Tag: Jude

Posted in Exposition

Contending for the Faith: Lessons from Jude 17-25

Posted on by writtenexposition

EXHORTATION (17-23)

In this section vv. 17-23 Jude issues a series of exhortations to his readers. They are, in fact, positive commands. The three main ones are: remember, keep and show mercy.

REMEMBER

17 But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;
18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
19 These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.

(17) Jude switches his focus from the false teachers who have wormed their way into the church to his readers who are genuine Christians. He says: ‘But [you] beloved.’ Both the ‘but’ and the ‘you’ are highly significant. With these words Jude draws a contrast between the earlier ‘these’ (referring to the intruders) and the ‘you’ (referring to the recipients of Jude’s’ letter). The latter are not just casual acquaintances – they are the ‘beloved’ – dear to Jude because they too have received the Lord Jesus Christ. He does not want them to be confused, dismayed or influenced by the teaching and behaviour of the intruders but instead recall the predictions by the apostles that such people would infiltrate the church.

The apostolic predictions are called ‘utterances,’ i.e. words spoken with a voice, therefore meaning: statement, teaching or message.

‘Before’ – to declare before, foretell, speak beforehand. This could mean either words spoken previously or words spoken openly and plainly. The Christians are to recall not only the words themselves but they are also to remember who spoke them. They are to look to the apostles, not to the apostates. They are to look to the men who delivered the faith, not to ones who have ditched it.

‘the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ’ – ‘apostles’ is probably used here in the narrower sense of the eleven disciples of Jesus (Acts 1:2) plus the apostle Paul (Rom 11:13) but could also mean ‘apostle’ in the more general sense of messenger/missionary (Rom 16:17; 2 Cor 8:23; Phil 2:25). ‘Of the Lord Jesus Christ’ emphasises the authority of their message.

‘How that they told you’ – Jude does not claim to be an apostle (in the more general sense) but since he says ‘they told you’ rather than ‘they told us’ that leaves open the possibility that Christians he addresses regard him as such.

‘the last time’ – an indefinite period that probably refers to the whole Christian era.

Someone has said that an apostate is a person who first of all receives the faith, then rejects the faith, ridicules the faith and tries to replace the faith. What did the apostles say about the presence of apostates in the church?

PAUL

For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Acts 20:29-30

For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. 1 Corinthians 11:19

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was. 2 Timothy 3:1-9

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. 2 Timothy 4:3-4

JOHN

Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. They went out from us, but they were not of us: for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us. 1 John 2:18-19

For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 2 John 1:7

PETER

Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 2 Peter 3:3

(18-19) Jude then refers to the mockery, the morals and marks of apostates who will arise during the ‘last time. ‘

The mockery of the apostates.

These men are characterised by mocking. The word ‘mockers’ occurs also in 2 Pet 3:3 where the KJV translates it as ‘scoffers.’ People like this jeer and sneer at the deity of Christ. They have no respect for Jesus Christ and his sacrificial death on the cross at Calvary. They belittle the Bible and those who believe what it says. They rebel against and reject the truth.

The morals of the apostates.

They ‘walk after (follow) their ungodly lusts (desires).’ Lit. ‘walking after their own desires of ungodlinesses (plural).’ People like this have no interest in holiness or upright living. They are only interested in satisfying their own wicked cravings. They happily promote and flaunt sinful activities with no regard for the consequences. Thus the lifestyle of the false teachers was one of immorality. Jude has already alluded to this in v.4 ‘turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness,’ v.8 ‘likewise these dreamers defile the flesh,’ v.10 ‘they corrupt themselves,’ v.13 ‘foaming out their own shame’ and v.16 ‘walking after their own lusts.’

The marks of the apostates.

Jude identifies three marks of the apostates:

  • They separate themselves. The idea here is that as separatists they cause division among the Christians. They create splits in the church. The apostle Paul warned the elders in Ephesus that apostates would ‘draw away disciples’ after themselves (Acts 20:30). It could be said also that by departing from the faith ‘once delivered unto the saints’ (Jude 3) apostates separate themselves from biblical Christianity. There is, of course, biblical separation in a good sense (2 Cor 6:17), but that is not what is in view here.
  • They are sensual i.e. soulish or natural. They live life subject to appetites and passions.
  • They do not have the Spirit. They are not saved and indwelt by the Holy Spirit (Rom 8:9-11; 1 Jn 4:13).

KEEP

20 But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost,
21 Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.

(20-21) ‘But you’ – like v.17 these are the recipients of Jude’s letter in contrast to the apostates he has just described. Now, for the third and last time, Jude addresses the recipients as ‘beloved.’ This he does in vv. 3, 17, and 20; in every case following it with an exhortation (contend, remember, build up). So that they might avoid apostasy themselves Jude exhorts them regarding their living (v.20), their loving (v21a) and their looking (v.21b).

These verses contain a main command ‘keep yourselves’ but there are four key ideas worth noticing: Building, Praying, Keeping, Looking.

BUILDING – ‘building up yourselves’ – epoikodoméō – to build up, build upon, viz. to complete the structure of which the foundation has already been laid. This word for ‘build’ is used in the passage about building in view of the day of judgement in 1 Cor 3:10-15 (cf. Mt 7:24; Col 2:7). The believers are to assume personal responsibility to keep building themselves up on their most holy faith. ‘Faith’ here is objective not subjective; it is not personal but the apostolic teaching (see also v.3) – the body of Christian doctrine contained in the Bible.

PRAYING – ‘praying in the Holy Ghost’ In contrast to the apostates who are ‘devoid of the Spirit’ the believers have the indwelling Holy Spirit . They can build themselves up in the faith by praying and are privileged to have the help of the Holy Spirit in performing this duty.

The preposition en can mean ‘by’ as well as ‘in;’ the following are two interesting passages where en signifies ‘by’ (bold letters mine):

But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne: Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. Matthew 5:34-36

By pureness, by knowledge, by longsuffering, by kindness, by the Holy Ghost, by love unfeigned, By the word of truth, by the power of God…. 2 Corinthians 6:6-7

Jude urges the believers to cultivate the ongoing habit of praying with the assistance and guidance of the Holy Ghost (Rom 8:26; Eph 6:18).

KEEPING – ‘keep yourselves in the love of God’ – Some view ‘the love of God’ as objective (i.e. ‘keep yourselves in your love for God’) others as subjective (i.e. ‘keep yourselves in God’s love for you’). JND Kelly (1969, p. 287) suspects that “the genitive may be… a ‘comprehensive’ one, including both.”

