Tag: Balaam

Posted in Exposition

Jude 3-11: Historical Judgments

Posted on by writtenexposition

COMMENTS ON JUDE CONTINUED

PURPOSE (3-4)

3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

Moving on from the initial greeting and description of the recipients in vv.1-2 Jude, in vv. 3-4, shifts to his purpose and the circumstances that have occasioned his writing. These two verses lay a foundation for the rest of the letter by introducing the threat from false teachings and the urgent need for believers to defend the true faith.

(3) Jude addresses the recipients as ‘beloved.’ He does this three times (3, 17, 20), in every case following it with an exhortation (contend, remember, build up). ‘Beloved’ (agapētós), meaning ‘worthy of love’ or ‘dear,’ expresses Jude’s deep affection for his readers.

There are two main, and opposing, views on what comes next. The first is that he changed his topic, the second that there is no indication of a change. Proponents of the first think that Jude originally intended to send a letter about ‘the common salvation’ but, sensing the pressing danger posed by false teachers, feels compelled to write urging the believers to ‘contend for the faith.’ Others see little difference between ‘the common salvation’ and ‘the faith which was once delivered’ and reckon that Jude is just saying that he did intend to write to them but has now written earlier because of the emergency of the situation.

‘The common salvation’ is that shared here and now by all Christians regardless of background (Jude may have had Jew and Gentile in mind).

Jude feels compelled (‘I have found it necessary’) to shift his focus from a discussion of ‘the common salvation’ to an exhortation for believers to ‘earnestly contend for the faith’ i.e. actively defend the faith. ‘Earnestly contend’ translates one very strong word in Greek (epagōnízomai – to fight [for], strive), which occurs only here in the New Testament. It refers not to warfare but to athletics, e.g. a wrestling match which requires strenuous activity and training. I am not sure whether the contending refers to a believer’s individual personal struggle or to collective concerted action by a group of Christians.

‘The faith’ does not refer to personal response to the gospel but to the body of faith i.e. essential Christian doctrine (cf. 1 Tim 3:16). Jude says that this was ‘once (hápax) delivered (handed down, transmitted).’ Hápax here means ‘once for all;’ therefore the doctrine is definitive and immutable. As it is fixed it cannot be changed to suit personal preferences; further additions or alterations are not permissible (Rev 22:18-19).

‘Saints’ – holy ones – is a term for Christian believers (1 Pet 1:15-16).

(4) Why is this call to defend the truths of the gospel necessary? Verse 3, which begins with ‘for,’ gives the reason.  It is because ‘certain men’ have infiltrated the church, subtly introducing false teachings. Jude does not name them but obviously has particular persons in view. They have ‘smuggled themselves in’ (NLT says ‘have wormed their way into…’). The Greek word pareisdúō – to enter without notice – occurs only here in the New Testament. ‘Crept’ in the KJV translation ‘crept in unawares’ aptly emphasizes the danger posed by these individuals; initially they appear harmless but slyly work to undermine the faith from within.

Even before discussing the characteristics of these men Jude comments that they were ‘long ago marked out for this condemnation’. ‘Before of old’ (long ago) translates pálai which, while not indicating a definite time, suggests that the condemnation (kríma, judgment) was not a recent development but rather a predetermined outcome from the distant past. It is clear from the use of the adverb pálai in Heb 1:1 (KJV ‘in time past’) that it refers to an unspecified past time in human history. This fact significantly weakens the argument that in this verse we have an example of Reprobation – the sovereign decision of God in eternity to pass over some people, deciding not to save them.

The Greek word prográphō translated as ‘ordain’, literally means ‘write publicly, ‘forewrite’ or ‘enrol.’ It also occurs in Rom 15:4. Thus the condemnation may either have been written ‘before’ as in time or ‘before’ as in openly or publicly.

‘This condemnation’ is a forward reference to vv.5-7 where Jude will demonstrate by use of three Old Testament examples that there is historical precedent for divine judgment against ungodliness. He refers to the punishment of rebellious Israelites, the judgment of the fallen angels and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (vv.5-7).

The ‘certain men’ who have intruded are ‘ungodly’ (profane, impious). The word ‘ungodly’ occurs 5 more times in Jude’s letter: four times in v.15 and once in v.18. As a result of being ungodly these people do two things:

  • they corrupt God’s grace by turning it into a license for unrestrained immoral behaviour (sensuality, debauchery) – likely sexual immorality – thus perverting grace – the liberty that a Christian enjoys as a result of forgiveness and salvation (Rom 8:21).
  • they deny the authority of God and the Lord Jesus Christ, either explicitly or implicitly, through their rejection of his lordship. ‘Denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.’ By their lewd actions they deny God (lit. ‘the only master’ despótēs – one with supreme authority) and the Lord (kúrios – one who owns or possesses) Jesus Christ. Some view the structure of the text as suggesting that ‘the only Lord God’ and ‘our Lord Jesus Christ’ are the same person. J.N.D. Kelly (1969, p. 252) comments:

