Jerusalem – Written Exposition

Ezekiel 24:15-27: The Death of Ezekiel’s Wife

Posted on 11th Dec 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 24 opens with YHWH revealing to the prophet on 15 January, 588 BCE that the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem has begun that very day. Ezekiel then delivers the parable of the cooking pot to his fellow-exiles. It depicts Jerusalem as a cauldron filled with ‘choice cuts’ (its inhabitants) set on a blazing fire (the siege). The pot has corrosion (the bloodguilt and violence that characterises the city). Its contents must be emptied into the fire; then the pot will be heated until red hot in order to be purified.

This next section (24:15-27) transforms the metaphor of the cooking pot into a tragic living reality for Ezekiel. Just as the siege is announced to Ezekiel in 24:1 by a word from YHWH likewise he is informed of his forthcoming personal loss by a specific divine word in 24:15. That word commands Ezekiel to use his personal grief to perform a prophetic sign-act to the exiles.

DIVISION

15-18 YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE
19-24 EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION
25-27 YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY

EXPOSITION

YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE (15-18)

This section (24:15-27) begins with YHWH addressing Ezekiel using the customary prophetic word formula ‘son of Adam.’ The oracle that follows focuses on a tragic personal loss for Ezekiel. YHWH will suddenly (‘at a blow’) take away the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ but Ezekiel is forbidden to mourn, weep, shed tears, sigh aloud, cover his beard, eat the bread of men, or sit barefoot and bareheaded.

It is unclear whether that which is forbidden is petitionary mourning (as in Joel 1:13-14) in response to the announcement – i.e. asking the Lord to reverse his decision – or posthumous mourning; after the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ has died. The traditional view is that posthumous mourning is in view. Once the ‘delight of his eyes’ is taken away Ezekiel is not to engage in a traditional public show of grief. The acts of mourning which are forbidden are ritual rather than emotional. Emotional mourning is permitted; he can mourn inwardly and sigh softly but must eat, drink and dress as normal.

It is only when we come to v.18 that we learn that Ezekiel’s ‘dearest treasure’ (NLT) is his wife: So I spake unto the people in the morning: and at even my wife died; and I did in the morning as I was commanded. This is reported in the first person (‘I’) but Ezekiel does not tell us his wife’s name or age and does not indicate how he felt or thought when his loved one’s imminent death was announced.

The fulfilment of the prophecy is swift but the timeline is unclear. Do the two mentions of ‘morning’ refer to the same morning or two different mornings?

Ezekiel delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning and immediately complies with YHWH’s instructions (that same morning). Then his wife dies that evening. OR
He delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning, his wife dies that evening and he obeys YHWH’s command the following morning.

The second possibility is the most commonly accepted. In either case he has little time to process his grief. I did . . . as I was commanded is a striking example of immediate and total obedience to the word of the Lord – at great personal cost.

EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION (19-24)

Doubtless aware of Ezekiel’s love for his wife the exiles are shocked by his violation of the expected social and religious norms of mourning. They realise that this is a symbolic act and so they ask him for an interpretation of the sign and how it applies to them: And the people said unto me, Wilt thou not tell us what these things are to us, that thou doest so? This is the only occasion in the book when the exiles directly address the prophet Ezekiel – normally what they say is quoted to Ezekiel by YHWH.

Ezekiel answers their brief question by telling them that a word from YHWH came to him, telling him what he was to communicate to the people. The thrust of the message is that Ezekiel’s behaviour in the aftermath of his wife’s death is a prescriptive sign to the exiles. It shows how they ought to respond to the fall of the city of Jerusalem and specifically the temple. The death of Ezekiel’s wife is an analogy for the ‘death’ of the temple. The exiles’ response to that ought to mirror Ezekiel’s response to his wife’s death.

YHWH (v.21) intends to desecrate his sanctuary (by the blood of Judah’s slain sons and daughters and the presence of foreigners). The temple is the pride of the people’s power (cf. Lev 26:19), the desire of their eyes and that with which they have sympathy – i.e. they cherish the temple because to them it represents the glory and strength of the nation.

Notice that in vv.22-24 the collective response of the exiles to the fall of the sanctuary is to mirror the individual response of Ezekiel to the death of his wife. There are obvious parallels;

in v.17 Ezekiel’s wife is the delight of his eyes, in v.21 the sanctuary is the delight of the people’s eyes.
Like Ezekiel in vv.16-17 the people (vv.22-23) are not to publicly mourn, weep, cover their lips, eat the bread of men or go about bareheaded and barefoot.

Covering the upper lip seems to have been a sign of shame and sorrow, cf. Lev 13:45; Mic3:7. ‘The bread of men’ refers to food brought to the bereaved by family and friends. Other descriptions of mourning occur in Ezekiel 7:18 and 27:30-31.

The exiles are to imitate Ezekiel – he is a sign to them:

And ye shall do as I have done: Ezek 24:22
according to all that he hath done shall ye do: Ezek 24:24

In addition (v.23), they are to pine away (cf. 4:17; 33:10) for (on account of) their iniquities and groan one to another. Their grief will be compounded by the recognition that they have brought this disaster upon themselves because of their sin. They are not to make a public display of mourning but rather groan because of conviction of their guilt. The exiles share responsibility with those in Judah for the destruction of the city and the temple.

When the disaster comes the people of Judah and the exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord

YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY (25-27)

Addressing himself to Ezekiel personally – thou son of man – YHWH refers to the false hope that the Judahites have placed in the temple, the city and future generations. They have considered these to be their strength (stronghold), joy, glory, delight and heart’s desire. Soon all will be taken from them.

As for Ezekiel, an eyewitness will escape the destruction of the city of Jerusalem and bring confirmation of its fall to him in Babylonia. Since his call Ezekiel has been mute (3:26-27), speaking only when he receives a direct oracle from YHWH, but on the day the messenger arrives Ezekiel’s speech will be restored, his silent mourning will end and his ministry enter a new phase. That too will be a sign to the exiles and they will recognise the presence of YHWH. This prophecy is fulfilled in 33:21-22.

SUMMATION

The death of Ezekiel’s wife symbolises the impending destruction of the Jerusalem temple by the Babylonian forces of Nebuchadnezzar and emphasises the severity and finality of the coming judgement. The prophet’s personal tragedy demonstrates that YHWH’s judgement is irrevocable and his muted grief is a prophetic sign of how the people should and would react to the coming destruction.

Up to this point Ezekiel has been proclaiming YHWH’s judgement upon Jerusalem and Judah. The fall of the city and the temple will confirm that he is indeed a true prophet and that YHWH has been in control of events throughout as Ezekiel has said. With the fall of Jerusalem the old era will pass and the lifting of Ezekiel’s silence mark a new phase in his ministry. The exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord and on that basis future restoration can be built. With his status as a true prophet confirmed the people will listen to Ezekiel, whose ministry will transition from one that proclaims judgement to one that offers hope. But before moving on to the restoration section of his book (chapters 33-48) Ezekiel records oracles against some of Judah’s hostile neighbours (chapters 25-32).

Exposition

Psalm 100 – A Psalm Of Thanksgiving

Posted on 26th Nov 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

A PSALM OF PRAISE.
¹ Make a joyful noise unto the LORD, all ye lands.
² Serve the LORD with gladness: come before his presence with singing.
³ Know ye that the LORD he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.
⁴ Enter into his gates with thanksgiving, and into his courts with praise: be thankful unto him, and bless his name.
⁵ For the LORD is good; his mercy is everlasting; and his truth endureth to all generations.

INTRODUCTION

This short but well-known psalm has a superscription that is usually translated ‘A psalm of praise’ or ‘A psalm of/for thanksgiving.’ People who may not be fully familiar with Psalm 100 would, nevertheless, probably recognise the words of some old Christian hymns that its content has inspired. The two most famous are Thomas Ken’s doxology ‘Praise God from whom all blessings flow’ and the sixteenth century ‘All people that on earth do dwell’ – composed by John Calvin’s friend Louis Bourgeois and translated from French to English by William Kethe. Unfortunately neither of these hymns specifically mentions thanksgiving; however, ‘praise’ and ‘thanksgiving’ are more or less synonymous. This is explained by W. S. Plumer (1867, p.895) in his ‘Studies in the Book of Psalms:’

In our version the word rendered praise is elsewhere twice rendered praise, once sacrifice of praise, twice confession, about twenty times thanksgiving, once in the plural sacrifices of praise, thrice thanks, thrice thank offerings. The English version does not nicely discriminate between praise and thanksgiving. It is doubtful whether the Hebrew does, though some think differently. In v. 4 of this Psalm the word, rendered Praise in the title, is rendered thanksgiving. Many notice that no other Psalm has the same title as this.

The psalm is anonymous – its author is unknown – nor do we know when it was written or how it was used in Israelite liturgy. Some think that it was written by Moses, or is a psalm of David, others speculate that it was composed after the return from Babylonian exile for use in the restored temple worship.

Many scholars class it as a processional hymn sung by pilgrims at the entrance to the Temple (cf. v.4), others suggest that it was sung to accompany a thank-offering (cf. Lev 7:12) – but there is no mention of sacrifice in the psalm. Many things about the psalm are unknown but we do know from its title that Psalm 100 is a song of thanksgiving.

STRUCTURE AND CONTENT

Psalm 100 has a bipartite structure.

1-3 An Invitation to Worship the Lord
4-5 An Invitation to Thank and Praise the Lord

Each of these two sections contains an invitation expressed in 3 lines which is then followed by 3 reasons to comply (i.e. 3 calls followed by 3 causes).

1-3
Calls – make a joyful noise. . .; Serve the Lord. . .: Come before his presence. . .
Causes – the Lord he is God; he hath made us. . .; we are his people. . .

4-5
Calls – enter into his gates. . .; be thankful unto him; bless his name
Causes – the Lord is good; his mercy is everlasting; his truth endureth. . .

Notice:
Psalm 100 contains seven imperatives: make a noise; serve; come; know; enter; be thankful; bless.

References to the one who is the focus of Psalm 100: the Lord; him; he; his (people, sheep, pasture, gates, courts, name, mercy, truth).

EXPOSITION

1-3 An Invitation to Worship the Lord

(1)
Audible – the emphasis is on the loudness of the shout – like a fanfare acclaiming the Lord as king.

Joyful – worshipping the Lord should be a joyful act.

Global – this shout rings out across the world calling upon every person in every nation, not just Israel, to worship the one true God.

(2) The word ‘serve’ can refer to any type of work but here in the religious sense it equates to worship. This ought to be performed with an attitude of delight. The happiness and exuberance will express itself in ‘singing’ – a joyful shout – when they ‘come before his presence.’ The same word translated ‘come’ is translated ‘enter’ in v.4. ‘His presence’ is a reference to the Jerusalem temple which was regarded as the dwelling place of the Lord. This idea is developed further in v. 4.

(3) ‘He’ and ‘We’

He is God

The fourth imperative ‘know’ that follows on from the invitation to worship is very important because, in a world that has a wide variety of deities, it makes the exclusive claim that the Lord (YHWH) – Israel’s God – is the true God whose authority and sovereignty must be recognised and acknowledged. ‘The Lord, he is God’ – YHWH, the God of the Exodus, is Elohim – the true God.

The person who worships the Lord must be convinced in his/her own mind as to who he is – the one true God- and, having reached that verdict, celebrate him and renounce allegiance to all other deities.

He made us

If the Lord is the one true God then he is the creator (‘he hath made us’). He is all-powerful and we are dependent on him. The KJV reads ‘and not we ourselves’ but other versions translate this as ‘we are his.’ Alternatively, some scholars view this as an asseverative (earnest declaration) and translate it as ‘indeed;’ linking it with the next statement ‘we are his people.’ The Oxford Bible Commentary (2007, p.393) provides the following succinct explanation:

The Hebrew words ‘his’ (lit. ‘to him’) and ‘not’ are identical in sound but differ in spelling. Aquila, the Targum, and Jerome have ‘his’, as do all the most recent English translations, while the LXX, Symmachus, and the Syriac follow the alternative meaning, ‘and not we ourselves’, made familiar through the AV. . . A modern proposal is to take the word as a note of emphasis, producing: ‘and we are indeed his people’.

We are his

‘We are his people’ follows logically from the fact that he is our creator. He has made us and we are his by right therefore we owe allegiance to him. Some commentators interpret v.3 strictly as referring to Israel. They take ‘He has made us’ as a reference to YHWH making Israel a nation (e.g. Deut 32:6, 15: Do ye thus requite the LORD, O foolish people and unwise? is not he thy father that hath bought thee? hath he not made thee, and established thee? . . .But Jeshurun waxed fat, and kicked: thou art waxen fat, thou art grown thick, thou art covered with fatness; then he forsook God which made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation.). They view ‘we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture’ as referring to the redemption of the nation by the Exodus, freeing the Israelites from slavery in Egypt and bringing them into a covenant relationship with himself and leading and guiding them to The Promised Land.

For Christians this points to the greater, ultimate redemption accomplished by the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ on the cross. By it we are saved, rescued from the slavery of sin and death, brought into a relationship with God and guided through life’s wilderness until we reach heaven, our permanent dwelling place.

The pastoral metaphor of sheep and their shepherd(s) is a common one in the Bible (Psalm 23 ‘The Lord is my shepherd’ and Jesus as the Good Shepherd in Jn 10:1-30 are well-known). See also Psa 74:1; 78:70-72; 79:13; 80:1; Isa 40:11; 44:28; Jer 10:21; Ezek 34:1-24; Zech 10:3; 11:4-17. Those who are shepherded by the one true God do not recognise the authority of false shepherds – false deities – lifeless idols that cannot guide and care for their worshippers.

Thus far the psalmist has made it clear that in order to worship God there are certain things we must acknowledge (‘know’). The three things are: 1. that he is the one, true God; 2. that he has made us therefore we are dependent upon and accountable to him; 3. that as the people (‘his people’) of the Lord we have a privileged relationship with him; enjoying his ongoing care, protection and provision like sheep from a shepherd.

4-5 An Invitation to Thank and Praise the Lord

This second part of the psalm moves to the very substance of worship; thanksgiving and praise rendered to the Lord by his people. The scene shifts to the outer gate of the Jerusalem temple – the building where God’s presence dwells. The last three of the psalm’s seven imperative verbs are in this section and they invite believers to enter the Lord’s presence, in his courts give thanks to him and bless his name. These detail the attitude of entry into God’s presence, a believer does not come to God reluctantly in fear or out of a sense of obligation but with a heart that overflows with thanksgiving and adoration – an attitude of gratitude.

In v.4 (enter into his gates with thanksgiving) we have another occurrence of tôḏāh, translated ‘praise’ or ‘thanksgiving’ in the title of the psalm. One can imagine pilgrims entering the temple gates and processing jubilantly into the courts – a movement from the outside world into the serenity of a sacred zone. Thankful for redemption, a relationship with the Lord God and the blessings of salvation they joyfully enter the courts ‘with praise'(tehillāh, a song of praise’) and bless the name of the Lord.

Thanksgiving and praise are almost indistinguishable but perhaps we could say that thanksgiving is primarily our response to what the Lord has done. It is gratitude for his blessings, gifts, guidance and activities in our lives and acknowledgment of the benefits those have brought us. Thanksgiving says: ‘Thank you, Lord, for. . .’

Praise, however, is primarily our response to who the Lord is. Praise is exalting God for his attributes like power, love, holiness, justice and faithfulness; independent of anything he does for us. Praise says: ‘You are worthy, Lord, because you are. . .’

Interestingly, ‘bless his name’ seems to bring those two aspects, thanksgiving and praise, together. To ‘bless his name’ is to express thanksgiving and praise by acknowledging and declaring both who God is and what he has done.

Verse 5 begins with ‘For;’ thus giving the reasons why we ought to thank and praise the Lord.

a) ‘The Lord is good’ – verse 3 affirms that the Lord is God; now v.5 states that the Lord is good. The word ‘good’ carries meanings like: well-pleasing, fruitful, morally correct, proper. As such, the Lord is the source of all blessings.

b) ‘his mercy is everlasting’ – ḥeseḏ: ‘Mercy’ is a popular word in the Old Testament and signifies God’s kindness, lovingkindness, mercy, goodness, faithfulness, love, acts of kindness. It is sometimes translated as ‘steadfast love’ or ‘covenant love.’ It is the basis of God’s acts of kindness towards his people and is said to be ‘everlasting’ (from eternity). The Lord is dependable because having shown lovingkindness in the past he will continue to show it in the future. Thinking about this prompts the believer to worship and praise the Lord even more.

Note: goodness and mercy are often linked together, see 1 Chron 16:34; 2 Chron 5:13; Ezra 3:11; Psa 106:1; 107:1; 118:1; 136:1.

c) ‘his truth endureth to all generations’ – ‘Truth’ has the idea of faithfulness. In Deut 32:4 it is used to describe God’s character. The Lord keeps his promises, he can never fail for his faithfulness extends from one generation to another.

SUMMATION

Psalm 100 summons not just Israel but all people everywhere to worship God alone; the one, true God. The psalm focuses on the Lord and makes it clear that worshipping him is not a sombre duty but a happy response to who he is and what he has done. The believer is to enter God’s presence with thanksgiving and praise.

The main reason why there ought to be this response is the character of God himself. He is our God, our Creator and our Shepherd who is unchanging and fully dependable. He is good, his love endures forever and his faithfulness continues through all generations.

The superscription of the psalm identifies it as a psalm of thanksgiving. When thanksgiving is mentioned our minds immediately turn to temporal blessings such as family, friends, finances and the like. However, in just a few short verses, Psalm 100 digs deeper. It doesn’t just tell us to give thanks but points to the how, the why and the who behind true thanksgiving.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Barton, J. and Muddiman, J. (2007). The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Plumer, W.S. (1867). Studies in the Book of Psalms: Being a Critical and Expository Commentary : with Doctrinal and Practical Remarks on the Entire Psalter. Edinburgh: A. & C. Black

JOURNAL ARTICLES

‌Amzallag, N. (2014). The Meaning of todah in the Title of Psalm 100. Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 126(4). pp.535-545

‌DIGITAL RESOURCES

Hymnary.org. (2023). All People That on Earth Do Dwell. [online] Available at: https://hymnary.org/text/all_people_that_on_earth_do_dwell. accessed 26 November, 2025

Hymnary.org. (n.d.). Praise God From Whom All Blessings Flow. [online] Available at: https://hymnary.org/text/praise_god_from_whom_all_blessings_ken. accessed 26 November, 2025

‌

Exposition

Ezekiel 24:1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

Posted on 22nd Nov 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION TO EZEKIEL CHAPTER 24

Ezekiel 24 serves as the climactic turning point in the book – the decisive moment when prophecy moves from warning to fulfilment. For the last time Ezekiel predicts the destruction of Jerusalem and its people. This is followed by symbolism that must have affected even the most hardened of his opponents.

The destruction of Jerusalem is prophesied in the parable of a cooking pot and then symbolised in the death of Ezekiel’s wife. The oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the same day and both images function together to signify that Jerusalem’s calamities will be so extreme that they are beyond any expression of sorrow. The two interlock to signify external suffering and internal collapse.

The chapter may be viewed as consisting of two main sections – the parable of the cooking pot and the death of Ezekiel’s wife – although also, as Petter (2023, Introduction to 24:1-27) observes, within these sections is ‘a series of five shocking announcements: the news of the city’s siege (24:2), the death of Ezekiel’s wife (24:16), the end of the sanctuary (24:21), the news from the fugitive (24:26), and the news Ezekiel will speak again (24:27).’

1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

(1-3a) A threefold instruction: record the date, use a parable, declare it to the rebellious house.

This oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year – the date on which Nebuchadnezzar’s forces commenced the siege of Jerusalem. All hope of deliverance has now gone, the time of intense pressure has arrived.

The oracle is viewed as very important because Ezekiel is emphatically told to record that particular date. In v.2 he is instructed to ‘write thee the name of the day, even of this same day… this same day.’

On that day – ‘the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year’ – Ezekiel announced to the exiles in Babylon that, some 400 miles away, Nebuchadnezzar had ‘set himself against’ (pressed violently upon, leaned heavily on, cf. Psa 88:7) Jerusalem. Ezekiel could not possibly have known that Nebuchadnezzar’s army had begun the siege of Jerusalem that very day except by revelation from YHWH. This record would therefore be indisputable proof, to anyone who later checked the dates of his prophecies, that he was a true prophet of YHWH.

Modern scholars debate what year that ‘ninth year’ actually was. According to the Parker-Dubberstein chronology the date equates to 15 January, 588 BCE. Albright, however, calculates the year as 587 BCE and Thiele as 586 BCE.

Throughout the book of Ezekiel dates are based on the year of King Jehoiachin’s exile which, since Nebuchadnezzar replaced Jehoiachin with Zedekiah, was also the year of Zedekiah’s accession. Three other biblical passages confirm that the date given by Ezekiel is that on which the siege of Jerusalem began – only they express it in terms of Zedekiah’s reign – the ninth year of Jehoiachin’s exile corresponding to the ninth year of Zedekiah’s reign.

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about. And the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. 2 Kgs 25:1-2

In the ninth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the tenth month, came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and all his army against Jerusalem, and they besieged it. Jer 39:1

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he and all his army, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it, and built forts against it round about. So the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. Jer 52:4-5

Ezekiel is then instructed to use a parable (māšāl – proverb, parable) and declare it to ‘the rebellious house.’ This most likely refers to the exiles who are with him in Babylonia (Ezek 2:5, 6; 12:2, 3, 9; 17:12) but perhaps also to the inhabitants of Judah. Details of the parable occupy vv.3b-14.

(3b-5) The parable involves a cauldron or cooking pot (siyr). Those for domestic use were normally made of pottery but the cauldron Ezekiel has in mind is made of copper/brass (v.11) which may suggest a large one like those used in the Temple (2 Kgs 25:14). In 11:1-12 Ezekiel has already referred to a proverb about a cooking pot that was widely quoted by the Judahites. The image of a cauldron was loaded with meaning for the people of Jerusalem who considered themselves to be like choice meat in the safety of YHWH’s protective pot (the city). Ezekiel now turns their own metaphor on its head and uses it to illustrate Jerusalem’s fate.

Addressing Ezekiel as if he were an imaginary cook YHWH tells him to:

set the cooking pot [on the fire] – the pot represents Jerusalem and the ‘setting on’ indicates the beginning of the siege.
pour in the water.
‘gather the pieces thereof’ – the pieces of meat belonging to the cooking pot – they represent the inhabitants of Jerusalem prepared for judgement.
‘even every good piece, the thigh, and the shoulder; fill it with the choice bones. . . take the choice of the flock’ – the best cuts of meat from the best animals represent the leading citizens of Jerusalem.
pile on the logs (bones) under the pot – the fire represents the siege – the heat intensifies – severe judgement.
boil the meat well – the verb rāṯaḥ (boil, seethe, be agitated) only occurs elsewhere in Job 30:27; 41:31. ‘Cook (KJV , seethe) its bones it in the pot’ – the judgement will be thorough and even the most durable will not survive.

Opinions differ as to whether the prophet publicly enacted this parable. Keil (1876, p.341) thinks that he did not but rather maintains that: the ensuing act, which the prophet is commanded to perform, is not to be regarded as a symbolical act which he really carried out, but that the act forms the substance of the māšāl, in other words, belongs to the parable itself.

It is possible, however, that Ezekiel did actually put a cooking pot on a wood fire and boil pieces of meat in it to symbolise what the population of Jerusalem would endure during the siege. To have done so would not have seemed unusual for the book records him enacting several of his prophecies:

4:1-3 The siege.
5-1-4 The city’s destruction.
12:1-16 The process of going into exile.
12:17-20 The fear and despair of the people of Jerusalem.
21:18-23 The two routes the king of Babylon could choose.
37:15-28 The two sticks symbolising the reunification of Israel and Judah.

(6-8) ‘Wherefore’ or ‘Now then’ indicates a transition from the parable itself to further explanation by YHWH. In v.6 he pronounces woe directly upon Jerusalem, calling it ‘the bloody city;’ this is repeated in v.9. That Jerusalem is notorious for murder (judicial killings and child sacrifice) is referred to in 11:6; 13:19; 16:21; 22:3. The term ‘bloody city’ was previously used by Nahum (Nah 3:1) to describe the city of Nineveh.

Jerusalem is a pot with reddish ‘scum’ (corrosion or deposit) in it that cannot be removed. The sin of murder has become part of the very fabric of the city. Since copper/brass does not rust some scholars view this ‘scum’ as verdigris, others as flaws in the metal itself and others as hardened food residue that will not scrub off.

Yet another view is that the corruption does not belong to the metal of the pot but to its contents, i.e. the meat. According to v.6 the scum is inside the pot and in v.7 so is blood. Since the consumption of blood is taboo to the Israelites (Gen 9:4; Lev 3:17; 17:10-14; Deut 12:23-25) the flesh in the pot is viewed as contaminated. The Judahites may think of themselves as choice cuts of meat but in YHWH’s sight they are putrid flesh. The meat is to be brought out of the cauldron ‘piece by piece;’ i.e. the city’s population will be taken into captivity or killed. All efforts to cleanse the filth have failed – this idea will be developed in vv.12-13.

‘Let no lot fall upon it’ – refers to the practice of decision-making by casting lots (Lev 16:7-10; Num 26:55-56; Josh 13:6; 1 Chron 24:5, 7; 25:8; 26:13-14). The results are reckoned to be God’s will: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD. Prov 16:33. In the context of this oracle the reference may be to the casting of lots by a victorious army in order to decide which captives should be allowed to live and which should put to death (2 Sam 8:2; Joel 3:3; Nah 3:10). There is no need to cast lots concerning the leading citizens of Jerusalem for they will be executed (Jer 39:6).

Verses 7-8, beginning with ‘For,’ give the reason why the contaminated pieces of meat (the people of Jerusalem) are rejected. The city has openly and shamelessly shed blood and there has been no attempt to cover up its sin. The background to v.7 is another taboo concerning blood: And whatsoever man there be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, which hunteth and catcheth any beast or fowl that may be eaten; he shall even pour out the blood thereof, and cover it with dust. Lev 17:13.

‘Her blood -‘ i.e. the blood that Jerusalem has shed – has not been covered up but deliberately poured out for all to see on non-porous rock that would not absorb it. That blood cries for vengeance (cf. Gen 4:10; Job 16:18; Isa 26:21). YHWH’s response is to likewise set Jerusalem’s blood on a rock uncovered. This will serve as a witness to other nations of the crimes that she has committed.

(9-12) In verses 9-12 the image of YHWH building a huge fire depicts the unleashing of his wrath upon Jerusalem ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because Jerusalem is full of blood and filth) YHWH again (see v.6) pronounces woe on the city and says that he will make the pile of wood great (cf. Isa 30:33).

Since YHWH is responsible for stoking the fire the siege of Jerusalem is not a random disaster but deliberate punishment by YHWH. The imaginary cook is given further instructions:

heap on wood.
light the fire
mix in the spices (KJV, ‘spice it well’)- the verb rāqaḥ is normally used for the process of making perfume and also for the preparation of the ingredients of the sacred anointing oil (Ex 30:33) – spices enhance the taste of meat – this may mean that the Chaldeans will enthusiastically enjoy destroying Jerusalem, just as hungry people enjoy well-seasoned food.
boil the meat away – the judgement is thorough and final.
empty the residue into the fire and burn the bones – the people will be dispersed and the city will be destroyed by fire. The image intensifies; it moves from cooking in v.5 to cremation in v.10. The city will lie desolate.
set the empty pot back on the coals and heat it until it is red hot and molten. All the impurities will be burned up. This recalls the smelting image in 22:20-22.

Jerusalem (v.12) has frustrated all efforts to cleanse her. The earlier attempts to do so may have included the messages from YHWH delivered by the prophets and perhaps also the reforms of King Hezekiah (2 Kgs 18; 2 Chron 31) and King Josiah (2 Kgs 22-23). The Chronicler gives the following apt assessment:

And the LORD God of their fathers sent to them by his messengers, rising up quickly, and sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his dwelling place: But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the LORD arose against his people, till there was no remedy. Therefore he brought upon them the king of the Chaldees. . . 2 Chron 36:15-17a

The scum in the pot has not been removed so into the fire with it!

(13-14) YHWH again addresses the city directly saying that every time he tried to cleanse her she refused to be purified from her uncleanness. Therefore she will not be pure again (there will be no more opportunities for cleansing) until his wrath against her has been satisfied.

The oracle closes with the formula: ‘I the Lord hath spoken’ (v.14). God’s word guarantees the fulfilment of what he has said. He will not reconsider or renege, what Ezekiel has prophesied will come to pass. This certainty is expressed in three negative statements:

I will not refrain, not go back
I will not spare
I will not repent (be sorry, moved to pity)

YHWH has spoken, Nebuchadnezzar’s army has now arrived. The Chaldeans will judge Jerusalem according to her ways and deeds. She is facing the consequences of her own choices.

SUMMATION

This oracle shatters once and for all the false view held by the Jerusalemites that they are YHWH’s chosen cuts of meat in the protective cauldron and that the city is therefore inviolable. Even though they were God’s people they could not evade the consequences of their sin. Like corrosion in the pot sin that is not addressed becomes deeply ingrained. When grace is consistently rejected then God’s righteous judgement upon the sinner is inevitable. The oracle emphasises that the sovereign God is directing the judgement upon Judah; the Babylonian invaders are merely his instruments.

Even while Ezekiel was delivering this solemn parable he became aware that he was about to experience great sorrow. His experience of loss was about to become the ultimate sign to the people of Judah. Chapter 24:15 moves seamlessly from public preaching to private tragedy. Inside a few hours Ezekiel’s wife will die.

BIBLOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Keil, C. F. (1876). Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Ezekiel, Vol 1. Transl. J. M. Martin. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.

Parker, R.A. and Dubberstein, W.H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology 626 B. C. – A. D. 75. Rhode Island: Brown University Press.

Petter, D.L. (2011). The Book of Ezekiel and Mesopotamian City Laments, Academic Press, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

Thiele, E. R. (1983). The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Albright, W. F. (1956). The Nebuchadnezzar and Neriglissar Chronicles. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 143, pp. 28–33.

Thiele, E.R. (1944). The Chronology of the Kings of Judah and Israel. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 3(3), pp.137–186.

DIGITAL RESOURCES

Petter, D. L. (2023). Ezekiel. [online] Available at: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/commentary/ezekiel/ accessed 22 November, 2025

Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 2)

Posted on 13th Nov 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

(11) Verse 10 ends with Aholah (Israel) having suffered punishment for her infidelities and having become a byword among other women (‘the nations’). This section (vv.11-21) makes the point (11, 14, 19) that Aholibah (Jerusalem) saw her sister Aholah’s fate but did not learn from it. Judah did not heed the warning from the past.

(12-13) Just as her sister had done (vv.5-6) Aholibah ‘lusted after’ (doted upon) the impeccably dressed young Assyrian cavaliers. She became more corrupt in her lust than her sister; her pattern of behaviour escalating as time progressed.

This may include a historical reference to Judah under Ahaz (735-715 BCE), a king who submitted to Assyrian rule – see 2 Kgs 16 and Isa 7.

Notice that in the oracle there are three objects of Aholibah’s admiration – the Assyrians v.12, the Chaldeans v.16 and Egypt’s concubines v.20.

(14-21) Judah’s fascination with the Chaldeans (Babylonians) is depicted as lust for ‘men portrayed upon the wall’ (probably a reference to Babylonian wall reliefs). Aholibah was attracted by these brightly coloured engraved images (possibly using ochre) of soldiers wearing red uniforms as well as broad waistbands and flowing turbans. This was the typical dress of high-ranking Babylonian military officers.

Having only heard reports of Babylonian might Judah sent ambassadors to seek an alliance. It is possible, but not certain, that Hezekiah first contacted the Babylonian king Merodach-Baladan who then sent an embassy to Jerusalem (2 Kgs 20:12-21; Isa 39:1-8). The point in these verses is not so much idolatry as unnecessary and ill-advised political alliances.

(17-18) The Babylonians came to Judah in bed and made her unclean but afterwards her soul abhorred them. The expression (mind is alienated KJV) occurs in Ezek 23 :17, 18, 28 and Jer 6:8. The verb yāqa‘ means to turn away or alienate and in a different context is used for the dislocation of Jacob’s hip in Gen 32:25.

Ezekiel is reminding his audience that after a time relations with the Babylonians soured. For example: Jehoiakim revolted against Babylonia c. 598 BCE. Jehoiakim died during the revolt and his eighteen year old son Jehoiachin (also known as Jeconiah or Coniah) succeeded to the throne of Judah but surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar after three months. Jehoiachin, along many leading Judahites, was then deported to Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah as a puppet king but nine years later he too rebelled against Babylonian rule (See 2 Kings 24).

Thus Aholibah (Jerusalem) revealed her nakedness and her harlotries with the result that YHWH turned away from her in disgust just as he had with her sister Aholah (Israel).

(19-21) Having been unfaithful to YHWH with powerful men like Assyria and Chaldea Aholibah did not return to the Lord but instead ‘called to remembrance’ the early days in Egypt. The verb means ‘to search for.’ The idea is that she reverted to an earlier pattern of behaviour; in this case the idolatry of her youth in Egypt.

She therefore sought a relationship with Egypt; longing to be one of Egypt’s concubines. Egypt, a world power at the time, is metaphorically described in graphic, animalistic terms as being sexually potent. Ezekiel employs coarse language in order to emphasise Aholibah’s excessive, unrestrained lust for foreign powers and also to evoke a feeling of revulsion in his audience.

The prophets of YHWH disapproved of Judah’s political flirtations with Egypt. Like Ezekiel, Isaiah and Jeremiah viewed Egypt as an unreliable ally (Isa 30:1-7; 31:1-3; Jer 2:18; 37:5-10).

Notice that until v.21 the verbs are in the third person (‘she’) but now change to the second person (‘you’). This anticipates YHWH directly addressing Aholibah in vv. 22-35 when announcing her punishment.

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

(22) ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because of her infidelities), followed by the prophetic messenger formula (‘thus saith the Lord God’), is followed by a direct message from YHWH to Aholibah (Jerusalem) stating his intention to punish her. He will accomplish this by bringing her former ‘lovers’ (the nations that she once courted) against her to attack her. Those with whom she was once allied but from whom she has turned in disgust (‘mind is alienated’ see on v.17 above) will become her deadly enemies.

(23-24) They include the Babylonians and various other groups, described as ‘desirable young men,’ ‘governors and officials,’ ‘cavalry officers and men of renown’ (lit. persons summoned to a meeting, Num 1:16; 16:2), who will come against her with military might. The list specifies:
– the Babylonians (sons of Babel) – the Neo-Babylonian empire under Nebuchadnezzar II, the superpower at that time
– the Chaldeans – a people group in the south of Babylonia – dominant in the Neo-Babylonian empire
– Pekod – possibly an Aramean tribe – from Syria
– Shoa – unknown
– Koa – unknown
– all the Assyrians (sons of Asshur) – possibly defeated Assyrian army units that had been pressed into military service by the Babylonians.

This confederation of Babylonian allies and vassals will attack Judah with an impressive array of the latest military equipment – weapons, chariots, wagons, large and small shields and helmets. YHWH will punish Judah by allowing these forces to judge her by their own inhumane laws rather than by biblical laws.

(25-27) Aholibah (Jerusalem) will therefore suffer the atrocities of ancient warfare. This will include brutal mutilations such as rhinotomy (nose-cutting) and ear cropping. In those ancient honour-shame cultures mutilations had to do with shame. They asserted the domination of the aggressor and indicated a change in the victim’s status. For biblical examples of wartime mutilations see Judg 1:6-7; 1 Sam 11:2; 31:9-10; 2 Sam 4:7,12; 2 Kgs 25:7; Jer 39:6-7.

Many who survive mutilation will be killed and others taken into captivity. Jerusalem will be stripped and plundered and the properties left empty (‘thy residue’) by those slain or deported will be consumed by fire. These agonies will be deliberately instigated by YHWH; in them Aholibah will experience his jealousy (intense fervour). The judgement will be so severe that her lewdness and the harlotries learned in Egypt will cease. She will no longer look amorously at Egypt, i.e. seek a political alliance or military help. ‘Look amorously’ is conveyed by the expression ‘lift up thine eyes unto’ – this is how Potiphar’s wife looked at Joseph in Gen 39:7.

(28-32) Beginning with ‘For,’ followed by the prophetic messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ (as v.22), Aholibah’s punishment is further described using the indecent image of YHWH handing her over to her former lovers, whom she has come to abhor, to be made a public spectacle. They will strip her stark naked, expose and violate her. This imagery of being left exposed symbolises not only physical vulnerability but also spiritual disgrace. This is due to her unfaithfulness to YHWH in the form of idolatry and alliances with ungodly nations (v.30).

It is ironic that the very nations with which Jerusalem sought an alliance for protection will become her oppressors. The language of v.29 emphasises the depth of betrayal and the resulting shame: they shall deal with thee hatefully, and shall take away all thy labour, and shall leave thee naked and bare. ‘Take away all thy labour’ reflects one of the curses promised for covenant unfaithfulness in Deut 28:33: The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shalt be only oppressed and crushed always.

Verse 28 echoes vv.17, 22 and 16:37. Verse 29 echoes v.26 and 16:39. Verse 31, looking back to v.13, states that Jerusalem has walked in the way of her sister, Aholah (Israel), and thus will drink from the same cup of judgement.

