in Jn 7:35 ‘Then said the Jews among themselves, Whither will he go, that we shall not find him? will he go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles?’ and occurs also in James 1:1 (see also Zeph 3:10; Isa 11:12). The verb diaspeírō is used in Acts 8:1, 4 to refer to the scattering of Christians from Jerusalem as a result of persecution.

It is not clear if Peter is using these terms in a literal or a metaphorical sense. If literal, then Peter was addressing Hebrew Christians from Palestine who must have been the mainstay of Christian churches in Asia Minor. The following reasons have been advanced for the view that he was addressing Hebrew Christians, not Gentile believers:

a) According to Acts 2:5-9, Jews from Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia heard Peter preach on the Day of Pentecost. Presumably those converted went home and formed Christian assemblies.

b) Peter was the apostle to ‘the circumcision’ (Gal 2:8).

c) Peter calls these people ‘strangers’. They were Jewish exiles.

d) In 1 Peter 1:18 the recipients of the letter are said to have been redeemed from the futile ways inherited from their forefathers. This is a reference to Jewish traditions.

e) In 1 Peter 2:9 the recipients are described in terms that are used of Israel in Exod 19:5-6.

It seems more likely, however, that Peter, with his Jewish background, is using the idea of diaspora metaphorically to describe the situation of believers in Asia Minor who, it seems, were from a predominantly Gentile background (1 Pet 1:14, 18; 2:10, 25; 4:3-4). Just like the people of Israel and Judah exiled from their homeland in the eighth and sixth centuries BCE, the Christians in Peter’s day were a minority scattered throughout a pagan society.

1:2

Here at the beginning of the letter Peter reminds these Christians who are under pressure that they are ‘chosen’ (‘by God’ is implied). In 1 Peter this idea of election is important as it is mentioned three times in chapter two (2:4, 6, 9) and the letter closes with greetings from people who are ‘likewise chosen’ (5:13).

The term ‘chosen’ was used of Israel in the Old Testament (Deut 7:6-8; Isa 41:8-9) but in the New Testament it is applied to Christian believers (Rom 8:33; Col 3:12; 2 Tim 2:10). It would have been of great comfort to these Asian Christians experiencing pressure to realize that they had become ‘God’s own people’ as a result of a special calling.

Matthew Henry comments:

‘Here was a set of excellent people, beloved of God, and yet strangers, dispersed and poor in the world; the eye of God was upon them in all their dispersions, and the apostle was tenderly careful to write to them for their direction and consolation.’

Verse 2 contains three prepositional clauses in which Peter explains this choice in terms of the actions of the Trinity (Father – Spirit – Jesus Christ) in bringing about their full salvation. Note the three prepositions:

a. κατὰ (katá) in accordance with the foreknowledge of God the Father

b. ἐν (en) through or in the sanctifying action of the Spirit

c. εἰς (eis) unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ

This choice (election) is said to originate with God the father and to be in accordance with his foreknowledge. Foreknowledge (prógnōsis) is much more than knowing what will happen in the future and seems rather to imply a deep personal knowledge of someone. This use of the word foreknowledge occurs in reference to Christ in Peter’s speech at Pentecost (Acts 2:23). The verb form is used of Christ (fore-ordained) in 1:20. Many scholars equate foreknowledge and predestination. The RSV and NRSV translations of 1:2 say: ‘chosen and destined by God the Father.’ The emphasis is on God’s effective choice (see also Rom 8:29-30; 9:11; Eph 1:11)

Peter mentions the sanctifying (making holy) action of the Spirit. The idea is of consecration or separation out for God’s purposes. These believers have been separated from an evil world and dedicated to God (2 Thess 2:13). Kelly (1969, p.43) observes: ‘His sanctifying action… became real for the Asian Christians in the movement of faith which led them to Christ…’ Although action is in the past he also allows that ‘the Spirit is continually present in the daily life of believers, developing their faith and deepening their sanctification. Grudem (1992, p.51) argues against putting ‘the activity too exclusively in the past: there is no past tense in the phrase, which literally says, in sanctification of (the) Spirit.’ He relates the phrase to the entire salutation and thus sees it as not referring exclusively to ‘chosen’ but to their entire status as ‘strangers.’

The twin goals of the predestinating choice are obedience and sprinkling with the blood of Jesus Christ. One looks at the human aspect and the other brings out the divine aspect. ‘Obedience’ (hupakoé) denotes ‘submission’ or allegiance’ and has the idea of listening to and obeying instructions. Here it probably refers to willing acceptance of the gospel message (Acts 6:7; Rom 10:16) but Peter also writes about everyday obedience (1:14, 22; 3:6). The ‘sprinkling with the blood of Jesus Christ’ refers to the Lord’s sacrificial and atoning death. The ‘sprinkling’ is doubtless an allusion to the Old Testament sacrifices. Generally speaking the blood of the sacrificial animal was sprinkled on the altar or on the mercy seat in the Tabernacle. There are, however, three cases in which the blood was sprinkled on human beings:

1. Exod 24:5-8 The sealing of the covenant between YHWH and his people.

2. Exod 29:21 The ordination ceremony for Aaron and his sons as priests.

3. Lev 14:6-7 The purification ceremony for a healed leper.

Here the imagery is from the Exodus 24 story in which the sprinkling of blood demonstrated the covenant between the ancient Israelites and their God YHWH (Yahweh) and in which there is also an emphasis on obedience (‘and they said, All that the Lord hath said will we do, and be obedient.’ Exod 24:7). See also Heb 9:18-22; 12:24. Because of the death of Christ (blood shed on their behalf) these chosen believers have been introduced into the new covenant.

Kelly (1969, p.44) explains: ‘the new covenant is made possible by the forgiveness of sins accomplished by Christ’s sacrificial death, which He Himself seems to have interpreted (Mk. xiv. 24 ‘my blood of the covenant’) in the light of Ex. xxiv. 8 in conjunction with Jer. xxxi. 31 ff. and Is. liii.’

The subject of the redemptive work of Christ is mentioned several more times throughout the epistle (1:18-21; 2:21-24; 3:18; 4:1).

Thus each Person in the Holy Trinity acts for the salvation of the believer, the Father foreknows, the Son atones and the Spirit applies the work of the Son.

Peter closes his salutation with the formula ‘Grace unto you, and peace’ which is a combination of the Greek greeting ‘grace’ with the Hebrew greeting ‘peace.’ Paul used it as a greeting in his letters, although he often added ‘from God our father and the Lord Jesus Christ.’ Here Peter adds that grace and peace may be ‘multiplied.’ A prayer for increase occurs also in his second epistle (2 Pet 2:2) and in Jude verse 2. Grace (charis) is spiritual blessing freely bestowed by God and peace (eiréné) is given to those who were once God’s enemies.

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER – 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER  – CHRISTIAN HOPE IN TIME OF TRIAL.

OUTLINE OF FIRST PETER


CHAPTER 1


1: 1-2Greeting


1:3-9The work of salvation


1:10-12The witness of revelation


1:13-25The holy life – ‘gird up’



CHAPTER 2


2: 1-3The holy life – ‘grow up’


2:4-12The chosen stone and a chosen generation


2:13-17Submission to government


2:18-25Submission at work



CHAPTER 3


3:1-7Submission in the home


3:8-12Principles of godly living


3:13-22Suffering for righteousness’ sake



CHAPTER 4


4:1-6Suffering as Christ suffered


4:7-19Suffering as a Christian



CHAPTER 5


5:1-4Exhortation to elders


5:5-7Exhortation to laity


5:8-11A warning about the adversary


5: 12-14Farewell and personal greetings

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER – 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER  – CHRISTIAN HOPE IN TIME OF TRIAL

INTRODUCTION

There are 21 epistles (letters) in the New Testament.