The second charge is that they deny the only Master and our Lord Jesus Christ, i.e. both God the Father and Christ…The alternative translation, ‘deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ….is equally possible linguistically, and the decision between them is not easy. The fact that there is a definite article before only Master and none before our Lord J.C. might seem to suggest that the whole complex expression applies to a single person, but this argument cannot be pressed: the article is often omitted before ‘God, ‘Lord’, and the like (…Eph. v. 5; 2 Thess. i.12; 1 Tim v. 21; Tit. ii. 13).

REMINDER (5-11)

In the following verses Jude reminds his readers of three notorious historical events from the Old Testament which illustrate the judgment of God upon evildoers:

EXAMPLE 1 – v.5 The wilderness generation – ‘destroyed;’

EXAMPLE 2 – v.6 angels – ‘everlasting chains;’

EXAMPLE 3 – v7. Sodom and Gomorrah – ‘the vengeance of eternal fire.’

(5) EXAMPLE 1 – Israel in the wilderness.

5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

Jude begins by complimenting the recipients on their knowledge (cf. Rom 15:14; 1 Thess 4:9; 1 Jn 2:21, 27) and says that he would like to remind them that the Lord, having saved the Israelites from Egypt, later (to deuteron, afterward, lit. ‘the second time’) destroyed many of them because of their unbelief. He is not saying this to frighten them but to make them aware that punishment awaits the ungodly men who have infiltrated the church. He is reassuring his readers because he says that they have been informed of these things and that ‘once for all’ (hapax). The knowledge that they have acquired ‘once for all’ is much more than familiarity with stories in the Old Testament; the reference is to their acceptance of the apostolic teachings (v.17).

Jude reminded them of the Exodus and of how the Lord delivered the Israelites out of Egypt but afterward destroyed those who did not believe. This illustration is taken from the book of Numbers which asserts that because of unbelief (Num 14:11; Deut 1:32) the wilderness generation, with the exception of Joshua and Caleb, would not enter the Promised Land (see Num 14:1-38; 26:64-65).

29 Your carcasses shall fall in this wilderness; and all that were numbered of you, according to your whole number, from twenty years old and upward, which have murmured against me,
30 Doubtless ye shall not come into the land, concerning which I swore to make — you dwell therein, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun. Numbers 14:29-30

This unbelief of the Israelites in the wilderness is cited by way of warning in other biblical passages (Psa 95:10-11; 1 Cor 10:1-13; Heb 3:7-19).

‘The Lord’ – although many commentators (also citing Jn 12:41; 1 Cor 10:4, 9; Heb 11:26; 1 Pet 1:11) view the use of ‘the Lord’ in v.5 as evidence of involvement by the preincarnate Jesus in Old Testament events it is more likely that here ‘the Lord’ is just another way of saying ‘God.’ The next verse (v.6) referring back to ‘the Lord’ in v.5 says concerning the rebellious angels: ‘he hath reserved.’ The parallel passage in 2 Pet 2:4 specifically attributes that to God: ‘For if God spared not the angels that sinned.’

(6) EXAMPLE 2 – The imprisoned angels

6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

Verse 6 of Jude is one of the most controversial and fascinating verses in the Bible. It contains Jude’s second example of God’s punishment of wrongdoers in the past. Notice:

1. Fallen angels. – a group of angels rebelled against God. They did not keep (tēréō) the positions that had been assigned to them but instead chose to abandon their proper dwelling. ‘First estate’ (archḗ) is status, eminence, principality, dominion. These angels did not maintain the dominions for which they had administrative responsibility, and as well as that they lusted after human women, leaving ‘their proper dwelling place i.e. heaven (oikētḗrion: house, dwelling, abode – also occurs in 2 Cor 5:2).

2. Severe consequences. – As a result of their rebellion God has reserved (tēréō, kept) them in everlasting chains and in darkness awaiting the judgment of ‘the great day’ (see Acts 2:20; Rev 6:17; 20:10). Notice the word play on tēréō – they did not keep…the Lord has kept them. The imagery conveys the idea that their punishment is severe and eternal; they will never again enjoy the light of God’s presence.

3. Links to other biblical passages: Jude 6 corresponds to 2 Pet 2:4. Peter does not specify the sin that led to the angels’ punishment; we learn about that here in verse 6 of Jude. This verse is often linked to Gen 6:1-7 which relates how the ‘sons of God’ (an Old Testament term for angels, Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7) cohabited with human women.

4. Lessons. This example demonstrates the seriousness of rebelling against God and the severity of the punishment that ensues.