‘Keep’ (tēréō) means to attend to carefully, preserve, take care of, guard. Jude is exhorting these Christians to keep themselves safe in the love of God. In Jude’s epistle the word tēréō occurs in v.1, twice in v.6, in v.13 and here in v. 21.

LOOKING – The fourth duty that Jude urges upon the believers is that of ‘looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.’

‘looking for’ (prosdéchomai) has the meanings: – to receive to one’s self, to admit, welcome, to accept (not reject) a thing offered, to expect, look for, wait for. The apostle Paul, writing to Titus, used the same word ‘looking for’ (prosdéchomai) about the Second Coming: ‘Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ.’ Titus 2:13

‘mercy’ is compassion, clemency, active pity and in the Bible often refers to God’s gracious disposition to help us in our distresses. Here it most likely refers to the Second Coming of Christ/Day of Judgement; a time to look forward to with vigilance and patience; a time when all sin, sorrow and temptations will be removed.

The mercy of the Lord Jesus Christ leads to, or results in, eternal life, which is the blessed state of the saved in heaven (Jn 3:15). It is eternal because it will be enjoyed forever without interruption or intermission. It is the mercy ‘of our Lord Jesus Christ’ because he will be the judge on that day: ‘Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.’ 2 Timothy 4:8

SHOW MERCY


22 And of some have compassion, making a difference:
23 And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.

(22-23) Jude quite abruptly turns from exhorting the recipients of his letter regarding their attitude towards false teachers to advising how they ought to respond to believers who have fallen under their sway.

There are some uncertainties and complications involving textual variations in the manuscripts (for an explanation see JND Kelly (1969. p. 288). The result is two rival texts; one with two clauses and one with three clauses. The New International Version, for example, supports the three-clause reading. This view that the passage speaks of three types of individual fits well with Jude’s fondness for groups of three.

22 Be merciful to those who doubt; 23 save others by snatching them from the fire; to others show mercy, mixed with fear—hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh. Jude 1:22-23 NIV

Vinson, Wilson and Mills (2010, pp. 395-396) give the following explanation: ‘If we are to understand three groups, Jude’s advice becomes progressively more drastic: (1) those who have not made up their minds—they must be convinced by argument; (2) those who are already involved with the false teachers—spare no effort in trying to rescue these (save others by snatching them out of the fire, v. 23); (3) those who have strayed so far they are only to be pitied—these must be feared by the faithful so as to avoid contamination.’

The two-clause reading sees two groups of delinquents in these verses: ‘some’ and ‘others’.

SOME

People in this first category are to be dealt with compassionately (shown mercy). This involves gently showing them the error of their ways and convincing them of their sin. This is similar to restoring a brother overtaken in a fault ‘in the spirit of meekness’ (Gal 6:1). The apostle Paul gave Timothy similar advice: ‘In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;’ 2 Timothy 2:25

‘Making a difference’ – diakrínō can mean to separate, make a distinction, discriminate, to be at variance with one’s self, take issue with one’s self, hesitate, doubt, waver. In v.22 therefore the NIV (‘those who doubt’) takes takes the meaning as contending with oneself, therefore hesitating or wavering.

Such people are hesitant about straying from the truth and might possibly be convinced by argument. There is also a suggestion in the word, however, that Jude’s recipients are to be discriminating with regard to offenders. They must be able to discern between them; realising which ones need to be treated gently and which more severely.

OTHERS

‘And (or ‘but’) others’ – ‘Others’ refers to a second group of people who are not like the ‘some’ in v.22 who have not made up their minds. The ‘others’ are already involved with the false teachers and are more obstinate. They have knowingly fallen into sin and therefore require a tougher approach. However, they to are to be shown mercy, but ‘with fear’.

These others are to be saved ‘with fear, pulling them out of the fire’. Usually saving is attributed to God (1 Tim 4:10) or Jesus Christ (Mt 1:21; Lk 2:11; Acts 4:12) but sometimes, in the sense of deliver, preserve from harm, it is attributed to human beings (1 Cor 7:16; 1 Tim 4:16; Jam 5:20). The apostle Paul said in 1 Cor 9:22: ‘I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.’ Jude is telling the believers that they can be instrumental in saving others from spiritual enemies and they are to do this ‘with fear.’

‘With fear’ is usually taken to indicate with caution and watchfulness lest the believer be infected (fall into the same sin) as the offenders. They must be careful not to get burned while ‘pulling them out of the fire.’ ‘Pull’ (harpázō) is a strong word with connotations of violence. It means ‘to yank back with force’, seize, snatch away, rob. It is the word translated ‘caught up’ 1 Thess 4:17 and ‘take by force’ in Mt 11:12. An alternative interpretation of ‘save with fear’ is that it means a firm approach to those who have already followed the false teachers. They are to be terrified by strong reproof (Isa 58:1) and made afraid to continue in their sin. This would involve concern for sinning believers resulting in reproof (Heb 12:15) and the exercise of church discipline if necessary.

‘Snatching out of the fire’ conveys ideas such as pity, speed, carefulness, danger and full concentration. Although the expression is used in Amos 4:11 it seems that Jude is drawing his imagery from Zechariah 3:1-5. He has already used the expression ‘the Lord rebuke thee’ (Jude 9; Zech 3:2) and now mentions ‘pulling out of the fire’ (Jude 23; Zech 3:2) and dirty garment[s] (Jude 23; Zech 3:3-4).

‘hating even the garment spotted by the flesh’ – the idea of stained clothing conveys the thought that these people are morally evil. The soiled chitṓn (an inner garment worn next to the skin) suggests that they are in a permanent state of defilement and that it would better not to associate with them. To do so would put one at risk of being ensnared in the same sin as the offenders, something a true believer would wish to avoid (2 Tim 2:21; James 1:27)

DOXOLOGY (24-25)

24 Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy,
25 To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.

Jude does not close his letter with greetings to individual believers but instead ends with a doxology – an expression of praise to the Lord. The praiseworthy characteristics Jude identifies are the ability and the unity of God our Saviour.

HIS ABILITY

Jude began by telling the believers that they are ‘preserved in Jesus Christ’ (v.1) and now ends with a similar assurance: he ‘is able to keep you from falling.’

‘he is able’ (dúnamai) – to have power

‘keep’ (phulássō) – to guard, keep safely, preserve

‘from falling’ – (aptaístous) – only used here – means ‘without stumbling’, therefore ‘blameless’

‘present’ (hístēmi) – to place, cause to stand

‘faultless’ (ámōmos) – without blemish, spotless

Jude tells his readers that God is able to preserve them from falling into moral failure, spiritual ruin or apostasy. He assures them that God’s grace empowers believers to remain steadfast despite the influence of the false teachers mentioned earlier in the letter. Not only that but in a future day (1 Jn 3:2) the Lord will place them in his glorious presence – a) negatively -‘faultless’ and b) positively – ‘with exuberant joy.’

