Tag: Egypt

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 2)

Posted on by writtenexposition

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

(11) Verse 10 ends with Aholah (Israel) having suffered punishment for her infidelities and having become a byword among other women (‘the nations’). This section (vv.11-21) makes the point (11, 14, 19) that Aholibah (Jerusalem) saw her sister Aholah’s fate but did not learn from it. Judah did not heed the warning from the past.

(12-13) Just as her sister had done (vv.5-6) Aholibah ‘lusted after’ (doted upon) the impeccably dressed young Assyrian cavaliers. She became more corrupt in her lust than her sister; her pattern of behaviour escalating as time progressed.

This may include a historical reference to Judah under Ahaz (735-715 BCE), a king who submitted to Assyrian rule – see 2 Kgs 16 and Isa 7.

Notice that in the oracle there are three objects of Aholibah’s admiration – the Assyrians v.12, the Chaldeans v.16 and Egypt’s concubines v.20.

(14-21) Judah’s fascination with the Chaldeans (Babylonians) is depicted as lust for ‘men portrayed upon the wall’ (probably a reference to Babylonian wall reliefs). Aholibah was attracted by these brightly coloured engraved images (possibly using ochre) of soldiers wearing red uniforms as well as broad waistbands and flowing turbans. This was the typical dress of high-ranking Babylonian military officers.

Having only heard reports of Babylonian might Judah sent ambassadors to seek an alliance. It is possible, but not certain, that Hezekiah first contacted the Babylonian king Merodach-Baladan who then sent an embassy to Jerusalem (2 Kgs 20:12-21; Isa 39:1-8). The point in these verses is not so much idolatry as unnecessary and ill-advised political alliances.

(17-18) The Babylonians came to Judah in bed and made her unclean but afterwards her soul abhorred them. The expression (mind is alienated KJV) occurs in Ezek 23 :17, 18, 28 and Jer 6:8. The verb yāqa‘ means to turn away or alienate and in a different context is used for the dislocation of Jacob’s hip in Gen 32:25.

Ezekiel is reminding his audience that after a time relations with the Babylonians soured. For example: Jehoiakim revolted against Babylonia c. 598 BCE. Jehoiakim died during the revolt and his eighteen year old son Jehoiachin (also known as Jeconiah or Coniah) succeeded to the throne of Judah but surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar after three months. Jehoiachin, along many leading Judahites, was then deported to Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah as a puppet king but nine years later he too rebelled against Babylonian rule (See 2 Kings 24).

Thus Aholibah (Jerusalem) revealed her nakedness and her harlotries with the result that YHWH turned away from her in disgust just as he had with her sister Aholah (Israel).

(19-21) Having been unfaithful to YHWH with powerful men like Assyria and Chaldea Aholibah did not return to the Lord but instead ‘called to remembrance’ the early days in Egypt. The verb means ‘to search for.’ The idea is that she reverted to an earlier pattern of behaviour; in this case the idolatry of her youth in Egypt.

She therefore sought a relationship with Egypt; longing to be one of Egypt’s concubines. Egypt, a world power at the time, is metaphorically described in graphic, animalistic terms as being sexually potent. Ezekiel employs coarse language in order to emphasise Aholibah’s excessive, unrestrained lust for foreign powers and also to evoke a feeling of revulsion in his audience.

The prophets of YHWH disapproved of Judah’s political flirtations with Egypt. Like Ezekiel, Isaiah and Jeremiah viewed Egypt as an unreliable ally (Isa 30:1-7; 31:1-3; Jer 2:18; 37:5-10).

Notice that until v.21 the verbs are in the third person (‘she’) but now change to the second person (‘you’). This anticipates YHWH directly addressing Aholibah in vv. 22-35 when announcing her punishment.

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

(22) ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because of her infidelities), followed by the prophetic messenger formula (‘thus saith the Lord God’), is followed by a direct message from YHWH to Aholibah (Jerusalem) stating his intention to punish her. He will accomplish this by bringing her former ‘lovers’ (the nations that she once courted) against her to attack her. Those with whom she was once allied but from whom she has turned in disgust (‘mind is alienated’ see on v.17 above) will become her deadly enemies.

(23-24) They include the Babylonians and various other groups, described as ‘desirable young men,’ ‘governors and officials,’ ‘cavalry officers and men of renown’ (lit. persons summoned to a meeting, Num 1:16; 16:2), who will come against her with military might. The list specifies:
– the Babylonians (sons of Babel) – the Neo-Babylonian empire under Nebuchadnezzar II, the superpower at that time
– the Chaldeans – a people group in the south of Babylonia – dominant in the Neo-Babylonian empire
– Pekod – possibly an Aramean tribe – from Syria
– Shoa – unknown
– Koa – unknown
– all the Assyrians (sons of Asshur) – possibly defeated Assyrian army units that had been pressed into military service by the Babylonians.

This confederation of Babylonian allies and vassals will attack Judah with an impressive array of the latest military equipment – weapons, chariots, wagons, large and small shields and helmets. YHWH will punish Judah by allowing these forces to judge her by their own inhumane laws rather than by biblical laws.

(25-27) Aholibah (Jerusalem) will therefore suffer the atrocities of ancient warfare. This will include brutal mutilations such as rhinotomy (nose-cutting) and ear cropping. In those ancient honour-shame cultures mutilations had to do with shame. They asserted the domination of the aggressor and indicated a change in the victim’s status. For biblical examples of wartime mutilations see Judg 1:6-7; 1 Sam 11:2; 31:9-10; 2 Sam 4:7,12; 2 Kgs 25:7; Jer 39:6-7.

Many who survive mutilation will be killed and others taken into captivity. Jerusalem will be stripped and plundered and the properties left empty (‘thy residue’) by those slain or deported will be consumed by fire. These agonies will be deliberately instigated by YHWH; in them Aholibah will experience his jealousy (intense fervour). The judgement will be so severe that her lewdness and the harlotries learned in Egypt will cease. She will no longer look amorously at Egypt, i.e. seek a political alliance or military help. ‘Look amorously’ is conveyed by the expression ‘lift up thine eyes unto’ – this is how Potiphar’s wife looked at Joseph in Gen 39:7.

