Tag: god

Posted in General

A Psalm For Father’s Day: Psalm 103

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Psalm 103

​1 Bless the LORD, O my soul,
and all that is within me,
bless his holy name!
2 Bless the LORD, O my soul,
and forget not all his benefits,
3 who forgives all your iniquity,
who heals all your diseases,
4 who redeems your life from the pit,
who crowns you with steadfast love and mercy,
5 who satisfies you with good
so that your youth is renewed like the eagle’s.
6 The LORD works righteousness
and justice for all who are oppressed.
7 He made known his ways to Moses,
his acts to the people of Israel.
8 The LORD is merciful and gracious,
slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love.
9 He will not always chide,
nor will he keep his anger forever.
10 He does not deal with us according to our sins,
nor repay us according to our iniquities.
11 For as high as the heavens are above the earth,
so great is his steadfast love toward those who fear him;
12 as far as the east is from the west,
so far does he remove our transgressions from us.
13 As a father shows compassion to his children,
so the LORD shows compassion to those who fear him.
14 For he knows our frame;
he remembers that we are dust.
15 As for man, his days are like grass;
he flourishes like a flower of the field;
16 for the wind passes over it, and it is gone,
and its place knows it no more.
17 But the steadfast love of the LORD is from everlasting to everlasting on those who fear him,
and his righteousness to children’s children,
18 to those who keep his covenant
and remember to do his commandments.
19 The LORD has established his throne in the heavens,
and his kingdom rules over all.
20 Bless the LORD, O you his angels,
you mighty ones who do his word,
obeying the voice of his word!
21 Bless the LORD, all his hosts,
his ministers, who do his will!
22 Bless the LORD, all his works,
in all places of his dominion.
Bless the LORD, O my soul! Psalm 103 ESV

Father’s Day Reflection

While there is no direct mention of human fathers in this psalm it may be helpful to reflect upon it in the context of Father’s Day. This ‘Psalm of David’ calls upon the faithful to remember and give thanks for all God’s goodness. In a similar way Father’s Day is a time to to remember and celebrate the blessings that fathers (or father figures) have brought into our lives.

In vv.13-14 David explicitly uses the analogy of a father’s compassion to describe God’s character. This theme, along with others in the psalm such as forgiveness, patience and steadfast love, brings to mind qualities that we most admire and appreciate in good fathers.

A good father, vv.3-5 would suggest, strives to protect, provide and nurture. He also offers forgiveness, helps heal from hurts, guides away from danger and shows unconditional love.

As earthly fathers, while recognising our own failures and limitations, may we have the capacity to understand our children’s fears, weaknesses, and vulnerabilities and offer compassion and understanding.

Verses 15-18 is a reminder that though time with, and as, fathers is fleeting, the impact of loving fathers can last for generations; with the legacy being passed on by ‘children’s children.’

In Psalm 103 we may view God as:

A Forgiving Father, v.3

A Kind Father, vv.4, 8, 11,17

A Providing Father, v. 5

A Righteous Father, vv.6, 17

A Patient Father, v.8

A Compassionate Father, v.13

An Understanding Father, v.14

Posted in General

Unexpected Disasters: The Shock of Sudden Tragedy

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Luke 13:1-5

1 There were some present at that very time who told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. 2 And he answered them, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans, because they suffered in this way? 3 No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. 4 Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them: do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem? 5 No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.” Luke 13:1-5 ESV

Today, 12 June, 2025, the newsfeeds have brought details of a tragic plane crash that occurred shortly after take-off at Ahmedabad airport in western India. The aircraft was bound for London Gatwick, carrying hopeful travellers, people like you and me. In a matter of moments many lives were lost, families devastated and the world left asking, ‘Why? How could this happen?

Disasters shock us and confront us with the fragility of life. We wonder: Why them? Why now? Could that happen to me? Such questions are not new. In Jesus’ day, people wrestled with those same thoughts about local tragedies. Luke chapter 13 records that Jesus responded with a message, not of speculation, but of salvation.

The Lord Jesus never shied away from real issues. He did not avoid hard questions but met people where they were and addressed their concerns head-on. Sometimes he illustrated his preaching with parables – stories about everyday real life – and he also referred to news stories of interest in order to drive home an important truth. That is exactly what he has done in Luke 13:1-5. The Lord Jesus alludes to two news stories of the time. No other historian but Luke records these two events.  Josephus the great Jewish historian does not mention them at all. They did not make national or international headlines and the exact details have not survived. These were local disasters: current events that had shaken the people of his day.

  • The Temple Disaster– where the Roman governor Pontius Pilate had slaughtered worshippers from Galilee
  • The Tower Disaster – where a structure in Siloam collapsed, killing 18 people.

Jesus first of all discusses the TEMPLE DISASTER. Then he mentions the TOWER DISASTER. He uses these to talk about the TRUE DISASTER

The Temple Disaster

It is very likely that this event took place during the Passover, and that these Galilean Jews had travelled to Jerusalem to fulfil their religious duties. Galileans had a reputation for being rebellious and it seems that Pilate’s soldiers attacked and slaughtered some of them while they were offering sacrifices. We don’t know the details but they were murdered in such a gruesome way that it was described as their blood being mingled with the blood of their offerings. A horrific scene.

The generally accepted wisdom at that time was that good things happened to good people and bad things happened to bad people. The people Jesus was talking to therefore assumed that those Galileans were especially sinful. After all, wouldn’t God protect good people in the act of worship? Jesus answered their thoughts plainly: ‘Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans, because they suffered in this way?  No,…’ He corrected their faulty theology. This is an emphatic ‘No!’ The Galileans who were slaughtered by Pilate were not greater sinners than others. Calamities are not reserved for the wicked. Jesus used that event to remind them of something very important: unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. It is a fact that all face the judgement of God unless they repent.

The Tower Disaster

The second calamity mentioned by Jesus related to part of a construction project, possibly an aqueduct. The tower collapsed, killing eighteen people. Were they worse sinners than than others in Jerusalem? Again Jesus says ‘No!’ Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them: do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem?

These two events may have seemed random but Jesus used both of them to emphasise the same point: tragedy does not discriminate. And, since death is unpredictable, the only wise response is repentance: unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.

The True Disaster

Jesus wasn’t lecturing them on politics or architecture. His concern was not with ‘health and safety’ but for their eternal safety. He was telling them: ‘Don’t ask why these people died – ask yourself if you are ready to die when your time comes.’

The real disaster is that if you don’t repent, when death comes you will perish. True disaster is that you die and experience the judgement of God because you have not repented. Jesus was not stressing the issue of how people die or when they die or why they die. The issue is that they might die without repenting.

The true disaster is not dying suddenly. It is not dying violently or unexpectedly. The real disaster, according to Jesus, is dying unrepentant. Repent or perish is not intended as a cruel ultimatum – it is a loving warning.

THREE WORDS THAT DEMAND ATTENTION

unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.

In Luke 13:1-5 Jesus uses three crucial words: all, repent and perish.

ALL – An Inclusive Word

No-one is exempt. Jesus said: unless you repent – not they, not those people, but you.

  • for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, Romans 3:23 ESV
  • None is righteous, no, not one; Romans 3:10 ESV
      

Your upbringing will not save you. Your morality will not exempt you. Your good works will not excuse you. You must repent.

REPENT – A DECISIVE WORD

Repentance is a necessity. Repentance by itself will not save you, but you cannot be saved without it. Repentance and faith are linked together inseparably in Acts 20:21: ‘Testifying both to the Jews, and also to the Greeks, repentance toward God, and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ.’ KJV. Repentance in the New Testament always includes faith in Jesus Christ as the only Saviour. It is a turning from sin to someone and that someone is Jesus Christ. The repentance that leads to eternal life is that repentance which embraces Christ as saviour.

Repentance is not a vague sorrow or an emotional moment. It is a decisive turning — a change of heart, mind, and direction.

PERISH – A SOBERING WORD

To perish is not simply to die. Everyone dies. To perish is to die without hope, to face eternal judgement.

Hebrews 9:27 says: it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgement, ESV

Jesus uses the word perish with eternal implications. The true tragedy is not a Roman sword or a collapsing tower; it is a person entering eternity unrepentant and unforgiven.

SUMMATION

None of those who died in the temple or under the tower expected that day to be their last. They had plans, routines and dreams; all disrupted in an instant.

That is the unsettling reality of life: we do not know what tomorrow holds. We might be sitting here today — reasonably healthy, strong, confident — but we cannot guarantee we will be here tomorrow. What if today is your final warning? What if this is God’s voice calling you, one last time: “Repent, or perish”?


Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 17:1-24

Background reading:
– King Jehoiachin’s exile to Babylon in 597 BCE, 2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10.
– Zedekiah’s installation as Nebuchadnezzar’s puppet king and his revolt against Babylonian rule, 2 Kgs 24:17-20; 2 Chron 36:11-16.
– The aftermath of Zedekiah’s revolt, 2 Kgs 25:1-30; 2 Chron 36:11-20.

THE ALLEGORY OF TWO EAGLES AND A VINE

DIVISION

1-10 The Imagery of the Allegory
11-21 The Interpretation of the Allegory
22-24 A Message of Hope

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 17 presents two further visions of Ezekiel in the section (chapters 4-24) that contains oracles of warning about the certainty of YHWH’s judgement upon Judah for crimes such as disobedience, violence, exploitation of the poor, foreign alliances and idolatry.

Already in exile in Babylon, Ezekiel prophesied to the people of Israel/Judah in the years leading up to and just after the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by Babylonian forces in 587/6 BCE.

In this chapter Ezekiel addresses the political crisis of the time which was King Zedekiah of Judah’s rebellion against Babylonian rule. This must have occurred about 590 BCE since it prompted Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Jerusalem that began in Zedekiah’s ninth regnal year, 589/8 BCE (Jer 39:1; 52:4; 2 Kgs 25:1).

THE IMAGERY OF THE ALLEGORY 1-10

(1) Ezekiel 17 begins with the standard prophetic word formula ‘and the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ which introduces a new revelation. This formula occurs again in v.11.

(2) As usual YHWH emphasises Ezekiel’s mortality by addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ and then issuing a double command: ‘pose a riddle (ḥiyḏāh) and tell an allegory (māšāl) to the house of Israel.’ The idea of a riddle or enigma is that it is difficult to understand whereas an allegory or fable is something that illuminates the understanding. Greenberg (Ezekiel I-XX, 1983, p. 309) comments: ‘While the two terms appear in parallelism (Ps 49:5, 78:2; Prov 1:6) they are not interchangeable (as Judg 14:12ff and 1 Kings 10:1 show )…’

(3) There follows the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ which cites the origin of the message and claims divine authority (also vv.9, 22).

FIRST GREAT EAGLE

The allegory begins with a great eagle that has powerful wings, long feathers and colourful plumage coming to Lebanon to the top branch of a cedar tree.

Comment – Nešer refers to a large bird of prey and can be translated as either ‘eagle’ or ‘vulture’ depending on the context. Most translations opt for ‘eagle,’ thus emphasising power, speed and dominance. Some scholars reckon that nešer here refers to the Great Griffon Vulture. Translating it thus would emphasise its scavenging behaviour and association with death and desolation.

great wings, long-winged, full of feathers, which had divers colours – a superpower which has widespread domination and influence over many peoples.

Lebanon – to the north of Israel but in the allegory it seems to represent Jerusalem, see v.12.

the highest branch – the aristocracy.

(4-6) Taking off the topmost twig from the highest branch of a cedar tree the eagle carries it to a land of commerce and sets it in a city of merchants. Then it takes a seedling from the ground and plants it in well-irrigated, fertile ground where it grows like a willow tree (a tree that loves water, cf. Isa 44:4). There it grows into ‘a spreading vine of low stature’ which produces branches and shoots and has its roots spread towards the eagle.

COMMENTS – He cropped off the top of his young twigs, carried it into a land of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants. – i.e. deported the king (Jehoiachin) to Babylon. The Babylonians were famous traders (Josh 7:21; Rev 18:10-16).

He took also of the seed of the land – Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah, a native of Judah, as a puppet ruler.

and planted it in a fruitful field; he placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree. – Zedekiah and Judah flourished under Babylonian rule – they were dependent upon Babylonia but the conditions for growth were excellent.

great waters – The Euphrates and the Tigris were the rivers of Babylon (cf. Psa 137).

And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs. – As a vassal state Judah was subservient to the Babylonians but was nevertheless thriving.

Vine – Often used for Israel, e.g. Psa 80:8-15; Isa 5:1-7; Jer 2:21; Hos 10:1.

(7) SECOND GREAT EAGLE

A second eagle with great wings and many feathers is introduced and the vine stretches its roots and branches towards this eagle hoping to obtain sustenance from it.

COMMENTS – The second great eagle is not quite as splendid as the first (cp. v.7a with v.3a). It has great wings and many feathers but they are not as long or colourful as those of the first eagle.

The vine tries to shift its loyalty, it stretches out its roots and branches towards the second eagle. Notice that, whereas in vv.3-5 the first great eagle takes the active role and the vine is passive, in v.7 the second great eagle is passive and the vine is active. It reaches out towards second eagle.

(8) The series of infinitives would suggest that v.8 is recapping the advantages the vine has enjoyed and could continue to enjoy (v.6) under the first eagle (it was planted: to bring forth branches, to bear fruit, to become a goodly vine). This emphasises the foolishness of turning towards the second eagle.

(9-10) Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 22) Ezekiel is told to ask his fellow exiles questions (featuring the words ‘shall it prosper’) and then supply the answers.

Q Shall it prosper? shall he not pull up the roots thereof, and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither?
A it shall wither in all the leaves of her spring, even without great power or many people to pluck it up by the roots thereof.

Q Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? shall it not utterly wither, when the east wind toucheth it?
A it shall wither in the furrows where it grew.

COMMENTS – these questions and answers are designed to show the utter futility of the vine changing its allegiance. The first eagle will uproot the vine (by applying great force) and cause it to wither (rot).

planted – some translations (e.g. NCB; NLT; RSV; NRSV) prefer ‘transplanted’ as the verb šāṯal  can mean either to plant or to transplant. In Ezek chapter 19 this same word is used of a vine’s first planting and again in v.13 of its second planting (transplanting).

east wind – a destructive hot wind (Job 27:21; Isa 27:8; Ezek 19:12; Hos 13:15).

the furrows (v.7 and v.10) – the River Nile and the irrigation canals that branch off from it.

THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ALLEGORY 11-21

(11-12a) In Ezek 17:11 the standard prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ introduces a new revelation that helpfully explains the previous one. Ezekiel is to communicate this to the exiles who are with him in Babylon; here referred to once again as ‘the rebellious house.’ This description occurs 12 times in the book of Ezekiel: 2:5, 6, 8; 3:9, 26, 27; 12:2, 3, 9, 25; 17:12; 24:3.

(12a-21) Explanation:

v.12 Behold, the king of Babylon is come to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and led them with him to Babylon;

COMMENT – Cp. vv. 3-4. The first great eagle is Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, who in 597 BCE besieged Jerusalem (Lebanon) and carried away the Judean king Jehoiachin, with the aristocracy and the elite of the land, to exile in Babylon (see 2 Kgs 24:10-16).

v.13-14 And hath taken of the king’s seed, and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath of him: he hath also taken the mighty of the land: That the kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand.

COMMENT- Cp. vv.5-6. Nebuchadnezzar appointed Zedekiah as his vassal king in Judah (2 Kgs 24:17). As part of this agreement Zedekiah swore an oath of allegiance to Nebuchadnezzar that would also have entailed a commitment to pay an annual tribute to the Babylonians. The Chronicler records that Nebuchadnezzar put him under oath; Zedekiah swore this in the name of YHWH (2 Chron 36:13). If this agreement was honoured Judah would survive and flourish as a Babylonian vassal state, YHWH had confirmed that this would be so in a word addressed to Zedekiah by the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 27:12-15).

vv.15-16 But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and much people. Shall he prosper? shall he escape that doeth such things? or shall he break the covenant, and be delivered? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he broke, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die.

COMMENT – Having decided to revolt against Babylonian rule Zedekiah sent diplomats to Egypt to request military support, which seems to have been forthcoming. Zedekiah then rebelled (2 Kgs 24:20), probably by withholding tribute. This action quickly backfired as Nebuchadnezzar marched on Jerusalem and laid siege to the city.

Echoing v.9 and v.10 YHWH asks ‘Shall he prosper?’ The alliance with Egypt will not work because YHWH is angry that Zedekiah broke the treaty with the Babylonians that was sworn in YHWH’s name. YHWH swears by himself that Zedekiah will die in Babylon.

v.17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company make for him in the war, by casting up mounts, and building forts, to cut off many persons:

COMMENT – Once the Babylonian siege apparatus is set up (ramps and bulwarks) Pharaoh and his army will be of no use (see Ezekiel’s description of Babylonian siege warfare against Tyre in 26:7-11). Jeremiah 37:4-11 indicates that Pharoah did send an army, causing the Babylonians to break the siege of Jerusalem for a short while in order to repulse that threat.

vv.18-19. Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head.

COMMENT – Zedekiah had ‘given his hand’ (this gesture must have meant ‘I promise’ cf. Ezra 30:8; Lam 5:6).

v.19, which I have shown in bold print, is the key verse in the chapter. It is the whole point of the allegory. Zedekiah swore an oath and made a treaty with a secular ruler, but did not honour its terms because he despised the oath (the word ‘oath’ also means ‘curse’). However, he swore it in YHWH’s name so it has religious significance. It is binding. Notice ‘mine oath’ and ‘my covenant.’ The oath and covenant that Zedekiah made with Nebuchadnezzar is also viewed as YHWH’s oath and covenant. Zedekiah violated that agreement and will suffer the consequences. Notice that YHWH himself makes an oath (‘as I live’) to punish Zedekiah.

v.20 predicts Zedekiah’s capture, exile to Babylon and judgement there for violating his duty and v.21 predicts that his soldiers will be pursued and either slain or dispersed. All this without any mention of Nebuchadnezzar! YHWH is in control. Nebuchadnezzar is his agent. Nebuchadnezzar is his instrument.

The fulfilment of these consequences will prove that YHWH indeed has spoken – ye shall know that I the LORD have spoken it.

A MESSAGE OF HOPE 22-24

The first 21 verses of Ezekiel 17 have been about judgement, the closing verses are about restoration. Utilising the earlier imagery of the chapter Ezekiel predicts the restoration of the Davidic line. Many interpret this passage as messianic.

Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 9) Ezekiel prophesies that YHWH will act to take a new tender sprig from the top of the high cedar in Babylon and plant it upon a high and eminent mountain in Israel. There it will thrive and become a place of shade and security for ‘all fowl of every wing.’ All the trees of the field will know that that YHWH has spoken this and has brought it about.

No explanation of this metaphor is given but based on the earlier explanation in the chapter where the top of the twigs represented Jehoiachin then this tender twig (from the top of the high cedar tree in Babylon) that YHWH will plant upon a high mountain in Israel refers to a future king of the Davidic line who will reign in Israel/Judah. Mt. Zion springs immediately to mind but ‘high and eminent mountain’ probably refers to this king’s greatness. He will flourish and be a blessing to all kinds of people – or perhaps v.23b (under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell) implies universal rule. This future Davidic ruler will have worldwide influence and significance (cf. Isa 9:6-7; Jer 23:5-6; Ezek 34:23; 37:24).

Ezekiel may have been hoping for the eventual restoration of King Jehoiachin with whom he was in exile in Babylon. Jehoiachin was released after Nebuchadnezzar’s death in 562 BCE (2 Kgs 25:27-30; Jer 52:3-4) but he was not the fulfilment of the prophecy. Nor was Zerubbabel, a later Governor of Judea under the First Persian Empire, although he was of the Davidic line and his name means ‘seed of Babylon.’

The chapter closes with ‘all the trees of the field’ (i.e. the nations) recognising that it is YHWH who has brought Judah down to nothing and who will restore and exalt the new king. YHWH makes the low high and brings the high low.

PREACTICAL LESSONS FROM EZEKIEL 17

a) The necessity of keeping one’s word. Breaking promises and betraying trust, whether in personal or business relationships or in the political sphere, matters to God. Integrity is important and actions have consequences. Do I honour my commitments, or shift loyalties if it seems more beneficial to do so?

b) The folly of placing dependence upon others rather than God. Zedekiah relied on Egypt’s prowess rather than trust God’s sovereignty. True security lies in trusting God, not others. Am I entangled in worldly alliances?

c) Although we live in uncertain times God is actively working out his purposes in world affairs. No matter how bad a situation seems he is in control. God can reverse national fortunes (bring the high low and make the low high, v.24) and ultimately his plans will prevail.

Posted in Exposition

Psalm 48: ‘This God is our God forever and ever.’

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Psalm 48

INTRODUCTION

Psalm 48 is a patriotic song, probably pre-exilic, which celebrates the protection of Jerusalem by Israel’s God, YHWH, who dwells there among his people and is supreme over all enemies. The greatness of YHWH is reflected in the security and beauty of the city.

The occasion of the psalm is unknown but it would seem from vv. 4-8 that it was composed in the aftermath of a historical event that resulted in a great national deliverance, which is attributed to YHWH. Some scholars suggest that it may have been written for the Feast of Tabernacles during which, so they speculate, the faithful praised the Lord as they toured the city (v.12).

Psalm 48 falls into the category known as ‘Zion psalms;’ these focus on Mt. Zion (Jerusalem) — the place of God’s presence and protection (cf. Psa 2:6; 9:11,14; 14:7; 20:2; 48:2,11, 12; 50:2; 51:18; 69:35; 74:2; 76:2; 78:68; 84:7; 87:2, 5; 97:8; 99:2; 102:13,16, 21; 110:2; 125:1; 126:1; 128:5; 129:5; 132.13; 133:3; 134:3; 135:21; 137:1; 146;10; 147:12; 149:2).

Psalm 48 is located in what is often called the Elohistic psalter – a group of psalms (42-83) that prefer the divine name Elohim. Psalm 48 calls God YHWH (the LORD) once, great King once, Lord of hosts once and Elohim (God) eight times.

THE TITLE

The Hebrew superscript says ‘a song, a psalm, for the sons of Korah’. The Septuagint (LXX) Greek translation adds: ‘on the second [day] of the week.’ Apparently specific psalms were sung on different days of the week by the Levite choir as part of the temple liturgy. Only one psalm title in the Hebrew Masoretic text (MT) specifies a day of the week (the sabbath) on which it is to be sung. Several psalm titles in the c. 3rd century BCE Greek translation known as the Septuagint (LXX) indicate a day of the week.

Sunday: Psalm 24  Psalm for David on the first day of the week LXX
Monday: Psalm 48 A Psalm of praise for the sons of Core on the second day of the week LXX
Wednesday: Psalm 94  A Psalm of David for the fourth day of the week LXX
Friday: Psalm 93 For the day before the Sabbath LXX
Saturday: Psalm 92  A Psalm or a Song for the sabbath day MT

No records survive for Tuesday or Thursday.

It would therefore seem that Psalm 48 was sung on Mondays. The title describes it as a song and a psalm. ‘Song’ is a general word for a lyrical song and ‘psalm’ most likely indicates that it is to be sung with musical accompaniment.

For Sons of Korah see my post: Sons of Korah: Their Role in Worship and Psalms

DIVISION

Psalm 48 has four sections:

1-3 Praise for Zion’s beauty
4-8 Panic for Zion’s foes
9-11 Pondering Zion’s God
12-14 Proclaiming Zion’s fortress

PRAISE FOR ZION’S BEAUTY 1-3

Psalm 48 opens with ascription of praise to YHWH, Israel’s national God, who is great (cf. Deut 10:21; 1 Chron 16:25) and very worthy of praise. The psalm makes clear that God’s unmatched greatness is because of his protection of Jerusalem and the defeat of Israel’s enemies (vv.3-8) and also because of his personal attributes (vv.9-14). He is therefore unsurpassed in greatness because of who he is and because of the mighty acts that he has done.

The geographical location in which YHWH is to be praised is Zion (Jerusalem). One might gain the impression that Jerusalem itself is the object of praise but ultimately the psalmist is praising the God whose greatness is reflected in the glory of the city – for which the psalmist uses seven epithets in vv.1-2:

The city of our God – YHWH is associated with Jerusalem, that is where he dwells (cf. Psa 14:7; 46:4-5; 76:2; Isa 12:6)

His holy mountain – The mountain is not intrinsically holy but is called this because of God’s presence in the temple there. Historically the location (formerly known as Mt. Moriah) is associated with YHWH because there he tested Abraham (Gen 22:2) and appeared to David (2 Chron 3:1). For holy hill/mountain see Psa 2:6; 87:1; Isa 2:3; Mic 4:1; Zech 8:3.

