Tag: New Testament

Posted in General

The Ultimate Sacrifice: Love and Faith on Remembrance Sunday

Posted on by writtenexposition

Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. John 15:13

In the United Kingdom Remembrance Sunday honours those who gave their lives in the two world wars as well as others who have died in conflicts since 1945. It falls on the second Sunday in November which is the one nearest to 11 November, Armistice Day (in USA, Veterans Day).

The Armistice, an agreement to end the fighting of the First World War in advance of peace negotiations, began at 11 a.m. on November 11, 1918; bringing that war to an end. The nation therefore commemorates the young men and women who sacrificed everything, as well as others who returned, carrying physical and emotional scars.

Not only on Remembrance Sunday but every Sunday Christians commemorate another young man who laid down his life. He is the one who spoke these profound words: Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends (John 15:13). The Lord Jesus Christ spoke those words the night before he died on the cross. His death was not for freedom from political tyranny, but to free us from the penalty of sin. His death was not just to give us a better life, but to give us eternal life.

The Greatness of the Person
Jesus stands unparalleled in history. His words inspire and challenge us: Whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain (Matthew 5:41). He taught us to love our enemies, to bless those who curse us, and to pray for those who persecute us (Matthew 5:44). His works testified to the power of love, as he healed the sick, fed the hungry, and raised the dead. He had no wealth, yet he offered the greatest treasure of all—eternal life.

I am sure that throughout history many men have died to save another. That is a wonderful thing!  But Jesus Christ, God manifest in the flesh, died for the sins of the whole world—that is something truly amazing!

The Greatness of the Affection
If love is measured by the depth of sacrifice then the ultimate expression of love is found in Christ’s willingness to lay down his life for us. In a world marked by conflict and division, his sacrifice stands as a beacon of hope. God took the initiative to reconcile us to himself, sending his only son to bridge the chasm created by sin. That is why the grand theme of the Bible is ‘no greater love.’ It reveals God’s plan to make reconciliation possible by the death of his only Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. His sacrifice was motivated by love for humanity—a love that knows no bounds. This act of love is the source of our peace and the foundation of our faith.

On Remembrance Sunday, as we recall those who have sacrificed their lives, let us also reflect on the love that motivated such acts. The soldiers who fought for freedom did so out of love for their country, their families, and their comrades.

The Greatness of the Demonstration
1 John 3:16 says, Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us… The essence of love is to care for someone enough to die for them. Jesus Christ willingly chose to lay down his life, demonstrating that true love is not merely a sentiment but an action. In this ultimate act of love he died not only for his friends but also for his enemies. But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:8 NIV

No-one took Jesus Christ’s life from Him (John 10:17-18). Death is the result of sin (Rom. 6:23; James 1:15) but the Lord Jesus had no sin — therefore death had no claim upon him. In order to die for our sins, Jesus had to ‘lay down his life’ voluntarily, of his own accord. 

On Remembrance Sunday let us each ask: Who would I lay down my life for? Would I extend that love even to my enemies? Am I willing to love deeply and sacrificially, like Jesus Christ? As we honour the memory of those who have given their lives, let us also commit ourselves to live in a way that reflects the greatness of sacrificial love.

Posted in Exposition

The Epistle Of Jude – Verses 1 and 2 – Introduction

Posted on by writtenexposition

READING: Jude 1-25

FURTHER READING: Zechariah 3:1-4; 2 Peter 2:1-18; 3:1-3; Commentary on 2 Peter 2:1-22; The Book of Enoch

INTRODUCTION

The short Epistle of Jude, containing 461 Greek words, is a New Testament book which preachers and teachers tend to neglect. Often they concentrate more on 2 Peter, with which the Epistle of Jude shares a number of verses. The resemblances between them in ideas and wording are indeed striking. Jude 4-13 aligns with 2 Peter 2:1-17 and Jude 17-18 echoes 2 Peter 3:2-3. It is thought that the similarities may be explained either by literary dependence (i.e. one of them used the other as a source) or by a common source (i.e. each of the writers drew upon an earlier document or tradition). Generally speaking, scholars argue for literary dependence; with 2 Peter thought to be secondary. If Jude had access to all of 2 Peter, so the argument goes, surely he would have used more of it; so Peter must have used Jude. We shall leave that debate to others.

Equally unclear are the date the epistle was written, those to whom it was originally addressed and the exact occasion for writing. There is nothing in the letter that would establish its year of origin but, since its author claims to be Jude the brother of James, it must have been written before the end of the first century; probably between 65 and 80 CE.

There is also no hint as to the identity of the letter’s recipients. Jude addresses them as ‘beloved’ (‘Dear friends’) so he must have known them personally. During the first century heretical ideas and practices like those he describes emerged in Asia Minor so perhaps Jude is writing to a group of Jewish Christians there. His allusions to Old Testament characters and events and the presumption that his readers would understand them would indicate that both he and they had a Jewish worldview. He also refers to, and quotes, from Jewish apocryphal literature.

Although Jude addresses a specific situation his book is usually classified as one of the seven New Testament ‘catholic’ or ‘general’ epistles (James, 1 Peter, 2 Peter, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, Jude). These are circular letters addressed to the Christian church at large rather than to one specific destination. Jude is written in the form of a first century Christian letter. It commences with the name of the sender, the recipients, a greeting and ends with a doxology. Jude’s purpose in writing is to underscore and emphasise the personal responsibility of Christian believers to be vigilant against false teachers/teaching and ungodly practices.

There are a couple of sevens (v. 14 ‘the seventh from Adam’ and allusions to seven Old Testament individuals/ groups and associated events – Israelites, angels, Sodom & Gomorrah, archangel Michael, Cain, Balaam, Korah) but Jude has a noticeable penchant for triadic constructions. His grouping of elements together in threes displays his skill as a writer and is an example of the rhetorical device of amplification by accumulation, where a series of words or phrases with similar meanings are presented together to create a stronger statement and have greater impact. This skilful use of language helps make Jude’s message memorable, persuasive and therefore more likely to achieve its intended effect. Currie (2023) lists 22 triplets in an appendix to his comments on the Epistle of Jude.

SIMPLE DIVISION OF JUDE

1-2 Greeting

3-4 Purpose

5-11 Reminder

12-16 Description

17-23 Exhortation

24-25 Doxology

COMMENTS

GREETING (1-2)

1 Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called.
2 Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied.

(1) In verse 1 Jude gives details of the author and the audience.

Jude

The writer identifies himself as ‘Jude ((Ioúdas) the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James’. This is a clear indication that Judas, the brother of Jesus, wrote this epistle. If the names in Mt 13:55 are listed in order of age then Jude may have been the youngest in the family. He may also have been married (1 Cor 9:5). There are several men in the New Testament called by the popular name Jude/Judas:

  • Judas, the half-brother of Jesus (Mt 13:55; Mk 6:3).
  • Judas [son] of James (Lk 6:16; Acts 1:13) also known as Lebbaeus Thaddeus or Thaddaeus (Mt 10:3; Mk 3:18). John calls him ‘Judas, not Iscariot (Jn 14:22).
  • Judas Iscariot, the disciple who betrayed Jesus (Mt 10:4, Lk 22:3-4).
  • Judas of Galilee, a revolutionary (Acts 5:37).
  • Judas, at whose home in Damascus Paul stayed after his conversion (Acts 9:11).
  • Judas, surnamed Barsabas (Acts 15:22).

Jesus Christ

Jude, while being Jesus’ brother, humbly calls himself a ‘slave’ rather than asserting his familial connection to Jesus Christ. This term ‘slave’, however, is often linked with Christian ministry (Rom 1:1; Gal 1:10; Phil 1:1; Col 4:12; Jam 1:1; 2 Pet 1:1) and therefore may also indicate someone specifically authorised to labour in the Lord’s service who, as such, deserves to be listened to and heeded. Jude states that he is a servant of Jesus Christ before mentioning that he is related to James; this would suggest that he prioritizes his submission to Jesus Christ over earthly ties (it is interesting that Jude’s brother James, in his epistle, introduces himself similarly as ‘James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ’). Jude’s use of ‘servant’ therefore not only reflects an emphasis on his spiritual rather than familial relationship with Jesus but also establishes his authority to address his readers and warn them about the dangers of false teachings.

James

James, the brother of Jesus, was a prominent figure in the early church, particularly within the Jerusalem community (Mt 13:55; Acts 15:13; 21:18; 1 Cor 15:7; Gal 1:19; 2:9,12) and was so highly respected that he could be referred to simply as ‘James’ without any confusion. The author of the Epistle of Jude probably identifies himself as ‘the brother of James’ for two reasons: 1) to distinguish himself from other individuals named Jude or Judas in the early church and 2) to leverage the authority and recognition associated with James, the Lord’s brother. By identifying himself as ‘the brother of James’ Jude implicitly links himself to James’ authority and reputation. This was particularly important since, as someone who was not an apostle, Jude would not have been widely known. Associating himself with James enhances the impact of his message, due to James’s esteemed position and influence within the early church.

AUDIENCE

The letter is addressed to ‘them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called.’ The terms ‘sanctified’, ‘preserved’, and ‘called’ are important theological concepts and together provide a concise definition of a true Christian believer:

Sanctification: This signifies being set apart for God’s purposes, a process of becoming more Christ-like.

Preservation: This emphasizes the ongoing (perfect tense – not only once but continuing) protection and security that believers have in Jesus Christ. This word (tēréō) in Jude 1 means ‘carefully guarded’ (see Acts 12:5; 16:23). There may also be the idea of preserved for Jesus Christ (cf. 1 Thess 5:23).

There are five references to ‘being kept’ (tēréō) in Jude: v.1 ‘preserved;’ v.6 ‘kept;’ v.6 ‘reserved;’ v.13 ‘reserved;’ v.21 ‘keep’

Calling: This refers to the divine initiative in salvation (Rom 1:6; 8:28; 1 Cor 1:24; 1Thess 2:12; 2 Thess 2:13-14; 2 Tim 1:9; 1 Pet 2:9; 5:10; Rev 17:14).

(2) Jude’s greeting in verse 2 is also a prayer: ‘Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied.’ This is typical of early Christian letters; they often included a prayer or blessing for the recipients (e.g. 1 Pet 1:2). These three objective aspects of God’s grace are often interpreted subjectively. Only in Jude are they found together.

Mercy: Objective: mercy is God’s saving action in Christ. Subjective: the recipients need God’s forgiveness and compassion, especially in the face of the challenges they face.

Peace: Objective: reconciliation with God. Subjective: the inner harmony and wholeness that comes from a right relationship with God, even in the midst of trials.

Love: Objective: God’s love extended to sinners. Subjective: brotherly love between Christians.

The request that these blessings be ‘multiplied’ expresses Jude’s desire for the recipients to experience these qualities in abundance.

Jude 3-11: Historical Judgments

Unmasking False Teachers in Jude 12-16: Key Metaphors Explained

Contending for the Faith: Lessons from Jude 17-25

Posted in Exposition

THOUGHTS ON 3 JOHN

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Consisting of just 219 Greek words 3 John is the shortest book in the New Testament. With 245 Greek words, 2 John is the next shortest. These two books by the same author share some similarities. They both appear to be personal letters addressed to individuals, from someone calling himself ‘the elder.’ 2 John is addressed to an anonymous lady and her children and 3 John to a man called Gaius. In each case, however, the content seems to be aimed at a wider readership. They have the same structure, similar conclusions and have ‘truth’ and ‘love’ as key words.

Neither letter records the writer’s name and date of writing but authorship has traditionally been ascribed to the Apostle John and the date of writing thought to be between 80 and 95 CE. Scholars also reckon that John was based in Ephesus at that time and, as the last of the twelve apostles still living, was a senior figure in the fellowship of Christian assemblies in Asia Minor.

Both epistles deal with the topic of hospitality, but from a different angle. On the one hand, 2 John forbids extending hospitality to visiting teachers who hold faulty teaching about Jesus Christ whereas, on the other hand, 3 John encourages the provision of hospitality and material supplies to itinerant Christian workers who have ‘gone out in the Name.’ The key verse in 3 John is v. 8 as it sums up John’s message to Gaius: ‘So we ourselves should support them so that we can be their partners as they teach the truth.’ 3 John 1:8 NLT

In 2 John the emphasis is more on the home whereas in 3 John the emphasis is on the church. Indeed, it is the only one of the Johannine writings, except the Revelation, that refers to ‘church’. 2 John, with its mention of deceivers, antichrist and teaching is more concerned with doctrine. 3 John mentions three men, at least one of whom is a church leader, and focuses more on personalities.

The occasion that inspired the writing of 3 John is unknown but may perhaps be reconstructed as follows from the sparse information in the epistle. John writes a personal note to a close friend called Gaius about a serious situation that has arisen in one of the Christian assemblies in Asia Minor. Gaius is an influential and hospitable member either of that assembly or of another one nearby. By sheer force of personality a man called Diotrephes has assumed leadership of the church, is refusing to receive itinerant Christian workers and has excommunicated other members of the church who opposed or disobeyed him. John has written to the assembly about these issues but Diotrephes has rejected his communication, made it clear that John is not welcome and has been spreading malicious rumours about him. John writes to encourage Gaius in his faith and exhort him to continue to extend hospitality to Christian workers. John himself will travel to the church urgently and will sort out the problem of Diotrephes.

Third John may be divided as follows:

1-2 SALUTATION
3- 8 PROSPEROUS GAIUS – WALKING IN THE TRUTH
9-11 PREEMINENT DIOTREPHES – WITHOUT TRUTH
12 PRAISEWORTHY DEMETRIUS – WELL-REPORTED OF THE TRUTH
13-14 CONCLUSION

SALUTATION (1-2)

(1) Like any first century Greek letter, 3 John begins with a salutation. As in 2 John, the writer identifies himself as ‘the presbyter (elder).’ This word can refer to an older man, which John certainly was at the time of writing, but in the early church it also referred to a church leader; of which there would have been a plurality in every assembly location (Ac 14:23; 20:17; Titus 1:5).

The elder addresses the letter to one person, a certain Gaius, whom he describes as ‘well-beloved’ in v.1 and also in vv. 2, 5 and 11. There are three references to love in the first two verses. The elder loves Gaius in truth i.e. he truly or genuinely loves him. Even though there is no definite article (‘the’) it may mean that the elder loves Gaius ‘in the truth’ i.e. they are fellow-believers in the truth about Jesus Christ. There are six references to truth in the epistle: vv.1, 3 twice, 4, 8, 12.

The name Gaius (meaning ‘rejoicing’) was popular in the Roman Empire at that time which would suggest that this man was a Gentile convert. There are three other men named Gaius in the New Testament:

  • Gaius of Macedonia Acts 19:29
  • Gaius of Derbe Acts 20:4
  • Gaius of Corinth Rom 16:23; 1 Cor 1:14

Some commentators speculate that Gaius of Corinth may have been the hospitable Gaius of 3 John since Paul says that he was his ‘host’ (Rom 16:23). That is unlikely because the Gaius in 3 John is one of the Apostle John’s converts (3 Jn 4) whereas the other three are closely associated with Paul. It would therefore seem that the Gaius of 3 John is a fourth Gaius, especially since there is no ancient tradition that links the epistle 3 John with Corinth.

(2) As in any secular letter of the time there follows a wish for the recipient’s good health and wellbeing. The verb eúchomai can mean ‘wish’ or ‘pray;’ perhaps the latter translation is more appropriate in this case. The elder addresses Gaius as ‘beloved’ (something like ‘dear friend’) and prays that Gaius may prosper (lit. be led along a good road; cp. Rom 1:10; 1 Cor 16:2) and be well even as his psyche (soul or life) is prosperous. This wish that Gaius might be as well off physically as he is spiritually may suggest that Gaius had some ongoing health problem(s).

PROSPEROUS GAIUS – WALKING IN THE TRUTH (3- 8)

(3) Having stated in v.2b that Gaius’ soul prospers, the elder proceeds to give his reasons for that confident assertion. He says that he rejoiced greatly when some of the brothers (see also vv.5, 10) came to him with a good report about Gaius’ faithfulness and adherence to the truth. The present participle in ‘coming’ and ‘testifying’ implies that these occurred more than once (‘the brothers coming and testifying’). Possibly the same ‘brothers’ who brought the good news about Gaius are those who also reported negatively on Diotrephes (v.10). ‘Even as’ – that the truth is in Gaius is exemplified by the fact that he always ‘walks (i.e. lives) in the truth.’

(4) Lit. ‘Greater than these I do not have joy that I hear.’ Referring to the occasions when he had heard good reports about Gaius the elder expands upon ‘rejoiced greatly’ (v.3) to say that nothing causes him greater joy than hearing reports like these about his ‘children’ (téknon). Presumably his children refers to converts who have come to faith in Jesus Christ through his ministry. The Apostle Paul uses téknon in this sense in 1 Cor 4:14; Gal 4:19; Phil 2:22. The joy that the elder experiences reflects his deep pastoral concern for the spiritual growth of his converts.

(5) Once again addressing Gaius as ‘beloved’ (vv. 1, 2, see also 11) the elder commends him for all his efforts for the brothers, even though they are strangers. What he does for them (i.e. his hospitality) is ‘a faithful thing’ – he is acting as a believer should. ‘And to strangers’ means ‘even to strangers.’ The strangers are the brothers, not a different group of people. They are fellow-believers, most likely itinerant preachers, unknown to Gaius.

‘You do the faithful thing’ is present tense but may also refer to future actions as if already accomplished. All that Gaius has done, currently does and will do for the brothers is an expression of his Christian faith.

(6) The brothers had testified to the truth that was in Gaius (v.3) but here it is said that they also testified to his love, speaking highly of him in the presence of the church. Most likely this means the presbyter’s assembly rather than Gaius’ assembly or the church at large. In the gospel and epistles of John ‘church’ only occurs here and in vv. 9 and 10 of this letter.

‘Whom if thou bring forward on their journey… thou shalt do well.’ To ‘bring them forward’ means to ‘send them on their way;’ the idea is that after extending hospitality Gaius would send them off equipped with enough food and money to last them until they reached their next destination (Acts 15:3; Rom 15:24; 1 Cor 16:6,11; 2 Cor 1:16; Tit 3:13). To send them on their journey like this would be ‘in a manner worthy of God. ‘Thou shalt do well’ is future which suggests that although the travelling workers had visited Gaius and then returned to the elder (v.3) they were about to go out again and would require hospitality from Gaius once more.

(7) ‘Because they have set out on behalf of the Name.’ ‘ Set out’ (exérchomai) is used of missionaries in Acts 14:20; 15:40. ‘The Name’ could refer to God but is more likely to refer to Jesus, as it does elsewhere in the New Testament (Jn 15:21; Acts 4:12, 17; 5:41; 9:16; 15:26; 21:13; Rom 1:5; Phil 2:9; 1 Pet 4:14). The reasons John gives for supporting the brothers are a) they are Christian missionaries, and b) they have no other means of support.

Perhaps to contrast with the begging activities of itinerant philosophers and representatives of pagan cults the Christian missionaries did not seek support (received nothing) from the Gentiles. Note that Jews used the word ‘Gentiles’ to refer to non-Jews whereas in this verse we have an example of its use by Christians to refer to non-believers.

(8) ‘We’ (i.e. Christian believers as distinct from non-believing Gentiles) are to receive such (i.e. those that match the criteria in v.7). Notice the word play: those who ‘receive’ (lambánō) nothing from the Gentiles ought to be ‘fully received’ (apolambánō) by the church. By receiving such people Gaius would prove to be a co-worker (sunergós, see also Rom 16:3; 2 Cor 6:1; Phil 2:25; Col 4:11) for the truth (the gospel message).

PREEMINENT DIOTREPHES – WITHOUT TRUTH (9-11)

(9) John now refers to the case of Diotrephes (his name means ‘God-nurtured’). This may have been his main motivation for writing to Gaius. He says ‘I wrote to the church’ which would suggest that in a letter that is no longer extant John wrote, perhaps to commend a worker or provide some teaching for the assembly, but the message was rejected by Diotrephes. This church where Diotrephes holds sway may be Gaius’ assembly also but since John seems to be informing Gaius of the situation it seems more likely that it is an assembly near Gaius.

John states that Diotrephes does not ‘receive’ him personally; i.e. he does not accept John’s apostolic authority. John notes that Diotrephes is someone who ‘loves to have first place.’ The present tense (‘loves’) denotes ongoing and habitual action. Egotistical and ambitious as he is, Diotrephes seems to have appointed himself as leader of the assembly and for some reason, whether doctrinal or personal, spurns the authority of the apostle John.

(10) In v.10 John lists four specific allegations about Diotrephes behaviour. ‘Which he doth’ is present tense. Diotrephes’ actions are continuous and ongoing.

  • He slanders John.
  • He refuses to accept the brothers (itinerant Christian workers).
  • He prevents others church members from extending hospitality to the brothers.
  • He expels those who disobey him and give hospitality to the brothers.

John says ‘wherefore, if I come, I will remember his deeds.’ This statement does not imply doubt about John’s arrival. He is promising to visit the assembly and publicly denounce Diotrephes (‘I will bring up, remind’). He will address Diotrephes’ deplorable behaviour when he visits.