– Thirteen of them were written by the apostle Paul and are therefore known as the Pauline epistles.

The Pauline Epistles fall into three groups:

1) Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians.

2) The Prison Epistles – These four epistles are thought to have been written when Paul was under house arrest in Rome c 60-62 CE. Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians were written to churches. Philemon was a personal letter.

3) The Pastoral Epistles – 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus

– The Epistle to the Hebrews is by an unknown author.

– There are a further seven letters which are known as the General or Catholic Epistles because they do not address specific issues in one of the churches but were probably circular letters. These are: James, 1 Peter, 2 Peter, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, Jude.

1, 2 and 3 John, along with the Gospel of John and the Revelation, are known as the Johannine Writings.

1 and 2 Peter are known collectively as the Petrine Epistles.


DATE & PLACE OF WRITING

Peter’s first letter is thought to have been written shortly before the persecutions of Christians by the Roman emperor Nero which began in 64 CE. In 5:13 the author says that he is writing from Babylon. He may indeed have been writing from Babylon on the Euphrates but it is possible that he may have been writing from Rome. Some think that ‘Babylon’ may have been a code word for Rome; viewing it as the seat of ungodliness and corruption.


THE RECIPIENTS

The recipients are identified in 1:1 as ‘God’s elect, exiles scattered throughout the provinces of Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia.’ The addressees were Christians scattered over a large area consisting of the four provinces of the Roman empire in Asia Minor in the first and second centuries CE (Pontus & Bithynia, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia). Peter’s first letter was written to fellow-Christians who were suffering, or about to suffer, persecution because of their faith in Jesus Christ. It addresses various issues in a compassionate and sympathetic manner. It is referred to in 2 Peter 3:1.

THE AUTHOR

In 1 Peter 1:1 the author identifies himself as the apostle Peter. What does the New Testament tell us about Peter?

1. He was one of Christ’s disciples; also known as apostles and frequently referred to as ‘the Twelve.’

2. He was the most prominent member of the group of disciples. Their names are listed four times in the New Testament (Mt 10:2-4; Mk 10:16-19; Lk 6:12-16; Acts 1:13) and Peter’s name is first in every list. When the references to him are taken together he has more mentions in the New Testament than the apostle Paul (162 mentions). Peter (161), Simon (50), Cephas (6) and in Jn 13:6 ekeínos (that one) usually translated ‘Peter’ (1).

3. He had a popular name. There are other people called Simon in the New Testament:

Simon the Zealot Lk 6:15

Simon the father of Judas Iscariot Jn 6:71

Simon, a half-brother of Jesus Mt 13:55

Simon the Pharisee Lk 7:20

Simon the leper Mt 26:6

Simon of Cyrene Mk 15:21

Simon the magician Acts 8:9

Simon the tanner Acts 9:43

4. He was from Bethsaida near Capernaum (Jn 1:44: Mk1:21, 29) and worked as a fisherman (Mt 4:18; Mk 1:16). He and his brother Andrew seem to have been in a business partnership (Lk 5:4)) with James and John.

5. He was married.

‘And when Jesus was come into Peter’s house, he saw his wife’s mother laid, and sick of a fever.’ Mt 8:14

‘Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?’ 1 Cor 9:5

6. He did not have a religious education. In Acts 4:13 the Sanhedrin realized that Peter and John were ‘unlearned (agrámmatos) and ignorant men’. This does not necessarily mean that they were illiterate. ‘Without letters’ probably meant that they were not scribes i.e. had not had a formal religious education. Peter would have had the normal schooling of a Jewish boy at that time.

7. He was called by the Lord (Mt 4:18-20) who changed his name to Peter – ‘a stone’- this ordinary man became a great apostle.

8. He was committed to the Lord.

‘And they straightway left their nets, and followed him’. Mt 4:20

‘Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?’ Mt 19:27

9. He recognized and declared the Lord’s deity.

‘And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ Mt 16:16

10. He was not perfect:

a) He spoke up when it was more appropriate to stay quiet (Mk 9:5-7).

b) He rebuked the Lord (Mt 16:21-23; Jn 13:6-9)

c) He denied the Lord three times (Lk 22:54-62). Later he was asked three times if he loved the Lord and was restored (Jn 21:17).

11. He had a varied ministry.

a. He was one of the most trusted disciples. Along with James and John, Peter was one of Jesus’ inner circle. Together these three men were privileged;

– to witness the power of the Lord in the raising of Jairus’ daughter (Mk 5:37)

– to witness the preeminence of the Lord at the transfiguration (Mk 17:1-2)

– to witness the passion of the Lord in the Garden of Gethsemane (Mk 14:32)

b) He suggested that there ought to be a replacement for Judas Iscariot (Acts 1:15)

c) He preached to large crowds on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:14-40)

d) He healed a lame man (Acts 3:1-11).

e) He defied the Sanhedrin (Acts 4:1-22)

f) He dealt with the problem of Ananias and Sapphira’s hypocrisy (Acts 5:1-10).

g) He handled the problem of Simon the Magician (Acts 8:9-25).

h) He raised Dorcas from the dead (Acts 9:32-43)

i) He took the gospel to the Gentiles (Acts 10:1 -11:18)

j) He wrote two epistles (1 Pet 1:1; 2 Pet 1:1).

12. He was martyred.

‘Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not. This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me.’ Jn 21:18-19


THEME

The theme of suffering is prominent in 1 Peter. The word ‘suffering’ and similar words occur 21 times in the letter.

1:6-7 Suffering from trials permitted by God to test the Christian’s faith.

2:19 Suffering for conscience’s sake toward God.

3:14 Suffering for righteousness’ sake.

4:12-14 Suffering for the name of Christ.

5:8-10 Suffering as a result of Satanic opposition.


Chapter 1 SALVATION

Chapter 2 SANCTIFICATION

Chapter 3 SUBMISSION

Chapter 4 SUFFERING

Chapter 5 SHEPHERDING



Chapter 1 HOPE

Chapter 2 HOLINESS

Chapter 3 HOME

Chapter 4 HARDNESS

Chapter 5 HUMILITY


KEYWORDS


‘SUFFERING’

‘PRECIOUS’

‘ BE’

‘GRACE’

‘SALVATION’

‘REVELATION’

‘GLORY’

‘FAITH’

‘HOPE’

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER – 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER – BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Achtemeier, P., 2009. 1 Peter. Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress Press

Aymer, M., Kittredge, C. and Sánchez, D., 2016. Hebrews, The General Epistles, And Revelation. Minneapolis: Fortress Press

Beda Venerabilis and Hurst, D., 1985. The Commentary on the Seven Catholic Letters of Bede the Venerable. Kalamazoo, Mich.: Cistercian Publications

Bigg, C., 1901, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude, New York: Scribners

Bullinger, E. W., 2011. The Spirits In Prison (1 Peter 3:17-4:6). Reading, UK: The Open Bible Trust

Clowney, E., 1994. The Message of 1 Peter. Leicester: IVP Academic

Cook, F. C., 1887. ‘1 Peter’, in Fuller J. M (ed.)The Student’s Commentary On The Holy Bible: New Testament Vol II Romans -Revelation, London: John Murray

Davids, P. H., 1995, The First Epistle of Peter, Grand Rapids, Mich: W. B. Eerdmans

Edwards, D., 2017. 1 Peter. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan

Feldmeier, R. and Feldmeier, R., 2008. The First Letter of Peter. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.

Fickett, H.L., 1974. Peter’s Principles: a Commentary for Laymen. Glendale, Calif.: G/L Regal Books

Gore, C., Goudge, H. L. and Guillaume, A., 1929. A New Commentary On Holy Scripture. New York: Macmillan Co.