Here are some things that the New Testament tells us about God’s ability -‘he is able.’

His saving ability – Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them. Hebrews 7:25

His surprising ability – Now unto him that is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think, according to the power that worketh in us, Ephesians 3:20

His sympathising ability – For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted. Hebrews 2:18

His satisfying ability – And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work: 2 Corinthians 9:8

His securing ability – For the which cause I also suffer these things: nevertheless I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day. 2 Timothy 1:12

His subduing ability – Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself. Philippians 3:21

His sustaining ability – Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, Jude 24

HIS UNITY

In a pluralistic and polytheistic world where many gods were worshipped and where even the Roman emperor was titled ‘god and saviour’ Jude assures them that there is only one God; he is not only their judge (v.21) but their saviour.

Finally Jude elaborates on attributes of God that describe his greatness and mentions:

  • Glory – refers to his inherent splendour and worth.
  • Majesty – denotes his supreme greatness and magnificence.
  • Dominion – emphasises his rule and kingship. It is translated strength in Lk 1:51. He has the power to do whatever he wills.
  • Power – his control or authority. He is sovereign and has the liberty to do whatever he wills.

The duration of this praise is said to be now and forever and then the doxology ends with a word of affirmation. ‘Amen’ means ‘so be it,’ expressing agreement and confidence in God’s eternal attributes and abilities.

We too should recognise God’s wisdom, glory and majesty, dominion and power, and be thankful for his grace to us in salvation, in preservation and in our future presentation.

SUMMATION

This short but powerful epistle warns believers against false teachers who have infiltrated the church and urges them to contend for the faith. Jude lists some examples of God’s historical judgment upon people who have rebelled against him in the past and assures the believers that the intruders will likewise be judged. Jude encourages his readers to build themselves up on their most holy faith, pray in the Holy Spirit, keep themselves in God’s love and wait for the mercy of Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life. He advises them how to treat people who have come under the sway of the false teachers and closes his letter with a doxology that declares God’s greatness and his ability to preserve believers and present them blameless in his presence.

The Epistle Of Jude – Verses 1 and 2 – Introduction

Jude 3-11: Historical Judgments

Unmasking False Teachers in Jude 12-16: Key Metaphors Explained

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Barker, M. (2005). The Lost Prophet: the Book of Enoch and its Influence on Christianity. Sheffield Phoenix Press

Bauckham, R. (2015). Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church. Bloomsbury Publishing

Charles, R. H. (2013). Book of Enoch. SPCK Publishing, London

‌Chester, A. and Martin, R. P. (1994). New Testament Theology: the Theology of James, Peter, and Jude. Cambridge University Press 

Currie, B, (2023). Meditations on the Single-Chapter Books of the Bible (Obadiah, Philemon, 2John, 3John, Jude). Assembly Testimony, Northern Ireland 

Davids, P. H. and Kostenberger, A.J. (2014). A Theology of James, Peter, and Jude: Living in the Light of the Coming King.  Zondervan, Grand Rapids 

Garrett, E. S. (2020). Jude: A Verse-By-Verse Commentary. Superior Word

Green, G. (2008). Jude and 2 Peter (Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament). Baker Academic 

Green, M. (1987). The Second Epistle of Peter, and the Epistle of Jude: an Introduction and Commentary. Inter-Varsity Press, Leicester, England

Heiser, M. (2020). A Companion to the Book of Enoch: A Reader’s Commentary, Vol I: The Book of the Watchers (1 Enoch 1-36). Defender Publishing, Crane, Missouri

Jenkyn, W. (1865). An Exposition upon the Epistle of Jude Delivered in Christ Church. James Nichol, Edinburgh 

Knight, J. (1995).  2 Peter and Jude: 18 (New Testament Guides), Sheffield Academic Press 

Landon, C. (1996). A Text-Critical Study of the Epistle of Jude. Sheffield Academic Press.

Norman, J. (1982). A Commentary on the Epistles of Peter and Jude.  Adam & Charles Black, London 

Reed, Y. A. (2010). Fallen Angels and the History of Judaism and Christianity : the Reception of Enochic Literature. Cambridge Univ. Press.

Samra, J. G. (2016). James, 1 & 2 Peter, and Jude. Baker Books, Grand Rapids, Michigan 

Schreiner, T. R. (2003). 1, 2 Peter, Jude. Broadman & Holman, Nashville, Tenn. 

‌Vinson, R. B., Wilson, R. F. and Mills, W. E. (2010). 1 & 2 Peter; Jude.  Smyth & Helwys Pub, Macon, Ga 

Walker, D. H. (2013). The General Epistles of John & Jude (The Learners Greek New Testament Series). David Harris Walker Pub. 

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Bartholomä, P. F. (2008) “Did Jesus Save the People out of Egypt? A Re-Examination of a Textual Problem in Jude 5.” Novum Testamentum, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 143–58. 

Eybers, I. H. (1975). “Aspects of the Background of the Letter of Jude.” Neotestamentica, vol. 9, pp. 113–23.

 Grace II, W. M. and Williams, J. (2015) “Jude.” Southwestern Journal of Theology, Vol. 58, No.1, pp.1-156

Jacobus, M. W. (1896). “The Letters of Peter and Jude.” The Biblical World, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 280–89.  

Joubert, S. J. (1990). “Language, Ideology and the Social Context of the Letter of Jude.” Neotestamentica, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 335–49. 

Lockett, D. (2015). “Objects of Mercy in Jude: The Prophetic Background of Jude 22-23.” CBQ, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 322–36 

Mathews, M. D. (2010). “The Literary Relationship of 2 Peter and Jude: Does the Synoptic Tradition Resolve this Synoptic Problem?” Neotestamentica, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 47–66. 

Mayor, J. B. (1905). “The Epistle of St. Jude and the Marcosian Heresy.” The Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 6, no. 24, pp. 569–77. 

Robinson, A., Llewelyn, S. and Wassell, B. (2018). “Showing Mercy to the Ungodly and the Inversion of Invective in Jude.” New Testament Studies, 64(2), pp.194–212.

