Tag: Day of the Lord

Posted in Exposition

The Day of the Lord: Justice and Restoration in Obadiah 15-21

Posted on by writtenexposition

DELIVERANCE FOR ISRAEL IN THE DAY OF THE LORD (15-21)

The book of Obadiah is a prophecy against Edom, a nation closely related by kinship to Israel/Judah but one with a long history of opposition and aggression towards it. The first section of the book condemns Edom’s pride and lists its crimes (10-14), both passive and aggressive, against Israel/Judah.

In verses 15-21 the prophet shifts from the judgment on Edom to a broader picture of God’s judgment on all nations, plus the restoration of Israel. YHWH is Lord over human history and therefore will judge not only Edom (as promised in Obad 2-4 and 8-10) but the other nations also; on a future occasion known The Day of YHWH.

For the day of the LORD is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head. Obadiah 1:15

(15) Verse 15 expands the scope of God’s judgment from Edom to all nations and introduces the ‘Day of the Lord’ with the word ‘for.’ This word connects the second oracle (vv.15-21) with the first as it refers back to the crimes against Judah outlined in vv.10-14. These crimes are the reasons for YHWH’s judgment upon Edom and the other nations in the Day of the Lord and for the lex talionis that will apply. Verses 15-16 contain three expressions of lex talionis:

as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee

thy reward shall return upon thine own head

as ye have drunk…so shall all the heathen drink

RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE

Lex talionis is a Latin expression for the legal principle of retributive justice. You might hear it referred to in everyday casual conversation as ‘tit for tat;’ ‘an eye for an eye;’ ‘it’s karma;’ ‘what comes around goes around;’ or ‘you reap what you sow.’

The law of retributive justice is clearly set out early in the Old Testament:

And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. Exodus 21:23-25

In the New Testament it is mentioned by Jesus –

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Matthew 7:2

– just before he goes on to restate it positively in what has become known as the Golden Rule:

Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. Matthew 7:12

Also relevant is a statement in the New Testament by the apostle Paul:

Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. Galatians 6:7

The principle of sowing and reaping is a popular theme in gospel preaching and it is no less popular on Christian web sites. Much online content on the topic appears to be based on the work of John W. Lawrence (The Seven Laws of the Harvest : Understanding the Realities of Sowing and Reaping, Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids, MI, 1995).

I found five of the laws Lawrence identifies particularly interesting and instructive:

  • We reap only what has been sown.
  • We reap the same in kind as we sow (Gal 6:7-8)
  • We reap in a different season than we sow (Eccl 3:2; Gal 6:9)
  • We reap more than we sow (2 Sam 12:9-12; Hos 8:7)
  • We reap in proportion to what we sow (Prov 11:24-26; Mt 19:29; 2 Cor 9:6)

The principle of lex talionis underscores the justice of God’s judgment: Edom and the nations will face consequences proportional to their actions. The emphasis is on God’s fairness, as every nation will be held to account for its deeds.

THE DAY OF THE LORD

The Day of the Lord in the Old Testament refers to a time when YHWH decisively intervenes in human history, mainly in judgment. The concept may have developed from the idea of YHWH as a divine warrior who comes to the aid of his worshippers in battle (Isa 13:6; Ezek 13:5). The Day of the Lord is associated with divine justice and overwhelming violence.

The expression ‘the Day of YHWH’ may not have been coined by the prophet Amos (c.760 BCE) but he is our earliest Old Testament written source for it. Amos viewed the Day of YHWH as characterised by darkness (Woe unto you that desire the day of the LORD! to what end is it for you? the day of the LORD is darkness, and not light. Amos 5:18 ).

More than 130 years after Amos the prophet Zephaniah listed more characteristics of the Day of the Lord; as well as darkness he included battle imagery such as noise, wrath, slaughter, destruction and finality (Zeph 1:14-18).

There are similar expressions that refer to this great event (e.g. ‘The day of the Lord’s vengeance’ Isa 34:8; ‘the day of the Lord of hosts’ Isa 2:12; ‘the day of the Lord’s wrath’ Zeph 1:18; ‘the day of the Lord’s anger’ Zeph 2:2; ‘the day of his fierce anger’ Isa 13:13) but according to Hoffmann (1981, p.39) the exact Hebrew expression ‘the Day of YHWH’ only occurs in six passages (Isaiah 13:6, 9; Ezek 13:5; Joel 1:15; 2:1, 11; 3:14; Amos 5:18; Obad 15; Zeph 1:7, 19).

For as ye have drunk upon my holy mountain, so shall all the heathen drink continually, yea, they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and they shall be as though they had not been. Obadiah 1:16

(16) Verse 16 continues the theme of judgment, using the imagery of drinking as a metaphor for experiencing God’s wrath. If we assume that in v.16a YHWH is addressing Edom rather than Judah then ‘as ye have drunk’ refers to (literal) drinking by Edom on an occasion when Jerusalem was invaded and looted (probably during the reign of Jehoram of Judah). ‘My holy mountain’ is Zion (see also Psa 2:6; Isa 11:9; Joel 2:1). The idea of (metaphorically) drinking the cup of God’s wrath occurs frequently in the Old Testament and means undergoing divine judgment (e.g. Isa 51:17, 22; Jer 25:15-17; 49:12; Lam 4:21). As a result of that drinking (swallowing God’s wrath) YHWH’s enemies ‘shall be as though they had not been’ i.e. they will be completely destroyed.