Beautiful in elevation – Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty, God hath shined. Psalm 50:2:

All that pass by clap their hands at thee; they hiss and wag their head at the daughter of Jerusalem, saying, Is this the city that men call The perfection of beauty, The joy of the whole earth? Lamentations 2:15

Some commentators aptly point out that in these epithets we have ‘theological geography’, i.e. symbolic or spiritual meaning assigned to physical locations. Here Jerusalem’s physical loftiness mirrors its spiritual significance.

Joy of the whole earth (or land?) – The psalmist views Jerusalem as a beacon of hope for all nations. A similar thought is expressed by Isaiah: And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. Isaiah 2:2-3

Mount Zion – Zion is another name for Jerusalem. It is sometimes associated with YHWH as a warrior, for example: The LORD also shall roar out of Zion, and utter his voice from Jerusalem; and the heavens and the earth shall shake: but the LORD will be the hope of his people, and the strength of the children of Israel. So shall ye know that I am the LORD your God dwelling in Zion, my holy mountain: then shall Jerusalem be holy, and there shall no strangers pass through her any more. Joel 3:16-17

On the sides of the north – Although the temple and royal palaces were located on the northern slopes of Mt. Zion the city of Jerusalem is not geographically in the far north so the expression ‘the sides of the north’ is likely symbolic.

The Hebrew word for north (zaphon) is also a proper name. The psalmist may therefore have in mind Mt. Zaphon in Syria, in Ancient Near Eastern mythology the place where the Canaanite pantheon of gods headed up by Baal – the Storm-god and bringer of rain and fertility – was thought to assemble. According to the Ugaritic text Baal Cycle Mt. Zaphon became the seat of the Storm-god Baal after his defeat of Yamm (the sea). It is interesting that two Old Testament passages refer to the creation of Zaphon (north) and link it with God’s battle with the sea (Job 26:7, 10-12; Psalm 89:9, 12). In the ‘Song of the Sea’ in Exodus 15, although there is no reference to Zaphon, it is said that God has created a mountain location for himself to dwell in (Exod 15:17).

There is a reference to the belief in an assembly of gods on Zaphon in Isaiah’s prophecy about the King of Babylon/ Lucifer in Isaiah 14:13: For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north.

If the psalmist intends Zaphon as a proper name he is applying to Zion the idea of Zaphon as the seat of deity and asserting that YHWH’s holy mountain surpasses the mythical mountain of Baal and the pagan gods. YHWH, not Baal, is the true God and Zion, not Zaphon, the true holy mountain.

The phrase translated ‘sides of the north’ also occurs in Isa 14:13; Ezek 38:6,15; 39:2.

City of the great King – the psalmist declares that Jerusalem belongs to YHWH and it is the seat of his rule. YHWH is the ultimate sovereign. Earthly powers may boast of having ‘great’ kings (for example, Assyria about Sennacherib: Isaiah 36:4,13) but they are subordinate to YHWH who truly is ‘the great king.’ The Lord is called ‘the great king’ in Psa 47:2; 48:2; 95:3; Mal 1:14. Jesus quoted this phrase in the Sermon on the Mount (Mat 5:35).

V.3. In Jerusalem’s fortresses God is recognised as a stronghold. His greatness is seen in his ongoing protection of Jerusalem from Israel’s enemies. This expression of belief in the inviolability of Jerusalem (cf. v.8) would indicate that the psalm is likely pre-exilic— as would its portrayal of the city as beautiful, with citadels (v.2, 13), towers (v.12), fortifications (v.13) and the temple (v.9) still standing.

PANIC FOR ZION’S FOES 4-8

Having described the beauty of Jerusalem and claimed that God is its stronghold the psalmist illustrates divine protection by referring to an occasion when the city came under attack but was delivered by God’s powerful intervention. He neither explains the exact historical context nor supplies names but these would have been familiar to the first readers/listeners.

With the words ‘For, lo’ he draws attention to the time when a coalition of kings had moved against Jerusalem but were unable to take it because, struck with terror, they fled in panic.

v.4. A coalition of hostile kings assembled against Zion and passed by (advanced through their enemy’s territory in battle array?).

vv.5-6. They themselves saw (N.B. there is no ‘it’ – we do not know what they saw – perhaps a theophany, or the city?), were terrified (fear took hold of them), then panicked (compared to writhing in agony like a woman giving birth, cf. Isa 13:8) and fled in disarray.

v.7. YHWH (metaphorically) broke them in pieces – see Isa 14:24-25.

v.8. The inhabitants of Jerusalem witnessed YHWH’s intervention to protect Jerusalem.

There has been much discussion and speculation about what historical event is being described. Suggestions include:

a) 2 Sam 5:17-25 – A coalition of Philistine princes (‘all the Philistines’ v.17) against David (c. 1010-970 BCE).

b) 2 Sam 10:6 – A coalition of Ammonites and Syrians against David (c. 1010-970 BCE).

c) 2 Chron 14:9-15 – The Ethiopians against King Asa of Judah (c. 911-870 BCE).

d) 2 Chron 20:1-30 – Ammonites, Moabites and Edomites against Jehoshaphat of Judah (c. 870-848 BCE).

e) Isa 7:1 – Syria and Israel against Ahaz of Judah (c. 736-716 BCE).

f) 2 Kgs 18:17 The Assyrian invasion of Judah in 701 BCE in the time of Hezekiah of Judah (c. 716-687 BCE).

The strongest possibility and one which now has widespread acceptance is (f) – the Assyrian invasion under Sennacherib in 701 BCE. The biblical accounts (2 Kgs 18-19; 2 Chron 32; Isa 36-37) tell of a miraculous intervention by the angel of the Lord that resulted in the withdrawal of Sennacherib’s army. The sudden and inexplicable retreat of the Assyrians and their vassal kings (Isa 10:8) aligns quite well with the panic and flight depicted in Psalm 48 (cf. Exod 15:15-16).

v.7 In the middle of recounting this historical event the psalmist unexpectedly addresses God directly, saying: ‘Thou breakest the ships of Tarshish with an east wind’. It is difficult to see what role ships of Tarshish (thought to have been a port in Spain that was controlled by the Phoenicians) can have played in the Assyrian invasion of Judah. Since a famous fleet was based there (1 Kgs 10:22; Isa 23:14; 60:9; Ezek 23:25) it may have been that the Phoenician merchant navy had secured a contract to supply the Assyrian army and that some of those supply vessels were subsequently wrecked in a storm at sea.

It is more likely that a Tarshish ship was a well-known type of freighter: large, sturdy and built for sailing long distances. According to 1 Kgs 22:48 King Jehoshaphat had taken delivery of ships constructed to this design but they were wrecked at a port on the Red Sea: Jehoshaphat made ships of Tharshish to go to Ophir for gold: but they went not; for the ships were broken at Ezion-geber.

The ‘ships of Tarshish’ comparison in v.7 is probably emphasizing the speed with which the destructive east wind shatters ships rather than the scale of destruction (cf. Job 27:21: The east wind carrieth him away, and he departeth: and as a storm hurleth him out of his place and Jer 18:17 I will scatter them as with an east wind before the enemy…) The point is that YHWH dealt suddenly and swiftly with the forces hostile to Jerusalem.

v.8. The people in Jerusalem have heard about God’s wonderful acts in the past but now they too have experienced his deliverance in the present. They have seen for themselves evidence of God’s protection of Zion. The psalmist now refers to Jerusalem as ‘the city of the Lord of hosts’ and again calls it ‘the city of our God’ (cf. v.1). He then expresses the commonly-held notion that Jerusalem would enjoy divine protection forever. The prophet Ezekiel confronted this idea of guaranteed immunity in the years leading up to the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the First Temple in 586/7 BCE.

PONDERING ZION’S GOD 9-11

v.9. God’s acts of deliverance cause the people of Zion to worship and praise him in the temple as they reflect on his steadfast love (ḥeseḏ). This word means mercy, goodness, love, acts of kindness and includes the idea of faithfulness or loyalty. The classic passage in which it appears is Psalm 136 where (translated ‘mercy’ KJV) it occurs 26 times.

v.10. Just as God’s name (reputation) is worldwide so his praise (i.e. praise given to him) extends to the ends of the earth (cf. Mal 1:11). This may be a recognition that YHWH’s defeat of the coalition of kings has not only benefited Judah but other nations as well. It is appropriate that God should be praised because his power (right hand) is righteous., i.e. his actions are always just and fair. ‘Right hand’ is an example of anthropomorphism – attributing human characteristics to something that is not human.

v.11. Mt. Zion is to rejoice (be happy) and the daughters of Jerusalem to be glad (take great pleasure in) God’s judgments (legal decisions).

Mt. Zion means the inhabitants of Jerusalem – this is an example of metonymy.

‘Daughters of Jerusalem’ refers to Jerusalem’s suburbs and satellite towns and villages (cf. The terms ‘Zion’ and ‘daughters’ are used in the same way in Psa 97:8). See: Num 21:25; Josh 17:11, 16 where the KJV translates ‘daughters’ as ‘villages’ or ‘towns.’

‘Judgments’ is the word for legal decisions but in this verse it might simply mean ‘justice.’

APPLICATION : If tempted to question God’s care for you just reflect on his faithfulness in the past and let these memories turn doubt into rejoicing.

PROCLAIMING ZION’S FORTRESS 12-14

The psalmist encourages the people of Jerusalem, who have been confined to the city during the siege, to walk around the city and view what they would have lost but for God’s protecting power. They are to count the city’s towers (which the enemy must have spied out, Isa 33:18), consider its bulwarks and go through its citadels. Some of Jerusalem’s towers are mentioned in the book of Nehemiah (3:1, 11, 25-27).

The purpose of this exercise is that they might appreciate the evidence of God’s protection and tell of his greatness to the next (KJV, ‘following’) generation. The word for ‘next’ also means ‘west.’

Some suggest that in this psalm, which speaks of a great God whose reputation and praise extend to the ends of the earth, the composer has cleverly woven in a reference to the four cardinal directions: North, East, South and West. Two are referred to directly and two indirectly.

v.2 – ‘the sides of the north‘
v.7 – ‘with an east wind’

v.10 – ‘thy right hand is full of righteousness.’ The word for ‘right hand’ also means south.
v.12 – ‘tell to the generation following.’ The word translated ‘following’ also means west.

v.14. The psalm ends with a profession of faith. It is an affirmation that this God is their God forever and will guide them unto death (i.e. throughout life). God, says the psalmist, not only delivers but also directs throughout life.

The most straightforward interpretation is that God guides throughout life, until death. Some interpreters extend the meaning to include guidance through death and into eternity.

APPLICATION: Take time to ‘walk about Zion.’ Look at your life and reflect on the great work that God has done and will continue to do because he never changes – ‘this God is our God forever and ever.’ And don’t keep this to yourself. Tell your children. Tell your friends. Share it with others. Someone else might need encouragement today!

SUMMATION

Psalm 48 is a song of praise that celebrates the greatness of God and his supremacy over all enemies. It portrays Jerusalem as a symbol of God’s strength and of his defence and protection of his people.

The psalm calls upon believers to contemplate God’s steadfast love, rejoice in his righteous decisions and testify of his faithfulness to future generations. It affirms that God is our God forever and will guide us throughout life.

Posted in General

Sons of Korah: Their Role in Worship and Psalms

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

The book of psalms is a collection of sacred poems suitable for private devotions or for use in worship. In Israel’s temple liturgy psalms were often sung to musical accompaniment, especially on stringed instruments. Almost half of the psalms are traditionally ascribed to David but some other contributors are also named. These authors or collectors are Moses (90), Solomon (72; 127), Asaph (50; 73-83), Heman the Ezrahite (88), Ethan the Ezrahite (89) and the Sons of Korah.

KORAH

Four people named Korah are mentioned in the Bible.

Edomite – Korah, son of Esau and Oholibamah (Gen 36:5, 14, 18; 1 Chron 1:35).

Edomite – Korah, son of Eliphaz and grandson of Esau (Gen 36:16).

Judahite (Num 13:6) – Korah, son of Hebron and a descendant of Caleb (1 Chron 2:43).

Levite – Korah, son of Izhar, known for rebellion against Moses (Exod 6:21, 24; Num 16:1; 1 Chron 6:22)

KORAH’S REBELLION

Numbers chapter 16 treats the rebellion of Korah the Levite in some detail. In the New Testament this event is briefly referred to as’ ‘the gainsaying of Korah’ (Jude 1:11). He and three Reubenites called Dathan, Abiram and On assembled with 250 Israelite community leaders to protest against Moses’s leadership.

Korah was a cousin of Moses; their fathers Amran and Izhar were brothers (Exod 6:18-21; 1 Chron 6:18-22). As a Levite and member of the Kohathite clan Korah already had significant responsibilities relating to the transport of YHWH’s portable sanctuary known as the tabernacle (Num 4:1-20; 7:9; 10:21; 16:9) but he resented the fact that only Aaron and his descendants were chosen to function as priests (Num 16:10). He falsely argued that all the people were holy (Num 16:3) and that each one could therefore approach YHWH on his own terms. He may also have been jealous that Moses appointed another cousin, Elizaphan, a son of Uzziel the youngest son of Kohath (Exod 6:22), to headship of the Kohathite clan (Num 3:30).

Korah and his associates contended that Moses and Aaron had led the Israelites out of Egypt only to exalt themselves and lord it over the people (Num16:3). In response, Moses pointed out that rejection of God’s appointed leaders and the Aaronic priesthood amounted to rebellion against YHWH and proposed a contest (Num 16:16) that would validate his claim to leadership and Aaron’s to priesthood. The dissenters were to offer incense before YHWH and see what would happen then. Korah, Dathan and Abiram did so with the result that:
the ground cleaved asunder that was under them: And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up, and their houses, and all the men that appertained unto Korah, and all their goods. They, and all that appertained to them, went down alive into the pit, and the earth closed upon them: and they perished from among the congregation. And all Israel that were round about them fled at the cry of them: for they said, Lest the earth swallow us up also. And there came out a fire from the LORD, and consumed the two hundred and fifty men that offered incense. Numbers 16:31-35

A later passage, however, stresses that, unlike those of Dathan and Abiram, the children (sons) of Korah were not punished: Notwithstanding the children of Korah died not. Numbers 26:11

LATER HISTORY OF THE KOHATHITES AND KORHITES

When Israel entered the promised land the Kohathites were allocated Levitical cities in the tribal territories of Judah (Josh 21:4), Ephraim, Dan and Manasseh. They do appear to have settled among the tribes in Judah (1 Chron 6:54-55), Ephraim (1 Chron 6:66-69) and Manasseh (1 Chron 6:70) but not in Dan.

Descendants of Korah are later listed as soldiers and also as bakers, singers, musicians and doorkeepers in the Tabernacle and Temple.

Soldiers

1 Chron 12:6

Bakers

1 Chron 9:31-32

Singers & musicians

Heman, a singer – 1 Chron 6:1-38
Heman’s 14 sons, singers and musicians – 1 Chron 25:4-6
Kohathite and Korhite singers – 2 Chron 20:19 in Jehoshaphat’s time.

Doorkeepers

1 Chron 9:17-23; Neh 11:19 after the exile (cf. Ezra 2:42; Neh 7:45).
1 Chron 26:1,19 in David’s time.
Psa 84:10

THE SONS OF KORAH IN PSALM TITLES

The literal ‘sons of Korah’ the Levite are named in Exod 6:24: And the sons of Korah; Assir, and Elkanah, and Abiasaph: these are the families of the Korhites. These are not the men referred to in the titles of some psalms. However, since in the Bible the expression ‘sons of Korah,’ apart from psalm titles, only refers to the progeny of Korah the Levite (Exod 6:24; Num 26:11) it is generally accepted that in the psalm titles ‘sons of Korah’ refers to later descendants of the infamous Korah the Levite and not to descendants of the Edomite and Judahite Korahs listed above.

Basing their ideas on the references to the Korhites as Levitical singers and musicians (see above references) many commentators argue that there must have been a temple guild of singers and musicians known as ‘the sons of Korah’ and contend that the Korah psalm titles refer to this group.

The relevant psalm titles include the phrase ‘for the sons of Korah’ where the prefix (lamed) means ‘to’, ‘for’ or ‘belonging to.’ These psalms may therefore have been composed a) by them, or b) for their use, or c) in their style. The titles may indicate that perhaps the Korah psalms are from the collection of the sons of Korah, or were given to the sons of Korah to be set to music. Most likely authorship is also implied, i.e. they composed them as well as collecting and singing them.

Ten psalms are directly attributed to the sons of Korah.

Psalm 42 TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN, MASCHIL, FOR THE SONS OF KORAH.
Psalm 44 TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN FOR THE SONS OF KORAH, MASCHIL.
Psalm 45 TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN UPON SHOSHANNIM, FOR THE SONS OF KORAH, MASCHIL, A SONG OF LOVES.
Psalm 46 TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN FOR THE SONS OF KORAH, A SONG UPON ALAMOTH.
Psalm 47 TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN, A PSALM FOR THE SONS OF KORAH.
Psalm 48 A SONG AND PSALM FOR THE SONS OF KORAH.
Psalm 49 TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN, A PSALM FOR THE SONS OF KORAH.
Psalm 84 TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN UPON GITTITH, A PSALM FOR THE SONS OF KORAH.
Psalm 85 TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN, A PSALM FOR THE SONS OF KORAH.
Psalm 87 A PSALM OR SONG FOR THE SONS OF KORAH.

One psalm (Psalm 88) is jointly attributed to the sons of Korah and Heman the Ezrahite: A SONG OR PSALM FOR THE SONS OF KORAH, TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN UPON MAHALATH LEANNOTH, MASCHIL OF HEMAN THE EZRAHITE.

OBSERVATIONS

Psalm 43 has no title. Some scholars view Psalms 42 and 43 as one split psalm and thus attribute Psalm 43 to the sons of Korah also.

The Korah psalms 42 and 44-49 are in a group of psalms that has come to be known as the Elohistic Psalter (Pss 42-83). These psalms primarily use the divine name Elohim to refer to God.

The Korah psalms 84-85 and 87-88 are Yahwistic. They prefer the divine name YHWH (Yahweh, the LORD).

The Korah psalms include a rich variety of psalm types, for example:

Zion psalm – 46, 48, 87
Individual lament – 88
Communal lament – 44, 85
Wisdom psalm – 45, 49
Sanctuary psalm – 42/43, 84


Posted in General

Remembering Lot’s Wife: A Call to Faith and Obedience

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Genesis 19:1-3, 15-17, 24-26; Luke 17:26-32

Text: Remember Lot’s wife. Luke 17:32

Introduction

The ability to remember has great value. Usually we remember as individuals but it can also be a corporate act. Individually, remembering past experiences allows us to learn from successes or failures and helps inform our future choices and decisions. Communal remembering, such as the recent VE Day celebrations, allows us to honour the contributions and sacrifices of past generations, learn from history and work towards a better future for all.

The Bible has much to say about remembering. A couple of solemn verses spring to mind immediately:

Remember now thy Creator… Eccl 12:1
Remember how short my time is… Psa 89:47.

At present, however, I wish to concentrate on Lk 17:32 where, in just a few words, the Lord Jesus delivers one of the most sobering warnings in scripture: Remember Lot’s wife. Nowhere in Scripture are we instructed to remember other wives, even good ones – like Sarah, Rachel, Rebekah, Ruth, Esther or Mary. Nor are we asked to remember the bad ones. Job’s wife was cynical (Job 2:9). David’s wife Michal was critical (2 Sam 6:16, 20). Ahab’s wife Jezebel was corrupt (1 Kgs 21:15). Herod’s wife Herodias was cruel (Mk 6:24). Jesus did not say to remember them. He said: Remember Lot’s wife!

The Lord was not just making a historical reference, he was issuing a spiritual warning that applies to all. He was emphasising the danger of being so attached to the world that we lose sight of God’s deliverance.

Jesus speaks these words in the context of his future return and end-time judgement. He has just been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come (Lk 17:20). His answer is a warning that his return will be when people least expect it and that the most important thing is to be ready. In v.31 he warns his hearers that they must be prepared to go when the Lord comes, and they are not to turn back.

In that day, he which shall be upon the housetop, and his stuff in the house, let him not come down to take it away: and he that is in the field, let him likewise not return back. Luke 17:31

Then Jesus gives a chilling command: Remember Lot’s wife.

Who was this woman? We are not told her name. In the only three references to her in the Bible she is just identified as Lot’s/his wife (Gen 19:16, 26; Lk 17:32). She was the spouse of Abraham’s nephew, Lot, and together they lived in Sodom, a city so wicked that God decided to destroy it.

Genesis 19 describes how angels arrived to rescue Lot and his family. They were given one clear command by the angels as they left the doomed city : ‘Do not look back!’ (Gen 19:17). But Lot’s wife did—as the fire fell from heaven she turned, looked back and in that moment of disobedience became a pillar of salt.

What is so outstanding about this episode that the Lord uses Lot’s wife as an example? Why does he command us to remember her? It is because her story is a warning that one can be so close to salvation, yet still be lost.

Let us consider three things:

Her Privileges

Her Problems

Her Punishment

REMEMBER HER PRIVILEGES

She had godly influence

She was connected to Abraham, her husband’s uncle, who was a great man of faith; probably the godliest man who has ever lived. His whole family circle had been blessed by God’s covenant with him. Lot’s wife had seen faith in action.

She was married to Lot.

Her husband Lot, although he may not have been a shining example, was certainly better than every other person in Sodom for we learn from the New Testament that he was a righteous man (2 Pet 2:7). This lady had the privilege of living in a home where the truth was known and put into practice.

She was warned by angels.

Angels literally visited her home to warn about the impending judgement, took her by the hand (19:16) and pulled her way from danger. How many other people have received such divine intervention?

She was halfway to safety.

Lot’s wife was not destroyed in Sodom. She was outside the city, on the road to deliverance. She was almost saved.

Yet, in spite of these blessings, she looked back. Her privileges did not save her.

You can sit in church every Sunday, surrounded by godly people. You can listen to the word of God every week but unless you obey it you are doomed. And your family relationships? Possibly you have grown up in ‘a Christian home,’ knowing the gospel from childhood.

You know that you are sinner in the sight of God and deserve only judgement but you are also aware of the fact that Jesus died on the cross at Calvary to bear the punishment due to you. You know that you need to receive him as Saviour and Lord, yet still you linger, looking back. Judgement awaits but still you don’t flee for refuge? You just cannot let go of the world and its attractions.

Being close to righteous people is not the same as being right with God. Being married to Lot did not save his wife. Similarly, connection with a Christian family is no guarantee of salvation. You cannot depend upon your religious background or church attendance to take you to heaven. Privilege without transformation ends in judgement.

REMEMBER HER PROBLEMS

Lack of faith – Maybe she thought God was bluffing, perhaps he wouldn’t carry out what he had said. But he wasn’t and he did.

Emotional attachment – She did not heed the command and she looked back. Her body had left Sodom but her mind and heart had not. Sodom may have been wicked, but it was home. She couldn’t bear to leave her way of life – her family, her friends, her possessions. She was too attached to what she was leaving behind. Like many today, she wanted salvation without separation.

Did you notice that Gen 19:26 says: But his wife looked back from behind him. Some modern translations leave that out, they just say: ‘his wife looked back.’ The idea, however, is that she had lagged behind. Notice how far she is from Lot. He is already in safety at Zoar in 19:23, but in v.26 she is still just outside Sodom; looking back longingly and with regret.

She did not fully obey.

The command was clear: ‘Do not look back!’ (Gen 19:17). Lot’s wife heard the warning, partly believed it and made a half-hearted effort to get saved – but not in the way that God required. That is tragic, for she was so close.

Do you hope to be saved but are not prepared to come God’s way? You would rather try your own good works, or something else, instead of Jesus Christ. He said: I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. Jn 14:6

REMEMBER HER PUNISHMENT

Gen 19:17 Escape for thy life; look not behind thee,

Gen 19:26 But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.

One act of disobedience sealed her fate. She started the journey but didn’t finish it. Her hesitation cost her everything. Lot’s wife didn’t die because she wasn’t warned. She perished because she did not fully obey.

The judgement was instant and irreversible.

It was sudden. In Luke 17 Jesus emphasized suddenness in the verses leading up to the warning.

He said that his coming will be like a FLASH of lightening (v.24).

His coming will be like the FLOOD in Noah’s day (vv. 26-27).

His coming will be like the FIRE from heaven that rained on Sodom in Lot’s day (v.29).

After that (v.32) he said: Remember Lot’s wife!

SUMMATION

Proximity to salvation is not the same as possession of it. Being close to righteous people is not the same as being right with God. You can be surrounded by truth and blessed with spiritual privileges but unless your heart is fully surrendered you remain in great danger.

God’s judgement is looming. It will be instant and irreversible. It will be swift and sure. Now is the time to leave your old life and self-effort behind and flee wholeheartedly to Jesus Christ for salvation. Delayed obedience is dangerous, and half-hearted obedience is still disobedience. Punishment follows and then, as with Lot’s wife, there will be no second chance and no hope.