(11) Once again calling Gaius ‘beloved’ John encourages him to imitate good and avoid evil. One who is good shows that he is of God whilst one who is evil has not seen God. The perfect tense of ‘has seen’ references a past event. ‘To see God’ is to have intimate knowledge of God (Jn 6:46; 14:9). John would not wish Gaius to imitate Diotrephes but in the next verse he mentions someone whom Gaius would do well to imitate.

PRAISEWORTHY DEMETRIUS – WELL-REPORTED OF THE TRUTH (12)

Implicit in the text is the suggestion that Gaius ought to imitate the life of Demetrius, who is a good person. His name meaning ‘belonging to Demeter’ (Demeter was a Greek fertility goddess) would suggest that he is a converted pagan. That he is ‘well spoken of by everyone and by the truth itself’ means that he has a good testimony and lives a life of truth. He is of good character and has a good reputation. Demetrius may have been the one who carried the letter to Gaius because John then adds a further endorsement: ‘we (pl) bear witness.’ John and his associates also vouch for Demetrius. John may have in mind the Old Testament requirement for three witnesses (Dt 19:15, cp. 1 Jn 5:7-8). The witness to Demetrius’ life and character was from a) everyone b) the truth, and c) John and his associates.

CONCLUSION (13-14)

The concluding words of 3 John are similar to those of 2 John 12-13. The elder ends on a personal note, saying that he looks forward to seeing Gaius, whom he asks to convey his greetings to other believers.

(13) John has been using the plural ‘we’ in v.12 but now changes to the singular ‘I’ in vv.13 and 14. He has told Gaius that he is coming to visit ‘shortly’ therefore he will not write more with a reed pen and ink (lit. black) but will talk to Gaius in person (lit, ‘mouth to mouth’).

(14) ‘Shortly’ is ‘immediately’ or ‘very soon’ and may reflect the urgency with which John needs to deal with the problem of Diotrephes. The letter closes with a three-fold greeting:

1. ‘Peace be to thee.’ John wishes a blessing upon Gaius (cp. Num 6:26).

2. ‘Our friends salute thee.’ John’s associates send their greetings as well.

3. ‘Greet the friends by name’ John asks Gaius to to pass on his greetings to each person individually rather than just as a group. This is the one and only time Christians are directly addressed as ‘friends’ in the New Testament.

SUMMATION

3 John highlights the topics of truth, hospitality and church leadership. It contrasts the behaviour of faithful and helpful believers like Gaius and Demetrius with the self-serving and divisive actions of Diotrephes and thus serves as both encouragement and warning.

Posted in Exposition

THOUGHTS ON 2 JOHN

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

The Second Epistle of John, the second shortest book in the New Testament with only 245 Greek words, is a brief letter written in the Greek style that was common in the first century CE and is the only New Testament epistle addressed to a woman. At first sight, 2 John appears to be a personal letter, possibly sent to an individual Christian woman. However, the content of the letter is general enough to suggest a broader audience. Many scholars believe that ‘elect lady’ is a cryptic reference to a Christian church or community, rather than an actual person.

Traditionally, the letter is attributed to the Apostle John, who is thought to have written it from Ephesus, possibly to a Christian community in Asia Minor c. 80-95 CE. The letter mentions the Father and Jesus Christ but does not refer directly to the Holy Spirit. Like 1 John, its major themes are ‘love’ and ‘truth.’

The epistle divides as follows:

1-3 Address and salutation

4-6 Spiritual life: following God’s commands.

7-11 Spiritual dangers: repudiating deceivers.

12-13 Closing greeting.

ADDRESS AND SALUTATION (1-3)

(1) The author of the letter does not provide his name but instead identifies himself as ‘the presbyter’ or ‘elder,’ The definite article (‘the’) would suggest that he was a well-known figure among his recipients. The word ‘elder’ means an older man but in the early church it also carried the idea of maturity, dignity and authority. It signified a church leader/overseer.

For further reading see my earlier posts on presbuteros in the Pastoral Epistles:

(1) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – INTRODUCTION

(2) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – QUALIFICATIONS

(3) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – CONCLUSION AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

The letter opens with a greeting from ‘the elder’ to ‘the elect lady and her children.’ In vv. 1 and 5 ‘lady’ (kuria) is the feminine form of ‘lord’ (kurios). She is described as ‘elect’ (eklektḗ). Possibly the writer is using this designation to respectfully address a woman of distinction (something like ‘dear lady’). If so, she is a Christian woman who has children (v.4) and her own house (v.10).

Note, however, that both words may be proper names. Electa meaning ‘chosen, selected or excellent’ and Kyria meaning ‘strong, valued, essential, noble.’ The letter may therefore be written to a woman called Electa Kyria. Notice that Rom 16:13 has a similar masculine example that includes ‘elect.’

Various interpretations of ‘elect lady’ have been suggested, such as:

  • the lady Electa (it is, however, unlikely that one particular woman would be known and loved by all Christians or that two sisters in the same family would be named Electa, see v.13).
  • the noble Kyria
  • Dear lady – a courteous greeting.
  • Elect lady – the Christian church at large.
  • Elect lady (and your children) – a local church or Christian community (and its members).

Given the context of Roman hostility towards Christianity at the time, the latter interpretation seems likely. By using symbolic language, the author may have been attempting to protect the identities of both himself and his audience.

If the ‘elect lady’ is indeed figuratively a church then her children (téknois) are her spiritual offspring or members. Church members are referred to as ‘children’ several times in 1 John (1 Jn 3:1, 2, 10; 5:2). John says that he loves them (‘whom’ is plural) ‘in truth.’ This means that he’ ‘really’ or ‘truly’ loves them.

Not only is it a church that John loves but it is also well-known – because it is loved by all who know the truth. John here associates himself with all who ‘have known’ the truth. The perfect tense conveys two ideas: an action that has taken place in the past and its results that continue in the present. In John’s thinking he and all who know the truth are orthodox in their beliefs unlike the deceivers in vv.7-11. ‘Truth’ is mentioned five times in 2 John, all occurrences are in the first four verses.

(2) John expands upon v.1 and says that he loves the lady and her children ‘on account of the truth.’ He does not only love her because she is well-respected but also because they share the truth. This truth dwells (abides, remains) in us and will be with us forever. The emphasis is on the words ‘with us.’ This may be an indirect reference to the Holy Spirit (Jn 14:17; 15:26; 1 Jn 3:24; 5:7). The indwelling power makes us capable of Christian love.

(3) The salutation concludes with a blessing, expressing confidence that the recipients will receive grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. God will support them (grace) and have compassion and pity on them (mercy) should they have to endure undeserved affliction. Grace and mercy will produce well-being (peace). These three things are associated with truth and love.

The formula ‘grace, mercy and peace’ occurs in other New Testament letters (1 Tim 1:2; 2 Tim 1:2; Tit 1:4). John says that grace, mercy and peace come from God the Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father. The expression ‘Son of the Father’ is unique to 2 John.

See: THE IDENTITY OF JESUS AS ‘SON OF’

The repetition of truth and love from v.1 marks the end of the opening salutation.

SPIRITUAL LIFE: FOLLOWING GOD’S COMMANDS (4-6)

(4) The next section shifts to a discussion about the spiritual life of the recipients. Having referred to truth and love at the end of v.3 the author takes these up as themes in vv.4-6. John expresses joy upon hearing that some members of the community are ‘walking in truth,’ living in accordance with God’s commands (1 Kgs 2:4; 2 Kgs 20:3; Psa 86:11; Isa 38:3; 3 Jn 3, 4). However, his use of ‘some’ suggests that not all are steadfast in their faith, indicating possible divisions or disagreements among the believers. Verse 4 attributes the command to live in the truth to the Father, not to the Lord Jesus Christ.

(5-6) Verses 5-6 make it clear that the command to live in the truth includes the obligation to love others. John emphasises the importance of love to resolve issues, reminding them that they are to love one another, a command which has been central since the beginning of Christianity. It is the new command which in the Fourth Gospel was issued by Jesus (Jn13:34; 15:12-17) but would have come from God (Jn 7:16-17). It is also attributed to God in 1 Jn 3:23. Love, John argues, is the foundation of all God’s commands.

‘Command’ appears four times in vv. 4-6. It appears three times in the singular; in v.4 (‘a command’), in v.5 (‘a new command’) and in v.6 (‘the command’). In v.6 it is in the plural (‘his commands’). The singular may perhaps refer to the specific command to love but the plural to all God’s commands.

Again emphasizing that the command is from the beginning, John in v.6 underlines the fact that they should love one another. He does this by reversing the order of the ideas of command and love; in v.5 command is followed by love, in v.6 love is followed by command. In v.6 he also uses ‘this’ and ‘that’ to provide emphasis: ‘this is love…that we should walk after his commandments.’ Obedience to the command to love is obligatory.

SPIRITUAL DANGERS: REPUDIATING DECEIVERS (7-11)

(7) John then moves on to warn against spiritual dangers, specifically false teachers who may lead believers astray. These ‘deceivers,’ as he calls them, have abandoned true doctrine and are opposing Christ, making them ‘antichrists.’ John cautions his readers to be vigilant so that they do not lose what they have worked for, but instead receive their full reward.

John links vv.7-11 with the preceding section vv.4-6 by the word hóti meaning ‘for’ or ‘because.’ He moves from rejoicing that his readers walk in truth to warning them against the malign influence of people who might mislead them into holding false beliefs. He claims that many deceivers have abandoned true doctrine and  ‘defected’ into the world (1 Jn 2:18-19). Switching from plural (‘many deceivers’) to singular (‘a deceiver’) John brands such a person as the deceiver and the antichrist. A deceiver is someone who figuratively wanders from the truth and leads others astray. An antichrist is someone who is actively opposed to Christ.

John says of the deceivers that ‘they confess not,’ – it is worth observing that often what people do not say can be more deceptive than what they actually do express.

Deceivers do not acknowledge ‘Jesus Christ coming in the flesh.’ ‘Coming’ (erchomenon) is a present active participle. What does John mean by this brief description of their heresy? Is he referring to Christ’s first or second coming, i.e. to his incarnation or to his parousia?

The usual interpretation takes this present active participle as meaning that the historical Jesus Christ came in the flesh and continues to remain in the flesh, i.e. he never stopped being human (see Patterson & Kelley, Women’s Evangelical Commentary NT, p. 879). It is thus a similar thought to 1 John 4:2 which is more precise as it has a perfect participle (elḗlythota):  ‘Jesus Christ having come in the flesh.’

Or, does the present participle have a future meaning? If it does then the deceivers either deny Christ’s future parousia or that it will be ‘in the flesh.’

(8) Since many deceivers are out and about John issues a strong warning to his readers. He instructs them using the imperative: ‘watch yourselves’ (‘be vigilant’ or ‘protect yourselves’). Self-effort is necessary, the believers must always be on the alert. This is because doctrinal error can result in loss. John presents this possibility negatively and then positively:

Do not lose what we have worked for. This refers to the missionary work and evangelistic effort that John and others have undertaken. It would be sad to lose what has been accomplished (cp. Gal 4:11; Phil 2:16).

That you may receive a full reward. This refers to the reward for service that believers will receive (Mt 5:12; Mk 9:41; Jn 4:35-36; 1 Cor 3:8; Rev 11:18; 22:12). Acceptance of false teaching will diminish that reward. John therefore warns them against complacency as he wants them to receive their reward ‘in full’ i.e. without anything lacking.

(9) Should someone, however, ‘transgress’ (run ahead, go beyond, make progress) and not remain in the doctrine of Christ then that person has never been saved. He may think that he is progressive but he does not have (possess) God. John draws a contrast between ‘whoever abideth not in the doctrine of Christ’ and ‘he that abideth in the doctrine of Christ.’ Someone with a wrong view of Christ has neither Christ nor the Father whereas someone who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both.

Whether the genitive (‘of’) is subjective (teaching from Christ) or objective (teaching about Christ) is matter of great debate. Either view makes sense but in view of the emphasis in 1 and 2 John on what is ‘from the beginning’ (1 Jn 1:1; 2:7, 13, 14, 24; 3:8, 11; 2 Jn 5, 6) it seems more likely that Christ’s own teaching is foremost in John’s mind, i.e. the genitive is subjective.

(10-11) CONTAMINATION BY ASSOCIATION

‘If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine…’ The two verbs ‘come’ and ‘bring’ together suggest the possibility that people are travelling about with the deliberate intention of promoting their false teaching. John may be aware of some who have already set out to visit the ‘elect lady’ for that purpose. He uses further imperatives: ‘do not receive’ and ‘do not greet’ to issue a clear instruction to reject false teachers and avoid any association with them. This is practical advice. Using the repeated negative ‘do not’ for emphasis, he warns the believers against what D. Moody Smith (1 2 & 3 John : Interpretation Commentary, p.145) aptly terms ‘contamination by association.’

Although hospitality was strongly encouraged in the early church (Acts 16:15; Rom 12:13; 1 Tim 3:2; 5:9-10; Tit 1:8; Heb 13:2; 1 Pet 4:9) the presence of false teachers in believers’ houses would make it easier for false teaching to be spread, especially since church services were usually held in homes.

Vv.10-11 make it clear that an individual Christian or a church has a responsibility to combat the spread of error by refusing to welcome false teachers into ‘the house’ or even to greet them cordially. The reason John gives for this is that anyone who welcomes and supports false teachers becomes complicit in their wrongdoing. Such a person ‘fellowships’ or ‘partners’ with the false teachers in their evil deeds. A similar thought is expressed by Paul in 1 Tim 5:22 where the same verb (koinōnéṓ̄) is used: ‘neither be partaker of other men’s sins.’ This apparent intolerance advocated by John demonstrates the seriousness with which the apostles regarded false teaching about the person of Christ. Such doctrine would undermine the true Christian faith so they were not prepared to permit or overlook it.

CLOSING GREETING (12-13)

John closes his letter by expressing his wish to visit in person. He has so much to write to them that he ‘did not wish’ to set out his thoughts on paper (lit. papyrus) and ink (lit. what is black). He looks forward to face-to-face (lit. mouth to mouth) communication that will bring ‘completed joy’ (see 1 Jn 1:4). He also sends greetings from the ‘offspring of your elect sister,’ which, if ‘elect lady’ in v.1 is indeed a metaphor for a church, suggests another Christian community sending regards.

SUMMATION

Though brief, 2 John is rich with meaning and insight into the early Christian church. It emphasises the importance of love and truth, warns against false teaching and teachers, and underscores the need for vigilance. Written in a time of persecution and uncertainty, this letter serves as both encouragement and a guide to maintaining the integrity of the Christian community.

Posted in Exposition

Living Out Our Faith: Practical Lessons from Hebrews 10:19-25

Posted on by writtenexposition

Having Therefore… Let Us!

The words ‘Having therefore… let us!’ indicate a powerful transition in the Epistle to the Hebrews which divides the letter into two clear sections: the doctrinal (1:1-10:18) and the practical (10:19-13:25). Essentially, the second section calls us to live out what we have learned.

This blog post focuses on the practical exhortations found in Hebrews 10:19-25. But first, for those unfamiliar with the Epistle to the Hebrews, here is a brief introduction and summary of its content so far.

When was the book written?

The exact date of Hebrews is uncertain, but it must predate the Roman siege and destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, as this event is not mentioned in the letter. It was likely written in the mid-60s CE, considering that the Jewish worship system in the Second Temple was still active (10:11).

Who wrote the book?

The author of Hebrews remains unknown. Scholars have suggested various figures, including Paul, Barnabas, Luke, and Apollos. While many favour Paul due to thematic similarities, arguments against his authorship, such as a Greek style different to his letters and potentially conflicting statements about the source of teaching (Gal 1:12; Heb 2:3), make definitive attribution impossible. Ultimately, who the author was is not all that important when one considers that Hebrews extols the Lord Jesus. It argues for the supremacy of Christ; the book is all about him!

Who was it written to?

Hebrews, as the name suggests, was written to early Jewish Christians, probably in Palestine, who had faced persecution. Some had had property confiscated or destroyed but up to that point none of them had been killed (12:4). Despite their initial kindness and faithfulness to the persecuted (10:32-34), these believers had not matured spiritually (5:12-14). With a further wave of persecution looming some were considering abandoning Christianity to return to traditional Jewish practices. The letter was written to warn them about the dangers of apostasy (2:1-4; 3:1-4:13; 5:11-6:20; 10:26-39; 12:25-29), to set out the superiority of Christ over the Old Testament institutions and to encourage them to move on to maturity in their Christian faith.

One gets the impression that the content of Hebrews was first delivered as a sermon, then the author reproduced his notes as a letter.

1) His approach is informal; he uses first and second person pronouns like I, we, us and you.

2) The expressions he uses are conversational:

‘The things which we have heard,’ (2:1)

‘We have many things to say,’ (5:11)

‘Although we speak this way’ (6:9)

‘And what shall I more say? for the time would fail me to tell of Gideon, and of Barak…’ (11:32)

3) In 13:22 the author says: ‘And I beseech you, brethren, suffer (bear patiently with) the word of exhortation:’

That expression (‘word of exhortation’) also occurs in Acts 13:15. On their first missionary journey Paul and his friends went to the synagogue in Psidian Antioch one sabbath day and sat down. After the usual public reading of the scriptures the leaders of the synagogue issued an invitation to the visitors: ‘Ye men and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for the people, say on. Then Paul stood up, and beckoning with his hand said, Men of Israel, and ye that fear God, give audience.’

Paul then proceeded to preach the longest of his sermons that we have on record. In Acts 13, therefore, we have an real-life example of ‘word of exhortation’ meaning a sermon.

Content and Purpose of Hebrews

The first section focuses on the person of Christ (1:1-4:13) and on the priesthood of Christ (4:14-10:18) . The whole epistle emphasizes the pre-eminence of Christ and the new covenant, frequently using the term ‘better’ to highlight this superiority. This is evident in several passages:

‘Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.’ (1:4)

‘For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.’ (7:19)

‘By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.’ (7:22)

‘But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.’ (8:6)

‘It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.’ (9:23)

‘For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, and took joyfully the spoiling of your goods, knowing in yourselves that ye have in heaven a better and an enduring substance.’ (10:34)

‘But now they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city.’ (11:16)

‘Women received their dead raised to life again: and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance; that they might obtain a better resurrection:’ (11:35)

‘God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.’ (11:40)

‘And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.’ (12:24)

Although addressed primarily to Hebrew Christians, this is something that we need to know and appreciate today: The Lord Jesus Christ and all that we have in him is better than anything that we have ever had before.

Practical Lessons from Hebrews 10:19-25

Starting in Hebrews 10:19, the content of the letter changes from doctrine to practical application with the phrase ‘Having therefore.’ This signals a shift from knowledge to action, encouraging believers to live out their faith based on what they have been taught. The transition reminds us that the Bible is not merely for information but for transformation. We are to live out the truths we learn.

Having therefore’ – a great privilege
‘Let us’ – a great responsibility’

Let Us Draw Near (10:22)

We are invited to draw near to God with sincerity, faith, and a cleansed life. This direct approach, which was unthinkable for Old Testament believers, is now possible for all through Jesus’ sacrifice. Drawing near to God requires:

A correct heart: We must approach God sincerely and reverently, recognizing His holiness. Sincerity means coming to God with honesty, without pretence or hypocrisy.
A confident faith: We should draw near to God with full assurance of faith, trusting in His acceptance and promises.
A cleansed life: Our hearts and lives have been purified through Christ’s sacrifice, allowing us to approach God without guilt.

Let Us Hold Fast (10:23)

Believers are urged to hold fast to their confession of faith without wavering. This steadfastness is crucial in a world filled with uncertainties and challenges. Holding fast involves:

Continuing in our faith: Remaining unwavering in our beliefs despite opposition.
Living out our faith: Maintaining a high standard of Christian living.
Trusting God’s faithfulness: Believing that God, who has saved us, is faithful to His promises.

Let Us Consider One Another (10:24-25)

The final exhortation focuses on mutual encouragement within the Christian community. Believers are encouraged to:

Deliberate on how to encourage one another: Actively think of ways to spur each other on to love and good works.
Assemble together regularly: Not forsaking meetings, which provide fellowship and support.
Exhort one another: Continuously encourage and support one another, especially as the Day of Christ approaches.

Summation: Faith, Hope, and Love

As individuals and communities of faith, let us commit to:

Drawing Near: in faith
Holding Fast: to hope
Considering One Another: to promote love and good works

Together, let’s live out the faith, hope, and love that define our Christian walk, encouraging one another until the day of the Lord’s return.

