Absalom – Written Exposition

INTRODUCTION

Psalms 3 and 4 are viewed as companion psalms because (according to their titles) both were composed by David and each one falls naturally into 4 stanzas, each composed of 2 verses. Psalm 3 is often said to be a Morning Psalm since 3:5 mentions waking from sleep and Psalm 4 an Evening Psalm since 4:8 speaks of lying down to sleep.

Psalm 3 is classified as an individual lament. Mandolfo (2014, p.115) maintains that ‘there are approximately forty-two psalms of lament in the canonical book of Psalms. About thirty of those are individual psalms of lament; the rest are communal.’ She further explains (2014, pp.115-116) that ‘the following features are typical of most lament psalms:

1. Invocation —the initial cry to God to take notice
2. Complaint —the description (usually general) of the psalmist’s suffering that
includes a complaint either against God or some enemy/ies
3. Request —the psalmist petitions God to act on the psalmist’s behalf
4. Expression of Confidence —often a recital of God’s trustworthy characteristics
5. Vow of Praise —assurance of praise that will follow deliverance (though the verbal tenses in this section are sometimes ambiguous).’

Psalm 3 exhibits the above features identified by Mandolfo.

THE TITLE OF THE PSALM

Psalm 3 is the first of seventy-three in the Psalter to be entitled A Psalm of David and also the first to bear a superscription indicating historical setting. Its context is Absalom’s rebellion and attempted coup against his father King David. Details of this conspiracy occupy 2 Samuel chapters 15-18. Betrayed by family and friends, David was in a precarious situation; having been forced to flee Jerusalem he found himself surrounded by enemies. The titles of several psalms situate them in the life and experience of David, Along with the relevant chapters in the books of Samuel and in probable historical chronological order they are:

Psalm 59 – 1 Samuel 19 – when Saul sent, and they watched the house to kill him.

Psalm 34 – 1 Samuel 21 – when he changed his behaviour before Abimelech. . .

Psalm 56 – 1 Samuel 21 – when the Philistines took him in Gath.

Psalm 142 – 1 Samuel 22 – a prayer when he was in the cave.

Psalm 52 – 1 Samuel 22 – when Doeg the Edomite came and told Saul. . .

Psalm 54 – 1 Samuel 23 – when the Ziphims came and said to Saul, Doth not David hide himself with us?

Psalm 57 – 1 Samuel 24 – when he fled from Saul in the cave.

Psalm 63 – 1 Samuel 24 – when he was in the wilderness of Judah.

Psalm 18 – 2 Samuel 22 – in the day that the LORD delivered him from the hand of all his enemies, and from the hand of Saul

Psalm 51 – 2 Samuel 12 – when Nathan the prophet came unto him, after he had gone in to Bathsheba.

Psalm 3 – 2 Samuel 15-18 – when he fled from Absalom his son.

The titles of two more psalms situate them in the life of David but, although there have been many suggestions, they cannot easily be placed in the accounts in the books of Samuel, Kings or Chronicles.

Psalm 7 – Shiggaion of David, which he sang unto the Lord, concerning the words of Cush the Benjamite.

Psalm 60 – . . . Michtam of David, to teach; when he strove with Aram-Naharaim and with Aram-Zobah, when Joab returned, and smote of Edom in the Valley of Salt twelve thousand.

In spite of the fact that the superscription informs us that Absalom’s revolt was the historical context Psalm 3 itself does not specifically mention either David or Absalom.

STRUCTURE

1-2 David’s Complaint

3-4 David’s Confidence

5-6 David’s Courage

7-8 David’s Conquering

EXPOSITION

David’s Complaint (1-2)

Psalm 3 is the first lament in the Psalter and also the first psalm to directly address the Lord. According to the title it was written by David during a period of crisis in his life. As a result of the revolt led by his son Absalom David had to to flee for his life. No doubt troubled about his son, betrayal by family and friends, about leaving his palace and kingdom and possibly also about his relationship with YHWH (v.2) David addresses this lament – a cry of distress – to the Lord. How wise and honest of him to bring his problems directly to the Lord, rather than blame God for them or deny that they existed! The pressure that he is under is emphasised by the triple repetition of ‘many.’