(28-32) Beginning with ‘For,’ followed by the prophetic messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ (as v.22), Aholibah’s punishment is further described using the indecent image of YHWH handing her over to her former lovers, whom she has come to abhor, to be made a public spectacle. They will strip her stark naked, expose and violate her. This imagery of being left exposed symbolises not only physical vulnerability but also spiritual disgrace. This is due to her unfaithfulness to YHWH in the form of idolatry and alliances with ungodly nations (v.30).

It is ironic that the very nations with which Jerusalem sought an alliance for protection will become her oppressors. The language of v.29 emphasises the depth of betrayal and the resulting shame: they shall deal with thee hatefully, and shall take away all thy labour, and shall leave thee naked and bare. ‘Take away all thy labour’ reflects one of the curses promised for covenant unfaithfulness in Deut 28:33: The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shalt be only oppressed and crushed always.

Verse 28 echoes vv.17, 22 and 16:37. Verse 29 echoes v.26 and 16:39. Verse 31, looking back to v.13, states that Jerusalem has walked in the way of her sister, Aholah (Israel), and thus will drink from the same cup of judgement.

(32-35) Verses 32-34 develop the thought of drinking from the same cup as her sister Samaria had drunk from (in 722 BCE, see 2 Kgs 17:6). This takes the form of a poem:

This is what the Lord GOD says:
“You will drink your sister’s cup,
which is deep and wide.
You will be an object of ridicule and scorn,
for it holds so much.
You will be filled with drunkenness and grief,
with a cup of devastation and desolation,
the cup of your sister Samaria.
You will drink it and drain it;
then you will gnaw its broken pieces,
and tear your breasts.
For I have spoken.”
This is the declaration of the Lord GOD. (Ezek 23:32-34 CSB)

The cup is large (deep and wide) and people will laugh at the fact that it is so great and has to be drained completely. Aholibah will be the object of derision and scorn because when she drinks the toxic contents she will stagger about, as if drunk, stunned by the severity of the judgement. The cup will be one of intoxication and grief, of ruin and desolation. The contents of the cup will drive Aholibah mad. Overcome by self-loathing, she will break it in pieces and self-harm with the fragments of pottery. Ortland Jnr (2016, p.129, footnote 82) explains:

The image is that of a cup filled to the brim with a powerful potion, to make the one who drinks it reel with an exaggerated drunkenness. Yahweh holds this cup in his hand and forces it to the lips of the nation to be judged. It represents, in real terms, the breakdown of order, the loss of control and good judgment, the panic and disarray, as a nation staggers like a drunk toward divinely ordained destruction. Cf. Ps. 75:9 [EVV 8]; Is. 51:17; Je. 25:15-16, 28; 51:7; La. 4:21; Hab. 2:16. The figure makes vividly clear to the Judahites ‘the compulsion there is to accept destiny, the impossibility of rejecting it, the trepidation at its death-dealing effects, the bitterness of the suffering it involves, and how it has to be tasted to the full’, to quote Eichrodt (1970: 331).

In v.35 YHWH emphasises that Aholibah (Jerusalem) will bear the consequences of her lewdness and whoredoms because she has forgotten him and cast him aside (‘KJV ‘behind thy back’ cf.1 Kgs 14:9; Neh 9:26).

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to judge both Aholah (Samaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem). He is to ‘declare’ (explain, make plain) to them their abominations (detestable acts) of idolatry and bloodshed. They have been spiritually unfaithful to YHWH by worshipping other deities. ‘Blood is in their hands’ refers to child sacrifice. They have offered their own children to pagan gods like Molech, burning them as sacrifices. To add insult to injury they would worship Molech and then, on the same day, go to the Temple to worship YHWH; thus placing Molech on a par with YHWH (cf. 2 Kgs 21:4-7). Their presence at the Temple profaned the sanctuary.

Verses 40-44 resume the adultery metaphor and describe the activities of the two harlots with the image in vv.40-42a of one woman (notice the singulars- ‘ye,’ ‘thou,’ ‘thy,’ ‘thyself,’ her’), probably Aholibah (Jerusalem), preparing herself for adulterous liaisons with foreign lovers. These liaisons represent political alliances with pagan powers like Egypt, Assyria and Babylonia. The washing, painting the eyes, decking with jewellery, sitting on an opulent divan in front of which is a table spread with lovely food and on which is set oil and spices to perfume the bed all symbolise seduction. These actions represent international diplomacy.

Many men came to carouse with her/them – in 42b the plural (‘their’) is resumed – these are described as ‘men of the common sort’ and ‘drunkards from the desert;’ probably a reference to the Assyrians and the Chaldeans. The latter were not desert-dwellers but came ‘from the desert’ in the sense that their route from Babylon to Judah would have involved skirting the top of the Arabian peninsula and travelling through Syria. These lovers put bracelets upon Aholah and Aholibah’s arms and beautiful crowns on their heads, i.e. alliances with foreign nations brought great wealth to both Israel and Judah.

In v.43 YHWH (or is it Ezekiel?) asks himself if these men will still engage with Aholah and Aholibah, two women who are ‘old (worn out, used up – used of the Gibeonites’ clothes in Josh 9:4-5) in adulteries.’ Sure enough, as Samaria and Jerusalem willingly play the harlot – i.e. are accessible to anyone, – the foreigners do ally with them.

Verse 45 is difficult in that it appears that YHWH describes the Assyrians and Babylonians as ‘righteous men’ who will judge and punish the women as adulteresses and murderers. The likely idea is that these conquerors are viewed as the instruments of YHWH and he will use them to enforce his justice and divine retribution. The standard penalty of the Law for adultery (Lev 20:10) and murder (Exod 21:12; Lev 24:17; Num 35:31) was death. This imagery suggests that the capital punishment of Samaria and Judah will be lawful and deserved.

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

This section concludes the allegory of Aholah (ISamaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem) and describes their judgement for adultery (idolatry) and political alliances with pagan nations.

Staying with the metaphor of judgement for adultery the Lord YHWH states that he will summon a crowd (i.e. armies, see vv. 23-24) to come up against ‘them’ (Israel and Judah) to which he will hand them over to suffer the atrocities and violence of war and to be plundered. These armies will pelt them with stones, cleave them with swords, kill their offspring and burn down their properties.