Posted in General

THE IDENTITY OF JESUS AS ‘SON OF’

Posted on by writtenexposition

SON OF GOD – often – including Mk 1:1; Lk 1:35; Jn 1:49; Ac 9:20, Rom 1:4; 2 Cor 1:19; Gal 2:20

SON OF THE MOST HIGH -Mk 5:7

SON OF THE HIGHEST – Lk 1:32

SON OF THE LIVING GOD – Mt16:16; Jn 6:69

SON OF THE BLESSED – Mk14:61

SON OF THE FATHER – 2 Jn1:3

SON OF MAN – often

SON OF MARY – Mk 6:3

CARPENTER’S SON – Mt 13:55

SON OF JOSEPH – Lk 3:23; Jn 1:45; 6:42

SON OF DAVID – Mt 1:1; 15:22; 20:30; 21:15

SON OF ABRAHAM – Mt 1:1

Posted in General

MARY OF BETHANY

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

As we read through the New Testament it soon becomes obvious that ‘Mary’ was a common name in first century Palestine. The name Mary (which is the Greek form of the Hebrew Miriam) is mentioned by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John and the apostle Paul. It can be quite easy to confuse the Marys since the name occurs fifty-four times, in about twenty-nine different passages/settings, so do not be too annoyed with yourself if at times you are not exactly sure which one you are reading about. Even biblical scholars disagree on exactly how many Marys are mentioned in the New Testament. Some think that there are six, some that there are seven and others that there are eight. I am satisfied that there are seven, but will not fall out with anyone who thinks otherwise. So, who are the seven New Testament Marys? Here they are, in no particular order of preference, although the one that would immediately spring to mind is Mary, the Lord’s mother.

1. MARY THE MOTHER OF JESUS

2. MARY MAGDALENE

3. MARY THE MOTHER OF JAMES AND JOSES – Mt 27:56 (also called THE OTHER MARY Mt 27:61)

4. MARY [WIFE] OF CLEOPHAS – Jn 19:25

5. MARY THE MOTHER OF JOHN MARK – Acts 12:12

6. MARY OF ROME – Rom 16:6

7. MARY OF BETHANY

Three New Testament passages mention Mary of Bethany and in each account we find her at Jesus’ feet. 

In Luke 10:38-42 we see Mary at his feet – worshipping.

In John 11:28-35 we see Mary at his feet – weeping.

In John 12:1-7 we see Mary at his feet – washing.

Luke 10:38-42 MARY AT HIS FEET – WORSHIPPING

There was great activity in one particular household in Bethany that day; Jesus was coming to visit. We gather from the above passages that Jesus was a close, personal friend of Martha, Mary and their brother Lazarus. Jn 11:5 tells us: ‘Now Jesus loved Martha, and her sister, and Lazarus.’ Their home was always open to him, he was like one of the family. How wonderful it must have been for the Lord Jesus to be received into and entertained in a home where he was welcome! In that home he could unwind and feel at ease, for he was cherished and respected as an esteemed guest. At that home he could be sure of a good meal and a bed to lie on; which was not the norm during his public ministry. As a wandering rabbi and prophet he would have spent many nights sleeping under the stars in the open air. In Matthew 8:20 he spoke to one of the scribes saying:  ‘The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.’

Martha, anxiously checking that everything was in order and fussing over preparations for his comfort, complained irritably to Jesus that her sister Mary was not helping her. Sensing Martha’s frustration, Jesus gently admonished her: “Martha, Martha”, then added “Mary hath chosen that good part.” What was that good part? We have it in verse 39: ‘Mary sat at Jesus’ feet, and heard his word.’ As Mary sat at his feet and listened to him speak she hung on his every word, not wanting to miss a thing he said. All her attention was focused on him. In contrast to Martha, it seems that Mary understood that what Jesus wanted was fellowship and not food, that as his death was imminent he wanted was someone to talk to, not a feast.

Perhaps you and I tend to be more like Martha, anxious to keep busy in our service for God. What Jesus said about Martha might be true of us too: ‘cumbered about much serving’ and ‘careful and troubled about many things.’ It is all too easy to be caught up in legitimate pursuits – such as church organisation, committee meetings, youth work, gospel outreach in various forms, mission support or even the social aspects of assembly life – so much so that we become too exhausted to pray or read and study the Bible. So often we deprive ourselves of just a few moments’ pause to listen to the Saviour’s voice? In spite of the fact that, due to family and other commitments, your life may be extremely busy, wouldn’t it be good if you could make a conscious effort to regularly set aside just a few minutes each day to meet with Jesus and sit at His feet – the place of discipleship – to learn from Him?

Mary realised that what Jesus would appreciate most was her worship and so she ‘chose’ to take her place as a devoted learner at his feet. That was an act of the will. Mary made that deliberate choice, to spend time with the Lord, and Jesus commended her for that: ‘Mary has chosen the good portion.’ That poses a challenge to you and to me. What shall our choice be? Like Mary, may we choose wisely and well!

John 11:28-35 MARY AT HIS FEET – WEEPING

We have already noticed that Mary of Bethany was a devoted disciple of Jesus. In this chapter we learn that this did not insulate or preserve her from the usual worries and sorrows of life. We began our reading in John 11 at the point where Jesus arrived in Bethany after Lazarus’ death and met Martha, who greeted him (v.21) with ‘Lord, if thou hadst been here my brother had not died’. Jesus spoke words of hope to Martha: ‘I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?’ She then went and found her sister Mary, telling her: ‘the Master is come and calleth for thee.’ Once Mary heard that she got up quickly and went automatically to the place where she had previously found blessing – the feet of Jesus. Verse 32 says: ‘she fell down at his feet saying unto him, Lord, if thou hadst been her my brother had not died’ (exactly what her sister Martha had already said). Mary prostrated herself at the feet of Jesus because she understood that the one who had taught her was also the one who could comfort her. When Jesus saw Mary weeping inconsolably, it stirred strong emotions within himself too.

‘When Jesus saw her weeping…he groaned in the spirit, and was troubled…Jesus wept’ (John 11:33,35)

There is a difference between crying and weeping. Many people cry when peeling an onion, but weeping is something much deeper. Jesus was not weeping because he was unable to help, for he was about to display his power.  He was weeping because his friends were hurting. Are you hurting this evening? I am sure that all of us, at one time or another, have missed a loved one, been heartbroken, had our plans dashed, been in great distress. No-one really seemed to care or understand. Maybe from the depth of a sorrowful heart we have cried out in despair ‘Where is Jesus? If only he were here!’ To those who feel that way tonight, the summons still rings out: “The Master is come and calleth for thee!” Jesus comprehends our sorrows and disappointments; and is ready to offer sympathy and comfort.

Jesus saw Mary at his feet weeping and he understood. He knew that her heart was broken so he wept with her. At his feet she was in a place of shelter and comfort, the place to flee to in time of sorrow.

John 12:1-7 MARY AT HIS FEET – WASHING

Once again we are at a scene in Bethany. Only six days to the Passover, and to the crucifixion of the Lord Jesus. Lazarus had recently been raised from the dead and so there was a dinner, probably to celebrate. Lazarus was reclining at the table with Jesus and, true to form, Martha was serving. The chitter-chatter stopped as into the room came Mary, carrying her most valuable possession –  a one pound vial of very expensive spikenard ointment – with which she anointed the feet of Jesus and, as the fragrance filled the house, she dried his feet with her hair.

Once again Mary was misunderstood. Those around her thought that this display of devotion was huge waste of money, and their objections were articulated by Judas Iscariot. Once more Jesus defended her and expressed his appreciation of her service, explaining that her actions constituted a symbolic anointing of his body in preparation for burial.

Mary’s sacrifice was not a waste. It was significant because it was offered out of true devotion to him. Let us ask ourselves: ‘Is there anything that we consider too extravagant or too costly to give to to the one who loved us, to the extent that he was willing to die of the cross to save us?’ If we love him, doesn’t he deserve our all? Mary washed his feet with her ointment and dried them with her hair. At his feet was for her a place of devotion, of consecration and sacrificial giving.

SUMMATION

Mary worshipped and listened to the words of Jesus at His feet. Mary wept at the feet of Jesus and received comfort. At his feet Mary seized an opportunity to do something for Jesus. That was her thanksgiving to the Lord, and it was a timely offering for he was crucified within a week. What about you? What about me?

Have we been at his feet worshipping? Do we take time to listen to what he says?

Have we been at his feet weeping?  

Have we washed his feet with a precious offering that honours him? 

These Gospel passages are wonderful testimonies to a woman who really loved the Lord. If we love him, let us be found at his feet too.

Posted in Exposition

THE APOSTLE THOMAS: A JOURNEY FROM DOUBT TO FAITH

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: John 20:19-29

Introduction

Whenever we think of the group of disciples surrounding Jesus, some figures stand out prominently, while others linger in the background. Among the latter is Thomas, often remembered as the quintessential doubter, unwilling to accept anything without tangible proof. The well-known proverbial expression ‘Doubting Thomas’ refers to the story in chapter 20 of the Fourth Gospel.  His experience, recorded in John 20:19-29, sheds light on the journey from doubt to deep faith.

Nothing is known about Thomas’ early life or of his call to follow Jesus as a full-time disciple. That he went fishing on the Sea of Galilee with six of the other disciples (Jn 21:2) has given rise to speculation that he was a fisherman by trade. The name Thomas means ‘twin’ in Aramaic and he was also called by the nickname ‘Didymus’ which in Greek also means ‘twin.’ We have no idea who his brother or sister was but it has been suggested that Matthew might have been his twin because their names appear together in the lists of Jesus’s disciples in the synoptic gospels (Mt 10:3; Mk 3:18; Lk 6:15). Thomas is also mentioned in Acts 1:3 as one of the disciples in the upper room on the day of Pentecost. However, it is the Gospel of John that documents Thomas’s encounters with Jesus (11:16; 14:5; 20:19-29). The words spoken by Thomas in all of these episodes are significant but it is the incident in John 20:19-29 that occupies our attention now.

Background to the event

This event unfolded on the first Sunday after Jesus’s crucifixion. The disciples, gripped by fear, gathered behind closed doors, reeling from the recent tumultuous events. There was much to discuss because not only had their master been taken away and executed but also several of their number maintained that Jesus had risen again from the dead and their friend Mary Magdalene had told them that she had already seen and spoken to Jesus (20:18). Two of their usual number were not there. None of the disciples expected Judas to be with them but Thomas was conspicuously absent. As a result he missed the transformative encounter with the resurrected Christ.

Then came Jesus (v.19)

Amidst the disciples’ discussions, Jesus appears, offering peace and revealing his wounds. They were delighted to see him alive. The narrator observes in v.20: ‘then were the disciples glad, when they saw the Lord.’ This joyful comment, however, is soon followed by what seems to me one of the saddest and most poignant verses in the Bible:

But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. (20:24)

Thomas was not with them when Jesus came

We are not told why Thomas was absent that Sunday evening. He may have been too frightened to come or perhaps had some other pressing business to attend to. Certainly he must have thought that he had a good reason for not attending but because he was not there that night he missed seeing the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ. His absence had a cause but it also had a cost.

Thomas missed the Lord’s presence. – v.19 ‘then came Jesus and stood in the midst.’

Thomas missed the Lord’s power. – v.19 ‘when the doors were shut……came Jesus.’

Thomas missed the Lord’s peace. – v.19 ‘peace be unto you.’

Thomas missed the Lord’s provision. – v.22b-23 ‘receive ye the Holy Ghost…..’

He missed the tangible presence, power, peace and provision of the Lord; therefore relegating himself to a week of needless doubt and discouragement.

I will not believe

The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the Lord. But he said unto them, Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe. John 20:25

The other disciples were so joyful at seeing the risen Lord that they could not keep the good news to themselves. When they informed him about the sighting of Jesus, Thomas demanded empirical evidence to assuage his doubts – evidence that he would have seen had he gathered with the other disciples the previous Sunday evening – and remained adamant that without it he would not believe.

Then came Jesus (v.26)

A week later the disciples met once again, this time with Thomas present. Jesus appeared once more among them even though the doors were shut; thus displaying the ability of his resurrection body to transcend physical barriers. This second appearance seems to have been mainly for the benefit of Thomas. How compassionate of the Lord to understand Thomas’s doubt and encourage him to have faith! How comforting to realize that he extends this same patience to those of us today who might struggle with doubt, while simultaneously asking us to move beyond that into belief! Jesus addressed Thomas directly, inviting him to touch his wounds, thus bridging the chasm of doubt with tangible proof. He then challenged Thomas to ‘be not faithless, but believing.’

My Lord and my God.   

There is no suggestion in the passage that Thomas actually took up this invitation to touch the healing wounds of Calvary. Note that the author’s focus on the wounds emphasizes to us how much Jesus loved us and was prepared to suffer on our behalf. Those wounds had been prophesied by the prophet Isaiah many centuries before they were inflicted:

He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. Isa 53:3-5

Thomas did not need to touch the wounds. He had sight of the crucified and resurrected Saviour; all the evidence he needed was standing before him. Convinced and convicted by this encounter Thomas uttered a profound declaration of faith: ‘My Lord and my God!’ In one short exclamation he affirmed the deity of Jesus Christ and acknowledged his lordship. With his faith transcending scepticism to embrace divine truth and with his doubts forever settled Thomas committed himself to the service of his Lord.

What is the relevance of this story to us today? It is that Jesus acknowledged Thomas’s faith but he also pronounced a blessing on those who, without the benefit of first-hand evidence, would transfer from doubt to belief by faith; that is, taking God at his word and relying on his promises; hence us.

Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Heb 11:1

Summation

The narrative of Thomas’s faith journey resonates with contemporary seekers grappling with doubts and uncertainties. Jesus’s response to Thomas exemplifies patience and understanding, encouraging faith amidst scepticism. If you are plagued with doubts, fears or sin I trust that you will be able to overcome your problems by getting a sight of the risen Christ. Like Thomas, may you move beyond doubt to embrace the profound truth of Christ’s divinity and lordship and experience the peace that only he can bestow. Be not faithless, but believing!

Perhaps at times you see something of yourself in Thomas; feeling alone, troubled, doubting and no longer active in the service of the Lord. You may have neglected attendance at the regular meetings of the church, even on a Sunday, as Thomas did. If so, there is much that you have missed; including Jesus, – for he is there:

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. Matthew 18:20

Ancient tradition holds that Thomas became a missionary, spreading the Gospel to distant lands. He went east, first evangelizing Parthia and then on to India where eventually he was martyred (see; Eusebius of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History 3, 1; Acts of Thomas 1-2 and 17ff). Thomas willingly died for that which he once doubted.

Thomas’s journey from doubt to faith serves as a beacon for us today, convincing us to draw closer to the Lord Jesus Christ, to relinquish our issues, fears and doubts in his presence and receive his peace.

Doubt sees the obstacles…..Faith sees the way,

Doubt sees the darkest night…….Faith sees the day,

Doubt dreads to take a step…….Faith soars on high,

Doubt questions ‘Who believes?’……Faith answers ‘I’.

Let us boldly declare that we believe; echoing Thomas’s resounding affirmation of faith in the risen Christ: ‘my Lord and my God!’

Posted in Exposition

PHILEMON: LESSONS IN FORGIVENESS, RECONCILIATION, AND TRANSFORMATION

Posted on by writtenexposition

Introduction:

In the rich tapestry of the New Testament, the epistle to Philemon stands out as a concise yet deeply personal letter from the apostle Paul. Comprising only 25 verses, it focuses on a specific situation, making it distinct from more extensive New Testament works. Philemon is neither a theological treatise (like Romans) nor a general epistle (like James, 1 & 2 Peter, 1 & 2 & 3 John, Jude); it is a narrative woven with the threads of three main characters – Paul, Philemon, and Onesimus. It is interesting to delve into this brief yet profound letter to uncover the lessons it offers on forgiveness, reconciliation, and the transformative power of the Christian gospel.

Philemon: A Portrait of Riches, Refreshment, Righteousness, and Repute:

Philemon, a converted Gentile residing in Colossae, emerges as a figure of wealth and influence. A slave owner with a spacious home, he opened his doors to the Colossian church, embodying hospitality and leadership. The very name “Philemon,” meaning ‘affectionate’ or ‘kindly,’ resonates with the refreshing spirit attributed to him in the letter (v.7).

Moreover, Philemon is portrayed as a righteous man, saved through the ministry of the apostle Paul (v.19). His good reputation (he was held in high esteem by Paul) is evidenced by the expressions of love, prayers, generosity, and hospitality that permeate the letter (vv. 5, 7, 21, 22).

Onesimus: From Slavery to Salvation:

Contrasting with Philemon’s social standing, Onesimus enters the narrative as a slave – one of millions in the Roman Empire. The name “Onesimus,” meaning ‘useful,’ takes on a bitter irony, as he had defrauded his master, no doubt making him seemingly ‘useless’ in Philemon’s eyes (v.11).

Onesimus, however, undergoes a profound transformation. From a runaway slave who stole from his master, he becomes a faithful and beloved brother in Christ (Col 4:9), saved through his encounter with the apostle Paul.

Paul: Preacher, Prisoner, Peacemaker:

In the character of Paul, we see a relentless preacher of the gospel, undeterred by societal divisions. Whether addressing the wealthy Philemon or the lowly Onesimus, Paul recognizes the universal need for salvation.

Paul writes this letter from his first imprisonment in Rome (c. 60-62 CE), emphasizing his status as a prisoner throughout (vv. 1, 9, 10, 13, 23). A peacemaker at heart, Paul intervenes on behalf of Onesimus, seeking reconciliation between master and slave.

Background and Division of the Letter:

The letter to Philemon is part of the Prison Epistles (Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon), composed during Paul’s first Roman imprisonment, and sent from Rome to Philemon in Colossae.

The content of the letter is often divided into three sections: for example:

1-7 Paul’s praise for Philemon, 8-21 Paul’s plea for Onesimus, and 17-25 Paul’s plans for himself.

Or

1-7 Paul’s partnership in prayer, 8-16 Paul’s plea for a prodigal, 17-25 Paul’s promise of payment.

A more detailed breakdown into nine smaller units reveals the intricacies of Paul’s message.

1-3 THE GREETING

4-7 THE THANKSGIVING

8-10 THE APPEAL

11-13 ONESIMUS

14 PHILEMON’S AGREEMENT SOUGHT

15-17 PHILEMON & ONESIMUS (‘YOU’ & ‘HIM’)

18-19 PHILEMON’S DEBT TO PAUL

20-22 WHAT PHILEMON CAN DO FOR PAUL

23-25 CLOSING GREETINGS

Conclusion: Lessons in Forgiveness and Transformation:

Despite its brevity, the letter to Philemon holds significant lessons. It showcases forgiveness, reconciliation, and the transformative power of the gospel in the social context of the Roman Empire. Paul’s appeal to Philemon to receive Onesimus not as a slave but as a beloved brother subtly challenges the accepted norms of the time, offering a timeless example of Christian principles in action (Receive him v.12; Receive him forever v.15; Receive him as myself v.17.

Philemon, Onesimus, and Paul – three distinct characters contributing to a narrative rich in lessons that resonate across the centuries.

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:24-29

Posted on by writtenexposition

John has already encouraged his followers by telling them (v.20) that they know all things because they possess the Holy Spirit. This is in contrast to those who deny that Jesus is the Christ and thus deny the Father as well as the Son.

ETERNAL LIFE

[24] The main translations do not make it clear that the word ‘you,’ as the first word in the verse, is emphatic. Some translations, such as the Darby Bible, convey this by opening the verse with ‘as for you.’ This shows that the apostle John is continuing to draw contrasts between the believers and the antichrists, as in vv. 22-23. He encourages his followers to make sure that the foundational truths that they had heard from the beginning of their Christian profession remain in them. If these teachings that they have heard from the beginning remain in them then they will remain in God the Father and his Son, Jesus Christ. The repetition of ‘which ye have heard from the beginning’ emphasizes the importance of adherence to the truths of the gospel message.

[25] The readers are reminded of the promise that ‘he’ (i.e. Jesus Christ himself) has given them, which is the gift of eternal life. In the Johannine Writings the word epaggelía (‘promise’) only occurs here and in 1 Jn 1:5, where it is translated ‘message.’ The promise referred to may be that given by Jesus in Jn 10:28.

[26 – 27] John now summarises what he has already written to them in vv. 18-25.

In v.26 he again addresses the topic of false teachers and adds to what he has already said by describing them as people ‘who are seducing you’; thus labelling them as deceivers who are trying to lead his readers astray. John, however, is writing to inform the believers and warn them about wrong teachings that would undermine their faith.

In v.27 he again refers to the spiritual resource that the believers have in the Holy Spirit who is the anointing (chrísma) from Jesus Christ (autós – ‘himself’, ‘the same’ – as in 2:20). This is another reason, besides the warning from John, why they need not be deceived by false teachers. The Holy Spirit instructs them about everything they need to know and what he teaches is truthful and reliable. They are to remain in the true teaching, as indeed they have, and thus abide in Christ.

[28 -29] ‘And now’ shows that John is about to move on to a different topic. He makes the transition by repeating the exhortation to his ‘little children’ (tekníon) to abide in Christ and asserts that doing so will produce two results at Christ’s Second Coming.

Abiding in Christ will bring confidence (parrēsía) when he shall appear (phaneróō – make know, manifest, visible). Parrēsía occurs four times in 1 John. It relates to confidence before Jesus Christ at the Parousia (2:28; 4:17) and confidence before God in prayer (3:21; 5:14).