Note: Jude refers to angels in vv. 6, 8, 9, 14.

(7) EXAMPLE 3 – Sodom and Gomorrah


7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Does ‘even as’ i.e. ‘likewise’ or ‘in like manner’ refer to:

a) giving themselves over to fornication,’ or

b) being ‘set forth as an example,’ or

c) ‘suffering the vengeance of eternal fire?’

I would choose option a) – that their sin is in view. Here Jude compares Sodom and Gomorrah and their surrounding cities to the fallen angels. The similarity lies in the fact that both groups practised sexual promiscuity and and lusted after ‘strange flesh.’ The citizens of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim (Deut 29:23; Hos 9:8) ‘gave themselves over to lewdness’ (ekporneúō) and lusted after different flesh. Heteras sarkos is ‘flesh of a different kind.’ Jude is making the point that ‘even as’ angels took human wives/women (Gen 6:1-7) so the people in these cities were so thoroughly immoral that they wished to have sexual relations with angels (Gen 19:5-9). Spiritual beings and mortals engaging in illicit relationships was a violation of God’s order (Psa 8:4-5). The people of these cities stand out as an example of unrestrained licentiousness. They are experiencing the punishment of eternal fire.

In verses 8-11 Jude applies the lessons from his three Old Testament illustrations of judgment to his present day situation and then alludes to four more Old Testament characters – the archangel Michael, Cain, Balaam, and Korah.


8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.

(8) ‘Likewise’ links the behaviour of the intruders, here called ‘dreamers’, to that of Jude’s three examples from Israelite history. The sins of the false teachers mirror those of Israel, the fallen angels and Sodom and Gomorrah. Jude lists them in reverse order. Like Sodom and Gomorrah etc. the intruders pollute their bodies (Jude has already referred to their debauchery in v.4). At the same time, like the rebellious angels they despise authority and like the Israelites they speak evil of dignitaries (in Num 14:1-4, the Israelites murmured against Moses, Aaron and the Lord).


9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. 10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.

(9-10) Having accused the intruders of despising authority and speaking evil of dignitaries Jude immediately contrasts their arrogance and presumption with the restraint shown by the archangel Michael in a dispute with the devil about the body of Moses. That story is not recorded in the Old Testament but, whatever the source, it was well-known to Jude and the recipients of his letter.

Michael means ‘who is like God.’

‘Archangel’ (chief angel) occurs in Jude 9 and 1 Thess 4:16.

Many commentators identify the archangel Michael in Jude 9 with Michael the prince (chief) in Dan 10:13, 21; 12:1 and the Michael of Rev 12:7-9.

Some (mainly Reformed) writers hold that Michael is a revelation of the preincarnate Christ. They base this on the meaning of his name and the fact that ‘angel’ equals ‘messenger.’

There is a view that ‘the body of Moses’ does not refer to his literal body but to his body of writing, i. e. The Law, Pentateuch (Jn 5:45; Acts 15:21; 21:21; 2 Cor 3:15).

Some suggest that the incident involving a disagreement between Michael and the devil occurred at the same time as that recorded in Zech 3:1-5.

It seems to me more sensible to take the passage at face value and accept that Jude refers to an occasion when Michael the chief angel was at odds with the devil (for reasons that are not stated) about the literal, physical body of Moses (see Deut 34:6). Jude does not provide full details because he is interested only in the attitude Michael displayed during the discussion. Michael did not pronounce a reviling judgment but deferred to the Lord’s authority as the one whose rightful position it was to rebuke the devil. Jude contrasts Michael’s attitude with the insolence of the intruders and their disrespect for authority (v.8).

Teaching by the apostle Paul about a proper Christian attitude is recorded in Tit 3:1-2: ​’Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work, To speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, showing all meekness unto all men.’

The contrast with Michael continues in v.10. Michael did not pronounce judgment ‘but these men’ revile everything that they do not understand. They have no spiritual understanding but are driven by their basic instincts and desires – just like animals.

Notice the repetition of ‘blaspheme’ (v.8, 10, ‘speak evil of,’ v. 9 ‘railing’)


11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Korah.

Jude pronounces a woe upon the intruders. ‘Woe to them’ indicates displeasure and calls for retribution. He links their fate to that of three Old Testament figures: Cain, Balaam and Korah, who are not listed in the order in which they appear in the Old Testament. Each of these men represents a different form of rebellion against divinely-appointed authority.

CAIN – an example of godlessness.

BALAAM – an example of compromise for personal gain.

KORAH – an example of rebellion against authority.