(32-35) Verses 32-34 develop the thought of drinking from the same cup as her sister Samaria had drunk from (in 722 BCE, see 2 Kgs 17:6). This takes the form of a poem:

This is what the Lord GOD says:
“You will drink your sister’s cup,
which is deep and wide.
You will be an object of ridicule and scorn,
for it holds so much.
You will be filled with drunkenness and grief,
with a cup of devastation and desolation,
the cup of your sister Samaria.
You will drink it and drain it;
then you will gnaw its broken pieces,
and tear your breasts.
For I have spoken.”
This is the declaration of the Lord GOD. (Ezek 23:32-34 CSB)

The cup is large (deep and wide) and people will laugh at the fact that it is so great and has to be drained completely. Aholibah will be the object of derision and scorn because when she drinks the toxic contents she will stagger about, as if drunk, stunned by the severity of the judgement. The cup will be one of intoxication and grief, of ruin and desolation. The contents of the cup will drive Aholibah mad. Overcome by self-loathing, she will break it in pieces and self-harm with the fragments of pottery. Ortland Jnr (2016, p.129, footnote 82) explains:

The image is that of a cup filled to the brim with a powerful potion, to make the one who drinks it reel with an exaggerated drunkenness. Yahweh holds this cup in his hand and forces it to the lips of the nation to be judged. It represents, in real terms, the breakdown of order, the loss of control and good judgment, the panic and disarray, as a nation staggers like a drunk toward divinely ordained destruction. Cf. Ps. 75:9 [EVV 8]; Is. 51:17; Je. 25:15-16, 28; 51:7; La. 4:21; Hab. 2:16. The figure makes vividly clear to the Judahites ‘the compulsion there is to accept destiny, the impossibility of rejecting it, the trepidation at its death-dealing effects, the bitterness of the suffering it involves, and how it has to be tasted to the full’, to quote Eichrodt (1970: 331).

In v.35 YHWH emphasises that Aholibah (Jerusalem) will bear the consequences of her lewdness and whoredoms because she has forgotten him and cast him aside (‘KJV ‘behind thy back’ cf.1 Kgs 14:9; Neh 9:26).

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to judge both Aholah (Samaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem). He is to ‘declare’ (explain, make plain) to them their abominations (detestable acts) of idolatry and bloodshed. They have been spiritually unfaithful to YHWH by worshipping other deities. ‘Blood is in their hands’ refers to child sacrifice. They have offered their own children to pagan gods like Molech, burning them as sacrifices. To add insult to injury they would worship Molech and then, on the same day, go to the Temple to worship YHWH; thus placing Molech on a par with YHWH (cf. 2 Kgs 21:4-7). Their presence at the Temple profaned the sanctuary.

Verses 40-44 resume the adultery metaphor and describe the activities of the two harlots with the image in vv.40-42a of one woman (notice the singulars- ‘ye,’ ‘thou,’ ‘thy,’ ‘thyself,’ her’), probably Aholibah (Jerusalem), preparing herself for adulterous liaisons with foreign lovers. These liaisons represent political alliances with pagan powers like Egypt, Assyria and Babylonia. The washing, painting the eyes, decking with jewellery, sitting on an opulent divan in front of which is a table spread with lovely food and on which is set oil and spices to perfume the bed all symbolise seduction. These actions represent international diplomacy.

Many men came to carouse with her/them – in 42b the plural (‘their’) is resumed – these are described as ‘men of the common sort’ and ‘drunkards from the desert;’ probably a reference to the Assyrians and the Chaldeans. The latter were not desert-dwellers but came ‘from the desert’ in the sense that their route from Babylon to Judah would have involved skirting the top of the Arabian peninsula and travelling through Syria. These lovers put bracelets upon Aholah and Aholibah’s arms and beautiful crowns on their heads, i.e. alliances with foreign nations brought great wealth to both Israel and Judah.

In v.43 YHWH (or is it Ezekiel?) asks himself if these men will still engage with Aholah and Aholibah, two women who are ‘old (worn out, used up – used of the Gibeonites’ clothes in Josh 9:4-5) in adulteries.’ Sure enough, as Samaria and Jerusalem willingly play the harlot – i.e. are accessible to anyone, – the foreigners do ally with them.

Verse 45 is difficult in that it appears that YHWH describes the Assyrians and Babylonians as ‘righteous men’ who will judge and punish the women as adulteresses and murderers. The likely idea is that these conquerors are viewed as the instruments of YHWH and he will use them to enforce his justice and divine retribution. The standard penalty of the Law for adultery (Lev 20:10) and murder (Exod 21:12; Lev 24:17; Num 35:31) was death. This imagery suggests that the capital punishment of Samaria and Judah will be lawful and deserved.

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

This section concludes the allegory of Aholah (ISamaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem) and describes their judgement for adultery (idolatry) and political alliances with pagan nations.

Staying with the metaphor of judgement for adultery the Lord YHWH states that he will summon a crowd (i.e. armies, see vv. 23-24) to come up against ‘them’ (Israel and Judah) to which he will hand them over to suffer the atrocities and violence of war and to be plundered. These armies will pelt them with stones, cleave them with swords, kill their offspring and burn down their properties.

At v.44 there is a change from ‘them’ to ‘your.’ YHWH directly informs Israel and Judah that their fate will serve as a warning to ‘all women’ (i.e. the surrounding nations) not to ‘do after your lewdness’ i.e. behave like the metaphorical Aholah and Aholibah. He announces that they will bear the punishment of their evil-doing and idolatry and, because of this discipline, will recognise that he is the Lord YHWH. Notice that in this allegory delivered by Ezekiel the punishment of Samaria (Israel) and Jerusalem (Judah) is viewed as simultaneous whereas in real life Israel’s had already taken place c. 722 BCE and Judah’s was yet to come – a few years later – in 586 BCE.

This oracle shows us the importance of remaining faithful to God and of placing our confidence in him for daily guidance and protection rather than trusting in human power and politics which can easily turn against us. God views persistent sin as a personal betrayal and it therefore has inevitable and severe consequences.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Eichrodt, W. (1970). Ezekiel; a Commentary. Philadelphia, Westminster Press.

Ortlund Jnr, R.C. (2016). God’s Unfaithful Wife. InterVarsity Press.

Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 1)

Posted on 2nd Nov 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 23, like chapter 16, is one of the most unsettling passages in the Bible. In order to evoke a strong emotional response of shame and disgust in his audience Ezekiel intentionally employs coarse and shocking language of a sexually explicit nature. In stark terms the prophet presents a general summary of Israelite history in the form of an allegory featuring two nymphomaniacal sisters and their infidelities.

The sisters, for whom Ezekiel symbolically coins the names Aholah and Aholibah, respectively represent the northern kingdom of Israel (Samaria) and the southern kingdom of Judah (Jerusalem). They are depicted as harlots who betray their covenant with their husband (YHWH) by promiscuously forming political alliances with foreign nations and engaging in idolatrous worship. Their political and spiritual infidelity ultimately results in the sisters’ downfall.

STRUCTURE

1-4 – TWO SISTERS

5-10 – AHOLAH (SAMARIA) ISRAEL

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

EXPOSITION

TWO SISTERS (1-4)

The typical prophetic word formula (‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’) in v.1 introduces the oracle which occupies the remainder of chapter 23. After Ezekiel is again addressed as ‘son of Adam’ there comes the allegorical statement: ‘There were two women, the daughters of one mother.’ There is no mention of a father but ‘daughters of one mother’ emphasises the closeness of the sisters; they are two members of the same family.

In two sets of parallel clauses verse 3 describes their first sexual experiences as being with the Egyptians :

And they committed whoredoms in Egypt;
they committed whoredoms in their youth:

there were their breasts pressed,
and there they bruised the teats of their virginity.

Although the sisters are said to have been acted upon by the Egyptians (this represents Israelite oppression in Egypt) Ezekiel describes these activities as ‘harlotries’ (KJV whoredoms); which to the modern reader seems like a case of blame the abused rather than the abuser. Although Ezekiel does not say that the young women found this pleasurable, nevertheless throughout the oracle there is the suggestion that they keep going back for more (e.g. 8,19-21, 27).

It is not until we come to verse 4 that we learn what these two metaphorical women represent – the elder (i.e. ‘greater) one, called Aholah, represents Samaria – the capital of Israel, the kingdom of ten tribes. The younger, called Aholibah, represents Jerusalem – the capital of Judah. These names, based on the word ‘tent’ (i.e. standing for sanctuary – Tabernacle/Temple) symbolise Israel and Judah’s religious relationship with YHWH. Aholah (her [own] tent) would point to the religious autonomy of the northern kingdom of Israel which established its own system of YHWH worship (1 Kgs 12:28; Hos 8:6). Aholibah (my tent [is] in her) would emphasise the authenticity of Judah’s worship which was centred at YHWH’s sanctuary in Jerusalem.

This oracle delivered by Ezekiel is shocking in that YHWH is said to have married both women (‘they became mine’ – see also 16:8) in spite of the fact that they had already ‘committed whoredoms’ (v.3). He had children with each one. It is even more shocking that the allegory represents YHWH as having done something that is forbidden by the torah: Do not take your wife’s sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while your wife is living. Lev 18:18 NIV.

Notice that because this is an allegory Ezekiel cannot adhere strictly to exact historical details. Therefore, in v.3, he represents Israel and Judah as two related nations in Egypt – even though Israel did not divide into separate northern and southern kingdoms until after the death of Solomon c. 930 BCE. Likewise, constrained by the allegory, he later prophesies the punishment upon the two nations as future (v.49), although Israel’s had already been fulfilled a long time before, c. 720 BCE.

AHOLAH (SAMARIA) ISRAEL (5-10)

In this section Ezekiel comments on the adultery of Samaria and uses the language of passion to reflect on Israel’s political alliances with Assyria. Despite belonging to YHWH (‘when she was mine’ – lit, under me v.5) she betrayed her covenant with him by turning to foreign powers for safety and protection. Verse 6 represents Aholah as ‘lusting after’ (she doted – desire carnally – 6 times in Ezek 23 – vs, 5, 7, 9, 12, 16, 20; Jer 4:30) the dashing Assyrian cavalrymen in their bright unforms. Dazzled by Assyrian military power and culture Israel not only made political alliances (‘committed her whoredoms’) with Assyria but also defiled herself by worshipping the idols of the Assyrian elite.

Verse 8 once more emphasises that Israel’s spiritual unfaithfulness can be traced back to its beginnings in Egypt. Joshua had referred to this in a speech recorded in Josh 24: Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD. Josh 24:14. Apparently there had been no improvement in Aholah’s behaviour over her history.

Because of this (vv.9-10) YHWH gave her over to the very nations she had longed for, Assyria in particular, for them to execute judgement upon her. They humiliated her (‘exposed her nakedness’), took her sons and daughters (into captivity), and killed her with the sword (Hos 13:16). The result was that her fate served as a warning to other women (i.e. the surrounding nations). This is a historical reference to Samaria’s fall to Assyria in 722 BCE (2 Kgs 17:6) after which the northern tribes were deported – they later became known as the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel.

Sweeney (2013, p.117) comments:
This…clearly portrays Israel’s relationship with Assyria from the late ninth through the eighth centuries BCE, which ultimately resulted in her destruction. In an effort to defend Israel against the Arameans, King Jehu of Israel (842-815 BCE) submitted to Assyria as a vassal…so that Assyrian power would check any Aramean efforts to invade Israel. This alliance lasted through the reigns of the Jehu kings, including Jehoahaz (815-801 BCE), Jehoash (801-786 BCE), Jeroboam II (786-746 BCE), and Zechariah (746 BCE). Zechariah’s assassination was prompted by an attempt to break the Assyrian alliance and establish a new alliance with Aram. The move was countered by Menahem (745-738 BCE), who assassinated Shallum (745 BCE) and restored relations with Assyria during his reign and that of his son Pekahiah (738-737 BCE). But Pekahiah was assassinated by Pekah (737-732 BCE), who allied with Aram and attacked Jerusalem during the Syro-Ephraimitic War. When King Ahaz of Judah (735-715 BCE) appealed to the Assyrian king Tiglath Pileser for assistance, the Assyrians attacked, destroyed Damascus, killed Pekah and subjugated both Israel and Judah, placing Hoshea as king (732-724 BCE) over a much reduced Israel. When Hoshea revolted against Assyria in 724 BCE, he was imprisoned, the land of Israel was devastated, Samaria was destroyed, and the northern kingdom of Israel came to an end as much of its surviving population was exiled to the far reaches of the Assyrian empire (2 Kings 17).

The timeless lesson from Aholah is that when the people of God betray their loyalty to him for political advantage, religious admiration or material gain the inevitable result is shame and loss.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sweeney, M. A., 2013, Reading Ezekiel. Smyth & Helwys Publishing Inc., Macon.

‌

Exposition

Ezekiel 22:23-31 – The Moral Failures of Judah’s Leaders

Posted on 25th Oct 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In the two previous oracles in chapter 22 YHWH confronts the bloodshed and idolatrous practices of the people of Jerusalem (22:1-16) and, using the metallurgical imagery of smelting, compares impure Israel to dross that has no value (22:17-22). This third oracle of chapter 22 focuses on the dysfunctional leaders of Judah – prophets, priests, government officials and landed gentry – and shows that every layer of authority is corrupt.

STRUCTURE

23-24 Instruction to Ezekiel to address the land of Judah.

25-39 A catalogue of corruption

30-31 YHWH’s unsuccessful search for a man who could prevent the coming destruction.

INSTRUCTION TO EZEKIEL TO ADDRESS THE LAND OF JUDAH (23-24)

After the familiar prophetic word formula and the designation of Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ there comes an instruction to the prophet to directly address the land of Judah. In the first oracle in chapter 22 Ezekiel speaks about ‘the city’ (22:2), in the second about ‘the house’ and in this third oracle about ‘the land.’ All of these represent the people of Jerusalem/Judah.

He is to say: ‘thou art a land not cleansed nor rained upon in the day of indignation.’ The word ‘indignation can mean anger, denunciation or curse. This statement is effectively a declaration of judgement and possibly a prophecy that literal drought will occur at the time of the forthcoming Babylonian siege of Jerusalem (588-586 BCE). It may however, refer metaphorically to current spiritual drought (without cleansing rain the land is impure) and the desolation (punishment) which that will bring about. Rain, followed by food abundance, was guaranteed for obedience to YHWH’s statutes and commandments (Lev 26:3-5) but desolation of the land for unfaithfulness (Deut 28:38-41; Isa 24:1-6; Hos 4:3). Judah is not just suffering misfortune, it is under divine judgement.

A CATALOGUE OF CORRUPTION (25-29)

Verses 25-29 give the basis for judgement and concentrate on the sins of four leading classes in society: prophets, priests, princes and the ‘people of the land.’ Similar sentiments are expressed in Micah 3:11 and Zeph 3:3-4.

(25) THE CONSPIRACY OF THE PROPHETS

‘There is a conspiracy of her prophets’ – The word ‘her’ occurs four times (vv. 25, 26, 27, 28). The prophets have made a pact, thus becoming a significant power bloc in the land. They use this power and influence for personal enrichment – like a roaring lion tearing prey they extort payment for their prophecies; seizing ‘treasures and wealth’ (cf. Jer 20:5). There may also be a suggestion here that the prophets in Judah are involved in murder for material gain (‘they have made her many widows’) but most likely the thought is that their false predictions of peace will lead to the deaths of many of the residents of Judah.

Although the Hebrew Masoretic text has ‘conspiracy of prophets’ in v.25 some translators (see NLT, NIV, NET, RSV, NRSV), in their infinite wisdom, emend this to read ‘conspiracy of princes.’ They reason that:
a) the metaphor of a roaring lion that tears its prey and devours men has already been used of the royal family in Ezek 19:6.
b) the types of crimes listed are more likely to be committed by political leaders than prophets.
c) prophets are mentioned later in the oracle (v.28).
d) In the similar passages in Micah (3:10-11) and Zephaniah (3:3-4) princes are mentioned first.

Like the KJV, other translations (e.g. DBY, ESV, CSB, NKJV, NASB) have retained ‘conspiracy of prophets.’

(26) THE CORRUPTION OF THE PRIESTS

a) They violate the Law.

The priests, whose responsibility it is to teach the torah (Lev 10:11; Hos 4:6), violate (harm, strip, lay waste) its teachings (cf. Zeph 3:4; Mal 2:8). As well as deliberately misinterpreting and perverting divine ordinances they desecrate holy things (e.g. eating the offerings in a state of ritual impurity, Lev 22:1-9).

b) They blur the distinctions between sacred and profane.

The priests also neglect their responsibility to ‘put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean’ (Lev 10:10). In a later vision Ezekiel includes this requirement in a list of obligations expected of the Zadokite priesthood in the new temple (44:23). ‘Holy’ refers to things dedicated to YHWH, ‘unholy’ to items in everyday use. They fail to show the people what is clean or unclean for sacrifice and do not explain what foods are clean or forbidden to be eaten.

c) They fail to observe the Sabbath.

The priests turn a blind eye to desecration of the Sabbath by the people, thus blatantly disregarding God’s commandment. Jeremiah comments on this in Jer 17:27.

d) God himself is profaned among them (i.e. among the priests). Those responsible for maintaining YHWH’s holiness do not honour it. YHWH is the object of the verb ḥālal (to pollute or profane) in Ezek 13:19 also.

(27) THE CRIMES OF THE PRINCES

The word sarim (chiefs, leaders, rulers), here translated ‘princes,’ refers to officials like top civil servants and judges. They are described as ‘fierce wolves’ – predators lower down the food chain than the ‘roaring lion’ of v.25 – but no less cruel and voracious. Instead of protecting the rights of the people they utilise violence and murder for dishonest gain.

(28) PROPHETS (again)

The prophets are mentioned again because of their complicity with ‘them’ (the officials in the previous verse). They ‘whitewash’ the evil deeds of the officials, making them appear legitimate, and cover up their abuses by proclaiming false visions and uttering divinations that are lies (cf. 13:7-10. They say: ‘Thus saith the Lord God, when the Lord hath not spoken’ (cf. Mic 3:9-1; Zeph 3:3-4).

(29) THE CHARACTER OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND

Many commentators take ‘the people of the land’ as referring to the common people, thus indicating that that corruption has spread throughout Judahite society from the top down. It is possible, however, that am ha-aretz is used in a technical sense for a particular social group – the landed gentry – that Ezekiel lists with other parties (prophets, princes and priests) as culpable for systemic corruption in Judah. This wealthy group seems to have been politically influential (2 Kgs 11:14, 18; 21:24; 23:30, 35) and in a position to perpetrate economic crimes against the most vulnerable members of society. They are said to have oppressed, extorted, robbed and ill-treated the poor and needy; including resident foreigners. This kind of behaviour is forbidden in Exod 22:21-23; Lev 19:13-15, 33; Deut 24:17.

YHWH’S UNSUCCESSFUL SEARCH FOR A MAN WHO COULD PREVENT THE COMING DESTRUCTION (30-31)

(30) Having catalogued the sins of the four most powerful groups in Judahite society – prophets, priests, princes and the people of the land – YHWH declares that he searched for a man among them who would ‘build up the wall and stand in the gap’ before him in order to avert judgement – but he found no-one. These four groups have opposed the Lord and have led society into sin.

‘Build up the wall’ and ‘stand in the gap’ are metaphors for repairing moral and spiritual defences and for standing in the breach (by intercession or strong spiritual leadership) in order to prevent coming disaster. The image is that of a gap in the protecting wall of a city with the result that someone must stand in that breach in order to defend it. In Ezek 13:5 it is just the prophets who are accused of failing to ‘stand in the gaps or make up the wall’ but in chapter 22 this applies to all levels of society. There is a failure of leadership; those who are meant to protect and guide would rather extort and exploit.

Since there is total moral collapse in Jerusalem not a single person has the credibility or courage to lead the nation back to faithfulness to YHWH and his covenant. This passage is disturbingly relevant to our modern societies. Corruption filters down when political leaders pursue power and influence at the expense of truth and justice and religious leaders sacrifice biblical convictions on the altar of political expediency. No doubt God is still looking for intercessors and righteous individuals who will make themselves available to repair what is broken and stand between society and disaster.

Is there one convicted enough to take on the challenge of building up God’s wall?

Is there one compassionate enough to care for others?

Is there one courageous enough to go against the flow?

Is there one consecrated enough to surrender talents, time, and treasures for the glory of God?

Unfortunately, in Jerusalem’s case YHWH’s search was unsuccessful. Tragically, YHWH reports: ‘but I found none.’

(31) In the absence of a single person who can ‘build up the wall’ and ‘stand in the gap’ judgement is inevitable, there is no reason for delay. This verse presents YHWH’s acts of judgement as if they have already taken place. He will consume the people of Jerusalem/Judah with the fire of his wrath; in this they will suffer the consequences of their own actions. Like the two previous oracles in Ezekiel chapter 22 this third one ends with a pronouncement of judgement.

SUMMATION

This oracle portrays a society in total moral collapse. Every level of society in Jerusalem is corrupt and guilty of violence, oppression and blatant disregard for the law of God. The extent of the rot is revealed in God’s search for a single person to ‘stand in the gap’ and defend or repair the city’s spiritual and moral defences. That search ends with the declaration: ‘but I found none.’ The nation must therefore face the fire of God’s wrath, a direct consequence of its corruption.

Exposition

Psalm 134 – A Song for the Night Shift

Posted on 9th Oct 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

A SONG OF DEGREES.
¹ Behold, bless ye the LORD, all ye servants of the LORD, which by night stand in the house of the LORD.
² Lift up your hands in the sanctuary, and bless the LORD.
³ The LORD that made heaven and earth bless thee out of Zion.

INTRODUCTION

Have you ever spent time in hospital overnight? If so, you will recall that the corridors which bustle with people during the day grow quiet. Visiting hours and supper over, the lights are dimmed. Many of the patients lie asleep but the work does not stop. A dedicated team of the night shift – doctors, nurses, porters, cleaners, security officers – go about their tasks. Often their work is unseen but it is essential.

In ancient times work never stopped at the Jerusalem temple. Once the evening sacrifice was offered (Psa 141:2) the priests and their assistants, the Levites, had plenty to keep them occupied (Num 3:7-8). 1 Chron 9:17-32 gives an account of the practical duties the Levities performed both day and night – looking after the sacred vessels, portering, baking, allocating oil, wine and spices. The priests were responsible for ensuring that the perpetual fire on the altar of burnt offering never went out (Lev 6:12-13) and that the lamps on the Menorah (lampstand) in the Holy Place burned brightly ‘from evening to morning’ (Exod 27:20-21). Some priests and Levites functioned as temple police. The priests also engaged in spiritual activities (prayer and praise) during the night. A high-ranking official known as the Captain of the Temple (Lk 22:4; Acts 4:1; 5:24) was in overall charge. Psalm 134 acknowledges the vital contribution of those who serve the Lord through the long hours of the night. This psalm is a song for the night shift.

Psalm 134 is the 15th and final poem of a collection (120-134) known as the ‘songs of degrees’ (or ascents). They are called this because they were sung by pilgrims as they travelled up to Jerusalem to celebrate the major Jewish religious festivals – Passover, Weeks (Pentecost) and Tabernacles.

It is also thought that the visitors sung them as they made their way round the city of Jerusalem. It is appropriate that this psalm has been placed at the end of the collection of songs of ascents for it seems to sum up the whole point of pilgrimage to Jerusalem – to bless the Lord and to be blessed by him.

Although mainly directed at a specific group of people – the priests and Levites working night shift at the Jerusalem temple – this psalm contains lessons that we can apply to ourselves, especially those of us who feel that we are on the night shift of life.

The psalm is structured as a call and response. It divides as follows:

1-2 The call – The festival pilgrims encourage the temple night shift to bless the Lord.

3 The response – The priests pronounce a blessing upon the pilgrims.

VERSES 1-2 – THE CALL

The pilgrims directly address the priests and Levites who work overnight in the temple and call on them to worship the Lord with uplifted hands .

‘Behold’ – expresses strong feeling so in this context could be translated ‘Come!’ or ‘Oh!

Bless’ – appears 3 times in the psalm – once in each verse. In vv. 1 and 2 it is an imperative giving a command, advice, or encouragement to worship the Lord. The word ‘bless’ means ‘pay homage to.’

‘the Lord’ – YHWH – the proper name of Israel’s national deity. The name occurs 5 times in these three verses.

‘all’ – all those working in the temple during the night.

‘servants of the Lord’ – this term is used to describe worshippers in general (Psa 135:1; Isa 54:17), also prophets (2 Kgs 9:7). The use of the word ‘stand’ following this phrase suggests that in Psa 134 it refers specifically to the temple personnel.

‘stand’ – a term used for the service of the priests and Levites (Deut 18:7; 1 Chron 2:30; 2 Chron 29:11).

‘by night’ – ‘during the nights’ – i.e. night after night.

‘the house of the Lord’ – the Temple – this term equates to ‘the sanctuary’ of v.2.

(2) ‘Lift up your hands’ – this displayed an attitude of surrender, reverence, worship and expectation while praying (cf. Psa 28:2; 1 Tim 2:8).

‘In the sanctuary’ – ‘sanctuary’ refers to the entire tabernacle (Exod 36:1, 3, 4; 38:27) and Temple.

‘bless the Lord’ – our praise and worship is an active response to who God is.

VERSE 3 – THE RESPONSE

In response to the exhortation from pilgrims to continue their praise and worship of the Lord throughout the night the priests invoke God’s blessing upon them.

‘The Lord…bless thee’ – This is not only a prayer but also a benediction. Some commentators view this as referring to the Priestly Blessing of Num 6:22-26. For a detailed consideration of that see my post THE AARONIC BLESSING. ‘To bless’ was one of the priestly functions (Deut 10:8; 21:5).

‘that made heaven and earth’ – (cf. Psa 121:2) – ‘heaven and earth’ is a merism (use of opposite extremes to express totality) – this figure of speech means the whole creation. It emphasises the power and sovereignty of YHWH the Creator.

‘thee’ – This singular may be taken as referring to the psalmist or interpreted as a collective singular referring to the group of pilgrims.

‘out of Zion’ – The blessing comes from the Lord, not the priests. Zion was where YHWH’s presence dwelt at that time.

LESSONS

Worship of the Lord is not restricted to certain days or times but continues 24/7 – all day and all night, every day of the week. The psalm encourages worshippers to serve and bless God during the night. The following psalms mention praising God at night: Psa 42:8; 63:5-7; 92:1-2; 119:62.

This psalm encourages us to continue serving and worshipping the Lord even when what we are doing seems insignificant and goes unnoticed by others.

The posture of lifted hands in the psalm reminds us that in praise and prayer we ought to have an attitude of surrender to God’s will and one of expectation of his blessing.

The priests are called on to bless the Lord and they in turn bless the people. Praise for the Lord results in blessing for the people of God.

The psalm is a reminder that it is God and not others who is the source of spiritual blessing and enrichment.

The Lord, the maker of heaven and earth, is well able to sustain us throughout the circumstances of our night; times of hardship when we are weary and all around seems dark. He is not a small god who is confined to a temple but is the Creator of all that exists.

Let us faithfully serve and praise God during our night shift, confident that blessing will flow out from his presence and enrich us while we wait for the dawn.

Exposition

The Beauty of Unity in Psalm 133

Posted on 30th Sep 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

A SONG OF DEGREES OF DAVID.
¹ Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!
² It is like the precious ointment upon the head, that ran down upon the beard, even Aaron’s beard: that went down to the skirts of his garments;
³ As the dew of Hermon, and as the dew that descended upon the mountains of Zion: for there the LORD commanded the blessing, even life forevermore.

INTRODUCTION

This psalm of just three verses is easy to read but difficult to put into practice. It is the 14th of 15 poems in the Psalter known collectively as the Songs of Degrees or (Ascents). This is a group of psalms (120-134) sung by the Jews when returning from exile or when going up to Jerusalem for one of the annual Jewish Festivals (Exod 23:14-17; 34:22-24). Psalm 133 is said to be ‘Of David.’ This could mean either that it was composed by David or was collected by him.

Imagine families from all over Israel and beyond travelling up to Jerusalem and then residing together in the city during the festival days. People from different areas, different tribes, having different customs and different accents; yet all coming together to worship the Lord and know the blessing of his presence. What a great experience that must have been and what a testimony to the heathen nations around them! This psalm celebrates the beauty of unity.

We live in a world that is obsessed with the individual. From an early age we are taught to be self-reliant, independent and are encouraged to be masters of our own destiny. Into our modern culture of radical individualism this ancient psalm from God’s Word speaks a powerful counter-cultural truth – our faith is not meant to be lived out in isolation. Psalm 133, as I have said, is a profound reflection on the beauty of unity. In it we have an exclamation about that truth, an elaboration on that truth and a declaration about that truth.

v.1 AN EXCLAMATION
vv.2-3a AN ELABORATION
v. 3b A DECLARATION

AN EXCLAMATION (1)

The psalm commences with a wisdom saying – something like a proverb – that comments on what is good. It is expressed as an exclamation: Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity! The psalmist conveys pleasure with his use of the words: ‘Behold…how…how!’ Behold (Look, stop and take notice) how good and how pleasant it is when brothers live in harmony! At this thought the psalmist bursts out with a cry of wonder and joyful praise. This is not a cool, detached, academic observation – it is an exclamation of delight.

What the psalmist says has wide application. It covers most situations because he cleverly uses words that have more than one meaning.

Brethren – can mean a) children of the same parents b) kin – extended family members c) kindred – members of a larger social unit (e.g. tribe, nation).

Dwell – can mean sit, remain or reside.

Unity – can mean ‘proximity’ or ‘harmony.’

The wisdom saying probably refers to to the ancient custom of living in extended families (cf. Deut 25:5) – with one clan occupying and working the same inheritance (ancestral land). The family members all worked for the common welfare and shared the same objectives. If one was sick or died, the others rallied around to provide support. If one was attacked, the others rushed to his defence. If one suffered financial loss, the others chipped in to help. I am sure that you can see how we could apply this concept to the local church.

The psalmist, however, takes up this social custom and uses it to make a point about the spiritual unity of the people of God. That unity likewise involves more than just living peacefully; it includes shared objectives, responsibilities and efforts to look out for and meet the needs of the others.

‘HOW GOOD!

‘Good’ carries not just the idea that something is morally correct but also that it is useful and beneficial. This word ṭôb was how God assessed his work of creation in Gen 1:4, 10, 12, 18 and 21.

HOW PLEASANT!

Notice the second adjective used by the psalmist. Nā‘ēm means lovely, good, attractive, joyous. Brothers (and sisters) living together in harmony is not just morally right and beneficial, it is also pleasant – delightful, enjoyable and lovely to experience. The two words ‘good’ and ‘pleasant’ also occur together in Gen 49:15; Job 36:11; Psa 135:3; 147:1; Prov 24:25.

The psalmist is speaking here about God’s people, the family of faith, so the lesson applies to us as well. Our unity ought not to be based on such things as personality or politics but should be because of our common salvation and mutual love for the Lord. Bringing this right up to date and making it personal, let us ask ourselves if that is our default setting in the church or assembly we attend. Do we appreciate other believers and view togetherness as a great benefit – something to be fostered and enjoyed?

Often the greatest threats to the unity of a church are sitting in its pews. Some people just cannot get along with and agree with others. One of Satan’s most effective tools is division among the people of God. We began by mentioning that this exclamation in Psalm 133 is based on the ancient idea of the extended family. We know that sometimes that didn’t work out too well. It is sad to read that even some members of the patriarchal families could not dwell together, for example:

And the land was not able to bear them, that they might dwell together: for their substance was great, so that they could not dwell together. And there was a strife between the herdsmen of Abram’s cattle and the herdsmen of Lot’s cattle: Genesis 13:6-7

The apostle Paul, writing to the early church in Philippi, said: I beseech Euodias, and beseech Syntyche, that they be of the same mind in the Lord. Philippians 4:2. The apostle James wrote: For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work. James 3:16.

The psalmist realised that there is not always harmony among the people of God. There are disagreements, some of them bitter. Sadly, it seems that for many maintaining unity is not a priority. It is almost as if the psalmist is saying to people like that: Wake up! Look at the incredible beauty of what you have when you are united in your purpose and witness! Realise how good and how pleasant it is!

AN ELABORATION (2-3a)

The psalmist knows that not everyone will believe his exclamation and so he elaborates on the notions of ‘good’ and ‘pleasant’ with rich illustrations, comparisons that would have been familiar to his first readers in the day and age he wrote. He uses two similes: unity between brethren is ‘like oil’ and it is ‘as dew’.

OIL

The oil is described as ‘good’ (same word as v.1), the KJV translates ‘good oil’ as ‘precious ointment.’ At the mention of ‘good oil’ a social custom would spring instantly to mind, a feature of ancient hospitality. In the hot, dry and dusty Near Eastern climate a mixture of olive oil and sweet spices was used for skincare. Travellers or guests would be welcomed with soothing oil being poured upon their heads (Psa 23:5; 92:10; 141:5; Lk 7:46.

Th psalmist then clarifies that he is not speaking of just any oil, but of the sacred anointing oil, made using a special formula (see Exod 30:34-38 for the ingredients), that was used to consecrate Aaron and the priests to the service of the Lord (Exod 30:30; Lev 8:10-12). In the imagery of Psalm 133 this oil is poured upon the head of Aaron, meaning any priest. The emphasis here is on the lavishness of the pouring; it is not just a dab of oil but such an abundance that it runs over the priest’s head, down his full beard and over the collar (lit ‘mouth’) of his robe.

That, says the psalmist, is what the unity of brethren is like. It is like a generous quantity of oil poured out in a sacred anointing. Unity marks us out as people saturated with the oil of consecration, set apart to serve God and exuding the delightful fragrance of holiness.

DEW

The second simile is ‘as dew of Hermon.’ Mt Hermon is the highest peak in Israel and is snow-capped for most of the year. The River Jordan, a key water source in the country, rises on its slopes. The dew (light rain, drizzle) of Hermon symbolises life-giving moisture, fertility, blessing, refreshment and pleasure.

Unity, says the psalmist, is like that dew of Hermon. It revitalises what is dry and promotes renewal and growth where there is stagnation. It provides daily, gentle refreshment.

Note: verse 3a – It is like the dew of Hermon, which falls on the mountains of Zion! causes much discussion among scholars. How can the psalmist claim that the dew of Mt. Hermon, which is situated at the far north of the country, precipitates on the mountains of Zion (Jerusalem) some 125 miles to the south of Hermon? The best answer seems to be that the metaphor is presenting an ideal situation. Unity is something wonderful, it is as if the dew from Hermon (or, dew like that of Hermon) were falling on Zion.

A DECLARATION (3b)

The psalm ends with a move from description to proclamation. We have noticed the exclamation – it describes unity. Then the elaboration – that illustrates unity. Now the declaration tells us the cause and effect of unity.

Notice the word ‘for.’ It is crucial because it tells why. It gives us the reason for the goodness, the pleasantness, the abundance and the refreshment. They all come from the Lord; ‘for’ (because) he bestows his blessing wherever unity is found.

Notice the word ‘there.’ It is in an environment where there is unity that God’s blessing is experienced. Where brethren dwell together in unity the Lord commands the blessing. This is his deliberate, powerful act. The psalmist reminds us that this is not just present blessing (peace, growth, powerful witness) but also future blessing – ‘life forevermore.’

Note: many take ‘there’ to mean Zion rather than, as I have suggested, anywhere unity is found.

SUMMATION

God’s people living together in unity is good and pleasant. It enriches our lives. It is abundant and refreshing like oil and dew, and it draws down God’s blessing. Strange as it may sound, ‘coming down’ is a feature of this ‘psalm of ascents’ (going up): the oil is poured on the head, flows down the beard, down to the collar of the robe. The dew comes down from Hermon. The blessing comes from God above.

Let us remember the exclamation: ‘How good and how pleasant unity is!’
Let us meditate on the elaboration: unity is beneficial and refreshing.
Let us rest on the declaration: where there is unity the Lord commands the blessing.

The New Testament does not contain a direct quote from Psalm 133 but it does say quite a lot about unity. Allow me to close by quoting Col 3:12-15 from the Christian Standard Bible:

Therefore, as God’s chosen ones, holy and dearly loved, put on compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, ¹³ bearing with one another and forgiving one another if anyone has a grievance against another. Just as the Lord has forgiven you, so you are also to forgive. ¹⁴ Above all, put on love, which is the perfect bond of unity. ¹⁵ And let the peace of Christ, to which you were also called in one body, rule your hearts…

Exposition

Ezekiel 22:17-22 – The Oracle Concerning the Smelting of Jerusalem

Posted on 23rd Sep 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

TEXT

¹⁷ And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
¹⁸ Son of man, the house of Israel is to me become dross: all they are brass, and tin, and iron, and lead, in the midst of the furnace; they are even the dross of silver.
¹⁹ Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Because ye are all become dross, behold, therefore I will gather you into the midst of Jerusalem.
²⁰ As they gather silver, and brass, and iron, and lead, and tin, into the midst of the furnace, to blow the fire upon it, to melt it; so will I gather you in mine anger and in my fury, and I will leave you there, and melt you.
²¹ Yea, I will gather you, and blow upon you in the fire of my wrath, and ye shall be melted in the midst thereof.
²² As silver is melted in the midst of the furnace, so shall ye be melted in the midst thereof; and ye shall know that I the LORD have poured out my fury upon you.

This brief oracle builds upon the idea of purification raised in the previous one (22:15), which predicts that the removal of Judah’s filth will be accomplished through the dispersion of the people among the nations.

This oracle employs the metaphor of smelting; however, the crucible or furnace is Jerusalem itself. The smelting therefore represents the siege and sacking of the city by the Babylonians in 587/6 BCE.

(17) The formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying’ indicates that this is a new oracle and that it comes by direct revelation from YHWH and thus has divine authority.

(18) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘Son of Adam’ YHWH informs him that he regards the ‘house of Israel’ as dross. ‘House of Israel’ does not refer to the northern kingdom of Israel as that had been destroyed by the Assyrians almost 130 years earlier. Ezekiel uses the phrase as a term for the covenant people of YHWH – in this context the entire society of Judah (those living in and around Jerusalem). ‘Dross’ describes the existing condition of Jerusalem as YHWH sees it.

The metaphor here is that of smelting – a process for extracting metal from ore by heating and melting. The application of intense heat separates the pure metal from the impure dross; the latter rises to the top and can be skimmed off.

The point of the process described here is to obtain precious silver – but seemingly only base metals (copper, tin, iron and lead) are present in the ore. The elements mentioned represent the various strata of Judahite society – the priests (v.26), the princes (v.27), the prophets (v.28) and the people (v.29). The metaphor only stretches so far as in real life no-one would smelt knowing at the start that all they have is dross.

(19) ‘ ‘Therefore’ – The action that will be taken against Judah will be a direct result of the diagnosis by the Sovereign Lord (Adonai YHWH) that they are dross. As the one possessing absolute power and authority YHWH has the right to judge them.

