Category: Exposition

Posted in Exposition

THE APOSTLE THOMAS: A JOURNEY FROM DOUBT TO FAITH

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: John 20:19-29

Introduction

Whenever we think of the group of disciples surrounding Jesus, some figures stand out prominently, while others linger in the background. Among the latter is Thomas, often remembered as the quintessential doubter, unwilling to accept anything without tangible proof. The well-known proverbial expression ‘Doubting Thomas’ refers to the story in chapter 20 of the Fourth Gospel.  His experience, recorded in John 20:19-29, sheds light on the journey from doubt to deep faith.

Nothing is known about Thomas’ early life or of his call to follow Jesus as a full-time disciple. That he went fishing on the Sea of Galilee with six of the other disciples (Jn 21:2) has given rise to speculation that he was a fisherman by trade. The name Thomas means ‘twin’ in Aramaic and he was also called by the nickname ‘Didymus’ which in Greek also means ‘twin.’ We have no idea who his brother or sister was but it has been suggested that Matthew might have been his twin because their names appear together in the lists of Jesus’s disciples in the synoptic gospels (Mt 10:3; Mk 3:18; Lk 6:15). Thomas is also mentioned in Acts 1:3 as one of the disciples in the upper room on the day of Pentecost. However, it is the Gospel of John that documents Thomas’s encounters with Jesus (11:16; 14:5; 20:19-29). The words spoken by Thomas in all of these episodes are significant but it is the incident in John 20:19-29 that occupies our attention now.

Background to the event

This event unfolded on the first Sunday after Jesus’s crucifixion. The disciples, gripped by fear, gathered behind closed doors, reeling from the recent tumultuous events. There was much to discuss because not only had their master been taken away and executed but also several of their number maintained that Jesus had risen again from the dead and their friend Mary Magdalene had told them that she had already seen and spoken to Jesus (20:18). Two of their usual number were not there. None of the disciples expected Judas to be with them but Thomas was conspicuously absent. As a result he missed the transformative encounter with the resurrected Christ.

Then came Jesus (v.19)

Amidst the disciples’ discussions, Jesus appears, offering peace and revealing his wounds. They were delighted to see him alive. The narrator observes in v.20: ‘then were the disciples glad, when they saw the Lord.’ This joyful comment, however, is soon followed by what seems to me one of the saddest and most poignant verses in the Bible:

But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. (20:24)

Thomas was not with them when Jesus came

We are not told why Thomas was absent that Sunday evening. He may have been too frightened to come or perhaps had some other pressing business to attend to. Certainly he must have thought that he had a good reason for not attending but because he was not there that night he missed seeing the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ. His absence had a cause but it also had a cost.

Thomas missed the Lord’s presence. – v.19 ‘then came Jesus and stood in the midst.’

Thomas missed the Lord’s power. – v.19 ‘when the doors were shut……came Jesus.’

Thomas missed the Lord’s peace. – v.19 ‘peace be unto you.’

Thomas missed the Lord’s provision. – v.22b-23 ‘receive ye the Holy Ghost…..’

He missed the tangible presence, power, peace and provision of the Lord; therefore relegating himself to a week of needless doubt and discouragement.

I will not believe

The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the Lord. But he said unto them, Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe. John 20:25

The other disciples were so joyful at seeing the risen Lord that they could not keep the good news to themselves. When they informed him about the sighting of Jesus, Thomas demanded empirical evidence to assuage his doubts – evidence that he would have seen had he gathered with the other disciples the previous Sunday evening – and remained adamant that without it he would not believe.

Then came Jesus (v.26)

A week later the disciples met once again, this time with Thomas present. Jesus appeared once more among them even though the doors were shut; thus displaying the ability of his resurrection body to transcend physical barriers. This second appearance seems to have been mainly for the benefit of Thomas. How compassionate of the Lord to understand Thomas’s doubt and encourage him to have faith! How comforting to realize that he extends this same patience to those of us today who might struggle with doubt, while simultaneously asking us to move beyond that into belief! Jesus addressed Thomas directly, inviting him to touch his wounds, thus bridging the chasm of doubt with tangible proof. He then challenged Thomas to ‘be not faithless, but believing.’

My Lord and my God.   

There is no suggestion in the passage that Thomas actually took up this invitation to touch the healing wounds of Calvary. Note that the author’s focus on the wounds emphasizes to us how much Jesus loved us and was prepared to suffer on our behalf. Those wounds had been prophesied by the prophet Isaiah many centuries before they were inflicted:

He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. Isa 53:3-5

Thomas did not need to touch the wounds. He had sight of the crucified and resurrected Saviour; all the evidence he needed was standing before him. Convinced and convicted by this encounter Thomas uttered a profound declaration of faith: ‘My Lord and my God!’ In one short exclamation he affirmed the deity of Jesus Christ and acknowledged his lordship. With his faith transcending scepticism to embrace divine truth and with his doubts forever settled Thomas committed himself to the service of his Lord.

What is the relevance of this story to us today? It is that Jesus acknowledged Thomas’s faith but he also pronounced a blessing on those who, without the benefit of first-hand evidence, would transfer from doubt to belief by faith; that is, taking God at his word and relying on his promises; hence us.

Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Heb 11:1

Summation

The narrative of Thomas’s faith journey resonates with contemporary seekers grappling with doubts and uncertainties. Jesus’s response to Thomas exemplifies patience and understanding, encouraging faith amidst scepticism. If you are plagued with doubts, fears or sin I trust that you will be able to overcome your problems by getting a sight of the risen Christ. Like Thomas, may you move beyond doubt to embrace the profound truth of Christ’s divinity and lordship and experience the peace that only he can bestow. Be not faithless, but believing!

Perhaps at times you see something of yourself in Thomas; feeling alone, troubled, doubting and no longer active in the service of the Lord. You may have neglected attendance at the regular meetings of the church, even on a Sunday, as Thomas did. If so, there is much that you have missed; including Jesus, – for he is there:

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. Matthew 18:20

Ancient tradition holds that Thomas became a missionary, spreading the Gospel to distant lands. He went east, first evangelizing Parthia and then on to India where eventually he was martyred (see; Eusebius of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History 3, 1; Acts of Thomas 1-2 and 17ff). Thomas willingly died for that which he once doubted.

Thomas’s journey from doubt to faith serves as a beacon for us today, convincing us to draw closer to the Lord Jesus Christ, to relinquish our issues, fears and doubts in his presence and receive his peace.

Doubt sees the obstacles…..Faith sees the way,

Doubt sees the darkest night…….Faith sees the day,

Doubt dreads to take a step…….Faith soars on high,

Doubt questions ‘Who believes?’……Faith answers ‘I’.

Let us boldly declare that we believe; echoing Thomas’s resounding affirmation of faith in the risen Christ: ‘my Lord and my God!’

Posted in Exposition

FOUR SYMBOLIC ACTS IN EZEKIEL 4:1-5:4

Posted on by writtenexposition

The Siege of Jerusalem: Contextual Background

Ezekiel chapter 4:1-5:4 is a continuation of the spirit’s speech to Ezekiel which commenced in 3:24. In it he receives instructions concerning his first messages to his fellow exiles in Babylon. He is to enact four dramatic performances which together represent YHWH’s judgement that is soon to come upon Judah. The drama relates to its capital city Jerusalem and the consequences of the forthcoming siege of the city by Nebuchadnezzar II.

At that time, of course, Ezekiel’s fellow exiles did not expect anything like that to happen. These prophecies are delivered by Ezekiel early in the period commencing with his call to the prophetic ministry (c. 593 BCE) and ending with the fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE). In 597 BCE Nebuchadnezzar had deposed Jehoiachin of Judah and exiled him along with ten thousand of his subjects (2 Kgs 24:8-16), including Ezekiel (1:1-3). He then installed Jehoiachin’s uncle Zedekiah as a puppet king. With this relatively stable government in Judah the exiles were doubtless looking forward to a soon return to their homeland. They could not have known then that Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24-25; 2 Chron 36; Jer 3) would cast off his allegiance to the Babylonians; provoking a violent response by Nebuchadnezzar. In order to quell the revolt by his Judaean vassal Nebuchadnezzar marched to Riblah in Syria where he established campaign headquarters (2 Kgs 25:6, 20; Jer 39:5; 52:9, 26). From that base his army invaded Judah and destroyed its fortified towns (Jer 44:2) before besieging Jerusalem in the ninth year of Zedekiah. Eventually, after a two and a half year siege, the city fell to the Babylonians in 586 BCE. Zedekiah’s family and the nobles of Jerusalem were executed, after which Zedekiah himself was blinded and transported to Babylon as a prisoner of war (2 Kgs 25:6-7).

Ezekiel’s dramatic performances feature:

4:1-3 A model of a siege – representing the siege of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A number of days spent lying on his left and right sides – representing the duration of judgement .

4:9-17 Consumption of small amounts of bread and water – representing a famine in Jerusalem.

5:1-4 A haircut and shave – representing the fate of Israel.

Some scholars are of the opinion that because Ezekiel does not explicitly state ‘I did this’ for each drama he may have just described the details of his vision to the people without physically acting out these scenarios. However, I take that Ezekiel literally carried out YHWH’s instructions since 4:12 makes it clear that the bread was to be baked in the sight of the people. In addition, impressive symbolic actions by Israel’s prophets were not unusual in that era (1 Kgs 11:30, 22:11; 2 Kgs 13:17; Isa 20:2-4; Jer 13:1-11, 19:1-10).

4:1-3 A MODEL OF A SIEGE

Ezekiel, once again addressed as ‘thou, son of man,’ is instructed to get a (clay) brick, set it before him, and inscribe a diagram of Jerusalem on it. He is then to impersonate the Babylonians by enacting a siege of the city. In practice, Ezekiel may have depicted siege warfare by drawing but the verbs (lay, build, cast, set, take) suggest it is more likely that he made little models and moved them towards his clay brick. These models were of:

a fort – siege works or a tower, manned by archers and slingers (2 Kgs 25:1).

a mount – mounds or ramps constructed of debris (earth, wood, stone) which were built against the walls of a besieged city. Siege towers and battering rams could be pushed up these ramps and from them attack troops could scale the walls using siege ladders. They would then fight their way to the city gates and open them.

a camp – living quarters of an army contingent. As well as fighting men this would have included sappers (who tunnelled under the walls to collapse them) and siege engineers.

battering rams – these wheeled vehicles had a heavy ram suspended from the roof by ropes, one of its ends being a large metal blade. The operators repeatedly slammed this into city gates and walls in order to breach them. These prefabricated machines were generally transported flat pack and assembled on site.

From the details in these three verses one can easily imagine the noise, mayhem and devastation of ancient siege warfare. Men shouting, rams battering, slingers and archers from both sides raining down stones and arrows at one another, the defenders throwing down flaming torches to set the attacking war engines and troops alight. Ezekiel’s enactment of such a siege that would soon be experienced by Jerusalem must have shocked his fellow countrymen.

Ezekiel was also to set up a flat iron pan or griddle between him and his model of the city and glare (‘direct your face forward’) at it. This obstruction probably represented the barrier between YHWH and the house of Israel and the stare represented God’s angry intentions towards Jerusalem. The visual demonstration of a siege serves as a prophetic ‘sign’ to the house of Israel of the impending destruction of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A NUMBER OF DAYS SPENT LYING ON HIS LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES

Ezekiel is then commanded to lie on his left and right sides for a specific number of days, symbolically bearing the sin of the people of Israel. Each day probably represents a year of punishment for Israel’s iniquity. This act serves as a vivid illustration of the consequences of Israel’s rebellion against God.

Having impersonated the Babylonians in the first episode Ezekiel now has to play the part of Israel. He is instructed to lie on his left side for 390 days and after that lie on his right side for 40 days. The first period relates to the ‘house of Israel,’ the second to the ‘house of Judah. Ezekiel is told that each day represents one year (vv. 5-6).

Apparently in the Ancient Near East directions were indicated from a position facing east. North (the northern kingdom of Israel) was therefore on the left side and South (the southern kingdom of Judah) on the right. Another example of this in Ezekiel is 16:46: ‘And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters that dwell at thy left hand: and thy younger sister, that dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters.’

Concerning the years, we have no idea what dates are referred to. In fact, even the number of years for the house of Israel is unclear for although the Hebrew Masoretic text reads 390 years the Greek LXX says 190 years. Scholars and commentators have fertile imaginations and many ingenious suggestions have been put forward.

Since 390+40=430 (the period of time spent by the children of Israel in Egypt) some see this as symbolic of years of oppression or wilderness experience for Israel. See also Ex12:40 and Gal 3:17.

There is some disagreement as to whether the days represent years of sin or the years of punishment for sin. The first would look back to years of iniquity, the other point forward to years of judgement. Basing their opinion on v.9b some commentators maintain that the 390 years and the 40 years run concurrently, although v.6 says ‘when thou hast accomplished them (390), lie again (40)…’ which strongly suggests that they are consecutive.

There also seems to be no agreement on a terminus a quo (start date). For the 390 years of iniquity a popular choice is the period from the the division of Israel in 931 BCE to the fall of Babylon in 539 BCE. Others think that the period is 390 years from the construction of Solomon’s temple in the tenth century BCE. A valid point made by several commentators is that the dates in the book of Ezekiel are based on the deportation of Jehoiachin in 597 BCE, on this basis they speculate that the 390 and 40 years of punishment run consecutively from then until the Maccabean Revolt in 167 BCE.

As regards the 40 year period of Judah’s iniquity some say it began during the reign of King Josiah (640 -609 BCE) and ended with the Fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE), others that it commenced during the long (2 Kgs 21:1), evil (2 Kgs 21:10-16; 23:26-27) reign of Manasseh (lived c. 697-642 BCE).

A few of the commentators I have read give the 430 years a future application, maintaining that because the northern tribes would not have received Ezekiel’s prophecy then these days have yet to be fulfilled. They assert that Ezekiel is portraying judgement that will fall on all Israel (5:4). This, in their view, will occur at the end of the age.

It therefore seems that this is to be a long drawn out drama. Ezekiel is to lie first on his left side for 390 days and then on his right for 40 days ‘to bear the iniquity’ of the house of Israel and the house of Judah. This bearing of the nation’s iniquity is not vicarious but rather Ezekiel’s period of suffering and discomfort symbolizes the pain that Israel will endure at the hands of the Babylonians. During this display YHWH will ‘put ropes on’ Ezekiel, perhaps inflicting him with some kind of temporary paralysis, in order to prevent him from turning from one side to the other.

Again (v.7) Ezekiel is instructed to stare/glare at his siege model while he is lying on his side with his arm uncovered (see v.4). This may symbolize an unimpeded warrior ready for battle (cp. Isa 52:10). He is also to prophesy against Jerusalem. Perhaps, however, there is one crumb of hope in Ezekiel’s message in that the judgement is for a set period and will one day come to an end.

Possibly Ezekiel did not lie immobile 24-7 but just lay for several hours per day as the passage represents him carrying out other activities like enacting the siege, baking bread, drinking water, shaving etc.

4:9-17 CONSUMPTION OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF BREAD AND WATER

In these verses Ezekiel is instructed to eat a specific ration of food, prepared from a mixture of grains and legumes. This is limited by weight and represents the scarcity of food that the people of Jerusalem would experience during a siege. This action demonstrates the severity of the impending judgment upon Israel.

He is directed to mix flour from six types of grain in one vessel and prepare enough bread to eat ‘ from time to time’ (v.10, i.e. at a set time each day) during the 390 day period that he would lie on one side or the other. These grains are: wheat, barley, beans (see also 2 Sam 17:28), lentils, millet and fitches (a species of wheat). This unusual mixture of cereals was to be baked in full view of his fellow exiles (v.12), using human excrement as fuel. The amount of Ezekiel’s daily allocation of this disgusting food is 20 (Babylonian) shekels – approximately 8 ounces or 227 grams – and his intake of water is restricted to one sixth of a hin – about 0.6 litres. That the quantities are to be precisely measured out (cp. Lev 26:26) emphasizes that these are starvation rations. Ezekiel’s general state of health will deteriorate on such an unbalanced diet. The main point of this symbolic action is that siege, starvation and famine will soon be the lot of the residents of Jerusalem. There will be a shortage of food and water therefore rationing will apply (vv.16-17). Rationing is described in Isa 30:20 as ‘the bread of adversity and the water of affliction’ (see also 1 Kgs 22:27).

Ezekiel is instructed to eat the bread ‘as barley cakes.’ The idea seems to be that of eating them with enjoyment or enthusiasm thus suggesting that during the siege of Jerusalem people will be delighted to have something to eat, even if it is polluted.

In verse 13 the Lord says ‘thus shall the children of Israel eat defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them’ (for YHWH driving the Israelites out see Jer 8:3; 16:15; 24:9; 27:10,15), Ezekiel’s starvation diet teaches his fellow Israelites a double lesson: it predicts the forthcoming siege of Jerusalem and also the defilement of the exile that would follow it. The may mean that the food they will eat abroad is defiled since it will not be slaughtered, produced, handled and prepared in accordance with the dietary laws in the Torah. It could also mean that they will be defiled by adopting heathen manners and customs during the Exile (cp. Hos 9:3-4 for a similar sentiment).

Even though Ezekiel was receiving these directions while in a prophetic trance his priestly upbringing seems to have automatically triggered an immediate protest at the instructions concerning the bread. That his problem concerns the use of human excrement as fuel is clear from YHWH’s response in v.15: ‘Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.’ Bread baked over dried cow manure will still be defiled but perhaps to Ezekiel it seems a little less revolting. In any case, it will still sound disgusting and memorably make the point to his audience.

Ezekiel’s request for relief begins with a passionate outburst ‘Ah Lord God!’ and he goes on to explain that thus far his life has not been ‘polluted.’ One would think that Ezekiel’s objection is based on either the regulations concerning unlawful mixing (Lev 19:19; Deut 22:9) or on the strict rules about the disposal of human waste (Deut 23:12-14). However, he mentions neither of these but gives as his reason (‘for’ v.14) the fact that he had never done the following things:

  • Eaten an animal that died of itself (Lev 11:39; 17:15; 22:8; Deut 14:21, cp. Ezek 44:31).
  • Eaten an animal that was torn in pieces (Ex 22:31; Lev 22:8).
  • Eaten abominable flesh – this was meat left over from peace offerings and not eaten by the third day (Lev19:7).

These things bear no relation to baking bread over human excrement but Ezekiel seems to be asserting that he has kept all the dietary regulations since his youth, and cites these three cases in point. It is commendable that Ezekiel lived a blameless life before his prophetic call and that during his ministry his conscience was so sensitive that he instinctively wanted to live his life in obedience to God’s requirements. What a great lesson and example for us today!

After granting Ezekiel a concession on the fuel YHWH further declares: ‘Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem: and they shall eat bread by weight, and with care; and they shall drink water by measure, and with astonishment: That they may want bread and water, and be astonished one with another, and consume away for their iniquity.’ Ezekiel 4:16-17

‘staff of bread’ – means supply of bread, that which human beings depend on for survival. See also Lev 26:26; Psa 105:16; Isa 3:1; Ezek 5:16; 14:13. The siege of Jerusalem will result in the rationing of food and water. Bread will be doled out by weight and water by measure. The people will partake of their daily rations ‘with astonishment’ (extreme fear and apprehension) and will ‘consume away for their iniquity,’ i.e. they will waste away. Ezekiel uses this same expression three times when prophesying YHWH’s judgement (4:17; 24:23; 33:10).

This drama symbolizes and emphasizes the severity of the judgement that will befall Jerusalem. The scarcity of food and water will lead to desperation and despair among the people. This judgment is portrayed as a consequence of the people’s sin and disobedience.

5:1-4 A HAIRCUT AND SHAVE

Again addressing him as ‘Mortal’ YHWH reveals to Ezekiel details of the fourth drama that he must enact. He is to take a sharp knife and shave his head and beard. Using a knife as a razor is a powerful depiction of the judgement that will come upon the people of Jerusalem. The shaving of the head and beard was a sign of mourning (Isa 22:12; Jer 16:6) or disgrace (2 Sam 10:4; Mic 1:16) in ancient Near Eastern cultures and Israelites were forbidden by the law (Lev 19:27; 21:5; Deut 14:1) to practise this custom.

Using balances Ezekiel is to weigh and divide the hair that he has shaved off. This intimates that God is supervising the judgements (see 5:12; 6:12). Unlike the previous three dramas (chapter 4), in this case Ezekiel is to perform the symbolic actions AFTER the set number of days he has to lie on one side or the other (‘when the days of the (mock) siege are fulfilled,’ 5:2).

  • He is to burn one third of the hair ‘in the midst of the city,’ i.e. on his brick representing Jerusalem. This symbolizes the destruction of Jerusalem by fire and of its inhabitants by famine and pestilence (5:12).
  • He is to strike another third of the hair with a sword symbolizing that many people will suffer a violent death in battle.
  • He is to throw the remaining third to the winds, symbolizing the dispersion of the people of Judah.
  • He is to take a small number of the scattered hairs and bind them in the hem of his garment. He then has to take some of these and burn them in the fire. This indicates that even a remnant (symbolizing either those who survive the Babylonian invasion and siege or those who remain faithful to YHWH) will not be spared from God’s judgement but will find themselves in desperate circumstances. This action emphasizes the severity of the consequences of disobedience.

We now move into the next section which begins with an oracle against Jerusalem (5:5-17) in which YHWH explains the symbolism of the haircut and shave in 5:1-4.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted on by writtenexposition

Introduction

Ezekiel 3:16 begins with a standard prophetic word formula (c. 50 times) that will become familiar as we progress through the book: ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying.’ It next occurs at 6:1 which would suggest that that 3:16-5:17 is one unit. This unit consists of several addresses by YHWH to Ezekiel and also includes a couple of Ezekiel’s reactions/responses to YHWH’s words (3:16; 4:14).

3:16-21 The Watchman Parable

After a seven day period of stunned anticipation Ezekiel receives a message from the Lord informing him that he has been given the specific role of watchman to the house of Israel. The parable of Ezekiel as a watchman occurs in two chapters of the book (3:17-21 and 33:1-9) but falls into three parts:

Part 1 – Found only in chapter 33.

1 Again the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, speak to the children of thy people, and say unto them, When I bring the sword upon a land, if the people of the land take a man of their coasts, and set him for their watchman:
3 If when he seeth the sword come upon the land, he blow the trumpet, and warn the people;
4 Then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the sword come, and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head.
5 He heard the sound of the trumpet, and took not warning; his blood shall be upon him. But he that taketh warning shall deliver his soul.
6 But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand. Ezekiel 33:1-6

Part 2 – Found in both chapter 3 and chapter 33

16 And it came to pass at the end of seven days, that the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
17 Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.
18 When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.
20 Again, When a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul. Ezekiel 3:16-21 and also 33:7-9

PART 3 – Found only in chapter 3.

20 Again, When a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul. Ezekiel 3:20-21

In this article we shall only deal with material found in Ezekiel 3:16-21.

Speaking in the first person the Lord addresses Ezekiel not by name but as ‘mortal’ and makes him watchman for the house of Israel. In ancient times, a watchman patrolled the walls of a city (2 Sam 18:24-27; 2 Kgs 9:17-20) and was responsible for keeping guard and for alerting the citizens to approaching dangers. Similarly, Ezekiel is appointed by the Lord as a spiritual watchman for the ‘house of Israel.’ Whenever he hears a message from YHWH it is his responsibility to convey that message and warn the people about impending consequences (3:17).

The Weight of Prophetic Responsibility – Illustrating the Prophet’s Task as a Watchman and the Consequences of Silence

In vv.18-21 YHWH introduces the idea of prophetic responsibility and elaborates on the role of watchman by outlining various scenarios involving a word from the Lord (‘when I say’) and possible prophetic responses to it. It is notable that YHWH does not use military style language (Isa 21:6-8; Jer 6:17), which one might expect, when expanding upon the role of watchman but rather expresses himself in legal terms more appropriate to the courtroom. The language is that of a judge addressing ‘the wicked man’ (in the second person ‘you’) while pronouncing the death sentence upon him: ‘When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die’ (3:18).

Four cases are set out in two sets of two. The grammar is not quite parallel but the meaning is. In each of the two sets we have one example of the prophetic watchman not fulfilling his role and one example of him fulfilling that role, and the consequences of each.

Case 1 (3:18) The prophet is made aware that the death sentence has been passed but does not warn the wicked man. The consequences are two-fold: a) the wicked man will die in his sin. b) the prophet will be held responsible for the wicked man’s death, because he failed to warn him.

Case 2 (3:19) The prophet is made aware that the death sentence has been passed and does warn the wicked man, who does not turn from his sin. The consequences are two-fold: a) the wicked man will die in his sin. b) the life of the prophet will be preserved.

Case 3 (3:20) ‘The righteous man’ turns from his righteousness and commits iniquity and the prophet does not warn him. The consequences are two-fold: a) The man’s former righteousness will not be remembered so he will die in his sin. b) because he did not warn the man the prophet will be held responsible for his death.

Case 4 ((3:21) The prophet warns the righteous man not to sin and the righteous man does not sin. The consequences are two-fold: a) the righteous man will live. b) the prophet’s life is preserved.

In summary, Ezekiel 3:16-21 depicts the prophet’s role as a watchman, emphasizing the weighty responsibility of delivering God’s warnings and messages to the people. Ezekiel’s task as a watchman is to ensure that he communicates to the people exactly what he hears from YHWH. The warnings will be solemn. What Ezekiel will be announcing is a legal decision that has already been taken and will not be revoked.

3:22-27 EZEKIEL’S CONFINEMENT AND DUMBNESS

In 3:22-23 we have Ezekiel as narrator introducing a series of three messages from YHWH, all of which begin with the words: ‘And thou, o son of man’ (3:25; 4:1; 5:1). The first message (3:24b-27) reveals to him further information about the conduct of his ministry. The second (4:1-17) orders him to symbolically represent the siege of Jerusalem and in the third (5:1-17) he is told to symbolically represent the fate of the inhabitants after fall of the city.

A Valley Encounter: The Glory of YHWH Revisited – Ezekiel’s Solitude and the Renewal of Divine Encounter

Ezekiel records (vv.22-24) that he was told to leave the Israelites among whom he found himself and go out into the solitude of a valley, presumably near Tel-Abib (3:15). When he had complied with this instruction the glory of YHWH appeared to him just as it had in his inaugural vision by the river of Chebar (1:1-3:14).

Bound with Cords: The Symbolism of Confinement

Again (see 2:2) the spirit enters him and sets him on his feet, telling him that he is to go back to his house and remain shut up there. Using the ‘son of man’ formula the spirit proceeds to emphasize the strictness of this confinement using the imagery of being bound with cords. As a result Ezekiel will not be able to go out among the people, they will have to come to him (8:1; 14:1; 20:1; 33:30). Although the text says that ‘they’ will bind Ezekiel it is generally understood that the binding will be done by YHWH, especially in light of 4:8. It is not the action of the Israelites.

Silenced Tongue: Understanding the Impact of Muteness on the Prophet’s Role

In vv. 26-27 Ezekiel is informed that his tongue will cleave to the roof of his mouth with the result that he will be speechless except when YHWH commands him to speak. Even then he will only be able to say what YHWH wants him to say and must begin his messages with ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’ The purpose/result of Ezekiel’s dumbness is that he will not be ‘a reprover’ to rebellious Israel.’ What is meant by ‘one who chides,’ ‘one who rebukes’ (compare Prov 9:7; 24:25; 25:12; 28:23)?

Some suggest that the idea of a reprover here is a legal concept. To reprove may perhaps mean to conduct a legal case (Job 40:2), or to preside or arbitrate at a trial (Job 9:33 daysman) and thus ensure a fair hearing. Trials took place at the gate of a city, which is where the reprover would exercise his role (Isa 29:21; Amos 5:10). This view seems to fit well what we have said about vv.16b-21 where the role of the watchman is expressed in legal terms.