DIGITAL 

Letter of Jude Word List https://vocab.perseus.org/word-list/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0031.tlg026.perseus-grc2/?o=-1&page=all 

Posted in Exposition

Unmasking False Teachers in Jude 12-16: Key Metaphors Explained

Posted on by writtenexposition

COMMENTS ON JUDE CONTINUED

DESCRIPTION (12-16)

In this section (vv.12-16) Jude describes the ‘certain men crept in unawares’ of v.4. Twice in this section (vv.12 and 16) he refers to them, rather disparagingly, as ‘these.’ Notice that Jude uses this pronoun ‘these’ (hoútos) for the intruders five times in his letter:

  • v.8 these filthy dreamers
  • v.10 these speak evil
  • v.12 these are spots
  • v.16 these are murmurers
  • v.19 these be they who separate

METAPHORS FOR DANGEROUS MEN

12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever.

(12-13) In these two verses Jude employs six vivid metaphors to describe the intruders. Two metaphors are nautical, two astronomical and two agricultural:

  1. Nautical – hidden reefs
  2. Agricultural – selfish shepherds
  3. Astronomical – empty clouds
  4. Agricultural – fruitless trees
  5. Nautical – raging waves
  6. Astronomical – wandering stars

HIDDEN REEFS

Spilás means ‘rock’ This can mean a rock in the sea on which a vessel is shipwrecked. The ESV translates the plural here as ‘hidden reefs’ and NET, NLT and CSB as ‘dangerous reefs.’  Therefore the metaphor means that the false teachers cause Christian believers to shipwreck.

If the reference is to rocks in general then similarly the idea is that they cause people to stumble and fall.

Other translations (e.g. KJV, NIV) read the Greek text as spilṓ, meaning ‘spot’ or ‘stain.’ NIV says’ ‘blemishes.’ This idea of the pollution caused by sin would tie in well with ‘defile the flesh’ in v.8 and ‘the garment spotted by the flesh’ in v.23. If indeed Jude has the priority (i.e. was written first) and was used by Peter, it is interesting that this is how Peter interpreted the word. 2 Pet 2:13 says: ‘spots they are and blemishes.

Nevertheless, I accept the nautical reference – dangerous reefs that can cause shipwreck –  making the assumption that Jude is not talking about specks of dirt but spots of danger. To the unsuspecting person everything seems fine but below the surface these rocks will cause shipwreck.

SELFISH SHEPHERDS

This metaphor is not immediately obvious from the Authorised Version (KJV) translation but ‘feeding themselves’ (poimaínō) is literally ‘pasturing themselves’, ‘shepherding themselves,’ ‘serving themselves.’ Darby translates as ‘pasturing themselves,’ NIV as ‘shepherds who feed only themselves.’

They feed themselves brazenly, with no qualms; thinking only of themselves while taking advantage of the generosity of unsuspecting believers. NLT calls them ‘shameless shepherds.’ They gorge themselves at the ‘love-feasts.’

In the early church the Christians often gathered as equals for a communal meal known as a ‘love-feast’ (cf. Acts 2:46) which was connected with the Lord’s Supper (Communion, the Eucharist). Note that the Apostle Paul addressed similar abuses at love-feasts in the church at Corinth (1 Cor 11:20-22).

‘Feeding themselves’ (KJV) brings to mind the passage in Ezekiel 34:2-10 about the false shepherds of Israel:

2 Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD unto the shepherds; Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks?

8 As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely because my flock became a prey, and my flock became meat to every beast of the field, because there was no shepherd, neither did my shepherds search for my flock, but the shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock;

10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against the shepherds; and I will require my flock at their hand, and cause them to cease from feeding the flock; neither shall the shepherds feed themselves any more; for I will deliver my flock from their mouth, that they may not be meat for them. Ezekiel 34:2, 8,10 (see also 34:18)

EMPTY CLOUDS

Jude compares the false teachers to clouds that do not produce rain and are driven by the winds. They are useless, promising a lot but delivering nothing. They do not bring satisfaction or refreshment (cf. Prov 25:14). ‘Winds’ are sometimes associated with false doctrine (Eph 4:14; Heb 13:9). These men can change their teaching on a whim, they are unstable.

FRUITLESS TREES

The intruders are like late autumn trees without fruit, twice dead, uprooted (they have no source of life). KJV says ‘trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit’ which sounds strange but the Greek word translated ‘withereth,’ found only here in the New Testament, is phthinopōrinós. This is made up of phthínō, to decay, fail, wither, and opṓra, autumn – i.e. trees such as they are at in late autumn, dry, with no leaves;’ therefore Jude adds ‘without fruit.’ He says that they are twice dead (they have no fruit and they are uprooted) to emphasise the fact that the false teachers are totally useless; they are unproductive (cp. Mt. 7:15-20).

RAGING WAVES

These dreamers (v.8) are like turbulent waters; ‘raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame.’ ‘Raging’ is ágrios; belonging to the field, wild, untamed. This metaphor suggests that they were either wild in the sense of uncontrollable or wild in the sense of cruel or savage. Probably both were true of these men. ‘Foaming out’ (epaphrízō, to pour out like foam) occurs only here in the New Testament. ‘Shame’ is plural and may therefore mean shameless deeds or acts. Perhaps Jude had Isa 57:20 in mind: ‘But the wicked are like the troubled sea, when it cannot rest, whose waters cast up mire and dirt.’

WANDERING STARS

‘Star’ is astḗr and ‘wandering’ is planḗtes, in which we see our English word planet. The intruders are like comets whose flight-paths appear quite random. For them the gloom of darkness has been reserved for eternity. Their eternal destiny will be deep darkness.

ENOCHS’S PROPHECY

14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
16 These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage.

(14-15) At this point Jude offers supporting evidence from prophecy of God’s judgment upon the wicked by referring to a second apocryphal account. The first account he introduced with ‘Yet Michael’ (v.9), this one begins with ‘And Enoch'(v.14). He identifies his source as a prophecy attributed to Enoch and gives a direct quotation from 1 Enoch 1:9.

In order to suit his purpose, which is to show that the punishment of the intruders when ‘He cometh’ has been authoritatively predicted centuries before, Jude slightly modifies the quotation. He changes the ‘He cometh’ of the original document to ‘the Lord cometh’ and thus applies Enoch’s prophecy about a theophany by ‘the Holy Great One… the eternal God’ (possibly a reference to the Flood, Gen 7-8) to a prophecy of the coming again of Jesus Christ.

Jude views that prophecy as authoritative, not because it was given in the distant past, but because Enoch was the seventh from Adam; the number seven being highly significant to the Jews who considered it a symbol of completeness or perfection. The generations listed in Gen 5:3-21 are in the order: Adam, Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalaleel, Jared, Enoch (as also Lk 3:37-38, working backwards).

Muriás means myriad or 10,000 but is sometimes used to express an unlimited number (Lk 12:1; Acts 21:20; Heb 12:22; Rev 5:11). For references to the Lord accompanied by angels see Deut 33:2; Dan 7:10; Zech 14:5; Mt 13:41; 25:31; Mk 8:38; 13:27; 1 Thess 3:13; 2 Thess 1:7).