Many are they that trouble me – who the ‘many are’ – those that trouble David.
Many are they that rise up against me – what the ‘many’ are doing – they ‘rise up’ in co-ordinated opposition to David.
Many there be which say of my soul, there is no help for him in God – what the ‘many’ are saying – God has abandoned David – they taunt him about his faith saying: ‘God has abandoned him, he either will not or cannot deliver him.’

Selah. This word appears at the end of 3 of the 4 stanzas (vv. 2, 4, 8). It could be a musical notation, or perhaps mean something like stop and think, what has been said is true.

David’s Confidence (3-4)

But – with this word David withdraws his attention from the activities of the ‘many’ and focuses on what God is. Thus the psalm shifts from complaint to confidence. He says that YHWH is:

a shield for (about, surrounding) me – shield is the only metaphor in Psalm 3 and it stands for protection or defence. The Lord as a shield is not only in front of David but all around him, protecting from his foes who have set themselves around him (v.6).
my glory – David’s true dignity comes alone from YHWH, the one who chose him and gave him the kingdom.
the lifter up of mine head – YHWH is the one who reverses humiliation and gives restoration and encouragement.

David expresses his confidence in the Lord as the one who will protect, honour and provide for him in his distress.

In v.4. he goes on to affirm his experience of answered prayer. Until this point in the psalm David has been addressing the Lord directly (note: he never directly addresses his enemies) but now he begins to speak about the Lord to others – I cried. . . he heard. The ‘holy hill’ can refer specifically to the Temple (Isa. 56.7; 65.11; 66.20) or more generally to the city of Jerusalem (Psa. 48.1, Dan. 9.16). Even though he finds himself in exile away from Jerusalem David still recognises it as the place of the Lord’s presence and authority and appreciates the fact that his prayers still reach the Lord there. He can therefore say: I cried. . .he responded.

Selah – Stop and think – God answers prayer!

David’s Courage (5-6)

I lay down – I slept – I woke up – he sustained me.

David reports what had happened on his flight from Jerusalem. He was so confident of the Lord’s protection that he lay down and slept – not fitful sleep or the sleep of exhaustion but that of trust. He attributes the fact that he woke up safe to YHWH’s care. David expresses trust using the image of sleep. Even though he was under threat he had profound faith in the Lord’s protection and was able to rest. This support and protection during the night gave David a further boost in confidence.

If the Lord protects him at night while he sleeps then David can be courageous for he has no need to fear during the day either. Even if myriads (tens of thousands) of troops surround him he will not be afraid. He will not panic in the face of great odds because any fears he has will be overruled by his sense of trust in the Lord. He will sleep at night, then rise in the morning and face what another day brings.

David’s Conquering (7-8)

Verse 7 and 8 counterbalance verses 1 and 2. The first two verses have enemies rising up against David and saying that there is no deliverance for him in God. In the last two verses the Lord rises up to defeat David’s enemies and deliverance belongs to the Lord.

Once more David addresses YHWH directly and using the language of holy war (Num 10:35; Psa 68:1) issues a double imperative calling upon God to enter battle on his behalf – arise. . .deliver. Expressing raw emotion he asks God to intervene immediately.

For thou hast smitten all mine enemies upon the cheek bone; thou hast broken the teeth of the ungodly.

David says to the Lord: you struck. . .you smashed. With these perfect tense verbs he may be reminding the Lord that this is something that he has already done in the past and can therefore do again now. More likely, however, these are prophetic perfects. David is so sure that these things will happen that he speaks of them as if they have already taken place.

The Lord would not literally strike the cheek bones of David’s foes or break their teeth. David employs these images of battle – in which faces and teeth would be smashed with weapons – to intimate that with the Lord’s help he will conquer his enemies.