At v.44 there is a change from ‘them’ to ‘your.’ YHWH directly informs Israel and Judah that their fate will serve as a warning to ‘all women’ (i.e. the surrounding nations) not to ‘do after your lewdness’ i.e. behave like the metaphorical Aholah and Aholibah. He announces that they will bear the punishment of their evil-doing and idolatry and, because of this discipline, will recognise that he is the Lord YHWH. Notice that in this allegory delivered by Ezekiel the punishment of Samaria (Israel) and Jerusalem (Judah) is viewed as simultaneous whereas in real life Israel’s had already taken place c. 722 BCE and Judah’s was yet to come – a few years later – in 586 BCE.

This oracle shows us the importance of remaining faithful to God and of placing our confidence in him for daily guidance and protection rather than trusting in human power and politics which can easily turn against us. God views persistent sin as a personal betrayal and it therefore has inevitable and severe consequences.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Eichrodt, W. (1970). Ezekiel; a Commentary. Philadelphia, Westminster Press.

Ortlund Jnr, R.C. (2016). God’s Unfaithful Wife. InterVarsity Press.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 1)

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 23, like chapter 16, is one of the most unsettling passages in the Bible. In order to evoke a strong emotional response of shame and disgust in his audience Ezekiel intentionally employs coarse and shocking language of a sexually explicit nature. In stark terms the prophet presents a general summary of Israelite history in the form of an allegory featuring two nymphomaniacal sisters and their infidelities.

The sisters, for whom Ezekiel symbolically coins the names Aholah and Aholibah, respectively represent the northern kingdom of Israel (Samaria) and the southern kingdom of Judah (Jerusalem). They are depicted as harlots who betray their covenant with their husband (YHWH) by promiscuously forming political alliances with foreign nations and engaging in idolatrous worship. Their political and spiritual infidelity ultimately results in the sisters’ downfall.

STRUCTURE

1-4 – TWO SISTERS

5-10 – AHOLAH (SAMARIA) ISRAEL

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

EXPOSITION

TWO SISTERS (1-4)

The typical prophetic word formula (‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’) in v.1 introduces the oracle which occupies the remainder of chapter 23. After Ezekiel is again addressed as ‘son of Adam’ there comes the allegorical statement: ‘There were two women, the daughters of one mother.’ There is no mention of a father but ‘daughters of one mother’ emphasises the closeness of the sisters; they are two members of the same family.

In two sets of parallel clauses verse 3 describes their first sexual experiences as being with the Egyptians :

And they committed whoredoms in Egypt;
they committed whoredoms in their youth:

there were their breasts pressed,
and there they bruised the teats of their virginity.

Although the sisters are said to have been acted upon by the Egyptians (this represents Israelite oppression in Egypt) Ezekiel describes these activities as ‘harlotries’ (KJV whoredoms); which to the modern reader seems like a case of blame the abused rather than the abuser. Although Ezekiel does not say that the young women found this pleasurable, nevertheless throughout the oracle there is the suggestion that they keep going back for more (e.g. 8,19-21, 27).

It is not until we come to verse 4 that we learn what these two metaphorical women represent – the elder (i.e. ‘greater) one, called Aholah, represents Samaria – the capital of Israel, the kingdom of ten tribes. The younger, called Aholibah, represents Jerusalem – the capital of Judah. These names, based on the word ‘tent’ (i.e. standing for sanctuary – Tabernacle/Temple) symbolise Israel and Judah’s religious relationship with YHWH. Aholah (her [own] tent) would point to the religious autonomy of the northern kingdom of Israel which established its own system of YHWH worship (1 Kgs 12:28; Hos 8:6). Aholibah (my tent [is] in her) would emphasise the authenticity of Judah’s worship which was centred at YHWH’s sanctuary in Jerusalem.

This oracle delivered by Ezekiel is shocking in that YHWH is said to have married both women (‘they became mine’ – see also 16:8) in spite of the fact that they had already ‘committed whoredoms’ (v.3). He had children with each one. It is even more shocking that the allegory represents YHWH as having done something that is forbidden by the torah: Do not take your wife’s sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while your wife is living. Lev 18:18 NIV.

Notice that because this is an allegory Ezekiel cannot adhere strictly to exact historical details. Therefore, in v.3, he represents Israel and Judah as two related nations in Egypt – even though Israel did not divide into separate northern and southern kingdoms until after the death of Solomon c. 930 BCE. Likewise, constrained by the allegory, he later prophesies the punishment upon the two nations as future (v.49), although Israel’s had already been fulfilled a long time before, c. 720 BCE.

AHOLAH (SAMARIA) ISRAEL (5-10)

In this section Ezekiel comments on the adultery of Samaria and uses the language of passion to reflect on Israel’s political alliances with Assyria. Despite belonging to YHWH (‘when she was mine’ – lit, under me v.5) she betrayed her covenant with him by turning to foreign powers for safety and protection. Verse 6 represents Aholah as ‘lusting after’ (she doted – desire carnally – 6 times in Ezek 23 – vs, 5, 7, 9, 12, 16, 20; Jer 4:30) the dashing Assyrian cavalrymen in their bright unforms. Dazzled by Assyrian military power and culture Israel not only made political alliances (‘committed her whoredoms’) with Assyria but also defiled herself by worshipping the idols of the Assyrian elite.

Verse 8 once more emphasises that Israel’s spiritual unfaithfulness can be traced back to its beginnings in Egypt. Joshua had referred to this in a speech recorded in Josh 24: Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD. Josh 24:14. Apparently there had been no improvement in Aholah’s behaviour over her history.

Because of this (vv.9-10) YHWH gave her over to the very nations she had longed for, Assyria in particular, for them to execute judgement upon her. They humiliated her (‘exposed her nakedness’), took her sons and daughters (into captivity), and killed her with the sword (Hos 13:16). The result was that her fate served as a warning to other women (i.e. the surrounding nations). This is a historical reference to Samaria’s fall to Assyria in 722 BCE (2 Kgs 17:6) after which the northern tribes were deported – they later became known as the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel.