‘Prophesied of these’ – Jude views Enoch’s ancient prophecy (about the Flood?) as relating to circumstances in Jude’s own day and asserts that the prediction of judgment has been fulfilled in the ‘certain men’ who have intruded into the early church. Jude may have taken this idea from 1 En 1:2-3 which specifically states that the prophecy is not for Enoch’s own day but relates to a future time: ‘I understood as I saw, but not for this generation, but for a remote one which is for to come.’

‘To execute judgment upon all’ Jude is not referring here to the universality of judgment (i.e. judgment upon all [people], including believers) but this is clearly a judgment upon all the ungodly who will be found guilty and punished. There is no suggestion of redemption in this verse for they are all described as godless. Jude repeats the word ‘ungodly’ in various forms (adjective, noun, verb) to emphasize that this is their outstanding characteristic. Their speech in particular is blasphemous, they have spoken ‘harsh words’ against the Lord.

(16) The thought of what the wicked say leads Jude to return to the subject of the dreamers of v.8 and describe them as ‘murmurers’ and ‘complainers.’ They are discontented and complain against God yet they live their lives according to their own appetites or desires (cf. vv. 11,18). They speak ‘great swelling words’ – oversized, swollen, boastful – i.e. they are bombastic men with great presentation skills. They will happily flatter people, pretending to be best friends but using them for their own gain.

The Epistle Of Jude – Verses 1 and 2 – Introduction

Jude 3-11: Historical Judgments

Contending for the Faith: Lessons from Jude 17-25

Posted in Exposition

Jude 3-11: Historical Judgments

Posted on by writtenexposition

COMMENTS ON JUDE CONTINUED

PURPOSE (3-4)

3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

Moving on from the initial greeting and description of the recipients in vv.1-2 Jude, in vv. 3-4, shifts to his purpose and the circumstances that have occasioned his writing. These two verses lay a foundation for the rest of the letter by introducing the threat from false teachings and the urgent need for believers to defend the true faith.

(3) Jude addresses the recipients as ‘beloved.’ He does this three times (3, 17, 20), in every case following it with an exhortation (contend, remember, build up). ‘Beloved’ (agapētós), meaning ‘worthy of love’ or ‘dear,’ expresses Jude’s deep affection for his readers.

There are two main, and opposing, views on what comes next. The first is that he changed his topic, the second that there is no indication of a change. Proponents of the first think that Jude originally intended to send a letter about ‘the common salvation’ but, sensing the pressing danger posed by false teachers, feels compelled to write urging the believers to ‘contend for the faith.’ Others see little difference between ‘the common salvation’ and ‘the faith which was once delivered’ and reckon that Jude is just saying that he did intend to write to them but has now written earlier because of the emergency of the situation.

‘The common salvation’ is that shared here and now by all Christians regardless of background (Jude may have had Jew and Gentile in mind).

Jude feels compelled (‘I have found it necessary’) to shift his focus from a discussion of ‘the common salvation’ to an exhortation for believers to ‘earnestly contend for the faith’ i.e. actively defend the faith. ‘Earnestly contend’ translates one very strong word in Greek (epagōnízomai – to fight [for], strive), which occurs only here in the New Testament. It refers not to warfare but to athletics, e.g. a wrestling match which requires strenuous activity and training. I am not sure whether the contending refers to a believer’s individual personal struggle or to collective concerted action by a group of Christians.

‘The faith’ does not refer to personal response to the gospel but to the body of faith i.e. essential Christian doctrine (cf. 1 Tim 3:16). Jude says that this was ‘once (hápax) delivered (handed down, transmitted).’ Hápax here means ‘once for all;’ therefore the doctrine is definitive and immutable. As it is fixed it cannot be changed to suit personal preferences; further additions or alterations are not permissible (Rev 22:18-19).

‘Saints’ – holy ones – is a term for Christian believers (1 Pet 1:15-16).

(4) Why is this call to defend the truths of the gospel necessary? Verse 3, which begins with ‘for,’ gives the reason.  It is because ‘certain men’ have infiltrated the church, subtly introducing false teachings. Jude does not name them but obviously has particular persons in view. They have ‘smuggled themselves in’ (NLT says ‘have wormed their way into…’). The Greek word pareisdúō – to enter without notice – occurs only here in the New Testament. ‘Crept’ in the KJV translation ‘crept in unawares’ aptly emphasizes the danger posed by these individuals; initially they appear harmless but slyly work to undermine the faith from within.

Even before discussing the characteristics of these men Jude comments that they were ‘long ago marked out for this condemnation’. ‘Before of old’ (long ago) translates pálai which, while not indicating a definite time, suggests that the condemnation (kríma, judgment) was not a recent development but rather a predetermined outcome from the distant past. It is clear from the use of the adverb pálai in Heb 1:1 (KJV ‘in time past’) that it refers to an unspecified past time in human history. This fact significantly weakens the argument that in this verse we have an example of Reprobation – the sovereign decision of God in eternity to pass over some people, deciding not to save them.

The Greek word prográphō translated as ‘ordain’, literally means ‘write publicly, ‘forewrite’ or ‘enrol.’ It also occurs in Rom 15:4. Thus the condemnation may either have been written ‘before’ as in time or ‘before’ as in openly or publicly.

‘This condemnation’ is a forward reference to vv.5-7 where Jude will demonstrate by use of three Old Testament examples that there is historical precedent for divine judgment against ungodliness. He refers to the punishment of rebellious Israelites, the judgment of the fallen angels and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (vv.5-7).

The ‘certain men’ who have intruded are ‘ungodly’ (profane, impious). The word ‘ungodly’ occurs 5 more times in Jude’s letter: four times in v.15 and once in v.18. As a result of being ungodly these people do two things:

  • they corrupt God’s grace by turning it into a license for unrestrained immoral behaviour (sensuality, debauchery) – likely sexual immorality – thus perverting grace – the liberty that a Christian enjoys as a result of forgiveness and salvation (Rom 8:21).
  • they deny the authority of God and the Lord Jesus Christ, either explicitly or implicitly, through their rejection of his lordship. ‘Denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.’ By their lewd actions they deny God (lit. ‘the only master’ despótēs – one with supreme authority) and the Lord (kúrios – one who owns or possesses) Jesus Christ. Some view the structure of the text as suggesting that ‘the only Lord God’ and ‘our Lord Jesus Christ’ are the same person. J.N.D. Kelly (1969, p. 252) comments:

The second charge is that they deny the only Master and our Lord Jesus Christ, i.e. both God the Father and Christ…The alternative translation, ‘deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ….is equally possible linguistically, and the decision between them is not easy. The fact that there is a definite article before only Master and none before our Lord J.C. might seem to suggest that the whole complex expression applies to a single person, but this argument cannot be pressed: the article is often omitted before ‘God, ‘Lord’, and the like (…Eph. v. 5; 2 Thess. i.12; 1 Tim v. 21; Tit. ii. 13).