He says that he will gather them ‘into the midst of Jerusalem.’ This may be a reference to people fleeing to fortified cities for safety from the Babylonians, as mentioned in Jer 4:5. Normally one would think of God ‘gathering’ for protection (e.g. 1 Chron 16:35; Isa 40:11; Mt23:27) but here we have a reversal of that thought. The people are being gathered for siege. They will undergo the fiery ordeal of smelting in the city.

(20-22) The metaphor becomes a simile (‘as they gather…as silver is melted’) with a concentration on the fierce heat that smelting requires. Just as in ancient smelting bellows were used to intensify the heat so YHWH’s breath (representing his wrath and fury) will heat up the furnace that ‘melts’ the people of Jerusalem.

The metaphor does not take the process any further. Although the ‘house of Israel’ is described as dross in v.19 we wonder if any silver will be found and separated? Can the ore be so corrupted that it contains no precious silver at all?

We are not told the result of the process, only that when the people of Jerusalem are smelted (i.e. experience invasion, war and devastation) they will realise that the fury has been poured out upon them by YHWH.

SUMMATION

In this oracle the metallurgical imagery of smelting is figurative of the purging of the people of Jerusalem by invasion, war and the death of many citizens. Ezekiel uses this metaphor to provide an explanation for the soon-coming disaster upon the people of Jerusalem – it is their own fault. Their sin has become so pervasive that purification is necessary and inevitable, a holy God cannot let it go unpunished.

Note: for use of the image of metal refining elsewhere in the Bible see: Isa 1:22, 25; 48:10; Jer 6:28-30; 9:7; Zech 13:9; Mal 3:2-3; 1 Pet 1:7.

Exposition

Ezekiel 22:1-16 – The Oracle Concerning Bloodshed in Jerusalem

Posted on 19th Sep 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 22 belongs to a series of oracles spoken a few years before the fall of Jerusalem in 587/586 BCE. These oracles, dated 14 August 591 BCE (20:1), focus on YHWH’s punishment of Israel/Judah. Chapter 22 presents three oracles indicting the city of Jerusalem and its inhabitants. In each the charges against Jerusalem are presented and judgement pronounced.

22:1-16 The Oracle Concerning Bloodshed in Jerusalem

22:17-22 The Oracle Concerning the Smelting of Jerusalem

22:23-31 The Oracle Concerning the Leaders of Jerusalem

THE ORACLE CONCERNING BLOODSHED IN JERUSALEM (1-16)

In this oracle, which gives a catalogue of Jerusalem’s sins, the most common words are ‘blood’ (2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 13) and ‘in thee’ (6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16).

(1) The formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ indicates that this is the beginning of a new oracle. It occurs again in v.17 and v.23.

(2) Addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH involves Ezekiel in the condemnation of Jerusalem by asking the double question ‘wilt thou judge, wilt thou judge?’ This is, in effect, an instruction (cf. 20:4; 23:36). Ezekiel is to judge the ‘bloody city’ (city of bloods) and point out her abominations (offensive things). The Jews thought of Jerusalem as the holy city (e.g. Mt 4:5; 27:53) but here Ezekiel calls it by a name that the prophet Nahum had used earlier (c. 650 BCE) to describe Nineveh (Nah 3:1). Ezekiel uses the description again concerning Jerusalem in 24:6,9.

(3) Ezekiel is to make it clear that his message has a divine origin (‘thus saith the Lord’) and proceed to inform Jerusalem and its people of the crimes of which they are accused. The charges are twofold; a) bloodshed, and b) idolatry.

a) BLOODSHED – This problem of violence and murder in Jerusalem was also highlighted by the prophet Isaiah:

And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood. Isaiah 1:15
How is the faithful city become a harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers. Isaiah 1:21

In Jerusalem itself there is total disregard for human life. ‘In the midst’ is repeated in v.7 and v.13. As a result of this ‘her time may come’ – a time of punishment – see Ezek 7:7,12.

IDOLATRY

Jerusalem makes idols (frequent, repeated, ongoing action) all over her to defile her. This breaks the first of the Ten Commandments (Exod 20:3).

(4-5) Verses 4-5 list five results of the crimes of bloodshed and idolatry:

i) Thou art become guilty in thy blood that thou hast shed; – ‘thy blood’ is ‘the blood of your victims.’ These would not only be people who were murdered but also human sacrifices which were part of idolatrous worship – children sacrificed to Molech (Ezek 16:20).

ii) and hast defiled thyself in thine idols which thou hast made

iii) and thou hast caused thy days to draw near, and art come even unto thy years: – these sins will accelerate the time of the city’s destruction (cf. 12:22-23; Jer 11:23). Some interpret ‘days’ as referring to the siege and fall of Jerusalem and ‘years’ to the time spent in captivity.

iv) therefore have I made thee a reproach unto the heathen, and a mocking to all countries. – even the Gentiles are horrified by Jerusalem’s behaviour and mock it. The consequences of her sin involve public shame. This was prophesied by Moses in Deut 28:37: And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations…

v) Those that be near, and those that be far from thee, shall mock thee, which art infamous and much vexed. – ‘Polluted in name and full of confusion,’ Jerusalem’s notoriety will spread near and far; the city will be universally despised and derided.

Verses 6-12 expand on the types of sins that are rife in Jerusalem.

(6-7) OPPRESSION

(6) ‘every one were in thee to their power’ lit. ‘everyone according to his arm’ i.e. strength, might. Every leader in Jerusalem uses his personal power for violence and murder.

The expression ‘to shed blood’ – occurs in v.6, 9, 12.

The princes of Israel could refer to the political leaders of Judah or to the Davidic kings who ruled in Jerusalem; some of whom were willing to engage in judicial murder e.g. Manasseh (2 Kgs 21:16), Jehoiakim (Jer 26:21). Instead of ensuring a stable and just society the powerful oppress others in order to benefit themselves.

The princes of Judah are like those who move boundary markers; I will pour out my fury on them like water. Hos 5:10 CSB
On the day of our king, the princes are sick with the heat of wine — there is a conspiracy with traitors. Hos 7:5 CSB
Both hands are good at accomplishing evil: the official and the judge demand a bribe;
when the powerful man communicates his evil desire, they plot it together. Mic 7:3 CSB
The princes within her are roaring lions; her judges are wolves of the night, which leave nothing for the morning. Zeph 3:3 CSB

(7) ‘In thee have they set light by father and mother: in the midst of thee have they dealt by oppression with the stranger: in thee have they vexed the fatherless and the widow.’

‘They’ in v.7 probably refers back to the ‘princes of Israel’ in v.6 but many commentators view it as referring to everyone in general in Jerusalem. The ethics of the Sinai covenant have been disregarded and the most vulnerable in society – older people, resident aliens, orphans and widows – are being exploited.

‘father and mother’ – The leaders/people have broken the fifth commandment (Exod 20:12, see also Deut 5:16; Lev 19:3) by ‘setting light by’ (i.e. dishonouring, slighting) their parents.

If you insult your father or mother, your light will be snuffed out in total darkness. Prov 20:20 NLT

Children, obey your parents because you belong to the Lord, for this is the right thing to do. “Honour your father and mother.” This is the first commandment with a promise: If you honour your father and mother, “things will go well for you, and you will have a long life on the earth.” Eph 6:1-3 NLT

‘resident aliens’ – these were foreigners allowed to live and work in Judah. Since they did not own land they were easily exploited. See Exod 22:21; Lev 19:13; Deut 10:19; 24:14-15.

‘the fatherless and the widow’ – See Exod 22:22; Deut 24:17, 19, 20, 21.

(8-11) RELIGION

These verses list sins that offend religious sensibilities and violate the ethical injunctions of the Holiness Code (Lev 17-16); especially Leviticus chapters 18 and 19. The list includes the sins of Sabbath desecration, slander, murder, idolatry, depravity and incest.

(8) Thou hast despised mine holy things, and hast profaned my sabbaths. These sins said here to have been committed by the city of Jerusalem are specifically attributed to the priests in v.26. Jeremiah, who was prophesying in Jerusalem at the same time as Ezekiel was prophesying in Babylonia, also preached against desecration of the Sabbath by the population of the city (Jer 17:20-23).

Disrespecting holy things would include activities like eating sacrificial meat while in a state of ritual impurity (Lev 7:20) or consuming it after the ‘expiry date’ (Lev 7:15-18; 19:6-8).

(9) In thee are men that carry tales to shed blood: In Jerusalem there are deceitful and treacherous men willing to give false testimony so that another may be put to death. Lit. ‘men of traffic’ or pedlars. Travelling salesmen probably carried gossip, the expression eventually came to mean slanderers or scandal-mongers. Possibly the idea here is that of informer. Naboth was a victim of malicious accusations in 1 Kgs 21:10-11. This behaviour was forbidden in the Holiness Code: Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the LORD. Lev 19:16

in thee they eat upon the mountains: in the midst of thee they commit lewdness.

The people of Jerusalem are involved in idolatrous worship (eating sacrificial meals at the high places) and, probably through participation in cultic rites, act in a depraved manner. The word zimmāh (see also v.11) meaning wickedness or lewdness is used in Leviticus of various sexual offences (e.g. Lev 18:17; 19:29; 20:14). See Ezek 16:27, 58; 22:9,11; 23:21, 27, 35, 44, 48.

(10-11) These verses give examples of the types of forbidden sexual acts practised in Jerusalem. They include cohabiting with a father’s wife, forcing (humiliating, oppressing) menstrual women to have sexual relations, committing adultery with other men’s wives (his fellow’s wife) and incestuous activity with female relatives like daughters in law and paternal sisters (see Lev 18:7-20).

(12) ACQUISITION

The people will stop at nothing, including murder, to acquire money and land. They indulge in economic exploitation – bribery, usury, extortion. These are sins of covetousness.

Acceptance of bribes – Lev19:15; Deut 16:19.

Usury (exorbitant interest on loans) – Lev 25:36-37

Extortion of a neighbour – Lev 19:35-36.

Verse 12 ends with the core accusation – they have forgotten God.

13-16 YHWH’S REACTION

(13) The Lord responds to these crimes by clapping his hands in a gesture of anger, vexation and indignation (6:11; 21:14,17). He is particularly enraged by their covetousness in pursuing ill-gotten gains and by the bloodshed that has been in their midst.

(14) YHWH asks the city a rhetorical question that emphasises that the people will not be able to endure the punishments that YHWH will certainly bring upon them because of their misconduct. Can thine heart endure, or can thine hands be strong, in the days that I shall deal with thee? In the terrible time of judgement their courage and strength will fail.

I the LORD have spoken it, and will do it. – ‘I am YHWH, what I have spoken I will do’ YHWH can be relied on to carry out what he says. This expression is also found in Ezek 17:25; 36:36; 37:14 and Num 14:35.

(15) Ezekiel predicts the Exile and claims that it is not only punishment but also purification. Exile will eradicate (consume, cause to cease, take completely way) the filth of idolatry and injustice.

(16) This will happen while the nations watch. While enduring public humiliation (‘take thine inheritance’ means ‘be profaned, be violated, dishonoured, degraded’) in the sight of the nations they will acknowledge the sovereignty of YHWH. The oracle ends with the recognition formula ‘thou shalt know that I am the Lord.’

The idea is that the Jerusalemites will be a disgrace in the sight of the surrounding nations but, as they recover from the pollution of idolatry, they will become inwardly (in thyself) conscious of their filthy state before God and eventually appreciate the Lord – as a holy and just God.

SUMMATION

Ezek 22:1-16 is a prophetic oracle in which YHWH, via Ezekiel, accuses Jerusalem of many sins and announces impending punishment in the form of exile. Ezekiel is instructed to act as judge over the ‘bloody city’ and confront it with its transgressions. These include murder, idolatry, profanation of the sabbaths, sexual depravity, extortion and the oppression of strangers, orphans and widows. The oracle singles out as especially guilty those leaders who abuse their power for personal gain. YHWH declares that Jerusalem’s doom and disgrace is inevitable.

RELEVANCE TODAY

This passage is a reminder that any society that forgets God will turn to idolatry (placing other things before God), produce corrupt leaders and tolerate injustice, oppression and exploitation of the vulnerable. Ignoring justice, compassion and faith places such a society at risk of divine judgement.

Exposition

Ezekiel 21:18-32 – The Third Oracle Concerning YHWH’s Sword

Posted on 4th Sep 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

This is the third and last of the oracles concerning YHWH’s sword in Ezekiel chapter 21. The oracle commences by focusing on the approach of the king of Babylon to a fork in the road and his use of divination to decide his path of conquest. Which branch of the road should he take – the one to Rabbath the capital of Ammon or the one to Jerusalem? Although seemingly guided by the omens, it is ultimately YHWH who directs him to go and lay siege to Jerusalem.

YHWH then directly addresses Zedekiah, the ‘profane and wicked prince of Israel,’ and prophesies his downfall. After that the focus shifts to the Ammonites and the judgement that will come upon them.

DIVISION

18-23 The sword at the crossroads.

24-27 Judgement upon Judah and its king.

28-32 Judgement upon the Ammonites

EXPOSITION

THE SWORD AT THE CROSSROADS (18-23)

(18-20) The oracle starts with the usual prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me again, saying’ followed by a reference to the prophet as ‘son of Adam.’ Ezekiel is given instructions that are reminiscent of chapter 4 where he was told to portray the siege of Jerusalem on a clay tile. Now he is told to draw a diagram representing the path that ‘the sword of the king of Babylon’ will take on a journey to deal with revolts by the kingdoms of Judah and Ammon. Nebuchadnezzar is thus identified as ‘the slayer’ of v.11.

Ezekiel is to sketch two routes that Nebuchadnezzar could follow. The road out of ‘one land’ (Babylonia) forks (cf. ‘the head of the way’ 16:25, 31) near a certain city (possibly Damascus). At this fork/crossroads Ezekiel is to ‘choose a place’ (place = hand, index, direction – Num 2:17; Jer 6:3), i.e. draw a signpost. The signpost indicates that one branch of the road leads to Rabbath Ammon (Deut 3:11) and the other to fortified Jerusalem. The sword (Nebuchadnezzar) will smite both destinations but which one will he go to first? The Ammonites seem to think that they will not be attacked (cf. v.29) but Jer 4:5 suggests that in Judah preparations were in place for the people to gather in ‘fortified’ Jerusalem for safety.

(21-23) Verses 21-22 explain the drawing. The crossroads represents a location at which King Nebuchadnezzar’s army comes to a standstill while the king and his soothsayers use three techniques of ancient divination to decide which city to attack first:

Belomancy – divination by use of arrows with symbols. They were mixed in a quiver then shaken and picked out.
Divination using teraphim – household deities (e.g. Gen 31:19, 30, 31) – small idols that represented the ancestors – these were consulted by means of magical rites.
Hepatoscopy – inspection of the liver of a sacrificed animal, usually a sheep. (For a more detailed explanation of hepatoscopy download or read the following article online: Jastrow, M. (1908). Hepatoscopy and Astrology in Babylonia and Assyria. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 47(190), 646–676.)

Omens appearing on the right side of the liver were considered auspicious and those on the left unlucky. Verse 22 represents Nebuchadnezzar as receiving favourable omens and, on that basis, deciding to invade Judah first.

The Babylonians will attack Jerusalem, set up battering rams, cause slaughter, sound a war cry, and prepare to storm the city. Similar preparations for siege warfare are described in Ezek 4:2.

(23) And it shall be unto them as a false divination in their sight, to them that have sworn oaths: but he will call to remembrance the iniquity, that they may be taken.

‘Them’ and ‘their’ refers to the Judeans (exiles and those in Judah) who will view as false the omens that Ezekiel predicts Nebuchadnezzar will get. This is because they are depending on their covenant with YHWH and thus expect him to protect them and send Nebuchadnezzar to punish the heathen Ammonites. YHWH, however, will remember that the people of Judah have not adhered to the stipulations of the Sinai covenant; with the result that he will judge them by allowing them to be seized (by the Babylonians).

JUDGEMENT UPON JUDAH AND ITS KING (24-27)

(24) Verse 24 refers back (‘therefore’) to v.23 and says much the same thing. The people of Judah are guilty and their iniquity has so attracted YHWH’s attention that he recalls all their wrongdoings and as punishment will deliver them to Nebuchadnezzar. They will be ‘taken with the hand,’ i.e. grasped by the hand of the slayer of v.11.

The divination rituals used by Nebuchadnezzar, although superstitious and forbidden to the Israelites, are sovereignly used by YHWH to bring about the attack on Jerusalem as an act of divine punishment. Prov 16:33 says: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

(25-27) In these verses Ezekiel directly addresses King Zedekiah and describes him as the ‘profane wicked prince of Israel.’ Ezekiel uses ‘prince,’ meaning ‘chieftain’ or ‘leader,’ instead of the term ‘king.’ It is possible that ‘prince of Israel’ was a title adopted by the Davidic kings of Judah once the northern kingdom came to an end. Zedekiah’s day of doom, on which his wrongdoing will cease, is close at hand. YHWH makes a proclamation to him: ‘thus saith the Lord God.’

Remove the turban and take off the crown. Things shall not remain as they are. Exalt that which is low, and bring low that which is exalted. Ezekiel 21:26 ESV

In v.26 four infinitive absolutes are translated as imperatives: remove, take off, exalt, abase. The cessation of Zedekiah’s reign is characterised by the removal of his turban and his crown – symbols of justice (Job 29:14) and dignity (Job 19:9). Things will not remain as they are; it is time his reign came to an end.

Note: Since the word for turban is also that used for the High Priest’s mitre (Exod. 28:4, 37, 39; 29:6; 39:28, 31; Lev. 8:9; 16:4) some commentators view the turban as belonging to the High Priest rather than the king and thus have YHWH proclaiming the overthrow of Judah’s religious and political institutions.

The inversion of the current state of affairs is summed up in the saying: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. These words are probably better known from the New Testament where Jesus said : And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted (Mt 23:12; Lk 14:11; 18:14). Similar thoughts, however, are expressed in 1 Sam 2:6-7; Job 5:11-13; Psa 75:7; Mk 10:43-44 and Lk 1:52.

A relevant example of someone of that era who was abased and then exalted is the prophet Jeremiah. He was badly treated under Zedekiah’s regime but later held in high regard by the Babylonians (Jer 40:1-6).

The severity of the coming upheaval is emphasised in v.27a by the threefold use of ‘overturn.’ This repetition expresses the superlative – e.g. ‘Holy, Holy, Holy’ Isa 6:3. The distortion and overthrow of everything is poetically described by Jeremiah in Jer 4:23-26:

I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.
I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger.

Verse 27b is an obvious reference to the famous prophecy of Gen 49:10: The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

Ezek 21:27b says; and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him. This verse is generally interpreted in one of three ways: a) as referring to the Messiah, or b) as referring to Jehoiachin, or c) as referring to Nebuchadnezzar.

a) MESSIAH. Zedekiah will fall and for an unspecified period of time there will not be another Davidic king until Messiah comes (‘it shall be no more, until). God will give the kingdom to him because it is rightfully his. Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning right or due as in KJV.

b) JEHOIACHIN – Temporarily there will be no Davidic ruler in Judah until the kingdom is restored to a legitimate king, i.e. Jehoiachin or one of his descendants. Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning a legal claim.

c) NEBUCHADNEZZAR – Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning punishing or judgement. Greenberg (1997, Ezekiel 21-37 : a New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, p. 434) explains:

punishing (mispat) … entrust [it] to him… mispat (usually “judgment”) here, as in 16:38 (plural); 5:8 (plural); 23:45; 39:21, means “punishment, punishing.” Combination with the verb ntn recurs in 23:24: “I will entrust judgment/punishing to them…and they will judge/punish you.”…Eliezer of Beaugency gives the sense: “Until Nebuchadnezzar, into whose hand I have committed my punishing, comes to punish him (Zedekiah).”

According to this view Ezekiel alludes to the Gen 49:10 prophecy but reinterprets it for the current situation. Those in Judah and Ezekiel’s fellow exiles doubtless interpret the prophecy messianically but the prophet turns it back on them; telling them that they can expect a slayer (Nebuchadnezzar), not a saviour (Messiah).

JUDGEMENT UPON THE AMMONITES (28-32)

Note: There are several interpretations of Ezekiel 21:28-29. Some see the entire section as a pronouncement of judgement upon the Ammonites, others view the entire section as pronouncing judgement upon the sword of YHWH, with the Ammonites as an audience.

(28-29) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH instructs him to prophesy (who to is not specified) concerning the Ammonites and concerning their reproach. The focus shifts from Judah to Ammon using language that is similar to that in vv.9-10. As in vv.9-10 concerning Judah, verse 28 concerning Ammon begins with Ezekiel being told to ‘say.’ It also contains a repetition of the word ‘sword’ (sword, sword), and an observation that the sword is ‘furbished.’ It is already drawn (opened, exposed) and polished in order to flash and be adequate to slaughter Ammonites. The Ammonites will taunt the people of Judah when they see the devastation that the sword (Babylonians) wreaks on the land of Israel (25:3, 6). Their rejoicing will be premature, however, because the sword will come against them as well.

It seems from v.29 that the Ammonite prophets and soothsayers were wrongly advising their citizens that they had nothing to fear from the Babylonians. Ezekiel says that these Ammonite diviners ‘see vanity’ and ‘divine a lie’ and thus mislead their people. The prophet Jeremiah also said this in a message he sent to the kings of five surrounding nations, including the Ammonites (Jer 27:3):

Therefore hearken not ye to your prophets, nor to your diviners, nor to your dreamers, nor to your enchanters, nor to your sorcerers, which speak unto you, saying, Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon: For they prophesy a lie unto you, Jer 27:9-10a

The inhabitants of the land of Ammon will be added to the number of slain Judahites, who have brought the sword (Nebuchadnezzar and his army) to the area because of their iniquity (vv. 23, 25, 29). The sword will conquer the Ammonites as well as the Judahites, both nations will share that same fate.

(30) ‘Return it to its sheath’- another infinitive absolute that translates as an imperative. This is either a command (to an unknown third party) to put the sword of the Lord back into its scabbard because its work is done or it is advice to the Ammonites that it is pointless for them to attempt to defend themselves because judgement upon them is certain. The Ammonites will be judged in their own land, the land of their origin. Unlike Israel/Judah, which will be exiled, Ammon will face destruction at home.

(31) YHWH’s anger will be poured out upon the Ammonites like a fiery flood. The fire of God’s wrath will blow against them like bellows fanning a fire (cf. Isa 54:16). YHWH will deliver them into the hands of brutish (i.e. cruel) men for whom destruction is an art form. They are craftsmen, expert at what they do. This probably refers to the efficient warriors of the Babylonian army.

(32) God’s fiery wrath will consume the Ammonites who will be like like fuel for a fire. Their blood will flow over all the land, this speaks of total military defeat.

‘No more remembered’ (cf. Psa 83:4; Jer 11:19; Zech13:2). The ultimate result of their judgement is oblivion. The nation that gloats and scorns the Lord’s people will suffer humiliation and obliteration. Unlike the Israelites who will retain their national identity and return from exile the Ammonites will never again exist as an independent nation. This nation that is so opposed to YHWH will eventually fade from history. Ezekiel goes into more dtail about the future of the Ammonites in chapter 25.

‘I the Lord have spoken.’ The oracle does not end with a maybe but with YHWH’s guarantee. These things will come to pass, God’s word is final.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

The Lord is sovereign and will judge all nations.
It is dangerous to take pleasure in the misfortune or downfall of others, especially the Lord’s people. This is a sin that invites judgement.
Be wary about who you trust. There are still false prophets and teachers about. It is better to hear the truth rather than trust in flattering and comforting lies.
God is true to his word. What he says, he will do.

Exposition

Ezekiel 21:8-17 – The Second Oracle Concerning YHWH’s Sword

Posted on 25th Aug 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In this second oracle concerning YHWH’s sword the prophet Ezekiel vividly foretells the imminent and inescapable judgement of YHWH’s sword against Jerusalem and the land of Israel. The slaughter is not portrayed as a distant threat but as wrath that is about to be unleashed upon the common people and their leaders.

Since it is written in poetic form this oracle is often referred to as ‘The Song of the Sword’ or ‘Ode to the Sword.’ Unfortunately there are great difficulties with the text, e.g., parts of vv.10 and 13 seem unintelligible and bear little relation to the context. Using textual criticism, scholars try to determine (i.e. guess) what the original might have said. Not all reach the same conclusions, which means that translations and interpretations differ. In spite of the textual difficulties it is clear that this second oracle continues the theme of the first; the destruction that will be brought about by the sword of YHWH. In this oracle Ezekiel concentrates upon two aspects of the sword – its preparation and its purpose.

DIVISION

8-11 The sword’s preparation

12-14a The prophet’s performance

14b-17 The sword’s purpose

EXPOSITION

THE SWORD’S PREPARATION (8-11)

(8) The familiar prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ introduces a new message. It is not Ezekiel’s own invention but comes directly from YHWH.

(9) The usual instruction to communicate the word of the Lord follows. Ezekiel is told to prophesy:

‘A sword, a sword’ – the double mention of sword is for emphasis and identifies this symbol of war as the focus of the oracle. The saying is repeated in v.28. This instrument is sharpened and furbished (polished). ‘Sharpened’ and ‘furbished’ occur together in vv.9, 10 and 11. These words suggest that the sword is prepared and ready for action.

(10) This is not a ceremonial sword – it is lethal. It has been sharpened so that it can make slaughter and has been polished so that it might dazzle like lightening (‘so that it might have lightening’ – see also Deut 32:40; Job 20:25).

should we then make mirth? Ezekiel seems to halt his flow of words at this juncture in order to reprove some of his listeners who are laughing or jesting at what he has to say. He asks: ‘Do you think this is a joke?’

it contemneth the rod of my son, as every tree The text here is obscure and reads: ‘Or shall we make mirth? The rod of my son despises every tree.’ Attempts at translation include:

CSB – The scepter of my son, the sword despises every tree.
DARBY – Shall we then make mirth, [saying,] The sceptre of my son contemneth all wood?
ESV – (Or shall we rejoice? You have despised the rod, my son, with everything of wood.)
NET – Should we rejoice in the scepter of my son? No! The sword despises every tree!
NIV – Shall we rejoice in the scepter of my royal son? The sword despises every such stick.
NLT – Now will you laugh? Those far stronger than you have fallen beneath its power!

Since the word šēḇeṭ means rod or sceptre scholars tend to view this verse as a reference to Gen 49:10 – The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be – especially since Ezekiel certainly has this passage from Genesis in view at v.27b. Some of the exiles jeered at Ezekiel, objecting to his prophecy because, in their view, it contradicted the promise to the tribe of Judah in Jacob’s blessing. The wooden sceptre of royal authority that despises every other such sceptre is that of Judah (here called YHWH’s son Israel, cf. Exod 4:22; Hos 11:1).

Based on the Gen 49:10 promise, the Davidic monarchy believes itself to be invulnerable and despises every force that comes against it. However, the sword of YHWH (i.e. Nebuchadnezzar v.19) will devour every sceptre, including that of Judah.

(11) The sword has been sharpened and polished and is now ready to be handed over to the slayer.

THE PROPHET’S PERFORMANCE (12-14a)

Ezekiel is once again (cf. v.6) told to dramatize his grief at the destruction that he is predicting. He is to ‘cry and howl,’ slap his thigh and clap his hands together.

(12) Addressing Ezekiel as ‘Son of Adam’ YHWH tells him to ‘cry and howl.’ Zā‘aq is a verb meaning to cry out or shriek in sorrow or anguish. Yālal is a verb meaning to wail or howl. This pair of words also occurs together in Isa 14:31; 65:14; Jer 25:34, 36; 47:2; 48:20, 31; 49:3; Hos 7:14; Zeph 1:10.

Ezekiel is to shriek and wail because the doom will come upon everyone in the land of Israel; from the lowest to the highest. The sword will strike down the rulers as well as the common people. ‘Be upon’ means come upon or come against.

it shall be upon my people
it shall be upon all the princes of Israel
terrors by reason of the sword shall be upon all my people

These verbs (translated: ‘it shall be’) are prophetic perfects. The predicted doom is so certain that it is viewed as a completed action – expressed using the past tense perfect verb form (‘it has been’).

Ezekiel is to accompany the loud audible sounds of grief (crying and howling) with a gesture symbolic of despair or mourning (cf. Jer 31:19). This involves slapping his thigh or upper side.

(13) for it is a trial; and what if even the rod that despises shall be no more? This is another obscure saying.

it is a trial – This possibly means that the pretensions of the Davidic monarchy of Judah will be tested. Or, it is saying that the sharpness of the sword has been proved on other people i.e. Nebuchadnezzar and his army have already won victories.

and what – What if the rod (Judah’s sceptre) is not strong enough to withstand the sword?

it is no more – The Davidic monarchy will be no more – Zedekiah’s revolt will fail, he will be gone and Judah will not have a ruler.

(14a) Ezekiel is again told to prophesy (see v.9) but what he is to say is not specified. Then he is instructed to make a further physical gesture; he is to clap his hands together. It would seem from 25:6 that this action expresses exultation: …thou hast clapped thine hands, and stamped with the feet, and rejoiced in heart with all thy despite against the land of Israel. Is Ezekiel rejoicing at the actions of YHWH and applauding the coming judgement? Surely that is unlikely! Perhaps the clapping of the hands signifies great emotion (Num 24:10), or is a threatening gesture.

THE SWORD’S PURPOSE (14b-17)

(14b) let the sword be doubled the third time. The sword is to strike twice, even three times. Possibly Ezekiel is to clap his hands three times, signifying the intensity of the judgement and its terrible effect. Some commentators view this as a reference to the three different Chaldean attacks on Jerusalem – in 605/604 BCE, 597 BCE and 586 BCE. It is interesting that the ‘sword’ is mentioned three times in v.14.

‘It is the sword of the great (singular) slain (pierced).’

it is the sword of a pierced man, the great one. The sword will pierce even the king, or perhaps this refers to any person in a high position. Or, this sword has slain the great men.

which entereth into their privy chambers. This can mean that the sword besets or encloses people (i.e. surrounds them) or that it will pursue them into their innermost chambers. The meaning is the same – there is no escape.

(15) YHWH has set the slaughter (the word translated ‘point’ occurs only here in Hebrew and means ‘slaughter’) of the sword against all their gates. This would suggest that the judgement is wider than Judah and applies to other nations as well. The sword is being brandished about with the result that the rapid movement back and forth makes it flash like lightening (cf. Gen 3:24). ‘Wrapped up’ means held in readiness i.e., it has already been grasped by the slayer and withdrawn from its scabbard.

Pointing the sword at the gates has two purposes in view:

that hearts may melt (they will lack the courage to defend themselves)
that falterings be many (many will (stumble) fall by the sword or, they will have many opportunities to fall by the sword)

(16) YHWH now addresses the sword directly (sword is a feminine noun and the verbs are in feminine form).

‘Go thee’ – This imperative is reckoned to be a military command meaning ‘stand as one’ or ‘close ranks.’ The sword is personified as the Babylonian army mobilised for battle and commanded to focus its attack on the right or the left (i.e. every direction); wherever its blade has been assigned (yā‘ad). The ‘face’ here is the cutting edge (also Eccl 10:10). For an example of the sword of the Lord being assigned or appointed (yā‘ad) see Jer 47:7.

(17) The oracle ends with YHWH again addressing Ezekiel: ‘I too, like you, will strike my hands together.’ This refers back to v.14a. YHWH will mirror Ezekiel’s gesture, then his wrath will subside.

SUMMATION

The difficult oracle in Ezekiel 21:8-17 is a dramatic poem that uses the image of a sharpened, polished sword to convey the certainty and severity of YHWH’s judgement on Judah and its leaders. This is not just any weapon; it has been divinely prepared, sharpened and polished for deadly effect, and targeted at the people and leaders of Judah. Ezekiel’s emotional involvement in the oracle – shrieking, wailing, striking of his thigh and clapping of his hands – illustrates the huge personal distress the punishment will cause. The oracle is a reminder that divine patience has a limit and that it is dangerous to make fun of or trivialise God’s warnings.

Exposition

Ezekiel 21:1-7 – The First Oracle Concerning YHWH’s Sword

Posted on 21st Aug 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

At the end of chapter 20 Ezekiel’s fellow-exiles told him that they did not understand his prophecies, especially the oracle concerning the Negev (20:45-49). Now, in chapter 21, three oracles about YHWH’s sword elaborate upon the destruction of the Negev in terms that are direct, stark and easily understood. They are powerful declarations that the sword of judgement is coming soon.

This first oracle of chapter 21 (vv.1-7) links back to the prophecy against the Negev (20:45-49) and interprets the forest of that oracle as Jerusalem and the forest fire as ‘the sword of YHWH’ (i.e. war). It parallels that previous oracle by repeating the same ideas and by using similar words and expressions: for example: ‘set your face;’ ‘drop the word;’ the righteous and the wicked/ green tree and dry tree; ‘from the south to the north;’ ‘all flesh may see/know;’ ‘it shall not be quenched/it shall not return.’

DIVISION

1-2 Address to Ezekiel

3-5 Announcement of Judgement

6-7 Anguish at Impending Doom

ADDRESS TO EZEKIEL (1-2)

This is a new oracle for it begins with the prophetic word formula ‘and the word of the Lord came unto me, saying.’ This frames it as a direct revelation from YHWH and makes clear that the message does not express Ezekiel’s own thoughts and opinions but has divine authority.

By addressing Ezekiel with the customary description ‘Son of Adam’ YHWH emphasises the prophet’s humanity in contrast to the divine status of the Lord who is communicating with him. YHWH issues three instructions to Ezekiel:

set thy face toward Jerusalem – This means that Ezekiel is to either totally focus on Jerusalem or to speak the oracle while facing in the direction of the city. ‘Set thy face toward’ sounds confrontational which would accord with ”I am against thee’ in v.3.
drop thy word toward the holy places – ‘drip/drop/trickle the word’ means ‘preach.’ It is quite shocking that Ezekiel is to condemn the Temple. The expression ‘the holy places’ could refer to sanctuaries of false worship but more likely refers to the holy places in the Jerusalem temple and thus to the Temple itself. For YHWH to condemn his own temple is a radical step. The Jews reckoned it was the inviolable dwelling place of YHWH and that belief gave them a (false) sense of security (Jer 7:4).
prophesy against the land of Israel – In v.2 the target of Ezekiel’s prophecy of doom is explicitly named as Jerusalem and the ‘land of Israel.’ Together these equal ‘the south’ of the previous oracle (20:45-49).

The mention of Israel’s city, sanctuary and soil (cf. same triad in Psa 79:1) shows that YHWH’s condemnation is total; his judgement will include everything – political, religious and territorial.

ANNOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT (3-5)

‘The land of Israel is repeated’ for emphasis. Ezekiel, speaking in Babylon to the Jewish exiles there, prophesies death and devastation upon the homeland.

I am against thee – It is rather frightening that the covenant God of Israel who once said ‘I will walk among you, and will be your God, and ye shall be my people.’ (Lev 26:12) has now become their adversary. He is not only hostile, he is about to become their attacker. YHWH intends to draw his sword from its sheath (this is stated 3 times; vv. 3, 4, 5) and with it ‘cut off…the righteous and the wicked’ (repeated). Moshe Greenberg (1997, Ezekiel 21-37. Anchor Bible, p.420) observes: ‘righteous and wicked. Or: innocent and guilty; a merism for “everybody.” Yet the choice of these terms rather than, say, “young and old” implies that punishment will not discriminate between those who do and those who do not deserve to die.’

The sword, representing the Babylonian army, is said to be YHWH’s sword. The Babylonians are his instruments, just as the Assyrians had also been (Isa 10:5). Various expressions in verses 3, 4 and 5 emphasise that the horrific punishment will be inescapable – ‘the righteous and the wicked;’ ‘all flesh;’ ‘from the south to the north.’ War does not discriminate between the upright and the corrupt.

V.5 maintains that the ultimate purpose of YHWH’s reckoning with Jerusalem/Judah is that the world at large will recognise that YHWH is acting according to his holy character. He will not tolerate sin. He has drawn his sword from its scabbard and will not return it again (cf. 2 Sam 1:22) – at least not until its work is finished (cf. v.30 – an imperative – lit ‘return it to its sheath!). YHWH will not relent, punishment is coming.

ANGUISH AT THE IMPENDING DOOM (6-7)

No doubt Ezekiel found it distressing to relay such a message of doom but YHWH then orders him to dramatize his anguish in the presence of the exiles. He is not to hide his feelings but moan or groan loudly in despair. ‘Broken loins’ stands for emotional breakdown – the loins (central part of the body including hips and lower back) were regarded as the seat of a person’s strength (cf. Isa 21:3). ‘Bitterness’ is bitter anguish or extreme grief. When they ask: ‘Why are you groaning?’ he is to tell them that he is mourning because of the news report that is certainly coming, viz., the soon coming judgement that will affect everyone in Jerusalem and the land of Israel. When the exiles hear the report from Jerusalem about the Babylonian army and the fall of the city their physical and psychological reaction will be similar to Ezekiel’s.

Every heart will melt, and all hands will be feeble; every spirit will faint, and all knees will be weak as water. Ezek 21:7 ESV

A different interpretation is that Ezekiel is describing the reaction in Jerusalem and the land of Israel to the Babylonian invasion (rather than that of the exiles in Babylon to news of it). The Christian Standard Bible, for example, translates what is literally ‘all knees shall flow with water’ (v.7) as all knees will run with urine. This would then refer to the paralysing fear and failure of courage that will be experienced by all in the homeland; graphically described by undignified image of people losing control of their bodily functions through sheer terror.

The oracle ends with an affirmation by the ‘Sovereign Lord’ (Adonai YHWH) that this is a certainty – behold, it cometh, and shall be brought to pass, saith the Lord GOD. This will definitely happen. In the two oracles that follow in chapter 21 Ezekiel prophesies in greater detail about YHWH’s sword.

Exposition

Ezekiel 20:45-49 – The Oracle Concerning Judgement on the Negev

Posted on 17th Aug 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In the Hebrew Bible this section is numbered as Ezekiel 21:1-5 but in most English translations it is 20:45-49. I follow the English chapter and verse arrangement.