The legal dispute in view is therefore that between YHWH and Israel. Ezekiel is not permitted to become involved. He is confined to his house and cannot go out among the people or sit with the elders at the city gate. He cannot see what is going on and react to it but can only speak what he is told to say by YHWH. He is dumb and therefore cannot exercise a mediatorial role between YHWH and Israel. He cannot intercede for them because the trial is already over, No negotiation or dialogue is possible. Communication is only one way; from YHWH to Israel. The decision has been made and the verdict pronounced. Ezekiel’s role is to proclaim the coming judgement.

Ezekiel’s Silent Years

Three passages refer to the onset of Ezekiel’s dumbness and its removal (3:22-27; 24:25-27; 33:21-22). The chronology of the book of Ezekiel would indicate that the limitations of confinement and the state of silence imposed upon him by the Lord may have lasted from the time of his call (c. 593 BCE) for a period of about seven years; ending only the evening prior to Ezekiel hearing the news (from a refugee one year following the event i.e. 585 BCE) that his prophecies of judgment have been fulfilled by the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians (586 BCE).

21 And it came to pass in the twelfth year of our captivity, in the tenth month, in the fifth day of the month, that one that had escaped out of Jerusalem came unto me, saying, The city is smitten.
22 Now the hand of the LORD was upon me in the evening, before he that was escaped came; and had opened my mouth, until he came to me in the morning; and my mouth was opened, and I was no more dumb. Ezekiel 33:21-22

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

‘AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

Posted in Exposition

‘AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

Posted on by writtenexposition

EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1- 3:15

BACKGROUND

In chapter one Ezekiel has a vision of YHWH (Yahweh – the Lord) coming from the direction of the north in a storm cloud, borne along by a strange chariot composed of four living creatures and with wheels which travelled in all directions at once. Above the living creatures is a crystal dome upon which he sees YHWH in human form sitting upon a throne, surrounded by a brightness resembling a rainbow. Overcome by this sight of ‘the glory of YHWH’ Ezekiel falls upon his face and hears a voice speaking to him.

In 2:1- 3:15 Ezekiel reports the speech in which YHWH calls him to be a prophet, authorised to speak on YHWH’s behalf. The speech divides into five sections, all of which are introduced with the formula ‘and he said to me.’

2:1-2 ‘And he said to me‘- Ezekiel is commanded to stand.

Ezekiel receives a direct command from YHWH to stand on his feet; signifying a readiness to receive the message that the Lord is about to communicate to him. YHWH addresses him as ‘son of man’ (son of Adam; son of a human). ‘Son of’ denotes membership of a particular class; e.g. ‘prophet’s son’ in Amos 7:14. In Ezekiel this form of address is used only by YHWH and is a key phrase in the book. Referring to Ezekiel as ‘mortal’ or ‘human being’ emphasizes his weakness and insignificance in light of the glory and majesty of YHWH that he is witnessing in the vision.

When YHWH speaks to him Ezekiel is set upon his feet by the ‘spirit.’ This again emphasizes Ezekiel’s weakness, he can do nothing apart from the power of God. In the call narrative the spirit lifts and set him on his feet (2:2), a hand holds out the scroll (2:9) and the Lord feeds him the scroll (3:2). Ezekiel’s only action, if one might call it that, is to eat the scroll (3:3). The Spirit entering into Ezekiel symbolizes divine transformation and empowerment, preparing him for the task ahead. As a prophet he will have to rely totally upon the Lord.

2:3-10 ‘And he said to me‘ – Ezekiel is sent to rebellious Israel.

God commissions Ezekiel as a prophet to the rebellious ‘sons of Israel.’ Although Ezekiel’s ministry would be to the people from Judah who were with him in exile yet throughout the book he often addresses Israel as a whole (the other tribes had already been exiled for more than 120 years) and characterizes them as rebellious. This is a reminder that misfortune befalls them because they have failed YHWH, not because YHWH has failed them.

The fact of YHWH’s displeasure is driven home by use of the word ‘nation’ (gôyim), also used for the heathen, pagan Gentile nations around (Ex 9:24; 34:10; Ezek 5:6-8). God does not say here that they are his people, in fact, in 3:11 he just refers to them as Ezekiel’s people (‘thy people’).

‘They and their fathers have transgressed against me…’ (2:3). Israel’s rebellious attitude can be traced back a long way. It was a characteristic their ancestors and could thus be almost viewed as hereditary. It is to these impudent (hard of face, obstinate) and stiffhearted (hard hearted) people that YHWH is sending Ezekiel. He is to tell them ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (2:4). This messenger formula is another key phrase in the book. The messages that Ezekiel delivers do not originate in his own mind but are directly from YHWH, delivered via Ezekiel acting as a conduit.

Since the people are rebellious they may refuse to listen to what Ezekiel says but whether or not they heed the message they ‘shall know that there hath been a prophet among them’ (2:5). That which Ezekiel predicts will come to pass.

Ezekiel is not to be afraid of these people who are characterized by harshness but is to be courageous in the face of opposition. The briers, thorns and scorpions (2:6) are usually viewed as describing the challenging and hostile environment in which Ezekiel will carry out his prophetic ministry (since the first two are plants it is likely that ‘scorpion’ also refers to a thorny plant, e.g. 1 Kgs 12:11). Ezekiel will be rejected and humiliated by the people. On the other hand, the idea may be that Ezekiel will be metaphorically surrounded by briers, thorns and scorpions, which will serve to protect him from the hostility of his fellow countrymen. Ezekiel is commanded to speak the Lord’s words boldly, regardless of whether the reaction is positive or negative (2:7).

In 2:8 Ezekiel is rather strangely exhorted not to be ‘rebellious like that rebellious house.’ Israel has been called ‘rebellious’ in vv. 5, 6 and 7 and now in v. 8 there is repetition of the word ‘rebellious.’ The focus is therefore on Israel’s rebelliousness; it is because of this that Ezekiel is being sent to them as a prophet. Ezekiel, however, is not to be like them, he is to open his mouth and eat whatever YHWH gives him. This command to eat is repeated in 3:1. Ezekiel at this stage has no idea what he is to eat.

In 2:9-10 Ezekiel sees a hand hold out a scroll which is then spread out before him so that he can glance at it. He notices that the writing covers both back and front of the scroll and that it contains ‘lamentations and mourning and woe.’ It would seem that the message written on it is one of judgement.

3:1-3 ‘And he said to me‘ - Ezekiel is commanded to eat the scroll.

YHWH repeats the command to Ezekiel to eat whatever he finds; that turns out to be the scroll, an inedible object. Fortunately for Ezekiel, he did not have to eat a physical scroll, this was happening in his trance-like state. Even at this point Ezekiel does not protest, in fact, he does not speak at all throughout the entire inaugural vision. Exercising unconditional obedience, he receives and consumes the scroll, symbolizing the word of God. He thus fills his ‘belly’ and ‘bowels’ (his innermost being) with it. The act of eating is also symbolic; it emphasizes the need for Ezekiel to fully digest, assimilate and comprehend YHWH’s message before sharing it with others.

Ezekiel reports that the scroll tastes as sweet as honey. The prophet Jeremiah (15:16) also reported that (metaphorically) feeding upon God’s word brought him joy: ‘Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.’ (See also Psa 19:10)

3:4-9 ‘And he said to me‘ - Ezekiel is formally commissioned as YHWH’s prophet to Israel.

Ezekiel is now commissioned to go and deliver God’s words to the house (family) of Israel. He is not to speak his own thoughts but to convey the divine message faithfully and accurately. His Israelite audience speaks the same language as him so communication ought to be fairly easy. The message, however, will meet with resistance and rejection. This is emphasized with a comparison. Were YHWH to send Ezekiel to many foreign nations which speak an unintelligible language (like the Babylonian overlords/invaders) they would readily receive the message, in contrast to rebellious Israel, who will reject it.

Unlike the other prophets Ezekiel is not sent with a message of hope that would enable Israel to repent and avoid judgement. He just has to deliver God’s words verbatim in spite of the fact that there will be no response. YHWH already knows (3:7) that the message will be rejected. Israel does not heed YHWH so they certainly will not heed Ezekiel. The success of Ezekiel’s ministry will not be measured by results but by his obedience in proclaiming what YHWH tells him to say.

Verses 8 and 9 return to the thought of Israel’s hardness already mentioned in 2:4. Israel is tough but YHWH will make Ezekiel equally tough. Verse 8 says he will be tough-browed; i.e. brazen (see Jer 3:3). Similarly in v. 9 Ezekiel’s brow will be like an adamant (unbreakable material) harder than flint; i.e. diamond (see Jer 17:1). Again Ezekiel is told not to be afraid and again Israel is described as a ‘rebellious house.’

3:10-11 ‘And he said to me‘ - Ezekiel is commanded to go to his fellow exiles

These verses sum up Ezekiel’s task. When Ezekiel hears all the words that the Lord will speak to him he is to lay them to heart and go and announce them to the exiles (‘them of the captivity’). All the other prophets of YHWH lived in the land of Israel and prophesied to the people there but Ezekiel is commissioned to directly address his fellow exiles; both he and they have been deported along with King Jehoiachin c. 597 BCE (1:2) and are now on foreign soil, far from the land of Israel. The message he has for them does not originate with him but comes from the Lord: ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’

3:12-15 Ezekiel describes his departure from YHWH’s presence and his arrival at Tel-Abib.

Ezekiel describes how that, still in his prophetic trance and experiencing the vision of God, the wind (or the Spirit of God) metaphorically (not physically, see 8:3; 11:1, 24) levitates and teleports him to Tel-Abib. That Ezekiel was still experiencing the vision is clear from his report that he heard the great rumbling sound (of an earthquake) and that the noise he heard was from the wings of the living creatures, the wheels, and the overall movement associated with the divine presence (3:13). The great rumbling sound which he hears symbolises the powerful presence of God. The declaration, “Blessed be the glory of the Lord from its place,” expresses praise for God’s majestic and glorious presence. Possibly it was sung by the cherubim.

Ezekiel describes his state of mind while he is carried away as ‘bitter.’ At what we are not told. He may have been bitter at the adamance of Israel or bitter because he has been called to be God’s spokesman to the people, with no likelihood of them paying attention to his message. In spite of his internal struggles he feels the strength of the Lord’s hand upon him, providing divine empowerment for his prophetic mission, . Jeremiah (Jer 15:17) seems to have have had a similar melancholy reaction to the grievous message he would announce.

Back in Tel-Abib (3:15) with the exiles Ezekiel says that he ‘sat where they sat.’ Sitting among them is a demonstration of Ezekiel’s identification with the people to whom he is sent, sharing in their experiences and challenges. Apparently he is so shocked and overwhelmed by the vision that he sits in stunned silence for seven days.

SUMMATION

In this section of the call narrative (2:1-3:15), Ezekiel receives a divine commission and is made aware of the difficulty of the task ahead. However, he receives assurance of God’s protection and empowerment. The stage is now set for Ezekiel’s prophetic ministry to the rebellious house of Israel.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

The Half-Shekel Ransom: Exodus 30:11-16

Posted on by writtenexposition

Introduction

Within the pages of Exodus, nestled among the divine instructions for the construction of the tabernacle, we come across a peculiar commandment concerning the census tax, or atonement money. 

This command lies in a block of chapters (25-31) in which the Lord directly addresses Moses and communicates the blueprint of the Tabernacle in a series of seven speeches. Each speech begins with the words: ‘and the Lord spoke unto Moses’ (25:1; 30:11; 30:17; 31:1; 31:12; 31:16; 31:18). Chapters 25-31 are prescriptive; that is, they lay down a set of instructions.

At the end of the book of Exodus there is another block of chapters (35-40) which are descriptive. They repeat more or less the same details contained in the prescriptive chapters. This is done in order to emphasize the meticulous adherence of the Israelites to the divine instructions for the construction of the Tabernacle; delivered to Moses on Mount Sinai. This latter descriptive section is characterized by the words: ‘as the Lord commanded Moses’ (39:1, 5, 7, 21, 26, 29, 31; 40:19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 32).

Sandwiched between the prescriptive section (25-31) and the descriptive section (35-40) is the account of Israel’s sin in worshipping the Golden Calf (32-34).

In Exodus 30, strangely placed between the instructions concerning the incense altar and the brass laver (basin), is the command to conduct a census.

Divine Directive

30:11: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,

This discourse marker introduces the instructions that follow and is a reminder of divine interest and guidance in human affairs.

Preventing Plague

30:12: When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel after their number, then shall they give every man a ransom for his soul unto the LORD, when thou numberest them; that there be no plague among them, when thou numberest them.

Moses (‘thou’ is singular) receives a command to take a census ; lit ‘when you lift up the head of the sons of Israel.’ Notice the emphasis on the idea of numbering, occurring four times in this verse. To ensure protection from plague (lit. ‘blow’) each eligible male counted was to pay a ransom for his life at the time of registration. Many commentators explain away the fear of plague (plague and census are also linked in 2 Sam 24) as a taboo or superstition, common among peoples in the ancient world, that a deity might easily become angry at a time of census. The reason is not explained here but I suspect there is much more to it than that.

Perhaps expiation or appeasement for the recent apostasy was necessary at the time of this census; expressed as a ‘ransom’ (a price paid in exchange for release) or as the related word ‘atonement’ (30:15-16). Somehow it seems significant that the two blocks of chapters about the Tabernacle referred to in the introduction above are connected by the story of the Golden Calf. This incident involving the worship of a representation of deity as a golden bull (32:8) violated the covenant almost as soon as it was ratified (20:3), almost scuppered the recently established relationship between the Lord and his people and nearly derailed the whole tabernacle project. The Lord was angry and would have destroyed the people but for three intercessions by Moses (32:11-14; 32:31-33:3; 33:12-17). Intercession was followed by repentance, forgiveness, covenant renewal and eventually the Lord’s presence among the people but there would still be punishment for the sin. Exactly what it would be and when it would fall was not revealed (32:34).

Half a Shekel

30:13:This they shall give, every one that passeth among them that are numbered, half a shekel after the shekel of the sanctuary: (a shekel is twenty gerahs:) an half shekel shall be the offering of the LORD.

Here, the prescribed amount of the ransom is revealed – half a shekel, according to the sanctuary shekel. It is thought that the sacred or holy shekel may have been heavier than a normal shekel and probably weighed about 12 grams. The shekel was not a coin but a unit of weight. This ransom payment was therefore about 6 grams in weight. The sanctuary shekel is further defined as being equivalent to twenty gerahs – another unit of weight that is thought to be Babylonian. We are not told here what was to be weighed out but from Exodus 38:25-26 we learn that the ransom was paid in silver. The total amount collected was 100 talents plus 1775 shekels. There were 3000 shekels in a talent so the total number of shekels was 301775. This represented a half-shekel per head given by 603550 men. At approximately 6 grams per half shekel the weight of silver given was just under 4 tonnes.

30:14: Every one that passeth among them that are numbered, from twenty years old and above, shall give an offering unto the LORD.

The census tax is required from all males who are twenty years old and above and this verse emphasizes that this offering is to the Lord. An offering was something that was lifted up in an act of dedication, elevated, i.e. a gift. This verse repeats ‘every one that passeth among them that are numbered’ from v.13. ‘Every one’ could refer to either male or female but in the Numbers 1 census those twenty years and above were males old enough to serve as soldiers. Perhaps we have here a practical hint as to how the census might be taken. Each man must have passed from one designated area to another, handing over a half-shekel at the point of registration.

Equal Offering, Equal Atonement

30:15:The rich shall not give more, and the poor shall not give less than half a shekel, when they give an offering unto the LORD, to make an atonement for your souls.

Regardless of one’s wealth, everyone is to give the same amount, emphasizing equality in the offering. The amount payable was not calculated on the basis of inheritance or income but was a poll tax, a fixed sum. Note the comparisons: ‘rich’ and ‘poor’, ‘more than’ and ‘less than.’ The purpose of the offering is to make atonement (‘covering over’ i.e. appeasement) for their lives.

Use of the atonement money

30:16: And thou shalt take the atonement money of the children of Israel, and shalt appoint it for the service of the tabernacle of the congregation; that it may be a memorial unto the children of Israel before the LORD, to make an atonement for your souls.

Moses was to take ‘the silver of coverings-over (plural)’ and use it for the service of the Tabernacle. In this context, as Ex 38:27-28 makes clear, ‘service’ refers to the construction of the Tabernacle, not its ongoing running costs. There we learn that the silver from this census was used to cast the bases of the sanctuary and the veil and to plate the tops of the pillars and make hooks for the pillars.

As part of the Tabernacle this silver becomes a tangible memorial, a constant remembrance either ‘of the people’ of Israel in the presence of the Lord, or a reminder ‘to the people’ that they belong to the Lord.

Frequency

In Exodus 30 the half-shekel ransom is presented as a one-time obligation on the part of the people of Israel. In later times, however, this command was used by the kings (2 Kgs 12:5-17; 2 Chron 24:4-14) and also by the Pharisees during the Second Temple period as the basis for imposing an annual temple tax upon the Jewish people (Mt 17:24).

Commentators, on the basis of the stated figures, tend to view this census in Exodus 30:11-16; 38:25-28 as the same one recorded in Numbers chapter 1. There is an argument for, but also one against, them being one and the same:

For: The figures do match. In Exodus 38:25-26 the weight of silver collected equalled a half shekel from 603550 men. In the Numbers 1 census the figures for fighting men from each of the Israelite tribes added up to 603550 (Num 1:46).

Against: The dates do not match. According to Num 1:1-2 the command from the Lord to conduct the Numbers 1 census came on day 1, month 2, year 2 after the exodus from Egypt. According to Ex 38:27-28 the silver from the Exodus 30 census was used in the construction of the Tabernacle. The Tabernacle, however, was erected on day 1, month 1, year 2 after the exodus (Ex 40:17). The Tabernacle had already been completed before the census of Numbers 1 took place.

Lessons for today

Although caution is advisable when dealing with texts which are set in the ancient world far removed from us and from our way of thinking nevertheless it is possible to extrapolate some principles from the half-shekel ransom which could be applied in gospel preaching today.

  • v.12 All are guilty Romans 3:23
  • v.12 ‘to the Lord.’ It is God who has been offended and must be appeased.
  • v.12 Refusal resulted in exclusion from the sanctuary and exposure to coming judgement.
  • v.13 The ransom price is set by God – a specific amount.
  • v.14 There are no exemptions. All who have reached a certain age are accountable.
  • v.14 Everyone who brings the ransom price is counted (Jn 10:14).
  • v.15 The price is the same for every person, all souls are of equal value in the eyes of God.
  • v.15 The ransom applies to all classes alike. Rank and possessions make no difference.
  • v.15 The ransom price is within the reach of all.
  • v.15 The ransom price is sufficient (Heb 10:14). Nothing can be added to it (nor can it be diminished).
  • v.16 The ransom serves as a memorial before the Lord.

The Septuagint (Greek Old Testament, LXX) translates the Hebrew word kōp̱er (ransom) in Ex 30:12 as lútron. This word occurs twice in the Greek New Testament (Mt 20:28; Mk 10:45), in each instance referring to the Lord Jesus Christ.

Posted in Exposition

GUARDIANS OF EDEN: THE MYSTERY OF THE CHERUBIM – Genesis 3:24

Posted on by writtenexposition

Introduction: Genesis as a Fundamental Pillar of Biblical Insight

Since it occupies first place in the canon of scripture, it almost goes without saying that a grasp of the book of Genesis is necessary for a proper understanding of the rest of the Bible. It is:

– a book of revelation – because the information in it has been revealed by God via transmission through Moses. Its contents are therefore fact and not fiction.

– a book of introduction (as its name indicates) – because it records how things began. Genesis mentions the beginning of such things as the universe, human beings, marriage, murder, music, agriculture, languages and the nations.

The book falls naturally into two parts: primaeval history and patriarchal history. Chapters 1-11 record four key events of global significance: The Creation, The Fall, The Flood and The Babel Crisis. The second part, chapters 12-50, concentrates on the life- stories of four key characters: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Joseph. Also within the book the family trees of ten significant individuals are given. Their records are introduced with the words ‘these are the generations of’:

Adam – 5:1; Noah – 6:9; Shem – 11:10 (10:1, 22); Ham – 10:1 (10:6); Japheth – 10:1 (10:2); Terah – 11:27; Ishmael – 25:12; Isaac – 25:19; Esau – 36:1l; Jacob – 37:2.

Background: Genesis 1-2 and the Duality of Creation Accounts

Genesis 1:1-2:3 records what is often referred to as the first account of creation. This section divides into three main episodes. The first two episodes together occupy six days, the third one day, the seventh. They are:

  • Gen 1:1-13 The creation of the inanimate world
  • Gen 1:14-31 The creation of living creatures; these occupy three spheres: sea, air and land.
  • Gen 2:1-3 God’s rest after his creative activity.

Chapter 2:4 begins what many scholars term the second account of creation. The reason for the idea that there are two accounts of creation is that each passage emphasizes a different name for God. Within Genesis 1:1-2:3 the name Elohim (trans. ‘God’) is used some thirty-five times. At the beginning of chapter two, however, there is a noticeable shift. In the second section YHWH Elohim (trans. ‘the Lord God’) is used, occurring twenty times within 2:4-3:24 . Whilst fully recognising this fact I think it unlikely that there are two accounts of creation. Chapter two simply continues with additional details of the creation of humanity on the sixth day; in other words, it is an expansion of 1:26-30. Genesis chapter two (along with chapter three) supplements chapter one.

The Paradise Narrative: Genesis Chapters 2 and 3

Genesis 2

Gen 2-4-7 – This section revisits the creation of man, emphasizing that Adam was created by God from the dust of the ground and that God breathed life into him.

Gen 2:8-14 – God plants a garden paradise called Eden into which he sets man. The garden is described as beautiful and abundant. It is watered by a river that flows through it; dividing into four streams. In the middle of the garden stand the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Gen 2: 15-17 – God gives Adam responsibility for tending the garden (2:15) and in 2:16-17 he personally addresses Adam instructing him not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. To do so will result in death.

Gen 2:18-25 – God declares that it is not good for man to be alone. God creates animals which are brought to Adam and named by him but no animal is suitable as a companion for Adam. God therefore creates woman (Eve) from one of Adam’s ribs. Adam recognises Eve as bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh.

Gen 2:24-25 – The chapter concludes with a statement about marriage. It declares that a man shall leave his parents, cleave to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. The final verse notes that the Adam and Eve are naked but not ashamed.

Genesis 3

This chapter describes the events surrounding what has become known as the Fall of Man.

Gen 3:1 – The cunning serpent engages in conversation with the woman and questions God’s instruction not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Gen 3:2-3 – Eve accepts the serpent’s insinuation (v.1) that God was being restrictive rather than generous and in her response to the serpent she both subtracts from God’s word (she omits the word ‘freely’) and adds to it (‘we cannot touch it’). You will recall that Revelation 22:18-19 contains prohibitions against adding to or taking away from the word of God.

Gen 3:4-5 The serpent (vv. 4-5) dismisses as untrue God’s warning that eating of the forbidden fruit would result in death and says that God has told the humans that in order to restrict their development. God does not want them to ‘know good and evil’. This expression seems to mean ‘have wisdom’ or ‘have the ability to understand’, ‘weigh up and discriminate’; for example: see Dt 1:39; 2 Sam 19:35; Isa 7:15-16 and Solomon’s prayer for understanding: Give therefore thy servant an understanding heart to judge thy people, that I may discern between good and bad: for who is able to judge this thy so great a people? 1 Kings 3:9

Gen 3:6 – The fall of humanity. Eve takes the fruit and eats it, then gives it to her husband, Adam, who also eats it.

Gen 3:7-19 These verses outline the results of disobedience. The man and the woman become aware of their nakedness and shame. They therefore sew fig leaves to cover themselves, and hide from God. God confronts them, and pronounces specific consequences that each party (the serpent, the woman, and the man) must face for their actions.

Gen 3:20-24 – In v.20 Adam names his wife Eve, meaning ‘living,’ signifying her role as the mother of all living. In v.21 God provides leather clothes for Adam and Eve before expelling them for the Garden of Eden in order to prevent them from eating from the tree of life and living forever in their fallen state. The entrance to the garden is blocked by cherubim and a flaming sword.

Unveiling Controversies and Posing Inquiries

Over the centuries Genesis 2 and 3 have been two of the most controversial and most discussed chapters of the Bible. A wide spectrum of opinion has been held and a variety of views put forward. Many believe that the events of Genesis 3 literally and physically happened as described, others maintain that the episode in Eden is myth or an allegory to explain sin and suffering, a few express an extreme view that the serpent is actually the hero of the story (since it ‘correctly’ predicted that the humans would not literally die the day they ate the forbidden fruit).

The Paradise Narrative raises many questions in the mind of the reader. These include:

  • How does one account for a talking animal (serpent)?
  • Where was Adam when Eve was having a conversation with the serpent?
  • Had Adam informed Eve about the prohibition? It had been given before she was created (2:16-17, 22).
  • Why did Adam not refuse to eat the fruit?
  • Why is no explanation given for the serpent wishing to bring about the catastrophe of the fall?
  • Why is there no further discussion of this episode in the Old Testament?
  • What does the passage mean by ‘life?’
  • What does the passage mean by ‘death?’
  • What does the passage mean by ‘day’ (2:17; 3:5)?
  • Are cherubim real or imaginary creatures?

The biblical passage does not address these questions.

Regardless of whatever view is held on the literalness or otherwise of the paradise story no-one can deny that, insofar as the biblical narrative is concerned, it marks a turning point in human history. The introduction of sin into the world disturbed the close relationship between God and human beings, disrupted the harmony of creation and introduced mortality, conflict, and suffering. The paradise narrative advances themes of good and evil, of original sin, human nature, free will, responsibility, separation from God and the hope of redemption. The consequences of the choice made by Adam and Eve and its impact on collective and individual destiny are subjects which everyone should ponder.

These themes are explored as the biblical revelation progresses but admittedly I find it strange that the fall of man does not feature in the rest of the Old Testament scriptures – with the possible exception of the following verses:

Job 31:33 (If I covered my transgressions as Adam, by hiding mine iniquity in my bosom),

Psa 51:5 (Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.)

Isa 43:27 (Thy first father hath sinned, and thy teachers have transgressed against me.)

Hos 6:7 (But they like men have transgressed the covenant: there have they dealt treacherously against me.) The word translated ‘men’ is ’āḏām, leading some to suppose an Adam covenant.

The paradise narrative is referred to in the following New Testament passages, most of which are in the writings of the apostle Paul.

  • John 8:44 The devil is the father of lying. He told Eve the first recorded lie ‘in the beginning’.
  • Rom 5:12-21- Death through a literal Adam, the federal head of humanity.
  • Rom 8:18-23 – Creation subjected to futility.
  • 1 Cor 11 – Headship applied to corporate worship. Paul’s argument is based on the creation order.
  • 1 Cor 14:34 Women/wives to keep silence in the church. Paul refers to the Old Testament statement that a woman ought to be to be submissive (Gen 3:16).2 Cor
  • 2 Cor 11:3 Paul refers to the deception of Eve by the serpent.
  • 1 Tim 2:13-14 Paul’s teaching regarding women in the church is based on the order of creation.

The Cherubim: Guardians Beyond the Boundaries of Eden

So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life. Genesis 3:24

In Genesis 3:24 we have the first appearance of cherubim. After the fall they are positioned at the east side of the Garden of Eden, along with the revolving flaming sword, to guard the path to the Tree of Life. It would seem that they are stationed there as boundary markers to prevent Adam and Eve, now expelled from the Garden, from returning and consuming the fruit, which would potentially grant them immortality in a state of sin. It is clear from the verse that their function was negative rather than positive. They were not there to point the way back to the Garden of Eden and the Tree of Life but to bar access to them.

The verse tells us hardly anything about these creatures but would indicate that they are animate beings whose primary function is to act as guardians. It does not specify the number of cherubim nor does it say what form they took or give a description of their appearance. However, their activity at the close of the story of the fall serves as a salutary reminder of the fateful consequences of human sin and disobedience.

