Tag: Ezekiel

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 24:15-27: The Death of Ezekiel’s Wife

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 24 opens with YHWH revealing to the prophet on 15 January, 588 BCE that the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem has begun that very day. Ezekiel then delivers the parable of the cooking pot to his fellow-exiles. It depicts Jerusalem as a cauldron filled with ‘choice cuts’ (its inhabitants) set on a blazing fire (the siege). The pot has corrosion (the bloodguilt and violence that characterises the city). Its contents must be emptied into the fire; then the pot will be heated until red hot in order to be purified.

This next section (24:15-27) transforms the metaphor of the cooking pot into a tragic living reality for Ezekiel. Just as the siege is announced to Ezekiel in 24:1 by a word from YHWH likewise he is informed of his forthcoming personal loss by a specific divine word in 24:15. That word commands Ezekiel to use his personal grief to perform a prophetic sign-act to the exiles.

DIVISION

15-18 YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE
19-24 EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION
25-27 YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY

EXPOSITION

YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE (15-18)

This section (24:15-27) begins with YHWH addressing Ezekiel using the customary prophetic word formula ‘son of Adam.’ The oracle that follows focuses on a tragic personal loss for Ezekiel. YHWH will suddenly (‘at a blow’) take away the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ but Ezekiel is forbidden to mourn, weep, shed tears, sigh aloud, cover his beard, eat the bread of men, or sit barefoot and bareheaded.

It is unclear whether that which is forbidden is petitionary mourning (as in Joel 1:13-14) in response to the announcement – i.e. asking the Lord to reverse his decision – or posthumous mourning; after the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ has died. The traditional view is that posthumous mourning is in view. Once the ‘delight of his eyes’ is taken away Ezekiel is not to engage in a traditional public show of grief. The acts of mourning which are forbidden are ritual rather than emotional. Emotional mourning is permitted; he can mourn inwardly and sigh softly but must eat, drink and dress as normal.

It is only when we come to v.18 that we learn that Ezekiel’s ‘dearest treasure’ (NLT) is his wife: So I spake unto the people in the morning: and at even my wife died; and I did in the morning as I was commanded. This is reported in the first person (‘I’) but Ezekiel does not tell us his wife’s name or age and does not indicate how he felt or thought when his loved one’s imminent death was announced.

The fulfilment of the prophecy is swift but the timeline is unclear. Do the two mentions of ‘morning’ refer to the same morning or two different mornings?

  • Ezekiel delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning and immediately complies with YHWH’s instructions (that same morning). Then his wife dies that evening. OR
  • He delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning, his wife dies that evening and he obeys YHWH’s command the following morning.

The second possibility is the most commonly accepted. In either case he has little time to process his grief. I did . . . as I was commanded is a striking example of immediate and total obedience to the word of the Lord – at great personal cost.

EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION (19-24)

Doubtless aware of Ezekiel’s love for his wife the exiles are shocked by his violation of the expected social and religious norms of mourning. They realise that this is a symbolic act and so they ask him for an interpretation of the sign and how it applies to them: And the people said unto me, Wilt thou not tell us what these things are to us, that thou doest so? This is the only occasion in the book when the exiles directly address the prophet Ezekiel – normally what they say is quoted to Ezekiel by YHWH.

Ezekiel answers their brief question by telling them that a word from YHWH came to him, telling him what he was to communicate to the people. The thrust of the message is that Ezekiel’s behaviour in the aftermath of his wife’s death is a prescriptive sign to the exiles. It shows how they ought to respond to the fall of the city of Jerusalem and specifically the temple. The death of Ezekiel’s wife is an analogy for the ‘death’ of the temple. The exiles’ response to that ought to mirror Ezekiel’s response to his wife’s death.

YHWH (v.21) intends to desecrate his sanctuary (by the blood of Judah’s slain sons and daughters and the presence of foreigners). The temple is the pride of the people’s power (cf. Lev 26:19), the desire of their eyes and that with which they have sympathy – i.e. they cherish the temple because to them it represents the glory and strength of the nation.

Notice that in vv.22-24 the collective response of the exiles to the fall of the sanctuary is to mirror the individual response of Ezekiel to the death of his wife. There are obvious parallels;

  • in v.17 Ezekiel’s wife is the delight of his eyes, in v.21 the sanctuary is the delight of the people’s eyes.
  • Like Ezekiel in vv.16-17 the people (vv.22-23) are not to publicly mourn, weep, cover their lips, eat the bread of men or go about bareheaded and barefoot.

Covering the upper lip seems to have been a sign of shame and sorrow, cf. Lev 13:45; Mic3:7. ‘The bread of men’ refers to food brought to the bereaved by family and friends. Other descriptions of mourning occur in Ezekiel 7:18 and 27:30-31.

The exiles are to imitate Ezekiel – he is a sign to them:

  • And ye shall do as I have done: Ezek 24:22
  • according to all that he hath done shall ye do: Ezek 24:24

In addition (v.23), they are to pine away (cf. 4:17; 33:10) for (on account of) their iniquities and groan one to another. Their grief will be compounded by the recognition that they have brought this disaster upon themselves because of their sin. They are not to make a public display of mourning but rather groan because of conviction of their guilt. The exiles share responsibility with those in Judah for the destruction of the city and the temple.

When the disaster comes the people of Judah and the exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord

YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY (25-27)

Addressing himself to Ezekiel personally – thou son of man – YHWH refers to the false hope that the Judahites have placed in the temple, the city and future generations. They have considered these to be their strength (stronghold), joy, glory, delight and heart’s desire. Soon all will be taken from them.

As for Ezekiel, an eyewitness will escape the destruction of the city of Jerusalem and bring confirmation of its fall to him in Babylonia. Since his call Ezekiel has been mute (3:26-27), speaking only when he receives a direct oracle from YHWH, but on the day the messenger arrives Ezekiel’s speech will be restored, his silent mourning will end and his ministry enter a new phase. That too will be a sign to the exiles and they will recognise the presence of YHWH. This prophecy is fulfilled in 33:21-22.

SUMMATION

The death of Ezekiel’s wife symbolises the impending destruction of the Jerusalem temple by the Babylonian forces of Nebuchadnezzar and emphasises the severity and finality of the coming judgement. The prophet’s personal tragedy demonstrates that YHWH’s judgement is irrevocable and his muted grief is a prophetic sign of how the people should and would react to the coming destruction.

Up to this point Ezekiel has been proclaiming YHWH’s judgement upon Jerusalem and Judah. The fall of the city and the temple will confirm that he is indeed a true prophet and that YHWH has been in control of events throughout as Ezekiel has said. With the fall of Jerusalem the old era will pass and the lifting of Ezekiel’s silence mark a new phase in his ministry. The exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord and on that basis future restoration can be built. With his status as a true prophet confirmed the people will listen to Ezekiel, whose ministry will transition from one that proclaims judgement to one that offers hope. But before moving on to the restoration section of his book (chapters 33-48) Ezekiel records oracles against some of Judah’s hostile neighbours (chapters 25-32).

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 24:1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION TO EZEKIEL CHAPTER 24

Ezekiel 24 serves as the climactic turning point in the book – the decisive moment when prophecy moves from warning to fulfilment. For the last time Ezekiel predicts the destruction of Jerusalem and its people. This is followed by symbolism that must have affected even the most hardened of his opponents.

The destruction of Jerusalem is prophesied in the parable of a cooking pot and then symbolised in the death of Ezekiel’s wife. The oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the same day and both images function together to signify that Jerusalem’s calamities will be so extreme that they are beyond any expression of sorrow. The two interlock to signify external suffering and internal collapse.

The chapter may be viewed as consisting of two main sections – the parable of the cooking pot and the death of Ezekiel’s wife – although also, as Petter (2023, Introduction to 24:1-27) observes, within these sections is ‘a series of five shocking announcements: the news of the city’s siege (24:2), the death of Ezekiel’s wife (24:16), the end of the sanctuary (24:21), the news from the fugitive (24:26), and the news Ezekiel will speak again (24:27).’

1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

(1-3a) A threefold instruction: record the date, use a parable, declare it to the rebellious house.

This oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year – the date on which Nebuchadnezzar’s forces commenced the siege of Jerusalem. All hope of deliverance has now gone, the time of intense pressure has arrived.

The oracle is viewed as very important because Ezekiel is emphatically told to record that particular date. In v.2 he is instructed to ‘write thee the name of the day, even of this same day… this same day.’

On that day – ‘the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year’ – Ezekiel announced to the exiles in Babylon that, some 400 miles away, Nebuchadnezzar had ‘set himself against’ (pressed violently upon, leaned heavily on, cf. Psa 88:7) Jerusalem. Ezekiel could not possibly have known that Nebuchadnezzar’s army had begun the siege of Jerusalem that very day except by revelation from YHWH.  This record would therefore be indisputable proof, to anyone who later checked the dates of his prophecies, that he was a true prophet of YHWH.

Modern scholars debate what year that ‘ninth year’ actually was. According to the Parker-Dubberstein chronology the date equates to 15 January, 588 BCE. Albright, however, calculates the year as 587 BCE and Thiele as 586 BCE.

Throughout the book of Ezekiel dates are based on the year of King Jehoiachin’s exile which, since Nebuchadnezzar replaced Jehoiachin with Zedekiah, was also the year of Zedekiah’s accession. Three other biblical passages confirm that the date given by Ezekiel is that on which the siege of Jerusalem began – only they express it in terms of Zedekiah’s reign – the ninth year of Jehoiachin’s exile corresponding to the ninth year of Zedekiah’s reign.

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about. And the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. 2 Kgs 25:1-2

In the ninth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the tenth month, came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and all his army against Jerusalem, and they besieged it. Jer 39:1

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he and all his army, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it, and built forts against it round about. So the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. Jer 52:4-5

Ezekiel is then instructed to use a parable (māšāl – proverb, parable) and declare it to ‘the rebellious house.’ This most likely refers to the exiles who are with him in Babylonia (Ezek 2:5, 6; 12:2, 3, 9; 17:12) but perhaps also to the inhabitants of Judah. Details of the parable occupy vv.3b-14.

(3b-5) The parable involves a cauldron or cooking pot (siyr). Those for domestic use were normally made of pottery but the cauldron Ezekiel has in mind is made of copper/brass (v.11) which may suggest a large one like those used in the Temple (2 Kgs 25:14). In 11:1-12 Ezekiel has already referred to a proverb about a cooking pot that was widely quoted by the Judahites. The image of a cauldron was loaded with meaning for the people of Jerusalem who considered themselves to be like choice meat in the safety of YHWH’s protective pot (the city). Ezekiel now turns their own metaphor on its head and uses it to illustrate Jerusalem’s fate.

Addressing Ezekiel as if he were an imaginary cook YHWH tells him to:

  • set the cooking pot [on the fire] – the pot represents Jerusalem and the ‘setting on’ indicates the beginning of the siege.
  • pour in the water.
  • ‘gather the pieces thereof’ – the pieces of meat belonging to the cooking pot – they represent the inhabitants of Jerusalem prepared for judgement.
  • ‘even every good piece, the thigh, and the shoulder; fill it with the choice bones. . . take the choice of the flock’ – the best cuts of meat from the best animals represent the leading citizens of Jerusalem.
  • pile on the logs (bones) under the pot – the fire represents the siege – the heat intensifies – severe judgement.
  • boil the meat well – the verb rāṯaḥ (boil, seethe, be agitated) only occurs elsewhere in Job 30:27; 41:31. ‘Cook (KJV , seethe) its bones it in the pot’ – the judgement will be thorough and even the most durable will not survive.

Opinions differ as to whether the prophet publicly enacted this parable. Keil (1876, p.341) thinks that he did not but rather maintains that: the ensuing act, which the prophet is commanded to perform, is not to be regarded as a symbolical act which he really carried out, but that the act forms the substance of the māšāl, in other words, belongs to the parable itself.

It is possible, however, that Ezekiel did actually put a cooking pot on a wood fire and boil pieces of meat in it to symbolise what the population of Jerusalem would endure during the siege. To have done so would not have seemed unusual for the book records him enacting several of his prophecies:

  • 4:1-3 The siege.
  • 5-1-4 The city’s destruction.
  • 12:1-16 The process of going into exile.
  • 12:17-20 The fear and despair of the people of Jerusalem.
  • 21:18-23 The two routes the king of Babylon could choose.
  • 37:15-28 The two sticks symbolising the reunification of Israel and Judah.

(6-8) ‘Wherefore’ or ‘Now then’ indicates a transition from the parable itself to further explanation by YHWH. In v.6 he pronounces woe directly upon Jerusalem, calling it ‘the bloody city;’ this is repeated in v.9. That Jerusalem is notorious for murder (judicial killings and child sacrifice) is referred to in 11:6; 13:19; 16:21; 22:3. The term ‘bloody city’ was previously used by Nahum (Nah 3:1) to describe the city of Nineveh.

Jerusalem is a pot with reddish ‘scum’ (corrosion or deposit) in it that cannot be removed. The sin of murder has become part of the very fabric of the city. Since copper/brass does not rust some scholars view this ‘scum’ as verdigris, others as flaws in the metal itself and others as hardened food residue that will not scrub off.

Yet another view is that the corruption does not belong to the metal of the pot but to its contents, i.e. the meat. According to v.6 the scum is inside the pot and in v.7 so is blood. Since the consumption of blood is taboo to the Israelites (Gen 9:4; Lev 3:17; 17:10-14; Deut 12:23-25) the flesh in the pot is viewed as contaminated. The Judahites may think of themselves as choice cuts of meat but in YHWH’s sight they are putrid flesh. The meat is to be brought out of the cauldron ‘piece by piece;’ i.e. the city’s population will be taken into captivity or killed. All efforts to cleanse the filth have failed – this idea will be developed in vv.12-13.

‘Let no lot fall upon it’ – refers to the practice of decision-making by casting lots (Lev 16:7-10; Num 26:55-56; Josh 13:6; 1 Chron 24:5, 7; 25:8; 26:13-14). The results are reckoned to be God’s will: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD. Prov 16:33. In the context of this oracle the reference may be to the casting of lots by a victorious army in order to decide which captives should be allowed to live and which should put to death (2 Sam 8:2; Joel 3:3; Nah 3:10). There is no need to cast lots concerning the leading citizens of Jerusalem for they will be executed (Jer 39:6).

Verses 7-8, beginning with ‘For,’ give the reason why the contaminated pieces of meat (the people of Jerusalem) are rejected. The city has openly and shamelessly shed blood and there has been no attempt to cover up its sin. The background to v.7 is another taboo concerning blood: And whatsoever man there be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, which hunteth and catcheth any beast or fowl that may be eaten; he shall even pour out the blood thereof, and cover it with dust. Lev 17:13.

‘Her blood -‘ i.e. the blood that Jerusalem has shed – has not been covered up but deliberately poured out for all to see on non-porous rock that would not absorb it. That blood cries for vengeance (cf. Gen 4:10; Job 16:18; Isa 26:21). YHWH’s response is to likewise set Jerusalem’s blood on a rock uncovered. This will serve as a witness to other nations of the crimes that she has committed.

(9-12) In verses 9-12 the image of YHWH building a huge fire depicts the unleashing of his wrath upon Jerusalem ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because Jerusalem is full of blood and filth) YHWH again (see v.6) pronounces woe on the city and says that he will make the pile of wood great (cf. Isa 30:33).

Since YHWH is responsible for stoking the fire the siege of Jerusalem is not a random disaster but deliberate punishment by YHWH. The imaginary cook is given further instructions:

  • heap on wood.
  • light the fire
  • mix in the spices (KJV, ‘spice it well’)- the verb rāqaḥ is normally used for the process of making perfume and also for the preparation of the ingredients of the sacred anointing oil (Ex 30:33) – spices enhance the taste of meat – this may mean that the Chaldeans will enthusiastically enjoy destroying Jerusalem, just as hungry people enjoy well-seasoned food.
  • boil the meat away – the judgement is thorough and final.
  • empty the residue into the fire and burn the bones – the people will be dispersed and the city will be destroyed by fire. The image intensifies; it moves from cooking in v.5 to cremation in v.10. The city will lie desolate.
  • set the empty pot back on the coals and heat it until it is red hot and molten. All the impurities will be burned up. This recalls the smelting image in 22:20-22.

Jerusalem (v.12) has frustrated all efforts to cleanse her. The earlier attempts to do so may have included the messages from YHWH delivered by the prophets and perhaps also the reforms of King Hezekiah (2 Kgs 18; 2 Chron 31) and King Josiah (2 Kgs 22-23). The Chronicler gives the following apt assessment:

And the LORD God of their fathers sent to them by his messengers, rising up quickly, and sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his dwelling place: But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the LORD arose against his people, till there was no remedy. Therefore he brought upon them the king of the Chaldees. . . 2 Chron 36:15-17a

The scum in the pot has not been removed so into the fire with it!

(13-14) YHWH again addresses the city directly saying that every time he tried to cleanse her she refused to be purified from her uncleanness. Therefore she will not be pure again (there will be no more opportunities for cleansing) until his wrath against her has been satisfied.

The oracle closes with the formula: ‘I the Lord hath spoken’ (v.14). God’s word guarantees the fulfilment of what he has said. He will not reconsider or renege, what Ezekiel has prophesied will come to pass. This certainty is expressed in three negative statements:

  • I will not refrain, not go back
  • I will not spare
  • I will not repent (be sorry, moved to pity)

YHWH has spoken, Nebuchadnezzar’s army has now arrived. The Chaldeans will judge Jerusalem according to her ways and deeds. She is facing the consequences of her own choices.

SUMMATION

This oracle shatters once and for all the false view held by the Jerusalemites that they are YHWH’s chosen cuts of meat in the protective cauldron and that the city is therefore inviolable. Even though they were God’s people they could not evade the consequences of their sin. Like corrosion in the pot sin that is not addressed becomes deeply ingrained. When grace is consistently rejected then God’s righteous judgement upon the sinner is inevitable. The oracle emphasises that the sovereign God is directing the judgement upon Judah; the Babylonian invaders are merely his instruments.

Even while Ezekiel was delivering this solemn parable he became aware that he was about to experience great sorrow. His experience of loss was about to become the ultimate sign to the people of Judah. Chapter 24:15 moves seamlessly from public preaching to private tragedy. Inside a few hours Ezekiel’s wife will die.

BIBLOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Keil, C. F. (1876). Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Ezekiel, Vol 1. Transl. J. M. Martin. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.

Parker, R.A. and Dubberstein, W.H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology 626 B. C. – A. D. 75. Rhode Island: Brown University Press.

Petter, D.L. (2011). The Book of Ezekiel and Mesopotamian City Laments, Academic Press, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

Thiele, E. R. (1983). The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Albright, W. F. (1956). The Nebuchadnezzar and Neriglissar Chronicles. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 143, pp. 28–33.

Thiele, E.R. (1944). The Chronology of the Kings of Judah and Israel. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 3(3), pp.137–186.

DIGITAL RESOURCES

Petter, D. L. (2023). Ezekiel. [online] Available at: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/commentary/ezekiel/ accessed 22 November, 2025

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 2)

Posted on by writtenexposition

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

(11) Verse 10 ends with Aholah (Israel) having suffered punishment for her infidelities and having become a byword among other women (‘the nations’). This section (vv.11-21) makes the point (11, 14, 19) that Aholibah (Jerusalem) saw her sister Aholah’s fate but did not learn from it. Judah did not heed the warning from the past.

(12-13) Just as her sister had done (vv.5-6) Aholibah ‘lusted after’ (doted upon) the impeccably dressed young Assyrian cavaliers. She became more corrupt in her lust than her sister; her pattern of behaviour escalating as time progressed.

This may include a historical reference to Judah under Ahaz (735-715 BCE), a king who submitted to Assyrian rule – see 2 Kgs 16 and Isa 7.

Notice that in the oracle there are three objects of Aholibah’s admiration – the Assyrians v.12, the Chaldeans v.16 and Egypt’s concubines v.20.

(14-21) Judah’s fascination with the Chaldeans (Babylonians) is depicted as lust for ‘men portrayed upon the wall’ (probably a reference to Babylonian wall reliefs). Aholibah was attracted by these brightly coloured engraved images (possibly using ochre) of soldiers wearing red uniforms as well as broad waistbands and flowing turbans. This was the typical dress of high-ranking Babylonian military officers.

Having only heard reports of Babylonian might Judah sent ambassadors to seek an alliance. It is possible, but not certain, that Hezekiah first contacted the Babylonian king Merodach-Baladan who then sent an embassy to Jerusalem (2 Kgs 20:12-21; Isa 39:1-8). The point in these verses is not so much idolatry as unnecessary and ill-advised political alliances.

(17-18) The Babylonians came to Judah in bed and made her unclean but afterwards her soul abhorred them. The expression (mind is alienated KJV) occurs in Ezek 23 :17, 18, 28 and Jer 6:8. The verb yāqa‘ means to turn away or alienate and in a different context is used for the dislocation of Jacob’s hip in Gen 32:25.

Ezekiel is reminding his audience that after a time relations with the Babylonians soured. For example: Jehoiakim revolted against Babylonia c. 598 BCE. Jehoiakim died during the revolt and his eighteen year old son Jehoiachin (also known as Jeconiah or Coniah) succeeded to the throne of Judah but surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar after three months. Jehoiachin, along many leading Judahites, was then deported to Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah as a puppet king but nine years later he too rebelled against Babylonian rule (See 2 Kings 24).

Thus Aholibah (Jerusalem) revealed her nakedness and her harlotries with the result that YHWH turned away from her in disgust just as he had with her sister Aholah (Israel).

(19-21) Having been unfaithful to YHWH with powerful men like Assyria and Chaldea Aholibah did not return to the Lord but instead ‘called to remembrance’ the early days in Egypt. The verb means ‘to search for.’ The idea is that she reverted to an earlier pattern of behaviour; in this case the idolatry of her youth in Egypt.

She therefore sought a relationship with Egypt; longing to be one of Egypt’s concubines. Egypt, a world power at the time, is metaphorically described in graphic, animalistic terms as being sexually potent. Ezekiel employs coarse language in order to emphasise Aholibah’s excessive, unrestrained lust for foreign powers and also to evoke a feeling of revulsion in his audience.

The prophets of YHWH disapproved of Judah’s political flirtations with Egypt. Like Ezekiel, Isaiah and Jeremiah viewed Egypt as an unreliable ally (Isa 30:1-7; 31:1-3; Jer 2:18; 37:5-10).

Notice that until v.21 the verbs are in the third person (‘she’) but now change to the second person (‘you’). This anticipates YHWH directly addressing Aholibah in vv. 22-35 when announcing her punishment.

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

(22) ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because of her infidelities), followed by the prophetic messenger formula (‘thus saith the Lord God’), is followed by a direct message from YHWH to Aholibah (Jerusalem) stating his intention to punish her. He will accomplish this by bringing her former ‘lovers’ (the nations that she once courted) against her to attack her. Those with whom she was once allied but from whom she has turned in disgust (‘mind is alienated’ see on v.17 above) will become her deadly enemies.

(23-24) They include the Babylonians and various other groups, described as ‘desirable young men,’ ‘governors and officials,’ ‘cavalry officers and men of renown’ (lit. persons summoned to a meeting, Num 1:16; 16:2), who will come against her with military might. The list specifies:
– the Babylonians (sons of Babel) – the Neo-Babylonian empire under Nebuchadnezzar II, the superpower at that time
– the Chaldeans – a people group in the south of Babylonia – dominant in the Neo-Babylonian empire
– Pekod – possibly an Aramean tribe – from Syria
– Shoa – unknown
– Koa – unknown
– all the Assyrians (sons of Asshur) – possibly defeated Assyrian army units that had been pressed into military service by the Babylonians.

This confederation of Babylonian allies and vassals will attack Judah with an impressive array of the latest military equipment – weapons, chariots, wagons, large and small shields and helmets. YHWH will punish Judah by allowing these forces to judge her by their own inhumane laws rather than by biblical laws.

(25-27) Aholibah (Jerusalem) will therefore suffer the atrocities of ancient warfare. This will include brutal mutilations such as rhinotomy (nose-cutting) and ear cropping. In those ancient honour-shame cultures mutilations had to do with shame. They asserted the domination of the aggressor and indicated a change in the victim’s status. For biblical examples of wartime mutilations see Judg 1:6-7; 1 Sam 11:2; 31:9-10; 2 Sam 4:7,12; 2 Kgs 25:7; Jer 39:6-7.

Many who survive mutilation will be killed and others taken into captivity. Jerusalem will be stripped and plundered and the properties left empty (‘thy residue’) by those slain or deported will be consumed by fire. These agonies will be deliberately instigated by YHWH; in them Aholibah will experience his jealousy (intense fervour). The judgement will be so severe that her lewdness and the harlotries learned in Egypt will cease. She will no longer look amorously at Egypt, i.e. seek a political alliance or military help. ‘Look amorously’ is conveyed by the expression ‘lift up thine eyes unto’ – this is how Potiphar’s wife looked at Joseph in Gen 39:7.

(28-32) Beginning with ‘For,’ followed by the prophetic messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ (as v.22), Aholibah’s punishment is further described using the indecent image of YHWH handing her over to her former lovers, whom she has come to abhor, to be made a public spectacle. They will strip her stark naked, expose and violate her. This imagery of being left exposed symbolises not only physical vulnerability but also spiritual disgrace. This is due to her unfaithfulness to YHWH in the form of idolatry and alliances with ungodly nations (v.30).

It is ironic that the very nations with which Jerusalem sought an alliance for protection will become her oppressors. The language of v.29 emphasises the depth of betrayal and the resulting shame: they shall deal with thee hatefully, and shall take away all thy labour, and shall leave thee naked and bare. ‘Take away all thy labour’ reflects one of the curses promised for covenant unfaithfulness in Deut 28:33: The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shalt be only oppressed and crushed always.

Verse 28 echoes vv.17, 22 and 16:37. Verse 29 echoes v.26 and 16:39. Verse 31, looking back to v.13, states that Jerusalem has walked in the way of her sister, Aholah (Israel), and thus will drink from the same cup of judgement.

(32-35) Verses 32-34 develop the thought of drinking from the same cup as her sister Samaria had drunk from (in 722 BCE, see 2 Kgs 17:6). This takes the form of a poem:

This is what the Lord GOD says:
“You will drink your sister’s cup,
which is deep and wide.
You will be an object of ridicule and scorn,
for it holds so much.
You will be filled with drunkenness and grief,
with a cup of devastation and desolation,
the cup of your sister Samaria.
You will drink it and drain it;
then you will gnaw its broken pieces,
and tear your breasts.
For I have spoken.”
This is the declaration of the Lord GOD. (Ezek 23:32-34 CSB)

The cup is large (deep and wide) and people will laugh at the fact that it is so great and has to be drained completely. Aholibah will be the object of derision and scorn because when she drinks the toxic contents she will stagger about, as if drunk, stunned by the severity of the judgement. The cup will be one of intoxication and grief, of ruin and desolation. The contents of the cup will drive Aholibah mad. Overcome by self-loathing, she will break it in pieces and self-harm with the fragments of pottery. Ortland Jnr (2016, p.129, footnote 82) explains:

The image is that of a cup filled to the brim with a powerful potion, to make the one who drinks it reel with an exaggerated drunkenness. Yahweh holds this cup in his hand and forces it to the lips of the nation to be judged. It represents, in real terms, the breakdown of order, the loss of control and good judgment, the panic and disarray, as a nation staggers like a drunk toward divinely ordained destruction. Cf. Ps. 75:9 [EVV 8]; Is. 51:17; Je. 25:15-16, 28; 51:7; La. 4:21; Hab. 2:16. The figure makes vividly clear to the Judahites ‘the compulsion there is to accept destiny, the impossibility of rejecting it, the trepidation at its death-dealing effects, the bitterness of the suffering it involves, and how it has to be tasted to the full’, to quote Eichrodt (1970: 331).

In v.35 YHWH emphasises that Aholibah (Jerusalem) will bear the consequences of her lewdness and whoredoms because she has forgotten him and cast him aside (‘KJV ‘behind thy back’ cf.1 Kgs 14:9; Neh 9:26).

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to judge both Aholah (Samaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem). He is to ‘declare’ (explain, make plain) to them their abominations (detestable acts) of idolatry and bloodshed. They have been spiritually unfaithful to YHWH by worshipping other deities. ‘Blood is in their hands’ refers to child sacrifice. They have offered their own children to pagan gods like Molech, burning them as sacrifices. To add insult to injury they would worship Molech and then, on the same day, go to the Temple to worship YHWH; thus placing Molech on a par with YHWH (cf. 2 Kgs 21:4-7). Their presence at the Temple profaned the sanctuary.

Verses 40-44 resume the adultery metaphor and describe the activities of the two harlots with the image in vv.40-42a of one woman (notice the singulars- ‘ye,’ ‘thou,’ ‘thy,’ ‘thyself,’ her’), probably Aholibah (Jerusalem), preparing herself for adulterous liaisons with foreign lovers. These liaisons represent political alliances with pagan powers like Egypt, Assyria and Babylonia. The washing, painting the eyes, decking with jewellery, sitting on an opulent divan in front of which is a table spread with lovely food and on which is set oil and spices to perfume the bed all symbolise seduction. These actions represent international diplomacy.

Many men came to carouse with her/them – in 42b the plural (‘their’) is resumed – these are described as ‘men of the common sort’ and ‘drunkards from the desert;’ probably a reference to the Assyrians and the Chaldeans. The latter were not desert-dwellers but came ‘from the desert’ in the sense that their route from Babylon to Judah would have involved skirting the top of the Arabian peninsula and travelling through Syria. These lovers put bracelets upon Aholah and Aholibah’s arms and beautiful crowns on their heads, i.e. alliances with foreign nations brought great wealth to both Israel and Judah.

In v.43 YHWH (or is it Ezekiel?) asks himself if these men will still engage with Aholah and Aholibah, two women who are ‘old (worn out, used up – used of the Gibeonites’ clothes in Josh 9:4-5) in adulteries.’ Sure enough, as Samaria and Jerusalem willingly play the harlot – i.e. are accessible to anyone, – the foreigners do ally with them.

Verse 45 is difficult in that it appears that YHWH describes the Assyrians and Babylonians as ‘righteous men’ who will judge and punish the women as adulteresses and murderers. The likely idea is that these conquerors are viewed as the instruments of YHWH and he will use them to enforce his justice and divine retribution. The standard penalty of the Law for adultery (Lev 20:10) and murder (Exod 21:12; Lev 24:17; Num 35:31) was death. This imagery suggests that the capital punishment of Samaria and Judah will be lawful and deserved.

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

This section concludes the allegory of Aholah (ISamaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem) and describes their judgement for adultery (idolatry) and political alliances with pagan nations.

Staying with the metaphor of judgement for adultery the Lord YHWH states that he will summon a crowd (i.e. armies, see vv. 23-24) to come up against ‘them’ (Israel and Judah) to which he will hand them over to suffer the atrocities and violence of war and to be plundered. These armies will pelt them with stones, cleave them with swords, kill their offspring and burn down their properties.

At v.44 there is a change from ‘them’ to ‘your.’ YHWH directly informs Israel and Judah that their fate will serve as a warning to ‘all women’ (i.e. the surrounding nations) not to ‘do after your lewdness’ i.e. behave like the metaphorical Aholah and Aholibah. He announces that they will bear the punishment of their evil-doing and idolatry and, because of this discipline, will recognise that he is the Lord YHWH. Notice that in this allegory delivered by Ezekiel the punishment of Samaria (Israel) and Jerusalem (Judah) is viewed as simultaneous whereas in real life Israel’s had already taken place c. 722 BCE and Judah’s was yet to come – a few years later – in 586 BCE.

This oracle shows us the importance of remaining faithful to God and of placing our confidence in him for daily guidance and protection rather than trusting in human power and politics which can easily turn against us. God views persistent sin as a personal betrayal and it therefore has inevitable and severe consequences.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Eichrodt, W. (1970). Ezekiel; a Commentary. Philadelphia, Westminster Press.

Ortlund Jnr, R.C. (2016). God’s Unfaithful Wife. InterVarsity Press.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 1)

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 23, like chapter 16, is one of the most unsettling passages in the Bible. In order to evoke a strong emotional response of shame and disgust in his audience Ezekiel intentionally employs coarse and shocking language of a sexually explicit nature. In stark terms the prophet presents a general summary of Israelite history in the form of an allegory featuring two nymphomaniacal sisters and their infidelities.

The sisters, for whom Ezekiel symbolically coins the names Aholah and Aholibah, respectively represent the northern kingdom of Israel (Samaria) and the southern kingdom of Judah (Jerusalem). They are depicted as harlots who betray their covenant with their husband (YHWH) by promiscuously forming political alliances with foreign nations and engaging in idolatrous worship. Their political and spiritual infidelity ultimately results in the sisters’ downfall.

STRUCTURE

1-4 – TWO SISTERS

5-10 – AHOLAH (SAMARIA) ISRAEL

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

EXPOSITION

TWO SISTERS (1-4)

The typical prophetic word formula (‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’) in v.1 introduces the oracle which occupies the remainder of chapter 23. After Ezekiel is again addressed as ‘son of Adam’ there comes the allegorical statement: ‘There were two women, the daughters of one mother.’ There is no mention of a father but ‘daughters of one mother’ emphasises the closeness of the sisters; they are two members of the same family.

In two sets of parallel clauses verse 3 describes their first sexual experiences as being with the Egyptians :

And they committed whoredoms in Egypt;
they committed whoredoms in their youth:

there were their breasts pressed,
and there they bruised the teats of their virginity.

Although the sisters are said to have been acted upon by the Egyptians (this represents Israelite oppression in Egypt) Ezekiel describes these activities as ‘harlotries’ (KJV whoredoms); which to the modern reader seems like a case of blame the abused rather than the abuser. Although Ezekiel does not say that the young women found this pleasurable, nevertheless throughout the oracle there is the suggestion that they keep going back for more (e.g. 8,19-21, 27).

It is not until we come to verse 4 that we learn what these two metaphorical women represent – the elder (i.e. ‘greater) one, called Aholah, represents Samaria – the capital of Israel, the kingdom of ten tribes. The younger, called Aholibah, represents Jerusalem – the capital of Judah. These names, based on the word ‘tent’ (i.e. standing for sanctuary – Tabernacle/Temple) symbolise Israel and Judah’s religious relationship with YHWH. Aholah (her [own] tent) would point to the religious autonomy of the northern kingdom of Israel which established its own system of YHWH worship (1 Kgs 12:28; Hos 8:6). Aholibah (my tent [is] in her) would emphasise the authenticity of Judah’s worship which was centred at YHWH’s sanctuary in Jerusalem.

This oracle delivered by Ezekiel is shocking in that YHWH is said to have married both women (‘they became mine’ – see also 16:8) in spite of the fact that they had already ‘committed whoredoms’ (v.3). He had children with each one. It is even more shocking that the allegory represents YHWH as having done something that is forbidden by the torah: Do not take your wife’s sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while your wife is living. Lev 18:18 NIV.

Notice that because this is an allegory Ezekiel cannot adhere strictly to exact historical details. Therefore, in v.3, he represents Israel and Judah as two related nations in Egypt – even though Israel did not divide into separate northern and southern kingdoms until after the death of Solomon c. 930 BCE. Likewise, constrained by the allegory, he later prophesies the punishment upon the two nations as future (v.49), although Israel’s had already been fulfilled a long time before, c. 720 BCE.

AHOLAH (SAMARIA) ISRAEL (5-10)

In this section Ezekiel comments on the adultery of Samaria and uses the language of passion to reflect on Israel’s political alliances with Assyria. Despite belonging to YHWH (‘when she was mine’ – lit, under me v.5) she betrayed her covenant with him by turning to foreign powers for safety and protection. Verse 6 represents Aholah as ‘lusting after’ (she doted – desire carnally – 6 times in Ezek 23 – vs, 5, 7, 9, 12, 16, 20; Jer 4:30) the dashing Assyrian cavalrymen in their bright unforms. Dazzled by Assyrian military power and culture Israel not only made political alliances (‘committed her whoredoms’) with Assyria but also defiled herself by worshipping the idols of the Assyrian elite.

Verse 8 once more emphasises that Israel’s spiritual unfaithfulness can be traced back to its beginnings in Egypt. Joshua had referred to this in a speech recorded in Josh 24: Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD. Josh 24:14. Apparently there had been no improvement in Aholah’s behaviour over her history.

Because of this (vv.9-10) YHWH gave her over to the very nations she had longed for, Assyria in particular, for them to execute judgement upon her. They humiliated her (‘exposed her nakedness’), took her sons and daughters (into captivity), and killed her with the sword (Hos 13:16). The result was that her fate served as a warning to other women (i.e. the surrounding nations). This is a historical reference to Samaria’s fall to Assyria in 722 BCE (2 Kgs 17:6) after which the northern tribes were deported – they later became known as the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel.

Sweeney (2013, p.117) comments:
This…clearly portrays Israel’s relationship with Assyria from the late ninth through the eighth centuries BCE, which ultimately resulted in her destruction. In an effort to defend Israel against the Arameans, King Jehu of Israel (842-815 BCE) submitted to Assyria as a vassal…so that Assyrian power would check any Aramean efforts to invade Israel. This alliance lasted through the reigns of the Jehu kings, including Jehoahaz (815-801 BCE), Jehoash (801-786 BCE), Jeroboam II (786-746 BCE), and Zechariah (746 BCE). Zechariah’s assassination was prompted by an attempt to break the Assyrian alliance and establish a new alliance with Aram. The move was countered by Menahem (745-738 BCE), who assassinated Shallum (745 BCE) and restored relations with Assyria during his reign and that of his son Pekahiah (738-737 BCE). But Pekahiah was assassinated by Pekah (737-732 BCE), who allied with Aram and attacked Jerusalem during the Syro-Ephraimitic War. When King Ahaz of Judah (735-715 BCE) appealed to the Assyrian king Tiglath Pileser for assistance, the Assyrians attacked, destroyed Damascus, killed Pekah and subjugated both Israel and Judah, placing Hoshea as king (732-724 BCE) over a much reduced Israel. When Hoshea revolted against Assyria in 724 BCE, he was imprisoned, the land of Israel was devastated, Samaria was destroyed, and the northern kingdom of Israel came to an end as much of its surviving population was exiled to the far reaches of the Assyrian empire (2 Kings 17).