Having closed the oracle about Israel’s historical rebellion (20:1-44) with a prophecy of restoration after purification and judgement Ezekiel gives a brief message about that impending judgement using a parable of a forest fire. This serves as an introduction to three oracles concerning the sword in chapter 21, which elaborate on the theme of judgement.

DIVISION

45-47a YHWH’s instructions to Ezekiel.

47b-48 Parable of the forest fire.

49 The complaint

EXPOSITION

YHWH’S INSTRUCTIONS TO EZEKIEL (45-47a)

Although covered by the date given in 20:1 the prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ in 20:45 lets us know that this is a fresh revelation. In the new prophetic oracle Ezekiel shifts from the plain-speaking of his previous message to vivid metaphor.

Addressing Ezekiel by the usual term ‘Son of Adam’ (emphasising mortality) YHWH in v.46 issues a threefold instruction to Ezekiel about the South, i.e. the Negev:

set thy face toward the south (tēymān),
and drop thy word toward the south (dārôm),
and prophesy against the forest of the south field (neg̱eb).

In this verse, whether for variety or literary effect, Ezekiel employs three different words meaning ‘South.’

Ezekiel is told to ‘set his face’ toward tēymān. He was to focus attention on the south, or perhaps literally speak while facing southwards (cf. 6:2; 13:17). Tēymān means ‘that which lies on the right hand,’ referring to the direction lying to the right of a person facing east. Sweeney (2013, Reading Ezekiel, p.107) points out that it is a term that generally means “south,” but has later come to designate Yemen in Hebrew. Here it refers to the southern region of Judah.

Ezekiel is to ‘drip or drop the word;’ which is a figurative term meaning to speak a prophetic utterance on behalf of YHWH (21:2; Amos 7:16). He is to preach to Darom, another word meaning south. He is also to prophesy against the forest of the Negev field. Although Negev is a general word for south it is also the name of a specific wilderness area south of Judea. ‘Field’ is used here in the sense of ‘territory’ rather than a relatively small expanse of agricultural land (e.g. Gen 14:7; 32:3). Since the Negev is a wilderness area ‘forest’ probably signifies population rather than trees and brush. By ‘south’ Ezekiel is therefore referring to the southern parts of the Holy Land, as 21:2 clarifies.

Why does Ezekiel say ‘south?’ He may be thinking in terms of Israel’s internal geography – Judah, Jerusalem and the Negev lay in the southern part of the Promised Land. Or, although Judah technically lay southwest of Babylon, Ezekiel may be thinking of Judah as ‘the south’ from his own perspective in Babylon. H. L. Ellison (1956, Ezekiel: The Man And His Message, P.84 ) gives an interesting explanation:

Ezekiel is told to “set his face toward the south,” for though Judea lay to the west of Tel-abib, Ezekiel has been transported in spirit to the Chaldean army, which is now marching south from Carchemish and the Euphrates.

The triple reference to the south draws attention to the fact that YHWH’s judgement will fall on Judah. Ezekiel is to communicate this to ‘the forest of the Negev,’ calling it to attention with the saying ‘Hear the word of YHWH’ followed by ‘Thus says my Lord YHWH.’ KJV translates ‘Adonai YHWH’ as ‘the Lord God.’ ’aḏōnāy means ‘my Lord.’

PARABLE OF THE FOREST FIRE (47b-48)

The short parable now unfolds. YHWH intends to destroy the forest by fire and everything will perish. The fire will be unstoppable – ‘shall not be quenched’ is repeated.

The forest stands for Judah’s population.
The trees are individual people.
‘Every green tree…every dry tree.’ The green trees are the righteous people and the dry trees are the wicked. God’s judgement will fall on all without distinction – everyone will be affected by the coming Babylonian invasion.
The fire (cf. Isa 9:18-19) is a symbol of judgement by war. The Babylonian army will sweep through Judah like a forest fire.
The ‘flaming flame’ (the flame of the flaming brightness) indicates the strongest possible flame.
‘All faces’ – every single thing (person) in the forest.
‘from the south to the north.’ – comprehensive scope, the whole land will suffer.
‘Shall not be quenched’ – the judgement is unstoppable and irreversible.

(v.48) And all flesh shall see that I the LORD have kindled it: it shall not be quenched.

This verse is the climax of the oracle. YHWH takes full responsibility for kindling the fire. The judgement is public and will be seen by the entire world. Everyone will realise that it has come from YHWH. He is the ultimate cause, the Babylonians are his instruments.

THE COMPLAINT (49)

In this verse Ezekiel interjects with his own thoughts on the reaction of his fellow-exiles to the oracle. It is in the form of a short prayer in which he laments the fact that they have ridiculed him and dismissed him as being someone who just spins riddles. They claimed that his words are too obscure. That they misunderstood (perhaps deliberately) sets the scene for chapter 21 in which YHWH speaks plainly in three oracles about the sword that was coming against Judah.

SUMMATION

In a section which provides confirmation that Ezekiel was a speaking prophet as well as one who wrote we learn that a severe and comprehensive judgement is coming upon an area that lies to the south of the prophet – this can be identified as the Negev – the southern part of Judea. Ezekiel uses the metaphor of a forest fire that consumes everything (green tree and dry tree) as it spreads unchecked to communicate the idea of overwhelming judgement. All the nations will see the devastation and realise that it has been sent by YHWH. The people to whom Ezekiel communicated the oracle failed to take God’s word seriously; dismissing it as a riddle rather than a real threat. That response sets the stage for the three sword oracles of chapter 21 which proclaim the coming judgement in plain language.

Exposition

Psalm 46: God’s Unshakeable Presence in Times of Trouble

Posted on 1st Aug 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN FOR THE SONS OF KORAH, A SONG UPON ALAMOTH.
¹ God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.
² Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea;
³ Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. Selah.
⁴ There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High.
⁵ God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early.
⁶ The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted.
⁷ The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.
⁸ Come, behold the works of the LORD, what desolations he hath made in the earth.
⁹ He maketh wars to cease unto the end of the earth; he breaketh the bow, and cutteth the spear in sunder; he burneth the chariot in the fire.
¹⁰ Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.
¹¹ The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.

INTRODUCTION

Psalm 46 was a favourite of the Reformer Martin Luther and is said to have been the inspiration for his famous hymn ‘A Mighty Fortress is Our God.’ The psalm is generally well-known and loved; especially for lines such as ‘God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.’ (v.1) and ‘Be still, and know that I am God’ (v.10).

Since its main theme is the assurance of God’s unshakeable presence during turmoil the psalm has been a great comfort over many centuries to those who have found themselves ‘in trouble.’ It assures readers that, no matter what form troubles may take (e.g. global uncertainty, overwhelming personal crisis, health scare, spiritual battles), God is right there with them, bringing stability, comfort and hope.

OCCASION AND TYPE

Psalm 46 does not specify an exact historical context but it must have been written during a time of crisis, perhaps when Jerusalem was under threat from external enemies. One possibility is the occasion described in 2 Chronicles 20 when a coalition of forces went to battle against Jehoshaphat, another is the significant threat to Jerusalem from the Assyrians during the reign of Hezekiah (c. 715-686 BCE); recorded in 2 Kings 18-19.

Psalm 46 is classified as one of the ‘Songs of Zion’ (46, 48, 76, 84, 87, 122) which celebrate Jerusalem as the ‘city of God.’

DIVISION

Psalm 46 can be divided into either: A) two sections, each ending with the same refrain, or: B) three stanzas, all ending with ‘Selah’

A) 2 sections:

1-7 THE DANGER – this section ends with the refrain v.7: The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.

8-11 THE END OF THE DANGER – this section closes with the same refrain v.11: The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.

B) 3 stanzas

1-3 GOD AS A REFUGE – v.3 ends with Selah.

4-7 GOD AS A RIVER – v.7 ends with Selah.

8-11 GOD AS A RULER – v.11 ends with Selah.

THE SUPERSCRIPTION

TO THE CHIEF MUSICIAN FOR THE SONS OF KORAH,

The ‘Sons of Korah’ was a group of Levitical musicians and singers descended from Korah. For further details; see my post Sons of Korah: Their Role in Worship and Psalms

A SONG UPON ALAMOTH.

See also 1 Chron 15:20. It is thought that Alamoth was either a musical instrument or a musical notation. The word means ‘young women’ therefore some scholars speculate that the music was set for a high-pitched voice.

EXPOSITION

GOD AS A REFUGE (1-3)

A personal refuge – ‘our’
A powerful refuge – ‘strength’
A present refuge – ‘help in trouble’
A peaceful refuge – ”we will not fear’

(1) The psalmist begins with a strong declaration of trust in God, who is said to be the people’s refuge, strength and help in times of trouble. God is a reliable shelter – a safe place – and a source of strength – providing protection during the troubles of life.

The second line implies that the psalmist and the nation had already experienced this help on more than one occasion – YLT gives the literal translation as ‘a help in adversities found most surely,’ i.e. in times like these God proves himself to be a help.

(2-3) On the basis that God is their refuge, strength and help, his people will not be in a continual state of fear but remain calm in all the experiences of life. To emphasise how fearless God’s people should be and illustrate their confidence that God will help them, even in extreme circumstances, the psalmist uses vivid imagery of seismic cataclysm – earthquakes, tidal waves and shifting mountains – as a metaphor for ‘troubles.’

though the earth trembles
and the mountains topple
into the depths of the seas,
though its water roars and foams
and the mountains quake with its turmoil. CSB

Verse three ends with ‘Selah’ – a pause for reflection, in order to grasp the full import of what has been said.

GOD AS A RIVER (4-7)

The scene now changes from raging seas to a silent river. Rivers often appear in the Bible as symbolic of God’s presence and the life, joy, and peace that this provides (e.g. Gen 2:10; Psa 65:9; Isa 48:18; 66:12; Jer 17:8; Ezek 47:1-12; Rev 22:1-2). Here the image of a quietly flowing river paints a serene picture of God’s sustaining presence with his people in the city of Jerusalem. The river’s streams (irrigation channels) bring joy to the city of God (i.e. the people in the city – this is an example of metonymy) which is the holy dwelling place of the Most High.

The title ‘Most High’ indicates God’s supreme position above all others. Its most famous occurrence is in connection with the blessing of Abraham by Melchizedek (Gen 14:18-24). Since Melchizedek was the priest of the Most High and also king of Salem (ancient Jerusalem) it would seem that this epithet for God had a strong connection to the city of Jerusalem.

Since Jerusalem did not have a river this reference is metaphorical. However, the psalmist may have had in mind the Gihon Spring situated to the east of Jerusalem. Facing the prospect of invasion by the Assyrians under Sennacherib, King Hezekiah built Hezekiah’s Tunnel (2 Kgs 20:20; 2 Chron 32:2-4, 30) to divert water from Gihon Spring to ‘the waters of Shiloah that go softly’ (later called the Pool of Siloam) – cf. Isaiah 8:5-8. Access to water in time of siege was viewed as evidence of God’s presence with his people.

Verses 5-7 are an expansion of the idea of God’s presence with his people (cf. Mic 3:11; Zeph 3:15) and of divine supremacy over natural and political upheaval. The psalmist cleverly links these verses to the previous section by repeating ‘topple’ (2, 5, 6, – be carried, move), ‘help’ (1, 5) and ‘be in uproar’ (3, 6 – roar, raged).

God is within her; she will not be toppled.
God will help her when the morning dawns.
Nations rage, kingdoms topple;
the earth melts when he lifts his voice. 46:5-6 CSB

God is with the city – therefore – it will not be toppled.
God will help the city – therefore – a new day will dawn.
God will ‘utter his voice’ (thunder? Job 37:4; Psa 18:13; 29:3-9) – and as a result – nations will rage, kingdoms topple and the earth melt (soften as a result of rain – Psa 65:10). A thunderstorm with torrential downpours is a spectacular display of God’s awesome power.

The assurance that God is with his people reinforces their belief that his divine presence provides security. They are secure in his shelter, knowing that his raised voice will overcome all distresses.

Verse 7 is the refrain (parallel to v.1 and repeated in v.11) The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.

As one of the psalms in a section of the book often referred to as the ‘Elohistic Psalter’ (Pss. 42-83) Psalm 46 prefers the divine name elohim (God) over YHWH (the Lord). YHWH occurs, however in v.8 and we have already noticed the title Most High in v.4. Now in v.7 we have two more names for God: YHWH Sabaoth (Lord of Hosts) and The God of Jacob.

Lord of Hosts – means Lord of Armies. Although God is in control of physical, earthly armies this title is usually interpreted in terms of God as cosmic commander of angelic, spiritual forces, such as:

And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries? And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the LORD am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my lord unto his servant? And the captain of the LORD’s host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so. Joshua 5:13-15

And when the servant of the man of God was risen early, and gone forth, behold, a host compassed the city both with horses and chariots. And his servant said unto him, Alas, my master! how shall we do? And he answered, Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them. And Elisha prayed, and said, LORD, I pray thee, open his eyes, that he may see. And the LORD opened the eyes of the young man; and he saw: and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha. 2 Kings 6:15-17

Lord of Hosts stresses God’s supreme power and ability to defend his people against any threat. They do not have to fight their own battles because the Lord of Armies has infinite resources and can assemble a team to assist whenever necessary.

is with us – cf. Immanuel – God with us, Isa 7:14; 8:8, 10.

The God of Jacob – This title occurs about 285 times in the Old Testament, of which 15 are in the Book of Psalms. Jacob is a patriarch whose life was marked by struggles, but God remained with him. That same God is now with his people in their struggles. He is a stronghold – a secure, inaccessible height. This same word occurs in 2 Samuel 22:3 (The God of my rock; in him will I trust: he is my shield, and the horn of my salvation, my high tower, and my refuge, my saviour; thou savest me from violence.) and is used to describe the righteous in Isaiah 33:16 (He shall dwell on high: his place of defence shall be the munitions of rocks: bread shall be given him; his waters shall be sure.) God is the true source of security.

GOD AS A RULER (8-11)

COME, SEE

From the thought in v.7 of the Lord of Armies as a great warrior the stanza vv.8-11 moves on to view him as the ultimate peacemaker. In this final section the outlook moves from personal/national to global and from confidence to awe.

The imperatives invite, indeed command, everyone to come, behold the works of the LORD, what desolations he hath made in the earth. The word translated ‘come’ is not the verb ‘come’ but means ‘walk’ or ‘go.’ The verb ‘behold’ is not the common word for ‘see’ but a more poetic term often used by the prophets (Isa 1:1; Lam 2:14; Hab 1:1; Zech 10:2) with the idea of ‘perceive.’ The ‘works of the Lord’ are his general acts or deeds. Often they are described as ‘wonderful’ (i.e. astonishing or extraordinary) but his activities referred to here are destructive (‘made desolations’). The main implication of the noun ‘desolations’ is ruin or horror. These acts, however, are not random but the result of God’s purposeful action to eliminate his enemies on earth. ‘Earth’ here, and in v.10, is another example of metonymy – it stands for people on the earth. God has to dismantle human pride and violence in order to establish peace so his works are not always gentle; sometimes they involve upheaval in order to bring about justice and renewal, e.g. the Flood, the Exodus, or Jesus overturning the moneychangers’ tables in the temple. ‘Hath made’ is a prophetic perfect which points to a time that is future to the psalmist; but the event is so certain that he speaks of it as having already happened.

V.9 contains the following statements:

He makes wars cease throughout the earth. – God will establish peace throughout the world (cf. Isa 2:4).
He shatters bows (cf. Hos 1:5) and cuts spears to pieces; – God will disable all armaments.
He sets wagons ablaze (cf. Josh 11:6, 9; Isa 9:5) – ‘wagons’ is usually translated as ‘chariots.’ God will destroy all powerful weaponry.

These implements of war represent various aspects of human conflict. Bows – long-range attack, striking from a distance. Spears – direct confrontation – close combat. Chariots – mobility and speed, hit and run tactics, transfer of troops. One day there will be no more war for all enemies of the Lord will be subdued and all their weaponry dismantled or destroyed.

BE STILL, KNOW

These acts of disarmament set the stage for verse 10 in which there are two more imperatives: ‘be still’ and ‘know.’ Until now the psalmist and the nation (‘we’ v.2, ‘us’ v.7) have been speaking but v.10 is a direct command from the Lord: Be still, and know that I am God. The verb ‘to be still’ means – to slack, relax one’s grip, cease, desist, become weak, let drop, let go (cf. Josh 10:6; Judg 8:3; 1 Sam 15:16; 2 Sam 4:1; Neh 6:9; Psa 138:8). This command is primarily addressed to the nations (KJV ‘heathen’) urging them to surrender, to end their pointless armed struggle against the invincible Lord of Armies. They are also instructed to ‘know’ that he is God, i.e. recognise his sovereignty and absolute authority.

God then gives his reason for stepping in to end all wars and establish universal peace. It is so that he will be exalted. The verb ‘I will be exalted’ is repeated in each of the two remaining clauses in v.10: I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted in the earth. Darby. This repetition further emphasises God’s sovereignty over the earth. He is not just Israel’s God but controls the world and will therefore be universally exalted.

Although addressed primarily to the raging nations these words have often been appreciated by believers in trouble who have viewed them as an invitation to pause, reflect and ‘let go.’ This is not passive surrender but rather a deliberate act of trust. It represents a decision to resist the pressure to always be in control. Rather, in the midst of instability, frantic activity and great anxiety, one must commit the situation to the Lord. God calls for stillness – so that we may stop striving but acknowledge his sovereignty and power as he fulfils his purposes throughout the world.

V.11 repeats the refrain of v.7: The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah. The psalm ends where it began – with God’s unwavering presence and protection – and with reassurance and confidence in God as an unshakeable fortress and refuge.

SUMMATION

Psalm 46 is a theological reflection upon God as a refuge and strength. It stresses that, in chaos and uncertainty, God remains a constantly available source of help and security. The psalm encourages us to place complete and unconditional trust in our omnipotent and omnipresent God, who is the true source of safety in times of trouble or tragedy. No matter how bad things may seem, believers can find comfort in God’s power, presence and promises; secure in the knowledge that his ultimate victory is assured.

Exposition

Psalm 48: ‘This God is our God forever and ever.’

Posted on 31st May 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

Reading: Psalm 48

INTRODUCTION

Psalm 48 is a patriotic song, probably pre-exilic, which celebrates the protection of Jerusalem by Israel’s God, YHWH, who dwells there among his people and is supreme over all enemies. The greatness of YHWH is reflected in the security and beauty of the city.

The occasion of the psalm is unknown but it would seem from vv. 4-8 that it was composed in the aftermath of a historical event that resulted in a great national deliverance, which is attributed to YHWH. Some scholars suggest that it may have been written for the Feast of Tabernacles during which, so they speculate, the faithful praised the Lord as they toured the city (v.12).

Psalm 48 falls into the category known as ‘Zion psalms;’ these focus on Mt. Zion (Jerusalem) — the place of God’s presence and protection (cf. Psa 2:6; 9:11,14; 14:7; 20:2; 48:2,11, 12; 50:2; 51:18; 69:35; 74:2; 76:2; 78:68; 84:7; 87:2, 5; 97:8; 99:2; 102:13,16, 21; 110:2; 125:1; 126:1; 128:5; 129:5; 132.13; 133:3; 134:3; 135:21; 137:1; 146;10; 147:12; 149:2).

Psalm 48 is located in what is often called the Elohistic psalter – a group of psalms (42-83) that prefer the divine name Elohim. Psalm 48 calls God YHWH (the LORD) once, great King once, Lord of hosts once and Elohim (God) eight times.

THE TITLE

The Hebrew superscript says ‘a song, a psalm, for the sons of Korah’. The Septuagint (LXX) Greek translation adds: ‘on the second [day] of the week.’ Apparently specific psalms were sung on different days of the week by the Levite choir as part of the temple liturgy. Only one psalm title in the Hebrew Masoretic text (MT) specifies a day of the week (the sabbath) on which it is to be sung. Several psalm titles in the c. 3rd century BCE Greek translation known as the Septuagint (LXX) indicate a day of the week.

Sunday: Psalm 24 Psalm for David on the first day of the week LXX
Monday: Psalm 48 A Psalm of praise for the sons of Core on the second day of the week LXX
Wednesday: Psalm 94 A Psalm of David for the fourth day of the week LXX
Friday: Psalm 93 For the day before the Sabbath LXX
Saturday: Psalm 92 A Psalm or a Song for the sabbath day MT

No records survive for Tuesday or Thursday.

It would therefore seem that Psalm 48 was sung on Mondays. The title describes it as a song and a psalm. ‘Song’ is a general word for a lyrical song and ‘psalm’ most likely indicates that it is to be sung with musical accompaniment.

For Sons of Korah see my post: Sons of Korah: Their Role in Worship and Psalms

DIVISION

Psalm 48 has four sections:

1-3 Praise for Zion’s beauty
4-8 Panic for Zion’s foes
9-11 Pondering Zion’s God
12-14 Proclaiming Zion’s fortress

PRAISE FOR ZION’S BEAUTY 1-3

Psalm 48 opens with ascription of praise to YHWH, Israel’s national God, who is great (cf. Deut 10:21; 1 Chron 16:25) and very worthy of praise. The psalm makes clear that God’s unmatched greatness is because of his protection of Jerusalem and the defeat of Israel’s enemies (vv.3-8) and also because of his personal attributes (vv.9-14). He is therefore unsurpassed in greatness because of who he is and because of the mighty acts that he has done.

The geographical location in which YHWH is to be praised is Zion (Jerusalem). One might gain the impression that Jerusalem itself is the object of praise but ultimately the psalmist is praising the God whose greatness is reflected in the glory of the city – for which the psalmist uses seven epithets in vv.1-2:

The city of our God – YHWH is associated with Jerusalem, that is where he dwells (cf. Psa 14:7; 46:4-5; 76:2; Isa 12:6)

His holy mountain – The mountain is not intrinsically holy but is called this because of God’s presence in the temple there. Historically the location (formerly known as Mt. Moriah) is associated with YHWH because there he tested Abraham (Gen 22:2) and appeared to David (2 Chron 3:1). For holy hill/mountain see Psa 2:6; 87:1; Isa 2:3; Mic 4:1; Zech 8:3.

Beautiful in elevation – Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty, God hath shined. Psalm 50:2:

All that pass by clap their hands at thee; they hiss and wag their head at the daughter of Jerusalem, saying, Is this the city that men call The perfection of beauty, The joy of the whole earth? Lamentations 2:15

Some commentators aptly point out that in these epithets we have ‘theological geography’, i.e. symbolic or spiritual meaning assigned to physical locations. Here Jerusalem’s physical loftiness mirrors its spiritual significance.

Joy of the whole earth (or land?) – The psalmist views Jerusalem as a beacon of hope for all nations. A similar thought is expressed by Isaiah: And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. Isaiah 2:2-3

Mount Zion – Zion is another name for Jerusalem. It is sometimes associated with YHWH as a warrior, for example: The LORD also shall roar out of Zion, and utter his voice from Jerusalem; and the heavens and the earth shall shake: but the LORD will be the hope of his people, and the strength of the children of Israel. So shall ye know that I am the LORD your God dwelling in Zion, my holy mountain: then shall Jerusalem be holy, and there shall no strangers pass through her any more. Joel 3:16-17

On the sides of the north – Although the temple and royal palaces were located on the northern slopes of Mt. Zion the city of Jerusalem is not geographically in the far north so the expression ‘the sides of the north’ is likely symbolic.

The Hebrew word for north (zaphon) is also a proper name. The psalmist may therefore have in mind Mt. Zaphon in Syria, in Ancient Near Eastern mythology the place where the Canaanite pantheon of gods headed up by Baal – the Storm-god and bringer of rain and fertility – was thought to assemble. According to the Ugaritic text Baal Cycle Mt. Zaphon became the seat of the Storm-god Baal after his defeat of Yamm (the sea). It is interesting that two Old Testament passages refer to the creation of Zaphon (north) and link it with God’s battle with the sea (Job 26:7, 10-12; Psalm 89:9, 12). In the ‘Song of the Sea’ in Exodus 15, although there is no reference to Zaphon, it is said that God has created a mountain location for himself to dwell in (Exod 15:17).

There is a reference to the belief in an assembly of gods on Zaphon in Isaiah’s prophecy about the King of Babylon/ Lucifer in Isaiah 14:13: For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north.

If the psalmist intends Zaphon as a proper name he is applying to Zion the idea of Zaphon as the seat of deity and asserting that YHWH’s holy mountain surpasses the mythical mountain of Baal and the pagan gods. YHWH, not Baal, is the true God and Zion, not Zaphon, the true holy mountain.

The phrase translated ‘sides of the north’ also occurs in Isa 14:13; Ezek 38:6,15; 39:2.

City of the great King – the psalmist declares that Jerusalem belongs to YHWH and it is the seat of his rule. YHWH is the ultimate sovereign. Earthly powers may boast of having ‘great’ kings (for example, Assyria about Sennacherib: Isaiah 36:4,13) but they are subordinate to YHWH who truly is ‘the great king.’ The Lord is called ‘the great king’ in Psa 47:2; 48:2; 95:3; Mal 1:14. Jesus quoted this phrase in the Sermon on the Mount (Mat 5:35).

V.3. In Jerusalem’s fortresses God is recognised as a stronghold. His greatness is seen in his ongoing protection of Jerusalem from Israel’s enemies. This expression of belief in the inviolability of Jerusalem (cf. v.8) would indicate that the psalm is likely pre-exilic— as would its portrayal of the city as beautiful, with citadels (v.2, 13), towers (v.12), fortifications (v.13) and the temple (v.9) still standing.

PANIC FOR ZION’S FOES 4-8

Having described the beauty of Jerusalem and claimed that God is its stronghold the psalmist illustrates divine protection by referring to an occasion when the city came under attack but was delivered by God’s powerful intervention. He neither explains the exact historical context nor supplies names but these would have been familiar to the first readers/listeners.

With the words ‘For, lo’ he draws attention to the time when a coalition of kings had moved against Jerusalem but were unable to take it because, struck with terror, they fled in panic.

v.4. A coalition of hostile kings assembled against Zion and passed by (advanced through their enemy’s territory in battle array?).

vv.5-6. They themselves saw (N.B. there is no ‘it’ – we do not know what they saw – perhaps a theophany, or the city?), were terrified (fear took hold of them), then panicked (compared to writhing in agony like a woman giving birth, cf. Isa 13:8) and fled in disarray.

v.7. YHWH (metaphorically) broke them in pieces – see Isa 14:24-25.

v.8. The inhabitants of Jerusalem witnessed YHWH’s intervention to protect Jerusalem.

There has been much discussion and speculation about what historical event is being described. Suggestions include:

a) 2 Sam 5:17-25 – A coalition of Philistine princes (‘all the Philistines’ v.17) against David (c. 1010-970 BCE).

b) 2 Sam 10:6 – A coalition of Ammonites and Syrians against David (c. 1010-970 BCE).

c) 2 Chron 14:9-15 – The Ethiopians against King Asa of Judah (c. 911-870 BCE).

d) 2 Chron 20:1-30 – Ammonites, Moabites and Edomites against Jehoshaphat of Judah (c. 870-848 BCE).

e) Isa 7:1 – Syria and Israel against Ahaz of Judah (c. 736-716 BCE).

f) 2 Kgs 18:17 The Assyrian invasion of Judah in 701 BCE in the time of Hezekiah of Judah (c. 716-687 BCE).

The strongest possibility and one which now has widespread acceptance is (f) – the Assyrian invasion under Sennacherib in 701 BCE. The biblical accounts (2 Kgs 18-19; 2 Chron 32; Isa 36-37) tell of a miraculous intervention by the angel of the Lord that resulted in the withdrawal of Sennacherib’s army. The sudden and inexplicable retreat of the Assyrians and their vassal kings (Isa 10:8) aligns quite well with the panic and flight depicted in Psalm 48 (cf. Exod 15:15-16).

v.7 In the middle of recounting this historical event the psalmist unexpectedly addresses God directly, saying: ‘Thou breakest the ships of Tarshish with an east wind’. It is difficult to see what role ships of Tarshish (thought to have been a port in Spain that was controlled by the Phoenicians) can have played in the Assyrian invasion of Judah. Since a famous fleet was based there (1 Kgs 10:22; Isa 23:14; 60:9; Ezek 23:25) it may have been that the Phoenician merchant navy had secured a contract to supply the Assyrian army and that some of those supply vessels were subsequently wrecked in a storm at sea.

It is more likely that a Tarshish ship was a well-known type of freighter: large, sturdy and built for sailing long distances. According to 1 Kgs 22:48 King Jehoshaphat had taken delivery of ships constructed to this design but they were wrecked at a port on the Red Sea: Jehoshaphat made ships of Tharshish to go to Ophir for gold: but they went not; for the ships were broken at Ezion-geber.

The ‘ships of Tarshish’ comparison in v.7 is probably emphasizing the speed with which the destructive east wind shatters ships rather than the scale of destruction (cf. Job 27:21: The east wind carrieth him away, and he departeth: and as a storm hurleth him out of his place and Jer 18:17 I will scatter them as with an east wind before the enemy…) The point is that YHWH dealt suddenly and swiftly with the forces hostile to Jerusalem.

v.8. The people in Jerusalem have heard about God’s wonderful acts in the past but now they too have experienced his deliverance in the present. They have seen for themselves evidence of God’s protection of Zion. The psalmist now refers to Jerusalem as ‘the city of the Lord of hosts’ and again calls it ‘the city of our God’ (cf. v.1). He then expresses the commonly-held notion that Jerusalem would enjoy divine protection forever. The prophet Ezekiel confronted this idea of guaranteed immunity in the years leading up to the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the First Temple in 586/7 BCE.

PONDERING ZION’S GOD 9-11

v.9. God’s acts of deliverance cause the people of Zion to worship and praise him in the temple as they reflect on his steadfast love (ḥeseḏ). This word means mercy, goodness, love, acts of kindness and includes the idea of faithfulness or loyalty. The classic passage in which it appears is Psalm 136 where (translated ‘mercy’ KJV) it occurs 26 times.

v.10. Just as God’s name (reputation) is worldwide so his praise (i.e. praise given to him) extends to the ends of the earth (cf. Mal 1:11). This may be a recognition that YHWH’s defeat of the coalition of kings has not only benefited Judah but other nations as well. It is appropriate that God should be praised because his power (right hand) is righteous., i.e. his actions are always just and fair. ‘Right hand’ is an example of anthropomorphism – attributing human characteristics to something that is not human.

v.11. Mt. Zion is to rejoice (be happy) and the daughters of Jerusalem to be glad (take great pleasure in) God’s judgments (legal decisions).

Mt. Zion means the inhabitants of Jerusalem – this is an example of metonymy.

‘Daughters of Jerusalem’ refers to Jerusalem’s suburbs and satellite towns and villages (cf. The terms ‘Zion’ and ‘daughters’ are used in the same way in Psa 97:8). See: Num 21:25; Josh 17:11, 16 where the KJV translates ‘daughters’ as ‘villages’ or ‘towns.’

‘Judgments’ is the word for legal decisions but in this verse it might simply mean ‘justice.’

APPLICATION : If tempted to question God’s care for you just reflect on his faithfulness in the past and let these memories turn doubt into rejoicing.

PROCLAIMING ZION’S FORTRESS 12-14

The psalmist encourages the people of Jerusalem, who have been confined to the city during the siege, to walk around the city and view what they would have lost but for God’s protecting power. They are to count the city’s towers (which the enemy must have spied out, Isa 33:18), consider its bulwarks and go through its citadels. Some of Jerusalem’s towers are mentioned in the book of Nehemiah (3:1, 11, 25-27).

The purpose of this exercise is that they might appreciate the evidence of God’s protection and tell of his greatness to the next (KJV, ‘following’) generation. The word for ‘next’ also means ‘west.’

Some suggest that in this psalm, which speaks of a great God whose reputation and praise extend to the ends of the earth, the composer has cleverly woven in a reference to the four cardinal directions: North, East, South and West. Two are referred to directly and two indirectly.

v.2 – ‘the sides of the north‘
v.7 – ‘with an east wind’

v.10 – ‘thy right hand is full of righteousness.’ The word for ‘right hand’ also means south.
v.12 – ‘tell to the generation following.’ The word translated ‘following’ also means west.

v.14. The psalm ends with a profession of faith. It is an affirmation that this God is their God forever and will guide them unto death (i.e. throughout life). God, says the psalmist, not only delivers but also directs throughout life.

The most straightforward interpretation is that God guides throughout life, until death. Some interpreters extend the meaning to include guidance through death and into eternity.

APPLICATION: Take time to ‘walk about Zion.’ Look at your life and reflect on the great work that God has done and will continue to do because he never changes – ‘this God is our God forever and ever.’ And don’t keep this to yourself. Tell your children. Tell your friends. Share it with others. Someone else might need encouragement today!

SUMMATION

Psalm 48 is a song of praise that celebrates the greatness of God and his supremacy over all enemies. It portrays Jerusalem as a symbol of God’s strength and of his defence and protection of his people.

The psalm calls upon believers to contemplate God’s steadfast love, rejoice in his righteous decisions and testify of his faithfulness to future generations. It affirms that God is our God forever and will guide us throughout life.

Exposition

Ezekiel 16:53-63 – The Surprising Restoration of Jerusalem, Sodom and Samaria

Posted on 25th Apr 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Verses 53-63 form a conclusion to the allegories in Ezekiel chapter 16: the allegory of Jerusalem as an adulterous wife and the allegory of the sinful sisters. This conclusion is surprising in that, despite Jerusalem’s unfaithfulness and inevitable punishment, Ezekiel declares a plan for her future restoration. Even more surprising is the additional prediction that Jerusalem’s ‘sisters,’ Sodom and Samaria, who have already been judged, will be restored as well. The same characters who have been viewed negatively in the allegories are now promised restoration.

Restoration for Sodom and Samaria

(53-55) With much repetition of the word translated ‘captivity’ YHWH announces the restoration of the fortunes of the sisters. This translation is misleading as the expression ‘bring again their captivity’ has nothing to do with exile and does not predict further judgement upon these cities, rather the opposite. The expression means ‘restore their fortunes.’ That is how the ESV translates v.53: I will restore their fortunes, both the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters, and the fortunes of Samaria and her daughters, and I will restore your own fortunes in their midst.

The original idea behind the expression may be that of someone who has entered slavery (captivity) due to extreme poverty or debt and has served his time. A male Hebrew slave was freed after six years service or during the Jubilee year (Ex 21:2; Lev 25:39). After that he could regain the status (liberty and prosperity) that he once had. A good example of the use and meaning of the expression reverse their captivity/restore their fortunes is at the end of the book of Job:

And the LORD turned the captivity of Job, when he prayed for his friends: also the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before. Job 42:10 KJV

And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends. And the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before. Job 42:10 ESV

As well as here in chapter 16 the expression occurs in Ezekiel 29:14 and 39:25.

Verses 53-55 are perplexing as, taken at face value, they predict restoration of the fortunes of Sodom, Samaria, Jerusalem and their satellite towns and villages (‘daughters’). Details about how and when this will be achieved are not supplied.

This is the only biblical prophecy which predicts that Sodom will regain its former status. By contrast, the tenor of other scriptures is rather that Sodom’s destruction is perpetual. For example: Isaiah speaking about Babylon says it will lie desolate like Sodom:

And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees’ excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there. Isaiah 13:19-20.

Zephaniah prophesied in a similar vein with reference to Moab: Therefore as I live, saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah, even the breeding of nettles, and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation… Zephaniah 2:9

Some would suggest (cf. Mat 11:23-24) that in fulfilment of 16:53-55 the people of Sodom will be raised to life and rehabilitated or given a second chance after death. Those who hold the doctrine of apokatastasis (restoration, reintegration, reconstitution) would view this Old Testament passage, along with others in the New Testament (Acts 3:21; Rom 5:18-19; 11:23-26,32; 1 Cor 15:24-28; 2 Cor 5:19; Eph 1:9-10; Phil 2:10-11; Col 1:19-20; 1 Tim 2:4-6; 4;10; Tit 2:11; 1 Pet 3:19-20; 2 Pet 3:9; Rev 5:13), as biblical evidence for universalism.

According to v.54 the purpose of YHWH’s restoration of Sodom and Samaria is that Jerusalem will feel shame. This is because she has been so wicked that if she is to be restored then the restoration of Sodom and Samaria, cities which are deemed to be less wicked than Jerusalem, is required as well. Judah will be a ‘comfort’ to Sodom and Samaria in the sense that their suffering was not as severe as that which Judah/Jerusalem will experience. Jerusalem will bear her own shame.

Perhaps one ought to bear in mind that Ezekiel chapter 16 is allegorical, metaphorical and full of hyperbole. In v.55 Ezekiel may just be saying that once Jerusalem’s punishment is over the entire country will one day prosper. Thus the three cities with their satellite towns and villages, representing the whole land, can metaphorically be said to regain the status that they had in their heyday.

A less common interpretation of v.55, based on the word ‘when’ in the KJV translation, is that this is a promise by YHWH never to restore the fortunes of the three cities.

When thy sisters, Sodom and her daughters, shall return to their former estate, and Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former estate, then thou and thy daughters shall return to your former estate. Ezekiel 16:55

That is, when the fortunes of Sodom and Samaria are restored, which is never (since the 10 tribes of Israel are lost and Sodom has been perpetually destroyed), then Judah/Jerusalem’s fortunes will be restored, i.e. never.

In v.55 notice the repetition of the verb (shall return), the proper name of a city and the phrase ‘and her daughters’ three times.

(56-59) Verses 56-57 are a question: ‘Was not Sodom thy sister such a chronicle upon thy lips in the day of thy exaltations….?’ YHWH again reminds Jerusalem of her past by saying that in her heyday (the day of thy exaltations- plural) she once considered herself morally superior to her sister Sodom and looked down upon her. Sodom’s fate was talked about during Jerusalem’s glory days (cf. v.14) but not presented as a warning and example of what pride could bring about.

