Tag: Judah

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 24:15-27: The Death of Ezekiel’s Wife

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 24 opens with YHWH revealing to the prophet on 15 January, 588 BCE that the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem has begun that very day. Ezekiel then delivers the parable of the cooking pot to his fellow-exiles. It depicts Jerusalem as a cauldron filled with ‘choice cuts’ (its inhabitants) set on a blazing fire (the siege). The pot has corrosion (the bloodguilt and violence that characterises the city). Its contents must be emptied into the fire; then the pot will be heated until red hot in order to be purified.

This next section (24:15-27) transforms the metaphor of the cooking pot into a tragic living reality for Ezekiel. Just as the siege is announced to Ezekiel in 24:1 by a word from YHWH likewise he is informed of his forthcoming personal loss by a specific divine word in 24:15. That word commands Ezekiel to use his personal grief to perform a prophetic sign-act to the exiles.

DIVISION

15-18 YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE
19-24 EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION
25-27 YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY

EXPOSITION

YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE (15-18)

This section (24:15-27) begins with YHWH addressing Ezekiel using the customary prophetic word formula ‘son of Adam.’ The oracle that follows focuses on a tragic personal loss for Ezekiel. YHWH will suddenly (‘at a blow’) take away the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ but Ezekiel is forbidden to mourn, weep, shed tears, sigh aloud, cover his beard, eat the bread of men, or sit barefoot and bareheaded.

It is unclear whether that which is forbidden is petitionary mourning (as in Joel 1:13-14) in response to the announcement – i.e. asking the Lord to reverse his decision – or posthumous mourning; after the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ has died. The traditional view is that posthumous mourning is in view. Once the ‘delight of his eyes’ is taken away Ezekiel is not to engage in a traditional public show of grief. The acts of mourning which are forbidden are ritual rather than emotional. Emotional mourning is permitted; he can mourn inwardly and sigh softly but must eat, drink and dress as normal.

It is only when we come to v.18 that we learn that Ezekiel’s ‘dearest treasure’ (NLT) is his wife: So I spake unto the people in the morning: and at even my wife died; and I did in the morning as I was commanded. This is reported in the first person (‘I’) but Ezekiel does not tell us his wife’s name or age and does not indicate how he felt or thought when his loved one’s imminent death was announced.

The fulfilment of the prophecy is swift but the timeline is unclear. Do the two mentions of ‘morning’ refer to the same morning or two different mornings?

  • Ezekiel delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning and immediately complies with YHWH’s instructions (that same morning). Then his wife dies that evening. OR
  • He delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning, his wife dies that evening and he obeys YHWH’s command the following morning.

The second possibility is the most commonly accepted. In either case he has little time to process his grief. I did . . . as I was commanded is a striking example of immediate and total obedience to the word of the Lord – at great personal cost.

EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION (19-24)

Doubtless aware of Ezekiel’s love for his wife the exiles are shocked by his violation of the expected social and religious norms of mourning. They realise that this is a symbolic act and so they ask him for an interpretation of the sign and how it applies to them: And the people said unto me, Wilt thou not tell us what these things are to us, that thou doest so? This is the only occasion in the book when the exiles directly address the prophet Ezekiel – normally what they say is quoted to Ezekiel by YHWH.

Ezekiel answers their brief question by telling them that a word from YHWH came to him, telling him what he was to communicate to the people. The thrust of the message is that Ezekiel’s behaviour in the aftermath of his wife’s death is a prescriptive sign to the exiles. It shows how they ought to respond to the fall of the city of Jerusalem and specifically the temple. The death of Ezekiel’s wife is an analogy for the ‘death’ of the temple. The exiles’ response to that ought to mirror Ezekiel’s response to his wife’s death.

YHWH (v.21) intends to desecrate his sanctuary (by the blood of Judah’s slain sons and daughters and the presence of foreigners). The temple is the pride of the people’s power (cf. Lev 26:19), the desire of their eyes and that with which they have sympathy – i.e. they cherish the temple because to them it represents the glory and strength of the nation.

Notice that in vv.22-24 the collective response of the exiles to the fall of the sanctuary is to mirror the individual response of Ezekiel to the death of his wife. There are obvious parallels;

  • in v.17 Ezekiel’s wife is the delight of his eyes, in v.21 the sanctuary is the delight of the people’s eyes.
  • Like Ezekiel in vv.16-17 the people (vv.22-23) are not to publicly mourn, weep, cover their lips, eat the bread of men or go about bareheaded and barefoot.

Covering the upper lip seems to have been a sign of shame and sorrow, cf. Lev 13:45; Mic3:7. ‘The bread of men’ refers to food brought to the bereaved by family and friends. Other descriptions of mourning occur in Ezekiel 7:18 and 27:30-31.

The exiles are to imitate Ezekiel – he is a sign to them:

  • And ye shall do as I have done: Ezek 24:22
  • according to all that he hath done shall ye do: Ezek 24:24

In addition (v.23), they are to pine away (cf. 4:17; 33:10) for (on account of) their iniquities and groan one to another. Their grief will be compounded by the recognition that they have brought this disaster upon themselves because of their sin. They are not to make a public display of mourning but rather groan because of conviction of their guilt. The exiles share responsibility with those in Judah for the destruction of the city and the temple.

When the disaster comes the people of Judah and the exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord

YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY (25-27)

Addressing himself to Ezekiel personally – thou son of man – YHWH refers to the false hope that the Judahites have placed in the temple, the city and future generations. They have considered these to be their strength (stronghold), joy, glory, delight and heart’s desire. Soon all will be taken from them.

As for Ezekiel, an eyewitness will escape the destruction of the city of Jerusalem and bring confirmation of its fall to him in Babylonia. Since his call Ezekiel has been mute (3:26-27), speaking only when he receives a direct oracle from YHWH, but on the day the messenger arrives Ezekiel’s speech will be restored, his silent mourning will end and his ministry enter a new phase. That too will be a sign to the exiles and they will recognise the presence of YHWH. This prophecy is fulfilled in 33:21-22.

SUMMATION

The death of Ezekiel’s wife symbolises the impending destruction of the Jerusalem temple by the Babylonian forces of Nebuchadnezzar and emphasises the severity and finality of the coming judgement. The prophet’s personal tragedy demonstrates that YHWH’s judgement is irrevocable and his muted grief is a prophetic sign of how the people should and would react to the coming destruction.

Up to this point Ezekiel has been proclaiming YHWH’s judgement upon Jerusalem and Judah. The fall of the city and the temple will confirm that he is indeed a true prophet and that YHWH has been in control of events throughout as Ezekiel has said. With the fall of Jerusalem the old era will pass and the lifting of Ezekiel’s silence mark a new phase in his ministry. The exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord and on that basis future restoration can be built. With his status as a true prophet confirmed the people will listen to Ezekiel, whose ministry will transition from one that proclaims judgement to one that offers hope. But before moving on to the restoration section of his book (chapters 33-48) Ezekiel records oracles against some of Judah’s hostile neighbours (chapters 25-32).

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 24:1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION TO EZEKIEL CHAPTER 24

Ezekiel 24 serves as the climactic turning point in the book – the decisive moment when prophecy moves from warning to fulfilment. For the last time Ezekiel predicts the destruction of Jerusalem and its people. This is followed by symbolism that must have affected even the most hardened of his opponents.

The destruction of Jerusalem is prophesied in the parable of a cooking pot and then symbolised in the death of Ezekiel’s wife. The oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the same day and both images function together to signify that Jerusalem’s calamities will be so extreme that they are beyond any expression of sorrow. The two interlock to signify external suffering and internal collapse.

The chapter may be viewed as consisting of two main sections – the parable of the cooking pot and the death of Ezekiel’s wife – although also, as Petter (2023, Introduction to 24:1-27) observes, within these sections is ‘a series of five shocking announcements: the news of the city’s siege (24:2), the death of Ezekiel’s wife (24:16), the end of the sanctuary (24:21), the news from the fugitive (24:26), and the news Ezekiel will speak again (24:27).’

1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

(1-3a) A threefold instruction: record the date, use a parable, declare it to the rebellious house.

This oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year – the date on which Nebuchadnezzar’s forces commenced the siege of Jerusalem. All hope of deliverance has now gone, the time of intense pressure has arrived.

The oracle is viewed as very important because Ezekiel is emphatically told to record that particular date. In v.2 he is instructed to ‘write thee the name of the day, even of this same day… this same day.’

On that day – ‘the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year’ – Ezekiel announced to the exiles in Babylon that, some 400 miles away, Nebuchadnezzar had ‘set himself against’ (pressed violently upon, leaned heavily on, cf. Psa 88:7) Jerusalem. Ezekiel could not possibly have known that Nebuchadnezzar’s army had begun the siege of Jerusalem that very day except by revelation from YHWH.  This record would therefore be indisputable proof, to anyone who later checked the dates of his prophecies, that he was a true prophet of YHWH.

Modern scholars debate what year that ‘ninth year’ actually was. According to the Parker-Dubberstein chronology the date equates to 15 January, 588 BCE. Albright, however, calculates the year as 587 BCE and Thiele as 586 BCE.

Throughout the book of Ezekiel dates are based on the year of King Jehoiachin’s exile which, since Nebuchadnezzar replaced Jehoiachin with Zedekiah, was also the year of Zedekiah’s accession. Three other biblical passages confirm that the date given by Ezekiel is that on which the siege of Jerusalem began – only they express it in terms of Zedekiah’s reign – the ninth year of Jehoiachin’s exile corresponding to the ninth year of Zedekiah’s reign.

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about. And the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. 2 Kgs 25:1-2

In the ninth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the tenth month, came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and all his army against Jerusalem, and they besieged it. Jer 39:1

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he and all his army, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it, and built forts against it round about. So the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. Jer 52:4-5

Ezekiel is then instructed to use a parable (māšāl – proverb, parable) and declare it to ‘the rebellious house.’ This most likely refers to the exiles who are with him in Babylonia (Ezek 2:5, 6; 12:2, 3, 9; 17:12) but perhaps also to the inhabitants of Judah. Details of the parable occupy vv.3b-14.

(3b-5) The parable involves a cauldron or cooking pot (siyr). Those for domestic use were normally made of pottery but the cauldron Ezekiel has in mind is made of copper/brass (v.11) which may suggest a large one like those used in the Temple (2 Kgs 25:14). In 11:1-12 Ezekiel has already referred to a proverb about a cooking pot that was widely quoted by the Judahites. The image of a cauldron was loaded with meaning for the people of Jerusalem who considered themselves to be like choice meat in the safety of YHWH’s protective pot (the city). Ezekiel now turns their own metaphor on its head and uses it to illustrate Jerusalem’s fate.

Addressing Ezekiel as if he were an imaginary cook YHWH tells him to:

  • set the cooking pot [on the fire] – the pot represents Jerusalem and the ‘setting on’ indicates the beginning of the siege.
  • pour in the water.
  • ‘gather the pieces thereof’ – the pieces of meat belonging to the cooking pot – they represent the inhabitants of Jerusalem prepared for judgement.
  • ‘even every good piece, the thigh, and the shoulder; fill it with the choice bones. . . take the choice of the flock’ – the best cuts of meat from the best animals represent the leading citizens of Jerusalem.
  • pile on the logs (bones) under the pot – the fire represents the siege – the heat intensifies – severe judgement.
  • boil the meat well – the verb rāṯaḥ (boil, seethe, be agitated) only occurs elsewhere in Job 30:27; 41:31. ‘Cook (KJV , seethe) its bones it in the pot’ – the judgement will be thorough and even the most durable will not survive.

Opinions differ as to whether the prophet publicly enacted this parable. Keil (1876, p.341) thinks that he did not but rather maintains that: the ensuing act, which the prophet is commanded to perform, is not to be regarded as a symbolical act which he really carried out, but that the act forms the substance of the māšāl, in other words, belongs to the parable itself.

It is possible, however, that Ezekiel did actually put a cooking pot on a wood fire and boil pieces of meat in it to symbolise what the population of Jerusalem would endure during the siege. To have done so would not have seemed unusual for the book records him enacting several of his prophecies:

  • 4:1-3 The siege.
  • 5-1-4 The city’s destruction.
  • 12:1-16 The process of going into exile.
  • 12:17-20 The fear and despair of the people of Jerusalem.
  • 21:18-23 The two routes the king of Babylon could choose.
  • 37:15-28 The two sticks symbolising the reunification of Israel and Judah.

(6-8) ‘Wherefore’ or ‘Now then’ indicates a transition from the parable itself to further explanation by YHWH. In v.6 he pronounces woe directly upon Jerusalem, calling it ‘the bloody city;’ this is repeated in v.9. That Jerusalem is notorious for murder (judicial killings and child sacrifice) is referred to in 11:6; 13:19; 16:21; 22:3. The term ‘bloody city’ was previously used by Nahum (Nah 3:1) to describe the city of Nineveh.

Jerusalem is a pot with reddish ‘scum’ (corrosion or deposit) in it that cannot be removed. The sin of murder has become part of the very fabric of the city. Since copper/brass does not rust some scholars view this ‘scum’ as verdigris, others as flaws in the metal itself and others as hardened food residue that will not scrub off.

Yet another view is that the corruption does not belong to the metal of the pot but to its contents, i.e. the meat. According to v.6 the scum is inside the pot and in v.7 so is blood. Since the consumption of blood is taboo to the Israelites (Gen 9:4; Lev 3:17; 17:10-14; Deut 12:23-25) the flesh in the pot is viewed as contaminated. The Judahites may think of themselves as choice cuts of meat but in YHWH’s sight they are putrid flesh. The meat is to be brought out of the cauldron ‘piece by piece;’ i.e. the city’s population will be taken into captivity or killed. All efforts to cleanse the filth have failed – this idea will be developed in vv.12-13.

‘Let no lot fall upon it’ – refers to the practice of decision-making by casting lots (Lev 16:7-10; Num 26:55-56; Josh 13:6; 1 Chron 24:5, 7; 25:8; 26:13-14). The results are reckoned to be God’s will: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD. Prov 16:33. In the context of this oracle the reference may be to the casting of lots by a victorious army in order to decide which captives should be allowed to live and which should put to death (2 Sam 8:2; Joel 3:3; Nah 3:10). There is no need to cast lots concerning the leading citizens of Jerusalem for they will be executed (Jer 39:6).

Verses 7-8, beginning with ‘For,’ give the reason why the contaminated pieces of meat (the people of Jerusalem) are rejected. The city has openly and shamelessly shed blood and there has been no attempt to cover up its sin. The background to v.7 is another taboo concerning blood: And whatsoever man there be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, which hunteth and catcheth any beast or fowl that may be eaten; he shall even pour out the blood thereof, and cover it with dust. Lev 17:13.

‘Her blood -‘ i.e. the blood that Jerusalem has shed – has not been covered up but deliberately poured out for all to see on non-porous rock that would not absorb it. That blood cries for vengeance (cf. Gen 4:10; Job 16:18; Isa 26:21). YHWH’s response is to likewise set Jerusalem’s blood on a rock uncovered. This will serve as a witness to other nations of the crimes that she has committed.

(9-12) In verses 9-12 the image of YHWH building a huge fire depicts the unleashing of his wrath upon Jerusalem ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because Jerusalem is full of blood and filth) YHWH again (see v.6) pronounces woe on the city and says that he will make the pile of wood great (cf. Isa 30:33).

Since YHWH is responsible for stoking the fire the siege of Jerusalem is not a random disaster but deliberate punishment by YHWH. The imaginary cook is given further instructions:

  • heap on wood.
  • light the fire
  • mix in the spices (KJV, ‘spice it well’)- the verb rāqaḥ is normally used for the process of making perfume and also for the preparation of the ingredients of the sacred anointing oil (Ex 30:33) – spices enhance the taste of meat – this may mean that the Chaldeans will enthusiastically enjoy destroying Jerusalem, just as hungry people enjoy well-seasoned food.
  • boil the meat away – the judgement is thorough and final.
  • empty the residue into the fire and burn the bones – the people will be dispersed and the city will be destroyed by fire. The image intensifies; it moves from cooking in v.5 to cremation in v.10. The city will lie desolate.
  • set the empty pot back on the coals and heat it until it is red hot and molten. All the impurities will be burned up. This recalls the smelting image in 22:20-22.

Jerusalem (v.12) has frustrated all efforts to cleanse her. The earlier attempts to do so may have included the messages from YHWH delivered by the prophets and perhaps also the reforms of King Hezekiah (2 Kgs 18; 2 Chron 31) and King Josiah (2 Kgs 22-23). The Chronicler gives the following apt assessment:

And the LORD God of their fathers sent to them by his messengers, rising up quickly, and sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his dwelling place: But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the LORD arose against his people, till there was no remedy. Therefore he brought upon them the king of the Chaldees. . . 2 Chron 36:15-17a

The scum in the pot has not been removed so into the fire with it!

(13-14) YHWH again addresses the city directly saying that every time he tried to cleanse her she refused to be purified from her uncleanness. Therefore she will not be pure again (there will be no more opportunities for cleansing) until his wrath against her has been satisfied.

The oracle closes with the formula: ‘I the Lord hath spoken’ (v.14). God’s word guarantees the fulfilment of what he has said. He will not reconsider or renege, what Ezekiel has prophesied will come to pass. This certainty is expressed in three negative statements:

  • I will not refrain, not go back
  • I will not spare
  • I will not repent (be sorry, moved to pity)

YHWH has spoken, Nebuchadnezzar’s army has now arrived. The Chaldeans will judge Jerusalem according to her ways and deeds. She is facing the consequences of her own choices.

SUMMATION

This oracle shatters once and for all the false view held by the Jerusalemites that they are YHWH’s chosen cuts of meat in the protective cauldron and that the city is therefore inviolable. Even though they were God’s people they could not evade the consequences of their sin. Like corrosion in the pot sin that is not addressed becomes deeply ingrained. When grace is consistently rejected then God’s righteous judgement upon the sinner is inevitable. The oracle emphasises that the sovereign God is directing the judgement upon Judah; the Babylonian invaders are merely his instruments.

Even while Ezekiel was delivering this solemn parable he became aware that he was about to experience great sorrow. His experience of loss was about to become the ultimate sign to the people of Judah. Chapter 24:15 moves seamlessly from public preaching to private tragedy. Inside a few hours Ezekiel’s wife will die.

BIBLOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Keil, C. F. (1876). Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Ezekiel, Vol 1. Transl. J. M. Martin. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.

Parker, R.A. and Dubberstein, W.H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology 626 B. C. – A. D. 75. Rhode Island: Brown University Press.

Petter, D.L. (2011). The Book of Ezekiel and Mesopotamian City Laments, Academic Press, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

Thiele, E. R. (1983). The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Albright, W. F. (1956). The Nebuchadnezzar and Neriglissar Chronicles. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 143, pp. 28–33.

Thiele, E.R. (1944). The Chronology of the Kings of Judah and Israel. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 3(3), pp.137–186.

DIGITAL RESOURCES

Petter, D. L. (2023). Ezekiel. [online] Available at: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/commentary/ezekiel/ accessed 22 November, 2025

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 2)

Posted on by writtenexposition

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

(11) Verse 10 ends with Aholah (Israel) having suffered punishment for her infidelities and having become a byword among other women (‘the nations’). This section (vv.11-21) makes the point (11, 14, 19) that Aholibah (Jerusalem) saw her sister Aholah’s fate but did not learn from it. Judah did not heed the warning from the past.

(12-13) Just as her sister had done (vv.5-6) Aholibah ‘lusted after’ (doted upon) the impeccably dressed young Assyrian cavaliers. She became more corrupt in her lust than her sister; her pattern of behaviour escalating as time progressed.

This may include a historical reference to Judah under Ahaz (735-715 BCE), a king who submitted to Assyrian rule – see 2 Kgs 16 and Isa 7.

Notice that in the oracle there are three objects of Aholibah’s admiration – the Assyrians v.12, the Chaldeans v.16 and Egypt’s concubines v.20.

(14-21) Judah’s fascination with the Chaldeans (Babylonians) is depicted as lust for ‘men portrayed upon the wall’ (probably a reference to Babylonian wall reliefs). Aholibah was attracted by these brightly coloured engraved images (possibly using ochre) of soldiers wearing red uniforms as well as broad waistbands and flowing turbans. This was the typical dress of high-ranking Babylonian military officers.

Having only heard reports of Babylonian might Judah sent ambassadors to seek an alliance. It is possible, but not certain, that Hezekiah first contacted the Babylonian king Merodach-Baladan who then sent an embassy to Jerusalem (2 Kgs 20:12-21; Isa 39:1-8). The point in these verses is not so much idolatry as unnecessary and ill-advised political alliances.

(17-18) The Babylonians came to Judah in bed and made her unclean but afterwards her soul abhorred them. The expression (mind is alienated KJV) occurs in Ezek 23 :17, 18, 28 and Jer 6:8. The verb yāqa‘ means to turn away or alienate and in a different context is used for the dislocation of Jacob’s hip in Gen 32:25.

Ezekiel is reminding his audience that after a time relations with the Babylonians soured. For example: Jehoiakim revolted against Babylonia c. 598 BCE. Jehoiakim died during the revolt and his eighteen year old son Jehoiachin (also known as Jeconiah or Coniah) succeeded to the throne of Judah but surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar after three months. Jehoiachin, along many leading Judahites, was then deported to Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah as a puppet king but nine years later he too rebelled against Babylonian rule (See 2 Kings 24).

Thus Aholibah (Jerusalem) revealed her nakedness and her harlotries with the result that YHWH turned away from her in disgust just as he had with her sister Aholah (Israel).

(19-21) Having been unfaithful to YHWH with powerful men like Assyria and Chaldea Aholibah did not return to the Lord but instead ‘called to remembrance’ the early days in Egypt. The verb means ‘to search for.’ The idea is that she reverted to an earlier pattern of behaviour; in this case the idolatry of her youth in Egypt.

She therefore sought a relationship with Egypt; longing to be one of Egypt’s concubines. Egypt, a world power at the time, is metaphorically described in graphic, animalistic terms as being sexually potent. Ezekiel employs coarse language in order to emphasise Aholibah’s excessive, unrestrained lust for foreign powers and also to evoke a feeling of revulsion in his audience.

The prophets of YHWH disapproved of Judah’s political flirtations with Egypt. Like Ezekiel, Isaiah and Jeremiah viewed Egypt as an unreliable ally (Isa 30:1-7; 31:1-3; Jer 2:18; 37:5-10).

Notice that until v.21 the verbs are in the third person (‘she’) but now change to the second person (‘you’). This anticipates YHWH directly addressing Aholibah in vv. 22-35 when announcing her punishment.

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

(22) ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because of her infidelities), followed by the prophetic messenger formula (‘thus saith the Lord God’), is followed by a direct message from YHWH to Aholibah (Jerusalem) stating his intention to punish her. He will accomplish this by bringing her former ‘lovers’ (the nations that she once courted) against her to attack her. Those with whom she was once allied but from whom she has turned in disgust (‘mind is alienated’ see on v.17 above) will become her deadly enemies.

(23-24) They include the Babylonians and various other groups, described as ‘desirable young men,’ ‘governors and officials,’ ‘cavalry officers and men of renown’ (lit. persons summoned to a meeting, Num 1:16; 16:2), who will come against her with military might. The list specifies:
– the Babylonians (sons of Babel) – the Neo-Babylonian empire under Nebuchadnezzar II, the superpower at that time
– the Chaldeans – a people group in the south of Babylonia – dominant in the Neo-Babylonian empire
– Pekod – possibly an Aramean tribe – from Syria
– Shoa – unknown
– Koa – unknown
– all the Assyrians (sons of Asshur) – possibly defeated Assyrian army units that had been pressed into military service by the Babylonians.

This confederation of Babylonian allies and vassals will attack Judah with an impressive array of the latest military equipment – weapons, chariots, wagons, large and small shields and helmets. YHWH will punish Judah by allowing these forces to judge her by their own inhumane laws rather than by biblical laws.

(25-27) Aholibah (Jerusalem) will therefore suffer the atrocities of ancient warfare. This will include brutal mutilations such as rhinotomy (nose-cutting) and ear cropping. In those ancient honour-shame cultures mutilations had to do with shame. They asserted the domination of the aggressor and indicated a change in the victim’s status. For biblical examples of wartime mutilations see Judg 1:6-7; 1 Sam 11:2; 31:9-10; 2 Sam 4:7,12; 2 Kgs 25:7; Jer 39:6-7.

Many who survive mutilation will be killed and others taken into captivity. Jerusalem will be stripped and plundered and the properties left empty (‘thy residue’) by those slain or deported will be consumed by fire. These agonies will be deliberately instigated by YHWH; in them Aholibah will experience his jealousy (intense fervour). The judgement will be so severe that her lewdness and the harlotries learned in Egypt will cease. She will no longer look amorously at Egypt, i.e. seek a political alliance or military help. ‘Look amorously’ is conveyed by the expression ‘lift up thine eyes unto’ – this is how Potiphar’s wife looked at Joseph in Gen 39:7.

(28-32) Beginning with ‘For,’ followed by the prophetic messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ (as v.22), Aholibah’s punishment is further described using the indecent image of YHWH handing her over to her former lovers, whom she has come to abhor, to be made a public spectacle. They will strip her stark naked, expose and violate her. This imagery of being left exposed symbolises not only physical vulnerability but also spiritual disgrace. This is due to her unfaithfulness to YHWH in the form of idolatry and alliances with ungodly nations (v.30).

It is ironic that the very nations with which Jerusalem sought an alliance for protection will become her oppressors. The language of v.29 emphasises the depth of betrayal and the resulting shame: they shall deal with thee hatefully, and shall take away all thy labour, and shall leave thee naked and bare. ‘Take away all thy labour’ reflects one of the curses promised for covenant unfaithfulness in Deut 28:33: The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shalt be only oppressed and crushed always.

Verse 28 echoes vv.17, 22 and 16:37. Verse 29 echoes v.26 and 16:39. Verse 31, looking back to v.13, states that Jerusalem has walked in the way of her sister, Aholah (Israel), and thus will drink from the same cup of judgement.

(32-35) Verses 32-34 develop the thought of drinking from the same cup as her sister Samaria had drunk from (in 722 BCE, see 2 Kgs 17:6). This takes the form of a poem:

This is what the Lord GOD says:
“You will drink your sister’s cup,
which is deep and wide.
You will be an object of ridicule and scorn,
for it holds so much.
You will be filled with drunkenness and grief,
with a cup of devastation and desolation,
the cup of your sister Samaria.
You will drink it and drain it;
then you will gnaw its broken pieces,
and tear your breasts.
For I have spoken.”
This is the declaration of the Lord GOD. (Ezek 23:32-34 CSB)

The cup is large (deep and wide) and people will laugh at the fact that it is so great and has to be drained completely. Aholibah will be the object of derision and scorn because when she drinks the toxic contents she will stagger about, as if drunk, stunned by the severity of the judgement. The cup will be one of intoxication and grief, of ruin and desolation. The contents of the cup will drive Aholibah mad. Overcome by self-loathing, she will break it in pieces and self-harm with the fragments of pottery. Ortland Jnr (2016, p.129, footnote 82) explains:

The image is that of a cup filled to the brim with a powerful potion, to make the one who drinks it reel with an exaggerated drunkenness. Yahweh holds this cup in his hand and forces it to the lips of the nation to be judged. It represents, in real terms, the breakdown of order, the loss of control and good judgment, the panic and disarray, as a nation staggers like a drunk toward divinely ordained destruction. Cf. Ps. 75:9 [EVV 8]; Is. 51:17; Je. 25:15-16, 28; 51:7; La. 4:21; Hab. 2:16. The figure makes vividly clear to the Judahites ‘the compulsion there is to accept destiny, the impossibility of rejecting it, the trepidation at its death-dealing effects, the bitterness of the suffering it involves, and how it has to be tasted to the full’, to quote Eichrodt (1970: 331).

In v.35 YHWH emphasises that Aholibah (Jerusalem) will bear the consequences of her lewdness and whoredoms because she has forgotten him and cast him aside (‘KJV ‘behind thy back’ cf.1 Kgs 14:9; Neh 9:26).

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to judge both Aholah (Samaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem). He is to ‘declare’ (explain, make plain) to them their abominations (detestable acts) of idolatry and bloodshed. They have been spiritually unfaithful to YHWH by worshipping other deities. ‘Blood is in their hands’ refers to child sacrifice. They have offered their own children to pagan gods like Molech, burning them as sacrifices. To add insult to injury they would worship Molech and then, on the same day, go to the Temple to worship YHWH; thus placing Molech on a par with YHWH (cf. 2 Kgs 21:4-7). Their presence at the Temple profaned the sanctuary.

Verses 40-44 resume the adultery metaphor and describe the activities of the two harlots with the image in vv.40-42a of one woman (notice the singulars- ‘ye,’ ‘thou,’ ‘thy,’ ‘thyself,’ her’), probably Aholibah (Jerusalem), preparing herself for adulterous liaisons with foreign lovers. These liaisons represent political alliances with pagan powers like Egypt, Assyria and Babylonia. The washing, painting the eyes, decking with jewellery, sitting on an opulent divan in front of which is a table spread with lovely food and on which is set oil and spices to perfume the bed all symbolise seduction. These actions represent international diplomacy.

Many men came to carouse with her/them – in 42b the plural (‘their’) is resumed – these are described as ‘men of the common sort’ and ‘drunkards from the desert;’ probably a reference to the Assyrians and the Chaldeans. The latter were not desert-dwellers but came ‘from the desert’ in the sense that their route from Babylon to Judah would have involved skirting the top of the Arabian peninsula and travelling through Syria. These lovers put bracelets upon Aholah and Aholibah’s arms and beautiful crowns on their heads, i.e. alliances with foreign nations brought great wealth to both Israel and Judah.

In v.43 YHWH (or is it Ezekiel?) asks himself if these men will still engage with Aholah and Aholibah, two women who are ‘old (worn out, used up – used of the Gibeonites’ clothes in Josh 9:4-5) in adulteries.’ Sure enough, as Samaria and Jerusalem willingly play the harlot – i.e. are accessible to anyone, – the foreigners do ally with them.

Verse 45 is difficult in that it appears that YHWH describes the Assyrians and Babylonians as ‘righteous men’ who will judge and punish the women as adulteresses and murderers. The likely idea is that these conquerors are viewed as the instruments of YHWH and he will use them to enforce his justice and divine retribution. The standard penalty of the Law for adultery (Lev 20:10) and murder (Exod 21:12; Lev 24:17; Num 35:31) was death. This imagery suggests that the capital punishment of Samaria and Judah will be lawful and deserved.

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

This section concludes the allegory of Aholah (ISamaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem) and describes their judgement for adultery (idolatry) and political alliances with pagan nations.

Staying with the metaphor of judgement for adultery the Lord YHWH states that he will summon a crowd (i.e. armies, see vv. 23-24) to come up against ‘them’ (Israel and Judah) to which he will hand them over to suffer the atrocities and violence of war and to be plundered. These armies will pelt them with stones, cleave them with swords, kill their offspring and burn down their properties.

At v.44 there is a change from ‘them’ to ‘your.’ YHWH directly informs Israel and Judah that their fate will serve as a warning to ‘all women’ (i.e. the surrounding nations) not to ‘do after your lewdness’ i.e. behave like the metaphorical Aholah and Aholibah. He announces that they will bear the punishment of their evil-doing and idolatry and, because of this discipline, will recognise that he is the Lord YHWH. Notice that in this allegory delivered by Ezekiel the punishment of Samaria (Israel) and Jerusalem (Judah) is viewed as simultaneous whereas in real life Israel’s had already taken place c. 722 BCE and Judah’s was yet to come – a few years later – in 586 BCE.

This oracle shows us the importance of remaining faithful to God and of placing our confidence in him for daily guidance and protection rather than trusting in human power and politics which can easily turn against us. God views persistent sin as a personal betrayal and it therefore has inevitable and severe consequences.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Eichrodt, W. (1970). Ezekiel; a Commentary. Philadelphia, Westminster Press.

Ortlund Jnr, R.C. (2016). God’s Unfaithful Wife. InterVarsity Press.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 1)

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 23, like chapter 16, is one of the most unsettling passages in the Bible. In order to evoke a strong emotional response of shame and disgust in his audience Ezekiel intentionally employs coarse and shocking language of a sexually explicit nature. In stark terms the prophet presents a general summary of Israelite history in the form of an allegory featuring two nymphomaniacal sisters and their infidelities.

The sisters, for whom Ezekiel symbolically coins the names Aholah and Aholibah, respectively represent the northern kingdom of Israel (Samaria) and the southern kingdom of Judah (Jerusalem). They are depicted as harlots who betray their covenant with their husband (YHWH) by promiscuously forming political alliances with foreign nations and engaging in idolatrous worship. Their political and spiritual infidelity ultimately results in the sisters’ downfall.

STRUCTURE

1-4 – TWO SISTERS

5-10 – AHOLAH (SAMARIA) ISRAEL

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

EXPOSITION

TWO SISTERS (1-4)

The typical prophetic word formula (‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’) in v.1 introduces the oracle which occupies the remainder of chapter 23. After Ezekiel is again addressed as ‘son of Adam’ there comes the allegorical statement: ‘There were two women, the daughters of one mother.’ There is no mention of a father but ‘daughters of one mother’ emphasises the closeness of the sisters; they are two members of the same family.

In two sets of parallel clauses verse 3 describes their first sexual experiences as being with the Egyptians :

And they committed whoredoms in Egypt;
they committed whoredoms in their youth:

there were their breasts pressed,
and there they bruised the teats of their virginity.

Although the sisters are said to have been acted upon by the Egyptians (this represents Israelite oppression in Egypt) Ezekiel describes these activities as ‘harlotries’ (KJV whoredoms); which to the modern reader seems like a case of blame the abused rather than the abuser. Although Ezekiel does not say that the young women found this pleasurable, nevertheless throughout the oracle there is the suggestion that they keep going back for more (e.g. 8,19-21, 27).

It is not until we come to verse 4 that we learn what these two metaphorical women represent – the elder (i.e. ‘greater) one, called Aholah, represents Samaria – the capital of Israel, the kingdom of ten tribes. The younger, called Aholibah, represents Jerusalem – the capital of Judah. These names, based on the word ‘tent’ (i.e. standing for sanctuary – Tabernacle/Temple) symbolise Israel and Judah’s religious relationship with YHWH. Aholah (her [own] tent) would point to the religious autonomy of the northern kingdom of Israel which established its own system of YHWH worship (1 Kgs 12:28; Hos 8:6). Aholibah (my tent [is] in her) would emphasise the authenticity of Judah’s worship which was centred at YHWH’s sanctuary in Jerusalem.

This oracle delivered by Ezekiel is shocking in that YHWH is said to have married both women (‘they became mine’ – see also 16:8) in spite of the fact that they had already ‘committed whoredoms’ (v.3). He had children with each one. It is even more shocking that the allegory represents YHWH as having done something that is forbidden by the torah: Do not take your wife’s sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while your wife is living. Lev 18:18 NIV.

Notice that because this is an allegory Ezekiel cannot adhere strictly to exact historical details. Therefore, in v.3, he represents Israel and Judah as two related nations in Egypt – even though Israel did not divide into separate northern and southern kingdoms until after the death of Solomon c. 930 BCE. Likewise, constrained by the allegory, he later prophesies the punishment upon the two nations as future (v.49), although Israel’s had already been fulfilled a long time before, c. 720 BCE.

AHOLAH (SAMARIA) ISRAEL (5-10)

In this section Ezekiel comments on the adultery of Samaria and uses the language of passion to reflect on Israel’s political alliances with Assyria. Despite belonging to YHWH (‘when she was mine’ – lit, under me v.5) she betrayed her covenant with him by turning to foreign powers for safety and protection. Verse 6 represents Aholah as ‘lusting after’ (she doted – desire carnally – 6 times in Ezek 23 – vs, 5, 7, 9, 12, 16, 20; Jer 4:30) the dashing Assyrian cavalrymen in their bright unforms. Dazzled by Assyrian military power and culture Israel not only made political alliances (‘committed her whoredoms’) with Assyria but also defiled herself by worshipping the idols of the Assyrian elite.

Verse 8 once more emphasises that Israel’s spiritual unfaithfulness can be traced back to its beginnings in Egypt. Joshua had referred to this in a speech recorded in Josh 24: Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD. Josh 24:14. Apparently there had been no improvement in Aholah’s behaviour over her history.

Because of this (vv.9-10) YHWH gave her over to the very nations she had longed for, Assyria in particular, for them to execute judgement upon her. They humiliated her (‘exposed her nakedness’), took her sons and daughters (into captivity), and killed her with the sword (Hos 13:16). The result was that her fate served as a warning to other women (i.e. the surrounding nations). This is a historical reference to Samaria’s fall to Assyria in 722 BCE (2 Kgs 17:6) after which the northern tribes were deported – they later became known as the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel.

Sweeney (2013, p.117) comments:
This…clearly portrays Israel’s relationship with Assyria from the late ninth through the eighth centuries BCE, which ultimately resulted in her destruction. In an effort to defend Israel against the Arameans, King Jehu of Israel (842-815 BCE) submitted to Assyria as a vassal…so that Assyrian power would check any Aramean efforts to invade Israel. This alliance lasted through the reigns of the Jehu kings, including Jehoahaz (815-801 BCE), Jehoash (801-786 BCE), Jeroboam II (786-746 BCE), and Zechariah (746 BCE). Zechariah’s assassination was prompted by an attempt to break the Assyrian alliance and establish a new alliance with Aram. The move was countered by Menahem (745-738 BCE), who assassinated Shallum (745 BCE) and restored relations with Assyria during his reign and that of his son Pekahiah (738-737 BCE). But Pekahiah was assassinated by Pekah (737-732 BCE), who allied with Aram and attacked Jerusalem during the Syro-Ephraimitic War. When King Ahaz of Judah (735-715 BCE) appealed to the Assyrian king Tiglath Pileser for assistance, the Assyrians attacked, destroyed Damascus, killed Pekah and subjugated both Israel and Judah, placing Hoshea as king (732-724 BCE) over a much reduced Israel. When Hoshea revolted against Assyria in 724 BCE, he was imprisoned, the land of Israel was devastated, Samaria was destroyed, and the northern kingdom of Israel came to an end as much of its surviving population was exiled to the far reaches of the Assyrian empire (2 Kings 17).