REMINDER (5-11)

In the following verses Jude reminds his readers of three notorious historical events from the Old Testament which illustrate the judgment of God upon evildoers:

EXAMPLE 1 – v.5 The wilderness generation – ‘destroyed;’

EXAMPLE 2 – v.6 angels – ‘everlasting chains;’

EXAMPLE 3 – v7. Sodom and Gomorrah – ‘the vengeance of eternal fire.’

(5) EXAMPLE 1 – Israel in the wilderness.

5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

Jude begins by complimenting the recipients on their knowledge (cf. Rom 15:14; 1 Thess 4:9; 1 Jn 2:21, 27) and says that he would like to remind them that the Lord, having saved the Israelites from Egypt, later (to deuteron, afterward, lit. ‘the second time’) destroyed many of them because of their unbelief. He is not saying this to frighten them but to make them aware that punishment awaits the ungodly men who have infiltrated the church. He is reassuring his readers because he says that they have been informed of these things and that ‘once for all’ (hapax). The knowledge that they have acquired ‘once for all’ is much more than familiarity with stories in the Old Testament; the reference is to their acceptance of the apostolic teachings (v.17).

Jude reminded them of the Exodus and of how the Lord delivered the Israelites out of Egypt but afterward destroyed those who did not believe. This illustration is taken from the book of Numbers which asserts that because of unbelief (Num 14:11; Deut 1:32) the wilderness generation, with the exception of Joshua and Caleb, would not enter the Promised Land (see Num 14:1-38; 26:64-65).

29 Your carcasses shall fall in this wilderness; and all that were numbered of you, according to your whole number, from twenty years old and upward, which have murmured against me,
30 Doubtless ye shall not come into the land, concerning which I swore to make — you dwell therein, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun. Numbers 14:29-30

This unbelief of the Israelites in the wilderness is cited by way of warning in other biblical passages (Psa 95:10-11; 1 Cor 10:1-13; Heb 3:7-19).

‘The Lord’ – although many commentators (also citing Jn 12:41; 1 Cor 10:4, 9; Heb 11:26; 1 Pet 1:11) view the use of ‘the Lord’ in v.5 as evidence of involvement by the preincarnate Jesus in Old Testament events it is more likely that here ‘the Lord’ is just another way of saying ‘God.’ The next verse (v.6) referring back to ‘the Lord’ in v.5 says concerning the rebellious angels: ‘he hath reserved.’ The parallel passage in 2 Pet 2:4 specifically attributes that to God: ‘For if God spared not the angels that sinned.’

(6) EXAMPLE 2 – The imprisoned angels

6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

Verse 6 of Jude is one of the most controversial and fascinating verses in the Bible. It contains Jude’s second example of God’s punishment of wrongdoers in the past. Notice:

1. Fallen angels. – a group of angels rebelled against God. They did not keep (tēréō) the positions that had been assigned to them but instead chose to abandon their proper dwelling. ‘First estate’ (archḗ) is status, eminence, principality, dominion. These angels did not maintain the dominions for which they had administrative responsibility, and as well as that they lusted after human women, leaving ‘their proper dwelling place i.e. heaven (oikētḗrion: house, dwelling, abode – also occurs in 2 Cor 5:2).

2. Severe consequences. – As a result of their rebellion God has reserved (tēréō, kept) them in everlasting chains and in darkness awaiting the judgment of ‘the great day’ (see Acts 2:20; Rev 6:17; 20:10). Notice the word play on tēréō – they did not keep…the Lord has kept them. The imagery conveys the idea that their punishment is severe and eternal; they will never again enjoy the light of God’s presence.

3. Links to other biblical passages: Jude 6 corresponds to 2 Pet 2:4. Peter does not specify the sin that led to the angels’ punishment; we learn about that here in verse 6 of Jude. This verse is often linked to Gen 6:1-7 which relates how the ‘sons of God’ (an Old Testament term for angels, Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7) cohabited with human women.

4. Lessons. This example demonstrates the seriousness of rebelling against God and the severity of the punishment that ensues.

Note: Jude refers to angels in vv. 6, 8, 9, 14.

(7) EXAMPLE 3 – Sodom and Gomorrah


7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Does ‘even as’ i.e. ‘likewise’ or ‘in like manner’ refer to:

a) giving themselves over to fornication,’ or

b) being ‘set forth as an example,’ or

c) ‘suffering the vengeance of eternal fire?’

I would choose option a) – that their sin is in view. Here Jude compares Sodom and Gomorrah and their surrounding cities to the fallen angels. The similarity lies in the fact that both groups practised sexual promiscuity and and lusted after ‘strange flesh.’ The citizens of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim (Deut 29:23; Hos 9:8) ‘gave themselves over to lewdness’ (ekporneúō) and lusted after different flesh. Heteras sarkos is ‘flesh of a different kind.’ Jude is making the point that ‘even as’ angels took human wives/women (Gen 6:1-7) so the people in these cities were so thoroughly immoral that they wished to have sexual relations with angels (Gen 19:5-9). Spiritual beings and mortals engaging in illicit relationships was a violation of God’s order (Psa 8:4-5). The people of these cities stand out as an example of unrestrained licentiousness. They are experiencing the punishment of eternal fire.

In verses 8-11 Jude applies the lessons from his three Old Testament illustrations of judgment to his present day situation and then alludes to four more Old Testament characters – the archangel Michael, Cain, Balaam, and Korah.


8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.

(8) ‘Likewise’ links the behaviour of the intruders, here called ‘dreamers’, to that of Jude’s three examples from Israelite history. The sins of the false teachers mirror those of Israel, the fallen angels and Sodom and Gomorrah. Jude lists them in reverse order. Like Sodom and Gomorrah etc. the intruders pollute their bodies (Jude has already referred to their debauchery in v.4). At the same time, like the rebellious angels they despise authority and like the Israelites they speak evil of dignitaries (in Num 14:1-4, the Israelites murmured against Moses, Aaron and the Lord).


9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. 10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.

(9-10) Having accused the intruders of despising authority and speaking evil of dignitaries Jude immediately contrasts their arrogance and presumption with the restraint shown by the archangel Michael in a dispute with the devil about the body of Moses. That story is not recorded in the Old Testament but, whatever the source, it was well-known to Jude and the recipients of his letter.

