Month: Nov 2024

Posted in Exposition

Jude 3-11: Historical Judgments

Posted on by writtenexposition

COMMENTS ON JUDE CONTINUED

PURPOSE (3-4)

3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

Moving on from the initial greeting and description of the recipients in vv.1-2 Jude, in vv. 3-4, shifts to his purpose and the circumstances that have occasioned his writing. These two verses lay a foundation for the rest of the letter by introducing the threat from false teachings and the urgent need for believers to defend the true faith.

(3) Jude addresses the recipients as ‘beloved.’ He does this three times (3, 17, 20), in every case following it with an exhortation (contend, remember, build up). ‘Beloved’ (agapētós), meaning ‘worthy of love’ or ‘dear,’ expresses Jude’s deep affection for his readers.

There are two main, and opposing, views on what comes next. The first is that he changed his topic, the second that there is no indication of a change. Proponents of the first think that Jude originally intended to send a letter about ‘the common salvation’ but, sensing the pressing danger posed by false teachers, feels compelled to write urging the believers to ‘contend for the faith.’ Others see little difference between ‘the common salvation’ and ‘the faith which was once delivered’ and reckon that Jude is just saying that he did intend to write to them but has now written earlier because of the emergency of the situation.

‘The common salvation’ is that shared here and now by all Christians regardless of background (Jude may have had Jew and Gentile in mind).

Jude feels compelled (‘I have found it necessary’) to shift his focus from a discussion of ‘the common salvation’ to an exhortation for believers to ‘earnestly contend for the faith’ i.e. actively defend the faith. ‘Earnestly contend’ translates one very strong word in Greek (epagōnízomai – to fight [for], strive), which occurs only here in the New Testament. It refers not to warfare but to athletics, e.g. a wrestling match which requires strenuous activity and training. I am not sure whether the contending refers to a believer’s individual personal struggle or to collective concerted action by a group of Christians.

‘The faith’ does not refer to personal response to the gospel but to the body of faith i.e. essential Christian doctrine (cf. 1 Tim 3:16). Jude says that this was ‘once (hápax) delivered (handed down, transmitted).’ Hápax here means ‘once for all;’ therefore the doctrine is definitive and immutable. As it is fixed it cannot be changed to suit personal preferences; further additions or alterations are not permissible (Rev 22:18-19).

‘Saints’ – holy ones – is a term for Christian believers (1 Pet 1:15-16).

(4) Why is this call to defend the truths of the gospel necessary? Verse 3, which begins with ‘for,’ gives the reason.  It is because ‘certain men’ have infiltrated the church, subtly introducing false teachings. Jude does not name them but obviously has particular persons in view. They have ‘smuggled themselves in’ (NLT says ‘have wormed their way into…’). The Greek word pareisdúō – to enter without notice – occurs only here in the New Testament. ‘Crept’ in the KJV translation ‘crept in unawares’ aptly emphasizes the danger posed by these individuals; initially they appear harmless but slyly work to undermine the faith from within.

Even before discussing the characteristics of these men Jude comments that they were ‘long ago marked out for this condemnation’. ‘Before of old’ (long ago) translates pálai which, while not indicating a definite time, suggests that the condemnation (kríma, judgment) was not a recent development but rather a predetermined outcome from the distant past. It is clear from the use of the adverb pálai in Heb 1:1 (KJV ‘in time past’) that it refers to an unspecified past time in human history. This fact significantly weakens the argument that in this verse we have an example of Reprobation – the sovereign decision of God in eternity to pass over some people, deciding not to save them.

The Greek word prográphō translated as ‘ordain’, literally means ‘write publicly, ‘forewrite’ or ‘enrol.’ It also occurs in Rom 15:4. Thus the condemnation may either have been written ‘before’ as in time or ‘before’ as in openly or publicly.

‘This condemnation’ is a forward reference to vv.5-7 where Jude will demonstrate by use of three Old Testament examples that there is historical precedent for divine judgment against ungodliness. He refers to the punishment of rebellious Israelites, the judgment of the fallen angels and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (vv.5-7).

The ‘certain men’ who have intruded are ‘ungodly’ (profane, impious). The word ‘ungodly’ occurs 5 more times in Jude’s letter: four times in v.15 and once in v.18. As a result of being ungodly these people do two things:

  • they corrupt God’s grace by turning it into a license for unrestrained immoral behaviour (sensuality, debauchery) – likely sexual immorality – thus perverting grace – the liberty that a Christian enjoys as a result of forgiveness and salvation (Rom 8:21).
  • they deny the authority of God and the Lord Jesus Christ, either explicitly or implicitly, through their rejection of his lordship. ‘Denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.’ By their lewd actions they deny God (lit. ‘the only master’ despótēs – one with supreme authority) and the Lord (kúrios – one who owns or possesses) Jesus Christ. Some view the structure of the text as suggesting that ‘the only Lord God’ and ‘our Lord Jesus Christ’ are the same person. J.N.D. Kelly (1969, p. 252) comments:

The second charge is that they deny the only Master and our Lord Jesus Christ, i.e. both God the Father and Christ…The alternative translation, ‘deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ….is equally possible linguistically, and the decision between them is not easy. The fact that there is a definite article before only Master and none before our Lord J.C. might seem to suggest that the whole complex expression applies to a single person, but this argument cannot be pressed: the article is often omitted before ‘God, ‘Lord’, and the like (…Eph. v. 5; 2 Thess. i.12; 1 Tim v. 21; Tit. ii. 13).