Taken together they convey the extent to which the false teachers have rebelled against and rejected the ways of God. ‘For’, ‘because’- the reasons for the pronouncement of the woe are:

1) ‘they have gone in the way of Cain’

Cain (Gen 4:1-16; Heb 11:4) was the first son of Adam and Eve and is better known for having killed his brother Abel, thus becoming the first murderer in the human race. Jude, however, is not accusing the false teachers of being murderers. He is accusing them of being thoroughly evil. Cain is more than a murderer, he is the prime example of an evil person. The apostle John calls him a child of the Evil One: ‘Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.’ 1 John 3:12.

A godless person, Cain relied on his own resources, despising God’s way and the sacrifice that the Lord required. Jude’s opponents allowed themselves to live their lives in the way that Cain lived his – ‘they have gone in the way of Cain’ i.e. ‘they have travelled down Cain’s path.’ It was of their own volition.

2) ‘and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward’ (Read Num 22-24)

The false teachers have abandoned themselves (‘rushed headlong’, ‘totally committed themselves’) to Balaam’s error for profit. Balaam’s ‘error’ was not an unintentional mistake but a deliberate deviation from the truth of God. According to Num 31:16 and Rev 2:14 it was on his advice that the Midianites caused the Israelites to commit idolatry: ‘Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD.’ Numbers 31:16.

The prophet Balaam is a prime example of someone who is willing to do anything, no matter how evil, for financial gain. Jude implies that the intruders have dedicated themselves to making money from their false teaching (cf. 1 Tim 6:5; Tit 1:11; 1 Pet 5:2).

In 2 Pet 2:15 the New Testament refers to ‘the way of Balaam, in Jude 11 to ‘the error of Balaam’ and in Rev 2:14 to ‘the doctrine of Balaam.’

3) ‘and perished in the gainsaying of Korah’

‘Gainsaying’ (antilogía) means ‘contradiction’ or ‘speaking against.’ It has to do with defiance against authority so some translate it as ‘rebellion.’ Korah (Num 16:1-40) was a Levite who mutinied against Moses and Aaron. He was privileged to be a Levite but was not satisfied with that position and level of responsibility; he thought that he should be a priest. He would not submit to the men to whom the Lord had entrusted leadership of the national worship. He, along with Dathan and Abiram, instigated a revolt, having recruited 250 of the most respected chiefs to join them. These arrogant, self-righteous men thought that they could come before God on their own merits so they tried to approach him without a mediator. The Lord opened up the ground so that Korah, Dathan, Abiram and their households were swallowed alive, while fire from heaven consumed their 250 co-conspirators.

The intruders Jude is writing about must have been rebelling against leaders in the church and causing unrest and division among the believers. The aorist tense (all three verbs in the verse are aorist) of the verb ‘they have perished’ dramatically views their fate as already sealed. Swift judgment upon them is certain.

The Epistle Of Jude – Verses 1 and 2 – Introduction

Unmasking False Teachers in Jude 12-16: Key Metaphors Explained

Contending for the Faith: Lessons from Jude 17-25

Posted in Exposition

NEHEMIAH 13:1-3

Posted on by writtenexposition

Nehemiah chapter 13 concludes the book of Nehemiah and provides insight into the reforms implemented by Nehemiah upon his return to Jerusalem from Persia. The background to chapter 13 may be summarised as follows:

BACKGROUND TO NEHEMIAH CHAPTER 13

Nehemiah, a Jewish cupbearer to king Artaxerxes I (465-424 BCE) of Persia, received news from home about the deteriorating state of Jerusalem and its broken walls. He therefore sought permission from the king for leave of absence from his job at Susa in order to return to Jerusalem, rebuild the walls and restore the glory of the city.

Having obtained the king’s blessing and support, Nehemiah travelled to Jerusalem in 445 BCE (2:1; 5:14) and rallied the people to rebuild the walls. Despite some local opposition, the walls were completed in fifty-two days (6:15). Nehemiah then focused on the spiritual renewal of the Jewish community. After twelve years in Jerusalem (5:14; 13:6) Nehemiah returned to the Persian court in 433 BCE. He must have continued to receive news from Jerusalem because he soon became aware that, in a spiritual sense, things were not progressing well there since his departure.

In chapter 13, Nehemiah returns to Jerusalem after an unspecified period of absence in Babylon. The date was probably 430 or 429 BCE. True enough, he finds that the people have reverted to various forms of disobedience and have neglected the laws of God. This final chapter highlights several significant events:

13:1-3 SEPARATION RENEWED

13:4-9 EXPULSION OF TOBIAH FROM THE TEMPLE

13:10-14 REORGANISATION OF THE LEVITES

13:15-22 RESTORATION OF SABBATH OBSERVANCE

13:23-29 PROBLEM OF EXOGAMOUS MARRIAGES

13: 30-31 SUMMARY OF NEHEMIAH’S CULTIC REFORMS

13:1-3 SEPARATION RENEWED

‘On that day’ (‘at that time’ i.e. in Nehemiah’s era) there was a public reading from the ‘book of Moses’ (cf. 2 Chron 25:4.; 35:12; Neh 8:1). This is certainly a reference to the torah (first five books of the Old Testament) since vv. 1b-2 cite Deut 23:3-6; a section of law dealing with persons excluded from Israelite worship. When the passage was read aloud the people learned that Ammonites or Moabites were specifically excluded from any religious assembly of Israel until ten generations had passed. This rule was to last forever. Interestingly, the reasons given for that do not include the origin of the two nations from the incestuous sexual relations each of Lot’s daughters had with him (Gen 19:30-38). Rather, the prohibition was based on on historical events. These two nations had opposed the Israelites after the exodus from Egypt and had hired a non-Israelite prophet called Balaam to curse them (Num 22-24). This, in turn, triggered a curse on them in accordance with God’s promise to Abraham in Gen 12:2-4. Although he could not actually bring himself to curse the Israelites Balaam nevertheless advised the Moabites how to lead them into sin (Num 31:16; 2 Pet 2:15; Jude 11; Rev 2:14).

MOAB

The Bible has nothing good to say about the Moabites or Ammonites but Moab in particular is singled out for criticism. The prophet Jeremiah gives a penetrating assessment of this inveterate enemy of the Israelites in his book:

‘Moab hath been at ease from his youth, and he hath settled on his lees, and hath not been emptied from vessel to vessel, neither hath he gone into captivity: therefore his taste remained in him, and his scent is not changed.‘ Jer 48:11

Moab, as we have mentioned, had a bad beginning. Nevertheless, like many who oppose God and his people today, everything seemed to go well for them. Their history was characterized by comfort and prosperity. Unlike Israel, nothing disturbed or interfered with their lives of ease. They were never taken into captivity. Jeremiah paints a word picture from the ancient process of wine-making. Totally at ease in its wickedness, unthinking and unconcerned about its sinful idolatry, never having yearned for deliverance, Moab went to rot.

Jeremiah’s metaphorical language conveys a sense of stagnation and lack of transformation. Despite being a nation that had been established for a long time, Moab had never undergone significant changes or been refined through challenging experiences. As a result, the character and behaviour of the Moabites remained unchanged, they were self-assured and unyielding. This important verse condemns Moab’s pride and self-reliance, suggesting that their failure to grow spiritually and morally would lead to their downfall and judgment from God. Devastation would come upon Moab as a consequence of their actions.

After the public reading of the law a ‘separation’ (Ezr 9:1; 10:11; Neh 10:28) of ‘the mixture’ took place. Not just Ammonites and Moabites were separated, but all foreigners. Intermarriage with the Canaanite nations had been forbidden because family relationships with idolators was perceived as likely to cause a turning away from the worship of Yahweh, the one true God (Deut 7:3-4). This problem seems to have plagued the Israelites throughout their history. During the era of Ezra and Nehemiah at least three attempts were made over a period of thirty years (468-429 BCE) to resolve the issue. Although these measures were fairly drastic (e.g. mass divorce, covenant not to intermarry), they were not entirely successful (Ezra 9-10; Neh 9:2; 10:28-30; 13:1-3). Nehemiah returns to the topic of unacceptable marriages later in the chapter.

The New Testament teaches the same general principle; that when it comes to spiritual matters a mixture never produces positive results. Every so often there must be a return to the word of God; accompanied by self-assessment leading to remedial action. 2 Corinthians 6:14-18:

‘Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.’

Nehemiah 13:4-14

Nehemiah 13:15-31

Posted in Exposition

2 PETER 2:1-22 FALSE TEACHERS

Posted on by writtenexposition

This entire chapter is taken up with the topic of false teachers.

2:1-3 THE DECEITFULNESS OF FALSE TEACHERS

2:4-10a THE DESTRUCTION OF FALSE TEACHERS

2:10b-22 THE DESCRIPTION OF FALSE TEACHERS

But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. 2 Pet 2:1-3

2:1-3 The Deceitfulness Of False Teachers

[1] Having claimed in 1:16 that what he preaches is the truth and also that the Old Testament scriptures are inspired and reliable Peter moves on to talk about those who will distort truth. He labels them ‘false teachers’ and predicts that just as false prophets (pseudoprophḗtēs) arose among ‘the people’ (nation of Israel), so false teachers (pseudodidáskalos) will appear in the Christian church; the new people of God (1 Pet 2:10). The Old Testament definition of a false prophet is given in Deut 18:20-22 (see also Deut 13:1-5). For OT examples of false prophecy see 1 Kgs 22:5-12; Jer 5:31; 14;13-15; Ezek 13:1-23; Mic 3:5-12). The rise of false teachers in the church was also predicted by Jesus (Matt 7:15; 24:11) and by Paul (Acts 20:29-30; 1 Cor 11:19; 1 Tim 4:1).