Grudem, W., 1988. The First Epistle General Of Peter. Leicester: Inter-Varsity

Hort, F. J. A., 1898, The First Epistle of St. Peter, I 1-II:17; The Greek Text with Introductory Lecture, Commentary, and Additional Notes, London: MacMillan

Jobes, K. H., 2005. 1 Peter. Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Academic

Jowett, J. H., 1993. The Epistles Of Peter. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications

Keating, D., 2011. First and Second Peter, Jude. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic

Kelly, J. N. D., 1969. A Commentary On The Epistles Of Peter And Of Jude. London: A. & C. Black

Leighton, R., 1853, A Practical Commentary Upon the First Epistle of St. Peter, London: Society For Promoting Christian Knowledge

Lincoln, W., 1871. Lectures On Epistles Of Peter. Kilmarnock: John Ritchie

Luther, M. and Gillett, F., 1859. Epistles Of St. Peter & St. Jude Preached & Explained By Martin Luther. New York: D. F. Randolph

MacArthur, J., 2004. 1 Peter. Chicago: Moody Publishers

Martin, T., 2020. ‘Translating λόγος as DNA in First Peter 1:22–25,’ in Thompson R. (Ed.), Listening Again to the Text: New Testament Studies in Honor of George Lyons (pp. 133-150), Claremont, CA: Claremont Press

Niebuhr, K., 2009. The Catholic Epistles And Apostolic Tradition. Waco, Tex: Baylor University Press

Nienhuis, D., 2007. Not By Paul Alone: The Formation Of The Catholic Epistle Collection And The Christian Canon. Waco, Tex.: Baylor University Press

Patterson, D. and Kelley, R., 2006. Women’s Evangelical Commentary. Nashville, Tenn.: Broadman & Holman Publishers

Pitstick, A. L, 2007. Light In Darkness: Hans Urs Von Balthasar And The Catholic Doctrine Of Christ’s Descent Into Hell. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company

Schlosser, J., 2004. The Catholic Epistles And The Tradition. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press

Selwyn, E. G., 1981. The First Epistle of St. Peter. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House

Smith, J., 1943, Handfuls on Purpose (1 Peter), Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co

Vinson, R., Wilson, R. and Mills, W., 2010. 1 & 2 Peter. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Pub

Watson, D. and Callan, T., 2012. First and Second Peter. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic

Williams, M., 2011. The Doctrine of Salvation in the First Letter of Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Brooks, O. S., 1974. ‘I Peter 3:21: The Clue to the Literary Structure of the Epistle,’ Novum Testamentum, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp.290-305

Brown, J. K., 2006. ‘Just a Busybody? A Look at the Greco-Roman Topos of Meddling for Defining Hebrew in 1 Peter 4:15,’ Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 125, No. 3 pp.549-568

Combrink, H., 1975. ‘The Structure of 1 Peter,’ Neotestamentica, Vol. 9, pp. 34-63

Dalton, W. J., 1979. ‘The Interpretation of 1 Peter 3,19 and 4, 6: Light from 2 Peter,’ Biblica, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 547–555.

De Villiers, J. L., 1975. ‘Joy in Suffering in 1 Peter,’ Neotestamentica, Vol. 9, pp. 64–86

Granbery, J. C., 1910. ‘Christological Peculiarities in the First Epistle of Peter,’ The American Journal of Theology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 62–81

Hiebert, D. E., 1982. ‘Selected Studies From 1 Peter, Part 2,’ Bibliotheca Sacra, 139, pp.146-158

Horrell, D. G., 2007. ‘The Label Hebrew 1 Peter 4:16 and the Formation of Christian Identity. Journal of Biblical Literature,’ Vol. 126, No. 2, pp. 361–381

Horrel, D. G, Arnold, B. and Williams, T. B., 2013. ‘Visuality, Vivid Description, and the Message of 1 Peter: The Significance of the Roaring Lion (1 Peter 5:8),’ Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 132, No. 3, pp.697-716

Kiley, M., 1987. ‘Like Sara: The Tale of Terror behind 1 Peter 3:6, Journal of Biblical Literature,’ Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 689–692

Martin, T., 1992. ‘The Present Indicative in the Eschatological Statements of 1 Peter 1:6, 8.,’ Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp.307-312

Osborne, T. P., 1983. ‘Guide Lines for Christian Suffering: A Source-Critical and Theological Study of 1 Peter 2, 21-25,’ Biblica, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 381–408

Wilcox, M., 1977. “Upon the Tree”: Deut 21:22-23 in the New Testament,’ Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp.85-99

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER – 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

(3) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – CONCLUSION AND  BIBLIOGRAPHY

SUMMATION

What is most striking about the qualifications for a presbyter-bishop in 1 Timothy and Titus is their simplicity. They are not vocational qualifications; formal training or academic attainment are not required. One would expect the characteristics to be true of any Christian; apart from the exceptions that a presbyter-bishop must be male, able to teach and not be a recent convert. Both lists begin with the qualifications of being ‘blameless’ and ‘the husband of one wife’ but the remainder seem to be in no set order.

They encompass the presbyter-bishop’s personal situation (able to teach, not a recent convert, a good reputation with outsiders), his family set-up (husband of one wife, managing own household well, having faithful children) and and also moral characteristics which are listed both positively and negatively. A suitable candidate will be never be perfect but these characteristics prove that his life is marked by self-control and by moral and spiritual integrity.

RESPECTING PRESBYTER-BISHOPS

‘The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honour’

According to 1Tim 5:17 church members are to count presbyter-bishops who discharge their responsibilities well as worthy of respect. ‘Honour’ does not necessarily include remuneration (1 Tim 6:1) but the use of the cognate verb in verse 3 and the scripture quotations in v 18 make it clear that Paul had economic assistance in mind rather than just verbal appreciation. ‘Double’ does not indicate a salary scale based on how well an elder performs but rather suggests that an elder has double honour when the respect due to his position is supplemented by the added respect he receives for faithful service.

PROTECTING AND DISCIPLINING PRESBYTER-BISHOPS

Having mentioned those who manage well Paul then contemplates the possibility that some will fail in their duties. He is careful to ensure that presbyter-bishops are protected from false accusations, and insists (1 Tim 5:19) that the Old Testament standard of justice must be applied. Charges must not be entertained unless supported by at least two witnesses. Verse 20 states that ‘those who sin are to be rebuked publicly, so that the others may take warning.’ This is generally understood to refer to sinning elders who are to be ‘rebuked before all’, presumably in the presence of the entire congregation rather than before all the other elders. However, I am inclined to the view that ‘those who are sinning’ refers not only to elders but equally also to those who persist in levelling unsubstantiated false charges against an elder and who must be publicly exposed as a result.