REMINDER (5-11)

In the following verses Jude reminds his readers of three notorious historical events from the Old Testament which illustrate the judgment of God upon evildoers:

EXAMPLE 1 – v.5 The wilderness generation – ‘destroyed;’

EXAMPLE 2 – v.6 angels – ‘everlasting chains;’

EXAMPLE 3 – v7. Sodom and Gomorrah – ‘the vengeance of eternal fire.’

(5) EXAMPLE 1 – Israel in the wilderness.

5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

Jude begins by complimenting the recipients on their knowledge (cf. Rom 15:14; 1 Thess 4:9; 1 Jn 2:21, 27) and says that he would like to remind them that the Lord, having saved the Israelites from Egypt, later (to deuteron, afterward, lit. ‘the second time’) destroyed many of them because of their unbelief. He is not saying this to frighten them but to make them aware that punishment awaits the ungodly men who have infiltrated the church. He is reassuring his readers because he says that they have been informed of these things and that ‘once for all’ (hapax). The knowledge that they have acquired ‘once for all’ is much more than familiarity with stories in the Old Testament; the reference is to their acceptance of the apostolic teachings (v.17).

Jude reminded them of the Exodus and of how the Lord delivered the Israelites out of Egypt but afterward destroyed those who did not believe. This illustration is taken from the book of Numbers which asserts that because of unbelief (Num 14:11; Deut 1:32) the wilderness generation, with the exception of Joshua and Caleb, would not enter the Promised Land (see Num 14:1-38; 26:64-65).

29 Your carcasses shall fall in this wilderness; and all that were numbered of you, according to your whole number, from twenty years old and upward, which have murmured against me,
30 Doubtless ye shall not come into the land, concerning which I swore to make — you dwell therein, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun. Numbers 14:29-30

This unbelief of the Israelites in the wilderness is cited by way of warning in other biblical passages (Psa 95:10-11; 1 Cor 10:1-13; Heb 3:7-19).

‘The Lord’ – although many commentators (also citing Jn 12:41; 1 Cor 10:4, 9; Heb 11:26; 1 Pet 1:11) view the use of ‘the Lord’ in v.5 as evidence of involvement by the preincarnate Jesus in Old Testament events it is more likely that here ‘the Lord’ is just another way of saying ‘God.’ The next verse (v.6) referring back to ‘the Lord’ in v.5 says concerning the rebellious angels: ‘he hath reserved.’ The parallel passage in 2 Pet 2:4 specifically attributes that to God: ‘For if God spared not the angels that sinned.’

(6) EXAMPLE 2 – The imprisoned angels

6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

Verse 6 of Jude is one of the most controversial and fascinating verses in the Bible. It contains Jude’s second example of God’s punishment of wrongdoers in the past. Notice:

1. Fallen angels. – a group of angels rebelled against God. They did not keep (tēréō) the positions that had been assigned to them but instead chose to abandon their proper dwelling. ‘First estate’ (archḗ) is status, eminence, principality, dominion. These angels did not maintain the dominions for which they had administrative responsibility, and as well as that they lusted after human women, leaving ‘their proper dwelling place i.e. heaven (oikētḗrion: house, dwelling, abode – also occurs in 2 Cor 5:2).

2. Severe consequences. – As a result of their rebellion God has reserved (tēréō, kept) them in everlasting chains and in darkness awaiting the judgment of ‘the great day’ (see Acts 2:20; Rev 6:17; 20:10). Notice the word play on tēréō – they did not keep…the Lord has kept them. The imagery conveys the idea that their punishment is severe and eternal; they will never again enjoy the light of God’s presence.

3. Links to other biblical passages: Jude 6 corresponds to 2 Pet 2:4. Peter does not specify the sin that led to the angels’ punishment; we learn about that here in verse 6 of Jude. This verse is often linked to Gen 6:1-7 which relates how the ‘sons of God’ (an Old Testament term for angels, Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7) cohabited with human women.

4. Lessons. This example demonstrates the seriousness of rebelling against God and the severity of the punishment that ensues.

Note: Jude refers to angels in vv. 6, 8, 9, 14.

(7) EXAMPLE 3 – Sodom and Gomorrah


7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Does ‘even as’ i.e. ‘likewise’ or ‘in like manner’ refer to:

a) giving themselves over to fornication,’ or

b) being ‘set forth as an example,’ or

c) ‘suffering the vengeance of eternal fire?’

I would choose option a) – that their sin is in view. Here Jude compares Sodom and Gomorrah and their surrounding cities to the fallen angels. The similarity lies in the fact that both groups practised sexual promiscuity and and lusted after ‘strange flesh.’ The citizens of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim (Deut 29:23; Hos 9:8) ‘gave themselves over to lewdness’ (ekporneúō) and lusted after different flesh. Heteras sarkos is ‘flesh of a different kind.’ Jude is making the point that ‘even as’ angels took human wives/women (Gen 6:1-7) so the people in these cities were so thoroughly immoral that they wished to have sexual relations with angels (Gen 19:5-9). Spiritual beings and mortals engaging in illicit relationships was a violation of God’s order (Psa 8:4-5). The people of these cities stand out as an example of unrestrained licentiousness. They are experiencing the punishment of eternal fire.