The timeless lesson from Aholah is that when the people of God betray their loyalty to him for political advantage, religious admiration or material gain the inevitable result is shame and loss.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sweeney, M. A., 2013, Reading Ezekiel. Smyth & Helwys Publishing Inc., Macon.

‌

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 22:23-31 – The Moral Failures of Judah’s Leaders

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In the two previous oracles in chapter 22 YHWH confronts the bloodshed and idolatrous practices of the people of Jerusalem (22:1-16) and, using the metallurgical imagery of smelting, compares impure Israel to dross that has no value (22:17-22). This third oracle of chapter 22 focuses on the dysfunctional leaders of Judah – prophets, priests, government officials and landed gentry – and shows that every layer of authority is corrupt.

STRUCTURE

23-24 Instruction to Ezekiel to address the land of Judah.

25-39 A catalogue of corruption

30-31 YHWH’s unsuccessful search for a man who could prevent the coming destruction.

INSTRUCTION TO EZEKIEL TO ADDRESS THE LAND OF JUDAH (23-24)

After the familiar prophetic word formula and the designation of Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ there comes an instruction to the prophet to directly address the land of Judah. In the first oracle in chapter 22 Ezekiel speaks about ‘the city’ (22:2), in the second about ‘the house’ and in this third oracle about ‘the land.’ All of these represent the people of Jerusalem/Judah.

He is to say: ‘thou art a land not cleansed nor rained upon in the day of indignation.’ The word ‘indignation can mean anger, denunciation or curse. This statement is effectively a declaration of judgement and possibly a prophecy that literal drought will occur at the time of the forthcoming Babylonian siege of Jerusalem (588-586 BCE). It may however, refer metaphorically to current spiritual drought (without cleansing rain the land is impure) and the desolation (punishment) which that will bring about. Rain, followed by food abundance, was guaranteed for obedience to YHWH’s statutes and commandments (Lev 26:3-5) but desolation of the land for unfaithfulness (Deut 28:38-41; Isa 24:1-6; Hos 4:3). Judah is not just suffering misfortune, it is under divine judgement.

A CATALOGUE OF CORRUPTION (25-29)

Verses 25-29 give the basis for judgement and concentrate on the sins of four leading classes in society: prophets, priests, princes and the ‘people of the land.’ Similar sentiments are expressed in Micah 3:11 and Zeph 3:3-4.

(25) THE CONSPIRACY OF THE PROPHETS

‘There is a conspiracy of her prophets’ – The word ‘her’ occurs four times (vv. 25, 26, 27, 28). The prophets have made a pact, thus becoming a significant power bloc in the land. They use this power and influence for personal enrichment – like a roaring lion tearing prey they extort payment for their prophecies; seizing ‘treasures and wealth’ (cf. Jer 20:5). There may also be a suggestion here that the prophets in Judah are involved in murder for material gain (‘they have made her many widows’) but most likely the thought is that their false predictions of peace will lead to the deaths of many of the residents of Judah.

Although the Hebrew Masoretic text has ‘conspiracy of prophets’ in v.25 some translators (see NLT, NIV, NET, RSV, NRSV), in their infinite wisdom, emend this to read ‘conspiracy of princes.’ They reason that:
a) the metaphor of a roaring lion that tears its prey and devours men has already been used of the royal family in Ezek 19:6.
b) the types of crimes listed are more likely to be committed by political leaders than prophets.
c) prophets are mentioned later in the oracle (v.28).
d) In the similar passages in Micah (3:10-11) and Zephaniah (3:3-4) princes are mentioned first.

Like the KJV, other translations (e.g. DBY, ESV, CSB, NKJV, NASB) have retained ‘conspiracy of prophets.’

(26) THE CORRUPTION OF THE PRIESTS

a) They violate the Law.

The priests, whose responsibility it is to teach the torah (Lev 10:11; Hos 4:6), violate (harm, strip, lay waste) its teachings (cf. Zeph 3:4; Mal 2:8). As well as deliberately misinterpreting and perverting divine ordinances they desecrate holy things (e.g. eating the offerings in a state of ritual impurity, Lev 22:1-9).

b) They blur the distinctions between sacred and profane.

The priests also neglect their responsibility to ‘put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean’ (Lev 10:10). In a later vision Ezekiel includes this requirement in a list of obligations expected of the Zadokite priesthood in the new temple (44:23). ‘Holy’ refers to things dedicated to YHWH, ‘unholy’ to items in everyday use. They fail to show the people what is clean or unclean for sacrifice and do not explain what foods are clean or forbidden to be eaten.

c) They fail to observe the Sabbath.

The priests turn a blind eye to desecration of the Sabbath by the people, thus blatantly disregarding God’s commandment. Jeremiah comments on this in Jer 17:27.

d) God himself is profaned among them (i.e. among the priests). Those responsible for maintaining YHWH’s holiness do not honour it. YHWH is the object of the verb ḥālal (to pollute or profane) in Ezek 13:19 also.

(27) THE CRIMES OF THE PRINCES

The word sarim (chiefs, leaders, rulers), here translated ‘princes,’ refers to officials like top civil servants and judges. They are described as ‘fierce wolves’ – predators lower down the food chain than the ‘roaring lion’ of v.25 – but no less cruel and voracious. Instead of protecting the rights of the people they utilise violence and murder for dishonest gain.

(28) PROPHETS (again)

The prophets are mentioned again because of their complicity with ‘them’ (the officials in the previous verse). They ‘whitewash’ the evil deeds of the officials, making them appear legitimate, and cover up their abuses by proclaiming false visions and uttering divinations that are lies (cf. 13:7-10. They say: ‘Thus saith the Lord God, when the Lord hath not spoken’ (cf. Mic 3:9-1; Zeph 3:3-4).

(29) THE CHARACTER OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND

Many commentators take ‘the people of the land’ as referring to the common people, thus indicating that that corruption has spread throughout Judahite society from the top down. It is possible, however, that am ha-aretz is used in a technical sense for a particular social group – the landed gentry – that Ezekiel lists with other parties (prophets, princes and priests) as culpable for systemic corruption in Judah. This wealthy group seems to have been politically influential (2 Kgs 11:14, 18; 21:24; 23:30, 35) and in a position to perpetrate economic crimes against the most vulnerable members of society. They are said to have oppressed, extorted, robbed and ill-treated the poor and needy; including resident foreigners. This kind of behaviour is forbidden in Exod 22:21-23; Lev 19:13-15, 33; Deut 24:17.

YHWH’S UNSUCCESSFUL SEARCH FOR A MAN WHO COULD PREVENT THE COMING DESTRUCTION (30-31)

(30) Having catalogued the sins of the four most powerful groups in Judahite society – prophets, priests, princes and the people of the land – YHWH declares that he searched for a man among them who would ‘build up the wall and stand in the gap’ before him in order to avert judgement – but he found no-one. These four groups have opposed the Lord and have led society into sin.

‘Build up the wall’ and ‘stand in the gap’ are metaphors for repairing moral and spiritual defences and for standing in the breach (by intercession or strong spiritual leadership) in order to prevent coming disaster. The image is that of a gap in the protecting wall of a city with the result that someone must stand in that breach in order to defend it. In Ezek 13:5 it is just the prophets who are accused of failing to ‘stand in the gaps or make up the wall’ but in chapter 22 this applies to all levels of society. There is a failure of leadership; those who are meant to protect and guide would rather extort and exploit.

Since there is total moral collapse in Jerusalem not a single person has the credibility or courage to lead the nation back to faithfulness to YHWH and his covenant. This passage is disturbingly relevant to our modern societies. Corruption filters down when political leaders pursue power and influence at the expense of truth and justice and religious leaders sacrifice biblical convictions on the altar of political expediency. No doubt God is still looking for intercessors and righteous individuals who will make themselves available to repair what is broken and stand between society and disaster.

Is there one convicted enough to take on the challenge of building up God’s wall?

Is there one compassionate enough to care for others?

Is there one courageous enough to go against the flow?

Is there one consecrated enough to surrender talents, time, and treasures for the glory of God?

Unfortunately, in Jerusalem’s case YHWH’s search was unsuccessful. Tragically, YHWH reports: ‘but I found none.’

(31) In the absence of a single person who can ‘build up the wall’ and ‘stand in the gap’ judgement is inevitable, there is no reason for delay. This verse presents YHWH’s acts of judgement as if they have already taken place. He will consume the people of Jerusalem/Judah with the fire of his wrath; in this they will suffer the consequences of their own actions. Like the two previous oracles in Ezekiel chapter 22 this third one ends with a pronouncement of judgement.

SUMMATION

This oracle portrays a society in total moral collapse. Every level of society in Jerusalem is corrupt and guilty of violence, oppression and blatant disregard for the law of God. The extent of the rot is revealed in God’s search for a single person to ‘stand in the gap’ and defend or repair the city’s spiritual and moral defences. That search ends with the declaration: ‘but I found none.’ The nation must therefore face the fire of God’s wrath, a direct consequence of its corruption.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 22:17-22 – The Oracle Concerning the Smelting of Jerusalem

Posted on by writtenexposition

TEXT

17 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
18 Son of man, the house of Israel is to me become dross: all they are brass, and tin, and iron, and lead, in the midst of the furnace; they are even the dross of silver.
19 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Because ye are all become dross, behold, therefore I will gather you into the midst of Jerusalem.
20 As they gather silver, and brass, and iron, and lead, and tin, into the midst of the furnace, to blow the fire upon it, to melt it; so will I gather you in mine anger and in my fury, and I will leave you there, and melt you.
21 Yea, I will gather you, and blow upon you in the fire of my wrath, and ye shall be melted in the midst thereof.
22 As silver is melted in the midst of the furnace, so shall ye be melted in the midst thereof; and ye shall know that I the LORD have poured out my fury upon you.

This brief oracle builds upon the idea of purification raised in the previous one (22:15), which predicts that the removal of Judah’s filth will be accomplished through the dispersion of the people among the nations.

This oracle employs the metaphor of smelting; however, the crucible or furnace is Jerusalem itself. The smelting therefore represents the siege and sacking of the city by the Babylonians in 587/6 BCE.

(17) The formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying’ indicates that this is a new oracle and that it comes by direct revelation from YHWH and thus has divine authority.

(18) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘Son of Adam’ YHWH informs him that he regards the ‘house of Israel’ as dross. ‘House of Israel’ does not refer to the northern kingdom of Israel as that had been destroyed by the Assyrians almost 130 years earlier. Ezekiel uses the phrase as a term for the covenant people of YHWH – in this context the entire society of Judah (those living in and around Jerusalem). ‘Dross’ describes the existing condition of Jerusalem as YHWH sees it.

The metaphor here is that of smelting – a process for extracting metal from ore by heating and melting. The application of intense heat separates the pure metal from the impure dross; the latter rises to the top and can be skimmed off.

The point of the process described here is to obtain precious silver – but seemingly only base metals (copper, tin, iron and lead) are present in the ore. The elements mentioned represent the various strata of Judahite society – the priests (v.26), the princes (v.27), the prophets (v.28) and the people (v.29). The metaphor only stretches so far as in real life no-one would smelt knowing at the start that all they have is dross.

(19) ‘ ‘Therefore’ – The action that will be taken against Judah will be a direct result of the diagnosis by the Sovereign Lord (Adonai YHWH) that they are dross. As the one possessing absolute power and authority YHWH has the right to judge them.

He says that he will gather them ‘into the midst of Jerusalem.’ This may be a reference to people fleeing to fortified cities for safety from the Babylonians, as mentioned in Jer 4:5. Normally one would think of God ‘gathering’ for protection (e.g. 1 Chron 16:35; Isa 40:11; Mt23:27) but here we have a reversal of that thought. The people are being gathered for siege. They will undergo the fiery ordeal of smelting in the city.

(20-22) The metaphor becomes a simile (‘as they gather…as silver is melted’) with a concentration on the fierce heat that smelting requires. Just as in ancient smelting bellows were used to intensify the heat so YHWH’s breath (representing his wrath and fury) will heat up the furnace that ‘melts’ the people of Jerusalem.

The metaphor does not take the process any further. Although the ‘house of Israel’ is described as dross in v.19 we wonder if any silver will be found and separated? Can the ore be so corrupted that it contains no precious silver at all?

We are not told the result of the process, only that when the people of Jerusalem are smelted (i.e. experience invasion, war and devastation) they will realise that the fury has been poured out upon them by YHWH.

SUMMATION

In this oracle the metallurgical imagery of smelting is figurative of the purging of the people of Jerusalem by invasion, war and the death of many citizens. Ezekiel uses this metaphor to provide an explanation for the soon-coming disaster upon the people of Jerusalem – it is their own fault. Their sin has become so pervasive that purification is necessary and inevitable, a holy God cannot let it go unpunished.

Note: for use of the image of metal refining elsewhere in the Bible see: Isa 1:22, 25; 48:10; Jer 6:28-30; 9:7; Zech 13:9; Mal 3:2-3; 1 Pet 1:7.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 22:1-16 – The Oracle Concerning Bloodshed in Jerusalem

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 22 belongs to a series of oracles spoken a few years before the fall of Jerusalem in 587/586 BCE. These oracles, dated 14 August 591 BCE (20:1), focus on YHWH’s punishment of Israel/Judah. Chapter 22 presents three oracles indicting the city of Jerusalem and its inhabitants. In each the charges against Jerusalem are presented and judgement pronounced.

22:1-16 The Oracle Concerning Bloodshed in Jerusalem

22:17-22 The Oracle Concerning the Smelting of Jerusalem

22:23-31 The Oracle Concerning the Leaders of Jerusalem

THE ORACLE CONCERNING BLOODSHED IN JERUSALEM (1-16)

In this oracle, which gives a catalogue of Jerusalem’s sins, the most common words are ‘blood’ (2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 13) and ‘in thee’ (6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16).

(1) The formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ indicates that this is the beginning of a new oracle. It occurs again in v.17 and v.23.

(2) Addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH involves Ezekiel in the condemnation of Jerusalem by asking the double question ‘wilt thou judge, wilt thou judge?’ This is, in effect, an instruction (cf. 20:4; 23:36). Ezekiel is to judge the ‘bloody city’ (city of bloods) and point out her abominations (offensive things). The Jews thought of Jerusalem as the holy city (e.g. Mt 4:5; 27:53) but here Ezekiel calls it by a name that the prophet Nahum had used earlier (c. 650 BCE) to describe Nineveh (Nah 3:1). Ezekiel uses the description again concerning Jerusalem in 24:6,9.

(3) Ezekiel is to make it clear that his message has a divine origin (‘thus saith the Lord’) and proceed to inform Jerusalem and its people of the crimes of which they are accused. The charges are twofold; a) bloodshed, and b) idolatry.

a) BLOODSHED – This problem of violence and murder in Jerusalem was also highlighted by the prophet Isaiah:

And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood. Isaiah 1:15
How is the faithful city become a harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers. Isaiah 1:21

In Jerusalem itself there is total disregard for human life. ‘In the midst’ is repeated in v.7 and v.13. As a result of this ‘her time may come’ – a time of punishment – see Ezek 7:7,12.

IDOLATRY

Jerusalem makes idols (frequent, repeated, ongoing action) all over her to defile her. This breaks the first of the Ten Commandments (Exod 20:3).

(4-5) Verses 4-5 list five results of the crimes of bloodshed and idolatry:

i) Thou art become guilty in thy blood that thou hast shed; – ‘thy blood’ is ‘the blood of your victims.’ These would not only be people who were murdered but also human sacrifices which were part of idolatrous worship – children sacrificed to Molech (Ezek 16:20).

ii) and hast defiled thyself in thine idols which thou hast made

iii) and thou hast caused thy days to draw near, and art come even unto thy years: – these sins will accelerate the time of the city’s destruction (cf. 12:22-23; Jer 11:23). Some interpret ‘days’ as referring to the siege and fall of Jerusalem and ‘years’ to the time spent in captivity.

iv) therefore have I made thee a reproach unto the heathen, and a mocking to all countries. – even the Gentiles are horrified by Jerusalem’s behaviour and mock it. The consequences of her sin involve public shame. This was prophesied by Moses in Deut 28:37: And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations…

v) Those that be near, and those that be far from thee, shall mock thee, which art infamous and much vexed. – ‘Polluted in name and full of confusion,’ Jerusalem’s notoriety will spread near and far; the city will be universally despised and derided.

Verses 6-12 expand on the types of sins that are rife in Jerusalem.

(6-7) OPPRESSION

(6) ‘every one were in thee to their power’ lit. ‘everyone according to his arm’ i.e. strength, might. Every leader in Jerusalem uses his personal power for violence and murder.

The expression ‘to shed blood’ – occurs in v.6, 9, 12.

The princes of Israel could refer to the political leaders of Judah or to the Davidic kings who ruled in Jerusalem; some of whom were willing to engage in judicial murder e.g. Manasseh (2 Kgs 21:16), Jehoiakim (Jer 26:21). Instead of ensuring a stable and just society the powerful oppress others in order to benefit themselves.

The princes of Judah are like those who move boundary markers; I will pour out my fury on them like water. Hos 5:10 CSB
On the day of our king, the princes are sick with the heat of wine — there is a conspiracy with traitors. Hos 7:5 CSB
Both hands are good at accomplishing evil: the official and the judge demand a bribe;
when the powerful man communicates his evil desire, they plot it together. Mic 7:3 CSB
The princes within her are roaring lions; her judges are wolves of the night, which leave nothing for the morning. Zeph 3:3 CSB

(7) ‘In thee have they set light by father and mother: in the midst of thee have they dealt by oppression with the stranger: in thee have they vexed the fatherless and the widow.’

‘They’ in v.7 probably refers back to the ‘princes of Israel’ in v.6 but many commentators view it as referring to everyone in general in Jerusalem. The ethics of the Sinai covenant have been disregarded and the most vulnerable in society – older people, resident aliens, orphans and widows – are being exploited.

‘father and mother’ – The leaders/people have broken the fifth commandment (Exod 20:12, see also Deut 5:16; Lev 19:3) by ‘setting light by’ (i.e. dishonouring, slighting) their parents.

If you insult your father or mother, your light will be snuffed out in total darkness. Prov 20:20 NLT

Children, obey your parents because you belong to the Lord, for this is the right thing to do. “Honour your father and mother.” This is the first commandment with a promise: If you honour your father and mother, “things will go well for you, and you will have a long life on the earth.” Eph 6:1-3 NLT

‘resident aliens’ – these were foreigners allowed to live and work in Judah. Since they did not own land they were easily exploited. See Exod 22:21; Lev 19:13; Deut 10:19; 24:14-15.

‘the fatherless and the widow’ – See Exod 22:22; Deut 24:17, 19, 20, 21.

(8-11) RELIGION

These verses list sins that offend religious sensibilities and violate the ethical injunctions of the Holiness Code (Lev 17-16); especially Leviticus chapters 18 and 19. The list includes the sins of Sabbath desecration, slander, murder, idolatry, depravity and incest.

(8) Thou hast despised mine holy things, and hast profaned my sabbaths. These sins said here to have been committed by the city of Jerusalem are specifically attributed to the priests in v.26. Jeremiah, who was prophesying in Jerusalem at the same time as Ezekiel was prophesying in Babylonia, also preached against desecration of the Sabbath by the population of the city (Jer 17:20-23).

Disrespecting holy things would include activities like eating sacrificial meat while in a state of ritual impurity (Lev 7:20) or consuming it after the ‘expiry date’ (Lev 7:15-18; 19:6-8).

(9) In thee are men that carry tales to shed blood: In Jerusalem there are deceitful and treacherous men willing to give false testimony so that another may be put to death. Lit. ‘men of traffic’ or pedlars. Travelling salesmen probably carried gossip, the expression eventually came to mean slanderers or scandal-mongers. Possibly the idea here is that of informer. Naboth was a victim of malicious accusations in 1 Kgs 21:10-11. This behaviour was forbidden in the Holiness Code: Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the LORD. Lev 19:16

in thee they eat upon the mountains: in the midst of thee they commit lewdness.

The people of Jerusalem are involved in idolatrous worship (eating sacrificial meals at the high places) and, probably through participation in cultic rites, act in a depraved manner. The word zimmāh (see also v.11) meaning wickedness or lewdness is used in Leviticus of various sexual offences (e.g. Lev 18:17; 19:29; 20:14). See Ezek 16:27, 58; 22:9,11; 23:21, 27, 35, 44, 48.

(10-11) These verses give examples of the types of forbidden sexual acts practised in Jerusalem. They include cohabiting with a father’s wife, forcing (humiliating, oppressing) menstrual women to have sexual relations, committing adultery with other men’s wives (his fellow’s wife) and incestuous activity with female relatives like daughters in law and paternal sisters (see Lev 18:7-20).

(12) ACQUISITION

The people will stop at nothing, including murder, to acquire money and land. They indulge in economic exploitation – bribery, usury, extortion. These are sins of covetousness.

Acceptance of bribes – Lev19:15; Deut 16:19.

Usury (exorbitant interest on loans) – Lev 25:36-37

Extortion of a neighbour – Lev 19:35-36.

Verse 12 ends with the core accusation – they have forgotten God.

13-16 YHWH’S REACTION

(13) The Lord responds to these crimes by clapping his hands in a gesture of anger, vexation and indignation (6:11; 21:14,17). He is particularly enraged by their covetousness in pursuing ill-gotten gains and by the bloodshed that has been in their midst.

(14) YHWH asks the city a rhetorical question that emphasises that the people will not be able to endure the punishments that YHWH will certainly bring upon them because of their misconduct. Can thine heart endure, or can thine hands be strong, in the days that I shall deal with thee? In the terrible time of judgement their courage and strength will fail.

I the LORD have spoken it, and will do it. – ‘I am YHWH, what I have spoken I will do’ YHWH can be relied on to carry out what he says. This expression is also found in Ezek 17:25; 36:36; 37:14 and Num 14:35.

(15) Ezekiel predicts the Exile and claims that it is not only punishment but also purification. Exile will eradicate (consume, cause to cease, take completely way) the filth of idolatry and injustice.

(16) This will happen while the nations watch. While enduring public humiliation (‘take thine inheritance’ means ‘be profaned, be violated, dishonoured, degraded’) in the sight of the nations they will acknowledge the sovereignty of YHWH. The oracle ends with the recognition formula ‘thou shalt know that I am the Lord.’

The idea is that the Jerusalemites will be a disgrace in the sight of the surrounding nations but, as they recover from the pollution of idolatry, they will become inwardly (in thyself) conscious of their filthy state before God and eventually appreciate the Lord – as a holy and just God.

SUMMATION

Ezek 22:1-16 is a prophetic oracle in which YHWH, via Ezekiel, accuses Jerusalem of many sins and announces impending punishment in the form of exile. Ezekiel is instructed to act as judge over the ‘bloody city’ and confront it with its transgressions. These include murder, idolatry, profanation of the sabbaths, sexual depravity, extortion and the oppression of strangers, orphans and widows. The oracle singles out as especially guilty those leaders who abuse their power for personal gain. YHWH declares that Jerusalem’s doom and disgrace is inevitable.

RELEVANCE TODAY

This passage is a reminder that any society that forgets God will turn to idolatry (placing other things before God), produce corrupt leaders and tolerate injustice, oppression and exploitation of the vulnerable. Ignoring justice, compassion and faith places such a society at risk of divine judgement.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 21:18-32 – The Third Oracle Concerning YHWH’s Sword

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

This is the third and last of the oracles concerning YHWH’s sword in Ezekiel chapter 21. The oracle commences by focusing on the approach of the king of Babylon to a fork in the road and his use of divination to decide his path of conquest. Which branch of the road should he take – the one to Rabbath the capital of Ammon or the one to Jerusalem? Although seemingly guided by the omens, it is ultimately YHWH who directs him to go and lay siege to Jerusalem.

YHWH then directly addresses Zedekiah, the ‘profane and wicked prince of Israel,’ and prophesies his downfall. After that the focus shifts to the Ammonites and the judgement that will come upon them.

DIVISION

18-23 The sword at the crossroads.

24-27 Judgement upon Judah and its king.

28-32 Judgement upon the Ammonites

EXPOSITION

THE SWORD AT THE CROSSROADS (18-23)

(18-20) The oracle starts with the usual prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me again, saying’ followed by a reference to the prophet as ‘son of Adam.’ Ezekiel is given instructions that are reminiscent of chapter 4 where he was told to portray the siege of Jerusalem on a clay tile. Now he is told to draw a diagram representing the path that ‘the sword of the king of Babylon’ will take on a journey to deal with revolts by the kingdoms of Judah and Ammon. Nebuchadnezzar is thus identified as ‘the slayer’ of v.11.

Ezekiel is to sketch two routes that Nebuchadnezzar could follow. The road out of ‘one land’ (Babylonia) forks (cf. ‘the head of the way’ 16:25, 31) near a certain city (possibly Damascus). At this fork/crossroads Ezekiel is to ‘choose a place’ (place = hand, index, direction – Num 2:17; Jer 6:3), i.e. draw a signpost. The signpost indicates that one branch of the road leads to Rabbath Ammon (Deut 3:11) and the other to fortified Jerusalem. The sword (Nebuchadnezzar) will smite both destinations but which one will he go to first? The Ammonites seem to think that they will not be attacked (cf. v.29) but Jer 4:5 suggests that in Judah preparations were in place for the people to gather in ‘fortified’ Jerusalem for safety.

(21-23) Verses 21-22 explain the drawing. The crossroads represents a location at which King Nebuchadnezzar’s army comes to a standstill while the king and his soothsayers use three techniques of ancient divination to decide which city to attack first:

Omens appearing on the right side of the liver were considered auspicious and those on the left unlucky. Verse 22 represents Nebuchadnezzar as receiving favourable omens and, on that basis, deciding to invade Judah first.

The Babylonians will attack Jerusalem, set up battering rams, cause slaughter, sound a war cry, and prepare to storm the city. Similar preparations for siege warfare are described in Ezek 4:2.

(23) And it shall be unto them as a false divination in their sight, to them that have sworn oaths: but he will call to remembrance the iniquity, that they may be taken.

‘Them’ and ‘their’ refers to the Judeans (exiles and those in Judah) who will view as false the omens that Ezekiel predicts Nebuchadnezzar will get. This is because they are depending on their covenant with YHWH and thus expect him to protect them and send Nebuchadnezzar to punish the heathen Ammonites. YHWH, however, will remember that the people of Judah have not adhered to the stipulations of the Sinai covenant; with the result that he will judge them by allowing them to be seized (by the Babylonians).

JUDGEMENT UPON JUDAH AND ITS KING (24-27)

(24) Verse 24 refers back (‘therefore’) to v.23 and says much the same thing. The people of Judah are guilty and their iniquity has so attracted YHWH’s attention that he recalls all their wrongdoings and as punishment will deliver them to Nebuchadnezzar. They will be ‘taken with the hand,’ i.e. grasped by the hand of the slayer of v.11.

The divination rituals used by Nebuchadnezzar, although superstitious and forbidden to the Israelites, are sovereignly used by YHWH to bring about the attack on Jerusalem as an act of divine punishment. Prov 16:33 says: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

(25-27) In these verses Ezekiel directly addresses King Zedekiah and describes him as the ‘profane wicked prince of Israel.’ Ezekiel uses ‘prince,’ meaning ‘chieftain’ or ‘leader,’ instead of the term ‘king.’ It is possible that ‘prince of Israel’ was a title adopted by the Davidic kings of Judah once the northern kingdom came to an end. Zedekiah’s day of doom, on which his wrongdoing will cease, is close at hand. YHWH makes a proclamation to him: ‘thus saith the Lord God.’

Remove the turban and take off the crown. Things shall not remain as they are. Exalt that which is low, and bring low that which is exalted. Ezekiel 21:26 ESV

In v.26 four infinitive absolutes are translated as imperatives: remove, take off, exalt, abase. The cessation of Zedekiah’s reign is characterised by the removal of his turban and his crown – symbols of justice (Job 29:14) and dignity (Job 19:9). Things will not remain as they are; it is time his reign came to an end.

Note: Since the word for turban is also that used for the High Priest’s mitre (Exod. 28:4, 37, 39; 29:6; 39:28, 31; Lev. 8:9; 16:4) some commentators view the turban as belonging to the High Priest rather than the king and thus have YHWH proclaiming the overthrow of Judah’s religious and political institutions.

The inversion of the current state of affairs is summed up in the saying: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. These words are probably better known from the New Testament where Jesus said : And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted (Mt 23:12; Lk 14:11; 18:14). Similar thoughts, however, are expressed in 1 Sam 2:6-7; Job 5:11-13; Psa 75:7; Mk 10:43-44 and Lk 1:52.

A relevant example of someone of that era who was abased and then exalted is the prophet Jeremiah. He was badly treated under Zedekiah’s regime but later held in high regard by the Babylonians (Jer 40:1-6).

The severity of the coming upheaval is emphasised in v.27a by the threefold use of ‘overturn.’ This repetition expresses the superlative – e.g. ‘Holy, Holy, Holy’ Isa 6:3. The distortion and overthrow of everything is poetically described by Jeremiah in Jer 4:23-26:

I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.
I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger.

Verse 27b is an obvious reference to the famous prophecy of Gen 49:10: The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

Ezek 21:27b says; and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him. This verse is generally interpreted in one of three ways: a) as referring to the Messiah, or b) as referring to Jehoiachin, or c) as referring to Nebuchadnezzar.

a) MESSIAH. Zedekiah will fall and for an unspecified period of time there will not be another Davidic king until Messiah comes (‘it shall be no more, until). God will give the kingdom to him because it is rightfully his. Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning right or due as in KJV.

b) JEHOIACHIN – Temporarily there will be no Davidic ruler in Judah until the kingdom is restored to a legitimate king, i.e. Jehoiachin or one of his descendants. Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning a legal claim.

c) NEBUCHADNEZZAR – Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning punishing or judgement. Greenberg (1997, Ezekiel 21-37 : a New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, p. 434) explains:

punishing (mispat) … entrust [it] to him… mispat (usually “judgment”) here, as in 16:38 (plural); 5:8 (plural); 23:45; 39:21, means “punishment, punishing.” Combination with the verb ntn recurs in 23:24: “I will entrust judgment/punishing to them…and they will judge/punish you.”…Eliezer of Beaugency gives the sense: “Until Nebuchadnezzar, into whose hand I have committed my punishing, comes to punish him (Zedekiah).”

According to this view Ezekiel alludes to the Gen 49:10 prophecy but reinterprets it for the current situation. Those in Judah and Ezekiel’s fellow exiles doubtless interpret the prophecy messianically but the prophet turns it back on them; telling them that they can expect a slayer (Nebuchadnezzar), not a saviour (Messiah).

JUDGEMENT UPON THE AMMONITES (28-32)

Note: There are several interpretations of Ezekiel 21:28-29. Some see the entire section as a pronouncement of judgement upon the Ammonites, others view the entire section as pronouncing judgement upon the sword of YHWH, with the Ammonites as an audience.

(28-29) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH instructs him to prophesy (who to is not specified) concerning the Ammonites and concerning their reproach. The focus shifts from Judah to Ammon using language that is similar to that in vv.9-10. As in vv.9-10 concerning Judah, verse 28 concerning Ammon begins with Ezekiel being told to ‘say.’ It also contains a repetition of the word ‘sword’ (sword, sword), and an observation that the sword is ‘furbished.’ It is already drawn (opened, exposed) and polished in order to flash and be adequate to slaughter Ammonites. The Ammonites will taunt the people of Judah when they see the devastation that the sword (Babylonians) wreaks on the land of Israel (25:3, 6). Their rejoicing will be premature, however, because the sword will come against them as well.

It seems from v.29 that the Ammonite prophets and soothsayers were wrongly advising their citizens that they had nothing to fear from the Babylonians. Ezekiel says that these Ammonite diviners ‘see vanity’ and ‘divine a lie’ and thus mislead their people. The prophet Jeremiah also said this in a message he sent to the kings of five surrounding nations, including the Ammonites (Jer 27:3):

Therefore hearken not ye to your prophets, nor to your diviners, nor to your dreamers, nor to your enchanters, nor to your sorcerers, which speak unto you, saying, Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon: For they prophesy a lie unto you, Jer 27:9-10a

The inhabitants of the land of Ammon will be added to the number of slain Judahites, who have brought the sword (Nebuchadnezzar and his army) to the area because of their iniquity (vv. 23, 25, 29). The sword will conquer the Ammonites as well as the Judahites, both nations will share that same fate.

(30) ‘Return it to its sheath’- another infinitive absolute that translates as an imperative. This is either a command (to an unknown third party) to put the sword of the Lord back into its scabbard because its work is done or it is advice to the Ammonites that it is pointless for them to attempt to defend themselves because judgement upon them is certain. The Ammonites will be judged in their own land, the land of their origin. Unlike Israel/Judah, which will be exiled, Ammon will face destruction at home.

(31) YHWH’s anger will be poured out upon the Ammonites like a fiery flood. The fire of God’s wrath will blow against them like bellows fanning a fire (cf. Isa 54:16). YHWH will deliver them into the hands of brutish (i.e. cruel) men for whom destruction is an art form. They are craftsmen, expert at what they do. This probably refers to the efficient warriors of the Babylonian army.

(32) God’s fiery wrath will consume the Ammonites who will be like like fuel for a fire. Their blood will flow over all the land, this speaks of total military defeat.

‘No more remembered’ (cf. Psa 83:4; Jer 11:19; Zech13:2). The ultimate result of their judgement is oblivion. The nation that gloats and scorns the Lord’s people will suffer humiliation and obliteration. Unlike the Israelites who will retain their national identity and return from exile the Ammonites will never again exist as an independent nation. This nation that is so opposed to YHWH will eventually fade from history. Ezekiel goes into more dtail about the future of the Ammonites in chapter 25.

‘I the Lord have spoken.’ The oracle does not end with a maybe but with YHWH’s guarantee. These things will come to pass, God’s word is final.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

  • The Lord is sovereign and will judge all nations.
  • It is dangerous to take pleasure in the misfortune or downfall of others, especially the Lord’s people. This is a sin that invites judgement.
  • Be wary about who you trust. There are still false prophets and teachers about. It is better to hear the truth rather than trust in flattering and comforting lies.
  • God is true to his word. What he says, he will do.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 21:8-17 – The Second Oracle Concerning YHWH’s Sword

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In this second oracle concerning YHWH’s sword the prophet Ezekiel vividly foretells the imminent and inescapable judgement of YHWH’s sword against Jerusalem and the land of Israel. The slaughter is not portrayed as a distant threat but as wrath that is about to be unleashed upon the common people and their leaders.

Since it is written in poetic form this oracle is often referred to as ‘The Song of the Sword’ or ‘Ode to the Sword.’ Unfortunately there are great difficulties with the text, e.g., parts of vv.10 and 13 seem unintelligible and bear little relation to the context. Using textual criticism, scholars try to determine (i.e. guess) what the original might have said. Not all reach the same conclusions, which means that translations and interpretations differ. In spite of the textual difficulties it is clear that this second oracle continues the theme of the first; the destruction that will be brought about by the sword of YHWH. In this oracle Ezekiel concentrates upon two aspects of the sword – its preparation and its purpose.

DIVISION

8-11 The sword’s preparation

12-14a The prophet’s performance

14b-17 The sword’s purpose

EXPOSITION

THE SWORD’S PREPARATION (8-11)

(8) The familiar prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ introduces a new message. It is not Ezekiel’s own invention but comes directly from YHWH.

(9) The usual instruction to communicate the word of the Lord follows. Ezekiel is told to prophesy:

‘A sword, a sword’ – the double mention of sword is for emphasis and identifies this symbol of war as the focus of the oracle. The saying is repeated in v.28. This instrument is sharpened and furbished (polished). ‘Sharpened’ and ‘furbished’ occur together in vv.9, 10 and 11. These words suggest that the sword is prepared and ready for action.

(10) This is not a ceremonial sword – it is lethal. It has been sharpened so that it can make slaughter and has been polished so that it might dazzle like lightening (‘so that it might have lightening’ – see also Deut 32:40; Job 20:25).

should we then make mirth? Ezekiel seems to halt his flow of words at this juncture in order to reprove some of his listeners who are laughing or jesting at what he has to say. He asks: ‘Do you think this is a joke?’

it contemneth the rod of my son, as every tree The text here is obscure and reads: ‘Or shall we make mirth? The rod of my son despises every tree.’ Attempts at translation include:

CSB – The scepter of my son, the sword despises every tree.
DARBY – Shall we then make mirth, [saying,] The sceptre of my son contemneth all wood?
ESV – (Or shall we rejoice? You have despised the rod, my son, with everything of wood.)
NET – Should we rejoice in the scepter of my son? No! The sword despises every tree!
NIV – Shall we rejoice in the scepter of my royal son? The sword despises every such stick.
NLT – Now will you laugh? Those far stronger than you have fallen beneath its power!

Since the word šēḇeṭ means rod or sceptre scholars tend to view this verse as a reference to Gen 49:10 – The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be – especially since Ezekiel certainly has this passage from Genesis in view at v.27b. Some of the exiles jeered at Ezekiel, objecting to his prophecy because, in their view, it contradicted the promise to the tribe of Judah in Jacob’s blessing. The wooden sceptre of royal authority that despises every other such sceptre is that of Judah (here called YHWH’s son Israel, cf. Exod 4:22; Hos 11:1).