In addition, abiding in Christ will result in ‘not being ashamed’ before him at his parousía (coming, advent, presence). This is the only reference to parousía in John’s writings. The word is also used for the second advent of Christ in the writings of Paul (1 Cor 15:23; 1 Thess 2:19; 3:13; 4:15; 5:23; 2 Thess 2:1,8), James (5:7,8) and Peter (2 Pet 1:16; 3:4,12).

Parousía is one of three technical terms the New Testament uses for the Second Coming of Christ. The others are epipháneia (2 Thess 2:8; 1 Tim 6:14; 2 Tim 4:1,8; Titus 2:13) and apokálupsis (1 Cor 1:7; 2 Thess 1:7; 1 Pet 1:7, 13).

Being confident and unashamed convey the idea that judgement is connected with the Parousia so in v.29 John advises his readers that since the judge is righteous they too ought to be righteous. i.e. do what is right, live in a manner that is acceptable to God. At the end of v.29 John introduces a topic that he will now take up in chapter three and to which he will return several times (3:9; 4:7; 5:1,4,18). The topic is the idea that Christians are ‘born of God’.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:3-11

Posted on by writtenexposition

The latter section of 1 John chapter 1 contains three assertions, aimed at false teachers, which begin with the expression ‘If we say.’ These are:

1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

1.10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

ASSURANCE

This section in chapter 2:3-11 contains another three assertions but these are aimed at believers, whose faith might have been rocked by false teaching and who are in need of assurance that they are genuine Christians. These assertions all begin with the expression ‘ the person who says’ ( KJV ‘he that saith’). They are:

2:4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

2:6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.

2:9 He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now.

These might actually be direct quotations from John’s opponents who were not genuine. Anyone, however, who can truthfully say: ‘I know him’, ‘I live in him’ and ‘I live in the light’ is sure to be a true Christian.

2:3 John introduces the theme of obedience and its relation to knowing God. He emphasizes that the evidence of a genuine relationship with God is seen in willingness to obey God’s commands. True knowledge of God is not just theoretical but results in a transformed life, characterized by a desire to follow God’s teachings and live in obedience to His will.

‘I KNOW HIM’

‘Hereby’ This phrase en toútō without a noun antecedent is a device John uses frequently in this epistle (2:3, 5, 3:10,16, 19, 24; 4:2, 6, 9, 10, 13; 5:2) to mark the change to new topic or to emphasize the importance of what he is about to say.

‘We know that we know.’ The first ‘we know’ is present tense and the second is perfect tense. The latter has the idea of ‘we have come to know’ indicating that the knowledge was obtained once for all and is continuing; it is a past experience that has ongoing consequences in the present.

‘him‘ Jesus Christ the Righteous One who is our advocate and propitiation (2:1-2).

2:4 John emphasizes his point by giving a negative example. He asserts that merely claiming to know God without obedience is a lie. Claiming to know God while living in disobedience is hypocritical and untrue. Our actions must match our words.

2:5 John restates positively the point that true knowledge of God should lead to a life of obedience and righteousness. When people genuinely obey God’s word, it is an indication that the love of God is being perfected or completed in them. By ‘the love of God’ does John mean their love for God (objective genitive) or God’s love for them (subjective genitive)? Both human love for God (cp. Ex 20:6; Jer 2:2) and God’s/Jesus’ love for human beings (cp. Jn 15: 9-10; 1 Jn 4:12) could be in view, but probably more the former.

An essential component of genuine love for God is obedience to God’s commands. It is a clear sign that one is truly a member of God’s family, and knows him intimately.

‘I LIVE IN HIM’

2:6 Once more John sets a high standard for the believers. Claiming to live (menṓ, remain) in Christ requires a life that emulates Jesus’ character, conduct, and teachings. This verse emphasizes that being a Christian involves imitating Christ and growing in Christlikeness in our daily lives. One must walk (peripatéō) as he walked.

THE COMMANDMENT IS BOTH OLD AND UP-TO-DATE

2:7 Having already mentioned the idea that the keeping of God’s/Jesus Christ’s commandments perfects love John now addresses the Christians as ‘beloved’ (agapētós)- N.B: other manuscripts read ‘brothers’ (adelphós). John assures his readers that his message is not a new teaching. ‘New’ has the idea of ‘novel’ or ‘previously unheard of’. The command to love had been around for a very long time e.g. ‘Love God and love your neighbour!’ (Deut 6:5; Lev 19:18; Mt 22:37-40; Rom 13:8; 2 Jn 6). This command is something that they had possessed (‘ye had’) ‘from the beginning’ i.e. since they first heard the gospel. Here ‘commandment’ in the singular, as elsewhere in John’s writings, refers to the commandment of love (Jn 13:34; 15:12; 1 Jn 3:23; 4:21; 2 Jn 5-6).

THE COMMANDMENT IS BOTH NEW AND TRUE

2:8 ‘Again’ i.e ‘on the other hand’ or ‘on second thought’. Here John seems to present a paradox by calling it both an old command and a new command. While the command to love one another is not new, in a sense it (‘which thing’) is new both in their case and in the case of Jesus Christ. For them it is new because they have recently come from darkness to light. As regards Christ it is new because he reaffirmed it. He called it new (Jn13:34) and exemplified it in his life (Mk 10:21; Jn 11:5,26; 13:1; 15:13; 19:26). Its full expression was realised first of all in Jesus Christ and now in them as they walk as he walked.

N.B. I have taken ‘which thing’ as referring to the command to love. Strictly speaking, this is grammatically incorrect as the noun ‘commandment’ is feminine but the pronoun ‘which thing’ is neuter. But what else could John have in mind? For various suggestions as to what ‘which thing’ might refer to please consult technical commentaries. As far as I know, there is not a satisfactory solution to this grammatical difficulty.

‘The darkness is passing (present tense) and the true light is now shining.’ John tells the believers that something wonderful is happening; darkness is dissipating (parágō) and the light is shining. This is a process that is not yet complete but will presumably be fulfilled at the Second Coming (2:18 ,28), which John reckons will be soon. The apostle Paul articulates a similar thought in Rom 13:12.

The concepts of darkness and light recur in the writings of John and make an appearance early in his Gospel as themes in the Prologue. For some thoughts on the themes in the Prologue (Jn 1:1-18) please see my previous posts:

(1) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(2) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(3) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(4) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(5) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(6) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

‘I LIVE IN THE LIGHT’

2:9 John highlights the inconsistency of claiming to live in the light (in Christ) while harbouring hatred or ill-will towards a fellow believer (‘adelphós’ – ‘brother’, ‘one of the same origin’ – Whether singular ‘brother’ or plural ‘brethren’ this is a New Testament technical term for a Christian believer either male or female, generally speaking no gender distinction is implied e.g. Jn 21:23; Acts 9:30; Rom16:14). Love for others, especially within the Christian community, is a key marker of walking in the light of Christ.

2:10 John states that someone who loves his or her fellow believers lives in the light. Love enables believers to walk in righteousness and unity with one another, removing obstacles that might cause them to stumble or fall away from their faith.

2:11 John reiterates the significance of love by maintaining that hatred towards a fellow believer is evidence that someone in a state of spiritual darkness. Hatred blinds an individual to the truth and causes him to walk aimlessly without direction or understanding.

Thus John maintains that being in the light and hating one’s brother are mutually exclusive. With John there are no grey areas, there is either light or darkness, there is either love or hatred. He restates this thought in 3:15 and 4:20.

In the 1871 JFB ‘Commentary Critical and Explanatory of the Whole Bible’ the authors include a quotation which gives a useful summary of vv. 10-11:

“In him who loves there is neither blindness nor occasion of stumbling [to himself]: in him who does not love, there is both blindness and occasion of stumbling. He who hates his brother, is both a stumbling-block to himself, and stumbles against himself and everything within and without; he who loves has an unimpeded path” [BENGEL].

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jamieson, R., Fausset, A. R., and Brown, D. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, vol. 2 (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997), 528.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:1-2

Posted on by writtenexposition

2:1-2 JESUS CHRIST IS OUR ADVOCATE

My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world. (KJV)

These two verses follow on from the previous chapter which is about Jesus Christ (1:1-4), Fellowship (mentioned 4 times in 1:3-7) and Sin/sins (9 times in 1:7-2:2). John addresses his audience affectionately as ‘my little children,’ showing his pastoral concern for those younger in the faith than he is and at the same time reminding them of his authority. Tekníon (‘little sons’) is the diminutive of the Greek ‘sons’ (‘son’ is téknon) and in this epistle occurs here and at 2:12; 3:18; 4:4, 5:21. A different word for ‘little children’ (paidíon meaning ‘infants) is used at 2:13,18. In John’s Gospel Jesus uses both words in addressing his disciples: tekníon in Jn 13:33 and paidíon in Jn 21:5.

John gives one of his reasons for writing as the desire that they avoid sinning but, at the same time, he acknowledges that they may still fall into sin at times. They are not sinless but they are to sin less.

‘And’ has the idea of ‘furthermore’. John recognizes that a Christian will sin from time to time. The change from the indefinite third person ‘any man’ to the first person plural ‘we’ is notable in that the apostle John includes himself along with those he is addressing as someone who is liable to sin. He assures them that believers who sin have an ‘advocate’ before God the Father in Jesus Christ. If those he is writing to (scholars often refer to them as ‘the Johannine community’) commit sin Jesus Christ is their advocate with the Father, just as he is John’s advocate too.

An advocate (paráklētos) is someone who is called to another person’s side to provide help or comfort. It can mean a legal adviser who represents someone in court but it refers more generally to someone who provides help of any kind. The main thought is of aid, encouragement or comfort. The emphasis is not so much on the ability of the advocate to help but on his dignity or standing as someone who can bring about a positive outcome for the person in trouble. In the New Testament the word occurs only here (2:1) and in The Upper Room Ministry section (Jn 13-17) of John’s Gospel (Jn 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7). In John’s Gospel the Paraclete is the Holy Spirit. On this point The Complete Word Study Dictionary helpfully comments that: ‘Christ designates the Holy Spirit as Paraclete (John 14:16), and calls Him állos, another, which means another of equal quality and not héteros, another of a different quality. Therefore, the Holy Spirit is designated by Jesus Christ as equal with Himself, i.e., God (1 John 2:1).’ In 1 John the Paraclete is Jesus Christ. He is described as ‘the Righteous One,’ emphasizing His perfect and sinless character, which qualifies him to be our advocate.

John goes on to explain that Jesus’ role as the advocate is rooted in His sacrificial work on the cross. He is the propitiation for our sins, which means His death on the cross reconciles us with God and satisfies God’s righteous demands for justice.

PROPITIATION

Verse 2 begins with ‘And,’ which tells us that what follows is another comment by John on the topic of sin. The word ‘He’ (lit. ‘himself’) keeps our attention focused on Jesus Christ. It is he, no one else, who is ‘the propitiation for our sins.’

The Greek word hilasmos here translated ‘propitiation’ occurs only twice in the New Testament; both occasions are in 1 John (2:2; 4:10). It is an act of atonement (the reconciliation of human beings with God) and a means of appeasing God’s wrath. The word carries two main connotations; propitiation and expiation. There is ongoing debate as to which is most prominent. Some scholars emphasize propitiation (an averting of God’s wrath), others expiation (removal of sin, cleansing). The object of propitiation is a person (God), the object of expiation is a problem (sin). Some Bible versions try to convey both ideas by translating hilasmos as ‘atoning sacrifice’. However, hilasmos does not focus on sin itself but on the means by which sins are dealt with and forgiven.

Jesus Christ the Righteous is the hilasmos. Because he is righteous he was able to be the sacrifice that is the means of appeasing the God’s anger and of delivering human beings from the defilement of sin. Sins are forgiven on the basis of his completed work on the cross.

Importantly, John clarifies that Jesus’ sacrifice as a means of propitiation is not for the benefit of a particular group (like the Johannine community) but is directed to the whole world. Kósmos is the universe or world and its contents; people and things. Here it may be a figure of speech (metonymy) meaning ‘the inhabitants of the world.’

Note that some translations, including the KJV, insert ‘the sins of‘ before ‘the whole world’ but this is not in the original. ‘For the whole world’ does not refer back to ‘for our sins’ but is one of three perí (concerning or regarding) clauses in verse 2, all of which link back to hilasmos.

‘himself the propitiation (hilasmos) –

  1. perí (concerning) our sins
  2. not perí (concerning) our own alone
  3. but also perí (concerning) the whole world‘

1 Jn 2:2 does not teach universalism. In 1 Jn 5:19 John clearly distinguishes between those who are ‘of God’ and ‘the world’.

For a detailed technical treatment of the words and grammar in verse 2, including the triple perí, please see:

Do, T., 2013, ‘Does πϵρὶ ὅλου του̑ κόμου imply “the sins of the whole world” in 1 John 2,2?’ Biblica, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 415–435.

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in General

LET THE PEACE OF GOD CALL THE SHOTS IN YOUR HEART!

Posted on by writtenexposition

‘And let the peace of God rule in your hearts.’ Colossians 3:15

I don’t know about you but I have never been much interested in sport. I do not follow any teams and am always at a loss when others start a conversation about cricket, soccer, rugby and (even at this Wimbledon season) tennis.

In the world of the New Testament it was athletic competitions with one winner rather than ball games or team sports that the people enjoyed. Since many of the big sporting events in those days were held in honour of pagan gods it is highly unlikely that the apostle Paul was a sports fanatic. However, he would certainly have been aware of major competitions like the four main Panhellenic Games: the Olympic, Pythian, Nemean and Isthmian Games. The latter games were held in honour of the sea-god Poseidon every two years at Corinth, a city where Paul lived for a year and a half (Acts 18:11).

Although not a fan Paul did make several allusions to sport in his letters:

APOSTLE PAUL’S REFERENCES TO ATHLETICS

1 Cor 9:24-27 speaks of the winner’s crown and the possibility of being disqualified.

2 Cor 5:10 mentions the judgement seat of Christ – bema – a raised platform on which the judges sat.

Galatians 2: 2 says; ‘lest I run or had run in vain.’

In Galatians 5:7 Paul again talks about running well (cp. Heb 12:1).

In Ephesians 6:12 he maintains: ‘we wrestle not against flesh and blood’

In Philippians 3:14 he says: ‘I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling in Christ.’

Near the end of his life Paul wrote: ‘I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, and I have remained faithful. And now the prize awaits me—the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will give me on the day of his return. And the prize is not just for me but for all who eagerly look forward to his appearing.’ 2 Tim 4:7-8 (NLT)

Here in Colossians 3:15 the reference is not to competitors but to someone who moderates a sporting event – a referee or umpire .

The term ‘rule’ is the verb brabeúō which describes the activity of an umpire at the games. It means ‘to act as an umpire (brabeus)’.

Paul’s advice to the Christians at Colosse was: ‘Let the peace of God be the umpire in your hearts!’

In other words:

‘Let the peace of God call the shots in your life!

‘Let the peace of God be the umpire that settles your emotions and your decisions!

‘Let the peace of God rule in your hearts!’

How do most of us react whenever we have a bad day, when things are uncertain and everything seems to get on top of us? Often we get grumpy, irritable and upset.

In this verse the apostle Paul tells us that whenever we confront difficult situations we should let God’s peace dominate every emotion. We must choose to let God’s peace settle any detrimental thoughts and feelings that might rise up in our minds. We are not to get into an emotional frenzy. The peace that comes from God will be a guide that orders and directs our decisions, relationships and actions but order to let this peace call the shots we must acknowledge the lordship of Jesus Christ and follow his instructions.

Whenever we let this umpire called ‘divine peace’ control the game of life all decisions will be correct. There will be no anxiety, fretfulness or worry, and definitely no need for the spiritual equivalent of review technology like Hawk-Eye.

So, whenever overwhelmed by problems or emotions that would disturb us, we ought to stop, refocus, and let God’s peace call the shots in our hearts.

The umpire always has the final say. Does God’s peace serve as umpire in your heart, and in mine?

‘And let the peace of God rule in your hearts.’ Colossians 3:15

Posted in General

COME, SEE, GO, TELL

Posted on by writtenexposition

Matthew 28:5-7

5 ‘And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified.
6 He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.
7 And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead;’

In these verses from Matthew’s gospel there are four verbs which, for me, sum up the message of Easter. The four words are imperatives, i.e. they give an order or instruction. They are commands.  COME, SEE, GO, TELL.

The Lord Jesus had been betrayed by Judas Iscariot, forsaken by his disciples, denied by Peter, tried by the Jewish and Roman authorities, sentenced by Pontius Pilate, crucified at Calvary, and buried in a new tomb belonging to Joseph of Arimathea. Afterwards, on the morning of the first day of the week, some women came to the garden tomb to anoint the body of Jesus with spices. Would they be able to gain access?

When they arrived they were surprised to find that there had been a great earthquake and a large stone that sealed the entrance to the tomb had been rolled back by an angel. He said that they were not to fear and that he knew that they were seeking Jesus. So he told them to ‘come.’

COME!

The Bible contains many invitations! The word “come” occurs often in the Bible. The first mention is in Gen. 7:1 when God called Noah and his family to come into the ark so that they might be saved from the flood. For Noah and his family to be saved they had accept the Lord’s invitation. This is still true today.

Jesus issued that same invitation in Matthew 11:28. ‘Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.’ That invitation still goes out to all who labour under the heavy burden of sin and guilt. Come, by faith, to the one who is no longer in the tomb! He has risen from the dead and is now in heaven! Come to Jesus who offers forgiveness, support and relief!


SEE!

The words ‘look’ and ‘see’ are similar but not exactly the same in meaning. When we casually look at something, we may not fully grasp what we are looking at. We may not comprehend the significance. By contrast, when we truly ‘see’ something we understand it. The angel wanted the women to ‘see’ (grasp and understand) that the tomb was empty; that Christ had risen from the dead and is alive forever.

GO!

The women were told to go. There was no suggestion or intention that from then on they should just stare into the empty tomb. As soon as we reach the point of seeing the empty tomb and trusting the living Lord Jesus Christ as Saviour, we must ‘go’. We ought to go and learn more about him. We should go to him in prayer. We need to go and fellowship with like-minded believers (Acts 2:42).

TELL!

The women were instructed to tell the disciples about the resurrection. We too ought to tell the good news to those who are lost and dying. It is neither necessary nor practical for everyone to be involved in missionary activity abroad. You can do it wherever you are. In Mark 5 a demon-possessed man who was healed by Jesus wanted to journey with the Lord but was told instead to go home to his friends and tell the great things the Lord had done for him (Mk 5:19).

Have you COME? Do you SEE? If so, GO and live for him and TELL others about what he has done for you.

‘He is not here: for he is risen!’

The message of Easter is COME, SEE, GO, TELL

Posted in General

‘INTENDING AFTER EASTER’

Posted on by writtenexposition

READING ACTS 12:1-4, 20-23

‘And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.’ Acts 12:4

I have chosen this text for a ‘Thought for the Week’ because it is the only mention of Easter in the Bible (AV) and because the events of this chapter occur around Eastertime. King Herod Agrippa I was looking ahead to Easter, which was about a week away, and had plans for what he would do thereafter. He was ‘intending after Easter’.

Marcus Julius Agrippa I (King Herod Agrippa 1), born in 10 BCE, was one of four members of the Herodian dynasty mentioned in the New Testament. The others are:

  • His grandfather, Herod the Great, king of Judea, who reigned at the time of Jesus’ birth. In the Gospel of Matthew chapter 2 he orders the massacre of all male infants in Bethlehem in an attempt to kill the baby Jesus.
  • His uncle, Herod Antipas – He was one of Herod the Great’s sons, and ruled over Galilee and Perea during the time of Jesus’ ministry. He was the ruler who executed John the Baptist and who mocked Jesus at his trial.
  • His son, Marcus Julius Agrippa II (Herod Agrippa II), who ruled over parts of Judea and Galilee. He is called King Agrippa in the Book of Acts, which describes how he heard the apostle Paul’s defence against accusations of blasphemy.

See my posts: KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (part 1); KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (part 2); KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (part 3)

This man Herod Agrippa I in Acts 12, was the grandson of Herod the Great and ruled over Judea and Samaria. He was brought up and educated along with the imperial family in Rome and was a close personal friend of the emperors Gaius (Caligula) and Claudius who granted him wide areas of territory to rule on Rome’s behalf as a client king.

Herod Agrippa I was a successful politician who managed to balance dual identity as a Jew and a Roman. Whilst maintaining excellent relations with Rome he acted as a devout Jew while in Judaea. He observed the festivals, offered sacrifices at the temple, and donated generously to Jewish causes. He was generally popular and was particularly highly regarded by the Jewish religious leaders whose approval he cultivated, especially the Pharisees.

As Acts 12:3 mentions, he also persecuted the early church, hoping to please the Jews who vehemently opposed the Christians. He executed James, the brother of John, and arrested Peter, planning to kill him ‘after Easter’.