In verses 8-11 Jude applies the lessons from his three Old Testament illustrations of judgment to his present day situation and then alludes to four more Old Testament characters – the archangel Michael, Cain, Balaam, and Korah.


8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.

(8) ‘Likewise’ links the behaviour of the intruders, here called ‘dreamers’, to that of Jude’s three examples from Israelite history. The sins of the false teachers mirror those of Israel, the fallen angels and Sodom and Gomorrah. Jude lists them in reverse order. Like Sodom and Gomorrah etc. the intruders pollute their bodies (Jude has already referred to their debauchery in v.4). At the same time, like the rebellious angels they despise authority and like the Israelites they speak evil of dignitaries (in Num 14:1-4, the Israelites murmured against Moses, Aaron and the Lord).


9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. 10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.

(9-10) Having accused the intruders of despising authority and speaking evil of dignitaries Jude immediately contrasts their arrogance and presumption with the restraint shown by the archangel Michael in a dispute with the devil about the body of Moses. That story is not recorded in the Old Testament but, whatever the source, it was well-known to Jude and the recipients of his letter.

Michael means ‘who is like God.’

‘Archangel’ (chief angel) occurs in Jude 9 and 1 Thess 4:16.

Many commentators identify the archangel Michael in Jude 9 with Michael the prince (chief) in Dan 10:13, 21; 12:1 and the Michael of Rev 12:7-9.

Some (mainly Reformed) writers hold that Michael is a revelation of the preincarnate Christ. They base this on the meaning of his name and the fact that ‘angel’ equals ‘messenger.’

There is a view that ‘the body of Moses’ does not refer to his literal body but to his body of writing, i. e. The Law, Pentateuch (Jn 5:45; Acts 15:21; 21:21; 2 Cor 3:15).

Some suggest that the incident involving a disagreement between Michael and the devil occurred at the same time as that recorded in Zech 3:1-5.

It seems to me more sensible to take the passage at face value and accept that Jude refers to an occasion when Michael the chief angel was at odds with the devil (for reasons that are not stated) about the literal, physical body of Moses (see Deut 34:6). Jude does not provide full details because he is interested only in the attitude Michael displayed during the discussion. Michael did not pronounce a reviling judgment but deferred to the Lord’s authority as the one whose rightful position it was to rebuke the devil. Jude contrasts Michael’s attitude with the insolence of the intruders and their disrespect for authority (v.8).

Teaching by the apostle Paul about a proper Christian attitude is recorded in Tit 3:1-2: ​’Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work, To speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, showing all meekness unto all men.’

The contrast with Michael continues in v.10. Michael did not pronounce judgment ‘but these men’ revile everything that they do not understand. They have no spiritual understanding but are driven by their basic instincts and desires – just like animals.

Notice the repetition of ‘blaspheme’ (v.8, 10, ‘speak evil of,’ v. 9 ‘railing’)


11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Korah.

Jude pronounces a woe upon the intruders. ‘Woe to them’ indicates displeasure and calls for retribution. He links their fate to that of three Old Testament figures: Cain, Balaam and Korah, who are not listed in the order in which they appear in the Old Testament. Each of these men represents a different form of rebellion against divinely-appointed authority.

CAIN – an example of godlessness.

BALAAM – an example of compromise for personal gain.

KORAH – an example of rebellion against authority.

Taken together they convey the extent to which the false teachers have rebelled against and rejected the ways of God. ‘For’, ‘because’- the reasons for the pronouncement of the woe are:

1) ‘they have gone in the way of Cain’

Cain (Gen 4:1-16; Heb 11:4) was the first son of Adam and Eve and is better known for having killed his brother Abel, thus becoming the first murderer in the human race. Jude, however, is not accusing the false teachers of being murderers. He is accusing them of being thoroughly evil. Cain is more than a murderer, he is the prime example of an evil person. The apostle John calls him a child of the Evil One: ‘Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.’ 1 John 3:12.

A godless person, Cain relied on his own resources, despising God’s way and the sacrifice that the Lord required. Jude’s opponents allowed themselves to live their lives in the way that Cain lived his – ‘they have gone in the way of Cain’ i.e. ‘they have travelled down Cain’s path.’ It was of their own volition.

2) ‘and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward’ (Read Num 22-24)

The false teachers have abandoned themselves (‘rushed headlong’, ‘totally committed themselves’) to Balaam’s error for profit. Balaam’s ‘error’ was not an unintentional mistake but a deliberate deviation from the truth of God. According to Num 31:16 and Rev 2:14 it was on his advice that the Midianites caused the Israelites to commit idolatry: ‘Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD.’ Numbers 31:16.

The prophet Balaam is a prime example of someone who is willing to do anything, no matter how evil, for financial gain. Jude implies that the intruders have dedicated themselves to making money from their false teaching (cf. 1 Tim 6:5; Tit 1:11; 1 Pet 5:2).

