Tag: Nebuchadnezzar

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 24:15-27: The Death of Ezekiel’s Wife

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 24 opens with YHWH revealing to the prophet on 15 January, 588 BCE that the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem has begun that very day. Ezekiel then delivers the parable of the cooking pot to his fellow-exiles. It depicts Jerusalem as a cauldron filled with ‘choice cuts’ (its inhabitants) set on a blazing fire (the siege). The pot has corrosion (the bloodguilt and violence that characterises the city). Its contents must be emptied into the fire; then the pot will be heated until red hot in order to be purified.

This next section (24:15-27) transforms the metaphor of the cooking pot into a tragic living reality for Ezekiel. Just as the siege is announced to Ezekiel in 24:1 by a word from YHWH likewise he is informed of his forthcoming personal loss by a specific divine word in 24:15. That word commands Ezekiel to use his personal grief to perform a prophetic sign-act to the exiles.

DIVISION

15-18 YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE
19-24 EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION
25-27 YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY

EXPOSITION

YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE (15-18)

This section (24:15-27) begins with YHWH addressing Ezekiel using the customary prophetic word formula ‘son of Adam.’ The oracle that follows focuses on a tragic personal loss for Ezekiel. YHWH will suddenly (‘at a blow’) take away the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ but Ezekiel is forbidden to mourn, weep, shed tears, sigh aloud, cover his beard, eat the bread of men, or sit barefoot and bareheaded.

It is unclear whether that which is forbidden is petitionary mourning (as in Joel 1:13-14) in response to the announcement – i.e. asking the Lord to reverse his decision – or posthumous mourning; after the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ has died. The traditional view is that posthumous mourning is in view. Once the ‘delight of his eyes’ is taken away Ezekiel is not to engage in a traditional public show of grief. The acts of mourning which are forbidden are ritual rather than emotional. Emotional mourning is permitted; he can mourn inwardly and sigh softly but must eat, drink and dress as normal.

It is only when we come to v.18 that we learn that Ezekiel’s ‘dearest treasure’ (NLT) is his wife: So I spake unto the people in the morning: and at even my wife died; and I did in the morning as I was commanded. This is reported in the first person (‘I’) but Ezekiel does not tell us his wife’s name or age and does not indicate how he felt or thought when his loved one’s imminent death was announced.

The fulfilment of the prophecy is swift but the timeline is unclear. Do the two mentions of ‘morning’ refer to the same morning or two different mornings?

  • Ezekiel delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning and immediately complies with YHWH’s instructions (that same morning). Then his wife dies that evening. OR
  • He delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning, his wife dies that evening and he obeys YHWH’s command the following morning.

The second possibility is the most commonly accepted. In either case he has little time to process his grief. I did . . . as I was commanded is a striking example of immediate and total obedience to the word of the Lord – at great personal cost.

EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION (19-24)

Doubtless aware of Ezekiel’s love for his wife the exiles are shocked by his violation of the expected social and religious norms of mourning. They realise that this is a symbolic act and so they ask him for an interpretation of the sign and how it applies to them: And the people said unto me, Wilt thou not tell us what these things are to us, that thou doest so? This is the only occasion in the book when the exiles directly address the prophet Ezekiel – normally what they say is quoted to Ezekiel by YHWH.

Ezekiel answers their brief question by telling them that a word from YHWH came to him, telling him what he was to communicate to the people. The thrust of the message is that Ezekiel’s behaviour in the aftermath of his wife’s death is a prescriptive sign to the exiles. It shows how they ought to respond to the fall of the city of Jerusalem and specifically the temple. The death of Ezekiel’s wife is an analogy for the ‘death’ of the temple. The exiles’ response to that ought to mirror Ezekiel’s response to his wife’s death.

YHWH (v.21) intends to desecrate his sanctuary (by the blood of Judah’s slain sons and daughters and the presence of foreigners). The temple is the pride of the people’s power (cf. Lev 26:19), the desire of their eyes and that with which they have sympathy – i.e. they cherish the temple because to them it represents the glory and strength of the nation.

Notice that in vv.22-24 the collective response of the exiles to the fall of the sanctuary is to mirror the individual response of Ezekiel to the death of his wife. There are obvious parallels;

  • in v.17 Ezekiel’s wife is the delight of his eyes, in v.21 the sanctuary is the delight of the people’s eyes.
  • Like Ezekiel in vv.16-17 the people (vv.22-23) are not to publicly mourn, weep, cover their lips, eat the bread of men or go about bareheaded and barefoot.

Covering the upper lip seems to have been a sign of shame and sorrow, cf. Lev 13:45; Mic3:7. ‘The bread of men’ refers to food brought to the bereaved by family and friends. Other descriptions of mourning occur in Ezekiel 7:18 and 27:30-31.

The exiles are to imitate Ezekiel – he is a sign to them:

  • And ye shall do as I have done: Ezek 24:22
  • according to all that he hath done shall ye do: Ezek 24:24

In addition (v.23), they are to pine away (cf. 4:17; 33:10) for (on account of) their iniquities and groan one to another. Their grief will be compounded by the recognition that they have brought this disaster upon themselves because of their sin. They are not to make a public display of mourning but rather groan because of conviction of their guilt. The exiles share responsibility with those in Judah for the destruction of the city and the temple.

When the disaster comes the people of Judah and the exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord

YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY (25-27)

Addressing himself to Ezekiel personally – thou son of man – YHWH refers to the false hope that the Judahites have placed in the temple, the city and future generations. They have considered these to be their strength (stronghold), joy, glory, delight and heart’s desire. Soon all will be taken from them.

As for Ezekiel, an eyewitness will escape the destruction of the city of Jerusalem and bring confirmation of its fall to him in Babylonia. Since his call Ezekiel has been mute (3:26-27), speaking only when he receives a direct oracle from YHWH, but on the day the messenger arrives Ezekiel’s speech will be restored, his silent mourning will end and his ministry enter a new phase. That too will be a sign to the exiles and they will recognise the presence of YHWH. This prophecy is fulfilled in 33:21-22.

SUMMATION

The death of Ezekiel’s wife symbolises the impending destruction of the Jerusalem temple by the Babylonian forces of Nebuchadnezzar and emphasises the severity and finality of the coming judgement. The prophet’s personal tragedy demonstrates that YHWH’s judgement is irrevocable and his muted grief is a prophetic sign of how the people should and would react to the coming destruction.

Up to this point Ezekiel has been proclaiming YHWH’s judgement upon Jerusalem and Judah. The fall of the city and the temple will confirm that he is indeed a true prophet and that YHWH has been in control of events throughout as Ezekiel has said. With the fall of Jerusalem the old era will pass and the lifting of Ezekiel’s silence mark a new phase in his ministry. The exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord and on that basis future restoration can be built. With his status as a true prophet confirmed the people will listen to Ezekiel, whose ministry will transition from one that proclaims judgement to one that offers hope. But before moving on to the restoration section of his book (chapters 33-48) Ezekiel records oracles against some of Judah’s hostile neighbours (chapters 25-32).

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 24:1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION TO EZEKIEL CHAPTER 24

Ezekiel 24 serves as the climactic turning point in the book – the decisive moment when prophecy moves from warning to fulfilment. For the last time Ezekiel predicts the destruction of Jerusalem and its people. This is followed by symbolism that must have affected even the most hardened of his opponents.

The destruction of Jerusalem is prophesied in the parable of a cooking pot and then symbolised in the death of Ezekiel’s wife. The oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the same day and both images function together to signify that Jerusalem’s calamities will be so extreme that they are beyond any expression of sorrow. The two interlock to signify external suffering and internal collapse.

The chapter may be viewed as consisting of two main sections – the parable of the cooking pot and the death of Ezekiel’s wife – although also, as Petter (2023, Introduction to 24:1-27) observes, within these sections is ‘a series of five shocking announcements: the news of the city’s siege (24:2), the death of Ezekiel’s wife (24:16), the end of the sanctuary (24:21), the news from the fugitive (24:26), and the news Ezekiel will speak again (24:27).’

1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

(1-3a) A threefold instruction: record the date, use a parable, declare it to the rebellious house.

This oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year – the date on which Nebuchadnezzar’s forces commenced the siege of Jerusalem. All hope of deliverance has now gone, the time of intense pressure has arrived.

The oracle is viewed as very important because Ezekiel is emphatically told to record that particular date. In v.2 he is instructed to ‘write thee the name of the day, even of this same day… this same day.’

On that day – ‘the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year’ – Ezekiel announced to the exiles in Babylon that, some 400 miles away, Nebuchadnezzar had ‘set himself against’ (pressed violently upon, leaned heavily on, cf. Psa 88:7) Jerusalem. Ezekiel could not possibly have known that Nebuchadnezzar’s army had begun the siege of Jerusalem that very day except by revelation from YHWH.  This record would therefore be indisputable proof, to anyone who later checked the dates of his prophecies, that he was a true prophet of YHWH.

Modern scholars debate what year that ‘ninth year’ actually was. According to the Parker-Dubberstein chronology the date equates to 15 January, 588 BCE. Albright, however, calculates the year as 587 BCE and Thiele as 586 BCE.

Throughout the book of Ezekiel dates are based on the year of King Jehoiachin’s exile which, since Nebuchadnezzar replaced Jehoiachin with Zedekiah, was also the year of Zedekiah’s accession. Three other biblical passages confirm that the date given by Ezekiel is that on which the siege of Jerusalem began – only they express it in terms of Zedekiah’s reign – the ninth year of Jehoiachin’s exile corresponding to the ninth year of Zedekiah’s reign.

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about. And the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. 2 Kgs 25:1-2

In the ninth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the tenth month, came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and all his army against Jerusalem, and they besieged it. Jer 39:1

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he and all his army, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it, and built forts against it round about. So the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. Jer 52:4-5

Ezekiel is then instructed to use a parable (māšāl – proverb, parable) and declare it to ‘the rebellious house.’ This most likely refers to the exiles who are with him in Babylonia (Ezek 2:5, 6; 12:2, 3, 9; 17:12) but perhaps also to the inhabitants of Judah. Details of the parable occupy vv.3b-14.

(3b-5) The parable involves a cauldron or cooking pot (siyr). Those for domestic use were normally made of pottery but the cauldron Ezekiel has in mind is made of copper/brass (v.11) which may suggest a large one like those used in the Temple (2 Kgs 25:14). In 11:1-12 Ezekiel has already referred to a proverb about a cooking pot that was widely quoted by the Judahites. The image of a cauldron was loaded with meaning for the people of Jerusalem who considered themselves to be like choice meat in the safety of YHWH’s protective pot (the city). Ezekiel now turns their own metaphor on its head and uses it to illustrate Jerusalem’s fate.

Addressing Ezekiel as if he were an imaginary cook YHWH tells him to:

  • set the cooking pot [on the fire] – the pot represents Jerusalem and the ‘setting on’ indicates the beginning of the siege.
  • pour in the water.
  • ‘gather the pieces thereof’ – the pieces of meat belonging to the cooking pot – they represent the inhabitants of Jerusalem prepared for judgement.
  • ‘even every good piece, the thigh, and the shoulder; fill it with the choice bones. . . take the choice of the flock’ – the best cuts of meat from the best animals represent the leading citizens of Jerusalem.
  • pile on the logs (bones) under the pot – the fire represents the siege – the heat intensifies – severe judgement.
  • boil the meat well – the verb rāṯaḥ (boil, seethe, be agitated) only occurs elsewhere in Job 30:27; 41:31. ‘Cook (KJV , seethe) its bones it in the pot’ – the judgement will be thorough and even the most durable will not survive.

Opinions differ as to whether the prophet publicly enacted this parable. Keil (1876, p.341) thinks that he did not but rather maintains that: the ensuing act, which the prophet is commanded to perform, is not to be regarded as a symbolical act which he really carried out, but that the act forms the substance of the māšāl, in other words, belongs to the parable itself.

It is possible, however, that Ezekiel did actually put a cooking pot on a wood fire and boil pieces of meat in it to symbolise what the population of Jerusalem would endure during the siege. To have done so would not have seemed unusual for the book records him enacting several of his prophecies:

  • 4:1-3 The siege.
  • 5-1-4 The city’s destruction.
  • 12:1-16 The process of going into exile.
  • 12:17-20 The fear and despair of the people of Jerusalem.
  • 21:18-23 The two routes the king of Babylon could choose.
  • 37:15-28 The two sticks symbolising the reunification of Israel and Judah.

(6-8) ‘Wherefore’ or ‘Now then’ indicates a transition from the parable itself to further explanation by YHWH. In v.6 he pronounces woe directly upon Jerusalem, calling it ‘the bloody city;’ this is repeated in v.9. That Jerusalem is notorious for murder (judicial killings and child sacrifice) is referred to in 11:6; 13:19; 16:21; 22:3. The term ‘bloody city’ was previously used by Nahum (Nah 3:1) to describe the city of Nineveh.

Jerusalem is a pot with reddish ‘scum’ (corrosion or deposit) in it that cannot be removed. The sin of murder has become part of the very fabric of the city. Since copper/brass does not rust some scholars view this ‘scum’ as verdigris, others as flaws in the metal itself and others as hardened food residue that will not scrub off.

Yet another view is that the corruption does not belong to the metal of the pot but to its contents, i.e. the meat. According to v.6 the scum is inside the pot and in v.7 so is blood. Since the consumption of blood is taboo to the Israelites (Gen 9:4; Lev 3:17; 17:10-14; Deut 12:23-25) the flesh in the pot is viewed as contaminated. The Judahites may think of themselves as choice cuts of meat but in YHWH’s sight they are putrid flesh. The meat is to be brought out of the cauldron ‘piece by piece;’ i.e. the city’s population will be taken into captivity or killed. All efforts to cleanse the filth have failed – this idea will be developed in vv.12-13.

‘Let no lot fall upon it’ – refers to the practice of decision-making by casting lots (Lev 16:7-10; Num 26:55-56; Josh 13:6; 1 Chron 24:5, 7; 25:8; 26:13-14). The results are reckoned to be God’s will: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD. Prov 16:33. In the context of this oracle the reference may be to the casting of lots by a victorious army in order to decide which captives should be allowed to live and which should put to death (2 Sam 8:2; Joel 3:3; Nah 3:10). There is no need to cast lots concerning the leading citizens of Jerusalem for they will be executed (Jer 39:6).

Verses 7-8, beginning with ‘For,’ give the reason why the contaminated pieces of meat (the people of Jerusalem) are rejected. The city has openly and shamelessly shed blood and there has been no attempt to cover up its sin. The background to v.7 is another taboo concerning blood: And whatsoever man there be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, which hunteth and catcheth any beast or fowl that may be eaten; he shall even pour out the blood thereof, and cover it with dust. Lev 17:13.

‘Her blood -‘ i.e. the blood that Jerusalem has shed – has not been covered up but deliberately poured out for all to see on non-porous rock that would not absorb it. That blood cries for vengeance (cf. Gen 4:10; Job 16:18; Isa 26:21). YHWH’s response is to likewise set Jerusalem’s blood on a rock uncovered. This will serve as a witness to other nations of the crimes that she has committed.

(9-12) In verses 9-12 the image of YHWH building a huge fire depicts the unleashing of his wrath upon Jerusalem ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because Jerusalem is full of blood and filth) YHWH again (see v.6) pronounces woe on the city and says that he will make the pile of wood great (cf. Isa 30:33).

Since YHWH is responsible for stoking the fire the siege of Jerusalem is not a random disaster but deliberate punishment by YHWH. The imaginary cook is given further instructions:

  • heap on wood.
  • light the fire
  • mix in the spices (KJV, ‘spice it well’)- the verb rāqaḥ is normally used for the process of making perfume and also for the preparation of the ingredients of the sacred anointing oil (Ex 30:33) – spices enhance the taste of meat – this may mean that the Chaldeans will enthusiastically enjoy destroying Jerusalem, just as hungry people enjoy well-seasoned food.
  • boil the meat away – the judgement is thorough and final.
  • empty the residue into the fire and burn the bones – the people will be dispersed and the city will be destroyed by fire. The image intensifies; it moves from cooking in v.5 to cremation in v.10. The city will lie desolate.
  • set the empty pot back on the coals and heat it until it is red hot and molten. All the impurities will be burned up. This recalls the smelting image in 22:20-22.

Jerusalem (v.12) has frustrated all efforts to cleanse her. The earlier attempts to do so may have included the messages from YHWH delivered by the prophets and perhaps also the reforms of King Hezekiah (2 Kgs 18; 2 Chron 31) and King Josiah (2 Kgs 22-23). The Chronicler gives the following apt assessment:

And the LORD God of their fathers sent to them by his messengers, rising up quickly, and sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his dwelling place: But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the LORD arose against his people, till there was no remedy. Therefore he brought upon them the king of the Chaldees. . . 2 Chron 36:15-17a

The scum in the pot has not been removed so into the fire with it!

(13-14) YHWH again addresses the city directly saying that every time he tried to cleanse her she refused to be purified from her uncleanness. Therefore she will not be pure again (there will be no more opportunities for cleansing) until his wrath against her has been satisfied.

The oracle closes with the formula: ‘I the Lord hath spoken’ (v.14). God’s word guarantees the fulfilment of what he has said. He will not reconsider or renege, what Ezekiel has prophesied will come to pass. This certainty is expressed in three negative statements:

  • I will not refrain, not go back
  • I will not spare
  • I will not repent (be sorry, moved to pity)

YHWH has spoken, Nebuchadnezzar’s army has now arrived. The Chaldeans will judge Jerusalem according to her ways and deeds. She is facing the consequences of her own choices.