Edom drank in revelry and celebration but the nations, including Edom, will drink from the cup of God’s judgment. The actions of Edom and the nations against Israel/Judah in the past will affect them in the future. Obadiah does not mention but doubtless assumes a major difference between what Edom has done and what YHWH will do. For Obadiah Edom’s actions against Judah were wrong whereas YHWH’s actions against Edom and the nations will be legitimate and just.

But upon mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. Obadiah 1:17

(17) Note the repetition of ‘shall’ in vv.17-21, emphasising that these predictions will surely come to pass.

As well as retribution against his enemies the Day of the Lord is associated with restoration, renewal and reward for his people. The word ‘but’ shows that a contrast is being drawn between the nations’ judgment and Israel’s restoration on the Day of the Lord. While the nations face destruction, there will be survivors in Zion (Jerusalem, Psa 48:2). YHWH will dwell in his temple on ‘Mount Zion’ (see Mic 4:1-2) and it will no longer be desecrated by Edom (v.16) but restored to holiness and purity. The “house of Jacob” (probably referring to Judah) will reclaim its land, from which it will have been dispossessed due to exile and oppression. This is a promise of restoration for God’s people. Note the repetition for emphasis – ‘possess their possessions.’ This suggests a period of peace and stability.

And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it. Obadiah 1:18

(18) This verse prophesies victory for Israel and destruction for Edom (‘house of Esau’) using parallelism.

the house of Jacob will be a fire

the house of Jacob [will be] a flame

the house of Esau [will be] stubble

Some commentators suggest that ‘house of Jacob’ may stand for Judah and ‘house of Joseph’ for the ten northern tribes of Israel. Thus the idea is of Israel in total. The imagery of fire (‘house of Jacob’) and flame (‘house of Joseph’) versus stubble (‘house of Esau’) highlights the overwhelming defeat that Edom will face. Fire consumes stubble quickly and completely, symbolising the destruction of Edom. The mention of ‘no survivor of the house of Esau’ reinforces the severity of Edom’s judgment. This statement is an example of a literary technique known as hyperbole (use of exaggeration for emphasis or effect) as v.21 predicts that ‘saviours’ will judge Edom. Assurance that these predictions will be fulfilled comes from the highest authority: ‘the Lord hath spoken it.’

And they of the south shall possess the mount of Esau; and they of the plain the Philistines: and they shall possess the fields of Ephraim, and the fields of Samaria: and Benjamin shall possess Gilead. Obadiah 1:19

(19) Verse 19 details Israel’s territorial expansion and the restoration of its land. The Negev (southern desert region) will take possession of Mount Esau (Edom’s territory) to the east, and the Shephelah (lowland region of Judah) will take over the land of the Philistines to the west (Isa 11:14; Zeph 2:4-7). Ephraim and Samaria represent the northern kingdom of Israel, Ephraim was the largest tribe and Samaria the capital. Benjamin (one of the two tribes in southern Israel) will take possession of Gilead (east of the Jordan River, i.e Transjordan).

And the captivity of this host of the children of Israel shall possess that of the Canaanites, even unto Zarephath; and the captivity of Jerusalem, which is in Sepharad, shall possess the cities of the south. Obadiah 1:20

(20) Israel will not only regain its own land but will expand into the territories of its enemies. This verse speaks specifically of the return of Israelite exiles. One group of exiles will expand through territory formerly occupied by the Canaanites as far north as ‘Zarephath,’ a town some ten miles south of Sidon (in present-day Lebanon).

The ‘exiles of Jerusalem’ who are in ‘Sepharad’ will return and possess the cities of the Negev. Lipiński (1973, p.368) maintains: ‘There can be no doubt that Sepharad is identical with the Persian satrapy of Sparda, in Asia Minor. The name itself appears in the Aramaic inscription found at Sardis, the capital of that satrapy.’

This verse indicates indicates the regaining of Israel’s traditional lands and also expansion into territory beyond that which they previously controlled. It suggests a regathering of Israelites from distant lands.

And saviours shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the LORD’s. Obadiah 1:21

(21) The deliverance will be by ‘saviours’ (judges), presumably appointed by YHWH to guide the Israelites to a proper form of worship. The administration will have its headquarters in Jerusalem (Mount Zion). Ironically, in a reversal of Edom’s fortunes, the judges will rule over Edom (Mount Esau – i.e. Mt. Seir). The two mountains are compared in order to emphasize the change in circumstances for Edom and the nations. The closing phrase of Obadiah’s book envisages a utopian future. It points to a future time when theocratic rule will be established; ‘the kingdom shall be the Lord’s.’

SUMMATION

The message of Obadiah is primarily one of judgment against Edom. This is said to be because of its attitudes and actions towards Israel. Key themes are:

Judgment

Obadiah prophesies that YHWH will make Edom small among the nations because of its pride and arrogance. It will be destroyed because of its cooperation with foreign invaders and actions against Israel at a time of distress.