Don’t let her story be your story too. Remember Lot’s wife!

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 16:53-63 – The Surprising Restoration of Jerusalem, Sodom and Samaria

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Verses 53-63 form a conclusion to the allegories in Ezekiel chapter 16: the allegory of Jerusalem as an adulterous wife and the allegory of the sinful sisters. This conclusion is surprising in that, despite Jerusalem’s unfaithfulness and inevitable punishment, Ezekiel declares a plan for her future restoration. Even more surprising is the additional prediction that Jerusalem’s ‘sisters,’ Sodom and Samaria, who have already been judged, will be restored as well. The same characters who have been viewed negatively in the allegories are now promised restoration.

Restoration for Sodom and Samaria

(53-55) With much repetition of the word translated ‘captivity’ YHWH announces the restoration of the fortunes of the sisters. This translation is misleading as the expression ‘bring again their captivity’ has nothing to do with exile and does not predict further judgement upon these cities, rather the opposite. The expression means ‘restore their fortunes.’ That is how the ESV translates v.53: I will restore their fortunes, both the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters, and the fortunes of Samaria and her daughters, and I will restore your own fortunes in their midst.

The original idea behind the expression may be that of someone who has entered slavery (captivity) due to extreme poverty or debt and has served his time. A male Hebrew slave was freed after six years service or during the Jubilee year (Ex 21:2; Lev 25:39). After that he could regain the status (liberty and prosperity) that he once had. A good example of the use and meaning of the expression reverse their captivity/restore their fortunes is at the end of the book of Job:

And the LORD turned the captivity of Job, when he prayed for his friends: also the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before. Job 42:10 KJV

And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends. And the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before. Job 42:10 ESV

As well as here in chapter 16 the expression occurs in Ezekiel 29:14 and 39:25.

Verses 53-55 are perplexing as, taken at face value, they predict restoration of the fortunes of Sodom, Samaria, Jerusalem and their satellite towns and villages (‘daughters’). Details about how and when this will be achieved are not supplied.

This is the only biblical prophecy which predicts that Sodom will regain its former status. By contrast, the tenor of other scriptures is rather that Sodom’s destruction is perpetual. For example: Isaiah speaking about Babylon says it will lie desolate like Sodom:

And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees’ excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there. Isaiah 13:19-20.

Zephaniah prophesied in a similar vein with reference to Moab: Therefore as I live, saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah, even the breeding of nettles, and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation… Zephaniah 2:9

Some would suggest (cf. Mat 11:23-24) that in fulfilment of 16:53-55 the people of Sodom will be raised to life and rehabilitated or given a second chance after death. Those who hold the doctrine of apokatastasis (restoration, reintegration, reconstitution) would view this Old Testament passage, along with others in the New Testament (Acts 3:21; Rom 5:18-19; 11:23-26,32; 1 Cor 15:24-28; 2 Cor 5:19; Eph 1:9-10; Phil 2:10-11; Col 1:19-20; 1 Tim 2:4-6; 4;10; Tit 2:11; 1 Pet 3:19-20; 2 Pet 3:9; Rev 5:13), as biblical evidence for universalism.

According to v.54 the purpose of YHWH’s restoration of Sodom and Samaria is that Jerusalem will feel shame. This is because she has been so wicked that if she is to be restored then the restoration of Sodom and Samaria, cities which are deemed to be less wicked than Jerusalem, is required as well. Judah will be a ‘comfort’ to Sodom and Samaria in the sense that their suffering was not as severe as that which Judah/Jerusalem will experience. Jerusalem will bear her own shame.

Perhaps one ought to bear in mind that Ezekiel chapter 16 is allegorical, metaphorical and full of hyperbole. In v.55 Ezekiel may just be saying that once Jerusalem’s punishment is over the entire country will one day prosper. Thus the three cities with their satellite towns and villages, representing the whole land, can metaphorically be said to regain the status that they had in their heyday.

A less common interpretation of v.55, based on the word ‘when’ in the KJV translation, is that this is a promise by YHWH never to restore the fortunes of the three cities.

When thy sisters, Sodom and her daughters, shall return to their former estate, and Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former estate, then thou and thy daughters shall return to your former estate. Ezekiel 16:55

That is, when the fortunes of Sodom and Samaria are restored, which is never (since the 10 tribes of Israel are lost and Sodom has been perpetually destroyed), then Judah/Jerusalem’s fortunes will be restored, i.e. never.

In v.55 notice the repetition of the verb (shall return), the proper name of a city and the phrase ‘and her daughters’ three times.

(56-59) Verses 56-57 are a question: ‘Was not Sodom thy sister such a chronicle upon thy lips in the day of thy exaltations….?’ YHWH again reminds Jerusalem of her past by saying that in her heyday (the day of thy exaltations- plural) she once considered herself morally superior to her sister Sodom and looked down upon her. Sodom’s fate was talked about during Jerusalem’s glory days (cf. v.14) but not presented as a warning and example of what pride could bring about.

Jerusalem’s own sins led to her exposure and humiliation before her surrounding enemies; ones like Syria (cf. Isa7:1-9) and the Philistines (cf. Isa 9:11-12). In vv. 58-59, speaking as though it had already been accomplished, YHWH asserts that before the restoration of vv.53-55 comes about Jerusalem must first endure the consequences of her lewdness (see vv.15-36) and her despising of the oath in breaking of the covenant (cf.16:8). Note the ‘thus saith the Lord’ in v.59. Sodom and Samaria have had their periods of humiliation and judgement, now Jerusalem must suffer hers before all three will be eventually restored together.

(60-63) Unlike Jerusalem who did not remember the days of her youth when YHWH showed kindness to her (16:22, 43) YHWH will remember those days and the covenant that he made with her. She had broken that one by her harlotry (vv. 32-34) but YHWH will will establish a new covenant (see Jer 31:31-34) with her; an everlasting one (see 2 Sam 23:5; Isa 55:3). The phrase ‘I will establish’ is repeated in v.62. We know from Ezek 11:19-20; 36:25-28 that this new covenant will last because it involves a new heart and a new spirit.

In those days Jerusalem will remember her ‘way’ (16:25, 27, 31, 43, 47×2) and be embarrassed by YHWH’s kindness toward Sodom and Samaria and perhaps humiliated at being linked with such despised sinners. However, those ‘sisters’ will not be equal partners with Jerusalem in the new covenant. Sodom, Samaria and other older and younger sisters (‘older and younger sisters’ is in the plural form) will be given to her as daughters. The areas represented by all the cities will become one unified territory with Jerusalem as the capital. Sodom, Samaria and the others will be her ‘daughters’ i.e. dependent cities. None of this is due from the former broken covenant but is an act of YHWH’s free grace.

The passage ends with the further assertion that YHWH will establish his (new) covenant with Jerusalem and although she will be forgiven yet the memory of what she has done will produce in her shame, embarrassment and self-loathing.

SUMMATION OF EZEKIEL CHAPTER 16

Ezekiel chapter 16, one of the most difficult chapters in the Bible, consists of two allegories in which YHWH speaks through the prophet Ezekiel and addresses Jerusalem as if the city is a real person. In what is sometimes crude and graphic language he describes how he found her as an abandoned and helpless baby, cared for her and watched her grow. He eventually married her and gave her everything; beauty, clothes and jewellery. He treated her like royalty but Jerusalem then turned away from YHWH and became unfaithful. She chases after other nations and their gods, acting as a prostitute but worse – offering herself freely, not even for gain.

In the second allegory YHWH drives home the message of Jerusalem’s betrayal by saying that her behaviour has been worse than that of her ‘sisters’ Sodom and Samaria; notorious sinners whom YHWH has already judged. This comparison is designed to humble Jerusalem.

Then, in an unforeseen twist, YHWH promises to restore Sodom and Samaria along with Jerusalem, a future act of mercy. After she suffers punishment for her sins he will restore the relationship with Jerusalem and establish a new and lasting covenant. She (i.e. the people of Judah) will be forgiven but will always remember her past with embarrassment.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 16:44-52: The Allegory of Jerusalem and Her Sinful Sisters

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In 16:1-43 Ezekiel has YHWH speak a lengthy allegory in which Jerusalem is personified as a woman. YHWH describes how he found her as an abandoned infant. He rescued her and, once she reached ‘the age for love,’ he married her. Abusing the gifts that he had given her, Jerusalem subsequently turned to idolatry and immorality; for which YHWH sentences her to harsh punishment. At this point one would expect a conclusion to the allegory but that does not come until v.60.

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14
The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34
The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Judgement – Ezekiel 16:35-43

Commentators disagree as to whether the section (16:44-59) is an extension of the allegory of 16:1-43 or a further allegory which, although closely linked with the preceding one, is not a continuation of it. I would contend that it is indeed a new allegory but one which shares the ending with the previous one.

The allegory in vv.1-43, while addressed to Jerusalem, clearly covers the history of Israel as a whole, not just Judah. In this new allegory, however, Judah and Israel are distinct. Jerusalem stands for the southern kingdom of Judah and Samaria represents the northern kingdom of Israel. In this second allegory YHWH compares Jerusalem with her ‘sisters’ Samaria and Sodom and concludes that Jerusalem has turned out much worse than either of them.

THE ALLEGORY OF THE SINFUL SISTERS

(44) Verse 44 begins with the word ‘behold’ which directs the reader’s attention to the new allegory and to the comparison of Jerusalem with Sodom and Samaria (the theme of Samaria and Jerusalem as sisters is developed more fully in chapter 23). YHWH says that everyone who quotes a proverb (cf. Num 21:27) will say of Jerusalem: ‘like mother, like daughter.’ With this short (two words in Hebrew) saying YHWH refers back to v.3 and sarcastically reminds Jerusalem that she has foreign ancestry.

(45-46) In v.3 the Amorite father is mentioned first but here the order is inverted. The Hittite mother is placed first now because this allegory focuses on female family members. Ezekiel is again referring to the Canaanite origins of the city of Jerusalem (Jebusites, Josh 15:63; Judge 1:21). This is by no means a compliment since Hittites and Amorites were two of the seven nations which the Israelites were commanded to drive out of the Promised Land ( Deut 7:1-2; Josh 3:10; 24:11) and with whom they were forbidden to intermarry (Deut 7:3).

Ezekiel paints a picture of a truly dysfunctional family. Jerusalem resembles her Hittite mother because just as her mother had shown contempt for her Amorite husband and their children (3 daughters) so Jerusalem had shown contempt for her husband and children (16:20-21, 31, 32). Her sisters, Samaria and Sodom, had likewise shown contempt for their husbands and daughters.

The husbands are not mentioned again, they don’t really feature in this allegory nor does the mother appear again after v.45. In this section Ezekiel concentrates on two important relationships; sister and daughter.

Daughter – vv. 44, 45, 46(x2), 48 (x2), 49, 53(x2), 55(x3), 57(x2), 61.
Sister – vv. 45(x2), 46(x2), 48, 49, 51, 52(x2), 55, 56, 61.

(46) YHWH begins a quite convoluted negative comparison between Jerusalem and her two sisters in which Samaria is described as the ‘elder’ sister and Sodom as the ‘younger.’ In fact, Jerusalem and Sodom had long histories whereas Samaria was much younger than either of them, having only been established (1 Kgs 16:23-24) by King Omri of Israel (884-873 BCE) almost 300 years before Ezekiel’s time. ‘Elder’ and ‘younger’ only make sense if interpreted in terms of greatness of geographical/territorial size, military power or historical importance. ‘Daughters’ probably refers to dependent satellite towns and villages, or perhaps to the inhabitants of the three cities.

Geographically Jerusalem is situated between the sites of the two cities. As one faces East the city of Samaria is to the left (North) and Sodom to the right (South). Samaria was the former capital of the northern kingdom of Israel and in patriarchal times Sodom had been the most important city of the Jordan valley (Gen 18-19).

(47) Jerusalem was not content with equalling the ways and abominations of Samaria and Sodom but became much more corrupt than they. As if despising their sinful deeds as small scale (‘a very little thing’ or ‘a thing of disgust’) Jerusalem outdid them by sinning on a much grander scale. Ezekiel’s hearers would have been greatly shocked to hear YHWH linking Jerusalem with Sodom and Samaria; cities that were notorious for sin and idolatry.

THE INIQUITY OF SODOM

(48-50) In v.48 YHWH stresses that Judah’s sins outstripped those of Sodom. In the next two verses he elaborates on the greatness of Judah’s guilt compared to that of Sodom. In v.49 YHWH specifies the ‘iniquity’ (guilt from conscious wrongdoing) of Sodom. The sins of Sodom and her daughters (the towns Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim – Gen 10:19) are enumerated as follows:

Pride – an example of success inflating the ego.

Satiety – because of an over-abundance of food – they were gluttonous.

‘Abundance of idleness’ KJV. – This means careless rest or security. The people of Sodom were so prosperous that they became complacent.

They were indifferent to the poor and needy.

They were ‘haughty’ (arrogant).

They committed abomination (cf. Lev 18:22) in the presence of YHWH (Gen 18:21).

YHWH says that when he saw the iniquity of Sodom and her daughters he removed them. The word ‘good’ is in italics, it is not in the original and has been supplied by translators. Without the word ‘good’ the phrase means ‘when I saw it’.

Ancient writers viewed Sodom as notorious for sexual sin, social injustice, arrogance and hostility towards strangers, for example: Isa 1:9-17; Jeremiah 23:14; 2 Pet 2:6-10; Jude 7; 2 Esdras 2:8-9; 3 Maccabees 2:5; Sirach 16:8; Wisdom of Solomon 19:13-17.

(51-52) YHWH states that Samaria did not sin half as much as Jerusalem. He does not spell out Samaria’s iniquity but Ezekiel’s audience are well aware that it was idolatry. Jerusalem has multiplied the sins of Sodom and Samaria to such an extent that she has ‘justified’ those cities. In other words, Jerusalem’s sins are so evil that she makes Sodom and Samaria look righteous. These two sinful cities had so angered YHWH that he had punished them severely.

Jerusalem, having privileges like the the Law, the Temple and YHWH’s presence, had behaved worse than Sodom and Samaria. She (v.52 ‘thou also’), who had ‘given judgement’ on her sisters (i.e. agreed that their punishment was well-deserved) but had behaved more abominably than they, could therefore expect to suffer a similar fate. It is appropriate that Jerusalem be punished because her sins make the other sisters look righteous.

Many centuries later a similar thought was expressed by Jesus Christ: But into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you not, go your ways out into the streets of the same, and say, Even the very dust of your city, which cleaveth on us, we do wipe off against you: notwithstanding be ye sure of this, that the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you. But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city. Luke 10:10-12

The next section of Ezekiel chapter 16 will deal with the sisters’ future.

Posted in General

Felix and Paul: The Danger of Procrastination

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In Acts chapter 24 Luke records details of the trial of the apostle Paul before the Roman Procurator Felix. This is the first of four trial scenes in Acts chapters 23-26 that involve Paul; before the Sanhedrin, before the Roman Procurator Felix, then Felix’s successor Festus and finally before King Herod Agrippa II.

In chapter 21, Paul, against the advice of his fellow Christians, returned to Jerusalem after his third missionary journey. He visited the temple and there was accused of bringing Gentiles in with him, thus defiling it. A riot started and Paul was seized by the crowd. Roman soldiers intervened and arrested him in order to stop the violence and restore public order. This was a policing matter and normally the garrison commander would hand out rough justice on the spot. However, he learned that Paul was a Roman citizen and as such had the right to a formal legal hearing.

In Acts 23 Paul appeared before the Jewish Sanhedrin and as part of his defence appealed to his belief in resurrection. This caused division between the Sadducees and Pharisees and led to further unrest. Claudius Lysias, the commander of the Roman garrison in Jerusalem, therefore removed Paul into secure custody for his own safety. Following the discovery of a Jewish plot to kill Paul the Romans transferred Paul to Caesarea to the procurator Felix who agreed to hear Paul’s case once the accusers arrived from Jerusalem.

Not much is known about Antonius Felix but what is recorded about him by ancient writers is generally unfavourable. He was cruel, ambitious and corrupt. His exact dates are not known. He was born a slave, sometime between the years 5 and 10 CE. His brother Pallas, a powerful freedman, was a favourite of the Emperor Claudius and through that connection to the imperial family Felix gained freedom and influence.

Like Pilate’s, his rule (thought to extend from 52-58 or 60 CE) was marked by brutality. Felix was married three times, each time to a woman of noble birth. Two of them were called Drusilla. This Drusilla in Acts 24 was a daughter of Herod Agrippa I and a sister of King Agrippa II and Berenice, whom we read about in Acts chapters 25 and 26. See:

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 1)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 2)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 3)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Bibliography)

Famous for her beauty, Drusilla was previously married at age fifteen to Azizus, a Syrian priest-king, whom she left for Felix. She and Felix had a son together (Marcus Antonius Agrippa) who perished at Pompeii when Mt. Vesuvius erupted in 79 CE. As a Jewish princess Drusilla would have been familiar with affairs in Judaea and so she accompanied her husband (according to v.24 they were married by this time, she was then in her early twenties) to listen to the apostle Paul.

We read in v.24 that Felix and Drusilla came to hear Paul ‘concerning the faith in Christ.’ This was not a casual conversation. Paul did not discuss politics or philosophy, he proclaimed the life-changing message of Jesus Christ.

FELIX’S PRIVILEGE

What must it have been like to sit in the presence of the apostle Paul and hear him speak? God was speaking to Felix through Paul; probably the greatest Christian preacher of all time. What a unique opportunity – to hear the gospel directly from the man who had encountered the risen Christ on the Damascus road!

Felix already knew something about Christianity, perhaps through his wife. During the trial, when the resurrection was mentioned, we read in v.22 ‘when Felix heard these things, having more perfect knowledge of that way, he deferred them.’

It is not enough to know the facts about Jesus Christ. You must by faith repent of your sins and trust him! The Lord Jesus said in John 5:24, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.’

Throughout life God gives us opportunities to hear his word; through gospel messages, sermons, Bible studies, the internet, or even conversations with believers. The question is: ‘Are you listening?’ Are you open to the truth of the gospel, or do pride and other distractions keep you from receiving it?

FELIX’S CONVICTION

The Holy Spirit had sparked some interest in the heart of Felix or else this meeting would not have taken place. We are not told why Felix and Drusilla wished to listen to Paul. They seem a most unlikely couple to want to hear the gospel message. He was the cruel and murderous Roman procurator and she was from the infamous Herodian family. Her great-grandfather had tried to kill the baby Jesus in Bethlehem (Mat. 2:1-16); her great-uncle had murdered John the Baptist (Mat 1:12; Mk 6:27) and mocked Jesus (Lk 23:6-12); and her father had executed the apostle James (Acts 12:1-2). Anyhow, that day they certainly heard the truth from the apostle Paul.

Paul did not shy away from addressing the hard facts of the gospel; this took great courage because of the kind of person Felix was; he later (58 CE) arranged for the High Priest Jonathan to be assassinated for criticising his behaviour. Paul in his message gave Felix and Drusilla three compelling reasons for repenting and believing on Jesus Christ: he reasoned with them about ‘righteousness, temperance and judgement to come.’

Righteousness (justice): this would have confronted Felix’s corrupt style of government.

None of us is righteous, we are all sinners (‘For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;’ Romans 3:23). There is nothing that we can do in order to merit salvation (‘Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us’, Tit 3:5). All who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ have his righteousness imputed to them (‘For God made Christ, who never sinned, to be the offering for our sin, so that we could be made right with God through Christ.’ 2 Cor 5:21. NLT ).

Temperance (self-control): this would have confronted Felix’s immoral lifestyle.

Felix and Drusilla were prime examples of a lack of self-control. Drusilla had left her husband to live with Felix and become his wife, and though a Jewess, she lived as though she had never known the Ten Commandments. Felix was an unscrupulous man who did not hesitate to lie, and even murder, in order to promote himself. Self-control was something neither of them knew anything about, they were wicked people. Jer 17:9 in NLT says: ‘The human heart is the most deceitful of all things, and desperately wicked. Who really knows how bad it is?’

Judgement to come. This would have reminded Felix of his accountability to God.

Paul would have told him that Jesus Christ is either your saviour or your judge. If he is your saviour the promise is, ‘There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit’ (Rom 8:1). If he is your judge, you will hear him say: ‘…I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity (Lk 13:27).

Paul’s third argument is the strongest of all. You cannot escape God’s judgement (‘… it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgement: Heb 9:27).

Luke records that as he considered these things ‘Felix trembled’ (v.25). Conviction gripped his heart and he could not hide it, he was terrified. He realised that what Paul said was true. He felt the weight of his sin and feared the prospect of God’s judgement. So what did he do?

FELIX’S PROCRASTINATION

‘That’s enough for now! You may leave. When I find it convenient, I will send for you.’ (v.25 NIV).

Conviction alone is not enough. There must be a response. By the Holy Spirit Felix felt the weight of conviction of sin but he pushed the matter aside, saying: ‘I’ll deal with that later.’ The problem is: later may never come. What might he have been thinking?

I can take or leave God’s word!

I know that I am a sinner but surely my sins are not that big a problem!

God’s grace will last until I’m ready to receive Christ.

Felix’s delay was not just a fleeting hesitation; it became a pattern. For the next two years he kept Paul in prison. Now and again he sent for him and talked to him but not in order to hear the gospel; instead, corrupt as he was, he hoped to receive a bribe. Felix was more interested in personal gain than spiritual riches and he chose to ignore the message of salvation. In the end he missed his opportunity for he was replaced as governor and recalled to Rome, leaving Paul in prison. By that time Felix’s heart had hardened and he had little concern for his soul.

That is the danger of procrastination. The longer you put off receiving Christ the harder your heart becomes. Heb 3:15 warns ‘today if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts…’ Procrastination thrives where there is an attitude that thinks, ‘I have plenty of time’ but God says in Prov 27:1: ‘Boast not thyself of tomorrow; for thou knowest not what a day may bring forth.’ Procrastination can be fatal.

This story of Felix is a cautionary tale. He was a man who heard the gospel directly from the apostle Paul and, despite being moved by the message, decided to delay his response. Do not make the same mistake. Don’t let pride, fear or other distractions keep you back. Examine your own response to the truth. The gospel is not just a message to hear, it is a call to act.

1. Why do you wait, dear sinner,
O why do you tarry so long?
The Saviour is waiting to give you
A place in His sanctified throng.

2. What do you hope, dear sinner,
To gain by a further delay?
There’s no one to save you but Jesus,
There’s no other way but His way.

3. Do you not feel, dear sinner,
The Spirit now striving within?
O why not accept His salvation
And throw off thy burden of sin?

4. Why do you wait, dear sinner?
The harvest is passing away;
The Saviour is longing to bless you,
There’s danger and death in delay.

Chorus: Why not? Why not?
Why not come to Him now?

George F. Root (1820-1895) – Gospel Hymn Book

Posted in General

Overcoming Fear: Lessons from David in Psalm 27

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In this modern world things can change very quickly. Take, for example, the international political scene which has seen big changes recently. Suddenly nothing is as it has been for the past seventy years. Allies who could once be trusted are now at best unpredictable and at worst treacherous. New power blocs are forming. During the past week I have even heard some (non-Christian) people say that a new world order has arrived.

In world economics tit-for-tat tariffs, we are told, are likely to result in global shortages, price increases, job losses and higher inflation. Such possibilities can make us fearful. We may begin to worry about things like the threat of nuclear war or the possibility of environmental disaster. Closer to home, and at a more personal level, Christians are not exempt from anxiety and fear. Some worry about the stability of their marriage, the well-being of their children and grandchildren or about their own state of health. Some, perhaps, wonder just how they are going to face the future without a loved one who has passed away. In addition to the cares of everyday life, of course, the Christian also has to contend with ongoing opposition from the world, the flesh and the Devil.

At times our faith is strong. We are full of confidence, secure in our beliefs and living a contented Christian life. Then trouble comes along and in comes fear and doubt. We see that in this psalm. Notice an abrupt change at v.7. The one who at the beginning of the psalm has made a strong declaration of confidence then starts to waver.

PSALM 27

Let me briefly introduce Psalm 27. According to its Hebrew title it is a psalm of David. The title in the Septuagint (LXX) Greek translation of 3rd century BCE adds the words ‘before he was anointed.’ Assuming that David was the author, then he may have drawn upon his experience of being hunted by King Saul.

Psalm 27 is one of a group of sanctuary Psalms (22-29, excluding 25), so called because they are linked by the theme of the ‘house of the Lord.’ At that time this would still have been the tabernacle, later it was the temple.