Jerusalem’s own sins led to her exposure and humiliation before her surrounding enemies; ones like Syria (cf. Isa7:1-9) and the Philistines (cf. Isa 9:11-12). In vv. 58-59, speaking as though it had already been accomplished, YHWH asserts that before the restoration of vv.53-55 comes about Jerusalem must first endure the consequences of her lewdness (see vv.15-36) and her despising of the oath in breaking of the covenant (cf.16:8). Note the ‘thus saith the Lord’ in v.59. Sodom and Samaria have had their periods of humiliation and judgement, now Jerusalem must suffer hers before all three will be eventually restored together.

(60-63) Unlike Jerusalem who did not remember the days of her youth when YHWH showed kindness to her (16:22, 43) YHWH will remember those days and the covenant that he made with her. She had broken that one by her harlotry (vv. 32-34) but YHWH will will establish a new covenant (see Jer 31:31-34) with her; an everlasting one (see 2 Sam 23:5; Isa 55:3). The phrase ‘I will establish’ is repeated in v.62. We know from Ezek 11:19-20; 36:25-28 that this new covenant will last because it involves a new heart and a new spirit.

In those days Jerusalem will remember her ‘way’ (16:25, 27, 31, 43, 47×2) and be embarrassed by YHWH’s kindness toward Sodom and Samaria and perhaps humiliated at being linked with such despised sinners. However, those ‘sisters’ will not be equal partners with Jerusalem in the new covenant. Sodom, Samaria and other older and younger sisters (‘older and younger sisters’ is in the plural form) will be given to her as daughters. The areas represented by all the cities will become one unified territory with Jerusalem as the capital. Sodom, Samaria and the others will be her ‘daughters’ i.e. dependent cities. None of this is due from the former broken covenant but is an act of YHWH’s free grace.

The passage ends with the further assertion that YHWH will establish his (new) covenant with Jerusalem and although she will be forgiven yet the memory of what she has done will produce in her shame, embarrassment and self-loathing.

SUMMATION OF EZEKIEL CHAPTER 16

Ezekiel chapter 16, one of the most difficult chapters in the Bible, consists of two allegories in which YHWH speaks through the prophet Ezekiel and addresses Jerusalem as if the city is a real person. In what is sometimes crude and graphic language he describes how he found her as an abandoned and helpless baby, cared for her and watched her grow. He eventually married her and gave her everything; beauty, clothes and jewellery. He treated her like royalty but Jerusalem then turned away from YHWH and became unfaithful. She chases after other nations and their gods, acting as a prostitute but worse – offering herself freely, not even for gain.

In the second allegory YHWH drives home the message of Jerusalem’s betrayal by saying that her behaviour has been worse than that of her ‘sisters’ Sodom and Samaria; notorious sinners whom YHWH has already judged. This comparison is designed to humble Jerusalem.

Then, in an unforeseen twist, YHWH promises to restore Sodom and Samaria along with Jerusalem, a future act of mercy. After she suffers punishment for her sins he will restore the relationship with Jerusalem and establish a new and lasting covenant. She (i.e. the people of Judah) will be forgiven but will always remember her past with embarrassment.

Exposition

Ezekiel 16:44-52: The Allegory of Jerusalem and Her Sinful Sisters

Posted on 2nd Apr 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In 16:1-43 Ezekiel has YHWH speak a lengthy allegory in which Jerusalem is personified as a woman. YHWH describes how he found her as an abandoned infant. He rescued her and, once she reached ‘the age for love,’ he married her. Abusing the gifts that he had given her, Jerusalem subsequently turned to idolatry and immorality; for which YHWH sentences her to harsh punishment. At this point one would expect a conclusion to the allegory but that does not come until v.60.

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14
The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34
The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Judgement – Ezekiel 16:35-43

Commentators disagree as to whether the section (16:44-59) is an extension of the allegory of 16:1-43 or a further allegory which, although closely linked with the preceding one, is not a continuation of it. I would contend that it is indeed a new allegory but one which shares the ending with the previous one.

The allegory in vv.1-43, while addressed to Jerusalem, clearly covers the history of Israel as a whole, not just Judah. In this new allegory, however, Judah and Israel are distinct. Jerusalem stands for the southern kingdom of Judah and Samaria represents the northern kingdom of Israel. In this second allegory YHWH compares Jerusalem with her ‘sisters’ Samaria and Sodom and concludes that Jerusalem has turned out much worse than either of them.

THE ALLEGORY OF THE SINFUL SISTERS

(44) Verse 44 begins with the word ‘behold’ which directs the reader’s attention to the new allegory and to the comparison of Jerusalem with Sodom and Samaria (the theme of Samaria and Jerusalem as sisters is developed more fully in chapter 23). YHWH says that everyone who quotes a proverb (cf. Num 21:27) will say of Jerusalem: ‘like mother, like daughter.’ With this short (two words in Hebrew) saying YHWH refers back to v.3 and sarcastically reminds Jerusalem that she has foreign ancestry.

(45-46) In v.3 the Amorite father is mentioned first but here the order is inverted. The Hittite mother is placed first now because this allegory focuses on female family members. Ezekiel is again referring to the Canaanite origins of the city of Jerusalem (Jebusites, Josh 15:63; Judge 1:21). This is by no means a compliment since Hittites and Amorites were two of the seven nations which the Israelites were commanded to drive out of the Promised Land ( Deut 7:1-2; Josh 3:10; 24:11) and with whom they were forbidden to intermarry (Deut 7:3).

Ezekiel paints a picture of a truly dysfunctional family. Jerusalem resembles her Hittite mother because just as her mother had shown contempt for her Amorite husband and their children (3 daughters) so Jerusalem had shown contempt for her husband and children (16:20-21, 31, 32). Her sisters, Samaria and Sodom, had likewise shown contempt for their husbands and daughters.

The husbands are not mentioned again, they don’t really feature in this allegory nor does the mother appear again after v.45. In this section Ezekiel concentrates on two important relationships; sister and daughter.

Daughter – vv. 44, 45, 46(x2), 48 (x2), 49, 53(x2), 55(x3), 57(x2), 61.
Sister – vv. 45(x2), 46(x2), 48, 49, 51, 52(x2), 55, 56, 61.

(46) YHWH begins a quite convoluted negative comparison between Jerusalem and her two sisters in which Samaria is described as the ‘elder’ sister and Sodom as the ‘younger.’ In fact, Jerusalem and Sodom had long histories whereas Samaria was much younger than either of them, having only been established (1 Kgs 16:23-24) by King Omri of Israel (884-873 BCE) almost 300 years before Ezekiel’s time. ‘Elder’ and ‘younger’ only make sense if interpreted in terms of greatness of geographical/territorial size, military power or historical importance. ‘Daughters’ probably refers to dependent satellite towns and villages, or perhaps to the inhabitants of the three cities.

Geographically Jerusalem is situated between the sites of the two cities. As one faces East the city of Samaria is to the left (North) and Sodom to the right (South). Samaria was the former capital of the northern kingdom of Israel and in patriarchal times Sodom had been the most important city of the Jordan valley (Gen 18-19).

(47) Jerusalem was not content with equalling the ways and abominations of Samaria and Sodom but became much more corrupt than they. As if despising their sinful deeds as small scale (‘a very little thing’ or ‘a thing of disgust’) Jerusalem outdid them by sinning on a much grander scale. Ezekiel’s hearers would have been greatly shocked to hear YHWH linking Jerusalem with Sodom and Samaria; cities that were notorious for sin and idolatry.

THE INIQUITY OF SODOM

(48-50) In v.48 YHWH stresses that Judah’s sins outstripped those of Sodom. In the next two verses he elaborates on the greatness of Judah’s guilt compared to that of Sodom. In v.49 YHWH specifies the ‘iniquity’ (guilt from conscious wrongdoing) of Sodom. The sins of Sodom and her daughters (the towns Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim – Gen 10:19) are enumerated as follows:

Pride – an example of success inflating the ego.

Satiety – because of an over-abundance of food – they were gluttonous.

‘Abundance of idleness’ KJV. – This means careless rest or security. The people of Sodom were so prosperous that they became complacent.

They were indifferent to the poor and needy.

They were ‘haughty’ (arrogant).

They committed abomination (cf. Lev 18:22) in the presence of YHWH (Gen 18:21).

YHWH says that when he saw the iniquity of Sodom and her daughters he removed them. The word ‘good’ is in italics, it is not in the original and has been supplied by translators. Without the word ‘good’ the phrase means ‘when I saw it’.

Ancient writers viewed Sodom as notorious for sexual sin, social injustice, arrogance and hostility towards strangers, for example: Isa 1:9-17; Jeremiah 23:14; 2 Pet 2:6-10; Jude 7; 2 Esdras 2:8-9; 3 Maccabees 2:5; Sirach 16:8; Wisdom of Solomon 19:13-17.

(51-52) YHWH states that Samaria did not sin half as much as Jerusalem. He does not spell out Samaria’s iniquity but Ezekiel’s audience are well aware that it was idolatry. Jerusalem has multiplied the sins of Sodom and Samaria to such an extent that she has ‘justified’ those cities. In other words, Jerusalem’s sins are so evil that she makes Sodom and Samaria look righteous. These two sinful cities had so angered YHWH that he had punished them severely.

Jerusalem, having privileges like the the Law, the Temple and YHWH’s presence, had behaved worse than Sodom and Samaria. She (v.52 ‘thou also’), who had ‘given judgement’ on her sisters (i.e. agreed that their punishment was well-deserved) but had behaved more abominably than they, could therefore expect to suffer a similar fate. It is appropriate that Jerusalem be punished because her sins make the other sisters look righteous.

Many centuries later a similar thought was expressed by Jesus Christ: But into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you not, go your ways out into the streets of the same, and say, Even the very dust of your city, which cleaveth on us, we do wipe off against you: notwithstanding be ye sure of this, that the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you. But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city. Luke 10:10-12

The next section of Ezekiel chapter 16 will deal with the sisters’ future.

Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Judgement – Ezekiel 16:35-43

Posted on 25th Mar 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

My two previous posts (The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14 and The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34) covered the first 34 verses of Ezekiel 16. This chapter consists of a monologue by YHWH which takes the form of an allegory in which he compares Jerusalem to a woman whom he found in a desperate state as an abandoned infant. He rescued, nurtured and cared for her and when he saw that she had matured, married her (entered into a covenant) and made her prosperous and beautiful.

However, she became spiritually unfaithful by prostituting herself with foreign powers and their false deities. She squandered her God-given resources on idolatry and prostituted herself (made alliances) with foreign nations rather than trusting her husband YHWH. She was actually worse than a prostitute because she paid others to corrupt her (i.e. paid tribute to states like Egypt, Assyria and Babylonia) rather than receive payment from them for her services. In the next section of the allegory (vv.35-43) YHWH declares judgement upon Jerusalem for her misdeeds.

JERUSALEM’S JUDGEMENT (35-43)

(35) This section begins with ‘wherefore’ (therefore, on account of, thus, so) which looks back to the accusations of prostitution set out in vv.15-34 and draws attention to what will now be said. YHWH addressing Jerusalem directly as ‘O harlot,’ tells her to ‘hear the word of the Lord.’ He is thus directing the nation to pay attention to his message of judgement.

The word here translated ‘wherefore’ appears many times in the book of Ezekiel to indicate the direct result of what has just been said (causes and consequences): Ezek 5:7; 11:11; 13:8; 15:6; 16:35, 37; 20:27; 21:24; 22:19; 23:35; 24:9; 25:4, 7, 9,13,16; 26:3; 28:6; 29:8; 31:10; 34:7, 9, 20; 35:6.11; 36:3,4, 5, 6,7, 14.

(36) Again the messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ appears, followed by two announcements of judgement (36-42; 43), each prefaced by ‘because you’ (v.36, 43). Then comes a summary of the reasons for judgement followed by a statement of the consequences.

FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT

THE REASONS for YHWH’s punishment are listed as;

Because thy filthiness was poured out, – The word translated filthiness (KJV, NKJV) means ‘bronze.’ Based on an assumption that neither the ancient Israelites nor the Babylonians used copper as money and that the verb ‘to pour out’ is used in v.15 and in Ezek 23:8 in connection with prostitution many translations (e,g. CSB; ESV; NIV; NLT; NRSV) follow the KJV thought of filthiness and translate ‘bronze’ as ‘lust.’ This idea may have been inspired by the green patina or crust caused by oxidation that forms on brass, bronze and copper. Darby, however, sensibly views ‘bronze’ as a general term for wealth and translates the word as ‘money.’ Payment of tribute in bronze was made to both Assyrians (2 Kgs 16:17-18) and Babylonians (2 Kgs 25:13-14).
and thy nakedness discovered through thy whoredoms with thy lovers, – the theme of the naked female body has appeared throughout this allegory and remains the focus of Jerusalem’s punishment (vv.36, 37, 39). ‘Lovers,’ referring to Egypt (v.26), Assyria (v.28) and Babylonia (v.29), occurs in vv. 33, 36 and 37.
and with all the idols of thy abominations, – this is the only appearance of the word ‘idols’ in Ezek 16. Here idols are linked with ‘abominations’ (offensive things), this word occurs in vv. 2, 22, 36, 43, 47, 50, 51, 58.
and by the blood of thy children, which thou didst give unto them; – a reference to child sacrifice (v.20).

(37-42) THE CONSEQUENCES

Exposure

Having listed Jerusalem’s crimes YHWH now pronounces the penalties. He declares that he will bring together all her former ‘lovers’ i.e. the nations with which Jerusalem had entered into alliances and idolatry. These will turn against her; therefore the ‘gathering’ against Jerusalem symbolises besieging armies. ‘Loved and hated’ reflects Judah’s shifting political relationships with other nations.

Stretching the allegory to its limits, the punishment for Jerusalem is compared to that for adultery.

‘Uncover thy nakedness’ – refers to public disgrace by exposure which formed part of the ancient punishment for being caught in the act of adultery (Isa 47:3; Jer 13:22, 26; Hos 2:3; Nah 3:5). YHWH will expose Jerusalem to the former lovers with whom she had prostituted herself. This public disgrace represents Jerusalem’s downfall that will be witnessed by the surrounding nations.

The ‘lovers’ represent the assembly (‘the men of the city’ Deut 21:21) who carry out the punishment for adultery. This, of course, is not true to real life as, according to the Law, both parties involved in adultery were due the death penalty: If a man be found lying with a woman married to a husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel. Deut 22:22

Death Penalty

(38) YHWH makes it clear that the death penalty pronounced upon Jerusalem is not only for adultery (‘break wedlock’) but also murder (‘shed blood’). The ‘shed blood’ may refer to the child sacrifice mentioned in v.36 or to the violence that was rife in Jerusalem (Jer 2:34; Ezek 7:23). The Law demanded execution for adultery (Lev 20:10), murder (Ex 21:12) and child sacrifice (Lev 20:1-4).

YHWH will enact this severe penalty against Jerusalem ‘in fury and jealousy.’ Fury relates to murder and the jealousy to adultery. This verse contains the final mention of blood in the chapter (see also vv. 6, 9, 22, 36).

Humiliation

(39) YHWH will cause Jerusalem’s former lovers, with whom she had previously sought security, to return her to her original state of vulnerability. Jerusalem’s former enemies will demolish the sites of false worship (mounds and high places) and strip her of YHWH’s gifts (clothes and vessels of glory, see vv.10-13); blessings which she has used unfaithfully (see vv. 16-19). In other words, Judah will lose wealth and status.

Stoning, Cutting to pieces and Burning.

(40-41) The crowd or mob that that will come up against Jerusalem represents the Babylonian army that will attack Jerusalem with stones (flung by war engines) and slay the inhabitants with swords. They will set fire to all the buildings in the city, including the Temple.

Stoning was the usual mode of execution in ancient Israel and was the penalty for a variety of crimes whereas execution by the sword was prescribed for communal idolatry (Deut 13:15). Execution by burning was unusual but did apply for two crimes (Lev 20:14; 21:9).

The term ‘many wives’ (or ‘women’, see vv. 30, 32, 34) probably represents other nations that will look on as YHWH’s public punishment on Jerusalem takes place and to which it will serve as an example. The goal of the punishment is to end Jerusalem’s prostitution, i.e. to bring an end to her idolatry and reliance upon heathen nations. Jerusalem will ‘give payment’ (ESV) no more because Judah will lose its national independence and cease to be a regional power. These verses predict the siege and invasion of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in 587/586 BCE.

(42) After the judgement is carried out YHWH’s fury will be appeased and his jealousy will subside. His wrath will be calmed because the matter will have been dealt with. In this verse we have an example of anthropopathism – ascribing human feelings and emotions to something that is not human; in this case deity.

SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT

As with the first announcement of judgement in vv. 36-42 this second announcement in v.43 restates the motivation for and then the consequences of YHWH’s punishment of Jerusalem.

(43) THE REASONS

Like v.36 this verse begins with ‘because you.’

Jerusalem did not remember the days of her youth (cf. v.22), i.e. the nation forgot the Lord’s deliverance and provision during its early history e.g. the Exodus and the making of the Sinai Covenant.
Jerusalem enraged YHWH ‘in all these [things].’ This must refer to the examples of prostitution listed from v.15 onwards.

THE CONSEQUENCES

As in v.37 the consequences here in v.43 begin with the words ‘behold, therefore.’

YHWH brought her way (deeds) on her head. The idea seems to be that because of her forgetting and her bad behaviour YHWH has held her to account for her ways (perfect tense). This verse views YHWH’s judgement from a future perspective, as having happened in the past. The phrase ‘I will give your [their} way upon your [their] head’ is also found in Ezek 9:10; 11:21; 17:19; 22:31; 33:4.
Jerusalem will no longer do licentiousness (engage in prostitution) in addition to all her other detestable practices (abominations). ‘Licentiousness’ (KJV ‘lewdness) and ‘abominations’ together sum up Jerusalem’s sin and are again paired in v.58.

SUMMATION

Using unsettling and violent imagery YHWH, in vv. 35-43, pronounces judgement upon Jerusalem for her infidelity (breach of covenant – Lev 26:16-17, 25, 38; Deut 28:25, 41, 47-58). She will be exposed and shamed before all her former ‘lovers’ and stripped of all the blessings that YHWH has bestowed upon her. YHWH will hand her over to these ‘lovers’ who will carry out divine justice in the form of invasion, destruction and exile.

The metaphor of an adulterous wife is used to show the seriousness of Judah’s spiritual betrayal and the harshness of the punishments in the allegory emphasise that the Lord will not tolerate sin. Idolatry and unfaithfulness are especially serious. As modern readers we might well ask ourselves how often do we turn away from God and chase after things that may be morally or spiritually corrupt. Do we take his kindness and provision for granted and forget that we have a covenant relationship with him?

Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34

Posted on 28th Feb 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

My previous post The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14 introduced an extended metaphor which was communicated by YHWH to the prophet Ezekiel with a command to deliver it to the exiles. This was in order to convince them that Jerusalem’s punishment was certain because of her abominations. In the section 1-14 Jerusalem is personified as a woman whom YHWH came across as an abandoned baby, then rescued and provided for. Once she reached maturity he married her (made a covenant with her), and dressed and adorned her to the extent that she became a beautiful queen; famous for her good looks. This all symbolises the early history of YHWH’s relationship with Israel.

JERUSALEM’S PROSTITUTION (15-34)

(15) Unfortunately v.15 begins with ‘but,’ which gives a hint that the relationship might have soured. Despite having been blessed by YHWH with beauty, prosperity and influence Jerusalem trusted in her good looks and prostituted herself with foreign nations. Unlike the previous section (1-14) where the focus is on YHWH (referring to himself as ‘I’) the next major section (15-43) focuses on Jerusalem (addressed as ‘you’). The two sections are linked by the words ‘beauty and ‘renown,’ both of which occur in v.14 and then again in v.15.

The beauty which gave her renown among the nations had been bestowed upon her by YHWH but, full of pride and self-confidence, Jerusalem abused YHWH’s trust and relied on her own beauty. It is a fact that success can change some people for the worse; this was recognised by Moses, writing in the book of Deuteronomy:

Beware that thou forget not the LORD thy God, in not keeping his commandments, and his judgements, and his statutes, which I command thee this day: Lest when thou hast eaten and art full, and hast built goodly houses, and dwelt therein; And when thy herds and thy flocks multiply, and thy silver and thy gold is multiplied, and all that thou hast is multiplied; Then thine heart be lifted up, and thou forget the LORD thy God, Deut 8:11-14

A similar observation to that about Jerusalem in v.15 is made about the king of Tyre in Ezek 28:17: ‘Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty.’

With new-found self confidence Jerusalem asserted her independence and ‘poured out’ (see also v.36) her harlotry (i.e. acted like a prostitute) on every passer-by. Since v.15 links her activity with her renown and in v.14 her renown was among the nations then those who received her sexual favours are the nations. This is a metaphorical way of describing alliances with foreign powers.

The allegory very much emphasises a verb meaning ‘engaging in prostitution’ and related words like ‘prostitute’ which occur some twenty times in vv.15-36. This perhaps becomes more obvious when these verses are read in a modern translation; such as the Christian Standard Bible.

16-21 ‘YOU TOOK’

Verses 16-21 specify four actions by Jerusalem in which she took gifts given to her by YHWH and used them for prostitution.

(16) And of thy garments thou didst take, and deckedst thy high places with divers colours, and playedst the harlot thereupon: the like things shall not come, neither shall it be so.

Jerusalem took the expensive embroidered ‘garments’ (clothes or coverings, also v.18) which had been presented to her by YHWH (vv.10, 13) and made shrines (bāmôt, high places) with the material. The image is of her making up a bed with these materials given by her husband and prostituting herself on them with her lovers (interestingly, the word ‘garment’ is elsewhere translated ‘bed’ – 1 Sam 19:13). This activity by Jerusalem may be a reference to the presence of cult prostitution in Israel (cf. Isa 57:7). The clause at the end of v.16 is unclear (‘such are not to come and it will not be’) but probably means something like: ‘things like this should not take place.’

(17) Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them,

YHWH says that Jerusalem also took ‘thy fair jewels.’ This may also be translated ”your vessels of glory’, a term that appears again in v.39. ‘Glory’ directs the reader back to ‘crown of glory’ (beautiful crown) in v.12. Gold and silver are mentioned in v.13 where it is implied but not stated that they were supplied by YHWH. Now v.17 makes it clear that they were indeed a gift from YHWH. Jerusalem took these precious metals and made ‘for herself’ (also v.24) ‘images of men’ (male statues), idols with which she engaged in prostitution. Israel turned to idolatry.

(18-19) And tookest thine embroidered garments, and coveredst them: and thou hast set mine oil and mine incense before them. My meat also which I gave thee, fine flour, and oil, and honey, wherewith I fed thee, thou hast even set it before them for a sweet savour: and thus it was, saith the Lord GOD.

Verse 18 begins with the third ‘you took’ specifying that the woman also used the embroidered garments (10, 13, 16) to dress the masculine images that she had made from YHWH’s precious metals. In addition she offered YHWH’s oil, incense and food (my oil, my incense, my food) to these idols. The specific food items are fine flour, oil and honey.

This is the only mention of incense in the allegory. In chapter 8:11-12 Ezekiel saw 70 elders of Israel burning incense to pagan deities. There it says that a fragrant (or thick) cloud of incense arose. The next verse in this passage (v.19), using a different word for fragrant, says that Jerusalem offered food – fine flour, oil and honey – to her idols for a ‘sweet savour’ (fragrant aroma). It was believed that as such products burned a fragrant or soothing aroma arose to the nostrils of the deity being worshipped.

This idea is first mentioned in connection with sacrifices offered by Noah after the Flood (Gen 8:20-21). Note that three of the five major Levitical fire offerings (‘ōlāh, minḥāh and šelem) in the tabernacle system of worship (Lev 1-7) are said to be ‘sweet savour’ offerings (‘ōlāh, transl. Burnt or Ascending offering – Lev 1:9, 13, 17; minḥāh, transl. Grain, Meal, Meat i.e. Food or Cereal offering – Lev 2:2, 9; šelem, transl. Peace or Fellowship offering – Lev 3:5, 16). The offering of honey by fire to YHWH was prohibited (Lev 2:11).

(20-21) Moreover thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this of thy whoredoms a small matter, That thou hast slain my children, and delivered them to cause them to pass through the fire for them?

Now YHWH accuses Jerusalem of taking her own children and giving them up to be sacrificed. ‘To them’ refers to the masculine statues of v.17 and it was to these that the woman offered up her sons and daughters (children that she had borne to YHWH) for consumption.

At the end of v.20 YHWH asks ‘Is this less than your harlotry?’ i.e. he is asking if her acts of prostitution were not enough, surely this is even worse!

She slaughtered her children whom she presented when offering them up ‘to them’ (the idols). The same verb ‘slaughtered’ (šāḥaṭ, KJV slain) is used again in Ezek 23:39 in connection with the sacrifice of children to idols. The practice of child sacrifice was associated with Canaanite religion, especially the worship of Molech. King Ahaz of Judah is said to have ‘made his son to pass through the fire,’ presumably as part of a pagan ritual (2 Kgs 16:3). That some Israelites practised this is mentioned in 2 Kgs 17:17 and Jer 32:35 cf. 2 Kgs 23:10. The Law specifically prohibited the Israelites from engaging in child sacrifice to Molech (Lev 18:21; 20:2-5).

22- 34 INGRATITUDE AND GREATER SPIRITUAL ADULTERY

(22) Jerusalem’s sin is not just idolatry but ingratitude. YHWH reminds her of her humble beginnings and of how he had rescued and provided for her (16:4-13). She has not remembered ‘the days of her youth’ (vv.22, 43) when she was ‘naked and bare’ (cf. v.70 and polluted in her own blood (cf. v.6).

(23) Upon reading the opening words of v.23 (‘then after all your evil’) one might expect a conclusion to follow but instead YHWH exclaims ‘Woe, woe, to you’ in horror at further acts of prostitution and adultery that he proceeds to list in vv.24-34.

(24-25) The accusations levelled by YHWH against Jerusalem flow from the assertion in v.15 that she trusted in her own beauty and engaged in prostitution. From vv. 16-23 that prostitution takes the form of idolatrous activity which includes the construction of shrines and the offering of sacrifices. These verses seem to concentrate on the idolatry and not so much on the sexual theme. The allegory, however, picks up the latter again in vv. 24-34 where the main idea is that Jerusalem is sexually insatiable. In vv. 24-25 the prostitution is still linked with idolatry, from v.26 the figure extends to political alliances with foreign powers.

V.24 has two accusations:

‘Thou hast also built unto thee an eminent place’ – This word is not bāmôt which is translated ‘high places’ in v.16. Here the word for ‘mound’ (KJV ’eminent place’) is gaḇ; it refers to something curved, to any convex surface, e.g eyebrows in Lev 14:9, the rim (KJV nave) of a wheel, 1 Kgs 7:33; Ezek 1:18). It occurs also in v.31 and v.39.
‘and hast made thee a high place in every street’ – Here the word translated ‘high place’ is rāmāh. It means a hill or high ground.

Jerusalem had constructed mounds upon which were shrines for the worship of pagan idols. The word ‘built’ in vv. 24 and 25 occurs also at v.31. These mounds were at the head of every path or square. Reḥôb means path, street, plaza or square, open area. There she ‘spread her feet to’ (had relations with) everyone that passed by. Perhaps this is a play on vv.5-6. There Jerusalem was a baby abandoned in an ‘open field’ and it was YHWH who ‘passed by’.

Jerusalem ‘multiplied her harlotry;’ this is repeated in vv. 26 and 29. Her once desirable beauty became detestable to YHWH and to others as a result of her promiscuity.

(26-29) Verse 26 again takes up the theme of prostitution with the expression ‘engaged in prostitution.’ It also occurs in vv. 15, 16 and 17 and will appear again twice in v.28. Now the prostitution is not so much cultic as political. Four nations (Egyptians, Philistines, Assyrians, Chaldeans) are mentioned in the historical order in which Jerusalem had political dealings with them. It is specifically stated that she engaged in prostitution with three of them.

1) The sons of Egypt – the Egyptians are described as neighbours and also as ‘great of flesh.’ The latter phrase is a double entendre that could either be taken to mean well-endowed or fat and flabby. As well as the repetition of ‘engaged in prostitution’ there is also repetition of the ‘multiplied your harlotry’ phrase from v.25. Several kings of Israel and Judah made it part of their diplomatic strategy to form an alliance (for political, military or economic reasons) with Egypt, one of the most powerful nations in the Ancient Near East. For example:

SOLOMON (United Monarchy)

Solomon made a marriage alliance with Pharaoh king of Egypt. He took Pharaoh’s daughter and brought her into the city of David until he had finished building his own house… 1 Kings 3:1ESV (see also 1 Kgs 9:16)

HOSHEA (Northern Kingdom – Israel) rebelled against Assyria and sought alliance with Egypt

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria. And Hoshea became his vassal and paid him tribute. But the king of Assyria found treachery in Hoshea, for he had sent messengers to So, king of Egypt, and offered no tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. 2 Kings 17:3-4 ESV

HEZEKIAH (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

And the Rabshakeh said to them, “Say to Hezekiah, ‘Thus says the great king, the king of Assyria: On what do you rest this trust of yours? ²⁰ Do you think that mere words are strategy and power for war? In whom do you now trust, that you have rebelled against me? Behold, you are trusting now in Egypt, that broken reed of a staff, which will pierce the hand of any man who leans on it. Such is Pharaoh king of Egypt to all who trust in him. 2 Kings 18:19-21 ESV

JEHOIAKIM (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

And Pharaoh Neco made Eliakim the son of Josiah king in the place of Josiah his father, and changed his name to Jehoiakim. But he took Jehoahaz away, and he came to Egypt and died there. And Jehoiakim gave the silver and the gold to Pharaoh, but he taxed the land to give the money according to the command of Pharaoh. He exacted the silver and the gold of the people of the land, from everyone according to his assessment, to give it to Pharaoh Neco. 2 Kings 23:34-35 ESV

ZEDEKIAH (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

But he rebelled against him by sending his ambassadors to Egypt, that they might give him horses and a large army. Will he thrive? Can one escape who does such things? Can he break the covenant and yet escape? “As I live, declares the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwells who made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant with him he broke, in Babylon he shall die. Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company will not help him in war, when mounds are cast up and siege walls built to cut off many lives. Ezekiel 17:15-17 ESV

Verses 22 and 23 suggested that the reasons for Jerusalem’s behaviour were her forgetfulness and wickedness. Now v.26 says that the motive was a deliberate intention to provoke her husband (YHWH). Her idolatry and foreign alliances so angered YHWH that in v.27 he draws attention to the fact (‘behold!) that he therefore ‘stretched out his hand over her’ i.e. acted against her in judgement. He reduced her lot and gave her over to the greed of her enemies the Philistines. At one stage Philistia must have annexed some of Judah’s territory.

Even the Philistines were appalled by Jerusalem’s lewd conduct, i.e. her moral and spiritual corruption. She is not said to have engaged in prostitution with the Philistines but v.28 states twice that she did so with the sons of Assyria (Assyrians), and was insatiable. That she was insatiable is repeated at the end of v.29. The kings who allied with Assyria include:

MENAHEM (Northern Kingdom – Israel)

Pul the king of Assyria came against the land, and Menahem gave Pul a thousand talents of silver, that he might help him to confirm his hold on the royal power. Menahem exacted the money from Israel, that is, from all the wealthy men, fifty shekels of silver from every man, to give to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria turned back and did not stay there in the land. 2 Kings 15:19-20 ESV

HOSHEA (Northern Kingdom – Israel)

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria. And Hoshea became his vassal and paid him tribute. 2 Kings 17:3 ESV

AHAZ (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria, saying, “I am your servant and your son. Come up and rescue me from the hand of the king of Syria and from the hand of the king of Israel, who are attacking me.” Ahaz also took the silver and gold that was found in the house of the LORD and in the treasures of the king’s house and sent a present to the king of Assyria. ⁹ And the king of Assyria listened to him. 2 Kings 16:7-9 ESV – see also Isa 7:1-17

Addicted to idolatry and political entanglements Jerusalem could not be satisfied so kept moving on to other relationships. The next relationship, mentioned in vv. 28-29, is that with the sons of Chaldea, i.e. the Babylonians, the ascendant power when Ezekiel was writing. Babylonia is described as a ‘land of Canaan’ i.e. a nation of merchants.

The Canaanites, e.g. the Phoenicians (main towns Tyre and Sidon), were so famous for trading in the ancient world that the name was used as a term for trader, trafficker or merchant. For a description of their trading activities that is of great historical interest see the Lament for Tyre in Ezekiel chapter 27, especially vv.12-25. For examples of the use of Canaanite or land of Canaan for merchant see Ezek 17:5; Prov 31:24; Hos 12:7; Zeph 1:11; Zech 14:21.

(30-34) In these last few verses of this section of the allegory accusing Jerusalem of engaging in prostitution YHWH moves on from the nations to claim that Jerusalem is not like other women and, as a matter of fact, she isn’t even like other prostitutes. The word ’iššāh, meaning woman or wife occurs 3 times in these verses, 30, 32, 34.

YHWH disgustedly asks Jerusalem what is wrong with her heart that she acted like a brazen prostitute. She had a great relationship with YHWH who loved, cared and provided her so why did she have so many relationships, moving from one to another, when none of them left her satisfied? He then refers in v.31 to some of her activities that have already been described in vv. 15-29:

In that thou buildest thine eminent place (gab) in the head of every way –
and makest thine high place (rāmāh) in every street;
and hast not been as a harlot, in that thou scornest hire;

The verb ‘to build’ is the same as that used in vv.24 and 25. ‘At the head of every way’ is also repeated from v.25a, there it is said of the rāmāh but here in v.31 of the gab.

Unlike other prostitutes who accept payment for their services Jerusalem was so depraved and desperate that she scoffed at payment. The word ’eṯnan, meaning a prostitute’s pay (KJV, hire or reward), occurs in v.31, v.34 twice and in v.41.

In v.32 , quite far on in the allegory the verb ‘commit adultery’ occurs (also in v.38. ‘break wedlock’ KJV). Like a woman (wife) who commits adultery Jerusalem takes strangers instead of her husband. She has therefore broken the covenant obligations of v.8.

Verse 33 quickly returns to the notion of prostitution and says that ‘they’ (i.e. the strangers) always give gifts to prostitutes (i.e. pay their fee) but Jerusalem gives presents to (i.e. bribes) her lovers ‘on every side’ that they may come ‘into’ her. This is another double entendre in the allegory; the preposition ’el can indicate motion toward (hence KJV ‘unto’) but can also mean ‘into.’ It is used of sexual intercourse in Gen 16:2 and Num 25:1. This is a metaphorical reference to Israel and Judah paying tribute as vassal states to the dominant powers of the time – the nations ‘on every side’ (i.e. all around).

V.34 makes the point that Jerusalem is not a typical female prostitute:

none followeth thee to commit whoredoms – none of the neighbouring states were interested in forming an alliance with Jerusalem.
and in that thou givest a reward, and no reward is given unto thee – In her quest for political security Jerusalem had to pay tribute to other states.

SUMMATION

In the Ezekiel 16:15-34 section of the allegory YHWH, through Ezekiel, accuses Jerusalem of pride leading to prostitution with foreign nations. Despite having experienced YHWH’s provision and protection the nation of Israel/ Judah was unfaithful. This reflects the history of Israel during the period of the judges and especially under the monarchy. The turning to idolatry and alliances with pagan states constituting spiritual adultery began in earnest with Solomon during the united monarchy. This state of affairs continued under the kings of both Israel and Judah when the monarchy divided after his death. Their dependence upon foreign nations rather than YHWH did not work out well for Israel and Judah. The Northern Kingdom (Israel) fell to Assyria in 722 BCE and the Southern Kingdom (Judah) to Babylon in 586/7 BCE. The next section of the allegory (vv. 35-43) is about Jerusalem’s judgement.

Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14

Posted on 18th Feb 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapter 16 Ezekiel continues to impress upon the Judahite exiles who are with him in Babylonia the fact that, contrary to the predictions of false prophets, things at home are not going to improve soon. Rather, such are the sins of Israel/Judah that there is now no hope of avoiding YHWH’s wrath. His judgement will fall upon the nation soon.

YHWH, through Ezekiel, uses shock tactics to convey how evil the nation appears in his sight. In an extended and elaborate metaphor (or, perhaps more accurately, two allegories that share the same ending) the prophet communicates a negative portrayal of the history of Israel’s relationship with YHWH. Using disturbing language that is vulgar, crude and charged with marital, sexual and violent imagery Ezekiel, speaking for YHWH, accuses the nation of unfaithfulness in the form of idolatry and inappropriate relations with foreign powers.

Jerusalem (representing Israel/Judah) is personified as a female infant who has been abandoned by her parents and is rescued by YHWH. He returns some years later to find that she has matured (breasts and pubic hair) and is ‘at the age for love’ (vv.7-8). He marries her (v.8), bestows many gifts upon her and beautifies her (vv.9-14), with the result that she becomes famous for her good looks. Proud and self-confident she becomes not just an adulteress but an insatiable nymphomaniac who lavishes the gifts she has received from YHWH upon men everywhere, including foreigners like the virile (‘great of flesh’) Egyptians, Assyrians and Chaldeans. She sacrifices her children to them and is even worse than her sisters Samaria and Sodom.

YHWH, acting as both accuser and judge, outlines Jerusalem’s crimes and then sentences her to some unusual punishments (stripping, stoning, cutting with swords and burning, all this in the presence of her former lovers) in order to appease his wrath and jealousy. Although unworthy, there is a promise of restoration for Jerusalem but she will remain silent (be shy) with embarrassment and shame.

OUTINE OF THE CHAPTER

1-3a – Preamble
3b-5 – Jerusalem’s humble origins
6-14 – YHWH’s dealings with Jerusalem
15-34 – Jerusalem’s prostitution
35-43 – Jerusalem’s judgement
44-52 – The allegory of Judah and her sinful sisters
53-59 – The sisters’ future
60-63 – A promise of restoration

PREAMBLE (1-3a)

In these verses which serve as an introduction to the oracle YHWH instructs Ezekiel to challenge Jerusalem about her abominations. The prophet duly reports YHWH’s thoughts on the subject using the metaphor of a woman to represent Jerusalem. As the capital of Judah the city symbolises Judah and (excluding vv.44-59) Israel as well.

