lament – Written Exposition

INTRODUCTION

Psalm 4 is an individual lament in which the author cries out to the Lord for relief in his current distress. Although the crisis in Psalm 3 is political /military and that in Psalm 4 personal the two psalms are often paired on the basis of similarities in language and content.

the notion that the Lord is on the side of the author and responds favourably whenever he calls.
the use of Selah
the expression there are many that say (3:2; 4:6)
morning and evening (3:5; 4:8)
the author lies down and goes to sleep peacefully, undisturbed by the trouble around him (3:5; 4:8).

Commentators vary as regards the structure of Psalm 4. Some say it naturally falls into two parts, whilst others divide it into three or four parts.

STRUCTURE

1-2 PLEA AND REPROACH

3-4 REMEMBRANCE AND RESTRAINT

5-6 RELIANCE AND REQUEST

7-8 REJOICING AND REST

EXPOSITION

PLEA AND REPROACH (1-2)

(1) The psalmist David begins with an urgent plea for the Lord to hear and answer his prayer. When I call refers to the trying circumstances in which the psalmist currently finds himself.

He addresses the Lord as God of my righteousness, thus appealing to him as the supreme righteous judge. God of my righteousness could mean either ‘my righteous God’ or something like ‘the God who takes up my righteous cause.’ David is claiming innocence and wants the Lord to vindicate him.

The perfect tense ‘have enlarged’ would indicate that David bases his confidence that God will uphold his cause on the fact that he has received help before – ‘you who have enlarged (made room) for me in my distress’. When we recall past answers to prayer we can find renewed courage to ask again.

On the other hand, the verb could be a precative perfect – expressing a wish or desire – and in that case would be translated as an imperative – ‘give me room.’ That would fit well with the three imperatives in verse 1: hear; have mercy; listen.

(2) David interrupts his prayer in order to address those who are causing him distress. It seems that they are falsely accusing him as well as mocking his faith in YHWH. These issues are conveyed by two rhetorical questions:

How long will ye turn my glory into shame? Here, David questions the motives of his accusers who are trying to ruin his reputation, highlighting the injustice he faces as they attempt to turn his royal dignity into reproach.
How long will ye love vanity and seek after leasing? I would suggest, based on vv. 4-7, that ’emptiness’ and ‘lies’ refer to the worship of false gods.

David addresses his foes as sons of man. Many commentators suggest that because the word for man here is ish rather than adam a specific category of people is intended, i.e. not common people but important, influential people like aristocracy or nobles.

Selah – stop and think. In this modern age many of us know how deeply gossip, slander, misrepresentation, social media attacks, or persistent criticism can wound. When anxiety rises or reproach hurts, we can start where David starts – with who God is and what he has already done – and bring our specific problems honestly to him.

REMEMBRANCE AND RESTRAINT (3-4)

(3) With a degree of confidence David reassures himself and informs his opponents that the Lord has separated the godly (those in a covenant relationship with YHWH) for himself. The Lord will therefore hear and answer David’s prayer when he calls to him. By opposing David these people oppose the Lord. There are echoes of verse 1 in verse 3 – ‘hear’ and ‘call.’

(4) Having spelled out the facts of the matter David advises them, almost paternally, that in view of the fact that the Lord will fulfil David’s requests they ought to reflect on God’s goodness to his people and be disturbed. That should lead them to change their attitude and stop sinning. The verb the KJV translates as stand in awe means tremble, panic, flinch, agitate. The Septuagint Greek translation (LXX) has ‘be angry’ – i.e. if ‘you get infuriated’ – and it is that translation that the Apostle Paul cites in Ephesians 4:26.

David also advises his foes to commune with your own heart upon your bed. They are to take time to soberly and seriously consider their attitude and actions, realise that they are wrong and make the wise decision to end their opposition to David, and the Lord.