Sweeney (2013, p.117) comments:
This…clearly portrays Israel’s relationship with Assyria from the late ninth through the eighth centuries BCE, which ultimately resulted in her destruction. In an effort to defend Israel against the Arameans, King Jehu of Israel (842-815 BCE) submitted to Assyria as a vassal…so that Assyrian power would check any Aramean efforts to invade Israel. This alliance lasted through the reigns of the Jehu kings, including Jehoahaz (815-801 BCE), Jehoash (801-786 BCE), Jeroboam II (786-746 BCE), and Zechariah (746 BCE). Zechariah’s assassination was prompted by an attempt to break the Assyrian alliance and establish a new alliance with Aram. The move was countered by Menahem (745-738 BCE), who assassinated Shallum (745 BCE) and restored relations with Assyria during his reign and that of his son Pekahiah (738-737 BCE). But Pekahiah was assassinated by Pekah (737-732 BCE), who allied with Aram and attacked Jerusalem during the Syro-Ephraimitic War. When King Ahaz of Judah (735-715 BCE) appealed to the Assyrian king Tiglath Pileser for assistance, the Assyrians attacked, destroyed Damascus, killed Pekah and subjugated both Israel and Judah, placing Hoshea as king (732-724 BCE) over a much reduced Israel. When Hoshea revolted against Assyria in 724 BCE, he was imprisoned, the land of Israel was devastated, Samaria was destroyed, and the northern kingdom of Israel came to an end as much of its surviving population was exiled to the far reaches of the Assyrian empire (2 Kings 17).

The timeless lesson from Aholah is that when the people of God betray their loyalty to him for political advantage, religious admiration or material gain the inevitable result is shame and loss.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sweeney, M. A., 2013, Reading Ezekiel. Smyth & Helwys Publishing Inc., Macon.

‌

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 17:1-24

Background reading:
– King Jehoiachin’s exile to Babylon in 597 BCE, 2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10.
– Zedekiah’s installation as Nebuchadnezzar’s puppet king and his revolt against Babylonian rule, 2 Kgs 24:17-20; 2 Chron 36:11-16.
– The aftermath of Zedekiah’s revolt, 2 Kgs 25:1-30; 2 Chron 36:11-20.

THE ALLEGORY OF TWO EAGLES AND A VINE

DIVISION

1-10 The Imagery of the Allegory
11-21 The Interpretation of the Allegory
22-24 A Message of Hope

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 17 presents two further visions of Ezekiel in the section (chapters 4-24) that contains oracles of warning about the certainty of YHWH’s judgement upon Judah for crimes such as disobedience, violence, exploitation of the poor, foreign alliances and idolatry.

Already in exile in Babylon, Ezekiel prophesied to the people of Israel/Judah in the years leading up to and just after the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by Babylonian forces in 587/6 BCE.

In this chapter Ezekiel addresses the political crisis of the time which was King Zedekiah of Judah’s rebellion against Babylonian rule. This must have occurred about 590 BCE since it prompted Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Jerusalem that began in Zedekiah’s ninth regnal year, 589/8 BCE (Jer 39:1; 52:4; 2 Kgs 25:1).

THE IMAGERY OF THE ALLEGORY 1-10

(1) Ezekiel 17 begins with the standard prophetic word formula ‘and the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ which introduces a new revelation. This formula occurs again in v.11.

(2) As usual YHWH emphasises Ezekiel’s mortality by addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ and then issuing a double command: ‘pose a riddle (ḥiyḏāh) and tell an allegory (māšāl) to the house of Israel.’ The idea of a riddle or enigma is that it is difficult to understand whereas an allegory or fable is something that illuminates the understanding. Greenberg (Ezekiel I-XX, 1983, p. 309) comments: ‘While the two terms appear in parallelism (Ps 49:5, 78:2; Prov 1:6) they are not interchangeable (as Judg 14:12ff and 1 Kings 10:1 show )…’

(3) There follows the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ which cites the origin of the message and claims divine authority (also vv.9, 22).

FIRST GREAT EAGLE

The allegory begins with a great eagle that has powerful wings, long feathers and colourful plumage coming to Lebanon to the top branch of a cedar tree.

Comment – Nešer refers to a large bird of prey and can be translated as either ‘eagle’ or ‘vulture’ depending on the context. Most translations opt for ‘eagle,’ thus emphasising power, speed and dominance. Some scholars reckon that nešer here refers to the Great Griffon Vulture. Translating it thus would emphasise its scavenging behaviour and association with death and desolation.

great wings, long-winged, full of feathers, which had divers colours – a superpower which has widespread domination and influence over many peoples.

Lebanon – to the north of Israel but in the allegory it seems to represent Jerusalem, see v.12.

the highest branch – the aristocracy.

(4-6) Taking off the topmost twig from the highest branch of a cedar tree the eagle carries it to a land of commerce and sets it in a city of merchants. Then it takes a seedling from the ground and plants it in well-irrigated, fertile ground where it grows like a willow tree (a tree that loves water, cf. Isa 44:4). There it grows into ‘a spreading vine of low stature’ which produces branches and shoots and has its roots spread towards the eagle.

COMMENTS – He cropped off the top of his young twigs, carried it into a land of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants. – i.e. deported the king (Jehoiachin) to Babylon. The Babylonians were famous traders (Josh 7:21; Rev 18:10-16).

He took also of the seed of the land – Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah, a native of Judah, as a puppet ruler.

and planted it in a fruitful field; he placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree. – Zedekiah and Judah flourished under Babylonian rule – they were dependent upon Babylonia but the conditions for growth were excellent.

great waters – The Euphrates and the Tigris were the rivers of Babylon (cf. Psa 137).

And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs. – As a vassal state Judah was subservient to the Babylonians but was nevertheless thriving.

Vine – Often used for Israel, e.g. Psa 80:8-15; Isa 5:1-7; Jer 2:21; Hos 10:1.

(7) SECOND GREAT EAGLE

A second eagle with great wings and many feathers is introduced and the vine stretches its roots and branches towards this eagle hoping to obtain sustenance from it.

COMMENTS – The second great eagle is not quite as splendid as the first (cp. v.7a with v.3a). It has great wings and many feathers but they are not as long or colourful as those of the first eagle.

The vine tries to shift its loyalty, it stretches out its roots and branches towards the second eagle. Notice that, whereas in vv.3-5 the first great eagle takes the active role and the vine is passive, in v.7 the second great eagle is passive and the vine is active. It reaches out towards second eagle.

(8) The series of infinitives would suggest that v.8 is recapping the advantages the vine has enjoyed and could continue to enjoy (v.6) under the first eagle (it was planted: to bring forth branches, to bear fruit, to become a goodly vine). This emphasises the foolishness of turning towards the second eagle.