(1) The chapter commences with the prophetic word (or ‘word-event’) formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying.’ This expression occurs 49 times in the book of Ezekiel and indicates that the message has come to the prophet directly from YHWH.

(2-3a) YHWH, as usual, addresses Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’, a formula that occurs 93 times in Ezekiel, and commands him to:

(a) make known to Jerusalem her abominations (offensive acts), and
(b) tell her ‘thus saith the Lord.’

The saying ‘thus saith the Lord’ re-emphasises that the message is from YHWH. It occurs again in this chapter in v. 36 and v.59. The three occurrences (3, 36, 59) could serve as an alternative way of dividing up the chapter, which would then fall into three main sections (1-34; 35-58; 59-63).

JERUSALEM’S HUMBLE ORIGINS (3b-5)

(3b) Addressing Jerusalem, which he personifies as a woman, YHWH casts aspersions on her origins and birth (‘diggings’ and ‘bringings forth,’ both plural) which he traces back to the land of Canaan. Her father and mother were the Amorite and the Hittite. These represent the Semitic and non-Semitic peoples who inhabited the land of Canaan before the patriarchs settled there. The words ‘Canaan’, ‘Amorite’ and ‘Hittite’ stress that Jerusalem was originally possessed by wicked and idolatrous pagan tribes (cf. Gen 15:16). There was therefore nothing holy about Jerusalem’s origins that would have commended her to YHWH.

(4) Repeating ‘thy birth’ YHWH proceeds to remind Jerusalem of the circumstances of her birth. Repetition for effect is a feature of this oracle. Notice that the phrase ‘the day thou wast born’ is repeated at the end of v.5. At birth, YHWH reminds her, the infant Jerusalem experienced a lack of basic medical care and attention.

her umbilical cord was not cut.
she was not washed with water.
she was not rubbed with salt, a natural healer.
She was not swaddled.

(5) No-one showed Jerusalem any pity or compassion. There was no-one to do ‘any of these unto thee.’ The plural demonstrative pronoun ‘these things’ refers back to the cutting, washing, salting and swaddling in v.4. No-one cared enough to do even one of these four things for Jerusalem. This was not a case of neglect; the infant Jerusalem (Israel) was abandoned because of deliberate rejection. She was treated with distain (‘to the loathing of thy person’) and cast away in an open field (cf. Deut 32:10). The idea of loathing appears again in v.45.

As regards historical period, this section of the oracle in which Jerusalem is depicted as an abandoned new-born baby, represents the patriarchal period, which extended from the days Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to the time of slavery in Egypt. During that period Israel was not quite a distinct, fully-fledged nation.

YHWH’S DEALINGS WITH JERUSALEM (6-14)

In this section YHWH explains what he has done for Jerusalem. He is the speaker throughout and Jerusalem has no opportunity to respond. Series of statements beginning with ‘I’ describe YHWH’s activity, these are interrupted occasionally by comments addressing Jerusalem as ‘you’ which note the affect of YHWH’s provision upon the girl.

(6) YHWH’S list in v.6 includes: ‘I passed by’; ‘I saw’; ‘I said’; ‘I have caused’. YHWH passed by, saw the abandoned child being trampled upon in its own blood and said to the infant ‘Live.’ In another example of repetition this command ‘I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live’ is repeated. The trampling may be a metaphorical reference to Israel’s treatment in Egypt.

At first reading it would seem that YHWH didn’t really do much more at this stage than tell the child to survive, as she remained naked until he passed by again some years later (v.7b) and remained unwashed until after her marriage (v.9). The next verse, however, shows that he had ensured her survival and development.

(7) In another clause beginning with ‘I’ YHWH says that he made her a myriad (10,000) ‘as the sprout of the field.’ This second mention of field is a much more positive image than the first in v.5. Jerusalem increased and became great. The word translated in KJV here as ‘increased’ means to be abundant, become numerous or great; it also occurs in vv. 25, 26, 29 and 51; translated as ‘increased’ or ‘multiplied’. This speaks of growth and may reference Exod 1:12 where the same verb is used of Israel’s population increase in Egypt: ‘But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew.’

Moving from the thought of growth to that of maturity YHWH says that she came with the finest ornaments (lit. ornaments of ornaments). What that means is unclear. Her breasts took shape and around the same time her (pubic) hair sprouted (same root as ‘sprout’ in v.7a). Jerusalem matured into a voluptuous, adolescent woman. YHWH adds ‘thou wast naked and bare’ which suggests that she had grown up as a young savage.

(8) Passing by once again YHWH sees that she has matured and he draws attention to the fact (‘behold’) that she was at the age for marriage (‘the time of love’). YHWH mentions five things about his reaction to Jerusalem’s maturity.

I spread my skirt (wing) over thee – this may indicate taking under protection (Deut 32:11) or perhaps betrothal (Ruth 3:9).
I covered thy nakedness – nakedness and covering are themes in this allegory. The infant was abandoned naked (‘not swaddled’ v.4), grew up naked (v.7), her nakedness was covered by YHWH (v.8), she failed to remember the time she was naked (v.22), she was naked with her lovers (v.36) and will be exposed naked by way of punishment (37, 39). YHWH covers her nakedness(v.8), he covered her with silk ((v.10), she used her fine clothes to cover idols (v.18), and YHWH will uncover her nakedness as punishment (v.37).
I sware unto thee – see next point
I entered a covenant with thee – in the context swearing and entering into a covenant must refer to marriage. The metaphor of marriage to describe God’s covenant relationship with Israel had previously been used by Hosea (e.g. Hos 2:19-20).
thou became mine -the emphasis is on possession rather than affection.

(9) The symbolism of rescue, nurture and a marital relationship may correspond to the period of the Exodus, the covenant at Mount Sinai and the giving of the Law (Exod 19-24) when Israel was established as the people of God. YHWH continues with his list of his provisions for Jerusalem during that time; a chain of ten statements beginning with ‘I.’ He claims: ‘I washed,’ ‘I washed,’ ‘I anointed,’ ‘I clothed,’ ‘I shod,’ ‘I girded,’ ‘I covered,’ ‘I decked,’ ‘I put,’ ‘I put.’

YHWH begins by saying that he washed her with water then repeats that he washed her, adding that he thoroughly washed her blood away from her. ‘Blood’ is plural – i.e. ‘bloods’. Then he anointed her with oil. The use of oil in connection with hygiene occurs also in Ruth 3:3; 2 Sam 12:20; 14:2; 2 Chron 28:15; Dan 10:3; Mic 6:15. YHWH therefore did some things for her that her parents, the Amorite and the Hittite (v.3), had failed to do when she was born (v4). He washed her and rubbed her with oil – but not until she had reached maturity.

(10) Also she had not been swaddled at birth but then, after their marriage, YHWH clothed her. In four clauses he describes how he dressed Jerusalem:

I clothed thee also with embroidered work, – embroidered cloth, repeated in v.13
and shod thee with badgers’ skin, – leather sandals.
and I girded thee about with fine linen, – repeated in v.13
and I covered thee with silk. – repeated in v.13

(11-12) Moving on from clothes YHWH reminds Jerusalem that he decked her out with jewellery and gives five examples: bracelets, a chain, nose ring, earrings and a beautiful crown (crown of glory). In the Ancient Near East these were symbols of wealth, status and royalty.

(13) In this verse YHWH reiterates his generosity towards Jerusalem after their marriage. She wore gold and silver jewellery and expensive clothes made of fine linen, silk and embroidered cloth. These are repeated from v.10. He adds that she also enjoyed the best of foods: fine flour, honey and oil. These appear again in v.19. She became very, very beautiful and achieved ed royal status.

All these gifts symbolise YHWH’s grace extended to Israel and the blessings, privileges and prosperity that the nation enjoyed on account of the special covenant relationship. Jerusalem’s rising to the status of queen represents Israel’s elevated status, prominence and influence among the surrounding nations.

(14) Jerusalem’s ‘renown’ for beauty went forth among the Gentile nations. This word ‘renown’ is repeated in the next verse, as is ‘beauty’ and together these serve as a link between this section of the allegory and the next. YHWH claims responsibility for Jerusalem’s beauty; it was all a result of his grace, she had no merit of her own. The section ends with a favourite formula of Ezekiel: ‘saith the Lord [God].’ It occurs 85 times in the book and 9 times in this chapter (vv.8, 14, 19, 23, 30, 43, 48, 58, 63).

SUMMATION

Thus far the allegory has YHWH vividly portraying his grace toward Israel/Judah in lifting the nation from obscurity and insignificance, entering into a covenant with it and bringing it to a position of prominence and prosperity. The focus is on YHWH’s (dominant and possessive) relationship with Jerusalem and the good things that he has provided for her. The implication is that she ought to be grateful for the relationship and such abundant provision. The allegory continues with an exploration of her response and her relationships with others.

This section of Ezekiel 16 is sometimes used in evangelistic preaching to illustrate God’s gracious dealings with sinners. C. H. Spurgeon, for example, published a sermon entitled Ezekiel’s Deserted Infant in 1862. A gospel message would perhaps apply the following points:

THE SINNER’S CONDITION

v.4 uncut – still attached to the world
v.4 unclean – tainted with the filth of sin
v.4 unsalted – uncared for
v.4 unclothed – no covering of righteousness
v.5 unclaimed – left to die

GOD’S SALVATION

God covered – ‘I spread’ v. 8 – Phil 3:9
God claimed – ‘thou becamest mine’ v.8 – SS 2:16
God cleansed – ‘I throughly washed’ v.9 – Isa 1:18
God clothed – ‘I clothed’ v.10 – Rev 3:18

Exposition

Ezekiel’s Vine Allegory: a Prophecy about Jerusalem – 15:1-8

Posted on 8th Feb 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapters 15, 16 and 17 Ezekiel delivers further messages from YHWH about impending judgement upon Jerusalem. These chapters contain striking allegories which convey YHWH’s perspective on Israel/Judah. In chapter 15 the nation is likened to a vine and in chapter 16 to an adulterous wife. Chapter 17 contains an allegory of two eagles and a vine.

Ezekiel chapter 15 falls into two parts:

vv. 1-5 The allegory of a vine – five rhetorical questions.

vv. 6-8 The allegory applied to the people of Jerusalem – six conclusions.

THE ALLEGORY OF A VINE (1-5)

(1) That this is a new oracle is indicated by the now familiar prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying.’ As we learn from previous chapters false prophets among the exiles in Babylon have been predicting that all will be well with Jerusalem. YHWH’s temple is there and he dwells in it, therefore the city is safe. One prophet, however, is predicting that Jerusalem will be punished and destroyed because of the people’s sinfulness and idolatry. That prophet is Ezekiel.

With this prophetic word formula Ezekiel claims that the content of his oracles does not consist of his own ideas; the messages come to him directly from YHWH and Ezekiel then passes them on to the people.

(2) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH employs a clever allegory to illustrate Israel/Judah’s guilt and punishment: he likens the nation to a grapevine. This image of Israel as a vine was familiar to Ezekiel’s fellow exiles.

Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall: Gen 49:22

Thou hast brought a vine out of Egypt: thou hast cast out the heathen, and planted it. Psa 80:8

For the vineyard of the LORD of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant… Isa 5:7 (The parable of the vineyard Isa 5:1-7)

In that day sing ye unto her, A vineyard of red wine. I the LORD do keep it; I will water it every moment: lest any hurt it, I will keep it night and day. Isa 27:2-3

Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me? Jer 2:21

Israel is an empty vine, he bringeth forth fruit unto himself: according to the multitude of his fruit he hath increased the altars; according to the goodness of his land they have made goodly images. Hos 10:1

The conventional interpretation of this familiar image focused on the vine’s purpose and ability to bear fruit. Indeed, that is the interpretation which Jesus applied in John chapter 15. Here in Ezekiel chapter 15, however, the fruit is not mentioned. The allegory is about the wood. It is not about Jerusalem being fruitless, rather it is about it being useless. YHWH addresses five rhetorical questions to Ezekiel which show how useless the wood of the vine is in comparison with the wood of the other trees of the forest. Its wood is portrayed as worthless and good for nothing.

QUESTION 1 – What is the vine tree more than any tree, or than a branch which is among the trees of the forest? 15:2

The implied answer to this question whether the wood of a vine is superior to the wood of other trees is: ‘No. its wood is inferior.’ The vine’s only value lies in its ability to bear fruit. If it does not bear fruit then it is useless.

QUESTION 2 – Shall wood be taken thereof to do any work? 15:3a

Again the implied answer is negative. Unlike other strong trees whose wood is suitable for construction or furniture the wood of a vine is useless for any kind of work.

QUESTION 3 – Will men take a pin of it to hang any vessel thereon? 15:3b

The wood of a vine cannot even be used to make a peg to hang things on.

QUESTION 4 – Behold, it is cast into the fire for fuel; the fire devoureth both the ends of it, and the midst of it is burned. Is it meet for any work? 15:4

Vine wood has no practical use; all one can do with it is burn it. Even then, it burns quickly.

QUESTION 5 – Behold, when it was whole, it was meet for no work: how much less shall it be meet yet for any work, when the fire hath devoured it, and it is burned? 15:5

If a healthy vine is already useless in its natural state then a burnt and damaged one is even more useless.

THE ALLEGORY OF A VINE APPLIED (6-8)

(6) This is an important verse since it serves as a bridge between the allegory in the first section and the explanation of the allegory in the second section. This verse contains the last mention of the vine in the chapter and also the first (and only) mention of Jerusalem. Beginning with the word ‘therefore’ (which tells us that what follows are conclusions drawn from that which has already been said) this verse moves the message on from allegory to reality. Jerusalem is no better than the other towns and cities in Israel/Judah so it too is destined to suffer destruction and burning. YHWH’s conclusions are set out in six statements:

STATEMENT No.1 – As the vine tree among the trees of the forest, which I have given to the fire for fuel, so will I give the inhabitants of Jerusalem. 15:6

Just as a useless vine is consigned to the fire so will YHWH hand over the people of Jerusalem to be consumed by the ‘fire’ of invasion and destruction by the Babylonian forces.

STATEMENT No. 2 – And I will set my face against them; 15:7a, 7d

This expression, which is repeated for emphasis at the end of the verse, indicates that YHWH is opposed to the people of Judah. He is determined to bring judgement upon them.

STATEMENT No. 3 – They shall go out from one fire, and another fire shall devour them; 15:7b

This may mean that in previous invasions Jerusalem suffered some damage but will be totally destroyed as a result of the coming siege and pillage by the Babylonians. It may also suggest that some citizens might manage to escape the destruction but will then face further calamity (e.g. Jer 42:22; 44:12-14). Judgement is inevitable.

STATEMENT No. 4 – And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I set my face against them. 15:7c

This recognition formula is common in Ezekiel. Here it is addressed (‘ye’ – you plural) to the exiles with Ezekiel in Babylon to whom he is delivering this oracle. When they will see what has happened to Jerusalem they will acknowledge that it is YHWH’s doing.

STATEMENT No. 5 – And I will make the land desolate, 15:8a

This reiterates that Jerusalem will be utterly destroyed.

STATEMENT No. 6 – Because they have committed a trespass,15:8b

This will happen because the Jerusalemites have committed a trespass – an unfaithful act. The destruction is a direct result of their actions. By worshipping idols the people of Jerusalem have acted unfaithfully towards YHWH so he will not protect the city. This idea of punishment for unfaithfulness is a common theme in the books of Chronicles – which use words like ‘trespassing’ and ‘transgressing’ to identify unfaithful acts (1 Chron 5:25; 10:13;2 Chron 12:2; 28:19; 29:6; 30:7; 36:14).

SUMMATION

In this short chapter YHWH gives a message about Jerusalem to Ezekiel who then relays the oracle to his fellow-exiles in Babylon. The first section of the chapter (vv. 1-5) contains a clever allegory which is communicated by the technique of asking rhetorical questions. The allegory inverts the usual picture of Israel as a valuable fruit-bearing vine by focusing on the wood rather than the fruit. The vine is revealed as useless and only fit for destruction. The second section (vv.6-8) applies the allegory to the people of Jerusalem (standing for the nation of Israel/Judah) and emphasizes their unfaithful acts and impending doom. The theme of unfaithfulness is taken up and presented in graphic detail in the next chapter which contains an extended allegory about an unfaithful wife.

Exposition

Understanding Ezekiel 14:12-23: Judgment and Righteousness

Posted on 1st Feb 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 14:12-23 records a new oracle from YHWH to Ezekiel about impending judgment upon Jerusalem. These verses highlight the severity and certainty of the punishment and show that it is inevitable because of Jerusalem’s sin and unfaithfulness.

The passage addresses a significant theoretical question that that must have been raised at the time: ‘Would YHWH really destroy Jerusalem when there are still some righteous people living in the city?’ In the oracle YHWH rejects the notion that the righteousness of a few can atone for the sins of the many and instead insists on individual personal responsibility. Even if the righteous should intercede the disaster cannot be averted. YHWH’s retributive justice cannot overlook sin just because of a connection with a righteous individual.

FAMINE

(13-14) This new oracle is introduced by the prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came…to me, saying.’ As usual, YHWH addresses Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ and refers to a hypothetical country (‘a land’) that sins against him by trespassing grievously. Note the use of the two closely related terms ‘sin’ and ‘trespass.’ Sin is a general term encompassing all forms of disobedience against God’s will, whether intentional or unintentional. Trespass is more specific and involves deliberately violating a known law. All trespasses are sins but not all sins are trespasses. In this connection Greenberg (1983, p. 257) observes : ‘Inasmuch as the hypothetical land of vss.13-20 is not specifically that of Israel, this will be the only passage in Hebrew Scripture in which “trespass (against Yahweh)” is predicated of a non-Israelite subject.’

When a nation sins against YHWH he will ‘stretch out his hand upon it.’ This biblical image signifies divine intervention in judgment. The specific punishment mentioned here is famine. Cutting off the food supply of both human beings and animals would be a reminder of humanity’s dependence upon YHWH. Would he, however, act against a sinful nation if righteous individuals live there and (presumably) intercede on behalf of the sinful population? The remainder of the oracle deals with the limitations of personal righteousness and intercession in a situation where sin is widespread.

Although the background to this oracle is idolatry in Judah YHWH indicates that what he says has a much wider application by referring to a hypothetical country and also by holding up two non-Israelite men along with the Israelite Daniel as iconic examples of righteousness. Even if Noah, Daniel and Job were in such a country they could not avert disaster. They would only be able to save themselves because of their righteous characters, no-one else.

At that time these three men were legendary throughout the Ancient Near East for their righteousness. Through it they had also been able to save the lives of others.

Noah – because of his righteousness (Gen 6:9) the primaeval hero Noah was able to save himself, his family and the animals from the Flood (Gen 6:9-8:22).

Daniel – This likely refers to Ezekiel’s older contemporary the Daniel of the Babylonian exile who, though still a young man (possibly late twenties) at this time, had already gained a reputation for righteousness. Has he saved lives through intercession? Some would point to Daniel 2:17-18.

Modern scholars tend to argue that this is not the Daniel of the book of Daniel but the righteous Ugaritic Daniel (Dn’il) of The Tale of Aqhat. Their arguments centre on the fact that the spelling of ‘Daniel’ in the book of Ezekiel differs from that in the book of Daniel, that Dn’il was a figure of antiquity as were Noah and Job but not the contemporary Daniel and the chronological argument that the Daniel of the book of Daniel was too young to have achieved fame at the time this oracle was given.

Arguments for Dn’il in the article by ‘Day, J. (1980). The Daniel of Ugarit and Ezekiel and the Hero of the Book of Daniel. Vetus Testamentum, 30(2), pp. 174–184′ may be read online free of charge by logging into JSTOR. ‘The Tale of Aqhat’ may be read in J. B. Pritchard’s ‘Ancient Near Eastern Texts’ at archive.org.

Job – Through intercession the righteous sufferer Job was able to save the lives of his three friends who had been wrong about the reasons for his affliction (Job 42:7-10).

That the presence of its most righteous inhabitants could not save a sinful nation underscores the seriousness of sin. Salvation is an individual affair, righteousness is non-transferable. That Noah, Job and Daniel are recognised by the Lord as examples of personal righteousness encourages us to maintain personal righteousness during times of trial and in circumstances where all around is marked by corruption.

(15-16) RAVENING ANIMALS

Here the imagery of wild beasts roaming the land attacking and killing the populace is used to describe another form of punishment. Travel throughout the country would be impossible. Society would break down and the land be uninhabitable. The repetition of the three righteous men again emphasises the fact that righteousness is non-transferable. Even their children would not be spared.

(17-18) WAR

The third scenario of judgment is war and conflict as symbolised by the sword. YHWH would subject a sinful nation to punishment by violence and invasion. Again it is stated that even if these three men were in it they could not save even their closest family members.

(19-20) BLEEDING PESTILENCE

The fourth scenario in this escalating progression of judgment is that of plague which will affect humans and animals (famine – ravening animals – war -bleeding pestilence). YHWH will pour out his fury upon the land ‘in blood.’ Pestilence and bloodshed are not two separate judgments but a hendiadys which specifies the type of plague – bleeding pestilence – i.e. the plague results in an outpouring of blood. (For a short technical discussion of this see: Tooman, W. A. (2010). On the Meaning of דבר ודם in Ezekiel (5:17, 14:19, 28:23, 38:22). Vetus Testamentum, 60(4), pp. 666–668.)

Once again swearing by his own life (‘as I live saith the Lord God’) in v.20 as in vv.16 and 18 YHWH repeats the point about the three righteous men. They could only deliver themselves by their righteousness, not their family members. The repetition reinforces YHWH’s point that no human being, however righteous, can turn back the Lord’s punishment of a sinful and unrepentant people.

(21) In this passage YHWH has so far been speaking in general terms about a hypothetical sinful country. This verse now makes it clear that that he had Judah, represented by Jerusalem, in view. The phrase ”how much more’ suggests that the punishment of Judah will be particularly severe because of its privileges. All four judgments (the sword, famine, wild beasts, plague) will be visited upon the city and the cumulative effect will be total devastation. Although directed at Judah this oracle was given in Babylon and served to remind the exiles there that their notion that things would work out well in the end for Jerusalem was false.

(22-23) These verses introduce a note of hope that despite overwhelming punishment YHWH would preserve a remnant ‘who will come forth unto you’ i.e. to Ezekiel and the exiles in Babylon. It does not seem that these few people will survive because of their personal righteousness but rather that they are examples of sinful people who experience YHWH’s mercy in the midst of judgment. When this group of exiles comes to Babylon the exiles will see how wicked they really are and be consoled that the Lord has been just in executing well-deserved judgment upon Jerusalem and Judah. God’s justice will be vindicated.

An alternative interpretation is that Ezekiel and the exiles will see the changed behaviour of the remnant. The judgment will have had a purifying effect upon them, they will have repented and been transformed, Ezekiel and the exiles will then be comforted that God’s purposes have been accomplished.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel 14:12-23 is a solemn and sobering reminder of the seriousness of sin and the certainty of God’s judgment. Even the presence of righteous men in a country cannot avert this. Everyone is responsible for his own sin. The passage emphasises the severity of God’s punishment upon Judah which will be fourfold: famine, wild animals, the sword and plague. Despite this some individuals will survive the catastrophe and eventually reach the exiles in Babylon. Their bad (or good???) behaviour will cause the exiles to acknowledge God’s justice. That there will be a remnant is a faint glimmer of hope in an otherwise gloomy forecast for Judah’s future.

Exposition

Ezekiel 13:1-16 The Danger of False Prophets

Posted on 1st Jan 202518th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

Reading Ezekiel 13: 1-23

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 13 is a significant passage in Ezekiel because it addresses the danger posed by false prophets whose messages originate in their own ‘hearts.’ In this chapter Ezekiel denounces counterfeit prophets who mislead the people by falsely claiming to speak for YHWH.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Ezekiel prophesied during a time of great turmoil for Israel. In 597 BCE the Chaldean king Nebuchadnezzar II subdued Jerusalem and placed a puppet king (Zedekiah) on the throne of Judah. He also deported the deposed king Jehoiachin to Babylonia (2 Kgs 24:15-17) along with many of the elite citizens of Judah, including Ezekiel. There YHWH called and commissioned Ezekiel as his prophet.

Although living in Babylonia at a place called Tel-Abib near the River Chebar Ezekiel directed many of his prophecies towards the people of Jerusalem. The situation there was deteriorating after King Zedekiah’s abortive attempt to revolt against Babylonian rule (2 Kgs 25:1-2). Interestingly, that revolt was supported and encouraged by false prophets in Judah (Jer 27:9-10,14-16). Soon the city was besieged by Nebuchadnezzar’s forces and eventually devastated by them in 586/7 BCE.

Meanwhile over in Babylonia Ezekiel condemned Israel and Judah because of their sin and idolatry; prophesying impending judgement upon them. At the same time other Israelite men and women in Babylonia were delivering prophecies which contradicted Ezekiel’s message of doom.

Instead of prophesying punishment, they offered false comfort to the people; assuring them that the situation at Jerusalem would soon be resolved peacefully and thus building up their hopes of a soon return from exile. Ezekiel as a true prophet of YHWH found it necessary to denounce these false prophets and confront their lies.

Chapter 13 of Ezekiel is situated within a section (12:21-14:11) that deals with various issues relating to prophecy. The chapter contains two parallel woe oracles which are similar in structure, content and style. One is against male prophets and the other against women who prophesy, The context (13:9) would indicate that these people, like Ezekiel, were Israelite exiles in Babylonia. Back in the homeland Jeremiah too was denouncing false prophets and prophecy. It is worth comparing his oracle in Jer 23:9-40 with those of Ezekiel in Ezek 13.

CHAPTER DIVISION

13:1-16 – An oracle addressed to male prophets.

13:17-23 – An oracle addressed to women who prophesy.

AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO MALE PROPHETS (1-16)

(1) ‘And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ – This phrase is often used in Ezekiel to introduce a new oracle (e.g. 11:14; 12:1; 15:1; 17:1; 18:1). In 13:1 it covers both oracles in chapter 13 (2-16; 17-23) and is particularly relevant since it emphasizes the fact that Ezekiel speaks the word of YHWH, unlike the false prophets whom he condemns. This oracle against male prophets is mirrored by that against the female prophets in vv.17-23. The structure and language are similar.

STRUCTURE

A preamble – vv.1-3a and vv.17-18a.
Ezekiel addressed as ‘Son of Man’ – v.2 and v.17.
An accusation – vv.3b-7 and vv.18b-19.
A forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ – vv.8-9 and vv.20-21.
A second forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – vv.10-14 and vv.22-23.

LANGUAGE

Although the content is different the language used in each of the two oracles is similar:

v.2 – ‘Son of Man, prophesy against’ and v.17 – ‘Son of man, set thy face against.’
v.2 – ‘that prophesy’ and v.16 – ‘which prophesy.’
v.2 – ‘say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own hearts’ and v.17 – ‘which prophesy out of their own heart; and prophesy thou against them.’
v.3 – ‘thus saith the Lord God’ and v.18 – ‘thus saith the Lord God.’
v.3 – ‘woe unto’ and v.18 – ‘woe to.’
v.8 – ‘therefore saith the Lord God’ and v.20 – ‘wherefore saith the Lord God.’
v.8 – ‘behold I am against’ and v.20 – ‘behold I am against.’
v.9 – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ and v.21 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’
v.10 – ‘because…’ and v.22 – ‘because…’
v.13 – ‘therefore…’ and v.23 – ‘therefore.’
v.14 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord’ and v.23 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

(2) Addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ (stressing human weakness in light of God’s greatness) YHWH instructs him to deliver this message ‘against’ (’el; 2, 8, 9, 17, 20) the false prophets. They are called ‘the prophets of Israel,’ a description unique to Ezekiel (13:2,16; 38:17, cf. 13:4). These men are in exile with Ezekiel but the term ‘prophets of Israel’ may suggest that he views them as part of a larger group that would include false prophets back in Israel/Judah. The latter are described by Jeremiah as ‘the prophets of Samaria’ (Jer 23:13) and ‘the prophets of Jerusalem’ (Jer 23:14). Ezekiel’s opponents are not prophets of other gods but men working within the Israelite religious system.

(3) The pronouncement of a ‘woe’ on these ‘foolish (nāḇāl) prophets’ hints at the severe consequences of prophesying lies while claiming to speak for YHWH; these will be set out in vv.8-9. The men are fools; what they say is empty and futile. In the Old Testament a fool (nāḇāl) is someone who denies or disrespects God (Job 2:10; Psa 14:1; 74:18, 22; Isa 32:5-6). These prophets do not follow the Spirit of God but their own spirits, they perceive nothing.

There are several changes in person within these verses which some people might find confusing:

In vv. 2-3, YHWH directly addresses Ezekiel in the second person ‘thou’.
In v. 4-5, YHWH directly addresses Israel in the second person ‘ye’.
In verse 6, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.
In vv. 7-8, YHWH directly addresses the false prophets in the second person ‘ye’.
In v. 9, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.

(4) YHWH addresses Israel and compares their false prophets to foxes or jackals among the ruins. Such animals survive in desolate places (Lam 5:18) by scavenging and are known to be opportunistic and destructive (Song 2:15). The simile implies that Judah is a society in ruins. It is morally desolate but these prophets thrive and capitalise on the chaos, exploiting the people’s vulnerability. They further undermine the ruins rather than try to build them up.

(5) Directly addressing the false prophets YHWH accuses them of failure to repair breaches in the wall (KJV ‘hedge’). The word gāḏēr refers to a protective wall, e.g. around a vineyard (Psa 80:12; Isa 5:5), or a city wall (Ezra 9:9; Mic &:11). Rather than rising to their responsibility for the defence of the people (e.g. by warnings, intercession, teaching) the false prophets contribute to their decline. Therefore the people will be defenceless in the Day of YHWH (Ezek 30:3, cf. 7:19) when his anger will come upon them (Ezek 5:13; 7:8; 9:8; 13:13; 16:42; 20:21, 34; 21:31; 20:20, 22, 31; 36:6; 38:19; 43:8).

(6-7) Vain visions and lying divination.

Verses 6 and 7 say much the same thing. Both highlight the deceitful arrogance of the false prophets who fabricate visions and use means of divination that YHWH has not authorised.

As well as seeing vain (empty, deceitful, false) visions they make lying divinations (predictions made by reading omens or by various rituals), practices forbidden in Deut 18:9-14. In Israelite religion the only sacred objects authorised for discerning God’s will in specific circumstances were the Urim and Thummim (Ex 28:30; Lev 8:8; Num 27:21; Deut 33:8; 1 Sam 28:6; Ezra 2:63; Neh 7:65).

Even worse is the false prophets’ habit of ascribing their lies to YHWH, hoping that this public declaration of authority would somehow obligate YHWH to fulfil their prophecies. V.6 ‘the Lord hath not sent them’ and v.7 ‘albeit I have not spoken’ emphasise that what they said did not have divine authorisation. Thus their predictions were not only false and deceitful but also blasphemous.

(8-9) Forecast of judgment upon the false prophets.

The word ‘therefore’ introduces details of the punishment due to the false prophets and a summary of the reasons why they deserve it – which is because they ‘have spoken vanity and seen lies.’ The prophets are informed that YHWH has had enough of their lies. He is already ‘against’ them and his hand will be raised up against (KJV ‘upon’) them. (’el – against – see 2, 8, 9, 17, 20). In Ezekiel YHWH’s outstretched hand is an indicator of punishment and judgment (6:14; 14:9,13; 16:27; 20:33,34; 25:7,13,16; 35:3). Their punishment will be three-fold:

1. They will lose membership of the assembly of YHWH’s people.

‘Assembly’ or ‘council’ (sôḏ) is an association of people who are closely connected, who have something in common (Gen 49:6; Job 19:19; Psa 64:3; 111:1; Jer 6:11; 15:17). This punishment has been interpreted as signifying a loss of leadership, honour or status in the community.

It has also been suggested that it may refer to exclusion from the select group who are confidants of YHWH (Psa 89:8; Jer 23:18,22); which would include true prophets (Amos 3:7). The meaning is probably even stronger: they would no longer be regarded as members of God’s earthly people – the community of faith.

2. They will not be listed in the register of the house of Israel.

These false prophets would not be listed in the genealogical register (keṯāb, writing) of Israelites. The existence and importance of this list for those returning from exile is clear from Ezra chapter 2 and Nehemiah chapter 7. For the false prophets exclusion would mean a loss of citizen rights. Notice that Jeremiah pronounced a similar punishment upon Shemaiah the Nehelamite (Jer 29:31-32).

Some commentators contend that this register is YHWH’s book (Ex 32:33; Psa 69:28; 87:6; 139:16; Dan 12:1). The Old Testament, however, is fairly vague about what is recorded in that book, whereas this document mentioned in Ezekiel 13:9 is specifically said to be the ‘register of the house of Israel.’ It seems more sensible to interpret it literally as a secular civil census list.

3. They will not be able to enter the land of Israel.

This flows logically from the previous two. Excision from the register would lead to serious consequences for the false prophets and their descendants; probably with respect to claims to ancestral land or the purchase of property.

The same word keṯāb meaning ‘register’ occurs in Ezra 2:62 and Neh 7:64. These twin passages illustrate the problems that exclusion from the register, in this case the record of priestly genealogies, could bring:

Another group returned at this time from the towns of Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Kerub, Addan, and Immer. However, they could not prove that they or their families were descendants of Israel. This group included the families of Delaiah, Tobiah, and Nekoda— a total of 652 people. Three families of priests — Hobaiah, Hakkoz, and Barzillai — also returned. (This Barzillai had married a woman who was a descendant of Barzillai of Gilead, and he had taken her family name.) They searched for their names in the genealogical records, but they were not found, so they were disqualified from serving as priests. Ezra 2:59-62 NLT

This first forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets ends with the divine recognition formula ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God.’

(10-14) A second forecast of judgment.

Verse 10 begins with a doubling of ya‘an (‘on account of’ or because’) which the KJV translates here as ‘because, even because’; meaning ‘for the very good reason.’ This phrase ya’an ub’ ya’an also occurs in Lev 26:43 and Ezek 36:3.

Punishment is due because they have misled (caused to go astray) the people saying ‘peace’ when there is no peace. Rather than warning them about the consequences of their sinful behaviour, the false prophets give an assurance of safety that is not rooted in reality. They intentionally lull the people into a false sense of security.

The image of a wall, used earlier in v.5 to represent the spiritual and moral state of the people of Judah, is taken up again in v.10. The word for ‘wall’ (ḥayiṣ) in v.10 is a hapax legomenon (a word that only occurs once) in the Old Testament and means a dry wall or party wall; an unimproved flimsy or crumbling wall built of mud-brick or loose stones and liable to collapse under stress. A different word (qiyrāh) is used for ‘wall’ in vv.12-15. The ‘wall’ in v.10 is not literal but metaphorical.

It is said to have been daubed or smeared with untempered mortar. The word tāp̱ēl translated ‘untempered’ (KJV) is an adjective meaning ‘unseasoned’ or ‘tasteless.’ The thought is that of lacking an essential ingredient; here the mortar is just mud to which a binding agent such as straw has not been added. It covers the wall but does not strengthen it. To emphasise that the product is insubstantial modern translations tend to replace the KJV translation’s ‘untempered [mortar]’ with ”whitewash.’ This conveys the thought of deceit and hypocrisy on the part of the false prophets.

(11-14) These verses continue with the figure of a whitewashed wall and the effect bad weather has on it. Flooding rain, great hailstones and stormy winds will cause it to fall. The futility of the false prophets’ assurances will be exposed and they will be held accountable. When judgement comes and the wall collapses people will ask (v.12) ‘Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it?’

Greenberg (1983, p.238) comments: ‘As said expressly in 22:8, “they” who daubed the wall were the prophets: the people built the dry wall – a figure of their unfounded optimism, while the prophets daubed it with worthless stuff – their self-inspired predictions of well-being.’

V.13 clarifies that the destructive forces represent YHWH’s anger against sin as well as the lies of the false prophets. His fury will be so intense that the prophets will not survive (vv.15b-16).

Scholars suggest that in v.14 the image of the wall changes. The wall which YHWH will break down is said to refer now to Jerusalem and the fall of the city. To quote Greenberg (1983, p.238) again, he says of the phrase leveling it to the ground in v.14:

‘The language of this clause is more appropriate to massive demolition than to the fall of a mere wall; it facilitates the intrusion, in the next clause, of the reference to Jerusalem. When it (fem.) falls and you perish within it (fem.).’

In other words proof for the assertion that in v.14 Ezekiel is thinking of the impending fall of Jerusalem is that the word ‘wall’ is masculine whereas ‘it shall fall’ and ‘in the midst thereof’ are feminine; therefore the reference cannot be to the metaphorical wall but to the city of Jerusalem.

This second forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets also ends with the divine recognition formula ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ (vv. 9, 14, 21, 23)

(15) YHWH asserts that he will accomplish his wrath upon the wall (the false assurances) and upon those that have smeared it with ‘whitewash’ (the false prophets).

(16) This verse summarises vv.10-15: the main lie of the false prophets is that they promise peace when there is no peace.

SUMMATION

This woe oracle denounces Israelite false prophets for failing to address the nation’s sin and instead spreading lies and details of false visions, claiming divine authority which they do not possess. They offer the people false hope by declaring ‘peace’ when there is no peace. The passage highlights God’s anger against deceit and spiritual negligence.

Exposition

Ezekiel 12: Prophecies of Exile and Judgment

Posted on 2nd Nov 202418th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel gives no new date marker at the beginning of chapter 12. The next one is not until 20:1 so in the absence of chronological data for chapters 12-19 one must assume that the messages they contain were delivered soon after the prophecies of chapters 8-11, during 592 BCE (8:1).

Since it would seem that the account of a trance which Ezekiel had communicated to his fellow-exiles (11:25) had had no effect upon them it was therefore essential that the theme of judgment upon Jerusalem and Judah be further developed, this is the main point of chapters 12-19. In chapter 12 Ezekiel emphasises the certainty of that impending judgment.