CONCLUSION

In the New Testament the terms presbuteros (elder) and episkopos (bishop) are used interchangeably and can refer to the same person. ‘Presbyter’ laid emphasis on the dignity of the office, ‘bishop’ on the duties. A plurality of presbyter-bishops was the norm in every church. Presbyter-bishops are important for the proper ordering of congregations (Titus 1:5) and fulfil an important role in the administration of church affairs, in teaching, in discipline and in guarding against false doctrine. The qualifications prescribed for presbyter-bishops in 1 Timothy and Titus indicate that they are to be an example to the congregation in their home, in their relationships, and in their personal conduct. They must be above reproach; in everything displaying self-control and highly regarded by unbelievers. Men like this in church leadership are a valuable asset to a Christian assembly and essential to its spiritual health.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen J. 1983, ‘1 Timothy’ in What the Bible Teaches, John Ritchie Ltd. Kilmarnock

Beckwith R. 2003, Elders in Every City; The Origin and Role of the Ordained Ministry, Paternoster Press

Brown R E. 1984, The Churches the Apostles Left Behind, Paulist Press

Campbell R. A. 2004, Elders: Seniority Within Earliest Christianity, Continuum International

Eyres L.A. 1975, The Elders of the Church, P&R Publishing, Phillipsburg

Getz G. A. 2003, Elders and Leaders: God’s Plan for Leading the Church, Moody Publishers, Chicago

Hammett, J.S. 2005, Biblical Foundations for Baptist Churches: A Contemporary Ecclesiology, Kregel Academic, Grand Rapids

Helyer L. A. 2002, Exploring Jewish Literature of the Second Temple Period: A Guide for New Testament Students, InterVarsity Press

Hendriksen W. (1957) 2007, ‘Thessalonians, the Pastorals and Hebrews’ in the New Testament Commentary, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids

Hiebert, D. E. 1957, First Timothy in the Everyman’s Bible Commentary, Moody Press, Chicago

Hopko, T. 1999, Women and the Priesthood, St Vladimir’s Seminary Press

Knight G. W. 1992, The Pastoral Epistles in The New International Greek Testament Commentary, Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids

Lacey, N. 1985, God’s Plan for The Local Church, Grace Publications, London

Marshall I H. 1999, The Pastoral Epistles in the International Critical Commentary, T & T Clark

Merkle, B L. 2008, 40 Questions About Elders and Deacons, Kregel Academic, Grand Rapids

Mounce, W D. 2000, Pastoral Epistles in Word Biblical Commentary, Thomas Nelson Inc.

Nichols, T L. 1997, That All May Be One: Hierarchy and Participation in the Church, Liturgical Press

Ramsay, W. M. (1909) 1966 Historical Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids

Strauch A. 1995, Biblical Eldership: An Urgent Call to Restore Biblical Church Leadership, Lewis and Roth Publishers, Colorado Springs

West D.E. 1983, ‘Titus’ in What the Bible Teaches, John Ritchie Ltd. Kilmarnock

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Köstenberger A. J. 2003, ‘Hermeneutical and Exegetical Challenges in Interpreting the Pastoral Epistles’, The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology, Vol. 7, No. 3

Köstenberger A. J. 2006, ‘The New Testament Pattern of Church Government’, Midwestern Journal of Theology, Vol. 4, No. 2

Harvey A. E. 1982, ‘”The Workman is Worthy of His Hire”: Fortunes of a Proverb in the Early Church’, Novum Testamentum, Vol. 24, No. 3

Mappes D. A. 1997, ‘The “Elder” in the Old and New Testaments’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 154, No. 613

Mappes D. A. 1997, ‘The New Testament Elder, Overseer and Pastor’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 154, No. 614

Mappes D. A. 1997, ‘The Discipline of a Sinning Elder’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 154, No. 615

Mappes D. A. 1997, ‘The “Laying on of Hands” of Elders,’ Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 154, No. 616

Mappes D. A. 1999, ‘The Heresy Paul Opposed in 1 Timothy,’ Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 156, No. 624

Posted in Exposition

(2) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – QUALIFICATIONS

This post sets out the eight characteristics of a presbyter-bishop that are listed in both 1 Timothy and Titus, the seven characteristics unique to 1 Timothy and the seven unique to Titus.

QUALIFICATIONSIN 1 TIMOTHY3: 2-7



KJVNIVGREEK WORD



BlamelessAbove reproachanepileptos
Husband of one wifeFaithful to his wifeun andra
VigilantTemperatenephaleos
SoberSelf-controlledsophron
Of good behaviourRespectablekosmios
Given to hospitalityHospitablephiloxenos
Apt to teachAble to teachdidactikos
Not given to wineNot given to drunkennessparoinos
No strikerNot violentplektes
Not greedy of filthy lucren/aaphilargyros
PatientGentleepieikes
Not a brawlerNot quarrelsomeamachos
Not covetousNot a lover of moneyaphilargyros
Ruleth well his own houseManage his own family well
Not a noviceNot a recent convertneophitos
Have a good reportA good reputationmarturia

QUALIFICATIONSIN TITUS 1: 6-9



KJVNIVGREEK WORD



Blameless v6 & v7Above reproachanegkletos
Husband of one wifeFaithful to his wifeun andra
Having faithful childrenWhose children believe
Not selfwilledNot overbearingauthades
Not soon angryNot quick-temperedorgilos
Not given to wineNot given to drunkennessparoinos
No strikerNot violentplektes
Not given to filthy lucreNot pursuing dishonest gainaischrokerdes
A lover of hospitalityHospitablephiloxenos
A lover of good menOne who loves what is goodphilagathos
SoberSelf-controlledsophron
JustUprightdikaios
HolyHolyhosios
TemperateDisciplinedegkrate
Holding fast the faithful wordHold firmly to the trustworthy message

EIGHT CHARACTERISTICS IN BOTH 1 TIMOTHY AND TITUS

1) ‘Above reproach’ (anepileptos) 1 Tim 3:2 ‘Blameless’ (anegketos) Titus 1:6

This is a general qualification meaning that the candidate has a good reputation because his character and conduct are free from moral or spiritual accusations. Most commentators describe this qualification as ‘overarching’ or ‘all-embracing’.

2) ‘Husband of one wife’ (un andra) 1 Tim 3:2; Titus 1:6

In both 1 Timothy and Titus Paul places ‘husband of one wife’ second in the list of qualifications and uses the expression three other times in the Pastoral Epistles (once in reverse, ‘wife of one man’); 1 Tim 3:2, 12, 1Tim 5:9, Titus 1:6. Exactly what he meant by this is unclear but the four main interpretations of this requirement are as follows:

a) A presbyter-bishop must be married.

This interpretation would seem to contradict the teaching of Paul in 1 Corinthians 7 regarding the advantages of singleness in the service of the Lord and it therefore seems unlikely that the apostle is insisting that a presbyter-bishop must be a man who has a wife.

b) A presbyter-bishop must be a man who marries only once. Some have taught that it means that a widowed presbyter-bishop cannot remarry and others that he cannot be divorced and remarry. Towner, quoted by Strauch (1995 p192), says: ‘the point is not how often one can be married, nor precisely what constitutes a legitimate marriage … but rather how one conducts himself in his marriage.’

c) A presbyter-bishop must be monogamous.

Some have argued that Paul’s intention was to prohibit polygamy but according to Mounce (2000, p171) there is no evidence that polygamy was practised among Christians at this time and he points out that assuming that the same interpretation holds true in reverse (when applied to widows, ‘the wife of one man’ 1 Tim 5:9) then there is certainly no evidence of polyandry.

d) A presbyter-bishop must be faithful in the marital realm.

According to this interpretation the apostle Paul was dealing with moral purity and emphasizing faithful, monogamous marriage. This represents a positive statement that a man who has the reputation of being faithful to his wife can be trusted in other areas of life that require integrity and honesty. A presbyter-bishop who has an exclusive relationship with his wife is therefore seen as a suitable candidate for oversight and is deemed to be ‘above reproach.’

3) ‘Managing own family well’ 1 Tim 3:4-5 ‘Having faithful children’ Titus 1:6

The apostle Paul here saw a parallel between the family and the church. He reckoned that a man’s ability to lead and control his family was an accurate indication of his ability to relate to and lead others in the church. One might ask if, as a result of these requirements relating to the family situation, was it considered necessary for a candidate to have more than one child and also for those children to be professing believers?

Just as it is unlikely that a presbyter-bishop had to have a wife, so it follows that an overseer was not required to have a family. If an overseer was married, he was to be faithful to that one woman. If an overseer had a family, then the behaviour of the children was taken into account when assessing his ability to lead the church.