SUMMATION

This oracle shatters once and for all the false view held by the Jerusalemites that they are YHWH’s chosen cuts of meat in the protective cauldron and that the city is therefore inviolable. Even though they were God’s people they could not evade the consequences of their sin. Like corrosion in the pot sin that is not addressed becomes deeply ingrained. When grace is consistently rejected then God’s righteous judgement upon the sinner is inevitable. The oracle emphasises that the sovereign God is directing the judgement upon Judah; the Babylonian invaders are merely his instruments.

Even while Ezekiel was delivering this solemn parable he became aware that he was about to experience great sorrow. His experience of loss was about to become the ultimate sign to the people of Judah. Chapter 24:15 moves seamlessly from public preaching to private tragedy. Inside a few hours Ezekiel’s wife will die.

BIBLOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Keil, C. F. (1876). Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Ezekiel, Vol 1. Transl. J. M. Martin. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.

Parker, R.A. and Dubberstein, W.H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology 626 B. C. – A. D. 75. Rhode Island: Brown University Press.

Petter, D.L. (2011). The Book of Ezekiel and Mesopotamian City Laments, Academic Press, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

Thiele, E. R. (1983). The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Albright, W. F. (1956). The Nebuchadnezzar and Neriglissar Chronicles. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 143, pp. 28–33.

Thiele, E.R. (1944). The Chronology of the Kings of Judah and Israel. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 3(3), pp.137–186.

DIGITAL RESOURCES

Petter, D. L. (2023). Ezekiel. [online] Available at: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/commentary/ezekiel/ accessed 22 November, 2025

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 23:1-49 – The Oracle Concerning Aholah and Aholibah (Part 2)

Posted on by writtenexposition

11-21 – AHOLIBAH (JERUSALEM) JUDAH

(11) Verse 10 ends with Aholah (Israel) having suffered punishment for her infidelities and having become a byword among other women (‘the nations’). This section (vv.11-21) makes the point (11, 14, 19) that Aholibah (Jerusalem) saw her sister Aholah’s fate but did not learn from it. Judah did not heed the warning from the past.

(12-13) Just as her sister had done (vv.5-6) Aholibah ‘lusted after’ (doted upon) the impeccably dressed young Assyrian cavaliers. She became more corrupt in her lust than her sister; her pattern of behaviour escalating as time progressed.

This may include a historical reference to Judah under Ahaz (735-715 BCE), a king who submitted to Assyrian rule – see 2 Kgs 16 and Isa 7.

Notice that in the oracle there are three objects of Aholibah’s admiration – the Assyrians v.12, the Chaldeans v.16 and Egypt’s concubines v.20.

(14-21) Judah’s fascination with the Chaldeans (Babylonians) is depicted as lust for ‘men portrayed upon the wall’ (probably a reference to Babylonian wall reliefs). Aholibah was attracted by these brightly coloured engraved images (possibly using ochre) of soldiers wearing red uniforms as well as broad waistbands and flowing turbans. This was the typical dress of high-ranking Babylonian military officers.

Having only heard reports of Babylonian might Judah sent ambassadors to seek an alliance. It is possible, but not certain, that Hezekiah first contacted the Babylonian king Merodach-Baladan who then sent an embassy to Jerusalem (2 Kgs 20:12-21; Isa 39:1-8). The point in these verses is not so much idolatry as unnecessary and ill-advised political alliances.

(17-18) The Babylonians came to Judah in bed and made her unclean but afterwards her soul abhorred them. The expression (mind is alienated KJV) occurs in Ezek 23 :17, 18, 28 and Jer 6:8. The verb yāqa‘ means to turn away or alienate and in a different context is used for the dislocation of Jacob’s hip in Gen 32:25.

Ezekiel is reminding his audience that after a time relations with the Babylonians soured. For example: Jehoiakim revolted against Babylonia c. 598 BCE. Jehoiakim died during the revolt and his eighteen year old son Jehoiachin (also known as Jeconiah or Coniah) succeeded to the throne of Judah but surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar after three months. Jehoiachin, along many leading Judahites, was then deported to Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah as a puppet king but nine years later he too rebelled against Babylonian rule (See 2 Kings 24).

Thus Aholibah (Jerusalem) revealed her nakedness and her harlotries with the result that YHWH turned away from her in disgust just as he had with her sister Aholah (Israel).

(19-21) Having been unfaithful to YHWH with powerful men like Assyria and Chaldea Aholibah did not return to the Lord but instead ‘called to remembrance’ the early days in Egypt. The verb means ‘to search for.’ The idea is that she reverted to an earlier pattern of behaviour; in this case the idolatry of her youth in Egypt.

She therefore sought a relationship with Egypt; longing to be one of Egypt’s concubines. Egypt, a world power at the time, is metaphorically described in graphic, animalistic terms as being sexually potent. Ezekiel employs coarse language in order to emphasise Aholibah’s excessive, unrestrained lust for foreign powers and also to evoke a feeling of revulsion in his audience.

The prophets of YHWH disapproved of Judah’s political flirtations with Egypt. Like Ezekiel, Isaiah and Jeremiah viewed Egypt as an unreliable ally (Isa 30:1-7; 31:1-3; Jer 2:18; 37:5-10).

Notice that until v.21 the verbs are in the third person (‘she’) but now change to the second person (‘you’). This anticipates YHWH directly addressing Aholibah in vv. 22-35 when announcing her punishment.

22-35 – AHOLIBAH’S PUNISHMENT

(22) ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because of her infidelities), followed by the prophetic messenger formula (‘thus saith the Lord God’), is followed by a direct message from YHWH to Aholibah (Jerusalem) stating his intention to punish her. He will accomplish this by bringing her former ‘lovers’ (the nations that she once courted) against her to attack her. Those with whom she was once allied but from whom she has turned in disgust (‘mind is alienated’ see on v.17 above) will become her deadly enemies.

(23-24) They include the Babylonians and various other groups, described as ‘desirable young men,’ ‘governors and officials,’ ‘cavalry officers and men of renown’ (lit. persons summoned to a meeting, Num 1:16; 16:2), who will come against her with military might. The list specifies:
– the Babylonians (sons of Babel) – the Neo-Babylonian empire under Nebuchadnezzar II, the superpower at that time
– the Chaldeans – a people group in the south of Babylonia – dominant in the Neo-Babylonian empire
– Pekod – possibly an Aramean tribe – from Syria
– Shoa – unknown
– Koa – unknown
– all the Assyrians (sons of Asshur) – possibly defeated Assyrian army units that had been pressed into military service by the Babylonians.

This confederation of Babylonian allies and vassals will attack Judah with an impressive array of the latest military equipment – weapons, chariots, wagons, large and small shields and helmets. YHWH will punish Judah by allowing these forces to judge her by their own inhumane laws rather than by biblical laws.

(25-27) Aholibah (Jerusalem) will therefore suffer the atrocities of ancient warfare. This will include brutal mutilations such as rhinotomy (nose-cutting) and ear cropping. In those ancient honour-shame cultures mutilations had to do with shame. They asserted the domination of the aggressor and indicated a change in the victim’s status. For biblical examples of wartime mutilations see Judg 1:6-7; 1 Sam 11:2; 31:9-10; 2 Sam 4:7,12; 2 Kgs 25:7; Jer 39:6-7.

Many who survive mutilation will be killed and others taken into captivity. Jerusalem will be stripped and plundered and the properties left empty (‘thy residue’) by those slain or deported will be consumed by fire. These agonies will be deliberately instigated by YHWH; in them Aholibah will experience his jealousy (intense fervour). The judgement will be so severe that her lewdness and the harlotries learned in Egypt will cease. She will no longer look amorously at Egypt, i.e. seek a political alliance or military help. ‘Look amorously’ is conveyed by the expression ‘lift up thine eyes unto’ – this is how Potiphar’s wife looked at Joseph in Gen 39:7.

(28-32) Beginning with ‘For,’ followed by the prophetic messenger formula ‘thus saith the Lord God’ (as v.22), Aholibah’s punishment is further described using the indecent image of YHWH handing her over to her former lovers, whom she has come to abhor, to be made a public spectacle. They will strip her stark naked, expose and violate her. This imagery of being left exposed symbolises not only physical vulnerability but also spiritual disgrace. This is due to her unfaithfulness to YHWH in the form of idolatry and alliances with ungodly nations (v.30).

It is ironic that the very nations with which Jerusalem sought an alliance for protection will become her oppressors. The language of v.29 emphasises the depth of betrayal and the resulting shame: they shall deal with thee hatefully, and shall take away all thy labour, and shall leave thee naked and bare. ‘Take away all thy labour’ reflects one of the curses promised for covenant unfaithfulness in Deut 28:33: The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shalt be only oppressed and crushed always.

Verse 28 echoes vv.17, 22 and 16:37. Verse 29 echoes v.26 and 16:39. Verse 31, looking back to v.13, states that Jerusalem has walked in the way of her sister, Aholah (Israel), and thus will drink from the same cup of judgement.

(32-35) Verses 32-34 develop the thought of drinking from the same cup as her sister Samaria had drunk from (in 722 BCE, see 2 Kgs 17:6). This takes the form of a poem:

This is what the Lord GOD says:
“You will drink your sister’s cup,
which is deep and wide.
You will be an object of ridicule and scorn,
for it holds so much.
You will be filled with drunkenness and grief,
with a cup of devastation and desolation,
the cup of your sister Samaria.
You will drink it and drain it;
then you will gnaw its broken pieces,
and tear your breasts.
For I have spoken.”
This is the declaration of the Lord GOD. (Ezek 23:32-34 CSB)

The cup is large (deep and wide) and people will laugh at the fact that it is so great and has to be drained completely. Aholibah will be the object of derision and scorn because when she drinks the toxic contents she will stagger about, as if drunk, stunned by the severity of the judgement. The cup will be one of intoxication and grief, of ruin and desolation. The contents of the cup will drive Aholibah mad. Overcome by self-loathing, she will break it in pieces and self-harm with the fragments of pottery. Ortland Jnr (2016, p.129, footnote 82) explains:

The image is that of a cup filled to the brim with a powerful potion, to make the one who drinks it reel with an exaggerated drunkenness. Yahweh holds this cup in his hand and forces it to the lips of the nation to be judged. It represents, in real terms, the breakdown of order, the loss of control and good judgment, the panic and disarray, as a nation staggers like a drunk toward divinely ordained destruction. Cf. Ps. 75:9 [EVV 8]; Is. 51:17; Je. 25:15-16, 28; 51:7; La. 4:21; Hab. 2:16. The figure makes vividly clear to the Judahites ‘the compulsion there is to accept destiny, the impossibility of rejecting it, the trepidation at its death-dealing effects, the bitterness of the suffering it involves, and how it has to be tasted to the full’, to quote Eichrodt (1970: 331).

In v.35 YHWH emphasises that Aholibah (Jerusalem) will bear the consequences of her lewdness and whoredoms because she has forgotten him and cast him aside (‘KJV ‘behind thy back’ cf.1 Kgs 14:9; Neh 9:26).

36-45 – INDICTMENT OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to judge both Aholah (Samaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem). He is to ‘declare’ (explain, make plain) to them their abominations (detestable acts) of idolatry and bloodshed. They have been spiritually unfaithful to YHWH by worshipping other deities. ‘Blood is in their hands’ refers to child sacrifice. They have offered their own children to pagan gods like Molech, burning them as sacrifices. To add insult to injury they would worship Molech and then, on the same day, go to the Temple to worship YHWH; thus placing Molech on a par with YHWH (cf. 2 Kgs 21:4-7). Their presence at the Temple profaned the sanctuary.

Verses 40-44 resume the adultery metaphor and describe the activities of the two harlots with the image in vv.40-42a of one woman (notice the singulars- ‘ye,’ ‘thou,’ ‘thy,’ ‘thyself,’ her’), probably Aholibah (Jerusalem), preparing herself for adulterous liaisons with foreign lovers. These liaisons represent political alliances with pagan powers like Egypt, Assyria and Babylonia. The washing, painting the eyes, decking with jewellery, sitting on an opulent divan in front of which is a table spread with lovely food and on which is set oil and spices to perfume the bed all symbolise seduction. These actions represent international diplomacy.

Many men came to carouse with her/them – in 42b the plural (‘their’) is resumed – these are described as ‘men of the common sort’ and ‘drunkards from the desert;’ probably a reference to the Assyrians and the Chaldeans. The latter were not desert-dwellers but came ‘from the desert’ in the sense that their route from Babylon to Judah would have involved skirting the top of the Arabian peninsula and travelling through Syria. These lovers put bracelets upon Aholah and Aholibah’s arms and beautiful crowns on their heads, i.e. alliances with foreign nations brought great wealth to both Israel and Judah.

In v.43 YHWH (or is it Ezekiel?) asks himself if these men will still engage with Aholah and Aholibah, two women who are ‘old (worn out, used up – used of the Gibeonites’ clothes in Josh 9:4-5) in adulteries.’ Sure enough, as Samaria and Jerusalem willingly play the harlot – i.e. are accessible to anyone, – the foreigners do ally with them.

Verse 45 is difficult in that it appears that YHWH describes the Assyrians and Babylonians as ‘righteous men’ who will judge and punish the women as adulteresses and murderers. The likely idea is that these conquerors are viewed as the instruments of YHWH and he will use them to enforce his justice and divine retribution. The standard penalty of the Law for adultery (Lev 20:10) and murder (Exod 21:12; Lev 24:17; Num 35:31) was death. This imagery suggests that the capital punishment of Samaria and Judah will be lawful and deserved.

46-49 – SENTENCING OF AHOLAH AND AHOLIBAH

This section concludes the allegory of Aholah (ISamaria) and Aholibah (Jerusalem) and describes their judgement for adultery (idolatry) and political alliances with pagan nations.

Staying with the metaphor of judgement for adultery the Lord YHWH states that he will summon a crowd (i.e. armies, see vv. 23-24) to come up against ‘them’ (Israel and Judah) to which he will hand them over to suffer the atrocities and violence of war and to be plundered. These armies will pelt them with stones, cleave them with swords, kill their offspring and burn down their properties.

At v.44 there is a change from ‘them’ to ‘your.’ YHWH directly informs Israel and Judah that their fate will serve as a warning to ‘all women’ (i.e. the surrounding nations) not to ‘do after your lewdness’ i.e. behave like the metaphorical Aholah and Aholibah. He announces that they will bear the punishment of their evil-doing and idolatry and, because of this discipline, will recognise that he is the Lord YHWH. Notice that in this allegory delivered by Ezekiel the punishment of Samaria (Israel) and Jerusalem (Judah) is viewed as simultaneous whereas in real life Israel’s had already taken place c. 722 BCE and Judah’s was yet to come – a few years later – in 586 BCE.

This oracle shows us the importance of remaining faithful to God and of placing our confidence in him for daily guidance and protection rather than trusting in human power and politics which can easily turn against us. God views persistent sin as a personal betrayal and it therefore has inevitable and severe consequences.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Eichrodt, W. (1970). Ezekiel; a Commentary. Philadelphia, Westminster Press.

Ortlund Jnr, R.C. (2016). God’s Unfaithful Wife. InterVarsity Press.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 21:18-32 – The Third Oracle Concerning YHWH’s Sword

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

This is the third and last of the oracles concerning YHWH’s sword in Ezekiel chapter 21. The oracle commences by focusing on the approach of the king of Babylon to a fork in the road and his use of divination to decide his path of conquest. Which branch of the road should he take – the one to Rabbath the capital of Ammon or the one to Jerusalem? Although seemingly guided by the omens, it is ultimately YHWH who directs him to go and lay siege to Jerusalem.

YHWH then directly addresses Zedekiah, the ‘profane and wicked prince of Israel,’ and prophesies his downfall. After that the focus shifts to the Ammonites and the judgement that will come upon them.

DIVISION

18-23 The sword at the crossroads.

24-27 Judgement upon Judah and its king.

28-32 Judgement upon the Ammonites

EXPOSITION

THE SWORD AT THE CROSSROADS (18-23)

(18-20) The oracle starts with the usual prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me again, saying’ followed by a reference to the prophet as ‘son of Adam.’ Ezekiel is given instructions that are reminiscent of chapter 4 where he was told to portray the siege of Jerusalem on a clay tile. Now he is told to draw a diagram representing the path that ‘the sword of the king of Babylon’ will take on a journey to deal with revolts by the kingdoms of Judah and Ammon. Nebuchadnezzar is thus identified as ‘the slayer’ of v.11.

Ezekiel is to sketch two routes that Nebuchadnezzar could follow. The road out of ‘one land’ (Babylonia) forks (cf. ‘the head of the way’ 16:25, 31) near a certain city (possibly Damascus). At this fork/crossroads Ezekiel is to ‘choose a place’ (place = hand, index, direction – Num 2:17; Jer 6:3), i.e. draw a signpost. The signpost indicates that one branch of the road leads to Rabbath Ammon (Deut 3:11) and the other to fortified Jerusalem. The sword (Nebuchadnezzar) will smite both destinations but which one will he go to first? The Ammonites seem to think that they will not be attacked (cf. v.29) but Jer 4:5 suggests that in Judah preparations were in place for the people to gather in ‘fortified’ Jerusalem for safety.