Retribution

The actions that Edom and other nations have taken against Israel will be repaid in kind. Lex talionis is a principle of divine justice – ‘as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee’ (v.15).

Restoration for Israel

The prophecy of Edom’s doom also contains a message of hope for Israel. Obadiah promises that YHWH will deliver Israel from its enemies, that Israel will possess and even expand its former territory and that the kingship of YHWH will be manifested.

Despite its brevity the book of Obadiah communicates a powerful message about the consequences of sin and the triumph of God’s justice. It still serves today as a warning against pride, arrogance and betrayal. It is a reminder of God’s sovereignty and of his ultimate retribution against all who oppose him and his people.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Alexander, T. D., Baker, D.W., and Waltke, B. (2015). Obadiah, Jonah and Micah. InterVarsity Press.

Assis, E. (2021). Identity in Conflict: The Struggle between Esau and Jacob, Edom and Israel. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

Currie, B, (2023). Meditations on the Single-Chapter Books of the Bible (Obadiah, Philemon, 2John, 3John, Jude). Assembly Testimony

Dicou, B. (1994). Edom, Israel’s Brother and Antagonist: the Role of Edom in Biblical Prophecy and Story. Sheffield: Jsot Press.

Ehud Ben Zvi (1996). A Historical-critical Study of the Book of Obadiah. Berlin; New York: Walter De Gruyter.

Jenson, P. P. (2009). Obadiah, Jonah, Micah. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Lawrence, J.W. (1995). The Seven Laws of the Harvest: Understanding the Realities of Sowing and Reaping. Grand Rapids, Mi: Kregel Publications.

Mason, R. (2004). Micah, Nahum and Obadiah. Bloomsbury Publishing.

McComiskey, T. E. (1993). The Minor Prophets / Vol. 2, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum and Habakkuk. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House.

Rushdoony, R. J. (2013). Sermons in Obadiah & Jonah. Chalcedon Foundation.

Simundson, D. J. (2011). Abingdon Old Testament Commentaries: Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah. Abingdon Press.

Sawyer, J. F. A. and Clines, D .J. A. (1983). Midian, Moab and Edom: The History and Archaeology of Late Bronze and Iron Age Jordan and North-West Arabia. A&C Black.

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Anderson, B.A. (2010). ‘Poetic Justice in Obadiah.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 35(2), pp. 247–255.

Anderson, B. A. (2012). “Edom in the Book of Numbers: Some Literary Reflections’ Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 38-51.

Anderson, B. A. (2014) ‘The Reception of Obadiah: Some Historical, Ideological, and Visual Considerations.’ Proceedings of the Irish Biblical Association, 36-37 . pp. 17-35.

Assis, E. (2006). ‘Why Edom? On the Hostility Towards Jacob’s Brother in Prophetic Sources.’ Vetus Testamentum, 56(1), ppp. 1–20.

Assis, E. (2014). ‘Structure, Redaction and Significance in the Prophecy of Obadiah.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 39(2), pp. 209–221.

Bartlett, J. R. (1969). ‘The Land of Seir and the Brotherhood of Edom.’ The Journal of Theological Studies, 20(1), pp. 1–20.

Bartlett, J. R. (1977). ‘The Brotherhood of Edom.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 2(4), pp. 2-27.

Becking, B. (2016). ‘The Betrayal of Edom: Remarks on a Claimed Tradition.’ HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 72(4). pp.1-4

Burdon, C. (1998). ‘Jacob and the Dominion of Edom.’ The Expository Times, 109(12), pp. 360-363.

Cannon, W. W. (1927). ‘Israel and Edom: The Oracle of Obadiah—II.’ Theology, 15(88), pp. 191-200.

Davies, G. I. (1977). ‘A New Solution to a Crux in Obadiah 7.’ Vetus Testamentum, 27(4), pp. 484–487.

Ferries, R. (2022). ‘Edom and Babylon: Archetypal Enemies of God and His People. A Comparative Analysis of Obadiah and Isaiah 13:2–14:23,’ Old Testament Essays 35 no.3, pp. 475 – 495.

Forder, A. (1901). ‘Sela or Petra, “The Strong City.” The Ruined Capital of Edom.’ The Biblical World, 18(5), pp. 328–337.

Glueck, N. (1936). ‘The Boundaries of Edom.’ Hebrew Union College Annual, 11, pp. 141–157.

Hoffmann, Y. (1981). ‘The Day of the Lord as a Concept and a Term in the Prophetic Literature.’ Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 37-50

Hwang, J. (2014). ”My Name Will Be Great among the Nations:’ The Missio Dei in the Book of the Twelve.’ Tyndale Bulletin, 65 (2): pp. 161–80.

Krause, J. J. (2008). ‘Tradition, History, and Our Story: Some Observations on Jacob and Esau in the Books of Obadiah and Malachi.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 32(4), pp. 475–486.

Lipiński, E. (1973). ‘Obadiah 20.’ Vetus Testamentum, 23(3), pp. 368–370.