I will declare thy name unto my brethren: in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee. Psalms 22:22

My praise shall be of thee in the great congregation: I will pay my vows before them that fear him. Psalms 22:25

Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the LORD forever. Psalms 23:6

Who shall ascend into the hill of the LORD? or who shall stand in his holy place? Psalms 24:3

LORD, I have loved the habitation of thy house, and the place where thine honour dwelleth. Psalms 26:8

One thing have I desired of the LORD, that will I seek after; that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life, to behold the beauty of the LORD, and to inquire in his temple. Psalms 27:4

Hear the voice of my supplications, when I cry unto thee, when I lift up my hands toward thy holy oracle. Psalms 28:2

The voice of the LORD maketh the hinds to calve, and discovereth the forests: and in his temple doth every one speak of his glory. Psalms 29:9

I am sure that much could be gained from a study of just those references but let us now focus on Psalm 27 – a psalm of confidence in the face of adversity.

It falls into 2 main sections: In vv.1-6 David talks about the Lord – in the third person – ‘he’, ‘him,’ ‘his.’ In vv.7-14 David talks to the Lord – second person – addressing him directly as ‘you.’ The psalm lends itself to further subdivision; I’ll use the following 4 headings:

1-3 David’s confidence in the Lord’s protection.

4-6 David’s desire for the Lord’s presence.

7-12 David’s prayer for the Lord’s deliverance.

13-14 David’s trust in the Lord’s goodness.

DAVID’S CONFIDENCE IN THE LORD’S PROTECTION (1-3)

In these three verses David makes a bold declaration of trust in the Lord amid trying circumstances. Verse 1 is introspective – he looks inward. Verse 2 is retrospective – he looks back. Verse 3 is prospective – he looks forward. In v.1 he speaks about the present, in v.2 he speaks about the past and in v.3 he talks about the future.

The Present

(1) David starts his psalm with ‘the Lord’ before mentioning men. That is the best place to begin when encountering difficulties – focus your attention on the Lord and keep it focused. The divine name YHWH (the Lord) occurs 12 times in these 14 verses. ‘The Lord is’ – he is sovereign. ‘The Lord is my’ – he is personal.

In this verse David uses various metaphors for God.

The Lord is my light – He guides me. In the New Testament this metaphor is taken up in the writings of the apostle John: Jn 1:4-9; 8:12; 1 Jn 1:5-7; Rev 21:23.

The Lord is my salvation – He saves me – whatever my circumstances, victory is certain.

The LORD is the strength of my life – He keeps me safe – a stronghold – a safe haven -a place of refuge such as a fortified city. There I am shielded from the enemy.

The Past

(2) David looks back to times when violent enemies attacked him suddenly like wild beasts, wanting to eat him up (this can refer to slander, or perhaps false testimony in a court of law). Thanks to intervention by the Lord these ‘cannibals’ ‘stumbled and fell’ (i.e. were vanquished). Like David, we too have no idea what tactics the enemy will employ in order to bring about our downfall.

The Future

(3) In the previous verse the attacks by his foes were swift and sudden. Now David foresees the possibility of a sustained assault. An army of enemies may besiege him (all around) or declare a long war but he will still be confident. He trusts God to handle his enemies.

What ‘enemies’ are you facing today? You may not be facing literal physical violence but fear, anxiety, sickness, financial problems or relationship problems could be your enemy. Draw comfort from David’s response to adversity. He considers the present, reviews the past and anticipates the future. In them he sees God’s power and greatness and this realisation gives him confidence and courage. The Lord is his light, his salvation and his stronghold, therefore he has no reason to be afraid.

DAVID’S DESIRE FOR THE LORD’S PRESENCE. (4-6)

This declaration of confidence in the Lord (vv.1-3) leads David to say that his priority in life, his greatest wish, in fact the only thing he craves, is intimacy with the Lord. He wants to have fellowship with the Lord and experience his presence. He expresses this in terms that are poetic and not meant to be taken literally, e.g. David could never see the splendour of the Lord in the Holy of Holies – unauthorised entry of that sacred space meant instant death.

He envisages himself living, serving and praying to the Lord in the Tabernacle (also called a temple in 1 Sam 1:9; 3:3) for an extended period (‘all the days of my life’). While there he could hide from all his cares and troubles, sheltered in the Lord’s pavilion. In these verses he uses several words to refer to the sanctuary: House of the Lord – the place where God lives; Temple – a palace or royal building; Pavilion – a cover, hiding place; Tabernacle – tent.

Verses 4-5 convey the thought that David yearns to experience the glorious and protective presence of God, not just as a one-off, but throughout his life. His primary aim is to live a life characterised by worship and prayer. As a result he will not only be hidden and protected but later exalted (‘set up upon a rock’ and lifted up above his enemies). When that happens he will publicly sacrifice (possibly a thank offering, Lev 22:28) at the Tabernacle and sing praises to the Lord.

What a great attitude to have in ‘the time of trouble!’ How do we compare? In adversity do I seek God above all else, longing for his presence more than approval, success or personal comfort? Do I pray that I might, by faith, get a sight of his person and his power? Is worship a feature of my daily life, or is it restricted to Sunday morning only?

This Old Testament ‘one thing’ that David desires in Psalm 27 reminds me of the apostle Paul’s ‘one thing’ in the New Testament: But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. Phil 3:13-14 (ESV)

DAVID’S PRAYER FOR THE LORD’S DELIVERANCE. (7-12)

What is happening here? As already mentioned, there is a striking and an abrupt change of tone at v.7. Notice the many references to ‘me’ and ‘my’ in these verses. It seems that David has taken his eye off the Lord and now focuses on himself. The one who has declared that he has nothing to fear is now extremely worried. The person whose only priority is the Lord’s presence now fears his absence. The one who announced his confidence in God is now in distress.

In this David is being honest and realistic. Isn’t it true that amid trials fear and doubt can torment us. We feel abandoned. God can at times seem silent; even believers who are strong in the faith can think this. In v.7 David articulates this struggle: Hear, O LORD, when I cry aloud; be gracious to me and answer me! (ESV). David has spoken about God in the third person, now he talks to him in the second person.

In David’s heart he recalls a command from the Lord for people (‘ye’ in v.8 is plural) to seek his face and so he responds with prayer; bringing his problems and requests to the Lord – hoping, since the Lord has always been his helper (v.9), that even should those nearest and dearest to him let him down the Lord will take him up (v.10).

Expressing his feelings of isolation David in vv.7-12 implores the Lord using a series of imperatives, 5 positive and 5 negative.

  • v.7 hear, have mercy, answer.
  • v.9 hide not, put not, leave me not, forsake me not
  • v.11 teach, lead,
  • v.12 deliver me not

Notice that in v. 11 he commits himself to going God’s way and asks the Lord for guidance (‘teach me’) and asks that he might be led along a level path; one without bumps and obstacles that might cause him to trip and fall, because his enemies are out to get him.

David has already mentioned his enemies in vv.2, 6, and 11. Now in v.12 he provides more details about them. They are cruel and corrupt; they bear false witness against him. This may recall verse 2 where he said that his enemies and his foes came upon him to eat his flesh (slander him). This idea may also be present in the first phrase of v.12 (‘deliver me not over unto the will of mine enemies’). The word ‘will’ may also be translated ‘appetite’ – i.e. Don’t feed me to my enemies.

This prayer in vv.7-12 reminds us that when fear or doubt arises we can bring all our anxieties to God, crying out to him honestly while holding on to his promises.

I’ll just mention in passing that some words which occur in the first part of the psalm appear again in the second, giving a kind of symmetry:

salvation – v.1 and v.9

enemies – v.2, v.6 and v.11 and v.12

heart – v.3, v.8 and v.14

rise – v.3 and v.12

seek – v.4 and v.8

life – v.1, v.4 and v.13

DAVID’S TRUST IN THE LORD’S GOODNESS (13-14)

David is overcome with emotion when, with renewed faith, he expects that he will see the Lord’s goodness deliver him from his problems while he is still alive. In v.13 that emotion is conveyed by means of a figure of speech known as aposiopesis. This is a literary device where a sentence is deliberately left unfinished, leaving the rest implied and thus creating an effect of suspense or strong emotion. David writes: ‘unless I had believed to see the goodness of the LORD in the land of the living…’ That is an unfinished sentence so, for it to make sense, the KJV translators have supplied the words ‘I had fainted’ in italics. In other words when he says: ‘If it were not for the fact that I had faith that I would see the Lord’s goodness while still alive….,’ we must supply the missing thought – something like: ‘I would have utterly despaired’ This is an expression of confidence, but David is so emotional that he can’t quite get it out.

He ends the psalm by encouraging himself, and others, to believe in the goodness of God despite adverse circumstances and to wait on God with patience, trusting him to act at the right time. In v.14 there is repetition for emphasis: ‘wait on the Lord….wait, I say, on the Lord.’

SUMMATION

Psalm 27 takes us on a journey from faith, through fear and doubt, to hope. It encourages us to trust God to be our protector, guide, and refuge. It reminds us that where faith thrives fear has no place. The psalm ends with good advice: ‘Rise above your fears, be strong, take heart and wait with expectancy for the Lord to act on your behalf.’

As you meditate further on this psalm, may it inspire you to enter God’s presence and seek his face daily, to cry out to him in times of need, and wait patiently for his perfect timing.


Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapter 16 Ezekiel continues to impress upon the Judahite exiles who are with him in Babylonia the fact that, contrary to the predictions of false prophets, things at home are not going to improve soon. Rather, such are the sins of Israel/Judah that there is now no hope of avoiding YHWH’s wrath. His judgement will fall upon the nation soon.

YHWH, through Ezekiel, uses shock tactics to convey how evil the nation appears in his sight. In an extended and elaborate metaphor (or, perhaps more accurately, two allegories that share the same ending) the prophet communicates a negative portrayal of the history of Israel’s relationship with YHWH. Using disturbing language that is vulgar, crude and charged with marital, sexual and violent imagery Ezekiel, speaking for YHWH, accuses the nation of unfaithfulness in the form of idolatry and inappropriate relations with foreign powers.

Jerusalem (representing Israel/Judah) is personified as a female infant who has been abandoned by her parents and is rescued by YHWH. He returns some years later to find that she has matured (breasts and pubic hair) and is ‘at the age for love’ (vv.7-8). He marries her (v.8), bestows many gifts upon her and beautifies her (vv.9-14), with the result that she becomes famous for her good looks. Proud and self-confident she becomes not just an adulteress but an insatiable nymphomaniac who lavishes the gifts she has received from YHWH upon men everywhere, including foreigners like the virile (‘great of flesh’) Egyptians, Assyrians and Chaldeans. She sacrifices her children to them and is even worse than her sisters Samaria and Sodom.

YHWH, acting as both accuser and judge, outlines Jerusalem’s crimes and then sentences her to some unusual punishments (stripping, stoning, cutting with swords and burning, all this in the presence of her former lovers) in order to appease his wrath and jealousy. Although unworthy, there is a promise of restoration for Jerusalem but she will remain silent (be shy) with embarrassment and shame.

OUTINE OF THE CHAPTER

1-3a – Preamble
3b-5 – Jerusalem’s humble origins
6-14 – YHWH’s dealings with Jerusalem
15-34 – Jerusalem’s prostitution
35-43 – Jerusalem’s judgement
44-52 – The allegory of Judah and her sinful sisters
53-59 – The sisters’ future
60-63 – A promise of restoration

PREAMBLE (1-3a)

In these verses which serve as an introduction to the oracle YHWH instructs Ezekiel to challenge Jerusalem about her abominations. The prophet duly reports YHWH’s thoughts on the subject using the metaphor of a woman to represent Jerusalem. As the capital of Judah the city symbolises Judah and (excluding vv.44-59) Israel as well.

(1) The chapter commences with the prophetic word (or ‘word-event’) formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying.’ This expression occurs 49 times in the book of Ezekiel and indicates that the message has come to the prophet directly from YHWH.

(2-3a) YHWH, as usual, addresses Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’, a formula that occurs 93 times in Ezekiel, and commands him to:

(a) make known to Jerusalem her abominations (offensive acts), and
(b) tell her ‘thus saith the Lord.’

The saying ‘thus saith the Lord’ re-emphasises that the message is from YHWH. It occurs again in this chapter in v. 36 and v.59. The three occurrences (3, 36, 59) could serve as an alternative way of dividing up the chapter, which would then fall into three main sections (1-34; 35-58; 59-63).

JERUSALEM’S HUMBLE ORIGINS (3b-5)

(3b) Addressing Jerusalem, which he personifies as a woman, YHWH casts aspersions on her origins and birth (‘diggings’ and ‘bringings forth,’ both plural) which he traces back to the land of Canaan. Her father and mother were the Amorite and the Hittite. These represent the Semitic and non-Semitic peoples who inhabited the land of Canaan before the patriarchs settled there. The words ‘Canaan’, ‘Amorite’ and ‘Hittite’ stress that Jerusalem was originally possessed by wicked and idolatrous pagan tribes (cf. Gen 15:16). There was therefore nothing holy about Jerusalem’s origins that would have commended her to YHWH.

(4) Repeating ‘thy birth’ YHWH proceeds to remind Jerusalem of the circumstances of her birth. Repetition for effect is a feature of this oracle. Notice that the phrase ‘the day thou wast born’ is repeated at the end of v.5. At birth, YHWH reminds her, the infant Jerusalem experienced a lack of basic medical care and attention.

  • her umbilical cord was not cut.
  • she was not washed with water.
  • she was not rubbed with salt, a natural healer.
  • She was not swaddled.

(5) No-one showed Jerusalem any pity or compassion. There was no-one to do ‘any of these unto thee.’ The plural demonstrative pronoun ‘these things’ refers back to the cutting, washing, salting and swaddling in v.4. No-one cared enough to do even one of these four things for Jerusalem. This was not a case of neglect; the infant Jerusalem (Israel) was abandoned because of deliberate rejection. She was treated with distain (‘to the loathing of thy person’) and cast away in an open field (cf. Deut 32:10). The idea of loathing appears again in v.45.

As regards historical period, this section of the oracle in which Jerusalem is depicted as an abandoned new-born baby, represents the patriarchal period, which extended from the days Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to the time of slavery in Egypt. During that period Israel was not quite a distinct, fully-fledged nation.

YHWH’S DEALINGS WITH JERUSALEM (6-14)

In this section YHWH explains what he has done for Jerusalem. He is the speaker throughout and Jerusalem has no opportunity to respond. Series of statements beginning with ‘I’  describe YHWH’s activity, these are interrupted occasionally by comments addressing Jerusalem as ‘you’ which note the affect of YHWH’s provision upon the girl.

(6) YHWH’S list in v.6 includes: ‘I passed by’; ‘I saw’; ‘I said’; ‘I have caused’. YHWH passed by, saw the abandoned child being trampled upon in its own blood and said to the infant ‘Live.’ In another example of repetition this command ‘I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live’ is repeated. The trampling may be a metaphorical reference to Israel’s treatment in Egypt.

At first reading it would seem that YHWH didn’t really do much more at this stage than tell the child to survive, as she remained naked until he passed by again some years later (v.7b) and remained unwashed until after her marriage (v.9). The next verse, however, shows that he had ensured her survival and development.

(7) In another clause beginning with ‘I’ YHWH says that he made her a myriad (10,000) ‘as the sprout of the field.’ This second mention of field is a much more positive image than the first in v.5. Jerusalem increased and became great. The word translated in KJV here as ‘increased’ means to be abundant, become numerous or great; it also occurs in vv. 25, 26, 29 and 51; translated as ‘increased’ or ‘multiplied’. This speaks of growth and may reference Exod 1:12 where the same verb is used of Israel’s population increase in Egypt: ‘But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew.’

Moving from the thought of growth to that of maturity YHWH says that she came with the finest ornaments (lit. ornaments of ornaments). What that means is unclear. Her breasts took shape and around the same time her (pubic) hair sprouted (same root as ‘sprout’ in v.7a). Jerusalem matured into a voluptuous, adolescent woman. YHWH adds ‘thou wast naked and bare’ which suggests that she had grown up as a young savage.

(8) Passing by once again YHWH sees that she has matured and he draws attention to the fact (‘behold’) that she was at the age for marriage (‘the time of love’). YHWH mentions five things about his reaction to Jerusalem’s maturity.

  • I spread my skirt (wing) over thee – this may indicate taking under protection (Deut 32:11) or perhaps betrothal (Ruth 3:9).
  • I covered thy nakedness – nakedness and covering are themes in this allegory. The infant was abandoned naked (‘not swaddled’ v.4), grew up naked (v.7), her nakedness was covered by YHWH (v.8), she failed to remember the time she was naked (v.22), she was naked with her lovers (v.36) and will be exposed naked by way of punishment (37, 39). YHWH covers her nakedness(v.8), he covered her with silk ((v.10), she used her fine clothes to cover idols (v.18), and YHWH will uncover her nakedness as punishment (v.37).
  • I sware unto thee – see next point
  • I entered a covenant with thee – in the context swearing and entering into a covenant must refer to marriage. The metaphor of marriage to describe God’s covenant relationship with Israel had previously been used by Hosea (e.g. Hos 2:19-20).
  • thou became mine -the emphasis is on possession rather than affection.

(9) The symbolism of rescue, nurture and a marital relationship may correspond to the period of the Exodus, the covenant at Mount Sinai and the giving of the Law (Exod 19-24) when Israel was established as the people of God. YHWH continues with his list of his provisions for Jerusalem during that time; a chain of ten statements beginning with ‘I.’ He claims: ‘I washed,’ ‘I washed,’ ‘I anointed,’ ‘I clothed,’ ‘I shod,’ ‘I girded,’ ‘I covered,’ ‘I decked,’ ‘I put,’ ‘I put.’

YHWH begins by saying that he washed her with water then repeats that he washed her, adding that he thoroughly washed her blood away from her. ‘Blood’ is plural – i.e. ‘bloods’. Then he anointed her with oil. The use of oil in connection with hygiene occurs also in Ruth 3:3; 2 Sam 12:20; 14:2; 2 Chron 28:15; Dan 10:3; Mic 6:15. YHWH therefore did some things for her that her parents, the Amorite and the Hittite (v.3), had failed to do when she was born (v4). He washed her and rubbed her with oil – but not until she had reached maturity.

(10) Also she had not been swaddled at birth but then, after their marriage, YHWH clothed her. In four clauses he describes how he dressed Jerusalem:

  • I clothed thee also with embroidered work, – embroidered cloth, repeated in v.13
  • and shod thee with badgers’ skin, – leather sandals.
  • and I girded thee about with fine linen, – repeated in v.13
  • and I covered thee with silk. – repeated in v.13

(11-12) Moving on from clothes YHWH reminds Jerusalem that he decked her out with jewellery and gives five examples: bracelets, a chain, nose ring, earrings and a beautiful crown (crown of glory). In the Ancient Near East these were symbols of wealth, status and royalty.

(13) In this verse YHWH reiterates his generosity towards Jerusalem after their marriage. She wore gold and silver jewellery and expensive clothes made of fine linen, silk and embroidered cloth. These are repeated from v.10. He adds that she also enjoyed the best of foods: fine flour, honey and oil. These appear again in v.19. She became very, very beautiful and achieved ed royal status.

All these gifts symbolise YHWH’s grace extended to Israel and the blessings, privileges and prosperity that the nation enjoyed on account of the special covenant relationship. Jerusalem’s rising to the status of queen represents Israel’s elevated status, prominence and influence among the surrounding nations.

(14) Jerusalem’s ‘renown’ for beauty went forth among the Gentile nations. This word ‘renown’ is repeated in the next verse, as is ‘beauty’ and together these serve as a link between this section of the allegory and the next. YHWH claims responsibility for Jerusalem’s beauty; it was all a result of his grace, she had no merit of her own. The section ends with a favourite formula of Ezekiel: ‘saith the Lord [God].’ It occurs 85 times in the book and 9 times in this chapter (vv.8, 14, 19, 23, 30, 43, 48, 58, 63).

SUMMATION

Thus far the allegory has YHWH vividly portraying his grace toward Israel/Judah in lifting the nation from obscurity and insignificance, entering into a covenant with it and bringing it to a position of prominence and prosperity. The focus is on YHWH’s (dominant and possessive) relationship with Jerusalem and the good things that he has provided for her. The implication is that she ought to be grateful for the relationship and such abundant provision. The allegory continues with an exploration of her response and her relationships with others.

This section of Ezekiel 16 is sometimes used in evangelistic preaching to illustrate God’s gracious dealings with sinners. C. H. Spurgeon, for example, published a sermon entitled Ezekiel’s Deserted Infant in 1862. A gospel message would perhaps apply the following points:

THE SINNER’S CONDITION

  • v.4 uncut – still attached to the world
  • v.4 unclean – tainted with the filth of sin
  • v.4 unsalted – uncared for
  • v.4 unclothed – no covering of righteousness
  • v.5 unclaimed – left to die

GOD’S SALVATION

  • God covered – ‘I spread’ v. 8 – Phil 3:9
  • God claimed – ‘thou becamest mine’ v.8 – SS 2:16
  • God cleansed – ‘I throughly washed’ v.9 – Isa 1:18
  • God clothed – ‘I clothed’ v.10 – Rev 3:18

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel’s Vine Allegory: a Prophecy about Jerusalem – 15:1-8

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapters 15, 16 and 17 Ezekiel delivers further messages from YHWH about impending judgement upon Jerusalem. These chapters contain striking allegories which convey YHWH’s perspective on Israel/Judah. In chapter 15 the nation is likened to a vine and in chapter 16 to an adulterous wife. Chapter 17 contains an allegory of two eagles and a vine.

Ezekiel chapter 15 falls into two parts:

vv. 1-5 The allegory of a vine – five rhetorical questions.

vv. 6-8 The allegory applied to the people of Jerusalem – six conclusions.

THE ALLEGORY OF A VINE (1-5)

(1) That this is a new oracle is indicated by the now familiar prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying.’ As we learn from previous chapters false prophets among the exiles in Babylon have been predicting that all will be well with Jerusalem. YHWH’s temple is there and he dwells in it, therefore the city is safe. One prophet, however, is predicting that Jerusalem will be punished and destroyed because of the people’s sinfulness and idolatry. That prophet is Ezekiel.

With this prophetic word formula Ezekiel claims that the content of his oracles does not consist of his own ideas; the messages come to him directly from YHWH and Ezekiel then passes them on to the people.

(2) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH employs a clever allegory to illustrate Israel/Judah’s guilt and punishment: he likens the nation to a grapevine. This image of Israel as a vine was familiar to Ezekiel’s fellow exiles.

Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall: Gen 49:22

Thou hast brought a vine out of Egypt: thou hast cast out the heathen, and planted it. Psa 80:8

For the vineyard of the LORD of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant… Isa 5:7 (The parable of the vineyard Isa 5:1-7)

In that day sing ye unto her, A vineyard of red wine. I the LORD do keep it; I will water it every moment: lest any hurt it, I will keep it night and day. Isa 27:2-3

Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me? Jer 2:21

Israel is an empty vine, he bringeth forth fruit unto himself: according to the multitude of his fruit he hath increased the altars; according to the goodness of his land they have made goodly images. Hos 10:1

The conventional interpretation of this familiar image focused on the vine’s purpose and ability to bear fruit. Indeed, that is the interpretation which Jesus applied in John chapter 15. Here in Ezekiel chapter 15, however, the fruit is not mentioned. The allegory is about the wood. It is not about Jerusalem being fruitless, rather it is about it being useless. YHWH addresses five rhetorical questions to Ezekiel which show how useless the wood of the vine is in comparison with the wood of the other trees of the forest. Its wood is portrayed as worthless and good for nothing.

QUESTION 1 – What is the vine tree more than any tree, or than a branch which is among the trees of the forest? 15:2

The implied answer to this question whether the wood of a vine is superior to the wood of other trees is: ‘No. its wood is inferior.’ The vine’s only value lies in its ability to bear fruit. If it does not bear fruit then it is useless.

QUESTION 2 – Shall wood be taken thereof to do any work? 15:3a

Again the implied answer is negative. Unlike other strong trees whose wood is suitable for construction or furniture the wood of a vine is useless for any kind of work.

QUESTION 3 – Will men take a pin of it to hang any vessel thereon? 15:3b

The wood of a vine cannot even be used to make a peg to hang things on.

QUESTION 4 – Behold, it is cast into the fire for fuel; the fire devoureth both the ends of it, and the midst of it is burned. Is it meet for any work? 15:4

Vine wood has no practical use; all one can do with it is burn it. Even then, it burns quickly.

QUESTION 5 – Behold, when it was whole, it was meet for no work: how much less shall it be meet yet for any work, when the fire hath devoured it, and it is burned? 15:5

If a healthy vine is already useless in its natural state then a burnt and damaged one is even more useless.