Is it appropriate for Christians to not only express fears, frustrations, and complaints to God but also pray against our enemies, as in the imprecatory psalms? The short answer is ‘No!’ Consider the following New Testament verses:

Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. Matthew 5:38-39

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; Matthew 5:43-44

And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have aught against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses. But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses. Mark 11:25-26

See that none render evil for evil unto any man; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all men. 1 Thessalonians 5:15

Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good. Romans 12:17-21

Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing. 1 Peter 3:9

David ends the psalm with recognition that deliverance is God’s right alone and then moves beyond his personal circumstances to pray for God’s blessing upon his people as a whole, even though many of them had turned against him.

THE ENDURING SIGNIFICANCE OF PSALM 3

Psalm 3 speaks powerfully to those who experience bullying, betrayal, opposition or sadness for it is a model of faith in the midst of crisis. The psalm illustrates how one might navigate distress and process feelings of isolation, worthlessness and betrayal by engaging honestly and prayerfully with God through lament.

Psalm 3 challenges its readers to, like David, place their confidence alone in God who is a shield around them, the one who lifts up their head and is the source of their deliverance. Believers ought not to collapse under pressure but bring their complaints directly to God and move from a desperate cry for help to confidence that God has not left them and that he hears and answers prayer.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Flanigan, J. (2001). What the Bible Teaches: Psalms, Ritchie Old Testament Commentary, Kilmarnock.

Mandolfo, C., (2014). ‘Language of Lament in the Psalms’, in William P. Brown (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Psalms, Oxford Handbooks Oxford University Press,

INTRODUCTION

The term ‘Zadok the Priest’ usually brings to mind a piece of music composed by George Frideric Handel in 1727 and first performed during the coronation of King George II and Queen Caroline of England on 11th October of that year. Since then this iconic anthem has been sung at the coronation of every British monarch (with the exception of Edward VIII who abdicated the throne before the date set for his coronation) and was therefore played during the coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla.

‘Zadok the Priest, and Nathan the Prophet anointed Solomon King.
And all the people rejoiced, and said:
God save the King! Long live the King!
May the King live for ever,
Amen, Alleluia.’

The biblical passage 1 Kings 1:38-48 is the inspiration for those words of the anthem:

So, what does the Bible tell us about Zadok?

THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF ZADOK’S STORY

Zadok was a priest in the time of King David and King Solomon who ruled over the ancient kingdom of Israel; David being the second king and Solomon his son and successor. David is believed to have become king around 1010 BCE, while Solomon reigned c. 970 – 930 BCE. David established Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and united the Israelite tribes into a single kingdom, Solomon was known for his wisdom, for building the first Temple in Jerusalem, and for expanding Israel’s trade and influence. Zadok is famous for anointing Solomon as king.

ZADOK’S GENEALOGY

In 1 Chronicles 6:3-8 and 6:50-53, Zadok is listed as a descendant of Eleazar, Aaron’s third son. In 1 Chronicles 24:3, Zadok is again listed as a descendant of Eleazar. This genealogy stretching back to Aaron demonstrates that Zadok was of the priestly family descended from Aaron (the brother of Moses). He was therefore a member of the Aaronic priesthood.

ZADOK’S LOYALTY TO KING DAVID

Almost nothing is known about Zadok’s early life but it seems that he may have belonged to a family of warrior priests. We learn that David was proclaimed king of Judah after the death of King Saul and established his capital in Hebron (2 Sam 2:1-4) where he reigned over Judah for seven and a half years before being acclaimed as king over all Israel (2 Sam 5:1-5). 1 Chronicles chapter 12 records that thousands from Israel defected to David at Hebron and in the census list of armed contingents that came over to David there is a reference (vv. 27-28) to ‘Zadok, a young man of valour.’

The young Zadok supported David’s cause and appears to have been rewarded for his loyalty. Once David firmly established the united monarchy he appointed Zadok and Abiathar as co-priests (2 Sam 8:17; 20:25) in Jerusalem; likely as keepers of the Ark of Covenant which had been transported there and housed in a tented shrine (2 Sam 6:1-17; 7:2; 1 Kgs 2:26; 1 Chron 16:39-40). In David’s administration Zadok also served as chief officer of the Aaronites (1 Chron 27:17) and he worked closely with another priestly colleague called Ahimelech in the organisation of the rotating courses of the priests for religious service (1 Chron 18:16; 24:3, 6, 31).