Ogden, G. S. (1982). ‘Prophetic Oracles Against Foreign Nations and Psalms of Communal Lament: the Relationship of Psalm 137 to Jeremiah 49:7-22 and Obadiah.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 7(24), 89-97.

Robinson, T. H. (1916). ‘The Structure of the Book of Obadiah.’ The Journal of Theological Studies, 17(68), pp. 402–408.

Tebes, J. M. (2017). ‘Memories of Humiliation, Cultures of Resentment towards Edom and the Formation of Ancient Jewish National Identity.’ Nations and Nationalism, 25(1), pp.124–145.

Werse, N. R. (2013). ‘Obadiah’s ‘Day of the Lord:’ A Semiotic Reading.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 38(1), pp.109–124.

DIGITAL

ANDERSON, B. A. (2010) Election, Brotherhood and Inheritance:
A Canonical Reading of the Esau and Edom Traditions. Doctoral thesis, Durham University.

Posted in Exposition

Understanding the Book of Obadiah: A Concise Overview

Posted on by writtenexposition

The prophecy of Obadiah is the shortest book in the Old Testament and fourth of the twelve Minor Prophets (note: it comes fifth in LXX which has a different order for the first six Minor Prophets – Hosea, Amos, Micah, Joel, Obadiah, Jonah). It commences with a superscription (v.1) which states that it was written by someone called Obadiah and also that the subject matter concerns Edom. The remainder of the book is a diatribe against Edom, consisting of two oracles; the first denouncing that nation for sins committed against the people of Israel/Judah and the second a prophecy about the Day of YHWH.

AUTHORSHIP

Obadiah is a common Old Testament name that means ‘servant of the Lord’ so this may either be the name of the book’s author or just a self-description. A dozen men named Obadiah are mentioned in the Old Testament. Smith’s Bible Dictionary lists them as follows:

  1. A man whose sons are enumerated in the genealogy of the tribe of Judah. (1 Chronicles 3:21)
  2. A descendant of Issachar and a chief man of his tribe. (1 Chronicles 7:3)
  3. One of the six sons of Azel, a descendant of Saul. (1 Chronicles 8:33; 9:44)
  4. A Levite, son of Shemaiah, and descended from Jeduthun. (1 Chronicles 9:16; Nehemiah 12:25)
  5. The second of the lion-faced Gadites who joined David at Ziklag. (1 Chronicles 12:9)
  6. One of the Princes of Judah in the reign of Jehoshaphat. (2 Chronicles 17:7)
  7. The son of Jehiel, of the sons of Joab, who came up in the second caravan with Ezra. (Ezra 8:9)
  8. A priest, or family of priests, who settled the covenant with Nehemiah. (Nehemiah 10:5)
  9. The fourth of the twelve minor prophets.
  10. An officer of high rank in the court of Ahab. (1 Kings 18:3)
  11. The father of Ishmaiah who was chief of the tribe of Zebulun in David’s reign. (1 Chronicles 27:19)
  12. A Merarite Levite in the reign of Josiah, and one of the overseers of the workmen in the restoration of the temple. (2 Chronicles 34:12)

Nothing is known about no. 9 in Smith’s list, the author of the book of Obadiah.

DATE OF WRITING

The book of Obadiah contains no internal evidence that would indicate when it was written. No information about the author (except for his name) is given so it is virtually impossible to determine the date of writing. There are differing theories as to when the book was written. That depends upon how v.11 is interpreted.

In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them. Obadiah 11

There is disagreement as to whether this verse refers to what happened around the time of the siege and fall of Jerusalem to Nebuchadnezzar II in 587/6 BCE or to a much earlier event. The verse relates to an attack on Jerusalem, when the Edomites participated in the city’s destruction.

PRE-EXILIC VIEW

Those who consider that Obadiah was a pre-exilic prophet view Obadiah 11 as referencing an event much earlier in Judah’s history than the fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians. They identify two possibilities:

a) The Edomite revolt during the reign of King Jehoram of Judah (c. 852-841 BCE) when, in league with the Philistines and the Arabians, the Edomites plundered the temple of YHWH in Jerusalem and also carried off the royal household.

In his days Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah, and made a king over themselves. So Joram went over to Zair, and all the chariots with him: and he rose by night, and smote the Edomites which compassed him about, and the captains of the chariots: and the people fled into their tents. Yet Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day... 2 Kings 8:20-22

In his days the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah, and made themselves a king. Then Jehoram went forth with his princes, and all his chariots with him: and he rose up by night, and smote the Edomites which compassed him in, and the captains of the chariots. So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day… 2 Chronicles 21:8-10

Moreover the LORD stirred up against Jehoram the spirit of the Philistines, and of the Arabians, that were near the Ethiopians: And they came up into Judah, and broke into it, and carried away all the substance that was found in the king’s house, and his sons also, and his wives; so that there was never a son left him, save Jehoahaz, the youngest of his sons. 2 Chronicles 21:16-17

Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Philistia? will ye render me a recompense? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompense upon your own head; Because ye have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried into your temples my goodly pleasant things: The children also of Judah and the children of Jerusalem have ye sold unto the Greeks, that ye might remove them far from their border. Joel 3:4-6

Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Gaza, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they carried away captive the whole captivity, to deliver them up to Edom: But I will send a fire on the wall of Gaza, which shall devour the palaces thereof: And I will cut off the inhabitant from Ashdod, and him that holdeth the scepter from Ashkelon, and I will turn mine hand against Ekron: and the remnant of the Philistines shall perish, saith the Lord GOD. Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Tyrus, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they delivered up the whole captivity to Edom, and remembered not the brotherly covenant: But I will send a fire on the wall of Tyrus, which shall devour the palaces thereof. Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Edom, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because he did pursue his brother with the sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, and he kept his wrath forever: But I will send a fire upon Teman, which shall devour the palaces of Bozrah. Amos 1:6-12

Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.
For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.
They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:
The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes (Arabians);
Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre;
Assur also is joined with them: they have helped the children of Lot. Selah. Psalms 83:1-8

b) Edomite conflict with Judah during the reign of King Ahaz of Judah (c. 732-716 BCE).

At that time did king Ahaz send unto the kings of Assyria to help him. For again the Edomites had come and smitten Judah, and carried away captives. The Philistines also had invaded the cities of the low country, and of the south of Judah, and had taken Beth-shemesh, and Ajalon, and Gederoth, and Shocho with the villages thereof, and Timnah with the villages thereof, Gimzo also and the villages thereof: and they dwelt there. 2 Chronicles 28:16-18

EXILIC VIEW

Those who view Obadiah 11 as referring to what happened around 586 BCE postulate that the prophet Obadiah wrote early in the exilic period, just after the fall of Jerusalem, of which he may have been a contemporary eyewitness. These are the relevant passages:

Remember, O LORD, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who said, Raze it, raze it, even to the foundation thereof. Psalms 137:7

As for us, our eyes as yet failed for our vain help: in our watching we have watched for a nation that could not save us. They hunt our steps, that we cannot go in our streets: our end is near, our days are fulfilled; for our end is come. Our persecutors are swifter than the eagles of the heaven: they pursued us upon the mountains, they laid wait for us in the wilderness. The breath of our nostrils, the anointed of the LORD, was taken in their pits, of whom we said, Under his shadow we shall live among the heathen. Rejoice and be glad, O daughter of Edom, that dwellest in the land of Uz; the cup also shall pass through unto thee: thou shalt be drunken, and shalt make thyself naked. The punishment of thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion; he will no more carry thee away into captivity: he will visit thine iniquity, O daughter of Edom; he will discover thy sins. Lamentations 4:17-22

Thus saith the Lord GOD; Because that Edom hath dealt against the house of Judah by taking vengeance, and hath greatly offended, and revenged himself upon them; Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; I will also stretch out mine hand upon Edom, and will cut off man and beast from it; and I will make it desolate from Teman; and they of Dedan shall fall by the sword. And I will lay my vengeance upon Edom by the hand of my people Israel: and they shall do in Edom according to mine anger and according to my fury; and they shall know my vengeance, saith the Lord GOD. Ezekiel 25:12-14

Moreover the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against mount Seir, and prophesy against it, And say unto it, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O mount Seir, I am against thee, and I will stretch out mine hand against thee, and I will make thee most desolate. I will lay thy cities waste, and thou shalt be desolate, and thou shalt know that I am the LORD. Because thou hast had a perpetual hatred, and hast shed the blood of the children of Israel by the force of the sword in the time of their calamity, in the time that their iniquity had an end: Ezekiel 35:1-5

I favour the pre-exilic view that Obadiah lived and wrote during or soon after Edomite rebellion in the reign of King Jehoram (c. 852-841 BCE) but the dominant opinion among modern scholars is that the Book of Obadiah was written sometime in the 6th century BCE, probably in the early years of the Babylonian exile. This assumes that the occasion when Edom gloated over Jerusalem was its destruction by the Babylonians. Psalm 137:7 strongly supports that view. Its proponents, however tend to ignore Jeremiah 40:11, which indicates that people from Judah fled from the Babylonians to other territories; a number of them finding refuge in Edom.

PROPHETIC PARALLELS

The book of Obadiah contains obvious parallels with other Old Testament prophetic writings; especially Jer 49:7-16. The other passages are Lam 4:21; Joel 1:15; 2:32; Ezek 25:12-14; 35:5; also compare Psa 137:7; Mal 1:2-5.

BACKGROUND

Read: Gen 25-33

According to the Old Testament the nations of Edom and Israel traced their roots to a common ancestor. This was the patriarch Isaac, son of Abraham. Isaac fathered twin sons named Esau and Jacob. From Esau came the nation of Edom and from Jacob the nation of Israel.

According to the biblical account the twin brothers were rivals from before birth (Gen 25:19-34). Verse 22 of Gen 25 notes that in their mother Rebekah’s womb ‘the children struggled together within her.’ Concerned by this she inquired of YHWH and in reply received a significant prophecy:

And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. Gen 25:23

Genesis does not clarify whether the prophecy relates to the two individuals (Esau and Jacob) or to the future nations (Edom and Israel) that would descend from them.