(21-23) Verses 21-22 explain the drawing. The crossroads represents a location at which King Nebuchadnezzar’s army comes to a standstill while the king and his soothsayers use three techniques of ancient divination to decide which city to attack first:

Omens appearing on the right side of the liver were considered auspicious and those on the left unlucky. Verse 22 represents Nebuchadnezzar as receiving favourable omens and, on that basis, deciding to invade Judah first.

The Babylonians will attack Jerusalem, set up battering rams, cause slaughter, sound a war cry, and prepare to storm the city. Similar preparations for siege warfare are described in Ezek 4:2.

(23) And it shall be unto them as a false divination in their sight, to them that have sworn oaths: but he will call to remembrance the iniquity, that they may be taken.

‘Them’ and ‘their’ refers to the Judeans (exiles and those in Judah) who will view as false the omens that Ezekiel predicts Nebuchadnezzar will get. This is because they are depending on their covenant with YHWH and thus expect him to protect them and send Nebuchadnezzar to punish the heathen Ammonites. YHWH, however, will remember that the people of Judah have not adhered to the stipulations of the Sinai covenant; with the result that he will judge them by allowing them to be seized (by the Babylonians).

JUDGEMENT UPON JUDAH AND ITS KING (24-27)

(24) Verse 24 refers back (‘therefore’) to v.23 and says much the same thing. The people of Judah are guilty and their iniquity has so attracted YHWH’s attention that he recalls all their wrongdoings and as punishment will deliver them to Nebuchadnezzar. They will be ‘taken with the hand,’ i.e. grasped by the hand of the slayer of v.11.

The divination rituals used by Nebuchadnezzar, although superstitious and forbidden to the Israelites, are sovereignly used by YHWH to bring about the attack on Jerusalem as an act of divine punishment. Prov 16:33 says: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

(25-27) In these verses Ezekiel directly addresses King Zedekiah and describes him as the ‘profane wicked prince of Israel.’ Ezekiel uses ‘prince,’ meaning ‘chieftain’ or ‘leader,’ instead of the term ‘king.’ It is possible that ‘prince of Israel’ was a title adopted by the Davidic kings of Judah once the northern kingdom came to an end. Zedekiah’s day of doom, on which his wrongdoing will cease, is close at hand. YHWH makes a proclamation to him: ‘thus saith the Lord God.’

Remove the turban and take off the crown. Things shall not remain as they are. Exalt that which is low, and bring low that which is exalted. Ezekiel 21:26 ESV

In v.26 four infinitive absolutes are translated as imperatives: remove, take off, exalt, abase. The cessation of Zedekiah’s reign is characterised by the removal of his turban and his crown – symbols of justice (Job 29:14) and dignity (Job 19:9). Things will not remain as they are; it is time his reign came to an end.

Note: Since the word for turban is also that used for the High Priest’s mitre (Exod. 28:4, 37, 39; 29:6; 39:28, 31; Lev. 8:9; 16:4) some commentators view the turban as belonging to the High Priest rather than the king and thus have YHWH proclaiming the overthrow of Judah’s religious and political institutions.

The inversion of the current state of affairs is summed up in the saying: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. These words are probably better known from the New Testament where Jesus said : And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted (Mt 23:12; Lk 14:11; 18:14). Similar thoughts, however, are expressed in 1 Sam 2:6-7; Job 5:11-13; Psa 75:7; Mk 10:43-44 and Lk 1:52.

A relevant example of someone of that era who was abased and then exalted is the prophet Jeremiah. He was badly treated under Zedekiah’s regime but later held in high regard by the Babylonians (Jer 40:1-6).

The severity of the coming upheaval is emphasised in v.27a by the threefold use of ‘overturn.’ This repetition expresses the superlative – e.g. ‘Holy, Holy, Holy’ Isa 6:3. The distortion and overthrow of everything is poetically described by Jeremiah in Jer 4:23-26:

I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.
I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger.

Verse 27b is an obvious reference to the famous prophecy of Gen 49:10: The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

Ezek 21:27b says; and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him. This verse is generally interpreted in one of three ways: a) as referring to the Messiah, or b) as referring to Jehoiachin, or c) as referring to Nebuchadnezzar.

a) MESSIAH. Zedekiah will fall and for an unspecified period of time there will not be another Davidic king until Messiah comes (‘it shall be no more, until). God will give the kingdom to him because it is rightfully his. Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning right or due as in KJV.

b) JEHOIACHIN – Temporarily there will be no Davidic ruler in Judah until the kingdom is restored to a legitimate king, i.e. Jehoiachin or one of his descendants. Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning a legal claim.

c) NEBUCHADNEZZAR – Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning punishing or judgement. Greenberg (1997, Ezekiel 21-37 : a New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, p. 434) explains:

punishing (mispat) … entrust [it] to him… mispat (usually “judgment”) here, as in 16:38 (plural); 5:8 (plural); 23:45; 39:21, means “punishment, punishing.” Combination with the verb ntn recurs in 23:24: “I will entrust judgment/punishing to them…and they will judge/punish you.”…Eliezer of Beaugency gives the sense: “Until Nebuchadnezzar, into whose hand I have committed my punishing, comes to punish him (Zedekiah).”

According to this view Ezekiel alludes to the Gen 49:10 prophecy but reinterprets it for the current situation. Those in Judah and Ezekiel’s fellow exiles doubtless interpret the prophecy messianically but the prophet turns it back on them; telling them that they can expect a slayer (Nebuchadnezzar), not a saviour (Messiah).

JUDGEMENT UPON THE AMMONITES (28-32)

Note: There are several interpretations of Ezekiel 21:28-29. Some see the entire section as a pronouncement of judgement upon the Ammonites, others view the entire section as pronouncing judgement upon the sword of YHWH, with the Ammonites as an audience.

(28-29) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH instructs him to prophesy (who to is not specified) concerning the Ammonites and concerning their reproach. The focus shifts from Judah to Ammon using language that is similar to that in vv.9-10. As in vv.9-10 concerning Judah, verse 28 concerning Ammon begins with Ezekiel being told to ‘say.’ It also contains a repetition of the word ‘sword’ (sword, sword), and an observation that the sword is ‘furbished.’ It is already drawn (opened, exposed) and polished in order to flash and be adequate to slaughter Ammonites. The Ammonites will taunt the people of Judah when they see the devastation that the sword (Babylonians) wreaks on the land of Israel (25:3, 6). Their rejoicing will be premature, however, because the sword will come against them as well.

It seems from v.29 that the Ammonite prophets and soothsayers were wrongly advising their citizens that they had nothing to fear from the Babylonians. Ezekiel says that these Ammonite diviners ‘see vanity’ and ‘divine a lie’ and thus mislead their people. The prophet Jeremiah also said this in a message he sent to the kings of five surrounding nations, including the Ammonites (Jer 27:3):

Therefore hearken not ye to your prophets, nor to your diviners, nor to your dreamers, nor to your enchanters, nor to your sorcerers, which speak unto you, saying, Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon: For they prophesy a lie unto you, Jer 27:9-10a

The inhabitants of the land of Ammon will be added to the number of slain Judahites, who have brought the sword (Nebuchadnezzar and his army) to the area because of their iniquity (vv. 23, 25, 29). The sword will conquer the Ammonites as well as the Judahites, both nations will share that same fate.

(30) ‘Return it to its sheath’- another infinitive absolute that translates as an imperative. This is either a command (to an unknown third party) to put the sword of the Lord back into its scabbard because its work is done or it is advice to the Ammonites that it is pointless for them to attempt to defend themselves because judgement upon them is certain. The Ammonites will be judged in their own land, the land of their origin. Unlike Israel/Judah, which will be exiled, Ammon will face destruction at home.

(31) YHWH’s anger will be poured out upon the Ammonites like a fiery flood. The fire of God’s wrath will blow against them like bellows fanning a fire (cf. Isa 54:16). YHWH will deliver them into the hands of brutish (i.e. cruel) men for whom destruction is an art form. They are craftsmen, expert at what they do. This probably refers to the efficient warriors of the Babylonian army.

(32) God’s fiery wrath will consume the Ammonites who will be like like fuel for a fire. Their blood will flow over all the land, this speaks of total military defeat.

‘No more remembered’ (cf. Psa 83:4; Jer 11:19; Zech13:2). The ultimate result of their judgement is oblivion. The nation that gloats and scorns the Lord’s people will suffer humiliation and obliteration. Unlike the Israelites who will retain their national identity and return from exile the Ammonites will never again exist as an independent nation. This nation that is so opposed to YHWH will eventually fade from history. Ezekiel goes into more dtail about the future of the Ammonites in chapter 25.

‘I the Lord have spoken.’ The oracle does not end with a maybe but with YHWH’s guarantee. These things will come to pass, God’s word is final.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

  • The Lord is sovereign and will judge all nations.
  • It is dangerous to take pleasure in the misfortune or downfall of others, especially the Lord’s people. This is a sin that invites judgement.
  • Be wary about who you trust. There are still false prophets and teachers about. It is better to hear the truth rather than trust in flattering and comforting lies.
  • God is true to his word. What he says, he will do.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 17:1-24

Background reading:
– King Jehoiachin’s exile to Babylon in 597 BCE, 2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10.
– Zedekiah’s installation as Nebuchadnezzar’s puppet king and his revolt against Babylonian rule, 2 Kgs 24:17-20; 2 Chron 36:11-16.
– The aftermath of Zedekiah’s revolt, 2 Kgs 25:1-30; 2 Chron 36:11-20.

THE ALLEGORY OF TWO EAGLES AND A VINE

DIVISION

1-10 The Imagery of the Allegory
11-21 The Interpretation of the Allegory
22-24 A Message of Hope

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 17 presents two further visions of Ezekiel in the section (chapters 4-24) that contains oracles of warning about the certainty of YHWH’s judgement upon Judah for crimes such as disobedience, violence, exploitation of the poor, foreign alliances and idolatry.

Already in exile in Babylon, Ezekiel prophesied to the people of Israel/Judah in the years leading up to and just after the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by Babylonian forces in 587/6 BCE.

In this chapter Ezekiel addresses the political crisis of the time which was King Zedekiah of Judah’s rebellion against Babylonian rule. This must have occurred about 590 BCE since it prompted Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Jerusalem that began in Zedekiah’s ninth regnal year, 589/8 BCE (Jer 39:1; 52:4; 2 Kgs 25:1).

THE IMAGERY OF THE ALLEGORY 1-10

(1) Ezekiel 17 begins with the standard prophetic word formula ‘and the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ which introduces a new revelation. This formula occurs again in v.11.

(2) As usual YHWH emphasises Ezekiel’s mortality by addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ and then issuing a double command: ‘pose a riddle (ḥiyḏāh) and tell an allegory (māšāl) to the house of Israel.’ The idea of a riddle or enigma is that it is difficult to understand whereas an allegory or fable is something that illuminates the understanding. Greenberg (Ezekiel I-XX, 1983, p. 309) comments: ‘While the two terms appear in parallelism (Ps 49:5, 78:2; Prov 1:6) they are not interchangeable (as Judg 14:12ff and 1 Kings 10:1 show )…’

(3) There follows the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ which cites the origin of the message and claims divine authority (also vv.9, 22).

FIRST GREAT EAGLE

The allegory begins with a great eagle that has powerful wings, long feathers and colourful plumage coming to Lebanon to the top branch of a cedar tree.

Comment – Nešer refers to a large bird of prey and can be translated as either ‘eagle’ or ‘vulture’ depending on the context. Most translations opt for ‘eagle,’ thus emphasising power, speed and dominance. Some scholars reckon that nešer here refers to the Great Griffon Vulture. Translating it thus would emphasise its scavenging behaviour and association with death and desolation.

great wings, long-winged, full of feathers, which had divers colours – a superpower which has widespread domination and influence over many peoples.

Lebanon – to the north of Israel but in the allegory it seems to represent Jerusalem, see v.12.

the highest branch – the aristocracy.

(4-6) Taking off the topmost twig from the highest branch of a cedar tree the eagle carries it to a land of commerce and sets it in a city of merchants. Then it takes a seedling from the ground and plants it in well-irrigated, fertile ground where it grows like a willow tree (a tree that loves water, cf. Isa 44:4). There it grows into ‘a spreading vine of low stature’ which produces branches and shoots and has its roots spread towards the eagle.

COMMENTS – He cropped off the top of his young twigs, carried it into a land of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants. – i.e. deported the king (Jehoiachin) to Babylon. The Babylonians were famous traders (Josh 7:21; Rev 18:10-16).

He took also of the seed of the land – Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah, a native of Judah, as a puppet ruler.

and planted it in a fruitful field; he placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree. – Zedekiah and Judah flourished under Babylonian rule – they were dependent upon Babylonia but the conditions for growth were excellent.

great waters – The Euphrates and the Tigris were the rivers of Babylon (cf. Psa 137).

And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs. – As a vassal state Judah was subservient to the Babylonians but was nevertheless thriving.

Vine – Often used for Israel, e.g. Psa 80:8-15; Isa 5:1-7; Jer 2:21; Hos 10:1.

(7) SECOND GREAT EAGLE

A second eagle with great wings and many feathers is introduced and the vine stretches its roots and branches towards this eagle hoping to obtain sustenance from it.

COMMENTS – The second great eagle is not quite as splendid as the first (cp. v.7a with v.3a). It has great wings and many feathers but they are not as long or colourful as those of the first eagle.

The vine tries to shift its loyalty, it stretches out its roots and branches towards the second eagle. Notice that, whereas in vv.3-5 the first great eagle takes the active role and the vine is passive, in v.7 the second great eagle is passive and the vine is active. It reaches out towards second eagle.

(8) The series of infinitives would suggest that v.8 is recapping the advantages the vine has enjoyed and could continue to enjoy (v.6) under the first eagle (it was planted: to bring forth branches, to bear fruit, to become a goodly vine). This emphasises the foolishness of turning towards the second eagle.

(9-10) Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 22) Ezekiel is told to ask his fellow exiles questions (featuring the words ‘shall it prosper’) and then supply the answers.

Q Shall it prosper? shall he not pull up the roots thereof, and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither?
A it shall wither in all the leaves of her spring, even without great power or many people to pluck it up by the roots thereof.

Q Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? shall it not utterly wither, when the east wind toucheth it?
A it shall wither in the furrows where it grew.

COMMENTS – these questions and answers are designed to show the utter futility of the vine changing its allegiance. The first eagle will uproot the vine (by applying great force) and cause it to wither (rot).

planted – some translations (e.g. NCB; NLT; RSV; NRSV) prefer ‘transplanted’ as the verb šāṯal  can mean either to plant or to transplant. In Ezek chapter 19 this same word is used of a vine’s first planting and again in v.13 of its second planting (transplanting).

east wind – a destructive hot wind (Job 27:21; Isa 27:8; Ezek 19:12; Hos 13:15).

the furrows (v.7 and v.10) – the River Nile and the irrigation canals that branch off from it.

THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ALLEGORY 11-21

(11-12a) In Ezek 17:11 the standard prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ introduces a new revelation that helpfully explains the previous one. Ezekiel is to communicate this to the exiles who are with him in Babylon; here referred to once again as ‘the rebellious house.’ This description occurs 12 times in the book of Ezekiel: 2:5, 6, 8; 3:9, 26, 27; 12:2, 3, 9, 25; 17:12; 24:3.

(12a-21) Explanation:

v.12 Behold, the king of Babylon is come to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and led them with him to Babylon;

COMMENT – Cp. vv. 3-4. The first great eagle is Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, who in 597 BCE besieged Jerusalem (Lebanon) and carried away the Judean king Jehoiachin, with the aristocracy and the elite of the land, to exile in Babylon (see 2 Kgs 24:10-16).

v.13-14 And hath taken of the king’s seed, and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath of him: he hath also taken the mighty of the land: That the kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand.

COMMENT- Cp. vv.5-6. Nebuchadnezzar appointed Zedekiah as his vassal king in Judah (2 Kgs 24:17). As part of this agreement Zedekiah swore an oath of allegiance to Nebuchadnezzar that would also have entailed a commitment to pay an annual tribute to the Babylonians. The Chronicler records that Nebuchadnezzar put him under oath; Zedekiah swore this in the name of YHWH (2 Chron 36:13). If this agreement was honoured Judah would survive and flourish as a Babylonian vassal state, YHWH had confirmed that this would be so in a word addressed to Zedekiah by the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 27:12-15).

vv.15-16 But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and much people. Shall he prosper? shall he escape that doeth such things? or shall he break the covenant, and be delivered? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he broke, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die.

COMMENT – Having decided to revolt against Babylonian rule Zedekiah sent diplomats to Egypt to request military support, which seems to have been forthcoming. Zedekiah then rebelled (2 Kgs 24:20), probably by withholding tribute. This action quickly backfired as Nebuchadnezzar marched on Jerusalem and laid siege to the city.

Echoing v.9 and v.10 YHWH asks ‘Shall he prosper?’ The alliance with Egypt will not work because YHWH is angry that Zedekiah broke the treaty with the Babylonians that was sworn in YHWH’s name. YHWH swears by himself that Zedekiah will die in Babylon.

v.17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company make for him in the war, by casting up mounts, and building forts, to cut off many persons:

COMMENT – Once the Babylonian siege apparatus is set up (ramps and bulwarks) Pharaoh and his army will be of no use (see Ezekiel’s description of Babylonian siege warfare against Tyre in 26:7-11). Jeremiah 37:4-11 indicates that Pharoah did send an army, causing the Babylonians to break the siege of Jerusalem for a short while in order to repulse that threat.

vv.18-19. Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head.