CHAPTER 12

1-2 A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE

3-7 THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED

8-16 THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD

17-20 THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED

21-28 THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED

A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE (1-2)

1 The word of the LORD also came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house. Ezekiel 12:1-2

(1) The phrase ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying’ signifies the commencement of a new message from YHWH.

(2) YHWH again addresses Ezekiel as ‘Son of man (adam)’ thus emphasising Ezekiel’s humanity in contrast to the Lord’s divinity. He says that Ezekiel dwells in the midst of a ‘rebellious house.’ This refers to the exiles who are already in Babylon along with Ezekiel. They are rebellious because they refuse to see or hear the truth (cp. Deut 29:3-4; Isa 6:9; Jer 5:21; Mk 8:18; Acts 28:27). The exiles probably shared the vain sentiments of the people back home in Judah whom Jeremiah (Jer 7:4) warned about misplaced trust in the temple. They thought that because the temple of the Lord was in Jerusalem the city would not fall to invading forces. Ezekiel needed to powerfully drive home the lesson that Jerusalem would indeed fall and that its inhabitants would be taken into exile.

THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED (3-7)

3 Therefore, thou son of man, prepare thee stuff for removing, and remove by day in their sight; and thou shalt remove from thy place to another place in their sight: it may be they will consider, though they be a rebellious house.
4 Then shalt thou bring forth thy stuff by day in their sight, as stuff for removing: and thou shalt go forth at even in their sight, as they that go forth into captivity.
5 Dig thou through the wall in their sight, and carry out thereby.
6 In their sight shalt thou bear it upon thy shoulders, and carry it forth in the twilight: thou shalt cover thy face, that thou see not the ground: for I have set thee for a sign unto the house of Israel.
7 And I did so as I was commanded: I brought forth my stuff by day, as stuff for captivity, and in the even I digged through the wall with mine hand; I brought it forth in the twilight, and I bore it upon my shoulder in their sight.

(3-7) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to enact a drama of someone going into exile. Referring back to ‘which have eyes to see, and see not’ in v.2 notice the seven-fold repetition of ‘in their sight’ in vv. 3-7. Also, the words ‘by day’ are mentioned three times in these verses. Ezekiel is to make sure that his actions get the attention of his audience. Notice also ‘remove’ and ‘removing’ – these are from a word meaning captivity or going into exile.

Ezekiel receives specific instructions regarding the drama he is to act out.

a. He is to ‘prepare his stuff’ by day for going into exile (v.4). ‘Stuff’ – According to Strongs H3627 this word can refer both to a vessel or receptacle and also to utensils or items of equipment. Most translations say something akin to ‘pack your baggage’ but here the reference is more likely to the bag or knapsack itself rather than to the few basic items (e.g. clothing, bedding, cooking utensils, food) an exile would put in it. Thus the Christian Standard Bible translates ‘prepare thee stuff for removing’ as: ‘get your bags ready for exile.’ Ezekiel’s fellow exiles in Babylonia would have no problem recognising what he was portraying; they had done this very thing for real a few years earlier, in 597 BCE.

b. He is to go out in the evening as if escaping like an exile (v.4).

c. He is to dig a hole in the wall (of his house, the courtyard or the town?) and take his baggage (stuff) out through it (v.5).

d. He is to carry his bag on his shoulder into the pitch darkness with his face covered so that he cannot see the ground (v.6). Note that the word translated ‘twilight’ in KJV means thick darkness. It occurs in vv. 6, 7, 12 and Gen 15:17.

Perhaps this performance will enable his rebellious fellow-exiles to understand (v.3) that this will soon be the situation in Jerusalem. People there will soon be fleeing as emigrants, never to return. YHWH tells Ezekiel (v. 6b) that by acting out this scenario he will serve as a sign or portent to the house of Israel (see also v.11). Isaiah is another prophet said to have been a sign (Isa 20:3).

‘I did so as I was commanded.’ In v.7 Ezekiel confirms that that he has faithfully complied with YHWH’s instructions. He adds that he excavated the hole in the wall by hand; thus avoiding the noise of a pick or other instrument that in a real life escape might alert the enemy. The main emphasis, however, is on his exile’s pack; its significance is revealed in v.10.

THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD (8-16)

8 And in the morning came the word of the LORD unto me, saying,
9 Son of man, hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?
10 Say thou unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; This burden concerneth the prince in Jerusalem, and all the house of Israel that are among them.
11 Say, I am your sign: like as I have done, so shall it be done unto them: they shall remove and go into captivity.
12 And the prince that is among them shall bear upon his shoulder in the twilight, and shall go forth: they shall dig through the wall to carry out thereby: he shall cover his face, that he see not the ground with his eyes.
13 My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare: and I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.
14 And I will scatter toward every wind all that are about him to help him, and all his bands; and I will draw out the sword after them.
15 And they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall scatter them among the nations, and disperse them in the countries.
16 But I will leave a few men of them from the sword, from the famine, and from the pestilence; that they may declare all their abominations among the heathen whither they come; and they shall know that I am the LORD.

(8-9) The following morning Ezekiel receives further communication from YHWH in the form of a negative question: ‘hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?’ Ezekiel’s strange behaviour has caught the attention of his fellow-exiles who have asked about it. This presents an opportunity for him to explain the significance of his symbolic act.

(10-11) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to give the explanation in the form of an authoritative prophetic message. It begins with ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ followed by a summary statement of the point of the drama. It is a message of impending disaster both for King Zedekiah and for all who remain with him in Jerusalem. Ezekiel uses ‘house of Israel’ in two different senses. Note that v.9 refers to the ‘house of Israel’ in Babylonia (cp. 11:15) and v.10 to the ‘house of Israel’ in Judah.

King Zedekiah of Judah is not mentioned by name but it is obvious that he is the person referred to. He is not called ‘the king’ (meleḵ) but ‘the prince’ (or chief). The Hebrew word for ‘prince’ is nasi.’ Many commentators point out that there is word play here on ‘prince’ (nasi) and ‘burden’ (maśśā). Greenberg (1983, p. 211) comments ‘The chief is this burden. Hebrew hannaśi hammaśśa hazze; this alliterative phrase is patterned after Jer 23:33.’ As well as a play on sound there seems also to be a pun on meaning. Ezekiel’s ‘burden’ was lifted up and borne on his shoulder, the term ‘prince’ refers to someone who is elevated or lifted up.

Some take ‘burden’ here to mean a threatening message, the word is used in that sense by other Old Testament prophets, but it only occurs here in Ezekiel and in the context must refer to the bag containing Ezekiel’s ‘stuff’ (v.4). Greenberg (1983, p. 212) explains: ‘The meaning of the sentence is: this burden – the exile’s pack – represents the chief and the Israelites of Jerusalem; they will be taken out of the city into exile. Two things are unexpected: the reference to two subjects, the chief (king) and the people, and the symbolic character of the exile’s pack (maśśā is linked to naśa ‘al katef “carry [the pack] on the shoulder” in vss.6f….’

Ezekiel’s message is that Zedekiah and his subjects will be carried into exile. Ezekiel himself is a ‘sign’ in that his actions represented the destiny and fate of King Zedekiah of Judah and the people of Judah. Note that the thought of Ezekiel as a sign reappears in 24:18-27 where he is forbidden to formally mourn the death of his wife; symbolising YHWH’s refusal to grieve for Jerusalem at the time of its destruction (24:24).

(12-14) Returning to the subject of the prince Ezekiel expands on his symbolic action. He predicts in detail Zedekiah’s flight from Jerusalem by night with his pack upon his shoulder and his eyes covered; probably to avoid recognition – but perhaps this also symbolises shame (cp. Jer 9:19).

Ezekiel predicts additional details that do not feature in his drama: Zedekiah will be pursued, apprehended, blinded and taken into captivity in Babylon. His supporters and troops will scatter in all directions and be pursued by the Babylonian forces. YHWH claims responsibility for these forthcoming events, saying (v.13) that Zedekiah will be metaphorically caught in his snare and trap.

The literal fulfilment of Ezekiel’s specific and accurate predictions is recorded in 2 Kgs 25:1-7; Jer 39:1-7; 52:1-11. These passages tell us that Zedekiah fled Jerusalem at night through a gap between two walls, was captured by the Babylonians near Jericho and taken to Riblah to meet Nebuchadnezzar. As punishment for his revolt Nebuchadnezzar had Zedekiah watch the murder of his family before blinding him and transporting him to Babylon.

The abovementioned accounts (e.g. Jer 39:7) explain the riddle or apparent enigma in Ezek 12:13: ‘I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.’ Zedekiah would be blinded before being transported to Babylon.

King Zedekiah himself may have been aware of this prophecy but failed to appreciate its significance. According to the first century CE historian Flavius Josephus, in his work ‘Antiquities of the Jews,’ Ezekiel wrote down this prophecy and sent a copy to King Hezekiah. He compared the prophecies of Jeremiah and Ezekiel and reckoned that these contradicted one another. He therefore decided not to believe either of them.

Josephus, living more than 600 years after this event, is the only source of this interesting but possibly unreliable piece of information:

Now as to Zedekiah himself, while he heard the prophet [Jeremiah] speak, he believed him, and agreed to every thing as true, and supposed it was for his advantage; but then his friends perverted him, and dissuaded him from what the prophet advised, and obliged him to do what they pleased. Ezekiel also foretold in Babylon what calamities were coming upon the people, which when he heard, he sent accounts of them unto Jerusalem. But Zedekiah did not believe their prophecies, for the reason following: It happened that the two prophets agreed with one another in what they said as in all other things, that the city should be taken, and Zedekiah himself should be taken captive; but Ezekiel disagreed with him, and said that Zedekiah should not see Babylon, while Jeremiah said to him, that the king of Babylon should carry him away thither in bonds….

For background it is worth reading all of chapter 7 in Book X of Josephus’ ‘Antiquities of the Jews’ (Ant. X. 7. 2)

(15-16) Now the prophet raises a faint note of hope with the mention of a ‘a few men’ of Judah (the remnant) who will be spared for the purpose of testifying to YHWH’s sovereignty. These people will recognise that it is their own idolatry that has brought the judgment upon them.

THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED (17-20)

17 Moreover the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
18 Son of man, eat thy bread with quaking, and drink thy water with trembling and with carefulness;
19 And say unto the people of the land, Thus saith the Lord GOD of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and of the land of Israel; They shall eat their bread with carefulness, and drink their water with astonishment, that her land may be desolate from all that is therein, because of the violence of all them that dwell therein.
20 And the cities that are inhabited shall be laid waste, and the land shall be desolate; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

(17-20) Ezekiel receives a further communication directly from YHWH, instructing him to perform another symbolic action. He is to eat his food and drink water in a manner that portrays fear and anxiety. By shaking and trembling as he eats and drinks Ezekiel will visually convey the fear that the people of Judah will experience during the siege of Jerusalem. His actions will symbolise the people’s anxiety and deep distress in the face of that calamity. This prophetic sign suggests that even basic tasks like eating and drinking will be carried out with fear.

Ezekiel is to impart this message to ‘the people of the land,’ here a reference to the exiles who are with Ezekiel in Babylonia. It is about Jerusalem and the land of Israel. It is especially about those who live in Jerusalem and in ‘her land’ i.e. the territory surrounding the city, since they would be the ones enduring the siege and destruction first-hand.

Vv. 19b and 20 further explain Ezekiel’s symbolic act. The word translated ‘carefulness’ used with reference to how they will drink their water (v.19) and how they will eat their food (v.20) means ‘anxiety.’ It also occurs in 4:16 where in the context the anxiety is about running out of food. That fear of scarcity and famine that will be experienced during the siege seems to be in view here too.

The people of Jerusalem and Judah will also feel terror because their towns will be laid waste and the land will be stripped of everything. The Babylonians will pursue a scorched-earth policy; they will leave no people, animals, crops or infrastructure. There will be total devastation. The reason for this is once again said to be the unrestrained violence of the people of Judah (7:11, 23; 8:17).

As has already been said in v.16, the purpose of the desolation is so that the people will recognise the authority and sovereignty of YHWH – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED (21-28)

21 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
22 Son of man, what is that proverb that ye have in the land of Israel, saying, The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth?
23 Tell them therefore, Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will make this proverb to cease, and they shall no more use it as a proverb in Israel; but say unto them, The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.
24 For there shall be no more any vain vision nor flattering divination within the house of Israel.
25 For I am the LORD: I will speak, and the word that I shall speak shall come to pass; it shall be no more prolonged: for in your days, O rebellious house, will I say the word, and will perform it, saith the Lord GOD.
26 Again the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
27 Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.
28 Therefore say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; There shall none of my words be prolonged any more, but the word which I have spoken shall be done, saith the Lord GOD.

(21-25) Verses 21-28 address the people’s doubt and scepticism that Ezekiel’s prophecies will be fulfilled.

Ezekiel receives a new message from YHWH which is introduced by the usual formula ‘the word of the LORD came unto me, saying.’ As elsewhere, Ezekiel is addressed as ‘Son of man’ then YHWH highlights a saying that was popular in the land of Israel. This proverb (māšāl) mocks the prophets and reflects a general belief that the judgment they predict will never come to pass: ‘The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth’ (Cp. Ecc 8:11; 2 Pet 3:3-4). Despite the passing of time none of their prophecies of doom have come to fruition.

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to inform the Israelites that he will cause this proverb to cease – because the course of events will prove the proverb wrong. In fact it will be replaced by a new proverb: ‘The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.’ i.e. the time is not far off and every vision will come to pass.

In addition, all false prophecies that flatter the people of Israel will cease. They are described as ‘vain visions and smooth divinations.’ These prophecies obtained through occult practices are by false prophets who flatter the people by predicting peace, security and the return of the Jehoiachin exiles from Babylon (for an example of this read Jer 28:1-17).

The coming judgment will expose their deceptive lies and bring their false assurances to an end. True predictions by genuine prophets of YHWH like Jeremiah and Ezekiel will come to pass but those expressed by the false prophets will fail. (Note that false prophecy is the subject of the next chapter -Ezekiel 13.)

In v.25 YHWH asserts his sovereign right to speak (declare judgment). Unlike the false prophets his words are truth and will be fulfilled soon. Through Ezekiel he declares that the judgment will come upon the current generation – ‘in your days.’ Once again he describes them as a ‘rebellious house’ (12:2, 3, 9, 25).

(26-28) Another communication from YHWH to Ezekiel is introduced by ‘the word of the Lord came to me saying.’ The prophecy that follows is similar but slightly different to that in the previous segment. Verses 20-25 relate to a proverb that denies that the prophecies of judgment would ever be fulfilled. In verses 26-28, however, YHWH quotes another proverb (‘they of the house of Israel say’) which promotes the equally erroneous view that that Ezekiel’s prophecies may well be fulfilled, but not for a very long time (‘the vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.’). YHWH, however, confirms that Ezekiel’s prophecies will be fulfilled soon.

SUMMATION

This chapter underscores the certainty of YHWH’s judgment. In it Ezekiel enacts the flight of a refugee. This sign-act is explained as predicting the attempted escape of King Zedekiah, and others, from Jerusalem. Ezekiel then enacts another drama, demonstrating the terror that the Jerusalemites will experience while the city is under siege. The remainder of the chapter addresses the apparent failure of Ezekiel’s visions of destruction. YHWH says that those prophecies will soon be fulfilled. Ezekiel is not a false prophet, his predictions will certainly come to pass.

Exposition

The Day of the Lord: Justice and Restoration in Obadiah 15-21

Posted on 17th Oct 202418th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

DELIVERANCE FOR ISRAEL IN THE DAY OF THE LORD (15-21)

The book of Obadiah is a prophecy against Edom, a nation closely related by kinship to Israel/Judah but one with a long history of opposition and aggression towards it. The first section of the book condemns Edom’s pride and lists its crimes (10-14), both passive and aggressive, against Israel/Judah.

In verses 15-21 the prophet shifts from the judgment on Edom to a broader picture of God’s judgment on all nations, plus the restoration of Israel. YHWH is Lord over human history and therefore will judge not only Edom (as promised in Obad 2-4 and 8-10) but the other nations also; on a future occasion known The Day of YHWH.

For the day of the LORD is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head. Obadiah 1:15

(15) Verse 15 expands the scope of God’s judgment from Edom to all nations and introduces the ‘Day of the Lord’ with the word ‘for.’ This word connects the second oracle (vv.15-21) with the first as it refers back to the crimes against Judah outlined in vv.10-14. These crimes are the reasons for YHWH’s judgment upon Edom and the other nations in the Day of the Lord and for the lex talionis that will apply. Verses 15-16 contain three expressions of lex talionis:

as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee

thy reward shall return upon thine own head

as ye have drunk…so shall all the heathen drink

RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE

Lex talionis is a Latin expression for the legal principle of retributive justice. You might hear it referred to in everyday casual conversation as ‘tit for tat;’ ‘an eye for an eye;’ ‘it’s karma;’ ‘what comes around goes around;’ or ‘you reap what you sow.’

The law of retributive justice is clearly set out early in the Old Testament:

And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. Exodus 21:23-25

In the New Testament it is mentioned by Jesus –

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Matthew 7:2

– just before he goes on to restate it positively in what has become known as the Golden Rule:

Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. Matthew 7:12

Also relevant is a statement in the New Testament by the apostle Paul:

Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. Galatians 6:7

The principle of sowing and reaping is a popular theme in gospel preaching and it is no less popular on Christian web sites. Much online content on the topic appears to be based on the work of John W. Lawrence (The Seven Laws of the Harvest : Understanding the Realities of Sowing and Reaping, Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids, MI, 1995).

I found five of the laws Lawrence identifies particularly interesting and instructive:

We reap only what has been sown.
We reap the same in kind as we sow (Gal 6:7-8)
We reap in a different season than we sow (Eccl 3:2; Gal 6:9)
We reap more than we sow (2 Sam 12:9-12; Hos 8:7)
We reap in proportion to what we sow (Prov 11:24-26; Mt 19:29; 2 Cor 9:6)

The principle of lex talionis underscores the justice of God’s judgment: Edom and the nations will face consequences proportional to their actions. The emphasis is on God’s fairness, as every nation will be held to account for its deeds.

THE DAY OF THE LORD

The Day of the Lord in the Old Testament refers to a time when YHWH decisively intervenes in human history, mainly in judgment. The concept may have developed from the idea of YHWH as a divine warrior who comes to the aid of his worshippers in battle (Isa 13:6; Ezek 13:5). The Day of the Lord is associated with divine justice and overwhelming violence.

The expression ‘the Day of YHWH’ may not have been coined by the prophet Amos (c.760 BCE) but he is our earliest Old Testament written source for it. Amos viewed the Day of YHWH as characterised by darkness (Woe unto you that desire the day of the LORD! to what end is it for you? the day of the LORD is darkness, and not light. Amos 5:18 ).

More than 130 years after Amos the prophet Zephaniah listed more characteristics of the Day of the Lord; as well as darkness he included battle imagery such as noise, wrath, slaughter, destruction and finality (Zeph 1:14-18).

There are similar expressions that refer to this great event (e.g. ‘The day of the Lord’s vengeance’ Isa 34:8; ‘the day of the Lord of hosts’ Isa 2:12; ‘the day of the Lord’s wrath’ Zeph 1:18; ‘the day of the Lord’s anger’ Zeph 2:2; ‘the day of his fierce anger’ Isa 13:13) but according to Hoffmann (1981, p.39) the exact Hebrew expression ‘the Day of YHWH’ only occurs in six passages (Isaiah 13:6, 9; Ezek 13:5; Joel 1:15; 2:1, 11; 3:14; Amos 5:18; Obad 15; Zeph 1:7, 19).

For as ye have drunk upon my holy mountain, so shall all the heathen drink continually, yea, they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and they shall be as though they had not been. Obadiah 1:16

(16) Verse 16 continues the theme of judgment, using the imagery of drinking as a metaphor for experiencing God’s wrath. If we assume that in v.16a YHWH is addressing Edom rather than Judah then ‘as ye have drunk’ refers to (literal) drinking by Edom on an occasion when Jerusalem was invaded and looted (probably during the reign of Jehoram of Judah). ‘My holy mountain’ is Zion (see also Psa 2:6; Isa 11:9; Joel 2:1). The idea of (metaphorically) drinking the cup of God’s wrath occurs frequently in the Old Testament and means undergoing divine judgment (e.g. Isa 51:17, 22; Jer 25:15-17; 49:12; Lam 4:21). As a result of that drinking (swallowing God’s wrath) YHWH’s enemies ‘shall be as though they had not been’ i.e. they will be completely destroyed.

Edom drank in revelry and celebration but the nations, including Edom, will drink from the cup of God’s judgment. The actions of Edom and the nations against Israel/Judah in the past will affect them in the future. Obadiah does not mention but doubtless assumes a major difference between what Edom has done and what YHWH will do. For Obadiah Edom’s actions against Judah were wrong whereas YHWH’s actions against Edom and the nations will be legitimate and just.

But upon mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. Obadiah 1:17

(17) Note the repetition of ‘shall’ in vv.17-21, emphasising that these predictions will surely come to pass.

As well as retribution against his enemies the Day of the Lord is associated with restoration, renewal and reward for his people. The word ‘but’ shows that a contrast is being drawn between the nations’ judgment and Israel’s restoration on the Day of the Lord. While the nations face destruction, there will be survivors in Zion (Jerusalem, Psa 48:2). YHWH will dwell in his temple on ‘Mount Zion’ (see Mic 4:1-2) and it will no longer be desecrated by Edom (v.16) but restored to holiness and purity. The “house of Jacob” (probably referring to Judah) will reclaim its land, from which it will have been dispossessed due to exile and oppression. This is a promise of restoration for God’s people. Note the repetition for emphasis – ‘possess their possessions.’ This suggests a period of peace and stability.

And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it. Obadiah 1:18

(18) This verse prophesies victory for Israel and destruction for Edom (‘house of Esau’) using parallelism.

the house of Jacob will be a fire

the house of Jacob [will be] a flame

the house of Esau [will be] stubble

Some commentators suggest that ‘house of Jacob’ may stand for Judah and ‘house of Joseph’ for the ten northern tribes of Israel. Thus the idea is of Israel in total. The imagery of fire (‘house of Jacob’) and flame (‘house of Joseph’) versus stubble (‘house of Esau’) highlights the overwhelming defeat that Edom will face. Fire consumes stubble quickly and completely, symbolising the destruction of Edom. The mention of ‘no survivor of the house of Esau’ reinforces the severity of Edom’s judgment. This statement is an example of a literary technique known as hyperbole (use of exaggeration for emphasis or effect) as v.21 predicts that ‘saviours’ will judge Edom. Assurance that these predictions will be fulfilled comes from the highest authority: ‘the Lord hath spoken it.’

And they of the south shall possess the mount of Esau; and they of the plain the Philistines: and they shall possess the fields of Ephraim, and the fields of Samaria: and Benjamin shall possess Gilead. Obadiah 1:19

(19) Verse 19 details Israel’s territorial expansion and the restoration of its land. The Negev (southern desert region) will take possession of Mount Esau (Edom’s territory) to the east, and the Shephelah (lowland region of Judah) will take over the land of the Philistines to the west (Isa 11:14; Zeph 2:4-7). Ephraim and Samaria represent the northern kingdom of Israel, Ephraim was the largest tribe and Samaria the capital. Benjamin (one of the two tribes in southern Israel) will take possession of Gilead (east of the Jordan River, i.e Transjordan).

And the captivity of this host of the children of Israel shall possess that of the Canaanites, even unto Zarephath; and the captivity of Jerusalem, which is in Sepharad, shall possess the cities of the south. Obadiah 1:20

(20) Israel will not only regain its own land but will expand into the territories of its enemies. This verse speaks specifically of the return of Israelite exiles. One group of exiles will expand through territory formerly occupied by the Canaanites as far north as ‘Zarephath,’ a town some ten miles south of Sidon (in present-day Lebanon).

The ‘exiles of Jerusalem’ who are in ‘Sepharad’ will return and possess the cities of the Negev. Lipiński (1973, p.368) maintains: ‘There can be no doubt that Sepharad is identical with the Persian satrapy of Sparda, in Asia Minor. The name itself appears in the Aramaic inscription found at Sardis, the capital of that satrapy.’

This verse indicates indicates the regaining of Israel’s traditional lands and also expansion into territory beyond that which they previously controlled. It suggests a regathering of Israelites from distant lands.

And saviours shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the LORD’s. Obadiah 1:21

(21) The deliverance will be by ‘saviours’ (judges), presumably appointed by YHWH to guide the Israelites to a proper form of worship. The administration will have its headquarters in Jerusalem (Mount Zion). Ironically, in a reversal of Edom’s fortunes, the judges will rule over Edom (Mount Esau – i.e. Mt. Seir). The two mountains are compared in order to emphasize the change in circumstances for Edom and the nations. The closing phrase of Obadiah’s book envisages a utopian future. It points to a future time when theocratic rule will be established; ‘the kingdom shall be the Lord’s.’

SUMMATION

The message of Obadiah is primarily one of judgment against Edom. This is said to be because of its attitudes and actions towards Israel. Key themes are:

Judgment

Obadiah prophesies that YHWH will make Edom small among the nations because of its pride and arrogance. It will be destroyed because of its cooperation with foreign invaders and actions against Israel at a time of distress.

Retribution

The actions that Edom and other nations have taken against Israel will be repaid in kind. Lex talionis is a principle of divine justice – ‘as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee’ (v.15).

Restoration for Israel

The prophecy of Edom’s doom also contains a message of hope for Israel. Obadiah promises that YHWH will deliver Israel from its enemies, that Israel will possess and even expand its former territory and that the kingship of YHWH will be manifested.

Despite its brevity the book of Obadiah communicates a powerful message about the consequences of sin and the triumph of God’s justice. It still serves today as a warning against pride, arrogance and betrayal. It is a reminder of God’s sovereignty and of his ultimate retribution against all who oppose him and his people.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Alexander, T. D., Baker, D.W., and Waltke, B. (2015). Obadiah, Jonah and Micah. InterVarsity Press.

Assis, E. (2021). Identity in Conflict: The Struggle between Esau and Jacob, Edom and Israel. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

Currie, B, (2023). Meditations on the Single-Chapter Books of the Bible (Obadiah, Philemon, 2John, 3John, Jude). Assembly Testimony

Dicou, B. (1994). Edom, Israel’s Brother and Antagonist: the Role of Edom in Biblical Prophecy and Story. Sheffield: Jsot Press.

Ehud Ben Zvi (1996). A Historical-critical Study of the Book of Obadiah. Berlin; New York: Walter De Gruyter.

Jenson, P. P. (2009). Obadiah, Jonah, Micah. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Lawrence, J.W. (1995). The Seven Laws of the Harvest: Understanding the Realities of Sowing and Reaping. Grand Rapids, Mi: Kregel Publications.

Mason, R. (2004). Micah, Nahum and Obadiah. Bloomsbury Publishing.

McComiskey, T. E. (1993). The Minor Prophets / Vol. 2, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum and Habakkuk. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House.

Rushdoony, R. J. (2013). Sermons in Obadiah & Jonah. Chalcedon Foundation.

Simundson, D. J. (2011). Abingdon Old Testament Commentaries: Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah. Abingdon Press.

Sawyer, J. F. A. and Clines, D .J. A. (1983). Midian, Moab and Edom: The History and Archaeology of Late Bronze and Iron Age Jordan and North-West Arabia. A&C Black.

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Anderson, B.A. (2010). ‘Poetic Justice in Obadiah.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 35(2), pp. 247–255.

Anderson, B. A. (2012). “Edom in the Book of Numbers: Some Literary Reflections’ Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 38-51.

Anderson, B. A. (2014) ‘The Reception of Obadiah: Some Historical, Ideological, and Visual Considerations.’ Proceedings of the Irish Biblical Association, 36-37 . pp. 17-35.

Assis, E. (2006). ‘Why Edom? On the Hostility Towards Jacob’s Brother in Prophetic Sources.’ Vetus Testamentum, 56(1), ppp. 1–20.

Assis, E. (2014). ‘Structure, Redaction and Significance in the Prophecy of Obadiah.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 39(2), pp. 209–221.

Bartlett, J. R. (1969). ‘The Land of Seir and the Brotherhood of Edom.’ The Journal of Theological Studies, 20(1), pp. 1–20.

Bartlett, J. R. (1977). ‘The Brotherhood of Edom.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 2(4), pp. 2-27.

Becking, B. (2016). ‘The Betrayal of Edom: Remarks on a Claimed Tradition.’ HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 72(4). pp.1-4

Burdon, C. (1998). ‘Jacob and the Dominion of Edom.’ The Expository Times, 109(12), pp. 360-363.

Cannon, W. W. (1927). ‘Israel and Edom: The Oracle of Obadiah—II.’ Theology, 15(88), pp. 191-200.

Davies, G. I. (1977). ‘A New Solution to a Crux in Obadiah 7.’ Vetus Testamentum, 27(4), pp. 484–487.

Ferries, R. (2022). ‘Edom and Babylon: Archetypal Enemies of God and His People. A Comparative Analysis of Obadiah and Isaiah 13:2–14:23,’ Old Testament Essays 35 no.3, pp. 475 – 495.

Forder, A. (1901). ‘Sela or Petra, “The Strong City.” The Ruined Capital of Edom.’ The Biblical World, 18(5), pp. 328–337.

Glueck, N. (1936). ‘The Boundaries of Edom.’ Hebrew Union College Annual, 11, pp. 141–157.

Hoffmann, Y. (1981). ‘The Day of the Lord as a Concept and a Term in the Prophetic Literature.’ Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 37-50

Hwang, J. (2014). ”My Name Will Be Great among the Nations:’ The Missio Dei in the Book of the Twelve.’ Tyndale Bulletin, 65 (2): pp. 161–80.

Krause, J. J. (2008). ‘Tradition, History, and Our Story: Some Observations on Jacob and Esau in the Books of Obadiah and Malachi.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 32(4), pp. 475–486.

Lipiński, E. (1973). ‘Obadiah 20.’ Vetus Testamentum, 23(3), pp. 368–370.

Ogden, G. S. (1982). ‘Prophetic Oracles Against Foreign Nations and Psalms of Communal Lament: the Relationship of Psalm 137 to Jeremiah 49:7-22 and Obadiah.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 7(24), 89-97.

Robinson, T. H. (1916). ‘The Structure of the Book of Obadiah.’ The Journal of Theological Studies, 17(68), pp. 402–408.

Tebes, J. M. (2017). ‘Memories of Humiliation, Cultures of Resentment towards Edom and the Formation of Ancient Jewish National Identity.’ Nations and Nationalism, 25(1), pp.124–145.

Werse, N. R. (2013). ‘Obadiah’s ‘Day of the Lord:’ A Semiotic Reading.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 38(1), pp.109–124.

DIGITAL

ANDERSON, B. A. (2010) Election, Brotherhood and Inheritance:
A Canonical Reading of the Esau and Edom Traditions. Doctoral thesis, Durham University.

Exposition

EZEKIEL 11 – THE GLORY DEPARTS

Posted on 12th Aug 202418th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 11 is the last of four chapters (8-11) that describe Ezekiel’s second vision. The main topic of that vision is the gradual departure of YHWH’s kabod (Glory) from Solomon’s temple and the city, leaving Jerusalem without divine protection. It begins with a change of location for Ezekiel when in vision he is transported to the east gate of the temple where he observes a meeting of ‘the princes of the people.’

The bulk of the chapter consists of two disputation speeches. Put simply, a disputation speech presents one particular viewpoint and contradicts or refutes it by presenting the other side of the argument. There are ten such speeches in the book of Ezekiel (11:1-12; 11:14-21; 12:21-25; 12:26-28; 18:1-32; 20:32-34; 33:10-11; 33:17-20; 33:23-29; 37:11-14).

Chapter 11 closes with the departure of the kabod, Ezekiel’s return to Chaldea in vision and confirmation that he communicated details of the vision to his fellow-exiles.

There are two main divisions:

1-13 CONDEMNATION

14-25 RESTORATION

Each of these sections contains a disputation oracle.

CONDEMNATION (1-13)

(1) Ezekiel is transported to the eastern gate of the temple where he observes a meeting of twenty-five members of the Jerusalem elite. This is the same number of individuals as in 8:16 but cannot be the same men. The sun-worshippers in the inner court of the temple in chapter 8 would have been priests whereas those meeting at the east gate are called the ‘princes of the people.’ They are not priests, they are politicians. Two of the most notable are mentioned by name: Jaazaniah the son of Azur and Pelatiah the son of Benaiah.

(2-3) The Spirit informs Ezekiel that this group of influential men meets to plot evil and is responsible for giving harmful counsel to the Jerusalemites. Verse 3 gives an example of this counsel: ‘it is not near; let us build houses, this city is the caldron, and we are the meat.’ The Preacher’s Commentary says that: ‘the Hebrew wording of their boast is difficult to understand. It says literally, “Not build houses near? It is the pot, we are the meat!”

The exact meaning escapes us but obviously it is an arrogant assertion of confidence that goes against what YHWH was revealing through Jeremiah at the time. The elders are insisting that all is well while Jeremiah prophesies imminent destruction at the hands of the Chaldeans (Jer 37:14 – 38:4).

The following ideas might be conveyed in the proverb:

‘All is well. Now is the time for us to build houses and restore the material damage done by Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians when Jerusalem under King Jehoiachin was besieged a few years ago (597 BCE).’

‘We who live in Jerusalem are like meat in a cooking pot. We are the best bits. The exiles in Babylon are the offal, they have been thrown away. We are in a city that is under YHWH’s protection, the exiles in Babylon are obviously under his judgement.’

‘Even if the Babylonians do attack it is much safer for us to be in the pot (within Jerusalem’s city walls) than outside it.’

In the verses that follow (especially vv. 7-12) their opinions are shown to be false. Note that in Ezekiel caldron (siyr) occurs only in chapter 11 and in chapter 24. The latter contains the parable (or allegory) of the cooking pot.

(4-6) In the vision Ezekiel is commanded to prophesy and is empowered by the Spirit to speak YHWH’s words. They reveal that the leaders’ thoughts, intentions, motives and hypocrisy are known to the Lord. They, the leaders of the people, have been responsible for widespread violence and death in the city. This may refer to the slaughter carried out by the six executioners earlier in the vision (9:5-7).

(7-12) In this disputation speech by the Lord God (Adonai YHWH) the analogy of the caldron (cooking pot) as used by the leaders of Jerusalem is refuted. The city of Jerusalem is the cooking pot but YHWH asserts that dead bodies, not living people, is the meat. The leaders may think that the pot guarantees safety but they will be driven out of it to face what they fear most: a violent death by the sword. YHWH will remove them from Jerusalem and hand them over to foreign enemies who will slay them at Israel’s border. Notice the double occurrence of ‘I will bring you out’ (7, 9). This is language reminiscent of the Exodus. The imminent ‘bringing out,’ however, will not be to salvation but death. Notice also the double mention of ‘border’ (10,11).

YHWH reiterates (vv.11) that the city will not provide safety (‘be a pot for you’) and emphasizes that the leaders will be judged. The judgement will reveal YHWH’s sovereignty and lordship (‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ vv.10,12). The Jerusalemites (represented by their leaders) will face consequences because: a) they have not followed the Lord’s decrees b) they have not kept his law, but c) they have adopted pagan practices. We learn from 2 Kgs 25:4-7 and Jeremiah 52:7-10 that what Ezekiel prophesied concerning the leaders of Judah literally came to pass.

(13) In Ezekiel’s vision the threat of impending judgement is emphasized by immediate judgement upon Pelatiah who drops dead while Ezekiel is prophesying. We do not know if Pelatiah really dies in Jerusalem at that time or if his death is just enacted in Ezekiel’s vision. Ezekiel’s reaction to this episode in the vision is one of concern that a remnant in Israel should survive. This is similar to a previous reaction by him in chapter 9: And it came to pass, while they were slaying them, and I was left, that I fell upon my face, and cried, and said, Ah Lord GOD! wilt thou destroy all the residue of Israel in thy pouring out of thy fury upon Jerusalem? Ezekiel 9:8. De Vries (The Kābôd of Yhwh in the Old Testament, p.281) observes that: ‘Whereas in 9:8b he had called this out as a question, in 11:13b it is actually a statement: the interrogative particle is lacking this time.’

LOUD VOICE

In the second vision the Jerusalemites cry with a ‘loud voice’ (8:8), YHWH cries with a ‘loud voice’ (9:1) and Ezekiel cries with a ‘loud voice’ (11:13).

RESTORATION 14-25

The hope that a remnant will survive is addressed in the following section of the chapter. The prevailing view is turned on its head. There will indeed be a remnant but it will not arise from Jerusalem, it will come from the Jehoiachin exiles who are already in Babylon. In this section we have the first of three prophecies of restoration delivered by Ezekiel before the fall of Jerusalem (11:16-21; 16:60-63; 20:33-44). After he hears about the fall of Jerusalem (33:21) Ezekiel utters further prophecies of restoration in chapters 34, 36, 37 and 39.

(14-16) Still in vision the word of YHWH came to Ezekiel and quotes what the inhabitants of Jerusalem say about the exiles: ‘Get you far from the LORD: unto us is this land given in possession.’ The Jerusalemites have the notion that it is the exiles who are far from the Lord and that the ancestral land they have left behind now belongs to those remaining in the city. The exiles referred to are the royals and professional people (including Ezekiel) who were deported to Babylonia a few years earlier by Nebuchadnezzar in the Jechoiachin Exile of 597 BCE (2 Kgs 24:8-17). As a result of that deportation the people of Judah became divided into two groups; those in exile with Jehoiachin in Babylon and ‘the people that were left in the land’ (Jer 40:6) of Judah under Zedekiah. It was very much a ‘them and us’ situation although ongoing contact between the two groups (e.g. Jeremiah’s letter to the exiles – Jer 29) did occur.

Throughout Israel’s history the concepts of deity, kingship, people and land have been closely linked. In spite of the fact that they are idolaters it suits the Jerusalemites financially to claim allegiance to YHWH and promote the view that the exiles had been deported far away because he was angry with them. They said that YHWH had expelled them because of their wickedness and that therefore their ancestral land was forfeit. The Jerusalemites claimed that YHWH favoured them rather than the exiles because they still had the land, a functioning royal court, and (YHWH’s presence in) the temple. They must therefore be the remnant.