The timeless lesson from Aholah is that when the people of God betray their loyalty to him for political advantage, religious admiration or material gain the inevitable result is shame and loss.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sweeney, M. A., 2013, Reading Ezekiel. Smyth & Helwys Publishing Inc., Macon.

‌

Posted in General

Jeremiah 8:20-22 – A missed opportunity, a shared sorrow and a required remedy.

Posted on by writtenexposition


The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.
For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me.
Is there no balm in Gilead; is there no physician there? why then is not the health of the daughter of my people recovered? Jeremiah 8:20-22

INTRODUCTION

The prophet Jeremiah (c. 650-570 BCE) was was born into a priestly family in Anathoth, a village near Jerusalem, during the reign of King Manasseh of Judah. He lived during, and beyond, the reigns of the last six kings of Judah – Manasseh (c. 686 to 642 BCE), Amon (642-640), Josiah (c. 640–609 BCE), Jehoahaz (609 BCE), Jehoiakim (609-598 BCE), Jehoiachin (598-597 BCE) and Zedekiah (597-586 BCE). According to Jer 1:2 his ministry as a prophet commenced during the thirteenth year of King Josiah, i.e. 626 BCE.

He prophesied at a traumatic time in history. Three superpowers; Egypt, Assyria and the emerging Babylonian empire were jockeying for supremacy. After the death of Ashurbanipal c.630 BCE the Assyrian empire went into decline and Nineveh eventually fell to Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians in 612 BCE. Nebuchadnezzar defeated Egypt at the battle of Carchemish in 605 BCE (Jer 46:2), achieving Babylonian control of the Near East.

Judah sought alliances with neighbouring states at this time, which led to tolerance of foreign religious cults and an increase in idolatrous worship. Jeremiah in Judah, like Ezekiel in Babylon, faithfully proclaimed a message of warning about judgement coming on Jerusalem because of the people’s sin. He was badly treated by the ruling authorities in Jerusalem – put in stocks, imprisoned and branded a traitor.

Jeremiah was a sensitive man who, saddened by the enormity of the pain, suffering and horror that the people of Judah would experience during the Babylonian siege and devastation of Jerusalem, wept over their spiritual state and their obstinacy in spite of repeated warnings. He is known as ‘the weeping prophet’ because his ministry was marked not only by proclamation but by deep lamentation. His heart broke for the people as he saw them wallowing in sin and rebellion against the Lord. In these verses Jeremiah voices three great realities: a missed opportunity, a shared sorrow, and a required remedy.

1. A Missed Opportunity (v. 20)

The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.

This is the season when many churches celebrate Harvest. It is a time of thankfulness for God’s grace and blessing – a joyful occasion. But happiness was not in Jeremiah’s mind here. In that agricultural society, harvest and summer represented opportunity and provision. The people laboured through the growing season with the expectation of gathering crops to sustain them throughout the year ahead. A failed harvest spelt disaster – no food, no income and utter ruin. They were season dependent, certain things had to be done at certain times. Summer was the time to be busy, some things couldn’t be put off. Autumn would soon come, the leaves would fall and growth would end.

Jeremiah applies this imagery spiritually. God had given the people time to repent. He had sent prophets with warnings. Yet they hardened their hearts. Now, the time of opportunity is slipping away. Jeremiah anticipates the lament of a nation that had missed the opportunity to repent, for whom time had passed by so quickly and who had made no preparation for the coming judgement.

How many today are living as if there will always be another chance? One day, however, the harvest will be past, the summer ended, and all opportunities gone. Have you let your opportunities to get right with God slip by? Day after day, season after season, year after year, perhaps decade after decade? How many times has the gospel been preached to you? How many opportunities have you spurned? Now the time to plant or grow – the time to prepare – has almost gone! The apostle Paul wrote in 2 Corinthians 6:2: Now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation. Do not let the words in Jeremiah 8:20 be wailed by you in the day of despair: The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.

2. A Shared Sorrow (v. 21)

For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me.

Jeremiah, as I have indicated, was a sensitive preacher. He wasn’t cold or detached. He wasn’t casually pronouncing judgment; his heart was broken over the sin and suffering of his people. ‘I am black’ refers to a mourning garment – he carried their sorrow as his own. Do we feel the weight of the lost? Do we ache for our families, friends, and associates who do not know Jesus Christ? Too often we are indifferent. Have we grown numb? If Jeremiah could weep for his nation, surely we can grieve for the lost around us.

3. A Required Remedy (v.22)

Is there no balm in Gilead; is there no physician there? Why then is not the health of the daughter of my people recovered?

In v.22 Jeremiah asks three rhetorical questions: beginning with Is?…Is?….Why? (Notice the same technique in v.19). The first question asks about medicine, the second about doctors, and the third about health. Health is something that interests and concerns us all. There seems to be so much illness about. Sometimes we wonder about the ability of our heath providers to cope with demand, and about how we will be treated when we are sick or old. The health in our text, however, is not physical but spiritual.

I wish to consider the questions in v.22 under three headings:

I. When The Balm Was Required
II. Where the Balm was Received
III. Why The Balm Was Refused?


I. When The Balm Was Required
The balm of Gilead was a popular substance celebrated for its medicinal qualities. The word ‘balm’ denotes the gum or resin of a tree that grew in the mountainous region of Gilead. It was a valuable commodity sold by Arab and Phoenician merchants. There are two other references to it in the Bible: Gen 37:23-25; Jer 46:11. In the story of Joseph being sold by his brothers to a caravan of Ishmaelites that passed by on the way to Egypt one of the valuable products they were carrying to Egypt was balm from Gilead (Genesis 37:25).

When the question was asked about this medicinal product, ‘Is there no balm in Gilead?’ the thought behind the metaphor was the spiritual health of the people of Judah. What does this balm represent? In the context of Jeremiah’s message, it symbolises the spiritual healing needed for a sinful heart. The people of Israel had turned away from God, worshipping false idols and engaging in practices that provoked his anger. In v.19 Jeremiah describes their idolatry as ‘strange vanities,’ highlighting the emptiness that sin brings.

Sin is like a sickness that affects us all. Just as physical ailments manifest in visible symptoms, our sins reveal themselves in various ways – pride, anger, greed, and gossip. While some people may have more obvious symptoms, the truth is that we all suffer from the same chronic illness: sin. This condition requires the healing balm of Gilead.

When is the balm required? It is needed when there is a sinful heart. We must recognise our need for healing and acknowledge that we cannot cure ourselves.


II. Where the Balm Was Received

The balm was available in Gilead. It was famous for its balm. When the question was asked, ‘Is there no balm in Gilead?’ everyone knew that the answer was ‘Yes!’ There is a balm in Gilead. There is a medicine for the sinful heart. There is provision in Gilead. The people of Judah knew this, and so should we. Spiritually, this balm represents the blood of Jesus Christ, which cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7). His sacrificial death is sufficient for every sin – past, present, and future.

Jeremiah also asked, ‘Is there no physician there?’ Again the answer is a resounding ‘yes!’ In Gilead, there were many physicians. Is there a doctor available to treat a sinful heart? Certainly there is! Spiritually, we have the Great Physician; Jesus Christ. If you have a spiritual need today, remember that there is a balm in Gilead and a Physician ready to heal your sin-sick soul. The prophet Malachi (4:2) speaks of the Lord Jesus as the ‘Sun of righteousness’ who brings healing. Jesus is the friend of sinners, ready to apply the healing balm to those who confess their sins and seek him as their Saviour.


III. Why The Balm Was Refused?
This is the crux of Jeremiah’s message: ‘Why then is not the health of the daughter of my people recovered?’ If there is a plentiful supply of balm and physicians, why do the people remain sick? The answer lies in their refusal to take advantage of the treatment that is available to them. The problem lies with the patients!

Are you burdened by sin and its effects? If so, why continue to carry that weight when healing is within reach? Maybe you believe you are just fine, but in the same way that a doctor cannot help those who think they are well, Jesus cannot help those who claim to be righteous. He came to save sinners (Matthew 9:12; Luke 5:31). The tragedy is not that there is no cure, but that many will not apply it.

To find healing for your heart, you must:

A. Go to the Right Place
The balm was found in Gilead. For us, healing is found at the cross of Christ. We must come to the place where help and healing can be found.

B. See the Right Person
You must come to the Lord Jesus. He is the only one who can heal a sinful heart.

C. Take the Right Prescription
It’s not enough to see the doctor; you must follow the prescription. We must believe in Jesus Christ for salvation (Acts 16:30). His prescription requires repentance; turning from sin and placing faith in him alone for salvation.

Conclusion

Jeremiah’s cry still echoes today: The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved. The time of opportunity is passing quickly but the good news is that, in Jesus Christ, there is still balm in Gilead. There is still a Physician who heals the sin-sick soul.

  • Missed opportunity → don’t delay, today is the day of salvation (2 Cor 6:2).
  • Shared sorrow → feel the burden of the lost and let compassion move you to prayer and witness.
  • Required remedy → Apply the remedy, get to Jesus Christ, the Balm of Gilead, who alone can save, heal and restore.
Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 22:1-16 – The Oracle Concerning Bloodshed in Jerusalem

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 22 belongs to a series of oracles spoken a few years before the fall of Jerusalem in 587/586 BCE. These oracles, dated 14 August 591 BCE (20:1), focus on YHWH’s punishment of Israel/Judah. Chapter 22 presents three oracles indicting the city of Jerusalem and its inhabitants. In each the charges against Jerusalem are presented and judgement pronounced.

22:1-16 The Oracle Concerning Bloodshed in Jerusalem

22:17-22 The Oracle Concerning the Smelting of Jerusalem

22:23-31 The Oracle Concerning the Leaders of Jerusalem

THE ORACLE CONCERNING BLOODSHED IN JERUSALEM (1-16)

In this oracle, which gives a catalogue of Jerusalem’s sins, the most common words are ‘blood’ (2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 13) and ‘in thee’ (6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16).

(1) The formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ indicates that this is the beginning of a new oracle. It occurs again in v.17 and v.23.

(2) Addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH involves Ezekiel in the condemnation of Jerusalem by asking the double question ‘wilt thou judge, wilt thou judge?’ This is, in effect, an instruction (cf. 20:4; 23:36). Ezekiel is to judge the ‘bloody city’ (city of bloods) and point out her abominations (offensive things). The Jews thought of Jerusalem as the holy city (e.g. Mt 4:5; 27:53) but here Ezekiel calls it by a name that the prophet Nahum had used earlier (c. 650 BCE) to describe Nineveh (Nah 3:1). Ezekiel uses the description again concerning Jerusalem in 24:6,9.

(3) Ezekiel is to make it clear that his message has a divine origin (‘thus saith the Lord’) and proceed to inform Jerusalem and its people of the crimes of which they are accused. The charges are twofold; a) bloodshed, and b) idolatry.

a) BLOODSHED – This problem of violence and murder in Jerusalem was also highlighted by the prophet Isaiah:

And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood. Isaiah 1:15
How is the faithful city become a harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers. Isaiah 1:21

In Jerusalem itself there is total disregard for human life. ‘In the midst’ is repeated in v.7 and v.13. As a result of this ‘her time may come’ – a time of punishment – see Ezek 7:7,12.

IDOLATRY

Jerusalem makes idols (frequent, repeated, ongoing action) all over her to defile her. This breaks the first of the Ten Commandments (Exod 20:3).

(4-5) Verses 4-5 list five results of the crimes of bloodshed and idolatry:

i) Thou art become guilty in thy blood that thou hast shed; – ‘thy blood’ is ‘the blood of your victims.’ These would not only be people who were murdered but also human sacrifices which were part of idolatrous worship – children sacrificed to Molech (Ezek 16:20).

ii) and hast defiled thyself in thine idols which thou hast made

iii) and thou hast caused thy days to draw near, and art come even unto thy years: – these sins will accelerate the time of the city’s destruction (cf. 12:22-23; Jer 11:23). Some interpret ‘days’ as referring to the siege and fall of Jerusalem and ‘years’ to the time spent in captivity.

iv) therefore have I made thee a reproach unto the heathen, and a mocking to all countries. – even the Gentiles are horrified by Jerusalem’s behaviour and mock it. The consequences of her sin involve public shame. This was prophesied by Moses in Deut 28:37: And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations…

v) Those that be near, and those that be far from thee, shall mock thee, which art infamous and much vexed. – ‘Polluted in name and full of confusion,’ Jerusalem’s notoriety will spread near and far; the city will be universally despised and derided.

Verses 6-12 expand on the types of sins that are rife in Jerusalem.

(6-7) OPPRESSION

(6) ‘every one were in thee to their power’ lit. ‘everyone according to his arm’ i.e. strength, might. Every leader in Jerusalem uses his personal power for violence and murder.

The expression ‘to shed blood’ – occurs in v.6, 9, 12.

The princes of Israel could refer to the political leaders of Judah or to the Davidic kings who ruled in Jerusalem; some of whom were willing to engage in judicial murder e.g. Manasseh (2 Kgs 21:16), Jehoiakim (Jer 26:21). Instead of ensuring a stable and just society the powerful oppress others in order to benefit themselves.

The princes of Judah are like those who move boundary markers; I will pour out my fury on them like water. Hos 5:10 CSB
On the day of our king, the princes are sick with the heat of wine — there is a conspiracy with traitors. Hos 7:5 CSB
Both hands are good at accomplishing evil: the official and the judge demand a bribe;
when the powerful man communicates his evil desire, they plot it together. Mic 7:3 CSB
The princes within her are roaring lions; her judges are wolves of the night, which leave nothing for the morning. Zeph 3:3 CSB

(7) ‘In thee have they set light by father and mother: in the midst of thee have they dealt by oppression with the stranger: in thee have they vexed the fatherless and the widow.’

‘They’ in v.7 probably refers back to the ‘princes of Israel’ in v.6 but many commentators view it as referring to everyone in general in Jerusalem. The ethics of the Sinai covenant have been disregarded and the most vulnerable in society – older people, resident aliens, orphans and widows – are being exploited.

‘father and mother’ – The leaders/people have broken the fifth commandment (Exod 20:12, see also Deut 5:16; Lev 19:3) by ‘setting light by’ (i.e. dishonouring, slighting) their parents.

If you insult your father or mother, your light will be snuffed out in total darkness. Prov 20:20 NLT

Children, obey your parents because you belong to the Lord, for this is the right thing to do. “Honour your father and mother.” This is the first commandment with a promise: If you honour your father and mother, “things will go well for you, and you will have a long life on the earth.” Eph 6:1-3 NLT

‘resident aliens’ – these were foreigners allowed to live and work in Judah. Since they did not own land they were easily exploited. See Exod 22:21; Lev 19:13; Deut 10:19; 24:14-15.

‘the fatherless and the widow’ – See Exod 22:22; Deut 24:17, 19, 20, 21.

(8-11) RELIGION

These verses list sins that offend religious sensibilities and violate the ethical injunctions of the Holiness Code (Lev 17-16); especially Leviticus chapters 18 and 19. The list includes the sins of Sabbath desecration, slander, murder, idolatry, depravity and incest.

(8) Thou hast despised mine holy things, and hast profaned my sabbaths. These sins said here to have been committed by the city of Jerusalem are specifically attributed to the priests in v.26. Jeremiah, who was prophesying in Jerusalem at the same time as Ezekiel was prophesying in Babylonia, also preached against desecration of the Sabbath by the population of the city (Jer 17:20-23).

Disrespecting holy things would include activities like eating sacrificial meat while in a state of ritual impurity (Lev 7:20) or consuming it after the ‘expiry date’ (Lev 7:15-18; 19:6-8).

(9) In thee are men that carry tales to shed blood: In Jerusalem there are deceitful and treacherous men willing to give false testimony so that another may be put to death. Lit. ‘men of traffic’ or pedlars. Travelling salesmen probably carried gossip, the expression eventually came to mean slanderers or scandal-mongers. Possibly the idea here is that of informer. Naboth was a victim of malicious accusations in 1 Kgs 21:10-11. This behaviour was forbidden in the Holiness Code: Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the LORD. Lev 19:16

in thee they eat upon the mountains: in the midst of thee they commit lewdness.

The people of Jerusalem are involved in idolatrous worship (eating sacrificial meals at the high places) and, probably through participation in cultic rites, act in a depraved manner. The word zimmāh (see also v.11) meaning wickedness or lewdness is used in Leviticus of various sexual offences (e.g. Lev 18:17; 19:29; 20:14). See Ezek 16:27, 58; 22:9,11; 23:21, 27, 35, 44, 48.

(10-11) These verses give examples of the types of forbidden sexual acts practised in Jerusalem. They include cohabiting with a father’s wife, forcing (humiliating, oppressing) menstrual women to have sexual relations, committing adultery with other men’s wives (his fellow’s wife) and incestuous activity with female relatives like daughters in law and paternal sisters (see Lev 18:7-20).

(12) ACQUISITION

The people will stop at nothing, including murder, to acquire money and land. They indulge in economic exploitation – bribery, usury, extortion. These are sins of covetousness.

Acceptance of bribes – Lev19:15; Deut 16:19.

Usury (exorbitant interest on loans) – Lev 25:36-37

Extortion of a neighbour – Lev 19:35-36.

Verse 12 ends with the core accusation – they have forgotten God.

13-16 YHWH’S REACTION

(13) The Lord responds to these crimes by clapping his hands in a gesture of anger, vexation and indignation (6:11; 21:14,17). He is particularly enraged by their covetousness in pursuing ill-gotten gains and by the bloodshed that has been in their midst.

(14) YHWH asks the city a rhetorical question that emphasises that the people will not be able to endure the punishments that YHWH will certainly bring upon them because of their misconduct. Can thine heart endure, or can thine hands be strong, in the days that I shall deal with thee? In the terrible time of judgement their courage and strength will fail.

I the LORD have spoken it, and will do it. – ‘I am YHWH, what I have spoken I will do’ YHWH can be relied on to carry out what he says. This expression is also found in Ezek 17:25; 36:36; 37:14 and Num 14:35.

(15) Ezekiel predicts the Exile and claims that it is not only punishment but also purification. Exile will eradicate (consume, cause to cease, take completely way) the filth of idolatry and injustice.

(16) This will happen while the nations watch. While enduring public humiliation (‘take thine inheritance’ means ‘be profaned, be violated, dishonoured, degraded’) in the sight of the nations they will acknowledge the sovereignty of YHWH. The oracle ends with the recognition formula ‘thou shalt know that I am the Lord.’

The idea is that the Jerusalemites will be a disgrace in the sight of the surrounding nations but, as they recover from the pollution of idolatry, they will become inwardly (in thyself) conscious of their filthy state before God and eventually appreciate the Lord – as a holy and just God.

SUMMATION

Ezek 22:1-16 is a prophetic oracle in which YHWH, via Ezekiel, accuses Jerusalem of many sins and announces impending punishment in the form of exile. Ezekiel is instructed to act as judge over the ‘bloody city’ and confront it with its transgressions. These include murder, idolatry, profanation of the sabbaths, sexual depravity, extortion and the oppression of strangers, orphans and widows. The oracle singles out as especially guilty those leaders who abuse their power for personal gain. YHWH declares that Jerusalem’s doom and disgrace is inevitable.

RELEVANCE TODAY

This passage is a reminder that any society that forgets God will turn to idolatry (placing other things before God), produce corrupt leaders and tolerate injustice, oppression and exploitation of the vulnerable. Ignoring justice, compassion and faith places such a society at risk of divine judgement.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 20:45-49 – The Oracle Concerning Judgement on the Negev

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In the Hebrew Bible this section is numbered as Ezekiel 21:1-5 but in most English translations it is 20:45-49. I follow the English chapter and verse arrangement.

Having closed the oracle about Israel’s historical rebellion (20:1-44) with a prophecy of restoration after purification and judgement Ezekiel gives a brief message about that impending judgement using a parable of a forest fire. This serves as an introduction to three oracles concerning the sword in chapter 21, which elaborate on the theme of judgement.

DIVISION

45-47a YHWH’s instructions to Ezekiel.

47b-48 Parable of the forest fire.

49 The complaint

EXPOSITION

YHWH’S INSTRUCTIONS TO EZEKIEL (45-47a)

Although covered by the date given in 20:1 the prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ in 20:45 lets us know that this is a fresh revelation. In the new prophetic oracle Ezekiel shifts from the plain-speaking of his previous message to vivid metaphor.

Addressing Ezekiel by the usual term ‘Son of Adam’ (emphasising mortality) YHWH in v.46 issues a threefold instruction to Ezekiel about the South, i.e. the Negev:

set thy face toward the south (tēymān),
and drop thy word toward the south (dārôm),
and prophesy against the forest of the south field (neg̱eb).

In this verse, whether for variety or literary effect, Ezekiel employs three different words meaning ‘South.’

Ezekiel is told to ‘set his face’ toward tēymān. He was to focus attention on the south, or perhaps literally speak while facing southwards (cf. 6:2; 13:17). Tēymān means ‘that which lies on the right hand,’ referring to the direction lying to the right of a person facing east. Sweeney (2013, Reading Ezekiel, p.107) points out that it is a term that generally means “south,” but has later come to designate Yemen in Hebrew. Here it refers to the southern region of Judah.

Ezekiel is to ‘drip or drop the word;’ which is a figurative term meaning to speak a prophetic utterance on behalf of YHWH (21:2; Amos 7:16). He is to preach to Darom, another word meaning south. He is also to prophesy against the forest of the Negev field. Although Negev is a general word for south it is also the name of a specific wilderness area south of Judea. ‘Field’ is used here in the sense of ‘territory’ rather than a relatively small expanse of agricultural land (e.g. Gen 14:7; 32:3). Since the Negev is a wilderness area ‘forest’ probably signifies population rather than trees and brush. By ‘south’ Ezekiel is therefore referring to the southern parts of the Holy Land, as 21:2 clarifies.

Why does Ezekiel say ‘south?’ He may be thinking in terms of Israel’s internal geography – Judah, Jerusalem and the Negev lay in the southern part of the Promised Land. Or, although Judah technically lay southwest of Babylon, Ezekiel may be thinking of Judah as ‘the south’ from his own perspective in Babylon. H. L. Ellison (1956, Ezekiel: The Man And His Message, P.84 ) gives an interesting explanation:

Ezekiel is told to “set his face toward the south,” for though Judea lay to the west of Tel-abib, Ezekiel has been transported in spirit to the Chaldean army, which is now marching south from Carchemish and the Euphrates.

The triple reference to the south draws attention to the fact that YHWH’s judgement will fall on Judah. Ezekiel is to communicate this to ‘the forest of the Negev,’ calling it to attention with the saying ‘Hear the word of YHWH’ followed by ‘Thus says my Lord YHWH.’ KJV translates ‘Adonai YHWH’ as ‘the Lord God.’ ’aḏōnāy means ‘my Lord.’

PARABLE OF THE FOREST FIRE (47b-48)

The short parable now unfolds. YHWH intends to destroy the forest by fire and everything will perish. The fire will be unstoppable – ‘shall not be quenched’ is repeated.

  • The forest stands for Judah’s population.
  • The trees are individual people.
  • ‘Every green tree…every dry tree.’ The green trees are the righteous people and the dry trees are the wicked. God’s judgement will fall on all without distinction – everyone will be affected by the coming Babylonian invasion.
  • The fire (cf. Isa 9:18-19) is a symbol of judgement by war. The Babylonian army will sweep through Judah like a forest fire.
  • The ‘flaming flame’ (the flame of the flaming brightness) indicates the strongest possible flame.
  • ‘All faces’ – every single thing (person) in the forest.
  • ‘from the south to the north.’ – comprehensive scope, the whole land will suffer.
  • ‘Shall not be quenched’ – the judgement is unstoppable and irreversible.

(v.48) And all flesh shall see that I the LORD have kindled it: it shall not be quenched.

This verse is the climax of the oracle. YHWH takes full responsibility for kindling the fire. The judgement is public and will be seen by the entire world. Everyone will realise that it has come from YHWH. He is the ultimate cause, the Babylonians are his instruments.

THE COMPLAINT (49)

In this verse Ezekiel interjects with his own thoughts on the reaction of his fellow-exiles to the oracle. It is in the form of a short prayer in which he laments the fact that they have ridiculed him and dismissed him as being someone who just spins riddles. They claimed that his words are too obscure. That they misunderstood (perhaps deliberately) sets the scene for chapter 21 in which YHWH speaks plainly in three oracles about the sword that was coming against Judah.

SUMMATION

In a section which provides confirmation that Ezekiel was a speaking prophet as well as one who wrote we learn that a severe and comprehensive judgement is coming upon an area that lies to the south of the prophet – this can be identified as the Negev – the southern part of Judea. Ezekiel uses the metaphor of a forest fire that consumes everything (green tree and dry tree) as it spreads unchecked to communicate the idea of overwhelming judgement. All the nations will see the devastation and realise that it has been sent by YHWH. The people to whom Ezekiel communicated the oracle failed to take God’s word seriously; dismissing it as a riddle rather than a real threat. That response sets the stage for the three sword oracles of chapter 21 which proclaim the coming judgement in plain language.

Posted in Exposition

History Repeats Itself – According To An Oracle Spoken On 14 August, 591 BCE (Ezekiel 20:1-44)

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 20 opens with the ‘elders of Israel’ approaching the prophet Ezekiel with an inquiry. YHWH, however, refuses to answer their question (vv.3, 31) and instead instructs Ezekiel to ‘judge’ them by presenting a historical review spanning many centuries. It reveals a cycle of rebellion against YHWH; with each generation repeating the sins of the one before. The review emphasizes that despite repeated provocations, YHWH withheld punishment in order to prevent the profanation of his ‘name’ by the surrounding nations. The latter part of the oracle shifts from reviewing Israel’s past to predicting its future – one that will involve judgement, purification and restoration.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

The oracle in Ezekiel 20:1-44 is time-stamped the tenth day of the fifth month of the seventh year (of the exile of King Jehoiachin, 1:2) which equates to 14 August 591 BCE. This date applies not only to the oracle concerning Israelite history in 20:1-44 but to all oracles up to 23:49:

  • 20:45-49 The oracle concerning judgement on the Negev
  • 21:1-7 The first oracle concerning YHWH’s sword
  • 21:8-17 The second oracle concerning YHWH’s sword
  • 21:18-32 The third oracle concerning YHWH’s sword
  • 22:1-16 The oracle concerning bloodshed in Jerusalem
  • 22:17-22 The oracle concerning the smelting of Jerusalem
  • 22:23-31 The oracle concerning the leaders and people of Jerusalem
  • 23:1-49 The oracle concerning two adulterous sisters – Aholah and Oholibah

The date lends authenticity to Ezekiel’s record of his prophecies and helps us follow the chronology. It also anchors the relevant oracles in a precise historical period; a time of major political upheaval. By 591 BCE the Kingdom of Judah was in disarray. The first wave of deportations to Babylon had already taken place in 597 BCE; that involved the exile of King Jehoiachin and many leading citizens of Jerusalem (including Ezekiel himself). Zedekiah, a puppet king installed by Nebuchadnezzar, was in the process of shifting Judah’s political allegiance so rebellion against Babylon loomed. The elders of the Jehoiachin exiles in Babylon who approached Ezekiel likely sought divine guidance about their future amid this uncertainty.

STRUCTURE

Ezekiel chapter 20 has been divided in many ways. The most basic division is:

  • 1-32 A review of Israel’s past
  • 32-44 A prediction of Israel’s future

I suggest the following:

1-4 PREAMBLE

  • 1-4 The elders’ inquiry and YHWH’s refusal

5-32 ISRAEL’S HISTORY OF REBELLION

  • 5-9 The slave generation in Egypt
  • 10-17 The first generation in the wilderness
  • 18-26 Later generations in the wilderness
  • 27-29 The generation in the Promised Land
  • 30-32 The present generation (Ezekiel’s day) in exile

33-44 ISRAEL’S POST-EXILIC FUTURE

  • 33-39 Judgement
  • 40-44 Restoration

EXPOSITION

1-4 PREAMBLE -THE ELDERS’ INQUIRY AND YHWH’S REFUSAL

The chapter commences with a preamble that sets the historical context and the immediate circumstances that occasioned this oracle. The date is given as the 10th day of the 5th month of the 7th year [of the Jehoiachin exile]. This date equates to 14 August, 591 BCE. According to Jeremiah 52:12-13 it was on this same date five years later that the Temple was destroyed (although the author/editor of Kings dates the destruction to the 7th day, 2 Kgs 25:8-9). The 591 BCE date in 20:1 covers all content up to Ezekiel 23:49. Ezekiel supplies dates at 1:1; 3:6; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 26:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:1; 32:17; 33:21 and 40:1 – each date signals a new batch of oracles.

On 14 August 591 BCE Ezekiel received a visit, presumably at his house, from some of the ‘elders of Israel.’ This was the third time they had come to see him (8:1; 14:1; 20:1). In 8:1 they are called the ‘elders of Judah’ whereas in 14:1 and 20:1 they are called the ‘elders of Israel.’ Ezekiel seems to have used these two terms interchangeably.

The elders sat before Ezekiel (cf. 2 Kgs 6:32), having come to inquire of YHWH. We are not told what their query was but some scholars speculate, on the basis of 20:32, that they may have wished to set up some image or other representation of YHWH in Babylon. YHWH emphatically refused to give an answer to their query (20:3, 31), using the negative oath formula ‘As I live…I will not.’

While they sat there, however, he gave Ezekiel a new revelation and instructed him to arraign (formally accuse) the elders and recount the offensive practices of their ancestors. The instruction in v.4 is an exclamation in the form of a rhetorical double question ‘Wilt thou judge… wilt thou judge?’ The question is so strong that it constitutes a command. For other examples of double questions see Num 24:5; 1 Sam 2:27-28; 2 Sam 1:25-27. The expression ‘wilt thou judge?’ occurs also in Ezekiel 22:2 and 23:36.

5-32 ISRAEL’S HISTORY OF REBELLION

GENERAL REMARKS

The message from YHWH moves from generation to generation showing that Israelite history is marked by rebellion against him. It is interesting to compare Ezekiel 20 with Psalm 106. Both chapters present a review of Israel’s history divided into similar periods: the time in Egypt, the wilderness generation, the next generation in the wilderness and the generation in the land of Canaan. Whereas the psalm adheres fairly closely to the historical details given in the Pentateuch Ezekiel’s review is general. In reference to the first generation in the wilderness, for example, Psalm 106:14-21 lists a succession of events but Ezekiel 20:22-26 just makes a general statement; to the effect that the Israelites rebelled against YHWH, failed to observe his statutes and judgements and profaned the sabbaths.

This oracle receives much attention from scholars because Ezekiel’s review not only leaves out historical events in the Pentateuchal accounts but also adds historical information that is not found elsewhere in the Bible, for example:

  • that YHWH revealed himself to the Israelites in Egypt, v.5
  • that the Israelites in Egypt received a directive from YHWH not to worship Egyptian idols but rejected it, v.7
  • that YHWH made this speech to the children of Israel in the wilderness, vv.18-20
  • that YHWH gave the Israelites laws that were ‘not good.’
  • that Joshua’s generation in the Promised Land was particularly idolatrous, v.28

Notice the use of repetition in this message; the following themes recur:

  • YHWH swearing a divine oath – ‘I lifted up my hand,’ e.g. 5, 6, 15, 23.
  • ‘I am the Lord,’ e.g. 5, 7, 12, 19, 20, 26, 38, 42, 44.
  • Israel’s rebellion, e.g. 8, 13, 21.
  • A threat of divine fury, e.g. 8, 13, 21
  • YHWH’s restraint – ‘I acted for the sake of my name,’ e.g. 9, 14, 22, 44
  • pollute, polluted – e.g. 9,13,14, 16, 21, 22, 24, 26, 30, 31, 39
  • A reference to Leviticus 18:5, ‘which if a man do, he shall even live in them,’ e.g. 11, 13, 21.
  • The sabbath(s), 13, 16, 21, 24
  • ‘My’ – more than 40 times – e.g. YHWH speaks of my hand, fury, anger, name, statutes, judgements, sabbaths, eye, holy mountain, holy name.

THE SLAVE GENERATION IN EGYPT (5-9)

YHWH recalls the day when he ‘chose’ the Israelites to be his people; revealing himself to them in Egypt. The language of swearing an oath (‘lifted up my hand’ – twice in v.5 and again in v.6) makes it clear that he established a covenant with ‘the house of Jacob’ (cf. Exod 6:8); promising to be their God and bring them out of Egypt into a special land (‘flowing with milk and honey’) that he had ‘sought out’ (cf. Deut 1:33) for them. This land is described (6, 15) as the ‘ornament’ (KJV, ‘glory’ i.e. fairest) of all lands (see also Jer 3:19; Dan 8:9; 11:16, 41, 45).

Verse 5 contains the only occurrence of the verb ‘chose’ in Ezekiel. Deut 7:7-8 makes it clear that the election of Israel was the result of God’s initiative and love and not based on the nation’s merit. ‘I am the Lord ‘ is used frequently in Ezekiel but ‘I am the Lord your God’ only occurs in chapter 20 (5, 7,19, 20); emphasising the exclusive nature of the relationship between YHWH and Israel. He is not just God but Israel’s God.

The implications of Israel’s election as the people of YHWH included the command to cast away ‘the abominations of the eyes’ (things that looked good but were offensive). This is a reference to the idols of Egypt for which Ezekiel uses one of his favourite derogatory words (gillûlîm – dung-gods). Of the 48 occurrences of the word in the Old Testament 39 are in Ezekiel, and 7 of those are in chapter 20 (7, 8, 16, 18, 24, 31, 39). In v.7 we learn that the Israelites in Egypt received a directive from YHWH not to worship Egyptian idols but rejected it (cf. Josh 24:14).

YHWH’s initial reaction was to destroy them in Egypt (v.8) but acting for the sake of his ‘name’ (reputation) lest it be profaned among the nations he witheld punishment. This is because the heathen would have drawn the conclusion that Israel’s God did not have the power to carry out his stated intentions.

This rebellion in Egypt set the pattern for the remainder of Israel’s history. Ezekiel will outline a cycle of divine grace, followed by human rebellion and YHWH’s gracious restraint.

THE FIRST GENERATION IN THE WILDERNESS (10-17)

Having brought the people out of Egypt into the wilderness (Exod 12-18) YHWH gave them statutes and laws at Sinai (Exod 19-31). They were expected to adhere to these regulations which were given for their well-being – ‘which if a man do, he shall even live in them.’ This comment relating to ‘statutes and judgements’ is a reference to Leviticus 18:5. Ezekiel repeats this in vv. 13 and 21. There are also many allusions to Lev 18:5 in Ezekiel chapter 18 (18:9, 13, 17,19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 32) and in chapter 33 (33:10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19).

The gift of the sabbaths (refers to the weekly sabbath but possibly includes the other holy days) as a sign between YHWH and Israel is highlighted in v.12. Verse 12 is a repetition of Exodus 31:13 which refers exclusively to the weekly sabbath. The Sabbath is a weekly reminder that YHWH has set the nation apart. Ezekiel refers to desecration of the sabbaths in 20:13, 16, 21, 24 and in 22:8, 26; 23:38.

In spite of YHWH’s gifts the ‘house of Israel’ rebelled against him (see Exod 32:1-6; Num 25:1-3) in the wilderness (v.13); disregarding his statutes, rejecting his judgements and profaning the sabbaths (see Exod 16:27; Num 15:32). Once again, acting for the sake of his name YHWH restrained his anger (vv.14,17). Although he did not destroy them in the desert he swore that he would penalise that rebellious first generation in the wilderness by not allowing them to enter the Promised Land (Num 14:28-30; Deut 2:14). Verse 16 repeats the reasons from v.13 but adds that their rejection of YHWH’s laws and desecration of the sabbath was because their heart went after their idols. According to Amos 5:25 no sacrifices to YHWH were offered during the wilderness wanderings. Again history repeats itself: the familiar cycle of deliverance, rebellion, threatened retribution and divine restraint.

LATER GENERATIONS IN THE WILDERNESS (18-26)

YHWH addressed the descendants of the first generation in the desert and warned them not to follow the sinful example of their fathers who had rejected YHWH’s laws and worshipped idols. These Israelites who had grown up in the wilderness were commanded to keep YHWH’s statutes and judgements and honour the sabbaths – the latter an acknowledgement that YHWH was their God (‘I am the Lord your God’) and a reminder of his covenant with them.

The pattern of rebellion continued. The next wilderness generations behaved exactly like their fathers and again YHWH thought to pour out his wrath upon them only to relent (‘withdrew mine hand’) for the sake of his ‘name.’

Nevertheless, at that stage, even when they had not yet entered the land of promise, YHWH swore an oath that rebellion would result in exile and dispersal from that land. Verse 24 views exile as just punishment for law-breaking, sabbath-breaking and idolatry.

Verses 25-26 are probably the most difficult verses in the book of Ezekiel. Referring to the threat of exile because of their sin YHWH says that for that reason he gave them ‘statutes that were not good and judgements whereby they should not live; and …polluted them in their own gifts.’ Exactly what these hostile actions involved is unclear; apparently giving Israel laws that were ‘not good,’ failed to give life and defiled the people was designed to devastate them so that they might know that YHWH is the Lord.