COMMENT – Zedekiah had ‘given his hand’ (this gesture must have meant ‘I promise’ cf. Ezra 30:8; Lam 5:6).

v.19, which I have shown in bold print, is the key verse in the chapter. It is the whole point of the allegory. Zedekiah swore an oath and made a treaty with a secular ruler, but did not honour its terms because he despised the oath (the word ‘oath’ also means ‘curse’). However, he swore it in YHWH’s name so it has religious significance. It is binding. Notice ‘mine oath’ and ‘my covenant.’ The oath and covenant that Zedekiah made with Nebuchadnezzar is also viewed as YHWH’s oath and covenant. Zedekiah violated that agreement and will suffer the consequences. Notice that YHWH himself makes an oath (‘as I live’) to punish Zedekiah.

v.20 predicts Zedekiah’s capture, exile to Babylon and judgement there for violating his duty and v.21 predicts that his soldiers will be pursued and either slain or dispersed. All this without any mention of Nebuchadnezzar! YHWH is in control. Nebuchadnezzar is his agent. Nebuchadnezzar is his instrument.

The fulfilment of these consequences will prove that YHWH indeed has spoken – ye shall know that I the LORD have spoken it.

A MESSAGE OF HOPE 22-24

The first 21 verses of Ezekiel 17 have been about judgement, the closing verses are about restoration. Utilising the earlier imagery of the chapter Ezekiel predicts the restoration of the Davidic line. Many interpret this passage as messianic.

Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 9) Ezekiel prophesies that YHWH will act to take a new tender sprig from the top of the high cedar in Babylon and plant it upon a high and eminent mountain in Israel. There it will thrive and become a place of shade and security for ‘all fowl of every wing.’ All the trees of the field will know that that YHWH has spoken this and has brought it about.

No explanation of this metaphor is given but based on the earlier explanation in the chapter where the top of the twigs represented Jehoiachin then this tender twig (from the top of the high cedar tree in Babylon) that YHWH will plant upon a high mountain in Israel refers to a future king of the Davidic line who will reign in Israel/Judah. Mt. Zion springs immediately to mind but ‘high and eminent mountain’ probably refers to this king’s greatness. He will flourish and be a blessing to all kinds of people – or perhaps v.23b (under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell) implies universal rule. This future Davidic ruler will have worldwide influence and significance (cf. Isa 9:6-7; Jer 23:5-6; Ezek 34:23; 37:24).

Ezekiel may have been hoping for the eventual restoration of King Jehoiachin with whom he was in exile in Babylon. Jehoiachin was released after Nebuchadnezzar’s death in 562 BCE (2 Kgs 25:27-30; Jer 52:3-4) but he was not the fulfilment of the prophecy. Nor was Zerubbabel, a later Governor of Judea under the First Persian Empire, although he was of the Davidic line and his name means ‘seed of Babylon.’

The chapter closes with ‘all the trees of the field’ (i.e. the nations) recognising that it is YHWH who has brought Judah down to nothing and who will restore and exalt the new king. YHWH makes the low high and brings the high low.

PREACTICAL LESSONS FROM EZEKIEL 17

a) The necessity of keeping one’s word. Breaking promises and betraying trust, whether in personal or business relationships or in the political sphere, matters to God. Integrity is important and actions have consequences. Do I honour my commitments, or shift loyalties if it seems more beneficial to do so?

b) The folly of placing dependence upon others rather than God. Zedekiah relied on Egypt’s prowess rather than trust God’s sovereignty. True security lies in trusting God, not others. Am I entangled in worldly alliances?

c) Although we live in uncertain times God is actively working out his purposes in world affairs. No matter how bad a situation seems he is in control. God can reverse national fortunes (bring the high low and make the low high, v.24) and ultimately his plans will prevail.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 13:1-16 The Danger of False Prophets

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading Ezekiel 13: 1-23

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 13 is a significant passage in Ezekiel because it addresses the danger posed by false prophets whose messages originate in their own ‘hearts.’ In this chapter Ezekiel denounces counterfeit prophets who mislead the people by falsely claiming to speak for YHWH.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Ezekiel prophesied during a time of great turmoil for Israel. In 597 BCE the Chaldean king Nebuchadnezzar II subdued Jerusalem and placed a puppet king (Zedekiah) on the throne of Judah. He also deported the deposed king Jehoiachin to Babylonia (2 Kgs 24:15-17) along with many of the elite citizens of Judah, including Ezekiel. There YHWH called and commissioned Ezekiel as his prophet.

Although living in Babylonia at a place called Tel-Abib near the River Chebar Ezekiel directed many of his prophecies towards the people of Jerusalem. The situation there was deteriorating after King Zedekiah’s abortive attempt to revolt against Babylonian rule (2 Kgs 25:1-2). Interestingly, that revolt was supported and encouraged by false prophets in Judah (Jer 27:9-10,14-16). Soon the city was besieged by Nebuchadnezzar’s forces and eventually devastated by them in 586/7 BCE.

Meanwhile over in Babylonia Ezekiel condemned Israel and Judah because of their sin and idolatry; prophesying impending judgement upon them. At the same time other Israelite men and women in Babylonia were delivering prophecies which contradicted Ezekiel’s message of doom.

Instead of prophesying punishment, they offered false comfort to the people; assuring them that the situation at Jerusalem would soon be resolved peacefully and thus building up their hopes of a soon return from exile. Ezekiel as a true prophet of YHWH found it necessary to denounce these false prophets and confront their lies.

Chapter 13 of Ezekiel is situated within a section (12:21-14:11) that deals with various issues relating to prophecy. The chapter contains two parallel woe oracles which are similar in structure, content and style. One is against male prophets and the other against women who prophesy, The context (13:9) would indicate that these people, like Ezekiel, were Israelite exiles in Babylonia. Back in the homeland Jeremiah too was denouncing false prophets and prophecy. It is worth comparing his oracle in Jer 23:9-40 with those of Ezekiel in Ezek 13.

CHAPTER DIVISION

13:1-16 – An oracle addressed to male prophets.


13:17-23 – An oracle addressed to women who prophesy.

AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO MALE PROPHETS (1-16)

(1) ‘And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ – This phrase is often used in Ezekiel to introduce a new oracle (e.g. 11:14; 12:1; 15:1; 17:1; 18:1). In 13:1 it covers both oracles in chapter 13 (2-16; 17-23) and is particularly relevant since it emphasizes the fact that Ezekiel speaks the word of YHWH, unlike the false prophets whom he condemns. This oracle against male prophets is mirrored by that against the female prophets in vv.17-23. The structure and language are similar.

STRUCTURE

  • A preamble – vv.1-3a and vv.17-18a.
  • Ezekiel addressed as ‘Son of Man’ – v.2 and v.17.
  • An accusation – vv.3b-7 and vv.18b-19.
  • A forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ – vv.8-9 and vv.20-21.
  • A second forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – vv.10-14 and vv.22-23.

LANGUAGE

Although the content is different the language used in each of the two oracles is similar:

  • v.2 – ‘Son of Man, prophesy against’ and v.17 – ‘Son of man, set thy face against.’
  • v.2 – ‘that prophesy’ and v.16 – ‘which prophesy.’
  • v.2 – ‘say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own hearts’ and v.17 – ‘which prophesy out of their own heart; and prophesy thou against them.’
  • v.3 – ‘thus saith the Lord God’ and v.18 – ‘thus saith the Lord God.’
  • v.3 – ‘woe unto’ and v.18 – ‘woe to.’
  • v.8 – ‘therefore saith the Lord God’ and v.20 – ‘wherefore saith the Lord God.’
  • v.8 – ‘behold I am against’ and v.20 – ‘behold I am against.’
  • v.9 – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ and v.21 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’
  • v.10 – ‘because…’ and v.22 – ‘because…’
  • v.13 – ‘therefore…’ and v.23 – ‘therefore.’
  • v.14 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord’ and v.23 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

(2) Addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ (stressing human weakness in light of God’s greatness) YHWH instructs him to deliver this message ‘against’ (’el; 2, 8, 9, 17, 20) the false prophets. They are called ‘the prophets of Israel,’ a description unique to Ezekiel (13:2,16; 38:17, cf. 13:4). These men are in exile with Ezekiel but the term ‘prophets of Israel’ may suggest that he views them as part of a larger group that would include false prophets back in Israel/Judah. The latter are described by Jeremiah as ‘the prophets of Samaria’ (Jer 23:13) and ‘the prophets of Jerusalem’ (Jer 23:14). Ezekiel’s opponents are not prophets of other gods but men working within the Israelite religious system.

(3) The pronouncement of a ‘woe’ on these ‘foolish (nāḇāl) prophets’ hints at the severe consequences of prophesying lies while claiming to speak for YHWH; these will be set out in vv.8-9. The men are fools; what they say is empty and futile. In the Old Testament a fool (nāḇāl) is someone who denies or disrespects God (Job 2:10; Psa 14:1; 74:18, 22; Isa 32:5-6). These prophets do not follow the Spirit of God but their own spirits, they perceive nothing.

There are several changes in person within these verses which some people might find confusing:

  • In vv. 2-3, YHWH directly addresses Ezekiel in the second person ‘thou’.
  • In v. 4-5, YHWH directly addresses Israel in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In verse 6, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.
  • In vv. 7-8, YHWH directly addresses the false prophets in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In v. 9, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.

(4) YHWH addresses Israel and compares their false prophets to foxes or jackals among the ruins. Such animals survive in desolate places (Lam 5:18) by scavenging and are known to be opportunistic and destructive (Song 2:15). The simile implies that Judah is a society in ruins. It is morally desolate but these prophets thrive and capitalise on the chaos, exploiting the people’s vulnerability. They further undermine the ruins rather than try to build them up.

(5) Directly addressing the false prophets YHWH accuses them of failure to repair breaches in the wall (KJV ‘hedge’). The word gāḏēr refers to a protective wall, e.g. around a vineyard (Psa 80:12; Isa 5:5), or a city wall (Ezra 9:9; Mic &:11). Rather than rising to their responsibility for the defence of the people (e.g. by warnings, intercession, teaching) the false prophets contribute to their decline. Therefore the people will be defenceless in the Day of YHWH (Ezek 30:3, cf. 7:19) when his anger will come upon them (Ezek 5:13; 7:8; 9:8; 13:13; 16:42; 20:21, 34; 21:31; 20:20, 22, 31; 36:6; 38:19; 43:8).

(6-7) Vain visions and lying divination.

Verses 6 and 7 say much the same thing. Both highlight the deceitful arrogance of the false prophets who fabricate visions and use means of divination that YHWH has not authorised.

As well as seeing vain (empty, deceitful, false) visions they make lying divinations (predictions made by reading omens or by various rituals), practices forbidden in Deut 18:9-14. In Israelite religion the only sacred objects authorised for discerning God’s will in specific circumstances were the Urim and Thummim (Ex 28:30; Lev 8:8; Num 27:21; Deut 33:8; 1 Sam 28:6; Ezra 2:63; Neh 7:65).

Even worse is the false prophets’ habit of ascribing their lies to YHWH, hoping that this public declaration of authority would somehow obligate YHWH to fulfil their prophecies. V.6 ‘the Lord hath not sent them’ and v.7 ‘albeit I have not spoken’ emphasise that what they said did not have divine authorisation. Thus their predictions were not only false and deceitful but also blasphemous.

(8-9) Forecast of judgment upon the false prophets.

The word ‘therefore’ introduces details of the punishment due to the false prophets and a summary of the reasons why they deserve it – which is because they ‘have spoken vanity and seen lies.’ The prophets are informed that YHWH has had enough of their lies. He is already ‘against’ them and his hand will be raised up against (KJV ‘upon’) them. (’el – against – see 2, 8, 9, 17, 20). In Ezekiel YHWH’s outstretched hand is an indicator of punishment and judgment (6:14; 14:9,13; 16:27; 20:33,34; 25:7,13,16; 35:3). Their punishment will be three-fold:

1. They will lose membership of the assembly of YHWH’s people.

‘Assembly’ or ‘council’ (sôḏ) is an association of people who are closely connected, who have something in common (Gen 49:6; Job 19:19; Psa 64:3; 111:1; Jer 6:11; 15:17). This punishment has been interpreted as signifying a loss of leadership, honour or status in the community.

It has also been suggested that it may refer to exclusion from the select group who are confidants of YHWH (Psa 89:8; Jer 23:18,22); which would include true prophets (Amos 3:7). The meaning is probably even stronger: they would no longer be regarded as members of God’s earthly people – the community of faith.

2. They will not be listed in the register of the house of Israel.

These false prophets would not be listed in the genealogical register (keṯāb, writing) of Israelites. The existence and importance of this list for those returning from exile is clear from Ezra chapter 2 and Nehemiah chapter 7. For the false prophets exclusion would mean a loss of citizen rights. Notice that Jeremiah pronounced a similar punishment upon Shemaiah the Nehelamite (Jer 29:31-32).

Some commentators contend that this register is YHWH’s book (Ex 32:33; Psa 69:28; 87:6; 139:16; Dan 12:1). The Old Testament, however, is fairly vague about what is recorded in that book, whereas this document mentioned in Ezekiel 13:9 is specifically said to be the ‘register of the house of Israel.’ It seems more sensible to interpret it literally as a secular civil census list.

3. They will not be able to enter the land of Israel.

This flows logically from the previous two. Excision from the register would lead to serious consequences for the false prophets and their descendants; probably with respect to claims to ancestral land or the purchase of property.

The same word keṯāb meaning ‘register’ occurs in Ezra 2:62 and Neh 7:64. These twin passages illustrate the problems that exclusion from the register, in this case the record of priestly genealogies, could bring:

Another group returned at this time from the towns of Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Kerub, Addan, and Immer. However, they could not prove that they or their families were descendants of Israel. This group included the families of Delaiah, Tobiah, and Nekoda— a total of 652 people. Three families of priests — Hobaiah, Hakkoz, and Barzillai — also returned. (This Barzillai had married a woman who was a descendant of Barzillai of Gilead, and he had taken her family name.) They searched for their names in the genealogical records, but they were not found, so they were disqualified from serving as priests. Ezra 2:59-62 NLT

This first forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets ends with the divine recognition formula ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God.’

(10-14) A second forecast of judgment.

Verse 10 begins with a doubling of ya‘an (‘on account of’ or because’) which the KJV translates here as ‘because, even because’; meaning ‘for the very good reason.’ This phrase ya’an ub’ ya’an also occurs in Lev 26:43 and Ezek 36:3.

Punishment is due because they have misled (caused to go astray) the people saying ‘peace’ when there is no peace. Rather than warning them about the consequences of their sinful behaviour, the false prophets give an assurance of safety that is not rooted in reality. They intentionally lull the people into a false sense of security.

The image of a wall, used earlier in v.5 to represent the spiritual and moral state of the people of Judah, is taken up again in v.10. The word for ‘wall’ (ḥayiṣ) in v.10 is a hapax legomenon (a word that only occurs once) in the Old Testament and means a dry wall or party wall; an unimproved flimsy or crumbling wall built of mud-brick or loose stones and liable to collapse under stress. A different word (qiyrāh) is used for ‘wall’ in vv.12-15. The ‘wall’ in v.10 is not literal but metaphorical.

It is said to have been daubed or smeared with untempered mortar. The word tāp̱ēl translated ‘untempered’ (KJV) is an adjective meaning ‘unseasoned’ or ‘tasteless.’ The thought is that of lacking an essential ingredient; here the mortar is just mud to which a binding agent such as straw has not been added. It covers the wall but does not strengthen it. To emphasise that the product is insubstantial modern translations tend to replace the KJV translation’s ‘untempered [mortar]’ with ”whitewash.’ This conveys the thought of deceit and hypocrisy on the part of the false prophets.

(11-14) These verses continue with the figure of a whitewashed wall and the effect bad weather has on it. Flooding rain, great hailstones and stormy winds will cause it to fall. The futility of the false prophets’ assurances will be exposed and they will be held accountable. When judgement comes and the wall collapses people will ask (v.12) ‘Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it?’

Greenberg (1983, p.238) comments: ‘As said expressly in 22:8, “they” who daubed the wall were the prophets: the people built the dry wall – a figure of their unfounded optimism, while the prophets daubed it with worthless stuff – their self-inspired predictions of well-being.’

V.13 clarifies that the destructive forces represent YHWH’s anger against sin as well as the lies of the false prophets. His fury will be so intense that the prophets will not survive (vv.15b-16).

Scholars suggest that in v.14 the image of the wall changes. The wall which YHWH will break down is said to refer now to Jerusalem and the fall of the city. To quote Greenberg (1983, p.238) again, he says of the phrase leveling it to the ground in v.14:

‘The language of this clause is more appropriate to massive demolition than to the fall of a mere wall; it facilitates the intrusion, in the next clause, of the reference to Jerusalem. When it (fem.) falls and you perish within it (fem.).’

In other words proof for the assertion that in v.14 Ezekiel is thinking of the impending fall of Jerusalem is that the word ‘wall’ is masculine whereas ‘it shall fall’ and ‘in the midst thereof’ are feminine; therefore the reference cannot be to the metaphorical wall but to the city of Jerusalem.

This second forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets also ends with the divine recognition formula ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ (vv. 9, 14, 21, 23)

(15) YHWH asserts that he will accomplish his wrath upon the wall (the false assurances) and upon those that have smeared it with ‘whitewash’ (the false prophets).

(16) This verse summarises vv.10-15: the main lie of the false prophets is that they promise peace when there is no peace.