In 2 Pet 2:15 the New Testament refers to ‘the way of Balaam, in Jude 11 to ‘the error of Balaam’ and in Rev 2:14 to ‘the doctrine of Balaam.’

3) ‘and perished in the gainsaying of Korah’

‘Gainsaying’ (antilogía) means ‘contradiction’ or ‘speaking against.’ It has to do with defiance against authority so some translate it as ‘rebellion.’ Korah (Num 16:1-40) was a Levite who mutinied against Moses and Aaron. He was privileged to be a Levite but was not satisfied with that position and level of responsibility; he thought that he should be a priest. He would not submit to the men to whom the Lord had entrusted leadership of the national worship. He, along with Dathan and Abiram, instigated a revolt, having recruited 250 of the most respected chiefs to join them. These arrogant, self-righteous men thought that they could come before God on their own merits so they tried to approach him without a mediator. The Lord opened up the ground so that Korah, Dathan, Abiram and their households were swallowed alive, while fire from heaven consumed their 250 co-conspirators.

The intruders Jude is writing about must have been rebelling against leaders in the church and causing unrest and division among the believers. The aorist tense (all three verbs in the verse are aorist) of the verb ‘they have perished’ dramatically views their fate as already sealed. Swift judgment upon them is certain.

The Epistle Of Jude – Verses 1 and 2 – Introduction

Unmasking False Teachers in Jude 12-16: Key Metaphors Explained

Contending for the Faith: Lessons from Jude 17-25

Posted in Exposition

The Epistle Of Jude – Verses 1 and 2 – Introduction

Posted on by writtenexposition

READING: Jude 1-25

FURTHER READING: Zechariah 3:1-4; 2 Peter 2:1-18; 3:1-3; Commentary on 2 Peter 2:1-22; The Book of Enoch

INTRODUCTION

The short Epistle of Jude, containing 461 Greek words, is a New Testament book which preachers and teachers tend to neglect. Often they concentrate more on 2 Peter, with which the Epistle of Jude shares a number of verses. The resemblances between them in ideas and wording are indeed striking. Jude 4-13 aligns with 2 Peter 2:1-17 and Jude 17-18 echoes 2 Peter 3:2-3. It is thought that the similarities may be explained either by literary dependence (i.e. one of them used the other as a source) or by a common source (i.e. each of the writers drew upon an earlier document or tradition). Generally speaking, scholars argue for literary dependence; with 2 Peter thought to be secondary. If Jude had access to all of 2 Peter, so the argument goes, surely he would have used more of it; so Peter must have used Jude. We shall leave that debate to others.

Equally unclear are the date the epistle was written, those to whom it was originally addressed and the exact occasion for writing. There is nothing in the letter that would establish its year of origin but, since its author claims to be Jude the brother of James, it must have been written before the end of the first century; probably between 65 and 80 CE.

There is also no hint as to the identity of the letter’s recipients. Jude addresses them as ‘beloved’ (‘Dear friends’) so he must have known them personally. During the first century heretical ideas and practices like those he describes emerged in Asia Minor so perhaps Jude is writing to a group of Jewish Christians there. His allusions to Old Testament characters and events and the presumption that his readers would understand them would indicate that both he and they had a Jewish worldview. He also refers to, and quotes, from Jewish apocryphal literature.

Although Jude addresses a specific situation his book is usually classified as one of the seven New Testament ‘catholic’ or ‘general’ epistles (James, 1 Peter, 2 Peter, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, Jude). These are circular letters addressed to the Christian church at large rather than to one specific destination. Jude is written in the form of a first century Christian letter. It commences with the name of the sender, the recipients, a greeting and ends with a doxology. Jude’s purpose in writing is to underscore and emphasise the personal responsibility of Christian believers to be vigilant against false teachers/teaching and ungodly practices.

There are a couple of sevens (v. 14 ‘the seventh from Adam’ and allusions to seven Old Testament individuals/ groups and associated events – Israelites, angels, Sodom & Gomorrah, archangel Michael, Cain, Balaam, Korah) but Jude has a noticeable penchant for triadic constructions. His grouping of elements together in threes displays his skill as a writer and is an example of the rhetorical device of amplification by accumulation, where a series of words or phrases with similar meanings are presented together to create a stronger statement and have greater impact. This skilful use of language helps make Jude’s message memorable, persuasive and therefore more likely to achieve its intended effect. Currie (2023) lists 22 triplets in an appendix to his comments on the Epistle of Jude.

SIMPLE DIVISION OF JUDE

1-2 Greeting

3-4 Purpose

5-11 Reminder

12-16 Description

17-23 Exhortation

24-25 Doxology

COMMENTS

GREETING (1-2)

1 Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called.
2 Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied.

(1) In verse 1 Jude gives details of the author and the audience.