Many interpretations have been proposed, for example:

  • God ‘gave’ has been interpreted in terms of a judicial sentence similar to ‘giving up’ or ‘giving over’ in the New Testament (e.g. Acts 7:42; Rom 1:24; 2 Thess 2:11) or to the hardening of Pharoah’s heart (Exod 4:21) . The idea is that God permitted them to follow their own desires and let them suffer the consequences of their own sin.
  • That Ezekiel as a priest was unhappy with the change to the law of Lev 17:1-9 (about profane slaughter) brought about in Deut 12:15-25 – in his view a law was ‘not good’ that allowed blood to be ‘poured out on the ground like water’ (Compare Lev 17:13 and Deut 12:16, 24).
  • Verse 26 connects child sacrifice to Molech (’cause to pass through the fire’) with the law of the firstborn. Ezekiel viewed the law of the firstborn (Exod 13:12) as a law that was ‘not good’ because people misinterpreted the command to consecrate the firstborn as a literal instruction to sacrifice children. YHWH allowed the continuation of this practice as punishment for their rebellion and idolatry. This was the means by which YHWH could defile and devastate (appal, fill with horror) the Israelites.
  • Ezekiel was being sarcastic. The Israelites found YHWH’s laws burdensome but because of their rebellion he allowed them to suffer under the even more severe rule of various foreign nations.

THE GENERATION IN THE PROMISED LAND (27-29)

Ezekiel is to speak to the people and recount how that even in the Promised Land the Israelites blasphemed YHWH and broke their commitment to him. Having previously spoken about rebellion (8,13, 21), rejection (13,16, 24) and pollution (13, 16, 21) YHWH now talks about blasphemy and treachery. Verse 28 explains what Ezekiel means by these terms.

Once in the land which YHWH had sworn to give them the Israelites indulged in idolatry; worshipping and sacrificing to pagan gods in elevated locations like ‘high hills’ or under ‘leafy trees’. Notice the repetition of ‘there’ in reference to these locations. This stands in contrast to the use of the word ‘there’ in Deut 12:1-14 to refer to the central sanctuary (the Jerusalem Temple) at ‘the place which the Lord your God shall choose out of all your tribes to place his name there’ (Deut 12:5).

…and they offered there their sacrifices, and there they presented the provocation of their offering: there also they made their sweet savour, and poured out there their drink offerings. Ezekiel 20:28

Scholars see a pun, joke or wordplay in v.29. Then I said unto them, What is the high place whereunto ye go? I have read several explanations of this, for example:

The Hebrew word for high place is bāmāh. Ba can mean ‘go’ and mah means ‘what/where,’ so bāmāh sounds like these two Hebrew words joined together to say ‘go where? Ezekiel turns the term for ‘high place’ into a mocking question from YHWH: ‘You’re going …where?’

or

‘YHWH sarcastically refers to the high places (Heb., bamah) with the pun, “what (Heb., mah) is this high place (Heh., bamah) to which you come (Heb., ba’im, singular ba)? Its name shall be called Bamah until this day.”‘ (Sweeney, Reading Ezekiel, 2013, p.105)

The final statement of v.29 that a high place is called Bamah ‘to this day’ neatly connects the behaviour of an earlier generation with Ezekiel’s generation.

THE PRESENT GENERATION (EZEKIEL’S DAY) IN EXILE (30-32)

Ezekiel is instructed to put rhetorical questions to the ‘house of Israel,’ represented by the elders who had come to him for a revelation: Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers? and commit ye whoredom after their abominations? For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even unto this day: and shall I be inquired of by you, O house of Israel? Ezekiel 20:30-31

YHWH was expressing surprise that those who offer sacrifices at the high places, practice child sacrifice and defile themselves with all their idols should dare to imagine that they could receive a revelation. Nothing has changed since the time when Israel was ‘chosen’ (v.5). every generation has been idolatrous. Therefore YHWH is not interested in their inquiry and categorically refuses to be consulted (see also v.3).

In v.32 YHWH reveals to the elders the thoughts that rose up their own minds. They had decided to be like the heathen in lands throughout the earth and serve wood and stone. They wanted to be idolaters.

33-44 ISRAEL’S POST-EXILIC FUTURE

JUDGEMENT (33-39)

In this section YHWH, using the oath formula ‘as I live,’ declares his intention to judge and purify Israel and rule over the nation as a powerful king – ‘with a mighty hand and with a stretched out arm’. This will involve severe judgement – ‘with fury poured out’ – v.33 repeated in v.34.

He speaks in v.34 about bringing Israel out from the people and countries in which they are scattered. This may be a commitment to bring the nation out of exile but the verses that follow would suggest that a spiritual leading out is in view rather than a physical. Just as he did with their ancestors in a literal sense (v.36) YHWH will bring them out into a wilderness – of the people (severing them from the heathen nations) -and lead them through another wilderness experience. There he will contend with them face to face and cause them to ‘pass under the rod’ and bring them into ‘the bond of the covenant.’ The rod is thought to be a shepherd’s rod under which sheep passed to be counted and scrutinised (cf. Jer 33:14) and ‘the bond’ to mean the discipline of the covenant.

Just like the generation in the wilderness that was denied entrance to the Promised Land (v.15) so the ‘rebels’ (i.e. idolaters) among the exiles will be purged. Many of those who had been taken into exile would not return home to Judah. To the rebels who would not acknowledge him YHWH says in v.39: ‘Just get on with your idolatry.’ He ironically tells them to fully commit to idol worship and stop mixing idol worship with worship of YHWH. This syncretism profanes YHWH’s holy name.

RESTORATION (40-44)

Having established Israel’s cycle of rebellion and exposed their idolatry and hypocrisy YHWH now reveals that there will be a future restoration – not because Israel deserves that, but in order that his name be vindicated. YHWH will bring the nation out of dispersion (v.41) and into the land that he had sworn to give to their ancestors (v.42). In that land the whole nation would serve him on ‘the holy mountain, the mountain of the height of Israel’ (i.e. Mt. Zion). There they would bring their offerings which would be accepted as a pleasing aroma.

When this new Exodus happens (v.42) the nation will finally recognise YHWH’s identity (‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’), remember their past failings and loathe themselves for all the evils they have committed. This restoration will involve owning up to their sin – true repentance brings spiritual transformation. YHWH ends the oracle by saying once more ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’ He will not act in this way because of their worthiness, for they have been wicked and corrupt and deserve to perish. YHWH will restore them solely for the sake of his own name.

In the Hebrew Bible Ezekiel chapter 20 ends at verse 44.

Posted in Exposition

A Lament for the Princes of Israel: Ezekiel 19:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 19:1-14

CHAPTER DIVISION

1-9 THE ALLEGORY OF A LIONESS AND HER CUBS

10-14 THE ALLEGORY OF AN UPROOTED VINE

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 19 continues the oracle of YHWH about ‘the land of Israel’ which commenced at 18:2. Ezekiel, instructed by YHWH, now presents a powerful lamentation for the ‘princes of Israel.’ The lament is in the form of two allegories: a lioness with her cubs and an uprooted vine. Ezekiel uses these to reflect upon the downfall of the Davidic kings of Judah. As with all parables, not just Ezekiel’s, it is unhelpful to speculate upon the meaning of every small detail. There are a variety of views on what different features of the parables represent.

When composing this dirge Ezekiel may have had in mind Jacob’s blessing upon Judah in Genesis 49. It mentions ‘a lion’s whelp’ and ‘the vine:’

…Judah is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be. Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass’s colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes… Gen 49:9-11

THE ALLEGORY OF A LIONESS AND HER CUBS (1-9)

(1) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to present a lamentation for ‘the princes of Israel.’ A lamentation (qiynāh) is a funeral song, elegy or dirge. The word is first used in 2 Sam 1:17 to describe David’s famous lament for Saul and Jonathan. This one in Ezekiel 19 is the first of six in the book of Ezekiel.

19:1-14 – A lament for Israel’s princes.
26:17 – A lament for Tyre
27:2-31 – A lament for Tyre
27:32-36 – A lament for Tyre
28:12-19 – A lament for the king of Tyre
32:2-16 – A lament for Pharaoh, King of Egypt

The ‘princes of Israel’ refers to the chieftains /rulers of Israel and in particular to the last few Davidic kings of Judah (see 12:10). Ezekiel does not call them kings; possibly to emphasise their subservience to foreign powers. Compare Jeremiah’s sorrowful prophecy about the Davidic kings in Jer 22:10-30.

(2) THE MOTHER LIONESS

Several words for lion occur in this passage: leḇiyyā’ – lioness; ’aryēh – lion (the animal); kep̱iyr – a lion, young lion (i.e. fierce).

Many commentators view the lioness as pointing to Judah (cf. Gen 49:9; Num 23:24; 24:9; Isa 29:1 – Ariel means lion of God; Rev 5:5) and her cubs as representing the royal house of Judah. In this allegory Judah the lioness lay down among other lions (the superpowers) and reared her cubs (the royal house) among young lions (the surrounding nations).

Others maintain that the reference is to Hamutal, a wife of King Josiah, whom the prophet Jeremiah referred to as queen [mother] in Jer 13:18. She was the mother of two of the last four kings of Judah; Jehoahaz (2 Kgs 23:31) and Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24:18; Jer 52:1).

(3-4) THE FIRST LION CUB

The mother lion raised her cubs in a politically dangerous environment. One in particular grew into a young lion and learned how to catch prey and devour men i.e. grew fierce and aggressive like those around it. The first lion cub is usually identified as Jehoahaz, son of Josiah and Hamutal (2 Kgs 23:31-34). The people chose him to succeed his father at age twenty-three but after a reign of just three months in 609 BCE ‘the nations also heard of him; he was taken in their pit (trap), and they brought him with chains (hooks) unto the land of Egypt.’ Jehoahaz was deported to Egypt by Pharoah Necho and his vassals, there he died. ‘Pit’ and ‘hook’ are vivid images that relate to the capture of wild animals. Despite his predatory nature Jehoahaz was easily subdued by Egypt.

(5-9) THE SECOND LION CUB

Disappointed by the fate of the first cub the mother (i.e. Judah), in desperation, took ‘another cub’ and reared him as young lion (i.e. to be aggressive). Some suggest that the second cub jointly represents Jehoiakim (605-598 BCE) and his son Jehoiachin (3 months in 597 BCE), 2 Kgs 24:8). Jehoiakim, however, was not chosen by the people of Judah but was installed by Pharaoh Necho as a puppet ruler. In addition, since Jehoiakim was not deported to Babylon but died at Jerusalem (Jer 22:18-19), it seems more likely that Ezekiel bypasses him and in this parable speaks of his son Jehoiachin (2 Kgs 24:8-16).

According to vv. 6-7 Jehoiachin too took his place among the other young lions (kings) and was ruthless, rapacious and cruel. His cruelty was not just exercised abroad but at home in Judah where he ‘knew’ (i.e. dishonoured) the nation’s defenceless widows (almanot) and laid towns to waste. Regarding widows, this may mean either that he made many women widows or that he took the wives of men he had killed into his harem. Instead of ‘widows’ many translations read ‘palaces’ (armonot), thus referring to the destruction of fortified citadels. The two words are textually similar. In either case the picture is one of ruin and desolation brought about by Jehoiachin’s oppressive rule. His ‘roaring’ represents the terror he inspired among his subjects,

As with the first cub, the nations (under Nebuchadnezzar’s rule) attacked and subjugated Jehoiachin – the net was spread over him, he was trapped in their pit, put in a cage in chains and sent to Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon, where he was imprisoned (Ezekiel was one of the aristocracy deported along with him at this time – 597 BCE). The result of the deportation was ‘that his voice should no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel.’ Jehoiachin’s rule, therefore, was brought to an end and his growl wasn’t heard again. Jehoiachin was released (2 Kgs 25:27-30) soon after the death of Nebuchadnezzar some thirty-seven years later but by that time any hope of his restoration to the throne of Judah in Jerusalem was long gone. He died in Babylon.

Note: The phrase ‘mountains of Israel’ occurs 17 times in the book of Ezekiel. See my previous post AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO THE MOUNTAINS OF ISRAEL – EZEKIEL 6:1-14. Ezekiel chapter 36:1-38 contains another oracle, this time of blessing, addressed to ‘the mountains of Israel.’

THE ALLEGORY OF AN UPROOTED VINE (10-14)

(10) The allegory now changes from a lion to a vine. The image of the nation as a vine is a common one (e.g. Psa 80; Isa 5) and Ezekiel has already used it twice: see: Ezekiel’s Vine Allegory: a Prophecy about Jerusalem – 15:1-8 and Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine. Most commentators agree that ‘in your blood’ (dam) is meaningless so there are many conjectures as to what Ezekiel might actually have meant. Some suggestions are:

  • ‘Blood’ refers to the juice of the grape therefore Ezekiel was thinking of sap, thus ‘full of vigour.’ Wine and the blood of grapes is mentioned also in Jacob’s blessing of Judah in Gen 49:11.
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘rest,’ thus Darby.
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘life.’
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘freshness.’
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘bloodline,’ thus NKJB
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘vineyard,’ thus HCSB, ESV, NASB, NIV, NRSV, NCV
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘fruitfulness.’
  • dam (blood) ought to read dama (to be like) thus ERV 1885 gives ‘in thy likeness’ as a marginal reading.

‘Your mother is a vine.’ Again, the mother is likely to represent the nation of Israel/Judah which has produced the kings. The description of a vine ‘planted by the waters’ (17:5,8) and ‘fruitful and full of branches’ evokes a time of prosperity, perhaps alluding to the reigns of David and Solomon which were considered a golden age, when Israel was strong and enjoyed God’s favour and blessings.

(11) The vine sent out strong shoots or branches that were suitable for rulers’ sceptres and its stature was exalted among the thick branches (lit. ‘thicket of clouds,’ see 31:3,10,14). This suggests that Judah produced powerful kings and was prominent among the nations.

(12) Verse 12, which is similar to 17:10, prophesies the violent end of the vine. ‘Plucked up in fury and cast to the ground’ signifies the wrath of God; his judgement upon Judah resulting in the fall of Jerusalem and the end of the Davidic monarchy. The ‘east wind’ symbolises a destructive force, in this case an invading army that brings destruction and ruin. The drying up of its fruit represents the economic strain caused by the annual payment of huge sums in tribute to Babylon. The withering and consumption by fire of its ‘strong rods’ represent the desolation of the land, the death or exile of its leaders (the kings and nobles), and the widespread suffering of the people. Most likely Zedekiah’s reign and the final siege and destruction of Jerusalem are in view.

(13) The tall luxuriant vine planted by the waters has been forcibly uprooted and now finds itself transplanted in a dry and thirsty wilderness. This verse looks forward to the Babylonian Captivity (586-538 BCE) that began when a significant portion of the Judean population was deported to Babylonia by Nebuchadnezzar after the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BCE. However, it also describes the current situation of Ezekiel and the Jehoiachin exiles who had already been exiled to Babylon in 597 BCE.

(14) This verse further emphasises complete destruction. It is possible that the phrase ‘fire is gone out of a rod of her branches’ alludes either to internal conflict and corruption or to the devastation that was accelerated by the actions of one of the kings (referred to as ‘a rod’). One instantly thinks of Zedekiah’s breach of covenant and rebellion against Babylon (see 17:18).

There is ‘no strong rod to be a sceptre to rule’—the outcome is final and definitive. This statement effectively declares Judah’s demise as a sovereign state. The line of Davidic kings has come to a sad end.

The elegy formally closes with the words: ‘This is a lamentation, and shall be for a lamentation.’ Some of the details in the lament had already come to pass and some had yet to be fulfilled. This, therefore, is a lamentation for what has already happened and it will serve as a lamentation for what will soon happen.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel 19 laments the tragic downfall of the Davidic monarchy and the kingdom of Judah. It attributes this destruction not merely to external enemies, but to internal corruption and the unrighteousness of its own kings; who ultimately brought ruin upon themselves and the nation through cruelty and poor leadership. The lament emphasises the severe consequences of sin and the utter devastation that divine justice and judgement bring about.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 16:53-63 – The Surprising Restoration of Jerusalem, Sodom and Samaria

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Verses 53-63 form a conclusion to the allegories in Ezekiel chapter 16: the allegory of Jerusalem as an adulterous wife and the allegory of the sinful sisters. This conclusion is surprising in that, despite Jerusalem’s unfaithfulness and inevitable punishment, Ezekiel declares a plan for her future restoration. Even more surprising is the additional prediction that Jerusalem’s ‘sisters,’ Sodom and Samaria, who have already been judged, will be restored as well. The same characters who have been viewed negatively in the allegories are now promised restoration.

Restoration for Sodom and Samaria

(53-55) With much repetition of the word translated ‘captivity’ YHWH announces the restoration of the fortunes of the sisters. This translation is misleading as the expression ‘bring again their captivity’ has nothing to do with exile and does not predict further judgement upon these cities, rather the opposite. The expression means ‘restore their fortunes.’ That is how the ESV translates v.53: I will restore their fortunes, both the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters, and the fortunes of Samaria and her daughters, and I will restore your own fortunes in their midst.

The original idea behind the expression may be that of someone who has entered slavery (captivity) due to extreme poverty or debt and has served his time. A male Hebrew slave was freed after six years service or during the Jubilee year (Ex 21:2; Lev 25:39). After that he could regain the status (liberty and prosperity) that he once had. A good example of the use and meaning of the expression reverse their captivity/restore their fortunes is at the end of the book of Job:

And the LORD turned the captivity of Job, when he prayed for his friends: also the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before. Job 42:10 KJV

And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends. And the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before. Job 42:10 ESV

As well as here in chapter 16 the expression occurs in Ezekiel 29:14 and 39:25.

Verses 53-55 are perplexing as, taken at face value, they predict restoration of the fortunes of Sodom, Samaria, Jerusalem and their satellite towns and villages (‘daughters’). Details about how and when this will be achieved are not supplied.

This is the only biblical prophecy which predicts that Sodom will regain its former status. By contrast, the tenor of other scriptures is rather that Sodom’s destruction is perpetual. For example: Isaiah speaking about Babylon says it will lie desolate like Sodom:

And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees’ excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there. Isaiah 13:19-20.

Zephaniah prophesied in a similar vein with reference to Moab: Therefore as I live, saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah, even the breeding of nettles, and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation… Zephaniah 2:9

Some would suggest (cf. Mat 11:23-24) that in fulfilment of 16:53-55 the people of Sodom will be raised to life and rehabilitated or given a second chance after death. Those who hold the doctrine of apokatastasis (restoration, reintegration, reconstitution) would view this Old Testament passage, along with others in the New Testament (Acts 3:21; Rom 5:18-19; 11:23-26,32; 1 Cor 15:24-28; 2 Cor 5:19; Eph 1:9-10; Phil 2:10-11; Col 1:19-20; 1 Tim 2:4-6; 4;10; Tit 2:11; 1 Pet 3:19-20; 2 Pet 3:9; Rev 5:13), as biblical evidence for universalism.

According to v.54 the purpose of YHWH’s restoration of Sodom and Samaria is that Jerusalem will feel shame. This is because she has been so wicked that if she is to be restored then the restoration of Sodom and Samaria, cities which are deemed to be less wicked than Jerusalem, is required as well. Judah will be a ‘comfort’ to Sodom and Samaria in the sense that their suffering was not as severe as that which Judah/Jerusalem will experience. Jerusalem will bear her own shame.

Perhaps one ought to bear in mind that Ezekiel chapter 16 is allegorical, metaphorical and full of hyperbole. In v.55 Ezekiel may just be saying that once Jerusalem’s punishment is over the entire country will one day prosper. Thus the three cities with their satellite towns and villages, representing the whole land, can metaphorically be said to regain the status that they had in their heyday.

A less common interpretation of v.55, based on the word ‘when’ in the KJV translation, is that this is a promise by YHWH never to restore the fortunes of the three cities.

When thy sisters, Sodom and her daughters, shall return to their former estate, and Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former estate, then thou and thy daughters shall return to your former estate. Ezekiel 16:55

That is, when the fortunes of Sodom and Samaria are restored, which is never (since the 10 tribes of Israel are lost and Sodom has been perpetually destroyed), then Judah/Jerusalem’s fortunes will be restored, i.e. never.

In v.55 notice the repetition of the verb (shall return), the proper name of a city and the phrase ‘and her daughters’ three times.

(56-59) Verses 56-57 are a question: ‘Was not Sodom thy sister such a chronicle upon thy lips in the day of thy exaltations….?’ YHWH again reminds Jerusalem of her past by saying that in her heyday (the day of thy exaltations- plural) she once considered herself morally superior to her sister Sodom and looked down upon her. Sodom’s fate was talked about during Jerusalem’s glory days (cf. v.14) but not presented as a warning and example of what pride could bring about.

Jerusalem’s own sins led to her exposure and humiliation before her surrounding enemies; ones like Syria (cf. Isa7:1-9) and the Philistines (cf. Isa 9:11-12). In vv. 58-59, speaking as though it had already been accomplished, YHWH asserts that before the restoration of vv.53-55 comes about Jerusalem must first endure the consequences of her lewdness (see vv.15-36) and her despising of the oath in breaking of the covenant (cf.16:8). Note the ‘thus saith the Lord’ in v.59. Sodom and Samaria have had their periods of humiliation and judgement, now Jerusalem must suffer hers before all three will be eventually restored together.

(60-63) Unlike Jerusalem who did not remember the days of her youth when YHWH showed kindness to her (16:22, 43) YHWH will remember those days and the covenant that he made with her. She had broken that one by her harlotry (vv. 32-34) but YHWH will will establish a new covenant (see Jer 31:31-34) with her; an everlasting one (see 2 Sam 23:5; Isa 55:3). The phrase ‘I will establish’ is repeated in v.62. We know from Ezek 11:19-20; 36:25-28 that this new covenant will last because it involves a new heart and a new spirit.

In those days Jerusalem will remember her ‘way’ (16:25, 27, 31, 43, 47×2) and be embarrassed by YHWH’s kindness toward Sodom and Samaria and perhaps humiliated at being linked with such despised sinners. However, those ‘sisters’ will not be equal partners with Jerusalem in the new covenant. Sodom, Samaria and other older and younger sisters (‘older and younger sisters’ is in the plural form) will be given to her as daughters. The areas represented by all the cities will become one unified territory with Jerusalem as the capital. Sodom, Samaria and the others will be her ‘daughters’ i.e. dependent cities. None of this is due from the former broken covenant but is an act of YHWH’s free grace.

The passage ends with the further assertion that YHWH will establish his (new) covenant with Jerusalem and although she will be forgiven yet the memory of what she has done will produce in her shame, embarrassment and self-loathing.

SUMMATION OF EZEKIEL CHAPTER 16

Ezekiel chapter 16, one of the most difficult chapters in the Bible, consists of two allegories in which YHWH speaks through the prophet Ezekiel and addresses Jerusalem as if the city is a real person. In what is sometimes crude and graphic language he describes how he found her as an abandoned and helpless baby, cared for her and watched her grow. He eventually married her and gave her everything; beauty, clothes and jewellery. He treated her like royalty but Jerusalem then turned away from YHWH and became unfaithful. She chases after other nations and their gods, acting as a prostitute but worse – offering herself freely, not even for gain.

In the second allegory YHWH drives home the message of Jerusalem’s betrayal by saying that her behaviour has been worse than that of her ‘sisters’ Sodom and Samaria; notorious sinners whom YHWH has already judged. This comparison is designed to humble Jerusalem.

Then, in an unforeseen twist, YHWH promises to restore Sodom and Samaria along with Jerusalem, a future act of mercy. After she suffers punishment for her sins he will restore the relationship with Jerusalem and establish a new and lasting covenant. She (i.e. the people of Judah) will be forgiven but will always remember her past with embarrassment.

Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Judgement – Ezekiel 16:35-43

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

My two previous posts (The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14 and The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34) covered the first 34 verses of Ezekiel 16. This chapter consists of a monologue by YHWH which takes the form of an allegory in which he compares Jerusalem to a woman whom he found in a desperate state as an abandoned infant. He rescued, nurtured and cared for her and when he saw that she had matured, married her (entered into a covenant) and made her prosperous and beautiful.

However, she became spiritually unfaithful by prostituting herself with foreign powers and their false deities. She squandered her God-given resources on idolatry and prostituted herself (made alliances) with foreign nations rather than trusting her husband YHWH. She was actually worse than a prostitute because she paid others to corrupt her (i.e. paid tribute to states like Egypt, Assyria and Babylonia) rather than receive payment from them for her services. In the next section of the allegory (vv.35-43) YHWH declares judgement upon Jerusalem for her misdeeds.

JERUSALEM’S JUDGEMENT (35-43)

(35) This section begins with ‘wherefore’ (therefore, on account of, thus, so) which looks back to the accusations of prostitution set out in vv.15-34 and draws attention to what will now be said. YHWH addressing Jerusalem directly as ‘O harlot,’ tells her to ‘hear the word of the Lord.’ He is thus directing the nation to pay attention to his message of judgement.

The word here translated ‘wherefore’ appears many times in the book of Ezekiel to indicate the direct result of what has just been said (causes and consequences): Ezek 5:7; 11:11; 13:8; 15:6; 16:35, 37; 20:27; 21:24; 22:19; 23:35; 24:9; 25:4, 7, 9,13,16; 26:3; 28:6; 29:8; 31:10; 34:7, 9, 20; 35:6.11; 36:3,4, 5, 6,7, 14.

(36) Again the messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ appears, followed by two announcements of judgement (36-42; 43), each prefaced by ‘because you’ (v.36, 43). Then comes a summary of the reasons for judgement followed by a statement of the consequences.

FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT

THE REASONS for YHWH’s punishment are listed as;

  • Because thy filthiness was poured out, – The word translated filthiness (KJV, NKJV) means ‘bronze.’ Based on an assumption that neither the ancient Israelites nor the Babylonians used copper as money and that the verb ‘to pour out’ is used in v.15 and in Ezek 23:8 in connection with prostitution many translations (e,g. CSB; ESV; NIV; NLT; NRSV) follow the KJV thought of filthiness and translate ‘bronze’ as ‘lust.’ This idea may have been inspired by the green patina or crust caused by oxidation that forms on brass, bronze and copper. Darby, however, sensibly views ‘bronze’ as a general term for wealth and translates the word as ‘money.’ Payment of tribute in bronze was made to both Assyrians (2 Kgs 16:17-18) and Babylonians (2 Kgs 25:13-14).
  • and thy nakedness discovered through thy whoredoms with thy lovers, – the theme of the naked female body has appeared throughout this allegory and remains the focus of Jerusalem’s punishment (vv.36, 37, 39). ‘Lovers,’ referring to Egypt (v.26), Assyria (v.28) and Babylonia (v.29), occurs in vv. 33, 36 and 37.
  • and with all the idols of thy abominations, – this is the only appearance of the word ‘idols’ in Ezek 16. Here idols are linked with ‘abominations’ (offensive things), this word occurs in vv. 2, 22, 36, 43, 47, 50, 51, 58.
  • and by the blood of thy children, which thou didst give unto them; – a reference to child sacrifice (v.20).

(37-42) THE CONSEQUENCES

Exposure

Having listed Jerusalem’s crimes YHWH now pronounces the penalties. He declares that he will bring together all her former ‘lovers’ i.e. the nations with which Jerusalem had entered into alliances and idolatry. These will turn against her; therefore the ‘gathering’ against Jerusalem symbolises besieging armies. ‘Loved and hated’ reflects Judah’s shifting political relationships with other nations.

Stretching the allegory to its limits, the punishment for Jerusalem is compared to that for adultery.

‘Uncover thy nakedness’ – refers to public disgrace by exposure which formed part of the ancient punishment for being caught in the act of adultery (Isa 47:3; Jer 13:22, 26; Hos 2:3; Nah 3:5). YHWH will expose Jerusalem to the former lovers with whom she had prostituted herself. This public disgrace represents Jerusalem’s downfall that will be witnessed by the surrounding nations.

The ‘lovers’ represent the assembly (‘the men of the city’ Deut 21:21) who carry out the punishment for adultery. This, of course, is not true to real life as, according to the Law, both parties involved in adultery were due the death penalty: If a man be found lying with a woman married to a husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel. Deut 22:22

Death Penalty

(38) YHWH makes it clear that the death penalty pronounced upon Jerusalem is not only for adultery (‘break wedlock’) but also murder (‘shed blood’). The ‘shed blood’ may refer to the child sacrifice mentioned in v.36 or to the violence that was rife in Jerusalem (Jer 2:34; Ezek 7:23). The Law demanded execution for adultery (Lev 20:10), murder (Ex 21:12) and child sacrifice (Lev 20:1-4).

YHWH will enact this severe penalty against Jerusalem ‘in fury and jealousy.’ Fury relates to murder and the jealousy to adultery. This verse contains the final mention of blood in the chapter (see also vv. 6, 9, 22, 36).

Humiliation

(39) YHWH will cause Jerusalem’s former lovers, with whom she had previously sought security, to return her to her original state of vulnerability. Jerusalem’s former enemies will demolish the sites of false worship (mounds and high places) and strip her of YHWH’s gifts (clothes and vessels of glory, see vv.10-13); blessings which she has used unfaithfully (see vv. 16-19). In other words, Judah will lose wealth and status.

Stoning, Cutting to pieces and Burning.

(40-41) The crowd or mob that that will come up against Jerusalem represents the Babylonian army that will attack Jerusalem with stones (flung by war engines) and slay the inhabitants with swords. They will set fire to all the buildings in the city, including the Temple.

Stoning was the usual mode of execution in ancient Israel and was the penalty for a variety of crimes whereas execution by the sword was prescribed for communal idolatry (Deut 13:15). Execution by burning was unusual but did apply for two crimes (Lev 20:14; 21:9).

The term ‘many wives’ (or ‘women’, see vv. 30, 32, 34) probably represents other nations that will look on as YHWH’s public punishment on Jerusalem takes place and to which it will serve as an example. The goal of the punishment is to end Jerusalem’s prostitution, i.e. to bring an end to her idolatry and reliance upon heathen nations. Jerusalem will ‘give payment’ (ESV) no more because Judah will lose its national independence and cease to be a regional power. These verses predict the siege and invasion of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in 587/586 BCE.

(42) After the judgement is carried out YHWH’s fury will be appeased and his jealousy will subside. His wrath will be calmed because the matter will have been dealt with. In this verse we have an example of anthropopathism – ascribing human feelings and emotions to something that is not human; in this case deity.

SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT

As with the first announcement of judgement in vv. 36-42 this second announcement in v.43 restates the motivation for and then the consequences of YHWH’s punishment of Jerusalem.

(43) THE REASONS

Like v.36 this verse begins with ‘because you.’

  • Jerusalem did not remember the days of her youth (cf. v.22), i.e. the nation forgot the Lord’s deliverance and provision during its early history e.g. the Exodus and the making of the Sinai Covenant.
  • Jerusalem enraged YHWH ‘in all these [things].’ This must refer to the examples of prostitution listed from v.15 onwards.

THE CONSEQUENCES

As in v.37 the consequences here in v.43 begin with the words ‘behold, therefore.’

  • YHWH brought her way (deeds) on her head. The idea seems to be that because of her forgetting and her bad behaviour YHWH has held her to account for her ways (perfect tense). This verse views YHWH’s judgement from a future perspective, as having happened in the past. The phrase ‘I will give your [their} way upon your [their] head’ is also found in Ezek 9:10; 11:21; 17:19; 22:31; 33:4.
  • Jerusalem will no longer do licentiousness (engage in prostitution) in addition to all her other detestable practices (abominations). ‘Licentiousness’ (KJV ‘lewdness) and ‘abominations’ together sum up Jerusalem’s sin and are again paired in v.58.

SUMMATION

Using unsettling and violent imagery YHWH, in vv. 35-43, pronounces judgement upon Jerusalem for her infidelity (breach of covenant – Lev 26:16-17, 25, 38; Deut 28:25, 41, 47-58). She will be exposed and shamed before all her former ‘lovers’ and stripped of all the blessings that YHWH has bestowed upon her. YHWH will hand her over to these ‘lovers’ who will carry out divine justice in the form of invasion, destruction and exile.

The metaphor of an adulterous wife is used to show the seriousness of Judah’s spiritual betrayal and the harshness of the punishments in the allegory emphasise that the Lord will not tolerate sin. Idolatry and unfaithfulness are especially serious. As modern readers we might well ask ourselves how often do we turn away from God and chase after things that may be morally or spiritually corrupt. Do we take his kindness and provision for granted and forget that we have a covenant relationship with him?

Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

My previous post The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14 introduced an extended metaphor which was communicated by YHWH to the prophet Ezekiel with a command to deliver it to the exiles. This was in order to convince them that Jerusalem’s punishment was certain because of her abominations. In the section 1-14 Jerusalem is personified as a woman whom YHWH came across as an abandoned baby, then rescued and provided for. Once she reached maturity he married her (made a covenant with her), and dressed and adorned her to the extent that she became a beautiful queen; famous for her good looks. This all symbolises the early history of YHWH’s relationship with Israel.

JERUSALEM’S PROSTITUTION (15-34)

(15) Unfortunately v.15 begins with ‘but,’ which gives a hint that the relationship might have soured. Despite having been blessed by YHWH with beauty, prosperity and influence Jerusalem trusted in her good looks and prostituted herself with foreign nations. Unlike the previous section (1-14) where the focus is on YHWH (referring to himself as ‘I’) the next major section (15-43) focuses on Jerusalem (addressed as ‘you’). The two sections are linked by the words ‘beauty and ‘renown,’ both of which occur in v.14 and then again in v.15.

The beauty which gave her renown among the nations had been bestowed upon her by YHWH but, full of pride and self-confidence, Jerusalem abused YHWH’s trust and relied on her own beauty. It is a fact that success can change some people for the worse; this was recognised by Moses, writing in the book of Deuteronomy:

Beware that thou forget not the LORD thy God, in not keeping his commandments, and his judgements, and his statutes, which I command thee this day: Lest when thou hast eaten and art full, and hast built goodly houses, and dwelt therein; And when thy herds and thy flocks multiply, and thy silver and thy gold is multiplied, and all that thou hast is multiplied; Then thine heart be lifted up, and thou forget the LORD thy God, Deut 8:11-14

A similar observation to that about Jerusalem in v.15 is made about the king of Tyre in Ezek 28:17: ‘Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty.’

With new-found self confidence Jerusalem asserted her independence and ‘poured out’ (see also v.36) her harlotry (i.e. acted like a prostitute) on every passer-by. Since v.15 links her activity with her renown and in v.14 her renown was among the nations then those who received her sexual favours are the nations. This is a metaphorical way of describing alliances with foreign powers.

The allegory very much emphasises a verb meaning ‘engaging in prostitution’ and related words like ‘prostitute’ which occur some twenty times in vv.15-36. This perhaps becomes more obvious when these verses are read in a modern translation; such as the Christian Standard Bible.

16-21 ‘YOU TOOK’

Verses 16-21 specify four actions by Jerusalem in which she took gifts given to her by YHWH and used them for prostitution.

(16) And of thy garments thou didst take, and deckedst thy high places with divers colours, and playedst the harlot thereupon: the like things shall not come, neither shall it be so.

Jerusalem took the expensive embroidered ‘garments’ (clothes or coverings, also v.18) which had been presented to her by YHWH (vv.10, 13) and made shrines (bāmôt, high places) with the material. The image is of her making up a bed with these materials given by her husband and prostituting herself on them with her lovers (interestingly, the word ‘garment’ is elsewhere translated ‘bed’ – 1 Sam 19:13). This activity by Jerusalem may be a reference to the presence of cult prostitution in Israel (cf. Isa 57:7). The clause at the end of v.16 is unclear (‘such are not to come and it will not be’) but probably means something like: ‘things like this should not take place.’

(17) Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them,

YHWH says that Jerusalem also took ‘thy fair jewels.’ This may also be translated ”your vessels of glory’, a term that appears again in v.39. ‘Glory’ directs the reader back to ‘crown of glory’ (beautiful crown) in v.12. Gold and silver are mentioned in v.13 where it is implied but not stated that they were supplied by YHWH. Now v.17 makes it clear that they were indeed a gift from YHWH. Jerusalem took these precious metals and made ‘for herself’ (also v.24) ‘images of men’ (male statues), idols with which she engaged in prostitution. Israel turned to idolatry.

(18-19) And tookest thine embroidered garments, and coveredst them: and thou hast set mine oil and mine incense before them. My meat also which I gave thee, fine flour, and oil, and honey, wherewith I fed thee, thou hast even set it before them for a sweet savour: and thus it was, saith the Lord GOD.

Verse 18 begins with the third ‘you took’ specifying that the woman also used the embroidered garments (10, 13, 16) to dress the masculine images that she had made from YHWH’s precious metals. In addition she offered YHWH’s oil, incense and food (my oil, my incense, my food) to these idols. The specific food items are fine flour, oil and honey.

This is the only mention of incense in the allegory. In chapter 8:11-12 Ezekiel saw 70 elders of Israel burning incense to pagan deities. There it says that a fragrant (or thick) cloud of incense arose. The next verse in this passage (v.19), using a different word for fragrant, says that Jerusalem offered food – fine flour, oil and honey – to her idols for a ‘sweet savour’ (fragrant aroma). It was believed that as such products burned a fragrant or soothing aroma arose to the nostrils of the deity being worshipped.

This idea is first mentioned in connection with sacrifices offered by Noah after the Flood (Gen 8:20-21). Note that three of the five major Levitical fire offerings (‘ōlāh, minḥāh and šelem) in the tabernacle system of worship (Lev 1-7) are said to be ‘sweet savour’ offerings (‘ōlāh, transl. Burnt or Ascending offering – Lev 1:9, 13, 17; minḥāh, transl. Grain, Meal, Meat i.e. Food or Cereal offering – Lev 2:2, 9; šelem, transl. Peace or Fellowship offering – Lev 3:5, 16). The offering of honey by fire to YHWH was prohibited (Lev 2:11).

(20-21) Moreover thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this of thy whoredoms a small matter, That thou hast slain my children, and delivered them to cause them to pass through the fire for them?

