Tag: Jerusalem

Posted in Exposition

Living Out Our Faith: Practical Lessons from Hebrews 10:19-25

Posted on by writtenexposition

Having Therefore… Let Us!

The words ‘Having therefore… let us!’ indicate a powerful transition in the Epistle to the Hebrews which divides the letter into two clear sections: the doctrinal (1:1-10:18) and the practical (10:19-13:25). Essentially, the second section calls us to live out what we have learned.

This blog post focuses on the practical exhortations found in Hebrews 10:19-25. But first, for those unfamiliar with the Epistle to the Hebrews, here is a brief introduction and summary of its content so far.

When was the book written?

The exact date of Hebrews is uncertain, but it must predate the Roman siege and destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, as this event is not mentioned in the letter. It was likely written in the mid-60s CE, considering that the Jewish worship system in the Second Temple was still active (10:11).

Who wrote the book?

The author of Hebrews remains unknown. Scholars have suggested various figures, including Paul, Barnabas, Luke, and Apollos. While many favour Paul due to thematic similarities, arguments against his authorship, such as a Greek style different to his letters and potentially conflicting statements about the source of teaching (Gal 1:12; Heb 2:3), make definitive attribution impossible. Ultimately, who the author was is not all that important when one considers that Hebrews extols the Lord Jesus. It argues for the supremacy of Christ; the book is all about him!

Who was it written to?

Hebrews, as the name suggests, was written to early Jewish Christians, probably in Palestine, who had faced persecution. Some had had property confiscated or destroyed but up to that point none of them had been killed (12:4). Despite their initial kindness and faithfulness to the persecuted (10:32-34), these believers had not matured spiritually (5:12-14). With a further wave of persecution looming some were considering abandoning Christianity to return to traditional Jewish practices. The letter was written to warn them about the dangers of apostasy (2:1-4; 3:1-4:13; 5:11-6:20; 10:26-39; 12:25-29), to set out the superiority of Christ over the Old Testament institutions and to encourage them to move on to maturity in their Christian faith.

One gets the impression that the content of Hebrews was first delivered as a sermon, then the author reproduced his notes as a letter.

1) His approach is informal; he uses first and second person pronouns like I, we, us and you.

2) The expressions he uses are conversational:

‘The things which we have heard,’ (2:1)

‘We have many things to say,’ (5:11)

‘Although we speak this way’ (6:9)

‘And what shall I more say? for the time would fail me to tell of Gideon, and of Barak…’ (11:32)

3) In 13:22 the author says: ‘And I beseech you, brethren, suffer (bear patiently with) the word of exhortation:’

That expression (‘word of exhortation’) also occurs in Acts 13:15. On their first missionary journey Paul and his friends went to the synagogue in Psidian Antioch one sabbath day and sat down. After the usual public reading of the scriptures the leaders of the synagogue issued an invitation to the visitors: ‘Ye men and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for the people, say on. Then Paul stood up, and beckoning with his hand said, Men of Israel, and ye that fear God, give audience.’

Paul then proceeded to preach the longest of his sermons that we have on record. In Acts 13, therefore, we have an real-life example of ‘word of exhortation’ meaning a sermon.

Content and Purpose of Hebrews

The first section focuses on the person of Christ (1:1-4:13) and on the priesthood of Christ (4:14-10:18) . The whole epistle emphasizes the pre-eminence of Christ and the new covenant, frequently using the term ‘better’ to highlight this superiority. This is evident in several passages:

‘Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.’ (1:4)

‘For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.’ (7:19)

‘By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.’ (7:22)

‘But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.’ (8:6)

‘It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.’ (9:23)

‘For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, and took joyfully the spoiling of your goods, knowing in yourselves that ye have in heaven a better and an enduring substance.’ (10:34)

‘But now they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city.’ (11:16)

‘Women received their dead raised to life again: and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance; that they might obtain a better resurrection:’ (11:35)

‘God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.’ (11:40)

‘And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.’ (12:24)

Although addressed primarily to Hebrew Christians, this is something that we need to know and appreciate today: The Lord Jesus Christ and all that we have in him is better than anything that we have ever had before.

Practical Lessons from Hebrews 10:19-25

Starting in Hebrews 10:19, the content of the letter changes from doctrine to practical application with the phrase ‘Having therefore.’ This signals a shift from knowledge to action, encouraging believers to live out their faith based on what they have been taught. The transition reminds us that the Bible is not merely for information but for transformation. We are to live out the truths we learn.

Having therefore’ – a great privilege
‘Let us’ – a great responsibility’

Let Us Draw Near (10:22)

We are invited to draw near to God with sincerity, faith, and a cleansed life. This direct approach, which was unthinkable for Old Testament believers, is now possible for all through Jesus’ sacrifice. Drawing near to God requires:

A correct heart: We must approach God sincerely and reverently, recognizing His holiness. Sincerity means coming to God with honesty, without pretence or hypocrisy.
A confident faith: We should draw near to God with full assurance of faith, trusting in His acceptance and promises.
A cleansed life: Our hearts and lives have been purified through Christ’s sacrifice, allowing us to approach God without guilt.

Let Us Hold Fast (10:23)

Believers are urged to hold fast to their confession of faith without wavering. This steadfastness is crucial in a world filled with uncertainties and challenges. Holding fast involves:

Continuing in our faith: Remaining unwavering in our beliefs despite opposition.
Living out our faith: Maintaining a high standard of Christian living.
Trusting God’s faithfulness: Believing that God, who has saved us, is faithful to His promises.

Let Us Consider One Another (10:24-25)

The final exhortation focuses on mutual encouragement within the Christian community. Believers are encouraged to:

Deliberate on how to encourage one another: Actively think of ways to spur each other on to love and good works.
Assemble together regularly: Not forsaking meetings, which provide fellowship and support.
Exhort one another: Continuously encourage and support one another, especially as the Day of Christ approaches.

Summation: Faith, Hope, and Love

As individuals and communities of faith, let us commit to:

Drawing Near: in faith
Holding Fast: to hope
Considering One Another: to promote love and good works

Together, let’s live out the faith, hope, and love that define our Christian walk, encouraging one another until the day of the Lord’s return.

Posted in Exposition

THE END IS NEAR – EZEKIEL CHAPTER 7

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 7:1-27

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 7:1 introduces a powerful and foreboding message from YHWH to the prophet Ezekiel, continuing the ominous prophecies about the judgement upon Judah and Jerusalem. Unlike the previous chapters (4-6) which held out some hope that a remnant would survive, this chapter does not mention that but rather makes it clear that disaster is imminent and unavoidable. The repeated emphasis on words like ‘day’ and ‘end’ underscores the urgency and finality of the impending judgement: for example: ‘the end is come’ (7:2, 6); ‘the day is come’ (7:10, 12); ‘the day draweth near’ (7:12); ‘the day of the wrath of the Lord’ (7:19).

DIVIDING THE PROPHECY

The prophecy in Ezekiel 7 naturally falls into two sections (vv. 2-4 and vv. 5-27), each beginning with ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’ However, for easier consideration it can be broken down into smaller segments:

7:2-4 Judgement announced

7:5-9 Unprecedented Disaster

7:10-13 Social Upheaval

7:14-16 Military Collapse

7:17-22 Signs of Despair

7:23-25 Make the Chain

7:26-27 Ineffective Leadership

JUDGEMENT ANNOUNCED (7:2-4)

In verses 2-4 the prophecy declares that disaster will strike not just Jerusalem and Judah but ‘the four corners of the land’ i.e. the whole land of Israel will be affected by the Babylonian invasion. The occurrence of ‘end’ five times in the first six verses emphasises the finality and certainty of the judgement

The end is presented as having already arrived (‘now’ – repeated v. 8), creating a sense of urgency and inevitability. The Preacher’s Commentary explains that:

The Hebrew word ba¯), translated here “has come” can also mean “is coming” and thus there is created a certain degree of uncertainty as to the exact timing of the events about which Ezekiel warns. Some of the usages of ba¯) by themselves would be grammatically almost certain to mean “has come” while others would by themselves mean “is coming.” That they are mixed purposely here suggests to the listener that there is an urgency to the timing. A process has started which will conclude quickly: it is not completed yet, but will not be delayed for long, either.

God’s anger is portrayed as a force that can be sent. ‘I will send mine anger’ shows that in actual fact it had not yet come. The people will be judged according to their sinful ways, particularly their idol worship, which Ezekiel refers to as ‘abominations’ (offensive things). This aligns with the New Testament depiction of the judgement of believers and unbelievers according to behaviour ( 2 Cor 5:10; Rev 20:12-13).

The severity of their sins means that YHWH will show no mercy or spare them from the judgement; they will face the consequences of their actions. The section concludes with the recognition formula ‘they shall know that I am the Lord.’ It is repeated in verses 9 and 27.

UNPRECEDENTED DISASTER (7:5-9)

Beginning with the authoritative ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ this section describes an unparalleled disaster. The ‘only’ evil that will come upon them will be unprecedented and decisive. The word ‘watcheth’ in verse 6 is a verb meaning to wake up. Verse 6 ends and verse 7 starts with the same verb ‘come,’ which is repeated seven times in vv. 5-12. These terms highlight the immediacy of the calamity.

What Ezekiel meant by the word ‘morning’ (KJV) in verse 7 is not entirely clear. It translates a word meaning ‘ring’ or ‘turn’ and the main thought is of something round. It contains the ideas of cycle, turn of events, crown and has been translated as doom, morning and diadem (Isa 28:5). It occurs again in verse 10. ‘Morning’ probably fits well with the idea of wake up in the previous verse and thus signifies the dawn of a new day, a dreadful era the like of which the Israelites have never experienced before. That day is near and is a day of tumult (KJV ‘trouble’) in which they will hear the noise of war. That clamour is contrasted with the ‘sounding again of the mountains.’ This is not referring to an earthquake but most likely to the joyful conversation of workers at harvest time (Isa 16:10) in vineyards on mountain slopes; the opposite of the tumult of invasion. In this verse the imminence of judgement is conveyed by the following phrases: ‘the morning is come,’ ‘the time is come,’ and ‘the day…is near.’ Here ‘the day’ is introduced – a concept that will be developed from verse 10 onwards.

If translated ‘crown’ or ‘diadem’ rather than ‘morning’ it could be a reference to the Chaldean King Nebuchadnezzar.