Posted in Exposition

PHILEMON: LESSONS IN FORGIVENESS, RECONCILIATION, AND TRANSFORMATION

Posted on by writtenexposition

Introduction:

In the rich tapestry of the New Testament, the epistle to Philemon stands out as a concise yet deeply personal letter from the apostle Paul. Comprising only 25 verses, it focuses on a specific situation, making it distinct from more extensive New Testament works. Philemon is neither a theological treatise (like Romans) nor a general epistle (like James, 1 & 2 Peter, 1 & 2 & 3 John, Jude); it is a narrative woven with the threads of three main characters – Paul, Philemon, and Onesimus. It is interesting to delve into this brief yet profound letter to uncover the lessons it offers on forgiveness, reconciliation, and the transformative power of the Christian gospel.

Philemon: A Portrait of Riches, Refreshment, Righteousness, and Repute:

Philemon, a converted Gentile residing in Colossae, emerges as a figure of wealth and influence. A slave owner with a spacious home, he opened his doors to the Colossian church, embodying hospitality and leadership. The very name “Philemon,” meaning ‘affectionate’ or ‘kindly,’ resonates with the refreshing spirit attributed to him in the letter (v.7).

Moreover, Philemon is portrayed as a righteous man, saved through the ministry of the apostle Paul (v.19). His good reputation (he was held in high esteem by Paul) is evidenced by the expressions of love, prayers, generosity, and hospitality that permeate the letter (vv. 5, 7, 21, 22).

Onesimus: From Slavery to Salvation:

Contrasting with Philemon’s social standing, Onesimus enters the narrative as a slave – one of millions in the Roman Empire. The name “Onesimus,” meaning ‘useful,’ takes on a bitter irony, as he had defrauded his master, no doubt making him seemingly ‘useless’ in Philemon’s eyes (v.11).

Onesimus, however, undergoes a profound transformation. From a runaway slave who stole from his master, he becomes a faithful and beloved brother in Christ (Col 4:9), saved through his encounter with the apostle Paul.

Paul: Preacher, Prisoner, Peacemaker:

In the character of Paul, we see a relentless preacher of the gospel, undeterred by societal divisions. Whether addressing the wealthy Philemon or the lowly Onesimus, Paul recognizes the universal need for salvation.

Paul writes this letter from his first imprisonment in Rome (c. 60-62 CE), emphasizing his status as a prisoner throughout (vv. 1, 9, 10, 13, 23). A peacemaker at heart, Paul intervenes on behalf of Onesimus, seeking reconciliation between master and slave.

Background and Division of the Letter:

The letter to Philemon is part of the Prison Epistles (Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon), composed during Paul’s first Roman imprisonment, and sent from Rome to Philemon in Colossae.

The content of the letter is often divided into three sections: for example:

1-7 Paul’s praise for Philemon, 8-21 Paul’s plea for Onesimus, and 17-25 Paul’s plans for himself.

Or

1-7 Paul’s partnership in prayer, 8-16 Paul’s plea for a prodigal, 17-25 Paul’s promise of payment.

A more detailed breakdown into nine smaller units reveals the intricacies of Paul’s message.

1-3 THE GREETING

4-7 THE THANKSGIVING

8-10 THE APPEAL

11-13 ONESIMUS

14 PHILEMON’S AGREEMENT SOUGHT

15-17 PHILEMON & ONESIMUS (‘YOU’ & ‘HIM’)

18-19 PHILEMON’S DEBT TO PAUL

20-22 WHAT PHILEMON CAN DO FOR PAUL

23-25 CLOSING GREETINGS

Conclusion: Lessons in Forgiveness and Transformation:

Despite its brevity, the letter to Philemon holds significant lessons. It showcases forgiveness, reconciliation, and the transformative power of the gospel in the social context of the Roman Empire. Paul’s appeal to Philemon to receive Onesimus not as a slave but as a beloved brother subtly challenges the accepted norms of the time, offering a timeless example of Christian principles in action (Receive him v.12; Receive him forever v.15; Receive him as myself v.17.

Philemon, Onesimus, and Paul – three distinct characters contributing to a narrative rich in lessons that resonate across the centuries.

Posted in Exposition

PSALM 61

Posted on by writtenexposition

(To the chief Musician upon Neginah, A Psalm of David.)

1. Hear my cry, O God; attend unto my prayer.

2. From the end of the earth will I cry unto thee, when my heart is overwhelmed: lead me to the rock that is higher than I.

3. For thou hast been a shelter for me, and a strong tower from the enemy.

4. I will abide in thy tabernacle for ever: I will trust in the covert of thy wings. Selah.

5. For thou, O God, hast heard my vows: thou hast given me the heritage of those that fear thy name.

6. Thou wilt prolong the king’s life: and his years as many generations.

7. He shall abide before God for ever: O prepare mercy and truth, which may preserve him.

8. So will I sing praise unto thy name for ever, that I may daily perform my vows.

INTRODUCTION

The Book of Psalms is possibly the best-loved book in the Bible. It stands as a testament to prayer, worship, praise, thanksgiving, adoration, and unwavering confidence in the Lord. It is a spiritual repository, encapsulating the full spectrum of human experience. Remarkably, despite its antiquity, it resonates with the same emotions, conflicts, and apprehensions that pervade contemporary life. It candidly articulates doubts, fears, grief, and anxieties, as well as assurance, trust, and hope.

It may be helpful to bear the following in mind when perusing the Psalms:

  1. Poetic Essence: The Psalms are steeped in the art of Hebrew poetry, this may not be obvious in English translations.
  2. Lyrical Tradition: Originally intended for musical accompaniment, the Psalms are compositions which were designed to be sung.
  3. Devotional Utility: These verses are ideally suited for both public and private acts of worship.
  4. Historical Anchorage: The Psalms derive their authenticity from genuine life experiences and historical events, notably episodes from the life of King David, particularly when on the run from King Saul and later, his own son Absalom.
  5. Prophetic Dimensions: It is said that the New Testament features two hundred and nineteen quotations from the Old Testament, of which one hundred and sixteen are drawn from the Book of Psalms. Many of these citations are prophecies, foreshadowing the advent of the Lord Jesus Christ.
  6. Doctrinal Significance: The Psalms provide profound insights into the character of God. They impart theological teachings concerning the nature, attributes, mercies, and works of God.

The Book of Psalms thus serves a dual purpose. It imparts doctrinal truths about God and the Lord Jesus Christ while also furnishing guidance to us for daily living as believers This is consistent with the overarching intent of the Old Testament scriptures which is expressed by the Apostle Paul in Romans 15:4: “For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope.”

Historically, the Book of Psalms has been embraced by Christians through the centuries, although its origins were as Israel’s hymnal. The Psalms were originally intended to be sung – they are essentially poems set to music – but modern Christianity has mostly departed from this practice. The Psalms, however, remain an enduring source of spiritual contemplation and devotional help.

In this post I hope to shed some light on the title of this Psalm, offer a concise summary of its contents, and conclude with a brief reflection on its pivotal statement.

THE TITLE AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF PSALM 61

Among the 150 Psalms, more than a hundred bear an inscript (heading or caption) containing specific details about the Psalm, along with directions for musicians regarding the tune or musical accompaniment. These titles, likely added sometime after the collection of the Psalms, date back to ancient times. Some words in these titles are so old that their meanings were lost even before the time of Christ, leaving rabbis to speculate about their significance. One such enigmatic word appears in the title of Psalm 61, and that word is “Neginah.”

The title of Psalm 61 reads: “To the chief musician upon Neginah, A Psalm of David.”

“Neginah” (singular) appears only here, while some other Psalms (4, 6, 54, 55, 67, 71) feature the plural form, “Neginoth,” in their headings. The term “Neginoth” can denote either “music” or “song” (as seen in Job 30:9, Psalms 69:12, Lamentations 3:14, and Lamentations 5:14) or even refer to a stringed instrument, as observed in Habakkuk 3:19:

“The LORD God is my strength, and he will make my feet like hinds’ feet, and he will make me to walk upon mine high places. To the chief singer on my stringed instruments (neginoth).”

Scholars debate whether “Neginah” in the title of Psalm 61 refers to a specific tune or melody or perhaps an ancient stringed instrument, details of which have faded into history. Other Psalms incorporate musical instruments in their titles, such as:

  • “Alamoth” in Psalm 46, thought to be a high-pitched harp.
  • “Gittith” in Psalms 8, 81, and 84, something akin to a guitar.
  • “Mahalath” in Psalms 5 and 88, indicating flutes.
  • “Sheminith” in Psalms 6, 12, and 1 Chronicles 15:21, referring to lyres or harps.

Notably, “A Psalm of David” reveals that King David penned this particular Psalm. Of the 150 Psalms, David is credited with composing 73, while the remaining ones are attributed to various authors, including Asaph (50; 73-83) , Ethan the Ezrahite (89), Heman the Ezrahite (88), Moses (90), and Solomon (127). David wrote so many psalms that he was known as “the sweet psalmist of Israel.” 2 Sam 23:1

THE ESSENCE AND MESSAGE OF PSALM 61

Psalm 61 lies within a cluster of Psalms (56-64) which offer sombre glimpses into King David’s life and the challenges he confronted. This brief Psalm traces the author’s emotional journey, beginning with desperation and culminating in a reaffirmation of trust in God. Whilst the specific circumstances are not elaborated, the Psalm provides a glimpse into the author’s inner turmoil, frustration, and mental anguish as he cries out to God in anticipation of relief.

Verse 1 commences with an urgent yell of desperation: “Hear my cry, O God!” The Psalmist conveys his sense of distance from God by claiming to call from the “end of the earth,” symbolizing alienation and indicating dire circumstances. His heart is faint with despair (“heart” here signifies courage that has failed) thus mirroring the inner turmoil of the Psalmist.

However, amid his despair, the Psalmist realizes that there is only one who can help in times of great need – God. Therefore, he reaches out to the Almighty for comfort and strength. This underscores for us the importance of turning to God in prayer even in the darkest moments of life.

In verses 2-4, the Psalmist invokes three powerful metaphors to describe God: a high rock that offers refuge, a strong tower that symbolizes security, and peaceful shelter (under God’s wings). These images emphasize God’s omnipotence and reliability in all circumstances. This confidence that the Psalmist has in God’s protection and strength is rooted in past experiences.

In the latter part of the psalm, the author expresses unshakable confidence in God’s faithfulness: “For thou, O God, hast heard my vows: thou hast given me the heritage of those that fear thy name.” This declaration underscores the fundamental belief that God not only hears but also responds to the sincere petitions of His worshippers. It is enduring faith like this that has sustained believers through the ages.

The Psalmist concludes with a commitment to ongoing worship: “So will I sing praise unto thy name forever, that I may daily perform my vows.” This reflects a resolute dedication to a life of worship and gratitude, acknowledging that the relationship with God transcends a single moment of need and extends into daily devotion, from the present into eternity.

THE PIVOTAL STATEMENT OF PSALM 61

Allow me to conclude with a reflection on what is, for me, the key statement within this Psalm:

Verse 2b states, “When my heart is overwhelmed: lead me to the rock that is higher than I.”

This text reveals a profound truth – that, despite our faithfulness to God, life can be fraught with challenges and difficulties.” “When” rather than “If” underscores the fact that every believer, at some point, will experience moments of overwhelming despair. The word “overwhelmed” paints a vivid picture of being buried beneath darkness, crushed, and enshrouded by life’s burdens.

Christians can find themselves overwhelmed in various ways:

  1. Overwhelmed by Sin: Despite being cleansed from sin, Christians can still falter and err. This realization of our sinful nature can be overwhelming. Yet, we have the means to rise above it through confession and seeking God’s forgiveness. 1 John 1:9 “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”
  2. Overwhelmed by Sorrow: This world is filled with sorrow, stemming from the consequences of human actions and the fragility of life. Loss, betrayal, and shattered dreams can bring overwhelming grief. In such moments, we turn to God for solace.
  3. Overwhelmed by Suffering: Suffering is an undeniable part of life. Illness, mortality, and witnessing the suffering of others can lead to feelings of being overwhelmed. In these times, we rely on God’s strength to endure.
  4. Overwhelmed by Service: While serving God is a privilege, it can also become burdensome. Burnout, disappointment, and feeling unappreciated can make service overwhelming. It is crucial to rely on God for strength and guidance in service.

In all these scenarios, the Psalmist’s cry becomes our own: “When my heart is overwhelmed: lead me to the rock that is higher than I.” It is a reminder that, in times of despair, we must turn to the Lord, the One who stands as our refuge and stronghold, and acknowledge our dependence on God’s strength to navigate life’s challenges and maintain our devotion to Him. Notice the four ‘I will’s in the psalm.

v.2 ‘I will cry’

v.4 ‘I will abide’

v.4 ‘I will trust’

v.8 ‘I will sing praise’

So, as we ponder Psalm 61, we find in its verses a timeless guide for seeking solace in God’s unwavering presence, irrespective of life’s overwhelming moments. Like other psalms, Psalm 61 has been a source of strength and comfort for countless believers throughout history. Its enduring appeal lies in its capacity to speak to the human condition and offer a pathway to deeper spiritual connection and understanding.

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:24-29

Posted on by writtenexposition

John has already encouraged his followers by telling them (v.20) that they know all things because they possess the Holy Spirit. This is in contrast to those who deny that Jesus is the Christ and thus deny the Father as well as the Son.

ETERNAL LIFE

[24] The main translations do not make it clear that the word ‘you,’ as the first word in the verse, is emphatic. Some translations, such as the Darby Bible, convey this by opening the verse with ‘as for you.’ This shows that the apostle John is continuing to draw contrasts between the believers and the antichrists, as in vv. 22-23. He encourages his followers to make sure that the foundational truths that they had heard from the beginning of their Christian profession remain in them. If these teachings that they have heard from the beginning remain in them then they will remain in God the Father and his Son, Jesus Christ. The repetition of ‘which ye have heard from the beginning’ emphasizes the importance of adherence to the truths of the gospel message.

[25] The readers are reminded of the promise that ‘he’ (i.e. Jesus Christ himself) has given them, which is the gift of eternal life. In the Johannine Writings the word epaggelía (‘promise’) only occurs here and in 1 Jn 1:5, where it is translated ‘message.’ The promise referred to may be that given by Jesus in Jn 10:28.

[26 – 27] John now summarises what he has already written to them in vv. 18-25.

In v.26 he again addresses the topic of false teachers and adds to what he has already said by describing them as people ‘who are seducing you’; thus labelling them as deceivers who are trying to lead his readers astray. John, however, is writing to inform the believers and warn them about wrong teachings that would undermine their faith.

In v.27 he again refers to the spiritual resource that the believers have in the Holy Spirit who is the anointing (chrísma) from Jesus Christ (autós – ‘himself’, ‘the same’ – as in 2:20). This is another reason, besides the warning from John, why they need not be deceived by false teachers. The Holy Spirit instructs them about everything they need to know and what he teaches is truthful and reliable. They are to remain in the true teaching, as indeed they have, and thus abide in Christ.

[28 -29] ‘And now’ shows that John is about to move on to a different topic. He makes the transition by repeating the exhortation to his ‘little children’ (tekníon) to abide in Christ and asserts that doing so will produce two results at Christ’s Second Coming.

Abiding in Christ will bring confidence (parrēsía) when he shall appear (phaneróō – make know, manifest, visible). Parrēsía occurs four times in 1 John. It relates to confidence before Jesus Christ at the Parousia (2:28; 4:17) and confidence before God in prayer (3:21; 5:14).

In addition, abiding in Christ will result in ‘not being ashamed’ before him at his parousía (coming, advent, presence). This is the only reference to parousía in John’s writings. The word is also used for the second advent of Christ in the writings of Paul (1 Cor 15:23; 1 Thess 2:19; 3:13; 4:15; 5:23; 2 Thess 2:1,8), James (5:7,8) and Peter (2 Pet 1:16; 3:4,12).

Parousía is one of three technical terms the New Testament uses for the Second Coming of Christ. The others are epipháneia (2 Thess 2:8; 1 Tim 6:14; 2 Tim 4:1,8; Titus 2:13) and apokálupsis (1 Cor 1:7; 2 Thess 1:7; 1 Pet 1:7, 13).

Being confident and unashamed convey the idea that judgement is connected with the Parousia so in v.29 John advises his readers that since the judge is righteous they too ought to be righteous. i.e. do what is right, live in a manner that is acceptable to God. At the end of v.29 John introduces a topic that he will now take up in chapter three and to which he will return several times (3:9; 4:7; 5:1,4,18). The topic is the idea that Christians are ‘born of God’.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:3-11

Posted on by writtenexposition

The latter section of 1 John chapter 1 contains three assertions, aimed at false teachers, which begin with the expression ‘If we say.’ These are:

1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

1.10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

ASSURANCE

This section in chapter 2:3-11 contains another three assertions but these are aimed at believers, whose faith might have been rocked by false teaching and who are in need of assurance that they are genuine Christians. These assertions all begin with the expression ‘ the person who says’ ( KJV ‘he that saith’). They are:

2:4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

2:6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.

2:9 He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now.

These might actually be direct quotations from John’s opponents who were not genuine. Anyone, however, who can truthfully say: ‘I know him’, ‘I live in him’ and ‘I live in the light’ is sure to be a true Christian.

2:3 John introduces the theme of obedience and its relation to knowing God. He emphasizes that the evidence of a genuine relationship with God is seen in willingness to obey God’s commands. True knowledge of God is not just theoretical but results in a transformed life, characterized by a desire to follow God’s teachings and live in obedience to His will.

‘I KNOW HIM’

‘Hereby’ This phrase en toútō without a noun antecedent is a device John uses frequently in this epistle (2:3, 5, 3:10,16, 19, 24; 4:2, 6, 9, 10, 13; 5:2) to mark the change to new topic or to emphasize the importance of what he is about to say.

‘We know that we know.’ The first ‘we know’ is present tense and the second is perfect tense. The latter has the idea of ‘we have come to know’ indicating that the knowledge was obtained once for all and is continuing; it is a past experience that has ongoing consequences in the present.

‘him‘ Jesus Christ the Righteous One who is our advocate and propitiation (2:1-2).

2:4 John emphasizes his point by giving a negative example. He asserts that merely claiming to know God without obedience is a lie. Claiming to know God while living in disobedience is hypocritical and untrue. Our actions must match our words.

2:5 John restates positively the point that true knowledge of God should lead to a life of obedience and righteousness. When people genuinely obey God’s word, it is an indication that the love of God is being perfected or completed in them. By ‘the love of God’ does John mean their love for God (objective genitive) or God’s love for them (subjective genitive)? Both human love for God (cp. Ex 20:6; Jer 2:2) and God’s/Jesus’ love for human beings (cp. Jn 15: 9-10; 1 Jn 4:12) could be in view, but probably more the former.

An essential component of genuine love for God is obedience to God’s commands. It is a clear sign that one is truly a member of God’s family, and knows him intimately.

‘I LIVE IN HIM’

2:6 Once more John sets a high standard for the believers. Claiming to live (menṓ, remain) in Christ requires a life that emulates Jesus’ character, conduct, and teachings. This verse emphasizes that being a Christian involves imitating Christ and growing in Christlikeness in our daily lives. One must walk (peripatéō) as he walked.

THE COMMANDMENT IS BOTH OLD AND UP-TO-DATE

2:7 Having already mentioned the idea that the keeping of God’s/Jesus Christ’s commandments perfects love John now addresses the Christians as ‘beloved’ (agapētós)- N.B: other manuscripts read ‘brothers’ (adelphós). John assures his readers that his message is not a new teaching. ‘New’ has the idea of ‘novel’ or ‘previously unheard of’. The command to love had been around for a very long time e.g. ‘Love God and love your neighbour!’ (Deut 6:5; Lev 19:18; Mt 22:37-40; Rom 13:8; 2 Jn 6). This command is something that they had possessed (‘ye had’) ‘from the beginning’ i.e. since they first heard the gospel. Here ‘commandment’ in the singular, as elsewhere in John’s writings, refers to the commandment of love (Jn 13:34; 15:12; 1 Jn 3:23; 4:21; 2 Jn 5-6).

THE COMMANDMENT IS BOTH NEW AND TRUE

2:8 ‘Again’ i.e ‘on the other hand’ or ‘on second thought’. Here John seems to present a paradox by calling it both an old command and a new command. While the command to love one another is not new, in a sense it (‘which thing’) is new both in their case and in the case of Jesus Christ. For them it is new because they have recently come from darkness to light. As regards Christ it is new because he reaffirmed it. He called it new (Jn13:34) and exemplified it in his life (Mk 10:21; Jn 11:5,26; 13:1; 15:13; 19:26). Its full expression was realised first of all in Jesus Christ and now in them as they walk as he walked.

N.B. I have taken ‘which thing’ as referring to the command to love. Strictly speaking, this is grammatically incorrect as the noun ‘commandment’ is feminine but the pronoun ‘which thing’ is neuter. But what else could John have in mind? For various suggestions as to what ‘which thing’ might refer to please consult technical commentaries. As far as I know, there is not a satisfactory solution to this grammatical difficulty.

‘The darkness is passing (present tense) and the true light is now shining.’ John tells the believers that something wonderful is happening; darkness is dissipating (parágō) and the light is shining. This is a process that is not yet complete but will presumably be fulfilled at the Second Coming (2:18 ,28), which John reckons will be soon. The apostle Paul articulates a similar thought in Rom 13:12.

The concepts of darkness and light recur in the writings of John and make an appearance early in his Gospel as themes in the Prologue. For some thoughts on the themes in the Prologue (Jn 1:1-18) please see my previous posts:

(1) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(2) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(3) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(4) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(5) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(6) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

‘I LIVE IN THE LIGHT’

2:9 John highlights the inconsistency of claiming to live in the light (in Christ) while harbouring hatred or ill-will towards a fellow believer (‘adelphós’ – ‘brother’, ‘one of the same origin’ – Whether singular ‘brother’ or plural ‘brethren’ this is a New Testament technical term for a Christian believer either male or female, generally speaking no gender distinction is implied e.g. Jn 21:23; Acts 9:30; Rom16:14). Love for others, especially within the Christian community, is a key marker of walking in the light of Christ.

2:10 John states that someone who loves his or her fellow believers lives in the light. Love enables believers to walk in righteousness and unity with one another, removing obstacles that might cause them to stumble or fall away from their faith.

2:11 John reiterates the significance of love by maintaining that hatred towards a fellow believer is evidence that someone in a state of spiritual darkness. Hatred blinds an individual to the truth and causes him to walk aimlessly without direction or understanding.

Thus John maintains that being in the light and hating one’s brother are mutually exclusive. With John there are no grey areas, there is either light or darkness, there is either love or hatred. He restates this thought in 3:15 and 4:20.

In the 1871 JFB ‘Commentary Critical and Explanatory of the Whole Bible’ the authors include a quotation which gives a useful summary of vv. 10-11:

“In him who loves there is neither blindness nor occasion of stumbling [to himself]: in him who does not love, there is both blindness and occasion of stumbling. He who hates his brother, is both a stumbling-block to himself, and stumbles against himself and everything within and without; he who loves has an unimpeded path” [BENGEL].

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jamieson, R., Fausset, A. R., and Brown, D. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, vol. 2 (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997), 528.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:1-2

Posted on by writtenexposition

2:1-2 JESUS CHRIST IS OUR ADVOCATE

My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world. (KJV)

These two verses follow on from the previous chapter which is about Jesus Christ (1:1-4), Fellowship (mentioned 4 times in 1:3-7) and Sin/sins (9 times in 1:7-2:2). John addresses his audience affectionately as ‘my little children,’ showing his pastoral concern for those younger in the faith than he is and at the same time reminding them of his authority. Tekníon (‘little sons’) is the diminutive of the Greek ‘sons’ (‘son’ is téknon) and in this epistle occurs here and at 2:12; 3:18; 4:4, 5:21. A different word for ‘little children’ (paidíon meaning ‘infants) is used at 2:13,18. In John’s Gospel Jesus uses both words in addressing his disciples: tekníon in Jn 13:33 and paidíon in Jn 21:5.

John gives one of his reasons for writing as the desire that they avoid sinning but, at the same time, he acknowledges that they may still fall into sin at times. They are not sinless but they are to sin less.

‘And’ has the idea of ‘furthermore’. John recognizes that a Christian will sin from time to time. The change from the indefinite third person ‘any man’ to the first person plural ‘we’ is notable in that the apostle John includes himself along with those he is addressing as someone who is liable to sin. He assures them that believers who sin have an ‘advocate’ before God the Father in Jesus Christ. If those he is writing to (scholars often refer to them as ‘the Johannine community’) commit sin Jesus Christ is their advocate with the Father, just as he is John’s advocate too.

An advocate (paráklētos) is someone who is called to another person’s side to provide help or comfort. It can mean a legal adviser who represents someone in court but it refers more generally to someone who provides help of any kind. The main thought is of aid, encouragement or comfort. The emphasis is not so much on the ability of the advocate to help but on his dignity or standing as someone who can bring about a positive outcome for the person in trouble. In the New Testament the word occurs only here (2:1) and in The Upper Room Ministry section (Jn 13-17) of John’s Gospel (Jn 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7). In John’s Gospel the Paraclete is the Holy Spirit. On this point The Complete Word Study Dictionary helpfully comments that: ‘Christ designates the Holy Spirit as Paraclete (John 14:16), and calls Him állos, another, which means another of equal quality and not héteros, another of a different quality. Therefore, the Holy Spirit is designated by Jesus Christ as equal with Himself, i.e., God (1 John 2:1).’ In 1 John the Paraclete is Jesus Christ. He is described as ‘the Righteous One,’ emphasizing His perfect and sinless character, which qualifies him to be our advocate.

John goes on to explain that Jesus’ role as the advocate is rooted in His sacrificial work on the cross. He is the propitiation for our sins, which means His death on the cross reconciles us with God and satisfies God’s righteous demands for justice.

PROPITIATION

Verse 2 begins with ‘And,’ which tells us that what follows is another comment by John on the topic of sin. The word ‘He’ (lit. ‘himself’) keeps our attention focused on Jesus Christ. It is he, no one else, who is ‘the propitiation for our sins.’

The Greek word hilasmos here translated ‘propitiation’ occurs only twice in the New Testament; both occasions are in 1 John (2:2; 4:10). It is an act of atonement (the reconciliation of human beings with God) and a means of appeasing God’s wrath. The word carries two main connotations; propitiation and expiation. There is ongoing debate as to which is most prominent. Some scholars emphasize propitiation (an averting of God’s wrath), others expiation (removal of sin, cleansing). The object of propitiation is a person (God), the object of expiation is a problem (sin). Some Bible versions try to convey both ideas by translating hilasmos as ‘atoning sacrifice’. However, hilasmos does not focus on sin itself but on the means by which sins are dealt with and forgiven.

Jesus Christ the Righteous is the hilasmos. Because he is righteous he was able to be the sacrifice that is the means of appeasing the God’s anger and of delivering human beings from the defilement of sin. Sins are forgiven on the basis of his completed work on the cross.

Importantly, John clarifies that Jesus’ sacrifice as a means of propitiation is not for the benefit of a particular group (like the Johannine community) but is directed to the whole world. Kósmos is the universe or world and its contents; people and things. Here it may be a figure of speech (metonymy) meaning ‘the inhabitants of the world.’

Note that some translations, including the KJV, insert ‘the sins of‘ before ‘the whole world’ but this is not in the original. ‘For the whole world’ does not refer back to ‘for our sins’ but is one of three perí (concerning or regarding) clauses in verse 2, all of which link back to hilasmos.

‘himself the propitiation (hilasmos) –

  1. perí (concerning) our sins
  2. not perí (concerning) our own alone
  3. but also perí (concerning) the whole world‘

1 Jn 2:2 does not teach universalism. In 1 Jn 5:19 John clearly distinguishes between those who are ‘of God’ and ‘the world’.

For a detailed technical treatment of the words and grammar in verse 2, including the triple perí, please see:

Do, T., 2013, ‘Does πϵρὶ ὅλου του̑ κόμου imply “the sins of the whole world” in 1 John 2,2?’ Biblica, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 415–435.