Now YHWH accuses Jerusalem of taking her own children and giving them up to be sacrificed. ‘To them’ refers to the masculine statues of v.17 and it was to these that the woman offered up her sons and daughters (children that she had borne to YHWH) for consumption.

At the end of v.20 YHWH asks ‘Is this less than your harlotry?’ i.e. he is asking if her acts of prostitution were not enough, surely this is even worse!

She slaughtered her children whom she presented when offering them up ‘to them’ (the idols). The same verb ‘slaughtered’ (šāḥaṭ, KJV slain) is used again in Ezek 23:39 in connection with the sacrifice of children to idols. The practice of child sacrifice was associated with Canaanite religion, especially the worship of Molech. King Ahaz of Judah is said to have ‘made his son to pass through the fire,’ presumably as part of a pagan ritual (2 Kgs 16:3). That some Israelites practised this is mentioned in 2 Kgs 17:17 and Jer 32:35 cf. 2 Kgs 23:10. The Law specifically prohibited the Israelites from engaging in child sacrifice to Molech (Lev 18:21; 20:2-5).

22- 34 INGRATITUDE AND GREATER SPIRITUAL ADULTERY

(22) Jerusalem’s sin is not just idolatry but ingratitude. YHWH reminds her of her humble beginnings and of how he had rescued and provided for her (16:4-13). She has not remembered ‘the days of her youth’ (vv.22, 43) when she was ‘naked and bare’ (cf. v.70 and polluted in her own blood (cf. v.6).

(23) Upon reading the opening words of v.23 (‘then after all your evil’) one might expect a conclusion to follow but instead YHWH exclaims ‘Woe, woe, to you’ in horror at further acts of prostitution and adultery that he proceeds to list in vv.24-34.

(24-25) The accusations levelled by YHWH against Jerusalem flow from the assertion in v.15 that she trusted in her own beauty and engaged in prostitution. From vv. 16-23 that prostitution takes the form of idolatrous activity which includes the construction of shrines and the offering of sacrifices. These verses seem to concentrate on the idolatry and not so much on the sexual theme. The allegory, however, picks up the latter again in vv. 24-34 where the main idea is that Jerusalem is sexually insatiable. In vv. 24-25 the prostitution is still linked with idolatry, from v.26 the figure extends to political alliances with foreign powers.

V.24 has two accusations:

  • ‘Thou hast also built unto thee an eminent place’ – This word is not bāmôt which is translated ‘high places’ in v.16. Here the word for ‘mound’ (KJV ’eminent place’) is gaḇ; it refers to something curved, to any convex surface, e.g eyebrows in Lev 14:9, the rim (KJV nave) of a wheel, 1 Kgs 7:33; Ezek 1:18). It occurs also in v.31 and v.39.
  • ‘and hast made thee a high place in every street’ – Here the word translated ‘high place’ is rāmāh. It means a hill or high ground.

Jerusalem had constructed mounds upon which were shrines for the worship of pagan idols. The word ‘built’ in vv. 24 and 25 occurs also at v.31. These mounds were at the head of every path or square. Reḥôb means path, street, plaza or square, open area. There she ‘spread her feet to’ (had relations with) everyone that passed by. Perhaps this is a play on vv.5-6. There Jerusalem was a baby abandoned in an ‘open field’ and it was YHWH who ‘passed by’.

Jerusalem ‘multiplied her harlotry;’ this is repeated in vv. 26 and 29. Her once desirable beauty became detestable to YHWH and to others as a result of her promiscuity.

(26-29) Verse 26 again takes up the theme of prostitution with the expression ‘engaged in prostitution.’ It also occurs in vv. 15, 16 and 17 and will appear again twice in v.28. Now the prostitution is not so much cultic as political. Four nations (Egyptians, Philistines, Assyrians, Chaldeans) are mentioned in the historical order in which Jerusalem had political dealings with them. It is specifically stated that she engaged in prostitution with three of them.

1) The sons of Egypt – the Egyptians are described as neighbours and also as ‘great of flesh.’ The latter phrase is a double entendre that could either be taken to mean well-endowed or fat and flabby. As well as the repetition of ‘engaged in prostitution’ there is also repetition of the ‘multiplied your harlotry’ phrase from v.25. Several kings of Israel and Judah made it part of their diplomatic strategy to form an alliance (for political, military or economic reasons) with Egypt, one of the most powerful nations in the Ancient Near East. For example:

SOLOMON (United Monarchy)

Solomon made a marriage alliance with Pharaoh king of Egypt. He took Pharaoh’s daughter and brought her into the city of David until he had finished building his own house… 1 Kings 3:1ESV (see also 1 Kgs 9:16)

HOSHEA (Northern Kingdom – Israel) rebelled against Assyria and sought alliance with Egypt

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria. And Hoshea became his vassal and paid him tribute. But the king of Assyria found treachery in Hoshea, for he had sent messengers to So, king of Egypt, and offered no tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. 2 Kings 17:3-4 ESV

HEZEKIAH (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

And the Rabshakeh said to them, “Say to Hezekiah, ‘Thus says the great king, the king of Assyria: On what do you rest this trust of yours? 20 Do you think that mere words are strategy and power for war? In whom do you now trust, that you have rebelled against me? Behold, you are trusting now in Egypt, that broken reed of a staff, which will pierce the hand of any man who leans on it. Such is Pharaoh king of Egypt to all who trust in him. 2 Kings 18:19-21 ESV

JEHOIAKIM (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

And Pharaoh Neco made Eliakim the son of Josiah king in the place of Josiah his father, and changed his name to Jehoiakim. But he took Jehoahaz away, and he came to Egypt and died there. And Jehoiakim gave the silver and the gold to Pharaoh, but he taxed the land to give the money according to the command of Pharaoh. He exacted the silver and the gold of the people of the land, from everyone according to his assessment, to give it to Pharaoh Neco. 2 Kings 23:34-35 ESV

ZEDEKIAH (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

But he rebelled against him by sending his ambassadors to Egypt, that they might give him horses and a large army. Will he thrive? Can one escape who does such things? Can he break the covenant and yet escape? “As I live, declares the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwells who made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant with him he broke, in Babylon he shall die. Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company will not help him in war, when mounds are cast up and siege walls built to cut off many lives. Ezekiel 17:15-17 ESV

Verses 22 and 23 suggested that the reasons for Jerusalem’s behaviour were her forgetfulness and wickedness. Now v.26 says that the motive was a deliberate intention to provoke her husband (YHWH). Her idolatry and foreign alliances so angered YHWH that in v.27 he draws attention to the fact (‘behold!) that he therefore ‘stretched out his hand over her’ i.e. acted against her in judgement. He reduced her lot and gave her over to the greed of her enemies the Philistines. At one stage Philistia must have annexed some of Judah’s territory.

Even the Philistines were appalled by Jerusalem’s lewd conduct, i.e. her moral and spiritual corruption. She is not said to have engaged in prostitution with the Philistines but v.28 states twice that she did so with the sons of Assyria (Assyrians), and was insatiable. That she was insatiable is repeated at the end of v.29. The kings who allied with Assyria include:

MENAHEM (Northern Kingdom – Israel)

Pul the king of Assyria came against the land, and Menahem gave Pul a thousand talents of silver, that he might help him to confirm his hold on the royal power. Menahem exacted the money from Israel, that is, from all the wealthy men, fifty shekels of silver from every man, to give to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria turned back and did not stay there in the land. 2 Kings 15:19-20 ESV

HOSHEA (Northern Kingdom – Israel)

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria. And Hoshea became his vassal and paid him tribute. 2 Kings 17:3 ESV

AHAZ (Southern Kingdom – Judah)

So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria, saying, “I am your servant and your son. Come up and rescue me from the hand of the king of Syria and from the hand of the king of Israel, who are attacking me.” Ahaz also took the silver and gold that was found in the house of the LORD and in the treasures of the king’s house and sent a present to the king of Assyria. 9 And the king of Assyria listened to him. 2 Kings 16:7-9 ESV – see also Isa 7:1-17

Addicted to idolatry and political entanglements Jerusalem could not be satisfied so kept moving on to other relationships. The next relationship, mentioned in vv. 28-29, is that with the sons of Chaldea, i.e. the Babylonians, the ascendant power when Ezekiel was writing. Babylonia is described as a ‘land of Canaan’ i.e. a nation of merchants.

The Canaanites, e.g. the Phoenicians (main towns Tyre and Sidon), were so famous for trading in the ancient world that the name was used as a term for trader, trafficker or merchant. For a description of their trading activities that is of great historical interest see the Lament for Tyre in Ezekiel chapter 27, especially vv.12-25. For examples of the use of Canaanite or land of Canaan for merchant see Ezek 17:5; Prov 31:24; Hos 12:7; Zeph 1:11; Zech 14:21.

(30-34) In these last few verses of this section of the allegory accusing Jerusalem of engaging in prostitution YHWH moves on from the nations to claim that Jerusalem is not like other women and, as a matter of fact, she isn’t even like other prostitutes. The word ’iššāh, meaning woman or wife occurs 3 times in these verses, 30, 32, 34.

YHWH disgustedly asks Jerusalem what is wrong with her heart that she acted like a brazen prostitute. She had a great relationship with YHWH who loved, cared and provided her so why did she have so many relationships, moving from one to another, when none of them left her satisfied? He then refers in v.31 to some of her activities that have already been described in vv. 15-29:

  • In that thou buildest thine eminent place (gab) in the head of every way –
  • and makest thine high place (rāmāh) in every street;
  • and hast not been as a harlot, in that thou scornest hire;

The verb ‘to build’ is the same as that used in vv.24 and 25. ‘At the head of every way’ is also repeated from v.25a, there it is said of the rāmāh but here in v.31 of the gab.

Unlike other prostitutes who accept payment for their services Jerusalem was so depraved and desperate that she scoffed at payment. The word ’eṯnan, meaning a prostitute’s pay (KJV, hire or reward), occurs in v.31, v.34 twice and in v.41.

In v.32 , quite far on in the allegory the verb ‘commit adultery’ occurs (also in v.38. ‘break wedlock’ KJV). Like a woman (wife) who commits adultery Jerusalem takes strangers instead of her husband. She has therefore broken the covenant obligations of v.8.

Verse 33 quickly returns to the notion of prostitution and says that ‘they’ (i.e. the strangers) always give gifts to prostitutes (i.e. pay their fee) but Jerusalem gives presents to (i.e. bribes) her lovers ‘on every side’ that they may come ‘into’ her. This is another double entendre in the allegory; the preposition ’el can indicate motion toward (hence KJV ‘unto’) but can also mean ‘into.’ It is used of sexual intercourse in Gen 16:2 and Num 25:1. This is a metaphorical reference to Israel and Judah paying tribute as vassal states to the dominant powers of the time – the nations ‘on every side’ (i.e. all around).

V.34 makes the point that Jerusalem is not a typical female prostitute:

  • none followeth thee to commit whoredoms – none of the neighbouring states were interested in forming an alliance with Jerusalem.
  • and in that thou givest a reward, and no reward is given unto thee – In her quest for political security Jerusalem had to pay tribute to other states.

SUMMATION

In the Ezekiel 16:15-34 section of the allegory YHWH, through Ezekiel, accuses Jerusalem of pride leading to prostitution with foreign nations. Despite having experienced YHWH’s provision and protection the nation of Israel/ Judah was unfaithful. This reflects the history of Israel during the period of the judges and especially under the monarchy. The turning to idolatry and alliances with pagan states constituting spiritual adultery began in earnest with Solomon during the united monarchy. This state of affairs continued under the kings of both Israel and Judah when the monarchy divided after his death. Their dependence upon foreign nations rather than YHWH did not work out well for Israel and Judah. The Northern Kingdom (Israel) fell to Assyria in 722 BCE and the Southern Kingdom (Judah) to Babylon in 586/7 BCE. The next section of the allegory (vv. 35-43) is about Jerusalem’s judgement.

Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapter 16 Ezekiel continues to impress upon the Judahite exiles who are with him in Babylonia the fact that, contrary to the predictions of false prophets, things at home are not going to improve soon. Rather, such are the sins of Israel/Judah that there is now no hope of avoiding YHWH’s wrath. His judgement will fall upon the nation soon.

YHWH, through Ezekiel, uses shock tactics to convey how evil the nation appears in his sight. In an extended and elaborate metaphor (or, perhaps more accurately, two allegories that share the same ending) the prophet communicates a negative portrayal of the history of Israel’s relationship with YHWH. Using disturbing language that is vulgar, crude and charged with marital, sexual and violent imagery Ezekiel, speaking for YHWH, accuses the nation of unfaithfulness in the form of idolatry and inappropriate relations with foreign powers.

Jerusalem (representing Israel/Judah) is personified as a female infant who has been abandoned by her parents and is rescued by YHWH. He returns some years later to find that she has matured (breasts and pubic hair) and is ‘at the age for love’ (vv.7-8). He marries her (v.8), bestows many gifts upon her and beautifies her (vv.9-14), with the result that she becomes famous for her good looks. Proud and self-confident she becomes not just an adulteress but an insatiable nymphomaniac who lavishes the gifts she has received from YHWH upon men everywhere, including foreigners like the virile (‘great of flesh’) Egyptians, Assyrians and Chaldeans. She sacrifices her children to them and is even worse than her sisters Samaria and Sodom.

YHWH, acting as both accuser and judge, outlines Jerusalem’s crimes and then sentences her to some unusual punishments (stripping, stoning, cutting with swords and burning, all this in the presence of her former lovers) in order to appease his wrath and jealousy. Although unworthy, there is a promise of restoration for Jerusalem but she will remain silent (be shy) with embarrassment and shame.

OUTINE OF THE CHAPTER

1-3a – Preamble
3b-5 – Jerusalem’s humble origins
6-14 – YHWH’s dealings with Jerusalem
15-34 – Jerusalem’s prostitution
35-43 – Jerusalem’s judgement
44-52 – The allegory of Judah and her sinful sisters
53-59 – The sisters’ future
60-63 – A promise of restoration

PREAMBLE (1-3a)

In these verses which serve as an introduction to the oracle YHWH instructs Ezekiel to challenge Jerusalem about her abominations. The prophet duly reports YHWH’s thoughts on the subject using the metaphor of a woman to represent Jerusalem. As the capital of Judah the city symbolises Judah and (excluding vv.44-59) Israel as well.

(1) The chapter commences with the prophetic word (or ‘word-event’) formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying.’ This expression occurs 49 times in the book of Ezekiel and indicates that the message has come to the prophet directly from YHWH.

(2-3a) YHWH, as usual, addresses Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’, a formula that occurs 93 times in Ezekiel, and commands him to:

(a) make known to Jerusalem her abominations (offensive acts), and
(b) tell her ‘thus saith the Lord.’

The saying ‘thus saith the Lord’ re-emphasises that the message is from YHWH. It occurs again in this chapter in v. 36 and v.59. The three occurrences (3, 36, 59) could serve as an alternative way of dividing up the chapter, which would then fall into three main sections (1-34; 35-58; 59-63).

JERUSALEM’S HUMBLE ORIGINS (3b-5)

(3b) Addressing Jerusalem, which he personifies as a woman, YHWH casts aspersions on her origins and birth (‘diggings’ and ‘bringings forth,’ both plural) which he traces back to the land of Canaan. Her father and mother were the Amorite and the Hittite. These represent the Semitic and non-Semitic peoples who inhabited the land of Canaan before the patriarchs settled there. The words ‘Canaan’, ‘Amorite’ and ‘Hittite’ stress that Jerusalem was originally possessed by wicked and idolatrous pagan tribes (cf. Gen 15:16). There was therefore nothing holy about Jerusalem’s origins that would have commended her to YHWH.

(4) Repeating ‘thy birth’ YHWH proceeds to remind Jerusalem of the circumstances of her birth. Repetition for effect is a feature of this oracle. Notice that the phrase ‘the day thou wast born’ is repeated at the end of v.5. At birth, YHWH reminds her, the infant Jerusalem experienced a lack of basic medical care and attention.

  • her umbilical cord was not cut.
  • she was not washed with water.
  • she was not rubbed with salt, a natural healer.
  • She was not swaddled.

(5) No-one showed Jerusalem any pity or compassion. There was no-one to do ‘any of these unto thee.’ The plural demonstrative pronoun ‘these things’ refers back to the cutting, washing, salting and swaddling in v.4. No-one cared enough to do even one of these four things for Jerusalem. This was not a case of neglect; the infant Jerusalem (Israel) was abandoned because of deliberate rejection. She was treated with distain (‘to the loathing of thy person’) and cast away in an open field (cf. Deut 32:10). The idea of loathing appears again in v.45.

As regards historical period, this section of the oracle in which Jerusalem is depicted as an abandoned new-born baby, represents the patriarchal period, which extended from the days Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to the time of slavery in Egypt. During that period Israel was not quite a distinct, fully-fledged nation.

YHWH’S DEALINGS WITH JERUSALEM (6-14)

In this section YHWH explains what he has done for Jerusalem. He is the speaker throughout and Jerusalem has no opportunity to respond. Series of statements beginning with ‘I’  describe YHWH’s activity, these are interrupted occasionally by comments addressing Jerusalem as ‘you’ which note the affect of YHWH’s provision upon the girl.

(6) YHWH’S list in v.6 includes: ‘I passed by’; ‘I saw’; ‘I said’; ‘I have caused’. YHWH passed by, saw the abandoned child being trampled upon in its own blood and said to the infant ‘Live.’ In another example of repetition this command ‘I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live’ is repeated. The trampling may be a metaphorical reference to Israel’s treatment in Egypt.

At first reading it would seem that YHWH didn’t really do much more at this stage than tell the child to survive, as she remained naked until he passed by again some years later (v.7b) and remained unwashed until after her marriage (v.9). The next verse, however, shows that he had ensured her survival and development.

(7) In another clause beginning with ‘I’ YHWH says that he made her a myriad (10,000) ‘as the sprout of the field.’ This second mention of field is a much more positive image than the first in v.5. Jerusalem increased and became great. The word translated in KJV here as ‘increased’ means to be abundant, become numerous or great; it also occurs in vv. 25, 26, 29 and 51; translated as ‘increased’ or ‘multiplied’. This speaks of growth and may reference Exod 1:12 where the same verb is used of Israel’s population increase in Egypt: ‘But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew.’

Moving from the thought of growth to that of maturity YHWH says that she came with the finest ornaments (lit. ornaments of ornaments). What that means is unclear. Her breasts took shape and around the same time her (pubic) hair sprouted (same root as ‘sprout’ in v.7a). Jerusalem matured into a voluptuous, adolescent woman. YHWH adds ‘thou wast naked and bare’ which suggests that she had grown up as a young savage.

(8) Passing by once again YHWH sees that she has matured and he draws attention to the fact (‘behold’) that she was at the age for marriage (‘the time of love’). YHWH mentions five things about his reaction to Jerusalem’s maturity.

  • I spread my skirt (wing) over thee – this may indicate taking under protection (Deut 32:11) or perhaps betrothal (Ruth 3:9).
  • I covered thy nakedness – nakedness and covering are themes in this allegory. The infant was abandoned naked (‘not swaddled’ v.4), grew up naked (v.7), her nakedness was covered by YHWH (v.8), she failed to remember the time she was naked (v.22), she was naked with her lovers (v.36) and will be exposed naked by way of punishment (37, 39). YHWH covers her nakedness(v.8), he covered her with silk ((v.10), she used her fine clothes to cover idols (v.18), and YHWH will uncover her nakedness as punishment (v.37).
  • I sware unto thee – see next point
  • I entered a covenant with thee – in the context swearing and entering into a covenant must refer to marriage. The metaphor of marriage to describe God’s covenant relationship with Israel had previously been used by Hosea (e.g. Hos 2:19-20).
  • thou became mine -the emphasis is on possession rather than affection.

(9) The symbolism of rescue, nurture and a marital relationship may correspond to the period of the Exodus, the covenant at Mount Sinai and the giving of the Law (Exod 19-24) when Israel was established as the people of God. YHWH continues with his list of his provisions for Jerusalem during that time; a chain of ten statements beginning with ‘I.’ He claims: ‘I washed,’ ‘I washed,’ ‘I anointed,’ ‘I clothed,’ ‘I shod,’ ‘I girded,’ ‘I covered,’ ‘I decked,’ ‘I put,’ ‘I put.’

YHWH begins by saying that he washed her with water then repeats that he washed her, adding that he thoroughly washed her blood away from her. ‘Blood’ is plural – i.e. ‘bloods’. Then he anointed her with oil. The use of oil in connection with hygiene occurs also in Ruth 3:3; 2 Sam 12:20; 14:2; 2 Chron 28:15; Dan 10:3; Mic 6:15. YHWH therefore did some things for her that her parents, the Amorite and the Hittite (v.3), had failed to do when she was born (v4). He washed her and rubbed her with oil – but not until she had reached maturity.

(10) Also she had not been swaddled at birth but then, after their marriage, YHWH clothed her. In four clauses he describes how he dressed Jerusalem:

  • I clothed thee also with embroidered work, – embroidered cloth, repeated in v.13
  • and shod thee with badgers’ skin, – leather sandals.
  • and I girded thee about with fine linen, – repeated in v.13
  • and I covered thee with silk. – repeated in v.13

(11-12) Moving on from clothes YHWH reminds Jerusalem that he decked her out with jewellery and gives five examples: bracelets, a chain, nose ring, earrings and a beautiful crown (crown of glory). In the Ancient Near East these were symbols of wealth, status and royalty.

(13) In this verse YHWH reiterates his generosity towards Jerusalem after their marriage. She wore gold and silver jewellery and expensive clothes made of fine linen, silk and embroidered cloth. These are repeated from v.10. He adds that she also enjoyed the best of foods: fine flour, honey and oil. These appear again in v.19. She became very, very beautiful and achieved ed royal status.

All these gifts symbolise YHWH’s grace extended to Israel and the blessings, privileges and prosperity that the nation enjoyed on account of the special covenant relationship. Jerusalem’s rising to the status of queen represents Israel’s elevated status, prominence and influence among the surrounding nations.

(14) Jerusalem’s ‘renown’ for beauty went forth among the Gentile nations. This word ‘renown’ is repeated in the next verse, as is ‘beauty’ and together these serve as a link between this section of the allegory and the next. YHWH claims responsibility for Jerusalem’s beauty; it was all a result of his grace, she had no merit of her own. The section ends with a favourite formula of Ezekiel: ‘saith the Lord [God].’ It occurs 85 times in the book and 9 times in this chapter (vv.8, 14, 19, 23, 30, 43, 48, 58, 63).

SUMMATION

Thus far the allegory has YHWH vividly portraying his grace toward Israel/Judah in lifting the nation from obscurity and insignificance, entering into a covenant with it and bringing it to a position of prominence and prosperity. The focus is on YHWH’s (dominant and possessive) relationship with Jerusalem and the good things that he has provided for her. The implication is that she ought to be grateful for the relationship and such abundant provision. The allegory continues with an exploration of her response and her relationships with others.

This section of Ezekiel 16 is sometimes used in evangelistic preaching to illustrate God’s gracious dealings with sinners. C. H. Spurgeon, for example, published a sermon entitled Ezekiel’s Deserted Infant in 1862. A gospel message would perhaps apply the following points:

THE SINNER’S CONDITION

  • v.4 uncut – still attached to the world
  • v.4 unclean – tainted with the filth of sin
  • v.4 unsalted – uncared for
  • v.4 unclothed – no covering of righteousness
  • v.5 unclaimed – left to die

GOD’S SALVATION

  • God covered – ‘I spread’ v. 8 – Phil 3:9
  • God claimed – ‘thou becamest mine’ v.8 – SS 2:16
  • God cleansed – ‘I throughly washed’ v.9 – Isa 1:18
  • God clothed – ‘I clothed’ v.10 – Rev 3:18

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel’s Vine Allegory: a Prophecy about Jerusalem – 15:1-8

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapters 15, 16 and 17 Ezekiel delivers further messages from YHWH about impending judgement upon Jerusalem. These chapters contain striking allegories which convey YHWH’s perspective on Israel/Judah. In chapter 15 the nation is likened to a vine and in chapter 16 to an adulterous wife. Chapter 17 contains an allegory of two eagles and a vine.

Ezekiel chapter 15 falls into two parts:

vv. 1-5 The allegory of a vine – five rhetorical questions.

vv. 6-8 The allegory applied to the people of Jerusalem – six conclusions.

THE ALLEGORY OF A VINE (1-5)

(1) That this is a new oracle is indicated by the now familiar prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying.’ As we learn from previous chapters false prophets among the exiles in Babylon have been predicting that all will be well with Jerusalem. YHWH’s temple is there and he dwells in it, therefore the city is safe. One prophet, however, is predicting that Jerusalem will be punished and destroyed because of the people’s sinfulness and idolatry. That prophet is Ezekiel.

With this prophetic word formula Ezekiel claims that the content of his oracles does not consist of his own ideas; the messages come to him directly from YHWH and Ezekiel then passes them on to the people.

(2) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH employs a clever allegory to illustrate Israel/Judah’s guilt and punishment: he likens the nation to a grapevine. This image of Israel as a vine was familiar to Ezekiel’s fellow exiles.

Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall: Gen 49:22

Thou hast brought a vine out of Egypt: thou hast cast out the heathen, and planted it. Psa 80:8

For the vineyard of the LORD of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant… Isa 5:7 (The parable of the vineyard Isa 5:1-7)

In that day sing ye unto her, A vineyard of red wine. I the LORD do keep it; I will water it every moment: lest any hurt it, I will keep it night and day. Isa 27:2-3

Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me? Jer 2:21

Israel is an empty vine, he bringeth forth fruit unto himself: according to the multitude of his fruit he hath increased the altars; according to the goodness of his land they have made goodly images. Hos 10:1

The conventional interpretation of this familiar image focused on the vine’s purpose and ability to bear fruit. Indeed, that is the interpretation which Jesus applied in John chapter 15. Here in Ezekiel chapter 15, however, the fruit is not mentioned. The allegory is about the wood. It is not about Jerusalem being fruitless, rather it is about it being useless. YHWH addresses five rhetorical questions to Ezekiel which show how useless the wood of the vine is in comparison with the wood of the other trees of the forest. Its wood is portrayed as worthless and good for nothing.

QUESTION 1 – What is the vine tree more than any tree, or than a branch which is among the trees of the forest? 15:2

The implied answer to this question whether the wood of a vine is superior to the wood of other trees is: ‘No. its wood is inferior.’ The vine’s only value lies in its ability to bear fruit. If it does not bear fruit then it is useless.

QUESTION 2 – Shall wood be taken thereof to do any work? 15:3a

Again the implied answer is negative. Unlike other strong trees whose wood is suitable for construction or furniture the wood of a vine is useless for any kind of work.

QUESTION 3 – Will men take a pin of it to hang any vessel thereon? 15:3b

The wood of a vine cannot even be used to make a peg to hang things on.

QUESTION 4 – Behold, it is cast into the fire for fuel; the fire devoureth both the ends of it, and the midst of it is burned. Is it meet for any work? 15:4

Vine wood has no practical use; all one can do with it is burn it. Even then, it burns quickly.

QUESTION 5 – Behold, when it was whole, it was meet for no work: how much less shall it be meet yet for any work, when the fire hath devoured it, and it is burned? 15:5

If a healthy vine is already useless in its natural state then a burnt and damaged one is even more useless.

THE ALLEGORY OF A VINE APPLIED (6-8)

(6) This is an important verse since it serves as a bridge between the allegory in the first section and the explanation of the allegory in the second section. This verse contains the last mention of the vine in the chapter and also the first (and only) mention of Jerusalem. Beginning with the word ‘therefore’ (which tells us that what follows are conclusions drawn from that which has already been said) this verse moves the message on from allegory to reality. Jerusalem is no better than the other towns and cities in Israel/Judah so it too is destined to suffer destruction and burning. YHWH’s conclusions are set out in six statements:

STATEMENT No.1 – As the vine tree among the trees of the forest, which I have given to the fire for fuel, so will I give the inhabitants of Jerusalem. 15:6

Just as a useless vine is consigned to the fire so will YHWH hand over the people of Jerusalem to be consumed by the ‘fire’ of invasion and destruction by the Babylonian forces.

STATEMENT No. 2 – And I will set my face against them; 15:7a, 7d

This expression, which is repeated for emphasis at the end of the verse, indicates that YHWH is opposed to the people of Judah. He is determined to bring judgement upon them.

STATEMENT No. 3 – They shall go out from one fire, and another fire shall devour them; 15:7b

This may mean that in previous invasions Jerusalem suffered some damage but will be totally destroyed as a result of the coming siege and pillage by the Babylonians. It may also suggest that some citizens might manage to escape the destruction but will then face further calamity (e.g. Jer 42:22; 44:12-14). Judgement is inevitable.

STATEMENT No. 4 – And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I set my face against them. 15:7c

This recognition formula is common in Ezekiel. Here it is addressed (‘ye’ – you plural) to the exiles with Ezekiel in Babylon to whom he is delivering this oracle. When they will see what has happened to Jerusalem they will acknowledge that it is YHWH’s doing.

STATEMENT No. 5 – And I will make the land desolate, 15:8a

This reiterates that Jerusalem will be utterly destroyed.

STATEMENT No. 6 – Because they have committed a trespass,15:8b

This will happen because the Jerusalemites have committed a trespass – an unfaithful act. The destruction is a direct result of their actions. By worshipping idols the people of Jerusalem have acted unfaithfully towards YHWH so he will not protect the city. This idea of punishment for unfaithfulness is a common theme in the books of Chronicles – which use words like ‘trespassing’ and ‘transgressing’ to identify unfaithful acts (1 Chron 5:25; 10:13;2 Chron 12:2; 28:19; 29:6; 30:7; 36:14).

SUMMATION

In this short chapter YHWH gives a message about Jerusalem to Ezekiel who then relays the oracle to his fellow-exiles in Babylon. The first section of the chapter (vv. 1-5) contains a clever allegory which is communicated by the technique of asking rhetorical questions. The allegory inverts the usual picture of Israel as a valuable fruit-bearing vine by focusing on the wood rather than the fruit. The vine is revealed as useless and only fit for destruction. The second section (vv.6-8) applies the allegory to the people of Jerusalem (standing for the nation of Israel/Judah) and emphasizes their unfaithful acts and impending doom. The theme of unfaithfulness is taken up and presented in graphic detail in the next chapter which contains an extended allegory about an unfaithful wife.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 13:1-16 The Danger of False Prophets

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading Ezekiel 13: 1-23

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 13 is a significant passage in Ezekiel because it addresses the danger posed by false prophets whose messages originate in their own ‘hearts.’ In this chapter Ezekiel denounces counterfeit prophets who mislead the people by falsely claiming to speak for YHWH.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Ezekiel prophesied during a time of great turmoil for Israel. In 597 BCE the Chaldean king Nebuchadnezzar II subdued Jerusalem and placed a puppet king (Zedekiah) on the throne of Judah. He also deported the deposed king Jehoiachin to Babylonia (2 Kgs 24:15-17) along with many of the elite citizens of Judah, including Ezekiel. There YHWH called and commissioned Ezekiel as his prophet.

Although living in Babylonia at a place called Tel-Abib near the River Chebar Ezekiel directed many of his prophecies towards the people of Jerusalem. The situation there was deteriorating after King Zedekiah’s abortive attempt to revolt against Babylonian rule (2 Kgs 25:1-2). Interestingly, that revolt was supported and encouraged by false prophets in Judah (Jer 27:9-10,14-16). Soon the city was besieged by Nebuchadnezzar’s forces and eventually devastated by them in 586/7 BCE.

Meanwhile over in Babylonia Ezekiel condemned Israel and Judah because of their sin and idolatry; prophesying impending judgement upon them. At the same time other Israelite men and women in Babylonia were delivering prophecies which contradicted Ezekiel’s message of doom.

Instead of prophesying punishment, they offered false comfort to the people; assuring them that the situation at Jerusalem would soon be resolved peacefully and thus building up their hopes of a soon return from exile. Ezekiel as a true prophet of YHWH found it necessary to denounce these false prophets and confront their lies.

Chapter 13 of Ezekiel is situated within a section (12:21-14:11) that deals with various issues relating to prophecy. The chapter contains two parallel woe oracles which are similar in structure, content and style. One is against male prophets and the other against women who prophesy, The context (13:9) would indicate that these people, like Ezekiel, were Israelite exiles in Babylonia. Back in the homeland Jeremiah too was denouncing false prophets and prophecy. It is worth comparing his oracle in Jer 23:9-40 with those of Ezekiel in Ezek 13.

CHAPTER DIVISION

13:1-16 – An oracle addressed to male prophets.


13:17-23 – An oracle addressed to women who prophesy.

AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO MALE PROPHETS (1-16)

(1) ‘And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ – This phrase is often used in Ezekiel to introduce a new oracle (e.g. 11:14; 12:1; 15:1; 17:1; 18:1). In 13:1 it covers both oracles in chapter 13 (2-16; 17-23) and is particularly relevant since it emphasizes the fact that Ezekiel speaks the word of YHWH, unlike the false prophets whom he condemns. This oracle against male prophets is mirrored by that against the female prophets in vv.17-23. The structure and language are similar.

STRUCTURE

  • A preamble – vv.1-3a and vv.17-18a.
  • Ezekiel addressed as ‘Son of Man’ – v.2 and v.17.
  • An accusation – vv.3b-7 and vv.18b-19.
  • A forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ – vv.8-9 and vv.20-21.
  • A second forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – vv.10-14 and vv.22-23.

LANGUAGE

Although the content is different the language used in each of the two oracles is similar:

  • v.2 – ‘Son of Man, prophesy against’ and v.17 – ‘Son of man, set thy face against.’
  • v.2 – ‘that prophesy’ and v.16 – ‘which prophesy.’
  • v.2 – ‘say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own hearts’ and v.17 – ‘which prophesy out of their own heart; and prophesy thou against them.’
  • v.3 – ‘thus saith the Lord God’ and v.18 – ‘thus saith the Lord God.’
  • v.3 – ‘woe unto’ and v.18 – ‘woe to.’
  • v.8 – ‘therefore saith the Lord God’ and v.20 – ‘wherefore saith the Lord God.’
  • v.8 – ‘behold I am against’ and v.20 – ‘behold I am against.’
  • v.9 – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ and v.21 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’
  • v.10 – ‘because…’ and v.22 – ‘because…’
  • v.13 – ‘therefore…’ and v.23 – ‘therefore.’
  • v.14 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord’ and v.23 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

(2) Addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ (stressing human weakness in light of God’s greatness) YHWH instructs him to deliver this message ‘against’ (’el; 2, 8, 9, 17, 20) the false prophets. They are called ‘the prophets of Israel,’ a description unique to Ezekiel (13:2,16; 38:17, cf. 13:4). These men are in exile with Ezekiel but the term ‘prophets of Israel’ may suggest that he views them as part of a larger group that would include false prophets back in Israel/Judah. The latter are described by Jeremiah as ‘the prophets of Samaria’ (Jer 23:13) and ‘the prophets of Jerusalem’ (Jer 23:14). Ezekiel’s opponents are not prophets of other gods but men working within the Israelite religious system.

(3) The pronouncement of a ‘woe’ on these ‘foolish (nāḇāl) prophets’ hints at the severe consequences of prophesying lies while claiming to speak for YHWH; these will be set out in vv.8-9. The men are fools; what they say is empty and futile. In the Old Testament a fool (nāḇāl) is someone who denies or disrespects God (Job 2:10; Psa 14:1; 74:18, 22; Isa 32:5-6). These prophets do not follow the Spirit of God but their own spirits, they perceive nothing.

There are several changes in person within these verses which some people might find confusing:

  • In vv. 2-3, YHWH directly addresses Ezekiel in the second person ‘thou’.
  • In v. 4-5, YHWH directly addresses Israel in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In verse 6, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.
  • In vv. 7-8, YHWH directly addresses the false prophets in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In v. 9, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.

(4) YHWH addresses Israel and compares their false prophets to foxes or jackals among the ruins. Such animals survive in desolate places (Lam 5:18) by scavenging and are known to be opportunistic and destructive (Song 2:15). The simile implies that Judah is a society in ruins. It is morally desolate but these prophets thrive and capitalise on the chaos, exploiting the people’s vulnerability. They further undermine the ruins rather than try to build them up.

(5) Directly addressing the false prophets YHWH accuses them of failure to repair breaches in the wall (KJV ‘hedge’). The word gāḏēr refers to a protective wall, e.g. around a vineyard (Psa 80:12; Isa 5:5), or a city wall (Ezra 9:9; Mic &:11). Rather than rising to their responsibility for the defence of the people (e.g. by warnings, intercession, teaching) the false prophets contribute to their decline. Therefore the people will be defenceless in the Day of YHWH (Ezek 30:3, cf. 7:19) when his anger will come upon them (Ezek 5:13; 7:8; 9:8; 13:13; 16:42; 20:21, 34; 21:31; 20:20, 22, 31; 36:6; 38:19; 43:8).

(6-7) Vain visions and lying divination.

Verses 6 and 7 say much the same thing. Both highlight the deceitful arrogance of the false prophets who fabricate visions and use means of divination that YHWH has not authorised.

As well as seeing vain (empty, deceitful, false) visions they make lying divinations (predictions made by reading omens or by various rituals), practices forbidden in Deut 18:9-14. In Israelite religion the only sacred objects authorised for discerning God’s will in specific circumstances were the Urim and Thummim (Ex 28:30; Lev 8:8; Num 27:21; Deut 33:8; 1 Sam 28:6; Ezra 2:63; Neh 7:65).

Even worse is the false prophets’ habit of ascribing their lies to YHWH, hoping that this public declaration of authority would somehow obligate YHWH to fulfil their prophecies. V.6 ‘the Lord hath not sent them’ and v.7 ‘albeit I have not spoken’ emphasise that what they said did not have divine authorisation. Thus their predictions were not only false and deceitful but also blasphemous.