The exiles are described as Ezekiel’s ‘brethren’ and ‘kindred.’ As prophet to the exiles (3:11) Ezekiel very much identified with them and viewed them as family. In 33:21 and 40:1 he refers to the exile as ‘our captivity.’

Ezekiel’s prophetic answer to the Jerusalemites arrogation of land to themselves is that, contrary to expectations. YHWH has deliberately sent the exiles to Babylon because he controls history; the Babylonians carry out his will. The temple might be in Jerusalem (soon to be destroyed), but the exiles would have access to YHWH because he would be a ‘little sanctuary’ (or some suggest: ‘sanctuary for a little while’) for the exiles, in Babylon or wherever else they dwelt.

This is highly significant as it means all the benefits of YHWH’s presence, protection and favour transfer from those still dwelling in the land to the exiles.

(17-20) In this disputation oracle (vv.14-21) YHWH reveals that the exile will be temporary. A remnant will indeed return to the land of Israel but it will be from the Babylonian exiles, NOT from the dwellers in Jerusalem. Those who come back will clear the land of all the idols and images (7:20; 8:3) that defile it. That they should do so will be evidence of a change of heart. This change will be brought about by YHWH himself. He promises to replace their heart of stone with a heart of flesh so that they will be receptive to what YHWH wants. He will ‘take away their stony, stubborn heart and give them a tender, responsive heart’ (11:19 NLT). The covenant between YHWH and his people will effectively be re-established – ‘they shall be my people, and I will be their God’ – as a result of them keeping the Lord’s regulations and following his commands.

(21) It is not clear who v.21 refers to. Is this a prophecy that some of those who return from the exile will return to or persist in idolatry and therefore receive the consequences of their behaviour? Or is this a warning to the leaders and residents of Jerusalem who are mentioned earlier in the chapter (vv.2-6,15)?

(22-23) The final stage of the vision takes place. The cherubim and wheels take off from the eastern gate of the temple and carry YHWH’s enthroned kabod to the hill to the east of the city (Mount of Olives, Zech 14:4). The judgement can begin, Jerusalem is no longer under YHWH’s protection.

(24-25) The chapter ends with comments by Ezekiel explaining that once the vision ended he was returned to Chaldea by the Spirit of God. He the shared with the exiles what YHWH had shown him. It was a solemn message about the current state of Jerusalem and its impending destruction but one which contained hope of a remnant and a return from captivity. That must have been a great encouragement to his fellow-exiles.

Exposition

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 10 – COALS OF FIRE

Posted on 30th Jul 202418th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 10 of Ezekiel is a continuation of the prophet’s second vision and is the third of four chapters (8-11) in which Ezekiel relates details of a visit to Jerusalem which he experienced while in a prophetic trance. Bear in mind that that he was physically located in Babylon while taken to Judah temporarily in a vision. Although complicated and repetitive, chapter 10 is important because it links back to the vision of YHWH’s kabod in chapter 1 and forward to its return in chapter 43.

The settings of Ezekiel’s first and second visions are different but the imagery is similar. Some small discrepancies in detail are noticeable but essentially chapters 1 and 10 each describe a firmament, a throne, winged creatures and wheels.

The parallels are as follows:

Four wings and four faces – 1:6 and 10:21

Human hand(s) – 1:8 and 10:8, 21

Each creature moves straight forward – 1:12 and 10:22

The four faces described – 1:10 and 10:14

A wheel beside each creature – 1:15 and 10:9

Wheels gleaming like beryl – 1:16 and 10:9

A wheel within a wheel – 1:16 and 10:10

Wheels travel in four directions without turning as they go – 1:17 and 10:11

Rims full of eyes – 1:18 and 10:12

The wheels moving in sync with the living creatures – 1:19 and 10:16

Spirit of the living creatures(s) – 1:21 and 10:17

The sound of wings – 1:24 and 10:5

Throne, firmament/sapphire – 1:26 and 10:1

The most important aspect of the chapter, however, is the location of the kabod (Glory, Presence) of the Lord. Because Judah and Jerusalem have been turning away from the pure worship of YHWH his Presence is gradually moving away from them (8:4; 9:3; 10:1, 10:18, 19; 11:23). This abandoning of the sanctuary by YHWH provides an explanation for the destruction soon to be wreaked by the Babylonians – the city is no longer under God’s protection. No doubt this revelation came as a great shock to a nation that thought itself invincible because of YHWH’s presence in the Jerusalem temple. Jeremiah, however, had warned them that such a belief was no longer valid: ‘Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD.’ (Jer 7:4)

Chapter 10 falls into two main sections:

(1-8) Preparations for Jerusalem’s Judgement

(9-22) Preparations for the Kabod’s Departure

(1-8) PREPARATIONS FOR JERUSALEM’S JUDGEMENT

Ezekiel continues his report of the second vision using the first person ‘I looked and behold.’ He uses this expression again in v. 9. What he sees is similar to the first vision of chapter 1 at Chebar. There he describes the figures as ‘living creatures’ (ḥayyāh), here in chapter ten he clarifies that they are, in fact, cherubim (vv. 15, 20). The chariot of the first vision reappears (10:1) and Ezekiel again sees the sapphire-like throne but makes no mention of any person on the throne. Note that in the book of Ezekiel ‘throne’ is only mentioned in the three visions that involve the kabod of YHWH (1:26; 10:1; 43:7).

Verse 2 does not clarify who speaks (probably YHWH) and commands the man clad in linen to go beneath the ‘whirlers’ (galgal), fill his hands with coals of fire and scatter them over the city. Galgal in 10:2, 6, 13; also 23:24; 26:10 is not the usual word for wheel (which is ’ôp̱ān). In Isa 5:28 and Jer 47:3 galgal refers specifically to chariot wheels. It is interesting that in Solomon’s temple, where this scene is set, the laver stands (1 Kgs 7:27-37) had carved panels decorated with lions, oxen and cherubim (1 Kgs 7:29) beneath which were wheels which the author of Kings (7:33) specifically says were made like chariot wheels.

The three imperatives in v.2 are Go, Fill, Scatter.

What do the coals signify? Many commentators point out that the mention of cherub(im) together with coals of fire is associated with judgement in 2 Sam 22:8-13 and Psa 18:8-13 (note: there is an opposite minority view that the coals are for marking those to be spared, see 9:4). Others, basing their conclusion on Isa 6:6-7, take the fire as a symbol of purification. Or, the fire may be symbolic of YHWH’s jealousy (8:5; Deut 4:24). The filling of both hands symbolises that the judgement will exhaustive.

That the cherub(im) here are the ones Ezekiel saw in his first vision and not the cherubim that covered the ark of the covenant (1 Kgs 6:23-28; 8:7) is clear because the latter were not located in the south side of the temple but in the Holy of Holies nor did they have wheels. ‘Cherub’ in v.2 is singular and possibly refers to the one nearest Ezekiel, or to the highest ranking of the four cherubim (cp 28:14), or to one especially associated with fire.

Ezekiel then sees the man in white linen go in as instructed, whereupon ‘the cloud’ fills the inner court (10:3) and then the whole temple (10:4). Presumably this refers to a cloud of smoke from the coals of judgement scattered on the temple by the man in linen. Alternatively, it might refer to the cloud of the kabod of YHWH that had previously filled the temple (1 Kgs 8:10-11) – although Ezekiel says in v.4 that here its brightness filled only the court. Solomon’s temple was literally burned by the Babylonians a few years later:

And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month, which is the nineteenth year of king Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, came Nebuzaradan, captain of the guard, a servant of the king of Babylon, unto Jerusalem: And he burnt the house of the LORD, and the king’s house, and all the houses of Jerusalem, and every great man’s house burnt he with fire. 2 Kings 25:8-9

In v.4 Ezekiel repeats the information already given in 9:3 that the kabod has moved to the temple exit and in v.5 concentrates on the scary noise made by the whirling wings. He uses a simile to describe the awesomeness of the sound, it was ‘as the voice of El Shaddai’ -God almighty.

In vv.6-8 Ezekiel’s attention focuses once more on the man dressed in linen. After the command of v.2 is reiterated a cherub reaches into the fire and places some (coals) into the man’s hands. Verse 8 explains how this is possible; the cherubim have hands under their wings, as in 1:8. The man in linen then leaves the scene in order to complete his task. The passage says of him: ‘he went in…..and went out.’ We are not told what happens to the coals of fire and what effect they have on the city. The man disappears and is not mentioned again.

(9-22) PREPARATIONS FOR THE KABOD’S DEPARTURE

THE WHEELS (9-13)

Again Ezekiel says ‘I looked and behold’ as his attention now shifts to the wheels. What he describes is essentially the same as 1:15-21 except that chapter 1 speaks of living creatures, here in chapter 10 they are called cherubim. For Ezekiel the noticeable aspects of the wheels are that a) their hubs are themselves wheels (v.10), b) they move forward in unison without veering off course (v.11) and c) they are full of eyes (v.12). Ezekiel emphasizes that the wheels move directly forward and maintain their course; the phrase ‘they turned not as they went’ occurs twice in v.11. In chapter 1 only the wheels were full of eyes, here the whole body – backs, hands and wings as well as the wheels – was full of eyes. They can see everything and nothing can divert them. In Ezekiel’s hearing (v.13) the wheels are instructed to turn or whirl (‘O wheel!’).

THE CHERUBIM (14-17)

10:14 begins exactly like 1:6 (‘and every one had four faces’) but there are differences in detail between the two accounts. In chapter 1 it is the four living creatures that have the faces but in chapter 10 it is grammatically unclear if the faces belong to the wheels or to the cherubim since the subject at the end of v.13 is the wheels. The cherubim, however, are the subject at the beginning of v.15 so it is more likely that Ezekiel is already thinking of them v.14. In 1:10 the faces listed are those of a human, a lion, an ox and an eagle, whereas in 10:14 they are the faces of a cherub, a human, a lion and an eagle. In chapter 1 Ezekiel just gives the position of two of the faces, the lion on the right and the ox on the left whereas in 10:14 he numbers the faces 1 to 4 (first, second, third, fourth).

In vv.15-17 he describes the cherubim taking off and notes that they and the wheels move in unison. This harmony is because the spirit of the living creature is in them, they are not machines – they share the same life. Whenever the cherubim fly the wheels go with them, whenever the cherubim are stationary the wheels are inactive as well. These observations are essentially the same as 1:19-21. As he views the scene Ezekiel realises that the cherubim are/is the ‘living creature’ (singular and feminine – ‘she is the creature’) of his first vision (10:15).

THE DEPARTURE (18-22)

Verse 18 describes another stage in the slow departure of the kabod from the temple. The ‘kabod of the God of Israel’ leaves the threshold of the temple and takes up position (on the sapphire stone, v.1) above the cherubim. The cherubim with the kabod above them then mount up and fly to the east gate, over which they hover while Ezekiel receives a further oracle in chapter 11. This gate was the main entrance to the temple complex.

The last three verses of the chapter (20-22) consist of editorial comment by Ezekiel in which he confirms:

his identification of the cherubim with the living creature that he saw under the God of Israel at the River Chebar. Note ‘God of Israel’ not ‘God of Judah.’
that the cherubim had four faces, four wings and hands like humans under their wings (1:8).
that their faces are the same as those he saw by the River Chebar i.e. man, lion, ox, eagle. There is no explanation about the cherub face of v.14 being replaced.
that they move directly forward. Nothing can stop the progress of YHWH’s throne-chariot. God can move around anywhere he pleases. This fact is important to Ezekiel, he mentions the idea several times (1:9, 12, 17, 19, 20, 21; 10:11,16, 22).

SUMMATION

Ezekiel chapter 10 continues Ezekiel’s report of experiences during his second vision. They are a dramatic portrayal of God’s righteous anger and determination to bring judgement upon a rebellious nation. The early verses of the chapter focus on coals of fire taken from between the cherubim and scattered over the city; an action that represents the fiery judgement about to befall Jerusalem. The awe-inspiring imagery of the cherubim and wheels emphasizes the holiness and majesty of the Lord. The gradual departure of God’s glory from the temple is a stark symbolic reminder of the withdrawal of both the Lord’s presence and protection from his people. The defeat and disaster that befalls them will not be because YHWH is dead or weak but because he is no longer in his temple and has left to be with the exiles in Babylon. Chapter 10 serves as a solemn warning about the dire consequences of sin and disobedience.

Exposition

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 9 – THE EXECUTIONERS

Posted on 2nd Jul 202418th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel’s second vision extends from 8:1-11:25 and concerns the departure of YHWH’s kabod (Glory or Presence) from Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem, thus signifying the removal of divine protection and the abandonment of the city to impending judgement. This will come in the form of a siege and destruction by Babylonian forces some five years later.

In chapter 8 Ezekiel has, in vision, been snatched away from Babylon to Judah and shown the state of religion in Jerusalem at that time (Aug/Sept 592 BCE). He was taken to four locations close to the sanctuary where he viewed progressively worse forms of idolatry take place:

An idol at the temple entrance.
Elders worshipping graven images.
Women weeping for Tammuz.
Sun worship in YHWH’s temple.

YHWH cannot be expected to remain where such abominations take place so in chapter 9 he initiates judgement upon Jerusalem and Judah.

9: 1-2 Judgement commanded.

9: 3-4 Marking foreheads.

9: 5-7, 11 Judgement executed.

9:8 Ezekiel’s reaction

9: 9-10 YHWH’s response.

JUDGEMENT COMMANDED (1-2)

Following on from the mention of idolaters crying to YHWH for mercy with a ‘loud voice’ at the end of chapter 8, verse 1 of chapter 9 begins with Ezekiel hearing the ‘loud voice’ of YHWH (or YHWH’s kabod) summoning those ‘that have charge over the city.’

‘in mine ears’ – YHWH was not addressing Ezekiel but speaking in his hearing.

These officials (the word means someone designated to carry out an official task) are called ‘men’ in vv.1-2 but seem to be supernatural creatures in human form, perhaps angels. Each is to carry what is termed an ‘instrument of destruction’ (v.1) and ‘implement of smashing/shattering) (v.2); probably a battle-axe or war-club (Jer 51:20).

In response to YHWH’s summons six men come from a northerly direction (i.e. from Babylonia), appearing from the upper gate situated at the north of the temple courts (2 Kgs 15:35; Jer 20:2). As instructed, each executioner carries a destructive weapon. A seventh (or perhaps one of the six) carries a writing kit (materials necessary for writing) at his waist. This supernatural scribe is dressed in linen which was a fabric was worn by priests (e.g. Exod 28:29-42; 39:27-29; Lev 16:4, 23) and heavenly beings (Dan 10:5; 12:6-7). Angels are often associated with judgement (e.g. Gen 19:15; 2 Sam 24:16; 2 Kgs 19:35; Psa 78:9; Mt 13:49-50; Ac 12:23; 2 Thess 1:7-8). The executioners and the scribe assemble beside the bronze altar.

MARKING FOREHEADS (3-4)

Just as in chapter 8 the idolatry viewed by Ezekiel in 4 locations gets progressively worse, so in chapters 9-11 the departure of the kabod progresses in 4 stages (9:3; 10:4; 10:18-19; 11:22-23). Verse 3a of chapter 9 interrupts the flow the story to inform the reader that even before Ezekiel sees this part of the vision the kabod has already risen from the cherub upon which it rested and has moved to the threshold (entrance) of the temple. The kabod sometimes appears in connection with judgement (Num 14:10; 16:19, 42).

The cherub here is not one of the winged living creatures that support the throne chariot of chapter 1 but one of two cherubim in a three-dimensional sculpture placed above the ark of the covenant (1 Kgs 6:23-28; 2 Chron 3:10-13; 1 Kgs 8:6-7; 2 Chron 5:7-8) in Solomon’s temple. Some suggest that the singular used here refers to both cherubim since the sculpture may have been crafted from a single lump of metal (1 Chron 28;18). LXX has the plural here , and also in 10:2.

CHERUB/CHERUBIM

‘Living’ cherubim are associated with the Garden of Eden (Gen 3:24; Ezek 28:14,16) and with theophanies (2 Sam 22:11; Psa 18:10; Book of Ezekiel).

In Solomon’s temple (as also in the Tabernacle before that) inanimate cherubim were depicted. I have given references for the three-dimensional sculpture(s) in the Holy of Holies above.

There were also two-dimensional representations of cherubim carved or engraved in friezes, upon doors, and on cultic stands (1Kgs 6:29;, 32, 35; 7:29, 36; 2 Chron 3:7). The motif of cherubim was so much associated with YHWH that he was known as ‘The Lord of hosts, the cherubim sitter/dweller’ (1 Sam 4:4; 2 Sam 6:2; 2 Kgs 19:15; 1 Chron 13:6; Psa 80:1; 99:1; Isa 37:16).

Vv. 3b-4. ‘And he called to the man clothed with linen’ Strictly speaking ‘he’ is the kabod but the order is said to be issued by YHWH. He instructs the man in linen to go through the city and put a mark on the foreheads of those who grieve and lament over all the detestable things being done in Jerusalem. There is no indication that necessarily these people are righteous, the standard is set much lower than that. They just have to be those who sigh and groan silently at the lamentable state of religious and social affairs in Jerusalem.

That this mark is a sign of protection, distinguishing the condemned from those to be spared, is not stated, but presumably that is the case (cp. Cain, Gen 4:15; First Passover, Exod 12). The Hebrew word for ‘mark’ is tāw, the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. Most English versions translate it as ‘signature’ in Job 31:35 (e.g. ‘Here is my signature! Let the Almighty answer me!’ ESV) which leads some commentators to conclude that the mark is God’s signature, therefore a person marked in this way belongs to God and will be spared.

Since tāw in Paleo-Hebrew script was written as a cross (something like the shape of a + or an x) it has been suggested that its occurrence in 9:4 is an Old Testament anticipation of the cross of Christ and its association with salvation. Personally, I find this very far-fetched.

JUDGEMENT EXECUTED (5-7, 11)

The other executioners are commanded to follow the man in linen and strike down everyone who does not have the protective mark, sparing neither the young nor the old including women and children, and beginning at the sanctuary (the temple). No-one is to be spared. Then the slaughter begins, starting with the elders (8:11? or 8:16?) who are at the front of the temple.

So unfit is the sanctuary for YHWH’s presence that in v.7 he commands that the executioners contaminate his own temple by filling the courts with slain. It was believed that blood, bones and dead bodies would defile religious shrines and render the sites unusable for worship; e.g. see the deliberate desecration of religious sites by King Josiah in 2 Kgs 23:12-20. Ezekiel uses this verb ‘defile’ (ṭām’āh) of the temple three times (5:11; 9:7; 23:38). Elsewhere he uses (ḥālal) meaning ‘pollute/profane’ (7:21, 22; 23:39; 24:21; 25:3; 44:7).

In v.11 the man in linen reports that he has done what he was commanded to do. He does not say whether the other six have accomplished their grisly assignment, presumably they have.

EZEKIEL’S REACTION (8)

While the men are carrying out their appointed tasks Ezekiel displays his concern for the nation by falling on his face and pleadingly asking YHWH if he intends to destroy the entire nation of Israel and city of Jerusalem in his fury. Will a remnant (6:8-10) not be spared? In 11:13b Ezekiel also falls on his face and asks the same question again.

YHWH’S RESPONSE (9-10)

Ezekiel’s intercession is to no avail. YHWH tells him that that things have gone too far. The iniquity of Israel and Judah is extremely great. Until this point it has either been ‘house of Israel’ (8:6, 10, 11, 12) or ‘house of Judah’ (4:6; 8:17), here they are combined, emphasizing the enormity of the sin and how widespread it is.

In this verse (9) ‘the land is full of blood’ and the city ‘full of perversity.’ In 7:23 ‘the land is full of bloody crimes and the city is full of violence’. In 8:17 ‘they have filled the land with violence.’

‘For they say, The LORD hath forsaken the earth, and the LORD seeth not.’ This refers back to the complaint of the elders in 8:12 but here the two parts of the saying are reversed. This reversal facilitates the irony of v.10; i.e. they say that YHWH does not see but he does see – and his eye will not spare (5:11; 7:4, 8:18; 9:5,10).

Again the ruthlessness of YHWH in judgement is emphasized.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel chapter 9 moves on from the reasons for YHWH’s judgement in chapter 8 to the execution of the judgement itself. The chapter underscores the severity of God’s punishment of sin and corruption. In this part of his second vision Ezekiel sees YHWH unleash six supernatural executioners upon Jerusalem, the city is doomed. Verse 11 does not state how many receive the mark. If the phrase in v.8 is translated ‘I alone was left’ rather than ‘I was left alone’ then it may be that Ezekiel thinks no Jerusalemite is to be spared, hence his despair. The vision concerning the departure of YHWH’s kabod from Jerusalem continues in chapter 10.

Exposition

IDOLATRY IN THE TEMPLE PRECINCTS – EZEKIEL CHAPTER 8

Posted on 22nd Jun 202418th Dec 2025 by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 8:1 commences the second major section of the book. This segment spans twelve chapters, from 8:1 to 19:14, with the initial four chapters (8-11) presenting what is arguably the most significant of Ezekiel’s visions. These chapters narrate the dramatic departure of the kabod (glory) of YHWH from the Jerusalem temple.

This vision is then followed by twelve oracles of varying length, each commencing with ‘The word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ (12:1; 12:8; 12:17; 12:21; 12:26; 13:1; 14:2; 14:12; 15:1; 16:1; 17:1; 18:1) and treating some aspect of the forthcoming judgement upon Judah and Jerusalem.

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 8

Ezekiel 8:1-2 details the circumstances and commencement date relating to the vision of chapters 8-11 and the oracles of chapters 12-19 that follow. The remaining verses provide justification for YHWH’s abandonment of his sanctuary. The chapter may be divided as follows:

The commencement date and circumstances of the vision and oracles (8:1-2)

The image that provokes jealousy (8:3-6)

Animal worship (8:7-13)

The weeping for Tammuz (8:14-15)

The worship of the Sun (8:16-18)

THE COMMENCEMENT DATE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE VISION AND ORACLES (8:1-2)

In chapter 1 we discover that Ezekiel is a priest from Judah who had been deported, presumably as one of ten thousand elite citizens of Judah, by Nebuchadnezzar to Babylon along with King Jehoiachin (Ezek 1:1-2; 2 Kgs 24:13-14) in 597 BCE. At that time Ezekiel was twenty-five years of age. Five years later, at age thirty, YHWH called him to be a prophet to the exiles in Babylon. Ezekiel supplies precise dates for his prophecies, all (with the exception of 29:17) in chronological order (1:1-2; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 26:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:1; 32:17; 33:21; 40:1).

Chapter 8:1 gives the date of Ezekiel’s second vision as the fifth day of the sixth month (Elul) of the sixth year of Jehoiachin’s exile (Aug/Sept 592 BCE), some thirteen (LXX) or fourteen (MT) months after the first vision. This is roughly halfway between the first siege of Jerusalem/Jehoiachin’s exile in 597 BCE and the forthcoming judgement of YHWH upon Judah and Jerusalem in the form of a second Babylonian siege (586/587 BCE).

On the recorded date Ezekiel was visited at his house by a group of ‘the elders of Judah,’ that is, the leaders of the Jewish community in exile in Babylonia. Why they wished to consult him on this occasion is not stated, unlike two other occasions (14:1-3; 20:1) when the purpose of their visit was to ‘inquire of the Lord.’ As the elders sat before Ezekiel YHWH took hold of him once more (see 1:3; 3:14) but this was not in response to any questions posed by them.

In this vision the mysterious supernatural figure of 1:27 returns, puts forth the likeness of a human hand ( i.e. he was not human), lifts Ezekiel by a lock (‘twisted’ i.e. tassel Num 15:38, 39) of hair and transports him to the Jerusalem temple where he shows him the sins of the leaders of Judah. There is some disagreement as to whether this figure is YHWH himself or a representative who speaks for him. There are certainly strong parallels between the description (of YHWH) in 1:27 and that in 8:2, although the characteristics are presented in reverse order.

1:27 the colour of amber

1:27 of his loins even upward

1:27 his loins even downward

1:27 the appearance of fire

———————————–

8:2 the appearance of fire

8:2 of his loins even downward

8:2 from his loins even upward

8:2 as the colour of amber

The figure certainly speaks as YHWH (‘my sanctuary’ 8:6; ‘provoke me to anger’ 8:17; ‘I will deal in fury,’ ‘I will not hear them’ 8:18) and later in the vision Ezekiel addresses him as ‘Lord God’ (9:8; 11:13).

THE IMAGE THAT PROVOKES JEALOUSY (8:3-6)

Having been snatched up in a trance by the mysterious figure and teleported from Babylonia to Israel (this happens another time in 40:1-2) and seeing what God was seeing (‘in the visions of God’), Ezekiel is deposited in the first of four locations – the north gate of Jerusalem, which is the ‘seat’ of an offensive idol that provokes jealousy. YHWH had made it clear to the Israelites in Ex 20:5; 34:14 that they were to worship him exclusively, he is a jealous God who will not share. This idol provokes YHWH to jealousy not only because it is a false god but also because of where it is situated; in the precincts of YHWH’s temple.

The statue is called a semel (translated ‘image’) in this passage, a word which occurs only here, in Deut 4:16 and in 2 Chron 33:7, 15. The 2 Chronicles passage describes the idol that King Manasseh of Judah (c. 686 to 642 BCE) set up in the temple, and later removed, as a carved semel. 2 Kings 21:7 clarifies that it was an Asherah pole, a representation of the goddess Asherah. Since the statue here in Ezekiel 8:3, 5 is said to be a semel what Ezekiel views in the vision may be another Asherah pole erected at the same site. Sweeney (Reading Ezekiel 2013, p.56), however, suggests that it may have been a stele, depicting Nebuchadnezzar and his gods (esp. Marduk) and commemorating Babylonian subjugation of the city at the time of Jehoiakim’s revolt in 598/597 BCE, which would have been erected in a prominent position like the temple courtyard.

Ezekiel reports that the kabod (glory) of YHWH there, as in the vision in the plain (3:2-23).

The kabod

Kabod occurs 199 times (excluding the proper name Ichabod) in the Old Testament and has the idea of weightiness. It carries various shades of meaning, including burden, riches, honour, respect, reverence, splendour, distinction, majesty, dignity and weight/mass. It is often translated into English as glory or presence. Kabod/glory is something that gives people or objects importance or makes them impressive:

Isa 60:13 – Isaiah speaks of the kabod of the trees of Lebanon.

Isa 16:11 – Isaiah wrote about the kabod of Moab, in 17:4 of Jacob and in 21:16 of Kedar.

Gen 45:13 – Joseph instructed his brothers to tell his father of all his kabod in Egypt.

YHWH’s kabod (glory)

There appears to be two sides to YHWH’s kabod (glory):

a) The glory the he himself manifests. b) The glory that is due to him.

It is the first of these that concerns us and there are various aspects to this.

i. The glory of YHWH in creation (Psa 19; 29; 57; 72; 96; 97; 102; 104; 108; 113; 138).

ii. The glory of YHWH’s works in history; especially in relation to Moses, Sinai (Ex 24:16-17; Deut 5:24) and the wilderness wanderings (pillar of fire and cloud).

iii. The glory of YHWH in Israel’s system of religion, his great power and majesty associated with the tabernacle (Ex 40:34-35) and later the temple (2 Chron 5:14; 7:1-2).

iv. The future eschatological glory of YHWH – mainly in Isaiah (e.g. Isa 60).

v. The glory of YHWH in theophany – mainly in Ezekiel where YHWH and his kabod are almost indistinguishable.

In Ezekiel 8:4 the kabod is called ‘the glory of the God of Israel’ – a title which only occurs in Ezekiel (8:4; 9:3; 10:19; 11:22; 43:2). In v.5 Ezekiel’s guide draws his attention to the semel that provokes jealousy located in the northern ‘entrance’ (this is the only occurrence of this Hebrew word in the Old Testament) and in v.6 asks him ‘Son of man, seest thou what they do?’ – this question is repeated in vv. 12, 15 and 17. This query would suggest that not only did Ezekiel see the statue but also people worshipping it. In this vision Ezekiel is being shown the reasons for the departure of the kabod from the temple (11:23) and for the forthcoming judgement and destruction.

There is much discussion about the subject of the infinitive ‘to drive away’ (KJV ‘go far off) in v.6. Ka Leung Wong (p.397) explains: ‘The crux of the problem lies in the word lrhqh which is a qal infinitive construct with l, having a feminine form. The main question is to decide what its subject is.’

The possibilities are the abominations, the people of Israel or YHWH. It can hardly be the abominations so which of the other two is it likely to be? Should it be translated a) to drive themselves away , or b) to drive me (i.e. YHWH) away?

Those who take the subject as YHWH point out that in the immediate context YHWH is the speaker and that the broader context (chapters 8-11) deals with the departure of YHWH’s kabod from the sanctuary. The problem for many is that this makes the departure of the kabod involuntary, i.e. YHWH is not departing of his own accord but is forced out of his own sanctuary because of the abominations present there.

The subject probably is the house of Israel. Although they are not literally far from YHWH’s sanctuary (since they are worshipping in the temple precincts) by their idolatry they figuratively drive themselves far from it, in a spiritual sense.

The standard view of chapters 8-11 is that they are chapters about the abandonment by YHWH of his sanctuary, thus depriving the people of his protection and leaving them open to defeat and exile. Ezekiel 5:11 would seem to support this view (Therefore, as I live” — this is the declaration of the Lord GOD — “I will withdraw and show you no pity, because you have defiled my sanctuary with all your abhorrent acts and detestable practices.” Ezekiel 5:11 CSB.)

An alternative, however, is that by the time of the vision of 8-11 YHWH’s mobile kabod had already left the Jerusalem temple and moved east to be with the exiles in Babylon (notice that it departs to there in 11:23 and comes from there in 43:2). According to this view chapters 8-11 are about a visitation in judgement. YHWH, having already departed from the temple, has temporarily returned in order to show Ezekiel the reasons for Jerusalem’s destruction (chapter 8) and to initiate the judgement (9:1 ff.). This theory is based on a statement in 43:3 which refers back to the vision of chapters 8-11: (‘And it was according to the appearance of the vision which I saw, even according to the vision that I saw when I came to destroy the city: and the visions were like the vision that I saw by the river Chebar; and I fell upon my face.’)

Verse 6 ends with the statement ‘and thou shalt see greater abominations.’ This saying is repeated in vv. 13 and 15.

ANIMAL WORSHIP (8:7-12)

Ezekiel’s guide then takes him to the entrance to the inner court and instructs him to view the practices being conducted inside the temple compound. This location is closer to the sanctuary than the first. It is unclear exactly how Ezekiel gains entrance but it involves a wall, a hole, further excavation by Ezekiel and the discovery of a secret door. Ezekiel, in vision, seems to break through a casemate wall and enter a room of a house. That dwelling either extends into the temple wall or is built in the space between double walls. There he encounters a group of seventy of the elders of Judah burning incense in front of animal reliefs or murals. These are said (v.10) to be depictions of reptiles and abominable beasts. ‘Abominable’ (šeqeṣ) occurs in Lev 7:21, eight times in Lev chapter 11 and in Isa 66:17. It describes ritually unclean animals including:

Lev 11:10-12 Creatures that live in water but do not have scales or fins.

Lev 11:13-20 Birds of prey.

Lev 11:20, 23 Some insects.

Lev 11:41-43 Reptiles.

Isa 66:17 Pigs, mice.

This scene is doubly abominable in that a) graven images are present, and b) that unclean foods are spread out for a ritual meal.

SEVENTY ELDERS

In Ex 24:9 seventy elders saw the glory of YHWH. In Num 11:25 the spirit of God rested upon seventy elders. Here seventy elders are offering incense to false gods.

The worship leader at this private ritual is named as Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan, who ‘stood’ in the midst of them. He is not the Jaazaniah of Ezekiel 11:1 because his father’s name is different. The verb ‘stand’ (āmaḏ), according to Strongs ‘has the sense of serving before someone, as Joseph served, stood before Pharaoh (Gen. 41:46).’ Likely Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan and the elders are not priests and therefore have no right to burn incense.

It may be that Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan was the brother of Gemariah the son of Shaphan the scribe (Jer 36:10, 12) who was supportive of the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 36:25). There are also references in Jeremiah to Ahikam (Jer 26:24) and Elasah (Jer 29:3) who are also said to be sons of Shaphan. Perhaps their father was Shaphan the scribe of 2 Kgs 22 who some thirty years earlier had read the rediscovered copy of the Torah to King Josiah, an event that sparked wide-ranging religious reforms.

Once again (v.12) Ezekiel’s supernatural guide asks him ‘hast thou seen? (8:6,15,17) and comments that the elders also worship in the dark (i.e. at night), in their own chambers. These men may have been occupying cell-like quarters meant for priests at the temple. Ezekiel includes similar accommodation in his plans for an ideal temple (45:1-11).

V.12 ends with an insight into the thinking of the elders who say: ‘The Lord seeth us not; the Lord hath forsaken the earth.’ This might mean that they thought they were acting in private and YHWH could not see them. It is, however, more likely that they are not referring to YHWH’s supposed inability to see but to his lack of interest and involvement. Somehow they were already aware that their idolatry had offended YHWH, his departure therefore inevitable. They accuse YHWH of forsaking the earth when, in effect, it was they who had forsaken him.

‘For they say.’ Ezekiel quotes what people are saying in other passages as well (9:9; 12:22; 18:2, 19; 20:49; 37:11).

Since the four episodes in this chapter are scenes of increasing abomination Ezekiel is once again told that even worse things than this are going on.

THE WEEPING FOR TAMMUZ (8:14-15)

Ezekiel’s guide now takes him to a new location; the north gate of the temple, where he sees a group of women weeping for Tammuz (Dumuzi). This was a fertility deity in Mesopotamian mythology usually depicted as a young man and said to be the consort of the goddess Ishtar (Inanna). He was associated with spring vegetation (died and then returned the following summer) and the cyclical nature of life, death and rebirth. The wailing for Tammuz was a feature of mourning rituals that lamented his death and looked forward to his return. This Babylonian cult must have been practised by some Jewish women in Jerusalem. This myth about a dying and rising god is thought to equate to the Egyptian one about Osiris and Isis and to the Greek story about Adonis and Aphrodite.

Again (v.15) Ezekiel is told that even worse things than this are going on.

THE WORSHIP OF THE SUN (8:16-18)

Ezekiel is now taken in vision to a fourth location. This is in the inner court before the entrance to Solomon’s temple and between the portico (’ûlām, porch, vestibule, 1 Kgs 6:3; 1 Chr 28:11; 2 Chr 3:4; Joel 2:17) and the altar. Presumably this was an area where only Levitical priests could enter (2 Chron 4:9; Joel 2:17). Here Ezekiel discovers a group of about 25 men (LXX says 20) facing eastward and worshipping the sun. That they are bowed down to the sun, standing with their backs toward the temple, is the ultimate act of disrespect and signifies a complete rejection of YHWH. They have literally turned their backs on him. This fourth scene is the climax of the abominations shown to Ezekiel, in ascending order of seriousness. There is an early Old Testament reference to solar worship in Job 31:26-28. That the practice of Sun worship took place in Judah is confirmed by 2 Kgs 23:5,11. There is a later reference to 25 men (11:1) but no indication that this is the same group.

In v.17 Ezekiel is once again asked if he has seen this. A rhetorical question then follows: ‘Is it not enough for the house of Judah to commit the detestable acts they are doing here, that they must also fill the land with violence and repeatedly anger me, even putting the branch to their nose?’ (CSB). This question, to which the answer is obviously ‘Yes!,’ is designed to emphasize that the practices Ezekiel has seen performed are abominations that provoke YHWH to anger. Three transgressions are listed:

The worship of false gods – committing abominations.
The land filled with violence. As in 7:23 idolatry is linked with social injustice.
The deliberate provocation of YHWH. They put a branch to their/his nose. What this involves is not known. If they put a branch to their nose possibly the reference is to an obscene worship ritual involving vine branches that provokes YHWH to anger. If they put the branch to his nose the implication is that they direct an obscene, arrogant and deliberately provocative gesture at YHWH. The word zemôrāh meaning branch or tendril occurs four other times in the Old Testament (Num 13:23; Isa 17:10; Ezek 15:2; Nah. 2:3) and refers to vines.

V.18. YHWH will therefore not spare them and will not have pity. Even though the people cry for mercy with ‘a loud voice’ he will not hear them. The thought of a loud voice is taken up again in the next verse (9:1) which begins with the ‘loud voice’ of YHWH.

SUMMATION

In chapter 8 Ezekiel is transported in vision from Babylonia to Jerusalem where he witnesses the idolatrous state of religion and society back home. He views scenes of idolatry in four locations. Each location is closer to the sanctuary itself and each scene of idolatry is progressively worse. The temple precincts are polluted, why would YHWH stay? Chapter 8 provides justification for the withdrawal of the kabod of YHWH from the temple (chapters 8-11). Once YHWH abandons Jerusalem because of his people’s sin it will no longer be inviolable; the Babylonians will be able sack the city.

This chapter sets the stage for the judgement to come, as YHWH withdraws His protection, leaving Jerusalem vulnerable to destruction. The vivid imagery and detailed narrative underscore the severity of the people’s sins and emphasize the dire consequences of forsaking YHWH for idols.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

de Vries, Pieter 2015. The Kābôd of Yhwh in the Old Testament: with particular reference to the Book of Ezekiel. BRILL.

‌Ackerman, Susan. “A Marzēaḥ in Ezekiel 8:7-13?” The Harvard Theological Review, vol. 82, no. 3, 1989, pp. 267–81.

Aharoni, Yohanan. “The Date of Casemate Walls in Judah and Israel and Their Purpose.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 154, 1959, pp. 35–39.

Lapp, Nancy L. “Casemate Walls in Palestine and the Late Iron II Casemate at Tell El-Fûl (Gibeah).” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 223, 1976, pp. 25–42.

Wong, Ka Leung. “A Note on Ezekiel VIII 6.” Vetus Testamentum, vol. 51, no. 3, 2001, pp. 396–400.

Yamauchi, Edwin M. “Tammuz and the Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 84, no. 3, 1965, pp. 283–90.