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

NEHEMIAH 13:15-31

Posted on by writtenexposition

13:15-22 RESTORATION OF SABBATH OBSERVANCE

Nehemiah finds that in his absence (‘in those days’) some in Judah have not been observing the Sabbath, but engaging in trade and commerce on the holy day. The offenders listed were involved in the main industry – agriculture – and included wine makers, farmers, fruit growers and haulage operatives. The word translated ‘sheaves’ means ‘heaps’ and need not be restricted to grain. As well as violating the command not to work, the loading and transportation of goods by donkey into Jerusalem also transgressed the concept of no (or very limited) travel on the Sabbath (Ex 16:29; Acts 1:12). Sabbath observance is prescribed in the one of the Ten Commandments (Ex 20:8-11; 31:12-17) and was viewed by Isaiah (56:1-8) as something that results in blessing. The prophets Jeremiah (17:19-27), Ezekiel (20:12-24) and Amos (8:4-5) identified profanation of the Sabbath as a cause of the woes that befell the Israelites; because they had became just like the heathens around them.

Nehemiah also observes that merchants from Tyre who had set up a trading colony in Jerusalem were selling fish and all kinds of wares to the local people on the Sabbath.

THE PHOENICIAN PORT OF TYRE

Tyre was an important port for the Phoenicians, a nation famous in ancient times for seafaring and commerce. Just as the Arabs with their camel trains dominated the transportation of goods over land so the Phoenician merchant navy dominated the shipping routes; conveying goods to and from the three continents (Africa, Asia and Europe) bordering the Mediterranean. They carried not only seawater fish from the Mediterranean and freshwater fish from the Nile but also an abundance of other foodstuffs, exported in cylindrical clay jars. These included: fish paste, pine nuts, olives, olive oil, wine, honey and grain. They shipped luxury goods like furniture, metal tableware (e.g. decorated bowls, candelabra), purple dye, and carved ivories, and were also experts in the delivery of bulk timber by sea (1 Kgs 5:9; 1 Chron 22:4; 2 Chron 2:3-16; Ezra 3:7). The prowess of the Phoenicians (Tyre and Sidon) as merchants and human traffickers is acknowledged by the Old Testament Hebrew prophets (Isa 23:1-8, 17-18; Ezekiel 27:1-36; 28:1-5; Joel 3:4-7; Amos 1:9). Ezekiel chapter 27 is of special historical interest because it not only gives a list of commodities traded by the Tyrians but also details the many and widespread locations where they did business.

NEHEMIAH PROMOTES SABBATH OBSERVANCE

Nehemiah confronts the Judaean nobles and accuses them of profaning the Sabbath (for this expression see: Neh 13:17, 18; Ezek 20:16, 21, 24, ; 22:8; 23:38) and adding to God’s wrath against them. He warns them about God’s punishment (13:18). He then institutes practical measures to enforce Sabbath observance and ensure the sanctity of the day.

  • Nehemiah closes the gates of Jerusalem on the Sabbath and initially has his servants guard them so that no burden could be carried into the city.
  • Some of the merchants camp outside the city gates so that the locals can go out and buy from them. Nehemiah tells them to leave or face forcible removal. They leave.
  • Nehemiah then hands over responsibility for guarding to gates to the Levites, after they purify themselves for the Sabbath.

13:22 Nehemiah again asks God to take note of his actions and ‘spare’ (have compassion on) him.

13:23-29 PROBLEM OF EXOGAMOUS MARRIAGES

Upon his return from Persia Nehemiah discovers that in his absence an old issue has resurfaced. Some Israelite men have married foreign women, contrary to God’s law (Deut 23:3-6)and the covenant that had been signed in chapter ten. One of the points of that covenant was the cessation of exogamous marriage (10:30). Nehemiah cites two specific examples of the problem.

1) Half the children spoke (Aramaic?) in a foreign dialect and could not speak ‘the language of the Jews’ i.e. Hebrew. Nehemiah could easily distinguish between the speech of children of Ashdodite mothers and that of children from all Jewish households. He was concerned about ungodly foreign cultural influence and was also very much aware that Jewish national identity was bound up with the worship of God. Since Hebrew was the language of the Jewish religion children who did not speak it could not be taught or understand the scriptures. Men who had married foreign wives were not only neglecting the Hebrew language, they were jeopardizing the purity of the Jewish religion.

Nehemiah therefore takes the offenders to court and challenges their actions. He calls down the curses of the broken covenant upon them, subjects them to a public shaming ritual (see Isa 50:6) and makes them take an oath once again not to marry their children off to foreigners. The reason (vv. 26-27) given for this is the sin of Solomon. In spite of the fact that God loved him (2 Sam 12:24-25) and made him king over all Israel (1 Kgs 4:1) Solomon entered into diplomatic marriages with foreign wives (1 Kgs 11:1-10; 2 Chron 8:11) who led him away from the true worship of Yahweh.

2) Jehoiada, son or grandson of the High Priest Eliashib, had married the daughter of Sanballat the Horonite, who was an enemy of Nehemiah (2:19; 4:1-2, 7; 6:1-9, 14) and a pagan. In the regulations recorded in Lev 21:10-15 the high priest was required to ‘take a virgin of his own people to wife’. In practical terms this prohibition against marrying a foreign wife probably extended to the sons and grandsons of a high priest since they could possibly become high priest in the future. Nehemiah expelled Jehoiada from Judea.

Nehemiah’s prayer at the end of this section (v29) is not about himself but he instead directs his prayer against the high priestly family who, because of intermarriage, had set a bad example to the people, defiled the priesthood and broken the covenant of 10:29-30.

13:30-31 SUMMARY OF NEHEMIAH’S CULTIC REFORMS

Nehemiah ends his memoir by summarizing his main achievements. He lists these as action taken against foreign marriages (10:30; 13:23ff), reorganisation of the temple duties of the priests and Levites (10:37-39; 12:44-47; 13:12-13), the institution of a wood offering (10:34) and the revival/rescheduling of the firstfruits offering (10:35-37).

SUMMATION

Nehemiah chapter thirteen emphasizes the need for continual vigilance in upholding God’s standards and reminds us that spiritual renewal is an ongoing process. The chapter underscores the importance of maintaining purity, honouring the Lord’s demands, and the people of God keeping separate from unholy influences. In spite of Nehemiah’s accomplishments chapter thirteen ends on a somewhat negative note. Sadly, the Israelites do not seem to have shared Nehemiah’s enthusiasm for the things of God. They yielded to secular and religious pressure from outside their community and, despite pledging ‘to walk in God’s law’ (10:29), they abandoned their commitments concerning intermarriage (10:30), Sabbath observance (10:31), and support of the Temple service (10:37-39) soon after Nehemiah left for Persia.

Chapter thirteen records Nehemiah’s final efforts to restore Jerusalem’s spiritual and moral fabric, and provides us with valuable examples of active leadership, faithfulness, and a timely warning about the possibility of departure from the will of God.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Carson, D.A. (2018). NIV Biblical Theology Study Bible : Follow God’s Redemptive Plan as it Unfolds Throughout Scripture [Previously published as NIV Zondervan Study Bible]. Grand Rapids, Mi: Zondervan.

Grabbe, L.L. (2012). An introduction to Second Temple Judaism : History and Religion of the Jews in the time of Nehemiah, the Maccabees, Hillel and Jesus. London Bloomsbury.

Knut Larson, Anders, M. and Dahlen, K. (2005). Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Nashville, Tenn. Broadman & Holman C.

López-Ruiz C. and Doak, B.R. (2019). The Oxford Handbook of the Phoenician and Punic Mediterranean. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Ruckman, P.S. (2004). The Books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. (The Bible Believer’s Commentary Series).

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Berlin, A.M. (1997). From Monarchy to Markets: The Phoenicians in Hellenistic Palestine. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 306, pp.75–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1357550.

Master, D.M. (2014). Economy and Exchange in the Iron Age Kingdoms of the Southern Levant. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 372, pp.81–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.5615/bullamerschoorie.372.0081.

Noonan, B.J. (2011). Did Nehemiah Own Tyrian Goods? Trade between Judea and Phoenicia during the Achaemenid Period. Journal of Biblical Literature, 130(2), pp.281–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41304201.

Nehemiah 13:1-3

Nehemiah 13:4-14

Posted in Exposition

NEHEMIAH 13:4-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

13:4-9 EXPULSION OF TOBIAH FROM THE TEMPLE

The main problem Nehemiah addresses in this section is the fact that Eliashib the priest had allowed Tobiah the Ammonite, a non-Jew, to occupy a spacious ‘room’ in the temple. Some suggest that Tobiah may have used the space for commercial purposes since in 13:5 the word liškāh (translated ‘room’ or ‘chamber’) often means storeroom (1 Chron. 9:26; 2 Chron. 31:11; Ezra 8:29; Neh. 10:38-39), but 13:7 uses the word nišḵāh, which refers to living quarters.

ELIASHIB

This ‘Eliashib the priest’ is probably the same Eliashib who was High Priest at that time (3:1, 20-21; 12:10, 22; 13:28) and would certainly have had the authority provide this space to Tobiah. He had participated in the building of the walls (3:1) but thereafter continued to associate with (‘allied’ = ‘close to’ v.4b) Nehemiah’s enemy Tobiah, especially while Nehemiah was away from Jerusalem. Sometimes ‘the priest’ is shorthand for ‘High Priest’, for example: Zadok (1 Kgs 1:8, 26, 32, 34, 38, 39, 44, 45; 2:35; 4;2 ,4) and Joshua in Ezra chapter 3, cp. Zech 6:11).

TOBIAH

Tobiah first appears in 2:10 where he is mentioned as one of the local dignitaries unhappy that Nehemiah had come ‘to seek the welfare of the people of Israel’. He and his friends mocked Nehemiah’s work on the walls, saying that the walls would be so weak that even a fox could knock them down (4:3). Tobiah, however, seems to have established close links with local Israelite officials, including members of the priesthood. This he partly achieved through marriage alliances with prominent Israelite families:

‘Moreover in those days the nobles of Judah sent many letters unto Tobiah, and the letters of Tobiah came unto them. For there were many in Judah sworn unto him, because he was the son in law of Shechaniah the son of Arah; and his son Johanan had taken the daughter of Meshullam the son of Berechiah (see 3:30). Also they reported his good deeds before me, and uttered my words to him. And Tobiah sent letters to put me in fear’ Neh 6:17-19

The provision by Eliashib the priest of a large ‘room’ in the temple for use by Tobiah (13:5) was a serious violation of the law as Deut 23:3-6 prohibited non-Jews from entering the temple or participating in its worship. It would seem that little has changed since then; even today some religious leaders still think that they are above God’s laws.

The room allocated to Tobiah was in an area of the temple which had been designated for the storage of paraphernalia relating to worship (12:44,) such as:

  • Grain offering
  • Frankincense
  • Vessels
  • Agricultural tithes (corn, new wine, oil).

The people had previously committed themselves in writing to provide the above items and store them in the Temple (9:38; 10:38-39). These goods were for the support of temple staff: the Levites, the singers, the porters and the priests. Although the items had been sanctified (12:47), Eliashib the priest had removed them from the storage area in order to accommodate Tobiah. This was a deliberate act of desecration.

Nehemiah emphasizes that he was out of the country (because he had returned to report to the king in Persia) when this happened and did not therefore become aware of it until he returned to Jerusalem (13:6-7). Neither Eliashib nor Tobiah may have expected Nehemiah to return so soon.

Nehemiah was furious when he heard of the arrangement and took immediate action to correct the problem. Determined to restore the temple to its proper state he used his power as Persian governor to overrule this poor decision by the temple authorities. He summarily removed Tobiah’s furniture and belongings (13:8) and had the area purified (13:8-9) and restocked.

13:10-14 REORGANISATION OF THE LEVITES

Nehemiah learns that the giving of tithes had ceased during his period of absence with the result that the Levites and the singers, who were responsible for conducting the temple services (‘that did the work’ KJV), had not received their portions of tithes and offerings.

The Torah envisaged that the tribe of Levi would be supported by the other tribes by means of the tithe (Num 18:21-24; Deut 14:27-28). The apostle Paul directly references this Old Testament system and applies its principles to the support of Christian workers in the New Testament era:

Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar? Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel. 1 Cor 9:13-14

The Levites had therefore left their duties (13:10, ‘fled’ i.e. the situation was forced upon them) and returned to their fields in order to support themselves financially; thus severely disrupting the worship of Yahweh. The passage may imply that this state of affairs was brought about by Tobiah’s occupation of the storage unit.

In theory the Levites ought not to have had pastureland other than that surrounding towns that had been allocated to them by the Lord (a list of the ‘Levitical cities’ is recorded in Josh 21:1-41 and in 1 Chron 6:54-81). It would seem, however, that in Nehemiah’s day Levites lived and farmed in various additional locations throughout the territory of Judah (7:72; 11:20; 12:27).

Since the ruling class in Judah had neglected their responsibilities with regards to the financial support of the Temple personnel, Nehemiah, as Persian governor, conducted a court case against them (13:11a) and accused them of forsaking the house of God, i.e. of breaking the covenant they made in 10:29ff. The word translated as ‘rebuke’ (5:7) and ‘contend’ (13:11,17, 25) in KJV means ‘to conduct a lawsuit or legal case’.

Nehemiah then gathered ‘them’ (the Levites and singers, not the rulers) together and got them back to their work in the temple. With the temple service revived the people of Judah responded positively. Soon the tithes were given and collected and proper distribution of the provisions restored. Nehemiah seized the opportunity to reorganise the Levites (13:13). No longer would responsibility for looking after the temple storerooms and distribution of support for the Levites be controlled by one man who, like Eliashib, might prove unreliable. Instead, Nehemiah assigned these tasks to a panel of three officials, Shelemiah, Zadok and Pedaiah. Hanan the son of of Zaccur, the son of Mattaniah was appointed to assist them. All of these committee members were honest and trustworthy men who, it appears, acted on behalf of the main parties which had an interest in the smooth operation of the system of tithing.

Shelemiah was a priest.

Pedaiah was a Levite (cp 3:25).

Hanan, presumably, was a singer. He was a grandson of Mattaniah who was the Temple choirmaster (11:17, 22; 12:8, 25).

Zadok the Scribe would have represented the interest of the Persian government.

13:14 – Throughout this chapter Nehemiah finishes his account of each reform with a short prayer (13:14, 22, 31). Here he asks God not to blot out the good deeds he had so loyally and faithfully performed for the temple of God and its services.

In this prayer Nehemiah uses the metaphor of God maintaining a ledger. The idea occurs several times throughout scripture, for example: Psa 56:8; 139:16; Isa 65:6; Dan 7:9-10; Mal 3:16; Rev 20:12; 21:27.

Nehemiah 13:1-3

Nehemiah 13:15-31

Posted in Exposition

NEHEMIAH 13:1-3

Posted on by writtenexposition

Nehemiah chapter 13 concludes the book of Nehemiah and provides insight into the reforms implemented by Nehemiah upon his return to Jerusalem from Persia. The background to chapter 13 may be summarised as follows:

BACKGROUND TO NEHEMIAH CHAPTER 13

Nehemiah, a Jewish cupbearer to king Artaxerxes I (465-424 BCE) of Persia, received news from home about the deteriorating state of Jerusalem and its broken walls. He therefore sought permission from the king for leave of absence from his job at Susa in order to return to Jerusalem, rebuild the walls and restore the glory of the city.

Having obtained the king’s blessing and support, Nehemiah travelled to Jerusalem in 445 BCE (2:1; 5:14) and rallied the people to rebuild the walls. Despite some local opposition, the walls were completed in fifty-two days (6:15). Nehemiah then focused on the spiritual renewal of the Jewish community. After twelve years in Jerusalem (5:14; 13:6) Nehemiah returned to the Persian court in 433 BCE. He must have continued to receive news from Jerusalem because he soon became aware that, in a spiritual sense, things were not progressing well there since his departure.

In chapter 13, Nehemiah returns to Jerusalem after an unspecified period of absence in Babylon. The date was probably 430 or 429 BCE. True enough, he finds that the people have reverted to various forms of disobedience and have neglected the laws of God. This final chapter highlights several significant events:

13:1-3 SEPARATION RENEWED

13:4-9 EXPULSION OF TOBIAH FROM THE TEMPLE

13:10-14 REORGANISATION OF THE LEVITES

13:15-22 RESTORATION OF SABBATH OBSERVANCE

13:23-29 PROBLEM OF EXOGAMOUS MARRIAGES

13: 30-31 SUMMARY OF NEHEMIAH’S CULTIC REFORMS

13:1-3 SEPARATION RENEWED

‘On that day’ (‘at that time’ i.e. in Nehemiah’s era) there was a public reading from the ‘book of Moses’ (cf. 2 Chron 25:4.; 35:12; Neh 8:1). This is certainly a reference to the torah (first five books of the Old Testament) since vv. 1b-2 cite Deut 23:3-6; a section of law dealing with persons excluded from Israelite worship. When the passage was read aloud the people learned that Ammonites or Moabites were specifically excluded from any religious assembly of Israel until ten generations had passed. This rule was to last forever. Interestingly, the reasons given for that do not include the origin of the two nations from the incestuous sexual relations each of Lot’s daughters had with him (Gen 19:30-38). Rather, the prohibition was based on on historical events. These two nations had opposed the Israelites after the exodus from Egypt and had hired a non-Israelite prophet called Balaam to curse them (Num 22-24). This, in turn, triggered a curse on them in accordance with God’s promise to Abraham in Gen 12:2-4. Although he could not actually bring himself to curse the Israelites Balaam nevertheless advised the Moabites how to lead them into sin (Num 31:16; 2 Pet 2:15; Jude 11; Rev 2:14).

MOAB

The Bible has nothing good to say about the Moabites or Ammonites but Moab in particular is singled out for criticism. The prophet Jeremiah gives a penetrating assessment of this inveterate enemy of the Israelites in his book:

‘Moab hath been at ease from his youth, and he hath settled on his lees, and hath not been emptied from vessel to vessel, neither hath he gone into captivity: therefore his taste remained in him, and his scent is not changed.‘ Jer 48:11

Moab, as we have mentioned, had a bad beginning. Nevertheless, like many who oppose God and his people today, everything seemed to go well for them. Their history was characterized by comfort and prosperity. Unlike Israel, nothing disturbed or interfered with their lives of ease. They were never taken into captivity. Jeremiah paints a word picture from the ancient process of wine-making. Totally at ease in its wickedness, unthinking and unconcerned about its sinful idolatry, never having yearned for deliverance, Moab went to rot.

Jeremiah’s metaphorical language conveys a sense of stagnation and lack of transformation. Despite being a nation that had been established for a long time, Moab had never undergone significant changes or been refined through challenging experiences. As a result, the character and behaviour of the Moabites remained unchanged, they were self-assured and unyielding. This important verse condemns Moab’s pride and self-reliance, suggesting that their failure to grow spiritually and morally would lead to their downfall and judgment from God. Devastation would come upon Moab as a consequence of their actions.

After the public reading of the law a ‘separation’ (Ezr 9:1; 10:11; Neh 10:28) of ‘the mixture’ took place. Not just Ammonites and Moabites were separated, but all foreigners. Intermarriage with the Canaanite nations had been forbidden because family relationships with idolators was perceived as likely to cause a turning away from the worship of Yahweh, the one true God (Deut 7:3-4). This problem seems to have plagued the Israelites throughout their history. During the era of Ezra and Nehemiah at least three attempts were made over a period of thirty years (468-429 BCE) to resolve the issue. Although these measures were fairly drastic (e.g. mass divorce, covenant not to intermarry), they were not entirely successful (Ezra 9-10; Neh 9:2; 10:28-30; 13:1-3). Nehemiah returns to the topic of unacceptable marriages later in the chapter.

The New Testament teaches the same general principle; that when it comes to spiritual matters a mixture never produces positive results. Every so often there must be a return to the word of God; accompanied by self-assessment leading to remedial action. 2 Corinthians 6:14-18:

‘Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.’

Nehemiah 13:4-14

Nehemiah 13:15-31

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

Posted on by writtenexposition

Ezekiel’s vision of the glory of the Lord is one of the most famous passages in the Bible. It is an elaborate, powerful and awe-inspiring description of God’s presence and majesty. Here is a summary of the key elements of the vision:

SUMMARY

The vision begins with Ezekiel seeing a great storm coming from the north. The storm is accompanied by lightning, thunder, and a brilliant light. In the centre of this light, Ezekiel sees what appears to be four living creatures. Each creature has four faces and four wings. Their legs are straight, and their feet resemble those of a calf. Their faces represent different aspects of creation: a human face, a lion face, an ox face, and an eagle face. These living creatures move with incredible speed and coordination, and their wings touch one another as they move.

The vision continues with Ezekiel seeing wheels, described as ‘terrifying’ (1:18), beside the living creatures. The wheels are covered in eyes and travel along with the living creatures, following their movements without turning.

Above the heads of the living creatures, Ezekiel sees a firmament (dome) that resembles a crystal expanse. Above it is a throne-like structure that appears like sapphire, and upon the throne is a figure that looks like a man. This figure shines with a brilliant light and is surrounded by a radiance that resembles a rainbow.

The vision concludes with Ezekiel understanding that this extraordinary sight represents the glory of the Lord.

COMMENTS

From verse four Ezekiel attempts to describe what he sees. The opening words are ‘And I saw.’ The expression occurs again in vv. 15 and 27.

He observes a whirlwind, symbolizing a powerful and dynamic force, coming from the north. Jeremiah also spoke of God’s judgement as a whirlwind (23:19; 25:32). In the ancient Near East there was a notion that the gods dwelt in the north. Ancient Canaanites (e.g. Hurrians, Hittites) believed that Baal lived at Mount Zaphon (zaphon became the Hebrew word for northward, the direction ‘north’). The Babylonians also believed that the gods resided in the north. Isa 14:13 refers to this belief by the nations. In Job 26:7; 37:22 the north is viewed as the opposite of earth; perhaps suggesting heaven as God’s home.

Israelites associated ‘the north’ with threats from hostile forces like Assyria and Babylonia. Ezekiel later prophesies that the final invasion of Israel before complete restoration will come from the north (38:6,15). From Ezekiel’s perspective, it is also the direction from which the Babylonian army will invade Judah.

The whirlwind is accompanied by a great cloud with blazing fire that seems to be consuming itself. In the Bible theophanies (appearances of God) are often described in terms of an atmospheric storm (Ex 19:16-18; Deut 33:2; Judg 5:4; Job 38:1; 40:6; Psa 18:7–15; 29:3–9; 50:3; 97:1-5; 104:3; Isa 29:6; Jer 23:19; Nah 1:3; Hab 3:8-15; Zech 9:14).

The cloud contains a fire, of which Ezekiel says ‘and a brightness about it.’ This is repeated in 1:27. The same word is used in Dan 12:3 of the brightness of heaven. The brightness and radiance of the fire are ‘like’ amber, which suggests a golden, glowing colour. The LXX and Vulgate translate ‘amber’ as ‘electrum’ – a shiny metal compounded of four parts gold and one silver (white gold). The only biblical occurrences of the word are in Ezekiel 1:4, 27; 8:2.

The storm, cloud and fire are symbols of wrath which together communicate the idea of the awe-inspiring presence and majesty of God.

Notice that Ezekiel avoids speaking of Yahweh in tangible terms. He describes God in the language of simile, using the terms ‘like’, ‘as’, ‘appearance’ or ‘likeness’ (1;4, 5, 13,16, 22, 24, 26, 27). Yahweh is indescribable, thus Ezekiel uses these words meaning ‘as it were’.

Within the whirlwind and fire, Ezekiel sees the ‘likeness’ of four living creatures (ḥayyāh -wild animals, as opposed to domestic animals). Verses 5b-14 give a description of these creatures. They have a human-like appearance, which probably implies that they possess intelligence and understanding. Each of them has (one head with) four faces, and four wings. Obviously supernatural beings, they are identified as cherubim in Ezek 10:1-22.

Ezekiel notes that their legs are straight, resembling the legs of a calf. Probably each creature has just one leg (Heb: ‘a straight foot’) with a hoof like a calf’s hoof, but, since Ezekiel says they were humanoid (presumably one head, human hands), he may mean that they have two legs each. Their hooves have a sparkling appearance, reminiscent of burnished bronze. The legs are described as ‘straight’. Some interpret this as meaning that the legs are parallel, others that they have no knee joints by which to bend their legs. This would imply that they never sit or lie down; they are constantly on the move.

1:10 describes the faces in some detail.

Lion – fearsome beast – Num 23:24; 24:9; Judg 14:18; 2 Sam 1:23.

Eagle – magnificent bird – Deut 28:49; 2 Sam 1:23; Job 39:27-30; Jer 48:40; Lam 4:19.

Ox – prized domestic animal – Ex 21:35- 22:15; Job 21:10; Prov 14:4.

Man – rules over over the animal kingdom – Gen 1:28; Psa 8:6-8.

From Ezekiel’s viewpoint (the south) coming towards him from the north was the human face at the front, the eagle face behind, the lion face to the right, the ox face to the left. In Ezekiel 10:14 the ox face has been changed to the face of a cherub and is called ‘the first face’.

In 1:8-9 and again in 1:11-12 their wings and movement are described. The four beings are connected to each other by two wings, thus forming a square. Two expressions are used in 1:9 and again in 1:12 to describe their movement:

a) ‘they turned not when they went’ and

b) ‘they went every one straight forward’.

Later, in v.24, Ezekiel describes the noise of the wings.

There are four wheels, representing mobility, under the four creatures. Each has the appearance of a wheel spinning within a wheel. They are described in vv. 15-21. The high rims (rings , v.18) are full of eyes – symbolizing the Lord’s omniscience (2 Chron 16:9; Zech 4:10, cp Rev 4:6, 8).

1:19-21 The wheels and the creatures move together as directed by the spirit. In 1:4 rûaḥ (wind, mind, breath, spirit) is translated ‘wind’, but in v.12 it is generally read as ‘spirit’. ‘The spirit of the living creature was in the wheels’ is usually interpreted as referring to the divine spirit. The LXX and Vulgate, however, render it ‘the spirit of life’, i.e. the life-giving spirit of the Lord. It may be, however, that Ezekiel just means that propulsion comes from the wind created by the whirling of the wheels. Ezek 10:13 says: ‘As for the wheels, they were called in my hearing the whirling wheels.’ (ESV). The cherubim look straight ahead, not up, as they move along.

Verse 22 introduces the firmament (dome, broad expanse, platform) above the heads of the four creatures (‘living creature’ – collective noun in the singular, see v.16 ‘the four had one likeness’). The best known use of this word ‘firmament’ is in Gen 1:6 where it is used of the heavens in the description of the second day of creation.

Although the passage primarily focuses on the visual aspects of Ezekiel’s vision we learn that his revelatory experience contained audio as well (1:24, 25, 28). In connection with the platform being borne by the creature Ezekiel mentions the great noise made by the wings (v.24). It is like ‘the noise of many waters’, ‘the sound of the Almighty’, and ‘the tumult of an army’. Ezekiel not only hears the noise of the wings below the expanse but also when the creatures let down their wings and stand still he hears a voice (or noise, sound) coming from above it; from the throne of the Lord.

The throne seems to be made of sapphire, which is blue in colour (see also 10:1). Elsewhere Micaiah the son of Imlah (1 Kgs 22:19) and Isaiah (Isa 6:1) saw Yahweh sitting on a throne. Above the throne Ezekiel sees a human figure. This is the appearance of the kabod (glory, lit. weight) of Yahweh in human form (1:28).

From the loins up (in everyday speech we would probably say: ‘from the waist’) this figure has the colour of amber and from that area downward the appearance of fire. The complete figure is enshrouded by a brightness that shines like a rainbow. Light is the overwhelming feature of the Lord’s presence since all the main parts of the vision (creatures, wheels, firmament, throne) are described in terms of fire and colour. The following colours are mentioned:

  • amber -1:4, 27
  • burnished brass (polished bronze) – 1:7
  • the colour of a beryl – 1:16
  • the colour of the terrible (awe-inspiring) crystal i.e. ice, frost – 1:22
  • the appearance of sapphire – 1:26

The vision began with a storm (1:4), in v. 28 the mention of a rainbow suggests that the vision is now over. Ezekiel is overwhelmed by the experience and reacts by falling on his face. He then hears a voice speaking to him.