SUMMATION

This woe oracle denounces Israelite false prophets for failing to address the nation’s sin and instead spreading lies and details of false visions, claiming divine authority which they do not possess. They offer the people false hope by declaring ‘peace’ when there is no peace. The passage highlights God’s anger against deceit and spiritual negligence.

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL 11 – THE GLORY DEPARTS

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 11 is the last of four chapters (8-11) that describe Ezekiel’s second vision. The main topic of that vision is the gradual departure of YHWH’s kabod (Glory) from Solomon’s temple and the city, leaving Jerusalem without divine protection. It begins with a change of location for Ezekiel when in vision he is transported to the east gate of the temple where he observes a meeting of ‘the princes of the people.’

The bulk of the chapter consists of two disputation speeches. Put simply, a disputation speech presents one particular viewpoint and contradicts or refutes it by presenting the other side of the argument. There are ten such speeches in the book of Ezekiel (11:1-12; 11:14-21; 12:21-25; 12:26-28; 18:1-32; 20:32-34; 33:10-11; 33:17-20; 33:23-29; 37:11-14).

Chapter 11 closes with the departure of the kabod, Ezekiel’s return to Chaldea in vision and confirmation that he communicated details of the vision to his fellow-exiles.

There are two main divisions:

1-13 CONDEMNATION

14-25 RESTORATION

Each of these sections contains a disputation oracle.

CONDEMNATION (1-13)

(1) Ezekiel is transported to the eastern gate of the temple where he observes a meeting of twenty-five members of the Jerusalem elite. This is the same number of individuals as in 8:16 but cannot be the same men. The sun-worshippers in the inner court of the temple in chapter 8 would have been priests whereas those meeting at the east gate are called the ‘princes of the people.’ They are not priests, they are politicians. Two of the most notable are mentioned by name: Jaazaniah the son of Azur and Pelatiah the son of Benaiah.

(2-3) The Spirit informs Ezekiel that this group of influential men meets to plot evil and is responsible for giving harmful counsel to the Jerusalemites. Verse 3 gives an example of this counsel: ‘it is not near; let us build houses, this city is the caldron, and we are the meat.’ The Preacher’s Commentary says that: ‘the Hebrew wording of their boast is difficult to understand. It says literally, “Not build houses near? It is the pot, we are the meat!”

The exact meaning escapes us but obviously it is an arrogant assertion of confidence that goes against what YHWH was revealing through Jeremiah at the time. The elders are insisting that all is well while Jeremiah prophesies imminent destruction at the hands of the Chaldeans (Jer 37:14 – 38:4).

The following ideas might be conveyed in the proverb:

  • ‘All is well. Now is the time for us to build houses and restore the material damage done by Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians when Jerusalem under King Jehoiachin was besieged a few years ago (597 BCE).’
  • ‘We who live in Jerusalem are like meat in a cooking pot. We are the best bits. The exiles in Babylon are the offal, they have been thrown away. We are in a city that is under YHWH’s protection, the exiles in Babylon are obviously under his judgement.’
  • ‘Even if the Babylonians do attack it is much safer for us to be in the pot (within Jerusalem’s city walls) than outside it.’

In the verses that follow (especially vv. 7-12) their opinions are shown to be false.  Note that in Ezekiel caldron (siyr) occurs only in chapter 11 and in chapter 24. The latter contains the parable (or allegory) of the cooking pot.

(4-6) In the vision Ezekiel is commanded to prophesy and is empowered by the Spirit to speak YHWH’s words. They reveal that the leaders’ thoughts, intentions, motives and hypocrisy are known to the Lord. They, the leaders of the people, have been responsible for widespread violence and death in the city. This may refer to the slaughter carried out by the six executioners earlier in the vision (9:5-7).

(7-12) In this disputation speech by the Lord God (Adonai YHWH) the analogy of the caldron (cooking pot) as used by the leaders of Jerusalem is refuted. The city of Jerusalem is the cooking pot but YHWH asserts that dead bodies, not living people, is the meat. The leaders may think that the pot guarantees safety but they will be driven out of it to face what they fear most: a violent death by the sword. YHWH will remove them from Jerusalem and hand them over to foreign enemies who will slay them at Israel’s border. Notice the double occurrence of ‘I will bring you out’ (7, 9). This is language reminiscent of the Exodus. The imminent ‘bringing out,’ however, will not be to salvation but death. Notice also the double mention of ‘border’ (10,11).

YHWH reiterates (vv.11) that the city will not provide safety (‘be a pot for you’) and emphasizes that the leaders will be judged. The judgement will reveal YHWH’s sovereignty and lordship (‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ vv.10,12). The Jerusalemites (represented by their leaders) will face consequences because: a) they have not followed the Lord’s decrees b) they have not kept his law, but c) they have adopted pagan practices. We learn from 2 Kgs 25:4-7 and Jeremiah 52:7-10 that what Ezekiel prophesied concerning the leaders of Judah literally came to pass.

(13) In Ezekiel’s vision the threat of impending judgement is emphasized by immediate judgement upon Pelatiah who drops dead while Ezekiel is prophesying. We do not know if Pelatiah really dies in Jerusalem at that time or if his death is just enacted in Ezekiel’s vision. Ezekiel’s reaction to this episode in the vision is one of concern that a remnant in Israel should survive. This is similar to a previous reaction by him in chapter 9: And it came to pass, while they were slaying them, and I was left, that I fell upon my face, and cried, and said, Ah Lord GOD! wilt thou destroy all the residue of Israel in thy pouring out of thy fury upon Jerusalem? Ezekiel 9:8. De Vries (The Kābôd of Yhwh in the Old Testament, p.281) observes that: ‘Whereas in 9:8b he had called this out as a question, in 11:13b it is actually a statement: the interrogative particle is lacking this time.’

LOUD VOICE

In the second vision the Jerusalemites cry with a ‘loud voice’ (8:8), YHWH cries with a ‘loud voice’ (9:1) and Ezekiel cries with a ‘loud voice’ (11:13).

RESTORATION 14-25

The hope that a remnant will survive is addressed in the following section of the chapter. The prevailing view is turned on its head. There will indeed be a remnant but it will not arise from Jerusalem, it will come from the Jehoiachin exiles who are already in Babylon. In this section we have the first of three prophecies of restoration delivered by Ezekiel before the fall of Jerusalem (11:16-21; 16:60-63; 20:33-44). After he hears about the fall of Jerusalem (33:21) Ezekiel utters further prophecies of restoration in chapters 34, 36, 37 and 39.

(14-16) Still in vision the word of YHWH came to Ezekiel and quotes what the inhabitants of Jerusalem say about the exiles: ‘Get you far from the LORD: unto us is this land given in possession.’ The Jerusalemites have the notion that it is the exiles who are far from the Lord and that the ancestral land they have left behind now belongs to those remaining in the city. The exiles referred to are the royals and professional people (including Ezekiel) who were deported to Babylonia a few years earlier by Nebuchadnezzar in the Jechoiachin Exile of 597 BCE (2 Kgs 24:8-17). As a result of that deportation the people of Judah became divided into two groups; those in exile with Jehoiachin in Babylon and ‘the people that were left in the land’ (Jer 40:6) of Judah under Zedekiah. It was very much a ‘them and us’ situation although ongoing contact between the two groups (e.g. Jeremiah’s letter to the exiles – Jer 29) did occur.

Throughout Israel’s history the concepts of deity, kingship, people and land have been closely linked. In spite of the fact that they are idolaters it suits the Jerusalemites financially to claim allegiance to YHWH and promote the view that the exiles had been deported far away because he was angry with them. They said that YHWH had expelled them because of their wickedness and that therefore their ancestral land was forfeit. The Jerusalemites claimed that YHWH favoured them rather than the exiles because they still had the land, a functioning royal court, and (YHWH’s presence in) the temple. They must therefore be the remnant.

The exiles are described as Ezekiel’s ‘brethren’ and ‘kindred.’ As prophet to the exiles (3:11) Ezekiel very much identified with them and viewed them as family. In 33:21 and 40:1 he refers to the exile as ‘our captivity.’

Ezekiel’s prophetic answer to the Jerusalemites arrogation of land to themselves is that, contrary to expectations. YHWH has deliberately sent the exiles to Babylon because he controls history; the Babylonians carry out his will. The temple might be in Jerusalem (soon to be destroyed), but the exiles would have access to YHWH because he would be a ‘little sanctuary’ (or some suggest: ‘sanctuary for a little while’) for the exiles, in Babylon or wherever else they dwelt.

This is highly significant as it means all the benefits of YHWH’s presence, protection and favour transfer from those still dwelling in the land to the exiles.

(17-20) In this disputation oracle (vv.14-21) YHWH reveals that the exile will be temporary. A remnant will indeed return to the land of Israel but it will be from the Babylonian exiles, NOT from the dwellers in Jerusalem. Those who come back will clear the land of all the idols and images (7:20; 8:3) that defile it. That they should do so will be evidence of a change of heart. This change will be brought about by YHWH himself. He promises to replace their heart of stone with a heart of flesh so that they will be receptive to what YHWH wants. He will ‘take away their stony, stubborn heart and give them a tender, responsive heart’ (11:19 NLT). The covenant between YHWH and his people will effectively be re-established – ‘they shall be my people, and I will be their God’ – as a result of them keeping the Lord’s regulations and following his commands.

(21) It is not clear who v.21 refers to. Is this a prophecy that some of those who return from the exile will return to or persist in idolatry and therefore receive the consequences of their behaviour? Or is this a warning to the leaders and residents of Jerusalem who are mentioned earlier in the chapter (vv.2-6,15)?

(22-23) The final stage of the vision takes place. The cherubim and wheels take off from the eastern gate of the temple and carry YHWH’s enthroned kabod to the hill to the east of the city (Mount of Olives, Zech 14:4). The judgement can begin, Jerusalem is no longer under YHWH’s protection.

(24-25) The chapter ends with comments by Ezekiel explaining that once the vision ended he was returned to Chaldea by the Spirit of God. He the shared with the exiles what YHWH had shown him. It was a solemn message about the current state of Jerusalem and its impending destruction but one which contained hope of a remnant and a return from captivity. That must have been a great encouragement to his fellow-exiles.

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 10 – COALS OF FIRE

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 10 of Ezekiel is a continuation of the prophet’s second vision and is the third of four chapters (8-11) in which Ezekiel relates details of a visit to Jerusalem which he experienced while in a prophetic trance. Bear in mind that that he was physically located in Babylon while taken to Judah temporarily in a vision.  Although complicated and repetitive, chapter 10 is important because it links back to the vision of YHWH’s kabod in chapter 1 and forward to its return in chapter 43.

The settings of Ezekiel’s first and second visions are different but the imagery is similar. Some small discrepancies in detail are noticeable but essentially chapters 1 and 10 each describe a firmament, a throne, winged creatures and wheels.

The parallels are as follows:

  • Four wings and four faces – 1:6 and 10:21
  • Human hand(s) – 1:8 and 10:8, 21
  • Each creature moves straight forward – 1:12 and 10:22
  • The four faces described – 1:10 and 10:14
  • A wheel beside each creature – 1:15 and 10:9
  • Wheels gleaming like beryl – 1:16 and 10:9
  • A wheel within a wheel – 1:16 and 10:10
  • Wheels travel in four directions without turning as they go – 1:17 and 10:11
  • Rims full of eyes – 1:18 and 10:12
  • The wheels moving in sync with the living creatures – 1:19 and 10:16
  • Spirit of the living creatures(s) – 1:21 and 10:17
  • The sound of wings – 1:24 and 10:5
  • Throne, firmament/sapphire – 1:26 and 10:1

The most important aspect of the chapter, however, is the location of the kabod (Glory, Presence) of the Lord. Because Judah and Jerusalem have been turning away from the pure worship of YHWH his Presence is gradually moving away from them (8:4; 9:3; 10:1, 10:18, 19; 11:23). This abandoning of the sanctuary by YHWH provides an explanation for the destruction soon to be wreaked by the Babylonians – the city is no longer under God’s protection. No doubt this revelation came as a great shock to a nation that thought itself invincible because of YHWH’s presence in the Jerusalem temple. Jeremiah, however, had warned them that such a belief was no longer valid: ‘Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD.’ (Jer 7:4)

Chapter 10 falls into two main sections:

(1-8) Preparations for Jerusalem’s Judgement

(9-22) Preparations for the Kabod’s Departure

(1-8) PREPARATIONS FOR JERUSALEM’S JUDGEMENT

Ezekiel continues his report of the second vision using the first person ‘I looked and behold.’ He uses this expression again in v. 9. What he sees is similar to the first vision of chapter 1 at Chebar. There he describes the figures as ‘living creatures’ (ḥayyāh), here in chapter ten he clarifies that they are, in fact, cherubim (vv. 15, 20). The chariot of the first vision reappears (10:1) and Ezekiel again sees the sapphire-like throne but makes no mention of any person on the throne. Note that in the book of Ezekiel ‘throne’ is only mentioned in the three visions that involve the kabod of YHWH (1:26; 10:1; 43:7).

Verse 2 does not clarify who speaks (probably YHWH) and commands the man clad in linen to go beneath the ‘whirlers’ (galgal), fill his hands with coals of fire and scatter them over the city. Galgal in 10:2, 6, 13; also 23:24; 26:10 is not the usual word for wheel (which is ’ôp̱ān). In Isa 5:28 and Jer 47:3 galgal refers specifically to chariot wheels. It is interesting that in Solomon’s temple, where this scene is set, the laver stands (1 Kgs 7:27-37) had carved panels decorated with lions, oxen and cherubim (1 Kgs 7:29) beneath which were wheels which the author of Kings (7:33) specifically says were made like chariot wheels.

The three imperatives in v.2 are Go, Fill, Scatter.

What do the coals signify? Many commentators point out that the mention of cherub(im) together with coals of fire is associated with judgement in 2 Sam 22:8-13 and Psa 18:8-13 (note: there is an opposite minority view that the coals are for marking those to be spared, see 9:4). Others, basing their conclusion on Isa 6:6-7, take the fire as a symbol of purification. Or, the fire may be symbolic of YHWH’s jealousy (8:5; Deut 4:24). The filling of both hands symbolises that the judgement will exhaustive.

That the cherub(im) here are the ones Ezekiel saw in his first vision and not the cherubim that covered the ark of the covenant (1 Kgs 6:23-28; 8:7) is clear because the latter were not located in the south side of the temple but in the Holy of Holies nor did they have wheels. ‘Cherub’ in v.2 is singular and possibly refers to the one nearest Ezekiel, or to the highest ranking of the four cherubim (cp 28:14), or to one especially associated with fire.

Ezekiel then sees the man in white linen go in as instructed, whereupon ‘the cloud’ fills the inner court (10:3) and then the whole temple (10:4). Presumably this refers to a cloud of smoke from the coals of judgement scattered on the temple by the man in linen. Alternatively, it might refer to the cloud of the kabod of YHWH that had previously filled the temple (1 Kgs 8:10-11) – although Ezekiel says in v.4 that here its brightness filled only the court. Solomon’s temple was literally burned by the Babylonians a few years later:

And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month, which is the nineteenth year of king Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, came Nebuzaradan, captain of the guard, a servant of the king of Babylon, unto Jerusalem: And he burnt the house of the LORD, and the king’s house, and all the houses of Jerusalem, and every great man’s house burnt he with fire. 2 Kings 25:8-9

In v.4 Ezekiel repeats the information already given in 9:3 that the kabod has moved to the temple exit and in v.5 concentrates on the scary noise made by the whirling wings. He uses a simile to describe the awesomeness of the sound, it was ‘as the voice of El Shaddai’ -God almighty.

In vv.6-8 Ezekiel’s attention focuses once more on the man dressed in linen. After the command of v.2 is reiterated a cherub reaches into the fire and places some (coals) into the man’s hands. Verse 8 explains how this is possible; the cherubim have hands under their wings, as in 1:8. The man in linen then leaves the scene in order to complete his task. The passage says of him: ‘he went in…..and went out.’ We are not told what happens to the coals of fire and what effect they have on the city. The man disappears and is not mentioned again.

(9-22) PREPARATIONS FOR THE KABOD’S DEPARTURE

THE WHEELS (9-13)

Again Ezekiel says ‘I looked and behold’ as his attention now shifts to the wheels. What he describes is essentially the same as 1:15-21 except that chapter 1 speaks of living creatures, here in chapter 10 they are called cherubim. For Ezekiel the noticeable aspects of the wheels are that a) their hubs are themselves wheels (v.10), b) they move forward in unison without veering off course (v.11) and c) they are full of eyes (v.12). Ezekiel emphasizes that the wheels move directly forward and maintain their course; the phrase ‘they turned not as they went’ occurs twice in v.11. In chapter 1 only the wheels were full of eyes, here the whole body – backs, hands and wings as well as the wheels – was full of eyes. They can see everything and nothing can divert them. In Ezekiel’s hearing (v.13) the wheels are instructed to turn or whirl (‘O wheel!’).

THE CHERUBIM (14-17)

10:14 begins exactly like 1:6 (‘and every one had four faces’) but there are differences in detail between the two accounts. In chapter 1 it is the four living creatures that have the faces but in chapter 10 it is grammatically unclear if the faces belong to the wheels or to the cherubim since the subject at the end of v.13 is the wheels. The cherubim, however, are the subject at the beginning of v.15 so it is more likely that Ezekiel is already thinking of them v.14. In 1:10 the faces listed are those of a human, a lion, an ox and an eagle, whereas in 10:14 they are the faces of a cherub, a human, a lion and an eagle. In chapter 1 Ezekiel just gives the position of two of the faces, the lion on the right and the ox on the left whereas in 10:14 he numbers the faces 1 to 4 (first, second, third, fourth).