Based on the Gen 49:10 promise, the Davidic monarchy believes itself to be invulnerable and despises every force that comes against it. However, the sword of YHWH (i.e. Nebuchadnezzar v.19) will devour every sceptre, including that of Judah.

(11) The sword has been sharpened and polished and is now ready to be handed over to the slayer.

THE PROPHET’S PERFORMANCE (12-14a)

Ezekiel is once again (cf. v.6) told to dramatize his grief at the destruction that he is predicting. He is to ‘cry and howl,’ slap his thigh and clap his hands together.

(12) Addressing Ezekiel as ‘Son of Adam’ YHWH tells him to ‘cry and howl.’ Zā‘aq is a verb meaning to cry out or shriek in sorrow or anguish. Yālal is a verb meaning to wail or howl. This pair of words also occurs together in Isa 14:31; 65:14; Jer 25:34, 36; 47:2; 48:20, 31; 49:3; Hos 7:14; Zeph 1:10.

Ezekiel is to shriek and wail because the doom will come upon everyone in the land of Israel; from the lowest to the highest. The sword will strike down the rulers as well as the common people. ‘Be upon’ means come upon or come against.

it shall be upon my people
it shall be upon all the princes of Israel
terrors by reason of the sword shall be upon all my people

These verbs (translated: ‘it shall be’) are prophetic perfects. The predicted doom is so certain that it is viewed as a completed action – expressed using the past tense perfect verb form (‘it has been’).

Ezekiel is to accompany the loud audible sounds of grief (crying and howling) with a gesture symbolic of despair or mourning (cf. Jer 31:19). This involves slapping his thigh or upper side.

(13) for it is a trial; and what if even the rod that despises shall be no more? This is another obscure saying.

it is a trial – This possibly means that the pretensions of the Davidic monarchy of Judah will be tested. Or, it is saying that the sharpness of the sword has been proved on other people i.e. Nebuchadnezzar and his army have already won victories.

and what – What if the rod (Judah’s sceptre) is not strong enough to withstand the sword?

it is no more – The Davidic monarchy will be no more – Zedekiah’s revolt will fail, he will be gone and Judah will not have a ruler.

(14a) Ezekiel is again told to prophesy (see v.9) but what he is to say is not specified. Then he is instructed to make a further physical gesture; he is to clap his hands together. It would seem from 25:6 that this action expresses exultation: …thou hast clapped thine hands, and stamped with the feet, and rejoiced in heart with all thy despite against the land of Israel. Is Ezekiel rejoicing at the actions of YHWH and applauding the coming judgement? Surely that is unlikely! Perhaps the clapping of the hands signifies great emotion (Num 24:10), or is a threatening gesture.

THE SWORD’S PURPOSE (14b-17)

(14b) let the sword be doubled the third time. The sword is to strike twice, even three times. Possibly Ezekiel is to clap his hands three times, signifying the intensity of the judgement and its terrible effect. Some commentators view this as a reference to the three different Chaldean attacks on Jerusalem – in 605/604 BCE, 597 BCE and 586 BCE. It is interesting that the ‘sword’ is mentioned three times in v.14.

‘It is the sword of the great (singular) slain (pierced).’

it is the sword of a pierced man, the great one. The sword will pierce even the king, or perhaps this refers to any person in a high position. Or, this sword has slain the great men.

which entereth into their privy chambers. This can mean that the sword besets or encloses people (i.e. surrounds them) or that it will pursue them into their innermost chambers. The meaning is the same – there is no escape.

(15) YHWH has set the slaughter (the word translated ‘point’ occurs only here in Hebrew and means ‘slaughter’) of the sword against all their gates. This would suggest that the judgement is wider than Judah and applies to other nations as well. The sword is being brandished about with the result that the rapid movement back and forth makes it flash like lightening (cf. Gen 3:24). ‘Wrapped up’ means held in readiness i.e., it has already been grasped by the slayer and withdrawn from its scabbard.

Pointing the sword at the gates has two purposes in view:

  • that hearts may melt (they will lack the courage to defend themselves)
  • that falterings be many (many will (stumble) fall by the sword or, they will have many opportunities to fall by the sword)

(16) YHWH now addresses the sword directly (sword is a feminine noun and the verbs are in feminine form).

‘Go thee’ – This imperative is reckoned to be a military command meaning ‘stand as one’ or ‘close ranks.’ The sword is personified as the Babylonian army mobilised for battle and commanded to focus its attack on the right or the left (i.e. every direction); wherever its blade has been assigned (yā‘ad). The ‘face’ here is the cutting edge (also Eccl 10:10). For an example of the sword of the Lord being assigned or appointed (yā‘ad) see Jer 47:7.

(17) The oracle ends with YHWH again addressing Ezekiel: ‘I too, like you, will strike my hands together.’ This refers back to v.14a. YHWH will mirror Ezekiel’s gesture, then his wrath will subside.

SUMMATION

The difficult oracle in Ezekiel 21:8-17 is a dramatic poem that uses the image of a sharpened, polished sword to convey the certainty and severity of YHWH’s judgement on Judah and its leaders. This is not just any weapon; it has been divinely prepared, sharpened and polished for deadly effect, and targeted at the people and leaders of Judah. Ezekiel’s emotional involvement in the oracle – shrieking, wailing, striking of his thigh and clapping of his hands – illustrates the huge personal distress the punishment will cause. The oracle is a reminder that divine patience has a limit and that it is dangerous to make fun of or trivialise God’s warnings.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 21:1-7 – The First Oracle Concerning YHWH’s Sword

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

At the end of chapter 20 Ezekiel’s fellow-exiles told him that they did not understand his prophecies, especially the oracle concerning the Negev (20:45-49). Now, in chapter 21, three oracles about YHWH’s sword elaborate upon the destruction of the Negev in terms that are direct, stark and easily understood. They are powerful declarations that the sword of judgement is coming soon.

This first oracle of chapter 21 (vv.1-7) links back to the prophecy against the Negev (20:45-49) and interprets the forest of that oracle as Jerusalem and the forest fire as ‘the sword of YHWH’ (i.e. war). It parallels that previous oracle by repeating the same ideas and by using similar words and expressions: for example: ‘set your face;’ ‘drop the word;’ the righteous and the wicked/ green tree and dry tree; ‘from the south to the north;’ ‘all flesh may see/know;’ ‘it shall not be quenched/it shall not return.’

DIVISION

1-2 Address to Ezekiel

3-5 Announcement of Judgement

6-7 Anguish at Impending Doom

ADDRESS TO EZEKIEL (1-2)

This is a new oracle for it begins with the prophetic word formula ‘and the word of the Lord came unto me, saying.’ This frames it as a direct revelation from YHWH and makes clear that the message does not express Ezekiel’s own thoughts and opinions but has divine authority.

By addressing Ezekiel with the customary description ‘Son of Adam’ YHWH emphasises the prophet’s humanity in contrast to the divine status of the Lord who is communicating with him. YHWH issues three instructions to Ezekiel:

  • set thy face toward Jerusalem – This means that Ezekiel is to either totally focus on Jerusalem or to speak the oracle while facing in the direction of the city. ‘Set thy face toward’ sounds confrontational which would accord with ”I am against thee’ in v.3.
  • drop thy word toward the holy places – ‘drip/drop/trickle the word’ means ‘preach.’ It is quite shocking that Ezekiel is to condemn the Temple. The expression ‘the holy places’ could refer to sanctuaries of false worship but more likely refers to the holy places in the Jerusalem temple and thus to the Temple itself. For YHWH to condemn his own temple is a radical step. The Jews reckoned it was the inviolable dwelling place of YHWH and that belief gave them a (false) sense of security (Jer 7:4).
  • prophesy against the land of Israel – In v.2 the target of Ezekiel’s prophecy of doom is explicitly named as Jerusalem and the ‘land of Israel.’ Together these equal ‘the south’ of the previous oracle (20:45-49).

The mention of Israel’s city, sanctuary and soil (cf. same triad in Psa 79:1) shows that YHWH’s condemnation is total; his judgement will include everything – political, religious and territorial.

ANNOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT (3-5)

‘The land of Israel is repeated’ for emphasis. Ezekiel, speaking in Babylon to the Jewish exiles there, prophesies death and devastation upon the homeland.

I am against thee – It is rather frightening that the covenant God of Israel who once said ‘I will walk among you, and will be your God, and ye shall be my people.’ (Lev 26:12) has now become their adversary. He is not only hostile, he is about to become their attacker. YHWH intends to draw his sword from its sheath (this is stated 3 times; vv. 3, 4, 5) and with it ‘cut off…the righteous and the wicked’ (repeated). Moshe Greenberg (1997, Ezekiel 21-37. Anchor Bible, p.420) observes: ‘righteous and wicked. Or: innocent and guilty; a merism for “everybody.” Yet the choice of these terms rather than, say, “young and old” implies that punishment will not discriminate between those who do and those who do not deserve to die.’

The sword, representing the Babylonian army, is said to be YHWH’s sword. The Babylonians are his instruments, just as the Assyrians had also been (Isa 10:5). Various expressions in verses 3, 4 and 5 emphasise that the horrific punishment will be inescapable – ‘the righteous and the wicked;’ ‘all flesh;’ ‘from the south to the north.’ War does not discriminate between the upright and the corrupt.

V.5 maintains that the ultimate purpose of YHWH’s reckoning with Jerusalem/Judah is that the world at large will recognise that YHWH is acting according to his holy character. He will not tolerate sin. He has drawn his sword from its scabbard and will not return it again (cf. 2 Sam 1:22) – at least not until its work is finished (cf. v.30 – an imperative – lit ‘return it to its sheath!). YHWH will not relent, punishment is coming.

ANGUISH AT THE IMPENDING DOOM (6-7)

No doubt Ezekiel found it distressing to relay such a message of doom but YHWH then orders him to dramatize his anguish in the presence of the exiles. He is not to hide his feelings but moan or groan loudly in despair. ‘Broken loins’ stands for emotional breakdown – the loins (central part of the body including hips and lower back) were regarded as the seat of a person’s strength (cf. Isa 21:3). ‘Bitterness’ is bitter anguish or extreme grief. When they ask: ‘Why are you groaning?’ he is to tell them that he is mourning because of the news report that is certainly coming, viz., the soon coming judgement that will affect everyone in Jerusalem and the land of Israel. When the exiles hear the report from Jerusalem about the Babylonian army and the fall of the city their physical and psychological reaction will be similar to Ezekiel’s.

Every heart will melt, and all hands will be feeble; every spirit will faint, and all knees will be weak as water. Ezek 21:7 ESV

A different interpretation is that Ezekiel is describing the reaction in Jerusalem and the land of Israel to the Babylonian invasion (rather than that of the exiles in Babylon to news of it). The Christian Standard Bible, for example, translates what is literally ‘all knees shall flow with water’ (v.7) as all knees will run with urine. This would then refer to the paralysing fear and failure of courage that will be experienced by all in the homeland; graphically described by undignified image of people losing control of their bodily functions through sheer terror.

The oracle ends with an affirmation by the ‘Sovereign Lord’ (Adonai YHWH) that this is a certainty – behold, it cometh, and shall be brought to pass, saith the Lord GOD. This will definitely happen. In the two oracles that follow in chapter 21 Ezekiel prophesies in greater detail about YHWH’s sword.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 20:45-49 – The Oracle Concerning Judgement on the Negev

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In the Hebrew Bible this section is numbered as Ezekiel 21:1-5 but in most English translations it is 20:45-49. I follow the English chapter and verse arrangement.

Having closed the oracle about Israel’s historical rebellion (20:1-44) with a prophecy of restoration after purification and judgement Ezekiel gives a brief message about that impending judgement using a parable of a forest fire. This serves as an introduction to three oracles concerning the sword in chapter 21, which elaborate on the theme of judgement.

DIVISION

45-47a YHWH’s instructions to Ezekiel.

47b-48 Parable of the forest fire.

49 The complaint

EXPOSITION

YHWH’S INSTRUCTIONS TO EZEKIEL (45-47a)

Although covered by the date given in 20:1 the prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ in 20:45 lets us know that this is a fresh revelation. In the new prophetic oracle Ezekiel shifts from the plain-speaking of his previous message to vivid metaphor.

Addressing Ezekiel by the usual term ‘Son of Adam’ (emphasising mortality) YHWH in v.46 issues a threefold instruction to Ezekiel about the South, i.e. the Negev:

set thy face toward the south (tēymān),
and drop thy word toward the south (dārôm),
and prophesy against the forest of the south field (neg̱eb).

In this verse, whether for variety or literary effect, Ezekiel employs three different words meaning ‘South.’

Ezekiel is told to ‘set his face’ toward tēymān. He was to focus attention on the south, or perhaps literally speak while facing southwards (cf. 6:2; 13:17). Tēymān means ‘that which lies on the right hand,’ referring to the direction lying to the right of a person facing east. Sweeney (2013, Reading Ezekiel, p.107) points out that it is a term that generally means “south,” but has later come to designate Yemen in Hebrew. Here it refers to the southern region of Judah.

Ezekiel is to ‘drip or drop the word;’ which is a figurative term meaning to speak a prophetic utterance on behalf of YHWH (21:2; Amos 7:16). He is to preach to Darom, another word meaning south. He is also to prophesy against the forest of the Negev field. Although Negev is a general word for south it is also the name of a specific wilderness area south of Judea. ‘Field’ is used here in the sense of ‘territory’ rather than a relatively small expanse of agricultural land (e.g. Gen 14:7; 32:3). Since the Negev is a wilderness area ‘forest’ probably signifies population rather than trees and brush. By ‘south’ Ezekiel is therefore referring to the southern parts of the Holy Land, as 21:2 clarifies.

Why does Ezekiel say ‘south?’ He may be thinking in terms of Israel’s internal geography – Judah, Jerusalem and the Negev lay in the southern part of the Promised Land. Or, although Judah technically lay southwest of Babylon, Ezekiel may be thinking of Judah as ‘the south’ from his own perspective in Babylon. H. L. Ellison (1956, Ezekiel: The Man And His Message, P.84 ) gives an interesting explanation:

Ezekiel is told to “set his face toward the south,” for though Judea lay to the west of Tel-abib, Ezekiel has been transported in spirit to the Chaldean army, which is now marching south from Carchemish and the Euphrates.

The triple reference to the south draws attention to the fact that YHWH’s judgement will fall on Judah. Ezekiel is to communicate this to ‘the forest of the Negev,’ calling it to attention with the saying ‘Hear the word of YHWH’ followed by ‘Thus says my Lord YHWH.’ KJV translates ‘Adonai YHWH’ as ‘the Lord God.’ ’aḏōnāy means ‘my Lord.’

PARABLE OF THE FOREST FIRE (47b-48)

The short parable now unfolds. YHWH intends to destroy the forest by fire and everything will perish. The fire will be unstoppable – ‘shall not be quenched’ is repeated.

  • The forest stands for Judah’s population.
  • The trees are individual people.
  • ‘Every green tree…every dry tree.’ The green trees are the righteous people and the dry trees are the wicked. God’s judgement will fall on all without distinction – everyone will be affected by the coming Babylonian invasion.
  • The fire (cf. Isa 9:18-19) is a symbol of judgement by war. The Babylonian army will sweep through Judah like a forest fire.
  • The ‘flaming flame’ (the flame of the flaming brightness) indicates the strongest possible flame.
  • ‘All faces’ – every single thing (person) in the forest.
  • ‘from the south to the north.’ – comprehensive scope, the whole land will suffer.
  • ‘Shall not be quenched’ – the judgement is unstoppable and irreversible.

(v.48) And all flesh shall see that I the LORD have kindled it: it shall not be quenched.

This verse is the climax of the oracle. YHWH takes full responsibility for kindling the fire. The judgement is public and will be seen by the entire world. Everyone will realise that it has come from YHWH. He is the ultimate cause, the Babylonians are his instruments.

THE COMPLAINT (49)

In this verse Ezekiel interjects with his own thoughts on the reaction of his fellow-exiles to the oracle. It is in the form of a short prayer in which he laments the fact that they have ridiculed him and dismissed him as being someone who just spins riddles. They claimed that his words are too obscure. That they misunderstood (perhaps deliberately) sets the scene for chapter 21 in which YHWH speaks plainly in three oracles about the sword that was coming against Judah.

SUMMATION

In a section which provides confirmation that Ezekiel was a speaking prophet as well as one who wrote we learn that a severe and comprehensive judgement is coming upon an area that lies to the south of the prophet – this can be identified as the Negev – the southern part of Judea. Ezekiel uses the metaphor of a forest fire that consumes everything (green tree and dry tree) as it spreads unchecked to communicate the idea of overwhelming judgement. All the nations will see the devastation and realise that it has been sent by YHWH. The people to whom Ezekiel communicated the oracle failed to take God’s word seriously; dismissing it as a riddle rather than a real threat. That response sets the stage for the three sword oracles of chapter 21 which proclaim the coming judgement in plain language.

Posted in Exposition

History Repeats Itself – According To An Oracle Spoken On 14 August, 591 BCE (Ezekiel 20:1-44)

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 20 opens with the ‘elders of Israel’ approaching the prophet Ezekiel with an inquiry. YHWH, however, refuses to answer their question (vv.3, 31) and instead instructs Ezekiel to ‘judge’ them by presenting a historical review spanning many centuries. It reveals a cycle of rebellion against YHWH; with each generation repeating the sins of the one before. The review emphasizes that despite repeated provocations, YHWH withheld punishment in order to prevent the profanation of his ‘name’ by the surrounding nations. The latter part of the oracle shifts from reviewing Israel’s past to predicting its future – one that will involve judgement, purification and restoration.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

The oracle in Ezekiel 20:1-44 is time-stamped the tenth day of the fifth month of the seventh year (of the exile of King Jehoiachin, 1:2) which equates to 14 August 591 BCE. This date applies not only to the oracle concerning Israelite history in 20:1-44 but to all oracles up to 23:49:

  • 20:45-49 The oracle concerning judgement on the Negev
  • 21:1-7 The first oracle concerning YHWH’s sword
  • 21:8-17 The second oracle concerning YHWH’s sword
  • 21:18-32 The third oracle concerning YHWH’s sword
  • 22:1-16 The oracle concerning bloodshed in Jerusalem
  • 22:17-22 The oracle concerning the smelting of Jerusalem
  • 22:23-31 The oracle concerning the leaders and people of Jerusalem
  • 23:1-49 The oracle concerning two adulterous sisters – Aholah and Oholibah

The date lends authenticity to Ezekiel’s record of his prophecies and helps us follow the chronology. It also anchors the relevant oracles in a precise historical period; a time of major political upheaval. By 591 BCE the Kingdom of Judah was in disarray. The first wave of deportations to Babylon had already taken place in 597 BCE; that involved the exile of King Jehoiachin and many leading citizens of Jerusalem (including Ezekiel himself). Zedekiah, a puppet king installed by Nebuchadnezzar, was in the process of shifting Judah’s political allegiance so rebellion against Babylon loomed. The elders of the Jehoiachin exiles in Babylon who approached Ezekiel likely sought divine guidance about their future amid this uncertainty.

STRUCTURE

Ezekiel chapter 20 has been divided in many ways. The most basic division is:

  • 1-32 A review of Israel’s past
  • 32-44 A prediction of Israel’s future

I suggest the following:

1-4 PREAMBLE

  • 1-4 The elders’ inquiry and YHWH’s refusal

5-32 ISRAEL’S HISTORY OF REBELLION

  • 5-9 The slave generation in Egypt
  • 10-17 The first generation in the wilderness
  • 18-26 Later generations in the wilderness
  • 27-29 The generation in the Promised Land
  • 30-32 The present generation (Ezekiel’s day) in exile

33-44 ISRAEL’S POST-EXILIC FUTURE

  • 33-39 Judgement
  • 40-44 Restoration

EXPOSITION

1-4 PREAMBLE -THE ELDERS’ INQUIRY AND YHWH’S REFUSAL

The chapter commences with a preamble that sets the historical context and the immediate circumstances that occasioned this oracle. The date is given as the 10th day of the 5th month of the 7th year [of the Jehoiachin exile]. This date equates to 14 August, 591 BCE. According to Jeremiah 52:12-13 it was on this same date five years later that the Temple was destroyed (although the author/editor of Kings dates the destruction to the 7th day, 2 Kgs 25:8-9). The 591 BCE date in 20:1 covers all content up to Ezekiel 23:49. Ezekiel supplies dates at 1:1; 3:6; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 26:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:1; 32:17; 33:21 and 40:1 – each date signals a new batch of oracles.

On 14 August 591 BCE Ezekiel received a visit, presumably at his house, from some of the ‘elders of Israel.’ This was the third time they had come to see him (8:1; 14:1; 20:1). In 8:1 they are called the ‘elders of Judah’ whereas in 14:1 and 20:1 they are called the ‘elders of Israel.’ Ezekiel seems to have used these two terms interchangeably.

The elders sat before Ezekiel (cf. 2 Kgs 6:32), having come to inquire of YHWH. We are not told what their query was but some scholars speculate, on the basis of 20:32, that they may have wished to set up some image or other representation of YHWH in Babylon. YHWH emphatically refused to give an answer to their query (20:3, 31), using the negative oath formula ‘As I live…I will not.’

While they sat there, however, he gave Ezekiel a new revelation and instructed him to arraign (formally accuse) the elders and recount the offensive practices of their ancestors. The instruction in v.4 is an exclamation in the form of a rhetorical double question ‘Wilt thou judge… wilt thou judge?’ The question is so strong that it constitutes a command. For other examples of double questions see Num 24:5; 1 Sam 2:27-28; 2 Sam 1:25-27. The expression ‘wilt thou judge?’ occurs also in Ezekiel 22:2 and 23:36.

5-32 ISRAEL’S HISTORY OF REBELLION

GENERAL REMARKS

The message from YHWH moves from generation to generation showing that Israelite history is marked by rebellion against him. It is interesting to compare Ezekiel 20 with Psalm 106. Both chapters present a review of Israel’s history divided into similar periods: the time in Egypt, the wilderness generation, the next generation in the wilderness and the generation in the land of Canaan. Whereas the psalm adheres fairly closely to the historical details given in the Pentateuch Ezekiel’s review is general. In reference to the first generation in the wilderness, for example, Psalm 106:14-21 lists a succession of events but Ezekiel 20:22-26 just makes a general statement; to the effect that the Israelites rebelled against YHWH, failed to observe his statutes and judgements and profaned the sabbaths.

This oracle receives much attention from scholars because Ezekiel’s review not only leaves out historical events in the Pentateuchal accounts but also adds historical information that is not found elsewhere in the Bible, for example:

  • that YHWH revealed himself to the Israelites in Egypt, v.5
  • that the Israelites in Egypt received a directive from YHWH not to worship Egyptian idols but rejected it, v.7
  • that YHWH made this speech to the children of Israel in the wilderness, vv.18-20
  • that YHWH gave the Israelites laws that were ‘not good.’
  • that Joshua’s generation in the Promised Land was particularly idolatrous, v.28

Notice the use of repetition in this message; the following themes recur:

  • YHWH swearing a divine oath – ‘I lifted up my hand,’ e.g. 5, 6, 15, 23.
  • ‘I am the Lord,’ e.g. 5, 7, 12, 19, 20, 26, 38, 42, 44.
  • Israel’s rebellion, e.g. 8, 13, 21.
  • A threat of divine fury, e.g. 8, 13, 21
  • YHWH’s restraint – ‘I acted for the sake of my name,’ e.g. 9, 14, 22, 44
  • pollute, polluted – e.g. 9,13,14, 16, 21, 22, 24, 26, 30, 31, 39
  • A reference to Leviticus 18:5, ‘which if a man do, he shall even live in them,’ e.g. 11, 13, 21.
  • The sabbath(s), 13, 16, 21, 24
  • ‘My’ – more than 40 times – e.g. YHWH speaks of my hand, fury, anger, name, statutes, judgements, sabbaths, eye, holy mountain, holy name.

THE SLAVE GENERATION IN EGYPT (5-9)

YHWH recalls the day when he ‘chose’ the Israelites to be his people; revealing himself to them in Egypt. The language of swearing an oath (‘lifted up my hand’ – twice in v.5 and again in v.6) makes it clear that he established a covenant with ‘the house of Jacob’ (cf. Exod 6:8); promising to be their God and bring them out of Egypt into a special land (‘flowing with milk and honey’) that he had ‘sought out’ (cf. Deut 1:33) for them. This land is described (6, 15) as the ‘ornament’ (KJV, ‘glory’ i.e. fairest) of all lands (see also Jer 3:19; Dan 8:9; 11:16, 41, 45).

Verse 5 contains the only occurrence of the verb ‘chose’ in Ezekiel. Deut 7:7-8 makes it clear that the election of Israel was the result of God’s initiative and love and not based on the nation’s merit. ‘I am the Lord ‘ is used frequently in Ezekiel but ‘I am the Lord your God’ only occurs in chapter 20 (5, 7,19, 20); emphasising the exclusive nature of the relationship between YHWH and Israel. He is not just God but Israel’s God.

The implications of Israel’s election as the people of YHWH included the command to cast away ‘the abominations of the eyes’ (things that looked good but were offensive). This is a reference to the idols of Egypt for which Ezekiel uses one of his favourite derogatory words (gillûlîm – dung-gods). Of the 48 occurrences of the word in the Old Testament 39 are in Ezekiel, and 7 of those are in chapter 20 (7, 8, 16, 18, 24, 31, 39). In v.7 we learn that the Israelites in Egypt received a directive from YHWH not to worship Egyptian idols but rejected it (cf. Josh 24:14).

YHWH’s initial reaction was to destroy them in Egypt (v.8) but acting for the sake of his ‘name’ (reputation) lest it be profaned among the nations he witheld punishment. This is because the heathen would have drawn the conclusion that Israel’s God did not have the power to carry out his stated intentions.

This rebellion in Egypt set the pattern for the remainder of Israel’s history. Ezekiel will outline a cycle of divine grace, followed by human rebellion and YHWH’s gracious restraint.

THE FIRST GENERATION IN THE WILDERNESS (10-17)

Having brought the people out of Egypt into the wilderness (Exod 12-18) YHWH gave them statutes and laws at Sinai (Exod 19-31). They were expected to adhere to these regulations which were given for their well-being – ‘which if a man do, he shall even live in them.’ This comment relating to ‘statutes and judgements’ is a reference to Leviticus 18:5. Ezekiel repeats this in vv. 13 and 21. There are also many allusions to Lev 18:5 in Ezekiel chapter 18 (18:9, 13, 17,19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 32) and in chapter 33 (33:10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19).

The gift of the sabbaths (refers to the weekly sabbath but possibly includes the other holy days) as a sign between YHWH and Israel is highlighted in v.12. Verse 12 is a repetition of Exodus 31:13 which refers exclusively to the weekly sabbath. The Sabbath is a weekly reminder that YHWH has set the nation apart. Ezekiel refers to desecration of the sabbaths in 20:13, 16, 21, 24 and in 22:8, 26; 23:38.

In spite of YHWH’s gifts the ‘house of Israel’ rebelled against him (see Exod 32:1-6; Num 25:1-3) in the wilderness (v.13); disregarding his statutes, rejecting his judgements and profaning the sabbaths (see Exod 16:27; Num 15:32). Once again, acting for the sake of his name YHWH restrained his anger (vv.14,17). Although he did not destroy them in the desert he swore that he would penalise that rebellious first generation in the wilderness by not allowing them to enter the Promised Land (Num 14:28-30; Deut 2:14). Verse 16 repeats the reasons from v.13 but adds that their rejection of YHWH’s laws and desecration of the sabbath was because their heart went after their idols. According to Amos 5:25 no sacrifices to YHWH were offered during the wilderness wanderings. Again history repeats itself: the familiar cycle of deliverance, rebellion, threatened retribution and divine restraint.

LATER GENERATIONS IN THE WILDERNESS (18-26)

YHWH addressed the descendants of the first generation in the desert and warned them not to follow the sinful example of their fathers who had rejected YHWH’s laws and worshipped idols. These Israelites who had grown up in the wilderness were commanded to keep YHWH’s statutes and judgements and honour the sabbaths – the latter an acknowledgement that YHWH was their God (‘I am the Lord your God’) and a reminder of his covenant with them.

The pattern of rebellion continued. The next wilderness generations behaved exactly like their fathers and again YHWH thought to pour out his wrath upon them only to relent (‘withdrew mine hand’) for the sake of his ‘name.’

Nevertheless, at that stage, even when they had not yet entered the land of promise, YHWH swore an oath that rebellion would result in exile and dispersal from that land. Verse 24 views exile as just punishment for law-breaking, sabbath-breaking and idolatry.

Verses 25-26 are probably the most difficult verses in the book of Ezekiel. Referring to the threat of exile because of their sin YHWH says that for that reason he gave them ‘statutes that were not good and judgements whereby they should not live; and …polluted them in their own gifts.’ Exactly what these hostile actions involved is unclear; apparently giving Israel laws that were ‘not good,’ failed to give life and defiled the people was designed to devastate them so that they might know that YHWH is the Lord.

Many interpretations have been proposed, for example:

  • God ‘gave’ has been interpreted in terms of a judicial sentence similar to ‘giving up’ or ‘giving over’ in the New Testament (e.g. Acts 7:42; Rom 1:24; 2 Thess 2:11) or to the hardening of Pharoah’s heart (Exod 4:21) . The idea is that God permitted them to follow their own desires and let them suffer the consequences of their own sin.
  • That Ezekiel as a priest was unhappy with the change to the law of Lev 17:1-9 (about profane slaughter) brought about in Deut 12:15-25 – in his view a law was ‘not good’ that allowed blood to be ‘poured out on the ground like water’ (Compare Lev 17:13 and Deut 12:16, 24).
  • Verse 26 connects child sacrifice to Molech (’cause to pass through the fire’) with the law of the firstborn. Ezekiel viewed the law of the firstborn (Exod 13:12) as a law that was ‘not good’ because people misinterpreted the command to consecrate the firstborn as a literal instruction to sacrifice children. YHWH allowed the continuation of this practice as punishment for their rebellion and idolatry. This was the means by which YHWH could defile and devastate (appal, fill with horror) the Israelites.
  • Ezekiel was being sarcastic. The Israelites found YHWH’s laws burdensome but because of their rebellion he allowed them to suffer under the even more severe rule of various foreign nations.

THE GENERATION IN THE PROMISED LAND (27-29)

Ezekiel is to speak to the people and recount how that even in the Promised Land the Israelites blasphemed YHWH and broke their commitment to him. Having previously spoken about rebellion (8,13, 21), rejection (13,16, 24) and pollution (13, 16, 21) YHWH now talks about blasphemy and treachery. Verse 28 explains what Ezekiel means by these terms.

Once in the land which YHWH had sworn to give them the Israelites indulged in idolatry; worshipping and sacrificing to pagan gods in elevated locations like ‘high hills’ or under ‘leafy trees’. Notice the repetition of ‘there’ in reference to these locations. This stands in contrast to the use of the word ‘there’ in Deut 12:1-14 to refer to the central sanctuary (the Jerusalem Temple) at ‘the place which the Lord your God shall choose out of all your tribes to place his name there’ (Deut 12:5).

…and they offered there their sacrifices, and there they presented the provocation of their offering: there also they made their sweet savour, and poured out there their drink offerings. Ezekiel 20:28

Scholars see a pun, joke or wordplay in v.29. Then I said unto them, What is the high place whereunto ye go? I have read several explanations of this, for example:

The Hebrew word for high place is bāmāh. Ba can mean ‘go’ and mah means ‘what/where,’ so bāmāh sounds like these two Hebrew words joined together to say ‘go where? Ezekiel turns the term for ‘high place’ into a mocking question from YHWH: ‘You’re going …where?’

or

‘YHWH sarcastically refers to the high places (Heb., bamah) with the pun, “what (Heb., mah) is this high place (Heh., bamah) to which you come (Heb., ba’im, singular ba)? Its name shall be called Bamah until this day.”‘ (Sweeney, Reading Ezekiel, 2013, p.105)

The final statement of v.29 that a high place is called Bamah ‘to this day’ neatly connects the behaviour of an earlier generation with Ezekiel’s generation.

THE PRESENT GENERATION (EZEKIEL’S DAY) IN EXILE (30-32)

Ezekiel is instructed to put rhetorical questions to the ‘house of Israel,’ represented by the elders who had come to him for a revelation: Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers? and commit ye whoredom after their abominations? For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even unto this day: and shall I be inquired of by you, O house of Israel? Ezekiel 20:30-31

YHWH was expressing surprise that those who offer sacrifices at the high places, practice child sacrifice and defile themselves with all their idols should dare to imagine that they could receive a revelation. Nothing has changed since the time when Israel was ‘chosen’ (v.5). every generation has been idolatrous. Therefore YHWH is not interested in their inquiry and categorically refuses to be consulted (see also v.3).

In v.32 YHWH reveals to the elders the thoughts that rose up their own minds. They had decided to be like the heathen in lands throughout the earth and serve wood and stone. They wanted to be idolaters.

33-44 ISRAEL’S POST-EXILIC FUTURE

JUDGEMENT (33-39)

In this section YHWH, using the oath formula ‘as I live,’ declares his intention to judge and purify Israel and rule over the nation as a powerful king – ‘with a mighty hand and with a stretched out arm’. This will involve severe judgement – ‘with fury poured out’ – v.33 repeated in v.34.

He speaks in v.34 about bringing Israel out from the people and countries in which they are scattered. This may be a commitment to bring the nation out of exile but the verses that follow would suggest that a spiritual leading out is in view rather than a physical. Just as he did with their ancestors in a literal sense (v.36) YHWH will bring them out into a wilderness – of the people (severing them from the heathen nations) -and lead them through another wilderness experience. There he will contend with them face to face and cause them to ‘pass under the rod’ and bring them into ‘the bond of the covenant.’ The rod is thought to be a shepherd’s rod under which sheep passed to be counted and scrutinised (cf. Jer 33:14) and ‘the bond’ to mean the discipline of the covenant.

Just like the generation in the wilderness that was denied entrance to the Promised Land (v.15) so the ‘rebels’ (i.e. idolaters) among the exiles will be purged. Many of those who had been taken into exile would not return home to Judah. To the rebels who would not acknowledge him YHWH says in v.39: ‘Just get on with your idolatry.’ He ironically tells them to fully commit to idol worship and stop mixing idol worship with worship of YHWH. This syncretism profanes YHWH’s holy name.

RESTORATION (40-44)

Having established Israel’s cycle of rebellion and exposed their idolatry and hypocrisy YHWH now reveals that there will be a future restoration – not because Israel deserves that, but in order that his name be vindicated. YHWH will bring the nation out of dispersion (v.41) and into the land that he had sworn to give to their ancestors (v.42). In that land the whole nation would serve him on ‘the holy mountain, the mountain of the height of Israel’ (i.e. Mt. Zion). There they would bring their offerings which would be accepted as a pleasing aroma.

When this new Exodus happens (v.42) the nation will finally recognise YHWH’s identity (‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’), remember their past failings and loathe themselves for all the evils they have committed. This restoration will involve owning up to their sin – true repentance brings spiritual transformation. YHWH ends the oracle by saying once more ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’ He will not act in this way because of their worthiness, for they have been wicked and corrupt and deserve to perish. YHWH will restore them solely for the sake of his own name.

In the Hebrew Bible Ezekiel chapter 20 ends at verse 44.

Posted in Exposition

A Lament for the Princes of Israel: Ezekiel 19:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 19:1-14

CHAPTER DIVISION

1-9 THE ALLEGORY OF A LIONESS AND HER CUBS

10-14 THE ALLEGORY OF AN UPROOTED VINE

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 19 continues the oracle of YHWH about ‘the land of Israel’ which commenced at 18:2. Ezekiel, instructed by YHWH, now presents a powerful lamentation for the ‘princes of Israel.’ The lament is in the form of two allegories: a lioness with her cubs and an uprooted vine. Ezekiel uses these to reflect upon the downfall of the Davidic kings of Judah. As with all parables, not just Ezekiel’s, it is unhelpful to speculate upon the meaning of every small detail. There are a variety of views on what different features of the parables represent.

When composing this dirge Ezekiel may have had in mind Jacob’s blessing upon Judah in Genesis 49. It mentions ‘a lion’s whelp’ and ‘the vine:’

…Judah is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be. Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass’s colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes… Gen 49:9-11

THE ALLEGORY OF A LIONESS AND HER CUBS (1-9)

(1) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to present a lamentation for ‘the princes of Israel.’ A lamentation (qiynāh) is a funeral song, elegy or dirge. The word is first used in 2 Sam 1:17 to describe David’s famous lament for Saul and Jonathan. This one in Ezekiel 19 is the first of six in the book of Ezekiel.

19:1-14 – A lament for Israel’s princes.
26:17 – A lament for Tyre
27:2-31 – A lament for Tyre
27:32-36 – A lament for Tyre
28:12-19 – A lament for the king of Tyre
32:2-16 – A lament for Pharaoh, King of Egypt

The ‘princes of Israel’ refers to the chieftains /rulers of Israel and in particular to the last few Davidic kings of Judah (see 12:10). Ezekiel does not call them kings; possibly to emphasise their subservience to foreign powers. Compare Jeremiah’s sorrowful prophecy about the Davidic kings in Jer 22:10-30.

(2) THE MOTHER LIONESS

Several words for lion occur in this passage: leḇiyyā’ – lioness; ’aryēh – lion (the animal); kep̱iyr – a lion, young lion (i.e. fierce).

Many commentators view the lioness as pointing to Judah (cf. Gen 49:9; Num 23:24; 24:9; Isa 29:1 – Ariel means lion of God; Rev 5:5) and her cubs as representing the royal house of Judah. In this allegory Judah the lioness lay down among other lions (the superpowers) and reared her cubs (the royal house) among young lions (the surrounding nations).

Others maintain that the reference is to Hamutal, a wife of King Josiah, whom the prophet Jeremiah referred to as queen [mother] in Jer 13:18. She was the mother of two of the last four kings of Judah; Jehoahaz (2 Kgs 23:31) and Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24:18; Jer 52:1).