Later Zadok again aligned himself with the king when David’s son Absalom rebelled. Since it seemed likely that Absalom’s conspiracy to usurp the throne would succeed David decided to flee Jerusalem. Zadok, Abiathar and a group of Levites left the city with him, taking the Ark of the Covenant as well. David, however, convinced that Jerusalem was the place where the ark ought to be, asked them to take it back. The two priests did so and, along with their two sons, remained there as secret agents. They kept David informed of events in the city (2 Sam. 15:13-36; 17:15-22). After Absalom’s rebellion failed David sent Zadok and Abiathar as emissaries to the elders of Judah in order to win back their support and negotiate his return to Jerusalem. Their mission was successful (2 Sam 19:11-15).

ZADOK’S INVOLVEMENT IN THE ANOINTING OF KING SOLOMON

Zadok once again demonstrated his loyalty to King David in the matter of Adonijah’s failed rebellion. Adonijah was the fourth son of King David, born in Hebron (2 Sam 3:4). He attempted to seize the throne while his father was still alive. The events surrounding Adonijah’s revolt are described in 1 Kings 1:5-53. Since David had grown old and infirm, Adonijah saw himself as the heir apparent and arranged to hold a grand feast at which he intended to proclaim himself king, and to which he invited many of David’s officials and supporters; but did not include others whom he knew would be loyal to David. The latter included Solomon, Nathan the prophet and Zadok the priest. Adonijah had the support of Joab, the commander of David’s army, and Abiathar the priest (for Abiathar’s part in the insurrection Solomon later dismissed him from his position as priest, 1 Kgs 2:26-27).

The prophet Nathan and Bathsheba, Solomon’s mother, brought the matter of Adonijah to David’s attention. He immediately took action to ensure that Solomon would be his successor. David instructed Nathan the prophet and Zadok the priest to proclaim Solomon as king (1 Kgs 1:34) and ride him on David’s own mule to the Gihon spring, where he would be officially anointed king over Israel.

So Zadok the priest, and Nathan the prophet, and Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, and the Cherethites, and the Pelethites, went down, and caused Solomon to ride upon king David’s mule, and brought him to Gihon.
And Zadok the priest took a horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon. And they blew the trumpet; and all the people said, God save king Solomon. 1 Kgs 1:38-39

This was done, and the people rejoiced, while Adonijah’s followers fled in fear. Thus David settled the succession question by appointing Solomon co-regent. Father and son ruled together until David’s death. Solomon was later anointed as king a second time; along with him Zadok was anointed to be (chief) priest (1 Chron 29:22), possibly serving for a time at Solomon’s temple.

SOME LESSONS FROM THE LIFE OF ZADOK

Be loyal to God and to your leaders. Zadok was loyal to God and to King David. Even when David made mistakes, Zadok remained faithful. This is a valuable lesson for us to learn, it is important to be loyal to those in authority, even when they make mistakes.

Be a person of action. Zadok was a man of action. He was willing to stand up for what he believed in, even when it was difficult to do so. We ought to be willing to stand up for what we believe in, even when that involves personal cost.

Be a person of integrity. Zadok was a man of integrity. He was honest, trustworthy. and was doubtless a great example to his children. David described Zadok’s son Ahimaaz as ‘a good man’ (2 Sam 18:27) – he may have been the same Ahimaaz who married Solomon’s daughter Basmath (1 Kgs 4:15). Another of Zadok’s sons (or perhaps a grandson? 1 Chron 6:8-9), Azariah, was one of the top officials in Solomon’s administration (1 Kgs 4:2).

Zadok was a priest who faithfully served God and the king. He made sound choices in life and was able to play an important role in the history of Israel. He is therefore an example for us to follow.

Tag: Absalom

Surrounded, but Secure: Crisis and Confidence in Psalm 3