These false teachers will smuggle in (pareiságō – secretly bring in) ‘heresies of destruction’ i.e destructive heresies. As teachers they were probably in positions of church leadership. ‘Heresy’ is a different school of thought or a sect, but in a bad sense (Gal 5:20). Here the plural word seems to mean the opinions or views of a single school of thought or sect, rather than plural (i.e. several) sects.

These false views will be destructive to the false teachers themselves as ‘they bring upon themselves swift (soon, same word as 1:14) destruction’ (2:1c) and ‘their destruction is not asleep’ (v3).

Peter again raises the concept of the master-slave relationship. In 1:1 he calls himself a ‘slave of Jesus Christ.’ Here in 2:1 he claims that the false teachers are denying ‘the master that bought them’ and in verse 19 says that they are the ‘slaves of corruption.’ This implies that we are all slaves to something.

The false teaching results in them ‘denying the master that bought them.’ This may have been a denial of Christ’s lordship over their lives because of their immoral behaviour but a reading of chapter 3 would suggest that it included rejection of the Second Coming/future judgement. The image of Christians having been bought by Christ’s death and owing allegiance to him as a result is found also in 1 Cor 6:20; 7:23 and Gal 3:13.

In this verse Peter refers to his opponents and by calling them ‘false teachers’ implies that what they teach is not reliable. He does not, however, present reasoned arguments against their doctrine but tries to arouse the emotions of his readers against the false teachers by concentrating, not on doctrinal but on moral failings which he attributes to them. He hopes that, disgusted by these, his readers will reject the opposing teachers.

[2 -3] Because of the many people who will follow the false teachers’ licentiousness (debauched behaviour, disordered sexual activity) the way of truth will be slandered and reviled. The apostles were very aware of the influence the conduct of Christians could have on the surrounding pagans (1 These 4:12; 1 Tim 6:1; Tit 2:5; 1 Pet 2:12, 15; 3:16).

Peter had been accused (1:16) of following ‘cunningly devised fables’ but here again maintains that his teaching is ‘the way of truth’.

In v.3 Peter warns his readers that in their greed (covetousness) the false teachers will exploit them financially with ‘feigned words’ In v.14 he says that the false teachers are ‘trained’ in greed.

plastois logois, ‘plastic words’ – artifical, easily moulded.

In two negative statements Peter maintains that the false teachers will be judged:

1. ‘from of old their condemnation has not been idle.’ – it is already active

2. ‘their destruction does not sleep.’ – it is awake and ready to fall on them.

For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly; And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an example unto those that after should live ungodly; And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked: (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds); The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished: But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. 2 Pet 2:4-10b

2:4-10a The Destruction Of False Teachers

In this section Peter seeks to support his statement that the condemnation and destruction of false teachers is certain. The argument is in the form of ‘If …then…’. He presents three examples from the Old Testament and in v.9 clearly states the point he is making.

EXAMPLE 1 The Angels That Sinned (2:4)

‘God did not spare the angels that sinned’ refers to the story in Gen 6:1-4 of heavenly beings that lusted after human women and produced offspring with them. The story is also referenced in Jude 6. More details are found in the Jewish apocryphal book 1 Enoch ( https://www.ccel.org/c/charles/otpseudepig/enoch/ENOCH_1.HTM) chapters 6 and 7 which was well-known at the time and from which (1 En 1:9) Jude quotes (Jude v.14).

Peter does not specify the angels’ misdemeanour but simply states that they ‘sinned.’ He concentrates instead on their punishment. God cast them (not necessarily ‘down’) into hell and consigned them to ‘pits (seirá – lit. pit) of darkness’ where they are kept until the judgement. The text of Jude v.6 reads ‘chains’ (desmós – strong bonds, chains) and many translations use ‘chains’ in both passages, although the words are different.

Strangely, Peter uses a rare verb tartaróō for ‘cast into hell’. It comes from the noun Tartarus (Tártaros) which in ancient Greek mythology denoted the deepest area of Hades. Since Peter’s readers in Asia Minor were from a Greek-speaking background he uses a word that they would understand to describe the fate of the angels that sinned. Although this incident occurred a long time in the past and the judgement is in the future they are even now undergoing punishment.

EXAMPLE 2 God Did not Spare the Ancient World but He Saved Noah and Seven Others (2:5)

Referring once more to Genesis chapter 6 Peter says that God brought judgement upon the ancient world through a flood and wiped out everyone; sparing only Noah and seven others (see 1 Pet 3:20), all members of the one family.

Noah is here called a ‘herald of righteousness.’ ‘Righeousness’ is upright behaviour. The word kḗrux can be used in the sense of ‘preacher’ e.g. 1 Tim 2:7. There is no mention in the Old Testament of Noah calling upon the antediluvians to repent.