Michael means ‘who is like God.’

‘Archangel’ (chief angel) occurs in Jude 9 and 1 Thess 4:16.

Many commentators identify the archangel Michael in Jude 9 with Michael the prince (chief) in Dan 10:13, 21; 12:1 and the Michael of Rev 12:7-9.

Some (mainly Reformed) writers hold that Michael is a revelation of the preincarnate Christ. They base this on the meaning of his name and the fact that ‘angel’ equals ‘messenger.’

There is a view that ‘the body of Moses’ does not refer to his literal body but to his body of writing, i. e. The Law, Pentateuch (Jn 5:45; Acts 15:21; 21:21; 2 Cor 3:15).

Some suggest that the incident involving a disagreement between Michael and the devil occurred at the same time as that recorded in Zech 3:1-5.

It seems to me more sensible to take the passage at face value and accept that Jude refers to an occasion when Michael the chief angel was at odds with the devil (for reasons that are not stated) about the literal, physical body of Moses (see Deut 34:6). Jude does not provide full details because he is interested only in the attitude Michael displayed during the discussion. Michael did not pronounce a reviling judgment but deferred to the Lord’s authority as the one whose rightful position it was to rebuke the devil. Jude contrasts Michael’s attitude with the insolence of the intruders and their disrespect for authority (v.8).

Teaching by the apostle Paul about a proper Christian attitude is recorded in Tit 3:1-2: ​’Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work, To speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, showing all meekness unto all men.’

The contrast with Michael continues in v.10. Michael did not pronounce judgment ‘but these men’ revile everything that they do not understand. They have no spiritual understanding but are driven by their basic instincts and desires – just like animals.

Notice the repetition of ‘blaspheme’ (v.8, 10, ‘speak evil of,’ v. 9 ‘railing’)


11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Korah.

Jude pronounces a woe upon the intruders. ‘Woe to them’ indicates displeasure and calls for retribution. He links their fate to that of three Old Testament figures: Cain, Balaam and Korah, who are not listed in the order in which they appear in the Old Testament. Each of these men represents a different form of rebellion against divinely-appointed authority.

CAIN – an example of godlessness.

BALAAM – an example of compromise for personal gain.

KORAH – an example of rebellion against authority.

Taken together they convey the extent to which the false teachers have rebelled against and rejected the ways of God. ‘For’, ‘because’- the reasons for the pronouncement of the woe are:

1) ‘they have gone in the way of Cain’

Cain (Gen 4:1-16; Heb 11:4) was the first son of Adam and Eve and is better known for having killed his brother Abel, thus becoming the first murderer in the human race. Jude, however, is not accusing the false teachers of being murderers. He is accusing them of being thoroughly evil. Cain is more than a murderer, he is the prime example of an evil person. The apostle John calls him a child of the Evil One: ‘Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.’ 1 John 3:12.

A godless person, Cain relied on his own resources, despising God’s way and the sacrifice that the Lord required. Jude’s opponents allowed themselves to live their lives in the way that Cain lived his – ‘they have gone in the way of Cain’ i.e. ‘they have travelled down Cain’s path.’ It was of their own volition.

2) ‘and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward’ (Read Num 22-24)

The false teachers have abandoned themselves (‘rushed headlong’, ‘totally committed themselves’) to Balaam’s error for profit. Balaam’s ‘error’ was not an unintentional mistake but a deliberate deviation from the truth of God. According to Num 31:16 and Rev 2:14 it was on his advice that the Midianites caused the Israelites to commit idolatry: ‘Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD.’ Numbers 31:16.

The prophet Balaam is a prime example of someone who is willing to do anything, no matter how evil, for financial gain. Jude implies that the intruders have dedicated themselves to making money from their false teaching (cf. 1 Tim 6:5; Tit 1:11; 1 Pet 5:2).

In 2 Pet 2:15 the New Testament refers to ‘the way of Balaam, in Jude 11 to ‘the error of Balaam’ and in Rev 2:14 to ‘the doctrine of Balaam.’

3) ‘and perished in the gainsaying of Korah’

‘Gainsaying’ (antilogía) means ‘contradiction’ or ‘speaking against.’ It has to do with defiance against authority so some translate it as ‘rebellion.’ Korah (Num 16:1-40) was a Levite who mutinied against Moses and Aaron. He was privileged to be a Levite but was not satisfied with that position and level of responsibility; he thought that he should be a priest. He would not submit to the men to whom the Lord had entrusted leadership of the national worship. He, along with Dathan and Abiram, instigated a revolt, having recruited 250 of the most respected chiefs to join them. These arrogant, self-righteous men thought that they could come before God on their own merits so they tried to approach him without a mediator. The Lord opened up the ground so that Korah, Dathan, Abiram and their households were swallowed alive, while fire from heaven consumed their 250 co-conspirators.

The intruders Jude is writing about must have been rebelling against leaders in the church and causing unrest and division among the believers. The aorist tense (all three verbs in the verse are aorist) of the verb ‘they have perished’ dramatically views their fate as already sealed. Swift judgment upon them is certain.

The Epistle Of Jude – Verses 1 and 2 – Introduction

Unmasking False Teachers in Jude 12-16: Key Metaphors Explained

Contending for the Faith: Lessons from Jude 17-25

Posted in Exposition

The Epistle Of Jude – Verses 1 and 2 – Introduction

Posted on by writtenexposition

READING: Jude 1-25

FURTHER READING: Zechariah 3:1-4; 2 Peter 2:1-18; 3:1-3; Commentary on 2 Peter 2:1-22; The Book of Enoch

INTRODUCTION

The short Epistle of Jude, containing 461 Greek words, is a New Testament book which preachers and teachers tend to neglect. Often they concentrate more on 2 Peter, with which the Epistle of Jude shares a number of verses. The resemblances between them in ideas and wording are indeed striking. Jude 4-13 aligns with 2 Peter 2:1-17 and Jude 17-18 echoes 2 Peter 3:2-3. It is thought that the similarities may be explained either by literary dependence (i.e. one of them used the other as a source) or by a common source (i.e. each of the writers drew upon an earlier document or tradition). Generally speaking, scholars argue for literary dependence; with 2 Peter thought to be secondary. If Jude had access to all of 2 Peter, so the argument goes, surely he would have used more of it; so Peter must have used Jude. We shall leave that debate to others.

Equally unclear are the date the epistle was written, those to whom it was originally addressed and the exact occasion for writing. There is nothing in the letter that would establish its year of origin but, since its author claims to be Jude the brother of James, it must have been written before the end of the first century; probably between 65 and 80 CE.