The Greek word translated ‘Easter’ in Acts 12:4 is pascha which occurs 29 times in the New Testament. In 28 of those occurrences it is rendered ‘passover’ – referring to the night when the Lord passed over Egypt and killed all the firstborn of Egypt (Ex. 12:12). The Authorized Version (King James), like the modern Bible Versions, uses the word ‘passover’ where this word pascha occurs; with the notable exception of Acts 12:4, where it translates it as ‘Easter.’

The AV translators took on board Luke’s comment at the end of verse 3: ‘Then were the days of unleavened bread’. This tells us that Peter was arrested during the Festival of Unleavened Bread (Nisan 15-21). Since it always followed the Passover (Nisan 14th) the Passover that year had already come and gone. Herod could not possibly have had the Passover in mind as regards his plans for Peter. The next Passover was a year away! It seems likely that Herod had in mind an Ancient Near Eastern pagan spring festival (now called Easter) in honour of the goddess Astarte/ Ishtar which was celebrated around the same time as Passover and which was due to fall within a few days.

The end of Acts chapter 12 records that Herod Agrippa I died suddenly at Caesarea Maritima after the people hailed him as a god. ‘The angel of the Lord smote him’ (Acts 12:23) for accepting divine honours and he died in 44 CE at the age of fifty-four. His intentions were unfulfilled.

Many people make plans for the period after Easter, whether to travel, work, study or relax. Few, however, bear in mind that there may be unforeseen circumstances or changes that affect them. They might never be able to carry out their intentions. Herod was no doubt confident that he would execute Peter after Easter but things did not quite work out as he had planned. After Easter Herod was no longer alive.

This is a salutary lesson for those of us who have plans for the week ahead, and beyond. Our intentions, unlike those of Herod, might be legitimate and good. For some, however, carefully laid plans might not come to pass. Life is uncertain and time is short. Are there matters that we really ought to sort out before Easter? Is there someone we should speak to about spiritual matters? Is there unresolved friction with another family or church member? Is there sin that needs to be confessed to God and forsaken?

Most of us have plans for Easter and hope to see them through. Let us not forget, however, the sad case of King Herod Agrippa I – who was ‘intending after Easter’.

Posted in General

SOME THINGS SAID TO BE ‘OF DAVID’ IN THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS

Posted on by writtenexposition

King David is a towering figure in the Bible. His name (according to my search of a KJV Bible app) occurs 841 times in the Old Testament and 54 times in the New Testament. The following is a list of things that are said to be ‘of David:’

OLD TESTAMENT

House of David – 1 Sam 20:16; 2 Sam 3:1; 7:26; 1 Kgs 12:26; 13:2, 14:8; 2 Kgs 17:21; 1 Chron 17:24; 2 Chron 10:19; 21:7; Neh 12:37; Psa 122:5; Isa 7:2, 13; 22:22; Jer 21:12; Zech 12:7, 8, 10, 12; 13:1.

City of David – 2 Sam 5:7; 6:16; 1 Kgs 2:10; 3:1; 9:24; 11:27, 43; 14:31; 15:8, 24; 22:50; 2 Kgs 8:24; 9:28; 12:21; 14:20; 15:7; 15:38; 16:20; 1 Chron 11:5, 7; 13:3; 15:1, 29; 2 Chron 8:11; 9:31; 12:16; 14:1; 16:14; 21:1, 20; 24:16, 25;27:9; 32:5,30; 33;14; Neh 3:15; 12:37; Isa 22:9.

Days of David – 2 Sam 21:1; 1 Kgs 2:1.

Throne of David – 1 Kgs 2:12, 24; Isa 9:7.

Statutes of David – 1 Kgs 3:3.

Heart of David – 1 Kgs 8:17.

Sons of David – 1 Chron 3:1, 9.

Reign of David – 1 Chron 4:31.

Mercies of David – 2 Chron 6:42; Isa 55:3.

Order (legal decision) of David – 2 Chron 8:17.

Way(s) of David – 2 Chron 11:17; 34:2.

Lord God of David – 2 Kgs 20:5; 2 Chron 21:12.

Commandment (edict) of David – 2 Chron 29:25; 35:15.

Instruments of David – 2 Chron 29:26; Neh 12:36.

Words of David – 2 Chron 29:30.

Writing of David – 2 Chron 35:4.

Ordinance of David – Ezra 3:10.

Sepulchres of David – Neh 3:16.

Horn of David – Psa 132:17.

Tower of David – Song of Solomon 4:4.

Tabernacle of David – Isa 16:5; Amos 9:11.

Seed of David – Jer 33:22.

NEW TESTAMENT

Son of David – Mt 15:22; 20:30, 31; 21:9, 15; 22:42.

House of David – Lk 1:27.

City of David – Lk 2:11.

Seed of David – Jn 7:42; Rom 1:3; 2 Tim 2:8.

Mouth of David – Acts 1:16.

Mercies of David – Acts 13:34.

Tabernacle of David – Acts 15:16

Root of David – Rev 5:5; 22:16.

Offspring of David – Rev 22:16

Posted in General

‘TOGETHER’ AS CHRISTIANS

Posted on by writtenexposition

QUICKENED (MADE ALIVE) TOGETHER – EPHESIANS 2:5

Even when we were dead in sins, [God] hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

RAISED TOGETHER – EPHESIANS 2:6a

And hath raised us up together,

SEATED TOGETHER – EPHESIANS 2:6b

and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:

GATHERED TOGETHER – MATTHEW 18:20

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

STRIVING TOGETHER – PHILIPPIANS 1:27

Only let your conversation be as it becometh the gospel of Christ: that whether I come and see you, or else be absent, I may hear of your affairs, that ye stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel;

TALKING TOGETHER – LUKE 24:14

And they talked together of all these things which had happened.

LIVING TOGETHER – 1 THESSALONIANS 5:10

Who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with him.

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted on by writtenexposition

1 Peter 5:5-7 EXHORTATION TO ASSEMBLY MEMBERS

1 Peter 5:8-11 A WARNING ABOUT THE ADVERSARY

1 Peter 5:12-14 FAREWELL AND FINAL GREETINGS

5:5-7 Just as in 3:1, 7 Peter uses the word ‘likewise’ to stay on the same subject but address his remarks to a different group of people. Here he continues with the idea of subordination and, having addressed the elders in v.1, now addresses the ‘younger.’ Although ‘younger’ is masculine Peter possibly has in mind every member of the assembly who was not an elder, rather than just the younger men. He instructs them to be subject to the elders (church leaders).

Without diminishing the leadership role Peter exhorts them all, including elders, to have an attitude of subordination to one another and to ‘clothe’ (egkombóomai) themselves with humility. This word is derived from egkómbōma – an apron or garment with strings that a slave wore when working. Humility (tapeinophrosúnē) is the attitude of lowliness of mind that Christians ought to display toward one another. A similar sentiment using the same word is expressed by the apostle Paul in Eph 4:2; Phil 2:3 and Col 3:12. Peter asserts that this is the will of God by quoting Prov 3:34 LXX. That verse is also quoted in James 4:6; a similar passage which also refers to resisting the devil (4:7) and to humbling oneself before God, who will later exalt (4:10).

The thought changes from humility in relation to others to humility before God. ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because God resists the arrogant but honours the humble) they should also subordinate themselves to God, knowing that he will exalt them in due time. They are to accept that, despite the persecution and uncomfortable situation in which they find themselves, everything is under God’s control (‘powerful hand’). The mighty hand of God is an Old Testament idea: Exod 12:3, 9, 14,16; Deut 9:26; Ezek 20:33.

Divine Provision – God gives grace to the humble.

Divine Promotion – God will exalt the humble in due time.

The contrast is between humbling and raising up. See 1 Sam 2:7-9; Ezek 17:24; Mt 23:12; Lk 1:52; 14:11; 18:14.

5:7 DON’T WORRY

‘Casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you.’ 1 Peter 5:7 This is not an imperative but a participle following ‘humble yourselves’ (6a). See Psa 55:22.

It is interesting that the apostle Peter employed a term from his former occupation as a fisherman to advise Christians how to handle the cares and worries of daily life. What does ‘casting’ involve? It calls for ‘throwing away’ and ‘letting go.’ This verse falls naturally into two sections; each emphasizing a responsibility. Our part: ‘casting all your care upon him’ and God’s part: ‘he careth for you.’ Let us follow Peter’s advice, bearing in mind those two parts. We do the casting, God does the caring.

The Action: ‘casting’

The Amount: ‘all’

The Advocate ‘on him’

The Affection: ‘he careth’

The Administration: ‘for you’

5:8 STAY AWAKE

‘Be sober’ (nḗphō) – be serious i.e. stay focused

‘Be vigilant’ (grēgoreúō) – stay awake.

Peter knew from experience how difficult it was to stay awake. He fell asleep in the Lord’s hour of need. Grēgoreúō is the word for ‘watch’ in the Gethsemane episode and occurs three times in Mark’s account (14:34, 37, 38).

‘And saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch…..And he cometh, and findeth them sleeping, and saith unto Peter, Simon, sleepest thou? couldest not thou watch one hour? Watch ye and pray, lest ye enter into temptation…’

By the way: The Lord Jesus had asked his disciples to watch and pray with Him in the Garden of Gethsemane, to help him through a difficult time. He was praying and suffering anguish such as no-one has ever suffered and went back to receive encouragement from his friends – but they were asleep. He woke them the first time, but thereafter let them sleep. Jesus had to bear his burden alone. Peter and the others who slept were able to serve him later on but never again did they have the opportunity to watch with Jesus in his hour of agony. The friend you fail today, you may not see again tomorrow. You may never have another opportunity to encourage, or display an act of kindness. Now back to the passage under consideration

5:9 FIGHT THE ADVERSARY

Peter tells them to keep calm and stay awake because there is a serious threat. Peter knew from experience how dangerous Satan was (Lk 22:31). The adversary is like a lion circling to ‘gulp them down’ (katapínō). This word can also mean ‘destroy’ or ‘overwhelm.’ Peter warns the believers about the person, power and purpose of Satan.

His Desire: ‘your adversary’ – He is an enemy.

His Danger: ‘a roaring lion’ – He is a formidable foe. – Psa 22:13

His Disposition: ‘ the devil’ – He slanders and falsely accuses.

His Determination: ‘walketh about’ – He never gives up.- Job 1:7

His Devouring: ‘may devour’

His Defeat: ‘resist stedfast in the faith’

They are to resist the Devil, firm in their faith. Firm and determined opposition is imperative. They are not told how to resist here but see Eph 6:10-13. The reference is most likely to their personal faith rather than faithfulness or the body of truth. A motivating factor in resisting the devil is knowing, as they do, that they have solidarity with other believers. The same kinds of sufferings are being experienced by the worldwide ‘brother hood’ (adelphótēs). Peter sets the suffering of Christian believers in Asia Minor in a global perspective.

‘ World’ – could be earth, inhabited world or world order.

5:10 ‘But’ – they have one who is more than a match for the adversary. He is the ‘God of all grace’ i.e. he gives help in every situation. He is the one who has called them in Christ (see also 1 Pet 1:15; 3:9, 21) to eternal glory. Their trials on earth will be short-lived but their glory will be eternal. Olígos could mean ‘little’ (a bit) but since the contrast here is with eternal glory it must mean a ‘little while.’

Next comes a promise, in the future tense. It is not a prayer. Four strong verbs emphasize their permanent vindication:

RESTORE (katartízō) complete, put back in order. For example, the fishing nets in Mt 4:21.

ESTABLISH (stērízō) make permanent. For example, the great gulf fixed in Lk 16:26.

STRENGTHEN (sthenóō) make strong.

SETTLE (themelióō) to lay on a firm foundation, secure by fixing firmly in place.

5:11 A doxology similar to that in 4:11b.

5:12-14 FAREWELL AND FINAL GREETINGS

‘By Silas’ See my post SILVANUS

For commendation of the bearer of a letter see: 1 Cor 16:10-11; Eph 6:21-22; Col 4:7-9; Tit 3:12-13.

‘Exhorting’ This could be a one word summary of 1 Peter. This letter gives instruction and encouragement to face persecution with hope and patience.

‘Testifying’ bearing witness. What he says carries weight.

‘God’s true grace’ This is the state they will enter at the unveiling of Jesus Christ (1:3). It is authentic, God will certainly fulfil his promises.

‘She who is at Babylon, elect like you, sends you her greetings’

Who was the lady? a) Peter’s wife 1 Cor 9:5? b) the church in the area Peter was writing from? A picturesque description. Compare 2 John 13.

What does ‘Babylon ‘ refer to? It is unlikely that the author was writing from Babylon on the Euphrates as it lay in ruins at that time. It is possible that he wrote from Rome. The city may have been a metaphor for a place of evil ( Rev 14:8; 17:5,18; 18:2. It was the capital of the pagan world. Or. since Babylon would have conjured up the idea of the Dispersion and the Exile in the minds of the Jewish believers the church at Rome was thought to be in Babylon because that was its place of exile. The Christians were sojourners and temporary aliens (1:1, 17;2:11).

‘Marcus my son’ John Mark the Evangelist. Peter had a close relationship with Mark.

The Christians are ‘all’ to greet each other with a kiss of love.

The letter closes with a prayer that this persecuted church will know peace. The peace is in Christ.

Peace as a Gift John 14:27

Peace as a Guard Phil 4:7

Peace as a Guide Col 3:15

Peace as a Goal Heb 12:14

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

Posted on by writtenexposition

4:7-11 CHRISTIAN BEHAVIOUR AS THE END APPROACHES

4:12-19 SUFFERING FOR THE GLORY OF GOD

4:7-11 CHRISTIAN BEHAVIOUR AS THE END APPROACHES

[4:7] The conjunction ‘but’ connects this passage back to the judgement of God (v.5). That is part of the consummation of history which is here called ‘the End’. That time is ‘at hand’ (Mk 1:15; Rom 13:12). For similar expressions see:

  • 1 Cor 7:29 ‘the time is short’.
  • Heb 10:25 ‘as ye see the day approaching’.
  • 1 Jn 2:18 ‘it is the last time’.

In light of the nearness of ‘the End’ Christians ought to be watchful and well-behaved (Mt 24:45-25;13; Mk 13:33-37; Rom 13:11-14; Phil 4:4-6; Heb 10:23-31; Jas 5:7-11; Rev 22:12).

‘sober’ (sōphronéō) self-controlled They are to remain clear-headed and not get overly-excited or emotional (see 2 Thess 2:2). It is not necessary for them to give up their usual routine, they are to be disciplined (nḗphō) and alert so that they can pray.

[4:8] Above everything else they are to keep their love for one another at full strength (see 1:22; 2:17) for love will cover a multitude of sins. This is a quotation from Prov 10:12. They are not to harbour grudges but overlook the offences of others.

‘fervent’ intense (ektenḗs)

‘have’ hold fast, adhere, cling (échō)

[4:9] ‘be hospitable’ (philóxenos)

This probably refers to the hosting of travelling apostles or other Christians. Hospitality was to be exercised without grumbling, especially perhaps should the visitors decide to overstay.

[4:10-11] ‘As every man hath received the gift (chárisma), even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace (cháris) of God.’

This is a general exhortation to Christians to use whatever gift they have received for the benefit of others. Every Christian is a steward (oikonómos). In those days a steward was the slave entrusted with managing his master’s household and property. The local church is viewed as a household in 1Tim 3:5, 15.

‘As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.’

(poikílos) means many in number and varied in kind. God’s grace is diversified, it is bestowed freely and takes many forms. The word ‘manifold’ occurs twice in 1 Peter:

1 Pet 1:6 ‘manifold temptations’

1 Pet 4:10 ’ manifold grace of God’

Peter mentions two categories of gift which perhaps together stand for all of the gifts. These are a) speaking and b) serving. His not concern is not just with the gifts but also how they are exercised.

Those who speak (preach and teach) should speak realizing that they are speaking the words of God ( 2 Cor 5:20; 1 Thess 2:13). ‘Oracles’ are divine utterances (Acts 7:38; Rom 3:2). Those who serve are not to depend upon their own resources but must rely on the strength that God supplies. Keating (2011, p.108) comments: ‘Our ability to exercise these gifts does not come from within us — God himself supplies the words to speak and the strength to serve.’

‘Giveth’ – supplies (chorēgéō) This verb originally referred to the provision of a choir for a public festival at the benefactor’s own expense. Eventually it carried the idea of lavish or unstinting giving.

All speaking and serving should have the glorification of God through Jesus Christ as the chief aim.

V.11 finishes with a short doxology to God, the relative pronoun does not refer to Jesus Christ but to God. ‘Glory’ links to ‘glorified’ in the previous clause. ‘Dominion’ (krátos) is power, might, sovereignty. The doxology, like many in the Bible, ends with an ‘Amen’ – may it be so! (Neh 8:6; Psa 41:13; Rom 1:25; Gal 1:5; Phil 4:20; 1 Pet 5 :11).

From its first mention in Num 5:22 and a passage in Deut 27:15–26 (where the word appears 12 times) it would seem that ‘Amen’ started life in the Old Testament as a sort of legal shortcut. Instead of formally repeating all the words of an oath, Israelites would merely say: ‘Amen.’ ie, ‘I agree with that.’

4:12-19 SUFFERING FOR THE GLORY OF GOD

This section returns to the theme of suffering which was introduced in 1:6 and which has been present throughout the letter so far (1:6-7; 2:18-25; 3:9-18; 4:1-4). There is no noticeable connection between this section and the previous verses but there are a few less obvious links.

  • The word (xenízō) meaning ‘think it strange’ or ‘be surprised’ is used in v. 4 and v.12.
  • The notion of glorifying God occurs in v. 11 and in v.16.
  • The idea of impending judgement is in v.5 and in vv.17-18.

4:12-16 The Christians will be partakers of Christ’s suffering. Peter reminds these ‘strangers’ and ‘aliens’ (1:1; 2:11) that even in their trials they are ‘beloved’ (agapētós). Using word play (see xenízō v.4) they are not to be ‘shocked’ (xenízō) as if it would be a ‘strange’ (xénos) thing for them to face a ‘fiery ordeal’ (púrōsis) lit. ’burning’. It is to try them: the word ‘is’ (gínomai); a present participle meaning ‘to begin to be.’ Their trial would be ongoing, not just a one-off event.

[13-16]

v.13 They will have future glory.

v. 14 God will have present glory.

‘But rejoice, inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ’s sufferings; that, when his glory shall be revealed, ye may be glad also with exceeding joy.’

Their fiery trial amounts to ‘sharing’ (koinōnéṓ̄) in the sufferings of the Messiah. This should cause them to ‘rejoice’ (chairete) and also, when Christ’s glory is revealed, they will then ‘rejoice with exultation’ ( charete agalliomenoi).

Note the word ‘also.’ Their rejoicing in suffering now is but a foretaste of the rapturous joy they will experience when the glory of Christ will be fully revealed.

When Christians are insulted on account of Christ they are ‘blessed,’ not just in the future but in the present time. This section is reminiscent of the beatitudes in Mt 5:11-12. Peter has already mentioned the topic of suffering unjustly in 2:20 and 3:17.

The verb ‘to insult’ or ‘reproach’ (oneidízō), and its noun (oneidismós), is used elsewhere to describe how Jesus Christ was treated:

Mt 27:44 ‘cast…in his teeth.’

Rom 15:3 ‘that reproached thee.’

Heb 11:26 ‘the reproach of Christ

Heb 13:13 ‘bearing his reproach.’

The Christians who suffer unjustly because of Christ are already blessed for (i.e because) ‘the spirit of glory and of God resteth’ upon them. Achtemeier (2009, p.308) comments:

‘The clause is framed in uncharacteristically awkward prose …with repeated neuter articles preceding genitival phrases tied together with a coordinating “and,” thus making both phrases appear to modify “Spirit. “

J. N. D. Kelly (1969, p.186) explains:

‘In part the wording is inspired by LXX Is. xi. 2 (‘and the Spirit of God shall rest upon him’). But while the broad meaning of the sentence is reasonably clear, the Greek is bafflingly difficult to construe, and it is possible that the original text (copyists very soon began altering it) is lost. As the text stands, we have the neuter definite article with the genitive ‘of the glory’ (to tes doxes) followed by and, and then a second neuter definite article with Spirit of God (to tou theou pneuma). The article may be repeated so as to give emphasis: ‘the Spirit of the glory—yes, the Spirit of God’. In both cases, on this assumption, it is one and the same Spirit, the genitives denoting its possessor and source, which is first (because of the mention of glory in 13) described as ‘the glory’, and then for purposes of clarification as ‘God’. Admittedly the reduplicated article is cumbersome, but this is the best sense that can be made of the sentence. An alternative explanation is that two distinct subjects are required, and so we should take ‘the of the glory’ as a substantival phrase equivalent to ‘the presence of the glory’, i.e. the Shekinah; but the precedents quoted for this use of the bare article (Mt. xxi. 21; i Cor. x. 24; Jas. iv. 14; 2 Pet. ii. 22) are instances of a well recognized usage which is of dubious relevance here. The motive, too, for this curious periphrasis, alleged to be reverence, is odd in view of the writer’s readiness to speak of the divine glory elsewhere.’

‘On their part he (it) is evil spoken of, but on your part he (it) is glorified’ probably refers back to the ‘name of Christ’ in v.14a.