Verses 8 and 9 again state that the punishment is the Israelites’ own fault and that no mercy or compassion will be shown by YHWH. These two verses are a repetition of verses 3 and 4 but with ‘that smiteth’ added after ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’ This emphasizes that the judgement is from YHWH. The additional wording forms a compound name of the Lord: YHWH-Makkeh, The Lord who smites. For other compound names see my post COMPOUND NAMES OF YHWH

SOCIAL UPHEAVAL (7:10-13)

Verses 10-13 depict a society in turmoil. The day of judgement has arrived, signified by the dawn of morning. Some commentators take ‘the rod hath blossomed’ etc. to refer to Judah; the idea being that pride has flourished among the people, contributing to their downfall, i.e. they have been over-confident. Violence has become a rod of wickedness, symbolizing the prevalence and severity of sin among the people.

I take it, however, that the rod refers to the Neo-Babylonian Empire and its swift rise to ascendancy in the Ancient Near East under the Chaldean kings Nabopolassar (626-605 BCE) and his son Nebuchadnezzar II (605-562 BCE). In the Bible a budding rod represents growth and prosperity (for the story about Aaron’s rod that budded, blossomed and bore almonds please read Numbers chapter 17). Three clauses describe the Chaldeans: 1) ‘the rod hath blossomed’ 2) ‘pride hath budded’ 3) ‘violence is risen up into a rod of wickedness.’ The prophet Habakkuk described this proud and violent nation as follows:

For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.
They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.
Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves: and their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.
They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every stronghold; for they shall heap dust, and take it. Habakkuk 1:6-10

Like a rod that blossoms, buds and grows that nation will rise up as an instrument of God’s punishment upon Judah. What will be the result for the inhabitants of the land of Israel? – ‘None of the people will be left, none of that crowd—none of their wealth, nothing of value. Ezekiel 7:11 (NIV). The invasion will bring total societal collapse. So many people will die that there will be no lamentation for their fate. The usual burial practices will not be carried out.

The day of judgement approaches (12-13) and it will be a time of despair for all. Everyday business transactions will be meaningless as the population faces extermination or captivity. Neither the buyer nor the seller will find cause for rejoicing or mourning as the entire population will be consumed by the wrath of God. The buyer will not rejoice in having negotiated a favourable deal for he will never enjoy what he has purchased. The seller will not mourn over what he has parted with for it will be taken away from him in any case. The invaders will take everything, there will be nothing left to buy or sell.

The usual protections of property laws, like those in Leviticus (Lev 25:14, 24-28) regarding the Year of Jubilee, will be irrelevant in the face of such widespread destruction. Every fiftieth year property that had been sold would revert to the original owner or his heir, thus ensuring the protection of a family’s inheritance, i.e. ancestral land. Those who have sold property will not be able to reclaim it, even if they are still alive, because they will be in captivity.

The vision concerning the people (the whole multitude) will not turn back; i.e. the prophecy will not be reversed. Because of their sins they will not be able to preserve their lives.

MILITARY COLLAPSE 7:14-16

Despite the sounding of a trumpet to prepare for war no-one will respond. God’s wrath will paralyse the people, rendering them defenceless against the Chaldean invaders.

The judgement will come through external threats such as war (sword) and internal afflictions like pestilence and famine. Whether people are in the field or in the city, death will be inevitable. Those who escape the city will be killed by the invaders and those under siege inside the city will die of famine and plague. This repeats the prophecy of the three-fold judgement (sword, famine, pestilence) already given in 5:2, 12 and 6:11. According to v.16 some may flee to the mountains but they will be overwhelmed by their guilt and grief and ‘mourn like doves of the valleys’ (Isa 38:14; 59:11).

SIGNS OF DESPAIR (7:17-22)

The coming judgement will induce such terror that the entire population will be physically weak and feeble. They will wear sackcloth, a sign of mourning and repentance, and display horror and shame. They will show their grief by shaving their heads (see Mic1:16), a practice that was forbidden in Deut 14:1; especially for priests Lev 21:5; Ezek 44:20. The picture seems to be that they will dress in sackcloth but wear horror as an outer garment.

Silver and gold, which have been the cause of their spiritual stumbling, will not be able to ‘deliver them in the day of the wrath of the Lord.’ It will become worthless because there will be no food available to buy. They will therefore throw away their wealth (for similar see Isa 2:7-8, 20) in disgust because it has become ‘detestable’ (KJV ‘removed’). The word niddāh means a woman’s menstrual flow. In the Old Testament it refers to something regarded as impure, filthy, and unclean (Lev 20:21; Ez 9:11; Lam 1:17). It occurs again in the next verse, v.20.

Speaking of the whole nation in the singular as ‘he’ and ‘his’ the prophecy says that the Lord had given them wealth but since in their pride (KJV ‘majesty) they turned it into abominable idols, the Lord will make it an unclean thing (niddāh) to them (KJV ‘set it far from them’).

God will allow their wealth to be plundered and defiled by foreign invaders. ‘They shall pollute it’ simply means that the precious metals that have been made into idols will not be used for religious purposes but rather put to common use. There is no suggestion that the idols are holy. ‘Pollute’ (ḥālal) in that same sense occurs again in the next verse, v. 22.

God will turn his face away from his people, symbolizing his withdrawal of help and protection from them. This will allow the heathen enemy robbers to desecrate his ‘treasure’ (KJV ‘secret place‘). Some commentators view this as a reference to the temple and its destruction by the invaders but in Hebrew ‘temple’ is masculine. Greenberg (1983, p. 154) points out: ‘Judging from the feminine suffixes in the next clause (“it”) this is an epithet of the city or land of vs. 23 (both fem. in Hebrew); so T (“the land in which my Presence dwells).’

In this passage the Babylonians are referred to in disparaging terms (cp. Ezek 28:7; 30:11) as ‘the strangers’ (v.21), ‘the wicked of the earth’ (v.21), ‘robbers’ (v.22) and ‘the worst of the heathen’ (v.24).

MAKE THE CHAIN 7:23-25

The instruction ‘make the chain’ tells Ezekiel to perform another symbolic action that conjures up an image of captivity and exile (cp. Jer 27:2; Nah 3:10). He is to forge a chain. Jerusalem’s crimes will lead to its downfall; it is full of violence and capital crimes (lit. judgements of blood). Foreign conquerors (‘the evil ones of the heathen’ i.e. the worst of) will occupy Israelite homes, defile their sacred places and end their pride and power.

The conquest of the land, the destruction of holy sites, the occupation of homes by the invaders, and deportation fulfil the covenant curses of Leviticus chapter 26:31-33. Despite desperate attempts to bring about peace their efforts will be in vain and horror will certainly come upon them.

INEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP 7:26-27

Calamity will be compounded by a lack of guidance. Prophets, priests and elders will have no answers as God will have withdrawn. There will be no words of revelation, knowledge or counsel and as a result all ranks of the population, the king, the prince (tribal chieftain), and the people of the land will be will be stricken with fear and despair.

God will bring on them the the evil that they have done to others. The judgement will be a direct consequence of their deeds and it will ensure that they recognize YHWH’s sovereignty and authority – ‘they shall know that I am the Lord.’

SUMMATION

This concludes the first major unit of the book, marking the end of the initial cycle of prophecies (chapters 4-7) which predicts dreadful judgements upon Judah and Jerusalem. Chapter 7 characterises these as retribution for their violence (7:7-11), improper use of wealth (7: 19-20), and idolatrous practices (7:20). It emphasises that they will be punished in accordance with their deeds (7:8, 9, 27) so they will suffer violence (7:25), their wealth will be unable to save them (7:19) and their holy places will be destroyed and defiled (7:24). This seventh chapter of Ezekiel presents a vivid depiction of impending judgment upon Judah and Jerusalem for their sins, highlighting the severity and inevitability of God’s wrath.

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL 5:5-17:  THE CONSEQUENCES OF SIN AND IDOLATRY

Posted on by writtenexposition

YHWH’s speech continues with an explanation of Ezekiel’s four dramatic performances described in 4:1-5:4; in particular the final performance (5:1-4). YHWH gives reasons for the forthcoming judgements and declares Jerusalem’s privilege, perversity and punishment.

5:5-6 Jerusalem’s sin.

5:7-12 Jerusalem’s judgement.

5:13-15 YHWH’s wrath.

5:16-17 Jerusalem’s destruction.

5:5-6 JERUSALEM’S SIN

In v.5 YHWH refers to Ezekiel’s model (4:1-3) and clearly identifies it as representing the city of Jerusalem under siege. The city is said to be privileged in that YHWH set it in ‘the midst of the nations.’ This expression should probably be taken theologically rather than physically. The city of Jerusalem, i.e. the Jewish nation, was considered central to God’s plans for salvation. Israel was to be ‘a kingdom of priests and a holy nation’ (Ex 19:4-6) and as such was intended to be a witness to YHWH’s power and his character in the sight of surrounding nations (Deut 4:5-8; Isa 2:2-4; Ezek 36:36-38; Mic 4:1-8). The prophet Isaiah viewed Israel as ‘a light to the Gentiles’ (Isa 42:6; 49:6; 60:3).

On the other hand, it is possible that here Jerusalem is viewed as being in a central position geographically. In the ancient world it was strategically situated on major trade routes (e.g. the King’s Highway and the International Coastal Highway) which connected Asia, Africa and Europe. Assyria and Babylon lay to the north, Egypt to the south, Arabia to the east and the Mediterranean Sea to the west. Having such a prominent position it was ideally located to be YHWH’s witness to the powers around. Unfortunately Israel did not live up to expectations.

Instead, the nation rebelled against God’s judgements and rejected his statutes; refusing to walk in them. In spite of a favourable position and great privilege, its actions had been even more corrupt than the pagans around (for a New Testament example see 1 Cor 5:1).

5:7-12 JERUSALEM’S JUDGEMENT

Having set out the general grounds for judgement YHWH presents more detailed charges and proceeds to specify the punishments, introducing these with the word ‘therefore’ (5:7, 8, 10, 11), which indicates consequence. A series of phrases in v.7 asserts that they:

  • have multiplied more than the nations around. – ‘Multiplied’ (KJV) does not refer to increase in population but the idea is that they have been more turbulent (Darby; ESV), insubordinate (CSB) or unruly (NIV) than the other nations. They ran after idols with unbridled enthusiasm.
  • have not walked in YHWH’s statutes or kept his judgements. – ‘Statutes’ are generally viewed as instructions relating to duty towards God and ‘judgements’ as relating to duty towards human beings.
  • have not even acted according to the laws of the surrounding nations. This would appear to contradict 11:12 which says that they ‘have acted according to the rules of the nations that are around'(ESV) but the explanation may lie in the fact that the other nations had some good laws as well as bad ones. Israel, however, did not even follow the good laws of the other nations, but only the bad ones. It is those good laws which Israel did not follow that are in view here. In New Testament terms these would be the laws written in the hearts of the heathen (Rom 2:14-15).