THE ALLEGORY OF A VINE APPLIED (6-8)

(6) This is an important verse since it serves as a bridge between the allegory in the first section and the explanation of the allegory in the second section. This verse contains the last mention of the vine in the chapter and also the first (and only) mention of Jerusalem. Beginning with the word ‘therefore’ (which tells us that what follows are conclusions drawn from that which has already been said) this verse moves the message on from allegory to reality. Jerusalem is no better than the other towns and cities in Israel/Judah so it too is destined to suffer destruction and burning. YHWH’s conclusions are set out in six statements:

STATEMENT No.1 – As the vine tree among the trees of the forest, which I have given to the fire for fuel, so will I give the inhabitants of Jerusalem. 15:6

Just as a useless vine is consigned to the fire so will YHWH hand over the people of Jerusalem to be consumed by the ‘fire’ of invasion and destruction by the Babylonian forces.

STATEMENT No. 2 – And I will set my face against them; 15:7a, 7d

This expression, which is repeated for emphasis at the end of the verse, indicates that YHWH is opposed to the people of Judah. He is determined to bring judgement upon them.

STATEMENT No. 3 – They shall go out from one fire, and another fire shall devour them; 15:7b

This may mean that in previous invasions Jerusalem suffered some damage but will be totally destroyed as a result of the coming siege and pillage by the Babylonians. It may also suggest that some citizens might manage to escape the destruction but will then face further calamity (e.g. Jer 42:22; 44:12-14). Judgement is inevitable.

STATEMENT No. 4 – And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I set my face against them. 15:7c

This recognition formula is common in Ezekiel. Here it is addressed (‘ye’ – you plural) to the exiles with Ezekiel in Babylon to whom he is delivering this oracle. When they will see what has happened to Jerusalem they will acknowledge that it is YHWH’s doing.

STATEMENT No. 5 – And I will make the land desolate, 15:8a

This reiterates that Jerusalem will be utterly destroyed.

STATEMENT No. 6 – Because they have committed a trespass,15:8b

This will happen because the Jerusalemites have committed a trespass – an unfaithful act. The destruction is a direct result of their actions. By worshipping idols the people of Jerusalem have acted unfaithfully towards YHWH so he will not protect the city. This idea of punishment for unfaithfulness is a common theme in the books of Chronicles – which use words like ‘trespassing’ and ‘transgressing’ to identify unfaithful acts (1 Chron 5:25; 10:13;2 Chron 12:2; 28:19; 29:6; 30:7; 36:14).

SUMMATION

In this short chapter YHWH gives a message about Jerusalem to Ezekiel who then relays the oracle to his fellow-exiles in Babylon. The first section of the chapter (vv. 1-5) contains a clever allegory which is communicated by the technique of asking rhetorical questions. The allegory inverts the usual picture of Israel as a valuable fruit-bearing vine by focusing on the wood rather than the fruit. The vine is revealed as useless and only fit for destruction. The second section (vv.6-8) applies the allegory to the people of Jerusalem (standing for the nation of Israel/Judah) and emphasizes their unfaithful acts and impending doom. The theme of unfaithfulness is taken up and presented in graphic detail in the next chapter which contains an extended allegory about an unfaithful wife.

Posted in General

Don’t Trade Your Future: Lessons from Esau

Posted on by writtenexposition

Have you ever noticed how comforting a bowl of hot soup can be on a cold day? There’s something about that warmth and flavour that just hits the spot, especially when the weather is chilly. But imagine paying a steep price for a simple bowl of soup – something far beyond what you’d ever intend or expect. That’s exactly what happened in Genesis 25:29-34, where Esau traded his birthright for a bowl of lentil soup.

Understanding the Birthright

In ancient Israelite society, the birthright was a significant privilege, typically granted to the eldest son. It wasn’t just about material inheritance – it was about leadership, authority, and spiritual responsibility. The eldest son would succeed his father as the head of the family and receive a double portion of his estate. Additionally, he would take charge of family worship, assuming the role of priest in maintaining the family’s covenant relationship with the Lord. Esau, driven by immediate gratification, undervalued this immense blessing and traded it for temporary satisfaction. Let us explore what we can learn from Esau’s mistake.

1) A Selfish Desire

Esau the hunter came back from the field one day, exhausted and famished. The aroma of the soup his brother Jacob was cooking was too tempting for him to resist. In that moment, all Esau could think about was his hunger. He begged Jacob for some of the soup, and Jacob, ever the opportunist, saw a chance to gain Esau’s birthright. He opened negotiations: ‘Sell me this day thy birthright.’ What was Esau’s response? He said: “I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?” (Gen 25:31-32).
Was Esau truly on the brink of death? Probably not. His selfish desire for immediate satisfaction blinded him to the value of his birthright. In his view God’s promises were not worth waiting for. That birthright meant nothing to him for he couldn’t see beyond his immediate need. How often do we, like Esau, focus on the desires of the present moment and disregard the long-term consequences? The pleasures of sin and the world can be tempting, but they are fleeting – Heb 11:25 refers to ‘the pleasures of sin for a season.’ Like Esau, we might be tempted to satisfy our immediate desires without considering the eternal consequences.

2) A Single Decision

Esau’s decision to trade his birthright for soup had far-reaching consequences. From that moment on, he was defined by that impulsive choice. The Bible notes that Esau’s nickname, ‘Edom,’ meaning ‘red,’ was derived from this event (Gen 25:30). One hasty decision can have lasting effects. Esau’s descendants were called ‘Edomites;’ a nation noted for conflicts with the people of God throughout history, all stemming from his poor choice. This reminds us that no one sins in isolation. Our choices affect not only ourselves but those around us, sometimes for generations. The world may offer immediate gratification, but it’s often at the cost of long-term blessings.

3) A Spiritual Disregard

Verse 34 tells us that ‘he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went his way: thus Esau despised his birthright.’ Notice that Esau went HIS way. After satisfying his hunger, Esau got up and left, unconcerned about the birthright he had just despised. He got on with life as usual, doing his own thing his own way, oblivious to the consequences of a single choice. The consequences weren’t immediately obvious, but they came later. When Esau realised the significance of what he had lost, it was too late. Esau begged and pleaded for the blessings of God but was unable to obtain them. He cried bitterly but couldn’t change the outcome (Gen 27:34; Heb 12:17). Esau’s disregard for his birthright is a warning. It’s easy to become so consumed with worldly pleasures that we neglect what is truly important. Don’t be like Esau, who valued temporary satisfaction over eternal blessings.

Summation

Esau’s story teaches us three crucial lessons:

A Selfish Desire: Don’t let immediate desires cloud your judgement and cause you to miss out on God’s future blessings.

A Single Decision: Remember that one decision can have lasting consequences, affecting not just you but others as well.

A Spiritual Disregard: Don’t disregard the spiritual inheritance God offers for the fleeting pleasures of this world.

Instead of living for the here and now, live with eternity in mind. Trust in Jesus Christ, who offers salvation and an inheritance that can never be taken away. 1 Peter 1:3-4 says:

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,

Don’t trade your eternal blessings for a bowl of soup. Choose wisely today, and you’ll secure a future that’s infinitely greater than anything the world can offer.

Posted in Exposition

IDOLS IN THEIR HEARTS: Ezekiel 14:1-11

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 14:1-11 contains the last oracle in a series relating to prophecy in the section 12:21-14:11. In this passage Ezekiel addresses the moral state of those who would seek guidance from YHWH. His particular concern is with hypocrites who worship idols in their heart but come to inquire of a prophet of YHWH. He issues a warning that both idolaters and the prophets who answer their queries will face certain judgment.

(1) The occasion of this oracle is a visit Ezekiel received from some of the ‘elders of Israel’ to inquire (v.3b) of YHWH. Presumably he was still at his house in Chebar (3:24; 4:4). Since it is unlikely that these men travelled from Jerusalem to see him the term ‘elders of Israel’ here and in 20:1 probably equates to ‘elders of Judah’ in 8:1. They are therefore leaders of the Israelite/Judahite community in Babylon. They respectfully ‘sat before’ Ezekiel, thus recognising him as a teacher. We are not told exactly when they visited (‘then came’) or what it was they wished to know. Whatever it was, the tenor of the passage would suggest that they did not receive a direct answer to their query.

(2) As the elders sat before him Ezekiel received a communication from YHWH in response to their presence.

(3)The revelation to Ezekiel is that the elders (‘these men) have ‘taken the idols into their heart’. The idea is that they have set up or enthroned idols in their heart; thus displacing YHWH. Even if these men do not literally bow down before idols the fact is that they are heavily influenced by pagan ideas and practices.

‘The stumbling block of their iniquity’ is a phrase used only by Ezekiel (7:19; 14:3, 4, 7; 18:30; 44:12) and refers metaphorically to spiritual obstacles or sins that cause the people to fail in their relationship with YHWH. If meant literally it refers to idols or sinful practices which they cherish. That the elders put these ‘before their face’ might suggest that they are using cult objects as intermediaries.

YHWH, addressing Ezekiel, raises a rhetorical question; to which the expected answer is ‘No!’ Referring to Israelites/Judahites who are preoccupied with idolatry and yet hypocritically consult a prophet, YHWH asks Ezekiel if it is appropriate that he should hear and respond to their inquiries since their divided loyalty means that they are in no fit moral state to hear his word.

(4-5) Ezekiel is instructed to speak to the elders of Israel about their sin and tell them that everyone of the house of Israel who consults a prophet while cherishing idolatry will, indeed, receive an answer. It will not be the kind of answer they expect; but will be judgement that involves giving them over to the many idols in their hearts. Their idolatry will not be ignored.

The statements in vv.4-5 and vv.7-8 regulating the approach of Israelites to YHWH through a prophet are set out in the form of casuistic law similar to Lev 17:3, 8, 10, 13.

Verse 5 states that the punishment is so that YHWH ‘may take the house of Israel in their own heart’ because they are estranged from him because of idolatry. The verb ‘take’ means to lay hold of, seize, take hold violently, capture. One view is that ‘take’ has the idea of catching in a snare, another is that YHWH will grasp their heart so tight that they will feel it, be terrified and thus forced to acknowledge his lordship. Or it could mean that YHWH will touch their conscience with the result that they turn to him. Most likely YHWH’s purpose is redemptive, he wishes to recapture their hearts and restore the relationship with his people.

(6) If a right relationship with YHWH is to be reinstated then the Israelites must renounce idolatry and return wholeheartedly to YHWH. The call to repentance features the verb ‘return’ (šûḇ) which occurs three times in this verse:

Repent (šûḇ) ,
and turn (šûḇ) yourselves from your idols;
and turn (šûḇ) away your faces from all your abominations.

(7) This verse is basically a restatement of v.4 but expands the warning to include ‘the stranger that sojourneth in Israel.’ The term ‘stranger’ (alien, foreigner) was used to describe someone who temporarily lived and worked in Israel, had no property rights (cf. Deut 26:10-13) and was expected to worship only YHWH (Lev 17:8-9; 20:1-2). Here it must mean proselytes, possibly Babylonians, who have converted to the religion of YHWH. Should a proselyte consult a prophet of YHWH with idolatry in his heart he too will suffer the same fate as an Israelite who does likewise.

Whereas v.4 says that ‘the Lord will answer him according to the multitude of his idols’ v.7 says ‘I the Lord will answer him by myself.’ He will receive a personal response from the Lord. The nature of that response is set out in v.8.

(8) YHWH will do three things:

  1. ‘I will set my face against that man.’ – be opposed to him.
  2. ‘[I] will make him a sign and a proverb’ – make his punishment an example that will become proverbial and act as a deterrent to others.
  3. ‘I will cut him off from the midst of my people’ – remove him from among his people.

The verse ends with the recognition formula: ”ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

(9) This verse is aimed at prophets. A true prophet of YHWH will not give an answer to an inquiry by someone who worships idols in his heart but a false prophet certainly will because this is what his reputation depends upon. A false prophet will ‘speak a word’ telling the people what they wish to hear. It will be given in the name of YHWH but it will not come from the Lord.

In such a situation, i.e. when a false prophet utters a false oracle, YHWH will ‘deceive’ (entice) the false prophet. YHWH will behind the false answer and use a false prophet to tell the people what they want to hear. YHWH will let the false prophet be deceived and in turn deceive the inquirer. For a similar idea see 1 Kgs 22:18-23; 2 Thess 2:11-12.

The ancient Israelites would not have considered deception of a prophet by YHWH to be morally questionable or contradictory. They thought in terms of a primary cause – God. He is sovereign and just; evil as well as good is under his control. This verse emphasises YHWH’s sovereignty. He does not actively cause sin but permits people to follow their own inclinations and suffer the consequences. The paradox of God’s sovereignty versus man’s responsibility is a theological theme that has been debated for centuries.

(10) Since both the false prophets and those who seek their advice perpetuate idolatry and deception they are held jointly accountable for their actions and will share the same consequences. Therefore the prophets will also be subject to the punishment by YHWH set out in v.8.

(11) The purpose (or perhaps the result) of the punishment is that Israel will forsake idolatry and once again be a holy people, as was the original intention (Lev 26:12; 30:22).

SUMMATION

This chapter addresses the sin of the elders of Israel who, despite seeking a word from YHWH, harbour idolatry in their hearts. Through Ezekiel YHWH exposes their hypocrisy and declares that he will not ignore it but will respond with judgement. He demands repentance and warns the entire Israelite community that false prophets and those who consult them will suffer the same consequences. The punishment, however, is redemptive and is designed to rehabilitate the nation.

Thus far in the book of Ezekiel the predicted outlook for the people of Israel/Judah has been bleak but in chapter 14 the call to repentance (v.6) and YHWH’s desire for a restoration of the covenant relationship (v.11) offer a glimmer of hope that he has not given up on them completely.

Posted in Exposition

Prophecy and Divination Practices of Women in Ezekiel 13:17-23

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading Ezekiel 13: 17-23

INTRODUCTION

Having addressed in 13:1-16 the danger posed by male false prophets who declare ‘peace’ when there is no peace, Ezekiel now turns his attention to the negative impact of prophesying women upon the community. They mislead with lies and deceptive practices and, like the male prophets, misrepresent YHWH.

Not much is known about female prophecy in ancient Israel, especially at this more personal (as opposed to national) level, so this passage in Ezekiel is of great interest. Unfortunately, as we shall see, the words for two items associated with divination practice occur only in this Bible passage, so exactly what these objects and their purpose were is unclear.

Women prophesying in Israel was not a new phenomenon. Several in the Old Testament are referred to as prophetesses (e.g. Miriam in Exod 15:20; Deborah in Judg 4:4; Huldah in 2 Chron 34:22; Noadiah in Neh 6:14) and appear to have been prominent women who operated at a national level; prophesying about matters that affected the people as a whole. Ezekiel does not seem to have a problem with the idea of women prophesying per se but he condemns these local prophetic women for their practices, for their profanation of YHWH and for their deceit, manipulation, false assurances and lies.

This oracle In Ezek 13:17-23 is also significant because it is one of only four that the Old Testament prophets addressed to women as a specific group. The other three are:

Isa 3:16-4:1 – Isaiah’s oracle against the women of Jerusalem
Isa 32:9-12 – Isaiah’s oracle against complacent women
Amos 4:1-3 – Amos’ oracle against the ‘cows of Bashan’

(17) Ezekiel is again addressed as ‘Son of Adam’ and is told to prophesy against the women who, like the men in v.2, are said to prophesy out of their own heart (imagination). YHWH, and therefore Ezekiel, is opposed to these women. The term ‘prophetess’ is not applied to them but they are referred to as ‘the daughters of thy people who prophesy.’ Since ‘sons of thy people’ in 3:11 refers to the Jehoiachin exiles it therefore seems likely that the description ‘daughters of thy people’ refers to women who are in exile with Ezekiel in Babylonia. However, perhaps it also refers to women who prophesy in Jerusalem.

As in v.2 concerning the male prophets, Ezekiel is commanded to ‘prophesy against’ the female prophets but in their case an additional phrase is added: ‘set thy face against.’ That expression is associated with judgement and occurs 9 times in Ezekiel. The other 8 occasions are: 6:2 the mountains of Israel; 20:46 the south; 21:2 Jerusalem; 25:2 the Ammonites; 28:21 Sidon; 29:2 Pharaoh; 35:2; Mt. Seir; 38:2 Gog.

(18-19) Verse 18, like v.3, begins with the messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God,’ followed by the pronouncement of a woe. We now learn why YHWH is against the women: it is because they use illegitimate divination practices. Two of the practices are:

  1. sewing cloth bindings on their wrists.
  2. making head-bands on heads of every height.

Unfortunately, as I have already mentioned, it is impossible to ascertain exactly what these practices involved.

Ezekiel uses two words for the distinctive articles of clothing worn by the women who prophesy:

kesatot – This plural word also occurs in v.20. Here in v.18 it is in a sentence which the KJV renders ‘that sew pillows to all armholes.’ Because kesatot were sewn upon the wrists or hands of the female prophets (not their clients) the word has been translated: bindings, covering-nets, amulets, cushions, pillows, or phylacteries. These accessories may have been magic charms made of cloth and fastened to ‘all the joints of the hands.’ The phrase ‘joints of the hands’ is usually translated ‘wrists’ but could also mean ‘elbows’

mispahot – This plural word, occurring only here and in v. 21, is thought to designate long veils. It has been translated variously as: kerchiefs, bird-nets, headbands, veils, mantles, shawls, scarves, and amulets.

Many commentators favour the idea of covering-nets and bird-nets, which links these objects with the ‘hunting for souls.’ V.18 ends with a question: ‘Will ye hunt the souls of my people, and will ye save the souls alive that come unto you?’ The image is of hunting for birds or game using nets. The women. therefore, are viewed as predators; hunting people and trapping them. ‘Souls’ (persons, lives) will feature again in vv.19 and 20.

V.19 poses another question: ‘And will ye pollute me among my people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread?’ Notice that here YHWH says ‘profane me.’ The women profess to prophesy in the name of YHWH but do not. Their motive for this seems to be personal gain.

Some suggest that barley and bread may be items used in the divination rituals but most commentators are of the view that clients paid the women for their divination and fortune-telling services with these commodities. 1 Sam 9:7, for example, refers to the use of food as payment for prophetic services: ‘Then Saul said to his servant, “But if we go, what can we bring the man? For the bread in our sacks is gone, and there is no present to bring to the man of God. What do we have?” ESV

The last part of the quesion in v.19 follows on from at the end of v.18. Are these women profaning YHWH for mere handfuls of barley and bread in order ‘to slay the souls that should not die, and to save the souls alive that should not live by their lying to the people?’

What is meant by putting to death souls who should not die and keeping alive souls who should not live? If the Jerusalem situation is in view it may mean that accepting food as payment in a time of shortage puts the lives of the women’s clients at risk while extending their own lives and those of their family members. It could also mean that their prophecies declare who is to live and who is to die (e.g. Jer 26:8), or that they deal death through black magic. They wield considerable influence in the community since their [false] prophecies lead to the death of innocent people and the preservation of the wicked. According to vv. 20-21, however, their magical power will be broken by YHWH.

(20-21) YHWH’s sentence upon the women is pronounced in a double ABC pattern setting out his action, aim and purpose:

A – action – I will tear them (the bands) from your arms.
B – aim – I will let the souls go [free].
C – purpose – to make them fly (i.e. that they may fly away)

A – action – Your kerchiefs also will I tear.
B – aim – I will deliver my people out of your hand.
C – purpose – they shall be no more in your hand to be hunted (i.e. cease to be prey in your hands).

The women bind pieces of cloth upon themselves but YHWH will tear these off. They prey upon and trap people with their covering-nets and bird-nets but YHWH will set their victims free to fly like a bird (cf. Psa 124:7).

(22) Further condemnation is pronounced upon the women because their lies and activities dishearten the righteous, causing unnecessary stress. The wicked are encouraged by false assurances, with the result that they do not repent (cf. Jer23:14). Instead of bringing the people closer to YHWH the women lead them further away.

(23) The chapter closes with YHWH vowing that that the false prophetesses will no longer see vain visions or practise divination and that he will deliver his people from them. YHWH mentions ‘my people’ in vv. 9, 10, 18, 19a, 19b, 21 and 23.

SUMMATION

In Ezek 13:17-23 YHWH strongly denounces the women who prophesy for their harmful effect on the Israelite community of the Jehoiachin exile in Babylon. Both the male prophets and the prophesying women practise divination but only the women are said to use certain accoutrements as part of the process. For reasons that are not given, YHWH particularly condemns their use of such items. The problem is not just the means used for divination but also the parasitic motives behind their prophecies; they make up lies for self-seeking and personal profit. In addition, their methods are sinister and occultic. They hunt souls, using their accoutrements to manipulate people, abusing the control they have over those who listen to them. These women exercise power that does not have its source in YHWH and from which people need to be delivered.

The women are not described as witches but they do seem to tread a fine line between religion and magic. Scripture forbids occultic practitioners; this includes soothsayers, sorcerers, witches, wizards, charmers, mediums, necromancers, fortune-tellers and interpreters of dreams (Deut 13:1-5; 18:9-11; Lev 19:26, 31; 20:6).

There are still male and female false prophets active in today’s world; preaching from their own imagination and leading people astray with lies and false assurances. The clear lesson from Ezekiel 13 is that we ought to beware of religious leaders, especially those who call themselves prophets, and therefore:

Evaluate what they teach – Compare what they say with the Bible. Do they distort and contradict biblical doctrine or claim to have some new revelation from the Lord? Do they preach miracles, prosperity and God’s blessings rather than warn about sin, death and judgement to come (Heb 9:27)?

Examine their character – Does their ministry provoke division and strife among believers? Do they display humility, accountability and integrity or are they immoral, dishonest, boastful and corrupt?

Assess their motives – While claiming to speak for God do they seek power, fame and personal gain. Do they want your money?

God is still sovereign and just! In Ezekiel 13 he promises to deliver his people from deception and to punish false prophets who bring God’s word into disrepute as well as exploiting others spiritually and financially.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 13:1-16 The Danger of False Prophets

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading Ezekiel 13: 1-23

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 13 is a significant passage in Ezekiel because it addresses the danger posed by false prophets whose messages originate in their own ‘hearts.’ In this chapter Ezekiel denounces counterfeit prophets who mislead the people by falsely claiming to speak for YHWH.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Ezekiel prophesied during a time of great turmoil for Israel. In 597 BCE the Chaldean king Nebuchadnezzar II subdued Jerusalem and placed a puppet king (Zedekiah) on the throne of Judah. He also deported the deposed king Jehoiachin to Babylonia (2 Kgs 24:15-17) along with many of the elite citizens of Judah, including Ezekiel. There YHWH called and commissioned Ezekiel as his prophet.

Although living in Babylonia at a place called Tel-Abib near the River Chebar Ezekiel directed many of his prophecies towards the people of Jerusalem. The situation there was deteriorating after King Zedekiah’s abortive attempt to revolt against Babylonian rule (2 Kgs 25:1-2). Interestingly, that revolt was supported and encouraged by false prophets in Judah (Jer 27:9-10,14-16). Soon the city was besieged by Nebuchadnezzar’s forces and eventually devastated by them in 586/7 BCE.

Meanwhile over in Babylonia Ezekiel condemned Israel and Judah because of their sin and idolatry; prophesying impending judgement upon them. At the same time other Israelite men and women in Babylonia were delivering prophecies which contradicted Ezekiel’s message of doom.

Instead of prophesying punishment, they offered false comfort to the people; assuring them that the situation at Jerusalem would soon be resolved peacefully and thus building up their hopes of a soon return from exile. Ezekiel as a true prophet of YHWH found it necessary to denounce these false prophets and confront their lies.

Chapter 13 of Ezekiel is situated within a section (12:21-14:11) that deals with various issues relating to prophecy. The chapter contains two parallel woe oracles which are similar in structure, content and style. One is against male prophets and the other against women who prophesy, The context (13:9) would indicate that these people, like Ezekiel, were Israelite exiles in Babylonia. Back in the homeland Jeremiah too was denouncing false prophets and prophecy. It is worth comparing his oracle in Jer 23:9-40 with those of Ezekiel in Ezek 13.

CHAPTER DIVISION

13:1-16 – An oracle addressed to male prophets.


13:17-23 – An oracle addressed to women who prophesy.

AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO MALE PROPHETS (1-16)

(1) ‘And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ – This phrase is often used in Ezekiel to introduce a new oracle (e.g. 11:14; 12:1; 15:1; 17:1; 18:1). In 13:1 it covers both oracles in chapter 13 (2-16; 17-23) and is particularly relevant since it emphasizes the fact that Ezekiel speaks the word of YHWH, unlike the false prophets whom he condemns. This oracle against male prophets is mirrored by that against the female prophets in vv.17-23. The structure and language are similar.

STRUCTURE

  • A preamble – vv.1-3a and vv.17-18a.
  • Ezekiel addressed as ‘Son of Man’ – v.2 and v.17.
  • An accusation – vv.3b-7 and vv.18b-19.
  • A forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ – vv.8-9 and vv.20-21.
  • A second forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – vv.10-14 and vv.22-23.