Jude

The writer identifies himself as ‘Jude ((Ioúdas) the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James’. This is a clear indication that Judas, the brother of Jesus, wrote this epistle. If the names in Mt 13:55 are listed in order of age then Jude may have been the youngest in the family. He may also have been married (1 Cor 9:5). There are several men in the New Testament called by the popular name Jude/Judas:

  • Judas, the half-brother of Jesus (Mt 13:55; Mk 6:3).
  • Judas [son] of James (Lk 6:16; Acts 1:13) also known as Lebbaeus Thaddeus or Thaddaeus (Mt 10:3; Mk 3:18). John calls him ‘Judas, not Iscariot (Jn 14:22).
  • Judas Iscariot, the disciple who betrayed Jesus (Mt 10:4, Lk 22:3-4).
  • Judas of Galilee, a revolutionary (Acts 5:37).
  • Judas, at whose home in Damascus Paul stayed after his conversion (Acts 9:11).
  • Judas, surnamed Barsabas (Acts 15:22).

Jesus Christ

Jude, while being Jesus’ brother, humbly calls himself a ‘slave’ rather than asserting his familial connection to Jesus Christ. This term ‘slave’, however, is often linked with Christian ministry (Rom 1:1; Gal 1:10; Phil 1:1; Col 4:12; Jam 1:1; 2 Pet 1:1) and therefore may also indicate someone specifically authorised to labour in the Lord’s service who, as such, deserves to be listened to and heeded. Jude states that he is a servant of Jesus Christ before mentioning that he is related to James; this would suggest that he prioritizes his submission to Jesus Christ over earthly ties (it is interesting that Jude’s brother James, in his epistle, introduces himself similarly as ‘James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ’). Jude’s use of ‘servant’ therefore not only reflects an emphasis on his spiritual rather than familial relationship with Jesus but also establishes his authority to address his readers and warn them about the dangers of false teachings.

James

James, the brother of Jesus, was a prominent figure in the early church, particularly within the Jerusalem community (Mt 13:55; Acts 15:13; 21:18; 1 Cor 15:7; Gal 1:19; 2:9,12) and was so highly respected that he could be referred to simply as ‘James’ without any confusion. The author of the Epistle of Jude probably identifies himself as ‘the brother of James’ for two reasons: 1) to distinguish himself from other individuals named Jude or Judas in the early church and 2) to leverage the authority and recognition associated with James, the Lord’s brother. By identifying himself as ‘the brother of James’ Jude implicitly links himself to James’ authority and reputation. This was particularly important since, as someone who was not an apostle, Jude would not have been widely known. Associating himself with James enhances the impact of his message, due to James’s esteemed position and influence within the early church.

AUDIENCE

The letter is addressed to ‘them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called.’ The terms ‘sanctified’, ‘preserved’, and ‘called’ are important theological concepts and together provide a concise definition of a true Christian believer:

Sanctification: This signifies being set apart for God’s purposes, a process of becoming more Christ-like.

Preservation: This emphasizes the ongoing (perfect tense – not only once but continuing) protection and security that believers have in Jesus Christ. This word (tēréō) in Jude 1 means ‘carefully guarded’ (see Acts 12:5; 16:23). There may also be the idea of preserved for Jesus Christ (cf. 1 Thess 5:23).

There are five references to ‘being kept’ (tēréō) in Jude: v.1 ‘preserved;’ v.6 ‘kept;’ v.6 ‘reserved;’ v.13 ‘reserved;’ v.21 ‘keep’

Calling: This refers to the divine initiative in salvation (Rom 1:6; 8:28; 1 Cor 1:24; 1Thess 2:12; 2 Thess 2:13-14; 2 Tim 1:9; 1 Pet 2:9; 5:10; Rev 17:14).

(2) Jude’s greeting in verse 2 is also a prayer: ‘Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied.’ This is typical of early Christian letters; they often included a prayer or blessing for the recipients (e.g. 1 Pet 1:2). These three objective aspects of God’s grace are often interpreted subjectively. Only in Jude are they found together.

Mercy: Objective: mercy is God’s saving action in Christ. Subjective: the recipients need God’s forgiveness and compassion, especially in the face of the challenges they face.

Peace: Objective: reconciliation with God. Subjective: the inner harmony and wholeness that comes from a right relationship with God, even in the midst of trials.

Love: Objective: God’s love extended to sinners. Subjective: brotherly love between Christians.

The request that these blessings be ‘multiplied’ expresses Jude’s desire for the recipients to experience these qualities in abundance.

Jude 3-11: Historical Judgments

Unmasking False Teachers in Jude 12-16: Key Metaphors Explained

Contending for the Faith: Lessons from Jude 17-25

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 12: Prophecies of Exile and Judgment

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel gives no new date marker at the beginning of chapter 12. The next one is not until 20:1 so in the absence of chronological data for chapters 12-19 one must assume that the messages they contain were delivered soon after the prophecies of chapters 8-11, during 592 BCE (8:1).

Since it would seem that the account of a trance which Ezekiel had communicated to his fellow-exiles (11:25) had had no effect upon them it was therefore essential that the theme of judgment upon Jerusalem and Judah be further developed, this is the main point of chapters 12-19. In chapter 12 Ezekiel emphasises the certainty of that impending judgment.

CHAPTER 12

1-2 A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE

3-7 THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED

8-16 THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD

17-20 THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED

21-28 THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED

A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE (1-2)

1 The word of the LORD also came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house. Ezekiel 12:1-2

(1) The phrase ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying’ signifies the commencement of a new message from YHWH.