In vv.15-17 he describes the cherubim taking off and notes that they and the wheels move in unison. This harmony is because the spirit of the living creature is in them, they are not machines – they share the same life. Whenever the cherubim fly the wheels go with them, whenever the cherubim are stationary the wheels are inactive as well. These observations are essentially the same as 1:19-21. As he views the scene Ezekiel realises that the cherubim are/is the ‘living creature’ (singular and feminine – ‘she is the creature’) of his first vision (10:15).

THE DEPARTURE (18-22)

Verse 18 describes another stage in the slow departure of the kabod from the temple. The ‘kabod of the God of Israel’ leaves the threshold of the temple and takes up position (on the sapphire stone, v.1) above the cherubim. The cherubim with the kabod above them then mount up and fly to the east gate, over which they hover while Ezekiel receives a further oracle in chapter 11. This gate was the main entrance to the temple complex.

The last three verses of the chapter (20-22) consist of editorial comment by Ezekiel in which he confirms:

  • his identification of the cherubim with the living creature that he saw under the God of Israel at the River Chebar. Note ‘God of Israel’ not ‘God of Judah.’
  • that the cherubim had four faces, four wings and hands like humans under their wings (1:8).
  • that their faces are the same as those he saw by the River Chebar i.e. man, lion, ox, eagle. There is no explanation about the cherub face of v.14 being replaced.
  • that they move directly forward. Nothing can stop the progress of YHWH’s throne-chariot. God can move around anywhere he pleases. This fact is important to Ezekiel, he mentions the idea several times (1:9, 12, 17, 19, 20, 21; 10:11,16, 22).

SUMMATION

Ezekiel chapter 10 continues Ezekiel’s report of experiences during his second vision. They are a dramatic portrayal of God’s righteous anger and determination to bring judgement upon a rebellious nation. The early verses of the chapter focus on coals of fire taken from between the cherubim and scattered over the city; an action that represents the fiery judgement about to befall Jerusalem. The awe-inspiring imagery of the cherubim and wheels emphasizes the holiness and majesty of the Lord. The gradual departure of God’s glory from the temple is a stark symbolic reminder of the withdrawal of both the Lord’s presence and protection from his people. The defeat and disaster that befalls them will not be because YHWH is dead or weak but because he is no longer in his temple and has left to be with the exiles in Babylon. Chapter 10 serves as a solemn warning about the dire consequences of sin and disobedience.

Posted in Exposition

IDOLATRY IN THE TEMPLE PRECINCTS – EZEKIEL CHAPTER 8

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 8:1 commences the second major section of the book. This segment spans twelve chapters, from 8:1 to 19:14, with the initial four chapters (8-11) presenting what is arguably the most significant of Ezekiel’s visions. These chapters narrate the dramatic departure of the kabod (glory) of YHWH from the Jerusalem temple.

This vision is then followed by twelve oracles of varying length, each commencing with ‘The word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ (12:1; 12:8; 12:17; 12:21; 12:26; 13:1; 14:2; 14:12; 15:1; 16:1; 17:1; 18:1) and treating some aspect of the forthcoming judgement upon Judah and Jerusalem.

EZEKIEL CHAPTER 8

Ezekiel 8:1-2 details the circumstances and commencement date relating to the vision of chapters 8-11 and the oracles of chapters 12-19 that follow.  The remaining verses provide justification for YHWH’s abandonment of his sanctuary. The chapter may be divided as follows:

The commencement date and circumstances of the vision and oracles (8:1-2)

The image that provokes jealousy (8:3-6)

Animal worship (8:7-13)

The weeping for Tammuz (8:14-15)

The worship of the Sun (8:16-18)

THE COMMENCEMENT DATE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE VISION AND ORACLES (8:1-2)

In chapter 1 we discover that Ezekiel is a priest from Judah who had been deported, presumably as one of ten thousand elite citizens of Judah, by Nebuchadnezzar to Babylon along with King Jehoiachin (Ezek 1:1-2; 2 Kgs 24:13-14) in 597 BCE. At that time Ezekiel was twenty-five years of age. Five years later, at age thirty, YHWH called him to be a prophet to the exiles in Babylon. Ezekiel supplies precise dates for his prophecies, all (with the exception of 29:17) in chronological order (1:1-2; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 26:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:1; 32:17; 33:21; 40:1).

Chapter 8:1 gives the date of Ezekiel’s second vision as the fifth day of the sixth month (Elul) of the sixth year of Jehoiachin’s exile (Aug/Sept 592 BCE), some thirteen (LXX) or fourteen (MT) months after the first vision. This is roughly halfway between the first siege of Jerusalem/Jehoiachin’s exile in 597 BCE and the forthcoming judgement of YHWH upon Judah and Jerusalem in the form of a second Babylonian siege (586/587 BCE).

On the recorded date Ezekiel was visited at his house by a group of ‘the elders of Judah,’ that is, the leaders of the Jewish community in exile in Babylonia. Why they wished to consult him on this occasion is not stated, unlike two other occasions (14:1-3; 20:1) when the purpose of their visit was to ‘inquire of the Lord.’ As the elders sat before Ezekiel YHWH took hold of him once more (see 1:3; 3:14) but this was not in response to any questions posed by them.

In this vision the mysterious supernatural figure of 1:27 returns, puts forth the likeness of a human hand ( i.e. he was not human), lifts Ezekiel by a lock (‘twisted’ i.e. tassel Num 15:38, 39) of hair and transports him to the Jerusalem temple where he shows him the sins of the leaders of Judah. There is some disagreement as to whether this figure is YHWH himself or a representative who speaks for him. There are certainly strong parallels between the description (of YHWH) in 1:27 and that in 8:2, although the characteristics are presented in reverse order.

1:27 the colour of amber

1:27 of his loins even upward

1:27 his loins even downward

1:27 the appearance of fire

———————————–

8:2 the appearance of fire

8:2 of his loins even downward

8:2 from his loins even upward

8:2 as the colour of amber

The figure certainly speaks as YHWH (‘my sanctuary’ 8:6; ‘provoke me to anger’ 8:17; ‘I will deal in fury,’ ‘I will not hear them’ 8:18) and later in the vision Ezekiel addresses him as ‘Lord God’ (9:8; 11:13).

THE IMAGE THAT PROVOKES JEALOUSY (8:3-6)

Having been snatched up in a trance by the mysterious figure and teleported from Babylonia to Israel (this happens another time in 40:1-2) and seeing what God was seeing (‘in the visions of God’), Ezekiel is deposited in the first of four locations – the north gate of Jerusalem, which is the ‘seat’ of an offensive idol that provokes jealousy. YHWH had made it clear to the Israelites in Ex 20:5; 34:14 that they were to worship him exclusively, he is a jealous God who will not share. This idol provokes YHWH to jealousy not only because it is a false god but also because of where it is situated; in the precincts of YHWH’s temple.

The statue is called a semel (translated ‘image’) in this passage, a word which occurs only here, in Deut 4:16 and in 2 Chron 33:7, 15. The 2 Chronicles passage describes the idol that King Manasseh of Judah (c. 686 to 642 BCE) set up in the temple, and later removed, as a carved semel. 2 Kings 21:7 clarifies that it was an Asherah pole, a representation of the goddess Asherah. Since the statue here in Ezekiel 8:3, 5 is said to be a semel what Ezekiel views in the vision may be another Asherah pole erected at the same site. Sweeney (Reading Ezekiel 2013, p.56), however, suggests that it may have been a stele, depicting Nebuchadnezzar and his gods (esp. Marduk) and commemorating Babylonian subjugation of the city at the time of Jehoiakim’s revolt in 598/597 BCE, which would have been erected in a prominent position like the temple courtyard.

Ezekiel reports that the kabod (glory) of YHWH there, as in the vision in the plain (3:2-23).

The kabod

Kabod occurs 199 times (excluding the proper name Ichabod) in the Old Testament and has the idea of weightiness. It carries various shades of meaning, including burden, riches, honour, respect, reverence, splendour, distinction, majesty, dignity and weight/mass. It is often translated into English as glory or presence. Kabod/glory is something that gives people or objects importance or makes them impressive:

Isa 60:13 – Isaiah speaks of the kabod of the trees of Lebanon.

Isa 16:11 – Isaiah wrote about the kabod of Moab, in 17:4 of Jacob and in 21:16 of Kedar.

Gen 45:13 – Joseph instructed his brothers to tell his father of all his kabod in Egypt.

YHWH’s kabod (glory)

There appears to be two sides to YHWH’s kabod (glory):

a) The glory the he himself manifests. b) The glory that is due to him.

It is the first of these that concerns us and there are various aspects to this.

i. The glory of YHWH in creation (Psa 19; 29; 57; 72; 96; 97; 102; 104; 108; 113; 138).

ii. The glory of YHWH’s works in history; especially in relation to Moses, Sinai (Ex 24:16-17; Deut 5:24) and the wilderness wanderings (pillar of fire and cloud).

iii. The glory of YHWH in Israel’s system of religion, his great power and majesty associated with the tabernacle (Ex 40:34-35) and later the temple (2 Chron 5:14; 7:1-2).

iv. The future eschatological glory of YHWH – mainly in Isaiah (e.g. Isa 60).

v. The glory of YHWH in theophany – mainly in Ezekiel where YHWH and his kabod are almost indistinguishable.

In Ezekiel 8:4 the kabod is called ‘the glory of the God of Israel’ – a title which only occurs in Ezekiel (8:4; 9:3; 10:19; 11:22; 43:2). In v.5 Ezekiel’s guide draws his attention to the semel that provokes jealousy located in the northern ‘entrance’ (this is the only occurrence of this Hebrew word in the Old Testament) and in v.6 asks him ‘Son of man, seest thou what they do?’ – this question is repeated in vv. 12, 15 and 17. This query would suggest that not only did Ezekiel see the statue but also people worshipping it. In this vision Ezekiel is being shown the reasons for the departure of the kabod from the temple (11:23) and for the forthcoming judgement and destruction.

There is much discussion about the subject of the infinitive ‘to drive away’ (KJV ‘go far off) in v.6. Ka Leung Wong (p.397) explains: ‘The crux of the problem lies in the word lrhqh which is a qal infinitive construct with l, having a feminine form. The main question is to decide what its subject is.’

The possibilities are the abominations, the people of Israel or YHWH. It can hardly be the abominations so which of the other two is it likely to be? Should it be translated a) to drive themselves away , or b) to drive me (i.e. YHWH) away?

Those who take the subject as YHWH point out that in the immediate context YHWH is the speaker and that the broader context (chapters 8-11) deals with the departure of YHWH’s kabod from the sanctuary. The problem for many is that this makes the departure of the kabod involuntary, i.e. YHWH is not departing of his own accord but is forced out of his own sanctuary because of the abominations present there.

The subject probably is the house of Israel. Although they are not literally far from YHWH’s sanctuary (since they are worshipping in the temple precincts) by their idolatry they figuratively drive themselves far from it, in a spiritual sense.

The standard view of chapters 8-11 is that they are chapters about the abandonment by YHWH of his sanctuary, thus depriving the people of his protection and leaving them open to defeat and exile. Ezekiel 5:11 would seem to support this view (Therefore, as I live” ​— ​this is the declaration of the Lord GOD ​— ​“I will withdraw and show you no pity, because you have defiled my sanctuary with all your abhorrent acts and detestable practices.” Ezekiel 5:11 CSB.)

An alternative, however, is that by the time of the vision of 8-11 YHWH’s mobile kabod had already left the Jerusalem temple and moved east to be with the exiles in Babylon (notice that it departs to there in 11:23 and comes from there in 43:2). According to this view chapters 8-11 are about a visitation in judgement. YHWH, having already departed from the temple, has temporarily returned in order to show Ezekiel the reasons for Jerusalem’s destruction (chapter 8) and to initiate the judgement (9:1 ff.). This theory is based on a statement in 43:3 which refers back to the vision of chapters 8-11: (‘And it was according to the appearance of the vision which I saw, even according to the vision that I saw when I came to destroy the city: and the visions were like the vision that I saw by the river Chebar; and I fell upon my face.’)

Verse 6 ends with the statement ‘and thou shalt see greater abominations.’ This saying is repeated in vv. 13 and 15.

ANIMAL WORSHIP (8:7-12)

Ezekiel’s guide then takes him to the entrance to the inner court and instructs him to view the practices being conducted inside the temple compound. This location is closer to the sanctuary than the first. It is unclear exactly how Ezekiel gains entrance but it involves a wall, a hole, further excavation by Ezekiel and the discovery of a secret door. Ezekiel, in vision, seems to break through a casemate wall and enter a room of a house. That dwelling either extends into the temple wall or is built in the space between double walls. There he encounters a group of seventy of the elders of Judah burning incense in front of animal reliefs or murals. These are said (v.10) to be depictions of reptiles and abominable beasts. ‘Abominable’ (šeqeṣ) occurs in Lev 7:21, eight times in Lev chapter 11 and in Isa 66:17. It describes ritually unclean animals including:

Lev 11:10-12 Creatures that live in water but do not have scales or fins.

Lev 11:13-20 Birds of prey.

Lev 11:20, 23 Some insects.

Lev 11:41-43 Reptiles.

Isa 66:17 Pigs, mice.

This scene is doubly abominable in that a) graven images are present, and b) that unclean foods are spread out for a ritual meal.

SEVENTY ELDERS

In Ex 24:9 seventy elders saw the glory of YHWH. In Num 11:25 the spirit of God rested upon seventy elders. Here seventy elders are offering incense to false gods.

The worship leader at this private ritual is named as Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan, who ‘stood’ in the midst of them. He is not the Jaazaniah of Ezekiel 11:1 because his father’s name is different. The verb ‘stand’ (āmaḏ), according to Strongs ‘has the sense of serving before someone, as Joseph served, stood before Pharaoh (Gen. 41:46).’ Likely Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan and the elders are not priests and therefore have no right to burn incense.

It may be that Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan was the brother of Gemariah the son of Shaphan the scribe (Jer 36:10, 12) who was supportive of the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 36:25). There are also references in Jeremiah to Ahikam (Jer 26:24) and Elasah (Jer 29:3) who are also said to be sons of Shaphan. Perhaps their father was Shaphan the scribe of 2 Kgs 22 who some thirty years earlier had read the rediscovered copy of the Torah to King Josiah, an event that sparked wide-ranging religious reforms.

Once again (v.12) Ezekiel’s supernatural guide asks him ‘hast thou seen? (8:6,15,17) and comments that the elders also worship in the dark (i.e. at night), in their own chambers. These men may have been occupying cell-like quarters meant for priests at the temple. Ezekiel includes similar accommodation in his plans for an ideal temple (45:1-11).

V.12 ends with an insight into the thinking of the elders who say: ‘The Lord seeth us not; the Lord hath forsaken the earth.’ This might mean that they thought they were acting in private and YHWH could not see them. It is, however, more likely that they are not referring to YHWH’s supposed inability to see but to his lack of interest and involvement. Somehow they were already aware that their idolatry had offended YHWH, his departure therefore inevitable. They accuse YHWH of forsaking the earth when, in effect, it was they who had forsaken him.

‘For they say.’ Ezekiel quotes what people are saying in other passages as well (9:9; 12:22; 18:2, 19; 20:49; 37:11).

Since the four episodes in this chapter are scenes of increasing abomination Ezekiel is once again told that even worse things than this are going on.

THE WEEPING FOR TAMMUZ (8:14-15)

Ezekiel’s guide now takes him to a new location; the north gate of the temple, where he sees a group of women weeping for Tammuz (Dumuzi). This was a fertility deity in Mesopotamian mythology usually depicted as a young man and said to be the consort of the goddess Ishtar (Inanna). He was associated with spring vegetation (died and then returned the following summer) and the cyclical nature of life, death and rebirth. The wailing for Tammuz was a feature of mourning rituals that lamented his death and looked forward to his return. This Babylonian cult must have been practised by some Jewish women in Jerusalem. This myth about a dying and rising god is thought to equate to the Egyptian one about Osiris and Isis and to the Greek story about Adonis and Aphrodite.

Again (v.15) Ezekiel is told that even worse things than this are going on.

THE WORSHIP OF THE SUN (8:16-18)

Ezekiel is now taken in vision to a fourth location. This is in the inner court before the entrance to Solomon’s temple and between the portico (’ûlām, porch, vestibule, 1 Kgs 6:3; 1 Chr 28:11; 2 Chr 3:4; Joel 2:17) and the altar. Presumably this was an area where only Levitical priests could enter (2 Chron 4:9; Joel 2:17). Here Ezekiel discovers a group of about 25 men (LXX says 20) facing eastward and worshipping the sun. That they are bowed down to the sun, standing with their backs toward the temple, is the ultimate act of disrespect and signifies a complete rejection of YHWH. They have literally turned their backs on him. This fourth scene is the climax of the abominations shown to Ezekiel, in ascending order of seriousness. There is an early Old Testament reference to solar worship in Job 31:26-28. That the practice of Sun worship took place in Judah is confirmed by 2 Kgs 23:5,11. There is a later reference to 25 men (11:1) but no indication that this is the same group.