LANGUAGE

Although the content is different the language used in each of the two oracles is similar:

  • v.2 – ‘Son of Man, prophesy against’ and v.17 – ‘Son of man, set thy face against.’
  • v.2 – ‘that prophesy’ and v.16 – ‘which prophesy.’
  • v.2 – ‘say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own hearts’ and v.17 – ‘which prophesy out of their own heart; and prophesy thou against them.’
  • v.3 – ‘thus saith the Lord God’ and v.18 – ‘thus saith the Lord God.’
  • v.3 – ‘woe unto’ and v.18 – ‘woe to.’
  • v.8 – ‘therefore saith the Lord God’ and v.20 – ‘wherefore saith the Lord God.’
  • v.8 – ‘behold I am against’ and v.20 – ‘behold I am against.’
  • v.9 – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ and v.21 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’
  • v.10 – ‘because…’ and v.22 – ‘because…’
  • v.13 – ‘therefore…’ and v.23 – ‘therefore.’
  • v.14 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord’ and v.23 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

(2) Addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ (stressing human weakness in light of God’s greatness) YHWH instructs him to deliver this message ‘against’ (’el; 2, 8, 9, 17, 20) the false prophets. They are called ‘the prophets of Israel,’ a description unique to Ezekiel (13:2,16; 38:17, cf. 13:4). These men are in exile with Ezekiel but the term ‘prophets of Israel’ may suggest that he views them as part of a larger group that would include false prophets back in Israel/Judah. The latter are described by Jeremiah as ‘the prophets of Samaria’ (Jer 23:13) and ‘the prophets of Jerusalem’ (Jer 23:14). Ezekiel’s opponents are not prophets of other gods but men working within the Israelite religious system.

(3) The pronouncement of a ‘woe’ on these ‘foolish (nāḇāl) prophets’ hints at the severe consequences of prophesying lies while claiming to speak for YHWH; these will be set out in vv.8-9. The men are fools; what they say is empty and futile. In the Old Testament a fool (nāḇāl) is someone who denies or disrespects God (Job 2:10; Psa 14:1; 74:18, 22; Isa 32:5-6). These prophets do not follow the Spirit of God but their own spirits, they perceive nothing.

There are several changes in person within these verses which some people might find confusing:

  • In vv. 2-3, YHWH directly addresses Ezekiel in the second person ‘thou’.
  • In v. 4-5, YHWH directly addresses Israel in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In verse 6, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.
  • In vv. 7-8, YHWH directly addresses the false prophets in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In v. 9, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.

(4) YHWH addresses Israel and compares their false prophets to foxes or jackals among the ruins. Such animals survive in desolate places (Lam 5:18) by scavenging and are known to be opportunistic and destructive (Song 2:15). The simile implies that Judah is a society in ruins. It is morally desolate but these prophets thrive and capitalise on the chaos, exploiting the people’s vulnerability. They further undermine the ruins rather than try to build them up.

(5) Directly addressing the false prophets YHWH accuses them of failure to repair breaches in the wall (KJV ‘hedge’). The word gāḏēr refers to a protective wall, e.g. around a vineyard (Psa 80:12; Isa 5:5), or a city wall (Ezra 9:9; Mic &:11). Rather than rising to their responsibility for the defence of the people (e.g. by warnings, intercession, teaching) the false prophets contribute to their decline. Therefore the people will be defenceless in the Day of YHWH (Ezek 30:3, cf. 7:19) when his anger will come upon them (Ezek 5:13; 7:8; 9:8; 13:13; 16:42; 20:21, 34; 21:31; 20:20, 22, 31; 36:6; 38:19; 43:8).

(6-7) Vain visions and lying divination.

Verses 6 and 7 say much the same thing. Both highlight the deceitful arrogance of the false prophets who fabricate visions and use means of divination that YHWH has not authorised.

As well as seeing vain (empty, deceitful, false) visions they make lying divinations (predictions made by reading omens or by various rituals), practices forbidden in Deut 18:9-14. In Israelite religion the only sacred objects authorised for discerning God’s will in specific circumstances were the Urim and Thummim (Ex 28:30; Lev 8:8; Num 27:21; Deut 33:8; 1 Sam 28:6; Ezra 2:63; Neh 7:65).

Even worse is the false prophets’ habit of ascribing their lies to YHWH, hoping that this public declaration of authority would somehow obligate YHWH to fulfil their prophecies. V.6 ‘the Lord hath not sent them’ and v.7 ‘albeit I have not spoken’ emphasise that what they said did not have divine authorisation. Thus their predictions were not only false and deceitful but also blasphemous.

(8-9) Forecast of judgment upon the false prophets.

The word ‘therefore’ introduces details of the punishment due to the false prophets and a summary of the reasons why they deserve it – which is because they ‘have spoken vanity and seen lies.’ The prophets are informed that YHWH has had enough of their lies. He is already ‘against’ them and his hand will be raised up against (KJV ‘upon’) them. (’el – against – see 2, 8, 9, 17, 20). In Ezekiel YHWH’s outstretched hand is an indicator of punishment and judgment (6:14; 14:9,13; 16:27; 20:33,34; 25:7,13,16; 35:3). Their punishment will be three-fold:

1. They will lose membership of the assembly of YHWH’s people.

‘Assembly’ or ‘council’ (sôḏ) is an association of people who are closely connected, who have something in common (Gen 49:6; Job 19:19; Psa 64:3; 111:1; Jer 6:11; 15:17). This punishment has been interpreted as signifying a loss of leadership, honour or status in the community.

It has also been suggested that it may refer to exclusion from the select group who are confidants of YHWH (Psa 89:8; Jer 23:18,22); which would include true prophets (Amos 3:7). The meaning is probably even stronger: they would no longer be regarded as members of God’s earthly people – the community of faith.

2. They will not be listed in the register of the house of Israel.

These false prophets would not be listed in the genealogical register (keṯāb, writing) of Israelites. The existence and importance of this list for those returning from exile is clear from Ezra chapter 2 and Nehemiah chapter 7. For the false prophets exclusion would mean a loss of citizen rights. Notice that Jeremiah pronounced a similar punishment upon Shemaiah the Nehelamite (Jer 29:31-32).

Some commentators contend that this register is YHWH’s book (Ex 32:33; Psa 69:28; 87:6; 139:16; Dan 12:1). The Old Testament, however, is fairly vague about what is recorded in that book, whereas this document mentioned in Ezekiel 13:9 is specifically said to be the ‘register of the house of Israel.’ It seems more sensible to interpret it literally as a secular civil census list.

3. They will not be able to enter the land of Israel.

This flows logically from the previous two. Excision from the register would lead to serious consequences for the false prophets and their descendants; probably with respect to claims to ancestral land or the purchase of property.

The same word keṯāb meaning ‘register’ occurs in Ezra 2:62 and Neh 7:64. These twin passages illustrate the problems that exclusion from the register, in this case the record of priestly genealogies, could bring:

Another group returned at this time from the towns of Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Kerub, Addan, and Immer. However, they could not prove that they or their families were descendants of Israel. This group included the families of Delaiah, Tobiah, and Nekoda— a total of 652 people. Three families of priests — Hobaiah, Hakkoz, and Barzillai — also returned. (This Barzillai had married a woman who was a descendant of Barzillai of Gilead, and he had taken her family name.) They searched for their names in the genealogical records, but they were not found, so they were disqualified from serving as priests. Ezra 2:59-62 NLT

This first forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets ends with the divine recognition formula ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God.’

(10-14) A second forecast of judgment.

Verse 10 begins with a doubling of ya‘an (‘on account of’ or because’) which the KJV translates here as ‘because, even because’; meaning ‘for the very good reason.’ This phrase ya’an ub’ ya’an also occurs in Lev 26:43 and Ezek 36:3.

Punishment is due because they have misled (caused to go astray) the people saying ‘peace’ when there is no peace. Rather than warning them about the consequences of their sinful behaviour, the false prophets give an assurance of safety that is not rooted in reality. They intentionally lull the people into a false sense of security.

The image of a wall, used earlier in v.5 to represent the spiritual and moral state of the people of Judah, is taken up again in v.10. The word for ‘wall’ (ḥayiṣ) in v.10 is a hapax legomenon (a word that only occurs once) in the Old Testament and means a dry wall or party wall; an unimproved flimsy or crumbling wall built of mud-brick or loose stones and liable to collapse under stress. A different word (qiyrāh) is used for ‘wall’ in vv.12-15. The ‘wall’ in v.10 is not literal but metaphorical.

It is said to have been daubed or smeared with untempered mortar. The word tāp̱ēl translated ‘untempered’ (KJV) is an adjective meaning ‘unseasoned’ or ‘tasteless.’ The thought is that of lacking an essential ingredient; here the mortar is just mud to which a binding agent such as straw has not been added. It covers the wall but does not strengthen it. To emphasise that the product is insubstantial modern translations tend to replace the KJV translation’s ‘untempered [mortar]’ with ”whitewash.’ This conveys the thought of deceit and hypocrisy on the part of the false prophets.

(11-14) These verses continue with the figure of a whitewashed wall and the effect bad weather has on it. Flooding rain, great hailstones and stormy winds will cause it to fall. The futility of the false prophets’ assurances will be exposed and they will be held accountable. When judgement comes and the wall collapses people will ask (v.12) ‘Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it?’

Greenberg (1983, p.238) comments: ‘As said expressly in 22:8, “they” who daubed the wall were the prophets: the people built the dry wall – a figure of their unfounded optimism, while the prophets daubed it with worthless stuff – their self-inspired predictions of well-being.’

V.13 clarifies that the destructive forces represent YHWH’s anger against sin as well as the lies of the false prophets. His fury will be so intense that the prophets will not survive (vv.15b-16).

Scholars suggest that in v.14 the image of the wall changes. The wall which YHWH will break down is said to refer now to Jerusalem and the fall of the city. To quote Greenberg (1983, p.238) again, he says of the phrase leveling it to the ground in v.14:

‘The language of this clause is more appropriate to massive demolition than to the fall of a mere wall; it facilitates the intrusion, in the next clause, of the reference to Jerusalem. When it (fem.) falls and you perish within it (fem.).’

In other words proof for the assertion that in v.14 Ezekiel is thinking of the impending fall of Jerusalem is that the word ‘wall’ is masculine whereas ‘it shall fall’ and ‘in the midst thereof’ are feminine; therefore the reference cannot be to the metaphorical wall but to the city of Jerusalem.

This second forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets also ends with the divine recognition formula ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ (vv. 9, 14, 21, 23)

(15) YHWH asserts that he will accomplish his wrath upon the wall (the false assurances) and upon those that have smeared it with ‘whitewash’ (the false prophets).

(16) This verse summarises vv.10-15: the main lie of the false prophets is that they promise peace when there is no peace.

SUMMATION

This woe oracle denounces Israelite false prophets for failing to address the nation’s sin and instead spreading lies and details of false visions, claiming divine authority which they do not possess. They offer the people false hope by declaring ‘peace’ when there is no peace. The passage highlights God’s anger against deceit and spiritual negligence.

Posted in General

Understanding Jesus Through John’s Question: A Christmas Reflection

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading Matthew 11:1-6; Luke 7:24-35

INTRODUCTION

As the coming of Jesus Christ into the world is celebrated this Christmas season let us briefly reflect upon a profound question asked by John the Baptist: ‘Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?’ This question, recorded in Matthew chapter 11 and Luke chapter 7, provides a powerful lens through which we can examine our own expectations of Jesus Christ.

JOHN’S DILEMMA

John the Baptist was perplexed. In prison because of his bold stand for biblical truth, news had filtered through to him about the ministry of Jesus. However, what he heard about Jesus’ activities did not quite align with his expectations of the Messiah. Like most Jews at the time John may have expected that the Messiah would come as a conquering king; a great military and political leader who would oust the occupying forces of the Roman Empire. Instead, Jesus was busy teaching, associating with and showing compassion to the marginalised in society and healing the sick. Although John was familiar with the many Old Testament messianic prophecies, and had previously identified Jesus as ‘the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world’ (John 1:29), he was confused by the reports about Jesus.

Some think that John’s faith was weak; that he was doubting and needed reassurance. Others suggest that John was prompting Jesus to hurry up and reveal himself as the conquering Messiah. Whatever his motivation, John sent two of his own disciples to Jesus to ask the question: ‘Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?’

CONTEMPORARY EXPECTATIONS

It is easy to become confused and distracted by the commercialisation, materialism and the festivities of this Christmas season but let us take the time to ask: ‘What are my expectations of the One who came?’ What does the coming of Christ mean to me today? The question ‘art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?’ is still relevant. ‘Am I trusting the Saviour, or looking for something else?’

JESUS’ RESPONSE

Jesus did not condemn John the Baptist for his question but gave a compassionate answer: “Go back to John and tell him what you have heard and seen — the blind see, the lame walk, those with leprosy are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised to life, and the Good News is being preached to the poor.” Matthew 11:4-5 (NLT)

Notice:

Indirect Confirmation: Rather than directly claiming to be the Messiah, Jesus allowed his works to speak for themselves. He demonstrated his identity by doing things that only God can do. He performed miraculous deeds: healing the blind, lame, lepers and deaf and raising the dead. This approach encouraged John and others to draw their own conclusions based on the evidence of Jesus’ ministry.

Fulfilment of Scripture: Jesus’ response alluded to Old Testament prophecies, particularly Isaiah 35:5-6 and 61:1-2, showing how his life and ministry fulfilled these predictions. (It has been estimated that there are more than 300 messianic prophecies in the Old Testament. Josh McDowell in chapter 9 of his book ‘Evidence that Demands a Verdict, Vol 1’ lists 61 of them. This book can be read online at The Internet Archive’s Open Library).

Emphasis on mercy: Christ’s coming has brought healing, restoration, and hope to a broken world.

Invitation to faith: Jesus concluded his response with ‘and blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in me’ (Mt 11:6); thus encouraging John and others to trust in him despite doubts or unmet expectations. True faith requires the setting aside of preconceptions.

This Christmas let us not be distracted by the ‘noise’ of the season but focus on Christ and the true meaning of his coming:

  • He came to heal the broken.
  • He came to bring help to the hopeless.
  • He came to give salvation to all who believe.

Like John the Baptist, have we rechecked and been reassured? Has Christ’s coming transformed our lives, or are we still ‘looking for another’?

Posted in Exposition

GUARDIANS OF EDEN: THE MYSTERY OF THE CHERUBIM – Genesis 3:24

Posted on by writtenexposition

Introduction: Genesis as a Fundamental Pillar of Biblical Insight

Since it occupies first place in the canon of scripture, it almost goes without saying that a grasp of the book of Genesis is necessary for a proper understanding of the rest of the Bible. It is:

– a book of revelation – because the information in it has been revealed by God via transmission through Moses. Its contents are therefore fact and not fiction.

– a book of introduction (as its name indicates) – because it records how things began. Genesis mentions the beginning of such things as the universe, human beings, marriage, murder, music, agriculture, languages and the nations.

The book falls naturally into two parts: primaeval history and patriarchal history. Chapters 1-11 record four key events of global significance: The Creation, The Fall, The Flood and The Babel Crisis. The second part, chapters 12-50, concentrates on the life- stories of four key characters: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Joseph. Also within the book the family trees of ten significant individuals are given. Their records are introduced with the words ‘these are the generations of’:

Adam – 5:1; Noah – 6:9; Shem – 11:10 (10:1, 22); Ham – 10:1 (10:6); Japheth – 10:1 (10:2); Terah – 11:27; Ishmael – 25:12; Isaac – 25:19; Esau – 36:1l; Jacob – 37:2.

Background: Genesis 1-2 and the Duality of Creation Accounts

Genesis 1:1-2:3 records what is often referred to as the first account of creation. This section divides into three main episodes. The first two episodes together occupy six days, the third one day, the seventh. They are:

  • Gen 1:1-13 The creation of the inanimate world
  • Gen 1:14-31 The creation of living creatures; these occupy three spheres: sea, air and land.
  • Gen 2:1-3 God’s rest after his creative activity.

Chapter 2:4 begins what many scholars term the second account of creation. The reason for the idea that there are two accounts of creation is that each passage emphasizes a different name for God. Within Genesis 1:1-2:3 the name Elohim (trans. ‘God’) is used some thirty-five times. At the beginning of chapter two, however, there is a noticeable shift. In the second section YHWH Elohim (trans. ‘the Lord God’) is used, occurring twenty times within 2:4-3:24 . Whilst fully recognising this fact I think it unlikely that there are two accounts of creation. Chapter two simply continues with additional details of the creation of humanity on the sixth day; in other words, it is an expansion of 1:26-30. Genesis chapter two (along with chapter three) supplements chapter one.

The Paradise Narrative: Genesis Chapters 2 and 3

Genesis 2

Gen 2-4-7 – This section revisits the creation of man, emphasizing that Adam was created by God from the dust of the ground and that God breathed life into him.

Gen 2:8-14 – God plants a garden paradise called Eden into which he sets man. The garden is described as beautiful and abundant. It is watered by a river that flows through it; dividing into four streams. In the middle of the garden stand the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Gen 2: 15-17 – God gives Adam responsibility for tending the garden (2:15) and in 2:16-17 he personally addresses Adam instructing him not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. To do so will result in death.

Gen 2:18-25 – God declares that it is not good for man to be alone. God creates animals which are brought to Adam and named by him but no animal is suitable as a companion for Adam. God therefore creates woman (Eve) from one of Adam’s ribs. Adam recognises Eve as bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh.

Gen 2:24-25 – The chapter concludes with a statement about marriage. It declares that a man shall leave his parents, cleave to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. The final verse notes that the Adam and Eve are naked but not ashamed.

Genesis 3

This chapter describes the events surrounding what has become known as the Fall of Man.

Gen 3:1 – The cunning serpent engages in conversation with the woman and questions God’s instruction not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Gen 3:2-3 – Eve accepts the serpent’s insinuation (v.1) that God was being restrictive rather than generous and in her response to the serpent she both subtracts from God’s word (she omits the word ‘freely’) and adds to it (‘we cannot touch it’). You will recall that Revelation 22:18-19 contains prohibitions against adding to or taking away from the word of God.

Gen 3:4-5 The serpent (vv. 4-5) dismisses as untrue God’s warning that eating of the forbidden fruit would result in death and says that God has told the humans that in order to restrict their development. God does not want them to ‘know good and evil’. This expression seems to mean ‘have wisdom’ or ‘have the ability to understand’, ‘weigh up and discriminate’; for example: see Dt 1:39; 2 Sam 19:35; Isa 7:15-16 and Solomon’s prayer for understanding: Give therefore thy servant an understanding heart to judge thy people, that I may discern between good and bad: for who is able to judge this thy so great a people? 1 Kings 3:9

Gen 3:6 – The fall of humanity. Eve takes the fruit and eats it, then gives it to her husband, Adam, who also eats it.

Gen 3:7-19 These verses outline the results of disobedience. The man and the woman become aware of their nakedness and shame. They therefore sew fig leaves to cover themselves, and hide from God. God confronts them, and pronounces specific consequences that each party (the serpent, the woman, and the man) must face for their actions.

Gen 3:20-24 – In v.20 Adam names his wife Eve, meaning ‘living,’ signifying her role as the mother of all living. In v.21 God provides leather clothes for Adam and Eve before expelling them for the Garden of Eden in order to prevent them from eating from the tree of life and living forever in their fallen state. The entrance to the garden is blocked by cherubim and a flaming sword.

Unveiling Controversies and Posing Inquiries

Over the centuries Genesis 2 and 3 have been two of the most controversial and most discussed chapters of the Bible. A wide spectrum of opinion has been held and a variety of views put forward. Many believe that the events of Genesis 3 literally and physically happened as described, others maintain that the episode in Eden is myth or an allegory to explain sin and suffering, a few express an extreme view that the serpent is actually the hero of the story (since it ‘correctly’ predicted that the humans would not literally die the day they ate the forbidden fruit).

The Paradise Narrative raises many questions in the mind of the reader. These include:

  • How does one account for a talking animal (serpent)?
  • Where was Adam when Eve was having a conversation with the serpent?
  • Had Adam informed Eve about the prohibition? It had been given before she was created (2:16-17, 22).
  • Why did Adam not refuse to eat the fruit?
  • Why is no explanation given for the serpent wishing to bring about the catastrophe of the fall?
  • Why is there no further discussion of this episode in the Old Testament?
  • What does the passage mean by ‘life?’
  • What does the passage mean by ‘death?’
  • What does the passage mean by ‘day’ (2:17; 3:5)?
  • Are cherubim real or imaginary creatures?

The biblical passage does not address these questions.

Regardless of whatever view is held on the literalness or otherwise of the paradise story no-one can deny that, insofar as the biblical narrative is concerned, it marks a turning point in human history. The introduction of sin into the world disturbed the close relationship between God and human beings, disrupted the harmony of creation and introduced mortality, conflict, and suffering. The paradise narrative advances themes of good and evil, of original sin, human nature, free will, responsibility, separation from God and the hope of redemption. The consequences of the choice made by Adam and Eve and its impact on collective and individual destiny are subjects which everyone should ponder.

These themes are explored as the biblical revelation progresses but admittedly I find it strange that the fall of man does not feature in the rest of the Old Testament scriptures – with the possible exception of the following verses:

Job 31:33 (If I covered my transgressions as Adam, by hiding mine iniquity in my bosom),

Psa 51:5 (Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.)

Isa 43:27 (Thy first father hath sinned, and thy teachers have transgressed against me.)

Hos 6:7 (But they like men have transgressed the covenant: there have they dealt treacherously against me.) The word translated ‘men’ is ’āḏām, leading some to suppose an Adam covenant.

The paradise narrative is referred to in the following New Testament passages, most of which are in the writings of the apostle Paul.

  • John 8:44 The devil is the father of lying. He told Eve the first recorded lie ‘in the beginning’.
  • Rom 5:12-21- Death through a literal Adam, the federal head of humanity.
  • Rom 8:18-23 – Creation subjected to futility.
  • 1 Cor 11 – Headship applied to corporate worship. Paul’s argument is based on the creation order.
  • 1 Cor 14:34 Women/wives to keep silence in the church. Paul refers to the Old Testament statement that a woman ought to be to be submissive (Gen 3:16).2 Cor
  • 2 Cor 11:3 Paul refers to the deception of Eve by the serpent.
  • 1 Tim 2:13-14 Paul’s teaching regarding women in the church is based on the order of creation.

The Cherubim: Guardians Beyond the Boundaries of Eden

So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life. Genesis 3:24

In Genesis 3:24 we have the first appearance of cherubim. After the fall they are positioned at the east side of the Garden of Eden, along with the revolving flaming sword, to guard the path to the Tree of Life. It would seem that they are stationed there as boundary markers to prevent Adam and Eve, now expelled from the Garden, from returning and consuming the fruit, which would potentially grant them immortality in a state of sin. It is clear from the verse that their function was negative rather than positive. They were not there to point the way back to the Garden of Eden and the Tree of Life but to bar access to them.

The verse tells us hardly anything about these creatures but would indicate that they are animate beings whose primary function is to act as guardians. It does not specify the number of cherubim nor does it say what form they took or give a description of their appearance. However, their activity at the close of the story of the fall serves as a salutary reminder of the fateful consequences of human sin and disobedience.

Posted in General

A GOOD WORD

Posted on by writtenexposition

‘Heaviness in the heart of man maketh it stoop: but a good word maketh it glad.’ Prov 12:25  

Have you ever had heaviness of heart? Have you ever been anxious, worried about the present and apprehensive about what the future might hold. If so you are not the only one. All of us at one time or another find ourselves in that situation. This little verse addresses the problem of a heavy heart.  

It paints a picture, in just a few words, of someone who is bowed down, who is figuratively stooped and bent over because of an anxious heart. This person is downcast and discouraged, full of uneasiness, fear, apprehension and stress. This is someone who has come to the end of his tether, who just does not know what to do. Worry has given way to despair, and the burden is so heavy that this person has hit rock-bottom, now looks downward all the time, and cannot even look up for help.

But then something occurs that brings about a noticeable change. Depression and dejection have lifted. That person is no longer stooped, the load has lightened. What has happened? A good word was spoken to him, and this good word banished the heaviness in his heart.

We human beings need to hear a good word every now and then. From time to time we all require encouragement. In this verse a wise man observed that a good word makes a person glad. The good word actually uplifts the anxious heart.

Think of some examples of individuals in the Bible who had heaviness of the heart;

Nehemiah:- ‘And it came to pass, when I heard these words, that I sat down and wept, and mourned certain days, and fasted, and prayed before the God of heaven.’ Neh 1:4

David:- ‘I am troubled; I am bowed down greatly; I go mourning all the day long.’ Psalm 38:6

Jeremiah:- ‘When I would comfort myself against sorrow, my heart is faint in me.’Jer 8:18

Where is that necessary ‘good word’ likely to come from. Let me suggest three possible sources.