Regarding the question of the children being believers the discussion hinges on the translation of pistos in Titus 1:6 (‘having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly’) which, according to Strauch (1995, p229) ‘can be translated either actively as “believing” (1 Tim 6:2) or passively as “faithful,” “trustworthy,” or “dutiful” (2 Tim 2:2).’ Merkle (2008, p132-133) concedes that the meaning is ambiguous but favours its translation as “faithful” for the following reasons:

a) The words “not accused of riot or unruly” qualify the type of faithfulness that the writer had in mind. ‘Paul is referring to the behavior of the child (“faithful”), not to the status of the child (“believing”).’

b) In view of the fact that the church in Ephesus was longer established and more mature than the church in Crete would Paul have placed a ‘more restrictive burden on the less mature church?’ Is it likely that he would have required a presbyter-bishop in Crete to have children who believed but those in Ephesus to have children who were just to “be in subjection” (1 Tim 3:4)?

c) The view that all of an elder’s children must be professing believers raises more questions than it answers. What if a child is not old enough to understand the gospel and believe? Does the father have to wait? What if one child out of several does not believe? Does that disqualify the father from serving as a presbyter-bishop?

d) The general teaching of the Bible is that salvation is of the Lord and not by any human effort. For example: “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9) It is the responsibility of Christian parents to bring up children “in the nurture and admonition of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4) but there have been many good parents who have done so only to see their children reject their teaching and take a different direction. The apostle Paul would not have required of a father something over which he had no control.

Getz (2003, p169) understands this requirement, especially the words “not accused of riot or unruly”, to refer, not to small children or adolescents, but to grown-up older children who, even though they might have rejected Christianity, would not have embraced the pagan lifestyle but lived moral and upright lives as a result of the good upbringing and influence of their father. He bases this on the use of the word teknon (child) which elsewhere in the Pastoral Epistles refers to grown children. He quotes 1 Timothy 5:4, where the reference is to children who ought to be caring for a widowed mother. Knight (1992, p161) discusses this but concludes that the qualification ‘in subjection’ (1 Tim 3:4) ‘indicates that the “children” in view are those under authority and therefore those not yet of age’.

The arguments put forward by Merkle are very convincing but Getz’s interpretation is interesting and merits consideration.

4) “Self-controlled” (sophron) 1 Tim 3:2; Titus 1:8

This word means “sound in mind” and can also be translated sober, sensible, prudent or discreet. As church leaders are sometimes called upon to make difficult decisions discretion is a vital attribute when handling people and problems.

5) “Hospitable” (philoxenos) 1 Tim 3:2; Titus 1:8

The presbyter-bishop’s home must be open to believers so that he can more easily build relationships and minister to their spiritual needs.

6) “Not a drunkard” (paroinos) 1 Tim 3:3; Titus 1:7

This is a negative qualification which relates to the abuse of alcohol. It disqualifies from church oversight anyone addicted to alcohol (or, by extension, other substances) as that would indicate a lack of self-control. A presbyter-bishop with a “drink problem” would be a stumbling block to others and bring the assembly into disrepute.

7) “Not violent” (plektes) 1 Tim 3:3, Titus 1:7

A presbyter-bishop must not be prone to verbal or physical assault on other people but must be able to handle church tensions and interpersonal conflicts calmly.

8) “Not a lover of money” (aphilargyros) 1 Tim 3:3, “Not pursuing dishonest gain” (aischrokerdes) Titus 1:7

Someone who would be prepared to use his position for personal profit is unfit for oversight. Leaders would most likely have access to assembly funds and must therefore be trustworthy in financial matters.

SEVEN CHARACTERISTICS UNIQUE TO 1 TIMOTHY

1 ) “Temperate” (nephaleos) 3:2

This can refer to temperance in the use of alcoholic drinks but here it probably refers to mental sobriety. The presbyter-bishop must be clear in his thinking and alert to issues relating to spirituality and morality.

2) “Respectable” (kosmios) 3:2

This word suggests proper behaviour and orderliness.

3) “Able to teach” (didactikos) 3:2

This word is used only here and in 2 Timothy 2:24 in Paul’s writings. One who meets this requirement would not only know the scriptures but also have the ability to communicate them effectively.

4) “Gentle” (epieikes) 3:3

Mounce (2000, p176) quotes Hawthorne who says that ‘it is one of the truly great Greek words that is almost untranslatable.’ It suggests someone who is fair, reasonable and who does not always demand his full rights.

5 ) “Not quarrelsome” (amachos) 3:3

This describes someone who will not involve himself in heated arguments and petty disputes.

6) “Not a recent convert” (neophitos) 3:6

Christians need time to learn and mature before undertaking leadership responsibilities. Paul says that someone appointed prematurely to a leadership role is likely to succumb to the sin of pride, as did Satan.

7) “Having a good reputation” (marturia) 3:7

The list of requirements for bishops in 1 Timothy 3 began with the need for a good reputation among believers (above reproach) and it now ends with the need for a good reputation among unbelievers.

SEVEN CHARACTERISTICS UNIQUE TO TITUS

1) “Not overbearing” (authades) 1:7

The presbyter-bishop must not be arrogant. He must not push his personal agenda or advance his own views, preferences and policies.

2) “Not quick-tempered” (orgilos) 1:7

A quick-tempered man is likely to have problems with self-control.

3) “Loves what is good” (philagathos) 1:8

Marshall (1999, P163) translates this as ‘loving what is good’ or ‘loving good people’. A person’s friends and associates are a good indicator of his character and interests.

4) “Just” (dikaios) 1:8

This characteristic involves fairness in dealings with others.

5) “Holy” (hosios) 1:8

A presbyter-bishop must be devoted to the Lord and his work.

6) “Disciplined” (egkrate) 1:8

This word again emphasizes the necessity for self-control.

7) “Holding firmly to the trustworthy message” 1:9

This final requirement in Titus fits the candidate to carry out the two main functions of eldership which are stated in the same verse: ‘so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it.’

Posted in Exposition

(1) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – INTRODUCTION

A local church is not just any gathering of Christians but a group of people (1) who meet recognising Christ as the authoritative Head of the church and (2) whose main aim to please God. It is not therefore free to organise itself as it pleases but must follow the biblical pattern: its membership must be recognised, regenerate, subject to discipline and have authorised leaders. When discussing church polity (government), we are speaking of the roles, duties and qualifications of those in leadership positions. This article focuses on one of the New Testament leadership groups, that of Presbyter-Bishop, as seen in the Pastoral Epistles.

THE PASTORAL EPISTLES

The term ‘Pastoral Epistles’ designates three New Testament letters; 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus. Although addressed to individuals, they are much more than personal, private letters since they deal with matters of church government. This article is written from a conservative perspective and assumes that the three letters are by the Apostle Paul and addressed to the historical Timothy and Titus. They were his co-workers whom he had left in Ephesus and Crete for a limited period in order to carry out some tasks (1 Tim 1:3, 6:20, 2 Tim 4:13, 21 and Titus 1:5, 3:12). All three letters are characterised by two main concerns that are identified by Knight (1992, p.10):

(1) ‘Paul warns Timothy and Titus about a false teaching and exhorts them to stand against it;

(2) Paul gives instructions to the Christians of Ephesus and Crete, through Timothy and Titus, concerning their conduct and church life. In 1 Timothy and Titus the latter includes instructions as to what sort of men are to be appointed to church leadership (1 Tim 3:1- 13; Tit 1:5-9; cf. 2 Tim 2:2).’

The requirements relating to appointment to church leadership in Ephesus and Crete are similar, yet the circumstances differ. In Ephesus, overseers already existed (Acts 20:17) and Timothy was to add to their number. Titus was to ensure that elders were appointed in Crete.