YHWH (v.8) is therefore ‘against’ Judah and will ‘execute judgements’ (also 5:10, 15; 11:9; 16:41) in full view of the other nations. These punishments will be unprecedented (v.9) because of the greatness of their abominations. ‘Abomination(s)’ occurs more than 40 times in Ezekiel and refers specifically to idolatry ( see also Deut 7:25-26; 12:31; 13:13-14; 17:3-4). In vv. 8-9 the first person pronoun ‘I’ is emphasized: ‘ I, even I am against thee... I will execute judgements… I will do in thee that which I have not done and whereunto I will not do any more the like.‘ The wickedness of Judah has been unparalleled therefore the severity of the punishment will be unparalleled also.

The ‘therefore’ at the beginning of v.10 indicates that this verse develops the announcement of severe punishment and provides proof of the unprecedented nature of the forthcoming judgement. The language echoes that of the covenant curses in Lev 26:21-39 and Deut 28:15-68. The cannibalism prophesied there (Lev 26:29 and Deut 28:53) involves children being eaten by their parents but here v.10 describes an aggravated situation where children will eat their parents. Jeremiah 19:9 also prophesies cannibalism during the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem and Lam 2:20 and 4:10 record that it did occur. People who manage to survive the siege will be scattered throughout the nations.

v.11 ‘as I live.’ Swearing an oath by his own eternal self-existence YHWH announces that because the people have defiled his Temple with idols (e.g. 2 Kgs 21:7, see also Ezek chp 8), which here are described as detestable objects, he will diminish them (remove their divine protection), his eye will not spare them and he will have no pity (Jer 13:14) on them. This solemn oath occurs sixteen times in Ezekiel (5:11; 14:16, 18, 20; 16:48; 17:16, 19; 18:3; 20:33; 33:11, 27; 34:8; 35:6,11). Here is the first mention in Ezekiel of the idolatry in the temple; it is the background to chapters 8-11.

v.12. ‘Wherefore’ refers back to v.11 and the pollution of the Jerusalem temple by idolatry as the basis of the threat of forthcoming punishment. Now YHWH plainly declares the meaning of the symbolic treatment of the shaved hair (5:1-4):

A third part of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will die of plague and famine during the siege.

A third part will ‘fall by the sword round about thee.’ These will be cut down by the Babylonians while trying to defend the city, or perhaps in the countryside while trying to make an escape.

Another third of the population will be scattered in all directions. Wherever they go they will suffer persecution (‘I will draw out a sword after them’).

5:13-15 YHWH’s WRATH.

Although faint, there is a glimmer of hope here. Despite the severity of his judgement, God’s ultimate purpose is not total destruction. The destruction of Jerusalem will ease the Lord’s anger. This emotion is referred to four times in v.13: ‘anger’ (’ap̱ -wrath); ‘fury’ (ḥēmā -heat); ‘zeal’ (qin’āh – fervour, passion); ‘fury’ (ḥēmā -heat). Because the punishment will not only have been predicted but also fulfilled ‘they shall know that I the Lord hath spoken it’. This expression is widespread throughout the book of Ezekiel and occurs again in vv. 15 and 17. God’s word will be vindicated.

Reflecting the thought of Deut 28:37, verses 14-15 predict that the destruction of Jerusalem will serve as a warning and a spectacle to the surrounding nations (‘that are round about thee’ occurs in each of these verses). Jerusalem’s downfall will be a vivid demonstration of God’s righteous anger and a sobering reminder to other nations of the consequences of sin.

  • I will make thee waste (a desolation, wilderness) v.14
  • I will make thee a reproach (reviling, taunt) among the nations v.14,15
  • It shall be an instruction (warning) v.15
  • It shall be an astonishment ( an object of horror) unto the nations v.15

‘Anger’ and ‘fury’ are again mentioned at the end of v.15 along with ‘furious rebukes.’ Since the Lord judges the wickedness of his own people in this way how much more severely will he punish the wickedness of other nations. A similar thought is expressed in 1 Pet 4:17: ‘For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?‘

5:16-17 JERUSALEM’S DESTRUCTION

YHWH uses vivid imagery to depict the severity of his judgement upon Jerusalem, likening it to a barrage of deadly arrows in the form of famine, which will decimate the city and its inhabitants. Famine/hunger features prominently in these closing verses of the oracle: ‘I shall send the evil arrows of famine…increase the famine…break your staff (supply) of bread…send upon you famine.’

God’s judgement will manifest itself in various forms of destruction. As well as famine there will be death by dangerous animals (perhaps meaning brutal men cp. Isa 56:9; Jer 12:9), plague, and bloodshed. All these calamities will result in loss of life (‘shall bereave thee’) and the desolation of the city, as decreed by the Lord.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel 5:5-17 discusses the consequences of Israel’s disobedience and unfaithfulness to God. Speaking through Ezekiel, the Lord declares that Jerusalem has been set in the midst of nations but has rebelled against God’s ordinances and disobeyed His laws,, more so than the peoples around it. Because of this disobedience, the Lord will enact judgements against Jerusalem which will be severe and serve as a warning to the surrounding nations. The punishment is described metaphorically as YHWH withdrawing his protection and favour from Jerusalem. This abandonment will lead to calamities such as famine, disease, and violence. Famine will be so severe that parents will resort to eating their children, and vice versa, and those who manage to survive will be scattered among the nations. The severity of God’s judgement is emphasized. He will unleash his anger and wrath against Jerusalem and the harshness of the punishment will shock all who witness it. Various forms of disaster will befall Jerusalem, including famine, pestilence, and the sword. These judgements are a result of Israel’s persistent disobedience and rebellion against YHWH. The passage serves as a warning of the dire consequences of disobeying God and breaking his laws. It illustrates the severity of God’s judgment against unrepentant sin.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

FOUR SYMBOLIC ACTS IN EZEKIEL 4:1-5:4

Posted in Exposition

FOUR SYMBOLIC ACTS IN EZEKIEL 4:1-5:4

Posted on by writtenexposition

The Siege of Jerusalem: Contextual Background

Ezekiel chapter 4:1-5:4 is a continuation of the spirit’s speech to Ezekiel which commenced in 3:24. In it he receives instructions concerning his first messages to his fellow exiles in Babylon. He is to enact four dramatic performances which together represent YHWH’s judgement that is soon to come upon Judah. The drama relates to its capital city Jerusalem and the consequences of the forthcoming siege of the city by Nebuchadnezzar II.

At that time, of course, Ezekiel’s fellow exiles did not expect anything like that to happen. These prophecies are delivered by Ezekiel early in the period commencing with his call to the prophetic ministry (c. 593 BCE) and ending with the fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE). In 597 BCE Nebuchadnezzar had deposed Jehoiachin of Judah and exiled him along with ten thousand of his subjects (2 Kgs 24:8-16), including Ezekiel (1:1-3). He then installed Jehoiachin’s uncle Zedekiah as a puppet king. With this relatively stable government in Judah the exiles were doubtless looking forward to a soon return to their homeland. They could not have known then that Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24-25; 2 Chron 36; Jer 3) would cast off his allegiance to the Babylonians; provoking a violent response by Nebuchadnezzar. In order to quell the revolt by his Judaean vassal Nebuchadnezzar marched to Riblah in Syria where he established campaign headquarters (2 Kgs 25:6, 20; Jer 39:5; 52:9, 26). From that base his army invaded Judah and destroyed its fortified towns (Jer 44:2) before besieging Jerusalem in the ninth year of Zedekiah. Eventually, after a two and a half year siege, the city fell to the Babylonians in 586 BCE. Zedekiah’s family and the nobles of Jerusalem were executed, after which Zedekiah himself was blinded and transported to Babylon as a prisoner of war (2 Kgs 25:6-7).

Ezekiel’s dramatic performances feature:

4:1-3 A model of a siege – representing the siege of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A number of days spent lying on his left and right sides – representing the duration of judgement .

4:9-17 Consumption of small amounts of bread and water – representing a famine in Jerusalem.

5:1-4 A haircut and shave – representing the fate of Israel.

Some scholars are of the opinion that because Ezekiel does not explicitly state ‘I did this’ for each drama he may have just described the details of his vision to the people without physically acting out these scenarios. However, I take that Ezekiel literally carried out YHWH’s instructions since 4:12 makes it clear that the bread was to be baked in the sight of the people. In addition, impressive symbolic actions by Israel’s prophets were not unusual in that era (1 Kgs 11:30, 22:11; 2 Kgs 13:17; Isa 20:2-4; Jer 13:1-11, 19:1-10).

4:1-3 A MODEL OF A SIEGE

Ezekiel, once again addressed as ‘thou, son of man,’ is instructed to get a (clay) brick, set it before him, and inscribe a diagram of Jerusalem on it. He is then to impersonate the Babylonians by enacting a siege of the city. In practice, Ezekiel may have depicted siege warfare by drawing but the verbs (lay, build, cast, set, take) suggest it is more likely that he made little models and moved them towards his clay brick. These models were of:

a fort – siege works or a tower, manned by archers and slingers (2 Kgs 25:1).

a mount – mounds or ramps constructed of debris (earth, wood, stone) which were built against the walls of a besieged city. Siege towers and battering rams could be pushed up these ramps and from them attack troops could scale the walls using siege ladders. They would then fight their way to the city gates and open them.

a camp – living quarters of an army contingent. As well as fighting men this would have included sappers (who tunnelled under the walls to collapse them) and siege engineers.

battering rams – these wheeled vehicles had a heavy ram suspended from the roof by ropes, one of its ends being a large metal blade. The operators repeatedly slammed this into city gates and walls in order to breach them. These prefabricated machines were generally transported flat pack and assembled on site.

From the details in these three verses one can easily imagine the noise, mayhem and devastation of ancient siege warfare. Men shouting, rams battering, slingers and archers from both sides raining down stones and arrows at one another, the defenders throwing down flaming torches to set the attacking war engines and troops alight. Ezekiel’s enactment of such a siege that would soon be experienced by Jerusalem must have shocked his fellow countrymen.

Ezekiel was also to set up a flat iron pan or griddle between him and his model of the city and glare (‘direct your face forward’) at it. This obstruction probably represented the barrier between YHWH and the house of Israel and the stare represented God’s angry intentions towards Jerusalem. The visual demonstration of a siege serves as a prophetic ‘sign’ to the house of Israel of the impending destruction of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A NUMBER OF DAYS SPENT LYING ON HIS LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES

Ezekiel is then commanded to lie on his left and right sides for a specific number of days, symbolically bearing the sin of the people of Israel. Each day probably represents a year of punishment for Israel’s iniquity. This act serves as a vivid illustration of the consequences of Israel’s rebellion against God.