EXAMPLE 3 GOD DESTROYED SODOM AND GOMORRAH BUT DELIVERED LOT (2:6-8)

The third example gets fuller treatment because the situation was similar to that in which Peter’s readers found themselves. Like Lot, the Christians in Asia Minor whom Peter addresses lived in a wicked society and found the sexual immorality and lawless conduct of their neighbours distressing. Not only that but false teachers in the church were denying the Lord’s Second Coming and rejecting the possibility of a future judgement. Thinking that they would not have to account for their conduct these teachers lived and promoted an evil lifestyle.

Genesis chapter 19 records how righteous Lot was rescued but Sodom and Gomorrah judged by fire. Peter says that this made them a model or pattern (hupódeigma) for what will happen to those who have lived ungodly since that time on. In the next chapter (3:10-12) Peter employs images of fire, heat and melting when describing the judgement at the end of the world (Day of the Lord).

[9-10a] In v.9 Peter sums up the main point of the ‘If…then…’ style argument he has been making in vv. 4-8 and applies the lesson from the well-known examples of God’s judgement that he has presented:

‘The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished.’

If God has punished those that sinned in Example 1, and punished sinners and saved the righteous in Examples 2 and 3, then God knows how to save the righteous and punish sinners.

The section ends at 10a with the comment that judgement falls especially upon those who ‘follow the flesh with its depraved desire’ and ‘despise lordship’. The latter term is probably equivalent to ‘denying the master’ in v.1. Peter thus brings the subject back to the false teachers mentioned in vv.1-3.

2:10b-22 The Description Of False Teachers

Presumptuous are they, self-willed, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities. Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord. But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption; And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you; Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: a heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children: Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;  2 Pet 2:10b-16

[10b-16] Peter launches into a description of false teachers and in vv.10b-16 deals with two of their main characteristics; arrogance and sensuality. In v. 10b he negatively assesses them as brazen and insolent and says that they are not afraid to slander the glorious ones. The example of this given in the following verses is difficult to understand.

Since ‘dignities’ (doxai – glories, glorious ones) seems to refer to angelic beings (whether good or bad) in Jude v.8 many take it that here in 2 Peter the ‘glorious beings’ are also angels. Most who hold this view take it that in this instance the reference is to evil angels/demons(2:4) and that the false teachers must have been reviling them. Keating (2011, p.182) summarizes this view:

‘They are charged with bringing reviling and blaspheming judgments against the glorious beings (literally, “the glories”), which is a reference to the angels or to demonic powers. If Peter is referring to good angels, then the false teachers are reviling them either by denying the authority of the Scriptures that the angels were mediators of, or more probably by denying the final judgment that was to be carried out by the angels. The angels were often understood in Jewish and Christian tradition to be the mediators of the Old Testament revelation (see Heb 2:2) and to be the instruments of the final judgment (see Matt 13:39–41). If Peter is referring to demonic powers here, then the false teachers are reviling them probably by “denying that the devil could have any power over them and speaking of the powers of evil in skeptical, mocking terms.”

In 2 Peter, however, it is God (1:17) and Jesus Christ (1:3,17; 3:18) who are said to have glory. I think it more likely that the disparaging of the glorious ones refers to the denial by the false teachers of the the Second Coming of Christ and dismissal of the fact that God will one day judge the world (See chapter 3).

[11] The conduct of the angels is contrasted with that of the false teachers.

Either:

The false teachers arrogantly slander glorious beings but the good angels, who are superior in strength and power to the false teachers, do not advance a slanderous judgement against the fallen angels before the Lord. (e.g Jude v.9).

Or:

The false teachers arrogantly slander God and Jesus Christ but angels, who are superior in strength and power to the false teachers, do not advance a slanderous judgement against the false teachers before the Lord.

[12-14] These three verses are one long sentence.

‘But these’ (i.e. the false teachers in contrast to the angels) are irrational animals born naturally for capture and destruction (i.e caught and killed for food). The emphasis is on the ignorance of the false teachers. They behave irrationally and live like animals. They slander things they are ignorant of (this is equivalent to ‘slander the glories’ in v.10b) and will perish in their own corruption. This tells us that these people were unregenerate as in 1:4 believers are said to have ‘escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.’

There is some wordplay in the original ‘shall utterly perish in their own corruption’. To replicate it in English the phrase would read something like: ‘ They shall be destroyed with the same destruction they have brought about.’ (Kraftchick cited by Vinson, Wilson & Mills 2010, p.338).

[13] They will receive the ‘reward of unrighteousness.’ This is similar to the ‘wages of sin’ in Rom 6:23.

‘They count it pleasure to revel in the day-time.’ Normally revelling was regarded as taking place at night (darkness is associated with evil) but the false teachers were so immoral that they practised their debauchery in full view during the day as well.