(9-10) Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 22) Ezekiel is told to ask his fellow exiles questions (featuring the words ‘shall it prosper’) and then supply the answers.

Q Shall it prosper? shall he not pull up the roots thereof, and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither?
A it shall wither in all the leaves of her spring, even without great power or many people to pluck it up by the roots thereof.

Q Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? shall it not utterly wither, when the east wind toucheth it?
A it shall wither in the furrows where it grew.

COMMENTS – these questions and answers are designed to show the utter futility of the vine changing its allegiance. The first eagle will uproot the vine (by applying great force) and cause it to wither (rot).

planted – some translations (e.g. NCB; NLT; RSV; NRSV) prefer ‘transplanted’ as the verb šāṯal  can mean either to plant or to transplant. In Ezek chapter 19 this same word is used of a vine’s first planting and again in v.13 of its second planting (transplanting).

east wind – a destructive hot wind (Job 27:21; Isa 27:8; Ezek 19:12; Hos 13:15).

the furrows (v.7 and v.10) – the River Nile and the irrigation canals that branch off from it.

THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ALLEGORY 11-21

(11-12a) In Ezek 17:11 the standard prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ introduces a new revelation that helpfully explains the previous one. Ezekiel is to communicate this to the exiles who are with him in Babylon; here referred to once again as ‘the rebellious house.’ This description occurs 12 times in the book of Ezekiel: 2:5, 6, 8; 3:9, 26, 27; 12:2, 3, 9, 25; 17:12; 24:3.

(12a-21) Explanation:

v.12 Behold, the king of Babylon is come to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and led them with him to Babylon;

COMMENT – Cp. vv. 3-4. The first great eagle is Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, who in 597 BCE besieged Jerusalem (Lebanon) and carried away the Judean king Jehoiachin, with the aristocracy and the elite of the land, to exile in Babylon (see 2 Kgs 24:10-16).

v.13-14 And hath taken of the king’s seed, and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath of him: he hath also taken the mighty of the land: That the kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand.

COMMENT- Cp. vv.5-6. Nebuchadnezzar appointed Zedekiah as his vassal king in Judah (2 Kgs 24:17). As part of this agreement Zedekiah swore an oath of allegiance to Nebuchadnezzar that would also have entailed a commitment to pay an annual tribute to the Babylonians. The Chronicler records that Nebuchadnezzar put him under oath; Zedekiah swore this in the name of YHWH (2 Chron 36:13). If this agreement was honoured Judah would survive and flourish as a Babylonian vassal state, YHWH had confirmed that this would be so in a word addressed to Zedekiah by the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 27:12-15).

vv.15-16 But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and much people. Shall he prosper? shall he escape that doeth such things? or shall he break the covenant, and be delivered? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he broke, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die.

COMMENT – Having decided to revolt against Babylonian rule Zedekiah sent diplomats to Egypt to request military support, which seems to have been forthcoming. Zedekiah then rebelled (2 Kgs 24:20), probably by withholding tribute. This action quickly backfired as Nebuchadnezzar marched on Jerusalem and laid siege to the city.

Echoing v.9 and v.10 YHWH asks ‘Shall he prosper?’ The alliance with Egypt will not work because YHWH is angry that Zedekiah broke the treaty with the Babylonians that was sworn in YHWH’s name. YHWH swears by himself that Zedekiah will die in Babylon.

v.17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company make for him in the war, by casting up mounts, and building forts, to cut off many persons:

COMMENT – Once the Babylonian siege apparatus is set up (ramps and bulwarks) Pharaoh and his army will be of no use (see Ezekiel’s description of Babylonian siege warfare against Tyre in 26:7-11). Jeremiah 37:4-11 indicates that Pharoah did send an army, causing the Babylonians to break the siege of Jerusalem for a short while in order to repulse that threat.

vv.18-19. Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head.

COMMENT – Zedekiah had ‘given his hand’ (this gesture must have meant ‘I promise’ cf. Ezra 30:8; Lam 5:6).

v.19, which I have shown in bold print, is the key verse in the chapter. It is the whole point of the allegory. Zedekiah swore an oath and made a treaty with a secular ruler, but did not honour its terms because he despised the oath (the word ‘oath’ also means ‘curse’). However, he swore it in YHWH’s name so it has religious significance. It is binding. Notice ‘mine oath’ and ‘my covenant.’ The oath and covenant that Zedekiah made with Nebuchadnezzar is also viewed as YHWH’s oath and covenant. Zedekiah violated that agreement and will suffer the consequences. Notice that YHWH himself makes an oath (‘as I live’) to punish Zedekiah.

v.20 predicts Zedekiah’s capture, exile to Babylon and judgement there for violating his duty and v.21 predicts that his soldiers will be pursued and either slain or dispersed. All this without any mention of Nebuchadnezzar! YHWH is in control. Nebuchadnezzar is his agent. Nebuchadnezzar is his instrument.

The fulfilment of these consequences will prove that YHWH indeed has spoken – ye shall know that I the LORD have spoken it.

A MESSAGE OF HOPE 22-24

The first 21 verses of Ezekiel 17 have been about judgement, the closing verses are about restoration. Utilising the earlier imagery of the chapter Ezekiel predicts the restoration of the Davidic line. Many interpret this passage as messianic.

Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 9) Ezekiel prophesies that YHWH will act to take a new tender sprig from the top of the high cedar in Babylon and plant it upon a high and eminent mountain in Israel. There it will thrive and become a place of shade and security for ‘all fowl of every wing.’ All the trees of the field will know that that YHWH has spoken this and has brought it about.

No explanation of this metaphor is given but based on the earlier explanation in the chapter where the top of the twigs represented Jehoiachin then this tender twig (from the top of the high cedar tree in Babylon) that YHWH will plant upon a high mountain in Israel refers to a future king of the Davidic line who will reign in Israel/Judah. Mt. Zion springs immediately to mind but ‘high and eminent mountain’ probably refers to this king’s greatness. He will flourish and be a blessing to all kinds of people – or perhaps v.23b (under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell) implies universal rule. This future Davidic ruler will have worldwide influence and significance (cf. Isa 9:6-7; Jer 23:5-6; Ezek 34:23; 37:24).