Having impersonated the Babylonians in the first episode Ezekiel now has to play the part of Israel. He is instructed to lie on his left side for 390 days and after that lie on his right side for 40 days. The first period relates to the ‘house of Israel,’ the second to the ‘house of Judah. Ezekiel is told that each day represents one year (vv. 5-6).

Apparently in the Ancient Near East directions were indicated from a position facing east. North (the northern kingdom of Israel) was therefore on the left side and South (the southern kingdom of Judah) on the right. Another example of this in Ezekiel is 16:46: ‘And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters that dwell at thy left hand: and thy younger sister, that dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters.’

Concerning the years, we have no idea what dates are referred to. In fact, even the number of years for the house of Israel is unclear for although the Hebrew Masoretic text reads 390 years the Greek LXX says 190 years. Scholars and commentators have fertile imaginations and many ingenious suggestions have been put forward.

Since 390+40=430 (the period of time spent by the children of Israel in Egypt) some see this as symbolic of years of oppression or wilderness experience for Israel. See also Ex12:40 and Gal 3:17.

There is some disagreement as to whether the days represent years of sin or the years of punishment for sin. The first would look back to years of iniquity, the other point forward to years of judgement. Basing their opinion on v.9b some commentators maintain that the 390 years and the 40 years run concurrently, although v.6 says ‘when thou hast accomplished them (390), lie again (40)…’ which strongly suggests that they are consecutive.

There also seems to be no agreement on a terminus a quo (start date). For the 390 years of iniquity a popular choice is the period from the the division of Israel in 931 BCE to the fall of Babylon in 539 BCE. Others think that the period is 390 years from the construction of Solomon’s temple in the tenth century BCE. A valid point made by several commentators is that the dates in the book of Ezekiel are based on the deportation of Jehoiachin in 597 BCE, on this basis they speculate that the 390 and 40 years of punishment run consecutively from then until the Maccabean Revolt in 167 BCE.

As regards the 40 year period of Judah’s iniquity some say it began during the reign of King Josiah (640 -609 BCE) and ended with the Fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE), others that it commenced during the long (2 Kgs 21:1), evil (2 Kgs 21:10-16; 23:26-27) reign of Manasseh (lived c. 697-642 BCE).

A few of the commentators I have read give the 430 years a future application, maintaining that because the northern tribes would not have received Ezekiel’s prophecy then these days have yet to be fulfilled. They assert that Ezekiel is portraying judgement that will fall on all Israel (5:4). This, in their view, will occur at the end of the age.

It therefore seems that this is to be a long drawn out drama. Ezekiel is to lie first on his left side for 390 days and then on his right for 40 days ‘to bear the iniquity’ of the house of Israel and the house of Judah. This bearing of the nation’s iniquity is not vicarious but rather Ezekiel’s period of suffering and discomfort symbolizes the pain that Israel will endure at the hands of the Babylonians. During this display YHWH will ‘put ropes on’ Ezekiel, perhaps inflicting him with some kind of temporary paralysis, in order to prevent him from turning from one side to the other.

Again (v.7) Ezekiel is instructed to stare/glare at his siege model while he is lying on his side with his arm uncovered (see v.4). This may symbolize an unimpeded warrior ready for battle (cp. Isa 52:10). He is also to prophesy against Jerusalem. Perhaps, however, there is one crumb of hope in Ezekiel’s message in that the judgement is for a set period and will one day come to an end.

Possibly Ezekiel did not lie immobile 24-7 but just lay for several hours per day as the passage represents him carrying out other activities like enacting the siege, baking bread, drinking water, shaving etc.

4:9-17 CONSUMPTION OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF BREAD AND WATER

In these verses Ezekiel is instructed to eat a specific ration of food, prepared from a mixture of grains and legumes. This is limited by weight and represents the scarcity of food that the people of Jerusalem would experience during a siege. This action demonstrates the severity of the impending judgment upon Israel.

He is directed to mix flour from six types of grain in one vessel and prepare enough bread to eat ‘ from time to time’ (v.10, i.e. at a set time each day) during the 390 day period that he would lie on one side or the other. These grains are: wheat, barley, beans (see also 2 Sam 17:28), lentils, millet and fitches (a species of wheat). This unusual mixture of cereals was to be baked in full view of his fellow exiles (v.12), using human excrement as fuel. The amount of Ezekiel’s daily allocation of this disgusting food is 20 (Babylonian) shekels – approximately 8 ounces or 227 grams – and his intake of water is restricted to one sixth of a hin – about 0.6 litres. That the quantities are to be precisely measured out (cp. Lev 26:26) emphasizes that these are starvation rations. Ezekiel’s general state of health will deteriorate on such an unbalanced diet. The main point of this symbolic action is that siege, starvation and famine will soon be the lot of the residents of Jerusalem. There will be a shortage of food and water therefore rationing will apply (vv.16-17). Rationing is described in Isa 30:20 as ‘the bread of adversity and the water of affliction’ (see also 1 Kgs 22:27).

Ezekiel is instructed to eat the bread ‘as barley cakes.’ The idea seems to be that of eating them with enjoyment or enthusiasm thus suggesting that during the siege of Jerusalem people will be delighted to have something to eat, even if it is polluted.

In verse 13 the Lord says ‘thus shall the children of Israel eat defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them’ (for YHWH driving the Israelites out see Jer 8:3; 16:15; 24:9; 27:10,15), Ezekiel’s starvation diet teaches his fellow Israelites a double lesson: it predicts the forthcoming siege of Jerusalem and also the defilement of the exile that would follow it. The may mean that the food they will eat abroad is defiled since it will not be slaughtered, produced, handled and prepared in accordance with the dietary laws in the Torah. It could also mean that they will be defiled by adopting heathen manners and customs during the Exile (cp. Hos 9:3-4 for a similar sentiment).

Even though Ezekiel was receiving these directions while in a prophetic trance his priestly upbringing seems to have automatically triggered an immediate protest at the instructions concerning the bread. That his problem concerns the use of human excrement as fuel is clear from YHWH’s response in v.15: ‘Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.’ Bread baked over dried cow manure will still be defiled but perhaps to Ezekiel it seems a little less revolting. In any case, it will still sound disgusting and memorably make the point to his audience.

Ezekiel’s request for relief begins with a passionate outburst ‘Ah Lord God!’ and he goes on to explain that thus far his life has not been ‘polluted.’ One would think that Ezekiel’s objection is based on either the regulations concerning unlawful mixing (Lev 19:19; Deut 22:9) or on the strict rules about the disposal of human waste (Deut 23:12-14). However, he mentions neither of these but gives as his reason (‘for’ v.14) the fact that he had never done the following things:

  • Eaten an animal that died of itself (Lev 11:39; 17:15; 22:8; Deut 14:21, cp. Ezek 44:31).
  • Eaten an animal that was torn in pieces (Ex 22:31; Lev 22:8).
  • Eaten abominable flesh – this was meat left over from peace offerings and not eaten by the third day (Lev19:7).

These things bear no relation to baking bread over human excrement but Ezekiel seems to be asserting that he has kept all the dietary regulations since his youth, and cites these three cases in point. It is commendable that Ezekiel lived a blameless life before his prophetic call and that during his ministry his conscience was so sensitive that he instinctively wanted to live his life in obedience to God’s requirements. What a great lesson and example for us today!

After granting Ezekiel a concession on the fuel YHWH further declares: ‘Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem: and they shall eat bread by weight, and with care; and they shall drink water by measure, and with astonishment: That they may want bread and water, and be astonished one with another, and consume away for their iniquity.’ Ezekiel 4:16-17

‘staff of bread’ – means supply of bread, that which human beings depend on for survival. See also Lev 26:26; Psa 105:16; Isa 3:1; Ezek 5:16; 14:13. The siege of Jerusalem will result in the rationing of food and water. Bread will be doled out by weight and water by measure. The people will partake of their daily rations ‘with astonishment’ (extreme fear and apprehension) and will ‘consume away for their iniquity,’ i.e. they will waste away. Ezekiel uses this same expression three times when prophesying YHWH’s judgement (4:17; 24:23; 33:10).

This drama symbolizes and emphasizes the severity of the judgement that will befall Jerusalem. The scarcity of food and water will lead to desperation and despair among the people. This judgment is portrayed as a consequence of the people’s sin and disobedience.

5:1-4 A HAIRCUT AND SHAVE

Again addressing him as ‘Mortal’ YHWH reveals to Ezekiel details of the fourth drama that he must enact. He is to take a sharp knife and shave his head and beard. Using a knife as a razor is a powerful depiction of the judgement that will come upon the people of Jerusalem. The shaving of the head and beard was a sign of mourning (Isa 22:12; Jer 16:6) or disgrace (2 Sam 10:4; Mic 1:16) in ancient Near Eastern cultures and Israelites were forbidden by the law (Lev 19:27; 21:5; Deut 14:1) to practise this custom.

Using balances Ezekiel is to weigh and divide the hair that he has shaved off. This intimates that God is supervising the judgements (see 5:12; 6:12). Unlike the previous three dramas (chapter 4), in this case Ezekiel is to perform the symbolic actions AFTER the set number of days he has to lie on one side or the other (‘when the days of the (mock) siege are fulfilled,’ 5:2).

  • He is to burn one third of the hair ‘in the midst of the city,’ i.e. on his brick representing Jerusalem. This symbolizes the destruction of Jerusalem by fire and of its inhabitants by famine and pestilence (5:12).
  • He is to strike another third of the hair with a sword symbolizing that many people will suffer a violent death in battle.
  • He is to throw the remaining third to the winds, symbolizing the dispersion of the people of Judah.
  • He is to take a small number of the scattered hairs and bind them in the hem of his garment. He then has to take some of these and burn them in the fire. This indicates that even a remnant (symbolizing either those who survive the Babylonian invasion and siege or those who remain faithful to YHWH) will not be spared from God’s judgement but will find themselves in desperate circumstances. This action emphasizes the severity of the consequences of disobedience.