(3-4) THE FIRST LION CUB

The mother lion raised her cubs in a politically dangerous environment. One in particular grew into a young lion and learned how to catch prey and devour men i.e. grew fierce and aggressive like those around it. The first lion cub is usually identified as Jehoahaz, son of Josiah and Hamutal (2 Kgs 23:31-34). The people chose him to succeed his father at age twenty-three but after a reign of just three months in 609 BCE ‘the nations also heard of him; he was taken in their pit (trap), and they brought him with chains (hooks) unto the land of Egypt.’ Jehoahaz was deported to Egypt by Pharoah Necho and his vassals, there he died. ‘Pit’ and ‘hook’ are vivid images that relate to the capture of wild animals. Despite his predatory nature Jehoahaz was easily subdued by Egypt.

(5-9) THE SECOND LION CUB

Disappointed by the fate of the first cub the mother (i.e. Judah), in desperation, took ‘another cub’ and reared him as young lion (i.e. to be aggressive). Some suggest that the second cub jointly represents Jehoiakim (605-598 BCE) and his son Jehoiachin (3 months in 597 BCE), 2 Kgs 24:8). Jehoiakim, however, was not chosen by the people of Judah but was installed by Pharaoh Necho as a puppet ruler. In addition, since Jehoiakim was not deported to Babylon but died at Jerusalem (Jer 22:18-19), it seems more likely that Ezekiel bypasses him and in this parable speaks of his son Jehoiachin (2 Kgs 24:8-16).

According to vv. 6-7 Jehoiachin too took his place among the other young lions (kings) and was ruthless, rapacious and cruel. His cruelty was not just exercised abroad but at home in Judah where he ‘knew’ (i.e. dishonoured) the nation’s defenceless widows (almanot) and laid towns to waste. Regarding widows, this may mean either that he made many women widows or that he took the wives of men he had killed into his harem. Instead of ‘widows’ many translations read ‘palaces’ (armonot), thus referring to the destruction of fortified citadels. The two words are textually similar. In either case the picture is one of ruin and desolation brought about by Jehoiachin’s oppressive rule. His ‘roaring’ represents the terror he inspired among his subjects,

As with the first cub, the nations (under Nebuchadnezzar’s rule) attacked and subjugated Jehoiachin – the net was spread over him, he was trapped in their pit, put in a cage in chains and sent to Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon, where he was imprisoned (Ezekiel was one of the aristocracy deported along with him at this time – 597 BCE). The result of the deportation was ‘that his voice should no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel.’ Jehoiachin’s rule, therefore, was brought to an end and his growl wasn’t heard again. Jehoiachin was released (2 Kgs 25:27-30) soon after the death of Nebuchadnezzar some thirty-seven years later but by that time any hope of his restoration to the throne of Judah in Jerusalem was long gone. He died in Babylon.

Note: The phrase ‘mountains of Israel’ occurs 17 times in the book of Ezekiel. See my previous post AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO THE MOUNTAINS OF ISRAEL – EZEKIEL 6:1-14. Ezekiel chapter 36:1-38 contains another oracle, this time of blessing, addressed to ‘the mountains of Israel.’

THE ALLEGORY OF AN UPROOTED VINE (10-14)

(10) The allegory now changes from a lion to a vine. The image of the nation as a vine is a common one (e.g. Psa 80; Isa 5) and Ezekiel has already used it twice: see: Ezekiel’s Vine Allegory: a Prophecy about Jerusalem – 15:1-8 and Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine. Most commentators agree that ‘in your blood’ (dam) is meaningless so there are many conjectures as to what Ezekiel might actually have meant. Some suggestions are:

  • ‘Blood’ refers to the juice of the grape therefore Ezekiel was thinking of sap, thus ‘full of vigour.’ Wine and the blood of grapes is mentioned also in Jacob’s blessing of Judah in Gen 49:11.
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘rest,’ thus Darby.
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘life.’
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘freshness.’
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘bloodline,’ thus NKJB
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘vineyard,’ thus HCSB, ESV, NASB, NIV, NRSV, NCV
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘fruitfulness.’
  • dam (blood) ought to read dama (to be like) thus ERV 1885 gives ‘in thy likeness’ as a marginal reading.

‘Your mother is a vine.’ Again, the mother is likely to represent the nation of Israel/Judah which has produced the kings. The description of a vine ‘planted by the waters’ (17:5,8) and ‘fruitful and full of branches’ evokes a time of prosperity, perhaps alluding to the reigns of David and Solomon which were considered a golden age, when Israel was strong and enjoyed God’s favour and blessings.

(11) The vine sent out strong shoots or branches that were suitable for rulers’ sceptres and its stature was exalted among the thick branches (lit. ‘thicket of clouds,’ see 31:3,10,14). This suggests that Judah produced powerful kings and was prominent among the nations.

(12) Verse 12, which is similar to 17:10, prophesies the violent end of the vine. ‘Plucked up in fury and cast to the ground’ signifies the wrath of God; his judgement upon Judah resulting in the fall of Jerusalem and the end of the Davidic monarchy. The ‘east wind’ symbolises a destructive force, in this case an invading army that brings destruction and ruin. The drying up of its fruit represents the economic strain caused by the annual payment of huge sums in tribute to Babylon. The withering and consumption by fire of its ‘strong rods’ represent the desolation of the land, the death or exile of its leaders (the kings and nobles), and the widespread suffering of the people. Most likely Zedekiah’s reign and the final siege and destruction of Jerusalem are in view.

(13) The tall luxuriant vine planted by the waters has been forcibly uprooted and now finds itself transplanted in a dry and thirsty wilderness. This verse looks forward to the Babylonian Captivity (586-538 BCE) that began when a significant portion of the Judean population was deported to Babylonia by Nebuchadnezzar after the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BCE. However, it also describes the current situation of Ezekiel and the Jehoiachin exiles who had already been exiled to Babylon in 597 BCE.

(14) This verse further emphasises complete destruction. It is possible that the phrase ‘fire is gone out of a rod of her branches’ alludes either to internal conflict and corruption or to the devastation that was accelerated by the actions of one of the kings (referred to as ‘a rod’). One instantly thinks of Zedekiah’s breach of covenant and rebellion against Babylon (see 17:18).

There is ‘no strong rod to be a sceptre to rule’—the outcome is final and definitive. This statement effectively declares Judah’s demise as a sovereign state. The line of Davidic kings has come to a sad end.

The elegy formally closes with the words: ‘This is a lamentation, and shall be for a lamentation.’ Some of the details in the lament had already come to pass and some had yet to be fulfilled. This, therefore, is a lamentation for what has already happened and it will serve as a lamentation for what will soon happen.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel 19 laments the tragic downfall of the Davidic monarchy and the kingdom of Judah. It attributes this destruction not merely to external enemies, but to internal corruption and the unrighteousness of its own kings; who ultimately brought ruin upon themselves and the nation through cruelty and poor leadership. The lament emphasises the severe consequences of sin and the utter devastation that divine justice and judgement bring about.

Posted in Exposition

No More Sour Grapes! – Ezekiel chapter 18

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In Ezekiel 18 YHWH addresses, through the prophet, a common proverb (v.2) which is circulating among the exiles in Babylon. Two other proverbs (vv.19, 25) that express popular opinion are also quoted but they are not the main concern.

This chapter is usually classified as a disputation speech. Sweeney (2013, p.93) explains: ‘A disputation speech typically includes three major elements: a premise or thesis to be disputed, an alternative premise or thesis to be supported, and argumentation designed to demonstrate the validity of the alternative premise or thesis…’

Here the thesis is stated in v2—in the form of a proverb which metaphorically maintains that YHWH is unfairly punishing the present generation for the sins of their ancestors. YHWH disputes that and in vv.3-4 states the counter thesis that people suffer because of their own sins (the soul that sinneth, it shall die). The counter thesis is again stated in v.20 but in more detail. The argumentation for the dispute begins at verse 5.

DIVISION

1-4 A False Proverb

5-20 The False Proverb Refuted – Three Practical Examples

  • a) 5-9 A righteous man will surely live
  • b) 10-13 A righteous man’s wicked son will surely die
  • c) 14-17 A wicked man’s righteous son will surely live

21-32 Repentance

A FALSE PROVERB (1-4)

(1) The familiar (some 50 times in Ezekiel) prophetic word formula ‘The word of the Lord came unto me again, saying’ introduces a new section consisting of chapters 18 and 19. The formula claims divine origin for the message and lends it authenticity and authority.

(2) Ezekiel is to draw attention to a popular proverb concerning ‘the land of Israel’ and ask what the people mean by bandying it about. Since Ezekiel is addressing his fellow-exiles it is likely that he means that the proverb is circulating among them in Babylon. We know, however, from the writings of Jeremiah (Jer 31:29; Lam 5:7), that the same proverb was also in use back home in Judah.

The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge. KJV

This proverb expresses the view that children suffer for the sins of their parents or ancestors. It reflects a sense of fatalism and victimhood on the part of the Israelites and a failure to grasp the fact that they themselves are sinful. They blame earlier generations for their current woes and thus do not heed prophetic warnings about the sinfulness of Judah. They have become defensive and seek to deflect responsibility from themselves. In effect they say: ‘It is our fathers who have sinned so why is our homeland under the Babylonian yoke and why are we in exile in Babylon?’ By justifying themselves they proclaim that God is not fair.

(3) Although it is true that the effects of wrongdoing can be felt for several generations thereafter (Exod 20:5) YHWH swears an oath by himself that never again will this illogical and false proverb (that one generation eats sour grapes and a later one has a sour taste in the mouth as a result) be quoted as truth in Israel. The people are to stop saying that their misfortune is inherited. No more sour grapes!

(4) YHWH draws attention (Behold!) to the fact that all souls are his — everyone belongs to him, the son as well as the father. YHWH has the right to punish children as well as parents because everyone is accountable to him — he is not accountable to them. However, he does not do that. He judges every soul (i.e. every person) individually and holds them personally responsible for their own sin. This principle is set out in the Torah (Lev 18:5; Deut 24:16; cf. 2 Kgs 14:6).

Perhaps it ought to be borne in mind that Ezekiel is not dispensing with the idea of national or collective responsibility here but rather expressing it in individualistic terms. Since the nation is made up of individuals it is individuals whom YHWH will personally evaluate.

Righteousness and wickedness are not inherited traits but the result of personal choices. The consequences of an individual’s actions are therefore personal: the soul who sins shall die. Violation of YHWH’s moral and ethical standards will incur the death penalty.

THE FALSE PROVERB REFUTED – THREE PRACTICAL EXAMPLES (5-20)

In these verses YHWH vindicates himself against the accusation that he is unfairly punishing the present generation for the sins of their ancestors. By way of defence and to argue for individual responsibility he uses three case studies. Three scenarios are presented, each about a hypothetical individual. These individuals represent three different generations: a righteous grandfather, a wicked father and a righteous grandson.

A RIGHTEOUS MAN WILL SURELY LIVE (5-9)

Verse 5 begins with the conditional ‘if’—so the argument is presented in case law format. This casuistic legal style is typical of the Holiness Code in Leviticus (chapters 17-26) with which Ezekiel the priest (1:3) was familiar. Notice that he frequently uses the language of Lev 18:4-5 — Ye shall do my judgements, and keep mine ordinances, to walk therein: I am the LORD your God. Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgements: which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the LORD.

  • statutes and judgements are mentioned in Ezek 18:9, 17, 19/21. See also Ezek 5:6-7; 11:12, 20; 20:11, 13, 18, 19 , 21, 25; 36:27; 37:24. (N.B. Ezek 20:11 makes it clear that statutes and judgements is a reference to the entire divine revelation at Mt. Sinai.)
  • The verb live occurs in Ezek 18:9, 13, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 32.
  • if a man do, he shall live in them occurs in Ezek 20:11,13, 21.

Lev 18:5 states that if the Israelites adhere to the stipulations of the covenant they will live. Failure to keep them amounts to covenant breaking (Lev 26:15) and will incur punishment in the form of disease, famine, invasion and exile (Lev 26).

Verse 5 continues from ‘if’ with the words: a man be just, and do that which is lawful and right. The first case study is about a just or righteous man. The argument continues to the end of v.9 where the conclusion is that if a man is just, he will surely live. YHWH states that a just man will do that which is ‘lawful and right.’ This phrase is repeated in vv. 19, 21, 27; see also 33:14, 16, 19; 45:9.

Verses 6-9 list the sorts of things that constitute being ‘righteous’ in the sight of YHWH. These requirements are mainly derived from the Holiness Code in Leviticus (chapters 17-26) and echo principles found in the Ten Commandments. A ‘just’ man:

  • does not eat at the mountain shrines – worshipping false gods. see 18:6, 11, 15; 22:9, cf. 20:28. This is addressed in the first and second commandments, Exod 20:3-4.
  • does not lift up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel. This is addressed in the first and second commandments, Exod 20:3-4. ‘Idols’ is a totally contemptuous term used 38 times in Ezekiel and probably alludes to excrement. It always occurs in the plural and is said to mean ‘dung-gods.’ Found also in 18:12, 15, cf. Deut 4:19.
  • does not defile his neighbour’s wife. Adultery violates the seventh commandment, Exod 20:14, see also Lev 18:20; 20:10; Deut 5:18; 22:22.
  • does not have sexual relations with a menstruating woman. See Lev 15:24; 18:19; 20:18.
  • does not oppress anyone. Lev 19:33; Deut 23:16; Zech 7:10.
  • returns to the debtor his pledge. He gives back what he has received as collateral when someone returns what he had borrowed, Exod 22:26; Deut 24:6, 13.
  • does not rob anyone using violence. Lev 19:13.
  • gives food to those in need. Deut 15:11; 24:19-22; Isa 58:7.
  • gives clothes to those in need. Isa 58:7.
  • does not charge the needy interest (nešek) on loans. Exod 22:25; Lev 25:35-37; Deut 23:19-20;.
  • does not charge the needy increase (tarbiyt) – accrued interest – unjust rates of interest on loans. see Lev 25:35-37.
  • withholds his hand from iniquity in whatever form.
  • judges between individuals impartially. Zech 7:9; 8:16.

Verse 9 sums up a person who lives by these principles as one who observes YHWH’s statutes and judgements and does that which is true (Deut 6:25). On this basis he is legally declared righteous and is therefore allowed to live. This declaration is made by the Lord God.

A RIGHTEOUS MAN’S WICKED SON WILL SURELY DIE (10-13)

The second case study in divine justice concerns a righteous person’s wicked son. Unlike his righteous father (vv.5-9) he turns out to be violent, a robber and commits other sins, something like those previously enumerated in vv.6-8. The wicked son will:

  • eat on the mountains
  • defile his neighbour’s wife
  • oppress the poor and needy
  • not restore the pledge
  • lift up his eyes to idols
  • commit abomination
  • take usury
  • take profit

These sins (vv.11-13) that the wicked man will commit do not exactly match those that his righteous father avoids (vv.6-8) but both lists include similar categories like idolatry, adultery, robbery, usury and oppression of the poor. Notice that v.11 also adds ‘and that doeth not any of those duties.’ This teaches us that sins of omission are every bit as serious in God’s sight as sins of commission.

V.13 asks the question ‘shall he then live? The answer is supplied: ‘he shall surely die’ (suffer the death penalty, cf: Exod 21:12; Lev 20:9, 11,12, 13, 16, 27; Deut 17:6; 21:22). The point is that since the wicked son does things that his righteous father has not done then it cannot be said that the father is at fault because his son has turned out wicked. He will surely die, not because of his father’s sins but because of his own choices. His father’s righteousness will not save him.

A WICKED MAN’S RIGHTEOUS SON WILL SURELY LIVE (14-17)

By way of contrast, the grandson (the next generation) sees his father’s wickedness, takes thought (‘considereth,’ see also v.28), and chooses to be righteous like his grandfather. The crimes that the righteous grandson avoids are listed in vv.15-17a. The list is much the same as that for his grandfather in vv.6-8 but approaching a menstruating woman is left out (see v.6). Verse 17b categorically states that the son will not die for his father’s crimes but will surely live and v.18 repeats (see v.13) that the father would be put to death for his own crimes.

(19-20) These two verses are the climax of YHWH’s argument for the principle of individual responsibility. He anticipates an objection that might be raised by the people about God’s verdict in the third case – that the son has been just so he will live. A righteous person, regardless of his father’s sins, will live but they will say: ‘Why should the son not bear the father’s guilt?’ God/Ezekiel must be mistaken since the people (in their own thinking) are righteous but suffering for the sins of their ancestors.

In v.20 YHWH again states his counter-thesis: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

The person who sins is the one who is subject to the death penalty. The son will not suffer for the iniquity of the father and the father will not suffer for the iniquity of the son. Each person is judged in accordance with his or her own actions. The righteous person is accounted as righteous and the wicked person as wicked. God’s judgement is not inherited (compare Isa 3:10-11).

The implications of this are: a) God’s judgement is personal, not arbitrary b) each person is judged according to his own actions therefore God is not unjust, and c) since God does not punish innocent people for the sins of others the Israelites cannot blame past generations for their present suffering. Their exile is the result of their own sin.

REPENTANCE (21-32)

YHWH now brings up the topic of repentance and describes two situations.

a) The wicked person’s repentance.

But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die. All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live. Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his ways, and live? Ezekiel 18:21-23

The first is that of a wicked person who genuinely decides to give up wrongdoing and instead live a righteous life. Since he abandons his sins and actively follows the ways of YHWH (‘keep my statutes,’ ‘do that which is lawful and right’) he will be treated as righteous and allowed to live. His past transgressions (lit, ‘rebellions’) will not be remembered and he will live (not die a premature physical death).

YHWH asks a rhetorical question in v.23: Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his ways, and live? The implied answer is ‘No!’ God is not a vengeful deity. Divine judgement is a necessary response to wickedness but not something in which YHWH takes delight. That is why he would allow a wicked person who repents to avoid judgement.

b) The righteous person’s reversal.

Verses 24-29 continue with the case of a righteous person who later chooses to embrace evil. Various phrases are used in v.24 (ESV) to describe this reversal:
– turns away from his righteousness
– does injustice
– does the same abominations that the wicked person does
– treachery of which he is guilty
– the sin he has committed

Verse 24b spells out the consequences. None of his righteous deeds will be remembered and he shall die for his sin. Past obedience does not count as credit against future rebellion. He will be sentenced to death for his crimes.

Verse 25 brings us back to the start of the chapter. Still of the opinion that they are suffering because of the sins of a previous generation Ezekiel’s fellow-exiles claim that YHWH is unfair. ‘Not equal’ means ‘biased.’ The verb means to weigh or be equal and was used in connection with weight and measurement. Addressing the people as a group (‘hear now’ is a plural imperative) God responds to the charge that these decisions are unfair by simply restating what he has already said in vv.21-24 in vv.26-28. Notice the double ‘turn away from’ and ‘to do.’

When a righteous person turns away from his righteousness and does injustice, he shall die for it; Ezekiel 18:26 ESV

Again, when a wicked person turns away from the wickedness he has committed and does what is just and right, he shall save his life. Ezekiel 18:27 ESV

(29) In spite of all that the Lord, through Ezekiel, has told them in this oracle the people still maintain that God’s ways are biased. YHWH retorts that it is their ways that are unfair, not his.

(30-32) The chapter concludes with a call to repentance. By arguing that those who repent will live and that those who turn to evil will die YHWH has indicated that the ‘house of Israel’ should accept responsibility for the situation in which they find themselves. He will judge them individually according to their actions so they need to repent and turn away from all their transgressions in order that iniquity will not be their ‘ruin’ (obstacle, stumbling block) i.e. downfall. The imperatives in vv.30-31 are repent, turn away, cast away, make yourselves a new heart… This passage contains one of three references in Ezekiel to ‘a new heart and a new spirit.’

And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them a heart of flesh: Ezekiel 11:19

Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel? Ezekiel 18:31

A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you a heart of flesh. Ezekiel 36:26

In v.32 YHWH reiterates that he has no pleasure in the death of anyone and his final words are both an invitation and a strong warning: ‘turn and live.’

SUMMATION

In this chapter YHWH, speaking through Ezekiel, highlights the responsibility of the nation for the current disaster. His argument demolishes the fatalistic view implied by the proverb in v.2 (The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge?) that they are suffering for the sins of their ancestors. In fact, each person is accountable to YHWH for his or her own choices and actions. Using case studies of hypothetical righteous and wicked individuals across generations YHWH emphasises that those who repent and pursue justice will live, while those who pursue evil will die, regardless of their past. The chapter ends with a statement of YHWH’s desire that everyone should live and ends with a powerful appeal — ‘turn and live’ —designed to motivate the people to make the right choice and repent.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 17:1-24

Background reading:
– King Jehoiachin’s exile to Babylon in 597 BCE, 2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10.
– Zedekiah’s installation as Nebuchadnezzar’s puppet king and his revolt against Babylonian rule, 2 Kgs 24:17-20; 2 Chron 36:11-16.
– The aftermath of Zedekiah’s revolt, 2 Kgs 25:1-30; 2 Chron 36:11-20.

THE ALLEGORY OF TWO EAGLES AND A VINE

DIVISION

1-10 The Imagery of the Allegory
11-21 The Interpretation of the Allegory
22-24 A Message of Hope

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 17 presents two further visions of Ezekiel in the section (chapters 4-24) that contains oracles of warning about the certainty of YHWH’s judgement upon Judah for crimes such as disobedience, violence, exploitation of the poor, foreign alliances and idolatry.

Already in exile in Babylon, Ezekiel prophesied to the people of Israel/Judah in the years leading up to and just after the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by Babylonian forces in 587/6 BCE.

In this chapter Ezekiel addresses the political crisis of the time which was King Zedekiah of Judah’s rebellion against Babylonian rule. This must have occurred about 590 BCE since it prompted Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Jerusalem that began in Zedekiah’s ninth regnal year, 589/8 BCE (Jer 39:1; 52:4; 2 Kgs 25:1).

THE IMAGERY OF THE ALLEGORY 1-10

(1) Ezekiel 17 begins with the standard prophetic word formula ‘and the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ which introduces a new revelation. This formula occurs again in v.11.

(2) As usual YHWH emphasises Ezekiel’s mortality by addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ and then issuing a double command: ‘pose a riddle (ḥiyḏāh) and tell an allegory (māšāl) to the house of Israel.’ The idea of a riddle or enigma is that it is difficult to understand whereas an allegory or fable is something that illuminates the understanding. Greenberg (Ezekiel I-XX, 1983, p. 309) comments: ‘While the two terms appear in parallelism (Ps 49:5, 78:2; Prov 1:6) they are not interchangeable (as Judg 14:12ff and 1 Kings 10:1 show )…’

(3) There follows the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ which cites the origin of the message and claims divine authority (also vv.9, 22).

FIRST GREAT EAGLE

The allegory begins with a great eagle that has powerful wings, long feathers and colourful plumage coming to Lebanon to the top branch of a cedar tree.

Comment – Nešer refers to a large bird of prey and can be translated as either ‘eagle’ or ‘vulture’ depending on the context. Most translations opt for ‘eagle,’ thus emphasising power, speed and dominance. Some scholars reckon that nešer here refers to the Great Griffon Vulture. Translating it thus would emphasise its scavenging behaviour and association with death and desolation.

great wings, long-winged, full of feathers, which had divers colours – a superpower which has widespread domination and influence over many peoples.

Lebanon – to the north of Israel but in the allegory it seems to represent Jerusalem, see v.12.

the highest branch – the aristocracy.

(4-6) Taking off the topmost twig from the highest branch of a cedar tree the eagle carries it to a land of commerce and sets it in a city of merchants. Then it takes a seedling from the ground and plants it in well-irrigated, fertile ground where it grows like a willow tree (a tree that loves water, cf. Isa 44:4). There it grows into ‘a spreading vine of low stature’ which produces branches and shoots and has its roots spread towards the eagle.

COMMENTS – He cropped off the top of his young twigs, carried it into a land of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants. – i.e. deported the king (Jehoiachin) to Babylon. The Babylonians were famous traders (Josh 7:21; Rev 18:10-16).

He took also of the seed of the land – Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah, a native of Judah, as a puppet ruler.

and planted it in a fruitful field; he placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree. – Zedekiah and Judah flourished under Babylonian rule – they were dependent upon Babylonia but the conditions for growth were excellent.

great waters – The Euphrates and the Tigris were the rivers of Babylon (cf. Psa 137).

And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs. – As a vassal state Judah was subservient to the Babylonians but was nevertheless thriving.

Vine – Often used for Israel, e.g. Psa 80:8-15; Isa 5:1-7; Jer 2:21; Hos 10:1.

(7) SECOND GREAT EAGLE

A second eagle with great wings and many feathers is introduced and the vine stretches its roots and branches towards this eagle hoping to obtain sustenance from it.

COMMENTS – The second great eagle is not quite as splendid as the first (cp. v.7a with v.3a). It has great wings and many feathers but they are not as long or colourful as those of the first eagle.

The vine tries to shift its loyalty, it stretches out its roots and branches towards the second eagle. Notice that, whereas in vv.3-5 the first great eagle takes the active role and the vine is passive, in v.7 the second great eagle is passive and the vine is active. It reaches out towards second eagle.

(8) The series of infinitives would suggest that v.8 is recapping the advantages the vine has enjoyed and could continue to enjoy (v.6) under the first eagle (it was planted: to bring forth branches, to bear fruit, to become a goodly vine). This emphasises the foolishness of turning towards the second eagle.

(9-10) Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 22) Ezekiel is told to ask his fellow exiles questions (featuring the words ‘shall it prosper’) and then supply the answers.

Q Shall it prosper? shall he not pull up the roots thereof, and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither?
A it shall wither in all the leaves of her spring, even without great power or many people to pluck it up by the roots thereof.

Q Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? shall it not utterly wither, when the east wind toucheth it?
A it shall wither in the furrows where it grew.

COMMENTS – these questions and answers are designed to show the utter futility of the vine changing its allegiance. The first eagle will uproot the vine (by applying great force) and cause it to wither (rot).

planted – some translations (e.g. NCB; NLT; RSV; NRSV) prefer ‘transplanted’ as the verb šāṯal  can mean either to plant or to transplant. In Ezek chapter 19 this same word is used of a vine’s first planting and again in v.13 of its second planting (transplanting).

east wind – a destructive hot wind (Job 27:21; Isa 27:8; Ezek 19:12; Hos 13:15).

the furrows (v.7 and v.10) – the River Nile and the irrigation canals that branch off from it.

THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ALLEGORY 11-21

(11-12a) In Ezek 17:11 the standard prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ introduces a new revelation that helpfully explains the previous one. Ezekiel is to communicate this to the exiles who are with him in Babylon; here referred to once again as ‘the rebellious house.’ This description occurs 12 times in the book of Ezekiel: 2:5, 6, 8; 3:9, 26, 27; 12:2, 3, 9, 25; 17:12; 24:3.

(12a-21) Explanation:

v.12 Behold, the king of Babylon is come to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and led them with him to Babylon;

COMMENT – Cp. vv. 3-4. The first great eagle is Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, who in 597 BCE besieged Jerusalem (Lebanon) and carried away the Judean king Jehoiachin, with the aristocracy and the elite of the land, to exile in Babylon (see 2 Kgs 24:10-16).

v.13-14 And hath taken of the king’s seed, and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath of him: he hath also taken the mighty of the land: That the kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand.

COMMENT- Cp. vv.5-6. Nebuchadnezzar appointed Zedekiah as his vassal king in Judah (2 Kgs 24:17). As part of this agreement Zedekiah swore an oath of allegiance to Nebuchadnezzar that would also have entailed a commitment to pay an annual tribute to the Babylonians. The Chronicler records that Nebuchadnezzar put him under oath; Zedekiah swore this in the name of YHWH (2 Chron 36:13). If this agreement was honoured Judah would survive and flourish as a Babylonian vassal state, YHWH had confirmed that this would be so in a word addressed to Zedekiah by the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 27:12-15).

vv.15-16 But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and much people. Shall he prosper? shall he escape that doeth such things? or shall he break the covenant, and be delivered? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he broke, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die.

COMMENT – Having decided to revolt against Babylonian rule Zedekiah sent diplomats to Egypt to request military support, which seems to have been forthcoming. Zedekiah then rebelled (2 Kgs 24:20), probably by withholding tribute. This action quickly backfired as Nebuchadnezzar marched on Jerusalem and laid siege to the city.

Echoing v.9 and v.10 YHWH asks ‘Shall he prosper?’ The alliance with Egypt will not work because YHWH is angry that Zedekiah broke the treaty with the Babylonians that was sworn in YHWH’s name. YHWH swears by himself that Zedekiah will die in Babylon.

v.17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company make for him in the war, by casting up mounts, and building forts, to cut off many persons:

COMMENT – Once the Babylonian siege apparatus is set up (ramps and bulwarks) Pharaoh and his army will be of no use (see Ezekiel’s description of Babylonian siege warfare against Tyre in 26:7-11). Jeremiah 37:4-11 indicates that Pharoah did send an army, causing the Babylonians to break the siege of Jerusalem for a short while in order to repulse that threat.

vv.18-19. Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head.

COMMENT – Zedekiah had ‘given his hand’ (this gesture must have meant ‘I promise’ cf. Ezra 30:8; Lam 5:6).

v.19, which I have shown in bold print, is the key verse in the chapter. It is the whole point of the allegory. Zedekiah swore an oath and made a treaty with a secular ruler, but did not honour its terms because he despised the oath (the word ‘oath’ also means ‘curse’). However, he swore it in YHWH’s name so it has religious significance. It is binding. Notice ‘mine oath’ and ‘my covenant.’ The oath and covenant that Zedekiah made with Nebuchadnezzar is also viewed as YHWH’s oath and covenant. Zedekiah violated that agreement and will suffer the consequences. Notice that YHWH himself makes an oath (‘as I live’) to punish Zedekiah.

v.20 predicts Zedekiah’s capture, exile to Babylon and judgement there for violating his duty and v.21 predicts that his soldiers will be pursued and either slain or dispersed. All this without any mention of Nebuchadnezzar! YHWH is in control. Nebuchadnezzar is his agent. Nebuchadnezzar is his instrument.

The fulfilment of these consequences will prove that YHWH indeed has spoken – ye shall know that I the LORD have spoken it.

A MESSAGE OF HOPE 22-24

The first 21 verses of Ezekiel 17 have been about judgement, the closing verses are about restoration. Utilising the earlier imagery of the chapter Ezekiel predicts the restoration of the Davidic line. Many interpret this passage as messianic.

Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 9) Ezekiel prophesies that YHWH will act to take a new tender sprig from the top of the high cedar in Babylon and plant it upon a high and eminent mountain in Israel. There it will thrive and become a place of shade and security for ‘all fowl of every wing.’ All the trees of the field will know that that YHWH has spoken this and has brought it about.

No explanation of this metaphor is given but based on the earlier explanation in the chapter where the top of the twigs represented Jehoiachin then this tender twig (from the top of the high cedar tree in Babylon) that YHWH will plant upon a high mountain in Israel refers to a future king of the Davidic line who will reign in Israel/Judah. Mt. Zion springs immediately to mind but ‘high and eminent mountain’ probably refers to this king’s greatness. He will flourish and be a blessing to all kinds of people – or perhaps v.23b (under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell) implies universal rule. This future Davidic ruler will have worldwide influence and significance (cf. Isa 9:6-7; Jer 23:5-6; Ezek 34:23; 37:24).

Ezekiel may have been hoping for the eventual restoration of King Jehoiachin with whom he was in exile in Babylon. Jehoiachin was released after Nebuchadnezzar’s death in 562 BCE (2 Kgs 25:27-30; Jer 52:3-4) but he was not the fulfilment of the prophecy. Nor was Zerubbabel, a later Governor of Judea under the First Persian Empire, although he was of the Davidic line and his name means ‘seed of Babylon.’

The chapter closes with ‘all the trees of the field’ (i.e. the nations) recognising that it is YHWH who has brought Judah down to nothing and who will restore and exalt the new king. YHWH makes the low high and brings the high low.

PREACTICAL LESSONS FROM EZEKIEL 17

a) The necessity of keeping one’s word. Breaking promises and betraying trust, whether in personal or business relationships or in the political sphere, matters to God. Integrity is important and actions have consequences. Do I honour my commitments, or shift loyalties if it seems more beneficial to do so?

b) The folly of placing dependence upon others rather than God. Zedekiah relied on Egypt’s prowess rather than trust God’s sovereignty. True security lies in trusting God, not others. Am I entangled in worldly alliances?

c) Although we live in uncertain times God is actively working out his purposes in world affairs. No matter how bad a situation seems he is in control. God can reverse national fortunes (bring the high low and make the low high, v.24) and ultimately his plans will prevail.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 16:53-63 – The Surprising Restoration of Jerusalem, Sodom and Samaria

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Verses 53-63 form a conclusion to the allegories in Ezekiel chapter 16: the allegory of Jerusalem as an adulterous wife and the allegory of the sinful sisters. This conclusion is surprising in that, despite Jerusalem’s unfaithfulness and inevitable punishment, Ezekiel declares a plan for her future restoration. Even more surprising is the additional prediction that Jerusalem’s ‘sisters,’ Sodom and Samaria, who have already been judged, will be restored as well. The same characters who have been viewed negatively in the allegories are now promised restoration.

Restoration for Sodom and Samaria

(53-55) With much repetition of the word translated ‘captivity’ YHWH announces the restoration of the fortunes of the sisters. This translation is misleading as the expression ‘bring again their captivity’ has nothing to do with exile and does not predict further judgement upon these cities, rather the opposite. The expression means ‘restore their fortunes.’ That is how the ESV translates v.53: I will restore their fortunes, both the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters, and the fortunes of Samaria and her daughters, and I will restore your own fortunes in their midst.

The original idea behind the expression may be that of someone who has entered slavery (captivity) due to extreme poverty or debt and has served his time. A male Hebrew slave was freed after six years service or during the Jubilee year (Ex 21:2; Lev 25:39). After that he could regain the status (liberty and prosperity) that he once had. A good example of the use and meaning of the expression reverse their captivity/restore their fortunes is at the end of the book of Job:

And the LORD turned the captivity of Job, when he prayed for his friends: also the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before. Job 42:10 KJV

And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends. And the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before. Job 42:10 ESV

As well as here in chapter 16 the expression occurs in Ezekiel 29:14 and 39:25.

Verses 53-55 are perplexing as, taken at face value, they predict restoration of the fortunes of Sodom, Samaria, Jerusalem and their satellite towns and villages (‘daughters’). Details about how and when this will be achieved are not supplied.

This is the only biblical prophecy which predicts that Sodom will regain its former status. By contrast, the tenor of other scriptures is rather that Sodom’s destruction is perpetual. For example: Isaiah speaking about Babylon says it will lie desolate like Sodom:

And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees’ excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there. Isaiah 13:19-20.

Zephaniah prophesied in a similar vein with reference to Moab: Therefore as I live, saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah, even the breeding of nettles, and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation… Zephaniah 2:9

Some would suggest (cf. Mat 11:23-24) that in fulfilment of 16:53-55 the people of Sodom will be raised to life and rehabilitated or given a second chance after death. Those who hold the doctrine of apokatastasis (restoration, reintegration, reconstitution) would view this Old Testament passage, along with others in the New Testament (Acts 3:21; Rom 5:18-19; 11:23-26,32; 1 Cor 15:24-28; 2 Cor 5:19; Eph 1:9-10; Phil 2:10-11; Col 1:19-20; 1 Tim 2:4-6; 4;10; Tit 2:11; 1 Pet 3:19-20; 2 Pet 3:9; Rev 5:13), as biblical evidence for universalism.

According to v.54 the purpose of YHWH’s restoration of Sodom and Samaria is that Jerusalem will feel shame. This is because she has been so wicked that if she is to be restored then the restoration of Sodom and Samaria, cities which are deemed to be less wicked than Jerusalem, is required as well. Judah will be a ‘comfort’ to Sodom and Samaria in the sense that their suffering was not as severe as that which Judah/Jerusalem will experience. Jerusalem will bear her own shame.

Perhaps one ought to bear in mind that Ezekiel chapter 16 is allegorical, metaphorical and full of hyperbole. In v.55 Ezekiel may just be saying that once Jerusalem’s punishment is over the entire country will one day prosper. Thus the three cities with their satellite towns and villages, representing the whole land, can metaphorically be said to regain the status that they had in their heyday.

A less common interpretation of v.55, based on the word ‘when’ in the KJV translation, is that this is a promise by YHWH never to restore the fortunes of the three cities.

When thy sisters, Sodom and her daughters, shall return to their former estate, and Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former estate, then thou and thy daughters shall return to your former estate. Ezekiel 16:55

That is, when the fortunes of Sodom and Samaria are restored, which is never (since the 10 tribes of Israel are lost and Sodom has been perpetually destroyed), then Judah/Jerusalem’s fortunes will be restored, i.e. never.

In v.55 notice the repetition of the verb (shall return), the proper name of a city and the phrase ‘and her daughters’ three times.

(56-59) Verses 56-57 are a question: ‘Was not Sodom thy sister such a chronicle upon thy lips in the day of thy exaltations….?’ YHWH again reminds Jerusalem of her past by saying that in her heyday (the day of thy exaltations- plural) she once considered herself morally superior to her sister Sodom and looked down upon her. Sodom’s fate was talked about during Jerusalem’s glory days (cf. v.14) but not presented as a warning and example of what pride could bring about.

Jerusalem’s own sins led to her exposure and humiliation before her surrounding enemies; ones like Syria (cf. Isa7:1-9) and the Philistines (cf. Isa 9:11-12). In vv. 58-59, speaking as though it had already been accomplished, YHWH asserts that before the restoration of vv.53-55 comes about Jerusalem must first endure the consequences of her lewdness (see vv.15-36) and her despising of the oath in breaking of the covenant (cf.16:8). Note the ‘thus saith the Lord’ in v.59. Sodom and Samaria have had their periods of humiliation and judgement, now Jerusalem must suffer hers before all three will be eventually restored together.