Ezekiel may have been hoping for the eventual restoration of King Jehoiachin with whom he was in exile in Babylon. Jehoiachin was released after Nebuchadnezzar’s death in 562 BCE (2 Kgs 25:27-30; Jer 52:3-4) but he was not the fulfilment of the prophecy. Nor was Zerubbabel, a later Governor of Judea under the First Persian Empire, although he was of the Davidic line and his name means ‘seed of Babylon.’

The chapter closes with ‘all the trees of the field’ (i.e. the nations) recognising that it is YHWH who has brought Judah down to nothing and who will restore and exalt the new king. YHWH makes the low high and brings the high low.

PREACTICAL LESSONS FROM EZEKIEL 17

a) The necessity of keeping one’s word. Breaking promises and betraying trust, whether in personal or business relationships or in the political sphere, matters to God. Integrity is important and actions have consequences. Do I honour my commitments, or shift loyalties if it seems more beneficial to do so?

b) The folly of placing dependence upon others rather than God. Zedekiah relied on Egypt’s prowess rather than trust God’s sovereignty. True security lies in trusting God, not others. Am I entangled in worldly alliances?

c) Although we live in uncertain times God is actively working out his purposes in world affairs. No matter how bad a situation seems he is in control. God can reverse national fortunes (bring the high low and make the low high, v.24) and ultimately his plans will prevail.

Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

My previous post The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14 introduced an extended metaphor which was communicated by YHWH to the prophet Ezekiel with a command to deliver it to the exiles. This was in order to convince them that Jerusalem’s punishment was certain because of her abominations. In the section 1-14 Jerusalem is personified as a woman whom YHWH came across as an abandoned baby, then rescued and provided for. Once she reached maturity he married her (made a covenant with her), and dressed and adorned her to the extent that she became a beautiful queen; famous for her good looks. This all symbolises the early history of YHWH’s relationship with Israel.

JERUSALEM’S PROSTITUTION (15-34)

(15) Unfortunately v.15 begins with ‘but,’ which gives a hint that the relationship might have soured. Despite having been blessed by YHWH with beauty, prosperity and influence Jerusalem trusted in her good looks and prostituted herself with foreign nations. Unlike the previous section (1-14) where the focus is on YHWH (referring to himself as ‘I’) the next major section (15-43) focuses on Jerusalem (addressed as ‘you’). The two sections are linked by the words ‘beauty and ‘renown,’ both of which occur in v.14 and then again in v.15.

The beauty which gave her renown among the nations had been bestowed upon her by YHWH but, full of pride and self-confidence, Jerusalem abused YHWH’s trust and relied on her own beauty. It is a fact that success can change some people for the worse; this was recognised by Moses, writing in the book of Deuteronomy:

Beware that thou forget not the LORD thy God, in not keeping his commandments, and his judgements, and his statutes, which I command thee this day: Lest when thou hast eaten and art full, and hast built goodly houses, and dwelt therein; And when thy herds and thy flocks multiply, and thy silver and thy gold is multiplied, and all that thou hast is multiplied; Then thine heart be lifted up, and thou forget the LORD thy God, Deut 8:11-14

A similar observation to that about Jerusalem in v.15 is made about the king of Tyre in Ezek 28:17: ‘Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty.’

With new-found self confidence Jerusalem asserted her independence and ‘poured out’ (see also v.36) her harlotry (i.e. acted like a prostitute) on every passer-by. Since v.15 links her activity with her renown and in v.14 her renown was among the nations then those who received her sexual favours are the nations. This is a metaphorical way of describing alliances with foreign powers.

The allegory very much emphasises a verb meaning ‘engaging in prostitution’ and related words like ‘prostitute’ which occur some twenty times in vv.15-36. This perhaps becomes more obvious when these verses are read in a modern translation; such as the Christian Standard Bible.

16-21 ‘YOU TOOK’

Verses 16-21 specify four actions by Jerusalem in which she took gifts given to her by YHWH and used them for prostitution.

(16) And of thy garments thou didst take, and deckedst thy high places with divers colours, and playedst the harlot thereupon: the like things shall not come, neither shall it be so.

Jerusalem took the expensive embroidered ‘garments’ (clothes or coverings, also v.18) which had been presented to her by YHWH (vv.10, 13) and made shrines (bāmôt, high places) with the material. The image is of her making up a bed with these materials given by her husband and prostituting herself on them with her lovers (interestingly, the word ‘garment’ is elsewhere translated ‘bed’ – 1 Sam 19:13). This activity by Jerusalem may be a reference to the presence of cult prostitution in Israel (cf. Isa 57:7). The clause at the end of v.16 is unclear (‘such are not to come and it will not be’) but probably means something like: ‘things like this should not take place.’

(17) Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them,

YHWH says that Jerusalem also took ‘thy fair jewels.’ This may also be translated ”your vessels of glory’, a term that appears again in v.39. ‘Glory’ directs the reader back to ‘crown of glory’ (beautiful crown) in v.12. Gold and silver are mentioned in v.13 where it is implied but not stated that they were supplied by YHWH. Now v.17 makes it clear that they were indeed a gift from YHWH. Jerusalem took these precious metals and made ‘for herself’ (also v.24) ‘images of men’ (male statues), idols with which she engaged in prostitution. Israel turned to idolatry.

(18-19) And tookest thine embroidered garments, and coveredst them: and thou hast set mine oil and mine incense before them. My meat also which I gave thee, fine flour, and oil, and honey, wherewith I fed thee, thou hast even set it before them for a sweet savour: and thus it was, saith the Lord GOD.

Verse 18 begins with the third ‘you took’ specifying that the woman also used the embroidered garments (10, 13, 16) to dress the masculine images that she had made from YHWH’s precious metals. In addition she offered YHWH’s oil, incense and food (my oil, my incense, my food) to these idols. The specific food items are fine flour, oil and honey.

This is the only mention of incense in the allegory. In chapter 8:11-12 Ezekiel saw 70 elders of Israel burning incense to pagan deities. There it says that a fragrant (or thick) cloud of incense arose. The next verse in this passage (v.19), using a different word for fragrant, says that Jerusalem offered food – fine flour, oil and honey – to her idols for a ‘sweet savour’ (fragrant aroma). It was believed that as such products burned a fragrant or soothing aroma arose to the nostrils of the deity being worshipped.