(8-9) Forecast of judgment upon the false prophets.

The word ‘therefore’ introduces details of the punishment due to the false prophets and a summary of the reasons why they deserve it – which is because they ‘have spoken vanity and seen lies.’ The prophets are informed that YHWH has had enough of their lies. He is already ‘against’ them and his hand will be raised up against (KJV ‘upon’) them. (’el – against – see 2, 8, 9, 17, 20). In Ezekiel YHWH’s outstretched hand is an indicator of punishment and judgment (6:14; 14:9,13; 16:27; 20:33,34; 25:7,13,16; 35:3). Their punishment will be three-fold:

1. They will lose membership of the assembly of YHWH’s people.

‘Assembly’ or ‘council’ (sôḏ) is an association of people who are closely connected, who have something in common (Gen 49:6; Job 19:19; Psa 64:3; 111:1; Jer 6:11; 15:17). This punishment has been interpreted as signifying a loss of leadership, honour or status in the community.

It has also been suggested that it may refer to exclusion from the select group who are confidants of YHWH (Psa 89:8; Jer 23:18,22); which would include true prophets (Amos 3:7). The meaning is probably even stronger: they would no longer be regarded as members of God’s earthly people – the community of faith.

2. They will not be listed in the register of the house of Israel.

These false prophets would not be listed in the genealogical register (keṯāb, writing) of Israelites. The existence and importance of this list for those returning from exile is clear from Ezra chapter 2 and Nehemiah chapter 7. For the false prophets exclusion would mean a loss of citizen rights. Notice that Jeremiah pronounced a similar punishment upon Shemaiah the Nehelamite (Jer 29:31-32).

Some commentators contend that this register is YHWH’s book (Ex 32:33; Psa 69:28; 87:6; 139:16; Dan 12:1). The Old Testament, however, is fairly vague about what is recorded in that book, whereas this document mentioned in Ezekiel 13:9 is specifically said to be the ‘register of the house of Israel.’ It seems more sensible to interpret it literally as a secular civil census list.

3. They will not be able to enter the land of Israel.

This flows logically from the previous two. Excision from the register would lead to serious consequences for the false prophets and their descendants; probably with respect to claims to ancestral land or the purchase of property.

The same word keṯāb meaning ‘register’ occurs in Ezra 2:62 and Neh 7:64. These twin passages illustrate the problems that exclusion from the register, in this case the record of priestly genealogies, could bring:

Another group returned at this time from the towns of Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Kerub, Addan, and Immer. However, they could not prove that they or their families were descendants of Israel. This group included the families of Delaiah, Tobiah, and Nekoda— a total of 652 people. Three families of priests — Hobaiah, Hakkoz, and Barzillai — also returned. (This Barzillai had married a woman who was a descendant of Barzillai of Gilead, and he had taken her family name.) They searched for their names in the genealogical records, but they were not found, so they were disqualified from serving as priests. Ezra 2:59-62 NLT

This first forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets ends with the divine recognition formula ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God.’

(10-14) A second forecast of judgment.

Verse 10 begins with a doubling of ya‘an (‘on account of’ or because’) which the KJV translates here as ‘because, even because’; meaning ‘for the very good reason.’ This phrase ya’an ub’ ya’an also occurs in Lev 26:43 and Ezek 36:3.

Punishment is due because they have misled (caused to go astray) the people saying ‘peace’ when there is no peace. Rather than warning them about the consequences of their sinful behaviour, the false prophets give an assurance of safety that is not rooted in reality. They intentionally lull the people into a false sense of security.

The image of a wall, used earlier in v.5 to represent the spiritual and moral state of the people of Judah, is taken up again in v.10. The word for ‘wall’ (ḥayiṣ) in v.10 is a hapax legomenon (a word that only occurs once) in the Old Testament and means a dry wall or party wall; an unimproved flimsy or crumbling wall built of mud-brick or loose stones and liable to collapse under stress. A different word (qiyrāh) is used for ‘wall’ in vv.12-15. The ‘wall’ in v.10 is not literal but metaphorical.

It is said to have been daubed or smeared with untempered mortar. The word tāp̱ēl translated ‘untempered’ (KJV) is an adjective meaning ‘unseasoned’ or ‘tasteless.’ The thought is that of lacking an essential ingredient; here the mortar is just mud to which a binding agent such as straw has not been added. It covers the wall but does not strengthen it. To emphasise that the product is insubstantial modern translations tend to replace the KJV translation’s ‘untempered [mortar]’ with ”whitewash.’ This conveys the thought of deceit and hypocrisy on the part of the false prophets.

(11-14) These verses continue with the figure of a whitewashed wall and the effect bad weather has on it. Flooding rain, great hailstones and stormy winds will cause it to fall. The futility of the false prophets’ assurances will be exposed and they will be held accountable. When judgement comes and the wall collapses people will ask (v.12) ‘Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it?’

Greenberg (1983, p.238) comments: ‘As said expressly in 22:8, “they” who daubed the wall were the prophets: the people built the dry wall – a figure of their unfounded optimism, while the prophets daubed it with worthless stuff – their self-inspired predictions of well-being.’

V.13 clarifies that the destructive forces represent YHWH’s anger against sin as well as the lies of the false prophets. His fury will be so intense that the prophets will not survive (vv.15b-16).

Scholars suggest that in v.14 the image of the wall changes. The wall which YHWH will break down is said to refer now to Jerusalem and the fall of the city. To quote Greenberg (1983, p.238) again, he says of the phrase leveling it to the ground in v.14:

‘The language of this clause is more appropriate to massive demolition than to the fall of a mere wall; it facilitates the intrusion, in the next clause, of the reference to Jerusalem. When it (fem.) falls and you perish within it (fem.).’

In other words proof for the assertion that in v.14 Ezekiel is thinking of the impending fall of Jerusalem is that the word ‘wall’ is masculine whereas ‘it shall fall’ and ‘in the midst thereof’ are feminine; therefore the reference cannot be to the metaphorical wall but to the city of Jerusalem.

This second forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets also ends with the divine recognition formula ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ (vv. 9, 14, 21, 23)

(15) YHWH asserts that he will accomplish his wrath upon the wall (the false assurances) and upon those that have smeared it with ‘whitewash’ (the false prophets).

(16) This verse summarises vv.10-15: the main lie of the false prophets is that they promise peace when there is no peace.

SUMMATION

This woe oracle denounces Israelite false prophets for failing to address the nation’s sin and instead spreading lies and details of false visions, claiming divine authority which they do not possess. They offer the people false hope by declaring ‘peace’ when there is no peace. The passage highlights God’s anger against deceit and spiritual negligence.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 12: Prophecies of Exile and Judgment

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel gives no new date marker at the beginning of chapter 12. The next one is not until 20:1 so in the absence of chronological data for chapters 12-19 one must assume that the messages they contain were delivered soon after the prophecies of chapters 8-11, during 592 BCE (8:1).

Since it would seem that the account of a trance which Ezekiel had communicated to his fellow-exiles (11:25) had had no effect upon them it was therefore essential that the theme of judgment upon Jerusalem and Judah be further developed, this is the main point of chapters 12-19. In chapter 12 Ezekiel emphasises the certainty of that impending judgment.

CHAPTER 12

1-2 A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE

3-7 THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED

8-16 THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD

17-20 THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED

21-28 THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED

A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE (1-2)

1 The word of the LORD also came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house. Ezekiel 12:1-2

(1) The phrase ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying’ signifies the commencement of a new message from YHWH.

(2) YHWH again addresses Ezekiel as ‘Son of man (adam)’ thus emphasising Ezekiel’s humanity in contrast to the Lord’s divinity. He says that Ezekiel dwells in the midst of a ‘rebellious house.’ This refers to the exiles who are already in Babylon along with Ezekiel. They are rebellious because they refuse to see or hear the truth (cp. Deut 29:3-4; Isa 6:9; Jer 5:21; Mk 8:18; Acts 28:27). The exiles probably shared the vain sentiments of the people back home in Judah whom Jeremiah (Jer 7:4) warned about misplaced trust in the temple. They thought that because the temple of the Lord was in Jerusalem the city would not fall to invading forces. Ezekiel needed to powerfully drive home the lesson that Jerusalem would indeed fall and that its inhabitants would be taken into exile.

THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED (3-7)

3 Therefore, thou son of man, prepare thee stuff for removing, and remove by day in their sight; and thou shalt remove from thy place to another place in their sight: it may be they will consider, though they be a rebellious house.
4 Then shalt thou bring forth thy stuff by day in their sight, as stuff for removing: and thou shalt go forth at even in their sight, as they that go forth into captivity.
5 Dig thou through the wall in their sight, and carry out thereby.
6 In their sight shalt thou bear it upon thy shoulders, and carry it forth in the twilight: thou shalt cover thy face, that thou see not the ground: for I have set thee for a sign unto the house of Israel.
7 And I did so as I was commanded: I brought forth my stuff by day, as stuff for captivity, and in the even I digged through the wall with mine hand; I brought it forth in the twilight, and I bore it upon my shoulder in their sight.

(3-7) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to enact a drama of someone going into exile. Referring back to ‘which have eyes to see, and see not’ in v.2 notice the seven-fold repetition of ‘in their sight’ in vv. 3-7. Also, the words ‘by day’ are mentioned three times in these verses. Ezekiel is to make sure that his actions get the attention of his audience. Notice also ‘remove’ and ‘removing’ – these are from a word meaning captivity or going into exile.

Ezekiel receives specific instructions regarding the drama he is to act out.

a. He is to ‘prepare his stuff’ by day for going into exile (v.4). ‘Stuff’ – According to Strongs H3627 this word can refer both to a vessel or receptacle and also to utensils or items of equipment. Most translations say something akin to ‘pack your baggage’ but here the reference is more likely to the bag or knapsack itself rather than to the few basic items (e.g. clothing, bedding, cooking utensils, food) an exile would put in it. Thus the Christian Standard Bible translates ‘prepare thee stuff for removing’ as: ‘get your bags ready for exile.’ Ezekiel’s fellow exiles in Babylonia would have no problem recognising what he was portraying; they had done this very thing for real a few years earlier, in 597 BCE.

b. He is to go out in the evening as if escaping like an exile (v.4).

c. He is to dig a hole in the wall (of his house, the courtyard or the town?) and take his baggage (stuff) out through it (v.5).

d. He is to carry his bag on his shoulder into the pitch darkness with his face covered so that he cannot see the ground (v.6). Note that the word translated ‘twilight’ in KJV means thick darkness. It occurs in vv. 6, 7, 12 and Gen 15:17.

Perhaps this performance will enable his rebellious fellow-exiles to understand (v.3) that this will soon be the situation in Jerusalem. People there will soon be fleeing as emigrants, never to return. YHWH tells Ezekiel (v. 6b) that by acting out this scenario he will serve as a sign or portent to the house of Israel (see also v.11). Isaiah is another prophet said to have been a sign (Isa 20:3).

‘I did so as I was commanded.’ In v.7 Ezekiel confirms that that he has faithfully complied with YHWH’s instructions. He adds that he excavated the hole in the wall by hand; thus avoiding the noise of a pick or other instrument that in a real life escape might alert the enemy. The main emphasis, however, is on his exile’s pack; its significance is revealed in v.10.

THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD (8-16)

8 And in the morning came the word of the LORD unto me, saying,
9 Son of man, hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?
10 Say thou unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; This burden concerneth the prince in Jerusalem, and all the house of Israel that are among them.
11 Say, I am your sign: like as I have done, so shall it be done unto them: they shall remove and go into captivity.
12 And the prince that is among them shall bear upon his shoulder in the twilight, and shall go forth: they shall dig through the wall to carry out thereby: he shall cover his face, that he see not the ground with his eyes.
13 My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare: and I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.
14 And I will scatter toward every wind all that are about him to help him, and all his bands; and I will draw out the sword after them.
15 And they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall scatter them among the nations, and disperse them in the countries.
16 But I will leave a few men of them from the sword, from the famine, and from the pestilence; that they may declare all their abominations among the heathen whither they come; and they shall know that I am the LORD.

(8-9) The following morning Ezekiel receives further communication from YHWH in the form of a negative question: ‘hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?’ Ezekiel’s strange behaviour has caught the attention of his fellow-exiles who have asked about it. This presents an opportunity for him to explain the significance of his symbolic act.

(10-11) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to give the explanation in the form of an authoritative prophetic message. It begins with ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ followed by a summary statement of the point of the drama. It is a message of impending disaster both for King Zedekiah and for all who remain with him in Jerusalem. Ezekiel uses ‘house of Israel’ in two different senses. Note that v.9 refers to the ‘house of Israel’ in Babylonia (cp. 11:15) and v.10 to the ‘house of Israel’ in Judah.

King Zedekiah of Judah is not mentioned by name but it is obvious that he is the person referred to. He is not called ‘the king’ (meleḵ) but ‘the prince’ (or chief). The Hebrew word for ‘prince’ is nasi.’ Many commentators point out that there is word play here on ‘prince’ (nasi) and ‘burden’ (maśśā). Greenberg (1983, p. 211) comments ‘The chief is this burden. Hebrew hannaśi hammaśśa hazze; this alliterative phrase is patterned after Jer 23:33.’ As well as a play on sound there seems also to be a pun on meaning. Ezekiel’s ‘burden’ was lifted up and borne on his shoulder, the term ‘prince’ refers to someone who is elevated or lifted up.

Some take ‘burden’ here to mean a threatening message, the word is used in that sense by other Old Testament prophets, but it only occurs here in Ezekiel and in the context must refer to the bag containing Ezekiel’s ‘stuff’ (v.4). Greenberg (1983, p. 212) explains: ‘The meaning of the sentence is: this burden – the exile’s pack – represents the chief and the Israelites of Jerusalem; they will be taken out of the city into exile. Two things are unexpected: the reference to two subjects, the chief (king) and the people, and the symbolic character of the exile’s pack (maśśā is linked to naśa ‘al katef “carry [the pack] on the shoulder” in vss.6f….’

Ezekiel’s message is that Zedekiah and his subjects will be carried into exile. Ezekiel himself is a ‘sign’ in that his actions represented the destiny and fate of King Zedekiah of Judah and the people of Judah. Note that the thought of Ezekiel as a sign reappears in 24:18-27 where he is forbidden to formally mourn the death of his wife; symbolising YHWH’s refusal to grieve for Jerusalem at the time of its destruction (24:24).

(12-14) Returning to the subject of the prince Ezekiel expands on his symbolic action. He predicts in detail Zedekiah’s flight from Jerusalem by night with his pack upon his shoulder and his eyes covered; probably to avoid recognition – but perhaps this also symbolises shame (cp. Jer 9:19).

Ezekiel predicts additional details that do not feature in his drama: Zedekiah will be pursued, apprehended, blinded and taken into captivity in Babylon. His supporters and troops will scatter in all directions and be pursued by the Babylonian forces. YHWH claims responsibility for these forthcoming events, saying (v.13) that Zedekiah will be metaphorically caught in his snare and trap.

The literal fulfilment of Ezekiel’s specific and accurate predictions is recorded in 2 Kgs 25:1-7; Jer 39:1-7; 52:1-11. These passages tell us that Zedekiah fled Jerusalem at night through a gap between  two walls, was captured by the Babylonians near Jericho and taken to Riblah to meet Nebuchadnezzar. As punishment for his revolt Nebuchadnezzar had Zedekiah watch the murder of his family before blinding him and transporting him to Babylon.

The abovementioned accounts (e.g. Jer 39:7) explain the riddle or apparent enigma in Ezek 12:13: ‘I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.’ Zedekiah would be blinded before being transported to Babylon.

King Zedekiah himself may have been aware of this prophecy but failed to appreciate its significance. According to the first century CE historian Flavius Josephus, in his work ‘Antiquities of the Jews,’ Ezekiel wrote down this prophecy and sent a copy to King Hezekiah. He compared the prophecies of Jeremiah and Ezekiel and reckoned that these contradicted one another. He therefore decided not to believe either of them.

Josephus, living more than 600 years after this event, is the only source of this interesting but possibly unreliable piece of information:

Now as to Zedekiah himself, while he heard the prophet [Jeremiah] speak, he believed him, and agreed to every thing as true, and supposed it was for his advantage; but then his friends perverted him, and dissuaded him from what the prophet advised, and obliged him to do what they pleased. Ezekiel also foretold in Babylon what calamities were coming upon the people, which when he heard, he sent accounts of them unto Jerusalem. But Zedekiah did not believe their prophecies, for the reason following: It happened that the two prophets agreed with one another in what they said as in all other things, that the city should be taken, and Zedekiah himself should be taken captive; but Ezekiel disagreed with him, and said that Zedekiah should not see Babylon, while Jeremiah said to him, that the king of Babylon should carry him away thither in bonds….

For background it is worth reading all of chapter 7 in Book X of Josephus’ ‘Antiquities of the Jews’ (Ant. X. 7. 2)

(15-16) Now the prophet raises a faint note of hope with the mention of a ‘a few men’ of Judah (the remnant) who will be spared for the purpose of testifying to YHWH’s sovereignty. These people will recognise that it is their own idolatry that has brought the judgment upon them.

THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED (17-20)

17 Moreover the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
18 Son of man, eat thy bread with quaking, and drink thy water with trembling and with carefulness;
19 And say unto the people of the land, Thus saith the Lord GOD of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and of the land of Israel; They shall eat their bread with carefulness, and drink their water with astonishment, that her land may be desolate from all that is therein, because of the violence of all them that dwell therein.
20 And the cities that are inhabited shall be laid waste, and the land shall be desolate; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

(17-20) Ezekiel receives a further communication directly from YHWH, instructing him to perform another symbolic action. He is to eat his food and drink water in a manner that portrays fear and anxiety. By shaking and trembling as he eats and drinks Ezekiel will visually convey the fear that the people of Judah will experience during the siege of Jerusalem. His actions will symbolise the people’s anxiety and deep distress in the face of that calamity. This prophetic sign suggests that even basic tasks like eating and drinking will be carried out with fear.

Ezekiel is to impart this message to ‘the people of the land,’ here a reference to the exiles who are with Ezekiel in Babylonia. It is about Jerusalem and the land of Israel. It is especially about those who live in Jerusalem and in ‘her land’ i.e. the territory surrounding the city, since they would be the ones enduring the siege and destruction first-hand.

Vv. 19b and 20 further explain Ezekiel’s symbolic act. The word translated ‘carefulness’ used with reference to how they will drink their water (v.19) and how they will eat their food (v.20) means ‘anxiety.’ It also occurs in 4:16 where in the context the anxiety is about running out of food. That fear of scarcity and famine that will be experienced during the siege seems to be in view here too.

The people of Jerusalem and Judah will also feel terror because their towns will be laid waste and the land will be stripped of everything. The Babylonians will pursue a scorched-earth policy; they will leave no people, animals, crops or infrastructure. There will be total devastation. The reason for this is once again said to be the unrestrained violence of the people of Judah (7:11, 23; 8:17).

As has already been said in v.16, the purpose of the desolation is so that the people will recognise the authority and sovereignty of YHWH – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED (21-28)

21 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
22 Son of man, what is that proverb that ye have in the land of Israel, saying, The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth?
23 Tell them therefore, Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will make this proverb to cease, and they shall no more use it as a proverb in Israel; but say unto them, The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.
24 For there shall be no more any vain vision nor flattering divination within the house of Israel.
25 For I am the LORD: I will speak, and the word that I shall speak shall come to pass; it shall be no more prolonged: for in your days, O rebellious house, will I say the word, and will perform it, saith the Lord GOD.
26 Again the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
27 Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.
28 Therefore say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; There shall none of my words be prolonged any more, but the word which I have spoken shall be done, saith the Lord GOD.

(21-25) Verses 21-28 address the people’s doubt and scepticism that Ezekiel’s prophecies will be fulfilled.

Ezekiel receives a new message from YHWH which is introduced by the usual formula ‘the word of the LORD came unto me, saying.’  As elsewhere, Ezekiel is addressed as ‘Son of man’ then YHWH highlights a saying that was popular in the land of Israel. This proverb (māšāl) mocks the prophets and reflects a general belief that the judgment they predict will never come to pass: ‘The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth’ (Cp. Ecc 8:11; 2 Pet 3:3-4). Despite the passing of time none of their prophecies of doom have come to fruition.

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to inform the Israelites that he will cause this proverb to cease – because the course of events will prove the proverb wrong. In fact it will be replaced by a new proverb: ‘The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.’ i.e. the time is not far off and every vision will come to pass.

In addition, all false prophecies that flatter the people of Israel will cease. They are described as ‘vain visions and smooth divinations.’ These prophecies obtained through occult practices are by false prophets who flatter the people by predicting peace, security and the return of the Jehoiachin exiles from Babylon (for an example of this read Jer 28:1-17).

The coming judgment will expose their deceptive lies and bring their false assurances to an end. True predictions by genuine prophets of YHWH like Jeremiah and Ezekiel will come to pass but those expressed by the false prophets will fail. (Note that false prophecy is the subject of the next chapter -Ezekiel 13.)

In v.25 YHWH asserts his sovereign right to speak (declare judgment). Unlike the false prophets his words are truth and will be fulfilled soon. Through Ezekiel he declares that the judgment will come upon the current generation – ‘in your days.’ Once again he describes them as a ‘rebellious house’ (12:2, 3, 9, 25).

(26-28) Another communication from YHWH to Ezekiel is introduced by ‘the word of the Lord came to me saying.’ The prophecy that follows is similar but slightly different to that in the previous segment. Verses 20-25 relate to a proverb that denies that the prophecies of judgment would ever be fulfilled. In verses 26-28, however, YHWH quotes another proverb (‘they of the house of Israel say’) which promotes the equally erroneous view that that Ezekiel’s prophecies may well be fulfilled, but not for a very long time (‘the vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.’). YHWH, however, confirms that Ezekiel’s prophecies will  be fulfilled soon.

SUMMATION

This chapter underscores the certainty of YHWH’s judgment. In it Ezekiel enacts the flight of a refugee. This sign-act is explained as predicting the attempted escape of King Zedekiah, and others, from Jerusalem. Ezekiel then enacts another drama, demonstrating the terror that the Jerusalemites will experience while the city is under siege. The remainder of the chapter addresses the apparent failure of Ezekiel’s visions of destruction. YHWH says that those prophecies will soon be fulfilled. Ezekiel is not a false prophet, his predictions will certainly come to pass.

Posted in Exposition

Pride and Fall: Obadiah 1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

As noted towards the end of my previous post Understanding the Book of Obadiah: A Concise Overview the prophecy of Obadiah to Judah about Edom falls into two main sections. The first section is historical, the second eschatological.

1-14 Declaration of Judgment on Edom

15-21 Deliverance for Israel in the day of YHWH

DECLARATION OF JUDGMENT ON EDOM (1-14)

1 The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord GOD concerning Edom; We have heard a rumour from the LORD, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle.

1. This verse introduces the prophecy of Obadiah with a superscription indicating that the author is a man called Obadiah. No chronological or biographical information is supplied. Obadiah means ‘servant of the Lord’ so this may either be the name of the writer or just a self-description (For a list of the other men in the Old Testament named Obadiah see Understanding the Book of Obadiah: A Concise Overview).

Obadiah claims to have received a ‘vision.’ This is a general word for divine communication but may also refer to oracles by false prophets (Jer 14:14; 23:16). Using the prophetic formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ (Isa 7:7; Jer 7:20; Ezek 2:4) Obadiah clarifies that the source of his vision is the Lord God (Adonai YHWH, Gen 15:2; Isa 3:1; Jer 1:6; Ezek 2:4), and thus it has divine authority. Strangely he does not follow this saying with direct speech from YHWH but instead with words spoken by YHWH’s audience; ‘we’. Who the ‘we’ are is not specified, probably Obadiah means himself plus others in the nation of Israel/Judah. In the parallel passage Jeremiah says ‘I,’ meaning just himself (Jer 49: 14-16).

‘We have heard a report (cp. Isa 53:1) straight from YHWH, and [what’s more] an envoy has been sent among the nations.’ Since Obadiah and his associates heard the tidings directly from YHWH we must presume that it is YHWH who has sent out an envoy to summon the nations to war against Edom. Whether this ambassador is human or angelic is not stated. The perfect tense ‘has been sent’ means that this will surely happen. ‘Among the nations’ is used in the context of war in Jer 49:14; 50:2; 51:27; Joel 3:9. ‘Arise ye’ is a summons to battle, as in Jer 6:4, 5; 49:14, 28, 31. YHWH will cause the nations to go to war against Edom.

EDOM

In the Old Testament the ancient nation of Edom was a prominent enemy of YHWH and his covenant people Israel. Edom, meaning ‘red,’ was descended from Esau and Israel was descended from Esau’s twin brother Jacob (Gen 25:22-26). The story of this family is found in Genesis chapters 25-33. Genesis 36:1-43 gives Esau’s family record and also lists the early kings of Edom.

Saul, Israel’s first king, waged war against Edom (1 Sam 14:47-48) as did his successor David (1 Kgs 11:15-16). David successfully subdued Edom (2 Sam 8:13-14), making it a vassal state of Israel, which it remained under Solomon. When the Israelite monarchy divided after Solomon’s death Edom remained under the control of Judah. The books of Kings and Chronicles record several Edomite revolts against Judah. These were during the reigns of the Judahite kings Jehoshaphat (2 Chron 20:10-23), Jehoram (2 Kgs 8:20-22; 2 Chron 21:8) and Amaziah (2 Kgs 14:7; 2 Chron 25:1-11). According to Psa 137:7 the Edomites were also complicit in the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in 586/7 BCE.

In the Bible Edom is often associated with Mt Seir (Num 24:18; Deut 2:4; Judg 5:4; 2 Chron 20:10; 25:11; Isa 21:11). Its exact location is unknown but must have been in or close to Edom, probably in the Negev (a desert area to the south of Judah). The traditional territory occupied by Edom lay to the southeast of Israel in what is now southern Jordan and included two important commercial and military ports on the coast of the Red Sea, Elah (modern Eilat) and Ezion-geber (1 Kgs 9:26). The capital of Edom was Bozrah (Isa 63:1) but by the time of Amaziah (2 Kgs 14:7; 2 Chron 25:11-12) the nation’s main fortification was at Sela (modern Petra) which means ‘rock.’

2 Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: thou art greatly despised.
3 The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?
4 Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the LORD. Obadiah 2-4

Verses 2-4 give the reason for Edom’s judgement – pride.

2. ‘Behold’ directs the reader’s attention to what is going to happen. YHWH declares judgment on Edom saying that that the nation will be made small. This may be an ironic play on Gen 27:1 where Esau is described as Isaac’s ‘big son.’ YHWH will make the Edomites insignificant and despised among the nations. Their forefather Esau had despised the birthright (Gen 25:34), now his progeny will be despised.

3. Edom’s pride of heart is noted. The main idea is that of presumption, overstepping acceptable bounds (cp, 1 Sam 17:28). Pride comes first in the list of seven sins that YHWH hates (Prov 6:16-19). According to Prov 16:5 ‘everyone that is proud in heart is an abomination to the Lord…he shall not be unpunished.’ Isaiah maintains that the proud and lofty will be brought low (Isa 2:13-17). Down through the years people have made arrogant and foolish statements (that God himself could not sink the Titanic springs to mind) but surely Edom is a biblical example of the truth of Prov 16:18: ‘Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall’. Ironically Edom has become delusional, its proud heart has deceived it and in v.7 its allies will deceive it too.

‘Thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high’. Since they live in mountainous regions and have a virtually impregnable stronghold at ‘the rock’ i.e. Sela (Petra) the Edomites trust in their natural fortifications. Sela‘ means rock. They believe that they are invincible and therefore they ask themselves the rhetorical question ‘Who shall bring me down to the earth? As Edom sees it the answer is ‘No-one!’

4. The correct answer to the question is given in v.4. No matter how high Edom exalts itself YHWH declares that he will bring them down from that perch. Using striking imagery Obadiah compares Edom’s fortress to an eagle’s eyrie (Job 39:27-30) situated at a great height ‘among the stars’ (Job 22:12). Edom’s pride and arrogance will result in humiliation. See Mt 11:23; 23:12.

As well as at Edom (Obad 3; Jer 49:16) the Old Testament prophets levelled the charge of pride at other nations also.

Assyria – Isa 10:12; Ezek 31:3,10; Zeph 2:13,15.

Babylon – Isa 47:8

Moab – Isa 16:6; Jer 48:29

Tyre – Ezek 28:2

5 If thieves came to thee, if robbers by night, (how art thou cut off!) would they not have stolen till they had enough? if the grape gatherers came to thee, would they not leave some grapes?
6 How are the things of Esau searched out! how are his hidden things sought up!
7 All the men of thy confederacy have brought thee even to the border: the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, and prevailed against thee; they that eat thy bread have laid a wound under thee: there is none understanding in him.
8 Shall I not in that day, saith the LORD, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?
9 And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter.
10 For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off forever

Verses 5-10 declare the extent of Edom’s judgement.

5. Obadiah’s use of powerful imagery continues as in three conditional clauses beginning with ‘if’ he compares Edom’s destruction to a night-time robbery and to the work of grape gatherers. Note the double use of ‘came’ and ‘would they not’ in the two parallel statements in v.5.

‘If thieves came to thee, if robbers by night…would they not have stolen till they had enough?’

‘If the grapegatherers came to thee, would they not leave some grapes?’

These rhetorical questions make the point that robbers and reapers only take what they can carry; they do not take everything, they always leave something. Edom’s destruction, however, will be total, its plunderers will leave nothing. Between the two metaphors lies a dramatic aside ‘how art thou cut off,’ this is a mock lament.

6. The mocking continues in v.6 and emphasises the thoroughness with which Esau (standing for Edom) will be plundered as its enemies search for and dig out its hidden treasures.

7. The regional powers with which Edom has allied and agreed peace treaties will betray her. Who these confederates are is not stated but YHWH will have them turn against Edom. These allies will commit three acts of treachery against Edom. They will (1) expel Edom’s ambassadors from their borders , i.e. send them back to their own country, (2) deceive and overpower Edom, reneging on bilateral agreements that have been ratified with a covenant meal (e.g. Josh 9:12-15), and (3) wound Edom’s lower parts, i.e. ambush Edom and strike a blow from which it will not recover. YHWH will execute destruction on Edom by influencing its allies to attack her.

That there was ongoing diplomatic activity among the nations in that region is clear from Jeremiah chapter 27. Envoys from Edom, Moab, Ammon, Tyre and Sidon arrived at Jerusalem, no doubt to discuss forming an alliance against Nebuchadnezzar and his advancing forces. Jeremiah got involved and sent each of the representatives on their way back to their kings with a yoke as an object lesson, along with advice to submit to Babylonian rule.

8-10. Again taking up the topic of divine retribution foretold in vv.2-4 YHWH asks a rhetorical question, to which the expected answer is ‘Yes!’ ‘Shall I not in that day, saith the LORD, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?’ YHWH say that he will remove wise men from Edom so that her leaders will no longer have the discernment to make good decisions. Because of this Edom’s warriors will become demoralised and the army ineffective. They will be slaughtered by opposing military forces.

‘The mount of Esau’ (also v.21) refers to Mt Seir and stands for all of Edom (Ezek 35:15). Teman (as well as Sela. see v.3) was a town in Edom and was named after one of Esau’s grandsons (Gen 36:11; 1 Chron 1:36).

‘In that day’ refers to the time when the events of v.7 take place.

Edom was famous for its wisdom (Obad 8; Jer 49:7; see also 1 Kgs 4:30). Eliphaz, one of Job’s comforters (Job 16:2) was a Temanite (Job 2:11).

Verse 10 makes it clear that Edom deserved severe punishment because it did not respect the historical kinship bond with Israel. This is emphasized by the use of ‘thy brother Jacob’ meaning Israel. Israel was descended from Jacob and Edom from Jacob’s twin brother Esau. Israel was bitter at the violence perpetrated against it by Edom; this resentment is expressed very powerfully in the book of Obadiah. Because of hostility displayed towards Israel Edom will be disgraced and will cease to exist as a nation (‘cut off forever’).

11 In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them.
12 But thou shouldest not have looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stranger; neither shouldest thou have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day of their destruction; neither shouldest thou have spoken proudly in the day of distress.
13 Thou shouldest not have entered into the gate of my people in the day of their calamity; yea, thou shouldest not have looked on their affliction in the day of their calamity, nor have laid hands on their substance in the day of their calamity;
14 Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.

11. Verse 11 refers to a specific time of crisis for Judah when Edom was complicit with foreign invaders, taking sides with them as they attacked Jerusalem.

12-14. Verses 12-14 lists eight crimes which Edom perpetrated against Judah on that occasion. ‘In/on that day’ occurs nine times in vv.10-14.

  • You should not have gloated over your brother in the day of his alienation (v.12).
  • You should not have rejoiced over the people of Judah in the day of their ruin (v.12).
  • You should not have boasted in the day of distress (v.12)
  • You should not have entered the gate of my people in the day of calamity (v.13).
  • You should not have gloated over their disaster in the day of their calamity (v.13).
  • You should not have looted their wealth in the day of their calamity (v.13).
  • You should not have stood at the crossroads to cut off fugitives (v.14).
  • You should not have handed over survivors in the day of distress (v.14).

These crimes against Judah may have occurred during the Edomite rebellion c. 850 BCE in the reign of Jehoram of Judah but the dominant view among scholars, based on Psa 137:7, is that Obadiah was written soon after the fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians in 587/6 BCE and that these verses refer to Edom’s behaviour at that time.

That view takes no account of the fact that the Edomites are not mentioned in the list of nations that helped the Babylonians at that time (2 Kgs 24:1-2). It also fails to explain Jer 40:11, which indicates that people from Judah fled from the Babylonians to other territories; a number of them finding refuge in Edom.

In his days Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up, and Jehoiakim became his servant three years: then he turned and rebelled against him. And the LORD sent against him bands of the Chaldees, and bands of the Syrians, and bands of the Moabites, and bands of the children of Ammon, and sent them against Judah to destroy it, according to the word of the LORD, which he spoke by his servants the prophets. 2 Kings 24:1-2

Verse 14 brings to an end the oracle against Edom. The prophet now turns from the day of Judah’s calamity when Edom acted against it to another day; the Day of YHWH. On that day the situation will be reversed. Edom and the other nations will be judged and Israel will be delivered (v.17).

Posted in Exposition

Understanding the Book of Obadiah: A Concise Overview

Posted on by writtenexposition

The prophecy of Obadiah is the shortest book in the Old Testament and fourth of the twelve Minor Prophets (note: it comes fifth in LXX which has a different order for the first six Minor Prophets – Hosea, Amos, Micah, Joel, Obadiah, Jonah). It commences with a superscription (v.1) which states that it was written by someone called Obadiah and also that the subject matter concerns Edom. The remainder of the book is a diatribe against Edom, consisting of two oracles; the first denouncing that nation for sins committed against the people of Israel/Judah and the second a prophecy about the Day of YHWH.

AUTHORSHIP

Obadiah is a common Old Testament name that means ‘servant of the Lord’ so this may either be the name of the book’s author or just a self-description. A dozen men named Obadiah are mentioned in the Old Testament. Smith’s Bible Dictionary lists them as follows:

  1. A man whose sons are enumerated in the genealogy of the tribe of Judah. (1 Chronicles 3:21)
  2. A descendant of Issachar and a chief man of his tribe. (1 Chronicles 7:3)
  3. One of the six sons of Azel, a descendant of Saul. (1 Chronicles 8:33; 9:44)
  4. A Levite, son of Shemaiah, and descended from Jeduthun. (1 Chronicles 9:16; Nehemiah 12:25)
  5. The second of the lion-faced Gadites who joined David at Ziklag. (1 Chronicles 12:9)
  6. One of the Princes of Judah in the reign of Jehoshaphat. (2 Chronicles 17:7)
  7. The son of Jehiel, of the sons of Joab, who came up in the second caravan with Ezra. (Ezra 8:9)
  8. A priest, or family of priests, who settled the covenant with Nehemiah. (Nehemiah 10:5)
  9. The fourth of the twelve minor prophets.
  10. An officer of high rank in the court of Ahab. (1 Kings 18:3)
  11. The father of Ishmaiah who was chief of the tribe of Zebulun in David’s reign. (1 Chronicles 27:19)
  12. A Merarite Levite in the reign of Josiah, and one of the overseers of the workmen in the restoration of the temple. (2 Chronicles 34:12)

Nothing is known about no. 9 in Smith’s list, the author of the book of Obadiah.

DATE OF WRITING

The book of Obadiah contains no internal evidence that would indicate when it was written. No information about the author (except for his name) is given so it is virtually impossible to determine the date of writing. There are differing theories as to when the book was written. That depends upon how v.11 is interpreted.

In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them. Obadiah 11

There is disagreement as to whether this verse refers to what happened around the time of the siege and fall of Jerusalem to Nebuchadnezzar II in 587/6 BCE or to a much earlier event. The verse relates to an attack on Jerusalem, when the Edomites participated in the city’s destruction.

PRE-EXILIC VIEW

Those who consider that Obadiah was a pre-exilic prophet view Obadiah 11 as referencing an event much earlier in Judah’s history than the fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians. They identify two possibilities:

a) The Edomite revolt during the reign of King Jehoram of Judah (c. 852-841 BCE) when, in league with the Philistines and the Arabians, the Edomites plundered the temple of YHWH in Jerusalem and also carried off the royal household.