We now move into the next section which begins with an oracle against Jerusalem (5:5-17) in which YHWH explains the symbolism of the haircut and shave in 5:1-4.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

NEHEMIAH 13:1-3

Posted on by writtenexposition

Nehemiah chapter 13 concludes the book of Nehemiah and provides insight into the reforms implemented by Nehemiah upon his return to Jerusalem from Persia. The background to chapter 13 may be summarised as follows:

BACKGROUND TO NEHEMIAH CHAPTER 13

Nehemiah, a Jewish cupbearer to king Artaxerxes I (465-424 BCE) of Persia, received news from home about the deteriorating state of Jerusalem and its broken walls. He therefore sought permission from the king for leave of absence from his job at Susa in order to return to Jerusalem, rebuild the walls and restore the glory of the city.

Having obtained the king’s blessing and support, Nehemiah travelled to Jerusalem in 445 BCE (2:1; 5:14) and rallied the people to rebuild the walls. Despite some local opposition, the walls were completed in fifty-two days (6:15). Nehemiah then focused on the spiritual renewal of the Jewish community. After twelve years in Jerusalem (5:14; 13:6) Nehemiah returned to the Persian court in 433 BCE. He must have continued to receive news from Jerusalem because he soon became aware that, in a spiritual sense, things were not progressing well there since his departure.

In chapter 13, Nehemiah returns to Jerusalem after an unspecified period of absence in Babylon. The date was probably 430 or 429 BCE. True enough, he finds that the people have reverted to various forms of disobedience and have neglected the laws of God. This final chapter highlights several significant events:

13:1-3 SEPARATION RENEWED

13:4-9 EXPULSION OF TOBIAH FROM THE TEMPLE

13:10-14 REORGANISATION OF THE LEVITES

13:15-22 RESTORATION OF SABBATH OBSERVANCE

13:23-29 PROBLEM OF EXOGAMOUS MARRIAGES

13: 30-31 SUMMARY OF NEHEMIAH’S CULTIC REFORMS

13:1-3 SEPARATION RENEWED

‘On that day’ (‘at that time’ i.e. in Nehemiah’s era) there was a public reading from the ‘book of Moses’ (cf. 2 Chron 25:4.; 35:12; Neh 8:1). This is certainly a reference to the torah (first five books of the Old Testament) since vv. 1b-2 cite Deut 23:3-6; a section of law dealing with persons excluded from Israelite worship. When the passage was read aloud the people learned that Ammonites or Moabites were specifically excluded from any religious assembly of Israel until ten generations had passed. This rule was to last forever. Interestingly, the reasons given for that do not include the origin of the two nations from the incestuous sexual relations each of Lot’s daughters had with him (Gen 19:30-38). Rather, the prohibition was based on on historical events. These two nations had opposed the Israelites after the exodus from Egypt and had hired a non-Israelite prophet called Balaam to curse them (Num 22-24). This, in turn, triggered a curse on them in accordance with God’s promise to Abraham in Gen 12:2-4. Although he could not actually bring himself to curse the Israelites Balaam nevertheless advised the Moabites how to lead them into sin (Num 31:16; 2 Pet 2:15; Jude 11; Rev 2:14).

MOAB

The Bible has nothing good to say about the Moabites or Ammonites but Moab in particular is singled out for criticism. The prophet Jeremiah gives a penetrating assessment of this inveterate enemy of the Israelites in his book:

‘Moab hath been at ease from his youth, and he hath settled on his lees, and hath not been emptied from vessel to vessel, neither hath he gone into captivity: therefore his taste remained in him, and his scent is not changed.‘ Jer 48:11

Moab, as we have mentioned, had a bad beginning. Nevertheless, like many who oppose God and his people today, everything seemed to go well for them. Their history was characterized by comfort and prosperity. Unlike Israel, nothing disturbed or interfered with their lives of ease. They were never taken into captivity. Jeremiah paints a word picture from the ancient process of wine-making. Totally at ease in its wickedness, unthinking and unconcerned about its sinful idolatry, never having yearned for deliverance, Moab went to rot.

Jeremiah’s metaphorical language conveys a sense of stagnation and lack of transformation. Despite being a nation that had been established for a long time, Moab had never undergone significant changes or been refined through challenging experiences. As a result, the character and behaviour of the Moabites remained unchanged, they were self-assured and unyielding. This important verse condemns Moab’s pride and self-reliance, suggesting that their failure to grow spiritually and morally would lead to their downfall and judgment from God. Devastation would come upon Moab as a consequence of their actions.

After the public reading of the law a ‘separation’ (Ezr 9:1; 10:11; Neh 10:28) of ‘the mixture’ took place. Not just Ammonites and Moabites were separated, but all foreigners. Intermarriage with the Canaanite nations had been forbidden because family relationships with idolators was perceived as likely to cause a turning away from the worship of Yahweh, the one true God (Deut 7:3-4). This problem seems to have plagued the Israelites throughout their history. During the era of Ezra and Nehemiah at least three attempts were made over a period of thirty years (468-429 BCE) to resolve the issue. Although these measures were fairly drastic (e.g. mass divorce, covenant not to intermarry), they were not entirely successful (Ezra 9-10; Neh 9:2; 10:28-30; 13:1-3). Nehemiah returns to the topic of unacceptable marriages later in the chapter.

The New Testament teaches the same general principle; that when it comes to spiritual matters a mixture never produces positive results. Every so often there must be a return to the word of God; accompanied by self-assessment leading to remedial action. 2 Corinthians 6:14-18:

‘Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.’

Nehemiah 13:4-14

Nehemiah 13:15-31

Posted in Exposition

OUTLINE OF THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL

Posted on by writtenexposition

The precise dates given throughout the book of Ezekiel show that his prophecies centred on a specific major event in the history of Judah, that is, the Fall of Jerusalem in 587 BCE. The book therefore divides into two main sections: prophecies relating to the ten years leading up to the Fall of Jerusalem ( chapters 1-32) and prophecies relating to time after the Fall of Jerusalem (chapters 33-48).

The material is arranged in five blocks:

PART 1 – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO THE PROPHETIC MINISTRY – CHAPTERS 1-3

1:1-3 – Introduction and superscription

1:4-28 – Vision of the glory of YHWH

2:1 – 3:27 – Ezekiel’s Commission

PART 2 – ORACLES OF WARNING TO ISRAEL AND JUDAH – CHAPTERS 4-24

4:1-5:4 – The siege of Jerusalem portrayed in symbolic acts

5:5 – 17 – A prophetic sermon directed against Jerusalem

6:1 – 7: 27 – A prophecy of judgement on the land of Israel

8:1 – 11:25 – A vision of God’s glory leaving the Temple

12:1 – 14:23 – False Prophets

15:1-8 – Jerusalem as a useless charred vine

16:1-63 – Jerusalem as Yahweh’s adulterous wife

17:1-24 – The allegory of two eagles and a vine

18:1-32 – Individual responsibility

19: 1-14 – A lament over the rulers of Israel

20: 1-49 – A review of Israel’s history

21:1-32 – The sword of destruction

22:1- 31 – Sinful Jerusalem

23:1-49 – Two unfaithful sisters

24:1-14 – Sayings on the cooking pot

24:15-27 – The death of Ezekiel’s wife

PART 3 – ORACLES AGAINST THE SURROUNDING NATIONS – CHAPTERS 25-32

25:1-7 – Against Ammon

25:8-11 – Against Moab

25:12-14 – Against Edom

25:15-17 – Against the Philistines

26:1 – 28: 19 – Against Tyre

28:20 -26 – Against Sidon

29:1 – 32:16 – Against Egypt

PART 4 – A MESSAGE OF HOPE AND RESTORATION -CHAPTERS 33-39

33:1-20 – The prophet as watchman

33:21-22 – News of the Fall of Jerusalem

33:23-29 – Prophecy against those who remained in Jerusalem

33:30-33 – God addresses Ezekiel: a prophet whose predictions had been fulfilled

34:1-31 – The false shepherds of Israel and the true shepherd

35:1-15 – Oracle against Edom

36:1-38 – Renewal promised to Israel

37:1 -14 – The valley of dry bones

37: 15-28 – Two sticks – reunification

38:1-39:29 – Oracle against Gog of Magog

PART 5 – THE NEW ISRAEL – CHAPTERS 40-48

40:1 – 43:12 – The vision of a new temple

43:13 – 46:24 – The worship in the new temple

47:1-12 – The life-giving river

47:13-48:35 – The Land and the City

Posted in Roman names

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 2)

Posted on by writtenexposition

READING: ACTS chapters 21-25

THE PREQUEL TO PAUL’S DEFENCE BEFORE KING AGRIPPA

THE ( LEGAL) BACKGROUND

After completing his third missionary journey Paul made his way to Phoenicia, landing at Tyre. He spent seven days with the Christians there before sailing down the coast to Ptolomais, a port near Caesarea Maritima. He spent a day with the Christians before travelling to Caesarea, where he stayed at Philip’s house. There a prophet, Agabus, foretold Paul’s troubles at Jerusalem. Although the Christians tried to persuade Paul not to venture to Jerusalem he would not be deterred (Acts 21:1-16). The opportunity to to preach to the large crowd of Jews from near and far who would gather there for the Festival of Pentecost was too good to be missed.

The Jerusalem Christians suggested that Paul ought to display conformity to his identity as a Jew by going through the rite of purification. This he did, probably in accordance with his principle set out in 1 Cor 9:22, paying for himself and four other men (21:18-26). While there Paul was noticed by Jews from Asia Minor (probably hardliners from Ephesus) who had earlier seen Trophimus from Ephesus in Jerusalem with him and assumed that Paul had brought him into the temple. They incited the crowd to physically attack Paul. The uproar was such that the Roman military intervened to quell the riot.

The Jews complained that Paul had taken a Greek into a section of the temple that was out of bounds to non-Jews but then stated the real problem as him teaching against the Jewish people, the torah and the temple (20: 28-29). The Roman authorities gave Paul leave to address the quietened crowd which listened attentively to his story of conversion up until he said that he had been sent to take the gospel to the Gentiles (22:21-23). Again there was another loud commotion as the Jews called for Paul’s death. The Roman commander, who may not have understood Paul’s speech to the crowd if spoken in Hebrew or Aramaic, wished to flog Paul in order to get the truth out of him but discovered that he could not do so as that would have violated Paul’s rights as a Roman citizen. He therefore commanded that Paul appear before the Sanhedrin so that the charges against him might be clarified (22:30).

Paul, knowing that the Sanhedrin was composed of Pharisees and Sadducees, shouted that he was a Pharisee and was being tried for the hope of the resurrection. He thus divided the council on this theological point (the Sadducees did not believe in resurrection) and the meeting was halted with no resolution to the problem of the charges, which Paul claimed had changed from teaching against the people, the law and the temple to the question of resurrection. The Roman commander, Claudius Lysias, therefore decided to send Paul for formal investigation by the Procurator, Antonius Felix. Details of a Jewish plot to kill Paul were revealed to the Roman authorities by Paul’s nephew with the result that Paul was quickly transferred to Caesarea, the seat of Roman government in Judaea.