The rivalry between the twin brothers continued into adulthood but it the Genesis record would indicate that later on they more or less patched up their differences; which would lead one to the conclusion that the prophecy pointed to future national affairs. The brothers may have reached an accommodation of sorts but that was not the case with Edom and Israel. Despite the fact that the two nations had a common ancestor and were thus related by kinship, their history is marked by mutual hatred and hostility. The nation of Israel expected Edom to behave towards it as a brother should, unfortunately Edom did not share those same sentiments (Deut 23:7; Num 20:14-21).

The brotherhood of Edom and Israel is referred to several times in the Old Testament. It is stressed even in the account of the birth of the twin brothers Esau and Jacob with the comment that immediately after Esau was born ‘his brother came out’ (Gen 25:26). Other references to this kinship are in Num 2:14; Deut 2:4, 23:7; Amos 1:11; Obad 10, 12; Mal 1:2.

The treatment of Esau and Edom in the Pentateuch is comparatively neutral in tone but in the prophets they are referred to with hostility. The main reasons are 1) Edom’s history of aggression towards Israel, often in cahoots with other Canaanite nations that were unrelated by kinship and also 2) Edom’s expansion into Judean territory in the Negev (Ezek 35:10; 36:5; Obad 19-20, cp. 1 Esdras 4:50).

The bad press continues in the New Testament where Esau is viewed negatively in Rom 9:13 as regards election and in Heb 12:16-17 is cited as a negative example of someone who prefers the gratification of fleshly appetites to the blessing of God. There is no direct quotation from Obadiah in the New Testament.

THEMES AND PURPOSE

The Book of Obadiah has two main themes. One is the overthrow and destruction of Edom, Israel’s inveterate enemy. The other is the eventual glory of Israel/Judah in the Day of YHWH. The purpose of the book is therefore to prophesy Edom’s doom because of its pride and hatred of Israel/Judah and to encourage the Israelites/Judeans in the fact that a bright future lies ahead. The book divides as follows:

1-14 Declaration of Judgement on Edom

15-21 Deliverance for Israel in the Day of YHWH

KEY VERSE

…as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head. Obadiah 15

KEY PHRASE

the kingdom shall be the LORD’s. Obadiah 21

Posted in Exposition

2 PETER 3:1-18 THE LORD’S RETURN

Posted on by writtenexposition

THE CERTAINTY OF THE LORD’S RETURN

3:1-2 COMMANDMENT

3:3-7 CONTEMPT

3:8-9 CONSTRAINT

3:10-13 CATASTROPHE

3:14-18 COUNSEL

‘This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance: That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour: 2 Pet 3:1-2

3:1-2 COMMANDMENT

Peter now turns from his tirade against false teachers to focus his attention on his readers and encourage them by addressing the disturbing topic of the delay of the Parousia. This seems to have been a problem for the early Christians, as they expected the return of the Lord during their lifetime.

[1] Peter addresses his readers as ‘beloved’ (agapētoí). This term was used by the New Testament writers to denote believers. It must, therefore, have been encouraging for Peter’s suffering readers to realise that they were loved with God’s deep unconditional love. The word occurs here in v.1 for the first time in 2 Peter but is used three more times in this same chapter; in vv.8, 14 and 17.

We learn that this is the second letter that he has written to them, the first must have been 1 Peter. The purpose of his writing is by way of reminder, he has already told them this in 1:13. He wants to stir up their ‘pure minds’ (sincere disposition). Diánoia means intellect or the thinking faculty. The idea is that of ‘true discernment.’

He wishes to remind them of topics addressed in his first letter which would include living a holy life, avoiding immorality, a glorious future for believers and doom for the wicked.

[2] He wants them to recall the words previously spoken by the holy prophets and the apostles of the Lord and Saviour.

‘prophets’ The reference could be to New Testament prophets but is more likely to be to Old Testament prophets since the prophets in 1 Peter (1:10-12) were clearly Old Testament as they lived before Christ.

‘apostles’ This is probably a reference to the missionaries who evangelised their part of Asia Minor. Peter associates himself with them.

‘the commandment’ In the context this may refer to a command to watch for the Lord’s return e.g. Mk 13:33-37.

‘Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished. But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.‘ 2 Pet 3:3-7

3:3-7 CONTEMPT

[3] Peter singles out what he views as the main point (‘understanding this first’ – same phrase as 1:20a) of the message of the Old Testament prophets and the New Testament apostles; that in the last days there will be ‘scoffers with scoffing’. Those who deny prophecy are themselves the subject of prophecy. This expression ‘scoffers will come to scoff’ emphasizes the activity of the false teachers. He goes on to say that they will not only be irreverent but also immoral, as they will ‘walk after their own lusts’ (see 2:10a). ‘walking’ is used to denote behaviour. The word ‘scoffer’ (empaíktēs) occurs only here and in Jude 1:18 in the New Testament.

‘in the last days’ This is a biblical term for the final days (usually thought of by Christians as the time between Christ’s ascension and second coming) e.g. Isa 2:2; Dan 2:28; Hos 3:5; Mic 4:1; Acts 2:17; Heb 1:2.