The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armor of light. Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying.  Rom 13:12-13 

Woe to thee, O land, when thy king is a child, and thy princes eat in the morning! Ecc 10:16 

Woe unto them that rise up early in the morning, that they may follow strong drink; that continue until night, till wine inflame them!  Isa 5:11 

‘spots and blemishes as they carouse with you, revelling in their own deceptions.’ This is about disgusting behaviour at their parties and banquets, but may refer to the Lord’s Supper.

[14] ‘Their eyes are filled with an adulteress and they are insatiable for sin.’ The false teachers are always eying up women with a view to sexual activity.

‘they ensnare unstable souls’ They try to bring those who lack foundation in the faith, probably recent converts, under their control.

‘souls’ More or less equivalent to ‘people.’

‘unstable’ (astḗriktos) This word occurs only here and at 3:16.

The false teachers have hearts ‘well-trained’ in greed. The word gumnázō was used of athletic training and exercise. Their greed was habitual, they were experts.

At the thought of it Peter cannot help exclaiming ‘Accursed creatures!’ (lit. children of a curse).

[15] The false teachers have abandoned the straight road, they have gone astray and followed the road of Balaam, son of Bosor, who loved profit from wrong-doing. It was believed that the non-Israelite Balaam willingly accepted a bribe to curse Israel (Read Num 22, for the four oracles of Balaam see Num 23:7-10, 18-24; 24:3-9, 15-19.

‘road’ or ‘way’ was generally used of conduct (see 1 Sam 12:23; Hos 14:9; Psa 107:7; Acts 13:10) and go astray for ‘being corrupted.’

In the Old Testament Balaam’s father’s name is given as Beor (Num 22:5, 25:3).

[16] Peter relates that the ‘dumb’ (áphōnos, without articulate speech)’beast of burden’ (hupozúgion) rebuked Balaam for his error. An irrational beast saw the error of Balaam’s way and spoke to him, the false prophets do not see the error of their way and proceed like brute beasts.

In the Old Testament account in Numbers 22:21-35 it was the angel of the Lord that issued the rebuke to Balaam. The ass had been aware of the angel’s presence and would not go any further After Balaam struck it the animal protested in a human voice. (See also Num 31:16; Deut 23:5; Neh 13:2; Jude v.11; Rev 2:14)

These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest: to whom the mist of darkness is reserved forever. For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error. While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire. 2 Pet 2:17-22

Slaves and Apostates 2:17-22

[17] Peter continues his description of the false teachers and refers to them as ‘these [people].’ He calls them ‘waterless wells and mists blown away by sharp gusts of wind’ Just as an empty well would leave thirsty travellers disappointed and mists that disappeared would disillusion farmers anxious for rain to water their crops so the teaching of the false teachers was empty and useless.

‘the gloom of darkness has been reserved for them’ Compare v.4.

[18] ‘great swelling words’ (hupérogkos) bombastic, inflated, swollen, oversized

They ensnare in the ‘passions of the flesh’ and ‘sensualities’ people who ‘are only just escaping.’ The false teachers target new converts who are still in the process of breaking away from their old way of life and from their former associates who live in error.

[19] The false teachers promise freedom (they probably taught that Christians are not bound by the moral law, see Rom 6:15; 1 Pet 2:16) but while talking to others about liberty they themselves are slaves to corruption (moral corruption). There follows a saying or maxim based on the image of someone defeated in battle, taken captive and enslaved: ‘for a man becomes the slave of him who overpowers him.’

[20] ‘For’ What does ‘for’ refer back to?

a) Perhaps it looks back to ‘slaves of corruption in 19a and is therefore a reference to the false teachers themselves. This is most likely.

b) Perhaps it looks back to v.18 and refers to those (recent converts) who are just escaping paganism but have been ensnared by the false teachers.

To become an apostate, to leave Christianity and return to paganism, is to be in a state worse than one was at first. Peter emphasizes the seriousness of this in the next verse.

[21] It would have been better to have remained pagans than to have known ‘the way of righteousness’ (Christianity) and then have turned from the ‘holy commandment’ (the gospel message – holy because it is from and about Jesus Christ).

Peter uses the noun epígnōsis in v.20 and twice in v. 21 the verb epiginṓskō. These speak of an intense, full sort of knowledge.

[22] ‘But it is happened unto them’ This is a dramatic perfect which speaks of what is certain to happen in the future as if it has already happened.

Peter then quotes two sayings about the filthy and disgusting habits of dogs and pigs.

  1. ‘The dog has returned to its vomit’ This same saying is used in Prov 26:11 of a fool who repeats his folly.
  2. ‘The sow which has been washed [has returned] to wallow in mire.’

These proverbial sayings aptly illustrate both the uncleanness and the apostasy of the false teachers