Five days later the trial before Felix commenced. The High Priest Ananias and some other members of the Sanhedrin attended and were represented by a lawyer named Tertullus who claimed that Paul, as well as opposing matters associated with the Jewish religion, was a revolutionary who incited political opposition to Rome. Paul, while defending himself, stated in 24:17: ‘Now after many years I came to bring alms to my nation, and offerings.’ Felix, who was well-known to be a corrupt official, did not find Paul guilty of the charges but, having heard Paul mention a large sum of money, neither did he release him. Paul remained imprisoned for two years at Caesarea, during which Felix interviewed him several times, hoping to receive a bribe.

When Felix  was recalled to Rome in disgrace he left Paul still in prison for his successor to deal with. Felix’s replacement was Porcius Festus, who arrived in 58 or 59 CE. The Jewish authorities lost no time in approaching the new governor, asking that Paul be transferred to Jerusalem for trial, hoping to hijack Paul on the journey and put him to death. Festus refused their request but offered them the opportunity to resume their case against Paul at Caesarea. This hearing took place eleven days later.

Luke does not specify the charges brought against Paul but says that they were ‘many’ and ‘serious’ (25:7) and that the Jews could not prove them. Wishing to ingratiate himself with the Jews Festus asked Paul to go to Jerusalem and be tried there, with Festus himself as the judge. Realising that he would not get justice in either Caesarea or Jerusalem, and that the proposed transfer posed a threat to his personal security, Paul exercised his right as a Roman citizen to appeal to the emperor. (25:11). This last recourse ensured that he would remain under Roman protection.

Not long after Festus took up the reins of procuratorial power King Herod Agrippa II and his sister Bernice paid a state visit to welcome the new governor. This social call from local royalty, which would have involved lavish entertaining, lasted ‘many days’, according to Acts 25:14, During the course of the visit Festus told Agrippa about Saul’s case. Agrippa said that he would like to hear Paul himself so Festus arranged for this to take place on the following day.

THE SCENE

The hearing took place in an auditorium at Caesarea Maritima. Caesarea was previously a Phoenician settlement that had been rebuilt by Herod the Great between 22 and 9 BCE and named in honour of his patron, the Roman emperor Caesar Augustus (27 BCE-14 CE). The city was one of Herod’s spectacular building projects and, constructed of gleaming white limestone, must have been an impressive sight. It was also a major feat of engineering.

Using huge stones and hydraulic concrete Herod created an artificial harbour by building a large breakwater. Along with a palace, temples, theatre and amphitheatre the city featured a modern underground drainage system and an aquaduct to transport water to the city from from the springs at Mount Carmel eight miles away.

When the Romans annexed Judaea in 6 CE Herod’s palace at Caesarea became the governors’ residence and the city the administrative headquarters of the Roman regime in the province. Paul would have been well acquainted with Caesarea and would have visited it many times (e.g. Acts 9:30; 18:22; 21:7-8; 23:31-27:3).

The following day Agrippa and Bernice arrived at the auditorium ‘with great pomp’ (phantasía 25:23). As well as Festus the hearing was attended by senior military commanders (chilíarchos) and by the leading citizens of Caesarea. Most of these would have been Gentiles.

One can imagine the spectacle as Agrippa and Bernice left their chariot and, waving to the crowd, entered the auditorium. There they were respectfully greeted by the military officers in shining uniforms and by the well-dressed dignitaries and their wives. Luke draws a contrast between Agrippa and Paul.

25:23 Agrippa came, Paul was brought.

25:23; 26:29 Agrippa entered with great pomp, Paul was in chains.

25:23 Agrippa was accompanied by Bernice, Paul stood alone.

Before the hearing began Festus addressed a few introductory remarks to the assembled company. He introduced Paul and summarized the case history, as he viewed it, up to the time of Paul’s appeal. In the course of his remarks he asserted Paul’s innocence of any crime (25:25, see also 25:18; 26:31). Although mentioning the appeal to Augustus he did not emphasize Paul’s Roman citizenship but instead dwelt on Jewish hostility towards him. Before handing the proceedings over to Agrippa Festus explained that the objective of the hearing was to enable him to compile a report advising the imperial court of the charges against Paul.

What followed was, in effect, a show trial. It may partly have been to enable Festus to send a report but was mostly for the entertainment of his guests. The views of Festus and Agrippa on Paul’s guilt or innocence were irrelevant. Paul had appealed to Caesar, Nero would decide.

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 1)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 3)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Bibliography)

Posted in Exposition

KING JOSIAH OF JUDAH – BIBLIOGRAPHY

Posted on by writtenexposition

BOOKS

Amit, Y., 2006. Essays on Ancient Israel in its Near Eastern Context: A Tribute to Nadav Na’aman. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns

Barrick, W. B., 2002. The King And The Cemeteries: Toward A New Understanding Of Josiah’s Reform. Leiden: Brill

Barton, J. and Muddiman, J., 2007. The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Beacon, R., 1892. Thoughts on 2 Chronicles, Addison, IL: Bible Truth Publishers

Blenkinsopp, J., 1986. Prophecy and Canon: A Contribution to the Study of Jewish Origins, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press

Bright, J., 2000. A History Of Israel. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press

Brueggemann, W., 2000. 1 & 2 Kings. Macon: GE: Smyth & Helwys Publishing

Day, J., 2010. Prophecy and the Prophets in Ancient Israel: Proceedings of the Oxford Old Testament Seminar, London: T & T Clark

Finegan, J., 1999. Handbook Of Biblical Chronology: Principles Of Time Reckoning In The Ancient World And Problems Of Chronology In The Bible. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson.

Gabriel, R. A., 2003. The Military History Of Ancient Israel. Westport, Conn.: Praeger

Goldingay, J. and Allen, L., 2007. Uprooting And Planting: Essays On Jeremiah For Leslie Allen. New York: T & T Clark

Grabbe, L. and Nissinen, M., 2011. Constructs of Prophecy in the Former and Latter Prophets and Other Texts, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature

Graham, M., Knoppers, G. and McKenzie, S., 2003. The Chronicler as Theologian. London: T & T Clark International

Gray, R., 1833. Josiah and Cyrus, Two Great Objects of Divine Notice, in the Scheme of Revelation. London: J. G. & F. Rivington

Harrison, R. K., 2009. Jeremiah And Lamentations. Nottingham, England: Inter-Varsity Press.

Jones, F. N., 1993. The Chronology Of The Old Testament: A Return To The Basics. The Woodlands Texas: KingsWord Press

Knapp, C., 1983. The Kings Of Judah And Israel. Neptune, N.J.: Loizeaux Brothers

Kratz, R. G. and Kurtz, P. M., 2015. Historical And Biblical Israel. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press

Lemche, N., 1998. The Israelites In History And Tradition. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

Liverani, M., Peri, C. and Davies, P., 2007. Israel’s History And The History Of Israel. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Longman, T., Enns, P. and Strauss, M., 2013. The Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Publishing Group

Lundbom, J., 2004. ‘Jeremiah’, in The Anchor Bible, New York, NY: Doubleday

Lundbom, J., 2013. Jeremiah Closer Up. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press

Monroe, L. A. S., 2011. Josiah’s Reform and the Dynamics of Defilement. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press

Porter, S., 2009. Dictionary Of Biblical Criticism And Interpretation. London: Routledge

Prosic, T., 2004. The Development and Symbolism of Passover until 70 CE. London: T & T Clark International

Rawlinson, G., 1879. ‘1 & 2 Chronicles’, in Student’s Commentary On The Bible: Old Testament Vol II Joshua -Esther. London: John Murray

Rawlinson, G., 1879. ‘1 & 2 Kings’, in Student’s Commentary On The Bible: Old Testament Vol II Joshua -Esther. London: John Murray

Rossier, H., 1993. Meditations On The Second Book Of Chronicles. Sunbury, Pa.: Believers Bookshelf, Inc.

Venema, G. J., 2004. Reading Scripture in the Old Testament, Leiden: Brill

Voegelin, E., Sandoz, E., Weiss, G. and Petropulos, W., 2001. The Collected Works Of Eric Voegelin: Volume 14: Order And History, Volume I, Israel And Revelation, Columbia: Missouri University Press

Walton, J., Matthews, V. and Chavalas, M., 2004. The IVP Bible Background Commentary. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press

Wolfendale, J., 1892. The Preacher’s Complete Homiletic Commentary on the First and Second Books of the Chronicles. New York: Funk & Wagnalls

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Ahlström, G., 1981. King Josiah and the dwd of Amos vi. 10. Journal of Semitic Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.7-9

Avioz, M., 2007. Josiah’s Death in the Book of Kings. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, Vol. 83, No.4, pp.359-36

Ben-Dov, J., 2008. Writing as Oracle and as Law: New Contexts for the Book-Find of King Josiah. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 127 , No. 2 (Summer, 2008), pp.223-239

Claburn, W., 1973. The Fiscal Basis of Josiah’s Reforms. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp.11-22

Delamarter, S., 2004. The Death of Josiah in Scripture and Tradition: Wrestling with the Problem of Evil? Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp.29-60

Galil, G., 1993. Geba’-Ephraim and the Northern Boundary of Judah in the days of Josiah, Revue Biblique, Vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 358-367

Glatt-Gilad, D., 1996, The Role of Huldah’s Prophecy in the Chronicler’s Portrayal of Josiah’s Reform, Biblica, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp.16-31

Hamori, E., 2013. The Prophet and the Necromancer: Women’s Divination for Kings. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 132, No. 4, pp.827-843

Hasegawa, S., 2017. Josiah’s Death: Its Reception History as Reflected in the Books of Kings and Chronicles. Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, Vol. 129, No. 4, pp.522-535

Heltzer, M., 2000. Some Questions Concerning the Economic Policy of Josiah, King of Judah. Israel Exploration Journal, Vol. 50 (1/2), pp.105-108

Janzen, D., 2013. The Sins of Josiah and Hezekiah: A Synchronic Reading of the Final Chapters of Kings. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.349-370

Jonker, L. C., 2012. Huldah’s Oracle: The Origin of the Chronicler’s Typical Style, Verbum et Ecclesia, Vol. 33, No.1, pp.1-7

Leuchter, M., 2009. »The Prophets« and »The Levites« in Josiah’s Covenant Ceremony. Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, Vol. 121, No.1, pp.31-47

Malamat, A., 1950. The Last Wars of the Kingdom of Judah, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.218-227

Markl, D., 2014. No Future without Moses: The Disastrous End of 2 Kings 22–25 and the Chance of the Moab Covenant (Deuteronomy 29–30). Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 133, No. 4, pp.711-728

Na’aman, N., 2011. The “Discovered Book” and the Legitimation of Josiah’s Reform. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp.47-62

Na’aman, N., 2013, Notes on the Temple ‘Restorations’ of Jehoash and Josiah. Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp.640-651

Mitchell, C, 2006. The Ironic Death of Josiah in 2 Chronicles. CBQ, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp.421-435

Paton, L. B., 1898. The Religion of Judah from Josiah to Ezra, The Biblical World, Vol. 11, No.6, pp.410-421.