SUMMATION

The function of this first vision in the book of Ezekiel is to validate Ezekiel’s claim to be a prophet of the Lord. His experience of the theophany / encounter with the kabod of the Lord establishes his prophetic authority. The vision proves that Ezekiel is not like the other Israelite exiles in Babylon. He sees and hear things that they cannot see or hear and must therefore act as a messenger of God’s word to them. The splendour of the glory of the Lord serves as a powerful affirmation of Ezekiel’s prophetic commission and will motivate and give him confidence to proclaim God’s messages to the people.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

‘AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

Posted on by writtenexposition

1. Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God. 2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king Jehoiachin’s captivity, 3. The word of the LORD came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the hand of the LORD was there upon him.

INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

These verses introduce the book of Ezekiel and provide historical background, as well as some information about the prophet Ezekiel and his message. They indicate when and where he was active; thus situating his visions within a specific historical and cultural context.

1:1 Ezekiel’s prophetic ministry is said to have begun ‘in the thirtieth year.’ The significance of the ‘thirtieth year’ is not explained but it is usually understood to mean that Ezekiel was thirty years of age at the time. The date given is the fifth day of the fourth month. This would have been the month of Tammuz and therefore the time of year was late June/early July.

The vision occurred while Ezekiel was among the exiles by the Chebar, which was most likely a canal near Babylon. It seems that many exiled Jews had been settled in this area. Ezekiel’s location by the canal underscores the fact that he was living among the exiles and sharing in their experiences and struggles.

1:2 Verse 2 provides more detailed historical context by specifying that it was the fifth year of King Jehoiachin’s exile. This information dates Ezekiel’s inaugural vision (592 BCE) and places it within the larger context of the Babylonian exile.

King Jehoiachin (2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10, also known as Jeconiah (Jer 24:1; 27:20; 28:4; 29:2) and Coniah (Jer 22:24, 28; 37:1), was the son of King Jehoiakim of Judah and a grandson of King Josiah. Jehoiachin became king of Judah at the age of eighteen (2 Kgs 24:8). His short reign was marked by political instability and conflict with the Babylonians. According to the Chronicler he ‘did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord’ (2 Chron 36:9). Jeremiah 22:24-30 has the Lord directly addressing Jehoiachin, prophesying his captivity and exile in Babylon. The Lord also declared that Jehoiachin’s descendants would neither prosper nor sit on the throne of David, thus signifying the end of the dynasty.

In 597 BCE King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon deported King Jehoiachin of Judah along with many of the leading citizens of Jerusalem (2 Kgs 24:15-16); including Ezekiel, who would have been twenty-five years of age at that time. Jehoiachin’s captivity in Babylon lasted for thirty-seven years. During that time, he was reportedly well-treated by the Babylonians and eventually released from captivity by King Evil-Merodach, who succeeded Nebuchadnezzar as ruler of Babylon. According to 2 Kings 25:27-30, Jehoiachin was then given a high position at the Babylonian court (new clothes, a daily allowance for the rest of his life, and allowed to dine at the king’s table).

Despite his short troubled reign and his captivity in Babylon, Jehoiachin was an important figure in the history of Judah. His deposition and deportation marked the beginning of the Babylonian Exile, a period of great spiritual and cultural significance for the Israelites. The Exile came to an end in 538 BCE.

During this difficult time Ezekiel, himself taken into captivity during Jehoiachin’s reign, provided spiritual guidance and hope to the exiles over a period of twenty years. The date of his inaugural vision in verse 2 is the first chronological marker in the book. The others are:

8:1 The vision of idols and abominations in the temple.

20:1 Ezekiel’s response to the elders.

24:1 The parable of a cooking pot

26:1 Threats against Tyre.

29:1 Prophecy against Egypt.

29:17 Desolation of Egypt.

30:20 Pharaoh’s defeat.

31:1 The cedar of Lebanon.

32:1 Lament over Pharoah..

32:17 Lament over Egypt.

33:21 News of the Fall of Jerusalem.

40:1 Vision of a new temple.

1:3 Verse 3 identifies Ezekiel as a member of the priestly class. This would suggest that his prophetic message was informed by his knowledge of Jewish ritual and tradition, which gave him religious authority to speak on behalf of God. Note that many respected commentators confidently assert that Ezekiel was a Zadokite priest. This they assume purely on the basis that Ezekiel speaks highly of the Zadokites in chapters 40-48, which contain his vision of how a future ideal temple might look and operate. In these chapters Ezekiel assigns a dominant role to the Zadokites (43:18-27; 44:15-16; 45:4; 46:19-24), presumably as a reward for remaining relatively (22:26) faithful (44:10-11, 15-16; 48:11) during the Exile. There is zero scriptural evidence for Ezekiel having a Zadokite heritage.

The reference to the “hand of the Lord” being upon him indicates that Ezekiel was divinely inspired and empowered to deliver God’s message to the exiles. The ‘land of the Chaldeans’ refers to the Neo-Babylonian empire ruled over by Nebopolassar (627-605 BCE) and his son Nebuchadnezzar (605-562 BCE).

SUMMATION

The opening verses of Ezekiel set the stage for the prophetic message that follows. The fact that Ezekiel received his vision among the exiles by the Chebar canal underscores the fact that his message is directed to the Israelite community in exile. The political and social upheaval of the time is also reflected in the references to King Jehoiachin’s exile and the Babylonian conquest.

Ezekiel 1:1-3 offers spiritual lessons that are still relevant today:

First, we see that God is not limited by our circumstances. Even in the midst of exile and captivity, God can still reveal himself and speak to his people.

Second, we see that God chooses ordinary people to do extraordinary things. Ezekiel was a priest, but God called him to be a prophet and to deliver his message to the exiles.

Finally, we see that God’s word is powerful and authoritative. Ezekiel’s prophetic message was not his own, but rather it came directly from God.

As we read the book of Ezekiel, we are reminded that God is sovereign over all of history, and that his word has the power to transform our lives and to give us hope even in the midst of difficult situations.

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

OUTLINE OF THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL

Posted on by writtenexposition

The precise dates given throughout the book of Ezekiel show that his prophecies centred on a specific major event in the history of Judah, that is, the Fall of Jerusalem in 587 BCE. The book therefore divides into two main sections: prophecies relating to the ten years leading up to the Fall of Jerusalem ( chapters 1-32) and prophecies relating to time after the Fall of Jerusalem (chapters 33-48).

The material is arranged in five blocks:

PART 1 – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO THE PROPHETIC MINISTRY – CHAPTERS 1-3

1:1-3 – Introduction and superscription

1:4-28 – Vision of the glory of YHWH

2:1 – 3:27 – Ezekiel’s Commission

PART 2 – ORACLES OF WARNING TO ISRAEL AND JUDAH – CHAPTERS 4-24

4:1-5:4 – The siege of Jerusalem portrayed in symbolic acts

5:5 – 17 – A prophetic sermon directed against Jerusalem

6:1 – 7: 27 – A prophecy of judgement on the land of Israel

8:1 – 11:25 – A vision of God’s glory leaving the Temple

12:1 – 14:23 – False Prophets

15:1-8 – Jerusalem as a useless charred vine

16:1-63 – Jerusalem as Yahweh’s adulterous wife

17:1-24 – The allegory of two eagles and a vine

18:1-32 – Individual responsibility

19: 1-14 – A lament over the rulers of Israel

20: 1-49 – A review of Israel’s history

21:1-32 – The sword of destruction

22:1- 31 – Sinful Jerusalem

23:1-49 – Two unfaithful sisters

24:1-14 – Sayings on the cooking pot

24:15-27 – The death of Ezekiel’s wife

PART 3 – ORACLES AGAINST THE SURROUNDING NATIONS – CHAPTERS 25-32

25:1-7 – Against Ammon

25:8-11 – Against Moab

25:12-14 – Against Edom

25:15-17 – Against the Philistines

26:1 – 28: 19 – Against Tyre

28:20 -26 – Against Sidon

29:1 – 32:16 – Against Egypt

PART 4 – A MESSAGE OF HOPE AND RESTORATION -CHAPTERS 33-39

33:1-20 – The prophet as watchman

33:21-22 – News of the Fall of Jerusalem

33:23-29 – Prophecy against those who remained in Jerusalem

33:30-33 – God addresses Ezekiel: a prophet whose predictions had been fulfilled

34:1-31 – The false shepherds of Israel and the true shepherd

35:1-15 – Oracle against Edom

36:1-38 – Renewal promised to Israel

37:1 -14 – The valley of dry bones

37: 15-28 – Two sticks – reunification

38:1-39:29 – Oracle against Gog of Magog

PART 5 – THE NEW ISRAEL – CHAPTERS 40-48

40:1 – 43:12 – The vision of a new temple

43:13 – 46:24 – The worship in the new temple

47:1-12 – The life-giving river

47:13-48:35 – The Land and the City

Posted in Exposition

WELCOME TO THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL!

Posted on by writtenexposition

Welcome to Ezekiel! What are today’s readers to make of this strange book, and of this weird prophet – someone who saw visions of fire, wheels and creatures with multiple wings and faces, and who shaved off his hair with a sword and did not mourn his own wife’s death? 

He was one of the writing prophets, men who were convinced that God spoke to them and through them. Their all-holy God controlled not just his own people but also the surrounding pagan nations and would definitely judge sin. Eventually, however, he would restore his people and all creation. When did they write?

These prophets were active for several centuries after the time of King Solomon. Following his death in 931 BCE the kingdom divided into two territories: Israel to the North and Judah in the South.

THE PRE-EXILIC PROPHETS

The prophets addressing Israel (and the approximate dates of their ministries) were;

Jonah c. 780 -753 BCE

Amos c. 765-753 BCE

Hosea c. 755-725 BCE

 In 722/721 BCE the Northern nation Israel was taken into captivity in Assyria and the Southern nation, Judah, continued as an independent state.

The early pre-exilic prophets in Judah were:

Micah c. 735-690 BCE

Isaiah c. 740-680 BCE

The late pre-exilic prophets in Judah were:

Nahum c. 630 BCE

Zephaniah c. 625 BCE

Habakkuk c. 607 BCE

Joel c. 590 BCE

Jeremiah c. 627-580 BCE

In 587/586 BCE the city of Jerusalem fell to the Babylonian army and there was a mass deportation of Jews to Babylon .

THE EXILIC PROPHETS

Obadiah ? c. 585 BCE – we do not know when he prophesied.

Ezekiel c. 593-571 BCE

Daniel c. 605-535 BCE

THE POST-EXILIC PROPHETS

Haggai 520 BCE

Zechariah c. 520-500 BCE

Malachi c 420 BCE

Daniel (Dan chp. 1) had been taken to Babylon in 605 BCE when Nebuchadnezzar invaded Judah under King Jehoiakim after defeating the Egyptians at the battle of Carchemish (see Jer 46.) Some years later (597 BCE), ten years before the fall of Jerusalem in 587 and the Exile, Nebuchadnezzar deported King Jehoiachin of Judah and ten thousand of the political and religious elite into captivity in Babylon. Ezekiel was one of those elite. 2 Kings 24:8-16:

8 Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother’s name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem.

9 And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father had done.

10 At that time the servants of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up against Jerusalem, and the city was besieged.

11 And Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came against the city, and his servants did besiege it.

12 And Jehoiachin the king of Judah went out to the king of Babylon, he, and his mother, and his servants, and his princes, and his officers: and the king of Babylon took him in the eighth year of his reign.

13 And he carried out thence all the treasures of the house of the LORD, and the treasures of the king’s house, and cut in pieces all the vessels of gold which Solomon king of Israel had made in the temple of the LORD, as the LORD had said.

14 And he carried away all Jerusalem, and all the princes, and all the mighty men of valour, even ten thousand captives, and all the craftsmen and smiths: none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of the land.

15 And he carried away Jehoiachin to Babylon, and the king’s mother, and the king’s wives, and his officers, and the mighty of the land, those carried he into captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon.

16 And all the men of might, even seven thousand, and craftsmen and smiths a thousand, all that were strong and apt for war, even them the king of Babylon brought captive to Babylon.

Ezekiel was therefore in exile in Babylon during the final siege and fall of Jerusalem. Although based far away in Babylon, he prophesied to the people living back in the homeland, Judah.

Ezekiel wrote in the first person throughout his long and complex book which is is grim and intimidating. He experienced strange visions and often dwelt on God’s wrath. The Book of Ezekiel, however, is quite easy to follow as it is highly organized and precise. The prophet records the dates of sixteen revelations and for eleven of those he gives the year, the month and the day (1:2; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:21; 33:21; 40:1).

Posted in Exposition

THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL – BIBLIOGRAPHY

Posted on by writtenexposition

BOOKS

Adams, J, 1928, The Hebrew Prophets and Their Message for To-day, T & T Clark, Edinburgh

Anderson, L. 1997, They Smell Like Sheep, Howard Books, New York

Berry, B. 2022, Ezekiel’s Temple, Scripture Teaching Library, Northern Ireland

Biggs, C. R. 1996, The Book of Ezekiel, Epworth Press, London

Bishop, E. F. F. 1962, Prophets of Palestine, Lutterworth Press, Cambridge

Brueggemann, W. and Miller, P. 2000, Texts That Linger, Words That Explode, Fortress Press, Minneapolis

Carro, D., Poe, J. T., Zorzoli, R.O. and Mundo, E. 2009, Comentario Bíblico Mundo Hispano, Casa Bautista of Pubns, El Paso

Carvalho, C. L. and Niskanen, P. V. 2012, Ezekiel, Daniel, Volume 16 in New Collegeville Bible Commentary: Old Testament, Liturgical Press, Collegeville

Christman, A G. R., 2005 What Did Ezekiel See? Brill, Leiden

Cook, S. L. and Patton, C. 2004, Ezekiel’s Hierarchical World: Wrestling with a Tiered Reality, Brill, Boston

Craigie, P. C. 1983, Ezekiel in the Daily Study Bible, Saint Andrew Press, Edinburgh

Davidson, A. B. 1893. The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, with Notes and Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Davis, E.F., 1989,  Swallowing the Scroll : Textuality and Dynamics of Discourse in Ezekiel’s Prophecy, The Almond Press, Sheffield

Davis, M. C. 2014, Living With The Glory Of The Lord: Ezekiel’s Prophecy, John Ritchie Ltd., Kilmarnock

Dempsey, C. J. 2000, The Prophets: a Liberation-Critical Reading, Fortress Press, Minneapolis

Eichrodt, W, 1970, Ezekiel: a Commentary in Old Testament Library, SCM Press, London

Ellison, H. E. 1958, Men Spake from God: Studies in the Hebrew Prophets, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids

Gaebelein, A. C. 1918, The Prophet Ezekiel: An Analytical Exposition, Fleming H. Revell Company, London

Gingrich, R. E. 2005, The Book of Ezekiel in Outline Form, Riverside Printing, Memphis,

Greenberg, M. 1983, Ezekiel 1-20 in The Anchor Yale Bible Commentaries, Doubleday & Company, New York

Haran, M. 1985, Temples and Temple-service in Ancient Israel, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake

Heaton, E. W. 2001. The Old Testament Prophets: A Short Introduction, Oneworld Publications, London

Hewlett, H. C. 1962, The Companion of the Way, Moody Press, Chicago

Hoeck, A. and Manhardt, L. 2010, Ezekiel, Hebrews, Revelation in Come and See: Catholic Bible Study Series, Emmaus Road Publishing, Steubenville, Ohio

Jeffery, P. 2005, Opening Up Ezekiel’s Visions, Day One Publications, Leominster

Job, J, 1983, Watchman in Babylon: A Study Guide to Ezekiel, Paternoster Press, Exeter

Johnson, A. 1979, The Cultic Prophet and Israel’s Psalmody, University of Wales Press, Cardiff

Johnson, A. R. 1962. The Cultic Prophet in Ancient Israel, University of Wales Press, Cardiff

Johnson, D. 2010, A Commentary on the Book of Ezekiel, Darren Johnson

Kamionkowski , S. T. and Kim, W. (eds) 2010, Bodies, Embodiment, and Theology of the Hebrew Bible, T & T Clark International, New York

Kraus, H-J, 1966. Worship in Israel: A Cultic History of the Old Testament, Basil Blackwell, Oxford

‌Kutsko, J.F., 2000, Between Heaven and Earth : Divine Presence and Absence in the Book of Ezekiel, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake

Lang, B. 1983. Monotheism and the Prophetic Minority: An Essay in Biblical History and Sociology (Social World of Biblical Antiquity No. 1), Sheffield Academic Press

Legge, D. 2001, Ezekiel: A Study of His Book, Preach The Word, Portadown

Levine, B. A. 1997. In the Presence of the Lord: A Study of Cult and Some Cultic Terms in Ancient Israel (Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity). Brill Academic, Leiden

Lucas, E. 2002, Ezekiel: A Bible Commentary for Every Day in The People’s Bible Commentary Series, The Bible Reading Fellowship, Oxford

McKeating, H. 1995. Ezekiel, Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield

Matties, G. 1990, Ezekiel 18 and the Rhetoric of Moral Discourse, Scholars Press, Atlanta

‌Melvin, D.P., 2013,  The Interpreting Angel Motif in Prophetic and Apocalyptic Literature. Fortress Press, Minneapolis

Moughtin, S. 2008, Sexual and Marital Metaphors in Hosea, Jeremiah, Isaiah, and Ezekiel, Oxford University Press

Olley, J. W. 2009, Ezekiel: A Commentary Based on Iezekiēl in Codex Vaticanus, Brill, Leiden

Patmore, H.M.,  2012, Adam, Satan, and the King of Tyre, Brill., Leiden

Prévost, J. 1997, How to read the Prophets, Continuum, New YorkPower, B. A, 2000, Iconographic Windows to Ezekiel’s World, National Library of Canada, Ottawa

Renz, T. 1999, The Rhetorical Function of the Book of Ezekiel, Brill, Leiden

Riddle, J. 2022, Ezekiel: Coming Back from Exile, John Ritchie Ltd., Kilmarnock

Robinson, T. H. 1948, Prophecy and Prophets in Ancient Israel, Duckworth, London

Rofé, A. 1997, Introduction to the Prophetic Literature, Sheffield Academic Press

Rowley, H. H. 2010. Worship in Ancient Israel: Its Forms and Meaning, Wipf & Stock, Eugene, Oregon

Ruiz, A. and Asurmendi, J. M. 1990,  Ezequiel, Editorial Verbo Divino, Navarra

Ruthven, J. M. 2003, The Prophecy That is Shaping History: New Research on Ezekiel’s Vision of the End, Xulon Press, Fairfax

Sanford, W., Hubbard, D. A., Bush, F. W. and Allen, L. C., 1996,  Old Testament Survey : the Message, Form, and Background of the Old Testament, W.B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids

Sawyer, J. F. A, 1993. Prophecy and the Biblical Prophets, Oxford University Press

Strine, C.A., 2013, Sworn Enemies: the Divine Oath, the Book of Ezekiel, and the Polemics of Exile,Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

Taylor, J. B. 1984, Ezekiel in Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, Inter-Varsity Press, Leicester

‌Tooman, W.A., 2011, Gog of Magog: Reuse of Scripture and Compositional Technique in Ezekiel 38–39, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

Toy, C. H. 1899, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel: A New English Translation with Explanatory Notes and Pictorial Illustrations, Dodd, Mead and Company, New York

Vaughan, P. H. 1974. The Meaning of ‘Bama’ in the Old Testament: A Study of Etymological, Textual and Archaeological Evidence, Cambridge University Press.

Von Rad, G. 1972. The Message of the Prophets, Harper & Row Publishers, New York

Westermann, C. 1991, Basic Forms of Prophetic Speech, Westminster John Knox Press, Cambridge

Wood, A. 2008,  Of Wings and Wheels: A Synthetic Study of the Biblical Cherubim (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, Bd. 385). De Gruyter, Berlin

‌Yee, G.A., Page, H.R. and Coomber, M.J.M., 2016,  The Prophets: Fortress Commentary on the Bible Study Edition. Augsburg Fortress, Minneapolis

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Ackerman, S. 1989, ‘A Marzēaḥ in Ezekiel 8:7-13?’, The Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 267-281

Adams, S. L. 2008, ‘Between Text and Sermon: Ezekiel 34: 11-19’, Interpretation, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 304-306

Alexander, R. H. 1974, ‘A Fresh Look at Ezekiel 38 and 39’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Vol. 17, No. 3, p. 932

Allen, L. C. 1989, ‘The Rejected Sceptre in Ezekiel XXI 15b, 18a.’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 67-71

Allen, L. C. 1992, ‘The Structuring of Ezekiel’s Revisionist History Lesson (Ezekiel 20:3-31)’, CBQ, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 448-462

Allen, L. C. 1993, ‘The Structure and Intention of Ezekiel 1’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 145-161

Almalech, M. 2005, ‘Contextual Aspects of the Saying for the Boiling Pot – Ezekiel 24’, paper presented at the 11th International Early Fall School in Semiotics at Southeast Europe Centre for Semiotic Studies, New Bulgarian University, Sofia

Ameisenowa, Z. 1949, ‘Animal-Headed Gods, Evangelists, Saints and Righteous Men’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Vol. 12, pp. 21-45

Arbel, D. 2005, ‘Questions about Eve’s Iniquity, Beauty, and Fall: The “Primal Figure” in Ezekiel 28:11-19 and “Genesis Rabbah” Traditions of Eve’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp. 641-655

Astour, M. 1976, ‘Ezekiel’s prophecy of Gog and the Cuthean Legend of Naram-Sin’, Journal of Biblical Literature, pp. 567-579

Barrick, W. B. 1982, ‘The Straight-Legged Cherubim of Ezekiel’s Inaugural Vision (Ezekiel 1:7a)’, CBQ, Vol. 44, pp. 543-550

Barrick, W. D. 2007, ‘Eternal Security and Perseverance: Ezekiel 33:12-19, Testamentum Imperium, Vol. 1.

Barrick, W. D. 2007, ‘Ezekiel 33:12-19 and Eternal Security’, paper presented at Evangelical Theological Society, Far West Region Annual Meeting, 20 April.

Berry, G. R. 1915, ‘The Authorship of Ezekiel 40-48’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 17-40

Berry, G. R. 1932, ‘The Title of Ezekiel (1:1-3)’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 54-57

Berry, G. R. 1937, ‘The Glory of Yahweh and the Temple’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 115-117

Berry, G, R. 1939, ‘The Composition of the Book of Ezekiel’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 163-175

Bevan A. A. 1903, ‘The King of Tyre in Ezekiel XXVIII’, Journal of Theological Studies, Vol. 16, pp. 500-505

Block, D. I. 1987, ‘Gog and the Pouring out of the Spirit: Reflections on Ezekiel XXXIX 21-9’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 257-270

Block, D. I. 1988, ‘Text and Emotion: A Study in the “Corruptions” in Ezekiel’s Inaugural Vision (Ezekiel 1:4-28)’, CBQ, Vol. 50, pp. 418-442

Block, D. I. 1991, ‘Ezekiel’s Boiling Cauldron: A Form-Critical Solution to Ezekiel XXIV 1-14’,Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 12-37

Block, D. I, 1992, ‘Beyond the Grave: Ezekiel’s Vision of Death and Afterlife’, Bulletin for Biblical Research’, Vol. 2, pp. 113-141

Block, D. I. 1992, ‘Gog in Prophetic Tradition: A New Look at Ezekiel XXXVIII 17’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp.154-172

Blumenthal, D. R. 1979, ‘Ezekiel’s Vision Seen Through the Eyes of a Philosophic Mystic’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 417-227

Boadt, L. 1975, ‘The A: B: B: A Chiasm of Identical Roots in Ezekiel’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 25, No.4, pp. 693-699

Bowen, N. R. 1999, ‘The Daughters of Your People: Female Prophets in Ezekiel 13:17-23’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 118, No. 3, pp. 417-433

Bewer, J. A. 1926, ‘On the Text of Ezekiel 7:5-14’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 45, No. 3/4, pp. 223-231

Brownlee, W. H. 1950, ‘Exorcising the Souls from Ezekiel 13:17-23’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 367-373

Brownlee, W.H. 1958, ‘Ezekiel’s Poetic Indictment of the Shepherds’, The Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 191-203

Brownlee, W. H. 1978, ‘Ezekiel’s Parable of the Watchman and the Editing of Ezekiel’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 392-408

Bunta, S. N. 2007, ‘Yhwh’s Cultic Statue after 597/586 B.C.E.: A Linguistic and Theological Reinterpretation of Ezekiel 28:12’, CBQ, Vol. 69, pp. 223-241

Chapman, C. R. 2007, ‘Sculpted Warriors: Sexuality and the Sacred in the Depiction of Warfare in the Assyrian Palace Reliefs and in Ezekiel 23:14-17’, Lectio Difficilior, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-19

Christman, A. R. 1999, “What Did Ezekiel See?” – Patristic Exegesis of Ezekiel 1 and Debates about God’s Incomprehensibility’, Pro Ecclesia, Vol. VIII, No. 3, pp. 338-363

Crouch, C. L. 2011, ‘Ezekiel’s Oracles against the Nations in Light of a Royal Ideology of Warfare’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp 473–492

Coxhead, S. 2008, ‘John Calvin’s Interpretation of Works Righteousness in Ezekiel 18’, The Westminster Theological Journal, Vol. 70, No.2, pp.303-316

Daiches, S. 1905, ‘Ezekiel and the Babylonian Account of the Deluge’, The Jewish Quarterly Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 441-455

Darr, K. P. 1987, ‘The Wall around Paradise: Ezekielian Ideas about the Future’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 271-279

Day, L. 2000, ‘Rhetoric and Domestic Violence in Ezekiel 16’, Biblical Interpretation, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 205-230

Day, P. L. 2000. ‘The Bitch Had It Coming to Her: Rhetoric and Interpretation in Ezekiel 16’, Biblical Interpretation, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 231–254

Day, P. L. 2000, ‘Adulterous Jerusalem’s Imagined Demise: Death of a Metaphor in Ezekiel XVI’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. L, No. 3, pp. 285-309

Dean, J. 1927, ‘The Date of Ezekiel 40-43’, The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures, Vol. 43, No.3, pp. 231-233

Dever, M. 1998, ‘A Vision of God Ezekiel 1:1–20’, Southern Baptist Journal of Theology, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 16-23

Dressler, H. H. P. 1979, ‘The Identification of the Ugaritic DNIL with the Daniel of Ezekiel’, Vetus Testamentum, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 152-161

Driver, G. R. 1951, ‘Ezekiel’s Inaugural Vision’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 60-62

Foster, R. S. 1958, ‘A Note on Ezekiel XVII 1-10 and 22-24‘, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 374-379

Fredericks, D. C. 1998, ‘Diglossia, Revelation, and Ezekiel’s Inaugural Rite’, Journal of The Evangelical Theological Society, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 189-199

Ganzel, T. ‘The Defilement and Desecration of the Temple in Ezekiel’, Biblica, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 369-379

Ganzel, T. 2010, ‘The Descriptions of the Restoration of Israel in Ezekiel’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 60, pp. 197-211

Gardiner, F, 1881, ‘The Relation of Ezekiel to the Levitical Law’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol.1, pp. 172-205

Garfinkel, S. 1987, ‘Of Thistles and Thorns: a New Approach to Ezekiel II 6’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. XXXVII, No. 4, pp. 421-137

Gaster. T. H. 1941, ‘Ezekiel and the Mysteries’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 289-310

Gehman, H. S. 1940, ‘The “Burden” of the Prophets’, The Jewish Quarterly Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 107-121

Geyer, J. B. 1986, ‘Mythology and Culture in the Oracles against the Nations’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 129-145

Gile, J. 2011, ‘Ezekiel 16 and the Song of Moses: A Prophetic Transformation?’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp. 87-108

Goerwitz, R. 2003, ‘Long hair or short hair in Ezekiel 44: 20?’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol.123, No. 2, pp. 371-376

Greenberg, M. 1957, ‘Ezekiel 17 And The Policy of Psammetichus II’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 304-309

Greenberg, M. 1958, ‘On Ezekiel’s Dumbness’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 101-105

Greenberg, M. 1968, ‘Idealism and Practicality in Numbers 35: 4-5 and Ezekiel 48’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 59-66