(2) YHWH again addresses Ezekiel as ‘Son of man (adam)’ thus emphasising Ezekiel’s humanity in contrast to the Lord’s divinity. He says that Ezekiel dwells in the midst of a ‘rebellious house.’ This refers to the exiles who are already in Babylon along with Ezekiel. They are rebellious because they refuse to see or hear the truth (cp. Deut 29:3-4; Isa 6:9; Jer 5:21; Mk 8:18; Acts 28:27). The exiles probably shared the vain sentiments of the people back home in Judah whom Jeremiah (Jer 7:4) warned about misplaced trust in the temple. They thought that because the temple of the Lord was in Jerusalem the city would not fall to invading forces. Ezekiel needed to powerfully drive home the lesson that Jerusalem would indeed fall and that its inhabitants would be taken into exile.

THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED (3-7)

3 Therefore, thou son of man, prepare thee stuff for removing, and remove by day in their sight; and thou shalt remove from thy place to another place in their sight: it may be they will consider, though they be a rebellious house.
4 Then shalt thou bring forth thy stuff by day in their sight, as stuff for removing: and thou shalt go forth at even in their sight, as they that go forth into captivity.
5 Dig thou through the wall in their sight, and carry out thereby.
6 In their sight shalt thou bear it upon thy shoulders, and carry it forth in the twilight: thou shalt cover thy face, that thou see not the ground: for I have set thee for a sign unto the house of Israel.
7 And I did so as I was commanded: I brought forth my stuff by day, as stuff for captivity, and in the even I digged through the wall with mine hand; I brought it forth in the twilight, and I bore it upon my shoulder in their sight.

(3-7) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to enact a drama of someone going into exile. Referring back to ‘which have eyes to see, and see not’ in v.2 notice the seven-fold repetition of ‘in their sight’ in vv. 3-7. Also, the words ‘by day’ are mentioned three times in these verses. Ezekiel is to make sure that his actions get the attention of his audience. Notice also ‘remove’ and ‘removing’ – these are from a word meaning captivity or going into exile.

Ezekiel receives specific instructions regarding the drama he is to act out.

a. He is to ‘prepare his stuff’ by day for going into exile (v.4). ‘Stuff’ – According to Strongs H3627 this word can refer both to a vessel or receptacle and also to utensils or items of equipment. Most translations say something akin to ‘pack your baggage’ but here the reference is more likely to the bag or knapsack itself rather than to the few basic items (e.g. clothing, bedding, cooking utensils, food) an exile would put in it. Thus the Christian Standard Bible translates ‘prepare thee stuff for removing’ as: ‘get your bags ready for exile.’ Ezekiel’s fellow exiles in Babylonia would have no problem recognising what he was portraying; they had done this very thing for real a few years earlier, in 597 BCE.

b. He is to go out in the evening as if escaping like an exile (v.4).

c. He is to dig a hole in the wall (of his house, the courtyard or the town?) and take his baggage (stuff) out through it (v.5).

d. He is to carry his bag on his shoulder into the pitch darkness with his face covered so that he cannot see the ground (v.6). Note that the word translated ‘twilight’ in KJV means thick darkness. It occurs in vv. 6, 7, 12 and Gen 15:17.

Perhaps this performance will enable his rebellious fellow-exiles to understand (v.3) that this will soon be the situation in Jerusalem. People there will soon be fleeing as emigrants, never to return. YHWH tells Ezekiel (v. 6b) that by acting out this scenario he will serve as a sign or portent to the house of Israel (see also v.11). Isaiah is another prophet said to have been a sign (Isa 20:3).

‘I did so as I was commanded.’ In v.7 Ezekiel confirms that that he has faithfully complied with YHWH’s instructions. He adds that he excavated the hole in the wall by hand; thus avoiding the noise of a pick or other instrument that in a real life escape might alert the enemy. The main emphasis, however, is on his exile’s pack; its significance is revealed in v.10.

THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD (8-16)

8 And in the morning came the word of the LORD unto me, saying,
9 Son of man, hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?
10 Say thou unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; This burden concerneth the prince in Jerusalem, and all the house of Israel that are among them.
11 Say, I am your sign: like as I have done, so shall it be done unto them: they shall remove and go into captivity.
12 And the prince that is among them shall bear upon his shoulder in the twilight, and shall go forth: they shall dig through the wall to carry out thereby: he shall cover his face, that he see not the ground with his eyes.
13 My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare: and I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.
14 And I will scatter toward every wind all that are about him to help him, and all his bands; and I will draw out the sword after them.
15 And they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall scatter them among the nations, and disperse them in the countries.
16 But I will leave a few men of them from the sword, from the famine, and from the pestilence; that they may declare all their abominations among the heathen whither they come; and they shall know that I am the LORD.

(8-9) The following morning Ezekiel receives further communication from YHWH in the form of a negative question: ‘hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?’ Ezekiel’s strange behaviour has caught the attention of his fellow-exiles who have asked about it. This presents an opportunity for him to explain the significance of his symbolic act.