Verse 15 begins with a ‘But.’ Peter reminds his readers that the promised blessedness does not apply to those who are badly treated for criminal behaviour. He gives four categories which seem to be listed in descending order of gravity:

1) Murderer

2) Thief

3) Evildoer (kakopoiós) see 2:12,14; 3:17

4) Busybody (allotrioepískopos) mischief-maker, meddler, one who gets involved in the affairs of other people.

This is a hapax legomenon, a word that occurs just once in a body of literature. There are more than fifty such words in 1 Peter. A list of New Testament hapax legomena may be viewed or downloaded here.

There is no shame, however, in someone suffering as a ‘Christian’ (follower of Christ) but he should rather glorify God ‘on this behalf’ i.e. on being described as a Christian, on account of bearing the name ‘Christian.’ This is one of the earliest (see Acts 11:26; 26:28) occurrences of ‘Christian and the first to bring out the stigma ‘(ashamed’ v.16) attached to such a designation in the society of the time.

[17-19] ‘For’ explains the reason why Christians who suffer unjustly should give God glory in that situation. Peter is assuring the Christians that those who persecute them will not go unpunished. They must realize that God’s first concern is with believers, he will certainly turn his attention to the ungodly sinners later. In fact, the suffering which the believers endure now represents the beginning of God’s final judgement (note the absolute tó kríma ‘the judgement’) on all human beings see 1: 17; 2:23; 4:5.

The idea that judgement will start with God’s people is present in the Old Testament:

‘Wherefore it shall come to pass, that when the Lord hath performed his whole work upon mount Zion and on Jerusalem, I will punish the fruit of the stout heart of the king of Assyria, and the glory of his high looks.’ Isa 10:12

‘For, lo, I begin to bring evil on the city which is called by my name, and should ye be utterly unpunished? Ye shall not be unpunished: for I will call for a sword upon all the inhabitants of the earth, saith the LORD of hosts.’ Jer 25:29

‘Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and women: but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at my sanctuary. Then they began at the ancient men which were before the house.’ Ezek 9:6

Also:

‘Now I urge those who read this book not to be depressed by such calamities, but to recognize that these punishments were designed not to destroy but to discipline our people.

In fact, not to let the impious alone for long, but to punish them immediately, is a sign of great kindness.
For in the case of the other nations the Lord waits patiently to punish them until they have reached the full measure of their sins; but he does not deal in this way with us,
in order that he may not take vengeance on us afterward when our sins have reached their height.’ 2 Macc 6:12-15 RSV


‘So that we ourselves glory in you in the churches of God for your patience and faith in all your persecutions and tribulations that ye endure:

Which is a manifest token of the righteous judgment of God, that ye may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which ye also suffer:

Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you;

And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,

In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.’ 2 Thess 5:4-8

Peter emphasizes the point that it is much better to suffer the refining judgement of God as a Christian now than the later damnation of the ungodly who reject God’s good news. He does this by use of two parallel questions each beginning with ‘And.’

v. 17b ‘and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?,

v.18 ‘And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear?’

These two questions have much the same meaning, the latter is almost an exact citation of Proverbs 11:31 LXX.

The conclusion of v.19 is that in such circumstances Christians ought to realize that their suffering is not random but is in accord with the will of God. They must therefore commit their souls (i.e. themselves’) to God and continue in active well-doing. God is the faithful Creator, he has the power to create and therefore has the power to sustain them. He is someone who can be trusted. The word (ktístēs) for Creator occurs only here in the New Testament.

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

Posted on by writtenexposition

Chapter five naturally divides into the following sections:

5:1-4 Exhortation to elders

5:5-7 Exhortation to church members

5:8-11 A warning about the adversary

5:12-14 Farewell and final greetings

5:1-4 EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

‘The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed: Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being examples to the flock. And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.‘

[1] Peter refers to the leaders of the Asian churches as ‘elders’ and says that he considers himself an elder as well.

Various terms are used for church leaders in the New Testament. For example:

Phil 1:1 ‘to the bishops and deacons.’

1 Tim 3:1-7 The qualifications of ‘the bishop’ (singular).

1 Tim 3: 8-13 The qualifications of ‘the deacons’ (plural).

1 Tim 5:1; 17-22 Instructions about ‘elders.’

Titus 1:5-9 ‘Elders’ in v1, ‘bishop’ in v7 – the terms seem to be used interchangeably as the same responsibilities are in view.

For further reading view my posts:

(1) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – INTRODUCTION

(2) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – QUALIFICATIONS

(3) THE PRESBYTER-BISHOP IN THE PASTORAL EPISTLES – CONCLUSION AND  BIBLIOGRAPHY

The word ‘so’ or ‘therefore’ (oun – also occurs in 3:7; 5:13) is not included here in most Bible translations. It may refer back to ‘well doing’ in 4:19 or possibly to the idea of judgement beginning at the house of God in 4:17. The Old Testament background for this is Ezek 9:6.

Peter uses the first person (‘I exhort’) followed by an imperative (‘feed’). The first person was last used in 2:11 (‘I beseech’) where it was followed by an infinitive (‘[to] abstain’). He is strongly encouraging them to comply with his request.

‘Elder’ (presbuteros) here refers to a church leader rather than just to an older man (Acts 14;23; 1 Cor 12:28; Phil 1:1; 1Thess 5:12). Peter adds weight to his exhortation by saying that he is a ‘fellow-elder'(sympresbuteros). This word occurs nowhere else in Greek literature and was probably coined by Peter. He can therefore relate to the responsibilities that elders carry. Since Peter did not claim to have a higher position than other elders we can be certain that he was not a pope.

He also claims that he is a witness (martus) to Christ’s sufferings. Does this mean that he was an actual eyewitness or just ‘one who testifies?’ For examples of the former meaning see Mk 14:63; Acts 7:58 and 2 Cor 13:1. For the latter meaning see Lk 24:48; Acts 1:8; 22:15. There may be suffering involved (Acts 22:20; Rev 2:13; 17:6).

Peter will be ‘a partaker in the glory which is going to be revealed’ (cp. 4:13). Presumably the force of ‘fellow’ elder carries on so that he is also a fellow-witness and a fellow-partaker in the glory. There may be a special glory for faithful elders.

[2] ‘feed the flock of God which is among you’ Using pastoral imagery Peter exhorts the elders to tend the flock of God in their charge. They were to feed, guard and guide the believers. There is a play on words here. The verb poimaínō (act as shepherd) and the noun poímnion (flock) are from the same root and in English would be something like ‘shepherd the sheep.’ The elders are to oversee (episkopéō) the flock of God (it belongs to God, not then). They are to function as overseers i.e. take upon themselves and carry out pastoral responsibility. Shepherding and oversight have already been linked in 2:25.

The idea of God’s people as a flock is present in both the Old Testament (Psa 23; Isa 40:11; Jer 23:1-4; Ezek 34:1-10) and in the New Testament (Jn 21:15-17; Acts 20:28). Some church leaders are designated ‘shepherds’ (KJV pastors) in Eph 4:11. This, however, describes the work they do, it is not a clerical title (‘Pastor’). How the elders must supervise (episkopéō) the flock is set out in a series of three antitheses or contrasts. The negative is given first, followed by the positive.

i. ‘not by constraint but willingly’

The elders are not to lead by constraint ( i.e. as a result of coercion or compulsion by others), but willingly (i.e. voluntarily and eagerly). To be a willing volunteer in spite of possible danger and government scrutiny, is ‘according to God’ (i.e. as God would have it).

ii. ‘not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind’

The elders ought to take up the role because they eagerly wish to serve others and are not to be motivated by desire for financial gain. They must wish to give rather than get.

iii. ‘neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock’

[3] The elders are not to lord it over (katakurieúō) those (klḗros) whom God has allotted to them but are to set them an example by how they live their own lives. Those who have been assigned to the elders are ‘the flock’ of 5:2. Jesus himself gave a similar instruction to the apostles in Mt 20:25-27; Mk 19:42-45; Lk 22:25-27.

[4] Peter here describes the Lord Jesus as the ‘chief shepherd’ (archipoímēn), one who oversees other shepherds when a flock is so large that more than one shepherd is required. Peter promises the elders that if they faithfully carry out their pastoral duties as undershepherds then they will receive an unfading reward when the chief shepherd is revealed. The reward is a crown of glory; this image of a crown as a reward would have been familiar to Peter’s first readers, The crown awarded to faithful elders will be everlasting.

Note:

Jn 10:11 ‘the good shepherd’

Heb 13:20 ‘ the great shepherd’

1 Pet 5:4 ‘the chief shepherd’

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Roman names

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (BIBLIOGRAPHY)

Posted on by writtenexposition

BOOKS

Aymer, M., Kittredge, C. and Sánchez, D., 2016. The Gospels and Acts, Minneapolis: Fortress Press

Barrett, C.K., 2002, Acts of the Apostles: A Shorter Commentary. Bloomsbury Publishing.

‌Baur, F. C., 1876. Paul The Apostle Of Jesus Christ, His Life and Work, His Epistles and His Doctrine: A Contribution to A Critical History Of Primitive Christianity, Vol. 1., London: Williams and Norgate

Balch, D. and Osiek, C., 2003. Early Christian Families in Context: an Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Cambridge: UK: Eerdmans.

Bruce, F. F., 1990. The Acts of the Apostles: The Greek Text With Introduction and Commentary, Grand Rapids, Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Conzelmann, H. and Epp, E. J., 1987,  Acts of the Apostles. Hermeneia: A Critical & Histor.

‌Dunn, J. D. G., 1992. The Acts of the Apostles, Grand Rapids, Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Earle, R, 1988, The Acts of the Apostles, Nicholasville, KY: Schmul Publishing Company

Gooding, D. W. 1990, True to the Faith: The Acts of the Apostles – Defining and Defending the Gospel, Belfast: Myrtlefield House

Green, M., 2004, Thirty Years That Changed the World: The Book of Acts for Today, Grand Rapids, Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Haenchen, E., 1971, The Acts of the Apostles: A Commentary, Philadelphia: The Westminster Press

Horton, S. M, 1981, Acts, Springfield, Mo: Logion Press.

Jacobson, D. M., 2019, Agrippa II: The Last of the Herods, London: Routledge

Jennings, W. J., 2017, Acts: A Theological Commentary on the Bible, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press

Johnston, L. T., 1992, The Acts of the Apostles, Collegeville, Minn: The Liturgical Press

Jones, A. H. M., 1967, The Herods of Judaea, London, Clarendon Press

Keener, C.S., 2015,  Acts, Vol. 4, 24 :1-28 : 31 : An Exegetical Commentary. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic.

Lightfoot, J. B. and Witherington, B., 2014,  The Acts of the Apostles : a New Commentary. Downers Grove, Illinois: Ivp Academic/Intervarsity Press.

Lyttelton, G, 1747, Observations on the Conversion and Apostleship of St. Paul. In a Letter tο Gilbert West, Esq., London : Printed for R. Dodsley, and sold by M. Cooper

‌MacArthur, J., 1986, Paul on Trial, Chicago: Moody Press

Marshall, I. H., 2008, Acts : an Introduction and Commentary. Nottingham: Inter-Varsity Press / Ivp Academic.

‌Montgomery, R. M, 2002, Great Events in Early Church History: Development and Spread of the Christian Faith as Recorded in the Book of Acts, Fort Worth, TX: Star Bible Publications

Neagoe, A., 2002, The Trial of the Gospel. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press

Pervo, R. I., 2009, Acts: A Commentary, Minneapolis, Minn: Fortress Press.

Sanford, W., 1972, Church Alive. Regal Books.

Seesengood, R. P., 2010, Paul: A Brief History, Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell

Schürer, E., Millar, F., Vermès, G., Black, M., Goodman, M. and Vermes, P., 2014, The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ (175 B.C. – A.D. 135). 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury T & T Clark

Sherwin-White, A. N., 2004, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament:The Sarum Lectures 1960-1961, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers

Stendahl, K., 1976, Paul Among Jews and Gentiles & Other Essays, Philadelphia, Fortress Press

Talbert, C. H., 2005. Reading Acts: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, Macon, GA: Smith & Helwys Publishing, Inc.

Tannehill, R., 1986, The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts: A Literary Interpretation – Vol. 2 The Acts of the Apostles, Minneapolis, Minn: Fortress Press

Taushev, A., 2017. The Acts of the Apostles, New York: Holy Trinity Seminary Press

Udoh, E. F., 2020. To Caesar What Is Caesar’s: Tribute, Taxes, and Imperial Administration in Early Roman Palestine, Providence, Rhode Island: Brown Judaic Studies

Wilkins, M., Evans, C., Bock, D., Köstenberger, A. and Howard, J., 2013, The Holman Apologetics Commentary on the Bible: The Gospels and Acts, Nashville: B & H Publishing Group

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Allison Jr., D. C., 2016, ‘Acts 9:1–9, 22:6–11, 26:12–18: Paul and Ezekiel’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 135, No. 4, pp. 807-826

Bunine, A., 2004, Paul, Jacques, Félix, Festus et Les Autres: Pour Une Révision de la Chronologie des Derniers Procurateurs de Palestine, Revue Biblique, Vol. 111, No.3, pp. 387-408

Bunine, A., 2004, Paul, Jacques, Félix, Festus et Les Autres: Pour Une Révision de la Chronologie des Derniers Procurateurs de Palestine (suite et fin), Revue Biblique, Vol. 111, No.4, pp. 531-562

Dupont, J., 1961, Aequitas Romana: Notes sur Actes, 25,16, Recherches de Science Religieuse, Vol 49, No.3, pp. 354-385 available: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k9816413w/f36.item.r=aequitas%20romana

Faunce, W. H. P., 1896, ‘Paul before Agrippa’. The Biblical World, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 6-93

Foerster, G., 1975, The Early History of Caesarea, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. Supplementary Studies, (19), pp. 9-22

Fredriksen, P, 1986, ‘Paul and Augustine: Conversion Narratives, Orthodox Traditions, and the Retrospective Self’, Journal of Theological Studies, NS, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 2-34

Harry, J. E., 1908, Agrippa’s Response to Paul (Acts 26. 28), The Classical Review, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 238-241

Hedrick, C. W., 1981, ‘Paul’s Conversion/Call: A Comparative Analysis of the Three Reports in Acts’, Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol.100, No.3, pp. 415-432

Hurtado, L. W, 1993. ‘Convert, Apostate or Apostle to the Nations: the “Conversion” of Paul in Recent Scholarship’, Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 273-284

Jacobson, D. M., 2017, ‘On the Chalkous of the Later Seleucids and of Agrippa II’, Israel Numismatic Research, Vol. 12, pp. 65-70

Jacobson, D. M., 2019, ‘The End of Agrippa II’s Rule, as Revealed by Coins’, Israel Numismatic Research, Vol. 14, pp. 131-139

Kilgallen, J. J., 1988, Paul before Agrippa (Acts 26, 2-23): Some Considerations. Biblica, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 170-195

Kokkinos, N., 2003, ‘Justus, Josephus, Agrippa II and his Coins’, Scripta Classica Israelica, Vol. XXII, pp. 163-180.

Kushnir-Stein, A., 2002, ‘The Coinage of Agrippa II’, Scripta Classica Israelica, Vol. XXI, pp. 123-131

Lewis, W. M., 1899, ‘St. Paul’s Defense before King Agrippa, in Relation to the Epistle to the Hebrews,’ The Biblical World, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 244-248

Prokulski, W., 1957, ‘The Conversion of St. Paul’, CBQ, Vol. 19, No 4, pp. 453-473

Speidel, M., 1982, ‘The Roman Army in Judaea under The Procurators: The Italian and The Augustan Cohort in The Acts of The Apostles,’ Ancient Society, 13/14, pp. 233-240

Spencer, A. B, 2016, ‘A style study of the Apostle Paul’s communication with Festus and Agrippa: The use of literary Koine Greek in Acts 25:14–22; 26:1–29,’ In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi. Vol. 50, No. 4

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 1)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 2)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 3)

Posted in Roman names

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 3)

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Acts 26:1-32

PAUL’S DEFENCE BEFORE KING HEROD AGRIPPA II

Luke’s account of Paul’s ‘apologia’ (defence) in Acts 26 consists of a speech by Paul and an interruption by Festus, followed by a closing dialogue between Paul and Agrippa.

26:1-23 Paul’s defence speech.

26:24-26 Festus’ interruption.

26:27-29 Closing dialogue.

26:1-12 Paul addresses the first charge.

After Agrippa invited him to speak Paul stretched out his hand in ancient oratorical style and ‘answered for himself’ (26:1). The same verb – ‘I shall answer for myself’ – occurs in verse 2. This verb is apologéomai, meaning: to defend or plead for oneself. Although the noun is not used in Acts chapter 26 the usual description of this speech as a ‘defence’ before Agrippa is justified because of Paul’s use of the verb ‘to defend’.

Paul began by courteously addressing Agrippa and saying that he considered himself blessed to be making his defence before him because the king was a recognized expert on Jewish affairs. Paul refers to ‘all the things’ of which he ‘is being accused’ by the Jews. These accusations are the two sets of charges that have been previously identified:

A) That he was anti-Jewish, teaching against the law and the people and profaning the Temple (21:28-29; 25:8).

B) Political agitation and disturbance of the Roman peace (24:5; 25:8).

Paul maintained, and continued to maintain before Agrippa (26:8), that in reality the first set of charges boiled down to the question of belief in resurrection. He explained that he was well-known in Jerusalem where he had lived from his youth. He was famous as a Pharisee, following the rules of the strictest sect in Judaism. The Jews who had been accusing him knew very well that there was no chance of him desecrating the temple or preaching against Judaism. That, according to Paul, was not the real issue. He was being judged for ‘the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers.’

Agrippa would have been aware that ‘the promise’ was the Messianic hope. Paul later clarified (26:8) that this hope included the resurrection of Jesus as proof that he really was the promised Messiah (26:23). It had been promised to the patriarchs (26:6) and been predicted by the prophets and in the torah (26:23). The strange thing was that the Jews, who had this ‘hope’, did not accept Paul’s message that ‘the hope’ had been fulfilled.

Although Jews, of all people, ought to have recognized this fulfilment Paul himself had made the same mistake. He was a Pharisee, and therefore theoretically a believer in resurrection, but had not accepted the fact that Jesus had risen from the dead. Paul had been so strongly opposed to the idea that he actively undertook an obsessive personal campaign of persecution against Christian believers. Chapter 26:9-11 details his involvement.

Thus, in this first part of his speech (26:4-12), Paul addressed the charge that he was anti-Jewish by outlining his past life as a strict Jew and by asserting that the resurrection (of Jesus) is compatible with Jewish messianic teaching. By using such expressions as ‘mine own nation’ (v. 4), ‘our religion’ (v. 5), ‘our fathers’ (v.6), and ‘our twelve tribes’ Paul emphasized that he still considered himself to be a Jew.

26:13-23 Paul addresses the second charge.

Paul’s response to the second charge (that he was a political revolutionary) was to ‘tell the story of his conversion’, explain his mission and give a potted history of his evangelistic activity up to that point in time (‘unto this day’ v. 22). Verses 13-23 may be divided into three sections:

A Christophany (13-15)

A Commission (15-18)

A Change (19-23)

A CHRISTOPHANY – OUTSIDE DAMASCUS (vv. 13-15)

Just as Luke records three accounts of the conversion of Cornelius (Acts 10:1-44; 11:5-17; 15:7-11) in the Acts of the Apostles so he also includes three accounts (9: 9-19; 22: 4-16; 26:12-18) of what we commonly refer to as ‘Paul’s ‘conversion’. This is the third of the three. Paul himself did not use the term ‘conversion.’ What Paul relates was by no means a typical experience and strictly speaking not even a conversion (since he did not begin to worship a different God or leave his ancestral faith). Strangely, however, Paul later wrote that it was a ‘pattern’ (1 Tim 1:16) for ensuing conversions. He referred to the Damascus Road experience five times in his epistles (1 Cor 9:1; 15:8; 2 Cor 4:6; Gal 1:11-17; Phil 3:6-8).

Here Paul relates a vivid story which includes exciting details of:

  • The Journey: Paul travelling to Damascus with authority from the Jewish religious leaders to persecute Christians (26:12).
  • The Light: A light at noon that was brighter than the sun (26:13).
  • The Voice: A voice asking why he kept persecuting him (Jesus). The voice addressed him by name in Aramaic: ‘Saoúl, Saoúl’. This is the third of three names for the apostle in the Greek text of the book of Acts. The other names are Saúlos (which is a transliteration of his Hebrew name Sha’ūl) and the Hellenistic name Paúlos. (N.B. Contrary to what one might think the name change from Saul to Paul was not due to his conversion but occurs at Acts 13:9 when Paul was in Cyprus before the Roman proconsul Sergius Paulus. The name change signified the change in priority from Jews to Gentiles.)

A COMMISSION – TO EVANGELIZE JEWS AND GENTILES (vv. 15-18)

Addressing the issue of stirring up political unrest, Paul told Agrippa that Jesus had confronted him in a vision outside Damascus in order to appoint (procheirízomai) him ‘a minister’ (hupērétēs) and a witness (márturos).’