RELIANCE AND REQUEST (5-6)

(5) David continues giving advice to his opponents and warns them that they ought to put their trust exclusively in YHWH (not in other gods) and as evidence of their faith offer the sacrifices of righteousness; i.e. sacrifices offered with the right attitude and thus acceptable to YHWH.

Barré (1995, p.61) comments on vv. 4-5:

The two verses appear to present the logical stages in the process of turning from idolatry to the worship of Yahweh: (1) realization of one’s wrongdoing (idolatry) and fear of Yahweh’s wrath (5aa: “Quake [with fear]”); (2) ceasing consequently to continue in this sin (5aß: “and sin no more”); (3) sincere repentance and conversion (5bc: “weep bitterly within your hearts // wail loudly upon your beds”); (4) the offering of “fitting” sacrifices to Yahweh – perhaps meaning sacrifices offered by someone with a righteous heart ) or sacrifices offered to Yahweh rather than some false god (6a: “Offer fitting sacrifices”); (5) finally, the penitents are admonished to trust in Yahweh alone (6b: “and put your trust in Yahweh”); in context, this probably means: Put your trust in Yahweh rather than in the false gods whom you have trusted in up to now.

(6) David continues: Many are saying, who can show us something good? There is some discussion as to whether the ‘many’ of v. 6 are the ‘sons of man’ in v.3 or a different category of persons. Even if they are not one and the same both groups display a lack of trust in YHWH’s providence. They are asking for proof of divine favour.

Since good (Heb, ṭôb) refers to rain in Deut 28:12 and Jer 17:6 some argue that the background context of Psalm 4 is a period of drought during which some people prayed to other deities, e.g. Baal, to send rain and also castigated David for his exclusive faith in YHWH. That view is worth consideration; certainly there is little in Psalm 4 to support the traditional idea that, just because it follows Psalm 3, it relates to the end of Absalom’s rebellion.

David’s response to the question Many are saying, who can show us something good? (i.e. ‘which god will give us a good harvest and grant us prosperity?’) is to resume the prayer which he interrupted at the end of v.1. Appealing to the Aaronic Blessing which was familiar to all Israelites he requests that YHWH lift up the light of his face upon the people.

The LORD bless thee, and keep thee: The LORD make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee: The LORD lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace. Numbers 6:24-26

By shining his face upon the people YHWH would display proof not only of his providence but also his presence (cf. in Exod 33:14 My presence shall go with thee . . . the word translated ‘presence’ is ‘face’).

Note: For a detailed consideration of the priestly blessing see my earlier post THE AARONIC BLESSING

REJOICING AND REST (7-8)

(7) David contrasts the despair of the ‘many’ with his own confidence in God’s goodness. Again (see v.1) referring to the Lord’s provision in the past David says: ‘you have put joy in my heart.’ He expresses that true satisfaction comes from God, who fills his inner being with joy greater than material prosperity. His gladness is greater than the pleasure his enemies enjoy when they have a good harvest – for which they are praying. Notice their corn and their wine.

(8) The psalm concludes with a powerful affirmation: I will both lay me down in peace, and sleep: for thou, LORD, only makest me dwell in safety. Here, David expresses the profound peace that comes from trusting in God. Confidence that God, who has delivered him in the past, will help him in the current crisis enables David to live without anxiety and to quietly lie down at night and sleep peacefully. This verse teaches that true security and rest, even amidst turmoil, are found in the Lord, David may have been feeling rejected and alone as for thou, LORD, only makest me dwell in safety could be taken as meaning ‘ You, Lord, lonely as I am, will keep me safe.’

SUMMATION

Psalm 4 is a reminder of the importance of turning to God in times of distress, maintaining faith amidst slander, and finding peace through trust in divine grace. David’s journey from distress to peace is a model for believers as we navigate our own challenges. Whenever we struggle to sleep because of worry or fear we can make 4:8 our evening prayer and entrust our rest to the Lord. The psalm does not promise that all problems will vanish before morning but it does offer something equally precious: the possibility of real peace amidst unresolved troubles because we know that the Lord hears our cry and guards our rest.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Flanigan, J. (2001). What the Bible Teaches: Psalms, Ritchie Old Testament Commentary, Kilmarnock.