In his days Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah, and made a king over themselves. So Joram went over to Zair, and all the chariots with him: and he rose by night, and smote the Edomites which compassed him about, and the captains of the chariots: and the people fled into their tents. Yet Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day... 2 Kings 8:20-22

In his days the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah, and made themselves a king. Then Jehoram went forth with his princes, and all his chariots with him: and he rose up by night, and smote the Edomites which compassed him in, and the captains of the chariots. So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day… 2 Chronicles 21:8-10

Moreover the LORD stirred up against Jehoram the spirit of the Philistines, and of the Arabians, that were near the Ethiopians: And they came up into Judah, and broke into it, and carried away all the substance that was found in the king’s house, and his sons also, and his wives; so that there was never a son left him, save Jehoahaz, the youngest of his sons. 2 Chronicles 21:16-17

Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Philistia? will ye render me a recompense? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompense upon your own head; Because ye have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried into your temples my goodly pleasant things: The children also of Judah and the children of Jerusalem have ye sold unto the Greeks, that ye might remove them far from their border. Joel 3:4-6

Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Gaza, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they carried away captive the whole captivity, to deliver them up to Edom: But I will send a fire on the wall of Gaza, which shall devour the palaces thereof: And I will cut off the inhabitant from Ashdod, and him that holdeth the scepter from Ashkelon, and I will turn mine hand against Ekron: and the remnant of the Philistines shall perish, saith the Lord GOD. Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Tyrus, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they delivered up the whole captivity to Edom, and remembered not the brotherly covenant: But I will send a fire on the wall of Tyrus, which shall devour the palaces thereof. Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Edom, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because he did pursue his brother with the sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, and he kept his wrath forever: But I will send a fire upon Teman, which shall devour the palaces of Bozrah. Amos 1:6-12

Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.
For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.
They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:
The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes (Arabians);
Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre;
Assur also is joined with them: they have helped the children of Lot. Selah. Psalms 83:1-8

b) Edomite conflict with Judah during the reign of King Ahaz of Judah (c. 732-716 BCE).

At that time did king Ahaz send unto the kings of Assyria to help him. For again the Edomites had come and smitten Judah, and carried away captives. The Philistines also had invaded the cities of the low country, and of the south of Judah, and had taken Beth-shemesh, and Ajalon, and Gederoth, and Shocho with the villages thereof, and Timnah with the villages thereof, Gimzo also and the villages thereof: and they dwelt there. 2 Chronicles 28:16-18

EXILIC VIEW

Those who view Obadiah 11 as referring to what happened around 586 BCE postulate that the prophet Obadiah wrote early in the exilic period, just after the fall of Jerusalem, of which he may have been a contemporary eyewitness. These are the relevant passages:

Remember, O LORD, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who said, Raze it, raze it, even to the foundation thereof. Psalms 137:7

As for us, our eyes as yet failed for our vain help: in our watching we have watched for a nation that could not save us. They hunt our steps, that we cannot go in our streets: our end is near, our days are fulfilled; for our end is come. Our persecutors are swifter than the eagles of the heaven: they pursued us upon the mountains, they laid wait for us in the wilderness. The breath of our nostrils, the anointed of the LORD, was taken in their pits, of whom we said, Under his shadow we shall live among the heathen. Rejoice and be glad, O daughter of Edom, that dwellest in the land of Uz; the cup also shall pass through unto thee: thou shalt be drunken, and shalt make thyself naked. The punishment of thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion; he will no more carry thee away into captivity: he will visit thine iniquity, O daughter of Edom; he will discover thy sins. Lamentations 4:17-22

Thus saith the Lord GOD; Because that Edom hath dealt against the house of Judah by taking vengeance, and hath greatly offended, and revenged himself upon them; Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; I will also stretch out mine hand upon Edom, and will cut off man and beast from it; and I will make it desolate from Teman; and they of Dedan shall fall by the sword. And I will lay my vengeance upon Edom by the hand of my people Israel: and they shall do in Edom according to mine anger and according to my fury; and they shall know my vengeance, saith the Lord GOD. Ezekiel 25:12-14

Moreover the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against mount Seir, and prophesy against it, And say unto it, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O mount Seir, I am against thee, and I will stretch out mine hand against thee, and I will make thee most desolate. I will lay thy cities waste, and thou shalt be desolate, and thou shalt know that I am the LORD. Because thou hast had a perpetual hatred, and hast shed the blood of the children of Israel by the force of the sword in the time of their calamity, in the time that their iniquity had an end: Ezekiel 35:1-5

I favour the pre-exilic view that Obadiah lived and wrote during or soon after Edomite rebellion in the reign of King Jehoram (c. 852-841 BCE) but the dominant opinion among modern scholars is that the Book of Obadiah was written sometime in the 6th century BCE, probably in the early years of the Babylonian exile. This assumes that the occasion when Edom gloated over Jerusalem was its destruction by the Babylonians. Psalm 137:7 strongly supports that view. Its proponents, however tend to ignore Jeremiah 40:11, which indicates that people from Judah fled from the Babylonians to other territories; a number of them finding refuge in Edom.

PROPHETIC PARALLELS

The book of Obadiah contains obvious parallels with other Old Testament prophetic writings; especially Jer 49:7-16. The other passages are Lam 4:21; Joel 1:15; 2:32; Ezek 25:12-14; 35:5; also compare Psa 137:7; Mal 1:2-5.

BACKGROUND

Read: Gen 25-33

According to the Old Testament the nations of Edom and Israel traced their roots to a common ancestor. This was the patriarch Isaac, son of Abraham. Isaac fathered twin sons named Esau and Jacob. From Esau came the nation of Edom and from Jacob the nation of Israel.

According to the biblical account the twin brothers were rivals from before birth (Gen 25:19-34). Verse 22 of Gen 25 notes that in their mother Rebekah’s womb ‘the children struggled together within her.’ Concerned by this she inquired of YHWH and in reply received a significant prophecy:

And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. Gen 25:23

Genesis does not clarify whether the prophecy relates to the two individuals (Esau and Jacob) or to the future nations (Edom and Israel) that would descend from them.

The rivalry between the twin brothers continued into adulthood but it the Genesis record would indicate that later on they more or less patched up their differences; which would lead one to the conclusion that the prophecy pointed to future national affairs. The brothers may have reached an accommodation of sorts but that was not the case with Edom and Israel. Despite the fact that the two nations had a common ancestor and were thus related by kinship, their history is marked by mutual hatred and hostility. The nation of Israel expected Edom to behave towards it as a brother should, unfortunately Edom did not share those same sentiments (Deut 23:7; Num 20:14-21).

The brotherhood of Edom and Israel is referred to several times in the Old Testament. It is stressed even in the account of the birth of the twin brothers Esau and Jacob with the comment that immediately after Esau was born ‘his brother came out’ (Gen 25:26). Other references to this kinship are in Num 2:14; Deut 2:4, 23:7; Amos 1:11; Obad 10, 12; Mal 1:2.

The treatment of Esau and Edom in the Pentateuch is comparatively neutral in tone but in the prophets they are referred to with hostility. The main reasons are 1) Edom’s history of aggression towards Israel, often in cahoots with other Canaanite nations that were unrelated by kinship and also 2) Edom’s expansion into Judean territory in the Negev (Ezek 35:10; 36:5; Obad 19-20, cp. 1 Esdras 4:50).

The bad press continues in the New Testament where Esau is viewed negatively in Rom 9:13 as regards election and in Heb 12:16-17 is cited as a negative example of someone who prefers the gratification of fleshly appetites to the blessing of God. There is no direct quotation from Obadiah in the New Testament.

THEMES AND PURPOSE

The Book of Obadiah has two main themes. One is the overthrow and destruction of Edom, Israel’s inveterate enemy. The other is the eventual glory of Israel/Judah in the Day of YHWH. The purpose of the book is therefore to prophesy Edom’s doom because of its pride and hatred of Israel/Judah and to encourage the Israelites/Judeans in the fact that a bright future lies ahead. The book divides as follows:

1-14 Declaration of Judgement on Edom

15-21 Deliverance for Israel in the Day of YHWH

KEY VERSE

…as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head. Obadiah 15

KEY PHRASE

the kingdom shall be the LORD’s. Obadiah 21

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 9 – THE EXECUTIONERS

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel’s second vision extends from 8:1-11:25 and concerns the departure of YHWH’s kabod (Glory or Presence) from Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem, thus signifying the removal of divine protection and the abandonment of the city to impending judgement. This will come in the form of a siege and destruction by Babylonian forces some five years later.

In chapter 8 Ezekiel has, in vision, been snatched away from Babylon to Judah and shown the state of religion in Jerusalem at that time (Aug/Sept 592 BCE). He was taken to four locations close to the sanctuary where he viewed progressively worse forms of idolatry take place:

  • An idol at the temple entrance.
  • Elders worshipping graven images.
  • Women weeping for Tammuz.
  • Sun worship in YHWH’s temple.

YHWH cannot be expected to remain where such abominations take place so in chapter 9 he initiates judgement upon Jerusalem and Judah.

9: 1-2 Judgement commanded.

9: 3-4 Marking foreheads.

9: 5-7, 11 Judgement executed.

9:8 Ezekiel’s reaction

9: 9-10 YHWH’s response.

JUDGEMENT COMMANDED (1-2)

Following on from the mention of idolaters crying to YHWH for mercy with a ‘loud voice’ at the end of chapter 8, verse 1 of chapter 9 begins with Ezekiel hearing the ‘loud voice’ of YHWH (or YHWH’s kabod) summoning those ‘that have charge over the city.’

‘in mine ears’ – YHWH was not addressing Ezekiel but speaking in his hearing.

These officials (the word means someone designated to carry out an official task) are called ‘men’ in vv.1-2 but seem to be supernatural creatures in human form, perhaps angels. Each is to carry what is termed an ‘instrument of destruction’ (v.1) and ‘implement of smashing/shattering) (v.2); probably a battle-axe or war-club (Jer 51:20).

In response to YHWH’s summons six men come from a northerly direction (i.e. from Babylonia), appearing from the upper gate situated at the north of the temple courts (2 Kgs 15:35; Jer 20:2). As instructed, each executioner carries a destructive weapon. A seventh (or perhaps one of the six) carries a writing kit (materials necessary for writing) at his waist. This supernatural scribe is dressed in linen which was a fabric was worn by priests (e.g. Exod 28:29-42; 39:27-29; Lev 16:4, 23) and heavenly beings (Dan 10:5; 12:6-7). Angels are often associated with judgement (e.g. Gen 19:15; 2 Sam 24:16; 2 Kgs 19:35; Psa 78:9; Mt 13:49-50; Ac 12:23; 2 Thess 1:7-8). The executioners and the scribe assemble beside the bronze altar.

MARKING FOREHEADS (3-4)

Just as in chapter 8 the idolatry viewed by Ezekiel in 4 locations gets progressively worse, so in chapters 9-11 the departure of the kabod progresses in 4 stages (9:3; 10:4; 10:18-19; 11:22-23). Verse 3a of chapter 9 interrupts the flow the story to inform the reader that even before Ezekiel sees this part of the vision the kabod has already risen from the cherub upon which it rested and has moved to the threshold (entrance) of the temple. The kabod sometimes appears in connection with judgement (Num 14:10; 16:19, 42).

The cherub here is not one of the winged living creatures that support the throne chariot of chapter 1 but one of two cherubim in a three-dimensional sculpture placed above the ark of the covenant (1 Kgs 6:23-28; 2 Chron 3:10-13; 1 Kgs 8:6-7; 2 Chron 5:7-8) in Solomon’s temple. Some suggest that the singular used here refers to both cherubim since the sculpture may have been crafted from a single lump of metal (1 Chron 28;18). LXX has the plural here , and also in 10:2.

CHERUB/CHERUBIM

‘Living’ cherubim are associated with the Garden of Eden (Gen 3:24; Ezek 28:14,16) and with theophanies (2 Sam 22:11; Psa 18:10; Book of Ezekiel).

In Solomon’s temple (as also in the Tabernacle before that) inanimate cherubim were depicted. I have given references for the three-dimensional sculpture(s) in the Holy of Holies above.

There were also two-dimensional representations of cherubim carved or engraved in friezes, upon doors, and on cultic stands (1Kgs 6:29;, 32, 35; 7:29, 36; 2 Chron 3:7). The motif of cherubim was so much associated with YHWH that he was known as ‘The Lord of hosts, the cherubim sitter/dweller’ (1 Sam 4:4; 2 Sam 6:2; 2 Kgs 19:15; 1 Chron 13:6; Psa 80:1; 99:1; Isa 37:16).

Vv. 3b-4. ‘And he called to the man clothed with linen’ Strictly speaking ‘he’ is the kabod but the order is said to be issued by YHWH. He instructs the man in linen to go through the city and put a mark on the foreheads of those who grieve and lament over all the detestable things being done in Jerusalem. There is no indication that necessarily these people are righteous, the standard is set much lower than that. They just have to be those who sigh and groan silently at the lamentable state of religious and social affairs in Jerusalem.

That this mark is a sign of protection, distinguishing the condemned from those to be spared, is not stated, but presumably that is the case (cp. Cain, Gen 4:15; First Passover, Exod 12). The Hebrew word for ‘mark’ is tāw, the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. Most English versions translate it as ‘signature’ in Job 31:35 (e.g. ‘Here is my signature! Let the Almighty answer me!’ ESV) which leads some commentators to conclude that the mark is God’s signature, therefore a person marked in this way belongs to God and will be spared.

Since tāw in Paleo-Hebrew script was written as a cross (something like the shape of a + or an x) it has been suggested that its occurrence in 9:4 is an Old Testament anticipation of the cross of Christ and its association with salvation. Personally, I find this very far-fetched.

JUDGEMENT EXECUTED (5-7, 11)

The other executioners are commanded to follow the man in linen and strike down everyone who does not have the protective mark, sparing neither the young nor the old including women and children, and beginning at the sanctuary (the temple). No-one is to be spared. Then the slaughter begins, starting with the elders (8:11? or 8:16?) who are at the front of the temple.

So unfit is the sanctuary for YHWH’s presence that in v.7 he commands that the executioners contaminate his own temple by filling the courts with slain. It was believed that blood, bones and dead bodies would defile religious shrines and render the sites unusable for worship; e.g. see the deliberate desecration of religious sites by King Josiah in 2 Kgs 23:12-20. Ezekiel uses this verb ‘defile’ (ṭām’āh) of the temple three times (5:11; 9:7; 23:38). Elsewhere he uses (ḥālal) meaning ‘pollute/profane’ (7:21, 22; 23:39; 24:21; 25:3; 44:7).

In v.11 the man in linen reports that he has done what he was commanded to do. He does not say whether the other six have accomplished their grisly assignment, presumably they have.

EZEKIEL’S REACTION (8)

While the men are carrying out their appointed tasks Ezekiel displays his concern for the nation by falling on his face and pleadingly asking YHWH if he intends to destroy the entire nation of Israel and city of Jerusalem in his fury. Will a remnant (6:8-10) not be spared? In 11:13b Ezekiel also falls on his face and asks the same question again.

YHWH’S RESPONSE (9-10)

Ezekiel’s intercession is to no avail. YHWH tells him that that things have gone too far. The iniquity of Israel and Judah is extremely great. Until this point it has either been ‘house of Israel’ (8:6, 10, 11, 12) or ‘house of Judah’ (4:6; 8:17), here they are combined, emphasizing the enormity of the sin and how widespread it is.

In this verse (9) ‘the land is full of blood’ and the city ‘full of perversity.’ In 7:23 ‘the land is full of bloody crimes and the city is full of violence’. In 8:17 ‘they have filled the land with violence.’

‘For they say, The LORD hath forsaken the earth, and the LORD seeth not.’ This refers back to the complaint of the elders in 8:12 but here the two parts of the saying are reversed. This reversal facilitates the irony of v.10; i.e. they say that YHWH does not see but he does see – and his eye will not spare (5:11; 7:4, 8:18; 9:5,10).

Again the ruthlessness of YHWH in judgement is emphasized.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel chapter 9 moves on from the reasons for YHWH’s judgement in chapter 8 to the execution of the judgement itself. The chapter underscores the severity of God’s punishment of sin and corruption. In this part of his second vision Ezekiel sees YHWH unleash six supernatural executioners upon Jerusalem, the city is doomed. Verse 11 does not state how many receive the mark. If the phrase in v.8 is translated ‘I alone was left’ rather than ‘I was left alone’ then it may be that Ezekiel thinks no Jerusalemite is to be spared, hence his despair. The vision concerning the departure of YHWH’s kabod from Jerusalem continues in chapter 10.

Posted in Exposition

IDOLATRY IN THE TEMPLE PRECINCTS – EZEKIEL CHAPTER 8

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 8:1 commences the second major section of the book. This segment spans twelve chapters, from 8:1 to 19:14, with the initial four chapters (8-11) presenting what is arguably the most significant of Ezekiel’s visions. These chapters narrate the dramatic departure of the kabod (glory) of YHWH from the Jerusalem temple.

This vision is then followed by twelve oracles of varying length, each commencing with ‘The word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ (12:1; 12:8; 12:17; 12:21; 12:26; 13:1; 14:2; 14:12; 15:1; 16:1; 17:1; 18:1) and treating some aspect of the forthcoming judgement upon Judah and Jerusalem.

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 8

Ezekiel 8:1-2 details the circumstances and commencement date relating to the vision of chapters 8-11 and the oracles of chapters 12-19 that follow.  The remaining verses provide justification for YHWH’s abandonment of his sanctuary. The chapter may be divided as follows:

The commencement date and circumstances of the vision and oracles (8:1-2)

The image that provokes jealousy (8:3-6)

Animal worship (8:7-13)

The weeping for Tammuz (8:14-15)

The worship of the Sun (8:16-18)

THE COMMENCEMENT DATE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE VISION AND ORACLES (8:1-2)

In chapter 1 we discover that Ezekiel is a priest from Judah who had been deported, presumably as one of ten thousand elite citizens of Judah, by Nebuchadnezzar to Babylon along with King Jehoiachin (Ezek 1:1-2; 2 Kgs 24:13-14) in 597 BCE. At that time Ezekiel was twenty-five years of age. Five years later, at age thirty, YHWH called him to be a prophet to the exiles in Babylon. Ezekiel supplies precise dates for his prophecies, all (with the exception of 29:17) in chronological order (1:1-2; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 26:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:1; 32:17; 33:21; 40:1).

Chapter 8:1 gives the date of Ezekiel’s second vision as the fifth day of the sixth month (Elul) of the sixth year of Jehoiachin’s exile (Aug/Sept 592 BCE), some thirteen (LXX) or fourteen (MT) months after the first vision. This is roughly halfway between the first siege of Jerusalem/Jehoiachin’s exile in 597 BCE and the forthcoming judgement of YHWH upon Judah and Jerusalem in the form of a second Babylonian siege (586/587 BCE).

On the recorded date Ezekiel was visited at his house by a group of ‘the elders of Judah,’ that is, the leaders of the Jewish community in exile in Babylonia. Why they wished to consult him on this occasion is not stated, unlike two other occasions (14:1-3; 20:1) when the purpose of their visit was to ‘inquire of the Lord.’ As the elders sat before Ezekiel YHWH took hold of him once more (see 1:3; 3:14) but this was not in response to any questions posed by them.

In this vision the mysterious supernatural figure of 1:27 returns, puts forth the likeness of a human hand ( i.e. he was not human), lifts Ezekiel by a lock (‘twisted’ i.e. tassel Num 15:38, 39) of hair and transports him to the Jerusalem temple where he shows him the sins of the leaders of Judah. There is some disagreement as to whether this figure is YHWH himself or a representative who speaks for him. There are certainly strong parallels between the description (of YHWH) in 1:27 and that in 8:2, although the characteristics are presented in reverse order.

1:27 the colour of amber

1:27 of his loins even upward

1:27 his loins even downward

1:27 the appearance of fire

———————————–

8:2 the appearance of fire

8:2 of his loins even downward

8:2 from his loins even upward

8:2 as the colour of amber

The figure certainly speaks as YHWH (‘my sanctuary’ 8:6; ‘provoke me to anger’ 8:17; ‘I will deal in fury,’ ‘I will not hear them’ 8:18) and later in the vision Ezekiel addresses him as ‘Lord God’ (9:8; 11:13).

THE IMAGE THAT PROVOKES JEALOUSY (8:3-6)

Having been snatched up in a trance by the mysterious figure and teleported from Babylonia to Israel (this happens another time in 40:1-2) and seeing what God was seeing (‘in the visions of God’), Ezekiel is deposited in the first of four locations – the north gate of Jerusalem, which is the ‘seat’ of an offensive idol that provokes jealousy. YHWH had made it clear to the Israelites in Ex 20:5; 34:14 that they were to worship him exclusively, he is a jealous God who will not share. This idol provokes YHWH to jealousy not only because it is a false god but also because of where it is situated; in the precincts of YHWH’s temple.

The statue is called a semel (translated ‘image’) in this passage, a word which occurs only here, in Deut 4:16 and in 2 Chron 33:7, 15. The 2 Chronicles passage describes the idol that King Manasseh of Judah (c. 686 to 642 BCE) set up in the temple, and later removed, as a carved semel. 2 Kings 21:7 clarifies that it was an Asherah pole, a representation of the goddess Asherah. Since the statue here in Ezekiel 8:3, 5 is said to be a semel what Ezekiel views in the vision may be another Asherah pole erected at the same site. Sweeney (Reading Ezekiel 2013, p.56), however, suggests that it may have been a stele, depicting Nebuchadnezzar and his gods (esp. Marduk) and commemorating Babylonian subjugation of the city at the time of Jehoiakim’s revolt in 598/597 BCE, which would have been erected in a prominent position like the temple courtyard.

Ezekiel reports that the kabod (glory) of YHWH there, as in the vision in the plain (3:2-23).

The kabod

Kabod occurs 199 times (excluding the proper name Ichabod) in the Old Testament and has the idea of weightiness. It carries various shades of meaning, including burden, riches, honour, respect, reverence, splendour, distinction, majesty, dignity and weight/mass. It is often translated into English as glory or presence. Kabod/glory is something that gives people or objects importance or makes them impressive:

Isa 60:13 – Isaiah speaks of the kabod of the trees of Lebanon.

Isa 16:11 – Isaiah wrote about the kabod of Moab, in 17:4 of Jacob and in 21:16 of Kedar.

Gen 45:13 – Joseph instructed his brothers to tell his father of all his kabod in Egypt.

YHWH’s kabod (glory)

There appears to be two sides to YHWH’s kabod (glory):

a) The glory the he himself manifests. b) The glory that is due to him.

It is the first of these that concerns us and there are various aspects to this.

i. The glory of YHWH in creation (Psa 19; 29; 57; 72; 96; 97; 102; 104; 108; 113; 138).

ii. The glory of YHWH’s works in history; especially in relation to Moses, Sinai (Ex 24:16-17; Deut 5:24) and the wilderness wanderings (pillar of fire and cloud).

iii. The glory of YHWH in Israel’s system of religion, his great power and majesty associated with the tabernacle (Ex 40:34-35) and later the temple (2 Chron 5:14; 7:1-2).

iv. The future eschatological glory of YHWH – mainly in Isaiah (e.g. Isa 60).

v. The glory of YHWH in theophany – mainly in Ezekiel where YHWH and his kabod are almost indistinguishable.

In Ezekiel 8:4 the kabod is called ‘the glory of the God of Israel’ – a title which only occurs in Ezekiel (8:4; 9:3; 10:19; 11:22; 43:2). In v.5 Ezekiel’s guide draws his attention to the semel that provokes jealousy located in the northern ‘entrance’ (this is the only occurrence of this Hebrew word in the Old Testament) and in v.6 asks him ‘Son of man, seest thou what they do?’ – this question is repeated in vv. 12, 15 and 17. This query would suggest that not only did Ezekiel see the statue but also people worshipping it. In this vision Ezekiel is being shown the reasons for the departure of the kabod from the temple (11:23) and for the forthcoming judgement and destruction.

There is much discussion about the subject of the infinitive ‘to drive away’ (KJV ‘go far off) in v.6. Ka Leung Wong (p.397) explains: ‘The crux of the problem lies in the word lrhqh which is a qal infinitive construct with l, having a feminine form. The main question is to decide what its subject is.’

The possibilities are the abominations, the people of Israel or YHWH. It can hardly be the abominations so which of the other two is it likely to be? Should it be translated a) to drive themselves away , or b) to drive me (i.e. YHWH) away?

Those who take the subject as YHWH point out that in the immediate context YHWH is the speaker and that the broader context (chapters 8-11) deals with the departure of YHWH’s kabod from the sanctuary. The problem for many is that this makes the departure of the kabod involuntary, i.e. YHWH is not departing of his own accord but is forced out of his own sanctuary because of the abominations present there.

The subject probably is the house of Israel. Although they are not literally far from YHWH’s sanctuary (since they are worshipping in the temple precincts) by their idolatry they figuratively drive themselves far from it, in a spiritual sense.

The standard view of chapters 8-11 is that they are chapters about the abandonment by YHWH of his sanctuary, thus depriving the people of his protection and leaving them open to defeat and exile. Ezekiel 5:11 would seem to support this view (Therefore, as I live” ​— ​this is the declaration of the Lord GOD ​— ​“I will withdraw and show you no pity, because you have defiled my sanctuary with all your abhorrent acts and detestable practices.” Ezekiel 5:11 CSB.)

An alternative, however, is that by the time of the vision of 8-11 YHWH’s mobile kabod had already left the Jerusalem temple and moved east to be with the exiles in Babylon (notice that it departs to there in 11:23 and comes from there in 43:2). According to this view chapters 8-11 are about a visitation in judgement. YHWH, having already departed from the temple, has temporarily returned in order to show Ezekiel the reasons for Jerusalem’s destruction (chapter 8) and to initiate the judgement (9:1 ff.). This theory is based on a statement in 43:3 which refers back to the vision of chapters 8-11: (‘And it was according to the appearance of the vision which I saw, even according to the vision that I saw when I came to destroy the city: and the visions were like the vision that I saw by the river Chebar; and I fell upon my face.’)

Verse 6 ends with the statement ‘and thou shalt see greater abominations.’ This saying is repeated in vv. 13 and 15.

ANIMAL WORSHIP (8:7-12)

Ezekiel’s guide then takes him to the entrance to the inner court and instructs him to view the practices being conducted inside the temple compound. This location is closer to the sanctuary than the first. It is unclear exactly how Ezekiel gains entrance but it involves a wall, a hole, further excavation by Ezekiel and the discovery of a secret door. Ezekiel, in vision, seems to break through a casemate wall and enter a room of a house. That dwelling either extends into the temple wall or is built in the space between double walls. There he encounters a group of seventy of the elders of Judah burning incense in front of animal reliefs or murals. These are said (v.10) to be depictions of reptiles and abominable beasts. ‘Abominable’ (šeqeṣ) occurs in Lev 7:21, eight times in Lev chapter 11 and in Isa 66:17. It describes ritually unclean animals including:

Lev 11:10-12 Creatures that live in water but do not have scales or fins.

Lev 11:13-20 Birds of prey.

Lev 11:20, 23 Some insects.

Lev 11:41-43 Reptiles.

Isa 66:17 Pigs, mice.

This scene is doubly abominable in that a) graven images are present, and b) that unclean foods are spread out for a ritual meal.

SEVENTY ELDERS

In Ex 24:9 seventy elders saw the glory of YHWH. In Num 11:25 the spirit of God rested upon seventy elders. Here seventy elders are offering incense to false gods.

The worship leader at this private ritual is named as Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan, who ‘stood’ in the midst of them. He is not the Jaazaniah of Ezekiel 11:1 because his father’s name is different. The verb ‘stand’ (āmaḏ), according to Strongs ‘has the sense of serving before someone, as Joseph served, stood before Pharaoh (Gen. 41:46).’ Likely Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan and the elders are not priests and therefore have no right to burn incense.

It may be that Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan was the brother of Gemariah the son of Shaphan the scribe (Jer 36:10, 12) who was supportive of the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 36:25). There are also references in Jeremiah to Ahikam (Jer 26:24) and Elasah (Jer 29:3) who are also said to be sons of Shaphan. Perhaps their father was Shaphan the scribe of 2 Kgs 22 who some thirty years earlier had read the rediscovered copy of the Torah to King Josiah, an event that sparked wide-ranging religious reforms.

Once again (v.12) Ezekiel’s supernatural guide asks him ‘hast thou seen? (8:6,15,17) and comments that the elders also worship in the dark (i.e. at night), in their own chambers. These men may have been occupying cell-like quarters meant for priests at the temple. Ezekiel includes similar accommodation in his plans for an ideal temple (45:1-11).

V.12 ends with an insight into the thinking of the elders who say: ‘The Lord seeth us not; the Lord hath forsaken the earth.’ This might mean that they thought they were acting in private and YHWH could not see them. It is, however, more likely that they are not referring to YHWH’s supposed inability to see but to his lack of interest and involvement. Somehow they were already aware that their idolatry had offended YHWH, his departure therefore inevitable. They accuse YHWH of forsaking the earth when, in effect, it was they who had forsaken him.

‘For they say.’ Ezekiel quotes what people are saying in other passages as well (9:9; 12:22; 18:2, 19; 20:49; 37:11).

Since the four episodes in this chapter are scenes of increasing abomination Ezekiel is once again told that even worse things than this are going on.

THE WEEPING FOR TAMMUZ (8:14-15)

Ezekiel’s guide now takes him to a new location; the north gate of the temple, where he sees a group of women weeping for Tammuz (Dumuzi). This was a fertility deity in Mesopotamian mythology usually depicted as a young man and said to be the consort of the goddess Ishtar (Inanna). He was associated with spring vegetation (died and then returned the following summer) and the cyclical nature of life, death and rebirth. The wailing for Tammuz was a feature of mourning rituals that lamented his death and looked forward to his return. This Babylonian cult must have been practised by some Jewish women in Jerusalem. This myth about a dying and rising god is thought to equate to the Egyptian one about Osiris and Isis and to the Greek story about Adonis and Aphrodite.

Again (v.15) Ezekiel is told that even worse things than this are going on.

THE WORSHIP OF THE SUN (8:16-18)

Ezekiel is now taken in vision to a fourth location. This is in the inner court before the entrance to Solomon’s temple and between the portico (’ûlām, porch, vestibule, 1 Kgs 6:3; 1 Chr 28:11; 2 Chr 3:4; Joel 2:17) and the altar. Presumably this was an area where only Levitical priests could enter (2 Chron 4:9; Joel 2:17). Here Ezekiel discovers a group of about 25 men (LXX says 20) facing eastward and worshipping the sun. That they are bowed down to the sun, standing with their backs toward the temple, is the ultimate act of disrespect and signifies a complete rejection of YHWH. They have literally turned their backs on him. This fourth scene is the climax of the abominations shown to Ezekiel, in ascending order of seriousness. There is an early Old Testament reference to solar worship in Job 31:26-28. That the practice of Sun worship took place in Judah is confirmed by 2 Kgs 23:5,11. There is a later reference to 25 men (11:1) but no indication that this is the same group.

In v.17 Ezekiel is once again asked if he has seen this. A rhetorical question then follows: ‘Is it not enough for the house of Judah to commit the detestable acts they are doing here, that they must also fill the land with violence and repeatedly anger me, even putting the branch to their nose?’ (CSB). This question, to which the answer is obviously ‘Yes!,’ is designed to emphasize that the practices Ezekiel has seen performed are abominations that provoke YHWH to anger. Three transgressions are listed:

  • The worship of false gods – committing abominations.
  • The land filled with violence. As in 7:23 idolatry is linked with social injustice.
  • The deliberate provocation of YHWH. They put a branch to their/his nose. What this involves is not known. If they put a branch to their nose possibly the reference is to an obscene worship ritual involving vine branches that provokes YHWH to anger. If they put the branch to his nose the implication is that they direct an obscene, arrogant and deliberately provocative gesture at YHWH. The word zemôrāh meaning branch or tendril occurs four other times in the Old Testament (Num 13:23; Isa 17:10; Ezek 15:2; Nah. 2:3) and refers to vines.

V.18. YHWH will therefore not spare them and will not have pity. Even though the people cry for mercy with ‘a loud voice’ he will not hear them. The thought of a loud voice is taken up again in the next verse (9:1) which begins with the ‘loud voice’ of YHWH.

SUMMATION

In chapter 8 Ezekiel is transported in vision from Babylonia to Jerusalem where he witnesses the idolatrous state of religion and society back home. He views scenes of idolatry in four locations. Each location is closer to the sanctuary itself and each scene of idolatry is progressively worse. The temple precincts are polluted, why would YHWH stay? Chapter 8 provides justification for the withdrawal of the kabod of YHWH from the temple (chapters 8-11). Once YHWH abandons Jerusalem because of his people’s sin it will no longer be inviolable; the Babylonians will be able sack the city.

This chapter sets the stage for the judgement to come, as YHWH withdraws His protection, leaving Jerusalem vulnerable to destruction. The vivid imagery and detailed narrative underscore the severity of the people’s sins and emphasize the dire consequences of forsaking YHWH for idols.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

de Vries, Pieter 2015. The Kābôd of Yhwh in the Old Testament: with particular reference to the Book of Ezekiel. BRILL.

‌Ackerman, Susan. “A Marzēaḥ in Ezekiel 8:7-13?” The Harvard Theological Review, vol. 82, no. 3, 1989, pp. 267–81.

Aharoni, Yohanan. “The Date of Casemate Walls in Judah and Israel and Their Purpose.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 154, 1959, pp. 35–39.

Lapp, Nancy L. “Casemate Walls in Palestine and the Late Iron II Casemate at Tell El-Fûl (Gibeah).” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 223, 1976, pp. 25–42.

Wong, Ka Leung. “A Note on Ezekiel VIII 6.” Vetus Testamentum, vol. 51, no. 3, 2001, pp. 396–400.

Yamauchi, Edwin M. “Tammuz and the Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 84, no. 3, 1965, pp. 283–90.

Posted in Exposition

THE END IS NEAR – EZEKIEL CHAPTER 7

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 7:1-27

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 7:1 introduces a powerful and foreboding message from YHWH to the prophet Ezekiel, continuing the ominous prophecies about the judgement upon Judah and Jerusalem. Unlike the previous chapters (4-6) which held out some hope that a remnant would survive, this chapter does not mention that but rather makes it clear that disaster is imminent and unavoidable. The repeated emphasis on words like ‘day’ and ‘end’ underscores the urgency and finality of the impending judgement: for example: ‘the end is come’ (7:2, 6); ‘the day is come’ (7:10, 12); ‘the day draweth near’ (7:12); ‘the day of the wrath of the Lord’ (7:19).

DIVIDING THE PROPHECY

The prophecy in Ezekiel 7 naturally falls into two sections (vv. 2-4 and vv. 5-27), each beginning with ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’ However, for easier consideration it can be broken down into smaller segments:

7:2-4 Judgement announced

7:5-9 Unprecedented Disaster

7:10-13 Social Upheaval

7:14-16 Military Collapse

7:17-22 Signs of Despair

7:23-25 Make the Chain

7:26-27 Ineffective Leadership

JUDGEMENT ANNOUNCED (7:2-4)

In verses 2-4 the prophecy declares that disaster will strike not just Jerusalem and Judah but ‘the four corners of the land’ i.e. the whole land of Israel will be affected by the Babylonian invasion. The occurrence of ‘end’ five times in the first six verses emphasises the finality and certainty of the judgement

The end is presented as having already arrived (‘now’ – repeated v. 8), creating a sense of urgency and inevitability. The Preacher’s Commentary explains that:

The Hebrew word ba¯), translated here “has come” can also mean “is coming” and thus there is created a certain degree of uncertainty as to the exact timing of the events about which Ezekiel warns. Some of the usages of ba¯) by themselves would be grammatically almost certain to mean “has come” while others would by themselves mean “is coming.” That they are mixed purposely here suggests to the listener that there is an urgency to the timing. A process has started which will conclude quickly: it is not completed yet, but will not be delayed for long, either.

God’s anger is portrayed as a force that can be sent. ‘I will send mine anger’ shows that in actual fact it had not yet come. The people will be judged according to their sinful ways, particularly their idol worship, which Ezekiel refers to as ‘abominations’ (offensive things). This aligns with the New Testament depiction of the judgement of believers and unbelievers according to behaviour ( 2 Cor 5:10; Rev 20:12-13).

The severity of their sins means that YHWH will show no mercy or spare them from the judgement; they will face the consequences of their actions. The section concludes with the recognition formula ‘they shall know that I am the Lord.’ It is repeated in verses 9 and 27.

UNPRECEDENTED DISASTER (7:5-9)

Beginning with the authoritative ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ this section describes an unparalleled disaster. The ‘only’ evil that will come upon them will be unprecedented and decisive. The word ‘watcheth’ in verse 6 is a verb meaning to wake up. Verse 6 ends and verse 7 starts with the same verb ‘come,’ which is repeated seven times in vv. 5-12. These terms highlight the immediacy of the calamity.

What Ezekiel meant by the word ‘morning’ (KJV) in verse 7 is not entirely clear. It translates a word meaning ‘ring’ or ‘turn’ and the main thought is of something round. It contains the ideas of cycle, turn of events, crown and has been translated as doom, morning and diadem (Isa 28:5). It occurs again in verse 10. ‘Morning’ probably fits well with the idea of wake up in the previous verse and thus signifies the dawn of a new day, a dreadful era the like of which the Israelites have never experienced before. That day is near and is a day of tumult (KJV ‘trouble’) in which they will hear the noise of war. That clamour is contrasted with the ‘sounding again of the mountains.’ This is not referring to an earthquake but most likely to the joyful conversation of workers at harvest time (Isa 16:10) in vineyards on mountain slopes; the opposite of the tumult of invasion. In this verse the imminence of judgement is conveyed by the following phrases: ‘the morning is come,’ ‘the time is come,’ and ‘the day…is near.’ Here ‘the day’ is introduced – a concept that will be developed from verse 10 onwards.

If translated ‘crown’ or ‘diadem’ rather than ‘morning’ it could be a reference to the Chaldean King Nebuchadnezzar.