Greenberg, M. 1983, ‘Ezekiel 17: A Holistic Interpretation’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp.149-154

Guillaume, P, 2004, ‘Metamorphosis of a Ferocious Pharaoh’, Biblica, Vol. 85, pp. 232-236

Hahn, S. W. 2004, ‘What Laws Were “Not Good”? A Canonical Approach to the Theological Problem of Ezekiel 20: 25–26’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 123, No. 2, pp. 201-218

Haupt, P. 1917, ‘Dolly and Buck-Tub in Ezekiel’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 142-145

Hayes, J. H. 1963, ‘The Tradition of Zion’s Inviolability’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 419-426

Heider, G. C. 1988, ‘A Further Turn on Ezekiel’s Baroque Twist in Ezek 20: 25-26’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 107, No. 4, pp. 721-724

Holladay, W. 1961, ‘On Every High Hill and Under Every Green Tree’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 11, No.2, pp.170-176

Houk, C. B. 1971, ‘The Final Redaction of Ezekiel 10’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp. 42-54

Hullinger, J. M. 2006, ‘The Divine Presence, Uncleanness, and Ezekiel’s Millennial Sacrifices’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 163, No. 4, pp. 405-422

Hullinger, J. M. 2010, ‘The Function of The Millennial Sacrifices in Ezekiel’s Temple, Part 1’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 167, No. 1, pp. 40-57

Hullinger, J. M. 2010, ‘The Function of The Millennial Sacrifices in Ezekiel’s Temple, Part 2’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 167, No. 2, pp. 166-179

Jauhiainen, M. 2008, ‘Turban and Crown Lost and Regained: Ezekiel 21:29-32 and Zechariah’s Zemah’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 127, No. 3, pp. 501-511

Jolivet, I, 2006, ‘The Ethical Instructions in Ephesians as the Unwritten Statutes and Ordinances of God’s New Temple in Ezekiel’, Restoration Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 193-210

Kalmanofsky, A. 2011, ‘The Dangerous Sisters of Jeremiah and Ezekiel’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 299-312

Kasher, R. 2009, ‘Haggai and Ezekiel: The Complicated Relations between the Two Prophets’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 556-582

Kelso, J. L. 1945, ‘Ezekiel’s Parable of the Corroded Copper Caldron’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 391-393

Kennedy J. M. 1991, ‘Hebrew PITHÔN PEH in the Book of Ezekiel’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. XLI, No. 2, pp. 233-235

King, E. G. 1885, ‘The Prince in Ezekiel’, The Old Testament Student, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 111-116

Kingsbury, E. C. 1964, ‘The Prophets and the Council of Yahweh’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 279-286

Lewis, T. J. 1996, ‘CT 13.33-34 and Ezekiel 32: Lion-Dragon Myths’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 116, No. 1, pp. 28-47

Lindars, B. 1965, ‘Ezekiel and Individual Responsibility’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 452–467

Lipton, D. 2006, ‘Early Mourning? Petitionary Versus Posthumous Ritual in Ezekiel xxiv.’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 185-202

Lutzky, H. C. 1996, ‘On “The Image of Jealousy” (Ezekiel VIII 3,5)’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 121-125

MacKay, C. 1965, ‘Why Study Ezekiel 40–48?’, The Evangelical Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3, p. 155- 167

Mackay, C. 1968, ‘Zechariah in Relation to Ezekiel 40-48’, The Evangelical Quarterly, Vol. 40, No.4, pp. 197-210

McKenzie, J. L. 1956, ‘Mythological Allusions in Ezek 28:12-18’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 322-327

Mein, A, 2007, ‘Profitable and Unprofitable Shepherds: Economic and Theological Perspectives on Ezekiel 34’, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 493-504

Morgan, D. M. 2010, ‘Ezekiel and the Twelve: Similar Concerns as an Indication of a Shared Tradition?’, Bulletin for Biblical Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 377-396

Moskala, J. 2007, ‘Toward the Fulfillment of the Gog and Magog Prophecy of Ezekiel 38-39’, Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 243-273

Moyer, C. J. 2011, ‘“What Do You See?” Verbalizing the Visual in Biblical Prophecy’, paper presented at the at the 2011 Society of Biblical Literature Meeting on Monday, November 21, San Francisco

Muller, R. A. 2009, ‘A Tale of Two Wills? Calvin and Amyraut on Ezekiel 18: 23’, Calvin Theological Journal, Vol. 44, pp. 211-225

Nielsen, K. 2008, ‘Ezekiel’s Visionary Call as Prologue: From Complexity and Changeability to Order and Stability?’, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 33, No.1, pp. 99-114

Odell, M. S. 1998, ‘You Are What You Eat: Ezekiel and the Scroll’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 117, No. 2, pp. 229-248

Odell, M. S. 1998, ‘The Particle and the Prophet: Observations on Ezekiel II 6’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 48, No. 3 (Jul., 1998), pp. 425-432

Olyan, S. 2009, ‘Unnoticed Resonances of Tomb Opening and Transportation of the Remains of the Dead in Ezekiel 37: 12-14’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 128, No. 3, pp. 491-502

Osborne, R. 2011, ‘Elements of Irony: History and Rhetoric In Ezekiel 20:1-44’, Criswell Theological Review, Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 3-15

Phillips, A. 1980, ‘Uncovering the Father’s Skirt’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 38-43

Phinney, D. 2005, ‘The Prophetic Objection in Ezekiel Iv 14 and Its Relation To Ezekiel’s Call’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 75-88

Porter, J. R. 1997, ‘Ezekiel XXX 16: A Suggestion’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 47, No. 1, p. 128

Qubti, S. 2007, Ezekiel 37: “Can These Bones Live? God, Only You Know”, Review and Expositor, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 659-665

Quispel, G. 1980, ‘Ezekiel 1:26 in Jewish Mysticism and Gnosis’, Vigiliae Christianae, Vol. 34, pp. 614-618

Railton, N. 2003, ‘Gog and Magog: the History of a Symbol’, Evangelical Quarterly, Vol. 75, No.1, pp. 23-44

Renz, T. 2000, ‘Proclaiming the Future: History and Theology in Prophecies Against Tyre’, Tyndale Bulletin, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 17-58

Sarna, N. M. 1964, ‘Ezekiel 8:17: A Fresh Examination’, Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 57, No. 04, pp. 347-352

Schafroth, V. 2009, ‘An Exegetical Exploration of ‘Spirit’ References in Ezekiel 36 and 37’, The European Pentecostal Theological Association, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 61-76

Schöpflin, K, 2005, ‘The Composition of Metaphorical Oracles within the Book of Ezekiel’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 101-120

Sharon, D. M. 1996, ‘A Biblical Parallel to a Sumerian Temple Hymn? Ezekiel 40-48’, Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society, Vol. 24, pp. 99-109

Simon, B. 2009, ‘Ezekiel’s Geometric Vision of the Restored Temple: From the Rod of His Wrath to the Reed of His Measuring’, Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 411 ­ 438

Slater, J. 1899, ‘Individualism and Solidarity as Developed by Jeremiah and Ezekiel’, The Biblical World, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.172-183

Smith, L. 1939, ‘The Eagle (s) of Ezekiel 17’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 58, No.1, pp. 43-50

Sprinkle, P. 2007, ‘Law and Life: Leviticus 18.5 in the Literary Framework of Ezekiel’, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 275-293

Stavrakopoulou, F. 2010, ‘Gog’s Grave and the Use and Abuse of Corpses in Ezekiel 39:11–20’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 129, No. 1, pp. 67–84

Strong, J. T. 2010, ‘Egypt’s Shameful Death and the House of Israel’s Exodus from Sheol (Ezekiel 32.17-32 and 37.1-14)’, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 475-504

Suh, R. 2007, ‘The use of Ezekiel 37 in Ephesians 2’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 715-733

Swanepoel, M. 1990, ‘Esegiel 16: Weggooikind, spogbruid of ontroue vrou?’, Verbum et Ecclesia, Vol.11, No.1, pp. 82-102

Tanner, J. 1996, ‘Rethinking Ezekiel’s Invasion by Gog’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Vol. 39, No.1, pp. 29-46

Taylor, S. G. 1966, ‘A Reconsideration of the ‘Thirtieth Year’ in Ezekiel 1:1’, Tyndale Bulletin, No. 17, pp. 119-120

Thompson, D. 1981, ‘A Problem of Unfulfilled Prophecy in Ezekiel: The Destruction of Tyre (Ezekiel 26:1-14 and 29:18-20)’, Wesleyan Theological Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 93-106

Tooman, W. 2005, ‘The Disarmament Of God: Ezekiel 38-39 in its Mythic Context (review)’, Hebrew Studies, Vol. 46. No. 1, pp. 417-419

Torrey, C. C. 1939, ‘Notes on Ezekiel’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 69-86

Udd, K. J. 2005, ‘Prediction And Foreknowledge In Ezekiel’s Prophecy Against Tyre’, Tyndale Bulletin, Vol. 56. No.1, pp. 25-41

Ulrich, D, 2000, ‘Dissonant Prophecy in Ezekiel 26 and 29’, Bulletin for Biblical Research, Vol. 10.No. 1, pp. 121-141

Unger, M. F. 1948, ‘The Temple Vision of Ezekiel – Part 1’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 105, No.4, pp. 418-432

Unger, M. F. 1949, ‘The Temple Vision of Ezekiel – Part 2’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 48-64

Unger, M. F. 1949, ‘The Temple Vision of Ezekiel – Part 3’, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 106, No. 2, pp. 169 – 177

Unger, M. F. 1949, ‘Ezekiel’s Vision of Israel’s Restoration’, Part 1, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 321-324

Unger, M. F. 1949, ‘Ezekiel’s Vision of Israel’s Restoration’, Part 2, Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 321-324

Van Dijk-Hemmes, F. 1993, ‘The Metaphorization of Woman in Prophetic Speech: An Analysis of Ezekiel XXIII’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 162-170

Van Rooy, H. F. 2000, ‘Ezekiel 18 and Human Rights’, Verbum et Ecclesia, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 654-665

Van Rooy, H. F. 2002, ‘Disappointed Expectations and False Hopes: The Message of Ezekiel 13:1-16 in a Time of Change’, HTS Teologiese Studies, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 1499-1511

Waldman, N. M. 1984, ‘A Note on Ezekiel 1:18’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 614-618

Wendland, E. R. 2001, “Can These Bones Live Again?”: A Rhetoric of the Gospel in Ezekiel 33-37, Part I’, Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 85-100

Wendland, E. R. 2001, “Can These Bones Live Again?”: A Rhetoric of the Gospel in Ezekiel 33-37, Part II’, Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 241-272

Whitley, C. F. 1959, ‘The ‘Thirtieth’ Year in Ezekiel 1:1’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 326-330

Wilson, R. R. 1972, ‘An Interpretation of Ezekiel’s Dumbness’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 91-104

Winkle, S. E. 2006, ‘Iridescence in Ezekiel’, Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp 51-77

York, A. D. 1977, ‘Ezekiel 1: Inaugural and Restoration Visions?’, Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 27, No.1, pp. 82-98

Young, E. J. ‘”And I Was Left”: Ezekiel 9:8’, The Jewish Quarterly Review, New Series, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 319-320

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted on by writtenexposition

1 Peter 5:5-7 EXHORTATION TO ASSEMBLY MEMBERS

1 Peter 5:8-11 A WARNING ABOUT THE ADVERSARY

1 Peter 5:12-14 FAREWELL AND FINAL GREETINGS

5:5-7 Just as in 3:1, 7 Peter uses the word ‘likewise’ to stay on the same subject but address his remarks to a different group of people. Here he continues with the idea of subordination and, having addressed the elders in v.1, now addresses the ‘younger.’ Although ‘younger’ is masculine Peter possibly has in mind every member of the assembly who was not an elder, rather than just the younger men. He instructs them to be subject to the elders (church leaders).

Without diminishing the leadership role Peter exhorts them all, including elders, to have an attitude of subordination to one another and to ‘clothe’ (egkombóomai) themselves with humility. This word is derived from egkómbōma – an apron or garment with strings that a slave wore when working. Humility (tapeinophrosúnē) is the attitude of lowliness of mind that Christians ought to display toward one another. A similar sentiment using the same word is expressed by the apostle Paul in Eph 4:2; Phil 2:3 and Col 3:12. Peter asserts that this is the will of God by quoting Prov 3:34 LXX. That verse is also quoted in James 4:6; a similar passage which also refers to resisting the devil (4:7) and to humbling oneself before God, who will later exalt (4:10).

The thought changes from humility in relation to others to humility before God. ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because God resists the arrogant but honours the humble) they should also subordinate themselves to God, knowing that he will exalt them in due time. They are to accept that, despite the persecution and uncomfortable situation in which they find themselves, everything is under God’s control (‘powerful hand’). The mighty hand of God is an Old Testament idea: Exod 12:3, 9, 14,16; Deut 9:26; Ezek 20:33.

Divine Provision – God gives grace to the humble.

Divine Promotion – God will exalt the humble in due time.

The contrast is between humbling and raising up. See 1 Sam 2:7-9; Ezek 17:24; Mt 23:12; Lk 1:52; 14:11; 18:14.

5:7 DON’T WORRY

‘Casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you.’ 1 Peter 5:7 This is not an imperative but a participle following ‘humble yourselves’ (6a). See Psa 55:22.

It is interesting that the apostle Peter employed a term from his former occupation as a fisherman to advise Christians how to handle the cares and worries of daily life. What does ‘casting’ involve? It calls for ‘throwing away’ and ‘letting go.’ This verse falls naturally into two sections; each emphasizing a responsibility. Our part: ‘casting all your care upon him’ and God’s part: ‘he careth for you.’ Let us follow Peter’s advice, bearing in mind those two parts. We do the casting, God does the caring.

The Action: ‘casting’

The Amount: ‘all’

The Advocate ‘on him’

The Affection: ‘he careth’

The Administration: ‘for you’

5:8 STAY AWAKE

‘Be sober’ (nḗphō) – be serious i.e. stay focused

‘Be vigilant’ (grēgoreúō) – stay awake.

Peter knew from experience how difficult it was to stay awake. He fell asleep in the Lord’s hour of need. Grēgoreúō is the word for ‘watch’ in the Gethsemane episode and occurs three times in Mark’s account (14:34, 37, 38).

‘And saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch…..And he cometh, and findeth them sleeping, and saith unto Peter, Simon, sleepest thou? couldest not thou watch one hour? Watch ye and pray, lest ye enter into temptation…’

By the way: The Lord Jesus had asked his disciples to watch and pray with Him in the Garden of Gethsemane, to help him through a difficult time. He was praying and suffering anguish such as no-one has ever suffered and went back to receive encouragement from his friends – but they were asleep. He woke them the first time, but thereafter let them sleep. Jesus had to bear his burden alone. Peter and the others who slept were able to serve him later on but never again did they have the opportunity to watch with Jesus in his hour of agony. The friend you fail today, you may not see again tomorrow. You may never have another opportunity to encourage, or display an act of kindness. Now back to the passage under consideration

5:9 FIGHT THE ADVERSARY

Peter tells them to keep calm and stay awake because there is a serious threat. Peter knew from experience how dangerous Satan was (Lk 22:31). The adversary is like a lion circling to ‘gulp them down’ (katapínō). This word can also mean ‘destroy’ or ‘overwhelm.’ Peter warns the believers about the person, power and purpose of Satan.

His Desire: ‘your adversary’ – He is an enemy.

His Danger: ‘a roaring lion’ – He is a formidable foe. – Psa 22:13

His Disposition: ‘ the devil’ – He slanders and falsely accuses.

His Determination: ‘walketh about’ – He never gives up.- Job 1:7

His Devouring: ‘may devour’

His Defeat: ‘resist stedfast in the faith’

They are to resist the Devil, firm in their faith. Firm and determined opposition is imperative. They are not told how to resist here but see Eph 6:10-13. The reference is most likely to their personal faith rather than faithfulness or the body of truth. A motivating factor in resisting the devil is knowing, as they do, that they have solidarity with other believers. The same kinds of sufferings are being experienced by the worldwide ‘brother hood’ (adelphótēs). Peter sets the suffering of Christian believers in Asia Minor in a global perspective.

‘ World’ – could be earth, inhabited world or world order.

5:10 ‘But’ – they have one who is more than a match for the adversary. He is the ‘God of all grace’ i.e. he gives help in every situation. He is the one who has called them in Christ (see also 1 Pet 1:15; 3:9, 21) to eternal glory. Their trials on earth will be short-lived but their glory will be eternal. Olígos could mean ‘little’ (a bit) but since the contrast here is with eternal glory it must mean a ‘little while.’

Next comes a promise, in the future tense. It is not a prayer. Four strong verbs emphasize their permanent vindication:

RESTORE (katartízō) complete, put back in order. For example, the fishing nets in Mt 4:21.

ESTABLISH (stērízō) make permanent. For example, the great gulf fixed in Lk 16:26.

STRENGTHEN (sthenóō) make strong.

SETTLE (themelióō) to lay on a firm foundation, secure by fixing firmly in place.

5:11 A doxology similar to that in 4:11b.

5:12-14 FAREWELL AND FINAL GREETINGS

‘By Silas’ See my post SILVANUS

For commendation of the bearer of a letter see: 1 Cor 16:10-11; Eph 6:21-22; Col 4:7-9; Tit 3:12-13.

‘Exhorting’ This could be a one word summary of 1 Peter. This letter gives instruction and encouragement to face persecution with hope and patience.

‘Testifying’ bearing witness. What he says carries weight.

‘God’s true grace’ This is the state they will enter at the unveiling of Jesus Christ (1:3). It is authentic, God will certainly fulfil his promises.

‘She who is at Babylon, elect like you, sends you her greetings’

Who was the lady? a) Peter’s wife 1 Cor 9:5? b) the church in the area Peter was writing from? A picturesque description. Compare 2 John 13.

What does ‘Babylon ‘ refer to? It is unlikely that the author was writing from Babylon on the Euphrates as it lay in ruins at that time. It is possible that he wrote from Rome. The city may have been a metaphor for a place of evil ( Rev 14:8; 17:5,18; 18:2. It was the capital of the pagan world. Or. since Babylon would have conjured up the idea of the Dispersion and the Exile in the minds of the Jewish believers the church at Rome was thought to be in Babylon because that was its place of exile. The Christians were sojourners and temporary aliens (1:1, 17;2:11).

‘Marcus my son’ John Mark the Evangelist. Peter had a close relationship with Mark.

The Christians are ‘all’ to greet each other with a kiss of love.

The letter closes with a prayer that this persecuted church will know peace. The peace is in Christ.

Peace as a Gift John 14:27

Peace as a Guard Phil 4:7

Peace as a Guide Col 3:15

Peace as a Goal Heb 12:14

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

Posted on by writtenexposition

4:7-11 CHRISTIAN BEHAVIOUR AS THE END APPROACHES

4:12-19 SUFFERING FOR THE GLORY OF GOD

4:7-11 CHRISTIAN BEHAVIOUR AS THE END APPROACHES

[4:7] The conjunction ‘but’ connects this passage back to the judgement of God (v.5). That is part of the consummation of history which is here called ‘the End’. That time is ‘at hand’ (Mk 1:15; Rom 13:12). For similar expressions see:

  • 1 Cor 7:29 ‘the time is short’.
  • Heb 10:25 ‘as ye see the day approaching’.
  • 1 Jn 2:18 ‘it is the last time’.

In light of the nearness of ‘the End’ Christians ought to be watchful and well-behaved (Mt 24:45-25;13; Mk 13:33-37; Rom 13:11-14; Phil 4:4-6; Heb 10:23-31; Jas 5:7-11; Rev 22:12).

‘sober’ (sōphronéō) self-controlled They are to remain clear-headed and not get overly-excited or emotional (see 2 Thess 2:2). It is not necessary for them to give up their usual routine, they are to be disciplined (nḗphō) and alert so that they can pray.

[4:8] Above everything else they are to keep their love for one another at full strength (see 1:22; 2:17) for love will cover a multitude of sins. This is a quotation from Prov 10:12. They are not to harbour grudges but overlook the offences of others.

‘fervent’ intense (ektenḗs)

‘have’ hold fast, adhere, cling (échō)

[4:9] ‘be hospitable’ (philóxenos)

This probably refers to the hosting of travelling apostles or other Christians. Hospitality was to be exercised without grumbling, especially perhaps should the visitors decide to overstay.

[4:10-11] ‘As every man hath received the gift (chárisma), even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace (cháris) of God.’

This is a general exhortation to Christians to use whatever gift they have received for the benefit of others. Every Christian is a steward (oikonómos). In those days a steward was the slave entrusted with managing his master’s household and property. The local church is viewed as a household in 1Tim 3:5, 15.

‘As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.’

(poikílos) means many in number and varied in kind. God’s grace is diversified, it is bestowed freely and takes many forms. The word ‘manifold’ occurs twice in 1 Peter:

1 Pet 1:6 ‘manifold temptations’

1 Pet 4:10 ’ manifold grace of God’

Peter mentions two categories of gift which perhaps together stand for all of the gifts. These are a) speaking and b) serving. His not concern is not just with the gifts but also how they are exercised.

Those who speak (preach and teach) should speak realizing that they are speaking the words of God ( 2 Cor 5:20; 1 Thess 2:13). ‘Oracles’ are divine utterances (Acts 7:38; Rom 3:2). Those who serve are not to depend upon their own resources but must rely on the strength that God supplies. Keating (2011, p.108) comments: ‘Our ability to exercise these gifts does not come from within us — God himself supplies the words to speak and the strength to serve.’

‘Giveth’ – supplies (chorēgéō) This verb originally referred to the provision of a choir for a public festival at the benefactor’s own expense. Eventually it carried the idea of lavish or unstinting giving.

All speaking and serving should have the glorification of God through Jesus Christ as the chief aim.

V.11 finishes with a short doxology to God, the relative pronoun does not refer to Jesus Christ but to God. ‘Glory’ links to ‘glorified’ in the previous clause. ‘Dominion’ (krátos) is power, might, sovereignty. The doxology, like many in the Bible, ends with an ‘Amen’ – may it be so! (Neh 8:6; Psa 41:13; Rom 1:25; Gal 1:5; Phil 4:20; 1 Pet 5 :11).

From its first mention in Num 5:22 and a passage in Deut 27:15–26 (where the word appears 12 times) it would seem that ‘Amen’ started life in the Old Testament as a sort of legal shortcut. Instead of formally repeating all the words of an oath, Israelites would merely say: ‘Amen.’ ie, ‘I agree with that.’

4:12-19 SUFFERING FOR THE GLORY OF GOD

This section returns to the theme of suffering which was introduced in 1:6 and which has been present throughout the letter so far (1:6-7; 2:18-25; 3:9-18; 4:1-4). There is no noticeable connection between this section and the previous verses but there are a few less obvious links.

  • The word (xenízō) meaning ‘think it strange’ or ‘be surprised’ is used in v. 4 and v.12.
  • The notion of glorifying God occurs in v. 11 and in v.16.
  • The idea of impending judgement is in v.5 and in vv.17-18.

4:12-16 The Christians will be partakers of Christ’s suffering. Peter reminds these ‘strangers’ and ‘aliens’ (1:1; 2:11) that even in their trials they are ‘beloved’ (agapētós). Using word play (see xenízō v.4) they are not to be ‘shocked’ (xenízō) as if it would be a ‘strange’ (xénos) thing for them to face a ‘fiery ordeal’ (púrōsis) lit. ’burning’. It is to try them: the word ‘is’ (gínomai); a present participle meaning ‘to begin to be.’ Their trial would be ongoing, not just a one-off event.

[13-16]

v.13 They will have future glory.

v. 14 God will have present glory.

‘But rejoice, inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ’s sufferings; that, when his glory shall be revealed, ye may be glad also with exceeding joy.’

Their fiery trial amounts to ‘sharing’ (koinōnéṓ̄) in the sufferings of the Messiah. This should cause them to ‘rejoice’ (chairete) and also, when Christ’s glory is revealed, they will then ‘rejoice with exultation’ ( charete agalliomenoi).

Note the word ‘also.’ Their rejoicing in suffering now is but a foretaste of the rapturous joy they will experience when the glory of Christ will be fully revealed.

When Christians are insulted on account of Christ they are ‘blessed,’ not just in the future but in the present time. This section is reminiscent of the beatitudes in Mt 5:11-12. Peter has already mentioned the topic of suffering unjustly in 2:20 and 3:17.

The verb ‘to insult’ or ‘reproach’ (oneidízō), and its noun (oneidismós), is used elsewhere to describe how Jesus Christ was treated:

Mt 27:44 ‘cast…in his teeth.’

Rom 15:3 ‘that reproached thee.’

Heb 11:26 ‘the reproach of Christ

Heb 13:13 ‘bearing his reproach.’

The Christians who suffer unjustly because of Christ are already blessed for (i.e because) ‘the spirit of glory and of God resteth’ upon them. Achtemeier (2009, p.308) comments:

‘The clause is framed in uncharacteristically awkward prose …with repeated neuter articles preceding genitival phrases tied together with a coordinating “and,” thus making both phrases appear to modify “Spirit. “

J. N. D. Kelly (1969, p.186) explains:

‘In part the wording is inspired by LXX Is. xi. 2 (‘and the Spirit of God shall rest upon him’). But while the broad meaning of the sentence is reasonably clear, the Greek is bafflingly difficult to construe, and it is possible that the original text (copyists very soon began altering it) is lost. As the text stands, we have the neuter definite article with the genitive ‘of the glory’ (to tes doxes) followed by and, and then a second neuter definite article with Spirit of God (to tou theou pneuma). The article may be repeated so as to give emphasis: ‘the Spirit of the glory—yes, the Spirit of God’. In both cases, on this assumption, it is one and the same Spirit, the genitives denoting its possessor and source, which is first (because of the mention of glory in 13) described as ‘the glory’, and then for purposes of clarification as ‘God’. Admittedly the reduplicated article is cumbersome, but this is the best sense that can be made of the sentence. An alternative explanation is that two distinct subjects are required, and so we should take ‘the of the glory’ as a substantival phrase equivalent to ‘the presence of the glory’, i.e. the Shekinah; but the precedents quoted for this use of the bare article (Mt. xxi. 21; i Cor. x. 24; Jas. iv. 14; 2 Pet. ii. 22) are instances of a well recognized usage which is of dubious relevance here. The motive, too, for this curious periphrasis, alleged to be reverence, is odd in view of the writer’s readiness to speak of the divine glory elsewhere.’

‘On their part he (it) is evil spoken of, but on your part he (it) is glorified’ probably refers back to the ‘name of Christ’ in v.14a.

Verse 15 begins with a ‘But.’ Peter reminds his readers that the promised blessedness does not apply to those who are badly treated for criminal behaviour. He gives four categories which seem to be listed in descending order of gravity:

1) Murderer

2) Thief

3) Evildoer (kakopoiós) see 2:12,14; 3:17

4) Busybody (allotrioepískopos) mischief-maker, meddler, one who gets involved in the affairs of other people.

This is a hapax legomenon, a word that occurs just once in a body of literature. There are more than fifty such words in 1 Peter. A list of New Testament hapax legomena may be viewed or downloaded here.

There is no shame, however, in someone suffering as a ‘Christian’ (follower of Christ) but he should rather glorify God ‘on this behalf’ i.e. on being described as a Christian, on account of bearing the name ‘Christian.’ This is one of the earliest (see Acts 11:26; 26:28) occurrences of ‘Christian and the first to bring out the stigma ‘(ashamed’ v.16) attached to such a designation in the society of the time.

[17-19] ‘For’ explains the reason why Christians who suffer unjustly should give God glory in that situation. Peter is assuring the Christians that those who persecute them will not go unpunished. They must realize that God’s first concern is with believers, he will certainly turn his attention to the ungodly sinners later. In fact, the suffering which the believers endure now represents the beginning of God’s final judgement (note the absolute tó kríma ‘the judgement’) on all human beings see 1: 17; 2:23; 4:5.