These terms would have been familiar to Festus and Agrippa as there would have been several of each in any courtroom. Note that an ‘assistant’ (minister) worked with documents (i.e. handling and delivering them e.g. Luke 4:20). John Mark is called this in Acts 13:5.

Paul claimed that since the Christophany his sole motivation in life had been obedience to Christ’s instructions which had been accompanied by a promise of deliverance from hostile Jews and Gentiles. Paul had been given a special commission to go to the Gentiles in order:

  • to open their eyes
  • to turn them from darkness to light
  • to turn them from the power of Satan to God
  • that they might receive forgiveness of sins
  • that they might obtain a place among them who are made holy (set apart to do God’s will) through faith in Jesus.

A CHANGE – IN PAUL’S LIFE (vv. 19-23)

Paul’s told Agrippa that his life had dramatically changed as a result of the vision of a heavenly being and gave a short account of his activities as a preacher and of the message he preached. That he was preoccupied with preaching the gospel across a wide geographical area answered the second charge levied against him; that he was a political agitator and disturber of the peace (25:8). He was motivated by the heavenly vision, not by political fervour.

Just like that of the earlier Christians in 1:8 there are four geographic divisions in Paul’s programme of outreach. His differs slightly in that his ministry began in Damascus where he was just after his conversion. He preached there (9:19-20) and in Jerusalem (9:28-29) but Acts does not record a preaching tour of Judaea, although such could possibly fit into 15:3-4. The summary of Paul’s missionary career in Galatians 1 gives no details of a period of ministry in Judaea but rather states (Gal 1:22) that Paul was personally unknown to the churches in Judaea. In an interesting article Lewis (1899, pp. 244-248) suggests that Paul’s ministry was not in person but through writing the Letter to the Hebrews during his time of imprisonment in Caesarea and arranging for it to be circulated throughout Judaea. Lewis identifies similarities in the thought and language of Acts 26 and the Letter to the Hebrews. Paul’s missionary activity began with Jews and then extended to the Gentile pagans.

Paul’s message was that his hearers were to repent, turn to God and do works ‘meet for repentance’. The idea is that their repentance could be viewed as sincere if it resulted in changed lives.

26:21 It was ‘for these causes’ that Jews sought to kill Paul. This might be a reference to what Paul had outlined in vv.16-20 but is more likely a reference to the charges that had been brought against him. In any case, with help from God, he had continued with his mission right up to that present time and was convinced that what he preached to everyone (both small and great) was nothing less, or more, than the message of the Old Testament (the prophets and Moses). He then summarizes this message in v. 23:

  • That the Messiah was to suffer
  • That the Messiah would be the first to rise from the dead
  • That the Messiah would show light to Israel and the Gentiles

Note that the unusual order ‘the prophets and Moses’ is the order of the Letter to the Hebrews (Heb 1:1; 3:2), as is ‘small and great’ (Heb 8:11).

FESTUS’ INTERRUPTION (vv. 24-26)

Although Paul’s speech had come to a close the outburst by Festus is usually treated as an interruption. This is because Paul had addressed his remarks to King Agrippa (26:4-23) but it was the Roman procurator Festus who spoke up loudly, telling Paul that great learning had driven him mad. Obviously Festus had been listening carefully but did not understand about resurrection. There had already been a hint of this in Acts 25:19. Festus reckoned that lit ‘many writings’ (possibly a reference to the Old Testament) had driven Paul insane.

Paul courteously addressed Festus as ‘most noble’ and assured him of his sanity and that the words he spoke were truthful and sound. Referring to Agrippa who had a good understanding of the Jewish religion (26:3) Paul said that the King knew that the death and resurrection of Jesus and associated events were public knowledge (‘not done in a corner’) and thus true and verifiable.

CLOSING DIALOGUE (vv. 27-29)

Turning from indirect to direct speech Paul called upon Agrippa as an expert witness and as one who knew that the prophets had prophesied the death and resurrection of the Messiah to confirm his belief in those prophecies.

‘King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets? I know that thou believest.’

Unfortunately Agrippa sidestepped the question with a frivolous and humorous comment: ‘Soon you will convince me to play (theatrical term) the Christian’. Since it was clear that Agrippa had not come to faith in Christ Paul had the last word and said that he wished that all those present were like himself, apart from the chains. Barrett (2002, p. 393) comments: ‘Paul’s desire to make Christians applies to the least and to the greatest, to the king himself. Paul wishes for all his hearers the election, the call and the commission he himself has.’

At that point King Agrippa, Festus, Bernice and their legal advisers rose and left. Luke reports that as they talked together about the day’s proceedings Agrippa spoke positively of Paul and explained to Festus that had Paul not already appealed to Caesar he could have been released. The New Testament has nothing further to say about Festus or Agrippa.

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 1)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 2)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Bibliography)

Posted in Exposition

1 John 2:18-23

Posted on by writtenexposition

THE DECEPTIONS OF THE LAST HOUR

Another reason John gives for writing this letter was that of end-time deceptions. He wanted his readers to be aware of false teachers who would be marked by the characteristics of antichrist.

[18] Having mentioned in v.17 that the world ‘passeth away’ John begins to think about the End.

‘last hour’ (éschatos hṓra) Some tend to overthink this expression and assign it to the long time period between Christ’s Ascension and Second Coming (others might say something similar, like: ‘between Pentecost and the Rapture’). How would the first readers/hearers of this letter have understood these words? They, like John, would have assumed that the eschatological climax of the ages was imminent.

What caused John to think that the End was near? He himself answers that question: ‘now there are many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the ‘last time.’

The word ‘antichrist’ (antíchristos) meaning ‘against Christ’ occurs only in the epistles of John (1 John 2:18, 22; 4:3; 2 John 1:7). The appearance of false teachers and false Christs had been predicted by Jesus himself in Mt 24:4-5, 24-25.

[19] ‘They went out from us’ Note: ‘They’ and ‘us’. The false teachers had defected from the fellowship of the apostles. As regards doctrine, there had been a rift between them and the apostles. ‘Us’ is most likely an apostolic first person plural pronoun (see also 1:1; 4:6). It is likely that as the false teachers travelled around they claimed an association with the apostles. John emphasizes that no such link existed. For John, the fact that these people had left the true faith showed what they were really like.

[20] ‘but ye’ The ‘you’ of vv. 21-22 contrasts with the ‘they’ of v. 19. John’s readers were faithful because they had ‘received an unction (chrísma) from the Holy One’. This may be an allusion to the anointing of the Levitical priests (Ex 40:15). If so, the main idea is that when a priest was anointed it was with the presumption that his ministry for God would continue for the remainder of his life. The ‘unction’ that John’s readers had received is mentioned again twice in v. 27, where it is clear that the reference is to a person.

‘The Holy One’ This is Jesus Christ (see Mk 1:24; Lk 4:34; Jn 6:69; Acts 3:14; Rev 3:7).

As a result of the unction they ‘know (understand) all things.’ (For use of the word ‘know’ (eídō) in 1 John see also: 2:11, 21 (2x), 29; 3:2, 5, 14, 15; 5:13, 15 (2x), 18, 19, 20)

[21] John tactfully tells them that he has written to them precisely because they know the truth (Jer 31:34; Jn 6:45), that because of the unction they already have a good grasp of truth i.e. about Jesus Christ. They will not be caught out by the lies that false teachers were spreading about the Person of Christ.

[22-23] The false teachers were liars because they denied that Jesus was the Messiah, i.e the One sent by God to be the Saviour (Jn 4: 29, 42; 20:31). Having defined the lie John then labels those who propagate that lie as antichrists. To deny the Son is tantamount to denying the Father who sent him (4:10) and who bore witness to him (5:9-10).

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

1 PETER 4 :1-6 THE GOSPEL PREACHED TO THE DEAD

Posted on by writtenexposition

Division of the chapter:

4:1-6 Suffering as Christ suffered

4:7-19 Suffering as a Christian

Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: Wherein they think it strange that ye run not with them to the same excess of riot, speaking evil of you: Who shall give account to him that is ready to judge the quick and the dead. For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit. 4:1-6

4:1-6 Suffering as Christ suffered

4:1-5 Their death with Christ:

  • v.1 liberates them from the power of sin.
  • v.2 enables them to do God’s will.
  • vv.3-5 gives them a new perspective on sin.

4:6 The Christian martyrs:

  • were judged (and slain) by men
  • are alive unto God.

[1] ‘Since then Christ has suffered in the flesh’ looks back to 3:18 – ‘being put to death in the flesh’.

‘suffered’ – suffering can be taken as including death (Acts 17:3; Heb 13:12).

‘In the flesh’ – during this life on earth.

‘arm yourselves’ (hoplízō) This is a military term meaning to equip or furnish with arms. The Christian life is sometimes thought of as a war (Rom 6:13; 13:12; 2 Cor 6:7; 10:4; Eph 6:11-17; 1 Th 5:8).

‘with the same mind’ In light of Christ’s suffering Christians are to think as Christ thought about suffering. His mind was fixed and focused on the will of God (v. 2).

(énnoia) attitude of mind, thought, guiding conviction – that ‘death in the flesh’ results in ‘life in the spirit’ (3:18). They are to arm themselves with a willingness to suffer.

‘likewise’ and ‘the same’ – the experience of Christians is equated with that (death, resurrection, triumph) of Christ.

‘for’ (hóti) – if taken as explicative it introduces the explanation of ‘same mind’, if taken as causal (translate ‘because’) it is introducing the reason for the exhortation in verse 1a.

It is most likely causal, which also avoids any perception that ‘ceased from sin’ implies that Christ has been a sinner. Peter has already stated that Christ was sinless (2:22).

‘he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin.’ The idea is possibly that in water baptism a believer identifies himself with Christ’s suffering and death.

paúsō stop, come to an end. To be finished with something does not necessarily imply participation in it.

If the singular ‘he’ is taken as referring to Christ as the one who has ‘suffered in the flesh and ceased from sin’ in what sense, therefore, has Christ ‘finished with sin’? One could say that he is finished with it in that he no longer has to reckon with the opposing powers and perhaps also in that it is no longer something that he has to bear for mankind. His bearing sin for mankind was finished at the cross and in his resurrection he was victorious over death and the evil powers. His death has removed him from sin’s sphere of influence.

Since this verse links back to 3:18, in which suffering and death seem to be equivalent, Peter could use the term ‘suffer’ here to speak of both the death of Christ and the suffering of Christians and draw an analogy between the two.

[2] By their willingness to suffer for righteousness’ sake the Christians demonstrate that they have made made a clean break with sin and have committed themselves to a new way of life.

‘The rest of…time in the flesh’ This refers not simply to the remainder of their earthly lives but also to the fact that the End is near (see v.7).

[3] ‘The time past of our life may suffice us’ Referring to their previous lifestyle Peter uses irony to tell them that they have wasted ‘more than enough’ time living in immorality. They were living ‘according to the wish of the Gentiles’. Peter uses ‘Gentiles’ here to refer to the local pagans – who are not Christians, rather than to people who are not Jews. Note the contrast between ‘the will of God’ (v.2) and the ‘will of the Gentiles’ (v.3).

Peter divides the Christian life into two parts. The first is ‘the time that has passed’ which is characterized by sinful practices (v.3 ff). The second part is the time that remains (v.2).

‘When we walked in’ is followed by a short list of vices (cp. Gal 5:19-21):

lasciviousness – asélgeia, sensuousness, no moral restraint.

lusts – epithumía, passions, cravings, sinful desires

excess of wine – oinophlugía, intoxications

revellings kṓmos, revelries, immoral parties

banquetings pótos, drinking bouts, drunken parties

abominable idolatries – athémitoi eidōlolatreíai, lawless idolatries, acts of idol worship

[4] ‘wherein’ refers to the content of v. 3. Contrast with the ‘wherein’ of 1:6. Non-Christians think it strange that the Christians no longer involve themselves in such social activities. The pagan neighbours ‘speak evil’ of the Christians because they do not rush with them (stampede) to the same ‘excess of riot’ (indulgence that is unrestrained).

The word for ‘speak evil’ is blasphēméō which, as well as meaning ‘ to blaspheme’ (Mt 9:3; Rom 2:24) can mean ‘to speak slanderously’ (Rom 3:8, 1 Cor 10:30; Tit 3:2).

[5] Those who vilify the Christians will be accountable to ‘him that is ready to judge the quick and the ‘dead’. The use of ‘ready’ implies that the judgement will be soon.

Who is the judge? Thus far in 1 Peter God the Father is viewed as the judge (1:17, 2:23). Generally, however, the New Testament teaches that God has committed this task to Christ (Mt 25:31-46; Lk 24:46; Acts 10:42, 17:31; Rom 14:10; 1 Cor 4:5; 2 Tim 4:1).

[6] Having mentioned the thought of judgement and its imminence Peter now makes a rather obscure statement: ‘For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.’

‘For’ links back to the mention of judgement and ‘this cause’ (this is why) refers forward to the day of judgement. The author is stating why the gospel was preached to dead people. Although there is no article here (it is not ‘the dead’) and thus the reference is to dead people in general Peter may be thinking of Christians who had already died (cp. 1 Thess 4:13-18) before the Day of Judgement. The early church expected a swift return by Christ. The Second Coming would involve judgement by Christ of the living and of those who were already dead (Acts 10:42; Rom 14:9-12; 2 Tim 4:1).

‘the gospel was preached’. Grammatically euaggelízō (to proclaim or tell) has no subject so we could read ‘it was preached’ or ‘he was preached’.

If taken as the impersonal ‘it was preached’ then Christ could have been the one who preached. In addition, the aorist tense refers to a definite occasion in the past when the preaching occurred.

It is unlikely, however, that this verse refers to the same preaching event as that of 3:19 as there the preaching was to spirits (pneúma) whereas here the preaching was to dead human beings (nekrós). ‘Dead’ refers to their present state but the ‘preaching’ occurred when they were alive. The gospel was preached to those who are dead.

Peter gives two reasons why the gospel was preached to these early believers:

a) that they might be judged according to men in the flesh.

b) that they might live according to God in the spirit.

The idea seems to be that these early Christians glorified God through martyrdom (see vv. 12-14). They were judged according to men (as men judge i.e. by appearances and unfairly) but once dead they leave the condemnation of men behind and enjoy eternal life. Jobes (2005, pp. 312-312) points out:

‘In the immediate context, Peter’s point is that death does not exempt a person from God’s coming judgment. Accountability after death was not widely taught in the pagan world. With such an assumption a pagan critic could reasonably question what good the gospel is, since it seems so restrictive of behavior in this life, and then the believer dies like everyone else. Peter, however, teaches that because people will be judged even after physical death, contra pagan expectation, the gospel message of forgiveness and judgment that has been preached to those who are now dead—whether they became believers or not—is still efficacious. Death does not invalidate either the promises or the warnings of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Peter’s claim not only would warn the unbeliever but would also encourage Christians concerning believers who may have passed on. Peter reassures his readers that the efficacy of the gospel continues after physical death to be the basis for God’s judgment, and therefore a decision to live for Christ in this life is truly the right decision, even despite appearances to the contrary as judged by the world’s reasoning.’

1 PETER BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 PETER – INTRODUCTION

1 PETER – OUTLINE

1 PETER 1:1-2 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:3-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 1:13 – 2:3 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:4-10 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:11-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 2:18-25 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:1-12 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:13-17 – COMMENTS

1 PETER 3:18-22 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

1 PETER 4:7-19 LIVING WITH ‘THE END’ IN VIEW

1 PETER 5:1-4 – EXHORTATION TO ELDERS

1 PETER 5:5-14 – CLOSING WORDS

Posted in Exposition

1 John 2:15-17

Posted on by writtenexposition

We have previously noticed that in the section 2:12-27 the author tells his first readers precisely why he has written this letter to them. The first reason, given in 2:12-14, is their spiritual state. Now, in 2:15-17, we have John’s second reason for writing: because of the enticements of the world.

THE ENTICEMENTS OF THE WORLD

No matter how good their spiritual state might be John was aware that the danger of worldliness was ever present. He therefore warns them to beware of it.

[15] A COMMAND

Rather than just offer one or two helpful suggestions John issues a firm command: ‘love not the world neither the things that are in the world’. This is the first of ten imperatives in 1 John. See the ten listed at:

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Although the ‘world’ (kósmos) can refer to people (e.g. John 3:16) here it seems to refer to the world system. Kósmos carries the idea of order or arrangement.

Lambert Dolphin makes the following useful comments on ‘the world:

‘The “world-system” involves a concern for external appearances more than inner content and quality. As used in the New Testament, the world does not refer to nature, but to the world-system, to society and human culture. The world system is outwardly religious, scientific, cultured and elegant. Inwardly it seethes with national and commercial rivalries.’

Much is said about the world in 1 John. See 2:2, 16-17; 3:1, 13; 4:3-5, 9, 14, 17; 5:4, 19.

[15] A CONCLUSION

‘If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.’

If a professing Christian is wholly taken up with love for the world John would conclude that such a person is not a genuine believer at all, for this behaviour is incompatible with love for God.

[16] A CHARACTERIZATION

Everything that is in the world system does not come from the Father. This system of values, goals and ethics excludes God and is opposed to God (5:19).

John identifies three elements othat characterize worldliness:

a) ‘The lust of the flesh’. Lusts (desires or cravings) of the flesh refers to human bodily appetites.

b) ‘The lust of the eyes’. This would refer to the human tendency to want what we see. We are naturally covetous and acquisitive.

c) ‘The pride of life’. This is a reminder of human showiness and the wish to impress others with one’s own importance.

The world encourages and caters to these perspectives. N.B. Some see the sin of Eve (Gen 3:6) as illustrating these three elements of worldiness: ‘the tree was good for food’, ‘it was pleasant to the eyes’, ‘a tree to be desired to make one wise’.

[17] A CONFIRMATION

John observes that worldiness is a craving for things that will soon pass away and confirms that whoever does the will of God will ‘live’ (ménō, abide, remain) forever. The idea of ‘abiding’ is that of living in fellowship with God. Such a life is viewed as never really coming to an end.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:12-14

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Exposition

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted on by writtenexposition

1. Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. 2:15

2. Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. 2:24

3. Abide in him. 2:27

4. Abide in him. 2:28

5. Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, 3:1

6. Let no man deceive you. 3:7

7. Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you. 3:13

8. Believe not every spirit. 4:1

9. Try the spirits. 4:1

10. Keep yourselves from idols. 5:21

Posted in Exposition

1 JOHN 2:12-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading through 1 John you will notice that the author often sets out his ideas in groups of three.

In chapter 1 he gives three tests of life and already in chapter 2 he has presented three tests for love.

Three tests in chapter 1: all begin with ‘if we say.’

1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:

1: 8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

Three tests in chapter two: all begin with ‘he that saith.’

2:4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him…

2:6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.

2:9 He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now.

In the section 2:12-27 the author tells his first readers precisely why he has written this letter to them. The first reason is given in 2:12-14.

2:12-14 John writes because of their spiritual state.

Because of previous warnings in the letter one might think that the state of his addressees was suspect but these verses clarify that their spiritual condition was good. John was hoping that this would continue.

In 2:12-14 we have more triplets, two series of three, all beginning with the assertion ‘I am writing to you….. because.’

Series 1

2:12 I write unto you, little children, because your sins are forgiven you for his name’s sake.

2:13 I write unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning.

2:13 I write unto you, young men, because ye have overcome the wicked one.

Series 2

2:13 I write unto you, little children, because ye have known the Father.

2:14 I have written unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning.

2:14 I have written unto you, young men, because ye are strong, and the word of God abideth in you, and ye have overcome the wicked one.

CHILDREN

FATHERS

YOUNG MEN

Opinion is divided as to what is meant by ‘children’, ‘fathers’, and ‘young men’. Is the author addressing:

  • three physical age groups , i.e. ‘children’, ‘fathers’, and ‘young men’?
  • three levels of spiritual maturity, i.e. new Christians, mature Christians, and those with some Christian experience?
  • all the Christians as children, and then directing his comments to ‘fathers’ and ‘young men’, whether according to physical age groups (older people and younger people) or spiritual maturity (more mature, maturing)?

Whatever the case may be it seems odd that the group labelled ‘fathers’ is placed in the middle of each sequence.

The word for children (teknía) is a figurative term of affection. It occurs in Jn 13:33, Gal 4:19 and seven times in 1 John (2:1, 12, 28; 3:7, 18; 4:4; 5:21). It is said of them that their sins have been forgiven ‘ on for his name’s sake’ i.e. on account of Jesus Christ. John is thus reminding them of the wonderful fact that they had experienced the forgiveness of sins. This is something that has happened in the past but is still true in the present.

It is said of the ‘fathers’ that they have ‘known him that is from the beginning. This refers to the person of Jesus Christ and would seem to refer back to 1:1-2. The ‘beginning’ is the incarnation of the ‘Word of life’.

The ‘young men’ (neanískos occurs only here and in the following verse in the Johannine writings) have overcome (nikáō – see also 4:4; 5:4 twice, 5) evil / the evil one (ponērós – 2:13, 14; 3:12; 5:18, 19).