Verses 8 and 9 again state that the punishment is the Israelites’ own fault and that no mercy or compassion will be shown by YHWH. These two verses are a repetition of verses 3 and 4 but with ‘that smiteth’ added after ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’ This emphasizes that the judgement is from YHWH. The additional wording forms a compound name of the Lord: YHWH-Makkeh, The Lord who smites. For other compound names see my post COMPOUND NAMES OF YHWH

SOCIAL UPHEAVAL (7:10-13)

Verses 10-13 depict a society in turmoil. The day of judgement has arrived, signified by the dawn of morning. Some commentators take ‘the rod hath blossomed’ etc. to refer to Judah; the idea being that pride has flourished among the people, contributing to their downfall, i.e. they have been over-confident. Violence has become a rod of wickedness, symbolizing the prevalence and severity of sin among the people.

I take it, however, that the rod refers to the Neo-Babylonian Empire and its swift rise to ascendancy in the Ancient Near East under the Chaldean kings Nabopolassar (626-605 BCE) and his son Nebuchadnezzar II (605-562 BCE). In the Bible a budding rod represents growth and prosperity (for the story about Aaron’s rod that budded, blossomed and bore almonds please read Numbers chapter 17). Three clauses describe the Chaldeans: 1) ‘the rod hath blossomed’ 2) ‘pride hath budded’ 3) ‘violence is risen up into a rod of wickedness.’ The prophet Habakkuk described this proud and violent nation as follows:

For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.
They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.
Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves: and their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.
They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every stronghold; for they shall heap dust, and take it. Habakkuk 1:6-10

Like a rod that blossoms, buds and grows that nation will rise up as an instrument of God’s punishment upon Judah. What will be the result for the inhabitants of the land of Israel? – ‘None of the people will be left, none of that crowd—none of their wealth, nothing of value. Ezekiel 7:11 (NIV). The invasion will bring total societal collapse. So many people will die that there will be no lamentation for their fate. The usual burial practices will not be carried out.

The day of judgement approaches (12-13) and it will be a time of despair for all. Everyday business transactions will be meaningless as the population faces extermination or captivity. Neither the buyer nor the seller will find cause for rejoicing or mourning as the entire population will be consumed by the wrath of God. The buyer will not rejoice in having negotiated a favourable deal for he will never enjoy what he has purchased. The seller will not mourn over what he has parted with for it will be taken away from him in any case. The invaders will take everything, there will be nothing left to buy or sell.

The usual protections of property laws, like those in Leviticus (Lev 25:14, 24-28) regarding the Year of Jubilee, will be irrelevant in the face of such widespread destruction. Every fiftieth year property that had been sold would revert to the original owner or his heir, thus ensuring the protection of a family’s inheritance, i.e. ancestral land. Those who have sold property will not be able to reclaim it, even if they are still alive, because they will be in captivity.

The vision concerning the people (the whole multitude) will not turn back; i.e. the prophecy will not be reversed. Because of their sins they will not be able to preserve their lives.

MILITARY COLLAPSE 7:14-16

Despite the sounding of a trumpet to prepare for war no-one will respond. God’s wrath will paralyse the people, rendering them defenceless against the Chaldean invaders.

The judgement will come through external threats such as war (sword) and internal afflictions like pestilence and famine. Whether people are in the field or in the city, death will be inevitable. Those who escape the city will be killed by the invaders and those under siege inside the city will die of famine and plague. This repeats the prophecy of the three-fold judgement (sword, famine, pestilence) already given in 5:2, 12 and 6:11. According to v.16 some may flee to the mountains but they will be overwhelmed by their guilt and grief and ‘mourn like doves of the valleys’ (Isa 38:14; 59:11).

SIGNS OF DESPAIR (7:17-22)

The coming judgement will induce such terror that the entire population will be physically weak and feeble. They will wear sackcloth, a sign of mourning and repentance, and display horror and shame. They will show their grief by shaving their heads (see Mic1:16), a practice that was forbidden in Deut 14:1; especially for priests Lev 21:5; Ezek 44:20. The picture seems to be that they will dress in sackcloth but wear horror as an outer garment.

Silver and gold, which have been the cause of their spiritual stumbling, will not be able to ‘deliver them in the day of the wrath of the Lord.’ It will become worthless because there will be no food available to buy. They will therefore throw away their wealth (for similar see Isa 2:7-8, 20) in disgust because it has become ‘detestable’ (KJV ‘removed’). The word niddāh means a woman’s menstrual flow. In the Old Testament it refers to something regarded as impure, filthy, and unclean (Lev 20:21; Ez 9:11; Lam 1:17). It occurs again in the next verse, v.20.

Speaking of the whole nation in the singular as ‘he’ and ‘his’ the prophecy says that the Lord had given them wealth but since in their pride (KJV ‘majesty) they turned it into abominable idols, the Lord will make it an unclean thing (niddāh) to them (KJV ‘set it far from them’).

God will allow their wealth to be plundered and defiled by foreign invaders. ‘They shall pollute it’ simply means that the precious metals that have been made into idols will not be used for religious purposes but rather put to common use. There is no suggestion that the idols are holy. ‘Pollute’ (ḥālal) in that same sense occurs again in the next verse, v. 22.

God will turn his face away from his people, symbolizing his withdrawal of help and protection from them. This will allow the heathen enemy robbers to desecrate his ‘treasure’ (KJV ‘secret place‘). Some commentators view this as a reference to the temple and its destruction by the invaders but in Hebrew ‘temple’ is masculine. Greenberg (1983, p. 154) points out: ‘Judging from the feminine suffixes in the next clause (“it”) this is an epithet of the city or land of vs. 23 (both fem. in Hebrew); so T (“the land in which my Presence dwells).’

In this passage the Babylonians are referred to in disparaging terms (cp. Ezek 28:7; 30:11) as ‘the strangers’ (v.21), ‘the wicked of the earth’ (v.21), ‘robbers’ (v.22) and ‘the worst of the heathen’ (v.24).

MAKE THE CHAIN 7:23-25

The instruction ‘make the chain’ tells Ezekiel to perform another symbolic action that conjures up an image of captivity and exile (cp. Jer 27:2; Nah 3:10). He is to forge a chain. Jerusalem’s crimes will lead to its downfall; it is full of violence and capital crimes (lit. judgements of blood). Foreign conquerors (‘the evil ones of the heathen’ i.e. the worst of) will occupy Israelite homes, defile their sacred places and end their pride and power.

The conquest of the land, the destruction of holy sites, the occupation of homes by the invaders, and deportation fulfil the covenant curses of Leviticus chapter 26:31-33. Despite desperate attempts to bring about peace their efforts will be in vain and horror will certainly come upon them.

INEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP 7:26-27

Calamity will be compounded by a lack of guidance. Prophets, priests and elders will have no answers as God will have withdrawn. There will be no words of revelation, knowledge or counsel and as a result all ranks of the population, the king, the prince (tribal chieftain), and the people of the land will be will be stricken with fear and despair.

God will bring on them the the evil that they have done to others. The judgement will be a direct consequence of their deeds and it will ensure that they recognize YHWH’s sovereignty and authority – ‘they shall know that I am the Lord.’

SUMMATION

This concludes the first major unit of the book, marking the end of the initial cycle of prophecies (chapters 4-7) which predicts dreadful judgements upon Judah and Jerusalem. Chapter 7 characterises these as retribution for their violence (7:7-11), improper use of wealth (7: 19-20), and idolatrous practices (7:20). It emphasises that they will be punished in accordance with their deeds (7:8, 9, 27) so they will suffer violence (7:25), their wealth will be unable to save them (7:19) and their holy places will be destroyed and defiled (7:24). This seventh chapter of Ezekiel presents a vivid depiction of impending judgment upon Judah and Jerusalem for their sins, highlighting the severity and inevitability of God’s wrath.

Posted in Exposition

AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO THE MOUNTAINS OF ISRAEL – EZEKIEL 6:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

Ezekiel Chapter 6:

The chapter may be simply divided as follows:

1-4 PREDICTION

5-7 DESOLATION

8-10 PRESERVATION

11-14 LAMENTATION

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter six, like chapters four, five and seven, predicts severe judgements on the people and land of Judah. The structure of this chapter is similar to that of chapters thirty-five and thirty-six, which are also addressed to mountains. Chapter thirty-five is addressed to Mount Seir and the mountains of Edom and chapter thirty-six to the mountains of Israel. All three chapters (6, 35 and 36) have the same basic structure:

  • The word of YHWH comes to the prophet.
  • A prophecy is addressed to the mountain(s).
  • Bloodshed, death and destruction are predicted.
  • The power of the Lord is recognized.

1-4 PREDICTION

In v.1 the word of YHWH comes to the prophet with an instruction (v.2) to ‘set thy face towards the mountains of Israel’ and address the oracle to them. The expression ‘set thy face’ most likely implies taking up an attitude of opposition. It might also mean that Ezekiel is not to be afraid when delivering the message or even that he is literally to face westwards while speaking (see also 13:17; 21:2; 25:2; 28:21; 38:2).

With the exception of Josh 11:21 the phrase ‘mountains of Israel’ is found only in Ezekiel. It stands for the land of Israel (Deut 11:11 ‘a land of hills and valleys’) and indicates that YHWH will not only judge Jerusalem but also the whole land.

Where there are hills or mountains one also finds valleys, ravines and watercourses and these are all addressed in v.3. Ezekiel, of course, was not asked to literally speak to geographic features. Rather, here we have a technique known as personification – attributing human qualities or characteristics to something that is not human. To the personified locations YHWH issues a threat of invasion (‘a sword upon you’). The purpose of this punishment is that the ‘high places,’ which have been associated with idolatrous worship, might be utterly destroyed.

The cultic practices at the high places were syncretic in that the people worshipped YHWH there but combined this with rituals associated with other deities, such as Baal, Asherah and the planets (2 Kgs 23:4; Ezek 8:16). In connection with this v.4 mentions altars, images and idols.

Altar (mizbēaḥ) – this word is derived from a verb meaning to slaughter and refers to a raised location where sacrifices are offered.

Image (ḥammān) – solar pillar (Isa17:8; 2 Chron 34;4,7) or incense altar.

Idols (gillûlim) – Always occurring in the plural, this is Ezekiel’s favourite word for the false deities worshipped by Israel and Judah. It is thought to have derived from the Hebrew for ‘dung’ and is therefore derogatory and contemptuous. Ezekiel refers to deities other than YHWH as ‘dung-gods.’ YHWH will cast down the slain before the idols.

5-7 DESOLATION

The first half of v.5 repeats the end of v.4 that dead Israelite bodies will lie before their idols. V.5b adds that their bones will be scattered round about the altars. This emphasizes the futility of idolatry. The people would be slain as they sought help from their idols and their corpses would be lying uninterred on the ground as if offered as human sacrifices to those idols. Ironically, the Babylonians would show no mercy to the Israelite idol worshippers, even though they were idolaters too.

Verses 6-7 predict total desolation. Their towns will be waste and the high places ruined. The altars and idols will be cut down and their works wiped out. ‘Your altars,’ ‘your idols’ and ‘your works’ stress that not only did the useless idols belong to the people of Judah but also that they had manufactured these images themselves. Everything relating to the idol worship would be obliterated. That these should be destroyed is the stated purpose for total destruction.

‘high places’ Before the construction of Solomon’s temple as the central shrine for the worship of YHWH rites and sacrifices were conducted at local shrines called high places (e.g. 1 Sam 9:13, 19, 25; 10:5; 1 Kgs 3:2). We read of them first in Lev 26:30 and especially in the Kings, Chronicles and the Prophets. According to Deut 12:2-3 these locations ought to have been destroyed once the Israelites entered the Promised Land but the Israelites, whose God had appeared to Moses at Mount Sinai, easily adopted the Canaanite custom of conducting religious rites on hills and worshipped YHWH in such locations. Unfortunately, they adopted heathen practices as well, especially those associated with the fertility cults, such as male and female sacred prostitution.

The Old Testament uses the following words in this connection:

qāḏēš / qeḏēšāh Deut 23:17-18; 1 Kgs 14:24; 15:12; 22:46; 2 Kgs 23:7; Hos 4:4

zōnāh Gen 38:15; Lev 21:7; Deut 23:18; Prov 7:10; Jer 2:20; Ezek 23:44; Hos 2:5

possibly also ‘ministering women’ Ex 38:8; 1 Sam 2:22

Three of Judah’s kings – Asa (1Kgs 15:12-14), Hezekiah (2 Chron 32:12) and Josiah (2 Kgs 23:4-20) – attempted to quash idolatry, with varying degrees of success.

V.7. Still addressing the personified mountains of Israel YHWH says to them that when they see the fallen corpses ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’ This expression is repeated in vv. 7, 10, 13, 14.

8-10 PRESERVATION

YHWH via Ezekiel prophesies that a remnant will survive the siege of Jerusalem and will eventually remember him (cf. Zech 10:9)and repent of their evil ways (see also 12:16;14:22). This idea of a remnant featured in the symbolic act of 5:3-4. Although the message is mainly one of desolation a glimmer of hope lies in the fact that the nation will not be totally wiped out. That God will preserve some is an indication of grace.

Many commentators take the verb in v.9 as passive and translate as ‘I am broken.’ YHWH, like a husband whose wife has been unfaithful, is grief-stricken and broken-hearted by their ‘whorish heart’ and by the severity of the punishment that he must inflict upon them. The use of ‘whorish’ and ‘whoring’ may reference the link between idolatry and impure sexual practices.

Others take the verb as reflexive and translate as ‘ when I will break’ or ‘when I shall have broken for myself’ (i.e. for my own glory or reputation) – ‘their whorish heart and their eyes’. ‘Break their eyes’ is an unusual expression that might mean ‘destroy their pride’ (cf. Lev 26:19). This would cause them to realise that their idolatrous practices provoked YHWH and cause them to ‘loathe themselves’ and repent (36:31-32). V.9 emphasizes the emotions that will be felt by both YHWH and the people.

V.10 repeats the expression ‘they shall know that I am the the Lord.’ This will be because he will keep his word and carry out the punishment. This prophecy is not an idle threat.

11-14 LAMENTATION

Ezekiel is instructed to clap his hands, stamp his feet and wail ‘Alas!’ over the fate of the house of Israel. These extravagant gestures express deep emotion at the draconian punishment to come upon Jerusalem. It is unlikely that the emotion is joy (as in 25:6 where clapping and stamping are linked as well) at the prospect of God’s righteous judgement upon idolators but is more likely to be grief or regret at what the people will have to suffer (21:12-14). Jeremiah also wept over the fate of the people (Jer 9:1).

Verse 11 ends with a further prediction of the three main causes of death that will come upon the people: sword, famine and pestilence. These correspond to the portions into which Ezekiel’s shaved hair was symbolically divided (5:2, 12). Sword equals war, famine equals hunger and pestilence equals disease. Verse 12 explains that these disasters will prevail in different places and in different circumstances: those afar off will die by plague, those near will be killed by the sword and those that remain will die of starvation in the siege. The use of ‘far off, ‘near’ and ‘remains’ makes the point that everyone will be affected. God’s wrath will come upon them wherever they are. Although he was physically located in Babylon Ezekiel in v.12 seems to be speaking as if he were at Jerusalem, since the location of those that will remain and undergo siege is Jerusalem. It is interesting that plague, war and famine are the same penalties which were specified in Lev 26:25-26 for violation of the covenant. ‘Fury’ at the end of v.12 reiterates YHWH’s anger at idolatry. He will certainly carry out these threats.

Verse 13 repeats the picture in v.5 of dead bodies strewn about in front of the idols at their idolatrous shrines and again repeats ‘then shall they know that I am the Lord.’ The verse lists types of location at which altars to idols were typically situated – hills, mountains, trees – and mentions the oak tree in particular. Hosea 4:13 adds poplar and elm.

‘upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree‘

This phrase upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree is drawn upon by various Old Testament authors when describing the high places and groves at which idolatrous worship in Israel took place. Some include all three locations (mountain, hill, tree), others just one or two. I have found the following examples, perhaps there are more.

MOUNTAIN, HILL, TREE

Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree: Deuteronomy Ezekiel 12:2

Then shall ye know that I am the LORD, when their slain men shall be among their idols round about their altars, upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree, and under every thick oak, the place where they did offer sweet savour to all their idols. Ezekiel 6:13

They sacrifice upon the tops of the mountains, and burn incense upon the hills, under oaks and poplars and elms, because the shadow thereof is good: therefore your daughters shall commit whoredom, and your spouses shall commit adultery. Hosea 4:13

HILL and TREE

For they also built them high places, and images, and groves, on every high hill, and under every green tree. 1 Kings 14:23

And they set them up images and groves in every high hill, and under every green tree: 2 Kings 17:10

And he sacrificed and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree. 2 Kings 16:4

He sacrificed also and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree. 2 Chronicles 28:4

For of old time I have broken thy yoke, and burst thy bands; and thou saidst, I will not transgress; when upon every high hill and under every green tree thou wanderest, playing the harlot. Jeremiah 2:20

Whilst their children remember their altars and their groves by the green trees upon the high hills. Jeremiah 17:2

For when I had brought them into the land, for the which I lifted up mine hand to give it to them, then they saw every high hill, and all the thick trees, and they offered there their sacrifices, and there they presented the provocation of their offering: there also they made their sweet savour, and poured out there their drink offerings. Ezekiel 20:28

MOUNTAIN and TREE

Inflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clefts of the rocks? Among the smooth stones of the stream is thy portion; they, they are thy lot: even to them hast thou poured a drink offering, thou hast offered a meat offering. Should I receive comfort in these? Upon a lofty and high mountain hast thou set thy bed: even thither wentest thou up to offer sacrifice. Isaiah 57:5-7

The LORD said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot. Jeremiah 3:6

MOUNTAIN AND HILL

And there shall be upon every high mountain, and upon every high hill, rivers and streams of waters in the day of the great slaughter, when the towers fall. Isaiah 30:25

Your iniquities, and the iniquities of your fathers together, saith the LORD, which have burned incense upon the mountains, and blasphemed me upon the hills: therefore will I measure their former work into their bosom. Isaiah 65:7

My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them. Ezekiel 34:6

TREE

Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the LORD thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the LORD. Jeremiah 3:13

MOUNTAIN

And hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, neither hath defiled his neighbour’s wife, neither hath come near to a menstruous woman, Ezekiel 18:6

And that doeth not any of those duties, but even hath eaten upon the mountains, and defiled his neighbour’s wife, Ezekiel 18:11

That hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, hath not defiled his neighbour’s wife, Ezekiel 18:15

Verse 14 promises that the Lord will ‘stretch out his hand’ in judgement. The result will be desolation and waste wherever they live. The desolation will be worse than that of ‘the wilderness toward Diblath.’ This most likely refers to the Arabian desert which lies to the east and south of the Dead Sea.

The location of Diblath is not known. Various unlikely suggestions have been put forward including;

Almon Diblathaim / Beth Diblathaim – in Moab, east of the Red Sea – Num 33:46-47; Jer 48:22

Riblah – on the Orontes river – 2 Kgs 25:6-7, 18-21; Jer 39:5-6; 52:9-11, 24-27

The oracle concludes with a further repetition of the recognition formula ‘they shall know that I am the LORD’ (vv. 7, 10, 13, 14).

SUMMATION

In this chapter the prophet Ezekiel receives a message from YHWH. He is to address this to the mountains of Israel and inform them that YHWH will bring devastation upon the high places, altars, and sacred pillars where the people have practised idolatry and worshipped false gods. The oracular speech describes how the people of Judah will be slain, their idols destroyed, and their land left desolate as punishment for their disobedience and rebellion against God. Despite this severe judgement, the Lord will leave a remnant who will remember him and acknowledge his sovereignty.

Posted in Exposition

FOUR SYMBOLIC ACTS IN EZEKIEL 4:1-5:4

Posted on by writtenexposition

The Siege of Jerusalem: Contextual Background

Ezekiel chapter 4:1-5:4 is a continuation of the spirit’s speech to Ezekiel which commenced in 3:24. In it he receives instructions concerning his first messages to his fellow exiles in Babylon. He is to enact four dramatic performances which together represent YHWH’s judgement that is soon to come upon Judah. The drama relates to its capital city Jerusalem and the consequences of the forthcoming siege of the city by Nebuchadnezzar II.

At that time, of course, Ezekiel’s fellow exiles did not expect anything like that to happen. These prophecies are delivered by Ezekiel early in the period commencing with his call to the prophetic ministry (c. 593 BCE) and ending with the fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE). In 597 BCE Nebuchadnezzar had deposed Jehoiachin of Judah and exiled him along with ten thousand of his subjects (2 Kgs 24:8-16), including Ezekiel (1:1-3). He then installed Jehoiachin’s uncle Zedekiah as a puppet king. With this relatively stable government in Judah the exiles were doubtless looking forward to a soon return to their homeland. They could not have known then that Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24-25; 2 Chron 36; Jer 3) would cast off his allegiance to the Babylonians; provoking a violent response by Nebuchadnezzar. In order to quell the revolt by his Judaean vassal Nebuchadnezzar marched to Riblah in Syria where he established campaign headquarters (2 Kgs 25:6, 20; Jer 39:5; 52:9, 26). From that base his army invaded Judah and destroyed its fortified towns (Jer 44:2) before besieging Jerusalem in the ninth year of Zedekiah. Eventually, after a two and a half year siege, the city fell to the Babylonians in 586 BCE. Zedekiah’s family and the nobles of Jerusalem were executed, after which Zedekiah himself was blinded and transported to Babylon as a prisoner of war (2 Kgs 25:6-7).

Ezekiel’s dramatic performances feature:

4:1-3 A model of a siege – representing the siege of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A number of days spent lying on his left and right sides – representing the duration of judgement .

4:9-17 Consumption of small amounts of bread and water – representing a famine in Jerusalem.

5:1-4 A haircut and shave – representing the fate of Israel.

Some scholars are of the opinion that because Ezekiel does not explicitly state ‘I did this’ for each drama he may have just described the details of his vision to the people without physically acting out these scenarios. However, I take that Ezekiel literally carried out YHWH’s instructions since 4:12 makes it clear that the bread was to be baked in the sight of the people. In addition, impressive symbolic actions by Israel’s prophets were not unusual in that era (1 Kgs 11:30, 22:11; 2 Kgs 13:17; Isa 20:2-4; Jer 13:1-11, 19:1-10).

4:1-3 A MODEL OF A SIEGE

Ezekiel, once again addressed as ‘thou, son of man,’ is instructed to get a (clay) brick, set it before him, and inscribe a diagram of Jerusalem on it. He is then to impersonate the Babylonians by enacting a siege of the city. In practice, Ezekiel may have depicted siege warfare by drawing but the verbs (lay, build, cast, set, take) suggest it is more likely that he made little models and moved them towards his clay brick. These models were of:

a fort – siege works or a tower, manned by archers and slingers (2 Kgs 25:1).

a mount – mounds or ramps constructed of debris (earth, wood, stone) which were built against the walls of a besieged city. Siege towers and battering rams could be pushed up these ramps and from them attack troops could scale the walls using siege ladders. They would then fight their way to the city gates and open them.

a camp – living quarters of an army contingent. As well as fighting men this would have included sappers (who tunnelled under the walls to collapse them) and siege engineers.

battering rams – these wheeled vehicles had a heavy ram suspended from the roof by ropes, one of its ends being a large metal blade. The operators repeatedly slammed this into city gates and walls in order to breach them. These prefabricated machines were generally transported flat pack and assembled on site.

From the details in these three verses one can easily imagine the noise, mayhem and devastation of ancient siege warfare. Men shouting, rams battering, slingers and archers from both sides raining down stones and arrows at one another, the defenders throwing down flaming torches to set the attacking war engines and troops alight. Ezekiel’s enactment of such a siege that would soon be experienced by Jerusalem must have shocked his fellow countrymen.

Ezekiel was also to set up a flat iron pan or griddle between him and his model of the city and glare (‘direct your face forward’) at it. This obstruction probably represented the barrier between YHWH and the house of Israel and the stare represented God’s angry intentions towards Jerusalem. The visual demonstration of a siege serves as a prophetic ‘sign’ to the house of Israel of the impending destruction of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A NUMBER OF DAYS SPENT LYING ON HIS LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES

Ezekiel is then commanded to lie on his left and right sides for a specific number of days, symbolically bearing the sin of the people of Israel. Each day probably represents a year of punishment for Israel’s iniquity. This act serves as a vivid illustration of the consequences of Israel’s rebellion against God.

Having impersonated the Babylonians in the first episode Ezekiel now has to play the part of Israel. He is instructed to lie on his left side for 390 days and after that lie on his right side for 40 days. The first period relates to the ‘house of Israel,’ the second to the ‘house of Judah. Ezekiel is told that each day represents one year (vv. 5-6).

Apparently in the Ancient Near East directions were indicated from a position facing east. North (the northern kingdom of Israel) was therefore on the left side and South (the southern kingdom of Judah) on the right. Another example of this in Ezekiel is 16:46: ‘And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters that dwell at thy left hand: and thy younger sister, that dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters.’

Concerning the years, we have no idea what dates are referred to. In fact, even the number of years for the house of Israel is unclear for although the Hebrew Masoretic text reads 390 years the Greek LXX says 190 years. Scholars and commentators have fertile imaginations and many ingenious suggestions have been put forward.

Since 390+40=430 (the period of time spent by the children of Israel in Egypt) some see this as symbolic of years of oppression or wilderness experience for Israel. See also Ex12:40 and Gal 3:17.

There is some disagreement as to whether the days represent years of sin or the years of punishment for sin. The first would look back to years of iniquity, the other point forward to years of judgement. Basing their opinion on v.9b some commentators maintain that the 390 years and the 40 years run concurrently, although v.6 says ‘when thou hast accomplished them (390), lie again (40)…’ which strongly suggests that they are consecutive.

There also seems to be no agreement on a terminus a quo (start date). For the 390 years of iniquity a popular choice is the period from the the division of Israel in 931 BCE to the fall of Babylon in 539 BCE. Others think that the period is 390 years from the construction of Solomon’s temple in the tenth century BCE. A valid point made by several commentators is that the dates in the book of Ezekiel are based on the deportation of Jehoiachin in 597 BCE, on this basis they speculate that the 390 and 40 years of punishment run consecutively from then until the Maccabean Revolt in 167 BCE.

As regards the 40 year period of Judah’s iniquity some say it began during the reign of King Josiah (640 -609 BCE) and ended with the Fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE), others that it commenced during the long (2 Kgs 21:1), evil (2 Kgs 21:10-16; 23:26-27) reign of Manasseh (lived c. 697-642 BCE).

A few of the commentators I have read give the 430 years a future application, maintaining that because the northern tribes would not have received Ezekiel’s prophecy then these days have yet to be fulfilled. They assert that Ezekiel is portraying judgement that will fall on all Israel (5:4). This, in their view, will occur at the end of the age.

It therefore seems that this is to be a long drawn out drama. Ezekiel is to lie first on his left side for 390 days and then on his right for 40 days ‘to bear the iniquity’ of the house of Israel and the house of Judah. This bearing of the nation’s iniquity is not vicarious but rather Ezekiel’s period of suffering and discomfort symbolizes the pain that Israel will endure at the hands of the Babylonians. During this display YHWH will ‘put ropes on’ Ezekiel, perhaps inflicting him with some kind of temporary paralysis, in order to prevent him from turning from one side to the other.

Again (v.7) Ezekiel is instructed to stare/glare at his siege model while he is lying on his side with his arm uncovered (see v.4). This may symbolize an unimpeded warrior ready for battle (cp. Isa 52:10). He is also to prophesy against Jerusalem. Perhaps, however, there is one crumb of hope in Ezekiel’s message in that the judgement is for a set period and will one day come to an end.

Possibly Ezekiel did not lie immobile 24-7 but just lay for several hours per day as the passage represents him carrying out other activities like enacting the siege, baking bread, drinking water, shaving etc.

4:9-17 CONSUMPTION OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF BREAD AND WATER

In these verses Ezekiel is instructed to eat a specific ration of food, prepared from a mixture of grains and legumes. This is limited by weight and represents the scarcity of food that the people of Jerusalem would experience during a siege. This action demonstrates the severity of the impending judgment upon Israel.

He is directed to mix flour from six types of grain in one vessel and prepare enough bread to eat ‘ from time to time’ (v.10, i.e. at a set time each day) during the 390 day period that he would lie on one side or the other. These grains are: wheat, barley, beans (see also 2 Sam 17:28), lentils, millet and fitches (a species of wheat). This unusual mixture of cereals was to be baked in full view of his fellow exiles (v.12), using human excrement as fuel. The amount of Ezekiel’s daily allocation of this disgusting food is 20 (Babylonian) shekels – approximately 8 ounces or 227 grams – and his intake of water is restricted to one sixth of a hin – about 0.6 litres. That the quantities are to be precisely measured out (cp. Lev 26:26) emphasizes that these are starvation rations. Ezekiel’s general state of health will deteriorate on such an unbalanced diet. The main point of this symbolic action is that siege, starvation and famine will soon be the lot of the residents of Jerusalem. There will be a shortage of food and water therefore rationing will apply (vv.16-17). Rationing is described in Isa 30:20 as ‘the bread of adversity and the water of affliction’ (see also 1 Kgs 22:27).

Ezekiel is instructed to eat the bread ‘as barley cakes.’ The idea seems to be that of eating them with enjoyment or enthusiasm thus suggesting that during the siege of Jerusalem people will be delighted to have something to eat, even if it is polluted.

In verse 13 the Lord says ‘thus shall the children of Israel eat defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them’ (for YHWH driving the Israelites out see Jer 8:3; 16:15; 24:9; 27:10,15), Ezekiel’s starvation diet teaches his fellow Israelites a double lesson: it predicts the forthcoming siege of Jerusalem and also the defilement of the exile that would follow it. The may mean that the food they will eat abroad is defiled since it will not be slaughtered, produced, handled and prepared in accordance with the dietary laws in the Torah. It could also mean that they will be defiled by adopting heathen manners and customs during the Exile (cp. Hos 9:3-4 for a similar sentiment).

Even though Ezekiel was receiving these directions while in a prophetic trance his priestly upbringing seems to have automatically triggered an immediate protest at the instructions concerning the bread. That his problem concerns the use of human excrement as fuel is clear from YHWH’s response in v.15: ‘Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.’ Bread baked over dried cow manure will still be defiled but perhaps to Ezekiel it seems a little less revolting. In any case, it will still sound disgusting and memorably make the point to his audience.

Ezekiel’s request for relief begins with a passionate outburst ‘Ah Lord God!’ and he goes on to explain that thus far his life has not been ‘polluted.’ One would think that Ezekiel’s objection is based on either the regulations concerning unlawful mixing (Lev 19:19; Deut 22:9) or on the strict rules about the disposal of human waste (Deut 23:12-14). However, he mentions neither of these but gives as his reason (‘for’ v.14) the fact that he had never done the following things:

  • Eaten an animal that died of itself (Lev 11:39; 17:15; 22:8; Deut 14:21, cp. Ezek 44:31).
  • Eaten an animal that was torn in pieces (Ex 22:31; Lev 22:8).
  • Eaten abominable flesh – this was meat left over from peace offerings and not eaten by the third day (Lev19:7).

These things bear no relation to baking bread over human excrement but Ezekiel seems to be asserting that he has kept all the dietary regulations since his youth, and cites these three cases in point. It is commendable that Ezekiel lived a blameless life before his prophetic call and that during his ministry his conscience was so sensitive that he instinctively wanted to live his life in obedience to God’s requirements. What a great lesson and example for us today!

After granting Ezekiel a concession on the fuel YHWH further declares: ‘Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem: and they shall eat bread by weight, and with care; and they shall drink water by measure, and with astonishment: That they may want bread and water, and be astonished one with another, and consume away for their iniquity.’ Ezekiel 4:16-17

‘staff of bread’ – means supply of bread, that which human beings depend on for survival. See also Lev 26:26; Psa 105:16; Isa 3:1; Ezek 5:16; 14:13. The siege of Jerusalem will result in the rationing of food and water. Bread will be doled out by weight and water by measure. The people will partake of their daily rations ‘with astonishment’ (extreme fear and apprehension) and will ‘consume away for their iniquity,’ i.e. they will waste away. Ezekiel uses this same expression three times when prophesying YHWH’s judgement (4:17; 24:23; 33:10).

This drama symbolizes and emphasizes the severity of the judgement that will befall Jerusalem. The scarcity of food and water will lead to desperation and despair among the people. This judgment is portrayed as a consequence of the people’s sin and disobedience.

5:1-4 A HAIRCUT AND SHAVE

Again addressing him as ‘Mortal’ YHWH reveals to Ezekiel details of the fourth drama that he must enact. He is to take a sharp knife and shave his head and beard. Using a knife as a razor is a powerful depiction of the judgement that will come upon the people of Jerusalem. The shaving of the head and beard was a sign of mourning (Isa 22:12; Jer 16:6) or disgrace (2 Sam 10:4; Mic 1:16) in ancient Near Eastern cultures and Israelites were forbidden by the law (Lev 19:27; 21:5; Deut 14:1) to practise this custom.

Using balances Ezekiel is to weigh and divide the hair that he has shaved off. This intimates that God is supervising the judgements (see 5:12; 6:12). Unlike the previous three dramas (chapter 4), in this case Ezekiel is to perform the symbolic actions AFTER the set number of days he has to lie on one side or the other (‘when the days of the (mock) siege are fulfilled,’ 5:2).

  • He is to burn one third of the hair ‘in the midst of the city,’ i.e. on his brick representing Jerusalem. This symbolizes the destruction of Jerusalem by fire and of its inhabitants by famine and pestilence (5:12).
  • He is to strike another third of the hair with a sword symbolizing that many people will suffer a violent death in battle.
  • He is to throw the remaining third to the winds, symbolizing the dispersion of the people of Judah.
  • He is to take a small number of the scattered hairs and bind them in the hem of his garment. He then has to take some of these and burn them in the fire. This indicates that even a remnant (symbolizing either those who survive the Babylonian invasion and siege or those who remain faithful to YHWH) will not be spared from God’s judgement but will find themselves in desperate circumstances. This action emphasizes the severity of the consequences of disobedience.

We now move into the next section which begins with an oracle against Jerusalem (5:5-17) in which YHWH explains the symbolism of the haircut and shave in 5:1-4.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

NEHEMIAH 13:15-31

Posted on by writtenexposition

13:15-22 RESTORATION OF SABBATH OBSERVANCE

Nehemiah finds that in his absence (‘in those days’) some in Judah have not been observing the Sabbath, but engaging in trade and commerce on the holy day. The offenders listed were involved in the main industry – agriculture – and included wine makers, farmers, fruit growers and haulage operatives. The word translated ‘sheaves’ means ‘heaps’ and need not be restricted to grain. As well as violating the command not to work, the loading and transportation of goods by donkey into Jerusalem also transgressed the concept of no (or very limited) travel on the Sabbath (Ex 16:29; Acts 1:12). Sabbath observance is prescribed in the one of the Ten Commandments (Ex 20:8-11; 31:12-17) and was viewed by Isaiah (56:1-8) as something that results in blessing. The prophets Jeremiah (17:19-27), Ezekiel (20:12-24) and Amos (8:4-5) identified profanation of the Sabbath as a cause of the woes that befell the Israelites; because they had became just like the heathens around them.

Nehemiah also observes that merchants from Tyre who had set up a trading colony in Jerusalem were selling fish and all kinds of wares to the local people on the Sabbath.

THE PHOENICIAN PORT OF TYRE

Tyre was an important port for the Phoenicians, a nation famous in ancient times for seafaring and commerce. Just as the Arabs with their camel trains dominated the transportation of goods over land so the Phoenician merchant navy dominated the shipping routes; conveying goods to and from the three continents (Africa, Asia and Europe) bordering the Mediterranean. They carried not only seawater fish from the Mediterranean and freshwater fish from the Nile but also an abundance of other foodstuffs, exported in cylindrical clay jars. These included: fish paste, pine nuts, olives, olive oil, wine, honey and grain. They shipped luxury goods like furniture, metal tableware (e.g. decorated bowls, candelabra), purple dye, and carved ivories, and were also experts in the delivery of bulk timber by sea (1 Kgs 5:9; 1 Chron 22:4; 2 Chron 2:3-16; Ezra 3:7). The prowess of the Phoenicians (Tyre and Sidon) as merchants and human traffickers is acknowledged by the Old Testament Hebrew prophets (Isa 23:1-8, 17-18; Ezekiel 27:1-36; 28:1-5; Joel 3:4-7; Amos 1:9). Ezekiel chapter 27 is of special historical interest because it not only gives a list of commodities traded by the Tyrians but also details the many and widespread locations where they did business.

NEHEMIAH PROMOTES SABBATH OBSERVANCE

Nehemiah confronts the Judaean nobles and accuses them of profaning the Sabbath (for this expression see: Neh 13:17, 18; Ezek 20:16, 21, 24, ; 22:8; 23:38) and adding to God’s wrath against them. He warns them about God’s punishment (13:18). He then institutes practical measures to enforce Sabbath observance and ensure the sanctity of the day.

  • Nehemiah closes the gates of Jerusalem on the Sabbath and initially has his servants guard them so that no burden could be carried into the city.
  • Some of the merchants camp outside the city gates so that the locals can go out and buy from them. Nehemiah tells them to leave or face forcible removal. They leave.
  • Nehemiah then hands over responsibility for guarding to gates to the Levites, after they purify themselves for the Sabbath.

13:22 Nehemiah again asks God to take note of his actions and ‘spare’ (have compassion on) him.

13:23-29 PROBLEM OF EXOGAMOUS MARRIAGES

Upon his return from Persia Nehemiah discovers that in his absence an old issue has resurfaced. Some Israelite men have married foreign women, contrary to God’s law (Deut 23:3-6)and the covenant that had been signed in chapter ten. One of the points of that covenant was the cessation of exogamous marriage (10:30). Nehemiah cites two specific examples of the problem.