Talshir, Z., 1996. The Three Deaths of Josiah and the Strata of Biblical Historiography (2 Kings XXIII 29-30; 2 Chronicles XXXV 20-5; 1 Esdras 1 23-31), Vetus Testamentum, 46 (Fasc. 2, (Apr.,1996), pp.213-236

Wilson, A. M., 1892. The Character and Work of Josiah, The Old and New Testament Student, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp.276-284

Yadin, Y., 1976. Beer-sheba: The High Place Destroyed by King Josiah. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, Vol. 222 (April), pp.5-17

See my posts:

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Chronicles

The Death of King Josiah of Judah

Posted in General

THE DEATH OF KING JOSIAH OF JUDAH (640-609 BCE)

Posted on by writtenexposition

THE UNEXPECTED END OF A GOOD KING

Since King Josiah of Judah (640-609 BCE) is unknown in secular history, records of his death are only to be found in three religious texts. These are the canonical books 2 Kings (23:29-30) and 2 Chronicles (35:20-25) plus the deuterocanonical book 1 Esdras (1:25-32). The accounts differ in some details but all agree that Josiah met his end as the result of an encounter with Pharaoh Neco of Egypt.

The biblical record of Josiah concentrates mainly on internal affairs and gives us neither the big picture as regards geopolitics, nor a summary of Josiah’s foreign policy and his manoeuvres in response to the power plays between the superpowers of Assyria, Egypt and Bablylonia. One therefore has to form a conjecture of the sequence of events from information about the period available in external historical sources.

The might of the Assyrian empire had been declining for many years, certainly since before Josiah came to the throne. The Egyptians, the Elamites, the Arabian tribes and others had all revolted, and internal power struggles further weakened the massive empire. Under Ashurbanipal (669-631 BCE) the Assyrians had some success in quelling revolts but things worsened after his death. By the end of Josiah’s reign the Babylonians, under Cyaxares the Mede (625-585 BCE) and the Chaldean Nabopolassar (626-605 BCE), father of Nebuchadnezzar, were coming into ascendancy. It would seem that the Egyptians under their new Pharaoh Neco, although traditionally hostile towards their Assyrians overlords, preferred a weak Assyria to a strong Babylonia, and had committed themselves to helping the Assyrians against the Babylonians.

‘While Josiah was king, Pharaoh Necho king of Egypt went up to the Euphrates River to help the king of Assyria. ‘ 2 Kgs 23:29a (NIV)

NB. There has been ongoing controversy over the translation of this verse. The KJV has ‘went up against’ while modern translations like the NIV and ESV say ‘went up to.’ For a technical discussion arguing for a retention of the KJV translation and maintaining that Egypt did not help Assyria see F. N. Jones, 1993, The Chronology of the Old Testament:
A Return to the Basics pp. 184-188. He contends that ‘the king of Assyria’ refers to the Neo-Babylonian Nabopolassar (‘the new possessor of the title “King of Assyria” p.188) who had recently defeated the Assyrians. This article, however, proceeds on the basis that Neco went up to help the Assyrians against the Babylonians, as per the modern translations.

The Babylonian Chronicle for 609 BCE confirms the information given in 2 Kings 23:29 that an Egyptian army crossed the River Euphrates in order to help the Assyrians under Asshur-uballit fight a last ditch attempt to retake Haran from the Babylonians. The Babylonians had taken and destroyed Nineveh, capital of the Assyrian empire in 612 BCE. The Assyrians had set up a refugee government in the town of Haran (in modern day Turkey) but had fled from there when it too was captured by the Babylonians in 610. They needed an Egypto-Assyrian victory in order to survive.

It is probable that Josiah, who is thought to have been an unwilling vassal of Egypt for some years before then, had foreseen that the Babylonians would emerge the superior power and had thrown in his lot with them. Some reckon that he therefore went to Megiddo with the express intention of engaging in military action against Neco and the Egyptian army in order to detain them on their way north to help the Assyrians retake Haran. The delay Josiah intended to cause would hinder the progress of the Egyptian reinforcements towards the Assyrians and make a Babylonian victory more likely.

‘King Josiah marched out to meet him in battle, but Necho faced him and killed him at Megiddo.’ 2 Kgs 23:29b (NIV)

2 Chronicles makes no mention of the Assyrians but does say that Neco was heading for Carchemish in great haste (2 Chron 35:20-21).

Some scholars think that Josiah had been summoned to Megiddo by Neco. Neco had ascended the Egyptian throne just the previous year (610 BCE) and may have wished to meet and receive homage from his Judaean vassal. This type of request was standard procedure (e.g. Ahaz’s trip to Damascus to meet Tiglath-pileser, 2 Kgs 16:10) and, as Neco assured Josiah, was not an occasion for hostilities (2 Chron 25:31; 1 Esdras 1:26-27)

Whatever the motive, Josiah went to Megiddo with war in mind. Various reasons have been proposed:

a) he was filled with religious and nationalistic fervour as a result of his reforms. He was so keen to fight the old enemy, Egypt, that he was blind to reason.

b) he overestimated his military capabilities.

C) as has already been suggested, he calculated that there would be a change in the balance of international power in favour of the Babylonians and hoped to curry favour by obstructing the Egyptian armed forces on their way to assist the Assyrians.

According to 2 Kings 23:29-30 Josiah was killed at Megiddo and his dead body transferred from there by chariot to Jerusalem for burial.

According to 2 Chronicles 35:23-24 archers shot and mortally wounded him at Megiddo. His officers transferred him into another chariot which brought him to Jerusalem, where he died and was buried.

According to 1 Esdras 1:30-31 he was not injured or killed in battle but was overcome by a weakness, transferred to a second chariot and taken to Jerusalem, where he died and was buried: ‘The king said to his servants, “Take me away from the battle, for I am very weak.” And immediately his servants took him out of the line of battle. He got into his second chariot; and after he was brought back to Jerusalem he died, and was buried in the tomb of his ancestors.’ 1 Esdras 1:30-31

Pharaoh Neco went on to the Euphrates to help with the assault on Haran. Near Carchemish his forces were routed by the Babylonians. Neco and his army retreated and, on his way back to Egypt some three months later, Neco summoned Josiah’s son and successor Jehoahaz to his camp at Riblah on the Orontes (near Lebanon). He took Jehoahaz captive and transported him to Egypt, installing his brother Jehoiakim as an Egyptian puppet and vassal. Although he paid dearly for it, Josiah’s delaying action may have successfully caused Neco’s failure to save Assyria.

One might wonder how Josiah’s untimely demise squares with the oracle of Huldah the prophetess which appeared to promise him a good death (2 Kgs 22:20; 2 Chron 34:28). Upon closer inspection, however, Huldah’s prophecy only promised him a peaceful burial (‘thou shalt be gathered into thy grave in peace’ ) i.e. his country would not be at war.

Huldah’s prophecy provides one of the explanations given in the Bible for Josiah’s unexpected death. In those days in Judah the death of a king in battle would not have been regarded as heroic. Nor would it have been attributed to bad decision-making on his part or just plain ‘bad luck’. It would have been regarded as part of a chain of cause and effect. Evil behaviour resulted in punishment, righteous living was rewarded with prosperity and long life. According to this system of retribution Josiah must have done wrong! How could such a thing have happened to a righteous and godly young man whose life was marked by ‘goodness’ (2 Chron 35:26) and warranted the glowing assessment of 2 Kgs 23:25?

‘And like unto him was there no king before him, that turned to the Lord with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might, according to all the law of Moses; neither after him arose there any like him’

Three possible explanations (reading between the lines) were given:

1) Josiah did not listen to the word of God spoken through a foreign king – Pharaoh Neco.

‘Nevertheless Josiah would not turn his face from him, but disguised himself, that he might fight with him, and hearkened not unto the words of Necho from the mouth of God, and came to fight in the valley of Megiddo’ 2 Chron 35:22

2) Josiah died because of his grandfather Manasseh’s sins.

‘Because they have forsaken me, and have burned incense unto other gods, that they might provoke me to anger with all the works of their hands; therefore my wrath shall be kindled against this place, and shall not be quenched.’ 2 Kings 22:17

‘Notwithstanding the LORD turned not from the fierceness of his great wrath, wherewith his anger was kindled against Judah, because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked him withal.’ 2 Kgs 23:26

3) Josiah’s death was a mercy.

According to Huldah’s prophecy (2 Kgs 22:20; 2 Chron 34:28) Josiah would have a peaceful burial. His country was not on a war footing and he was spared the distress of the forthcoming Babylonian invasion.


LESSONS:

a. Do not involve yourself in conflicts that do not concern the Lord’s people. Neco’s battle was with Babylon, not Judah.

b. Be open to the prompting and leading of the Lord through personal circumstances. Josiah died because he failed to recognize and heed God’s word through Pharoah Neco. Often God prompts through people and circumstances as well as through his written word.

See my posts:

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Chronicles

King Josiah of Judah – Bibliography

Posted in Exposition

KING JOSIAH OF JUDAH in 2 Chronicles

Posted on by writtenexposition

READING: 2 Chronicles chapters 34-35

DIVISION

34:1-2 Opening Formula

34:3-5 Josiah’s religious purification of Jerusalem and Judah in his 12th regnal year

34:6-7 The extension of his activities to the northern tribal areas of Manasseh, Ephraim, Simeon, Naphtali, all Israel

34:8-18 Temple repairs and the finding of a torah scroll

34:19-28 Huldah’s oracle

34:29-32 Covenant-making

34:33 A summary verse

35:1-19 The Passover Celebration

35:20-27 The Death of King Josiah

THE JOSIAH ACCOUNT IN 2 CHRONICLES 34-35

34:1-2 Opening Formula

As in 2 Kings this introductory formula introduces the king and profiles his reign. Josiah was eight years old when he began to reign and the length of his reign was thirty-one years (640-609 BCE). He is commended for doing what was right in the sight of YHWH and like 2 Kgs 22:2 his name is linked with that of his ancestor David. The opening formula in 2 Kings gives us three facts; 1) his age at accession 2) the number of years he reigned 3) his mother’s name. The latter piece of information is not mentioned by the Chronicler. In both 2 Kings 22:2 and 2 Chron 34:2 Josiah is said to have deviated ‘neither to the right hand, nor to the left.’ Both formulae therefore immediately link Josiah to the book of Deuteronomy, where it is said that the model king should make a copy of the torah and read it all his life so that ‘he turn not aside from the commandment, to the right hand, or to the left.’