In v.17 Ezekiel is once again asked if he has seen this. A rhetorical question then follows: ‘Is it not enough for the house of Judah to commit the detestable acts they are doing here, that they must also fill the land with violence and repeatedly anger me, even putting the branch to their nose?’ (CSB). This question, to which the answer is obviously ‘Yes!,’ is designed to emphasize that the practices Ezekiel has seen performed are abominations that provoke YHWH to anger. Three transgressions are listed:

  • The worship of false gods – committing abominations.
  • The land filled with violence. As in 7:23 idolatry is linked with social injustice.
  • The deliberate provocation of YHWH. They put a branch to their/his nose. What this involves is not known. If they put a branch to their nose possibly the reference is to an obscene worship ritual involving vine branches that provokes YHWH to anger. If they put the branch to his nose the implication is that they direct an obscene, arrogant and deliberately provocative gesture at YHWH. The word zemôrāh meaning branch or tendril occurs four other times in the Old Testament (Num 13:23; Isa 17:10; Ezek 15:2; Nah. 2:3) and refers to vines.

V.18. YHWH will therefore not spare them and will not have pity. Even though the people cry for mercy with ‘a loud voice’ he will not hear them. The thought of a loud voice is taken up again in the next verse (9:1) which begins with the ‘loud voice’ of YHWH.

SUMMATION

In chapter 8 Ezekiel is transported in vision from Babylonia to Jerusalem where he witnesses the idolatrous state of religion and society back home. He views scenes of idolatry in four locations. Each location is closer to the sanctuary itself and each scene of idolatry is progressively worse. The temple precincts are polluted, why would YHWH stay? Chapter 8 provides justification for the withdrawal of the kabod of YHWH from the temple (chapters 8-11). Once YHWH abandons Jerusalem because of his people’s sin it will no longer be inviolable; the Babylonians will be able sack the city.

This chapter sets the stage for the judgement to come, as YHWH withdraws His protection, leaving Jerusalem vulnerable to destruction. The vivid imagery and detailed narrative underscore the severity of the people’s sins and emphasize the dire consequences of forsaking YHWH for idols.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

de Vries, Pieter 2015. The Kābôd of Yhwh in the Old Testament: with particular reference to the Book of Ezekiel. BRILL.

‌Ackerman, Susan. “A Marzēaḥ in Ezekiel 8:7-13?” The Harvard Theological Review, vol. 82, no. 3, 1989, pp. 267–81.

Aharoni, Yohanan. “The Date of Casemate Walls in Judah and Israel and Their Purpose.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 154, 1959, pp. 35–39.

Lapp, Nancy L. “Casemate Walls in Palestine and the Late Iron II Casemate at Tell El-Fûl (Gibeah).” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 223, 1976, pp. 25–42.

Wong, Ka Leung. “A Note on Ezekiel VIII 6.” Vetus Testamentum, vol. 51, no. 3, 2001, pp. 396–400.

Yamauchi, Edwin M. “Tammuz and the Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 84, no. 3, 1965, pp. 283–90.

Posted in Exposition

THE END IS NEAR – EZEKIEL CHAPTER 7

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 7:1-27

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 7:1 introduces a powerful and foreboding message from YHWH to the prophet Ezekiel, continuing the ominous prophecies about the judgement upon Judah and Jerusalem. Unlike the previous chapters (4-6) which held out some hope that a remnant would survive, this chapter does not mention that but rather makes it clear that disaster is imminent and unavoidable. The repeated emphasis on words like ‘day’ and ‘end’ underscores the urgency and finality of the impending judgement: for example: ‘the end is come’ (7:2, 6); ‘the day is come’ (7:10, 12); ‘the day draweth near’ (7:12); ‘the day of the wrath of the Lord’ (7:19).

DIVIDING THE PROPHECY

The prophecy in Ezekiel 7 naturally falls into two sections (vv. 2-4 and vv. 5-27), each beginning with ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’ However, for easier consideration it can be broken down into smaller segments:

7:2-4 Judgement announced

7:5-9 Unprecedented Disaster

7:10-13 Social Upheaval

7:14-16 Military Collapse

7:17-22 Signs of Despair

7:23-25 Make the Chain

7:26-27 Ineffective Leadership

JUDGEMENT ANNOUNCED (7:2-4)

In verses 2-4 the prophecy declares that disaster will strike not just Jerusalem and Judah but ‘the four corners of the land’ i.e. the whole land of Israel will be affected by the Babylonian invasion. The occurrence of ‘end’ five times in the first six verses emphasises the finality and certainty of the judgement

The end is presented as having already arrived (‘now’ – repeated v. 8), creating a sense of urgency and inevitability. The Preacher’s Commentary explains that:

The Hebrew word ba¯), translated here “has come” can also mean “is coming” and thus there is created a certain degree of uncertainty as to the exact timing of the events about which Ezekiel warns. Some of the usages of ba¯) by themselves would be grammatically almost certain to mean “has come” while others would by themselves mean “is coming.” That they are mixed purposely here suggests to the listener that there is an urgency to the timing. A process has started which will conclude quickly: it is not completed yet, but will not be delayed for long, either.

God’s anger is portrayed as a force that can be sent. ‘I will send mine anger’ shows that in actual fact it had not yet come. The people will be judged according to their sinful ways, particularly their idol worship, which Ezekiel refers to as ‘abominations’ (offensive things). This aligns with the New Testament depiction of the judgement of believers and unbelievers according to behaviour ( 2 Cor 5:10; Rev 20:12-13).

The severity of their sins means that YHWH will show no mercy or spare them from the judgement; they will face the consequences of their actions. The section concludes with the recognition formula ‘they shall know that I am the Lord.’ It is repeated in verses 9 and 27.

UNPRECEDENTED DISASTER (7:5-9)

Beginning with the authoritative ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ this section describes an unparalleled disaster. The ‘only’ evil that will come upon them will be unprecedented and decisive. The word ‘watcheth’ in verse 6 is a verb meaning to wake up. Verse 6 ends and verse 7 starts with the same verb ‘come,’ which is repeated seven times in vv. 5-12. These terms highlight the immediacy of the calamity.

What Ezekiel meant by the word ‘morning’ (KJV) in verse 7 is not entirely clear. It translates a word meaning ‘ring’ or ‘turn’ and the main thought is of something round. It contains the ideas of cycle, turn of events, crown and has been translated as doom, morning and diadem (Isa 28:5). It occurs again in verse 10. ‘Morning’ probably fits well with the idea of wake up in the previous verse and thus signifies the dawn of a new day, a dreadful era the like of which the Israelites have never experienced before. That day is near and is a day of tumult (KJV ‘trouble’) in which they will hear the noise of war. That clamour is contrasted with the ‘sounding again of the mountains.’ This is not referring to an earthquake but most likely to the joyful conversation of workers at harvest time (Isa 16:10) in vineyards on mountain slopes; the opposite of the tumult of invasion. In this verse the imminence of judgement is conveyed by the following phrases: ‘the morning is come,’ ‘the time is come,’ and ‘the day…is near.’ Here ‘the day’ is introduced – a concept that will be developed from verse 10 onwards.

If translated ‘crown’ or ‘diadem’ rather than ‘morning’ it could be a reference to the Chaldean King Nebuchadnezzar.

Verses 8 and 9 again state that the punishment is the Israelites’ own fault and that no mercy or compassion will be shown by YHWH. These two verses are a repetition of verses 3 and 4 but with ‘that smiteth’ added after ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’ This emphasizes that the judgement is from YHWH. The additional wording forms a compound name of the Lord: YHWH-Makkeh, The Lord who smites. For other compound names see my post COMPOUND NAMES OF YHWH

SOCIAL UPHEAVAL (7:10-13)

Verses 10-13 depict a society in turmoil. The day of judgement has arrived, signified by the dawn of morning. Some commentators take ‘the rod hath blossomed’ etc. to refer to Judah; the idea being that pride has flourished among the people, contributing to their downfall, i.e. they have been over-confident. Violence has become a rod of wickedness, symbolizing the prevalence and severity of sin among the people.

I take it, however, that the rod refers to the Neo-Babylonian Empire and its swift rise to ascendancy in the Ancient Near East under the Chaldean kings Nabopolassar (626-605 BCE) and his son Nebuchadnezzar II (605-562 BCE). In the Bible a budding rod represents growth and prosperity (for the story about Aaron’s rod that budded, blossomed and bore almonds please read Numbers chapter 17). Three clauses describe the Chaldeans: 1) ‘the rod hath blossomed’ 2) ‘pride hath budded’ 3) ‘violence is risen up into a rod of wickedness.’ The prophet Habakkuk described this proud and violent nation as follows:

For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.
They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.
Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves: and their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.
They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every stronghold; for they shall heap dust, and take it. Habakkuk 1:6-10

Like a rod that blossoms, buds and grows that nation will rise up as an instrument of God’s punishment upon Judah. What will be the result for the inhabitants of the land of Israel? – ‘None of the people will be left, none of that crowd—none of their wealth, nothing of value. Ezekiel 7:11 (NIV). The invasion will bring total societal collapse. So many people will die that there will be no lamentation for their fate. The usual burial practices will not be carried out.

The day of judgement approaches (12-13) and it will be a time of despair for all. Everyday business transactions will be meaningless as the population faces extermination or captivity. Neither the buyer nor the seller will find cause for rejoicing or mourning as the entire population will be consumed by the wrath of God. The buyer will not rejoice in having negotiated a favourable deal for he will never enjoy what he has purchased. The seller will not mourn over what he has parted with for it will be taken away from him in any case. The invaders will take everything, there will be nothing left to buy or sell.

The usual protections of property laws, like those in Leviticus (Lev 25:14, 24-28) regarding the Year of Jubilee, will be irrelevant in the face of such widespread destruction. Every fiftieth year property that had been sold would revert to the original owner or his heir, thus ensuring the protection of a family’s inheritance, i.e. ancestral land. Those who have sold property will not be able to reclaim it, even if they are still alive, because they will be in captivity.

The vision concerning the people (the whole multitude) will not turn back; i.e. the prophecy will not be reversed. Because of their sins they will not be able to preserve their lives.

MILITARY COLLAPSE 7:14-16

Despite the sounding of a trumpet to prepare for war no-one will respond. God’s wrath will paralyse the people, rendering them defenceless against the Chaldean invaders.

The judgement will come through external threats such as war (sword) and internal afflictions like pestilence and famine. Whether people are in the field or in the city, death will be inevitable. Those who escape the city will be killed by the invaders and those under siege inside the city will die of famine and plague. This repeats the prophecy of the three-fold judgement (sword, famine, pestilence) already given in 5:2, 12 and 6:11. According to v.16 some may flee to the mountains but they will be overwhelmed by their guilt and grief and ‘mourn like doves of the valleys’ (Isa 38:14; 59:11).

SIGNS OF DESPAIR (7:17-22)

The coming judgement will induce such terror that the entire population will be physically weak and feeble. They will wear sackcloth, a sign of mourning and repentance, and display horror and shame. They will show their grief by shaving their heads (see Mic1:16), a practice that was forbidden in Deut 14:1; especially for priests Lev 21:5; Ezek 44:20. The picture seems to be that they will dress in sackcloth but wear horror as an outer garment.

Silver and gold, which have been the cause of their spiritual stumbling, will not be able to ‘deliver them in the day of the wrath of the Lord.’ It will become worthless because there will be no food available to buy. They will therefore throw away their wealth (for similar see Isa 2:7-8, 20) in disgust because it has become ‘detestable’ (KJV ‘removed’). The word niddāh means a woman’s menstrual flow. In the Old Testament it refers to something regarded as impure, filthy, and unclean (Lev 20:21; Ez 9:11; Lam 1:17). It occurs again in the next verse, v.20.

Speaking of the whole nation in the singular as ‘he’ and ‘his’ the prophecy says that the Lord had given them wealth but since in their pride (KJV ‘majesty) they turned it into abominable idols, the Lord will make it an unclean thing (niddāh) to them (KJV ‘set it far from them’).

God will allow their wealth to be plundered and defiled by foreign invaders. ‘They shall pollute it’ simply means that the precious metals that have been made into idols will not be used for religious purposes but rather put to common use. There is no suggestion that the idols are holy. ‘Pollute’ (ḥālal) in that same sense occurs again in the next verse, v. 22.

God will turn his face away from his people, symbolizing his withdrawal of help and protection from them. This will allow the heathen enemy robbers to desecrate his ‘treasure’ (KJV ‘secret place‘). Some commentators view this as a reference to the temple and its destruction by the invaders but in Hebrew ‘temple’ is masculine. Greenberg (1983, p. 154) points out: ‘Judging from the feminine suffixes in the next clause (“it”) this is an epithet of the city or land of vs. 23 (both fem. in Hebrew); so T (“the land in which my Presence dwells).’

In this passage the Babylonians are referred to in disparaging terms (cp. Ezek 28:7; 30:11) as ‘the strangers’ (v.21), ‘the wicked of the earth’ (v.21), ‘robbers’ (v.22) and ‘the worst of the heathen’ (v.24).

MAKE THE CHAIN 7:23-25

The instruction ‘make the chain’ tells Ezekiel to perform another symbolic action that conjures up an image of captivity and exile (cp. Jer 27:2; Nah 3:10). He is to forge a chain. Jerusalem’s crimes will lead to its downfall; it is full of violence and capital crimes (lit. judgements of blood). Foreign conquerors (‘the evil ones of the heathen’ i.e. the worst of) will occupy Israelite homes, defile their sacred places and end their pride and power.

The conquest of the land, the destruction of holy sites, the occupation of homes by the invaders, and deportation fulfil the covenant curses of Leviticus chapter 26:31-33. Despite desperate attempts to bring about peace their efforts will be in vain and horror will certainly come upon them.

INEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP 7:26-27

Calamity will be compounded by a lack of guidance. Prophets, priests and elders will have no answers as God will have withdrawn. There will be no words of revelation, knowledge or counsel and as a result all ranks of the population, the king, the prince (tribal chieftain), and the people of the land will be will be stricken with fear and despair.

God will bring on them the the evil that they have done to others. The judgement will be a direct consequence of their deeds and it will ensure that they recognize YHWH’s sovereignty and authority – ‘they shall know that I am the Lord.’

SUMMATION

This concludes the first major unit of the book, marking the end of the initial cycle of prophecies (chapters 4-7) which predicts dreadful judgements upon Judah and Jerusalem. Chapter 7 characterises these as retribution for their violence (7:7-11), improper use of wealth (7: 19-20), and idolatrous practices (7:20). It emphasises that they will be punished in accordance with their deeds (7:8, 9, 27) so they will suffer violence (7:25), their wealth will be unable to save them (7:19) and their holy places will be destroyed and defiled (7:24). This seventh chapter of Ezekiel presents a vivid depiction of impending judgment upon Judah and Jerusalem for their sins, highlighting the severity and inevitability of God’s wrath.

Posted in Exposition

FOUR SYMBOLIC ACTS IN EZEKIEL 4:1-5:4

Posted on by writtenexposition

The Siege of Jerusalem: Contextual Background

Ezekiel chapter 4:1-5:4 is a continuation of the spirit’s speech to Ezekiel which commenced in 3:24. In it he receives instructions concerning his first messages to his fellow exiles in Babylon. He is to enact four dramatic performances which together represent YHWH’s judgement that is soon to come upon Judah. The drama relates to its capital city Jerusalem and the consequences of the forthcoming siege of the city by Nebuchadnezzar II.

At that time, of course, Ezekiel’s fellow exiles did not expect anything like that to happen. These prophecies are delivered by Ezekiel early in the period commencing with his call to the prophetic ministry (c. 593 BCE) and ending with the fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE). In 597 BCE Nebuchadnezzar had deposed Jehoiachin of Judah and exiled him along with ten thousand of his subjects (2 Kgs 24:8-16), including Ezekiel (1:1-3). He then installed Jehoiachin’s uncle Zedekiah as a puppet king. With this relatively stable government in Judah the exiles were doubtless looking forward to a soon return to their homeland. They could not have known then that Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24-25; 2 Chron 36; Jer 3) would cast off his allegiance to the Babylonians; provoking a violent response by Nebuchadnezzar. In order to quell the revolt by his Judaean vassal Nebuchadnezzar marched to Riblah in Syria where he established campaign headquarters (2 Kgs 25:6, 20; Jer 39:5; 52:9, 26). From that base his army invaded Judah and destroyed its fortified towns (Jer 44:2) before besieging Jerusalem in the ninth year of Zedekiah. Eventually, after a two and a half year siege, the city fell to the Babylonians in 586 BCE. Zedekiah’s family and the nobles of Jerusalem were executed, after which Zedekiah himself was blinded and transported to Babylon as a prisoner of war (2 Kgs 25:6-7).

Ezekiel’s dramatic performances feature:

4:1-3 A model of a siege – representing the siege of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A number of days spent lying on his left and right sides – representing the duration of judgement .

4:9-17 Consumption of small amounts of bread and water – representing a famine in Jerusalem.

5:1-4 A haircut and shave – representing the fate of Israel.

Some scholars are of the opinion that because Ezekiel does not explicitly state ‘I did this’ for each drama he may have just described the details of his vision to the people without physically acting out these scenarios. However, I take that Ezekiel literally carried out YHWH’s instructions since 4:12 makes it clear that the bread was to be baked in the sight of the people. In addition, impressive symbolic actions by Israel’s prophets were not unusual in that era (1 Kgs 11:30, 22:11; 2 Kgs 13:17; Isa 20:2-4; Jer 13:1-11, 19:1-10).