(60-63) Unlike Jerusalem who did not remember the days of her youth when YHWH showed kindness to her (16:22, 43) YHWH will remember those days and the covenant that he made with her. She had broken that one by her harlotry (vv. 32-34) but YHWH will will establish a new covenant (see Jer 31:31-34) with her; an everlasting one (see 2 Sam 23:5; Isa 55:3). The phrase ‘I will establish’ is repeated in v.62. We know from Ezek 11:19-20; 36:25-28 that this new covenant will last because it involves a new heart and a new spirit.

In those days Jerusalem will remember her ‘way’ (16:25, 27, 31, 43, 47×2) and be embarrassed by YHWH’s kindness toward Sodom and Samaria and perhaps humiliated at being linked with such despised sinners. However, those ‘sisters’ will not be equal partners with Jerusalem in the new covenant. Sodom, Samaria and other older and younger sisters (‘older and younger sisters’ is in the plural form) will be given to her as daughters. The areas represented by all the cities will become one unified territory with Jerusalem as the capital. Sodom, Samaria and the others will be her ‘daughters’ i.e. dependent cities. None of this is due from the former broken covenant but is an act of YHWH’s free grace.

The passage ends with the further assertion that YHWH will establish his (new) covenant with Jerusalem and although she will be forgiven yet the memory of what she has done will produce in her shame, embarrassment and self-loathing.

SUMMATION OF EZEKIEL CHAPTER 16

Ezekiel chapter 16, one of the most difficult chapters in the Bible, consists of two allegories in which YHWH speaks through the prophet Ezekiel and addresses Jerusalem as if the city is a real person. In what is sometimes crude and graphic language he describes how he found her as an abandoned and helpless baby, cared for her and watched her grow. He eventually married her and gave her everything; beauty, clothes and jewellery. He treated her like royalty but Jerusalem then turned away from YHWH and became unfaithful. She chases after other nations and their gods, acting as a prostitute but worse – offering herself freely, not even for gain.

In the second allegory YHWH drives home the message of Jerusalem’s betrayal by saying that her behaviour has been worse than that of her ‘sisters’ Sodom and Samaria; notorious sinners whom YHWH has already judged. This comparison is designed to humble Jerusalem.

Then, in an unforeseen twist, YHWH promises to restore Sodom and Samaria along with Jerusalem, a future act of mercy. After she suffers punishment for her sins he will restore the relationship with Jerusalem and establish a new and lasting covenant. She (i.e. the people of Judah) will be forgiven but will always remember her past with embarrassment.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 16:44-52: The Allegory of Jerusalem and Her Sinful Sisters

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In 16:1-43 Ezekiel has YHWH speak a lengthy allegory in which Jerusalem is personified as a woman. YHWH describes how he found her as an abandoned infant. He rescued her and, once she reached ‘the age for love,’ he married her. Abusing the gifts that he had given her, Jerusalem subsequently turned to idolatry and immorality; for which YHWH sentences her to harsh punishment. At this point one would expect a conclusion to the allegory but that does not come until v.60.

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14
The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34
The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Judgement – Ezekiel 16:35-43

Commentators disagree as to whether the section (16:44-59) is an extension of the allegory of 16:1-43 or a further allegory which, although closely linked with the preceding one, is not a continuation of it. I would contend that it is indeed a new allegory but one which shares the ending with the previous one.

The allegory in vv.1-43, while addressed to Jerusalem, clearly covers the history of Israel as a whole, not just Judah. In this new allegory, however, Judah and Israel are distinct. Jerusalem stands for the southern kingdom of Judah and Samaria represents the northern kingdom of Israel. In this second allegory YHWH compares Jerusalem with her ‘sisters’ Samaria and Sodom and concludes that Jerusalem has turned out much worse than either of them.

THE ALLEGORY OF THE SINFUL SISTERS

(44) Verse 44 begins with the word ‘behold’ which directs the reader’s attention to the new allegory and to the comparison of Jerusalem with Sodom and Samaria (the theme of Samaria and Jerusalem as sisters is developed more fully in chapter 23). YHWH says that everyone who quotes a proverb (cf. Num 21:27) will say of Jerusalem: ‘like mother, like daughter.’ With this short (two words in Hebrew) saying YHWH refers back to v.3 and sarcastically reminds Jerusalem that she has foreign ancestry.

(45-46) In v.3 the Amorite father is mentioned first but here the order is inverted. The Hittite mother is placed first now because this allegory focuses on female family members. Ezekiel is again referring to the Canaanite origins of the city of Jerusalem (Jebusites, Josh 15:63; Judge 1:21). This is by no means a compliment since Hittites and Amorites were two of the seven nations which the Israelites were commanded to drive out of the Promised Land ( Deut 7:1-2; Josh 3:10; 24:11) and with whom they were forbidden to intermarry (Deut 7:3).

Ezekiel paints a picture of a truly dysfunctional family. Jerusalem resembles her Hittite mother because just as her mother had shown contempt for her Amorite husband and their children (3 daughters) so Jerusalem had shown contempt for her husband and children (16:20-21, 31, 32). Her sisters, Samaria and Sodom, had likewise shown contempt for their husbands and daughters.

The husbands are not mentioned again, they don’t really feature in this allegory nor does the mother appear again after v.45. In this section Ezekiel concentrates on two important relationships; sister and daughter.

Daughter – vv. 44, 45, 46(x2), 48 (x2), 49, 53(x2), 55(x3), 57(x2), 61.
Sister – vv. 45(x2), 46(x2), 48, 49, 51, 52(x2), 55, 56, 61.

(46) YHWH begins a quite convoluted negative comparison between Jerusalem and her two sisters in which Samaria is described as the ‘elder’ sister and Sodom as the ‘younger.’ In fact, Jerusalem and Sodom had long histories whereas Samaria was much younger than either of them, having only been established (1 Kgs 16:23-24) by King Omri of Israel (884-873 BCE) almost 300 years before Ezekiel’s time. ‘Elder’ and ‘younger’ only make sense if interpreted in terms of greatness of geographical/territorial size, military power or historical importance. ‘Daughters’ probably refers to dependent satellite towns and villages, or perhaps to the inhabitants of the three cities.

Geographically Jerusalem is situated between the sites of the two cities. As one faces East the city of Samaria is to the left (North) and Sodom to the right (South). Samaria was the former capital of the northern kingdom of Israel and in patriarchal times Sodom had been the most important city of the Jordan valley (Gen 18-19).

(47) Jerusalem was not content with equalling the ways and abominations of Samaria and Sodom but became much more corrupt than they. As if despising their sinful deeds as small scale (‘a very little thing’ or ‘a thing of disgust’) Jerusalem outdid them by sinning on a much grander scale. Ezekiel’s hearers would have been greatly shocked to hear YHWH linking Jerusalem with Sodom and Samaria; cities that were notorious for sin and idolatry.

THE INIQUITY OF SODOM

(48-50) In v.48 YHWH stresses that Judah’s sins outstripped those of Sodom. In the next two verses he elaborates on the greatness of Judah’s guilt compared to that of Sodom. In v.49 YHWH specifies the ‘iniquity’ (guilt from conscious wrongdoing) of Sodom. The sins of Sodom and her daughters (the towns Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim – Gen 10:19) are enumerated as follows:

Pride – an example of success inflating the ego.

Satiety – because of an over-abundance of food – they were gluttonous.

‘Abundance of idleness’ KJV. – This means careless rest or security. The people of Sodom were so prosperous that they became complacent.

They were indifferent to the poor and needy.

They were ‘haughty’ (arrogant).

They committed abomination (cf. Lev 18:22) in the presence of YHWH (Gen 18:21).

YHWH says that when he saw the iniquity of Sodom and her daughters he removed them. The word ‘good’ is in italics, it is not in the original and has been supplied by translators. Without the word ‘good’ the phrase means ‘when I saw it’.

Ancient writers viewed Sodom as notorious for sexual sin, social injustice, arrogance and hostility towards strangers, for example: Isa 1:9-17; Jeremiah 23:14; 2 Pet 2:6-10; Jude 7; 2 Esdras 2:8-9; 3 Maccabees 2:5; Sirach 16:8; Wisdom of Solomon 19:13-17.

(51-52) YHWH states that Samaria did not sin half as much as Jerusalem. He does not spell out Samaria’s iniquity but Ezekiel’s audience are well aware that it was idolatry. Jerusalem has multiplied the sins of Sodom and Samaria to such an extent that she has ‘justified’ those cities. In other words, Jerusalem’s sins are so evil that she makes Sodom and Samaria look righteous. These two sinful cities had so angered YHWH that he had punished them severely.

Jerusalem, having privileges like the the Law, the Temple and YHWH’s presence, had behaved worse than Sodom and Samaria. She (v.52 ‘thou also’), who had ‘given judgement’ on her sisters (i.e. agreed that their punishment was well-deserved) but had behaved more abominably than they, could therefore expect to suffer a similar fate. It is appropriate that Jerusalem be punished because her sins make the other sisters look righteous.

Many centuries later a similar thought was expressed by Jesus Christ: But into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you not, go your ways out into the streets of the same, and say, Even the very dust of your city, which cleaveth on us, we do wipe off against you: notwithstanding be ye sure of this, that the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you. But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city. Luke 10:10-12

The next section of Ezekiel chapter 16 will deal with the sisters’ future.

Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Judgement – Ezekiel 16:35-43

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

My two previous posts (The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14 and The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34) covered the first 34 verses of Ezekiel 16. This chapter consists of a monologue by YHWH which takes the form of an allegory in which he compares Jerusalem to a woman whom he found in a desperate state as an abandoned infant. He rescued, nurtured and cared for her and when he saw that she had matured, married her (entered into a covenant) and made her prosperous and beautiful.

However, she became spiritually unfaithful by prostituting herself with foreign powers and their false deities. She squandered her God-given resources on idolatry and prostituted herself (made alliances) with foreign nations rather than trusting her husband YHWH. She was actually worse than a prostitute because she paid others to corrupt her (i.e. paid tribute to states like Egypt, Assyria and Babylonia) rather than receive payment from them for her services. In the next section of the allegory (vv.35-43) YHWH declares judgement upon Jerusalem for her misdeeds.

JERUSALEM’S JUDGEMENT (35-43)

(35) This section begins with ‘wherefore’ (therefore, on account of, thus, so) which looks back to the accusations of prostitution set out in vv.15-34 and draws attention to what will now be said. YHWH addressing Jerusalem directly as ‘O harlot,’ tells her to ‘hear the word of the Lord.’ He is thus directing the nation to pay attention to his message of judgement.

The word here translated ‘wherefore’ appears many times in the book of Ezekiel to indicate the direct result of what has just been said (causes and consequences): Ezek 5:7; 11:11; 13:8; 15:6; 16:35, 37; 20:27; 21:24; 22:19; 23:35; 24:9; 25:4, 7, 9,13,16; 26:3; 28:6; 29:8; 31:10; 34:7, 9, 20; 35:6.11; 36:3,4, 5, 6,7, 14.

(36) Again the messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ appears, followed by two announcements of judgement (36-42; 43), each prefaced by ‘because you’ (v.36, 43). Then comes a summary of the reasons for judgement followed by a statement of the consequences.

FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT

THE REASONS for YHWH’s punishment are listed as;

  • Because thy filthiness was poured out, – The word translated filthiness (KJV, NKJV) means ‘bronze.’ Based on an assumption that neither the ancient Israelites nor the Babylonians used copper as money and that the verb ‘to pour out’ is used in v.15 and in Ezek 23:8 in connection with prostitution many translations (e,g. CSB; ESV; NIV; NLT; NRSV) follow the KJV thought of filthiness and translate ‘bronze’ as ‘lust.’ This idea may have been inspired by the green patina or crust caused by oxidation that forms on brass, bronze and copper. Darby, however, sensibly views ‘bronze’ as a general term for wealth and translates the word as ‘money.’ Payment of tribute in bronze was made to both Assyrians (2 Kgs 16:17-18) and Babylonians (2 Kgs 25:13-14).
  • and thy nakedness discovered through thy whoredoms with thy lovers, – the theme of the naked female body has appeared throughout this allegory and remains the focus of Jerusalem’s punishment (vv.36, 37, 39). ‘Lovers,’ referring to Egypt (v.26), Assyria (v.28) and Babylonia (v.29), occurs in vv. 33, 36 and 37.
  • and with all the idols of thy abominations, – this is the only appearance of the word ‘idols’ in Ezek 16. Here idols are linked with ‘abominations’ (offensive things), this word occurs in vv. 2, 22, 36, 43, 47, 50, 51, 58.
  • and by the blood of thy children, which thou didst give unto them; – a reference to child sacrifice (v.20).

(37-42) THE CONSEQUENCES

Exposure

Having listed Jerusalem’s crimes YHWH now pronounces the penalties. He declares that he will bring together all her former ‘lovers’ i.e. the nations with which Jerusalem had entered into alliances and idolatry. These will turn against her; therefore the ‘gathering’ against Jerusalem symbolises besieging armies. ‘Loved and hated’ reflects Judah’s shifting political relationships with other nations.

Stretching the allegory to its limits, the punishment for Jerusalem is compared to that for adultery.

‘Uncover thy nakedness’ – refers to public disgrace by exposure which formed part of the ancient punishment for being caught in the act of adultery (Isa 47:3; Jer 13:22, 26; Hos 2:3; Nah 3:5). YHWH will expose Jerusalem to the former lovers with whom she had prostituted herself. This public disgrace represents Jerusalem’s downfall that will be witnessed by the surrounding nations.

The ‘lovers’ represent the assembly (‘the men of the city’ Deut 21:21) who carry out the punishment for adultery. This, of course, is not true to real life as, according to the Law, both parties involved in adultery were due the death penalty: If a man be found lying with a woman married to a husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel. Deut 22:22

Death Penalty

(38) YHWH makes it clear that the death penalty pronounced upon Jerusalem is not only for adultery (‘break wedlock’) but also murder (‘shed blood’). The ‘shed blood’ may refer to the child sacrifice mentioned in v.36 or to the violence that was rife in Jerusalem (Jer 2:34; Ezek 7:23). The Law demanded execution for adultery (Lev 20:10), murder (Ex 21:12) and child sacrifice (Lev 20:1-4).

YHWH will enact this severe penalty against Jerusalem ‘in fury and jealousy.’ Fury relates to murder and the jealousy to adultery. This verse contains the final mention of blood in the chapter (see also vv. 6, 9, 22, 36).

Humiliation

(39) YHWH will cause Jerusalem’s former lovers, with whom she had previously sought security, to return her to her original state of vulnerability. Jerusalem’s former enemies will demolish the sites of false worship (mounds and high places) and strip her of YHWH’s gifts (clothes and vessels of glory, see vv.10-13); blessings which she has used unfaithfully (see vv. 16-19). In other words, Judah will lose wealth and status.

Stoning, Cutting to pieces and Burning.

(40-41) The crowd or mob that that will come up against Jerusalem represents the Babylonian army that will attack Jerusalem with stones (flung by war engines) and slay the inhabitants with swords. They will set fire to all the buildings in the city, including the Temple.

Stoning was the usual mode of execution in ancient Israel and was the penalty for a variety of crimes whereas execution by the sword was prescribed for communal idolatry (Deut 13:15). Execution by burning was unusual but did apply for two crimes (Lev 20:14; 21:9).

The term ‘many wives’ (or ‘women’, see vv. 30, 32, 34) probably represents other nations that will look on as YHWH’s public punishment on Jerusalem takes place and to which it will serve as an example. The goal of the punishment is to end Jerusalem’s prostitution, i.e. to bring an end to her idolatry and reliance upon heathen nations. Jerusalem will ‘give payment’ (ESV) no more because Judah will lose its national independence and cease to be a regional power. These verses predict the siege and invasion of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in 587/586 BCE.

(42) After the judgement is carried out YHWH’s fury will be appeased and his jealousy will subside. His wrath will be calmed because the matter will have been dealt with. In this verse we have an example of anthropopathism – ascribing human feelings and emotions to something that is not human; in this case deity.

SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT

As with the first announcement of judgement in vv. 36-42 this second announcement in v.43 restates the motivation for and then the consequences of YHWH’s punishment of Jerusalem.

(43) THE REASONS

Like v.36 this verse begins with ‘because you.’

  • Jerusalem did not remember the days of her youth (cf. v.22), i.e. the nation forgot the Lord’s deliverance and provision during its early history e.g. the Exodus and the making of the Sinai Covenant.
  • Jerusalem enraged YHWH ‘in all these [things].’ This must refer to the examples of prostitution listed from v.15 onwards.

THE CONSEQUENCES

As in v.37 the consequences here in v.43 begin with the words ‘behold, therefore.’

  • YHWH brought her way (deeds) on her head. The idea seems to be that because of her forgetting and her bad behaviour YHWH has held her to account for her ways (perfect tense). This verse views YHWH’s judgement from a future perspective, as having happened in the past. The phrase ‘I will give your [their} way upon your [their] head’ is also found in Ezek 9:10; 11:21; 17:19; 22:31; 33:4.
  • Jerusalem will no longer do licentiousness (engage in prostitution) in addition to all her other detestable practices (abominations). ‘Licentiousness’ (KJV ‘lewdness) and ‘abominations’ together sum up Jerusalem’s sin and are again paired in v.58.

SUMMATION

Using unsettling and violent imagery YHWH, in vv. 35-43, pronounces judgement upon Jerusalem for her infidelity (breach of covenant – Lev 26:16-17, 25, 38; Deut 28:25, 41, 47-58). She will be exposed and shamed before all her former ‘lovers’ and stripped of all the blessings that YHWH has bestowed upon her. YHWH will hand her over to these ‘lovers’ who will carry out divine justice in the form of invasion, destruction and exile.

The metaphor of an adulterous wife is used to show the seriousness of Judah’s spiritual betrayal and the harshness of the punishments in the allegory emphasise that the Lord will not tolerate sin. Idolatry and unfaithfulness are especially serious. As modern readers we might well ask ourselves how often do we turn away from God and chase after things that may be morally or spiritually corrupt. Do we take his kindness and provision for granted and forget that we have a covenant relationship with him?

Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

My previous post The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14 introduced an extended metaphor which was communicated by YHWH to the prophet Ezekiel with a command to deliver it to the exiles. This was in order to convince them that Jerusalem’s punishment was certain because of her abominations. In the section 1-14 Jerusalem is personified as a woman whom YHWH came across as an abandoned baby, then rescued and provided for. Once she reached maturity he married her (made a covenant with her), and dressed and adorned her to the extent that she became a beautiful queen; famous for her good looks. This all symbolises the early history of YHWH’s relationship with Israel.

JERUSALEM’S PROSTITUTION (15-34)

(15) Unfortunately v.15 begins with ‘but,’ which gives a hint that the relationship might have soured. Despite having been blessed by YHWH with beauty, prosperity and influence Jerusalem trusted in her good looks and prostituted herself with foreign nations. Unlike the previous section (1-14) where the focus is on YHWH (referring to himself as ‘I’) the next major section (15-43) focuses on Jerusalem (addressed as ‘you’). The two sections are linked by the words ‘beauty and ‘renown,’ both of which occur in v.14 and then again in v.15.

The beauty which gave her renown among the nations had been bestowed upon her by YHWH but, full of pride and self-confidence, Jerusalem abused YHWH’s trust and relied on her own beauty. It is a fact that success can change some people for the worse; this was recognised by Moses, writing in the book of Deuteronomy:

Beware that thou forget not the LORD thy God, in not keeping his commandments, and his judgements, and his statutes, which I command thee this day: Lest when thou hast eaten and art full, and hast built goodly houses, and dwelt therein; And when thy herds and thy flocks multiply, and thy silver and thy gold is multiplied, and all that thou hast is multiplied; Then thine heart be lifted up, and thou forget the LORD thy God, Deut 8:11-14

A similar observation to that about Jerusalem in v.15 is made about the king of Tyre in Ezek 28:17: ‘Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty.’

With new-found self confidence Jerusalem asserted her independence and ‘poured out’ (see also v.36) her harlotry (i.e. acted like a prostitute) on every passer-by. Since v.15 links her activity with her renown and in v.14 her renown was among the nations then those who received her sexual favours are the nations. This is a metaphorical way of describing alliances with foreign powers.

The allegory very much emphasises a verb meaning ‘engaging in prostitution’ and related words like ‘prostitute’ which occur some twenty times in vv.15-36. This perhaps becomes more obvious when these verses are read in a modern translation; such as the Christian Standard Bible.

16-21 ‘YOU TOOK’

Verses 16-21 specify four actions by Jerusalem in which she took gifts given to her by YHWH and used them for prostitution.

(16) And of thy garments thou didst take, and deckedst thy high places with divers colours, and playedst the harlot thereupon: the like things shall not come, neither shall it be so.

Jerusalem took the expensive embroidered ‘garments’ (clothes or coverings, also v.18) which had been presented to her by YHWH (vv.10, 13) and made shrines (bāmôt, high places) with the material. The image is of her making up a bed with these materials given by her husband and prostituting herself on them with her lovers (interestingly, the word ‘garment’ is elsewhere translated ‘bed’ – 1 Sam 19:13). This activity by Jerusalem may be a reference to the presence of cult prostitution in Israel (cf. Isa 57:7). The clause at the end of v.16 is unclear (‘such are not to come and it will not be’) but probably means something like: ‘things like this should not take place.’

(17) Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them,

YHWH says that Jerusalem also took ‘thy fair jewels.’ This may also be translated ”your vessels of glory’, a term that appears again in v.39. ‘Glory’ directs the reader back to ‘crown of glory’ (beautiful crown) in v.12. Gold and silver are mentioned in v.13 where it is implied but not stated that they were supplied by YHWH. Now v.17 makes it clear that they were indeed a gift from YHWH. Jerusalem took these precious metals and made ‘for herself’ (also v.24) ‘images of men’ (male statues), idols with which she engaged in prostitution. Israel turned to idolatry.

(18-19) And tookest thine embroidered garments, and coveredst them: and thou hast set mine oil and mine incense before them. My meat also which I gave thee, fine flour, and oil, and honey, wherewith I fed thee, thou hast even set it before them for a sweet savour: and thus it was, saith the Lord GOD.

Verse 18 begins with the third ‘you took’ specifying that the woman also used the embroidered garments (10, 13, 16) to dress the masculine images that she had made from YHWH’s precious metals. In addition she offered YHWH’s oil, incense and food (my oil, my incense, my food) to these idols. The specific food items are fine flour, oil and honey.

This is the only mention of incense in the allegory. In chapter 8:11-12 Ezekiel saw 70 elders of Israel burning incense to pagan deities. There it says that a fragrant (or thick) cloud of incense arose. The next verse in this passage (v.19), using a different word for fragrant, says that Jerusalem offered food – fine flour, oil and honey – to her idols for a ‘sweet savour’ (fragrant aroma). It was believed that as such products burned a fragrant or soothing aroma arose to the nostrils of the deity being worshipped.

This idea is first mentioned in connection with sacrifices offered by Noah after the Flood (Gen 8:20-21). Note that three of the five major Levitical fire offerings (‘ōlāh, minḥāh and šelem) in the tabernacle system of worship (Lev 1-7) are said to be ‘sweet savour’ offerings (‘ōlāh, transl. Burnt or Ascending offering – Lev 1:9, 13, 17; minḥāh, transl. Grain, Meal, Meat i.e. Food or Cereal offering – Lev 2:2, 9; šelem, transl. Peace or Fellowship offering – Lev 3:5, 16). The offering of honey by fire to YHWH was prohibited (Lev 2:11).

(20-21) Moreover thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this of thy whoredoms a small matter, That thou hast slain my children, and delivered them to cause them to pass through the fire for them?

Now YHWH accuses Jerusalem of taking her own children and giving them up to be sacrificed. ‘To them’ refers to the masculine statues of v.17 and it was to these that the woman offered up her sons and daughters (children that she had borne to YHWH) for consumption.

At the end of v.20 YHWH asks ‘Is this less than your harlotry?’ i.e. he is asking if her acts of prostitution were not enough, surely this is even worse!

She slaughtered her children whom she presented when offering them up ‘to them’ (the idols). The same verb ‘slaughtered’ (šāḥaṭ, KJV slain) is used again in Ezek 23:39 in connection with the sacrifice of children to idols. The practice of child sacrifice was associated with Canaanite religion, especially the worship of Molech. King Ahaz of Judah is said to have ‘made his son to pass through the fire,’ presumably as part of a pagan ritual (2 Kgs 16:3). That some Israelites practised this is mentioned in 2 Kgs 17:17 and Jer 32:35 cf. 2 Kgs 23:10. The Law specifically prohibited the Israelites from engaging in child sacrifice to Molech (Lev 18:21; 20:2-5).

22- 34 INGRATITUDE AND GREATER SPIRITUAL ADULTERY

(22) Jerusalem’s sin is not just idolatry but ingratitude. YHWH reminds her of her humble beginnings and of how he had rescued and provided for her (16:4-13). She has not remembered ‘the days of her youth’ (vv.22, 43) when she was ‘naked and bare’ (cf. v.70 and polluted in her own blood (cf. v.6).

(23) Upon reading the opening words of v.23 (‘then after all your evil’) one might expect a conclusion to follow but instead YHWH exclaims ‘Woe, woe, to you’ in horror at further acts of prostitution and adultery that he proceeds to list in vv.24-34.

(24-25) The accusations levelled by YHWH against Jerusalem flow from the assertion in v.15 that she trusted in her own beauty and engaged in prostitution. From vv. 16-23 that prostitution takes the form of idolatrous activity which includes the construction of shrines and the offering of sacrifices. These verses seem to concentrate on the idolatry and not so much on the sexual theme. The allegory, however, picks up the latter again in vv. 24-34 where the main idea is that Jerusalem is sexually insatiable. In vv. 24-25 the prostitution is still linked with idolatry, from v.26 the figure extends to political alliances with foreign powers.

V.24 has two accusations:

  • ‘Thou hast also built unto thee an eminent place’ – This word is not bāmôt which is translated ‘high places’ in v.16. Here the word for ‘mound’ (KJV ’eminent place’) is gaḇ; it refers to something curved, to any convex surface, e.g eyebrows in Lev 14:9, the rim (KJV nave) of a wheel, 1 Kgs 7:33; Ezek 1:18). It occurs also in v.31 and v.39.
  • ‘and hast made thee a high place in every street’ – Here the word translated ‘high place’ is rāmāh. It means a hill or high ground.

Jerusalem had constructed mounds upon which were shrines for the worship of pagan idols. The word ‘built’ in vv. 24 and 25 occurs also at v.31. These mounds were at the head of every path or square. Reḥôb means path, street, plaza or square, open area. There she ‘spread her feet to’ (had relations with) everyone that passed by. Perhaps this is a play on vv.5-6. There Jerusalem was a baby abandoned in an ‘open field’ and it was YHWH who ‘passed by’.

Jerusalem ‘multiplied her harlotry;’ this is repeated in vv. 26 and 29. Her once desirable beauty became detestable to YHWH and to others as a result of her promiscuity.

(26-29) Verse 26 again takes up the theme of prostitution with the expression ‘engaged in prostitution.’ It also occurs in vv. 15, 16 and 17 and will appear again twice in v.28. Now the prostitution is not so much cultic as political. Four nations (Egyptians, Philistines, Assyrians, Chaldeans) are mentioned in the historical order in which Jerusalem had political dealings with them. It is specifically stated that she engaged in prostitution with three of them.

1) The sons of Egypt – the Egyptians are described as neighbours and also as ‘great of flesh.’ The latter phrase is a double entendre that could either be taken to mean well-endowed or fat and flabby. As well as the repetition of ‘engaged in prostitution’ there is also repetition of the ‘multiplied your harlotry’ phrase from v.25. Several kings of Israel and Judah made it part of their diplomatic strategy to form an alliance (for political, military or economic reasons) with Egypt, one of the most powerful nations in the Ancient Near East. For example:

SOLOMON (United Monarchy)

Solomon made a marriage alliance with Pharaoh king of Egypt. He took Pharaoh’s daughter and brought her into the city of David until he had finished building his own house… 1 Kings 3:1ESV (see also 1 Kgs 9:16)

HOSHEA (Northern Kingdom – Israel) rebelled against Assyria and sought alliance with Egypt

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria. And Hoshea became his vassal and paid him tribute. But the king of Assyria found treachery in Hoshea, for he had sent messengers to So, king of Egypt, and offered no tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. 2 Kings 17:3-4 ESV

HEZEKIAH (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

And the Rabshakeh said to them, “Say to Hezekiah, ‘Thus says the great king, the king of Assyria: On what do you rest this trust of yours? 20 Do you think that mere words are strategy and power for war? In whom do you now trust, that you have rebelled against me? Behold, you are trusting now in Egypt, that broken reed of a staff, which will pierce the hand of any man who leans on it. Such is Pharaoh king of Egypt to all who trust in him. 2 Kings 18:19-21 ESV

JEHOIAKIM (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

And Pharaoh Neco made Eliakim the son of Josiah king in the place of Josiah his father, and changed his name to Jehoiakim. But he took Jehoahaz away, and he came to Egypt and died there. And Jehoiakim gave the silver and the gold to Pharaoh, but he taxed the land to give the money according to the command of Pharaoh. He exacted the silver and the gold of the people of the land, from everyone according to his assessment, to give it to Pharaoh Neco. 2 Kings 23:34-35 ESV

ZEDEKIAH (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

But he rebelled against him by sending his ambassadors to Egypt, that they might give him horses and a large army. Will he thrive? Can one escape who does such things? Can he break the covenant and yet escape? “As I live, declares the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwells who made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant with him he broke, in Babylon he shall die. Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company will not help him in war, when mounds are cast up and siege walls built to cut off many lives. Ezekiel 17:15-17 ESV

Verses 22 and 23 suggested that the reasons for Jerusalem’s behaviour were her forgetfulness and wickedness. Now v.26 says that the motive was a deliberate intention to provoke her husband (YHWH). Her idolatry and foreign alliances so angered YHWH that in v.27 he draws attention to the fact (‘behold!) that he therefore ‘stretched out his hand over her’ i.e. acted against her in judgement. He reduced her lot and gave her over to the greed of her enemies the Philistines. At one stage Philistia must have annexed some of Judah’s territory.

Even the Philistines were appalled by Jerusalem’s lewd conduct, i.e. her moral and spiritual corruption. She is not said to have engaged in prostitution with the Philistines but v.28 states twice that she did so with the sons of Assyria (Assyrians), and was insatiable. That she was insatiable is repeated at the end of v.29. The kings who allied with Assyria include:

MENAHEM (Northern Kingdom – Israel)

Pul the king of Assyria came against the land, and Menahem gave Pul a thousand talents of silver, that he might help him to confirm his hold on the royal power. Menahem exacted the money from Israel, that is, from all the wealthy men, fifty shekels of silver from every man, to give to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria turned back and did not stay there in the land. 2 Kings 15:19-20 ESV

HOSHEA (Northern Kingdom – Israel)

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria. And Hoshea became his vassal and paid him tribute. 2 Kings 17:3 ESV

AHAZ (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria, saying, “I am your servant and your son. Come up and rescue me from the hand of the king of Syria and from the hand of the king of Israel, who are attacking me.” Ahaz also took the silver and gold that was found in the house of the LORD and in the treasures of the king’s house and sent a present to the king of Assyria. 9 And the king of Assyria listened to him. 2 Kings 16:7-9 ESV – see also Isa 7:1-17

Addicted to idolatry and political entanglements Jerusalem could not be satisfied so kept moving on to other relationships. The next relationship, mentioned in vv. 28-29, is that with the sons of Chaldea, i.e. the Babylonians, the ascendant power when Ezekiel was writing. Babylonia is described as a ‘land of Canaan’ i.e. a nation of merchants.

The Canaanites, e.g. the Phoenicians (main towns Tyre and Sidon), were so famous for trading in the ancient world that the name was used as a term for trader, trafficker or merchant. For a description of their trading activities that is of great historical interest see the Lament for Tyre in Ezekiel chapter 27, especially vv.12-25. For examples of the use of Canaanite or land of Canaan for merchant see Ezek 17:5; Prov 31:24; Hos 12:7; Zeph 1:11; Zech 14:21.

(30-34) In these last few verses of this section of the allegory accusing Jerusalem of engaging in prostitution YHWH moves on from the nations to claim that Jerusalem is not like other women and, as a matter of fact, she isn’t even like other prostitutes. The word ’iššāh, meaning woman or wife occurs 3 times in these verses, 30, 32, 34.

YHWH disgustedly asks Jerusalem what is wrong with her heart that she acted like a brazen prostitute. She had a great relationship with YHWH who loved, cared and provided her so why did she have so many relationships, moving from one to another, when none of them left her satisfied? He then refers in v.31 to some of her activities that have already been described in vv. 15-29:

  • In that thou buildest thine eminent place (gab) in the head of every way –
  • and makest thine high place (rāmāh) in every street;
  • and hast not been as a harlot, in that thou scornest hire;

The verb ‘to build’ is the same as that used in vv.24 and 25. ‘At the head of every way’ is also repeated from v.25a, there it is said of the rāmāh but here in v.31 of the gab.

Unlike other prostitutes who accept payment for their services Jerusalem was so depraved and desperate that she scoffed at payment. The word ’eṯnan, meaning a prostitute’s pay (KJV, hire or reward), occurs in v.31, v.34 twice and in v.41.

In v.32 , quite far on in the allegory the verb ‘commit adultery’ occurs (also in v.38. ‘break wedlock’ KJV). Like a woman (wife) who commits adultery Jerusalem takes strangers instead of her husband. She has therefore broken the covenant obligations of v.8.

Verse 33 quickly returns to the notion of prostitution and says that ‘they’ (i.e. the strangers) always give gifts to prostitutes (i.e. pay their fee) but Jerusalem gives presents to (i.e. bribes) her lovers ‘on every side’ that they may come ‘into’ her. This is another double entendre in the allegory; the preposition ’el can indicate motion toward (hence KJV ‘unto’) but can also mean ‘into.’ It is used of sexual intercourse in Gen 16:2 and Num 25:1. This is a metaphorical reference to Israel and Judah paying tribute as vassal states to the dominant powers of the time – the nations ‘on every side’ (i.e. all around).

V.34 makes the point that Jerusalem is not a typical female prostitute:

  • none followeth thee to commit whoredoms – none of the neighbouring states were interested in forming an alliance with Jerusalem.
  • and in that thou givest a reward, and no reward is given unto thee – In her quest for political security Jerusalem had to pay tribute to other states.

SUMMATION

In the Ezekiel 16:15-34 section of the allegory YHWH, through Ezekiel, accuses Jerusalem of pride leading to prostitution with foreign nations. Despite having experienced YHWH’s provision and protection the nation of Israel/ Judah was unfaithful. This reflects the history of Israel during the period of the judges and especially under the monarchy. The turning to idolatry and alliances with pagan states constituting spiritual adultery began in earnest with Solomon during the united monarchy. This state of affairs continued under the kings of both Israel and Judah when the monarchy divided after his death. Their dependence upon foreign nations rather than YHWH did not work out well for Israel and Judah. The Northern Kingdom (Israel) fell to Assyria in 722 BCE and the Southern Kingdom (Judah) to Babylon in 586/7 BCE. The next section of the allegory (vv. 35-43) is about Jerusalem’s judgement.

Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapter 16 Ezekiel continues to impress upon the Judahite exiles who are with him in Babylonia the fact that, contrary to the predictions of false prophets, things at home are not going to improve soon. Rather, such are the sins of Israel/Judah that there is now no hope of avoiding YHWH’s wrath. His judgement will fall upon the nation soon.

YHWH, through Ezekiel, uses shock tactics to convey how evil the nation appears in his sight. In an extended and elaborate metaphor (or, perhaps more accurately, two allegories that share the same ending) the prophet communicates a negative portrayal of the history of Israel’s relationship with YHWH. Using disturbing language that is vulgar, crude and charged with marital, sexual and violent imagery Ezekiel, speaking for YHWH, accuses the nation of unfaithfulness in the form of idolatry and inappropriate relations with foreign powers.

Jerusalem (representing Israel/Judah) is personified as a female infant who has been abandoned by her parents and is rescued by YHWH. He returns some years later to find that she has matured (breasts and pubic hair) and is ‘at the age for love’ (vv.7-8). He marries her (v.8), bestows many gifts upon her and beautifies her (vv.9-14), with the result that she becomes famous for her good looks. Proud and self-confident she becomes not just an adulteress but an insatiable nymphomaniac who lavishes the gifts she has received from YHWH upon men everywhere, including foreigners like the virile (‘great of flesh’) Egyptians, Assyrians and Chaldeans. She sacrifices her children to them and is even worse than her sisters Samaria and Sodom.

YHWH, acting as both accuser and judge, outlines Jerusalem’s crimes and then sentences her to some unusual punishments (stripping, stoning, cutting with swords and burning, all this in the presence of her former lovers) in order to appease his wrath and jealousy. Although unworthy, there is a promise of restoration for Jerusalem but she will remain silent (be shy) with embarrassment and shame.

OUTINE OF THE CHAPTER

1-3a – Preamble
3b-5 – Jerusalem’s humble origins
6-14 – YHWH’s dealings with Jerusalem
15-34 – Jerusalem’s prostitution
35-43 – Jerusalem’s judgement
44-52 – The allegory of Judah and her sinful sisters
53-59 – The sisters’ future
60-63 – A promise of restoration

PREAMBLE (1-3a)

In these verses which serve as an introduction to the oracle YHWH instructs Ezekiel to challenge Jerusalem about her abominations. The prophet duly reports YHWH’s thoughts on the subject using the metaphor of a woman to represent Jerusalem. As the capital of Judah the city symbolises Judah and (excluding vv.44-59) Israel as well.