The idea that judgement will start with God’s people is present in the Old Testament:

‘Wherefore it shall come to pass, that when the Lord hath performed his whole work upon mount Zion and on Jerusalem, I will punish the fruit of the stout heart of the king of Assyria, and the glory of his high looks.’ Isa 10:12

‘For, lo, I begin to bring evil on the city which is called by my name, and should ye be utterly unpunished? Ye shall not be unpunished: for I will call for a sword upon all the inhabitants of the earth, saith the LORD of hosts.’ Jer 25:29

‘Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and women: but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at my sanctuary. Then they began at the ancient men which were before the house.’ Ezek 9:6

Also:

‘Now I urge those who read this book not to be depressed by such calamities, but to recognize that these punishments were designed not to destroy but to discipline our people.

In fact, not to let the impious alone for long, but to punish them immediately, is a sign of great kindness.
For in the case of the other nations the Lord waits patiently to punish them until they have reached the full measure of their sins; but he does not deal in this way with us,
in order that he may not take vengeance on us afterward when our sins have reached their height.’ 2 Macc 6:12-15 RSV


‘So that we ourselves glory in you in the churches of God for your patience and faith in all your persecutions and tribulations that ye endure:

Which is a manifest token of the righteous judgment of God, that ye may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which ye also suffer:

Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you;

And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,

In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.’ 2 Thess 5:4-8

Peter emphasizes the point that it is much better to suffer the refining judgement of God as a Christian now than the later damnation of the ungodly who reject God’s good news. He does this by use of two parallel questions each beginning with ‘And.’

v. 17b ‘and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?,

v.18 ‘And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear?’

These two questions have much the same meaning, the latter is almost an exact citation of Proverbs 11:31 LXX.

The conclusion of v.19 is that in such circumstances Christians ought to realize that their suffering is not random but is in accord with the will of God. They must therefore commit their souls (i.e. themselves’) to God and continue in active well-doing. God is the faithful Creator, he has the power to create and therefore has the power to sustain them. He is someone who can be trusted. The word (ktístēs) for Creator occurs only here in the New Testament.

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

Posted on by writtenexposition

Chapter five naturally divides into the following sections:

5:1-4 Exhortation to elders

5:5-7 Exhortation to church members

5:8-11 A warning about the adversary

5:12-14 Farewell and final greetings

5:1-4 EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

‘The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed: Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being examples to the flock. And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.‘

[1] Peter refers to the leaders of the Asian churches as ‘elders’ and says that he considers himself an elder as well.

Various terms are used for church leaders in the New Testament. For example:

Phil 1:1 ‘to the bishops and deacons.’

1 Tim 3:1-7 The qualifications of ‘the bishop’ (singular).

1 Tim 3: 8-13 The qualifications of ‘the deacons’ (plural).

1 Tim 5:1; 17-22 Instructions about ‘elders.’

Titus 1:5-9 ‘Elders’ in v1, ‘bishop’ in v7 – the terms seem to be used interchangeably as the same responsibilities are in view.

For further reading view my posts:

(1) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – INTRODUCTION

(2) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – QUALIFICATIONS

(3) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – CONCLUSION AND  BIBLIOGRAPHY

The word ‘so’ or ‘therefore’ (oun – also occurs in 3:7; 5:13) is not included here in most Bible translations. It may refer back to ‘well doing’ in 4:19 or possibly to the idea of judgement beginning at the house of God in 4:17. The Old Testament background for this is Ezek 9:6.

Peter uses the first person (‘I exhort’) followed by an imperative (‘feed’). The first person was last used in 2:11 (‘I beseech’) where it was followed by an infinitive (‘[to] abstain’). He is strongly encouraging them to comply with his request.

‘Elder’ (presbuteros) here refers to a church leader rather than just to an older man (Acts 14;23; 1 Cor 12:28; Phil 1:1; 1Thess 5:12). Peter adds weight to his exhortation by saying that he is a ‘fellow-elder'(sympresbuteros). This word occurs nowhere else in Greek literature and was probably coined by Peter. He can therefore relate to the responsibilities that elders carry. Since Peter did not claim to have a higher position than other elders we can be certain that he was not a pope.

He also claims that he is a witness (martus) to Christ’s sufferings. Does this mean that he was an actual eyewitness or just ‘one who testifies?’ For examples of the former meaning see Mk 14:63; Acts 7:58 and 2 Cor 13:1. For the latter meaning see Lk 24:48; Acts 1:8; 22:15. There may be suffering involved (Acts 22:20; Rev 2:13; 17:6).

Peter will be ‘a partaker in the glory which is going to be revealed’ (cp. 4:13). Presumably the force of ‘fellow’ elder carries on so that he is also a fellow-witness and a fellow-partaker in the glory. There may be a special glory for faithful elders.

[2] ‘feed the flock of God which is among you’ Using pastoral imagery Peter exhorts the elders to tend the flock of God in their charge. They were to feed, guard and guide the believers. There is a play on words here. The verb poimaínō (act as shepherd) and the noun poímnion (flock) are from the same root and in English would be something like ‘shepherd the sheep.’ The elders are to oversee (episkopéō) the flock of God (it belongs to God, not then). They are to function as overseers i.e. take upon themselves and carry out pastoral responsibility. Shepherding and oversight have already been linked in 2:25.

The idea of God’s people as a flock is present in both the Old Testament (Psa 23; Isa 40:11; Jer 23:1-4; Ezek 34:1-10) and in the New Testament (Jn 21:15-17; Acts 20:28). Some church leaders are designated ‘shepherds’ (KJV pastors) in Eph 4:11. This, however, describes the work they do, it is not a clerical title (‘Pastor’). How the elders must supervise (episkopéō) the flock is set out in a series of three antitheses or contrasts. The negative is given first, followed by the positive.

i. ‘not by constraint but willingly’

The elders are not to lead by constraint ( i.e. as a result of coercion or compulsion by others), but willingly (i.e. voluntarily and eagerly). To be a willing volunteer in spite of possible danger and government scrutiny, is ‘according to God’ (i.e. as God would have it).

ii. ‘not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind’

The elders ought to take up the role because they eagerly wish to serve others and are not to be motivated by desire for financial gain. They must wish to give rather than get.

iii. ‘neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock’

[3] The elders are not to lord it over (katakurieúō) those (klḗros) whom God has allotted to them but are to set them an example by how they live their own lives. Those who have been assigned to the elders are ‘the flock’ of 5:2. Jesus himself gave a similar instruction to the apostles in Mt 20:25-27; Mk 19:42-45; Lk 22:25-27.

[4] Peter here describes the Lord Jesus as the ‘chief shepherd’ (archipoímēn), one who oversees other shepherds when a flock is so large that more than one shepherd is required. Peter promises the elders that if they faithfully carry out their pastoral duties as undershepherds then they will receive an unfading reward when the chief shepherd is revealed. The reward is a crown of glory; this image of a crown as a reward would have been familiar to Peter’s first readers, The crown awarded to faithful elders will be everlasting.

Note:

Jn 10:11 ‘the good shepherd’

Heb 13:20 ‘ the great shepherd’

1 Pet 5:4 ‘the chief shepherd’

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 John 2:18-23

Posted on by writtenexposition

THE DECEPTIONS OF THE LAST HOUR

Another reason John gives for writing this letter was that of end-time deceptions. He wanted his readers to be aware of false teachers who would be marked by the characteristics of antichrist.

[18] Having mentioned in v.17 that the world ‘passeth away’ John begins to think about the End.

‘last hour’ (éschatos hṓra) Some tend to overthink this expression and assign it to the long time period between Christ’s Ascension and Second Coming (others might say something similar, like: ‘between Pentecost and the Rapture’). How would the first readers/hearers of this letter have understood these words? They, like John, would have assumed that the eschatological climax of the ages was imminent.

What caused John to think that the End was near? He himself answers that question: ‘now there are many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the ‘last time.’

The word ‘antichrist’ (antíchristos) meaning ‘against Christ’ occurs only in the epistles of John (1 John 2:18, 22; 4:3; 2 John 1:7). The appearance of false teachers and false Christs had been predicted by Jesus himself in Mt 24:4-5, 24-25.

[19] ‘They went out from us’ Note: ‘They’ and ‘us’. The false teachers had defected from the fellowship of the apostles. As regards doctrine, there had been a rift between them and the apostles. ‘Us’ is most likely an apostolic first person plural pronoun (see also 1:1; 4:6). It is likely that as the false teachers travelled around they claimed an association with the apostles. John emphasizes that no such link existed. For John, the fact that these people had left the true faith showed what they were really like.

[20] ‘but ye’ The ‘you’ of vv. 21-22 contrasts with the ‘they’ of v. 19. John’s readers were faithful because they had ‘received an unction (chrísma) from the Holy One’. This may be an allusion to the anointing of the Levitical priests (Ex 40:15). If so, the main idea is that when a priest was anointed it was with the presumption that his ministry for God would continue for the remainder of his life. The ‘unction’ that John’s readers had received is mentioned again twice in v. 27, where it is clear that the reference is to a person.

‘The Holy One’ This is Jesus Christ (see Mk 1:24; Lk 4:34; Jn 6:69; Acts 3:14; Rev 3:7).

As a result of the unction they ‘know (understand) all things.’ (For use of the word ‘know’ (eídō) in 1 John see also: 2:11, 21 (2x), 29; 3:2, 5, 14, 15; 5:13, 15 (2x), 18, 19, 20)

[21] John tactfully tells them that he has written to them precisely because they know the truth (Jer 31:34; Jn 6:45), that because of the unction they already have a good grasp of truth i.e. about Jesus Christ. They will not be caught out by the lies that false teachers were spreading about the Person of Christ.

[22-23] The false teachers were liars because they denied that Jesus was the Messiah, i.e the One sent by God to be the Saviour (Jn 4: 29, 42; 20:31). Having defined the lie John then labels those who propagate that lie as antichrists. To deny the Son is tantamount to denying the Father who sent him (4:10) and who bore witness to him (5:9-10).

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 4 :1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

Posted on by writtenexposition

Division of the chapter:

4:1-6 Suffering as Christ suffered

4:7-19 Suffering as a Christian

Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: Wherein they think it strange that ye run not with them to the same excess of riot, speaking evil of you: Who shall give account to him that is ready to judge the quick and the dead. For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit. 4:1-6

4:1-6 Suffering as Christ suffered

4:1-5 Their death with Christ:

  • v.1 liberates them from the power of sin.
  • v.2 enables them to do God’s will.
  • vv.3-5 gives them a new perspective on sin.

4:6 The Christian martyrs:

  • were judged (and slain) by men
  • are alive unto God.

[1] ‘Since then Christ has suffered in the flesh’ looks back to 3:18 – ‘being put to death in the flesh’.

‘suffered’ – suffering can be taken as including death (Acts 17:3; Heb 13:12).

‘In the flesh’ – during this life on earth.

‘arm yourselves’ (hoplízō) This is a military term meaning to equip or furnish with arms. The Christian life is sometimes thought of as a war (Rom 6:13; 13:12; 2 Cor 6:7; 10:4; Eph 6:11-17; 1 Th 5:8).

‘with the same mind’ In light of Christ’s suffering Christians are to think as Christ thought about suffering. His mind was fixed and focused on the will of God (v. 2).

(énnoia) attitude of mind, thought, guiding conviction – that ‘death in the flesh’ results in ‘life in the spirit’ (3:18). They are to arm themselves with a willingness to suffer.

‘likewise’ and ‘the same’ – the experience of Christians is equated with that (death, resurrection, triumph) of Christ.

‘for’ (hóti) – if taken as explicative it introduces the explanation of ‘same mind’, if taken as causal (translate ‘because’) it is introducing the reason for the exhortation in verse 1a.

It is most likely causal, which also avoids any perception that ‘ceased from sin’ implies that Christ has been a sinner. Peter has already stated that Christ was sinless (2:22).

‘he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin.’ The idea is possibly that in water baptism a believer identifies himself with Christ’s suffering and death.

paúsō stop, come to an end. To be finished with something does not necessarily imply participation in it.

If the singular ‘he’ is taken as referring to Christ as the one who has ‘suffered in the flesh and ceased from sin’ in what sense, therefore, has Christ ‘finished with sin’? One could say that he is finished with it in that he no longer has to reckon with the opposing powers and perhaps also in that it is no longer something that he has to bear for mankind. His bearing sin for mankind was finished at the cross and in his resurrection he was victorious over death and the evil powers. His death has removed him from sin’s sphere of influence.

Since this verse links back to 3:18, in which suffering and death seem to be equivalent, Peter could use the term ‘suffer’ here to speak of both the death of Christ and the suffering of Christians and draw an analogy between the two.

[2] By their willingness to suffer for righteousness’ sake the Christians demonstrate that they have made made a clean break with sin and have committed themselves to a new way of life.

‘The rest of…time in the flesh’ This refers not simply to the remainder of their earthly lives but also to the fact that the End is near (see v.7).

[3] ‘The time past of our life may suffice us’ Referring to their previous lifestyle Peter uses irony to tell them that they have wasted ‘more than enough’ time living in immorality. They were living ‘according to the wish of the Gentiles’. Peter uses ‘Gentiles’ here to refer to the local pagans – who are not Christians, rather than to people who are not Jews. Note the contrast between ‘the will of God’ (v.2) and the ‘will of the Gentiles’ (v.3).

Peter divides the Christian life into two parts. The first is ‘the time that has passed’ which is characterized by sinful practices (v.3 ff). The second part is the time that remains (v.2).

‘When we walked in’ is followed by a short list of vices (cp. Gal 5:19-21):

lasciviousness – asélgeia, sensuousness, no moral restraint.

lusts – epithumía, passions, cravings, sinful desires

excess of wine – oinophlugía, intoxications

revellings kṓmos, revelries, immoral parties

banquetings pótos, drinking bouts, drunken parties

abominable idolatries – athémitoi eidōlolatreíai, lawless idolatries, acts of idol worship

[4] ‘wherein’ refers to the content of v. 3. Contrast with the ‘wherein’ of 1:6. Non-Christians think it strange that the Christians no longer involve themselves in such social activities. The pagan neighbours ‘speak evil’ of the Christians because they do not rush with them (stampede) to the same ‘excess of riot’ (indulgence that is unrestrained).

The word for ‘speak evil’ is blasphēméō which, as well as meaning ‘ to blaspheme’ (Mt 9:3; Rom 2:24) can mean ‘to speak slanderously’ (Rom 3:8, 1 Cor 10:30; Tit 3:2).

[5] Those who vilify the Christians will be accountable to ‘him that is ready to judge the quick and the ‘dead’. The use of ‘ready’ implies that the judgement will be soon.

Who is the judge? Thus far in 1 Peter God the Father is viewed as the judge (1:17, 2:23). Generally, however, the New Testament teaches that God has committed this task to Christ (Mt 25:31-46; Lk 24:46; Acts 10:42, 17:31; Rom 14:10; 1 Cor 4:5; 2 Tim 4:1).

[6] Having mentioned the thought of judgement and its imminence Peter now makes a rather obscure statement: ‘For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.’

‘For’ links back to the mention of judgement and ‘this cause’ (this is why) refers forward to the day of judgement. The author is stating why the gospel was preached to dead people. Although there is no article here (it is not ‘the dead’) and thus the reference is to dead people in general Peter may be thinking of Christians who had already died (cp. 1 Thess 4:13-18) before the Day of Judgement. The early church expected a swift return by Christ. The Second Coming would involve judgement by Christ of the living and of those who were already dead (Acts 10:42; Rom 14:9-12; 2 Tim 4:1).

‘the gospel was preached’. Grammatically euaggelízō (to proclaim or tell) has no subject so we could read ‘it was preached’ or ‘he was preached’.

If taken as the impersonal ‘it was preached’ then Christ could have been the one who preached. In addition, the aorist tense refers to a definite occasion in the past when the preaching occurred.

It is unlikely, however, that this verse refers to the same preaching event as that of 3:19 as there the preaching was to spirits (pneúma) whereas here the preaching was to dead human beings (nekrós). ‘Dead’ refers to their present state but the ‘preaching’ occurred when they were alive. The gospel was preached to those who are dead.

Peter gives two reasons why the gospel was preached to these early believers:

a) that they might be judged according to men in the flesh.

b) that they might live according to God in the spirit.

The idea seems to be that these early Christians glorified God through martyrdom (see vv. 12-14). They were judged according to men (as men judge i.e. by appearances and unfairly) but once dead they leave the condemnation of men behind and enjoy eternal life. Jobes (2005, pp. 312-312) points out:

‘In the immediate context, Peter’s point is that death does not exempt a person from God’s coming judgment. Accountability after death was not widely taught in the pagan world. With such an assumption a pagan critic could reasonably question what good the gospel is, since it seems so restrictive of behavior in this life, and then the believer dies like everyone else. Peter, however, teaches that because people will be judged even after physical death, contra pagan expectation, the gospel message of forgiveness and judgment that has been preached to those who are now dead—whether they became believers or not—is still efficacious. Death does not invalidate either the promises or the warnings of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Peter’s claim not only would warn the unbeliever but would also encourage Christians concerning believers who may have passed on. Peter reassures his readers that the efficacy of the gospel continues after physical death to be the basis for God’s judgment, and therefore a decision to live for Christ in this life is truly the right decision, even despite appearances to the contrary as judged by the world’s reasoning.’

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 John 2:15-17

Posted on by writtenexposition

We have previously noticed that in the section 2:12-27 the author tells his first readers precisely why he has written this letter to them. The first reason, given in 2:12-14, is their spiritual state. Now, in 2:15-17, we have John’s second reason for writing: because of the enticements of the world.

THE ENTICEMENTS OF THE WORLD

No matter how good their spiritual state might be John was aware that the danger of worldliness was ever present. He therefore warns them to beware of it.

[15] A COMMAND

Rather than just offer one or two helpful suggestions John issues a firm command: ‘love not the world neither the things that are in the world’. This is the first of ten imperatives in 1 John. See the ten listed at:

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Although the ‘world’ (kósmos) can refer to people (e.g. John 3:16) here it seems to refer to the world system. Kósmos carries the idea of order or arrangement.

Lambert Dolphin makes the following useful comments on ‘the world:

‘The “world-system” involves a concern for external appearances more than inner content and quality. As used in the New Testament, the world does not refer to nature, but to the world-system, to society and human culture. The world system is outwardly religious, scientific, cultured and elegant. Inwardly it seethes with national and commercial rivalries.’

Much is said about the world in 1 John. See 2:2, 16-17; 3:1, 13; 4:3-5, 9, 14, 17; 5:4, 19.

[15] A CONCLUSION

‘If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.’

If a professing Christian is wholly taken up with love for the world John would conclude that such a person is not a genuine believer at all, for this behaviour is incompatible with love for God.

[16] A CHARACTERIZATION

Everything that is in the world system does not come from the Father. This system of values, goals and ethics excludes God and is opposed to God (5:19).

John identifies three elements othat characterize worldliness:

a) ‘The lust of the flesh’. Lusts (desires or cravings) of the flesh refers to human bodily appetites.

b) ‘The lust of the eyes’. This would refer to the human tendency to want what we see. We are naturally covetous and acquisitive.

c) ‘The pride of life’. This is a reminder of human showiness and the wish to impress others with one’s own importance.

The world encourages and caters to these perspectives. N.B. Some see the sin of Eve (Gen 3:6) as illustrating these three elements of worldiness: ‘the tree was good for food’, ‘it was pleasant to the eyes’, ‘a tree to be desired to make one wise’.

[17] A CONFIRMATION

John observes that worldiness is a craving for things that will soon pass away and confirms that whoever does the will of God will ‘live’ (ménō, abide, remain) forever. The idea of ‘abiding’ is that of living in fellowship with God. Such a life is viewed as never really coming to an end.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted on by writtenexposition

1. Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. 2:15

2. Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. 2:24

3. Abide in him. 2:27

4. Abide in him. 2:28

5. Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, 3:1

6. Let no man deceive you. 3:7

7. Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you. 3:13

8. Believe not every spirit. 4:1

9. Try the spirits. 4:1

10. Keep yourselves from idols. 5:21

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:12-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading through 1 John you will notice that the author often sets out his ideas in groups of three.

In chapter 1 he gives three tests of life and already in chapter 2 he has presented three tests for love.

Three tests in chapter 1: all begin with ‘if we say.’

1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:

1: 8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

Three tests in chapter two: all begin with ‘he that saith.’

2:4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him…

2:6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.

2:9 He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now.

In the section 2:12-27 the author tells his first readers precisely why he has written this letter to them. The first reason is given in 2:12-14.

2:12-14 John writes because of their spiritual state.

Because of previous warnings in the letter one might think that the state of his addressees was suspect but these verses clarify that their spiritual condition was good. John was hoping that this would continue.

In 2:12-14 we have more triplets, two series of three, all beginning with the assertion ‘I am writing to you….. because.’

Series 1

2:12 I write unto you, little children, because your sins are forgiven you for his name’s sake.

2:13 I write unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning.

2:13 I write unto you, young men, because ye have overcome the wicked one.

Series 2

2:13 I write unto you, little children, because ye have known the Father.

2:14 I have written unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning.

2:14 I have written unto you, young men, because ye are strong, and the word of God abideth in you, and ye have overcome the wicked one.

CHILDREN

FATHERS

YOUNG MEN

Opinion is divided as to what is meant by ‘children’, ‘fathers’, and ‘young men’. Is the author addressing:

  • three physical age groups , i.e. ‘children’, ‘fathers’, and ‘young men’?
  • three levels of spiritual maturity, i.e. new Christians, mature Christians, and those with some Christian experience?
  • all the Christians as children, and then directing his comments to ‘fathers’ and ‘young men’, whether according to physical age groups (older people and younger people) or spiritual maturity (more mature, maturing)?

Whatever the case may be it seems odd that the group labelled ‘fathers’ is placed in the middle of each sequence.

The word for children (teknía) is a figurative term of affection. It occurs in Jn 13:33, Gal 4:19 and seven times in 1 John (2:1, 12, 28; 3:7, 18; 4:4; 5:21). It is said of them that their sins have been forgiven ‘ on for his name’s sake’ i.e. on account of Jesus Christ. John is thus reminding them of the wonderful fact that they had experienced the forgiveness of sins. This is something that has happened in the past but is still true in the present.

It is said of the ‘fathers’ that they have ‘known him that is from the beginning. This refers to the person of Jesus Christ and would seem to refer back to 1:1-2. The ‘beginning’ is the incarnation of the ‘Word of life’.

The ‘young men’ (neanískos occurs only here and in the following verse in the Johannine writings) have overcome (nikáō – see also 4:4; 5:4 twice, 5) evil / the evil one (ponērós – 2:13, 14; 3:12; 5:18, 19).

Having addressed his first readers as ‘children’, ‘fathers’ and ‘young men’ in 2:12-13a John does so for the second time in 2:13-14. What he says to these parties is similar to what he has said in the first series.

The ‘children’ have ‘known the Father’.

Again the ‘fathers’ have known the one who is ‘from the beginning’. Here the ‘I am writing’ changes from the present tense to the Aorist, John now presenting his writing of the epistles as a complete rather than as an ongoing action.

Again it is said that the young men have overcome ‘the wicked one’ but John now adds two further reasons for writing to them:

  • because they are strong
  • because the word of God abides (remains, lives) in them.

SUMMATION

Viewed as ‘children’ the believers had experienced forgiveness of sins and had come to know the Father.

Viewed as ‘fathers’ the believers had fellowship with the eternal One who had become incarnate.

Viewed as ‘young men’ the believers had fought and overcome the evil one. This had made them strong in their faith.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

THE AARONIC BLESSING

Posted on by writtenexposition


‘The LORD bless thee, and keep thee: The LORD make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee: The LORD lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.’ Numbers 6:24-26

INTRODUCTION

Recently I attended a wedding service during which the officiating minister delivered the Aaronic Blessing. I was intrigued by this pronouncement, in a 21st century CE Christian setting, of a liturgical blessing from the ancient Israelite cult. I therefore decided to look more closely at the scriptural occurrence of this benediction and seek to determine the original circumstances and meaning behind its use?

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

The Aaronic Blessing appears in the book of Numbers which is the fourth of the first five books of the Old Testament (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy). These books are often referred to collectively as the Pentateuch, or as the Torah (law or instruction). The Aaronic blessing comes at the end of a large chunk of religious legislation extending from Leviticus 1:1 – Numbers 6: 27.

This cycle of instructions is mainly concerned with the holiness of YHWH (the Lord) and with the holiness of the Israelites as his chosen people. YHWH had revealed himself to the Israelites as their national god, had brought them out of slavery in Egypt (the Exodus) and had made a covenant with them at Sinai by which they obligated themselves to worship him exclusively. He had also delivered to Moses blueprints for the construction and erection of a portable shrine (known as the Tabernacle) dedicated to YHWH worship and had given detailed instructions for an associated cult (set of religious practices). The latter involved the institution of a priesthood and a sacrificial system. All of this had been successfully implemented as instructed by the time the book of Numbers opens.

At that point the Israelites are preparing to leave Sinai and travel through the wilderness to the Promised Land. Just as the community is about to set out on the journey Moses delivers instructions, specifically to the Aaronite priests, about a blessing. It draws attention to the good things that lie in store for YHWH’s covenant people; those who live their lives in accordance with his revealed word.

THE CONCEPT OF BLESSING

‘Bless’ and ‘blessing’ are common words in the Old Testament and in the culture of the time the concept carried various shades of meaning.

1. Blessing functioned as part of an everyday greeting similar to our modern ‘Hello!’ (see Ruth 2:4; Psa 129:8).

2. Blessing was regarded as having almost magical power to bestow future fertility, prosperity and security (see Gen 27:30-38).

3. Blessing often had God as the object and in these instances it conveyed gratitude and thanksgiving on the part of human beings (see Gen 24:27; Ex 18:10; Ruth 4:14; 1 Sam 25:32-33; 2 Sam 18:28; 1 Kgs 1:48; 5:7; 8:15, 56; 1 Chron 16:36; 2 Chron 2:12; 6:4 and various psalms e.g. Psa 28:6; 31:21). The emphasis is on God as the recipient of praise for blessings already received rather than as the giver of future blessings.

4. ‘Blessed’ was used to describe the situation of one who had already received good things, e.g. Psa 1:1

5. Blessing was used as part of religious worship as petition for the favour of the deity and perhaps also, in the case of the Aaronic Blessing, as a prayer for protection through death (e.g. the Ketef Hinnom amulets – see below).

Hagee (2012, p.27) comments:

‘When God blesses man it is to bestow good health, abundant success, and prosperity, both materially and spiritually. When man blesses God, it is presented in the forms of thanksgiving, reverence, obedience, praise and worship. When a man blesses his fellow believer, he recites the Priestly Blessing of Numbers 6:22-27…’

It is useful to note the important difference in emphasis between blessings already received and those wished for the future. One produces a beatitude, the other a benediction. The Aaronic Blessing is a benediction.

AN ANCIENT BENEDICTION

In 1979 two tiny silver scrolls were found during the excavation of a tomb at Ketef Hinnom near Jerusalem. Since they contain an abbreviation of this priestly blessing in miniature script it is generally thought that these were worn as amulets by the person buried there (possibly a priest). Dating from about the end of the seventh century BCE, these tiny silver sheets are now the oldest written portions of the Hebrew Bible in known existence, predating the Dead Sea Scrolls by three or four centuries.

THE STRUCTURE OF THE  PASSAGE

Following immediately upon the block of legislation dealing with Israel’s holiness, particularly that in Num 5-6 about holiness in the camp, comes this benediction which expresses a wish for the ideal situation; a state of harmony, security and prosperity for the Israelites, brought about by holiness.

6:22-23. The introduction to the blessing.

6:24-26 The wording of the blessing.

6: 27 The conclusion to the blessing.

THE INTRODUCTION TO THE AARONIC BLESSING

‘And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying, Speak unto Aaron and unto his sons, saying, On this wise ye shall bless the children of Israel, saying unto them‘  Num 6:22-23

This introductory section emphasizes that the Lord himself initiated this blessing. YHWH (the Lord) is the author, Moses is the messenger and Aaron and his descendants are the mediators of the blessing. The revelation by YHWH to Moses specifies the blessing as part of a religious ritual that is to be invoked only by priests. These are weighty words that not just anyone can speak casually.