PROBLEMS IN THE CHURCHES

EPHESUS

By the time Paul made his third visit to Ephesus (cf. Acts 18-20) the church had become influenced by false teachers. His reaction was to excommunicate two of them (1 Tim 1:20) and then move on into Macedonia leaving Timothy to correct the error and help the church. Paul then wrote Timothy an authoritative letter (1 Timothy) explaining how he was to discharge his duties, how to deal with false teachers and outlining how the assembly was to conduct itself as the ‘household of God.’ Essential to this conduct was the quality, reputation and behaviour of its spiritual leaders.

The Ephesian church had already been governed by elders for some years but there were problems. Some had become false teachers and those who had not done so had failed to counteract the false doctrine and its effect. Paul therefore addressed the spiritual, moral and personal qualifications of presbyter-bishops in his letter to Timothy.

CRETE

It is unclear if Paul had previously planted churches on the island of Crete or if they had been established before he arrived but it seems that in either case no elders had been appointed. Therefore, on leaving Crete, Paul left Titus behind temporarily to ensure that elders were appointed. Paul also wrote to Titus authorising him to ‘straighten out what was left unfinished’ (Tit 1:5) in every church.

That Paul should leave Timothy and Titus behind in order to temporarily administer the churches shows his commitment to the establishment of good leadership and gives us a glimpse into the management and actual situation in the early churches.


BACKGROUND OF “ELDER” AND “OVERSEER”

presbuteros

It is important to attempt to understand the origin and usage of the terms presbyter and bishop. According to Merkle (2008, p.61-63) the term for elder (zaqen) in the Old Testament refers either to someone who has entered old age or to a community leader who carries out various functions. It usually occurs in the plural referring to a collective body. Merkle identifies three roles in which the elders of Israel functioned they served the nation.

1. They were a representative body which represented the people in religious or political activities.

2. After the exile, they were, along with the governor, the ruling body in Jerusalem (Ezra 5:5, 6:7, 14).

3. They had a judicial function (Deuteronomy 19:12, 21:3, 22:15). The translators of the Septuagint preferred the Greek word presbuteros to translate zaqen, using it 127 times out of 184.

In the Gospels presbuteros usually refers to the chief priests or scribes whom Jesus encountered but in Acts presbuteros refers not only to the Jewish leaders but also to the Christian elders. The latter designation first occurs in Acts 11:30 with no explanation of the new use of the term given by the author.

According to Mappes (1997, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 154, No. 613, p.88) scholars such as Lightfoot argued that this absence of definition ‘was because of the counterpart of elders in synagogues’. Mappes agrees that church eldership was based on eldership in synagogues but points out that there is disagreement among scholars on the similarities between the two and notes the ‘paucity of information regarding the synagogue elder’. On the basis that it is known that synagogue elders functioned as a ‘collegium’, that they were responsible for the well-being of the people, that they had authority and were responsible for the care and communication of the scriptures he concludes that ‘while the synagogal eldership did influence church eldership, the influence was of a general nature.’

Campbell (2004, p.21f) argues that there is no difference between Christian elders and Jewish elders because in each case the designation is just a cultural reference to someone who was respected in the community. He notes that ‘Israelite society was tribal and patriarchal’ and that at each level (tribes, clans and families) leadership was given to the senior males whose functions were accordingly ‘deliberative, representative and judicial’. He emphasises (2004, p.25) that “elders” is a collective term for the leadership and that ‘the word “elder” never occurs in the singular, referring to an officeholder’.

episkopos

Regarding the origin of the term episkopos Mounce (2000, p.165) says that the issue is “shrouded in mystery”. Merkle (2008, p72), identifies three views of origin: as (1) the Old Testament (Isaiah 60:17b) (2) the Greek Societies, or (3) the Jewish mbaqqer (spiritual leader) of the Qumran community but again admits a ‘paucity of evidence.’ One must therefore conclude that how the title arose is uncertain.

ONE ROLE OR TWO?

In any discussion of New Testament church leadership the issue of terminology arises. In the Pastoral Epistles two terms are used; presbuteros (“elder”) and episkopos (“bishop”). Beckwith (2003, p.46ff), commenting on the appointment of presbyters by Paul and Barnabas in the first Gentile churches and referring to Paul’s meeting with the presbyters of Ephesus recorded in Acts chapter 20 says:

‘These are presbyters whom, in accordance with his policy, he had doubtless appointed himself on one of his visits to Ephesus earlier in his second missionary journey. It is here, in verse 28, that we first find presbyters called by their other name of episkopoi, bishops or overseers. Elsewhere in the New Testament, presbyters are referred to in the Pastoral Epistles (1 Tim. 5:17, 19; Tit 1:5), in James 5:14 and in 1 Peter 5:1, and, by their other name of ‘bishops’, in the Pastoral Epistles again (1 Tim 3:1f; Tit 1:7) and in Philippians 1:1. As presbyters they taught, and as bishops they exercised oversight.’

Having pointed out that the two titles are interchangeable Beckwith henceforth refers to the Christian ‘Presbyter-Bishop’, an appropriate and convenient designation that is therefore used in the title and body of this paper.

The emphasis on this dual role of teaching and oversight in the Pastoral Epistles has led some to say that two separate offices are in view; one a ministry of teaching, the other a ministry of ruling. An early exponent of this viewpoint was Calvin (1548, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom.html) who wrote of 1 Timothy 5:17:

‘We may learn from this, that there were at that time two kinds of elders; for all were not ordained to teach. The words plainly mean, that there were some who “ruled well” and honourably, but who did not hold the office of teachers.’

The following reasons have been offered in support of this view:

1) In the Pastoral Epistles “bishop” is always in the singular, whereas (with the exception of 1 Tim 5:19) “the presbyters” is always in the plural.

2) The use of the definite article “(“the”) in 1 Timothy 3:2 and Titus 1:7 (ton episkopon) suggests that one bishop is above the presbyters.

3) All bishops are responsible to teach (1 Tim 3:2, Tit 1:7) but not all presbyters have this responsibility (1 Tim 5:17).

4) It is unlikely that two separate terms would refer to the one office.

The following have been presented in support of the view that the two terms are synonymous:

1) That the terms are clearly used interchangeably may be demonstrated in three texts; Acts 20:17-19, Titus 1:5, 7, 1 Peter 5:1-2.

2) If presbyter and bishop are two separate offices one would expect Paul to give a list of qualifications for each. In 1 Timothy 1:3-7 and in Titus 1:7-9 the necessary qualifications for bishops are given but presbyters are also mentioned in 1 Timothy (5:17-25) and in Titus (1:5). If presbyter is a distinct office from bishop one would expect the qualifications for such to be clearly stated.

3) According to the Pastoral Epistles presbyters and bishops have the same functions; they both rule (manage) and teach. 1 Timothy 3:4-5 states that a bishop must rule his own household before he is fit to take care of the church. 1 Timothy 5:17 mentions presbyters who “rule well”. Similarly, in 1 Timothy 3:2 a bishop must be ‘apt to teach’ and 1 Timothy 5:17 refers to presbyters who ‘labour in preaching and teaching’.

4) Two distinct offices are not required in order to carry out different functions of
eldership/oversight.

On balance it seems more likely that the two terms represented the same office and that ‘elder’ has more the holder’s character in view, whereas ‘overseer’ his function. It is likely that at first the Christian Jewish assemblies favoured the term presbuteros and the Gentile congregations the term episkopos but that in the course of time both came to be used to describe the church leaders.

A PLURALITY OF PRESBYTER-BISHOPS

The New Testament does not legislate for a specific number of presbyter-bishops in any given congregation but it does clearly envisage a plurality of overseers in every local assembly (Acts 14:23, 15:22, 20:17, Philippians 1:1, James 5:14, 1 Peter 5:1). This was also true of the assemblies in Ephesus and Crete. In 1 Timothy 5:17 Paul refers to ‘the elders who direct the affairs of the church well’ and told Titus (1:5) to ‘appoint elders in every town as I directed you.’ “Elders” is plural and “in every town” is singular, thus indicating multiple elders serving each church on Crete. Plurality of leadership within even small assemblies makes good sense as it ensures accountability, mutual support and shared experience from qualified men.