(1) The chapter commences with the prophetic word (or ‘word-event’) formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying.’ This expression occurs 49 times in the book of Ezekiel and indicates that the message has come to the prophet directly from YHWH.

(2-3a) YHWH, as usual, addresses Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’, a formula that occurs 93 times in Ezekiel, and commands him to:

(a) make known to Jerusalem her abominations (offensive acts), and
(b) tell her ‘thus saith the Lord.’

The saying ‘thus saith the Lord’ re-emphasises that the message is from YHWH. It occurs again in this chapter in v. 36 and v.59. The three occurrences (3, 36, 59) could serve as an alternative way of dividing up the chapter, which would then fall into three main sections (1-34; 35-58; 59-63).

JERUSALEM’S HUMBLE ORIGINS (3b-5)

(3b) Addressing Jerusalem, which he personifies as a woman, YHWH casts aspersions on her origins and birth (‘diggings’ and ‘bringings forth,’ both plural) which he traces back to the land of Canaan. Her father and mother were the Amorite and the Hittite. These represent the Semitic and non-Semitic peoples who inhabited the land of Canaan before the patriarchs settled there. The words ‘Canaan’, ‘Amorite’ and ‘Hittite’ stress that Jerusalem was originally possessed by wicked and idolatrous pagan tribes (cf. Gen 15:16). There was therefore nothing holy about Jerusalem’s origins that would have commended her to YHWH.

(4) Repeating ‘thy birth’ YHWH proceeds to remind Jerusalem of the circumstances of her birth. Repetition for effect is a feature of this oracle. Notice that the phrase ‘the day thou wast born’ is repeated at the end of v.5. At birth, YHWH reminds her, the infant Jerusalem experienced a lack of basic medical care and attention.

  • her umbilical cord was not cut.
  • she was not washed with water.
  • she was not rubbed with salt, a natural healer.
  • She was not swaddled.

(5) No-one showed Jerusalem any pity or compassion. There was no-one to do ‘any of these unto thee.’ The plural demonstrative pronoun ‘these things’ refers back to the cutting, washing, salting and swaddling in v.4. No-one cared enough to do even one of these four things for Jerusalem. This was not a case of neglect; the infant Jerusalem (Israel) was abandoned because of deliberate rejection. She was treated with distain (‘to the loathing of thy person’) and cast away in an open field (cf. Deut 32:10). The idea of loathing appears again in v.45.

As regards historical period, this section of the oracle in which Jerusalem is depicted as an abandoned new-born baby, represents the patriarchal period, which extended from the days Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to the time of slavery in Egypt. During that period Israel was not quite a distinct, fully-fledged nation.

YHWH’S DEALINGS WITH JERUSALEM (6-14)

In this section YHWH explains what he has done for Jerusalem. He is the speaker throughout and Jerusalem has no opportunity to respond. Series of statements beginning with ‘I’  describe YHWH’s activity, these are interrupted occasionally by comments addressing Jerusalem as ‘you’ which note the affect of YHWH’s provision upon the girl.

(6) YHWH’S list in v.6 includes: ‘I passed by’; ‘I saw’; ‘I said’; ‘I have caused’. YHWH passed by, saw the abandoned child being trampled upon in its own blood and said to the infant ‘Live.’ In another example of repetition this command ‘I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live’ is repeated. The trampling may be a metaphorical reference to Israel’s treatment in Egypt.

At first reading it would seem that YHWH didn’t really do much more at this stage than tell the child to survive, as she remained naked until he passed by again some years later (v.7b) and remained unwashed until after her marriage (v.9). The next verse, however, shows that he had ensured her survival and development.

(7) In another clause beginning with ‘I’ YHWH says that he made her a myriad (10,000) ‘as the sprout of the field.’ This second mention of field is a much more positive image than the first in v.5. Jerusalem increased and became great. The word translated in KJV here as ‘increased’ means to be abundant, become numerous or great; it also occurs in vv. 25, 26, 29 and 51; translated as ‘increased’ or ‘multiplied’. This speaks of growth and may reference Exod 1:12 where the same verb is used of Israel’s population increase in Egypt: ‘But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew.’

Moving from the thought of growth to that of maturity YHWH says that she came with the finest ornaments (lit. ornaments of ornaments). What that means is unclear. Her breasts took shape and around the same time her (pubic) hair sprouted (same root as ‘sprout’ in v.7a). Jerusalem matured into a voluptuous, adolescent woman. YHWH adds ‘thou wast naked and bare’ which suggests that she had grown up as a young savage.

(8) Passing by once again YHWH sees that she has matured and he draws attention to the fact (‘behold’) that she was at the age for marriage (‘the time of love’). YHWH mentions five things about his reaction to Jerusalem’s maturity.

  • I spread my skirt (wing) over thee – this may indicate taking under protection (Deut 32:11) or perhaps betrothal (Ruth 3:9).
  • I covered thy nakedness – nakedness and covering are themes in this allegory. The infant was abandoned naked (‘not swaddled’ v.4), grew up naked (v.7), her nakedness was covered by YHWH (v.8), she failed to remember the time she was naked (v.22), she was naked with her lovers (v.36) and will be exposed naked by way of punishment (37, 39). YHWH covers her nakedness(v.8), he covered her with silk ((v.10), she used her fine clothes to cover idols (v.18), and YHWH will uncover her nakedness as punishment (v.37).
  • I sware unto thee – see next point
  • I entered a covenant with thee – in the context swearing and entering into a covenant must refer to marriage. The metaphor of marriage to describe God’s covenant relationship with Israel had previously been used by Hosea (e.g. Hos 2:19-20).
  • thou became mine -the emphasis is on possession rather than affection.

(9) The symbolism of rescue, nurture and a marital relationship may correspond to the period of the Exodus, the covenant at Mount Sinai and the giving of the Law (Exod 19-24) when Israel was established as the people of God. YHWH continues with his list of his provisions for Jerusalem during that time; a chain of ten statements beginning with ‘I.’ He claims: ‘I washed,’ ‘I washed,’ ‘I anointed,’ ‘I clothed,’ ‘I shod,’ ‘I girded,’ ‘I covered,’ ‘I decked,’ ‘I put,’ ‘I put.’

YHWH begins by saying that he washed her with water then repeats that he washed her, adding that he thoroughly washed her blood away from her. ‘Blood’ is plural – i.e. ‘bloods’. Then he anointed her with oil. The use of oil in connection with hygiene occurs also in Ruth 3:3; 2 Sam 12:20; 14:2; 2 Chron 28:15; Dan 10:3; Mic 6:15. YHWH therefore did some things for her that her parents, the Amorite and the Hittite (v.3), had failed to do when she was born (v4). He washed her and rubbed her with oil – but not until she had reached maturity.

(10) Also she had not been swaddled at birth but then, after their marriage, YHWH clothed her. In four clauses he describes how he dressed Jerusalem:

  • I clothed thee also with embroidered work, – embroidered cloth, repeated in v.13
  • and shod thee with badgers’ skin, – leather sandals.
  • and I girded thee about with fine linen, – repeated in v.13
  • and I covered thee with silk. – repeated in v.13

(11-12) Moving on from clothes YHWH reminds Jerusalem that he decked her out with jewellery and gives five examples: bracelets, a chain, nose ring, earrings and a beautiful crown (crown of glory). In the Ancient Near East these were symbols of wealth, status and royalty.

(13) In this verse YHWH reiterates his generosity towards Jerusalem after their marriage. She wore gold and silver jewellery and expensive clothes made of fine linen, silk and embroidered cloth. These are repeated from v.10. He adds that she also enjoyed the best of foods: fine flour, honey and oil. These appear again in v.19. She became very, very beautiful and achieved ed royal status.

All these gifts symbolise YHWH’s grace extended to Israel and the blessings, privileges and prosperity that the nation enjoyed on account of the special covenant relationship. Jerusalem’s rising to the status of queen represents Israel’s elevated status, prominence and influence among the surrounding nations.

(14) Jerusalem’s ‘renown’ for beauty went forth among the Gentile nations. This word ‘renown’ is repeated in the next verse, as is ‘beauty’ and together these serve as a link between this section of the allegory and the next. YHWH claims responsibility for Jerusalem’s beauty; it was all a result of his grace, she had no merit of her own. The section ends with a favourite formula of Ezekiel: ‘saith the Lord [God].’ It occurs 85 times in the book and 9 times in this chapter (vv.8, 14, 19, 23, 30, 43, 48, 58, 63).

SUMMATION

Thus far the allegory has YHWH vividly portraying his grace toward Israel/Judah in lifting the nation from obscurity and insignificance, entering into a covenant with it and bringing it to a position of prominence and prosperity. The focus is on YHWH’s (dominant and possessive) relationship with Jerusalem and the good things that he has provided for her. The implication is that she ought to be grateful for the relationship and such abundant provision. The allegory continues with an exploration of her response and her relationships with others.

This section of Ezekiel 16 is sometimes used in evangelistic preaching to illustrate God’s gracious dealings with sinners. C. H. Spurgeon, for example, published a sermon entitled Ezekiel’s Deserted Infant in 1862. A gospel message would perhaps apply the following points:

THE SINNER’S CONDITION

  • v.4 uncut – still attached to the world
  • v.4 unclean – tainted with the filth of sin
  • v.4 unsalted – uncared for
  • v.4 unclothed – no covering of righteousness
  • v.5 unclaimed – left to die

GOD’S SALVATION

  • God covered – ‘I spread’ v. 8 – Phil 3:9
  • God claimed – ‘thou becamest mine’ v.8 – SS 2:16
  • God cleansed – ‘I throughly washed’ v.9 – Isa 1:18
  • God clothed – ‘I clothed’ v.10 – Rev 3:18

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel’s Vine Allegory: a Prophecy about Jerusalem – 15:1-8

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapters 15, 16 and 17 Ezekiel delivers further messages from YHWH about impending judgement upon Jerusalem. These chapters contain striking allegories which convey YHWH’s perspective on Israel/Judah. In chapter 15 the nation is likened to a vine and in chapter 16 to an adulterous wife. Chapter 17 contains an allegory of two eagles and a vine.

Ezekiel chapter 15 falls into two parts:

vv. 1-5 The allegory of a vine – five rhetorical questions.

vv. 6-8 The allegory applied to the people of Jerusalem – six conclusions.

THE ALLEGORY OF A VINE (1-5)

(1) That this is a new oracle is indicated by the now familiar prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying.’ As we learn from previous chapters false prophets among the exiles in Babylon have been predicting that all will be well with Jerusalem. YHWH’s temple is there and he dwells in it, therefore the city is safe. One prophet, however, is predicting that Jerusalem will be punished and destroyed because of the people’s sinfulness and idolatry. That prophet is Ezekiel.

With this prophetic word formula Ezekiel claims that the content of his oracles does not consist of his own ideas; the messages come to him directly from YHWH and Ezekiel then passes them on to the people.

(2) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH employs a clever allegory to illustrate Israel/Judah’s guilt and punishment: he likens the nation to a grapevine. This image of Israel as a vine was familiar to Ezekiel’s fellow exiles.

Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall: Gen 49:22

Thou hast brought a vine out of Egypt: thou hast cast out the heathen, and planted it. Psa 80:8

For the vineyard of the LORD of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant… Isa 5:7 (The parable of the vineyard Isa 5:1-7)

In that day sing ye unto her, A vineyard of red wine. I the LORD do keep it; I will water it every moment: lest any hurt it, I will keep it night and day. Isa 27:2-3

Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me? Jer 2:21

Israel is an empty vine, he bringeth forth fruit unto himself: according to the multitude of his fruit he hath increased the altars; according to the goodness of his land they have made goodly images. Hos 10:1

The conventional interpretation of this familiar image focused on the vine’s purpose and ability to bear fruit. Indeed, that is the interpretation which Jesus applied in John chapter 15. Here in Ezekiel chapter 15, however, the fruit is not mentioned. The allegory is about the wood. It is not about Jerusalem being fruitless, rather it is about it being useless. YHWH addresses five rhetorical questions to Ezekiel which show how useless the wood of the vine is in comparison with the wood of the other trees of the forest. Its wood is portrayed as worthless and good for nothing.

QUESTION 1 – What is the vine tree more than any tree, or than a branch which is among the trees of the forest? 15:2

The implied answer to this question whether the wood of a vine is superior to the wood of other trees is: ‘No. its wood is inferior.’ The vine’s only value lies in its ability to bear fruit. If it does not bear fruit then it is useless.

QUESTION 2 – Shall wood be taken thereof to do any work? 15:3a

Again the implied answer is negative. Unlike other strong trees whose wood is suitable for construction or furniture the wood of a vine is useless for any kind of work.

QUESTION 3 – Will men take a pin of it to hang any vessel thereon? 15:3b

The wood of a vine cannot even be used to make a peg to hang things on.

QUESTION 4 – Behold, it is cast into the fire for fuel; the fire devoureth both the ends of it, and the midst of it is burned. Is it meet for any work? 15:4

Vine wood has no practical use; all one can do with it is burn it. Even then, it burns quickly.

QUESTION 5 – Behold, when it was whole, it was meet for no work: how much less shall it be meet yet for any work, when the fire hath devoured it, and it is burned? 15:5

If a healthy vine is already useless in its natural state then a burnt and damaged one is even more useless.

THE ALLEGORY OF A VINE APPLIED (6-8)

(6) This is an important verse since it serves as a bridge between the allegory in the first section and the explanation of the allegory in the second section. This verse contains the last mention of the vine in the chapter and also the first (and only) mention of Jerusalem. Beginning with the word ‘therefore’ (which tells us that what follows are conclusions drawn from that which has already been said) this verse moves the message on from allegory to reality. Jerusalem is no better than the other towns and cities in Israel/Judah so it too is destined to suffer destruction and burning. YHWH’s conclusions are set out in six statements:

STATEMENT No.1 – As the vine tree among the trees of the forest, which I have given to the fire for fuel, so will I give the inhabitants of Jerusalem. 15:6

Just as a useless vine is consigned to the fire so will YHWH hand over the people of Jerusalem to be consumed by the ‘fire’ of invasion and destruction by the Babylonian forces.

STATEMENT No. 2 – And I will set my face against them; 15:7a, 7d

This expression, which is repeated for emphasis at the end of the verse, indicates that YHWH is opposed to the people of Judah. He is determined to bring judgement upon them.

STATEMENT No. 3 – They shall go out from one fire, and another fire shall devour them; 15:7b

This may mean that in previous invasions Jerusalem suffered some damage but will be totally destroyed as a result of the coming siege and pillage by the Babylonians. It may also suggest that some citizens might manage to escape the destruction but will then face further calamity (e.g. Jer 42:22; 44:12-14). Judgement is inevitable.

STATEMENT No. 4 – And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I set my face against them. 15:7c

This recognition formula is common in Ezekiel. Here it is addressed (‘ye’ – you plural) to the exiles with Ezekiel in Babylon to whom he is delivering this oracle. When they will see what has happened to Jerusalem they will acknowledge that it is YHWH’s doing.

STATEMENT No. 5 – And I will make the land desolate, 15:8a

This reiterates that Jerusalem will be utterly destroyed.

STATEMENT No. 6 – Because they have committed a trespass,15:8b

This will happen because the Jerusalemites have committed a trespass – an unfaithful act. The destruction is a direct result of their actions. By worshipping idols the people of Jerusalem have acted unfaithfully towards YHWH so he will not protect the city. This idea of punishment for unfaithfulness is a common theme in the books of Chronicles – which use words like ‘trespassing’ and ‘transgressing’ to identify unfaithful acts (1 Chron 5:25; 10:13;2 Chron 12:2; 28:19; 29:6; 30:7; 36:14).

SUMMATION

In this short chapter YHWH gives a message about Jerusalem to Ezekiel who then relays the oracle to his fellow-exiles in Babylon. The first section of the chapter (vv. 1-5) contains a clever allegory which is communicated by the technique of asking rhetorical questions. The allegory inverts the usual picture of Israel as a valuable fruit-bearing vine by focusing on the wood rather than the fruit. The vine is revealed as useless and only fit for destruction. The second section (vv.6-8) applies the allegory to the people of Jerusalem (standing for the nation of Israel/Judah) and emphasizes their unfaithful acts and impending doom. The theme of unfaithfulness is taken up and presented in graphic detail in the next chapter which contains an extended allegory about an unfaithful wife.

Posted in Exposition

Understanding Ezekiel 14:12-23: Judgment and Righteousness

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 14:12-23 records a new oracle from YHWH to Ezekiel about impending judgment upon Jerusalem. These verses highlight the severity and certainty of the punishment and show that it is inevitable because of Jerusalem’s sin and unfaithfulness.

The passage addresses a significant theoretical question that that must have been raised at the time: ‘Would YHWH really destroy Jerusalem when there are still some righteous people living in the city?’ In the oracle YHWH rejects the notion that the righteousness of a few can atone for the sins of the many and instead insists on individual personal responsibility. Even if the righteous should intercede the disaster cannot be averted. YHWH’s retributive justice cannot overlook sin just because of a connection with a righteous individual.

FAMINE

(13-14) This new oracle is introduced by the prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came…to me, saying.’ As usual, YHWH addresses Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ and refers to a hypothetical country (‘a land’) that sins against him by trespassing grievously. Note the use of the two closely related terms ‘sin’ and ‘trespass.’ Sin is a general term encompassing all forms of disobedience against God’s will, whether intentional or unintentional. Trespass is more specific and involves deliberately violating a known law. All trespasses are sins but not all sins are trespasses. In this connection Greenberg (1983, p. 257) observes : ‘Inasmuch as the hypothetical land of vss.13-20 is not specifically that of Israel, this will be the only passage in Hebrew Scripture in which “trespass (against Yahweh)” is predicated of a non-Israelite subject.’

When a nation sins against YHWH he will ‘stretch out his hand upon it.’ This biblical image signifies divine intervention in judgment. The specific punishment mentioned here is famine. Cutting off the food supply of both human beings and animals would be a reminder of humanity’s dependence upon YHWH. Would he, however, act against a sinful nation if righteous individuals live there and (presumably) intercede on behalf of the sinful population? The remainder of the oracle deals with the limitations of personal righteousness and intercession in a situation where sin is widespread.

Although the background to this oracle is idolatry in Judah YHWH indicates that what he says has a much wider application by referring to a hypothetical country and also by holding up two non-Israelite men along with the Israelite Daniel as iconic examples of righteousness. Even if Noah, Daniel and Job were in such a country they could not avert disaster. They would only be able to save themselves because of their righteous characters, no-one else.

At that time these three men were legendary throughout the Ancient Near East for their righteousness. Through it they had also been able to save the lives of others.

Noah – because of his righteousness (Gen 6:9) the primaeval hero Noah was able to save himself, his family and the animals from the Flood (Gen 6:9-8:22).

Daniel – This likely refers to Ezekiel’s older contemporary the Daniel of the Babylonian exile who, though still a young man (possibly late twenties) at this time, had already gained a reputation for righteousness. Has he saved lives through intercession?  Some would point to Daniel 2:17-18.

Modern scholars tend to argue that this is not the Daniel of the book of Daniel but the righteous Ugaritic Daniel (Dn’il) of The Tale of Aqhat. Their arguments centre on the fact that the spelling of ‘Daniel’ in the book of Ezekiel differs from that in the book of Daniel, that Dn’il was a figure of antiquity as were Noah and Job but not the contemporary Daniel and the chronological argument that the Daniel of the book of Daniel was too young to have achieved fame at the time this oracle was given.

Arguments for Dn’il in the article by ‘Day, J. (1980). The Daniel of Ugarit and Ezekiel and the Hero of the Book of Daniel. Vetus Testamentum, 30(2), pp. 174–184′ may be read online free of charge by logging into JSTOR. ‘The Tale of Aqhat’ may be read in J. B. Pritchard’s ‘Ancient Near Eastern Texts’ at archive.org.

Job – Through intercession the righteous sufferer Job was able to save the lives of his three friends who had been wrong about the reasons for his affliction (Job 42:7-10).

That the presence of its most righteous inhabitants could not save a sinful nation underscores the seriousness of sin. Salvation is an individual affair, righteousness is non-transferable. That Noah, Job and Daniel are recognised by the Lord as examples of personal righteousness encourages us to maintain personal righteousness during times of trial and in circumstances where all around is marked by corruption.

(15-16) RAVENING ANIMALS

Here the imagery of wild beasts roaming the land attacking and killing the populace is used to describe another form of punishment. Travel throughout the country would be impossible. Society would break down and the land be uninhabitable. The repetition of the three righteous men again emphasises the fact that righteousness is non-transferable. Even their children would not be spared.

(17-18) WAR

The third scenario of judgment is war and conflict as symbolised by the sword. YHWH would subject a sinful nation to punishment by violence and invasion. Again it is stated that even if these three men were in it they could not save even their closest family members.

(19-20) BLEEDING PESTILENCE

The fourth scenario in this escalating progression of judgment is that of plague which will affect humans and animals (famine – ravening animals – war -bleeding pestilence). YHWH will pour out his fury upon the land ‘in blood.’ Pestilence and bloodshed are not two separate judgments but a hendiadys which specifies the type of plague – bleeding pestilence – i.e. the plague results in an outpouring of blood. (For a short technical discussion of this see: Tooman, W. A. (2010). On the Meaning of דבר ודם in Ezekiel (5:17, 14:19, 28:23, 38:22). Vetus Testamentum, 60(4), pp. 666–668.)

Once again swearing by his own life (‘as I live saith the Lord God’) in v.20 as in vv.16 and 18 YHWH repeats the point about the three righteous men. They could only deliver themselves by their righteousness, not their family members. The repetition reinforces YHWH’s point that no human being, however righteous, can turn back the Lord’s punishment of a sinful and unrepentant people.

(21) In this passage YHWH has so far been speaking in general terms about a hypothetical sinful country. This verse now makes it clear that that he had Judah, represented by Jerusalem, in view. The phrase ”how much more’ suggests that the punishment of Judah will be particularly severe because of its privileges. All four judgments (the sword, famine, wild beasts, plague) will be visited upon the city and the cumulative effect will be total devastation. Although directed at Judah this oracle was given in Babylon and served to remind the exiles there that their notion that things would work out well in the end for Jerusalem was false.

(22-23) These verses introduce a note of hope that despite overwhelming punishment YHWH would preserve a remnant ‘who will come forth unto you’ i.e. to Ezekiel and the exiles in Babylon. It does not seem that these few people will survive because of their personal righteousness but rather that they are examples of sinful people who experience YHWH’s mercy in the midst of judgment. When this group of exiles comes to Babylon the exiles will see how wicked they really are and be consoled that the Lord has been just in executing well-deserved judgment upon Jerusalem and Judah. God’s justice will be vindicated.

An alternative interpretation is that Ezekiel and the exiles will see the changed behaviour of the remnant. The judgment will have had a purifying effect upon them, they will have repented and been transformed, Ezekiel and the exiles will then be comforted that God’s purposes have been accomplished.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel 14:12-23 is a solemn and sobering reminder of the seriousness of sin and the certainty of God’s judgment. Even the presence of righteous men in a country cannot avert this. Everyone is responsible for his own sin. The passage emphasises the severity of God’s punishment upon Judah which will be fourfold: famine, wild animals, the sword and plague. Despite this some individuals will survive the catastrophe and eventually reach the exiles in Babylon. Their bad (or good???) behaviour will cause the exiles to acknowledge God’s justice. That there will be a remnant is a faint glimmer of hope in an otherwise gloomy forecast for Judah’s future.

Posted in Exposition

IDOLS IN THEIR HEARTS: Ezekiel 14:1-11

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 14:1-11 contains the last oracle in a series relating to prophecy in the section 12:21-14:11. In this passage Ezekiel addresses the moral state of those who would seek guidance from YHWH. His particular concern is with hypocrites who worship idols in their heart but come to inquire of a prophet of YHWH. He issues a warning that both idolaters and the prophets who answer their queries will face certain judgment.

(1) The occasion of this oracle is a visit Ezekiel received from some of the ‘elders of Israel’ to inquire (v.3b) of YHWH. Presumably he was still at his house in Chebar (3:24; 4:4). Since it is unlikely that these men travelled from Jerusalem to see him the term ‘elders of Israel’ here and in 20:1 probably equates to ‘elders of Judah’ in 8:1. They are therefore leaders of the Israelite/Judahite community in Babylon. They respectfully ‘sat before’ Ezekiel, thus recognising him as a teacher. We are not told exactly when they visited (‘then came’) or what it was they wished to know. Whatever it was, the tenor of the passage would suggest that they did not receive a direct answer to their query.

(2) As the elders sat before him Ezekiel received a communication from YHWH in response to their presence.

(3)The revelation to Ezekiel is that the elders (‘these men) have ‘taken the idols into their heart’. The idea is that they have set up or enthroned idols in their heart; thus displacing YHWH. Even if these men do not literally bow down before idols the fact is that they are heavily influenced by pagan ideas and practices.

‘The stumbling block of their iniquity’ is a phrase used only by Ezekiel (7:19; 14:3, 4, 7; 18:30; 44:12) and refers metaphorically to spiritual obstacles or sins that cause the people to fail in their relationship with YHWH. If meant literally it refers to idols or sinful practices which they cherish. That the elders put these ‘before their face’ might suggest that they are using cult objects as intermediaries.

YHWH, addressing Ezekiel, raises a rhetorical question; to which the expected answer is ‘No!’ Referring to Israelites/Judahites who are preoccupied with idolatry and yet hypocritically consult a prophet, YHWH asks Ezekiel if it is appropriate that he should hear and respond to their inquiries since their divided loyalty means that they are in no fit moral state to hear his word.

(4-5) Ezekiel is instructed to speak to the elders of Israel about their sin and tell them that everyone of the house of Israel who consults a prophet while cherishing idolatry will, indeed, receive an answer. It will not be the kind of answer they expect; but will be judgement that involves giving them over to the many idols in their hearts. Their idolatry will not be ignored.

The statements in vv.4-5 and vv.7-8 regulating the approach of Israelites to YHWH through a prophet are set out in the form of casuistic law similar to Lev 17:3, 8, 10, 13.

Verse 5 states that the punishment is so that YHWH ‘may take the house of Israel in their own heart’ because they are estranged from him because of idolatry. The verb ‘take’ means to lay hold of, seize, take hold violently, capture. One view is that ‘take’ has the idea of catching in a snare, another is that YHWH will grasp their heart so tight that they will feel it, be terrified and thus forced to acknowledge his lordship. Or it could mean that YHWH will touch their conscience with the result that they turn to him. Most likely YHWH’s purpose is redemptive, he wishes to recapture their hearts and restore the relationship with his people.

(6) If a right relationship with YHWH is to be reinstated then the Israelites must renounce idolatry and return wholeheartedly to YHWH. The call to repentance features the verb ‘return’ (šûḇ) which occurs three times in this verse:

Repent (šûḇ) ,
and turn (šûḇ) yourselves from your idols;
and turn (šûḇ) away your faces from all your abominations.

(7) This verse is basically a restatement of v.4 but expands the warning to include ‘the stranger that sojourneth in Israel.’ The term ‘stranger’ (alien, foreigner) was used to describe someone who temporarily lived and worked in Israel, had no property rights (cf. Deut 26:10-13) and was expected to worship only YHWH (Lev 17:8-9; 20:1-2). Here it must mean proselytes, possibly Babylonians, who have converted to the religion of YHWH. Should a proselyte consult a prophet of YHWH with idolatry in his heart he too will suffer the same fate as an Israelite who does likewise.

Whereas v.4 says that ‘the Lord will answer him according to the multitude of his idols’ v.7 says ‘I the Lord will answer him by myself.’ He will receive a personal response from the Lord. The nature of that response is set out in v.8.

(8) YHWH will do three things:

  1. ‘I will set my face against that man.’ – be opposed to him.
  2. ‘[I] will make him a sign and a proverb’ – make his punishment an example that will become proverbial and act as a deterrent to others.
  3. ‘I will cut him off from the midst of my people’ – remove him from among his people.

The verse ends with the recognition formula: ”ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

(9) This verse is aimed at prophets. A true prophet of YHWH will not give an answer to an inquiry by someone who worships idols in his heart but a false prophet certainly will because this is what his reputation depends upon. A false prophet will ‘speak a word’ telling the people what they wish to hear. It will be given in the name of YHWH but it will not come from the Lord.

In such a situation, i.e. when a false prophet utters a false oracle, YHWH will ‘deceive’ (entice) the false prophet. YHWH will behind the false answer and use a false prophet to tell the people what they want to hear. YHWH will let the false prophet be deceived and in turn deceive the inquirer. For a similar idea see 1 Kgs 22:18-23; 2 Thess 2:11-12.

The ancient Israelites would not have considered deception of a prophet by YHWH to be morally questionable or contradictory. They thought in terms of a primary cause – God. He is sovereign and just; evil as well as good is under his control. This verse emphasises YHWH’s sovereignty. He does not actively cause sin but permits people to follow their own inclinations and suffer the consequences. The paradox of God’s sovereignty versus man’s responsibility is a theological theme that has been debated for centuries.

(10) Since both the false prophets and those who seek their advice perpetuate idolatry and deception they are held jointly accountable for their actions and will share the same consequences. Therefore the prophets will also be subject to the punishment by YHWH set out in v.8.

(11) The purpose (or perhaps the result) of the punishment is that Israel will forsake idolatry and once again be a holy people, as was the original intention (Lev 26:12; 30:22).

SUMMATION

This chapter addresses the sin of the elders of Israel who, despite seeking a word from YHWH, harbour idolatry in their hearts. Through Ezekiel YHWH exposes their hypocrisy and declares that he will not ignore it but will respond with judgement. He demands repentance and warns the entire Israelite community that false prophets and those who consult them will suffer the same consequences. The punishment, however, is redemptive and is designed to rehabilitate the nation.

Thus far in the book of Ezekiel the predicted outlook for the people of Israel/Judah has been bleak but in chapter 14 the call to repentance (v.6) and YHWH’s desire for a restoration of the covenant relationship (v.11) offer a glimmer of hope that he has not given up on them completely.

Posted in Exposition

Prophecy and Divination Practices of Women in Ezekiel 13:17-23

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading Ezekiel 13: 17-23

INTRODUCTION

Having addressed in 13:1-16 the danger posed by male false prophets who declare ‘peace’ when there is no peace, Ezekiel now turns his attention to the negative impact of prophesying women upon the community. They mislead with lies and deceptive practices and, like the male prophets, misrepresent YHWH.

Not much is known about female prophecy in ancient Israel, especially at this more personal (as opposed to national) level, so this passage in Ezekiel is of great interest. Unfortunately, as we shall see, the words for two items associated with divination practice occur only in this Bible passage, so exactly what these objects and their purpose were is unclear.

Women prophesying in Israel was not a new phenomenon. Several in the Old Testament are referred to as prophetesses (e.g. Miriam in Exod 15:20; Deborah in Judg 4:4; Huldah in 2 Chron 34:22; Noadiah in Neh 6:14) and appear to have been prominent women who operated at a national level; prophesying about matters that affected the people as a whole. Ezekiel does not seem to have a problem with the idea of women prophesying per se but he condemns these local prophetic women for their practices, for their profanation of YHWH and for their deceit, manipulation, false assurances and lies.

This oracle In Ezek 13:17-23 is also significant because it is one of only four that the Old Testament prophets addressed to women as a specific group. The other three are:

Isa 3:16-4:1 – Isaiah’s oracle against the women of Jerusalem
Isa 32:9-12 – Isaiah’s oracle against complacent women
Amos 4:1-3 – Amos’ oracle against the ‘cows of Bashan’

(17) Ezekiel is again addressed as ‘Son of Adam’ and is told to prophesy against the women who, like the men in v.2, are said to prophesy out of their own heart (imagination). YHWH, and therefore Ezekiel, is opposed to these women. The term ‘prophetess’ is not applied to them but they are referred to as ‘the daughters of thy people who prophesy.’ Since ‘sons of thy people’ in 3:11 refers to the Jehoiachin exiles it therefore seems likely that the description ‘daughters of thy people’ refers to women who are in exile with Ezekiel in Babylonia. However, perhaps it also refers to women who prophesy in Jerusalem.

As in v.2 concerning the male prophets, Ezekiel is commanded to ‘prophesy against’ the female prophets but in their case an additional phrase is added: ‘set thy face against.’ That expression is associated with judgement and occurs 9 times in Ezekiel. The other 8 occasions are: 6:2 the mountains of Israel; 20:46 the south; 21:2 Jerusalem; 25:2 the Ammonites; 28:21 Sidon; 29:2 Pharaoh; 35:2; Mt. Seir; 38:2 Gog.

(18-19) Verse 18, like v.3, begins with the messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God,’ followed by the pronouncement of a woe. We now learn why YHWH is against the women: it is because they use illegitimate divination practices. Two of the practices are:

  1. sewing cloth bindings on their wrists.
  2. making head-bands on heads of every height.

Unfortunately, as I have already mentioned, it is impossible to ascertain exactly what these practices involved.

Ezekiel uses two words for the distinctive articles of clothing worn by the women who prophesy:

kesatot – This plural word also occurs in v.20. Here in v.18 it is in a sentence which the KJV renders ‘that sew pillows to all armholes.’ Because kesatot were sewn upon the wrists or hands of the female prophets (not their clients) the word has been translated: bindings, covering-nets, amulets, cushions, pillows, or phylacteries. These accessories may have been magic charms made of cloth and fastened to ‘all the joints of the hands.’ The phrase ‘joints of the hands’ is usually translated ‘wrists’ but could also mean ‘elbows’

mispahot – This plural word, occurring only here and in v. 21, is thought to designate long veils. It has been translated variously as: kerchiefs, bird-nets, headbands, veils, mantles, shawls, scarves, and amulets.

Many commentators favour the idea of covering-nets and bird-nets, which links these objects with the ‘hunting for souls.’ V.18 ends with a question: ‘Will ye hunt the souls of my people, and will ye save the souls alive that come unto you?’ The image is of hunting for birds or game using nets. The women. therefore, are viewed as predators; hunting people and trapping them. ‘Souls’ (persons, lives) will feature again in vv.19 and 20.

V.19 poses another question: ‘And will ye pollute me among my people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread?’ Notice that here YHWH says ‘profane me.’ The women profess to prophesy in the name of YHWH but do not. Their motive for this seems to be personal gain.

Some suggest that barley and bread may be items used in the divination rituals but most commentators are of the view that clients paid the women for their divination and fortune-telling services with these commodities. 1 Sam 9:7, for example, refers to the use of food as payment for prophetic services: ‘Then Saul said to his servant, “But if we go, what can we bring the man? For the bread in our sacks is gone, and there is no present to bring to the man of God. What do we have?” ESV

The last part of the quesion in v.19 follows on from at the end of v.18. Are these women profaning YHWH for mere handfuls of barley and bread in order ‘to slay the souls that should not die, and to save the souls alive that should not live by their lying to the people?’

What is meant by putting to death souls who should not die and keeping alive souls who should not live? If the Jerusalem situation is in view it may mean that accepting food as payment in a time of shortage puts the lives of the women’s clients at risk while extending their own lives and those of their family members. It could also mean that their prophecies declare who is to live and who is to die (e.g. Jer 26:8), or that they deal death through black magic. They wield considerable influence in the community since their [false] prophecies lead to the death of innocent people and the preservation of the wicked. According to vv. 20-21, however, their magical power will be broken by YHWH.

(20-21) YHWH’s sentence upon the women is pronounced in a double ABC pattern setting out his action, aim and purpose:

A – action – I will tear them (the bands) from your arms.
B – aim – I will let the souls go [free].
C – purpose – to make them fly (i.e. that they may fly away)

A – action – Your kerchiefs also will I tear.
B – aim – I will deliver my people out of your hand.
C – purpose – they shall be no more in your hand to be hunted (i.e. cease to be prey in your hands).

The women bind pieces of cloth upon themselves but YHWH will tear these off. They prey upon and trap people with their covering-nets and bird-nets but YHWH will set their victims free to fly like a bird (cf. Psa 124:7).

(22) Further condemnation is pronounced upon the women because their lies and activities dishearten the righteous, causing unnecessary stress. The wicked are encouraged by false assurances, with the result that they do not repent (cf. Jer23:14). Instead of bringing the people closer to YHWH the women lead them further away.

(23) The chapter closes with YHWH vowing that that the false prophetesses will no longer see vain visions or practise divination and that he will deliver his people from them. YHWH mentions ‘my people’ in vv. 9, 10, 18, 19a, 19b, 21 and 23.

SUMMATION

In Ezek 13:17-23 YHWH strongly denounces the women who prophesy for their harmful effect on the Israelite community of the Jehoiachin exile in Babylon. Both the male prophets and the prophesying women practise divination but only the women are said to use certain accoutrements as part of the process. For reasons that are not given, YHWH particularly condemns their use of such items. The problem is not just the means used for divination but also the parasitic motives behind their prophecies; they make up lies for self-seeking and personal profit. In addition, their methods are sinister and occultic. They hunt souls, using their accoutrements to manipulate people, abusing the control they have over those who listen to them. These women exercise power that does not have its source in YHWH and from which people need to be delivered.

The women are not described as witches but they do seem to tread a fine line between religion and magic. Scripture forbids occultic practitioners; this includes soothsayers, sorcerers, witches, wizards, charmers, mediums, necromancers, fortune-tellers and interpreters of dreams (Deut 13:1-5; 18:9-11; Lev 19:26, 31; 20:6).

There are still male and female false prophets active in today’s world; preaching from their own imagination and leading people astray with lies and false assurances. The clear lesson from Ezekiel 13 is that we ought to beware of religious leaders, especially those who call themselves prophets, and therefore:

Evaluate what they teach – Compare what they say with the Bible. Do they distort and contradict biblical doctrine or claim to have some new revelation from the Lord? Do they preach miracles, prosperity and God’s blessings rather than warn about sin, death and judgement to come (Heb 9:27)?