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Barré, Michael L., (1995) “Hearts, Beds, and Repentance in Psalm 4,5 and Hosea 7,14.” Biblica, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 53–62.

‘I speak the truth in Christ—I am not lying, my conscience confirms it through the Holy Spirit— I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my people, those of my own race, the people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption to sonship; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises. Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of the Messiah, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen’ Romans 9:1-5 (NIV)

Romans chapter nine begins with a personal lament which introduces the problem that Paul intends to address; the failure of Israel to accept the gospel in spite of the privileges with which they had been blessed. This is the first of four times (9:1-5; 10:1-4; 11:1-6; 11:13-14) in chapters 9-11 when Paul involves himself personally at major turning points of the discussion:

a) In 9:1-5, he stresses how much God’s mercy to Israel matters to him – to the extent that he would be willing to be cut off for the sake of his people.

b) In 10:1-4 he bears witness on behalf of Israel that they have good intentions: they have a zeal for God, but it is is not according to knowledge.

c) In 11:1-6 Paul testifies to the faithfulness of God who has, in fact, called a remnant of Israel in Paul himself.

d) In 11:13-14 he says that he glorifies his ministry as apostle to
the Gentiles; this is part of God’s plan to make Israel jealous.

Paul begins this section with a series of double expressions in vv. 1-2 (‘I speak the truth —I am not lying; in Christ – through the Holy Spirit; great sorrow – unceasing anguish’) by which he asserts his honesty and expresses his grief that his fellow Jews are lost.

In v. 1 he sets forth in one sentence a five-fold cumulative assertion of his sincerity:

a) ‘I speak the truth!’

b) ‘I speak the truth in Christ’

c) ‘I speak the truth in Christ – I am not lying’

d) ‘ I speak the truth in Christ – I am not lying, my conscience confirms it’

e) ‘I speak the truth in Christ – I am not lying, my conscience confirms it through the Holy Spirit’

Paul calls on Christ himself as the one who can vouch for the truthfulness of what he is about to say about Israel and reminds his audience that a second witness, his conscience, is testifying by means of the Holy Spirit. He may have had in mind the OT Law of Evidence which required at least two witnesses (Deuteronomy 19:15-16).

Paul (v.2) describes his heartbreak as continual (adialeiptos) and his response to this as a wish (or prayer) that he might be condemned in order that they might be saved. Was Paul speaking in hyperbole or was he serious? Moo (1996, p.558) comments:

‘I prefer, in agreement with most English translations, to ascribe a hypothetical nuance to the imperfect tense; as Cranfield paraphrases, “I would pray (were it permissible for me so to pray and if the fulfilment of such a prayer could benefit them”)’

Since Paul’s giving up of his own salvation was neither possible nor permissible the wish could not be fulfilled. He seems to model himself on Moses (Exodus 30:30-32), who had also at times been badly treated by the Israelites and yet expressed a willingness to sacrifice himself for them. That those for whom Paul is heartbroken are unbelieving Jews is emphasized in v. 3 where their identification as ‘my people’ is modified by ‘those of my own race’ and further in v. 4 by ‘the people
of Israel’. Paul may have been the Apostle to the Gentiles but he was certainly a Jew by race.

In the concluding words of this lament Paul lists eight special privileges given to Israel and bemoans the fact that the Israelites have not benefitted from these spiritual advantages:

1) adoption
2) the glory
3) the covenants
4) the giving of the law
5) the temple worship
6) the promises
7) the patriarchs
8) the Messiah – who was himself a Jew

Thus in verses 1-5 Paul laments the unbelief of his fellow Jews and their failure to take advantage of their unique privileges, and expresses his overwhelming desire for their conversion. This introduces the subject that will occupy him throughout the rest of chapters 9-11; the unbelief of Israel and the question of God’s faithfulness.