1) Half the children spoke (Aramaic?) in a foreign dialect and could not speak ‘the language of the Jews’ i.e. Hebrew. Nehemiah could easily distinguish between the speech of children of Ashdodite mothers and that of children from all Jewish households. He was concerned about ungodly foreign cultural influence and was also very much aware that Jewish national identity was bound up with the worship of God. Since Hebrew was the language of the Jewish religion children who did not speak it could not be taught or understand the scriptures. Men who had married foreign wives were not only neglecting the Hebrew language, they were jeopardizing the purity of the Jewish religion.

Nehemiah therefore takes the offenders to court and challenges their actions. He calls down the curses of the broken covenant upon them, subjects them to a public shaming ritual (see Isa 50:6) and makes them take an oath once again not to marry their children off to foreigners. The reason (vv. 26-27) given for this is the sin of Solomon. In spite of the fact that God loved him (2 Sam 12:24-25) and made him king over all Israel (1 Kgs 4:1) Solomon entered into diplomatic marriages with foreign wives (1 Kgs 11:1-10; 2 Chron 8:11) who led him away from the true worship of Yahweh.

2) Jehoiada, son or grandson of the High Priest Eliashib, had married the daughter of Sanballat the Horonite, who was an enemy of Nehemiah (2:19; 4:1-2, 7; 6:1-9, 14) and a pagan. In the regulations recorded in Lev 21:10-15 the high priest was required to ‘take a virgin of his own people to wife’. In practical terms this prohibition against marrying a foreign wife probably extended to the sons and grandsons of a high priest since they could possibly become high priest in the future. Nehemiah expelled Jehoiada from Judea.

Nehemiah’s prayer at the end of this section (v29) is not about himself but he instead directs his prayer against the high priestly family who, because of intermarriage, had set a bad example to the people, defiled the priesthood and broken the covenant of 10:29-30.

13:30-31 SUMMARY OF NEHEMIAH’S CULTIC REFORMS

Nehemiah ends his memoir by summarizing his main achievements. He lists these as action taken against foreign marriages (10:30; 13:23ff), reorganisation of the temple duties of the priests and Levites (10:37-39; 12:44-47; 13:12-13), the institution of a wood offering (10:34) and the revival/rescheduling of the firstfruits offering (10:35-37).

SUMMATION

Nehemiah chapter thirteen emphasizes the need for continual vigilance in upholding God’s standards and reminds us that spiritual renewal is an ongoing process. The chapter underscores the importance of maintaining purity, honouring the Lord’s demands, and the people of God keeping separate from unholy influences. In spite of Nehemiah’s accomplishments chapter thirteen ends on a somewhat negative note. Sadly, the Israelites do not seem to have shared Nehemiah’s enthusiasm for the things of God. They yielded to secular and religious pressure from outside their community and, despite pledging ‘to walk in God’s law’ (10:29), they abandoned their commitments concerning intermarriage (10:30), Sabbath observance (10:31), and support of the Temple service (10:37-39) soon after Nehemiah left for Persia.

Chapter thirteen records Nehemiah’s final efforts to restore Jerusalem’s spiritual and moral fabric, and provides us with valuable examples of active leadership, faithfulness, and a timely warning about the possibility of departure from the will of God.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Carson, D.A. (2018). NIV Biblical Theology Study Bible : Follow God’s Redemptive Plan as it Unfolds Throughout Scripture [Previously published as NIV Zondervan Study Bible]. Grand Rapids, Mi: Zondervan.

Grabbe, L.L. (2012). An introduction to Second Temple Judaism : History and Religion of the Jews in the time of Nehemiah, the Maccabees, Hillel and Jesus. London Bloomsbury.

Knut Larson, Anders, M. and Dahlen, K. (2005). Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Nashville, Tenn. Broadman & Holman C.

López-Ruiz C. and Doak, B.R. (2019). The Oxford Handbook of the Phoenician and Punic Mediterranean. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Ruckman, P.S. (2004). The Books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. (The Bible Believer’s Commentary Series).

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Berlin, A.M. (1997). From Monarchy to Markets: The Phoenicians in Hellenistic Palestine. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 306, pp.75–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1357550.

Master, D.M. (2014). Economy and Exchange in the Iron Age Kingdoms of the Southern Levant. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 372, pp.81–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.5615/bullamerschoorie.372.0081.

Noonan, B.J. (2011). Did Nehemiah Own Tyrian Goods? Trade between Judea and Phoenicia during the Achaemenid Period. Journal of Biblical Literature, 130(2), pp.281–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41304201.

Nehemiah 13:1-3

Nehemiah 13:4-14

Posted in General

WHO WAS ZADOK THE PRIEST?

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

The term ‘Zadok the Priest’ usually brings to mind a piece of music composed by George Frideric Handel in 1727 and first performed during the coronation of King George II and Queen Caroline of England on 11th October of that year. Since then this iconic anthem has been sung at the coronation of every British monarch (with the exception of Edward VIII who abdicated the throne before the date set for his coronation) and was therefore played during the coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla.

‘Zadok the Priest, and Nathan the Prophet anointed Solomon King.
And all the people rejoiced, and said:
God save the King! Long live the King!
May the King live for ever,
Amen, Alleluia.’

The biblical passage 1 Kings 1:38-48 is the inspiration for those words of the anthem:

So, what does the Bible tell us about Zadok?

THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF ZADOK’S STORY

Zadok was a priest in the time of King David and King Solomon who ruled over the ancient kingdom of Israel; David being the second king and Solomon his son and successor. David is believed to have become king around 1010 BCE, while Solomon reigned c. 970 – 930 BCE. David established Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and united the Israelite tribes into a single kingdom, Solomon was known for his wisdom, for building the first Temple in Jerusalem, and for expanding Israel’s trade and influence. Zadok is famous for anointing Solomon as king.

ZADOK’S GENEALOGY

In 1 Chronicles 6:3-8 and 6:50-53, Zadok is listed as a descendant of Eleazar, Aaron’s third son. In 1 Chronicles 24:3, Zadok is again listed as a descendant of Eleazar. This genealogy stretching back to Aaron demonstrates that Zadok was of the priestly family descended from Aaron (the brother of Moses). He was therefore a member of the Aaronic priesthood.

ZADOK’S LOYALTY TO KING DAVID

Almost nothing is known about Zadok’s early life but it seems that he may have belonged to a family of warrior priests. We learn that David was proclaimed king of Judah after the death of King Saul and established his capital in Hebron (2 Sam 2:1-4) where he reigned over Judah for seven and a half years before being acclaimed as king over all Israel (2 Sam 5:1-5). 1 Chronicles chapter 12 records that thousands from Israel defected to David at Hebron and in the census list of armed contingents that came over to David there is a reference (vv. 27-28) to ‘Zadok, a young man of valour.’

The young Zadok supported David’s cause and appears to have been rewarded for his loyalty. Once David firmly established the united monarchy he appointed Zadok and Abiathar as co-priests (2 Sam 8:17; 20:25) in Jerusalem; likely as keepers of the Ark of Covenant which had been transported there and housed in a tented shrine (2 Sam 6:1-17; 7:2; 1 Kgs 2:26; 1 Chron 16:39-40). In David’s administration Zadok also served as chief officer of the Aaronites (1 Chron 27:17) and he worked closely with another priestly colleague called Ahimelech in the organisation of the rotating courses of the priests for religious service (1 Chron 18:16; 24:3, 6, 31).

Later Zadok again aligned himself with the king when David’s son Absalom rebelled. Since it seemed likely that Absalom’s conspiracy to usurp the throne would succeed David decided to flee Jerusalem. Zadok, Abiathar and a group of Levites left the city with him, taking the Ark of the Covenant as well. David, however, convinced that Jerusalem was the place where the ark ought to be, asked them to take it back. The two priests did so and, along with their two sons, remained there as secret agents. They kept David informed of events in the city (2 Sam. 15:13-36; 17:15-22). After Absalom’s rebellion failed David sent Zadok and Abiathar as emissaries to the elders of Judah in order to win back their support and negotiate his return to Jerusalem. Their mission was successful (2 Sam 19:11-15).

ZADOK’S INVOLVEMENT IN THE ANOINTING OF KING SOLOMON

Zadok once again demonstrated his loyalty to King David in the matter of Adonijah’s failed rebellion. Adonijah was the fourth son of King David, born in Hebron (2 Sam 3:4). He attempted to seize the throne while his father was still alive. The events surrounding Adonijah’s revolt are described in 1 Kings 1:5-53. Since David had grown old and infirm, Adonijah saw himself as the heir apparent and arranged to hold a grand feast at which he intended to proclaim himself king, and to which he invited many of David’s officials and supporters; but did not include others whom he knew would be loyal to David. The latter included Solomon, Nathan the prophet and Zadok the priest. Adonijah had the support of Joab, the commander of David’s army, and Abiathar the priest (for Abiathar’s part in the insurrection Solomon later dismissed him from his position as priest, 1 Kgs 2:26-27).

The prophet Nathan and Bathsheba, Solomon’s mother, brought the matter of Adonijah to David’s attention. He immediately took action to ensure that Solomon would be his successor. David instructed Nathan the prophet and Zadok the priest to proclaim Solomon as king (1 Kgs 1:34) and ride him on David’s own mule to the Gihon spring, where he would be officially anointed king over Israel.

So Zadok the priest, and Nathan the prophet, and Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, and the Cherethites, and the Pelethites, went down, and caused Solomon to ride upon king David’s mule, and brought him to Gihon.
And Zadok the priest took a horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon. And they blew the trumpet; and all the people said, God save king Solomon. 1 Kgs 1:38-39

This was done, and the people rejoiced, while Adonijah’s followers fled in fear. Thus David settled the succession question by appointing Solomon co-regent. Father and son ruled together until David’s death. Solomon was later anointed as king a second time; along with him Zadok was anointed to be (chief) priest (1 Chron 29:22), possibly serving for a time at Solomon’s temple.

SOME LESSONS FROM THE LIFE OF ZADOK

Be loyal to God and to your leaders. Zadok was loyal to God and to King David. Even when David made mistakes, Zadok remained faithful. This is a valuable lesson for us to learn, it is important to be loyal to those in authority, even when they make mistakes.

Be a person of action. Zadok was a man of action. He was willing to stand up for what he believed in, even when it was difficult to do so. We ought to be willing to stand up for what we believe in, even when that involves personal cost.

Be a person of integrity. Zadok was a man of integrity. He was honest, trustworthy. and was doubtless a great example to his children. David described Zadok’s son Ahimaaz as ‘a good man’ (2 Sam 18:27) – he may have been the same Ahimaaz who married Solomon’s daughter Basmath (1 Kgs 4:15). Another of Zadok’s sons (or perhaps a grandson? 1 Chron 6:8-9), Azariah, was one of the top officials in Solomon’s administration (1 Kgs 4:2).

Zadok was a priest who faithfully served God and the king. He made sound choices in life and was able to play an important role in the history of Israel. He is therefore an example for us to follow.

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

Posted on by writtenexposition

1. Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God. 2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king Jehoiachin’s captivity, 3. The word of the LORD came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the hand of the LORD was there upon him.

INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

These verses introduce the book of Ezekiel and provide historical background, as well as some information about the prophet Ezekiel and his message. They indicate when and where he was active; thus situating his visions within a specific historical and cultural context.

1:1 Ezekiel’s prophetic ministry is said to have begun ‘in the thirtieth year.’ The significance of the ‘thirtieth year’ is not explained but it is usually understood to mean that Ezekiel was thirty years of age at the time. The date given is the fifth day of the fourth month. This would have been the month of Tammuz and therefore the time of year was late June/early July.

The vision occurred while Ezekiel was among the exiles by the Chebar, which was most likely a canal near Babylon. It seems that many exiled Jews had been settled in this area. Ezekiel’s location by the canal underscores the fact that he was living among the exiles and sharing in their experiences and struggles.

1:2 Verse 2 provides more detailed historical context by specifying that it was the fifth year of King Jehoiachin’s exile. This information dates Ezekiel’s inaugural vision (592 BCE) and places it within the larger context of the Babylonian exile.

King Jehoiachin (2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10, also known as Jeconiah (Jer 24:1; 27:20; 28:4; 29:2) and Coniah (Jer 22:24, 28; 37:1), was the son of King Jehoiakim of Judah and a grandson of King Josiah. Jehoiachin became king of Judah at the age of eighteen (2 Kgs 24:8). His short reign was marked by political instability and conflict with the Babylonians. According to the Chronicler he ‘did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord’ (2 Chron 36:9). Jeremiah 22:24-30 has the Lord directly addressing Jehoiachin, prophesying his captivity and exile in Babylon. The Lord also declared that Jehoiachin’s descendants would neither prosper nor sit on the throne of David, thus signifying the end of the dynasty.

In 597 BCE King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon deported King Jehoiachin of Judah along with many of the leading citizens of Jerusalem (2 Kgs 24:15-16); including Ezekiel, who would have been twenty-five years of age at that time. Jehoiachin’s captivity in Babylon lasted for thirty-seven years. During that time, he was reportedly well-treated by the Babylonians and eventually released from captivity by King Evil-Merodach, who succeeded Nebuchadnezzar as ruler of Babylon. According to 2 Kings 25:27-30, Jehoiachin was then given a high position at the Babylonian court (new clothes, a daily allowance for the rest of his life, and allowed to dine at the king’s table).

Despite his short troubled reign and his captivity in Babylon, Jehoiachin was an important figure in the history of Judah. His deposition and deportation marked the beginning of the Babylonian Exile, a period of great spiritual and cultural significance for the Israelites. The Exile came to an end in 538 BCE.

During this difficult time Ezekiel, himself taken into captivity during Jehoiachin’s reign, provided spiritual guidance and hope to the exiles over a period of twenty years. The date of his inaugural vision in verse 2 is the first chronological marker in the book. The others are:

8:1 The vision of idols and abominations in the temple.

20:1 Ezekiel’s response to the elders.

24:1 The parable of a cooking pot

26:1 Threats against Tyre.

29:1 Prophecy against Egypt.

29:17 Desolation of Egypt.

30:20 Pharaoh’s defeat.

31:1 The cedar of Lebanon.

32:1 Lament over Pharoah..

32:17 Lament over Egypt.

33:21 News of the Fall of Jerusalem.

40:1 Vision of a new temple.

1:3 Verse 3 identifies Ezekiel as a member of the priestly class. This would suggest that his prophetic message was informed by his knowledge of Jewish ritual and tradition, which gave him religious authority to speak on behalf of God. Note that many respected commentators confidently assert that Ezekiel was a Zadokite priest. This they assume purely on the basis that Ezekiel speaks highly of the Zadokites in chapters 40-48, which contain his vision of how a future ideal temple might look and operate. In these chapters Ezekiel assigns a dominant role to the Zadokites (43:18-27; 44:15-16; 45:4; 46:19-24), presumably as a reward for remaining relatively (22:26) faithful (44:10-11, 15-16; 48:11) during the Exile. There is zero scriptural evidence for Ezekiel having a Zadokite heritage.

The reference to the “hand of the Lord” being upon him indicates that Ezekiel was divinely inspired and empowered to deliver God’s message to the exiles. The ‘land of the Chaldeans’ refers to the Neo-Babylonian empire ruled over by Nebopolassar (627-605 BCE) and his son Nebuchadnezzar (605-562 BCE).

SUMMATION

The opening verses of Ezekiel set the stage for the prophetic message that follows. The fact that Ezekiel received his vision among the exiles by the Chebar canal underscores the fact that his message is directed to the Israelite community in exile. The political and social upheaval of the time is also reflected in the references to King Jehoiachin’s exile and the Babylonian conquest.

Ezekiel 1:1-3 offers spiritual lessons that are still relevant today:

First, we see that God is not limited by our circumstances. Even in the midst of exile and captivity, God can still reveal himself and speak to his people.

Second, we see that God chooses ordinary people to do extraordinary things. Ezekiel was a priest, but God called him to be a prophet and to deliver his message to the exiles.

Finally, we see that God’s word is powerful and authoritative. Ezekiel’s prophetic message was not his own, but rather it came directly from God.

As we read the book of Ezekiel, we are reminded that God is sovereign over all of history, and that his word has the power to transform our lives and to give us hope even in the midst of difficult situations.

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

OUTLINE OF THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL

Posted on by writtenexposition

The precise dates given throughout the book of Ezekiel show that his prophecies centred on a specific major event in the history of Judah, that is, the Fall of Jerusalem in 587 BCE. The book therefore divides into two main sections: prophecies relating to the ten years leading up to the Fall of Jerusalem ( chapters 1-32) and prophecies relating to time after the Fall of Jerusalem (chapters 33-48).

The material is arranged in five blocks:

PART 1 – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO THE PROPHETIC MINISTRY – CHAPTERS 1-3

1:1-3 – Introduction and superscription

1:4-28 – Vision of the glory of YHWH

2:1 – 3:27 – Ezekiel’s Commission

PART 2 – ORACLES OF WARNING TO ISRAEL AND JUDAH – CHAPTERS 4-24

4:1-5:4 – The siege of Jerusalem portrayed in symbolic acts

5:5 – 17 – A prophetic sermon directed against Jerusalem

6:1 – 7: 27 – A prophecy of judgement on the land of Israel

8:1 – 11:25 – A vision of God’s glory leaving the Temple

12:1 – 14:23 – False Prophets

15:1-8 – Jerusalem as a useless charred vine

16:1-63 – Jerusalem as Yahweh’s adulterous wife

17:1-24 – The allegory of two eagles and a vine

18:1-32 – Individual responsibility

19: 1-14 – A lament over the rulers of Israel

20: 1-49 – A review of Israel’s history

21:1-32 – The sword of destruction

22:1- 31 – Sinful Jerusalem

23:1-49 – Two unfaithful sisters

24:1-14 – Sayings on the cooking pot

24:15-27 – The death of Ezekiel’s wife

PART 3 – ORACLES AGAINST THE SURROUNDING NATIONS – CHAPTERS 25-32

25:1-7 – Against Ammon

25:8-11 – Against Moab

25:12-14 – Against Edom

25:15-17 – Against the Philistines

26:1 – 28: 19 – Against Tyre

28:20 -26 – Against Sidon

29:1 – 32:16 – Against Egypt

PART 4 – A MESSAGE OF HOPE AND RESTORATION -CHAPTERS 33-39

33:1-20 – The prophet as watchman

33:21-22 – News of the Fall of Jerusalem

33:23-29 – Prophecy against those who remained in Jerusalem

33:30-33 – God addresses Ezekiel: a prophet whose predictions had been fulfilled

34:1-31 – The false shepherds of Israel and the true shepherd

35:1-15 – Oracle against Edom

36:1-38 – Renewal promised to Israel

37:1 -14 – The valley of dry bones

37: 15-28 – Two sticks – reunification

38:1-39:29 – Oracle against Gog of Magog

PART 5 – THE NEW ISRAEL – CHAPTERS 40-48

40:1 – 43:12 – The vision of a new temple

43:13 – 46:24 – The worship in the new temple

47:1-12 – The life-giving river

47:13-48:35 – The Land and the City

Posted in Exposition

WELCOME TO THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL!

Posted on by writtenexposition

Welcome to Ezekiel! What are today’s readers to make of this strange book, and of this weird prophet – someone who saw visions of fire, wheels and creatures with multiple wings and faces, and who shaved off his hair with a sword and did not mourn his own wife’s death? 

He was one of the writing prophets, men who were convinced that God spoke to them and through them. Their all-holy God controlled not just his own people but also the surrounding pagan nations and would definitely judge sin. Eventually, however, he would restore his people and all creation. When did they write?

These prophets were active for several centuries after the time of King Solomon. Following his death in 931 BCE the kingdom divided into two territories: Israel to the North and Judah in the South.

THE PRE-EXILIC PROPHETS

The prophets addressing Israel (and the approximate dates of their ministries) were;

Jonah c. 780 -753 BCE

Amos c. 765-753 BCE

Hosea c. 755-725 BCE

 In 722/721 BCE the Northern nation Israel was taken into captivity in Assyria and the Southern nation, Judah, continued as an independent state.

The early pre-exilic prophets in Judah were:

Micah c. 735-690 BCE

Isaiah c. 740-680 BCE

The late pre-exilic prophets in Judah were:

Nahum c. 630 BCE

Zephaniah c. 625 BCE

Habakkuk c. 607 BCE

Joel c. 590 BCE

Jeremiah c. 627-580 BCE

In 587/586 BCE the city of Jerusalem fell to the Babylonian army and there was a mass deportation of Jews to Babylon .

THE EXILIC PROPHETS

Obadiah ? c. 585 BCE – we do not know when he prophesied.

Ezekiel c. 593-571 BCE

Daniel c. 605-535 BCE

THE POST-EXILIC PROPHETS

Haggai 520 BCE

Zechariah c. 520-500 BCE

Malachi c 420 BCE

Daniel (Dan chp. 1) had been taken to Babylon in 605 BCE when Nebuchadnezzar invaded Judah under King Jehoiakim after defeating the Egyptians at the battle of Carchemish (see Jer 46.) Some years later (597 BCE), ten years before the fall of Jerusalem in 587 and the Exile, Nebuchadnezzar deported King Jehoiachin of Judah and ten thousand of the political and religious elite into captivity in Babylon. Ezekiel was one of those elite. 2 Kings 24:8-16:

8 Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother’s name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem.

9 And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father had done.

10 At that time the servants of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up against Jerusalem, and the city was besieged.

11 And Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came against the city, and his servants did besiege it.

12 And Jehoiachin the king of Judah went out to the king of Babylon, he, and his mother, and his servants, and his princes, and his officers: and the king of Babylon took him in the eighth year of his reign.

13 And he carried out thence all the treasures of the house of the LORD, and the treasures of the king’s house, and cut in pieces all the vessels of gold which Solomon king of Israel had made in the temple of the LORD, as the LORD had said.

14 And he carried away all Jerusalem, and all the princes, and all the mighty men of valour, even ten thousand captives, and all the craftsmen and smiths: none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of the land.

15 And he carried away Jehoiachin to Babylon, and the king’s mother, and the king’s wives, and his officers, and the mighty of the land, those carried he into captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon.

16 And all the men of might, even seven thousand, and craftsmen and smiths a thousand, all that were strong and apt for war, even them the king of Babylon brought captive to Babylon.

Ezekiel was therefore in exile in Babylon during the final siege and fall of Jerusalem. Although based far away in Babylon, he prophesied to the people living back in the homeland, Judah.

Ezekiel wrote in the first person throughout his long and complex book which is is grim and intimidating. He experienced strange visions and often dwelt on God’s wrath. The Book of Ezekiel, however, is quite easy to follow as it is highly organized and precise. The prophet records the dates of sixteen revelations and for eleven of those he gives the year, the month and the day (1:2; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:21; 33:21; 40:1).

Posted in Exposition

KING JOSIAH OF JUDAH in 2 Kings

Posted on by writtenexposition

READINGS:

2 Kings 22:1 – 23:30;

2 Chronicles 33:25 – 35:27;

See also: 1 Esdras 1:1-33

INTRODUCTION

Although unknown to secular history, King Josiah of Judah is one of the most significant figures in the Old Testament. He figures prominently in 2 Kings (22:1-23:30) and in 2 Chronicles (chps 34-35). The author of the Book of Kings is particularly enthusiastic about him and his achievements: ‘Neither before nor after Josiah was there a king like him who turned to the LORD as he did—with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his strength, in accordance with all the Law of Moses’ (2 Kgs 23:25). As well as the two accounts of Josiah’s career in the canonical books of 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles there is a third in the deuterocanonical book 1 Esdras (1:1-33). These three accounts differ from one another, most noticeably in the details surrounding Josiah’s death.

EARLY LIFE

Scant details are given in 2 Kings of the first seventeen years of Josiah’s life. He was the son of King Amon (642-640 BCE) of Judah (2 Kgs 21:26) by Jedidiah, daughter of Adaiah of Bozkath (2 Kgs 22:1). He probably remembered his grandfather Manasseh who, after a long reign (2 Kgs 21:1), died when Josiah was six years old.

His father Amon reigned for just two years before being assassinated by his own courtiers (2 Kgs 21:23). The biblical accounts do not give us the course of events leading up to the coup d’état that toppled Amon but it is thought that he continued the pro-Assyrian policies of his father Manasseh who had been a loyal vassal of Assyria for more than fifty years. Manasseh had not only tolerated but also encouraged pagan cults and practices, including divination, magic, sacred prostitution and human sacrifice. He even set up altars to the astral deities in the Temple of YHWH at Jerusalem (2 Kings 21:2-7; Zeph 1:4-6). According to the Chronicler, Amon was even more devoted to Assyrian religious practices than his father had been:

‘But he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, as did Manasseh his father: for Amon sacrificed unto all the carved images which Manasseh his father had made, and served them; And humbled not himself before the LORD, as Manasseh his father had humbled himself; but Amon trespassed more and more.’ 2 Chron 33:22-23

Those who conspired to kill Amon must have been anti-Assyrian and thought it a good time to rebel against the weakening Assyrian empire. It was struggling to quell uprisings in various parts of the empire at that time. Egypt was trying to gain control of Assyrian territory in Palestine and c. 639 laid siege to Ashdod, capital of Philistia, a province belonging to Assyria. The Arabian tribes and Acre and Ushu (mainland Tyre) revolted as did Elam. That Ashurbanipal brutally quelled these rebellions makes it seem likely that ‘the people of the land’, wishing to avoid military conflict with Assyria and the reprisals that would follow, successfully launched a counter-revolution. They executed those responsible for the regicide and installed Amon’s underage son Josiah as king. The status quo was thus restored and Assyria took no punitive action.

The child-king Josiah must have had a regent and/or a body of advisors but no details are given in the biblical record. The following officials are mentioned in the Josiah story and it may be that one or more of them acted on Josiah’s behalf.

Shaphan the scribe, son of Azaliah, the son of Meshullam  2 Kgs 22:3

Ahikam the son of Shaphan  2 Kgs 22:12,14; 2 Chron 34:20

Maaseiah the governor of the city   2 Chron 34:8

Joah the son of Joahaz the recorder  2 Chron 34:8

Achbor the son of Michaiah   2 Kgs 22:12,14

Abdon the son of Micah  2 Chron 34:20

Hilkiah the High Priest   2 Kgs 22:4, 8,10,12;  2 Chron 34:9,14, 15,18, 20

THE JOSIAH ACCOUNT IN 2 KINGS 22:1-23:30

22:1-2 Introductory Formula

22:3-10 The Temple and the Torah scroll

22:11-13 King Josiah’s response to the scroll

22:14-20 Huldah’s oracle

23:1-3 Making a covenant

23:4-20, 24 Purging Judah’s worship

23:21-23 The Passover

23:25 A positive verdict on Josiah

23:26-27 A negative verdict on Jerusalem

23:28-30 Josiah’s death

22:1-2 Introductory Formula

This tells us that Josiah began to reign at age eight and was on the throne for a period of thirty-one years (640-609 BCE). His mother was Jedidah, daughter of Adaiah of Boscath. It also gives a glowing introductory assessment based on his devotion to YHWH, Israel’s God.

‘And he did that which was right in the sight of the LORD, and walked in all the way of David his father, and turned not aside to the right hand or to the left.’

This is essentially repeated in the closing verdict on Josiah given in 2 Kgs 23:25:

‘And like unto him was there no king before him, that turned to the Lord with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might, according to all the law of Moses; neither after him arose there any like him.’

A similar assessment was made of King Hezekiah in chapter 18:

‘He trusted in the LORD God of Israel; so that after him was none like him among all the kings of Judah, nor any that were before him. For he cleaved to the LORD, and departed not from following him, but kept his commandments, which the LORD commanded — Moses.’ 2 Kgs 18:5-6

There is, however, a difference of emphasis in the assessment of the two kings. The author of Kings is acclaiming Hezekiah’s trust but he applauds Josiah’s repentance.

22:3-10 The Temple and the Torah scroll

In the eighteenth year of Josiah’s reign (621 BCE) a programme of temple refurbishment was launched. Shaphan the scribe was appointed by the king to manage the project. His main responsibilities were the management of the finances for the building work and the payment of the tradesmen. He is the first of two main characters who feature in this section. The other is Hilkiah the High Priest. He reported to Shaphan his find of a torah scroll (the book of the law) in the temple (22:8). It must have lain in storage for years, the implication is that it had been long forgotten. Shaphan, in an audience with the king, unemotionally reported two main facts:

a) the financial arrangements had been carried out as required and the workmen had been paid.

b) the High Priest Hilkiah had found a scroll in the Temple.

The scroll was then read to King Josiah.

22:11-13 King Josiah’s response to the scroll

‘When the king had heard the words of the book of the law…he rent his clothes.’ The verb ‘to hear (šāma) has the idea of not just literally hearing but of also obeying. The most familiar passage in which the word is used is probably in Deut 6:4, where the instruction is not only to hear but also to do:

‘Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.’

THE BOOK

It is generally reckoned that ‘the book’ that was found in the Temple was a scroll of Deuteronomy. It is called ‘the book of the law’ (2 Kgs 22:8, 11), ‘the book of the covenant’ (2 Kgs 23:2; 21) and ‘a book of the law of the Lord given by Moses’ (2 Chron 34:14). That it certainly contained threats (for Josiah’s reaction was extreme) strongly suggests Deuteronomy (Deut 27:15-25; 28:15-68). Josiah found it unsettling that Judah’s indifference meant that the Lord was angry with the nation (v13).

Josiah’s response was to rend (tear) his clothes. This was a dramatic expression of either grief ( Gen 37:29; Job 1:20) or repentance (1 Kgs 21:27). In Josiah’s case it probably represented both. His response to the reading of the torah (law) scroll stands in marked contrast to the later reaction of King Jehoiakim to a scroll containing words of the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 36:23). He cut it up with a scribe’s knife and burned it. ‘Rent (tore)’ in 2 Kings 22:11 and ‘cut’ in Jeremiah 36:23 translate the same Hebrew word (qāra). Josiah was willing to listen and respond positively to the word of the Lord that he heard. He tore his clothes in distress and repentance, Jehoiakim cut the scroll in rejection of its message.

Josiah then arranged for a committee composed of five of his top advisors (Hilkiah the priest, Ahikam the son of Shaphan, Achbor the son of Michaiah, Shaphan the scribe, Asahiah the king’s attendant) to ‘inquire of the Lord’ concerning the contents of the book. ‘Inquire’ seems to have meant to seek oracular guidance from a prophet (1 Kgs 22:5-6; 2 Kgs 3:11).

22:14-20 Huldah’s oracle

The delegation went to see Huldah the prophetess. She was the wife of Shallum the keeper of the wardrobe (in the Temple or the palace?) and was therefore well-connected and well-known at the court. She is one of several female prophets in the Old Testament, the others being: Miriam (Ex 15:20), Deborah (Judg 4:4), Noadiah (Neh 6:14) and Isaiah’s wife (Isa 8:3). It is strange that the commissioners did not consult Jeremiah, whose ministry had begun five years earlier in the thirteenth year of Josiah (Jer 1:2).

Huldah’s oracle falls into two parts ( 2 Kgs 22:16-17, 19-20) , each preceded by an instruction that what followed was to be communicated to Josiah:

22:15 ‘And she said unto them, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Tell the man that sent you to me.’

22:18 ‘But to the king of Judah which sent — you to inquire of — the LORD, thus shall ye say to him, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, As touching the words which thou hast heard’

She begins by describing Josiah as ‘the man that sent you.’ Perhaps this was a reminder to the Near Eastern despot that in the sight of the Lord he was just ‘a man.’

Public Fate

The first part of the oracle deals with Jerusalem and the people of Judah. First, Jerusalem and its inhabitants are given notice that because they have not exclusively worshipped YHWH then the curses that are found in the book (Deut 27 & 28) will come upon them. There is no call for repentance in order that disaster might be averted. Their worship of other gods has provoked the anger of YHWH to such an extent that the judgement is certain. There will be no escape. God’s wrath ‘shall not be quenched.’

Personal Future

The second part of the oracle addresses King Josiah. He is given an assurance (introduced by ‘therefore’ 22:20) that because his heart is tender and that he has humbled himself before YHWH, has torn his clothes and wept and has ‘heard’ (listened and acted upon’) the message of coming destruction, he will be gathered into his grave in peace. Although not explicitly stated it seems likely, from subsequent events, that Huldah advised Josiah that should he lead the people back to obedience to YHWH then there would be a temporary stay of judgement. Joshua therefore went on to initiate national reform in the knowledge that it would not stop the inevitable judgement and on the understanding that it would not fall during his lifetime; he would have a peaceful death before it came to pass. This seems to contradict the violence of his death as recorded in 2 Kgs 23:29-30.

See my post ‘The Death of King Josiah of Judah‘

Josiah had sent the delegation to the respected prophetess Huldah in order that she might authenticate the scroll. This she did by a word from YHWH. It seems that from this point forward the written word assumes greater importance. The importance of the temple and its rituals seems to recede (23:27b), it will be of no use during the exile anyhow. Brueggemann (2000, p.550) observes:

‘…it is clear that Huldah’s prophetic function is to enhance and reinforce the Torah scroll. Everything turns on “the words of the scroll” (22:16). The threat against the city, she pro-
claims, is rooted in the scroll and is simply articulated by Huldah. The assurance to the king is because of “the words you have heard,” words of Torah (22:18). Clearly Huldah as a prophetess has no autonomous function or voice, but is dependent on the Torah…’

23:1-3 Making a covenant

Josiah called the elders of Judah and organised a great assembly at the Temple at which all the inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem, both ‘small and great’ were present. It is not known exactly what function the ‘elders’ (tribal and family heads) had during the monarchy but they must have had a degree of authority in their communities and involvement in local issues.

During the assembly the torah scroll which had turned up in the Temple was read aloud. The public reading of documents was important in the ancient Near East where many people were illiterate. In view of the whole nation Josiah stood near a pillar in the ‘house of YHWH’, probably on a platform, and made a covenant before YHWH, to follow his commands, statutes and decrees with all his heart and soul. The people pledged obedience also. Thus Josiah officiated at a public religious act that did not involve Temple liturgy or sacrifice.

N. B. Covenant-making was a familiar concept in ancient Israel. In the Old Testament we read that God made covenants with individuals (Adam, Abraham, Moses, Aaron, David and Phinehas) and also with his special people, Israel. The most famous were the Mosaic covenants at Sinai (Exod 24:1-8) and Moab (Deut 29:1). There was also covenant-making by Joshua (Josh 24:1-28), Jehoiada/ King Jehoash (2 Kgs 11:17) and now by Josiah. In the Old Testament three types of relationships are called covenants: friendship (1 Sam 18:1-4), marriage (Mal 2:14) and international treaties (1 Kgs 5:12; Ezek 17:14). It is the latter type of covenant that is in view as regards the relationship between Israel and its national God YHWH.

23:4-20, 24 Purging Judah’s worship

2 Kgs 23:4-20 gives a catalogue of activities carried out by Josiah. It lists a series of extreme measures aimed at wiping out any religious practice that did not conform to the covenantal Yahwism of the book of Deuteronomy. 2 Kings gives the impression that these activities were influenced by the torah scroll that was found in the Temple (23:24). It is likely, however, that vv. 4-20 are a parenthesis giving details of religious cleansing that had already taken place long before the finding of the scroll in the eighteenth year of Josiah’s reign. According to the 2 Chron 34:3-7 account it was ‘in the twelfth year he began to purge Judah and Jerusalem…’ (34:3).

This inventory in 2 Kgs 23:4-20 falls into two parts; a) vv. 4-14 – purges in Judah and Jerusalem b) vv. 15-20 – purges in Samaria (the territory of the former Northern kingdom of Israel)

It is startling to read the wide range of idolatrous practices present in Judah until at that time and which were tolerated even in the temple and its precincts. They included worship of Baal, Asherah, Molech, the sun, astral deities and also three deities that in 23:13 are said to have been introduced by Solomon; Ashtoreth, Chemosh and Milcom. Equally startling is the passion and zeal, along with the ruthlessness and efficiency, with which Josiah eliminated these cults and their functionaries (23:7). He even entered the territory of the former state of Israel (ended 722 BCE) which was officially part of the Assyrian empire, then in decline.

23:21-23 The Passover

Until this point the author of 2 Kings has been reporting negative activities of Josiah under the influence of the torah scroll found in the Temple. These verses briefly note the only positive act of of reform by Josiah in the 2 Kings account of his life. This was a celebration of the Passover held at Jerusalem in Josiah’s eighteenth year. Much greater detail is given in 2 Chronicles chapter 35. According to 23:22 no such Passover had been observed in the days of the judges or of the kings of Israel and Judah. In fact, the previous occasion on which a Passover was celebrated is recorded in Josh 5:10.

23:25 A positive verdict on Josiah

After a further summary of Josiah’s purges (v24) which are said to have been in accordance with what was written in the law-book the author proceeds to give a glowing verdict on Josiah. He views him as the model king, there was none before like him, neither will there ever be another after him. Similar things were said of King Hezekiah (2 Kgs 18:3-6) and of Moses (Deut 34:10-12). Josiah ‘turned to the LORD with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might’ (23:25). That seems fairly close to fulfilling the initial obligations of the Shema in Deut 6:5: ‘And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.’

23:26-27 A negative verdict on Jerusalem

The narrator has bad news for us. In spite of all the good that Josiah did, and the esteem in which he was held by the Lord, these were not sufficient to outweigh the harm done by one man, his grandfather Manasseh (2 Kgs 21:1-18). The disobedience to God’s law and the sins that he instigated have been so serious that nothing, not even Josiah’s piety and merits, can reverse the destruction that will come upon Jerusalem and Judah.

23:28-30 Josiah’s death

Josiah intercepted an Egyptian force at Megiddo and was mortally injured in battle.

See my posts:

King Josiah of Judah in 2 Chronicles

The Death of King Josiah of Judah

King Josiah of Judah – Bibliography