Examine their character – Does their ministry provoke division and strife among believers? Do they display humility, accountability and integrity or are they immoral, dishonest, boastful and corrupt?

Assess their motives – While claiming to speak for God do they seek power, fame and personal gain. Do they want your money?

God is still sovereign and just! In Ezekiel 13 he promises to deliver his people from deception and to punish false prophets who bring God’s word into disrepute as well as exploiting others spiritually and financially.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 13:1-16 The Danger of False Prophets

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading Ezekiel 13: 1-23

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 13 is a significant passage in Ezekiel because it addresses the danger posed by false prophets whose messages originate in their own ‘hearts.’ In this chapter Ezekiel denounces counterfeit prophets who mislead the people by falsely claiming to speak for YHWH.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Ezekiel prophesied during a time of great turmoil for Israel. In 597 BCE the Chaldean king Nebuchadnezzar II subdued Jerusalem and placed a puppet king (Zedekiah) on the throne of Judah. He also deported the deposed king Jehoiachin to Babylonia (2 Kgs 24:15-17) along with many of the elite citizens of Judah, including Ezekiel. There YHWH called and commissioned Ezekiel as his prophet.

Although living in Babylonia at a place called Tel-Abib near the River Chebar Ezekiel directed many of his prophecies towards the people of Jerusalem. The situation there was deteriorating after King Zedekiah’s abortive attempt to revolt against Babylonian rule (2 Kgs 25:1-2). Interestingly, that revolt was supported and encouraged by false prophets in Judah (Jer 27:9-10,14-16). Soon the city was besieged by Nebuchadnezzar’s forces and eventually devastated by them in 586/7 BCE.

Meanwhile over in Babylonia Ezekiel condemned Israel and Judah because of their sin and idolatry; prophesying impending judgement upon them. At the same time other Israelite men and women in Babylonia were delivering prophecies which contradicted Ezekiel’s message of doom.

Instead of prophesying punishment, they offered false comfort to the people; assuring them that the situation at Jerusalem would soon be resolved peacefully and thus building up their hopes of a soon return from exile. Ezekiel as a true prophet of YHWH found it necessary to denounce these false prophets and confront their lies.

Chapter 13 of Ezekiel is situated within a section (12:21-14:11) that deals with various issues relating to prophecy. The chapter contains two parallel woe oracles which are similar in structure, content and style. One is against male prophets and the other against women who prophesy, The context (13:9) would indicate that these people, like Ezekiel, were Israelite exiles in Babylonia. Back in the homeland Jeremiah too was denouncing false prophets and prophecy. It is worth comparing his oracle in Jer 23:9-40 with those of Ezekiel in Ezek 13.

CHAPTER DIVISION

13:1-16 – An oracle addressed to male prophets.


13:17-23 – An oracle addressed to women who prophesy.

AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO MALE PROPHETS (1-16)

(1) ‘And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ – This phrase is often used in Ezekiel to introduce a new oracle (e.g. 11:14; 12:1; 15:1; 17:1; 18:1). In 13:1 it covers both oracles in chapter 13 (2-16; 17-23) and is particularly relevant since it emphasizes the fact that Ezekiel speaks the word of YHWH, unlike the false prophets whom he condemns. This oracle against male prophets is mirrored by that against the female prophets in vv.17-23. The structure and language are similar.

STRUCTURE

  • A preamble – vv.1-3a and vv.17-18a.
  • Ezekiel addressed as ‘Son of Man’ – v.2 and v.17.
  • An accusation – vv.3b-7 and vv.18b-19.
  • A forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ – vv.8-9 and vv.20-21.
  • A second forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – vv.10-14 and vv.22-23.

LANGUAGE

Although the content is different the language used in each of the two oracles is similar:

  • v.2 – ‘Son of Man, prophesy against’ and v.17 – ‘Son of man, set thy face against.’
  • v.2 – ‘that prophesy’ and v.16 – ‘which prophesy.’
  • v.2 – ‘say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own hearts’ and v.17 – ‘which prophesy out of their own heart; and prophesy thou against them.’
  • v.3 – ‘thus saith the Lord God’ and v.18 – ‘thus saith the Lord God.’
  • v.3 – ‘woe unto’ and v.18 – ‘woe to.’
  • v.8 – ‘therefore saith the Lord God’ and v.20 – ‘wherefore saith the Lord God.’
  • v.8 – ‘behold I am against’ and v.20 – ‘behold I am against.’
  • v.9 – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ and v.21 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’
  • v.10 – ‘because…’ and v.22 – ‘because…’
  • v.13 – ‘therefore…’ and v.23 – ‘therefore.’
  • v.14 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord’ and v.23 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

(2) Addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ (stressing human weakness in light of God’s greatness) YHWH instructs him to deliver this message ‘against’ (’el; 2, 8, 9, 17, 20) the false prophets. They are called ‘the prophets of Israel,’ a description unique to Ezekiel (13:2,16; 38:17, cf. 13:4). These men are in exile with Ezekiel but the term ‘prophets of Israel’ may suggest that he views them as part of a larger group that would include false prophets back in Israel/Judah. The latter are described by Jeremiah as ‘the prophets of Samaria’ (Jer 23:13) and ‘the prophets of Jerusalem’ (Jer 23:14). Ezekiel’s opponents are not prophets of other gods but men working within the Israelite religious system.

(3) The pronouncement of a ‘woe’ on these ‘foolish (nāḇāl) prophets’ hints at the severe consequences of prophesying lies while claiming to speak for YHWH; these will be set out in vv.8-9. The men are fools; what they say is empty and futile. In the Old Testament a fool (nāḇāl) is someone who denies or disrespects God (Job 2:10; Psa 14:1; 74:18, 22; Isa 32:5-6). These prophets do not follow the Spirit of God but their own spirits, they perceive nothing.

There are several changes in person within these verses which some people might find confusing:

  • In vv. 2-3, YHWH directly addresses Ezekiel in the second person ‘thou’.
  • In v. 4-5, YHWH directly addresses Israel in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In verse 6, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.
  • In vv. 7-8, YHWH directly addresses the false prophets in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In v. 9, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.

(4) YHWH addresses Israel and compares their false prophets to foxes or jackals among the ruins. Such animals survive in desolate places (Lam 5:18) by scavenging and are known to be opportunistic and destructive (Song 2:15). The simile implies that Judah is a society in ruins. It is morally desolate but these prophets thrive and capitalise on the chaos, exploiting the people’s vulnerability. They further undermine the ruins rather than try to build them up.

(5) Directly addressing the false prophets YHWH accuses them of failure to repair breaches in the wall (KJV ‘hedge’). The word gāḏēr refers to a protective wall, e.g. around a vineyard (Psa 80:12; Isa 5:5), or a city wall (Ezra 9:9; Mic &:11). Rather than rising to their responsibility for the defence of the people (e.g. by warnings, intercession, teaching) the false prophets contribute to their decline. Therefore the people will be defenceless in the Day of YHWH (Ezek 30:3, cf. 7:19) when his anger will come upon them (Ezek 5:13; 7:8; 9:8; 13:13; 16:42; 20:21, 34; 21:31; 20:20, 22, 31; 36:6; 38:19; 43:8).

(6-7) Vain visions and lying divination.

Verses 6 and 7 say much the same thing. Both highlight the deceitful arrogance of the false prophets who fabricate visions and use means of divination that YHWH has not authorised.

As well as seeing vain (empty, deceitful, false) visions they make lying divinations (predictions made by reading omens or by various rituals), practices forbidden in Deut 18:9-14. In Israelite religion the only sacred objects authorised for discerning God’s will in specific circumstances were the Urim and Thummim (Ex 28:30; Lev 8:8; Num 27:21; Deut 33:8; 1 Sam 28:6; Ezra 2:63; Neh 7:65).

Even worse is the false prophets’ habit of ascribing their lies to YHWH, hoping that this public declaration of authority would somehow obligate YHWH to fulfil their prophecies. V.6 ‘the Lord hath not sent them’ and v.7 ‘albeit I have not spoken’ emphasise that what they said did not have divine authorisation. Thus their predictions were not only false and deceitful but also blasphemous.

(8-9) Forecast of judgment upon the false prophets.

The word ‘therefore’ introduces details of the punishment due to the false prophets and a summary of the reasons why they deserve it – which is because they ‘have spoken vanity and seen lies.’ The prophets are informed that YHWH has had enough of their lies. He is already ‘against’ them and his hand will be raised up against (KJV ‘upon’) them. (’el – against – see 2, 8, 9, 17, 20). In Ezekiel YHWH’s outstretched hand is an indicator of punishment and judgment (6:14; 14:9,13; 16:27; 20:33,34; 25:7,13,16; 35:3). Their punishment will be three-fold:

1. They will lose membership of the assembly of YHWH’s people.

‘Assembly’ or ‘council’ (sôḏ) is an association of people who are closely connected, who have something in common (Gen 49:6; Job 19:19; Psa 64:3; 111:1; Jer 6:11; 15:17). This punishment has been interpreted as signifying a loss of leadership, honour or status in the community.

It has also been suggested that it may refer to exclusion from the select group who are confidants of YHWH (Psa 89:8; Jer 23:18,22); which would include true prophets (Amos 3:7). The meaning is probably even stronger: they would no longer be regarded as members of God’s earthly people – the community of faith.

2. They will not be listed in the register of the house of Israel.

These false prophets would not be listed in the genealogical register (keṯāb, writing) of Israelites. The existence and importance of this list for those returning from exile is clear from Ezra chapter 2 and Nehemiah chapter 7. For the false prophets exclusion would mean a loss of citizen rights. Notice that Jeremiah pronounced a similar punishment upon Shemaiah the Nehelamite (Jer 29:31-32).

Some commentators contend that this register is YHWH’s book (Ex 32:33; Psa 69:28; 87:6; 139:16; Dan 12:1). The Old Testament, however, is fairly vague about what is recorded in that book, whereas this document mentioned in Ezekiel 13:9 is specifically said to be the ‘register of the house of Israel.’ It seems more sensible to interpret it literally as a secular civil census list.

3. They will not be able to enter the land of Israel.

This flows logically from the previous two. Excision from the register would lead to serious consequences for the false prophets and their descendants; probably with respect to claims to ancestral land or the purchase of property.

The same word keṯāb meaning ‘register’ occurs in Ezra 2:62 and Neh 7:64. These twin passages illustrate the problems that exclusion from the register, in this case the record of priestly genealogies, could bring:

Another group returned at this time from the towns of Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Kerub, Addan, and Immer. However, they could not prove that they or their families were descendants of Israel. This group included the families of Delaiah, Tobiah, and Nekoda— a total of 652 people. Three families of priests — Hobaiah, Hakkoz, and Barzillai — also returned. (This Barzillai had married a woman who was a descendant of Barzillai of Gilead, and he had taken her family name.) They searched for their names in the genealogical records, but they were not found, so they were disqualified from serving as priests. Ezra 2:59-62 NLT

This first forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets ends with the divine recognition formula ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God.’

(10-14) A second forecast of judgment.

Verse 10 begins with a doubling of ya‘an (‘on account of’ or because’) which the KJV translates here as ‘because, even because’; meaning ‘for the very good reason.’ This phrase ya’an ub’ ya’an also occurs in Lev 26:43 and Ezek 36:3.

Punishment is due because they have misled (caused to go astray) the people saying ‘peace’ when there is no peace. Rather than warning them about the consequences of their sinful behaviour, the false prophets give an assurance of safety that is not rooted in reality. They intentionally lull the people into a false sense of security.

The image of a wall, used earlier in v.5 to represent the spiritual and moral state of the people of Judah, is taken up again in v.10. The word for ‘wall’ (ḥayiṣ) in v.10 is a hapax legomenon (a word that only occurs once) in the Old Testament and means a dry wall or party wall; an unimproved flimsy or crumbling wall built of mud-brick or loose stones and liable to collapse under stress. A different word (qiyrāh) is used for ‘wall’ in vv.12-15. The ‘wall’ in v.10 is not literal but metaphorical.

It is said to have been daubed or smeared with untempered mortar. The word tāp̱ēl translated ‘untempered’ (KJV) is an adjective meaning ‘unseasoned’ or ‘tasteless.’ The thought is that of lacking an essential ingredient; here the mortar is just mud to which a binding agent such as straw has not been added. It covers the wall but does not strengthen it. To emphasise that the product is insubstantial modern translations tend to replace the KJV translation’s ‘untempered [mortar]’ with ”whitewash.’ This conveys the thought of deceit and hypocrisy on the part of the false prophets.

(11-14) These verses continue with the figure of a whitewashed wall and the effect bad weather has on it. Flooding rain, great hailstones and stormy winds will cause it to fall. The futility of the false prophets’ assurances will be exposed and they will be held accountable. When judgement comes and the wall collapses people will ask (v.12) ‘Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it?’

Greenberg (1983, p.238) comments: ‘As said expressly in 22:8, “they” who daubed the wall were the prophets: the people built the dry wall – a figure of their unfounded optimism, while the prophets daubed it with worthless stuff – their self-inspired predictions of well-being.’

V.13 clarifies that the destructive forces represent YHWH’s anger against sin as well as the lies of the false prophets. His fury will be so intense that the prophets will not survive (vv.15b-16).

Scholars suggest that in v.14 the image of the wall changes. The wall which YHWH will break down is said to refer now to Jerusalem and the fall of the city. To quote Greenberg (1983, p.238) again, he says of the phrase leveling it to the ground in v.14:

‘The language of this clause is more appropriate to massive demolition than to the fall of a mere wall; it facilitates the intrusion, in the next clause, of the reference to Jerusalem. When it (fem.) falls and you perish within it (fem.).’

In other words proof for the assertion that in v.14 Ezekiel is thinking of the impending fall of Jerusalem is that the word ‘wall’ is masculine whereas ‘it shall fall’ and ‘in the midst thereof’ are feminine; therefore the reference cannot be to the metaphorical wall but to the city of Jerusalem.

This second forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets also ends with the divine recognition formula ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ (vv. 9, 14, 21, 23)

(15) YHWH asserts that he will accomplish his wrath upon the wall (the false assurances) and upon those that have smeared it with ‘whitewash’ (the false prophets).

(16) This verse summarises vv.10-15: the main lie of the false prophets is that they promise peace when there is no peace.

SUMMATION

This woe oracle denounces Israelite false prophets for failing to address the nation’s sin and instead spreading lies and details of false visions, claiming divine authority which they do not possess. They offer the people false hope by declaring ‘peace’ when there is no peace. The passage highlights God’s anger against deceit and spiritual negligence.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 12: Prophecies of Exile and Judgment

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel gives no new date marker at the beginning of chapter 12. The next one is not until 20:1 so in the absence of chronological data for chapters 12-19 one must assume that the messages they contain were delivered soon after the prophecies of chapters 8-11, during 592 BCE (8:1).

Since it would seem that the account of a trance which Ezekiel had communicated to his fellow-exiles (11:25) had had no effect upon them it was therefore essential that the theme of judgment upon Jerusalem and Judah be further developed, this is the main point of chapters 12-19. In chapter 12 Ezekiel emphasises the certainty of that impending judgment.

CHAPTER 12

1-2 A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE

3-7 THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED

8-16 THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD

17-20 THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED

21-28 THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED

A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE (1-2)

1 The word of the LORD also came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house. Ezekiel 12:1-2

(1) The phrase ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying’ signifies the commencement of a new message from YHWH.

(2) YHWH again addresses Ezekiel as ‘Son of man (adam)’ thus emphasising Ezekiel’s humanity in contrast to the Lord’s divinity. He says that Ezekiel dwells in the midst of a ‘rebellious house.’ This refers to the exiles who are already in Babylon along with Ezekiel. They are rebellious because they refuse to see or hear the truth (cp. Deut 29:3-4; Isa 6:9; Jer 5:21; Mk 8:18; Acts 28:27). The exiles probably shared the vain sentiments of the people back home in Judah whom Jeremiah (Jer 7:4) warned about misplaced trust in the temple. They thought that because the temple of the Lord was in Jerusalem the city would not fall to invading forces. Ezekiel needed to powerfully drive home the lesson that Jerusalem would indeed fall and that its inhabitants would be taken into exile.

THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED (3-7)

3 Therefore, thou son of man, prepare thee stuff for removing, and remove by day in their sight; and thou shalt remove from thy place to another place in their sight: it may be they will consider, though they be a rebellious house.
4 Then shalt thou bring forth thy stuff by day in their sight, as stuff for removing: and thou shalt go forth at even in their sight, as they that go forth into captivity.
5 Dig thou through the wall in their sight, and carry out thereby.
6 In their sight shalt thou bear it upon thy shoulders, and carry it forth in the twilight: thou shalt cover thy face, that thou see not the ground: for I have set thee for a sign unto the house of Israel.
7 And I did so as I was commanded: I brought forth my stuff by day, as stuff for captivity, and in the even I digged through the wall with mine hand; I brought it forth in the twilight, and I bore it upon my shoulder in their sight.

(3-7) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to enact a drama of someone going into exile. Referring back to ‘which have eyes to see, and see not’ in v.2 notice the seven-fold repetition of ‘in their sight’ in vv. 3-7. Also, the words ‘by day’ are mentioned three times in these verses. Ezekiel is to make sure that his actions get the attention of his audience. Notice also ‘remove’ and ‘removing’ – these are from a word meaning captivity or going into exile.

Ezekiel receives specific instructions regarding the drama he is to act out.

a. He is to ‘prepare his stuff’ by day for going into exile (v.4). ‘Stuff’ – According to Strongs H3627 this word can refer both to a vessel or receptacle and also to utensils or items of equipment. Most translations say something akin to ‘pack your baggage’ but here the reference is more likely to the bag or knapsack itself rather than to the few basic items (e.g. clothing, bedding, cooking utensils, food) an exile would put in it. Thus the Christian Standard Bible translates ‘prepare thee stuff for removing’ as: ‘get your bags ready for exile.’ Ezekiel’s fellow exiles in Babylonia would have no problem recognising what he was portraying; they had done this very thing for real a few years earlier, in 597 BCE.

b. He is to go out in the evening as if escaping like an exile (v.4).

c. He is to dig a hole in the wall (of his house, the courtyard or the town?) and take his baggage (stuff) out through it (v.5).

d. He is to carry his bag on his shoulder into the pitch darkness with his face covered so that he cannot see the ground (v.6). Note that the word translated ‘twilight’ in KJV means thick darkness. It occurs in vv. 6, 7, 12 and Gen 15:17.

Perhaps this performance will enable his rebellious fellow-exiles to understand (v.3) that this will soon be the situation in Jerusalem. People there will soon be fleeing as emigrants, never to return. YHWH tells Ezekiel (v. 6b) that by acting out this scenario he will serve as a sign or portent to the house of Israel (see also v.11). Isaiah is another prophet said to have been a sign (Isa 20:3).

‘I did so as I was commanded.’ In v.7 Ezekiel confirms that that he has faithfully complied with YHWH’s instructions. He adds that he excavated the hole in the wall by hand; thus avoiding the noise of a pick or other instrument that in a real life escape might alert the enemy. The main emphasis, however, is on his exile’s pack; its significance is revealed in v.10.

THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD (8-16)

8 And in the morning came the word of the LORD unto me, saying,
9 Son of man, hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?
10 Say thou unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; This burden concerneth the prince in Jerusalem, and all the house of Israel that are among them.
11 Say, I am your sign: like as I have done, so shall it be done unto them: they shall remove and go into captivity.
12 And the prince that is among them shall bear upon his shoulder in the twilight, and shall go forth: they shall dig through the wall to carry out thereby: he shall cover his face, that he see not the ground with his eyes.
13 My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare: and I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.
14 And I will scatter toward every wind all that are about him to help him, and all his bands; and I will draw out the sword after them.
15 And they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall scatter them among the nations, and disperse them in the countries.
16 But I will leave a few men of them from the sword, from the famine, and from the pestilence; that they may declare all their abominations among the heathen whither they come; and they shall know that I am the LORD.

(8-9) The following morning Ezekiel receives further communication from YHWH in the form of a negative question: ‘hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?’ Ezekiel’s strange behaviour has caught the attention of his fellow-exiles who have asked about it. This presents an opportunity for him to explain the significance of his symbolic act.

(10-11) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to give the explanation in the form of an authoritative prophetic message. It begins with ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ followed by a summary statement of the point of the drama. It is a message of impending disaster both for King Zedekiah and for all who remain with him in Jerusalem. Ezekiel uses ‘house of Israel’ in two different senses. Note that v.9 refers to the ‘house of Israel’ in Babylonia (cp. 11:15) and v.10 to the ‘house of Israel’ in Judah.

King Zedekiah of Judah is not mentioned by name but it is obvious that he is the person referred to. He is not called ‘the king’ (meleḵ) but ‘the prince’ (or chief). The Hebrew word for ‘prince’ is nasi.’ Many commentators point out that there is word play here on ‘prince’ (nasi) and ‘burden’ (maśśā). Greenberg (1983, p. 211) comments ‘The chief is this burden. Hebrew hannaśi hammaśśa hazze; this alliterative phrase is patterned after Jer 23:33.’ As well as a play on sound there seems also to be a pun on meaning. Ezekiel’s ‘burden’ was lifted up and borne on his shoulder, the term ‘prince’ refers to someone who is elevated or lifted up.

Some take ‘burden’ here to mean a threatening message, the word is used in that sense by other Old Testament prophets, but it only occurs here in Ezekiel and in the context must refer to the bag containing Ezekiel’s ‘stuff’ (v.4). Greenberg (1983, p. 212) explains: ‘The meaning of the sentence is: this burden – the exile’s pack – represents the chief and the Israelites of Jerusalem; they will be taken out of the city into exile. Two things are unexpected: the reference to two subjects, the chief (king) and the people, and the symbolic character of the exile’s pack (maśśā is linked to naśa ‘al katef “carry [the pack] on the shoulder” in vss.6f….’

Ezekiel’s message is that Zedekiah and his subjects will be carried into exile. Ezekiel himself is a ‘sign’ in that his actions represented the destiny and fate of King Zedekiah of Judah and the people of Judah. Note that the thought of Ezekiel as a sign reappears in 24:18-27 where he is forbidden to formally mourn the death of his wife; symbolising YHWH’s refusal to grieve for Jerusalem at the time of its destruction (24:24).

(12-14) Returning to the subject of the prince Ezekiel expands on his symbolic action. He predicts in detail Zedekiah’s flight from Jerusalem by night with his pack upon his shoulder and his eyes covered; probably to avoid recognition – but perhaps this also symbolises shame (cp. Jer 9:19).

Ezekiel predicts additional details that do not feature in his drama: Zedekiah will be pursued, apprehended, blinded and taken into captivity in Babylon. His supporters and troops will scatter in all directions and be pursued by the Babylonian forces. YHWH claims responsibility for these forthcoming events, saying (v.13) that Zedekiah will be metaphorically caught in his snare and trap.

The literal fulfilment of Ezekiel’s specific and accurate predictions is recorded in 2 Kgs 25:1-7; Jer 39:1-7; 52:1-11. These passages tell us that Zedekiah fled Jerusalem at night through a gap between  two walls, was captured by the Babylonians near Jericho and taken to Riblah to meet Nebuchadnezzar. As punishment for his revolt Nebuchadnezzar had Zedekiah watch the murder of his family before blinding him and transporting him to Babylon.

The abovementioned accounts (e.g. Jer 39:7) explain the riddle or apparent enigma in Ezek 12:13: ‘I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.’ Zedekiah would be blinded before being transported to Babylon.

King Zedekiah himself may have been aware of this prophecy but failed to appreciate its significance. According to the first century CE historian Flavius Josephus, in his work ‘Antiquities of the Jews,’ Ezekiel wrote down this prophecy and sent a copy to King Hezekiah. He compared the prophecies of Jeremiah and Ezekiel and reckoned that these contradicted one another. He therefore decided not to believe either of them.

Josephus, living more than 600 years after this event, is the only source of this interesting but possibly unreliable piece of information:

Now as to Zedekiah himself, while he heard the prophet [Jeremiah] speak, he believed him, and agreed to every thing as true, and supposed it was for his advantage; but then his friends perverted him, and dissuaded him from what the prophet advised, and obliged him to do what they pleased. Ezekiel also foretold in Babylon what calamities were coming upon the people, which when he heard, he sent accounts of them unto Jerusalem. But Zedekiah did not believe their prophecies, for the reason following: It happened that the two prophets agreed with one another in what they said as in all other things, that the city should be taken, and Zedekiah himself should be taken captive; but Ezekiel disagreed with him, and said that Zedekiah should not see Babylon, while Jeremiah said to him, that the king of Babylon should carry him away thither in bonds….

For background it is worth reading all of chapter 7 in Book X of Josephus’ ‘Antiquities of the Jews’ (Ant. X. 7. 2)

(15-16) Now the prophet raises a faint note of hope with the mention of a ‘a few men’ of Judah (the remnant) who will be spared for the purpose of testifying to YHWH’s sovereignty. These people will recognise that it is their own idolatry that has brought the judgment upon them.

THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED (17-20)

17 Moreover the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
18 Son of man, eat thy bread with quaking, and drink thy water with trembling and with carefulness;
19 And say unto the people of the land, Thus saith the Lord GOD of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and of the land of Israel; They shall eat their bread with carefulness, and drink their water with astonishment, that her land may be desolate from all that is therein, because of the violence of all them that dwell therein.
20 And the cities that are inhabited shall be laid waste, and the land shall be desolate; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

(17-20) Ezekiel receives a further communication directly from YHWH, instructing him to perform another symbolic action. He is to eat his food and drink water in a manner that portrays fear and anxiety. By shaking and trembling as he eats and drinks Ezekiel will visually convey the fear that the people of Judah will experience during the siege of Jerusalem. His actions will symbolise the people’s anxiety and deep distress in the face of that calamity. This prophetic sign suggests that even basic tasks like eating and drinking will be carried out with fear.

Ezekiel is to impart this message to ‘the people of the land,’ here a reference to the exiles who are with Ezekiel in Babylonia. It is about Jerusalem and the land of Israel. It is especially about those who live in Jerusalem and in ‘her land’ i.e. the territory surrounding the city, since they would be the ones enduring the siege and destruction first-hand.

Vv. 19b and 20 further explain Ezekiel’s symbolic act. The word translated ‘carefulness’ used with reference to how they will drink their water (v.19) and how they will eat their food (v.20) means ‘anxiety.’ It also occurs in 4:16 where in the context the anxiety is about running out of food. That fear of scarcity and famine that will be experienced during the siege seems to be in view here too.

The people of Jerusalem and Judah will also feel terror because their towns will be laid waste and the land will be stripped of everything. The Babylonians will pursue a scorched-earth policy; they will leave no people, animals, crops or infrastructure. There will be total devastation. The reason for this is once again said to be the unrestrained violence of the people of Judah (7:11, 23; 8:17).

As has already been said in v.16, the purpose of the desolation is so that the people will recognise the authority and sovereignty of YHWH – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED (21-28)

21 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
22 Son of man, what is that proverb that ye have in the land of Israel, saying, The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth?
23 Tell them therefore, Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will make this proverb to cease, and they shall no more use it as a proverb in Israel; but say unto them, The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.
24 For there shall be no more any vain vision nor flattering divination within the house of Israel.
25 For I am the LORD: I will speak, and the word that I shall speak shall come to pass; it shall be no more prolonged: for in your days, O rebellious house, will I say the word, and will perform it, saith the Lord GOD.
26 Again the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
27 Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.
28 Therefore say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; There shall none of my words be prolonged any more, but the word which I have spoken shall be done, saith the Lord GOD.

(21-25) Verses 21-28 address the people’s doubt and scepticism that Ezekiel’s prophecies will be fulfilled.

Ezekiel receives a new message from YHWH which is introduced by the usual formula ‘the word of the LORD came unto me, saying.’  As elsewhere, Ezekiel is addressed as ‘Son of man’ then YHWH highlights a saying that was popular in the land of Israel. This proverb (māšāl) mocks the prophets and reflects a general belief that the judgment they predict will never come to pass: ‘The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth’ (Cp. Ecc 8:11; 2 Pet 3:3-4). Despite the passing of time none of their prophecies of doom have come to fruition.

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to inform the Israelites that he will cause this proverb to cease – because the course of events will prove the proverb wrong. In fact it will be replaced by a new proverb: ‘The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.’ i.e. the time is not far off and every vision will come to pass.

In addition, all false prophecies that flatter the people of Israel will cease. They are described as ‘vain visions and smooth divinations.’ These prophecies obtained through occult practices are by false prophets who flatter the people by predicting peace, security and the return of the Jehoiachin exiles from Babylon (for an example of this read Jer 28:1-17).

The coming judgment will expose their deceptive lies and bring their false assurances to an end. True predictions by genuine prophets of YHWH like Jeremiah and Ezekiel will come to pass but those expressed by the false prophets will fail. (Note that false prophecy is the subject of the next chapter -Ezekiel 13.)

In v.25 YHWH asserts his sovereign right to speak (declare judgment). Unlike the false prophets his words are truth and will be fulfilled soon. Through Ezekiel he declares that the judgment will come upon the current generation – ‘in your days.’ Once again he describes them as a ‘rebellious house’ (12:2, 3, 9, 25).

(26-28) Another communication from YHWH to Ezekiel is introduced by ‘the word of the Lord came to me saying.’ The prophecy that follows is similar but slightly different to that in the previous segment. Verses 20-25 relate to a proverb that denies that the prophecies of judgment would ever be fulfilled. In verses 26-28, however, YHWH quotes another proverb (‘they of the house of Israel say’) which promotes the equally erroneous view that that Ezekiel’s prophecies may well be fulfilled, but not for a very long time (‘the vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.’). YHWH, however, confirms that Ezekiel’s prophecies will  be fulfilled soon.

SUMMATION

This chapter underscores the certainty of YHWH’s judgment. In it Ezekiel enacts the flight of a refugee. This sign-act is explained as predicting the attempted escape of King Zedekiah, and others, from Jerusalem. Ezekiel then enacts another drama, demonstrating the terror that the Jerusalemites will experience while the city is under siege. The remainder of the chapter addresses the apparent failure of Ezekiel’s visions of destruction. YHWH says that those prophecies will soon be fulfilled. Ezekiel is not a false prophet, his predictions will certainly come to pass.

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL 11 – THE GLORY DEPARTS

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 11 is the last of four chapters (8-11) that describe Ezekiel’s second vision. The main topic of that vision is the gradual departure of YHWH’s kabod (Glory) from Solomon’s temple and the city, leaving Jerusalem without divine protection. It begins with a change of location for Ezekiel when in vision he is transported to the east gate of the temple where he observes a meeting of ‘the princes of the people.’

The bulk of the chapter consists of two disputation speeches. Put simply, a disputation speech presents one particular viewpoint and contradicts or refutes it by presenting the other side of the argument. There are ten such speeches in the book of Ezekiel (11:1-12; 11:14-21; 12:21-25; 12:26-28; 18:1-32; 20:32-34; 33:10-11; 33:17-20; 33:23-29; 37:11-14).

Chapter 11 closes with the departure of the kabod, Ezekiel’s return to Chaldea in vision and confirmation that he communicated details of the vision to his fellow-exiles.

There are two main divisions:

1-13 CONDEMNATION

14-25 RESTORATION

Each of these sections contains a disputation oracle.

CONDEMNATION (1-13)

(1) Ezekiel is transported to the eastern gate of the temple where he observes a meeting of twenty-five members of the Jerusalem elite. This is the same number of individuals as in 8:16 but cannot be the same men. The sun-worshippers in the inner court of the temple in chapter 8 would have been priests whereas those meeting at the east gate are called the ‘princes of the people.’ They are not priests, they are politicians. Two of the most notable are mentioned by name: Jaazaniah the son of Azur and Pelatiah the son of Benaiah.

(2-3) The Spirit informs Ezekiel that this group of influential men meets to plot evil and is responsible for giving harmful counsel to the Jerusalemites. Verse 3 gives an example of this counsel: ‘it is not near; let us build houses, this city is the caldron, and we are the meat.’ The Preacher’s Commentary says that: ‘the Hebrew wording of their boast is difficult to understand. It says literally, “Not build houses near? It is the pot, we are the meat!”

The exact meaning escapes us but obviously it is an arrogant assertion of confidence that goes against what YHWH was revealing through Jeremiah at the time. The elders are insisting that all is well while Jeremiah prophesies imminent destruction at the hands of the Chaldeans (Jer 37:14 – 38:4).

The following ideas might be conveyed in the proverb:

  • ‘All is well. Now is the time for us to build houses and restore the material damage done by Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians when Jerusalem under King Jehoiachin was besieged a few years ago (597 BCE).’
  • ‘We who live in Jerusalem are like meat in a cooking pot. We are the best bits. The exiles in Babylon are the offal, they have been thrown away. We are in a city that is under YHWH’s protection, the exiles in Babylon are obviously under his judgement.’
  • ‘Even if the Babylonians do attack it is much safer for us to be in the pot (within Jerusalem’s city walls) than outside it.’

In the verses that follow (especially vv. 7-12) their opinions are shown to be false.  Note that in Ezekiel caldron (siyr) occurs only in chapter 11 and in chapter 24. The latter contains the parable (or allegory) of the cooking pot.

(4-6) In the vision Ezekiel is commanded to prophesy and is empowered by the Spirit to speak YHWH’s words. They reveal that the leaders’ thoughts, intentions, motives and hypocrisy are known to the Lord. They, the leaders of the people, have been responsible for widespread violence and death in the city. This may refer to the slaughter carried out by the six executioners earlier in the vision (9:5-7).

(7-12) In this disputation speech by the Lord God (Adonai YHWH) the analogy of the caldron (cooking pot) as used by the leaders of Jerusalem is refuted. The city of Jerusalem is the cooking pot but YHWH asserts that dead bodies, not living people, is the meat. The leaders may think that the pot guarantees safety but they will be driven out of it to face what they fear most: a violent death by the sword. YHWH will remove them from Jerusalem and hand them over to foreign enemies who will slay them at Israel’s border. Notice the double occurrence of ‘I will bring you out’ (7, 9). This is language reminiscent of the Exodus. The imminent ‘bringing out,’ however, will not be to salvation but death. Notice also the double mention of ‘border’ (10,11).

YHWH reiterates (vv.11) that the city will not provide safety (‘be a pot for you’) and emphasizes that the leaders will be judged. The judgement will reveal YHWH’s sovereignty and lordship (‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ vv.10,12). The Jerusalemites (represented by their leaders) will face consequences because: a) they have not followed the Lord’s decrees b) they have not kept his law, but c) they have adopted pagan practices. We learn from 2 Kgs 25:4-7 and Jeremiah 52:7-10 that what Ezekiel prophesied concerning the leaders of Judah literally came to pass.

(13) In Ezekiel’s vision the threat of impending judgement is emphasized by immediate judgement upon Pelatiah who drops dead while Ezekiel is prophesying. We do not know if Pelatiah really dies in Jerusalem at that time or if his death is just enacted in Ezekiel’s vision. Ezekiel’s reaction to this episode in the vision is one of concern that a remnant in Israel should survive. This is similar to a previous reaction by him in chapter 9: And it came to pass, while they were slaying them, and I was left, that I fell upon my face, and cried, and said, Ah Lord GOD! wilt thou destroy all the residue of Israel in thy pouring out of thy fury upon Jerusalem? Ezekiel 9:8. De Vries (The Kābôd of Yhwh in the Old Testament, p.281) observes that: ‘Whereas in 9:8b he had called this out as a question, in 11:13b it is actually a statement: the interrogative particle is lacking this time.’

LOUD VOICE

In the second vision the Jerusalemites cry with a ‘loud voice’ (8:8), YHWH cries with a ‘loud voice’ (9:1) and Ezekiel cries with a ‘loud voice’ (11:13).

RESTORATION 14-25

The hope that a remnant will survive is addressed in the following section of the chapter. The prevailing view is turned on its head. There will indeed be a remnant but it will not arise from Jerusalem, it will come from the Jehoiachin exiles who are already in Babylon. In this section we have the first of three prophecies of restoration delivered by Ezekiel before the fall of Jerusalem (11:16-21; 16:60-63; 20:33-44). After he hears about the fall of Jerusalem (33:21) Ezekiel utters further prophecies of restoration in chapters 34, 36, 37 and 39.

(14-16) Still in vision the word of YHWH came to Ezekiel and quotes what the inhabitants of Jerusalem say about the exiles: ‘Get you far from the LORD: unto us is this land given in possession.’ The Jerusalemites have the notion that it is the exiles who are far from the Lord and that the ancestral land they have left behind now belongs to those remaining in the city. The exiles referred to are the royals and professional people (including Ezekiel) who were deported to Babylonia a few years earlier by Nebuchadnezzar in the Jechoiachin Exile of 597 BCE (2 Kgs 24:8-17). As a result of that deportation the people of Judah became divided into two groups; those in exile with Jehoiachin in Babylon and ‘the people that were left in the land’ (Jer 40:6) of Judah under Zedekiah. It was very much a ‘them and us’ situation although ongoing contact between the two groups (e.g. Jeremiah’s letter to the exiles – Jer 29) did occur.

Throughout Israel’s history the concepts of deity, kingship, people and land have been closely linked. In spite of the fact that they are idolaters it suits the Jerusalemites financially to claim allegiance to YHWH and promote the view that the exiles had been deported far away because he was angry with them. They said that YHWH had expelled them because of their wickedness and that therefore their ancestral land was forfeit. The Jerusalemites claimed that YHWH favoured them rather than the exiles because they still had the land, a functioning royal court, and (YHWH’s presence in) the temple. They must therefore be the remnant.

The exiles are described as Ezekiel’s ‘brethren’ and ‘kindred.’ As prophet to the exiles (3:11) Ezekiel very much identified with them and viewed them as family. In 33:21 and 40:1 he refers to the exile as ‘our captivity.’