A NOBLE TASK/DESIRING THE OFFICE

The apostle introduces his list of qualifications for ‘overseership’ in 1 Timothy with the formula ‘faithful is the saying’. ‘Here is a trustworthy saying: If anyone sets his heart on being an overseer, he desires a noble task’ (1 Timothy 3:1). This is one of five such sayings in the Pastoral Epistles (1 Tim1:15, 3:1, 4:9; 2 Tim 2:11; Titus 3:8).

‘Overseership’ or ‘the office of a bishop’(KJV) translates the Greek
word episcope and ‘it represents the position and function of an overseer’ (Strauch, 1995, p186).

‘Noble’ or ‘fine’ translates the word ‘kalos’ and has the idea of ‘excellent’ or ‘worthwhile’.

It is not known where the saying originated but it does suggest that there was a widespread view that oversight of a local assembly was a noble work. Paul is here commending the role of presbyter-bishop as significant and worthy of respect and appreciation on the part of the congregation. Such a fine work demanded a special type of person.

Paul’s requirements that a bishop be ‘the husband of one wife’ (1 Tim 3), and that a woman must not exercise authority in the church (1 Tim 2) make it clear that candidature for the role of presbyter-bishop was open only to males. Getz (2003, p123ff) argues that this is because Paul followed the “Household Model”, viewing the family as a prototype for the church. There was thus a strong emphasis on male leadership with a requirement for presbyter-bishops to be men who manage their own families well (1 Tim 3:4-5).

Paul is drawing an analogy between the role of husband and the role of elder. If a man displays incompetence in the management of his own children at home how would he be a suitable candidate for the additional challenges of leading the church? Just as a husband is to lead his wife and a father is to lead his family, so qualified presbyter-bishops are to lead the family of God; the local church.

Those qualified to undertake this ‘noble task’ would be obvious to all from ongoing evaluation of their life and work. This is the thrust of 1 Timothy 3:10, ‘And let these [deacons] also [like the overseers] first be tested’, of which Allen (1983, p.22) says: ‘Here it is not a period of probation or a formal examination….but a constant observation and scrutiny of the man and the work he is already doing.’

APPOINTING PRESBYTER-BISHOPS

The only verb in the Pastoral Epistles that conveys the idea of appointing is
kathistemi’ in Titus 1:5 where Titus is told to ‘appoint elders’ but this verse does not expand on the formalities surrounding the installation of presbyter-bishops. There appears to be no hint of ordination as we know it today although some understand ‘Do not be hasty in the laying on of hands’ in 1 Timothy 5:22 as referring to formal appointment to office rather than to restoration of the repentant offenders of verse 20.

Someone who aspired to the task of oversight (1 Tim 3:1) and matched the
qualifications in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 would have been publicly chosen either by the congregation or selected by the existing presbyter-bishops fulfilling their scriptural role in ‘managing’ the local church (1 Tim 3:5, 5:17).

Posted in Latin loanwords

COLONIA

‘And from thence to Philippi, which is the chief city of that part of Macedonia, and a colony: and we were in that city abiding certain days.’ Acts 16:12

Greek – κολωνία (kolōnía)
Latin – colonia
English – colony


THE GOSPEL COMES TO EUROPE


After Paul and Silas completed the first stage of the second missionary journey during which they had visited previously established churches in Phrygia and Galatia, they decided to preach the gospel in the next-door province of Asia. Somehow they were ‘forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia’ so they journeyed northwards through Asia until they reached Mysia in northwest Asia Minor. From there they tried to enter Bithynia but again ‘the Spirit suffered them not’. So they travelled south to the seaport of Troas, on the Aegaen Sea. There Paul received his vision of a man from Macedonia calling for help (Acts 16:9), after which the party set sail from Troas and reached the island of Samothrace which was about halfway between Asia Minor and Greece. The following day they disembarked at Neapolis, a port in Macedonia, and travelled some ten miles up the road to Philippi. Some years later the reverse journey took five days (20:6)!


These first Christian missionaries to arrive in Europe must have seemed a motley crew. Two of them, Paul and Silas, were obviously Jews (Acts 16:19-20). Another, Timothy, was half Jewish (Acts 16:1) but probably looked and dressed like a Gentile. The fourth was Luke, who appears to have joined the missionary party at Troas and is thought to have been a Gentile (compare Col 4:11 with 4:14). Luke was the author of the Acts of the Apostles and in 16:10 includes himself with the others (‘we’) as responding to the Macedonian Call. This is the first of five ‘We’ sections in Acts (16:10-17; 20:5-15; 21:1-18; 27:1-29; 28:16) in which the usual third person (he, they) narrative changes to first person plural (we). This suggests that Luke was writing as an eyewitness who had spent some time at Philippi along with the missionaries.


PHILIPPI


Philippi was located in eastern Macedonia (now northern Greece) and strategically situated on a hill surrounded by marshes. There were mountains to the north and south, and also to the south was the port of Neapolis. The city lay on the Via Egnatia which was the only land route from Rome to the East of the empire.

The town, originally named Crenides (‘springs’), was founded by settlers from the Greek island of Thasos around 360 BCE. They began to mine gold and silver from nearby Mt. Pangaion but were so harassed by nearby tribes from Thrace that three or four years later they called on Philip II of Macedon (Alexander the Great’s father) for assistance. Philip was quick to take control of the town in 356 BCE and name it after himself. He fortified Philippi, expanded the mining operations and set up a royal mint nearby. He exploited the natural resources of the area to such an extent that the town declined. The Romans conquered Macedonia c. 167 BCE but Philippi remained relatively unknown until it hit the headlines in 42 BCE as the site of the battle of Philippi. This was between the forces of Octavian and Mark Anthony on the one hand and, on the other, those of Brutus and Cassius (the assassins of Julius Caesar).


After the victory of Octavian and Anthony the town was made a Roman colony; Mark Anthony named it Colonia Victrix Philippensium. Veterans of the campaign were discharged and given land there as compensation for their service. In 30 BCE Augustus renamed it Colonia Augusta Julia Philippensis and resettled more former Roman soldiers. This time the colonists were veterans of a campaign that had ended with the Battle of Actium in 31 BCE. Thus Philippi was very much a military town.

Not only was Philippi martial in character but it was very Roman. As a Roman colony (colonia) the town had special rights; including exemption from poll tax. It also had the privilege of ius italicum (Italian law) of which it was proud. In the Provinces land was regarded as belonging to the Roman state and could not, therefore, be bought. In a colony with ius italicum, however, land could be bought and sold; the transactions being tax-free. The architecture of Philippi was Roman, inscriptions were in Latin and the usual Roman officials ran the colony. The official language was Latin and, although the people mostly spoke Greek, Latin held a strong position. It was the language of the Roman army and would therefore have been spoken by the resettled veterans and their family members, by slaves in Roman households and by employees in the imperial administration.


In areas previously unreached with the gospel Paul’s evangelistic strategy usually involved the establishment of churches in large urban centres from which the message could then be circulated to rural areas. Although his preaching was always aimed at both Jews and Gentiles he tended to first present the gospel to the local Jewish community at their synagogue worship. If they refused to accept it he then moved on to evangelize Gentiles. This procedure was not followed in Philippi, for two reasons. First, Philippi was something of a backwater and, although historically important (‘chief city’ 16:12), it was small. It had a population of about 10,000; tiny compared with Corinth or Thessalonica which numbered c. 80,000 -100,000. Second, hardly any Jews lived there so it did not have a synagogue.