1. THE WORD OF GOD

‘…thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart…’ Jer 15:16

Ideally, for a Christian, the first recourse for support should always be the living word of God. We ought to turn immediately to the Bible whenever we need ‘a good word’. There are many ‘exceeding great and precious promises’ (2 Pet 1:4) and encouraging verses in God’s word. Verses such as:

‘For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.’ 2 Tim 1:7

‘Be of good courage, and he shall strengthen your heart, all ye that hope in the LORD.’ Psalm 31:24

‘Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.’ Jn 14:27

When we are bowed down with worry let us turn to the Bible, and find relief from heaviness of heart.

2. THE ASSEMBLY OF GOD

‘Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.’ Heb 10:25

We ought to receive encouragement at the meetings of the assembly of God, the local church. There may be exceptions but, generally speaking, whenever we attend a meeting, especially the ‘Breaking of Bread’, we receive ‘a good word’ as a result of hearing:

  • The hymns of worship sung.
  • Thanks given to God for his great plan of salvation.
  • The word of God publicly read and preached.
  • The name of the our Lord Jesus uplifted and praised.

3. THE CHILDREN OF GOD 

Still thinking of v.25 of Hebrews 10:

“… exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.” Hebrews 10:25

Every Christian has a responsibility to encourage others. According to the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews this is something we ought to do often. Do you ever take the time to speak ‘a good word’ of encouragement and comfort to a fellow-believer?

Finally, it is possible to become so bowed down with anxiety that we just don’t get anything from reading the Bible, attending church meetings (even if able to do so), or conversing with other Christians. In the event that we find ourselves in such a distressing situation let us console ourselves with the thought that God loves us. At the very least, when nothing else seems to be going right, we can rely on that.

‘The LORD hath appeared of old unto me, saying, Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee.’ Jer 31:3

Notice that ‘thee’ is singular. God’s love for each one of us is personal and individual.

Aren’t we thankful that there is a remedy for heaviness (anxiety, fear and apprehension) in our hearts. This verse supplies the solution. Proverbs 12:25 says plainly that ‘a good word’ will restore our joy.

‘Heaviness in the heart of man maketh it stoop: but a good word maketh it glad.’

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:3-11

Posted on by writtenexposition

The latter section of 1 John chapter 1 contains three assertions, aimed at false teachers, which begin with the expression ‘If we say.’ These are:

1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

1.10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

ASSURANCE

This section in chapter 2:3-11 contains another three assertions but these are aimed at believers, whose faith might have been rocked by false teaching and who are in need of assurance that they are genuine Christians. These assertions all begin with the expression ‘ the person who says’ ( KJV ‘he that saith’). They are:

2:4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

2:6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.

2:9 He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now.

These might actually be direct quotations from John’s opponents who were not genuine. Anyone, however, who can truthfully say: ‘I know him’, ‘I live in him’ and ‘I live in the light’ is sure to be a true Christian.

2:3 John introduces the theme of obedience and its relation to knowing God. He emphasizes that the evidence of a genuine relationship with God is seen in willingness to obey God’s commands. True knowledge of God is not just theoretical but results in a transformed life, characterized by a desire to follow God’s teachings and live in obedience to His will.

‘I KNOW HIM’

‘Hereby’ This phrase en toútō without a noun antecedent is a device John uses frequently in this epistle (2:3, 5, 3:10,16, 19, 24; 4:2, 6, 9, 10, 13; 5:2) to mark the change to new topic or to emphasize the importance of what he is about to say.

‘We know that we know.’ The first ‘we know’ is present tense and the second is perfect tense. The latter has the idea of ‘we have come to know’ indicating that the knowledge was obtained once for all and is continuing; it is a past experience that has ongoing consequences in the present.

‘him‘ Jesus Christ the Righteous One who is our advocate and propitiation (2:1-2).

2:4 John emphasizes his point by giving a negative example. He asserts that merely claiming to know God without obedience is a lie. Claiming to know God while living in disobedience is hypocritical and untrue. Our actions must match our words.

2:5 John restates positively the point that true knowledge of God should lead to a life of obedience and righteousness. When people genuinely obey God’s word, it is an indication that the love of God is being perfected or completed in them. By ‘the love of God’ does John mean their love for God (objective genitive) or God’s love for them (subjective genitive)? Both human love for God (cp. Ex 20:6; Jer 2:2) and God’s/Jesus’ love for human beings (cp. Jn 15: 9-10; 1 Jn 4:12) could be in view, but probably more the former.

An essential component of genuine love for God is obedience to God’s commands. It is a clear sign that one is truly a member of God’s family, and knows him intimately.

‘I LIVE IN HIM’

2:6 Once more John sets a high standard for the believers. Claiming to live (menṓ, remain) in Christ requires a life that emulates Jesus’ character, conduct, and teachings. This verse emphasizes that being a Christian involves imitating Christ and growing in Christlikeness in our daily lives. One must walk (peripatéō) as he walked.

THE COMMANDMENT IS BOTH OLD AND UP-TO-DATE

2:7 Having already mentioned the idea that the keeping of God’s/Jesus Christ’s commandments perfects love John now addresses the Christians as ‘beloved’ (agapētós)- N.B: other manuscripts read ‘brothers’ (adelphós). John assures his readers that his message is not a new teaching. ‘New’ has the idea of ‘novel’ or ‘previously unheard of’. The command to love had been around for a very long time e.g. ‘Love God and love your neighbour!’ (Deut 6:5; Lev 19:18; Mt 22:37-40; Rom 13:8; 2 Jn 6). This command is something that they had possessed (‘ye had’) ‘from the beginning’ i.e. since they first heard the gospel. Here ‘commandment’ in the singular, as elsewhere in John’s writings, refers to the commandment of love (Jn 13:34; 15:12; 1 Jn 3:23; 4:21; 2 Jn 5-6).

THE COMMANDMENT IS BOTH NEW AND TRUE

2:8 ‘Again’ i.e ‘on the other hand’ or ‘on second thought’. Here John seems to present a paradox by calling it both an old command and a new command. While the command to love one another is not new, in a sense it (‘which thing’) is new both in their case and in the case of Jesus Christ. For them it is new because they have recently come from darkness to light. As regards Christ it is new because he reaffirmed it. He called it new (Jn13:34) and exemplified it in his life (Mk 10:21; Jn 11:5,26; 13:1; 15:13; 19:26). Its full expression was realised first of all in Jesus Christ and now in them as they walk as he walked.

N.B. I have taken ‘which thing’ as referring to the command to love. Strictly speaking, this is grammatically incorrect as the noun ‘commandment’ is feminine but the pronoun ‘which thing’ is neuter. But what else could John have in mind? For various suggestions as to what ‘which thing’ might refer to please consult technical commentaries. As far as I know, there is not a satisfactory solution to this grammatical difficulty.

‘The darkness is passing (present tense) and the true light is now shining.’ John tells the believers that something wonderful is happening; darkness is dissipating (parágō) and the light is shining. This is a process that is not yet complete but will presumably be fulfilled at the Second Coming (2:18 ,28), which John reckons will be soon. The apostle Paul articulates a similar thought in Rom 13:12.

The concepts of darkness and light recur in the writings of John and make an appearance early in his Gospel as themes in the Prologue. For some thoughts on the themes in the Prologue (Jn 1:1-18) please see my previous posts:

(1) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(2) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(3) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(4) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(5) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(6) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

‘I LIVE IN THE LIGHT’

2:9 John highlights the inconsistency of claiming to live in the light (in Christ) while harbouring hatred or ill-will towards a fellow believer (‘adelphós’ – ‘brother’, ‘one of the same origin’ – Whether singular ‘brother’ or plural ‘brethren’ this is a New Testament technical term for a Christian believer either male or female, generally speaking no gender distinction is implied e.g. Jn 21:23; Acts 9:30; Rom16:14). Love for others, especially within the Christian community, is a key marker of walking in the light of Christ.

2:10 John states that someone who loves his or her fellow believers lives in the light. Love enables believers to walk in righteousness and unity with one another, removing obstacles that might cause them to stumble or fall away from their faith.

2:11 John reiterates the significance of love by maintaining that hatred towards a fellow believer is evidence that someone in a state of spiritual darkness. Hatred blinds an individual to the truth and causes him to walk aimlessly without direction or understanding.

Thus John maintains that being in the light and hating one’s brother are mutually exclusive. With John there are no grey areas, there is either light or darkness, there is either love or hatred. He restates this thought in 3:15 and 4:20.

In the 1871 JFB ‘Commentary Critical and Explanatory of the Whole Bible’ the authors include a quotation which gives a useful summary of vv. 10-11:

“In him who loves there is neither blindness nor occasion of stumbling [to himself]: in him who does not love, there is both blindness and occasion of stumbling. He who hates his brother, is both a stumbling-block to himself, and stumbles against himself and everything within and without; he who loves has an unimpeded path” [BENGEL].

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jamieson, R., Fausset, A. R., and Brown, D. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, vol. 2 (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997), 528.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:1-2

Posted on by writtenexposition

2:1-2 JESUS CHRIST IS OUR ADVOCATE

My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world. (KJV)

These two verses follow on from the previous chapter which is about Jesus Christ (1:1-4), Fellowship (mentioned 4 times in 1:3-7) and Sin/sins (9 times in 1:7-2:2). John addresses his audience affectionately as ‘my little children,’ showing his pastoral concern for those younger in the faith than he is and at the same time reminding them of his authority. Tekníon (‘little sons’) is the diminutive of the Greek ‘sons’ (‘son’ is téknon) and in this epistle occurs here and at 2:12; 3:18; 4:4, 5:21. A different word for ‘little children’ (paidíon meaning ‘infants) is used at 2:13,18. In John’s Gospel Jesus uses both words in addressing his disciples: tekníon in Jn 13:33 and paidíon in Jn 21:5.

John gives one of his reasons for writing as the desire that they avoid sinning but, at the same time, he acknowledges that they may still fall into sin at times. They are not sinless but they are to sin less.

‘And’ has the idea of ‘furthermore’. John recognizes that a Christian will sin from time to time. The change from the indefinite third person ‘any man’ to the first person plural ‘we’ is notable in that the apostle John includes himself along with those he is addressing as someone who is liable to sin. He assures them that believers who sin have an ‘advocate’ before God the Father in Jesus Christ. If those he is writing to (scholars often refer to them as ‘the Johannine community’) commit sin Jesus Christ is their advocate with the Father, just as he is John’s advocate too.

An advocate (paráklētos) is someone who is called to another person’s side to provide help or comfort. It can mean a legal adviser who represents someone in court but it refers more generally to someone who provides help of any kind. The main thought is of aid, encouragement or comfort. The emphasis is not so much on the ability of the advocate to help but on his dignity or standing as someone who can bring about a positive outcome for the person in trouble. In the New Testament the word occurs only here (2:1) and in The Upper Room Ministry section (Jn 13-17) of John’s Gospel (Jn 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7). In John’s Gospel the Paraclete is the Holy Spirit. On this point The Complete Word Study Dictionary helpfully comments that: ‘Christ designates the Holy Spirit as Paraclete (John 14:16), and calls Him állos, another, which means another of equal quality and not héteros, another of a different quality. Therefore, the Holy Spirit is designated by Jesus Christ as equal with Himself, i.e., God (1 John 2:1).’ In 1 John the Paraclete is Jesus Christ. He is described as ‘the Righteous One,’ emphasizing His perfect and sinless character, which qualifies him to be our advocate.

John goes on to explain that Jesus’ role as the advocate is rooted in His sacrificial work on the cross. He is the propitiation for our sins, which means His death on the cross reconciles us with God and satisfies God’s righteous demands for justice.

PROPITIATION

Verse 2 begins with ‘And,’ which tells us that what follows is another comment by John on the topic of sin. The word ‘He’ (lit. ‘himself’) keeps our attention focused on Jesus Christ. It is he, no one else, who is ‘the propitiation for our sins.’

The Greek word hilasmos here translated ‘propitiation’ occurs only twice in the New Testament; both occasions are in 1 John (2:2; 4:10). It is an act of atonement (the reconciliation of human beings with God) and a means of appeasing God’s wrath. The word carries two main connotations; propitiation and expiation. There is ongoing debate as to which is most prominent. Some scholars emphasize propitiation (an averting of God’s wrath), others expiation (removal of sin, cleansing). The object of propitiation is a person (God), the object of expiation is a problem (sin). Some Bible versions try to convey both ideas by translating hilasmos as ‘atoning sacrifice’. However, hilasmos does not focus on sin itself but on the means by which sins are dealt with and forgiven.

Jesus Christ the Righteous is the hilasmos. Because he is righteous he was able to be the sacrifice that is the means of appeasing the God’s anger and of delivering human beings from the defilement of sin. Sins are forgiven on the basis of his completed work on the cross.

Importantly, John clarifies that Jesus’ sacrifice as a means of propitiation is not for the benefit of a particular group (like the Johannine community) but is directed to the whole world. Kósmos is the universe or world and its contents; people and things. Here it may be a figure of speech (metonymy) meaning ‘the inhabitants of the world.’

Note that some translations, including the KJV, insert ‘the sins of‘ before ‘the whole world’ but this is not in the original. ‘For the whole world’ does not refer back to ‘for our sins’ but is one of three perí (concerning or regarding) clauses in verse 2, all of which link back to hilasmos.

‘himself the propitiation (hilasmos) –

  1. perí (concerning) our sins
  2. not perí (concerning) our own alone
  3. but also perí (concerning) the whole world‘

1 Jn 2:2 does not teach universalism. In 1 Jn 5:19 John clearly distinguishes between those who are ‘of God’ and ‘the world’.

For a detailed technical treatment of the words and grammar in verse 2, including the triple perí, please see:

Do, T., 2013, ‘Does πϵρὶ ὅλου του̑ κόμου imply “the sins of the whole world” in 1 John 2,2?’ Biblica, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 415–435.

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

NEHEMIAH 13:1-3

Posted on by writtenexposition

Nehemiah chapter 13 concludes the book of Nehemiah and provides insight into the reforms implemented by Nehemiah upon his return to Jerusalem from Persia. The background to chapter 13 may be summarised as follows:

BACKGROUND TO NEHEMIAH CHAPTER 13

Nehemiah, a Jewish cupbearer to king Artaxerxes I (465-424 BCE) of Persia, received news from home about the deteriorating state of Jerusalem and its broken walls. He therefore sought permission from the king for leave of absence from his job at Susa in order to return to Jerusalem, rebuild the walls and restore the glory of the city.

Having obtained the king’s blessing and support, Nehemiah travelled to Jerusalem in 445 BCE (2:1; 5:14) and rallied the people to rebuild the walls. Despite some local opposition, the walls were completed in fifty-two days (6:15). Nehemiah then focused on the spiritual renewal of the Jewish community. After twelve years in Jerusalem (5:14; 13:6) Nehemiah returned to the Persian court in 433 BCE. He must have continued to receive news from Jerusalem because he soon became aware that, in a spiritual sense, things were not progressing well there since his departure.

In chapter 13, Nehemiah returns to Jerusalem after an unspecified period of absence in Babylon. The date was probably 430 or 429 BCE. True enough, he finds that the people have reverted to various forms of disobedience and have neglected the laws of God. This final chapter highlights several significant events:

13:1-3 SEPARATION RENEWED

13:4-9 EXPULSION OF TOBIAH FROM THE TEMPLE

13:10-14 REORGANISATION OF THE LEVITES

13:15-22 RESTORATION OF SABBATH OBSERVANCE

13:23-29 PROBLEM OF EXOGAMOUS MARRIAGES

13: 30-31 SUMMARY OF NEHEMIAH’S CULTIC REFORMS

13:1-3 SEPARATION RENEWED

‘On that day’ (‘at that time’ i.e. in Nehemiah’s era) there was a public reading from the ‘book of Moses’ (cf. 2 Chron 25:4.; 35:12; Neh 8:1). This is certainly a reference to the torah (first five books of the Old Testament) since vv. 1b-2 cite Deut 23:3-6; a section of law dealing with persons excluded from Israelite worship. When the passage was read aloud the people learned that Ammonites or Moabites were specifically excluded from any religious assembly of Israel until ten generations had passed. This rule was to last forever. Interestingly, the reasons given for that do not include the origin of the two nations from the incestuous sexual relations each of Lot’s daughters had with him (Gen 19:30-38). Rather, the prohibition was based on on historical events. These two nations had opposed the Israelites after the exodus from Egypt and had hired a non-Israelite prophet called Balaam to curse them (Num 22-24). This, in turn, triggered a curse on them in accordance with God’s promise to Abraham in Gen 12:2-4. Although he could not actually bring himself to curse the Israelites Balaam nevertheless advised the Moabites how to lead them into sin (Num 31:16; 2 Pet 2:15; Jude 11; Rev 2:14).

MOAB

The Bible has nothing good to say about the Moabites or Ammonites but Moab in particular is singled out for criticism. The prophet Jeremiah gives a penetrating assessment of this inveterate enemy of the Israelites in his book:

‘Moab hath been at ease from his youth, and he hath settled on his lees, and hath not been emptied from vessel to vessel, neither hath he gone into captivity: therefore his taste remained in him, and his scent is not changed.‘ Jer 48:11

Moab, as we have mentioned, had a bad beginning. Nevertheless, like many who oppose God and his people today, everything seemed to go well for them. Their history was characterized by comfort and prosperity. Unlike Israel, nothing disturbed or interfered with their lives of ease. They were never taken into captivity. Jeremiah paints a word picture from the ancient process of wine-making. Totally at ease in its wickedness, unthinking and unconcerned about its sinful idolatry, never having yearned for deliverance, Moab went to rot.

Jeremiah’s metaphorical language conveys a sense of stagnation and lack of transformation. Despite being a nation that had been established for a long time, Moab had never undergone significant changes or been refined through challenging experiences. As a result, the character and behaviour of the Moabites remained unchanged, they were self-assured and unyielding. This important verse condemns Moab’s pride and self-reliance, suggesting that their failure to grow spiritually and morally would lead to their downfall and judgment from God. Devastation would come upon Moab as a consequence of their actions.

After the public reading of the law a ‘separation’ (Ezr 9:1; 10:11; Neh 10:28) of ‘the mixture’ took place. Not just Ammonites and Moabites were separated, but all foreigners. Intermarriage with the Canaanite nations had been forbidden because family relationships with idolators was perceived as likely to cause a turning away from the worship of Yahweh, the one true God (Deut 7:3-4). This problem seems to have plagued the Israelites throughout their history. During the era of Ezra and Nehemiah at least three attempts were made over a period of thirty years (468-429 BCE) to resolve the issue. Although these measures were fairly drastic (e.g. mass divorce, covenant not to intermarry), they were not entirely successful (Ezra 9-10; Neh 9:2; 10:28-30; 13:1-3). Nehemiah returns to the topic of unacceptable marriages later in the chapter.

The New Testament teaches the same general principle; that when it comes to spiritual matters a mixture never produces positive results. Every so often there must be a return to the word of God; accompanied by self-assessment leading to remedial action. 2 Corinthians 6:14-18:

‘Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.’

Nehemiah 13:4-14

Nehemiah 13:15-31

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

Posted on by writtenexposition

Ezekiel’s vision of the glory of the Lord is one of the most famous passages in the Bible. It is an elaborate, powerful and awe-inspiring description of God’s presence and majesty. Here is a summary of the key elements of the vision:

SUMMARY

The vision begins with Ezekiel seeing a great storm coming from the north. The storm is accompanied by lightning, thunder, and a brilliant light. In the centre of this light, Ezekiel sees what appears to be four living creatures. Each creature has four faces and four wings. Their legs are straight, and their feet resemble those of a calf. Their faces represent different aspects of creation: a human face, a lion face, an ox face, and an eagle face. These living creatures move with incredible speed and coordination, and their wings touch one another as they move.

The vision continues with Ezekiel seeing wheels, described as ‘terrifying’ (1:18), beside the living creatures. The wheels are covered in eyes and travel along with the living creatures, following their movements without turning.

Above the heads of the living creatures, Ezekiel sees a firmament (dome) that resembles a crystal expanse. Above it is a throne-like structure that appears like sapphire, and upon the throne is a figure that looks like a man. This figure shines with a brilliant light and is surrounded by a radiance that resembles a rainbow.

The vision concludes with Ezekiel understanding that this extraordinary sight represents the glory of the Lord.

COMMENTS

From verse four Ezekiel attempts to describe what he sees. The opening words are ‘And I saw.’ The expression occurs again in vv. 15 and 27.

He observes a whirlwind, symbolizing a powerful and dynamic force, coming from the north. Jeremiah also spoke of God’s judgement as a whirlwind (23:19; 25:32). In the ancient Near East there was a notion that the gods dwelt in the north. Ancient Canaanites (e.g. Hurrians, Hittites) believed that Baal lived at Mount Zaphon (zaphon became the Hebrew word for northward, the direction ‘north’). The Babylonians also believed that the gods resided in the north. Isa 14:13 refers to this belief by the nations. In Job 26:7; 37:22 the north is viewed as the opposite of earth; perhaps suggesting heaven as God’s home.

Israelites associated ‘the north’ with threats from hostile forces like Assyria and Babylonia. Ezekiel later prophesies that the final invasion of Israel before complete restoration will come from the north (38:6,15). From Ezekiel’s perspective, it is also the direction from which the Babylonian army will invade Judah.

The whirlwind is accompanied by a great cloud with blazing fire that seems to be consuming itself. In the Bible theophanies (appearances of God) are often described in terms of an atmospheric storm (Ex 19:16-18; Deut 33:2; Judg 5:4; Job 38:1; 40:6; Psa 18:7–15; 29:3–9; 50:3; 97:1-5; 104:3; Isa 29:6; Jer 23:19; Nah 1:3; Hab 3:8-15; Zech 9:14).

The cloud contains a fire, of which Ezekiel says ‘and a brightness about it.’ This is repeated in 1:27. The same word is used in Dan 12:3 of the brightness of heaven. The brightness and radiance of the fire are ‘like’ amber, which suggests a golden, glowing colour. The LXX and Vulgate translate ‘amber’ as ‘electrum’ – a shiny metal compounded of four parts gold and one silver (white gold). The only biblical occurrences of the word are in Ezekiel 1:4, 27; 8:2.

The storm, cloud and fire are symbols of wrath which together communicate the idea of the awe-inspiring presence and majesty of God.

Notice that Ezekiel avoids speaking of Yahweh in tangible terms. He describes God in the language of simile, using the terms ‘like’, ‘as’, ‘appearance’ or ‘likeness’ (1;4, 5, 13,16, 22, 24, 26, 27). Yahweh is indescribable, thus Ezekiel uses these words meaning ‘as it were’.

Within the whirlwind and fire, Ezekiel sees the ‘likeness’ of four living creatures (ḥayyāh -wild animals, as opposed to domestic animals). Verses 5b-14 give a description of these creatures. They have a human-like appearance, which probably implies that they possess intelligence and understanding. Each of them has (one head with) four faces, and four wings. Obviously supernatural beings, they are identified as cherubim in Ezek 10:1-22.

Ezekiel notes that their legs are straight, resembling the legs of a calf. Probably each creature has just one leg (Heb: ‘a straight foot’) with a hoof like a calf’s hoof, but, since Ezekiel says they were humanoid (presumably one head, human hands), he may mean that they have two legs each. Their hooves have a sparkling appearance, reminiscent of burnished bronze. The legs are described as ‘straight’. Some interpret this as meaning that the legs are parallel, others that they have no knee joints by which to bend their legs. This would imply that they never sit or lie down; they are constantly on the move.

1:10 describes the faces in some detail.

Lion – fearsome beast – Num 23:24; 24:9; Judg 14:18; 2 Sam 1:23.

Eagle – magnificent bird – Deut 28:49; 2 Sam 1:23; Job 39:27-30; Jer 48:40; Lam 4:19.

Ox – prized domestic animal – Ex 21:35- 22:15; Job 21:10; Prov 14:4.

Man – rules over over the animal kingdom – Gen 1:28; Psa 8:6-8.

From Ezekiel’s viewpoint (the south) coming towards him from the north was the human face at the front, the eagle face behind, the lion face to the right, the ox face to the left. In Ezekiel 10:14 the ox face has been changed to the face of a cherub and is called ‘the first face’.

In 1:8-9 and again in 1:11-12 their wings and movement are described. The four beings are connected to each other by two wings, thus forming a square. Two expressions are used in 1:9 and again in 1:12 to describe their movement:

a) ‘they turned not when they went’ and

b) ‘they went every one straight forward’.

Later, in v.24, Ezekiel describes the noise of the wings.

There are four wheels, representing mobility, under the four creatures. Each has the appearance of a wheel spinning within a wheel. They are described in vv. 15-21. The high rims (rings , v.18) are full of eyes – symbolizing the Lord’s omniscience (2 Chron 16:9; Zech 4:10, cp Rev 4:6, 8).