Having addressed his first readers as ‘children’, ‘fathers’ and ‘young men’ in 2:12-13a John does so for the second time in 2:13-14. What he says to these parties is similar to what he has said in the first series.

The ‘children’ have ‘known the Father’.

Again the ‘fathers’ have known the one who is ‘from the beginning’. Here the ‘I am writing’ changes from the present tense to the Aorist, John now presenting his writing of the epistles as a complete rather than as an ongoing action.

Again it is said that the young men have overcome ‘the wicked one’ but John now adds two further reasons for writing to them:

  • because they are strong
  • because the word of God abides (remains, lives) in them.

SUMMATION

Viewed as ‘children’ the believers had experienced forgiveness of sins and had come to know the Father.

Viewed as ‘fathers’ the believers had fellowship with the eternal One who had become incarnate.

Viewed as ‘young men’ the believers had fought and overcome the evil one. This had made them strong in their faith.

1 JOHN 2:1-2

1 JOHN 2:3-11

1 JOHN 2:15-17

1 JOHN 2:18-23

1 JOHN 2:24-29

THE TEN IMPERATIVES IN 1 JOHN

Posted in Roman names

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 2)

Posted on by writtenexposition

READING: ACTS chapters 21-25

THE PREQUEL TO PAUL’S DEFENCE BEFORE KING AGRIPPA

THE ( LEGAL) BACKGROUND

After completing his third missionary journey Paul made his way to Phoenicia, landing at Tyre. He spent seven days with the Christians there before sailing down the coast to Ptolomais, a port near Caesarea Maritima. He spent a day with the Christians before travelling to Caesarea, where he stayed at Philip’s house. There a prophet, Agabus, foretold Paul’s troubles at Jerusalem. Although the Christians tried to persuade Paul not to venture to Jerusalem he would not be deterred (Acts 21:1-16). The opportunity to to preach to the large crowd of Jews from near and far who would gather there for the Festival of Pentecost was too good to be missed.

The Jerusalem Christians suggested that Paul ought to display conformity to his identity as a Jew by going through the rite of purification. This he did, probably in accordance with his principle set out in 1 Cor 9:22, paying for himself and four other men (21:18-26). While there Paul was noticed by Jews from Asia Minor (probably hardliners from Ephesus) who had earlier seen Trophimus from Ephesus in Jerusalem with him and assumed that Paul had brought him into the temple. They incited the crowd to physically attack Paul. The uproar was such that the Roman military intervened to quell the riot.

The Jews complained that Paul had taken a Greek into a section of the temple that was out of bounds to non-Jews but then stated the real problem as him teaching against the Jewish people, the torah and the temple (20: 28-29). The Roman authorities gave Paul leave to address the quietened crowd which listened attentively to his story of conversion up until he said that he had been sent to take the gospel to the Gentiles (22:21-23). Again there was another loud commotion as the Jews called for Paul’s death. The Roman commander, who may not have understood Paul’s speech to the crowd if spoken in Hebrew or Aramaic, wished to flog Paul in order to get the truth out of him but discovered that he could not do so as that would have violated Paul’s rights as a Roman citizen. He therefore commanded that Paul appear before the Sanhedrin so that the charges against him might be clarified (22:30).

Paul, knowing that the Sanhedrin was composed of Pharisees and Sadducees, shouted that he was a Pharisee and was being tried for the hope of the resurrection. He thus divided the council on this theological point (the Sadducees did not believe in resurrection) and the meeting was halted with no resolution to the problem of the charges, which Paul claimed had changed from teaching against the people, the law and the temple to the question of resurrection. The Roman commander, Claudius Lysias, therefore decided to send Paul for formal investigation by the Procurator, Antonius Felix. Details of a Jewish plot to kill Paul were revealed to the Roman authorities by Paul’s nephew with the result that Paul was quickly transferred to Caesarea, the seat of Roman government in Judaea.

Five days later the trial before Felix commenced. The High Priest Ananias and some other members of the Sanhedrin attended and were represented by a lawyer named Tertullus who claimed that Paul, as well as opposing matters associated with the Jewish religion, was a revolutionary who incited political opposition to Rome. Paul, while defending himself, stated in 24:17: ‘Now after many years I came to bring alms to my nation, and offerings.’ Felix, who was well-known to be a corrupt official, did not find Paul guilty of the charges but, having heard Paul mention a large sum of money, neither did he release him. Paul remained imprisoned for two years at Caesarea, during which Felix interviewed him several times, hoping to receive a bribe.

When Felix  was recalled to Rome in disgrace he left Paul still in prison for his successor to deal with. Felix’s replacement was Porcius Festus, who arrived in 58 or 59 CE. The Jewish authorities lost no time in approaching the new governor, asking that Paul be transferred to Jerusalem for trial, hoping to hijack Paul on the journey and put him to death. Festus refused their request but offered them the opportunity to resume their case against Paul at Caesarea. This hearing took place eleven days later.

Luke does not specify the charges brought against Paul but says that they were ‘many’ and ‘serious’ (25:7) and that the Jews could not prove them. Wishing to ingratiate himself with the Jews Festus asked Paul to go to Jerusalem and be tried there, with Festus himself as the judge. Realising that he would not get justice in either Caesarea or Jerusalem, and that the proposed transfer posed a threat to his personal security, Paul exercised his right as a Roman citizen to appeal to the emperor. (25:11). This last recourse ensured that he would remain under Roman protection.

Not long after Festus took up the reins of procuratorial power King Herod Agrippa II and his sister Bernice paid a state visit to welcome the new governor. This social call from local royalty, which would have involved lavish entertaining, lasted ‘many days’, according to Acts 25:14, During the course of the visit Festus told Agrippa about Saul’s case. Agrippa said that he would like to hear Paul himself so Festus arranged for this to take place on the following day.

THE SCENE

The hearing took place in an auditorium at Caesarea Maritima. Caesarea was previously a Phoenician settlement that had been rebuilt by Herod the Great between 22 and 9 BCE and named in honour of his patron, the Roman emperor Caesar Augustus (27 BCE-14 CE). The city was one of Herod’s spectacular building projects and, constructed of gleaming white limestone, must have been an impressive sight. It was also a major feat of engineering.

Using huge stones and hydraulic concrete Herod created an artificial harbour by building a large breakwater. Along with a palace, temples, theatre and amphitheatre the city featured a modern underground drainage system and an aquaduct to transport water to the city from from the springs at Mount Carmel eight miles away.

When the Romans annexed Judaea in 6 CE Herod’s palace at Caesarea became the governors’ residence and the city the administrative headquarters of the Roman regime in the province. Paul would have been well acquainted with Caesarea and would have visited it many times (e.g. Acts 9:30; 18:22; 21:7-8; 23:31-27:3).

The following day Agrippa and Bernice arrived at the auditorium ‘with great pomp’ (phantasía 25:23). As well as Festus the hearing was attended by senior military commanders (chilíarchos) and by the leading citizens of Caesarea. Most of these would have been Gentiles.

One can imagine the spectacle as Agrippa and Bernice left their chariot and, waving to the crowd, entered the auditorium. There they were respectfully greeted by the military officers in shining uniforms and by the well-dressed dignitaries and their wives. Luke draws a contrast between Agrippa and Paul.

25:23 Agrippa came, Paul was brought.

25:23; 26:29 Agrippa entered with great pomp, Paul was in chains.

25:23 Agrippa was accompanied by Bernice, Paul stood alone.

Before the hearing began Festus addressed a few introductory remarks to the assembled company. He introduced Paul and summarized the case history, as he viewed it, up to the time of Paul’s appeal. In the course of his remarks he asserted Paul’s innocence of any crime (25:25, see also 25:18; 26:31). Although mentioning the appeal to Augustus he did not emphasize Paul’s Roman citizenship but instead dwelt on Jewish hostility towards him. Before handing the proceedings over to Agrippa Festus explained that the objective of the hearing was to enable him to compile a report advising the imperial court of the charges against Paul.

What followed was, in effect, a show trial. It may partly have been to enable Festus to send a report but was mostly for the entertainment of his guests. The views of Festus and Agrippa on Paul’s guilt or innocence were irrelevant. Paul had appealed to Caesar, Nero would decide.

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 1)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 3)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Bibliography)

Posted in Roman names

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 1)

Posted on by writtenexposition

Greek: Ἀγρίππας (Agríppas)

Latin: Agrippa

English: Agrippa

Full name: Marcus Julius Agrippa

Known in history as: King Herod Agrippa II

Reading: Acts 25:13 – 26:32

‘King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets? I know that thou believest. Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.’  Acts 26:27-28

INTRODUCTION

The Acts of the Apostles is a second volume by Luke the Evangelist (Acts 1:1; Lk 1:3) who ended his gospel with an account of the Ascension of Jesus. It is at that same point he commences the book of Acts. In this second work he documents the rise of early Christianity; from its small beginning as a new sect within Judaism to status as an international religion. A key verse in the Acts of the Apostles is 1:8:

‘But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.’

Acts falls into two main sections: chapters 1-12 and chapters 13-28. The first section concentrates on local missionary work in Palestine and in the surrounding areas of Judaea and Samaria. It is Jewish in flavour, Peter is the prominent apostle and the activity is based in Jerusalem.

Chapters 13-28 concentrate on overseas mission. The emphasis is therefore gentile rather than Jewish, the apostle Paul is prominent and the operational base is Antioch. This section includes details of three missionary journeys by the apostle Paul plus a record of his journey to Rome for trial. It ends with his physical imprisonment there and yet his amazing freedom to preach and teach ‘those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ’ (28:31) right in the hub of the Roman empire.

In this second half of the Book of Acts, as Christianity moves away from Judaism towards the Gentiles, Luke highlights the hostile attitude of the Jews towards the apostle Paul by including details of four incidents which deal with Paul’s status in the eyes of the ruling authorities. In these four cases the Romans are portrayed as having treated him with comparative fairness.

23:12-35 Claudius Lysias

24:1-27 Antonius Felix

25: 1-12 Porcius Festus

25:13 – 26:32 Porcius Festus and King Agrippa II

Our study will focus mainly on Acts 25:13 – 26:32 which details the state visit of King Herod Agrippa II to the Roman governor Festus and the hearing before Agrippa at which the apostle Paul gave his defence. This section may be divided as follows:

25:13-22 Festus briefs King Agrippa privately on the charges against Paul.

25:23-27 Festus briefs the assembled company publicly on the charges against Paul.

26: 1-29 King Herod Agrippa II hears Paul’s defence.

26: 30-32 Luke reports a private conversation during which Agrippa and others conclude that Paul is innocent.

THE MAIN CHARACTERS AT PAUL’S DEFENCE BEFORE AGRIPPA

THE APOSTLE PAUL

Paul, also known as Saul, was a first century Jew who was born in Tarsus in modern Turkey. He was a Pharisee who trained under Gamaliel, one of the most famous rabbis of the day (Acts 22:3). He described himself as having been a persecutor of the early Christians until he had a conversion experience on the road to Damascus. Thereafter, believing that Jesus was the Messiah, he spent the rest of his life in missionary activity, assisted by various co-workers, in various parts of the Roman empire; especially in areas around the coast of the Aegean Sea. Although it was his custom to commence his work in each area by teaching in the local Jewish synagogue Paul believed that salvation through faith in the resurrected Messiah Jesus was available also to Gentiles, without them first having to convert to Judaism or observe Jewish customs, rituals or food regulations. He gathered groups of his converts to Christianity into assemblies which functioned under local leadership (elders and deacons) and after moving on to new areas he conducted ongoing written correspondence with these churches. Some of his letters, all undated, have survived and are included in the New Testament canon. In his Defence before Agrippa Paul summarized his early career and reported on his missionary work (conducted in fulfillment of his commission by the risen Jesus) up to that point in time (c. 60 CE).

PORCIUS FESTUS

Festus was a Roman procurator of Judaea whose period of office is thought to have begun in 59 or 60 CE. He took over at a turbulent time in the history of Judaea as the Jews had been cruelly treated by previous procurators and revolution was brewing. He comes across in Acts as a man of action. After just three days in office he left his residence at Caesarea Maritima and went up to Jerusalem to survey the situation there. After returning to Caesarea about ten days later he lost no time in having Paul brought before him (‘the next day’ 25:6). Referring to this in v.17 he said ‘without any delay on the morrow I sat on the judgement seat’. By comparison with other governors he was an upright man who did not accept bribes, nevertheless, like Felix, he did experience pressure from the influential Jewish leaders (Acts 24:27; 25:9). He died in 61 or 62 CE, less than two years after his meeting with the apostle Paul.

BERNICE

Bernice (or Julia Berenice) was a great-granddaughter of Herod the Great and one of five children of King Herod Agrippa I of Judaea by his wife Cypros. Bernice was born in 28 CE, and was a year younger than her brother, the future King Herod Agrippa II.

When she was aged 12 or 13 her father gave her in marriage to Marcus Julius Alexander who was about 16 years her senior and son of a prominent Jew, Alexander the Alabarch of Alexandria, who had bailed her father out of some financial troubles. She became a widow when her husband died some three years later.

Her father, just before his death in 44 CE, then married her off to his own brother, her uncle Herod, King of Chalcis. She had just turned 16 and her uncle was 38 years her senior. The marriage lasted six years until he died c. 49/50 CE. At 22 years of age Queen Bernice was left a widow for the second time, with two young sons, Berenicianus and Hyrcanus, whom she had borne to her uncle.

She and her boys then moved to live with her brother Agrippa who was subsequently granted their uncle’s kingdom of Chalcis. She remained with him for more than a decade, effectively acting as his consort and co-ruler. Her visit along with Agrippa to greet Festus at Caesarea Maritima and her presence at the interrogation of the apostle Paul is confirmation that she carried out royal and ceremonial duties with her brother.

Their intimate relationship became the subject of much scandalous gossip at the time and it is thought that her third marriage in 63 CE to Ptolemon II of Cilicia Trachaea may have been contracted in an attempt to quell the rumour that she and Agrippa had entered into an incestuous relationship. The marriage lasted less than a year, after which she returned to live with her brother. Luke makes no mention of a sexual relationship in the book of Acts, nevertheless he does make it clear that she was definitely involved along with Agrippa in all the proceedings. This he achieves by repetition of the words ‘and Bernice:’

‘And after certain days king Agrippa and Bernice came unto Caesarea to salute Festus.’ Acts 25:13

‘And on the morrow, when Agrippa was come, and Bernice, with great pomp.’ Acts 25:23a

‘And when he had thus spoken, the king rose up, and the governor, and Bernice, and they that sat with them.’ Acts 26:30

In the years leading up to 66 CE she, along with her brother, unsuccessfully implored the Jews to remain obedient to Roman rule and was forced to leave Jerusalem with him.

About the year 67 CE she met the future Roman emperor Titus, who with his father Vespasian and their army was resting up up at Caesarea Philippi (the capital of Herod Agrippa’s kingdom) after a military campaign in Galilee, and became his lover. He was about ten years younger than Bernice.

Some years after the Fall of Jerusalem (c. 75 CE) she moved to Rome where Titus was heir apparent to the imperial throne. Their affair restarted and she lived openly with Titus at the palace, behaving as if she were already the Empress of Rome. Unfortunately the Romans did not like the idea of a foreign queen and both the aristocracy and the general populace turned against her.

Such was was the hostility of public opinion that when Titus became Emperor in 79 CE he did not make her his queen but, probably against his will, dismissed her. He died in 81 CE just before his 42nd birthday. By then Bernice had probably left Rome. Nothing is known of how, when or where she died.

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II

Herod Agrippa II, born 27 CE, was the last ruling member of the Herodian family in the Eastern Mediterranean. The year of his death is uncertain (estimates range from 86 -100 CE) but is likely to have been 93 CE. He is mentioned in the book of Acts chapters 25 and 26 in connection with Festus, the Roman procurator of Judaea (59-62 CE), and the apostle Paul. Although he was a member of the Herodian dynasty Luke seems quite favourable towards him. Luke does not refer to him by the dreaded name ‘Herod’ but only by his name Agrippa. Having been brought up and educated at the imperial court in Rome on account of his father being a Roman client king, Agrippa generally used his Latin name ‘Marcus Julius Agrippa’. He therefore thought of himself as a Roman, though nominally he was a Jew. He took a deep interest in Jewish affairs (in which Paul acknowledged him to be an expert (Acts 26:3), and on occasion spoke up for Jewish interests at Rome. He remained, however, thoroughly hellenized and totally loyal to the Romans throughout his lifetime.

The Herodian family was infamous for its lax morals, brutality and intrigue. New Testament references to the dynasty make unpleasant reading:

Agrippa II’s great-grandfather was Herod the Great (72-4 BCE) who killed all the babies in Bethlehem (Mt 2:16).

His great-uncle Herod Antipas (c. 20 BCE- later than 39 CE in exile) had John the Baptist beheaded (Mk 6:14-29; Lk 9:7-9). Along with his soldiers Herod Antipas mocked Jesus, who had been sent to him by Pontius Pilate (Lk 23:11).

His father King Herod Agrippa I (11 BCE – 44 CE) executed James the brother of John and also imprisoned Peter (Acts 12:1-3).

Marcus Julius Agrippa II had one brother and three sisters. His younger brother Drusus died young, before reaching his teens. His three sisters were Bernice (or Berenice), Mariamne and Drusilla (whose second husband was the Procurator Antonius Felix). Mariamne and Drusilla were ten and six when their father died.

King Herod Agrippa I died in 44 CE. Three years earlier Judaea, a Roman province since 6 CE, had been handed over to his control and he had been given the title ‘King’. At the time of his death his son Marcus Julius Agrippa junior was 17 and still being tutored at Rome. The emperor Claudius (41-54 CE) and his advisors considered him too young for the responsibilities of kingship so Judaea was annexed once more by the Romans and administered for a second period (44-66 CE) by procurators. Having been brought up at the Roman court Agrippa did, however, have very good connections with the imperial family.

In 49 CE the Emperor Claudius granted him the territory of Chalcis in Lebanon on the death of his uncle (and brother-in-law!) Herod of Chalcis. This gave him the royal title ‘King’ and with Chalcis came Curatorship of the Temple in Jerusalem which gave the right to appoint and dismiss the High Priest. Agrippa made full use of this power and had an ongoing rocky relationship with the Jewish priesthood; for example, during the seven years from 59 CE he appointed and dismissed five High Priests.

In 53 CE, Claudius exchanged Agrippa’s small kingdom of Chalcis for a much larger area, the former tetrarchy of Philip plus several eastern territories.

In 54/55 CE the Emperor Nero (54-68 CE) further expanded Agrippa’s kingdom by giving him control of Tiberias, Tarichaea, Bethsaida and Julias in Galilee plus some territory in Southern Peraea.

During the 60’s CE Jewish outrage at abuses by the procurators increased. As tension grew Agrippa tried his best to persuade the Jews not to revolt but to submit to Roman domination. This was unsuccessful and the Jews expelled him and his sister Bernice from Jerusalem in 66 CE. King Herod Agrippa II supported Vespasian and Titus in their war against the Jews (66-70) and played a small role in that war. He was involved in the sack of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple, much of which had been built by his great-grandfather. As reward for his support he was made a senior senator in Rome c. 75 CE and his territory was expanded. Until his death he remained active in his kingdom while also furthering his political career in Rome. He was fabulously wealthy; Jacobson (2019, pp129-130) writes;

‘While we have no quantitative information about Agrippa’s personal wealth, its size can be approximately estimated from the data given by Josephus for his predecessors who had title to much of the same territory. Josephus states that Herod Antipas enjoyed an annual revenue of 200 talents from Peraea and Galilee, while the areas to the east of Galilee, namely Batanaea, Trachonitis, Auranitis and ‘a certain portion of what was called the domain of Zenodorus’ yielded Philip the Tetrarch the sum of 100 talents (AJ 17.319; BJ 2.95). Although Agrippa II only possessed the eastern portion of Galilee, he certainly made up for the lack of western Galilee with Arca and Abilene. So, it seems reasonable to estimate the annual revenue from his territories as exceeding 300 talents (of silver) and may have been nearer 1,000 talents. With one Attic talent equivalent to 6,000 drachmas, his revenue from those sources would have approached six million drachmas. One drachma represents the average day wage of a labourer in the Graeco-Roman economy. Besides this revenue, Agrippa would have derived supplementary income from the vast estates that he owned outright. As an example, together with his sister, Berenice, the king possessed estates near Mount Tabor administrated by his steward (epitropos), Ptolemy, and elsewhere by Thaumastus, who their father Agrippa I received as a slave from Caligula.’

In spite of all his wealth and political power King Herod Agrippa II ended his life as a renegade who turned his back on his people and on his religion.

One can only wonder how history might have been different had Agrippa shifted his allegiance from the Roman empire to the kingdom of the risen Messiah Jesus. If only he had genuinely believed the Old Testament prophets (Acts 26:27) and had moved from being ‘almost’ a Christian (26:28) to being ‘altogether’ a Christian (26:29)!

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 2):

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 3)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Bibliography)