In Acts 16:11-40, Luke gives a flavour of the early days of gospel work in Philippi by detailing three episodes of conversion. The first two concern the conversion of women and are connected with a ‘place of prayer’, the third is the conversion of a man and the setting is a prison. Two of the episodes contain a miracle; an exorcism and a miraculous release from prison. Taken together the stories of conversion remind us that God works providentially in the lives of different kinds of people in order to bring them to faith.


LYDIA


On the Sabbath, since there was no synagogue in Philippi, Paul looked for a ‘place of prayer’. According to the early Jewish historian Josephus (Antiquities, 14.10.23 § 258) Jews were accustomed to meet for prayer beside a river or at the seaside. At a river outside the town Paul found a group of women gathered together to pray. One was a merchant called Lydia who was a dealer in purple. This was an expensive dye used on fabrics and as rouge for cheeks or lips. Having a business that catered to the rich Lydia would have been well-dressed and wealthy herself. She was a native of Thyatira and already a worshipper of the one true God of the Jews. As she listened to Paul’s preaching her ‘heart’ was ‘opened’ and she became a believer in Christ. Not only that, she and her household were baptized (16:15). Then, at her insistence, the missionaries lodged at her home. Thus the church in Europe began with Lydia.


THE SLAVE GIRL


On their way to the place of prayer Paul and his friends met a slave girl who was possessed by a ‘spirit of Python’ (16:16). Python was a surname (epithet) of Apollo, the Greek god of divination. Her fortune-telling was a source of profit for her owners. She followed Paul and his companions shouting: ‘These men are servants of the Most High God, who declare to us a way of salvation’ (Young’s Literal Translation). The term ‘Most High God’ was used by Jews as a title of God, but in that local environment it could equally be understood as a term of respect applied to gods like Zeus or Isis. The slave girl was also shouting that the missionaries were proclaiming ‘a’ (not ‘the’) way of salvation. Paul was tolerant ‘for many days’ but, aware of the ambiguities in her proclamation, he commanded the spirit to leave her. When her owners realized that their source of income had dried up as a result of this they dragged Paul and Silas before the town authorities at the forum and accused them of:


1) Being Jews.


This was a sure way of stirring up the crowd against them as Jews were unpopular in the empire at that time. The emperor Claudius had expelled all Jews from Rome in 49 CE, probably just a few months before this incident. Luke refers to that Edict of Claudius in Acts 18:1.


2) Causing civic unrest.


The Romans were obsessed with maintaining public order in conquered territories, and they ruthlessly suppressed any hint of disturbance. This explains the action of the magistrates (the ‘duumviri’) in Philippi.


3) Promoting customs that were not legal for Romans to adopt.


The Romans insisted that religious cults be licensed as it was generally thought that calamity would come if the old ancestral gods and religious customs were forsaken. Also, the imperial cult was prevalent in Philippi and ‘Saviour and ‘Lord’ were titles of the Roman emperor. Paul may have been preaching about Jesus as ‘the’ Saviour and ‘the’ Lord, and also about the possibility of obtaining citizenship in a different kind of colony. He certainly reminded the Philippian believers about these things in his Epistle to the Philippians, written about five years later:


‘But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Saviour from there, the Lord Jesus Christ’ Phil 3:20 (NIV)


The Romans would have regarded this as treason against Caesar (Jn 19:12; Acts 17:7).


THE PHILIPPIAN GAOLER


The accusations were not related to the exorcism but had the desired effect of stirring up the mob against Paul and Silas. Unfortunately, the magistrates were swayed by the crowd and without properly investigating the matter had Paul and Silas stripped, cruelly flogged, and delivered to the gaoler; who secured them in the inner prison with their feet in stocks. It was unlawful to treat Roman citizens in this way, but they were given no opportunity to say that they had this status.


A dramatic event occurred as Paul and Silas prayed and sang praises to God during the night, while the other prisoners listened. This reminds us that others are looking on and gauging our reactions as Christians when under pressure. Paul and Silas were not moaning and groaning or cursing and swearing about their beating. It is not surprising that they prayed, but how could they have sung in such circumstances?


Then an earthquake released the fastenings of all the prisoners. This earthquake shook the prison foundations but left it standing, burst open its doors, and released the prisoners’ chains. The event must have impressed upon the inmates the fact that God was working. At times God uses circumstances to awaken individuals to the realisation that they are sinners in his sight, and arouse them to their need of salvation. In your case, it may be nothing so dramatic as an earthquake, but it is worth asking yourself the question: ‘What does God have to do to awaken me’?


The Philippian gaoler certainly reacted. Thinking that all the prisoners had escaped, and preferring death to disgrace, he had drawn his sword to kill himself when Paul shouted: ‘Do thyself no harm, for we are all here!’ Having called for a light, the gaoler came in trembling and asked a great question.


‘Sirs, what must I do to be saved?’


(N.B. I have had the following points in my notes for years, unfortunately I cannot reference the original source)


THE REQUEST (Acts 16:30) ‘What must I do to be saved?’

It speaks of:


1) HUMILITY – ‘what must I do’ – it implies that there is a need for salvation.

2) NECESSITY – ‘must’ – it implies that salvation cannot be done without.

3) INDIVIDUALITY – I’ – it implies that salvation is a personal issue. No-one else can receive it on my behalf.

4) AVAILABILITY – God is willing to save a repentant sinner.


THE REPLY (Acts 16:31) ‘Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house[hold]’

It speaks of:


1) A Person – ‘the Lord Jesus Christ

2) A Plan – ‘’believe on the Lord Jesus Christ’

3) A Promise – ‘thou shalt be saved’


THE RESULTS (Acts 16:33-34)


1) Salvation – ‘believing in God with all his house.’

2) Service – ‘And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes”

3) Satisfaction – ‘and rejoiced’


Verse 32 is very important: ‘And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house.’ Paul and Silas did not expect the gaoler to profess faith in the Lord Jesus Christ without first receiving an explanation of the facts of the gospel. The passage might suggest that they preached the gospel to him even before their wounds were dressed.


The next morning the magistrates, (perhaps realizing that they had acted unfairly and wishing to send the prisoners away as quietly as possible), sent the police (lictors), who ordered the gaoler to release Paul and Silas. Paul, however, refused to leave until the issue of their Roman citizenship was addressed. It was bad enough that Roman citizens had been imprisoned without a trial but the fact that it was illegal to flog Roman citizens created a major headache for the magistrates. They came to the prison themselves and tried to placate Paul and Silas. After receiving an official apology Paul and Silas were escorted from the prison, and went back to Lydia’s house to confer with the believers before leaving Philippi.


Paul maintained a close relationship with this assembly in the colony of Philippi, the first Christian assembly in Europe, and it, in turn, was supportive of his missionary work; sending him financial assistance on several occasions. (Phil 4:10, 15-16; 2 Cor 11:9).

Posted in General

ARE YOU READY?

No-one knows what lies ahead in 2021 but Christians need not be taken unawares. How prepared are we in the following areas? Are we:

I. READY TO ANSWER (1 Peter 3:15)

‘But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear’

II. READY TO PREACH (Romans 1:15)

‘So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.’

III. READY TO DISTRIBUTE (1 Timothy 6:17-18)

‘Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not high-minded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy: That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate:’

IV. READY TO SUFFER AND/OR DIE FOR THE LORD (Acts 21:13; 2 Tim 4:6 )

‘Then Paul answered, What mean ye to weep and to break mine heart? for I am ready not to be bound only, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.’

‘For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.’

V. READY TO FEED THE FLOCK (1 Peter 5: 2)

‘Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof , not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind;’

VII. READY FOR HEAVEN (Matthew 25:10)

‘the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.’

What know I of the coming year
Or what ’twill bring to me
Whether it’s close will find me here
Or in eternity?