1:19-21 The wheels and the creatures move together as directed by the spirit. In 1:4 rûaḥ (wind, mind, breath, spirit) is translated ‘wind’, but in v.12 it is generally read as ‘spirit’. ‘The spirit of the living creature was in the wheels’ is usually interpreted as referring to the divine spirit. The LXX and Vulgate, however, render it ‘the spirit of life’, i.e. the life-giving spirit of the Lord. It may be, however, that Ezekiel just means that propulsion comes from the wind created by the whirling of the wheels. Ezek 10:13 says: ‘As for the wheels, they were called in my hearing the whirling wheels.’ (ESV). The cherubim look straight ahead, not up, as they move along.

Verse 22 introduces the firmament (dome, broad expanse, platform) above the heads of the four creatures (‘living creature’ – collective noun in the singular, see v.16 ‘the four had one likeness’). The best known use of this word ‘firmament’ is in Gen 1:6 where it is used of the heavens in the description of the second day of creation.

Although the passage primarily focuses on the visual aspects of Ezekiel’s vision we learn that his revelatory experience contained audio as well (1:24, 25, 28). In connection with the platform being borne by the creature Ezekiel mentions the great noise made by the wings (v.24). It is like ‘the noise of many waters’, ‘the sound of the Almighty’, and ‘the tumult of an army’. Ezekiel not only hears the noise of the wings below the expanse but also when the creatures let down their wings and stand still he hears a voice (or noise, sound) coming from above it; from the throne of the Lord.

The throne seems to be made of sapphire, which is blue in colour (see also 10:1). Elsewhere Micaiah the son of Imlah (1 Kgs 22:19) and Isaiah (Isa 6:1) saw Yahweh sitting on a throne. Above the throne Ezekiel sees a human figure. This is the appearance of the kabod (glory, lit. weight) of Yahweh in human form (1:28).

From the loins up (in everyday speech we would probably say: ‘from the waist’) this figure has the colour of amber and from that area downward the appearance of fire. The complete figure is enshrouded by a brightness that shines like a rainbow. Light is the overwhelming feature of the Lord’s presence since all the main parts of the vision (creatures, wheels, firmament, throne) are described in terms of fire and colour. The following colours are mentioned:

  • amber -1:4, 27
  • burnished brass (polished bronze) – 1:7
  • the colour of a beryl – 1:16
  • the colour of the terrible (awe-inspiring) crystal i.e. ice, frost – 1:22
  • the appearance of sapphire – 1:26

The vision began with a storm (1:4), in v. 28 the mention of a rainbow suggests that the vision is now over. Ezekiel is overwhelmed by the experience and reacts by falling on his face. He then hears a voice speaking to him.

SUMMATION

The function of this first vision in the book of Ezekiel is to validate Ezekiel’s claim to be a prophet of the Lord. His experience of the theophany / encounter with the kabod of the Lord establishes his prophetic authority. The vision proves that Ezekiel is not like the other Israelite exiles in Babylon. He sees and hear things that they cannot see or hear and must therefore act as a messenger of God’s word to them. The splendour of the glory of the Lord serves as a powerful affirmation of Ezekiel’s prophetic commission and will motivate and give him confidence to proclaim God’s messages to the people.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

‘AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in General

COME, SEE, GO, TELL

Posted on by writtenexposition

Matthew 28:5-7

5 ‘And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified.
6 He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.
7 And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead;’

In these verses from Matthew’s gospel there are four verbs which, for me, sum up the message of Easter. The four words are imperatives, i.e. they give an order or instruction. They are commands.  COME, SEE, GO, TELL.

The Lord Jesus had been betrayed by Judas Iscariot, forsaken by his disciples, denied by Peter, tried by the Jewish and Roman authorities, sentenced by Pontius Pilate, crucified at Calvary, and buried in a new tomb belonging to Joseph of Arimathea. Afterwards, on the morning of the first day of the week, some women came to the garden tomb to anoint the body of Jesus with spices. Would they be able to gain access?

When they arrived they were surprised to find that there had been a great earthquake and a large stone that sealed the entrance to the tomb had been rolled back by an angel. He said that they were not to fear and that he knew that they were seeking Jesus. So he told them to ‘come.’

COME!

The Bible contains many invitations! The word “come” occurs often in the Bible. The first mention is in Gen. 7:1 when God called Noah and his family to come into the ark so that they might be saved from the flood. For Noah and his family to be saved they had accept the Lord’s invitation. This is still true today.

Jesus issued that same invitation in Matthew 11:28. ‘Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.’ That invitation still goes out to all who labour under the heavy burden of sin and guilt. Come, by faith, to the one who is no longer in the tomb! He has risen from the dead and is now in heaven! Come to Jesus who offers forgiveness, support and relief!


SEE!

The words ‘look’ and ‘see’ are similar but not exactly the same in meaning. When we casually look at something, we may not fully grasp what we are looking at. We may not comprehend the significance. By contrast, when we truly ‘see’ something we understand it. The angel wanted the women to ‘see’ (grasp and understand) that the tomb was empty; that Christ had risen from the dead and is alive forever.

GO!

The women were told to go. There was no suggestion or intention that from then on they should just stare into the empty tomb. As soon as we reach the point of seeing the empty tomb and trusting the living Lord Jesus Christ as Saviour, we must ‘go’. We ought to go and learn more about him. We should go to him in prayer. We need to go and fellowship with like-minded believers (Acts 2:42).

TELL!

The women were instructed to tell the disciples about the resurrection. We too ought to tell the good news to those who are lost and dying. It is neither necessary nor practical for everyone to be involved in missionary activity abroad. You can do it wherever you are. In Mark 5 a demon-possessed man who was healed by Jesus wanted to journey with the Lord but was told instead to go home to his friends and tell the great things the Lord had done for him (Mk 5:19).

Have you COME? Do you SEE? If so, GO and live for him and TELL others about what he has done for you.

‘He is not here: for he is risen!’

The message of Easter is COME, SEE, GO, TELL

Posted in General

‘TOGETHER’ AS CHRISTIANS

Posted on by writtenexposition

QUICKENED (MADE ALIVE) TOGETHER – EPHESIANS 2:5

Even when we were dead in sins, [God] hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

RAISED TOGETHER – EPHESIANS 2:6a

And hath raised us up together,

SEATED TOGETHER – EPHESIANS 2:6b

and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:

GATHERED TOGETHER – MATTHEW 18:20

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

STRIVING TOGETHER – PHILIPPIANS 1:27

Only let your conversation be as it becometh the gospel of Christ: that whether I come and see you, or else be absent, I may hear of your affairs, that ye stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel;

TALKING TOGETHER – LUKE 24:14

And they talked together of all these things which had happened.

LIVING TOGETHER – 1 THESSALONIANS 5:10

Who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with him.

Posted in Exposition

WELCOME TO THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL!

Posted on by writtenexposition

Welcome to Ezekiel! What are today’s readers to make of this strange book, and of this weird prophet – someone who saw visions of fire, wheels and creatures with multiple wings and faces, and who shaved off his hair with a sword and did not mourn his own wife’s death? 

He was one of the writing prophets, men who were convinced that God spoke to them and through them. Their all-holy God controlled not just his own people but also the surrounding pagan nations and would definitely judge sin. Eventually, however, he would restore his people and all creation. When did they write?

These prophets were active for several centuries after the time of King Solomon. Following his death in 931 BCE the kingdom divided into two territories: Israel to the North and Judah in the South.

THE PRE-EXILIC PROPHETS

The prophets addressing Israel (and the approximate dates of their ministries) were;

Jonah c. 780 -753 BCE

Amos c. 765-753 BCE

Hosea c. 755-725 BCE

 In 722/721 BCE the Northern nation Israel was taken into captivity in Assyria and the Southern nation, Judah, continued as an independent state.

The early pre-exilic prophets in Judah were:

Micah c. 735-690 BCE

Isaiah c. 740-680 BCE

The late pre-exilic prophets in Judah were:

Nahum c. 630 BCE

Zephaniah c. 625 BCE

Habakkuk c. 607 BCE

Joel c. 590 BCE

Jeremiah c. 627-580 BCE

In 587/586 BCE the city of Jerusalem fell to the Babylonian army and there was a mass deportation of Jews to Babylon .

THE EXILIC PROPHETS

Obadiah ? c. 585 BCE – we do not know when he prophesied.

Ezekiel c. 593-571 BCE

Daniel c. 605-535 BCE

THE POST-EXILIC PROPHETS

Haggai 520 BCE

Zechariah c. 520-500 BCE

Malachi c 420 BCE

Daniel (Dan chp. 1) had been taken to Babylon in 605 BCE when Nebuchadnezzar invaded Judah under King Jehoiakim after defeating the Egyptians at the battle of Carchemish (see Jer 46.) Some years later (597 BCE), ten years before the fall of Jerusalem in 587 and the Exile, Nebuchadnezzar deported King Jehoiachin of Judah and ten thousand of the political and religious elite into captivity in Babylon. Ezekiel was one of those elite. 2 Kings 24:8-16:

8 Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother’s name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem.

9 And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father had done.

10 At that time the servants of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up against Jerusalem, and the city was besieged.

11 And Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came against the city, and his servants did besiege it.

12 And Jehoiachin the king of Judah went out to the king of Babylon, he, and his mother, and his servants, and his princes, and his officers: and the king of Babylon took him in the eighth year of his reign.

13 And he carried out thence all the treasures of the house of the LORD, and the treasures of the king’s house, and cut in pieces all the vessels of gold which Solomon king of Israel had made in the temple of the LORD, as the LORD had said.

14 And he carried away all Jerusalem, and all the princes, and all the mighty men of valour, even ten thousand captives, and all the craftsmen and smiths: none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of the land.

15 And he carried away Jehoiachin to Babylon, and the king’s mother, and the king’s wives, and his officers, and the mighty of the land, those carried he into captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon.

16 And all the men of might, even seven thousand, and craftsmen and smiths a thousand, all that were strong and apt for war, even them the king of Babylon brought captive to Babylon.

Ezekiel was therefore in exile in Babylon during the final siege and fall of Jerusalem. Although based far away in Babylon, he prophesied to the people living back in the homeland, Judah.

Ezekiel wrote in the first person throughout his long and complex book which is is grim and intimidating. He experienced strange visions and often dwelt on God’s wrath. The Book of Ezekiel, however, is quite easy to follow as it is highly organized and precise. The prophet records the dates of sixteen revelations and for eleven of those he gives the year, the month and the day (1:2; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:21; 33:21; 40:1).

Posted in General

‘EBENEZER’

Posted on by writtenexposition

Closing message on our last Sunday with our church before moving to live elsewhere.

1 Samuel 7:12 ‘EBENEZER’

‘Then Samuel took a stone, and set it between Mizpeh and Shen, and called the name of it Ebenezer, saying, Hitherto hath the Lord helped us.’ 1 Samuel 7:12

There is a certain form of words occurring throughout our Bible which makes a very interesting study. I’ll mention the following example references:

Deuteronomy chapters 31-34 – the speaker is Moses.

Joshua chapters 23-24 – the speaker is Joshua.

1 Samuel chapter 12 – the speaker is Samuel.

1 Kings chapter 2 and also 1 Chronicles chapters 28 -29 – the speaker is David,

Luke chapter 22 and also John chapters 13-17 – the speaker is the Lord Jesus Christ.

Acts chapter 20 – the speaker is the apostle Paul.

You may have already realized that in these chapters we have what scholars term ‘THE FAREWELL ADDRESS.’

You will be relieved to know, although this is our last Sunday here, that I am not about to deliver a long farewell speech.

Instead I would like to leave this verse from 1 Samuel with you, not only because it is my favourite Bible verse but also because we have experienced, and can testify to, its truth. Today we look back over the 32 years since we walked in the door of the old building one Sunday morning in September 1989, with two small children in tow and not knowing anyone in this part of the world.

Ebenezer is an unusual name. Personally, I don’t know anyone called Ebenezer. Unless familiar with the Bible most people would probably recall it as the name of the miser Scrooge in Charles Dicken’s story, ‘A Christmas Carol’ – but Ebenezer Scrooge bears no relation to the Ebenezer of the Bible because:

The biblical Ebenezer was not a person, it was a place.

The biblical Ebenezer was not a scrooge, it was a stone.

The biblical Ebenezer was not a miser, it was a marker.

In 1 Samuel chapters 4-7 you can read for yourselves the historical background to Samuel’s erection of this stone monument. Sufficient to say that for a long period of time the ancient Israelites forgot God and had consequently suffered defeat at the hands of their neighbours, the Philistines. These enemies captured the Ark of the Lord, which was gone for twenty years (7:2). After a national turning to the Lord, however, and intercession on the part of Samuel, the Philistines were defeated. Samuel then set up the memorial stone as a reminder to the people of the faithfulness of God to those who trust in him alone.

As we review more than three decades spent here:

EBENEZER REMINDS US OF THE PAST

Looking back we recognise God’s help and protection in our lives. There have been many good times and some difficult times; there has been employment and also unemployment; there has been health and there has been sickness. However, we can honestly say: ‘Ebenezer …. Hitherto hath the Lord helped us.’ Had we set up a memorial stone for every occasion on which the Lord helped us there would be a long trail of gratitude behind us, stretching back over thirty-two years. As well as reminding us of the past…

EBENEZER DIRECTS US TO THE PRESENT

‘Hitherto’ means ‘up to now’ and that, of course, includes the present time. We can therefore be confident that the Lord who has helped us in the past is now helping us in the present. The One who HAS helped us is STILL helping us. As we undergo the stress of uprooting our lives and moving to one of the other countries in the UK ‘Ebenezer’ reminds us to be thankful for what the Lord is doing now.

Ebenezer reminds us of the past.

Ebenezer directs us to the present, but also:

EBENEZER POINTS US TO THE FUTURE

When we get to a certain point in time and can still say ‘hitherto’ that means that we haven’t reached the end yet. The Lord has more to do, for us and with us, and he will help us until our lives on earth come to a close. I suppose that as we contemplate the future we can change the ‘hitherto hath the Lord helped us’ to ‘henceforth the Lord will help us’.

Let me publicly pay tribute to all the members of this church (to the many who have already gone to be with the Lord, and to you all who remain) and thank you for your fellowship, your friendship, your kindness to us and your confidence in us as we have fulfilled our various roles and responsibilities in this assembly.

We brought up our children here and are thankful that, at a young age, both of them placed their trust in Jesus Christ for eternal salvation. Thank you for providing a loving and caring atmosphere in which we could raise our family and for being a positive Christian influence upon young lives.

We ask you to pray for us as we assume a nomadic lifestyle for a few months, that the Lord will guide us as to where we ought to settle down and live in retirement and that we might be of help in whatever assembly of Christians we meet with.

I trust that you all (individually and as an assembly of believers) will continue to experience the Lord’s help and blessing and be able to say, as we can: ‘Ebenezer …. hitherto hath the Lord helped us.’

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 4 :1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

Posted on by writtenexposition

Division of the chapter:

4:1-6 Suffering as Christ suffered

4:7-19 Suffering as a Christian

Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: Wherein they think it strange that ye run not with them to the same excess of riot, speaking evil of you: Who shall give account to him that is ready to judge the quick and the dead. For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit. 4:1-6

4:1-6 Suffering as Christ suffered

4:1-5 Their death with Christ:

  • v.1 liberates them from the power of sin.
  • v.2 enables them to do God’s will.
  • vv.3-5 gives them a new perspective on sin.

4:6 The Christian martyrs:

  • were judged (and slain) by men
  • are alive unto God.

[1] ‘Since then Christ has suffered in the flesh’ looks back to 3:18 – ‘being put to death in the flesh’.

‘suffered’ – suffering can be taken as including death (Acts 17:3; Heb 13:12).

‘In the flesh’ – during this life on earth.

‘arm yourselves’ (hoplízō) This is a military term meaning to equip or furnish with arms. The Christian life is sometimes thought of as a war (Rom 6:13; 13:12; 2 Cor 6:7; 10:4; Eph 6:11-17; 1 Th 5:8).

‘with the same mind’ In light of Christ’s suffering Christians are to think as Christ thought about suffering. His mind was fixed and focused on the will of God (v. 2).

(énnoia) attitude of mind, thought, guiding conviction – that ‘death in the flesh’ results in ‘life in the spirit’ (3:18). They are to arm themselves with a willingness to suffer.

‘likewise’ and ‘the same’ – the experience of Christians is equated with that (death, resurrection, triumph) of Christ.

‘for’ (hóti) – if taken as explicative it introduces the explanation of ‘same mind’, if taken as causal (translate ‘because’) it is introducing the reason for the exhortation in verse 1a.

It is most likely causal, which also avoids any perception that ‘ceased from sin’ implies that Christ has been a sinner. Peter has already stated that Christ was sinless (2:22).

‘he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin.’ The idea is possibly that in water baptism a believer identifies himself with Christ’s suffering and death.

paúsō stop, come to an end. To be finished with something does not necessarily imply participation in it.

If the singular ‘he’ is taken as referring to Christ as the one who has ‘suffered in the flesh and ceased from sin’ in what sense, therefore, has Christ ‘finished with sin’? One could say that he is finished with it in that he no longer has to reckon with the opposing powers and perhaps also in that it is no longer something that he has to bear for mankind. His bearing sin for mankind was finished at the cross and in his resurrection he was victorious over death and the evil powers. His death has removed him from sin’s sphere of influence.

Since this verse links back to 3:18, in which suffering and death seem to be equivalent, Peter could use the term ‘suffer’ here to speak of both the death of Christ and the suffering of Christians and draw an analogy between the two.

[2] By their willingness to suffer for righteousness’ sake the Christians demonstrate that they have made made a clean break with sin and have committed themselves to a new way of life.

‘The rest of…time in the flesh’ This refers not simply to the remainder of their earthly lives but also to the fact that the End is near (see v.7).

[3] ‘The time past of our life may suffice us’ Referring to their previous lifestyle Peter uses irony to tell them that they have wasted ‘more than enough’ time living in immorality. They were living ‘according to the wish of the Gentiles’. Peter uses ‘Gentiles’ here to refer to the local pagans – who are not Christians, rather than to people who are not Jews. Note the contrast between ‘the will of God’ (v.2) and the ‘will of the Gentiles’ (v.3).

Peter divides the Christian life into two parts. The first is ‘the time that has passed’ which is characterized by sinful practices (v.3 ff). The second part is the time that remains (v.2).

‘When we walked in’ is followed by a short list of vices (cp. Gal 5:19-21):

lasciviousness – asélgeia, sensuousness, no moral restraint.

lusts – epithumía, passions, cravings, sinful desires

excess of wine – oinophlugía, intoxications

revellings kṓmos, revelries, immoral parties

banquetings pótos, drinking bouts, drunken parties

abominable idolatries – athémitoi eidōlolatreíai, lawless idolatries, acts of idol worship

[4] ‘wherein’ refers to the content of v. 3. Contrast with the ‘wherein’ of 1:6. Non-Christians think it strange that the Christians no longer involve themselves in such social activities. The pagan neighbours ‘speak evil’ of the Christians because they do not rush with them (stampede) to the same ‘excess of riot’ (indulgence that is unrestrained).

The word for ‘speak evil’ is blasphēméō which, as well as meaning ‘ to blaspheme’ (Mt 9:3; Rom 2:24) can mean ‘to speak slanderously’ (Rom 3:8, 1 Cor 10:30; Tit 3:2).

[5] Those who vilify the Christians will be accountable to ‘him that is ready to judge the quick and the ‘dead’. The use of ‘ready’ implies that the judgement will be soon.

Who is the judge? Thus far in 1 Peter God the Father is viewed as the judge (1:17, 2:23). Generally, however, the New Testament teaches that God has committed this task to Christ (Mt 25:31-46; Lk 24:46; Acts 10:42, 17:31; Rom 14:10; 1 Cor 4:5; 2 Tim 4:1).

[6] Having mentioned the thought of judgement and its imminence Peter now makes a rather obscure statement: ‘For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.’

‘For’ links back to the mention of judgement and ‘this cause’ (this is why) refers forward to the day of judgement. The author is stating why the gospel was preached to dead people. Although there is no article here (it is not ‘the dead’) and thus the reference is to dead people in general Peter may be thinking of Christians who had already died (cp. 1 Thess 4:13-18) before the Day of Judgement. The early church expected a swift return by Christ. The Second Coming would involve judgement by Christ of the living and of those who were already dead (Acts 10:42; Rom 14:9-12; 2 Tim 4:1).

‘the gospel was preached’. Grammatically euaggelízō (to proclaim or tell) has no subject so we could read ‘it was preached’ or ‘he was preached’.

If taken as the impersonal ‘it was preached’ then Christ could have been the one who preached. In addition, the aorist tense refers to a definite occasion in the past when the preaching occurred.

It is unlikely, however, that this verse refers to the same preaching event as that of 3:19 as there the preaching was to spirits (pneúma) whereas here the preaching was to dead human beings (nekrós). ‘Dead’ refers to their present state but the ‘preaching’ occurred when they were alive. The gospel was preached to those who are dead.

Peter gives two reasons why the gospel was preached to these early believers:

a) that they might be judged according to men in the flesh.

b) that they might live according to God in the spirit.

The idea seems to be that these early Christians glorified God through martyrdom (see vv. 12-14). They were judged according to men (as men judge i.e. by appearances and unfairly) but once dead they leave the condemnation of men behind and enjoy eternal life. Jobes (2005, pp. 312-312) points out:

‘In the immediate context, Peter’s point is that death does not exempt a person from God’s coming judgment. Accountability after death was not widely taught in the pagan world. With such an assumption a pagan critic could reasonably question what good the gospel is, since it seems so restrictive of behavior in this life, and then the believer dies like everyone else. Peter, however, teaches that because people will be judged even after physical death, contra pagan expectation, the gospel message of forgiveness and judgment that has been preached to those who are now dead—whether they became believers or not—is still efficacious. Death does not invalidate either the promises or the warnings of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Peter’s claim not only would warn the unbeliever but would also encourage Christians concerning believers who may have passed on. Peter reassures his readers that the efficacy of the gospel continues after physical death to be the basis for God’s judgment, and therefore a decision to live for Christ in this life is truly the right decision, even despite appearances to the contrary as judged by the world’s reasoning.’

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 John 2:15-17

Posted on by writtenexposition

We have previously noticed that in the section 2:12-27 the author tells his first readers precisely why he has written this letter to them. The first reason, given in 2:12-14, is their spiritual state. Now, in 2:15-17, we have John’s second reason for writing: because of the enticements of the world.

THE ENTICEMENTS OF THE WORLD

No matter how good their spiritual state might be John was aware that the danger of worldliness was ever present. He therefore warns them to beware of it.

[15] A COMMAND

Rather than just offer one or two helpful suggestions John issues a firm command: ‘love not the world neither the things that are in the world’. This is the first of ten imperatives in 1 John. See the ten listed at:

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Although the ‘world’ (kósmos) can refer to people (e.g. John 3:16) here it seems to refer to the world system. Kósmos carries the idea of order or arrangement.

Lambert Dolphin makes the following useful comments on ‘the world:

‘The “world-system” involves a concern for external appearances more than inner content and quality. As used in the New Testament, the world does not refer to nature, but to the world-system, to society and human culture. The world system is outwardly religious, scientific, cultured and elegant. Inwardly it seethes with national and commercial rivalries.’

Much is said about the world in 1 John. See 2:2, 16-17; 3:1, 13; 4:3-5, 9, 14, 17; 5:4, 19.

[15] A CONCLUSION

‘If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.’

If a professing Christian is wholly taken up with love for the world John would conclude that such a person is not a genuine believer at all, for this behaviour is incompatible with love for God.

[16] A CHARACTERIZATION

Everything that is in the world system does not come from the Father. This system of values, goals and ethics excludes God and is opposed to God (5:19).

John identifies three elements othat characterize worldliness:

a) ‘The lust of the flesh’. Lusts (desires or cravings) of the flesh refers to human bodily appetites.

b) ‘The lust of the eyes’. This would refer to the human tendency to want what we see. We are naturally covetous and acquisitive.

c) ‘The pride of life’. This is a reminder of human showiness and the wish to impress others with one’s own importance.

The world encourages and caters to these perspectives. N.B. Some see the sin of Eve (Gen 3:6) as illustrating these three elements of worldiness: ‘the tree was good for food’, ‘it was pleasant to the eyes’, ‘a tree to be desired to make one wise’.

[17] A CONFIRMATION

John observes that worldiness is a craving for things that will soon pass away and confirms that whoever does the will of God will ‘live’ (ménō, abide, remain) forever. The idea of ‘abiding’ is that of living in fellowship with God. Such a life is viewed as never really coming to an end.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted on by writtenexposition

1. Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. 2:15

2. Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. 2:24

3. Abide in him. 2:27

4. Abide in him. 2:28

5. Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, 3:1

6. Let no man deceive you. 3:7

7. Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you. 3:13

8. Believe not every spirit. 4:1

9. Try the spirits. 4:1

10. Keep yourselves from idols. 5:21