4:1-3 A MODEL OF A SIEGE

Ezekiel, once again addressed as ‘thou, son of man,’ is instructed to get a (clay) brick, set it before him, and inscribe a diagram of Jerusalem on it. He is then to impersonate the Babylonians by enacting a siege of the city. In practice, Ezekiel may have depicted siege warfare by drawing but the verbs (lay, build, cast, set, take) suggest it is more likely that he made little models and moved them towards his clay brick. These models were of:

a fort – siege works or a tower, manned by archers and slingers (2 Kgs 25:1).

a mount – mounds or ramps constructed of debris (earth, wood, stone) which were built against the walls of a besieged city. Siege towers and battering rams could be pushed up these ramps and from them attack troops could scale the walls using siege ladders. They would then fight their way to the city gates and open them.

a camp – living quarters of an army contingent. As well as fighting men this would have included sappers (who tunnelled under the walls to collapse them) and siege engineers.

battering rams – these wheeled vehicles had a heavy ram suspended from the roof by ropes, one of its ends being a large metal blade. The operators repeatedly slammed this into city gates and walls in order to breach them. These prefabricated machines were generally transported flat pack and assembled on site.

From the details in these three verses one can easily imagine the noise, mayhem and devastation of ancient siege warfare. Men shouting, rams battering, slingers and archers from both sides raining down stones and arrows at one another, the defenders throwing down flaming torches to set the attacking war engines and troops alight. Ezekiel’s enactment of such a siege that would soon be experienced by Jerusalem must have shocked his fellow countrymen.

Ezekiel was also to set up a flat iron pan or griddle between him and his model of the city and glare (‘direct your face forward’) at it. This obstruction probably represented the barrier between YHWH and the house of Israel and the stare represented God’s angry intentions towards Jerusalem. The visual demonstration of a siege serves as a prophetic ‘sign’ to the house of Israel of the impending destruction of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A NUMBER OF DAYS SPENT LYING ON HIS LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES

Ezekiel is then commanded to lie on his left and right sides for a specific number of days, symbolically bearing the sin of the people of Israel. Each day probably represents a year of punishment for Israel’s iniquity. This act serves as a vivid illustration of the consequences of Israel’s rebellion against God.

Having impersonated the Babylonians in the first episode Ezekiel now has to play the part of Israel. He is instructed to lie on his left side for 390 days and after that lie on his right side for 40 days. The first period relates to the ‘house of Israel,’ the second to the ‘house of Judah. Ezekiel is told that each day represents one year (vv. 5-6).

Apparently in the Ancient Near East directions were indicated from a position facing east. North (the northern kingdom of Israel) was therefore on the left side and South (the southern kingdom of Judah) on the right. Another example of this in Ezekiel is 16:46: ‘And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters that dwell at thy left hand: and thy younger sister, that dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters.’

Concerning the years, we have no idea what dates are referred to. In fact, even the number of years for the house of Israel is unclear for although the Hebrew Masoretic text reads 390 years the Greek LXX says 190 years. Scholars and commentators have fertile imaginations and many ingenious suggestions have been put forward.

Since 390+40=430 (the period of time spent by the children of Israel in Egypt) some see this as symbolic of years of oppression or wilderness experience for Israel. See also Ex12:40 and Gal 3:17.

There is some disagreement as to whether the days represent years of sin or the years of punishment for sin. The first would look back to years of iniquity, the other point forward to years of judgement. Basing their opinion on v.9b some commentators maintain that the 390 years and the 40 years run concurrently, although v.6 says ‘when thou hast accomplished them (390), lie again (40)…’ which strongly suggests that they are consecutive.

There also seems to be no agreement on a terminus a quo (start date). For the 390 years of iniquity a popular choice is the period from the the division of Israel in 931 BCE to the fall of Babylon in 539 BCE. Others think that the period is 390 years from the construction of Solomon’s temple in the tenth century BCE. A valid point made by several commentators is that the dates in the book of Ezekiel are based on the deportation of Jehoiachin in 597 BCE, on this basis they speculate that the 390 and 40 years of punishment run consecutively from then until the Maccabean Revolt in 167 BCE.

As regards the 40 year period of Judah’s iniquity some say it began during the reign of King Josiah (640 -609 BCE) and ended with the Fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE), others that it commenced during the long (2 Kgs 21:1), evil (2 Kgs 21:10-16; 23:26-27) reign of Manasseh (lived c. 697-642 BCE).

A few of the commentators I have read give the 430 years a future application, maintaining that because the northern tribes would not have received Ezekiel’s prophecy then these days have yet to be fulfilled. They assert that Ezekiel is portraying judgement that will fall on all Israel (5:4). This, in their view, will occur at the end of the age.

It therefore seems that this is to be a long drawn out drama. Ezekiel is to lie first on his left side for 390 days and then on his right for 40 days ‘to bear the iniquity’ of the house of Israel and the house of Judah. This bearing of the nation’s iniquity is not vicarious but rather Ezekiel’s period of suffering and discomfort symbolizes the pain that Israel will endure at the hands of the Babylonians. During this display YHWH will ‘put ropes on’ Ezekiel, perhaps inflicting him with some kind of temporary paralysis, in order to prevent him from turning from one side to the other.

Again (v.7) Ezekiel is instructed to stare/glare at his siege model while he is lying on his side with his arm uncovered (see v.4). This may symbolize an unimpeded warrior ready for battle (cp. Isa 52:10). He is also to prophesy against Jerusalem. Perhaps, however, there is one crumb of hope in Ezekiel’s message in that the judgement is for a set period and will one day come to an end.

Possibly Ezekiel did not lie immobile 24-7 but just lay for several hours per day as the passage represents him carrying out other activities like enacting the siege, baking bread, drinking water, shaving etc.

4:9-17 CONSUMPTION OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF BREAD AND WATER

In these verses Ezekiel is instructed to eat a specific ration of food, prepared from a mixture of grains and legumes. This is limited by weight and represents the scarcity of food that the people of Jerusalem would experience during a siege. This action demonstrates the severity of the impending judgment upon Israel.

He is directed to mix flour from six types of grain in one vessel and prepare enough bread to eat ‘ from time to time’ (v.10, i.e. at a set time each day) during the 390 day period that he would lie on one side or the other. These grains are: wheat, barley, beans (see also 2 Sam 17:28), lentils, millet and fitches (a species of wheat). This unusual mixture of cereals was to be baked in full view of his fellow exiles (v.12), using human excrement as fuel. The amount of Ezekiel’s daily allocation of this disgusting food is 20 (Babylonian) shekels – approximately 8 ounces or 227 grams – and his intake of water is restricted to one sixth of a hin – about 0.6 litres. That the quantities are to be precisely measured out (cp. Lev 26:26) emphasizes that these are starvation rations. Ezekiel’s general state of health will deteriorate on such an unbalanced diet. The main point of this symbolic action is that siege, starvation and famine will soon be the lot of the residents of Jerusalem. There will be a shortage of food and water therefore rationing will apply (vv.16-17). Rationing is described in Isa 30:20 as ‘the bread of adversity and the water of affliction’ (see also 1 Kgs 22:27).

Ezekiel is instructed to eat the bread ‘as barley cakes.’ The idea seems to be that of eating them with enjoyment or enthusiasm thus suggesting that during the siege of Jerusalem people will be delighted to have something to eat, even if it is polluted.

In verse 13 the Lord says ‘thus shall the children of Israel eat defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them’ (for YHWH driving the Israelites out see Jer 8:3; 16:15; 24:9; 27:10,15), Ezekiel’s starvation diet teaches his fellow Israelites a double lesson: it predicts the forthcoming siege of Jerusalem and also the defilement of the exile that would follow it. The may mean that the food they will eat abroad is defiled since it will not be slaughtered, produced, handled and prepared in accordance with the dietary laws in the Torah. It could also mean that they will be defiled by adopting heathen manners and customs during the Exile (cp. Hos 9:3-4 for a similar sentiment).

Even though Ezekiel was receiving these directions while in a prophetic trance his priestly upbringing seems to have automatically triggered an immediate protest at the instructions concerning the bread. That his problem concerns the use of human excrement as fuel is clear from YHWH’s response in v.15: ‘Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.’ Bread baked over dried cow manure will still be defiled but perhaps to Ezekiel it seems a little less revolting. In any case, it will still sound disgusting and memorably make the point to his audience.

Ezekiel’s request for relief begins with a passionate outburst ‘Ah Lord God!’ and he goes on to explain that thus far his life has not been ‘polluted.’ One would think that Ezekiel’s objection is based on either the regulations concerning unlawful mixing (Lev 19:19; Deut 22:9) or on the strict rules about the disposal of human waste (Deut 23:12-14). However, he mentions neither of these but gives as his reason (‘for’ v.14) the fact that he had never done the following things:

  • Eaten an animal that died of itself (Lev 11:39; 17:15; 22:8; Deut 14:21, cp. Ezek 44:31).
  • Eaten an animal that was torn in pieces (Ex 22:31; Lev 22:8).
  • Eaten abominable flesh – this was meat left over from peace offerings and not eaten by the third day (Lev19:7).

These things bear no relation to baking bread over human excrement but Ezekiel seems to be asserting that he has kept all the dietary regulations since his youth, and cites these three cases in point. It is commendable that Ezekiel lived a blameless life before his prophetic call and that during his ministry his conscience was so sensitive that he instinctively wanted to live his life in obedience to God’s requirements. What a great lesson and example for us today!

After granting Ezekiel a concession on the fuel YHWH further declares: ‘Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem: and they shall eat bread by weight, and with care; and they shall drink water by measure, and with astonishment: That they may want bread and water, and be astonished one with another, and consume away for their iniquity.’ Ezekiel 4:16-17

‘staff of bread’ – means supply of bread, that which human beings depend on for survival. See also Lev 26:26; Psa 105:16; Isa 3:1; Ezek 5:16; 14:13. The siege of Jerusalem will result in the rationing of food and water. Bread will be doled out by weight and water by measure. The people will partake of their daily rations ‘with astonishment’ (extreme fear and apprehension) and will ‘consume away for their iniquity,’ i.e. they will waste away. Ezekiel uses this same expression three times when prophesying YHWH’s judgement (4:17; 24:23; 33:10).

This drama symbolizes and emphasizes the severity of the judgement that will befall Jerusalem. The scarcity of food and water will lead to desperation and despair among the people. This judgment is portrayed as a consequence of the people’s sin and disobedience.

5:1-4 A HAIRCUT AND SHAVE

Again addressing him as ‘Mortal’ YHWH reveals to Ezekiel details of the fourth drama that he must enact. He is to take a sharp knife and shave his head and beard. Using a knife as a razor is a powerful depiction of the judgement that will come upon the people of Jerusalem. The shaving of the head and beard was a sign of mourning (Isa 22:12; Jer 16:6) or disgrace (2 Sam 10:4; Mic 1:16) in ancient Near Eastern cultures and Israelites were forbidden by the law (Lev 19:27; 21:5; Deut 14:1) to practise this custom.

Using balances Ezekiel is to weigh and divide the hair that he has shaved off. This intimates that God is supervising the judgements (see 5:12; 6:12). Unlike the previous three dramas (chapter 4), in this case Ezekiel is to perform the symbolic actions AFTER the set number of days he has to lie on one side or the other (‘when the days of the (mock) siege are fulfilled,’ 5:2).

  • He is to burn one third of the hair ‘in the midst of the city,’ i.e. on his brick representing Jerusalem. This symbolizes the destruction of Jerusalem by fire and of its inhabitants by famine and pestilence (5:12).
  • He is to strike another third of the hair with a sword symbolizing that many people will suffer a violent death in battle.
  • He is to throw the remaining third to the winds, symbolizing the dispersion of the people of Judah.
  • He is to take a small number of the scattered hairs and bind them in the hem of his garment. He then has to take some of these and burn them in the fire. This indicates that even a remnant (symbolizing either those who survive the Babylonian invasion and siege or those who remain faithful to YHWH) will not be spared from God’s judgement but will find themselves in desperate circumstances. This action emphasizes the severity of the consequences of disobedience.

We now move into the next section which begins with an oracle against Jerusalem (5:5-17) in which YHWH explains the symbolism of the haircut and shave in 5:1-4.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

Posted on by writtenexposition

1. Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God. 2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king Jehoiachin’s captivity, 3. The word of the LORD came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the hand of the LORD was there upon him.

INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

These verses introduce the book of Ezekiel and provide historical background, as well as some information about the prophet Ezekiel and his message. They indicate when and where he was active; thus situating his visions within a specific historical and cultural context.

1:1 Ezekiel’s prophetic ministry is said to have begun ‘in the thirtieth year.’ The significance of the ‘thirtieth year’ is not explained but it is usually understood to mean that Ezekiel was thirty years of age at the time. The date given is the fifth day of the fourth month. This would have been the month of Tammuz and therefore the time of year was late June/early July.

The vision occurred while Ezekiel was among the exiles by the Chebar, which was most likely a canal near Babylon. It seems that many exiled Jews had been settled in this area. Ezekiel’s location by the canal underscores the fact that he was living among the exiles and sharing in their experiences and struggles.

1:2 Verse 2 provides more detailed historical context by specifying that it was the fifth year of King Jehoiachin’s exile. This information dates Ezekiel’s inaugural vision (592 BCE) and places it within the larger context of the Babylonian exile.

King Jehoiachin (2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10, also known as Jeconiah (Jer 24:1; 27:20; 28:4; 29:2) and Coniah (Jer 22:24, 28; 37:1), was the son of King Jehoiakim of Judah and a grandson of King Josiah. Jehoiachin became king of Judah at the age of eighteen (2 Kgs 24:8). His short reign was marked by political instability and conflict with the Babylonians. According to the Chronicler he ‘did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord’ (2 Chron 36:9). Jeremiah 22:24-30 has the Lord directly addressing Jehoiachin, prophesying his captivity and exile in Babylon. The Lord also declared that Jehoiachin’s descendants would neither prosper nor sit on the throne of David, thus signifying the end of the dynasty.

In 597 BCE King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon deported King Jehoiachin of Judah along with many of the leading citizens of Jerusalem (2 Kgs 24:15-16); including Ezekiel, who would have been twenty-five years of age at that time. Jehoiachin’s captivity in Babylon lasted for thirty-seven years. During that time, he was reportedly well-treated by the Babylonians and eventually released from captivity by King Evil-Merodach, who succeeded Nebuchadnezzar as ruler of Babylon. According to 2 Kings 25:27-30, Jehoiachin was then given a high position at the Babylonian court (new clothes, a daily allowance for the rest of his life, and allowed to dine at the king’s table).

Despite his short troubled reign and his captivity in Babylon, Jehoiachin was an important figure in the history of Judah. His deposition and deportation marked the beginning of the Babylonian Exile, a period of great spiritual and cultural significance for the Israelites. The Exile came to an end in 538 BCE.

During this difficult time Ezekiel, himself taken into captivity during Jehoiachin’s reign, provided spiritual guidance and hope to the exiles over a period of twenty years. The date of his inaugural vision in verse 2 is the first chronological marker in the book. The others are:

8:1 The vision of idols and abominations in the temple.

20:1 Ezekiel’s response to the elders.

24:1 The parable of a cooking pot

26:1 Threats against Tyre.

29:1 Prophecy against Egypt.

29:17 Desolation of Egypt.

30:20 Pharaoh’s defeat.

31:1 The cedar of Lebanon.

32:1 Lament over Pharoah..

32:17 Lament over Egypt.

33:21 News of the Fall of Jerusalem.

40:1 Vision of a new temple.

1:3 Verse 3 identifies Ezekiel as a member of the priestly class. This would suggest that his prophetic message was informed by his knowledge of Jewish ritual and tradition, which gave him religious authority to speak on behalf of God. Note that many respected commentators confidently assert that Ezekiel was a Zadokite priest. This they assume purely on the basis that Ezekiel speaks highly of the Zadokites in chapters 40-48, which contain his vision of how a future ideal temple might look and operate. In these chapters Ezekiel assigns a dominant role to the Zadokites (43:18-27; 44:15-16; 45:4; 46:19-24), presumably as a reward for remaining relatively (22:26) faithful (44:10-11, 15-16; 48:11) during the Exile. There is zero scriptural evidence for Ezekiel having a Zadokite heritage.

The reference to the “hand of the Lord” being upon him indicates that Ezekiel was divinely inspired and empowered to deliver God’s message to the exiles. The ‘land of the Chaldeans’ refers to the Neo-Babylonian empire ruled over by Nebopolassar (627-605 BCE) and his son Nebuchadnezzar (605-562 BCE).

SUMMATION

The opening verses of Ezekiel set the stage for the prophetic message that follows. The fact that Ezekiel received his vision among the exiles by the Chebar canal underscores the fact that his message is directed to the Israelite community in exile. The political and social upheaval of the time is also reflected in the references to King Jehoiachin’s exile and the Babylonian conquest.

Ezekiel 1:1-3 offers spiritual lessons that are still relevant today:

First, we see that God is not limited by our circumstances. Even in the midst of exile and captivity, God can still reveal himself and speak to his people.

Second, we see that God chooses ordinary people to do extraordinary things. Ezekiel was a priest, but God called him to be a prophet and to deliver his message to the exiles.

Finally, we see that God’s word is powerful and authoritative. Ezekiel’s prophetic message was not his own, but rather it came directly from God.

As we read the book of Ezekiel, we are reminded that God is sovereign over all of history, and that his word has the power to transform our lives and to give us hope even in the midst of difficult situations.

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27