See my post: ‘King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings‘

34:3-5 Josiah’s religious purification of Jerusalem and Judah in his 12th year

Unlike the Kings account which seems unconcerned with chronology and telescopes the main events of Josiah’s career into just one year (his eighteenth), the Chronicler is at pains to emphasize that his reforms were a step-by-step process. According to 2 Chronicles 34:3 he had a religious awakening during his eighth regnal year (633/2 BCE) while he was still young (about 16 years of age). It was then that he began to seek YHWH. It does not seem that his advisers, whoever they were, during the early part of his reign were concerned to guide him in the ways of the Lord. Presumably, for the first sixteen years of his life, those advising him were pro-Assyrian, and his religious policies would therefore have been similar to those pursued by his father Amon. We are not told why it took him four years of ‘seeking after’ the Lord before launching his campaign to rid the land of idolatry in the twelth year of his reign. 2 Kings has the purge initiated following the discovery of a torah scroll in the Temple in his eighteenth year (621 BCE). Here in 2 Chronicles the reforms begin in his twelth year – a full six years before the discovery of the law-book. This sequence of events is the most noticeable difference between the accounts of 2 Kgs 22-23 and 2 Chron 34-35.

In his twelth year (c. 628 BCE), at age twenty, he began a purge aimed at ridding Judah and Jerusalem of the high places, the groves, the carved idols and the cast images and restoring the pure worship of YHWH. Verses 3b-5 give a fuller explanation of what he did in Jerusalem and Judah. He personally supervised the destruction of places of idolatry, of the images themselves and of objects related to their worship. The high places must have been those which his grandfather Manasseh had rebuilt but at which the people only sacrificed to YHWH (33:3, 17). Verse 4 clearly states that the altars of the Baals were destroyed by him and that, as part of the same event, so were the images that were located high above them. It is not clear what these images were, possibly they had something to do with sun worship. The Chronicler does not record him purging the Jerusalem Temple, this had already been done by Manasseh ( 33:15-16). The purification of the temple mentioned in v. 8 would have been to sanctify it again through rituals after the completion of restoration works.

Verses 4b and 5 tell us that Josiah desecrated the graves of the idolatrous priests and burned their bones upon their altars. This was a crime for which the prophet Amos had denounced the king of Moab (Amos 2:1), yet the Chronicler passes no comment upon it. (cp. another passage about the disrespectful treatment of bones Jer 8:1-3). Perhaps this was seen as posthumous punishment for the idolaters, cremation being the punishment meted out to those regarded as false priests in Num16:35. Cremation is also prescribed as a punishment in Lev 20:14; 21:9 and Josh 7:25.

34:6-7 The extension of Josiah’s activities to the northern tribal areas of Manasseh, Ephraim, Simeon, Naphtali, all Israel

Taking advantage of Assyrian weakness at that time Josiah extended his campaign against idolatry into the territory that had been the Northern kingdom of Israel but was then part of the Assyrian empire. Although the Bible says little about his military exploits Josiah must have been strong enough to act independently and recover this territory from Assyrian control. The religious purge he conducted there was just as thorough as that in Judah:

‘In the towns of Manasseh, Ephraim and Simeon, as far as Naphtali, and in the ruins around them, he tore down the altars and the Asherah poles and crushed the idols to powder and cut to pieces all the incense altars throughout Israel. Then he went back to Jerusalem.’ 2 Chron 34:6-7 (NIV)

Thus Josiah set out on a personal, fanatical crusade against idolatry which, as clarified in 2 Kings 23:4-20, was implemented in three stages; 1) Judah and Jerusalem 2) Bethel 3) the towns of Samaria. Apart from the plural subject (they) at the beginning of v.4, the Chronicler, in 34:3-7, portrays Josiah himself as the one who toured the country systematically demolishing and burning;

‘he began to purge, he cut down, he broke..made dust, strewed, he burnt, so did he, when he had broken.’

2 Chron 34:4 and 2 Kgs 23:16 actually place him on site supervising the destruction.

34:8-18 Temple repairs and the finding of a torah scroll

The Chronicler comes now to the eighteenth year of Josiah which features so prominently in the 2 Kings account of his reign and relates the story of the finding of ‘a book of the law of the Lord given by Moses’ during restoration work on the Temple. Before this work by Josiah there seems to have been few changes made to the Temple since its construction by Solomon more than three hundred years earlier except;

* Some repairs by King Jehoash (2 Kgs 12:5-17).

* King Jotham built the upper gate of the temple (2 Kgs 15:35)

* King Ahaz made some structural changes on account of the king of Assyria (2 Kgs 16:17-18)

When money that had been given by people visiting the temple was brought out Hilkiah the priest found the law-book. This money appears to have been collected in large collection chests situated near the altar and watched over (2 Kgs 12:10; 22:4) by the ‘keepers of the threshold’ (Levites stationed at the door). Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan the scribe who told Josiah about it while reporting on the finances of the Temple restoration project. Shaphan then read ‘out of it’ to the king who was greatly affected by what he heard and instructed a committee to inquire of the Lord concerning the book.

34:19-28 Huldah’s oracle and 34:29-32 Covenant-making

For comments on the above topics see my post: ‘King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings‘

34:33 A summary verse

This verse emphasizes the role of the king in the religious purges and emphasizes that he ‘made’ the people serve the Lord. Compelled by Josiah, the commitment of the people to YHWH was superficial, there had been no inner change; they were still idolators at heart. Is it any wonder that his reforms had no permanent results, but died along with him? The Chronicler adds a comment of his own: ‘And all his days they departed not from following the Lord, the God of their fathers.’ There was no open idolatry for the rest of Josiah’s reign.

35:1-19 The Passover Celebration see also 1 Esdras 1:1-22

This Passover celebration, expressing renewed commitment to YHWH, is given prominence in the Chronicles account whereas it is mentioned but briefly in 2 Kings 23:21-23. Prior to this families would have observed the Passover in their own homes. This Passover, however was a public celebration in Jerusalem (35:1), in accordance with Deut 16:1-5. According to the Chronicler, there had never been a Passover like it (35:18). Much the same was said of Hezekiah’s Passover (2 Chron 30:26). From v.1 we learn that Josiah held it on the 14th day of the first month (Nisan). That was the correct date; Hezekiah’s celebration had been held a month later, on the 14th of the second month (2 Chron 30:15), and had lasted for two weeks rather than one (2 Chron 30:23).

By way of preparation for the great Passover Josiah set in motion the Temple service. For some reason he had to ‘urge’ the priests to take up their duties. He also organised the Levites, changing their responsibilities since they no longer carried the ark, see point a). They were to assist the priests in the Temple worship and in flaying the sacrificial animals. They are identified in v. 3 as teachers in Israel, a role formerly fulfilled by the priests (Jer 18:18; Hos 4:6) The obligations of the Levites are listed as:

a) To take the Ark of the Covenant back to its place in the Temple (35:3). It must have been stored elsewhere while the renovations were ongoing. It would no longer be a burden upon their shoulders i.e. its location in the Temple would be permanent so other duties would be allocated to them (35:11).

b) To serve the Lord their God and his people Israel (35:3).

c) To arrange themselves by families into divisions as appointed and decreed by David and Solomon (35:4)

d) To stand in the holy place in groups representing the subdivisions of each family(35:5)

e) To slaughter the Passover lambs (35:6)

f) To consecrate themselves (35:6)

g) To prepare the lambs for their fellow-Israelites (35:6).

THE SACRIFICIAL ANIMALS

The king, representing the nation and as the leading worshipper of YHWH, the national God, was the major supplier of animals for sacrifice. For this Passover he is said to have contributed 30,000 flock animals (lambs and kids) and 3000 bullocks.

2600 small animals and 300 oxen were willingly supplied by three men ( Hilkiah, Zechariah, Jehiel) who, all at the one time, shared the title ‘chief of the Temple.’ In other references to this position only one official bore the title (1 Chron 9:11; 2 Chron 31:13; Neh 11;11).

Other chiefs (named in v.9) donated 5000 small animals and 500 oxen. The sacrificial victims therefore numbered 41,400; 37,600 small animals and 3800 large animals.

35:10-19 With the priests and Levites in appointed stations the Passover began. The Levites slaughtered the sacrificial animals and passed the blood on to the priests who sprinkled it upon the altar. As this was a public Passover the blood could not be sprinkled on the side posts and upper door posts of family homes (Ex 12:7). The Levites butchered the cattle and prepared the pieces for the burnt offerings. They also roasted the Passover and boiled the consecrated offerings – distributing the cooked meat among the people. Since the priests were busy with the burnt offerings they and the Levites did not partake until later. The musicians and doorkeepers (Temple security) participated without having to leave their posts. Th Chronicler gives an extravagantly positive assessment of the occasion saying that there was never a Passover like it.

It is interesting to read, compare and contrast the major biblical Passovers:

1. In Egypt – at the Exodus. Exod 12;1-51

2. At Sinai. Num 9:1-5

3. In Canaan. Josh 5:10-12

4. Hezekiah’s Passover. 2 Chron 30:1-27

5. Josiah’s Passover 2 Kgs 23:21-23; 2 Chron 35:1-19

6. After the return from exile. Ezra 6:19-21

35:20-27 The Death of King Josiah

We are told nothing about the final thirteen years of King Josiah’s life. His death as a result of a confrontation with Pharaoh Neco at Megiddo is recorded. He was buried in one of the royal tombs and mourned by all Judah and Jerusalem, including the prophet Jeremiah who wrote a lament for him. In 2 Chronicles Jeremiah is mentioned here (35;25) and also in 36:12, 22, and 22. We know from an oracle pronounced against Shallum (Jehoahaz), a son of Josiah, that Jeremiah considered Josiah to be a just man:

‘Shalt thou reign, because thou closest thyself in cedar? did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice, and then it was well with him? He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well with him: was not this to know me? saith the LORD.’ Jer 22:15-16

See my posts:

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Kings

The Death of King Josiah of Judah

King Josiah of Judah – Bibliography