This idea is first mentioned in connection with sacrifices offered by Noah after the Flood (Gen 8:20-21). Note that three of the five major Levitical fire offerings (‘ōlāh, minḥāh and šelem) in the tabernacle system of worship (Lev 1-7) are said to be ‘sweet savour’ offerings (‘ōlāh, transl. Burnt or Ascending offering – Lev 1:9, 13, 17; minḥāh, transl. Grain, Meal, Meat i.e. Food or Cereal offering – Lev 2:2, 9; šelem, transl. Peace or Fellowship offering – Lev 3:5, 16). The offering of honey by fire to YHWH was prohibited (Lev 2:11).

(20-21) Moreover thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this of thy whoredoms a small matter, That thou hast slain my children, and delivered them to cause them to pass through the fire for them?

Now YHWH accuses Jerusalem of taking her own children and giving them up to be sacrificed. ‘To them’ refers to the masculine statues of v.17 and it was to these that the woman offered up her sons and daughters (children that she had borne to YHWH) for consumption.

At the end of v.20 YHWH asks ‘Is this less than your harlotry?’ i.e. he is asking if her acts of prostitution were not enough, surely this is even worse!

She slaughtered her children whom she presented when offering them up ‘to them’ (the idols). The same verb ‘slaughtered’ (šāḥaṭ, KJV slain) is used again in Ezek 23:39 in connection with the sacrifice of children to idols. The practice of child sacrifice was associated with Canaanite religion, especially the worship of Molech. King Ahaz of Judah is said to have ‘made his son to pass through the fire,’ presumably as part of a pagan ritual (2 Kgs 16:3). That some Israelites practised this is mentioned in 2 Kgs 17:17 and Jer 32:35 cf. 2 Kgs 23:10. The Law specifically prohibited the Israelites from engaging in child sacrifice to Molech (Lev 18:21; 20:2-5).

22- 34 INGRATITUDE AND GREATER SPIRITUAL ADULTERY

(22) Jerusalem’s sin is not just idolatry but ingratitude. YHWH reminds her of her humble beginnings and of how he had rescued and provided for her (16:4-13). She has not remembered ‘the days of her youth’ (vv.22, 43) when she was ‘naked and bare’ (cf. v.70 and polluted in her own blood (cf. v.6).

(23) Upon reading the opening words of v.23 (‘then after all your evil’) one might expect a conclusion to follow but instead YHWH exclaims ‘Woe, woe, to you’ in horror at further acts of prostitution and adultery that he proceeds to list in vv.24-34.

(24-25) The accusations levelled by YHWH against Jerusalem flow from the assertion in v.15 that she trusted in her own beauty and engaged in prostitution. From vv. 16-23 that prostitution takes the form of idolatrous activity which includes the construction of shrines and the offering of sacrifices. These verses seem to concentrate on the idolatry and not so much on the sexual theme. The allegory, however, picks up the latter again in vv. 24-34 where the main idea is that Jerusalem is sexually insatiable. In vv. 24-25 the prostitution is still linked with idolatry, from v.26 the figure extends to political alliances with foreign powers.

V.24 has two accusations:

  • ‘Thou hast also built unto thee an eminent place’ – This word is not bāmôt which is translated ‘high places’ in v.16. Here the word for ‘mound’ (KJV ’eminent place’) is gaḇ; it refers to something curved, to any convex surface, e.g eyebrows in Lev 14:9, the rim (KJV nave) of a wheel, 1 Kgs 7:33; Ezek 1:18). It occurs also in v.31 and v.39.
  • ‘and hast made thee a high place in every street’ – Here the word translated ‘high place’ is rāmāh. It means a hill or high ground.

Jerusalem had constructed mounds upon which were shrines for the worship of pagan idols. The word ‘built’ in vv. 24 and 25 occurs also at v.31. These mounds were at the head of every path or square. Reḥôb means path, street, plaza or square, open area. There she ‘spread her feet to’ (had relations with) everyone that passed by. Perhaps this is a play on vv.5-6. There Jerusalem was a baby abandoned in an ‘open field’ and it was YHWH who ‘passed by’.

Jerusalem ‘multiplied her harlotry;’ this is repeated in vv. 26 and 29. Her once desirable beauty became detestable to YHWH and to others as a result of her promiscuity.

(26-29) Verse 26 again takes up the theme of prostitution with the expression ‘engaged in prostitution.’ It also occurs in vv. 15, 16 and 17 and will appear again twice in v.28. Now the prostitution is not so much cultic as political. Four nations (Egyptians, Philistines, Assyrians, Chaldeans) are mentioned in the historical order in which Jerusalem had political dealings with them. It is specifically stated that she engaged in prostitution with three of them.

1) The sons of Egypt – the Egyptians are described as neighbours and also as ‘great of flesh.’ The latter phrase is a double entendre that could either be taken to mean well-endowed or fat and flabby. As well as the repetition of ‘engaged in prostitution’ there is also repetition of the ‘multiplied your harlotry’ phrase from v.25. Several kings of Israel and Judah made it part of their diplomatic strategy to form an alliance (for political, military or economic reasons) with Egypt, one of the most powerful nations in the Ancient Near East. For example:

SOLOMON (United Monarchy)

Solomon made a marriage alliance with Pharaoh king of Egypt. He took Pharaoh’s daughter and brought her into the city of David until he had finished building his own house… 1 Kings 3:1ESV (see also 1 Kgs 9:16)

HOSHEA (Northern Kingdom – Israel) rebelled against Assyria and sought alliance with Egypt

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria. And Hoshea became his vassal and paid him tribute. But the king of Assyria found treachery in Hoshea, for he had sent messengers to So, king of Egypt, and offered no tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. 2 Kings 17:3-4 ESV

HEZEKIAH (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

And the Rabshakeh said to them, “Say to Hezekiah, ‘Thus says the great king, the king of Assyria: On what do you rest this trust of yours? 20 Do you think that mere words are strategy and power for war? In whom do you now trust, that you have rebelled against me? Behold, you are trusting now in Egypt, that broken reed of a staff, which will pierce the hand of any man who leans on it. Such is Pharaoh king of Egypt to all who trust in him. 2 Kings 18:19-21 ESV

JEHOIAKIM (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

And Pharaoh Neco made Eliakim the son of Josiah king in the place of Josiah his father, and changed his name to Jehoiakim. But he took Jehoahaz away, and he came to Egypt and died there. And Jehoiakim gave the silver and the gold to Pharaoh, but he taxed the land to give the money according to the command of Pharaoh. He exacted the silver and the gold of the people of the land, from everyone according to his assessment, to give it to Pharaoh Neco. 2 Kings 23:34-35 ESV