[4] ‘Where is?’ i.e ‘What has happened to?’ This expresses skepticism (Psa 42:10; Jer 17:15; Mal 2:17).

‘promise’ This is a key word in this chapter: vv. 4, 9, 13, see also 1:4.

‘coming’ parousía

‘fathers’ ancestors. This possibly refers to the first generation Christians who had died, or probably to the Old Testament patriarchs (Jn 6:31; Rom 9:5; Heb 1:1).

‘fell asleep’ – This is a metaphorical way of saying ‘died’ (Mt 27:52; 1 Cor 15:6,18).

The scoffers had decided that since nothing had changed since the beginning of the world they were free to indulge their own passions (v.3b).

[5-7] Peter answers these two objections of the scoffers in reverse order. In vv.5-7 he addresses their view that all things have remained stable since the beginning (4b) and then in vv. 8-10 addresses the question ‘Where is the promise of his coming?’ (4a).

Objection 1. All things have remained stable since the beginning.

According to Peter the scoffers deliberately ignore the fact that the heavens and the earth (i.e the universe) were created by the word of God and that, far from allowing them to continue unchanged, he has intervened and destroyed them once already by the Flood (see also 1 Pet. 3:20-21; 2 Pet 2:5). Drawing upon Genesis 1:2, 6-7, according to which only water existed before the formation of the universe, Peter says that the heavens and earth were formed ‘out of water’ and ‘by means of water’. They (the heavens and the earth meaning: ‘the world that then existed’) were therefore destroyed by the very element from which they were formed.

‘whereby” by which. This is usually taken to refer to the water but since ‘which’ is in the plural the antecedent might be ‘word’ as well as ‘water’, in that case we have ‘the two agents of creation cooperating in destruction’ (C. Bigg cited by J.N.D. Kelly, 1969, P.360).

In v.7 Peter accepts a tradition found in Jewish apocalyptic writings that the universe will be destroyed by fire. This is the only biblical reference to that, although there are many that speak of fire as the instrument of God to destroy his enemies. The universe is reserved by the same word for future judgement by fire. Peter’s emphasis is not on the fire but on the judgement. This will fall on ‘ungodly men’, undoubtedly this is a sideways swipe at the false teachers and scoffers.

Peter’s answer to the claim that all things have continued undisturbed from the beginning is that the world has not always remained stable. God does intervene and has done so at the Flood. This gives good grounds for believing that he will do so again in the future (see Mt 24:37-39).

‘But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.’ 2 Pet 3:8-9

CONSTRAINT

[8-9]

‘You must not fail to notice’ Again addressing them as ‘beloved’ (see v.1), Peter uses the same expression as that in v.5 (‘are ignorant of’) – with the ‘you’ in v.8 standing in contrast to the ‘they’ of v.5.

Objection 2. ‘Where is the promise of his coming?’

Peter now answers that question and makes three main points in his explanation of the delay:

1. The Lord does not calculate time the way we do (v.8).

God does not distinguish between one day and a thousand years. He bases this upon Psa 90:4 (‘For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night’) to show that the time of the Parousia and Day of the Lord cannot be predicted accurately. He is NOT hinting that in scripture one day equals a thousand years

2. The Lord is patient and gives opportunity for people to repent (v.9).

The Lord (i.e. God as in v.8) is not slow (in the sense of ‘slack’ – bradúnō ) about his ‘promise’ (same word as v.4), as some (the scoffers and those who have been influenced by them) reckon slowness (i.e. due to negligence) but the delay is due to his forbearance (makrothuméō – long anger). He delays judgement because he desires that all should repent and none perish ( e.g. 1 Pet 3:20)

3. The Day of the Lord will come suddenly (v.10)

God’s patience does not mean that the judgement will never come and, in fact, the delay will have intensified divine judgement (v.10).

‘But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.’ 2 Pet 3:10-13

3:10-13 CATASTROPHE

[10] Despite what seems like a long delay (v.9) the Day of the Lord (Jer 46:10; Joel 2:1–11; Amos 5:18–20) will certainly come (Acts 17:30-31); like a ‘thief in the night’ (Mt 24:43; Lk12:39; 1Thess 5:2; Rev 3:3; 16:15). It will be sudden and unexpected, but not for believers, 1 Thess 5:4.

The Day of the Lord will bring catastrophe for the universe because ‘the heavens will pass away with a rushing sound, the celestial bodies will will be set ablaze and disintegrate’ (translation by J.N. D. Kelly, 1969, p.364)

‘Elements’ (stoicheíon – one of a row, plural – series) can mean either the basic elements of which everything in the universe is composed (earth, air, fire, water) or celestial bodies like stars. ‘Earth’ here probably refers to the planet rather than the people who live on it. All that humans have done on it will be done away with. The Old Testament background is probably Isa 34:4. See Rev 14:13 for what happens to the works of Christians.

[11] Peter maintains that this prediction of a future catastrophe ought to stimulate Christians to holy living in the here and now. They should not get overly attached to the things of this world, for those will not last. He presents this in the form of a question (vv.11-12) containing the challenging and memorable phrase: ‘What manner of persons ought ye to be?’

[12] Unlike the false teachers and scoffers, who deny the reality of the Lord’s second coming, believers should look forward to it, and even hasten it. Speúdō can either mean ‘earnestly desiring’ (Isa 16:5) or ‘urge on, hasten on.’ Since the Lord desires that all should come to repentance presumably the acceleration of the ‘Day of God’ can be brought about through prayer and evangelism, resulting in people repenting and converting. Peter had earlier preached this idea of repentance and conversion speeding up Christ’s return in a sermon recorded in Acts chapter 3:

‘Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord, and that he may send the Messiah, who has been appointed for you—even Jesus. Heaven must receive him until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago through his holy prophets.’ Acts 3:19-21 NIV

The ‘coming’ (parousía) of the Day of God. Here parousía does not refer to a person, as in v.4a, but a day.

That Day of God (see Rev 16:14), also known as the ‘Day of the Lord’, will generate cosmic destruction. The heavens will be destroyed (loosed or broken up) and the elements will melt.

[13] The positive thing, according to Peter, is that the universe will not be annihilated but remodelled. The idea seems to be that of purification rather than total destruction. The transformation will inaugurate a new era.

The intensity of divine judgement should not cause the Christians to despair but rather cause them to hope as they can look forward to new heavens and a new earth. Two things are said about this new creation:

1. Righteousness dwells in it.

At present the believers face opposition from false teachers and scoffers but they can look forward to the future state in which unrighteous people like those will be excluded.

2. It is ‘according to his promise’.

‘his’ i.e. God’s, refers back to ‘[Day of]God’ v.12

The promise referred to is Isa 65:17 (see also Isa 66:22; Rev 20:11; 21:1):

‘For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.’

‘Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless. And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own steadfastness. But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen.’ 2 Pet 3:14-18

3:14-18 COUNSEL

[14] Since they have ‘these things’ (new heavens and a new earth) to look forward to Peter again emphasizes the need for the Christians to live a holy life.

‘look forward to’ – the same verb (prosdokáō) as in v.12 and v.13.

‘be diligent’ – make an effort, also 2 Pet 1:10,15.

‘at peace’ – The state of reconciliation with God, 1 Pet 1:2, 2 Pet 1:2.

‘without spot or blemish’ This contrasts with the scoffers who in 2:13 are said to be ‘spots and blemishes.’ This means that the Christians are to be eager to be like Christ himself (1 Pet 1:19; Eph 1:4; 5:27).

‘to be found of him’ i.e. in the sight of the Lord (judgement) at his Coming.

[15] Unlike the scoffers who considered it slackness (v.9) the Christians are to ‘reckon’ that God’s (‘the Lord’ vv. 8,9,10 + Day of God v.12)) forbearance is salvation. This is a repetition of the idea in v.9 that God delays the parousia and judgement because he desires that all repent.

Peter uses Paul for further confirmation and says that he counts Paul ‘a beloved brother.’ He refers to Paul’s correspondence which was circulating among the churches and says that Paul had written something similar, ‘in virtue of the wisdom given to him’ (1 Cor 2:6-16; Col 1:28). Peter may have had Rom 2:4 or Rom 3:25-26 in mind, but what epistles and what passages he means is left rather vague.

In more general terms, Peter must have felt that Paul’s teaching supported his own exhortations to Christians to lead holy lives in view of the Second Coming.

[16] It is unclear from 2 Peter (3:1) exactly what group of Christians this letter is addressed to. It is also impossible for us to know what, if anything, Paul had written specifically to them. Peter mentions ‘all’ Paul’s letters, which would suggest that the Christians in Asia Minor had access to a collection. This may have been more than just the three addressed to churches in Asia Minor; Galatians, Ephesians and Colossians.

Peter notes that Paul’s letters are difficult and easily misunderstood. He was concerned about false teachers taking parts of Paul’s letters out of context and using them to back up their version of Christian freedom, i.e. license. The false teachers twist Paul’s letters to their own perdition, as they do the other scriptures. What are ‘the other writings’ Peter refers to? They were probably the Old Testament books and the New Testament Gospels. Peter is certainly saying that the false teachers distort these in the same way as they do Paul’s writings. Some commentators, however, go further and maintain that Peter is denoting Paul’s letters as authoritative and inspired and that here he is putting them on a par with the other writings.

[17-18] In these two verses Peter repeats his warning against false teachers, encourages the Christians to grow in grace and knowledge and concludes his letter with a doxology to Jesus Christ. He reminds the believers that since they have been forewarned they are to ‘beware’. They are ‘to be on guard’ (phulássō keep watch), this is the same verb as ‘saved’ in 2:5. They are to take care:

negatively:

a. Not to be carried away by the error of lawless or unprincipled people.

b. Not to fall from their own stability (he has already told them that they are stable in 1:12)

positively:

i. They are to grow in grace (God’s favour) and

ii. They are to grow in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

‘to him [be or belongs – there is no verb in the original] glory now and to the day of eternity (lit. the day of the age).’ All the glory is to go to Christ alone for forever. Amen.