There is also no hint as to the identity of the letter’s recipients. Jude addresses them as ‘beloved’ (‘Dear friends’) so he must have known them personally. During the first century heretical ideas and practices like those he describes emerged in Asia Minor so perhaps Jude is writing to a group of Jewish Christians there. His allusions to Old Testament characters and events and the presumption that his readers would understand them would indicate that both he and they had a Jewish worldview. He also refers to, and quotes, from Jewish apocryphal literature.

Although Jude addresses a specific situation his book is usually classified as one of the seven New Testament ‘catholic’ or ‘general’ epistles (James, 1 Peter, 2 Peter, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, Jude). These are circular letters addressed to the Christian church at large rather than to one specific destination. Jude is written in the form of a first century Christian letter. It commences with the name of the sender, the recipients, a greeting and ends with a doxology. Jude’s purpose in writing is to underscore and emphasise the personal responsibility of Christian believers to be vigilant against false teachers/teaching and ungodly practices.

There are a couple of sevens (v. 14 ‘the seventh from Adam’ and allusions to seven Old Testament individuals/ groups and associated events – Israelites, angels, Sodom & Gomorrah, archangel Michael, Cain, Balaam, Korah) but Jude has a noticeable penchant for triadic constructions. His grouping of elements together in threes displays his skill as a writer and is an example of the rhetorical device of amplification by accumulation, where a series of words or phrases with similar meanings are presented together to create a stronger statement and have greater impact. This skilful use of language helps make Jude’s message memorable, persuasive and therefore more likely to achieve its intended effect. Currie (2023) lists 22 triplets in an appendix to his comments on the Epistle of Jude.

SIMPLE DIVISION OF JUDE

1-2 Greeting

3-4 Purpose

5-11 Reminder

12-16 Description

17-23 Exhortation

24-25 Doxology

COMMENTS

GREETING (1-2)

1 Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called.
2 Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied.

(1) In verse 1 Jude gives details of the author and the audience.

Jude

The writer identifies himself as ‘Jude ((Ioúdas) the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James’. This is a clear indication that Judas, the brother of Jesus, wrote this epistle. If the names in Mt 13:55 are listed in order of age then Jude may have been the youngest in the family. He may also have been married (1 Cor 9:5). There are several men in the New Testament called by the popular name Jude/Judas:

  • Judas, the half-brother of Jesus (Mt 13:55; Mk 6:3).
  • Judas [son] of James (Lk 6:16; Acts 1:13) also known as Lebbaeus Thaddeus or Thaddaeus (Mt 10:3; Mk 3:18). John calls him ‘Judas, not Iscariot (Jn 14:22).
  • Judas Iscariot, the disciple who betrayed Jesus (Mt 10:4, Lk 22:3-4).
  • Judas of Galilee, a revolutionary (Acts 5:37).
  • Judas, at whose home in Damascus Paul stayed after his conversion (Acts 9:11).
  • Judas, surnamed Barsabas (Acts 15:22).

Jesus Christ

Jude, while being Jesus’ brother, humbly calls himself a ‘slave’ rather than asserting his familial connection to Jesus Christ. This term ‘slave’, however, is often linked with Christian ministry (Rom 1:1; Gal 1:10; Phil 1:1; Col 4:12; Jam 1:1; 2 Pet 1:1) and therefore may also indicate someone specifically authorised to labour in the Lord’s service who, as such, deserves to be listened to and heeded. Jude states that he is a servant of Jesus Christ before mentioning that he is related to James; this would suggest that he prioritizes his submission to Jesus Christ over earthly ties (it is interesting that Jude’s brother James, in his epistle, introduces himself similarly as ‘James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ’). Jude’s use of ‘servant’ therefore not only reflects an emphasis on his spiritual rather than familial relationship with Jesus but also establishes his authority to address his readers and warn them about the dangers of false teachings.

James

James, the brother of Jesus, was a prominent figure in the early church, particularly within the Jerusalem community (Mt 13:55; Acts 15:13; 21:18; 1 Cor 15:7; Gal 1:19; 2:9,12) and was so highly respected that he could be referred to simply as ‘James’ without any confusion. The author of the Epistle of Jude probably identifies himself as ‘the brother of James’ for two reasons: 1) to distinguish himself from other individuals named Jude or Judas in the early church and 2) to leverage the authority and recognition associated with James, the Lord’s brother. By identifying himself as ‘the brother of James’ Jude implicitly links himself to James’ authority and reputation. This was particularly important since, as someone who was not an apostle, Jude would not have been widely known. Associating himself with James enhances the impact of his message, due to James’s esteemed position and influence within the early church.

AUDIENCE

The letter is addressed to ‘them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called.’ The terms ‘sanctified’, ‘preserved’, and ‘called’ are important theological concepts and together provide a concise definition of a true Christian believer:

Sanctification: This signifies being set apart for God’s purposes, a process of becoming more Christ-like.

Preservation: This emphasizes the ongoing (perfect tense – not only once but continuing) protection and security that believers have in Jesus Christ. This word (tēréō) in Jude 1 means ‘carefully guarded’ (see Acts 12:5; 16:23). There may also be the idea of preserved for Jesus Christ (cf. 1 Thess 5:23).

There are five references to ‘being kept’ (tēréō) in Jude: v.1 ‘preserved;’ v.6 ‘kept;’ v.6 ‘reserved;’ v.13 ‘reserved;’ v.21 ‘keep’

Calling: This refers to the divine initiative in salvation (Rom 1:6; 8:28; 1 Cor 1:24; 1Thess 2:12; 2 Thess 2:13-14; 2 Tim 1:9; 1 Pet 2:9; 5:10; Rev 17:14).

(2) Jude’s greeting in verse 2 is also a prayer: ‘Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied.’ This is typical of early Christian letters; they often included a prayer or blessing for the recipients (e.g. 1 Pet 1:2). These three objective aspects of God’s grace are often interpreted subjectively. Only in Jude are they found together.

Mercy: Objective: mercy is God’s saving action in Christ. Subjective: the recipients need God’s forgiveness and compassion, especially in the face of the challenges they face.

Peace: Objective: reconciliation with God. Subjective: the inner harmony and wholeness that comes from a right relationship with God, even in the midst of trials.

Love: Objective: God’s love extended to sinners. Subjective: brotherly love between Christians.

The request that these blessings be ‘multiplied’ expresses Jude’s desire for the recipients to experience these qualities in abundance.

Jude 3-11: Historical Judgments

Unmasking False Teachers in Jude 12-16: Key Metaphors Explained

Contending for the Faith: Lessons from Jude 17-25