ZEDEKIAH (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

But he rebelled against him by sending his ambassadors to Egypt, that they might give him horses and a large army. Will he thrive? Can one escape who does such things? Can he break the covenant and yet escape? “As I live, declares the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwells who made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant with him he broke, in Babylon he shall die. Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company will not help him in war, when mounds are cast up and siege walls built to cut off many lives. Ezekiel 17:15-17 ESV

Verses 22 and 23 suggested that the reasons for Jerusalem’s behaviour were her forgetfulness and wickedness. Now v.26 says that the motive was a deliberate intention to provoke her husband (YHWH). Her idolatry and foreign alliances so angered YHWH that in v.27 he draws attention to the fact (‘behold!) that he therefore ‘stretched out his hand over her’ i.e. acted against her in judgement. He reduced her lot and gave her over to the greed of her enemies the Philistines. At one stage Philistia must have annexed some of Judah’s territory.

Even the Philistines were appalled by Jerusalem’s lewd conduct, i.e. her moral and spiritual corruption. She is not said to have engaged in prostitution with the Philistines but v.28 states twice that she did so with the sons of Assyria (Assyrians), and was insatiable. That she was insatiable is repeated at the end of v.29. The kings who allied with Assyria include:

MENAHEM (Northern Kingdom – Israel)

Pul the king of Assyria came against the land, and Menahem gave Pul a thousand talents of silver, that he might help him to confirm his hold on the royal power. Menahem exacted the money from Israel, that is, from all the wealthy men, fifty shekels of silver from every man, to give to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria turned back and did not stay there in the land. 2 Kings 15:19-20 ESV

HOSHEA (Northern Kingdom – Israel)

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria. And Hoshea became his vassal and paid him tribute. 2 Kings 17:3 ESV

AHAZ (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria, saying, “I am your servant and your son. Come up and rescue me from the hand of the king of Syria and from the hand of the king of Israel, who are attacking me.” Ahaz also took the silver and gold that was found in the house of the LORD and in the treasures of the king’s house and sent a present to the king of Assyria. 9 And the king of Assyria listened to him. 2 Kings 16:7-9 ESV – see also Isa 7:1-17

Addicted to idolatry and political entanglements Jerusalem could not be satisfied so kept moving on to other relationships. The next relationship, mentioned in vv. 28-29, is that with the sons of Chaldea, i.e. the Babylonians, the ascendant power when Ezekiel was writing. Babylonia is described as a ‘land of Canaan’ i.e. a nation of merchants.

The Canaanites, e.g. the Phoenicians (main towns Tyre and Sidon), were so famous for trading in the ancient world that the name was used as a term for trader, trafficker or merchant. For a description of their trading activities that is of great historical interest see the Lament for Tyre in Ezekiel chapter 27, especially vv.12-25. For examples of the use of Canaanite or land of Canaan for merchant see Ezek 17:5; Prov 31:24; Hos 12:7; Zeph 1:11; Zech 14:21.

(30-34) In these last few verses of this section of the allegory accusing Jerusalem of engaging in prostitution YHWH moves on from the nations to claim that Jerusalem is not like other women and, as a matter of fact, she isn’t even like other prostitutes. The word ’iššāh, meaning woman or wife occurs 3 times in these verses, 30, 32, 34.

YHWH disgustedly asks Jerusalem what is wrong with her heart that she acted like a brazen prostitute. She had a great relationship with YHWH who loved, cared and provided her so why did she have so many relationships, moving from one to another, when none of them left her satisfied? He then refers in v.31 to some of her activities that have already been described in vv. 15-29:

  • In that thou buildest thine eminent place (gab) in the head of every way –
  • and makest thine high place (rāmāh) in every street;
  • and hast not been as a harlot, in that thou scornest hire;

The verb ‘to build’ is the same as that used in vv.24 and 25. ‘At the head of every way’ is also repeated from v.25a, there it is said of the rāmāh but here in v.31 of the gab.

Unlike other prostitutes who accept payment for their services Jerusalem was so depraved and desperate that she scoffed at payment. The word ’eṯnan, meaning a prostitute’s pay (KJV, hire or reward), occurs in v.31, v.34 twice and in v.41.

In v.32 , quite far on in the allegory the verb ‘commit adultery’ occurs (also in v.38. ‘break wedlock’ KJV). Like a woman (wife) who commits adultery Jerusalem takes strangers instead of her husband. She has therefore broken the covenant obligations of v.8.

Verse 33 quickly returns to the notion of prostitution and says that ‘they’ (i.e. the strangers) always give gifts to prostitutes (i.e. pay their fee) but Jerusalem gives presents to (i.e. bribes) her lovers ‘on every side’ that they may come ‘into’ her. This is another double entendre in the allegory; the preposition ’el can indicate motion toward (hence KJV ‘unto’) but can also mean ‘into.’ It is used of sexual intercourse in Gen 16:2 and Num 25:1. This is a metaphorical reference to Israel and Judah paying tribute as vassal states to the dominant powers of the time – the nations ‘on every side’ (i.e. all around).

V.34 makes the point that Jerusalem is not a typical female prostitute:

  • none followeth thee to commit whoredoms – none of the neighbouring states were interested in forming an alliance with Jerusalem.
  • and in that thou givest a reward, and no reward is given unto thee – In her quest for political security Jerusalem had to pay tribute to other states.

SUMMATION

In the Ezekiel 16:15-34 section of the allegory YHWH, through Ezekiel, accuses Jerusalem of pride leading to prostitution with foreign nations. Despite having experienced YHWH’s provision and protection the nation of Israel/ Judah was unfaithful. This reflects the history of Israel during the period of the judges and especially under the monarchy. The turning to idolatry and alliances with pagan states constituting spiritual adultery began in earnest with Solomon during the united monarchy. This state of affairs continued under the kings of both Israel and Judah when the monarchy divided after his death. Their dependence upon foreign nations rather than YHWH did not work out well for Israel and Judah. The Northern Kingdom (Israel) fell to Assyria in 722 BCE and the Southern Kingdom (Judah) to Babylon in 586/7 BCE. The next section of the allegory (vv. 35-43) is about Jerusalem’s judgement.