(10-11) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to give the explanation in the form of an authoritative prophetic message. It begins with ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ followed by a summary statement of the point of the drama. It is a message of impending disaster both for King Zedekiah and for all who remain with him in Jerusalem. Ezekiel uses ‘house of Israel’ in two different senses. Note that v.9 refers to the ‘house of Israel’ in Babylonia (cp. 11:15) and v.10 to the ‘house of Israel’ in Judah.

King Zedekiah of Judah is not mentioned by name but it is obvious that he is the person referred to. He is not called ‘the king’ (meleḵ) but ‘the prince’ (or chief). The Hebrew word for ‘prince’ is nasi.’ Many commentators point out that there is word play here on ‘prince’ (nasi) and ‘burden’ (maśśā). Greenberg (1983, p. 211) comments ‘The chief is this burden. Hebrew hannaśi hammaśśa hazze; this alliterative phrase is patterned after Jer 23:33.’ As well as a play on sound there seems also to be a pun on meaning. Ezekiel’s ‘burden’ was lifted up and borne on his shoulder, the term ‘prince’ refers to someone who is elevated or lifted up.

Some take ‘burden’ here to mean a threatening message, the word is used in that sense by other Old Testament prophets, but it only occurs here in Ezekiel and in the context must refer to the bag containing Ezekiel’s ‘stuff’ (v.4). Greenberg (1983, p. 212) explains: ‘The meaning of the sentence is: this burden – the exile’s pack – represents the chief and the Israelites of Jerusalem; they will be taken out of the city into exile. Two things are unexpected: the reference to two subjects, the chief (king) and the people, and the symbolic character of the exile’s pack (maśśā is linked to naśa ‘al katef “carry [the pack] on the shoulder” in vss.6f….’

Ezekiel’s message is that Zedekiah and his subjects will be carried into exile. Ezekiel himself is a ‘sign’ in that his actions represented the destiny and fate of King Zedekiah of Judah and the people of Judah. Note that the thought of Ezekiel as a sign reappears in 24:18-27 where he is forbidden to formally mourn the death of his wife; symbolising YHWH’s refusal to grieve for Jerusalem at the time of its destruction (24:24).

(12-14) Returning to the subject of the prince Ezekiel expands on his symbolic action. He predicts in detail Zedekiah’s flight from Jerusalem by night with his pack upon his shoulder and his eyes covered; probably to avoid recognition – but perhaps this also symbolises shame (cp. Jer 9:19).

Ezekiel predicts additional details that do not feature in his drama: Zedekiah will be pursued, apprehended, blinded and taken into captivity in Babylon. His supporters and troops will scatter in all directions and be pursued by the Babylonian forces. YHWH claims responsibility for these forthcoming events, saying (v.13) that Zedekiah will be metaphorically caught in his snare and trap.

The literal fulfilment of Ezekiel’s specific and accurate predictions is recorded in 2 Kgs 25:1-7; Jer 39:1-7; 52:1-11. These passages tell us that Zedekiah fled Jerusalem at night through a gap between  two walls, was captured by the Babylonians near Jericho and taken to Riblah to meet Nebuchadnezzar. As punishment for his revolt Nebuchadnezzar had Zedekiah watch the murder of his family before blinding him and transporting him to Babylon.

The abovementioned accounts (e.g. Jer 39:7) explain the riddle or apparent enigma in Ezek 12:13: ‘I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.’ Zedekiah would be blinded before being transported to Babylon.

King Zedekiah himself may have been aware of this prophecy but failed to appreciate its significance. According to the first century CE historian Flavius Josephus, in his work ‘Antiquities of the Jews,’ Ezekiel wrote down this prophecy and sent a copy to King Hezekiah. He compared the prophecies of Jeremiah and Ezekiel and reckoned that these contradicted one another. He therefore decided not to believe either of them.

Josephus, living more than 600 years after this event, is the only source of this interesting but possibly unreliable piece of information:

Now as to Zedekiah himself, while he heard the prophet [Jeremiah] speak, he believed him, and agreed to every thing as true, and supposed it was for his advantage; but then his friends perverted him, and dissuaded him from what the prophet advised, and obliged him to do what they pleased. Ezekiel also foretold in Babylon what calamities were coming upon the people, which when he heard, he sent accounts of them unto Jerusalem. But Zedekiah did not believe their prophecies, for the reason following: It happened that the two prophets agreed with one another in what they said as in all other things, that the city should be taken, and Zedekiah himself should be taken captive; but Ezekiel disagreed with him, and said that Zedekiah should not see Babylon, while Jeremiah said to him, that the king of Babylon should carry him away thither in bonds….

For background it is worth reading all of chapter 7 in Book X of Josephus’ ‘Antiquities of the Jews’ (Ant. X. 7. 2)

(15-16) Now the prophet raises a faint note of hope with the mention of a ‘a few men’ of Judah (the remnant) who will be spared for the purpose of testifying to YHWH’s sovereignty. These people will recognise that it is their own idolatry that has brought the judgment upon them.

THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED (17-20)

17 Moreover the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
18 Son of man, eat thy bread with quaking, and drink thy water with trembling and with carefulness;
19 And say unto the people of the land, Thus saith the Lord GOD of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and of the land of Israel; They shall eat their bread with carefulness, and drink their water with astonishment, that her land may be desolate from all that is therein, because of the violence of all them that dwell therein.
20 And the cities that are inhabited shall be laid waste, and the land shall be desolate; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

(17-20) Ezekiel receives a further communication directly from YHWH, instructing him to perform another symbolic action. He is to eat his food and drink water in a manner that portrays fear and anxiety. By shaking and trembling as he eats and drinks Ezekiel will visually convey the fear that the people of Judah will experience during the siege of Jerusalem. His actions will symbolise the people’s anxiety and deep distress in the face of that calamity. This prophetic sign suggests that even basic tasks like eating and drinking will be carried out with fear.

Ezekiel is to impart this message to ‘the people of the land,’ here a reference to the exiles who are with Ezekiel in Babylonia. It is about Jerusalem and the land of Israel. It is especially about those who live in Jerusalem and in ‘her land’ i.e. the territory surrounding the city, since they would be the ones enduring the siege and destruction first-hand.

Vv. 19b and 20 further explain Ezekiel’s symbolic act. The word translated ‘carefulness’ used with reference to how they will drink their water (v.19) and how they will eat their food (v.20) means ‘anxiety.’ It also occurs in 4:16 where in the context the anxiety is about running out of food. That fear of scarcity and famine that will be experienced during the siege seems to be in view here too.

The people of Jerusalem and Judah will also feel terror because their towns will be laid waste and the land will be stripped of everything. The Babylonians will pursue a scorched-earth policy; they will leave no people, animals, crops or infrastructure. There will be total devastation. The reason for this is once again said to be the unrestrained violence of the people of Judah (7:11, 23; 8:17).

As has already been said in v.16, the purpose of the desolation is so that the people will recognise the authority and sovereignty of YHWH – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED (21-28)

21 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
22 Son of man, what is that proverb that ye have in the land of Israel, saying, The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth?
23 Tell them therefore, Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will make this proverb to cease, and they shall no more use it as a proverb in Israel; but say unto them, The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.
24 For there shall be no more any vain vision nor flattering divination within the house of Israel.
25 For I am the LORD: I will speak, and the word that I shall speak shall come to pass; it shall be no more prolonged: for in your days, O rebellious house, will I say the word, and will perform it, saith the Lord GOD.
26 Again the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
27 Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.
28 Therefore say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; There shall none of my words be prolonged any more, but the word which I have spoken shall be done, saith the Lord GOD.

(21-25) Verses 21-28 address the people’s doubt and scepticism that Ezekiel’s prophecies will be fulfilled.

Ezekiel receives a new message from YHWH which is introduced by the usual formula ‘the word of the LORD came unto me, saying.’  As elsewhere, Ezekiel is addressed as ‘Son of man’ then YHWH highlights a saying that was popular in the land of Israel. This proverb (māšāl) mocks the prophets and reflects a general belief that the judgment they predict will never come to pass: ‘The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth’ (Cp. Ecc 8:11; 2 Pet 3:3-4). Despite the passing of time none of their prophecies of doom have come to fruition.

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to inform the Israelites that he will cause this proverb to cease – because the course of events will prove the proverb wrong. In fact it will be replaced by a new proverb: ‘The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.’ i.e. the time is not far off and every vision will come to pass.

In addition, all false prophecies that flatter the people of Israel will cease. They are described as ‘vain visions and smooth divinations.’ These prophecies obtained through occult practices are by false prophets who flatter the people by predicting peace, security and the return of the Jehoiachin exiles from Babylon (for an example of this read Jer 28:1-17).

The coming judgment will expose their deceptive lies and bring their false assurances to an end. True predictions by genuine prophets of YHWH like Jeremiah and Ezekiel will come to pass but those expressed by the false prophets will fail. (Note that false prophecy is the subject of the next chapter -Ezekiel 13.)

In v.25 YHWH asserts his sovereign right to speak (declare judgment). Unlike the false prophets his words are truth and will be fulfilled soon. Through Ezekiel he declares that the judgment will come upon the current generation – ‘in your days.’ Once again he describes them as a ‘rebellious house’ (12:2, 3, 9, 25).

(26-28) Another communication from YHWH to Ezekiel is introduced by ‘the word of the Lord came to me saying.’ The prophecy that follows is similar but slightly different to that in the previous segment. Verses 20-25 relate to a proverb that denies that the prophecies of judgment would ever be fulfilled. In verses 26-28, however, YHWH quotes another proverb (‘they of the house of Israel say’) which promotes the equally erroneous view that that Ezekiel’s prophecies may well be fulfilled, but not for a very long time (‘the vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.’). YHWH, however, confirms that Ezekiel’s prophecies will  be fulfilled soon.

SUMMATION

This chapter underscores the certainty of YHWH’s judgment. In it Ezekiel enacts the flight of a refugee. This sign-act is explained as predicting the attempted escape of King Zedekiah, and others, from Jerusalem. Ezekiel then enacts another drama, demonstrating the terror that the Jerusalemites will experience while the city is under siege. The remainder of the chapter addresses the apparent failure of Ezekiel’s visions of destruction. YHWH says that those prophecies will soon be fulfilled. Ezekiel is not a false prophet, his predictions will certainly come to pass.