Ezekiel’s prophetic answer to the Jerusalemites arrogation of land to themselves is that, contrary to expectations. YHWH has deliberately sent the exiles to Babylon because he controls history; the Babylonians carry out his will. The temple might be in Jerusalem (soon to be destroyed), but the exiles would have access to YHWH because he would be a ‘little sanctuary’ (or some suggest: ‘sanctuary for a little while’) for the exiles, in Babylon or wherever else they dwelt.

This is highly significant as it means all the benefits of YHWH’s presence, protection and favour transfer from those still dwelling in the land to the exiles.

(17-20) In this disputation oracle (vv.14-21) YHWH reveals that the exile will be temporary. A remnant will indeed return to the land of Israel but it will be from the Babylonian exiles, NOT from the dwellers in Jerusalem. Those who come back will clear the land of all the idols and images (7:20; 8:3) that defile it. That they should do so will be evidence of a change of heart. This change will be brought about by YHWH himself. He promises to replace their heart of stone with a heart of flesh so that they will be receptive to what YHWH wants. He will ‘take away their stony, stubborn heart and give them a tender, responsive heart’ (11:19 NLT). The covenant between YHWH and his people will effectively be re-established – ‘they shall be my people, and I will be their God’ – as a result of them keeping the Lord’s regulations and following his commands.

(21) It is not clear who v.21 refers to. Is this a prophecy that some of those who return from the exile will return to or persist in idolatry and therefore receive the consequences of their behaviour? Or is this a warning to the leaders and residents of Jerusalem who are mentioned earlier in the chapter (vv.2-6,15)?

(22-23) The final stage of the vision takes place. The cherubim and wheels take off from the eastern gate of the temple and carry YHWH’s enthroned kabod to the hill to the east of the city (Mount of Olives, Zech 14:4). The judgement can begin, Jerusalem is no longer under YHWH’s protection.

(24-25) The chapter ends with comments by Ezekiel explaining that once the vision ended he was returned to Chaldea by the Spirit of God. He the shared with the exiles what YHWH had shown him. It was a solemn message about the current state of Jerusalem and its impending destruction but one which contained hope of a remnant and a return from captivity. That must have been a great encouragement to his fellow-exiles.

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 10 – COALS OF FIRE

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 10 of Ezekiel is a continuation of the prophet’s second vision and is the third of four chapters (8-11) in which Ezekiel relates details of a visit to Jerusalem which he experienced while in a prophetic trance. Bear in mind that that he was physically located in Babylon while taken to Judah temporarily in a vision.  Although complicated and repetitive, chapter 10 is important because it links back to the vision of YHWH’s kabod in chapter 1 and forward to its return in chapter 43.

The settings of Ezekiel’s first and second visions are different but the imagery is similar. Some small discrepancies in detail are noticeable but essentially chapters 1 and 10 each describe a firmament, a throne, winged creatures and wheels.

The parallels are as follows:

  • Four wings and four faces – 1:6 and 10:21
  • Human hand(s) – 1:8 and 10:8, 21
  • Each creature moves straight forward – 1:12 and 10:22
  • The four faces described – 1:10 and 10:14
  • A wheel beside each creature – 1:15 and 10:9
  • Wheels gleaming like beryl – 1:16 and 10:9
  • A wheel within a wheel – 1:16 and 10:10
  • Wheels travel in four directions without turning as they go – 1:17 and 10:11
  • Rims full of eyes – 1:18 and 10:12
  • The wheels moving in sync with the living creatures – 1:19 and 10:16
  • Spirit of the living creatures(s) – 1:21 and 10:17
  • The sound of wings – 1:24 and 10:5
  • Throne, firmament/sapphire – 1:26 and 10:1

The most important aspect of the chapter, however, is the location of the kabod (Glory, Presence) of the Lord. Because Judah and Jerusalem have been turning away from the pure worship of YHWH his Presence is gradually moving away from them (8:4; 9:3; 10:1, 10:18, 19; 11:23). This abandoning of the sanctuary by YHWH provides an explanation for the destruction soon to be wreaked by the Babylonians – the city is no longer under God’s protection. No doubt this revelation came as a great shock to a nation that thought itself invincible because of YHWH’s presence in the Jerusalem temple. Jeremiah, however, had warned them that such a belief was no longer valid: ‘Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD.’ (Jer 7:4)

Chapter 10 falls into two main sections:

(1-8) Preparations for Jerusalem’s Judgement

(9-22) Preparations for the Kabod’s Departure

(1-8) PREPARATIONS FOR JERUSALEM’S JUDGEMENT

Ezekiel continues his report of the second vision using the first person ‘I looked and behold.’ He uses this expression again in v. 9. What he sees is similar to the first vision of chapter 1 at Chebar. There he describes the figures as ‘living creatures’ (ḥayyāh), here in chapter ten he clarifies that they are, in fact, cherubim (vv. 15, 20). The chariot of the first vision reappears (10:1) and Ezekiel again sees the sapphire-like throne but makes no mention of any person on the throne. Note that in the book of Ezekiel ‘throne’ is only mentioned in the three visions that involve the kabod of YHWH (1:26; 10:1; 43:7).

Verse 2 does not clarify who speaks (probably YHWH) and commands the man clad in linen to go beneath the ‘whirlers’ (galgal), fill his hands with coals of fire and scatter them over the city. Galgal in 10:2, 6, 13; also 23:24; 26:10 is not the usual word for wheel (which is ’ôp̱ān). In Isa 5:28 and Jer 47:3 galgal refers specifically to chariot wheels. It is interesting that in Solomon’s temple, where this scene is set, the laver stands (1 Kgs 7:27-37) had carved panels decorated with lions, oxen and cherubim (1 Kgs 7:29) beneath which were wheels which the author of Kings (7:33) specifically says were made like chariot wheels.

The three imperatives in v.2 are Go, Fill, Scatter.

What do the coals signify? Many commentators point out that the mention of cherub(im) together with coals of fire is associated with judgement in 2 Sam 22:8-13 and Psa 18:8-13 (note: there is an opposite minority view that the coals are for marking those to be spared, see 9:4). Others, basing their conclusion on Isa 6:6-7, take the fire as a symbol of purification. Or, the fire may be symbolic of YHWH’s jealousy (8:5; Deut 4:24). The filling of both hands symbolises that the judgement will exhaustive.

That the cherub(im) here are the ones Ezekiel saw in his first vision and not the cherubim that covered the ark of the covenant (1 Kgs 6:23-28; 8:7) is clear because the latter were not located in the south side of the temple but in the Holy of Holies nor did they have wheels. ‘Cherub’ in v.2 is singular and possibly refers to the one nearest Ezekiel, or to the highest ranking of the four cherubim (cp 28:14), or to one especially associated with fire.

Ezekiel then sees the man in white linen go in as instructed, whereupon ‘the cloud’ fills the inner court (10:3) and then the whole temple (10:4). Presumably this refers to a cloud of smoke from the coals of judgement scattered on the temple by the man in linen. Alternatively, it might refer to the cloud of the kabod of YHWH that had previously filled the temple (1 Kgs 8:10-11) – although Ezekiel says in v.4 that here its brightness filled only the court. Solomon’s temple was literally burned by the Babylonians a few years later:

And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month, which is the nineteenth year of king Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, came Nebuzaradan, captain of the guard, a servant of the king of Babylon, unto Jerusalem: And he burnt the house of the LORD, and the king’s house, and all the houses of Jerusalem, and every great man’s house burnt he with fire. 2 Kings 25:8-9

In v.4 Ezekiel repeats the information already given in 9:3 that the kabod has moved to the temple exit and in v.5 concentrates on the scary noise made by the whirling wings. He uses a simile to describe the awesomeness of the sound, it was ‘as the voice of El Shaddai’ -God almighty.

In vv.6-8 Ezekiel’s attention focuses once more on the man dressed in linen. After the command of v.2 is reiterated a cherub reaches into the fire and places some (coals) into the man’s hands. Verse 8 explains how this is possible; the cherubim have hands under their wings, as in 1:8. The man in linen then leaves the scene in order to complete his task. The passage says of him: ‘he went in…..and went out.’ We are not told what happens to the coals of fire and what effect they have on the city. The man disappears and is not mentioned again.

(9-22) PREPARATIONS FOR THE KABOD’S DEPARTURE

THE WHEELS (9-13)

Again Ezekiel says ‘I looked and behold’ as his attention now shifts to the wheels. What he describes is essentially the same as 1:15-21 except that chapter 1 speaks of living creatures, here in chapter 10 they are called cherubim. For Ezekiel the noticeable aspects of the wheels are that a) their hubs are themselves wheels (v.10), b) they move forward in unison without veering off course (v.11) and c) they are full of eyes (v.12). Ezekiel emphasizes that the wheels move directly forward and maintain their course; the phrase ‘they turned not as they went’ occurs twice in v.11. In chapter 1 only the wheels were full of eyes, here the whole body – backs, hands and wings as well as the wheels – was full of eyes. They can see everything and nothing can divert them. In Ezekiel’s hearing (v.13) the wheels are instructed to turn or whirl (‘O wheel!’).

THE CHERUBIM (14-17)

10:14 begins exactly like 1:6 (‘and every one had four faces’) but there are differences in detail between the two accounts. In chapter 1 it is the four living creatures that have the faces but in chapter 10 it is grammatically unclear if the faces belong to the wheels or to the cherubim since the subject at the end of v.13 is the wheels. The cherubim, however, are the subject at the beginning of v.15 so it is more likely that Ezekiel is already thinking of them v.14. In 1:10 the faces listed are those of a human, a lion, an ox and an eagle, whereas in 10:14 they are the faces of a cherub, a human, a lion and an eagle. In chapter 1 Ezekiel just gives the position of two of the faces, the lion on the right and the ox on the left whereas in 10:14 he numbers the faces 1 to 4 (first, second, third, fourth).

In vv.15-17 he describes the cherubim taking off and notes that they and the wheels move in unison. This harmony is because the spirit of the living creature is in them, they are not machines – they share the same life. Whenever the cherubim fly the wheels go with them, whenever the cherubim are stationary the wheels are inactive as well. These observations are essentially the same as 1:19-21. As he views the scene Ezekiel realises that the cherubim are/is the ‘living creature’ (singular and feminine – ‘she is the creature’) of his first vision (10:15).

THE DEPARTURE (18-22)

Verse 18 describes another stage in the slow departure of the kabod from the temple. The ‘kabod of the God of Israel’ leaves the threshold of the temple and takes up position (on the sapphire stone, v.1) above the cherubim. The cherubim with the kabod above them then mount up and fly to the east gate, over which they hover while Ezekiel receives a further oracle in chapter 11. This gate was the main entrance to the temple complex.

The last three verses of the chapter (20-22) consist of editorial comment by Ezekiel in which he confirms:

  • his identification of the cherubim with the living creature that he saw under the God of Israel at the River Chebar. Note ‘God of Israel’ not ‘God of Judah.’
  • that the cherubim had four faces, four wings and hands like humans under their wings (1:8).
  • that their faces are the same as those he saw by the River Chebar i.e. man, lion, ox, eagle. There is no explanation about the cherub face of v.14 being replaced.
  • that they move directly forward. Nothing can stop the progress of YHWH’s throne-chariot. God can move around anywhere he pleases. This fact is important to Ezekiel, he mentions the idea several times (1:9, 12, 17, 19, 20, 21; 10:11,16, 22).

SUMMATION

Ezekiel chapter 10 continues Ezekiel’s report of experiences during his second vision. They are a dramatic portrayal of God’s righteous anger and determination to bring judgement upon a rebellious nation. The early verses of the chapter focus on coals of fire taken from between the cherubim and scattered over the city; an action that represents the fiery judgement about to befall Jerusalem. The awe-inspiring imagery of the cherubim and wheels emphasizes the holiness and majesty of the Lord. The gradual departure of God’s glory from the temple is a stark symbolic reminder of the withdrawal of both the Lord’s presence and protection from his people. The defeat and disaster that befalls them will not be because YHWH is dead or weak but because he is no longer in his temple and has left to be with the exiles in Babylon. Chapter 10 serves as a solemn warning about the dire consequences of sin and disobedience.

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 9 – THE EXECUTIONERS

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel’s second vision extends from 8:1-11:25 and concerns the departure of YHWH’s kabod (Glory or Presence) from Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem, thus signifying the removal of divine protection and the abandonment of the city to impending judgement. This will come in the form of a siege and destruction by Babylonian forces some five years later.

In chapter 8 Ezekiel has, in vision, been snatched away from Babylon to Judah and shown the state of religion in Jerusalem at that time (Aug/Sept 592 BCE). He was taken to four locations close to the sanctuary where he viewed progressively worse forms of idolatry take place:

  • An idol at the temple entrance.
  • Elders worshipping graven images.
  • Women weeping for Tammuz.
  • Sun worship in YHWH’s temple.

YHWH cannot be expected to remain where such abominations take place so in chapter 9 he initiates judgement upon Jerusalem and Judah.

9: 1-2 Judgement commanded.

9: 3-4 Marking foreheads.

9: 5-7, 11 Judgement executed.

9:8 Ezekiel’s reaction

9: 9-10 YHWH’s response.

JUDGEMENT COMMANDED (1-2)

Following on from the mention of idolaters crying to YHWH for mercy with a ‘loud voice’ at the end of chapter 8, verse 1 of chapter 9 begins with Ezekiel hearing the ‘loud voice’ of YHWH (or YHWH’s kabod) summoning those ‘that have charge over the city.’

‘in mine ears’ – YHWH was not addressing Ezekiel but speaking in his hearing.

These officials (the word means someone designated to carry out an official task) are called ‘men’ in vv.1-2 but seem to be supernatural creatures in human form, perhaps angels. Each is to carry what is termed an ‘instrument of destruction’ (v.1) and ‘implement of smashing/shattering) (v.2); probably a battle-axe or war-club (Jer 51:20).

In response to YHWH’s summons six men come from a northerly direction (i.e. from Babylonia), appearing from the upper gate situated at the north of the temple courts (2 Kgs 15:35; Jer 20:2). As instructed, each executioner carries a destructive weapon. A seventh (or perhaps one of the six) carries a writing kit (materials necessary for writing) at his waist. This supernatural scribe is dressed in linen which was a fabric was worn by priests (e.g. Exod 28:29-42; 39:27-29; Lev 16:4, 23) and heavenly beings (Dan 10:5; 12:6-7). Angels are often associated with judgement (e.g. Gen 19:15; 2 Sam 24:16; 2 Kgs 19:35; Psa 78:9; Mt 13:49-50; Ac 12:23; 2 Thess 1:7-8). The executioners and the scribe assemble beside the bronze altar.

MARKING FOREHEADS (3-4)

Just as in chapter 8 the idolatry viewed by Ezekiel in 4 locations gets progressively worse, so in chapters 9-11 the departure of the kabod progresses in 4 stages (9:3; 10:4; 10:18-19; 11:22-23). Verse 3a of chapter 9 interrupts the flow the story to inform the reader that even before Ezekiel sees this part of the vision the kabod has already risen from the cherub upon which it rested and has moved to the threshold (entrance) of the temple. The kabod sometimes appears in connection with judgement (Num 14:10; 16:19, 42).

The cherub here is not one of the winged living creatures that support the throne chariot of chapter 1 but one of two cherubim in a three-dimensional sculpture placed above the ark of the covenant (1 Kgs 6:23-28; 2 Chron 3:10-13; 1 Kgs 8:6-7; 2 Chron 5:7-8) in Solomon’s temple. Some suggest that the singular used here refers to both cherubim since the sculpture may have been crafted from a single lump of metal (1 Chron 28;18). LXX has the plural here , and also in 10:2.

CHERUB/CHERUBIM

‘Living’ cherubim are associated with the Garden of Eden (Gen 3:24; Ezek 28:14,16) and with theophanies (2 Sam 22:11; Psa 18:10; Book of Ezekiel).

In Solomon’s temple (as also in the Tabernacle before that) inanimate cherubim were depicted. I have given references for the three-dimensional sculpture(s) in the Holy of Holies above.

There were also two-dimensional representations of cherubim carved or engraved in friezes, upon doors, and on cultic stands (1Kgs 6:29;, 32, 35; 7:29, 36; 2 Chron 3:7). The motif of cherubim was so much associated with YHWH that he was known as ‘The Lord of hosts, the cherubim sitter/dweller’ (1 Sam 4:4; 2 Sam 6:2; 2 Kgs 19:15; 1 Chron 13:6; Psa 80:1; 99:1; Isa 37:16).

Vv. 3b-4. ‘And he called to the man clothed with linen’ Strictly speaking ‘he’ is the kabod but the order is said to be issued by YHWH. He instructs the man in linen to go through the city and put a mark on the foreheads of those who grieve and lament over all the detestable things being done in Jerusalem. There is no indication that necessarily these people are righteous, the standard is set much lower than that. They just have to be those who sigh and groan silently at the lamentable state of religious and social affairs in Jerusalem.

That this mark is a sign of protection, distinguishing the condemned from those to be spared, is not stated, but presumably that is the case (cp. Cain, Gen 4:15; First Passover, Exod 12). The Hebrew word for ‘mark’ is tāw, the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. Most English versions translate it as ‘signature’ in Job 31:35 (e.g. ‘Here is my signature! Let the Almighty answer me!’ ESV) which leads some commentators to conclude that the mark is God’s signature, therefore a person marked in this way belongs to God and will be spared.

Since tāw in Paleo-Hebrew script was written as a cross (something like the shape of a + or an x) it has been suggested that its occurrence in 9:4 is an Old Testament anticipation of the cross of Christ and its association with salvation. Personally, I find this very far-fetched.

JUDGEMENT EXECUTED (5-7, 11)

The other executioners are commanded to follow the man in linen and strike down everyone who does not have the protective mark, sparing neither the young nor the old including women and children, and beginning at the sanctuary (the temple). No-one is to be spared. Then the slaughter begins, starting with the elders (8:11? or 8:16?) who are at the front of the temple.

So unfit is the sanctuary for YHWH’s presence that in v.7 he commands that the executioners contaminate his own temple by filling the courts with slain. It was believed that blood, bones and dead bodies would defile religious shrines and render the sites unusable for worship; e.g. see the deliberate desecration of religious sites by King Josiah in 2 Kgs 23:12-20. Ezekiel uses this verb ‘defile’ (ṭām’āh) of the temple three times (5:11; 9:7; 23:38). Elsewhere he uses (ḥālal) meaning ‘pollute/profane’ (7:21, 22; 23:39; 24:21; 25:3; 44:7).

In v.11 the man in linen reports that he has done what he was commanded to do. He does not say whether the other six have accomplished their grisly assignment, presumably they have.

EZEKIEL’S REACTION (8)

While the men are carrying out their appointed tasks Ezekiel displays his concern for the nation by falling on his face and pleadingly asking YHWH if he intends to destroy the entire nation of Israel and city of Jerusalem in his fury. Will a remnant (6:8-10) not be spared? In 11:13b Ezekiel also falls on his face and asks the same question again.

YHWH’S RESPONSE (9-10)

Ezekiel’s intercession is to no avail. YHWH tells him that that things have gone too far. The iniquity of Israel and Judah is extremely great. Until this point it has either been ‘house of Israel’ (8:6, 10, 11, 12) or ‘house of Judah’ (4:6; 8:17), here they are combined, emphasizing the enormity of the sin and how widespread it is.

In this verse (9) ‘the land is full of blood’ and the city ‘full of perversity.’ In 7:23 ‘the land is full of bloody crimes and the city is full of violence’. In 8:17 ‘they have filled the land with violence.’

‘For they say, The LORD hath forsaken the earth, and the LORD seeth not.’ This refers back to the complaint of the elders in 8:12 but here the two parts of the saying are reversed. This reversal facilitates the irony of v.10; i.e. they say that YHWH does not see but he does see – and his eye will not spare (5:11; 7:4, 8:18; 9:5,10).

Again the ruthlessness of YHWH in judgement is emphasized.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel chapter 9 moves on from the reasons for YHWH’s judgement in chapter 8 to the execution of the judgement itself. The chapter underscores the severity of God’s punishment of sin and corruption. In this part of his second vision Ezekiel sees YHWH unleash six supernatural executioners upon Jerusalem, the city is doomed. Verse 11 does not state how many receive the mark. If the phrase in v.8 is translated ‘I alone was left’ rather than ‘I was left alone’ then it may be that Ezekiel thinks no Jerusalemite is to be spared, hence his despair. The vision concerning the departure of YHWH’s kabod from Jerusalem continues in chapter 10.

Posted in Exposition

IDOLATRY IN THE TEMPLE PRECINCTS – EZEKIEL CHAPTER 8

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 8:1 commences the second major section of the book. This segment spans twelve chapters, from 8:1 to 19:14, with the initial four chapters (8-11) presenting what is arguably the most significant of Ezekiel’s visions. These chapters narrate the dramatic departure of the kabod (glory) of YHWH from the Jerusalem temple.

This vision is then followed by twelve oracles of varying length, each commencing with ‘The word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ (12:1; 12:8; 12:17; 12:21; 12:26; 13:1; 14:2; 14:12; 15:1; 16:1; 17:1; 18:1) and treating some aspect of the forthcoming judgement upon Judah and Jerusalem.

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 8

Ezekiel 8:1-2 details the circumstances and commencement date relating to the vision of chapters 8-11 and the oracles of chapters 12-19 that follow.  The remaining verses provide justification for YHWH’s abandonment of his sanctuary. The chapter may be divided as follows:

The commencement date and circumstances of the vision and oracles (8:1-2)

The image that provokes jealousy (8:3-6)

Animal worship (8:7-13)

The weeping for Tammuz (8:14-15)

The worship of the Sun (8:16-18)

THE COMMENCEMENT DATE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE VISION AND ORACLES (8:1-2)

In chapter 1 we discover that Ezekiel is a priest from Judah who had been deported, presumably as one of ten thousand elite citizens of Judah, by Nebuchadnezzar to Babylon along with King Jehoiachin (Ezek 1:1-2; 2 Kgs 24:13-14) in 597 BCE. At that time Ezekiel was twenty-five years of age. Five years later, at age thirty, YHWH called him to be a prophet to the exiles in Babylon. Ezekiel supplies precise dates for his prophecies, all (with the exception of 29:17) in chronological order (1:1-2; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 26:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:1; 32:17; 33:21; 40:1).

Chapter 8:1 gives the date of Ezekiel’s second vision as the fifth day of the sixth month (Elul) of the sixth year of Jehoiachin’s exile (Aug/Sept 592 BCE), some thirteen (LXX) or fourteen (MT) months after the first vision. This is roughly halfway between the first siege of Jerusalem/Jehoiachin’s exile in 597 BCE and the forthcoming judgement of YHWH upon Judah and Jerusalem in the form of a second Babylonian siege (586/587 BCE).

On the recorded date Ezekiel was visited at his house by a group of ‘the elders of Judah,’ that is, the leaders of the Jewish community in exile in Babylonia. Why they wished to consult him on this occasion is not stated, unlike two other occasions (14:1-3; 20:1) when the purpose of their visit was to ‘inquire of the Lord.’ As the elders sat before Ezekiel YHWH took hold of him once more (see 1:3; 3:14) but this was not in response to any questions posed by them.

In this vision the mysterious supernatural figure of 1:27 returns, puts forth the likeness of a human hand ( i.e. he was not human), lifts Ezekiel by a lock (‘twisted’ i.e. tassel Num 15:38, 39) of hair and transports him to the Jerusalem temple where he shows him the sins of the leaders of Judah. There is some disagreement as to whether this figure is YHWH himself or a representative who speaks for him. There are certainly strong parallels between the description (of YHWH) in 1:27 and that in 8:2, although the characteristics are presented in reverse order.

1:27 the colour of amber

1:27 of his loins even upward

1:27 his loins even downward

1:27 the appearance of fire

———————————–

8:2 the appearance of fire

8:2 of his loins even downward

8:2 from his loins even upward

8:2 as the colour of amber

The figure certainly speaks as YHWH (‘my sanctuary’ 8:6; ‘provoke me to anger’ 8:17; ‘I will deal in fury,’ ‘I will not hear them’ 8:18) and later in the vision Ezekiel addresses him as ‘Lord God’ (9:8; 11:13).

THE IMAGE THAT PROVOKES JEALOUSY (8:3-6)

Having been snatched up in a trance by the mysterious figure and teleported from Babylonia to Israel (this happens another time in 40:1-2) and seeing what God was seeing (‘in the visions of God’), Ezekiel is deposited in the first of four locations – the north gate of Jerusalem, which is the ‘seat’ of an offensive idol that provokes jealousy. YHWH had made it clear to the Israelites in Ex 20:5; 34:14 that they were to worship him exclusively, he is a jealous God who will not share. This idol provokes YHWH to jealousy not only because it is a false god but also because of where it is situated; in the precincts of YHWH’s temple.

The statue is called a semel (translated ‘image’) in this passage, a word which occurs only here, in Deut 4:16 and in 2 Chron 33:7, 15. The 2 Chronicles passage describes the idol that King Manasseh of Judah (c. 686 to 642 BCE) set up in the temple, and later removed, as a carved semel. 2 Kings 21:7 clarifies that it was an Asherah pole, a representation of the goddess Asherah. Since the statue here in Ezekiel 8:3, 5 is said to be a semel what Ezekiel views in the vision may be another Asherah pole erected at the same site. Sweeney (Reading Ezekiel 2013, p.56), however, suggests that it may have been a stele, depicting Nebuchadnezzar and his gods (esp. Marduk) and commemorating Babylonian subjugation of the city at the time of Jehoiakim’s revolt in 598/597 BCE, which would have been erected in a prominent position like the temple courtyard.

Ezekiel reports that the kabod (glory) of YHWH there, as in the vision in the plain (3:2-23).

The kabod

Kabod occurs 199 times (excluding the proper name Ichabod) in the Old Testament and has the idea of weightiness. It carries various shades of meaning, including burden, riches, honour, respect, reverence, splendour, distinction, majesty, dignity and weight/mass. It is often translated into English as glory or presence. Kabod/glory is something that gives people or objects importance or makes them impressive:

Isa 60:13 – Isaiah speaks of the kabod of the trees of Lebanon.

Isa 16:11 – Isaiah wrote about the kabod of Moab, in 17:4 of Jacob and in 21:16 of Kedar.

Gen 45:13 – Joseph instructed his brothers to tell his father of all his kabod in Egypt.

YHWH’s kabod (glory)

There appears to be two sides to YHWH’s kabod (glory):

a) The glory the he himself manifests. b) The glory that is due to him.

It is the first of these that concerns us and there are various aspects to this.

i. The glory of YHWH in creation (Psa 19; 29; 57; 72; 96; 97; 102; 104; 108; 113; 138).

ii. The glory of YHWH’s works in history; especially in relation to Moses, Sinai (Ex 24:16-17; Deut 5:24) and the wilderness wanderings (pillar of fire and cloud).

iii. The glory of YHWH in Israel’s system of religion, his great power and majesty associated with the tabernacle (Ex 40:34-35) and later the temple (2 Chron 5:14; 7:1-2).

iv. The future eschatological glory of YHWH – mainly in Isaiah (e.g. Isa 60).

v. The glory of YHWH in theophany – mainly in Ezekiel where YHWH and his kabod are almost indistinguishable.

In Ezekiel 8:4 the kabod is called ‘the glory of the God of Israel’ – a title which only occurs in Ezekiel (8:4; 9:3; 10:19; 11:22; 43:2). In v.5 Ezekiel’s guide draws his attention to the semel that provokes jealousy located in the northern ‘entrance’ (this is the only occurrence of this Hebrew word in the Old Testament) and in v.6 asks him ‘Son of man, seest thou what they do?’ – this question is repeated in vv. 12, 15 and 17. This query would suggest that not only did Ezekiel see the statue but also people worshipping it. In this vision Ezekiel is being shown the reasons for the departure of the kabod from the temple (11:23) and for the forthcoming judgement and destruction.

There is much discussion about the subject of the infinitive ‘to drive away’ (KJV ‘go far off) in v.6. Ka Leung Wong (p.397) explains: ‘The crux of the problem lies in the word lrhqh which is a qal infinitive construct with l, having a feminine form. The main question is to decide what its subject is.’

The possibilities are the abominations, the people of Israel or YHWH. It can hardly be the abominations so which of the other two is it likely to be? Should it be translated a) to drive themselves away , or b) to drive me (i.e. YHWH) away?

Those who take the subject as YHWH point out that in the immediate context YHWH is the speaker and that the broader context (chapters 8-11) deals with the departure of YHWH’s kabod from the sanctuary. The problem for many is that this makes the departure of the kabod involuntary, i.e. YHWH is not departing of his own accord but is forced out of his own sanctuary because of the abominations present there.

The subject probably is the house of Israel. Although they are not literally far from YHWH’s sanctuary (since they are worshipping in the temple precincts) by their idolatry they figuratively drive themselves far from it, in a spiritual sense.

The standard view of chapters 8-11 is that they are chapters about the abandonment by YHWH of his sanctuary, thus depriving the people of his protection and leaving them open to defeat and exile. Ezekiel 5:11 would seem to support this view (Therefore, as I live” ​— ​this is the declaration of the Lord GOD ​— ​“I will withdraw and show you no pity, because you have defiled my sanctuary with all your abhorrent acts and detestable practices.” Ezekiel 5:11 CSB.)

An alternative, however, is that by the time of the vision of 8-11 YHWH’s mobile kabod had already left the Jerusalem temple and moved east to be with the exiles in Babylon (notice that it departs to there in 11:23 and comes from there in 43:2). According to this view chapters 8-11 are about a visitation in judgement. YHWH, having already departed from the temple, has temporarily returned in order to show Ezekiel the reasons for Jerusalem’s destruction (chapter 8) and to initiate the judgement (9:1 ff.). This theory is based on a statement in 43:3 which refers back to the vision of chapters 8-11: (‘And it was according to the appearance of the vision which I saw, even according to the vision that I saw when I came to destroy the city: and the visions were like the vision that I saw by the river Chebar; and I fell upon my face.’)

Verse 6 ends with the statement ‘and thou shalt see greater abominations.’ This saying is repeated in vv. 13 and 15.

ANIMAL WORSHIP (8:7-12)

Ezekiel’s guide then takes him to the entrance to the inner court and instructs him to view the practices being conducted inside the temple compound. This location is closer to the sanctuary than the first. It is unclear exactly how Ezekiel gains entrance but it involves a wall, a hole, further excavation by Ezekiel and the discovery of a secret door. Ezekiel, in vision, seems to break through a casemate wall and enter a room of a house. That dwelling either extends into the temple wall or is built in the space between double walls. There he encounters a group of seventy of the elders of Judah burning incense in front of animal reliefs or murals. These are said (v.10) to be depictions of reptiles and abominable beasts. ‘Abominable’ (šeqeṣ) occurs in Lev 7:21, eight times in Lev chapter 11 and in Isa 66:17. It describes ritually unclean animals including:

Lev 11:10-12 Creatures that live in water but do not have scales or fins.

Lev 11:13-20 Birds of prey.

Lev 11:20, 23 Some insects.

Lev 11:41-43 Reptiles.

Isa 66:17 Pigs, mice.

This scene is doubly abominable in that a) graven images are present, and b) that unclean foods are spread out for a ritual meal.

SEVENTY ELDERS

In Ex 24:9 seventy elders saw the glory of YHWH. In Num 11:25 the spirit of God rested upon seventy elders. Here seventy elders are offering incense to false gods.

The worship leader at this private ritual is named as Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan, who ‘stood’ in the midst of them. He is not the Jaazaniah of Ezekiel 11:1 because his father’s name is different. The verb ‘stand’ (āmaḏ), according to Strongs ‘has the sense of serving before someone, as Joseph served, stood before Pharaoh (Gen. 41:46).’ Likely Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan and the elders are not priests and therefore have no right to burn incense.

It may be that Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan was the brother of Gemariah the son of Shaphan the scribe (Jer 36:10, 12) who was supportive of the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 36:25). There are also references in Jeremiah to Ahikam (Jer 26:24) and Elasah (Jer 29:3) who are also said to be sons of Shaphan. Perhaps their father was Shaphan the scribe of 2 Kgs 22 who some thirty years earlier had read the rediscovered copy of the Torah to King Josiah, an event that sparked wide-ranging religious reforms.

Once again (v.12) Ezekiel’s supernatural guide asks him ‘hast thou seen? (8:6,15,17) and comments that the elders also worship in the dark (i.e. at night), in their own chambers. These men may have been occupying cell-like quarters meant for priests at the temple. Ezekiel includes similar accommodation in his plans for an ideal temple (45:1-11).

V.12 ends with an insight into the thinking of the elders who say: ‘The Lord seeth us not; the Lord hath forsaken the earth.’ This might mean that they thought they were acting in private and YHWH could not see them. It is, however, more likely that they are not referring to YHWH’s supposed inability to see but to his lack of interest and involvement. Somehow they were already aware that their idolatry had offended YHWH, his departure therefore inevitable. They accuse YHWH of forsaking the earth when, in effect, it was they who had forsaken him.

‘For they say.’ Ezekiel quotes what people are saying in other passages as well (9:9; 12:22; 18:2, 19; 20:49; 37:11).

Since the four episodes in this chapter are scenes of increasing abomination Ezekiel is once again told that even worse things than this are going on.

THE WEEPING FOR TAMMUZ (8:14-15)

Ezekiel’s guide now takes him to a new location; the north gate of the temple, where he sees a group of women weeping for Tammuz (Dumuzi). This was a fertility deity in Mesopotamian mythology usually depicted as a young man and said to be the consort of the goddess Ishtar (Inanna). He was associated with spring vegetation (died and then returned the following summer) and the cyclical nature of life, death and rebirth. The wailing for Tammuz was a feature of mourning rituals that lamented his death and looked forward to his return. This Babylonian cult must have been practised by some Jewish women in Jerusalem. This myth about a dying and rising god is thought to equate to the Egyptian one about Osiris and Isis and to the Greek story about Adonis and Aphrodite.

Again (v.15) Ezekiel is told that even worse things than this are going on.

THE WORSHIP OF THE SUN (8:16-18)

Ezekiel is now taken in vision to a fourth location. This is in the inner court before the entrance to Solomon’s temple and between the portico (’ûlām, porch, vestibule, 1 Kgs 6:3; 1 Chr 28:11; 2 Chr 3:4; Joel 2:17) and the altar. Presumably this was an area where only Levitical priests could enter (2 Chron 4:9; Joel 2:17). Here Ezekiel discovers a group of about 25 men (LXX says 20) facing eastward and worshipping the sun. That they are bowed down to the sun, standing with their backs toward the temple, is the ultimate act of disrespect and signifies a complete rejection of YHWH. They have literally turned their backs on him. This fourth scene is the climax of the abominations shown to Ezekiel, in ascending order of seriousness. There is an early Old Testament reference to solar worship in Job 31:26-28. That the practice of Sun worship took place in Judah is confirmed by 2 Kgs 23:5,11. There is a later reference to 25 men (11:1) but no indication that this is the same group.

In v.17 Ezekiel is once again asked if he has seen this. A rhetorical question then follows: ‘Is it not enough for the house of Judah to commit the detestable acts they are doing here, that they must also fill the land with violence and repeatedly anger me, even putting the branch to their nose?’ (CSB). This question, to which the answer is obviously ‘Yes!,’ is designed to emphasize that the practices Ezekiel has seen performed are abominations that provoke YHWH to anger. Three transgressions are listed:

  • The worship of false gods – committing abominations.
  • The land filled with violence. As in 7:23 idolatry is linked with social injustice.
  • The deliberate provocation of YHWH. They put a branch to their/his nose. What this involves is not known. If they put a branch to their nose possibly the reference is to an obscene worship ritual involving vine branches that provokes YHWH to anger. If they put the branch to his nose the implication is that they direct an obscene, arrogant and deliberately provocative gesture at YHWH. The word zemôrāh meaning branch or tendril occurs four other times in the Old Testament (Num 13:23; Isa 17:10; Ezek 15:2; Nah. 2:3) and refers to vines.

V.18. YHWH will therefore not spare them and will not have pity. Even though the people cry for mercy with ‘a loud voice’ he will not hear them. The thought of a loud voice is taken up again in the next verse (9:1) which begins with the ‘loud voice’ of YHWH.

SUMMATION

In chapter 8 Ezekiel is transported in vision from Babylonia to Jerusalem where he witnesses the idolatrous state of religion and society back home. He views scenes of idolatry in four locations. Each location is closer to the sanctuary itself and each scene of idolatry is progressively worse. The temple precincts are polluted, why would YHWH stay? Chapter 8 provides justification for the withdrawal of the kabod of YHWH from the temple (chapters 8-11). Once YHWH abandons Jerusalem because of his people’s sin it will no longer be inviolable; the Babylonians will be able sack the city.

This chapter sets the stage for the judgement to come, as YHWH withdraws His protection, leaving Jerusalem vulnerable to destruction. The vivid imagery and detailed narrative underscore the severity of the people’s sins and emphasize the dire consequences of forsaking YHWH for idols.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

de Vries, Pieter 2015. The Kābôd of Yhwh in the Old Testament: with particular reference to the Book of Ezekiel. BRILL.

‌Ackerman, Susan. “A Marzēaḥ in Ezekiel 8:7-13?” The Harvard Theological Review, vol. 82, no. 3, 1989, pp. 267–81.

Aharoni, Yohanan. “The Date of Casemate Walls in Judah and Israel and Their Purpose.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 154, 1959, pp. 35–39.

Lapp, Nancy L. “Casemate Walls in Palestine and the Late Iron II Casemate at Tell El-Fûl (Gibeah).” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 223, 1976, pp. 25–42.

Wong, Ka Leung. “A Note on Ezekiel VIII 6.” Vetus Testamentum, vol. 51, no. 3, 2001, pp. 396–400.

Yamauchi, Edwin M. “Tammuz and the Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 84, no. 3, 1965, pp. 283–90.