Deuteronomy makes it clear that blessing was one of the main functions of the Levitical priestly office (see also 1 Chron 23:23):

‘At that time the LORD separated the tribe of Levi, to bear the ark of the covenant of the LORD, to stand before the LORD to minister unto him, and to bless in his name, unto this day.’  Deut 10:8

‘And the priests the sons of Levi shall come near; for them the LORD thy God hath chosen to minister unto him, and to bless in the name of the LORD; and by their word shall every controversy and every stroke be tried:’ Deut 21:5

In Numbers 6, however, the message is even more specific: only the Aaronite priests can invoke this priestly blessing. The mediation of the blessing was a specific duty which was exclusive to a single group of priests authorised by YHWH.

We are not told when this blessing was first pronounced by Aaron but it may have been some time earlier when the priests began to exercise their ministry just after the inauguration of the Tabernacle and the priesthood. According to Lev 9:22:

‘And Aaron lifted up his hand toward the people, and blessed them, and came down from offering of the sin offering, and the burnt offering, and peace offerings.’

What Aaron said on that occasion is not divulged nor is there mention of the lifting of the hand in Num 6, but perhaps the wording of that first blessing matched what is recorded here in Numbers 6:24-26.

The particle ‘thus’ (translated ‘on this wise’ in the KJV) specifies that the blessing must be given exactly in the form and wording prescribed by YHWH.

THE WORDING OF THE AARONIC BLESSING

‘The LORD bless thee, and keep thee:
The LORD make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee:
The LORD lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.’

This formal request to God for the granting of prosperity, fertility and success to the Israelites consists of three lines each having two clauses and containing two verbs.

bless         keep

shine         be gracious

lift              give

The verbs call for six related actions on the part of YHWH in order that this favourable situation for his people might be achieved.

YHWH appears as the first word in each line and is therefore explicitly the subject of the first clause in each line. He is also implicitly the subject of the second clause in each line. The placement of YHWH at the beginning of each line is for emphasis, as grammatically the threefold repetition is unnecessary. This stresses that although the benediction is spoken by the priests it is the Lord who issues the blessing. This rules out the possibility that blessing can come from another source e.g. the priests or false deities.

Some equate the threefold mention of ‘the Lord’ with the Holy Trinity (Father, Psa 110:1; Jesus, Rom 10:9; Holy Spirit, 2 Cor 3:17) and link the Aaronic Blessing with the Apostolic Benediction ‘The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen.’ in 2 Cor 13:14.

Scholars see great literary accomplishment in the Hebrew. Each of the three lines is longer than the one before thus, it is thought, illustrating the increasing flow of God’s blessings. In the original the lines have 3, 5 and 7 words which is a regular sequence of odd numbers. The number of consonants in the lines is 15, 20 and 25 which is a sequence by five. The number of syllables is 12, 14 and 16.

The pronouns throughout the blessing are singular. The KJV clearly shows that they are second person singular by the use of  ‘thee’, e.g. ‘The Lord bless thee and keep thee’. Although singular, and therefore referring to each individual Israelite, this is a collective singular similar to that in the Ten Commandments (Ex 20:2-17: Deut 5:6-21), e.g ‘Thou shalt, thou shalt not’, so the import is wide.

Although one could hardly describe the relationship between YHWH and his Old Testament worshippers as intimate yet the use of second person singular pronouns emphasizes that it was personal. By blessing individuals YHWH blessed the people as a whole, by blessing the people as a whole (collective sense) he blessed individuals.

There is some discussion as to whether the blessing contains six petitions or three. The general opinion seems to be that there are three. That assumes that the verbs are in pairs. The first clause of each line is a call for YHWH to act towards the Israelites, the second clause has to do with his activity on their behalf in response to that call.

The last part of each line can be taken as expanding or explaining the request in the first part (i.e. it is epexegetical).

Some suggest that the Lord blesses by keeping (protecting), the Lord makes his face to shine by being gracious and that he lifts up his countenance thereby giving peace.

The last part of each line may be regarded as giving the consequent action of God to the request in the first part, i.e. it is the result.

The verbs in the Aaronic Blessing

BLESS

bāraḵ: to bless, kneel, salute, greet. Its derived meaning is to bless someone or something.

Blessing in the Old Testament had little to do with spirituality but more to do with material benefits. The first biblical mention of blessing in Gen 1:28 shows that it has to do with productivity (offspring), prosperity, empowerment and personal physical security. Deuteronomy 28:1-14  (which is also in the second person singular) gives a list of blessings that an obedient worshipper of YHWH might expect to receive:

28:3 Blessed shalt thou be in the city, and blessed shalt thou be in the field.

28:4 Blessed shall be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy ground, and the fruit of thy cattle, the increase of thy kine, and the flocks of thy sheep.

28:5 Blessed shall be thy basket and thy store.

28:6 Blessed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed shalt thou be when thou goest out.

28:7 The LORD shall cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways.

28:8 The LORD shall command the blessing upon thee in thy storehouses, and in all that thou settest thine hand unto; and he shall bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.

28:11 And the LORD shall make thee plenteous in goods, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy ground, in the land which the LORD swore unto thy fathers to give thee.

28:12 The LORD shall open unto thee his good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto thy land in his season, and to bless all the work of thine hand: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow.

28:13 And the LORD shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath;…

KEEP

šāmar: to watch, to keep, to preserve, to guard, to be careful, to watch over.

This word is used of men guarding, protecting or tending (e.g Gen 2:15; Isa 21:11-12) and of YHWH keeping covenant (e.g. 1Kgs 8:23-25). This request in the Aaronic Benediction is for protection by YHWH against any force, human or spiritual, that would disrupt or destroy the blessing once received by his people.

Psalm 121, in which šāmar occurs several times, is a meditation on YHWH’s vigilance (‘neither slumber nor sleep’) and his preservation of his people. He is a divine security guard.

I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. My help cometh from the LORD, which made heaven and earth. He will not suffer thy foot to be moved: he that keepeth thee will not slumber. Behold, he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep. The LORD is thy keeper: the LORD is thy shade upon thy right hand. The sun shall not smite thee by day, nor the moon by night. The LORD shall preserve thee from all evil: he shall preserve thy soul. The LORD shall preserve thy going out and thy coming in from this time forth, and even forevermore.

SHINE

’ôr: to give light, to shine, to become light, make bright

Examples: Jonathan’s eyes brightened 1 Sam 14:27, 29; and Ezra 9:8 ‘that God may brighten our eyes’.

‘May YHWH make his face to shine in your direction’

This anthropomorphism which attributes human features to God indicates that God makes his presence known but the imagery of his face shining means much more. God is not only near but also friendly and his attitude is benevolent. He will give a positive and favourable reception. See also Psa 31:16; Psa 80:3, 7, 19.

Note: The opposite imagery of the shining face is that of hiding the face (e.g. Deut 31:18) which speaks of rejection.

Psalm 67, which is based on the Aaronic Blessing, is a meditation on ‘bless’ (vv. 1, 6, 7) but also includes the expression ’cause his face to shine upon us’ in v.1.

BE GRACIOUS

ḥānan: to be gracious toward, to favour, to have mercy on.

The idea here is that of God showing favour to his people. This is usually thought of as the action of a superior towards an inferior. There is not the distinction between grace and mercy that we have in the New Testament. The Septuagint (Greek Old Testament) translates ‘be gracious’ as ‘show mercy’. The prayer is that God might deal with his people in mercy, grace and deliverance from afflictions. Perhaps forgiveness of sins would be included as one of God’s gracious actions; judgement tempered with mercy.

At Sinai YHWH had revealed himself as ‘merciful and gracious’ but also held out the possibility of judgement:

And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.

Unlike the above quotation from Exod 34:6-7 there is no mention of judgement in in the Aaronic blessing.

LIFT

nāśā’: to lift, to carry, to take away.

The ‘lifting up of the countenance toward’ literally ‘turn his face towards’ suggests that God is looking at and therefore paying attention to his people, smiling upon them with pleasure and affection.

GIVE

śiym: to put, to set, or to place, to appoint, to bring, to call, to put, to change, to charge, to commit, to consider, to convey, to determine.

The petition ends with a request for the Lord to grant šālôm (peace). ‘Peace’ does not just mean the absence of war but also carries the thought of unity, harmony, well-being, health, prosperity,wholeness, security and salvation.

THE CONCLUSION OF THE AARONIC BLESSING

And they shall put my name upon the children of Israel; and I will bless them. Num 6:27

Following the words of the Aaronic Blessing comes verse 27 which continues the instructions for blessing given by YHWH to Moses in vv. 22-23. The Septuagint places verse 27 at the end of verse 23. The verse concludes the section on the Aaronic Blessing and gives an insight into how it was viewd by the Lord.

‘and they shall put my name upon the children of Israel;‘ Does this refer to a further separate ritual that is not described here or back to the invocation of the Aaronic Blessing? Given that details of a different ritual are not supplied it seems most likely that YHWH regarded the invocation of the blessing by the Aaronite priests as a figurative act of putting his name upon the people.

As a ritual act the recitation of the Aaronic Blessing expressed the divine name (being and character) of the covenant-making and covenant-keeping God and reminded the Israelites that they belonged him.

The divine name reminded them of who he is – his character.

The divine name reminded them of what he had done – his works.

The divine name reminded them of what he had promised- his covenant.

As worshippers of an awe-inspiring, holy God they had to be holy as well. The pronouncement of the benediction did not provide an easy magic shortcut to blessing. They had to worship the Lord, obey him and walk in his ways, then blessing would follow. Whenever the blessing was asked for such people it would definitely be granted.

The blessing had to be requested by the Aaronite priests but it was not caused by them. The Lord alone could bless.

SUMMATION

As Christians today we can enjoy the principle enshrined in the Aaronic Blessing: that the Lord who has saved us and brought us into a relationship with himself can sustain us on our journey of life with blessings which are unmerited but graciously bestowed. It is our responsibility, as those who belong to him, to live holy lives.

‘But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.’ Mat 6:33

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Bailey, L. R., 2005. Leviticus-Numbers, Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys

Bush, G., 1858. Notes, Critical and Practical, on the Book of Numbers: Designed as a General Help to Biblical Reading and Instruction, New York: Ivison & Whinney

Duguid, I. M. and Hughes, K. R., 2006. Numbers: God’s Presence in the Wilderness. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

Hagee J., 2012. The Power of the Prophetic Blessing, Brentwood, TH: Worthy Publishing

Martin, G. and Anders, M., 2002. Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers. Nashville, Tenn: Broadman & Holman.

North, G., 1996. Sanctions and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Numbers, Tyler, TX: Inst for Christian Economics

Pitkänen, P., 2018. A Commentary on Numbers: Narrative Ritual and Colonialism. New York: Routledge

Swete, H. B., 1909, The Old Testament in Greek According to the Septuagint, Cambridge University Press

Rushdoony, J. R., 2006. Numbers, Vallecito, CA: Chalcedon/Ross House Books

van Kooten, G. H., 2007. The Revelation of the Name YHWH to Moses: Perspectives from Judaism, the Pagan Graeco-Roman World, and Early Christianity, Leiden: Brill.

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Cocco, F., 2007, La sonrisa de Dios. Los verbos de la bendición de Num 6,24-26, available at

https://www.academia.edu/9648468/La_sonrisa_de_Dios_Los_verbos_de_la_bendici%C3%B3n_de_Num_6_24_26

Cohen, C., 1993, The Biblical Priestly Blessing (Num. 6:24-26) in the Light of Akkadian Parallels, Tel Aviv, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 228-238

Fishbane, M., 1983, Form and Reformulation of the Biblical Priestly Blessing, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 115–121.

Isaak, M. A., 1995, Literary Structure and Theology of the Patriarchal Narratives: The Three-fold Blessing, Direction Magazine, Vol. 24. No. 2 pp. 65-74

Martens, E., 2009, Intertext Messaging: Echoes of the Aaronic Blessing (Numbers 6:24-26), Direction Magazine, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 163-178

Miller, P. D., 1975. The Blessing of God, Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology, Vol. 29, No.3, pp.240-251

Ozolins, K., 2021. Artifact in Focus: The Ketef Hinnom Amulets, Ink Magazine, Issue 9, pp. 12-14

Yardeni, A., 1991. ‘Remarks on the Priestly Blessing on Two Ancient Amulets from Jerusalem.’ Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 176–185

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

Posted on by writtenexposition

For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God, by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him. 1 Pet 3:18-22

Having already discussed the topic of undeserved suffering with reference to Christ’s crucifixion in 1 Pet 2:21-25 the author now deals with it in terms of Christ’s resurrection and ascension. Note that the passage begins and ends with the resurrection of Christ. The flow of thought in these verses is as follows:

  • Christ suffered once for sins
  • he was put to death
  • he was made alive
  • he preached to imprisoned spirits
  • they had been imprisoned because they had been disobedient
  • they had been disobedient during Noah’s time
  • when only eight people had survived the flood
  • this reminds us of baptism
  • it ‘saves’ us because of Christ’s resurrection
  • when he ascended into heaven to sit at God’s right hand

[18] ‘For’ ‘because’ (hóti) – this is a link with the thought of vv.13-17. It does not link back to v.17 alone. If so Peter would be telling them that they are suffering innocently but are to be happy because Christ also suffered innocently as the pattern of innocent suffering. That interpretation is not possible because Christ’s suffering was unique, it was ‘for sins once for all.’ The link is to the entire thrust of vv.13-17 that they are blessed because they are suffering innocently. Peter is telling these Christians in Asia Minor that just as Christ seemed defeated by his suffering but emerged triumphant so they too will be triumphant. He is thus preparing them for fiery trial ahead and encouraging them to stand fast throughout.

‘For’ may also introduce a quotation from an early Christian hymn (cp. 2:21), the relevant extract here being v.18 and v.22.

‘also’ You are suffering but remember that Christ suffered too.

‘once’ (hápax) once for all. For similar see Rom 6:10; Heb 7:27; Heb 9:12, 26, 28; 10:10). Christ’s sacrificial death was of infinite value.

The argument here is not that of Hebrews (chapters 7-10) that Christ’s once for all sacrifice does away with the need for more sacrifices. The point here is the one brought out in 4:1-3; that just as Christ dealt with sin once and then began a new phase of life so these Christians should be finished with sin and not return to pagan practices.

‘suffered for sins, the just for the unjust’ Note the two different words translated ‘for:’

1) ‘for sins’ (perí) concerning or with regard to (see also Rom 8:3; 1 Jn 2:2; 1 Jn 4:10). Christ’s suffering was related to sins, but not his own sins for he was righteous.

2) ‘for the unjust’ (hupér) on behalf of. Christ’s death was vicarious, a substitutionary atonement.

Peter stresses the innocence of Christ’s character and therefore that his suffering was undeserved. Peter refers to Christ by the title ‘the Just One’ in Acts 3:14.

The purpose and intention of Christ’s suffering was that he might lead us to God i.e. to provide access to God or to bring us into God’s presence, in the sense of presenting us at a royal court.

Christ was able to provide this access to God by ‘being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit.’ Watson & Callan (2012, p.88) explain:

“Christ,” the subject of the sentence, is modified by two passive participles: “put to death” (thanatōtheis), with the human authorities in Jerusalem as implied agents, and “made alive” (zōopoiētheis), with God understood as the agent (cf. 1 Pet. 1:3, 21), for the latter verb typically refers to the resurrection (John 5:21; Rom. 4:17; 8:11; 1 Cor. 15:22; Eph. 2:5; Col. 2:13.

These parallel participles, each connected to a noun, are contrasts.

mén……dé on the one hand……on the other hand. This same expression denoting contrast appears elsewhere in 1 Peter, for example, 1:20; 2:4; 4:14.

What is meant by ‘in the flesh’ and ‘by the spirit?’ According to Vinson, Wilson & Mills (2010, p.174) there are three options :

  1. in the flesh – as a human being , in the spirit – as a spiritual being. 1 Pet 4:6 makes it clear that the spirit is God’s spirit.
  2. in the flesh – in the human realm, human sphere of existence, in the spirit – in the realm of the spirit, spiritual sphere of existence, i.e. Jesus was put to death in the human realm and made alive in God’s realm.
  3. by the flesh – Jesus was killed by human beings, by the spirit – Jesus was raised by the action of God’s spirit i.e. by God’s power.

[19] ‘in/by which’ This refers back to ‘spirit’ (v.18b) and the three possible meanings are:

  • ‘in which realm’ i.e in the Spirit’s realm, in his mode of existence as a spirit.
  • ‘by which’ i.e. by the Spirit’s enabling.
  • in which’ i.e . this refers to the event (the resurrection – when the Spirit made him alive).

‘also’ This does not refer to the ‘spirits in prison’ as that would infer that Christ had made a previous proclamation to others. It indicates that another point about Christ’s activity has occurred to the writer. The previous point is that Christ died to bring us to God, this next point is that he made a proclamation to the spirits in prison.

‘spirits in prison’ This expression does not occur elsewhere in the New Testament. Peter’s readers obviously understood the reference to these imprisoned spirits as it is not presented as a new revelation nor does Peter give an explanation. Unfortunately, since we do not understand the reference we can therefore only speculate upon the answers to the following questions:

  1. Who are the imprisoned spirits?
  2. Where are they located?
  3. What is meant by ‘went?’ In which direction did Christ travel?
  4. What was the nature and content of his preaching?
  5. When did the preaching occur?

‘spirits’ (pneúma) This word refers to supernatural beings (Mt 12:45; Lk 10:20; Heb 1:14). In the New Testament dead human beings are called nekroi, dead ones, or psychoi, souls. Peter had Genesis 6:1-4 in mind, where we read about the ‘sons of God’ (rebellious angels, Jude 6) who were attracted by and raped human women (1 En 15:3-7).

‘prison’ (phulakḗ) This is the usual word for prison, a place where criminals are held. It is used with regard to spirits in Rev 20:7 and probably also in Mt 5:25 – referring to ‘Gehenna of fire’ in Mt 5:22. Jude 6 ‘chains’ also suggests imprisonment of spirits. In Isa 24:21-22 we read about the imprisonment of ‘the host of the high ones on high’. Since it is spirit beings, not human souls, that are said to be imprisoned, the location is not the abode of the dead (Sheol or Hades, never viewed as a prison in the Bible) but seemingly an undisclosed location in the upper regions where disobedient spirit beings are held.

‘went'(poreúomai) In what direction did Christ travel? This word itself gives no clue. Since, however, it occurs again in v.22 where it obviously refers to Christ’s ascension (as in Acts 1:10), logically the direction is ‘upward.’ The preaching occurred after Christ’s resurrection (v.18b having been made alive in the spirit) so it makes sense that the reference here is to the Ascension.

‘preached’ (kērússō) – to announce or proclaim. This was not a proclamation of the gospel as Peter uses another word for that (euaggelízō) in 1 Pet 4:6 but most likely an announcement of judgement. It would have brought comfort to the Christians experiencing trials to know that the judgement of the wicked, even powerful spirits, was assured.

[20] ‘sometime’ (poté) at one time or another, formerly

These imprisoned spirits are said to have been disobedient.’ They are now in prison but the main focus is on their past disobedience rather than their present condition. They failed to heed the warning that they were given ‘in the days of Noah’. Mention of this time in history enables Peter to introduce the topic of the Flood (Gen 6-8). This story is referred to elsewhere in the New Testament in Mt 24:37-39; Lk 17:26-27; Heb 11:7; 2 Pet 2:5; 3:6.

‘the patience of God waited’ This does not just mean that a long-suffering God waited with patience while the ark was was under construction. The sense of ekdéchomai is eager expectation. God’s patience is personified as eagerly awaiting the time when it could be demonstrated in the saving of a few people, in this case eight.

‘in which’ lit. into which. Kelly (1969, p.158) points out: ‘eis conveys the double sense of going into the ark and so being saved in it.’

‘a few’ ‘eight souls (persons). Noah, his wife, his three sons and their wives.

‘were saved by water’ Just as the water effected Noah’s deliverance from the evil world of his day so baptism symbolized the deliverance of the Asian Christians from the evil society in which they lived.

‘BAPTISM NOW SAVES’

[21] What is meant by this dramatic statement in v.21?

‘now’ This refers to the present age in contrast to the time before Christ came.

‘figure’ (antítupon) – a type, pattern or model

‘flesh’ (sarkós) – the flesh of a living creature i.e. body.

‘filth’ (rhúpos) a coarser word than ‘dirt.’

‘answer’ (eperṓtēma) declaration, pledge, profession, agreement, contract, question, inquiry. This word occurs only here in the New Testament but is used in the LXX of Dan 4:17 to mean ‘decision.’

Others would argue that here eperṓtēma means ‘request’ (see Mt 16:1 KJV ‘desired him’). The following interpretations are possible:

• a request to God from a good conscience
• a request to God for a good conscience
• a declaration to God from (or ‘of’ ) a good conscience
• a pledge to God to maintain a good conscience

‘conscience’ (suneídēsis) consciousness of, awareness of an important situation, circumstance or attitude (comes from the words meaning co-knowlege or knowledge shared with another). The Christian receives a good/clear conscience as a result of cleansing at conversion. The idea is not that of absence of guilt but of submission and obedience to God’s will (2:19; 3:16).

Addressing his first readers, Peter tells them that ‘a few, that is, eight people were saved through water, which even in reference to them is a pattern. Baptism now saves, not as a removal of filth from the body but as a declaration of an appropriate awareness toward God through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.’

Baptism corresponds to the water and thus to Noah’s experience of salvation. As Noah passed through the water from evil and death to life, so Christians pass through water as a symbol of their transition from evil and death to new life at conversion.

Peter negates any idea that there is something miraculous about the baptismal water and goes on to explain how baptism saves. He defines it in terms of a declaration.

‘baptism saves’ Brooks (1974, p. 293) comments: ‘It spares from the unfavorable circumstance of judgment. It does so because it is the declaration of the individual’s appropriate conscious awareness in reference to God. He can have this appropriate awareness because of the resurrection of Christ. Baptism saves in that it is the moment when the individual testifies to the fact that he shares something in common with God. He makes known that he has the right attitude and relationship toward God. He willingly responds with his declaration to anyone who interrogates him. He has become a “co-knower” with God and other Christians that in the resurrection of Christ there is salvation. The baptized is saved because he recognizes the authenticity and divine origin of the message that in Christ God has offered man the ultimate revelation of His grace.’

The declaration of a good conscience is made possible ‘by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.’ See 1:3.

[22] Peter returns to what he has been saying about Christ in v.18 (and about Christ’s journey in v.19) and reminds his readers that Christ has been raised by the Father, that he has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with all angels, authorities, and powers subject to him. He thus reassures them that just as Christ has emerged triumphant from suffering, so too will they. There is no need to be afraid (v.14).

‘right hand of God’ The place of authority. This was a fulfillment of Psa 110:1. For Christ at God’s right hand see Mt 22:41-46; 26:64; Mk 12:35-37; 14:62; 16:19; Luke 20:41-44; 22:69; Acts 7:55–56; Rom. 8:34; Col. 3:1; Heb. 1:13; 8:1; 10:12; 12:2

‘has gone into heaven’ Refers to an event i.e. the Ascension.

‘has gone’ This is the same participle as in v.19.

For the Ascension see: Mk 16:19; Lk 24:51; Acts 1:6-11.

For the subjection of supernatural beings see 1 Cor 15:24; Eph 1:20-21; Phil 2:9-10; Col 2:15. Angels are listed along with authorities and powers in Rom 8:38 and in this verse (v.22). This makes it even more likely that the imprisoned spirits of v.19 are disobedient angels.

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTARY

Posted on by writtenexposition

3:13-17 Suffering for righteousness’ sake

‘And who is he that will harm you, if ye be followers of that which is good? But and if ye suffer for righteousness’ sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ. For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing.‘ 1 Pet 3:13-17

We have now arrived at the main section of 1 Peter which, depending upon how one divides the epistle, ends at either 4:19 or 5:10. It deals with the subject of undeserved suffering; specifically, suffering as a Christian. The suffering endured by his readers has already been referred to in 1:6-7; 2:12,15, 19-20 and 3:9 but now Peter addresses it as his main topic.

Kelly (1969, p. 139) identifies three main interwoven strands of thought that Peter develops throughout the section:

  • ‘the idea that the innocent man can face suffering with confidence.’
  • ‘the basis of this confidence is Christ’s victory and the privilege of sharing His passion.’
  • ‘the imminence of the End, when righteous suffering will receive its reward.’

[13] Generally, undeserved suffering is exceptional. Following on naturally from what he has said in vv.9-12 Peter asks a rhetorical question: ‘Who then (i.e. under the circumstances that I have just outlined) is going to harm you if you are devoted to what is good?’

‘followers of that which is good’ lit. ‘zealous of good ‘ – enthusiastic for.

The implied answer is ‘no-one’.

‘harm’ This does not mean literal physical harm but eternal, lasting harm.

[14] Peter tells them that in the event that they should have to suffer physical abuse for the sake of righteousness they ought to count it a blessing and a privilege. The thought is similar to that of Mt 5:10-11. Peter goes into more detail on this point in 4:14. ‘Righteousness’ is upright behaviour. In this verse the situation is hypothetical but in 4:12 the suffering is about to take place, therefore the situation for the original readers must have been deteriorating. In an environment hostile to, and suspicious of, Christianity the risk is always present.

‘be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled’ Peter quotes from Isa 8:12 -13 by way of encouragement. Keating (2011, p.93) explains the point:

‘Just as the Lord was a stronghold for beleaguered Jerusalem in the time of the prophet Isaiah, so he is the comfort and strength for the small, vulnerable Christian communities of Asia Minor— and for us today. To shrink in fear before those who abuse us verbally and physically is a natural human response. We need supernatural faith and hope to resist falling into fear.’

[15] Undeserved suffering presents an opportunity to witness. Christians are not to be terrified by those around them. Their response should not be to deny Christ but to ‘sanctify’ (acknowledge as holy) the Lord God in their hearts. The words ‘in your hearts’ are not in Isaiah, these are added by Peter.

‘give an answer’ A second response is to be ‘ready for a defence (apologian)’. See Acts 22:1; 25:16 ‘answer for himself’; 26:2; Phil 1:7,17; 2 Cor 7:11 ‘clearing;’ 2 Tim 4:16 ‘answer’.

‘reason’ (lógos) account.

This may be a reference to formal interrogation by government or to making a legal defence against a charge, but ‘defence’ and ‘account’ do not always have a technical legal sense. Apologian is used in a non-technical way in 1 Cor 9:3 and 2 Cor 7:11.

‘Always’ and ‘everyone’ are general words so, while they may be called upon to answer to government authorities, Peter’s readers are expected to give an explanation or justification of their faith in answer to general informal questions from non-Christians.

‘hope’ – looking for something good with the expectation of obtaining it.

‘within you’ – either in the Christian community in Asia Minor as a group or within each of their individual hearts.

Their defence of their beliefs is to be conducted with an attitude of gentleness (towards their critics) and fear (towards God).

[16] ‘having a good conscience’ It is necessary to maintain a clear conscience for their witness to be effective. The idea is of knowing that one is not guilty and has nothing to hide. For similar see 3:21 and also Acts 23:1; 1 Tim 1:5,19; 3:9; 2 Tim 1:3; Heb 13:18.

Peter hopes that the exemplary behaviour of Christians will shame those who slander them. Their good manner of life is rooted ‘in Christ”.

‘conversation’ (anastrophḗ) mode of conduct, way of life.

‘that they may be ashamed who falsely accuse you’ (epēreázō) misuse, insult, treat despitefully – this word only occurs here and in Mt 5:44; Lk 6:28.

[17] The paragraph closes with a general statement: ‘it is better to suffer when doing right, if it be God’s will, than when doing wrong.’ lit, ‘if the will of God were so to will.’ Peter has already given this advice to slaves in 2:20.

SUMMARY POINTS

3:14 BE CONFIDENT ‘Be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled’

3:15 BE COMMITTED ‘But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts ‘

3:15 BE CONVERSATIONAL ‘Be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you.’

3:15 BE CONSIDERATE ‘With meekness and fear.’

3:16 BE CLEAN ‘Having a good conscience.’

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER – 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS