Tag: parable

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 24:1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION TO EZEKIEL CHAPTER 24

Ezekiel 24 serves as the climactic turning point in the book – the decisive moment when prophecy moves from warning to fulfilment. For the last time Ezekiel predicts the destruction of Jerusalem and its people. This is followed by symbolism that must have affected even the most hardened of his opponents.

The destruction of Jerusalem is prophesied in the parable of a cooking pot and then symbolised in the death of Ezekiel’s wife. The oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the same day and both images function together to signify that Jerusalem’s calamities will be so extreme that they are beyond any expression of sorrow. The two interlock to signify external suffering and internal collapse.

The chapter may be viewed as consisting of two main sections – the parable of the cooking pot and the death of Ezekiel’s wife – although also, as Petter (2023, Introduction to 24:1-27) observes, within these sections is ‘a series of five shocking announcements: the news of the city’s siege (24:2), the death of Ezekiel’s wife (24:16), the end of the sanctuary (24:21), the news from the fugitive (24:26), and the news Ezekiel will speak again (24:27).’

1-14 The Parable of the Cooking Pot

(1-3a) A threefold instruction: record the date, use a parable, declare it to the rebellious house.

This oracle and the death of Ezekiel’s wife are dated the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year – the date on which Nebuchadnezzar’s forces commenced the siege of Jerusalem. All hope of deliverance has now gone, the time of intense pressure has arrived.

The oracle is viewed as very important because Ezekiel is emphatically told to record that particular date. In v.2 he is instructed to ‘write thee the name of the day, even of this same day… this same day.’

On that day – ‘the tenth day of the tenth month of the ninth year’ – Ezekiel announced to the exiles in Babylon that, some 400 miles away, Nebuchadnezzar had ‘set himself against’ (pressed violently upon, leaned heavily on, cf. Psa 88:7) Jerusalem. Ezekiel could not possibly have known that Nebuchadnezzar’s army had begun the siege of Jerusalem that very day except by revelation from YHWH.  This record would therefore be indisputable proof, to anyone who later checked the dates of his prophecies, that he was a true prophet of YHWH.

Modern scholars debate what year that ‘ninth year’ actually was. According to the Parker-Dubberstein chronology the date equates to 15 January, 588 BCE. Albright, however, calculates the year as 587 BCE and Thiele as 586 BCE.

Throughout the book of Ezekiel dates are based on the year of King Jehoiachin’s exile which, since Nebuchadnezzar replaced Jehoiachin with Zedekiah, was also the year of Zedekiah’s accession. Three other biblical passages confirm that the date given by Ezekiel is that on which the siege of Jerusalem began – only they express it in terms of Zedekiah’s reign – the ninth year of Jehoiachin’s exile corresponding to the ninth year of Zedekiah’s reign.

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about. And the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. 2 Kgs 25:1-2

In the ninth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the tenth month, came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and all his army against Jerusalem, and they besieged it. Jer 39:1

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he and all his army, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it, and built forts against it round about. So the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. Jer 52:4-5

Ezekiel is then instructed to use a parable (māšāl – proverb, parable) and declare it to ‘the rebellious house.’ This most likely refers to the exiles who are with him in Babylonia (Ezek 2:5, 6; 12:2, 3, 9; 17:12) but perhaps also to the inhabitants of Judah. Details of the parable occupy vv.3b-14.

(3b-5) The parable involves a cauldron or cooking pot (siyr). Those for domestic use were normally made of pottery but the cauldron Ezekiel has in mind is made of copper/brass (v.11) which may suggest a large one like those used in the Temple (2 Kgs 25:14). In 11:1-12 Ezekiel has already referred to a proverb about a cooking pot that was widely quoted by the Judahites. The image of a cauldron was loaded with meaning for the people of Jerusalem who considered themselves to be like choice meat in the safety of YHWH’s protective pot (the city). Ezekiel now turns their own metaphor on its head and uses it to illustrate Jerusalem’s fate.

Addressing Ezekiel as if he were an imaginary cook YHWH tells him to:

  • set the cooking pot [on the fire] – the pot represents Jerusalem and the ‘setting on’ indicates the beginning of the siege.
  • pour in the water.
  • ‘gather the pieces thereof’ – the pieces of meat belonging to the cooking pot – they represent the inhabitants of Jerusalem prepared for judgement.
  • ‘even every good piece, the thigh, and the shoulder; fill it with the choice bones. . . take the choice of the flock’ – the best cuts of meat from the best animals represent the leading citizens of Jerusalem.
  • pile on the logs (bones) under the pot – the fire represents the siege – the heat intensifies – severe judgement.
  • boil the meat well – the verb rāṯaḥ (boil, seethe, be agitated) only occurs elsewhere in Job 30:27; 41:31. ‘Cook (KJV , seethe) its bones it in the pot’ – the judgement will be thorough and even the most durable will not survive.

Opinions differ as to whether the prophet publicly enacted this parable. Keil (1876, p.341) thinks that he did not but rather maintains that: the ensuing act, which the prophet is commanded to perform, is not to be regarded as a symbolical act which he really carried out, but that the act forms the substance of the māšāl, in other words, belongs to the parable itself.

It is possible, however, that Ezekiel did actually put a cooking pot on a wood fire and boil pieces of meat in it to symbolise what the population of Jerusalem would endure during the siege. To have done so would not have seemed unusual for the book records him enacting several of his prophecies:

  • 4:1-3 The siege.
  • 5-1-4 The city’s destruction.
  • 12:1-16 The process of going into exile.
  • 12:17-20 The fear and despair of the people of Jerusalem.
  • 21:18-23 The two routes the king of Babylon could choose.
  • 37:15-28 The two sticks symbolising the reunification of Israel and Judah.

(6-8) ‘Wherefore’ or ‘Now then’ indicates a transition from the parable itself to further explanation by YHWH. In v.6 he pronounces woe directly upon Jerusalem, calling it ‘the bloody city;’ this is repeated in v.9. That Jerusalem is notorious for murder (judicial killings and child sacrifice) is referred to in 11:6; 13:19; 16:21; 22:3. The term ‘bloody city’ was previously used by Nahum (Nah 3:1) to describe the city of Nineveh.

Jerusalem is a pot with reddish ‘scum’ (corrosion or deposit) in it that cannot be removed. The sin of murder has become part of the very fabric of the city. Since copper/brass does not rust some scholars view this ‘scum’ as verdigris, others as flaws in the metal itself and others as hardened food residue that will not scrub off.

Yet another view is that the corruption does not belong to the metal of the pot but to its contents, i.e. the meat. According to v.6 the scum is inside the pot and in v.7 so is blood. Since the consumption of blood is taboo to the Israelites (Gen 9:4; Lev 3:17; 17:10-14; Deut 12:23-25) the flesh in the pot is viewed as contaminated. The Judahites may think of themselves as choice cuts of meat but in YHWH’s sight they are putrid flesh. The meat is to be brought out of the cauldron ‘piece by piece;’ i.e. the city’s population will be taken into captivity or killed. All efforts to cleanse the filth have failed – this idea will be developed in vv.12-13.

‘Let no lot fall upon it’ – refers to the practice of decision-making by casting lots (Lev 16:7-10; Num 26:55-56; Josh 13:6; 1 Chron 24:5, 7; 25:8; 26:13-14). The results are reckoned to be God’s will: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD. Prov 16:33. In the context of this oracle the reference may be to the casting of lots by a victorious army in order to decide which captives should be allowed to live and which should put to death (2 Sam 8:2; Joel 3:3; Nah 3:10). There is no need to cast lots concerning the leading citizens of Jerusalem for they will be executed (Jer 39:6).

Verses 7-8, beginning with ‘For,’ give the reason why the contaminated pieces of meat (the people of Jerusalem) are rejected. The city has openly and shamelessly shed blood and there has been no attempt to cover up its sin. The background to v.7 is another taboo concerning blood: And whatsoever man there be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, which hunteth and catcheth any beast or fowl that may be eaten; he shall even pour out the blood thereof, and cover it with dust. Lev 17:13.

‘Her blood -‘ i.e. the blood that Jerusalem has shed – has not been covered up but deliberately poured out for all to see on non-porous rock that would not absorb it. That blood cries for vengeance (cf. Gen 4:10; Job 16:18; Isa 26:21). YHWH’s response is to likewise set Jerusalem’s blood on a rock uncovered. This will serve as a witness to other nations of the crimes that she has committed.

(9-12) In verses 9-12 the image of YHWH building a huge fire depicts the unleashing of his wrath upon Jerusalem ‘Therefore’ (i.e. because Jerusalem is full of blood and filth) YHWH again (see v.6) pronounces woe on the city and says that he will make the pile of wood great (cf. Isa 30:33).

Since YHWH is responsible for stoking the fire the siege of Jerusalem is not a random disaster but deliberate punishment by YHWH. The imaginary cook is given further instructions:

  • heap on wood.
  • light the fire
  • mix in the spices (KJV, ‘spice it well’)- the verb rāqaḥ is normally used for the process of making perfume and also for the preparation of the ingredients of the sacred anointing oil (Ex 30:33) – spices enhance the taste of meat – this may mean that the Chaldeans will enthusiastically enjoy destroying Jerusalem, just as hungry people enjoy well-seasoned food.
  • boil the meat away – the judgement is thorough and final.
  • empty the residue into the fire and burn the bones – the people will be dispersed and the city will be destroyed by fire. The image intensifies; it moves from cooking in v.5 to cremation in v.10. The city will lie desolate.
  • set the empty pot back on the coals and heat it until it is red hot and molten. All the impurities will be burned up. This recalls the smelting image in 22:20-22.

Jerusalem (v.12) has frustrated all efforts to cleanse her. The earlier attempts to do so may have included the messages from YHWH delivered by the prophets and perhaps also the reforms of King Hezekiah (2 Kgs 18; 2 Chron 31) and King Josiah (2 Kgs 22-23). The Chronicler gives the following apt assessment:

And the LORD God of their fathers sent to them by his messengers, rising up quickly, and sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his dwelling place: But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the LORD arose against his people, till there was no remedy. Therefore he brought upon them the king of the Chaldees. . . 2 Chron 36:15-17a

The scum in the pot has not been removed so into the fire with it!

(13-14) YHWH again addresses the city directly saying that every time he tried to cleanse her she refused to be purified from her uncleanness. Therefore she will not be pure again (there will be no more opportunities for cleansing) until his wrath against her has been satisfied.

The oracle closes with the formula: ‘I the Lord hath spoken’ (v.14). God’s word guarantees the fulfilment of what he has said. He will not reconsider or renege, what Ezekiel has prophesied will come to pass. This certainty is expressed in three negative statements:

  • I will not refrain, not go back
  • I will not spare
  • I will not repent (be sorry, moved to pity)

YHWH has spoken, Nebuchadnezzar’s army has now arrived. The Chaldeans will judge Jerusalem according to her ways and deeds. She is facing the consequences of her own choices.

SUMMATION

This oracle shatters once and for all the false view held by the Jerusalemites that they are YHWH’s chosen cuts of meat in the protective cauldron and that the city is therefore inviolable. Even though they were God’s people they could not evade the consequences of their sin. Like corrosion in the pot sin that is not addressed becomes deeply ingrained. When grace is consistently rejected then God’s righteous judgement upon the sinner is inevitable. The oracle emphasises that the sovereign God is directing the judgement upon Judah; the Babylonian invaders are merely his instruments.

Even while Ezekiel was delivering this solemn parable he became aware that he was about to experience great sorrow. His experience of loss was about to become the ultimate sign to the people of Judah. Chapter 24:15 moves seamlessly from public preaching to private tragedy. Inside a few hours Ezekiel’s wife will die.

BIBLOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Keil, C. F. (1876). Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Ezekiel, Vol 1. Transl. J. M. Martin. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.

Parker, R.A. and Dubberstein, W.H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology 626 B. C. – A. D. 75. Rhode Island: Brown University Press.

Petter, D.L. (2011). The Book of Ezekiel and Mesopotamian City Laments, Academic Press, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

Thiele, E. R. (1983). The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Albright, W. F. (1956). The Nebuchadnezzar and Neriglissar Chronicles. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 143, pp. 28–33.

Thiele, E.R. (1944). The Chronology of the Kings of Judah and Israel. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 3(3), pp.137–186.

DIGITAL RESOURCES

Petter, D. L. (2023). Ezekiel. [online] Available at: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/commentary/ezekiel/ accessed 22 November, 2025

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 20:45-49 – The Oracle Concerning Judgement on the Negev

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In the Hebrew Bible this section is numbered as Ezekiel 21:1-5 but in most English translations it is 20:45-49. I follow the English chapter and verse arrangement.

Having closed the oracle about Israel’s historical rebellion (20:1-44) with a prophecy of restoration after purification and judgement Ezekiel gives a brief message about that impending judgement using a parable of a forest fire. This serves as an introduction to three oracles concerning the sword in chapter 21, which elaborate on the theme of judgement.

DIVISION

45-47a YHWH’s instructions to Ezekiel.

47b-48 Parable of the forest fire.

49 The complaint

EXPOSITION

YHWH’S INSTRUCTIONS TO EZEKIEL (45-47a)

Although covered by the date given in 20:1 the prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ in 20:45 lets us know that this is a fresh revelation. In the new prophetic oracle Ezekiel shifts from the plain-speaking of his previous message to vivid metaphor.

Addressing Ezekiel by the usual term ‘Son of Adam’ (emphasising mortality) YHWH in v.46 issues a threefold instruction to Ezekiel about the South, i.e. the Negev:

set thy face toward the south (tēymān),
and drop thy word toward the south (dārôm),
and prophesy against the forest of the south field (neg̱eb).

In this verse, whether for variety or literary effect, Ezekiel employs three different words meaning ‘South.’

Ezekiel is told to ‘set his face’ toward tēymān. He was to focus attention on the south, or perhaps literally speak while facing southwards (cf. 6:2; 13:17). Tēymān means ‘that which lies on the right hand,’ referring to the direction lying to the right of a person facing east. Sweeney (2013, Reading Ezekiel, p.107) points out that it is a term that generally means “south,” but has later come to designate Yemen in Hebrew. Here it refers to the southern region of Judah.

Ezekiel is to ‘drip or drop the word;’ which is a figurative term meaning to speak a prophetic utterance on behalf of YHWH (21:2; Amos 7:16). He is to preach to Darom, another word meaning south. He is also to prophesy against the forest of the Negev field. Although Negev is a general word for south it is also the name of a specific wilderness area south of Judea. ‘Field’ is used here in the sense of ‘territory’ rather than a relatively small expanse of agricultural land (e.g. Gen 14:7; 32:3). Since the Negev is a wilderness area ‘forest’ probably signifies population rather than trees and brush. By ‘south’ Ezekiel is therefore referring to the southern parts of the Holy Land, as 21:2 clarifies.

Why does Ezekiel say ‘south?’ He may be thinking in terms of Israel’s internal geography – Judah, Jerusalem and the Negev lay in the southern part of the Promised Land. Or, although Judah technically lay southwest of Babylon, Ezekiel may be thinking of Judah as ‘the south’ from his own perspective in Babylon. H. L. Ellison (1956, Ezekiel: The Man And His Message, P.84 ) gives an interesting explanation:

Ezekiel is told to “set his face toward the south,” for though Judea lay to the west of Tel-abib, Ezekiel has been transported in spirit to the Chaldean army, which is now marching south from Carchemish and the Euphrates.

The triple reference to the south draws attention to the fact that YHWH’s judgement will fall on Judah. Ezekiel is to communicate this to ‘the forest of the Negev,’ calling it to attention with the saying ‘Hear the word of YHWH’ followed by ‘Thus says my Lord YHWH.’ KJV translates ‘Adonai YHWH’ as ‘the Lord God.’ ’aḏōnāy means ‘my Lord.’

PARABLE OF THE FOREST FIRE (47b-48)

The short parable now unfolds. YHWH intends to destroy the forest by fire and everything will perish. The fire will be unstoppable – ‘shall not be quenched’ is repeated.

  • The forest stands for Judah’s population.
  • The trees are individual people.
  • ‘Every green tree…every dry tree.’ The green trees are the righteous people and the dry trees are the wicked. God’s judgement will fall on all without distinction – everyone will be affected by the coming Babylonian invasion.
  • The fire (cf. Isa 9:18-19) is a symbol of judgement by war. The Babylonian army will sweep through Judah like a forest fire.
  • The ‘flaming flame’ (the flame of the flaming brightness) indicates the strongest possible flame.
  • ‘All faces’ – every single thing (person) in the forest.
  • ‘from the south to the north.’ – comprehensive scope, the whole land will suffer.
  • ‘Shall not be quenched’ – the judgement is unstoppable and irreversible.

(v.48) And all flesh shall see that I the LORD have kindled it: it shall not be quenched.

This verse is the climax of the oracle. YHWH takes full responsibility for kindling the fire. The judgement is public and will be seen by the entire world. Everyone will realise that it has come from YHWH. He is the ultimate cause, the Babylonians are his instruments.

THE COMPLAINT (49)

In this verse Ezekiel interjects with his own thoughts on the reaction of his fellow-exiles to the oracle. It is in the form of a short prayer in which he laments the fact that they have ridiculed him and dismissed him as being someone who just spins riddles. They claimed that his words are too obscure. That they misunderstood (perhaps deliberately) sets the scene for chapter 21 in which YHWH speaks plainly in three oracles about the sword that was coming against Judah.

SUMMATION

In a section which provides confirmation that Ezekiel was a speaking prophet as well as one who wrote we learn that a severe and comprehensive judgement is coming upon an area that lies to the south of the prophet – this can be identified as the Negev – the southern part of Judea. Ezekiel uses the metaphor of a forest fire that consumes everything (green tree and dry tree) as it spreads unchecked to communicate the idea of overwhelming judgement. All the nations will see the devastation and realise that it has been sent by YHWH. The people to whom Ezekiel communicated the oracle failed to take God’s word seriously; dismissing it as a riddle rather than a real threat. That response sets the stage for the three sword oracles of chapter 21 which proclaim the coming judgement in plain language.

Posted in Exposition

A Lament for the Princes of Israel: Ezekiel 19:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 19:1-14

CHAPTER DIVISION

1-9 THE ALLEGORY OF A LIONESS AND HER CUBS

10-14 THE ALLEGORY OF AN UPROOTED VINE

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 19 continues the oracle of YHWH about ‘the land of Israel’ which commenced at 18:2. Ezekiel, instructed by YHWH, now presents a powerful lamentation for the ‘princes of Israel.’ The lament is in the form of two allegories: a lioness with her cubs and an uprooted vine. Ezekiel uses these to reflect upon the downfall of the Davidic kings of Judah. As with all parables, not just Ezekiel’s, it is unhelpful to speculate upon the meaning of every small detail. There are a variety of views on what different features of the parables represent.

When composing this dirge Ezekiel may have had in mind Jacob’s blessing upon Judah in Genesis 49. It mentions ‘a lion’s whelp’ and ‘the vine:’

…Judah is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be. Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass’s colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes… Gen 49:9-11

THE ALLEGORY OF A LIONESS AND HER CUBS (1-9)

(1) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to present a lamentation for ‘the princes of Israel.’ A lamentation (qiynāh) is a funeral song, elegy or dirge. The word is first used in 2 Sam 1:17 to describe David’s famous lament for Saul and Jonathan. This one in Ezekiel 19 is the first of six in the book of Ezekiel.

19:1-14 – A lament for Israel’s princes.
26:17 – A lament for Tyre
27:2-31 – A lament for Tyre
27:32-36 – A lament for Tyre
28:12-19 – A lament for the king of Tyre
32:2-16 – A lament for Pharaoh, King of Egypt

The ‘princes of Israel’ refers to the chieftains /rulers of Israel and in particular to the last few Davidic kings of Judah (see 12:10). Ezekiel does not call them kings; possibly to emphasise their subservience to foreign powers. Compare Jeremiah’s sorrowful prophecy about the Davidic kings in Jer 22:10-30.

(2) THE MOTHER LIONESS

Several words for lion occur in this passage: leḇiyyā’ – lioness; ’aryēh – lion (the animal); kep̱iyr – a lion, young lion (i.e. fierce).

Many commentators view the lioness as pointing to Judah (cf. Gen 49:9; Num 23:24; 24:9; Isa 29:1 – Ariel means lion of God; Rev 5:5) and her cubs as representing the royal house of Judah. In this allegory Judah the lioness lay down among other lions (the superpowers) and reared her cubs (the royal house) among young lions (the surrounding nations).

Others maintain that the reference is to Hamutal, a wife of King Josiah, whom the prophet Jeremiah referred to as queen [mother] in Jer 13:18. She was the mother of two of the last four kings of Judah; Jehoahaz (2 Kgs 23:31) and Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24:18; Jer 52:1).

(3-4) THE FIRST LION CUB

The mother lion raised her cubs in a politically dangerous environment. One in particular grew into a young lion and learned how to catch prey and devour men i.e. grew fierce and aggressive like those around it. The first lion cub is usually identified as Jehoahaz, son of Josiah and Hamutal (2 Kgs 23:31-34). The people chose him to succeed his father at age twenty-three but after a reign of just three months in 609 BCE ‘the nations also heard of him; he was taken in their pit (trap), and they brought him with chains (hooks) unto the land of Egypt.’ Jehoahaz was deported to Egypt by Pharoah Necho and his vassals, there he died. ‘Pit’ and ‘hook’ are vivid images that relate to the capture of wild animals. Despite his predatory nature Jehoahaz was easily subdued by Egypt.

(5-9) THE SECOND LION CUB

Disappointed by the fate of the first cub the mother (i.e. Judah), in desperation, took ‘another cub’ and reared him as young lion (i.e. to be aggressive). Some suggest that the second cub jointly represents Jehoiakim (605-598 BCE) and his son Jehoiachin (3 months in 597 BCE), 2 Kgs 24:8). Jehoiakim, however, was not chosen by the people of Judah but was installed by Pharaoh Necho as a puppet ruler. In addition, since Jehoiakim was not deported to Babylon but died at Jerusalem (Jer 22:18-19), it seems more likely that Ezekiel bypasses him and in this parable speaks of his son Jehoiachin (2 Kgs 24:8-16).

According to vv. 6-7 Jehoiachin too took his place among the other young lions (kings) and was ruthless, rapacious and cruel. His cruelty was not just exercised abroad but at home in Judah where he ‘knew’ (i.e. dishonoured) the nation’s defenceless widows (almanot) and laid towns to waste. Regarding widows, this may mean either that he made many women widows or that he took the wives of men he had killed into his harem. Instead of ‘widows’ many translations read ‘palaces’ (armonot), thus referring to the destruction of fortified citadels. The two words are textually similar. In either case the picture is one of ruin and desolation brought about by Jehoiachin’s oppressive rule. His ‘roaring’ represents the terror he inspired among his subjects,

As with the first cub, the nations (under Nebuchadnezzar’s rule) attacked and subjugated Jehoiachin – the net was spread over him, he was trapped in their pit, put in a cage in chains and sent to Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon, where he was imprisoned (Ezekiel was one of the aristocracy deported along with him at this time – 597 BCE). The result of the deportation was ‘that his voice should no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel.’ Jehoiachin’s rule, therefore, was brought to an end and his growl wasn’t heard again. Jehoiachin was released (2 Kgs 25:27-30) soon after the death of Nebuchadnezzar some thirty-seven years later but by that time any hope of his restoration to the throne of Judah in Jerusalem was long gone. He died in Babylon.

Note: The phrase ‘mountains of Israel’ occurs 17 times in the book of Ezekiel. See my previous post AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO THE MOUNTAINS OF ISRAEL – EZEKIEL 6:1-14. Ezekiel chapter 36:1-38 contains another oracle, this time of blessing, addressed to ‘the mountains of Israel.’

THE ALLEGORY OF AN UPROOTED VINE (10-14)

(10) The allegory now changes from a lion to a vine. The image of the nation as a vine is a common one (e.g. Psa 80; Isa 5) and Ezekiel has already used it twice: see: Ezekiel’s Vine Allegory: a Prophecy about Jerusalem – 15:1-8 and Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine. Most commentators agree that ‘in your blood’ (dam) is meaningless so there are many conjectures as to what Ezekiel might actually have meant. Some suggestions are:

  • ‘Blood’ refers to the juice of the grape therefore Ezekiel was thinking of sap, thus ‘full of vigour.’ Wine and the blood of grapes is mentioned also in Jacob’s blessing of Judah in Gen 49:11.
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘rest,’ thus Darby.
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘life.’
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘freshness.’
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘bloodline,’ thus NKJB
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘vineyard,’ thus HCSB, ESV, NASB, NIV, NRSV, NCV
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘fruitfulness.’
  • dam (blood) ought to read dama (to be like) thus ERV 1885 gives ‘in thy likeness’ as a marginal reading.

‘Your mother is a vine.’ Again, the mother is likely to represent the nation of Israel/Judah which has produced the kings. The description of a vine ‘planted by the waters’ (17:5,8) and ‘fruitful and full of branches’ evokes a time of prosperity, perhaps alluding to the reigns of David and Solomon which were considered a golden age, when Israel was strong and enjoyed God’s favour and blessings.

(11) The vine sent out strong shoots or branches that were suitable for rulers’ sceptres and its stature was exalted among the thick branches (lit. ‘thicket of clouds,’ see 31:3,10,14). This suggests that Judah produced powerful kings and was prominent among the nations.

(12) Verse 12, which is similar to 17:10, prophesies the violent end of the vine. ‘Plucked up in fury and cast to the ground’ signifies the wrath of God; his judgement upon Judah resulting in the fall of Jerusalem and the end of the Davidic monarchy. The ‘east wind’ symbolises a destructive force, in this case an invading army that brings destruction and ruin. The drying up of its fruit represents the economic strain caused by the annual payment of huge sums in tribute to Babylon. The withering and consumption by fire of its ‘strong rods’ represent the desolation of the land, the death or exile of its leaders (the kings and nobles), and the widespread suffering of the people. Most likely Zedekiah’s reign and the final siege and destruction of Jerusalem are in view.

(13) The tall luxuriant vine planted by the waters has been forcibly uprooted and now finds itself transplanted in a dry and thirsty wilderness. This verse looks forward to the Babylonian Captivity (586-538 BCE) that began when a significant portion of the Judean population was deported to Babylonia by Nebuchadnezzar after the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BCE. However, it also describes the current situation of Ezekiel and the Jehoiachin exiles who had already been exiled to Babylon in 597 BCE.

(14) This verse further emphasises complete destruction. It is possible that the phrase ‘fire is gone out of a rod of her branches’ alludes either to internal conflict and corruption or to the devastation that was accelerated by the actions of one of the kings (referred to as ‘a rod’). One instantly thinks of Zedekiah’s breach of covenant and rebellion against Babylon (see 17:18).

There is ‘no strong rod to be a sceptre to rule’—the outcome is final and definitive. This statement effectively declares Judah’s demise as a sovereign state. The line of Davidic kings has come to a sad end.

The elegy formally closes with the words: ‘This is a lamentation, and shall be for a lamentation.’ Some of the details in the lament had already come to pass and some had yet to be fulfilled. This, therefore, is a lamentation for what has already happened and it will serve as a lamentation for what will soon happen.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel 19 laments the tragic downfall of the Davidic monarchy and the kingdom of Judah. It attributes this destruction not merely to external enemies, but to internal corruption and the unrighteousness of its own kings; who ultimately brought ruin upon themselves and the nation through cruelty and poor leadership. The lament emphasises the severe consequences of sin and the utter devastation that divine justice and judgement bring about.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 17:1-24

Background reading:
– King Jehoiachin’s exile to Babylon in 597 BCE, 2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10.
– Zedekiah’s installation as Nebuchadnezzar’s puppet king and his revolt against Babylonian rule, 2 Kgs 24:17-20; 2 Chron 36:11-16.
– The aftermath of Zedekiah’s revolt, 2 Kgs 25:1-30; 2 Chron 36:11-20.

THE ALLEGORY OF TWO EAGLES AND A VINE

DIVISION

1-10 The Imagery of the Allegory
11-21 The Interpretation of the Allegory
22-24 A Message of Hope

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 17 presents two further visions of Ezekiel in the section (chapters 4-24) that contains oracles of warning about the certainty of YHWH’s judgement upon Judah for crimes such as disobedience, violence, exploitation of the poor, foreign alliances and idolatry.

Already in exile in Babylon, Ezekiel prophesied to the people of Israel/Judah in the years leading up to and just after the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by Babylonian forces in 587/6 BCE.

In this chapter Ezekiel addresses the political crisis of the time which was King Zedekiah of Judah’s rebellion against Babylonian rule. This must have occurred about 590 BCE since it prompted Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Jerusalem that began in Zedekiah’s ninth regnal year, 589/8 BCE (Jer 39:1; 52:4; 2 Kgs 25:1).

THE IMAGERY OF THE ALLEGORY 1-10

(1) Ezekiel 17 begins with the standard prophetic word formula ‘and the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ which introduces a new revelation. This formula occurs again in v.11.

(2) As usual YHWH emphasises Ezekiel’s mortality by addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ and then issuing a double command: ‘pose a riddle (ḥiyḏāh) and tell an allegory (māšāl) to the house of Israel.’ The idea of a riddle or enigma is that it is difficult to understand whereas an allegory or fable is something that illuminates the understanding. Greenberg (Ezekiel I-XX, 1983, p. 309) comments: ‘While the two terms appear in parallelism (Ps 49:5, 78:2; Prov 1:6) they are not interchangeable (as Judg 14:12ff and 1 Kings 10:1 show )…’

(3) There follows the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ which cites the origin of the message and claims divine authority (also vv.9, 22).

FIRST GREAT EAGLE

The allegory begins with a great eagle that has powerful wings, long feathers and colourful plumage coming to Lebanon to the top branch of a cedar tree.

Comment – Nešer refers to a large bird of prey and can be translated as either ‘eagle’ or ‘vulture’ depending on the context. Most translations opt for ‘eagle,’ thus emphasising power, speed and dominance. Some scholars reckon that nešer here refers to the Great Griffon Vulture. Translating it thus would emphasise its scavenging behaviour and association with death and desolation.

great wings, long-winged, full of feathers, which had divers colours – a superpower which has widespread domination and influence over many peoples.

Lebanon – to the north of Israel but in the allegory it seems to represent Jerusalem, see v.12.

the highest branch – the aristocracy.

(4-6) Taking off the topmost twig from the highest branch of a cedar tree the eagle carries it to a land of commerce and sets it in a city of merchants. Then it takes a seedling from the ground and plants it in well-irrigated, fertile ground where it grows like a willow tree (a tree that loves water, cf. Isa 44:4). There it grows into ‘a spreading vine of low stature’ which produces branches and shoots and has its roots spread towards the eagle.

COMMENTS – He cropped off the top of his young twigs, carried it into a land of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants. – i.e. deported the king (Jehoiachin) to Babylon. The Babylonians were famous traders (Josh 7:21; Rev 18:10-16).

He took also of the seed of the land – Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah, a native of Judah, as a puppet ruler.

and planted it in a fruitful field; he placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree. – Zedekiah and Judah flourished under Babylonian rule – they were dependent upon Babylonia but the conditions for growth were excellent.

great waters – The Euphrates and the Tigris were the rivers of Babylon (cf. Psa 137).

And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs. – As a vassal state Judah was subservient to the Babylonians but was nevertheless thriving.

Vine – Often used for Israel, e.g. Psa 80:8-15; Isa 5:1-7; Jer 2:21; Hos 10:1.

(7) SECOND GREAT EAGLE

A second eagle with great wings and many feathers is introduced and the vine stretches its roots and branches towards this eagle hoping to obtain sustenance from it.

COMMENTS – The second great eagle is not quite as splendid as the first (cp. v.7a with v.3a). It has great wings and many feathers but they are not as long or colourful as those of the first eagle.

The vine tries to shift its loyalty, it stretches out its roots and branches towards the second eagle. Notice that, whereas in vv.3-5 the first great eagle takes the active role and the vine is passive, in v.7 the second great eagle is passive and the vine is active. It reaches out towards second eagle.

(8) The series of infinitives would suggest that v.8 is recapping the advantages the vine has enjoyed and could continue to enjoy (v.6) under the first eagle (it was planted: to bring forth branches, to bear fruit, to become a goodly vine). This emphasises the foolishness of turning towards the second eagle.

(9-10) Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 22) Ezekiel is told to ask his fellow exiles questions (featuring the words ‘shall it prosper’) and then supply the answers.

Q Shall it prosper? shall he not pull up the roots thereof, and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither?
A it shall wither in all the leaves of her spring, even without great power or many people to pluck it up by the roots thereof.

Q Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? shall it not utterly wither, when the east wind toucheth it?
A it shall wither in the furrows where it grew.

COMMENTS – these questions and answers are designed to show the utter futility of the vine changing its allegiance. The first eagle will uproot the vine (by applying great force) and cause it to wither (rot).

planted – some translations (e.g. NCB; NLT; RSV; NRSV) prefer ‘transplanted’ as the verb šāṯal  can mean either to plant or to transplant. In Ezek chapter 19 this same word is used of a vine’s first planting and again in v.13 of its second planting (transplanting).

east wind – a destructive hot wind (Job 27:21; Isa 27:8; Ezek 19:12; Hos 13:15).

the furrows (v.7 and v.10) – the River Nile and the irrigation canals that branch off from it.

THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ALLEGORY 11-21

(11-12a) In Ezek 17:11 the standard prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ introduces a new revelation that helpfully explains the previous one. Ezekiel is to communicate this to the exiles who are with him in Babylon; here referred to once again as ‘the rebellious house.’ This description occurs 12 times in the book of Ezekiel: 2:5, 6, 8; 3:9, 26, 27; 12:2, 3, 9, 25; 17:12; 24:3.

(12a-21) Explanation:

v.12 Behold, the king of Babylon is come to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and led them with him to Babylon;

COMMENT – Cp. vv. 3-4. The first great eagle is Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, who in 597 BCE besieged Jerusalem (Lebanon) and carried away the Judean king Jehoiachin, with the aristocracy and the elite of the land, to exile in Babylon (see 2 Kgs 24:10-16).

v.13-14 And hath taken of the king’s seed, and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath of him: he hath also taken the mighty of the land: That the kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand.

COMMENT- Cp. vv.5-6. Nebuchadnezzar appointed Zedekiah as his vassal king in Judah (2 Kgs 24:17). As part of this agreement Zedekiah swore an oath of allegiance to Nebuchadnezzar that would also have entailed a commitment to pay an annual tribute to the Babylonians. The Chronicler records that Nebuchadnezzar put him under oath; Zedekiah swore this in the name of YHWH (2 Chron 36:13). If this agreement was honoured Judah would survive and flourish as a Babylonian vassal state, YHWH had confirmed that this would be so in a word addressed to Zedekiah by the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 27:12-15).

vv.15-16 But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and much people. Shall he prosper? shall he escape that doeth such things? or shall he break the covenant, and be delivered? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he broke, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die.

COMMENT – Having decided to revolt against Babylonian rule Zedekiah sent diplomats to Egypt to request military support, which seems to have been forthcoming. Zedekiah then rebelled (2 Kgs 24:20), probably by withholding tribute. This action quickly backfired as Nebuchadnezzar marched on Jerusalem and laid siege to the city.

Echoing v.9 and v.10 YHWH asks ‘Shall he prosper?’ The alliance with Egypt will not work because YHWH is angry that Zedekiah broke the treaty with the Babylonians that was sworn in YHWH’s name. YHWH swears by himself that Zedekiah will die in Babylon.

v.17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company make for him in the war, by casting up mounts, and building forts, to cut off many persons:

COMMENT – Once the Babylonian siege apparatus is set up (ramps and bulwarks) Pharaoh and his army will be of no use (see Ezekiel’s description of Babylonian siege warfare against Tyre in 26:7-11). Jeremiah 37:4-11 indicates that Pharoah did send an army, causing the Babylonians to break the siege of Jerusalem for a short while in order to repulse that threat.

vv.18-19. Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head.

COMMENT – Zedekiah had ‘given his hand’ (this gesture must have meant ‘I promise’ cf. Ezra 30:8; Lam 5:6).

v.19, which I have shown in bold print, is the key verse in the chapter. It is the whole point of the allegory. Zedekiah swore an oath and made a treaty with a secular ruler, but did not honour its terms because he despised the oath (the word ‘oath’ also means ‘curse’). However, he swore it in YHWH’s name so it has religious significance. It is binding. Notice ‘mine oath’ and ‘my covenant.’ The oath and covenant that Zedekiah made with Nebuchadnezzar is also viewed as YHWH’s oath and covenant. Zedekiah violated that agreement and will suffer the consequences. Notice that YHWH himself makes an oath (‘as I live’) to punish Zedekiah.

v.20 predicts Zedekiah’s capture, exile to Babylon and judgement there for violating his duty and v.21 predicts that his soldiers will be pursued and either slain or dispersed. All this without any mention of Nebuchadnezzar! YHWH is in control. Nebuchadnezzar is his agent. Nebuchadnezzar is his instrument.

The fulfilment of these consequences will prove that YHWH indeed has spoken – ye shall know that I the LORD have spoken it.

A MESSAGE OF HOPE 22-24

The first 21 verses of Ezekiel 17 have been about judgement, the closing verses are about restoration. Utilising the earlier imagery of the chapter Ezekiel predicts the restoration of the Davidic line. Many interpret this passage as messianic.

Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 9) Ezekiel prophesies that YHWH will act to take a new tender sprig from the top of the high cedar in Babylon and plant it upon a high and eminent mountain in Israel. There it will thrive and become a place of shade and security for ‘all fowl of every wing.’ All the trees of the field will know that that YHWH has spoken this and has brought it about.

No explanation of this metaphor is given but based on the earlier explanation in the chapter where the top of the twigs represented Jehoiachin then this tender twig (from the top of the high cedar tree in Babylon) that YHWH will plant upon a high mountain in Israel refers to a future king of the Davidic line who will reign in Israel/Judah. Mt. Zion springs immediately to mind but ‘high and eminent mountain’ probably refers to this king’s greatness. He will flourish and be a blessing to all kinds of people – or perhaps v.23b (under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell) implies universal rule. This future Davidic ruler will have worldwide influence and significance (cf. Isa 9:6-7; Jer 23:5-6; Ezek 34:23; 37:24).

Ezekiel may have been hoping for the eventual restoration of King Jehoiachin with whom he was in exile in Babylon. Jehoiachin was released after Nebuchadnezzar’s death in 562 BCE (2 Kgs 25:27-30; Jer 52:3-4) but he was not the fulfilment of the prophecy. Nor was Zerubbabel, a later Governor of Judea under the First Persian Empire, although he was of the Davidic line and his name means ‘seed of Babylon.’

The chapter closes with ‘all the trees of the field’ (i.e. the nations) recognising that it is YHWH who has brought Judah down to nothing and who will restore and exalt the new king. YHWH makes the low high and brings the high low.

PREACTICAL LESSONS FROM EZEKIEL 17

a) The necessity of keeping one’s word. Breaking promises and betraying trust, whether in personal or business relationships or in the political sphere, matters to God. Integrity is important and actions have consequences. Do I honour my commitments, or shift loyalties if it seems more beneficial to do so?

b) The folly of placing dependence upon others rather than God. Zedekiah relied on Egypt’s prowess rather than trust God’s sovereignty. True security lies in trusting God, not others. Am I entangled in worldly alliances?

c) Although we live in uncertain times God is actively working out his purposes in world affairs. No matter how bad a situation seems he is in control. God can reverse national fortunes (bring the high low and make the low high, v.24) and ultimately his plans will prevail.

Posted in Exposition

Understanding the Book of Obadiah: A Concise Overview

Posted on by writtenexposition

The prophecy of Obadiah is the shortest book in the Old Testament and fourth of the twelve Minor Prophets (note: it comes fifth in LXX which has a different order for the first six Minor Prophets – Hosea, Amos, Micah, Joel, Obadiah, Jonah). It commences with a superscription (v.1) which states that it was written by someone called Obadiah and also that the subject matter concerns Edom. The remainder of the book is a diatribe against Edom, consisting of two oracles; the first denouncing that nation for sins committed against the people of Israel/Judah and the second a prophecy about the Day of YHWH.

AUTHORSHIP

Obadiah is a common Old Testament name that means ‘servant of the Lord’ so this may either be the name of the book’s author or just a self-description. A dozen men named Obadiah are mentioned in the Old Testament. Smith’s Bible Dictionary lists them as follows:

  1. A man whose sons are enumerated in the genealogy of the tribe of Judah. (1 Chronicles 3:21)
  2. A descendant of Issachar and a chief man of his tribe. (1 Chronicles 7:3)
  3. One of the six sons of Azel, a descendant of Saul. (1 Chronicles 8:33; 9:44)
  4. A Levite, son of Shemaiah, and descended from Jeduthun. (1 Chronicles 9:16; Nehemiah 12:25)
  5. The second of the lion-faced Gadites who joined David at Ziklag. (1 Chronicles 12:9)
  6. One of the Princes of Judah in the reign of Jehoshaphat. (2 Chronicles 17:7)
  7. The son of Jehiel, of the sons of Joab, who came up in the second caravan with Ezra. (Ezra 8:9)
  8. A priest, or family of priests, who settled the covenant with Nehemiah. (Nehemiah 10:5)
  9. The fourth of the twelve minor prophets.
  10. An officer of high rank in the court of Ahab. (1 Kings 18:3)
  11. The father of Ishmaiah who was chief of the tribe of Zebulun in David’s reign. (1 Chronicles 27:19)
  12. A Merarite Levite in the reign of Josiah, and one of the overseers of the workmen in the restoration of the temple. (2 Chronicles 34:12)

Nothing is known about no. 9 in Smith’s list, the author of the book of Obadiah.

DATE OF WRITING

The book of Obadiah contains no internal evidence that would indicate when it was written. No information about the author (except for his name) is given so it is virtually impossible to determine the date of writing. There are differing theories as to when the book was written. That depends upon how v.11 is interpreted.

In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them. Obadiah 11

There is disagreement as to whether this verse refers to what happened around the time of the siege and fall of Jerusalem to Nebuchadnezzar II in 587/6 BCE or to a much earlier event. The verse relates to an attack on Jerusalem, when the Edomites participated in the city’s destruction.

PRE-EXILIC VIEW

Those who consider that Obadiah was a pre-exilic prophet view Obadiah 11 as referencing an event much earlier in Judah’s history than the fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians. They identify two possibilities:

a) The Edomite revolt during the reign of King Jehoram of Judah (c. 852-841 BCE) when, in league with the Philistines and the Arabians, the Edomites plundered the temple of YHWH in Jerusalem and also carried off the royal household.

In his days Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah, and made a king over themselves. So Joram went over to Zair, and all the chariots with him: and he rose by night, and smote the Edomites which compassed him about, and the captains of the chariots: and the people fled into their tents. Yet Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day... 2 Kings 8:20-22

In his days the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah, and made themselves a king. Then Jehoram went forth with his princes, and all his chariots with him: and he rose up by night, and smote the Edomites which compassed him in, and the captains of the chariots. So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day… 2 Chronicles 21:8-10

Moreover the LORD stirred up against Jehoram the spirit of the Philistines, and of the Arabians, that were near the Ethiopians: And they came up into Judah, and broke into it, and carried away all the substance that was found in the king’s house, and his sons also, and his wives; so that there was never a son left him, save Jehoahaz, the youngest of his sons. 2 Chronicles 21:16-17

Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Philistia? will ye render me a recompense? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompense upon your own head; Because ye have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried into your temples my goodly pleasant things: The children also of Judah and the children of Jerusalem have ye sold unto the Greeks, that ye might remove them far from their border. Joel 3:4-6

Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Gaza, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they carried away captive the whole captivity, to deliver them up to Edom: But I will send a fire on the wall of Gaza, which shall devour the palaces thereof: And I will cut off the inhabitant from Ashdod, and him that holdeth the scepter from Ashkelon, and I will turn mine hand against Ekron: and the remnant of the Philistines shall perish, saith the Lord GOD. Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Tyrus, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they delivered up the whole captivity to Edom, and remembered not the brotherly covenant: But I will send a fire on the wall of Tyrus, which shall devour the palaces thereof. Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Edom, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because he did pursue his brother with the sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, and he kept his wrath forever: But I will send a fire upon Teman, which shall devour the palaces of Bozrah. Amos 1:6-12

Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.
For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.
They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:
The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes (Arabians);
Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre;
Assur also is joined with them: they have helped the children of Lot. Selah. Psalms 83:1-8

b) Edomite conflict with Judah during the reign of King Ahaz of Judah (c. 732-716 BCE).

At that time did king Ahaz send unto the kings of Assyria to help him. For again the Edomites had come and smitten Judah, and carried away captives. The Philistines also had invaded the cities of the low country, and of the south of Judah, and had taken Beth-shemesh, and Ajalon, and Gederoth, and Shocho with the villages thereof, and Timnah with the villages thereof, Gimzo also and the villages thereof: and they dwelt there. 2 Chronicles 28:16-18

EXILIC VIEW

Those who view Obadiah 11 as referring to what happened around 586 BCE postulate that the prophet Obadiah wrote early in the exilic period, just after the fall of Jerusalem, of which he may have been a contemporary eyewitness. These are the relevant passages:

Remember, O LORD, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who said, Raze it, raze it, even to the foundation thereof. Psalms 137:7

As for us, our eyes as yet failed for our vain help: in our watching we have watched for a nation that could not save us. They hunt our steps, that we cannot go in our streets: our end is near, our days are fulfilled; for our end is come. Our persecutors are swifter than the eagles of the heaven: they pursued us upon the mountains, they laid wait for us in the wilderness. The breath of our nostrils, the anointed of the LORD, was taken in their pits, of whom we said, Under his shadow we shall live among the heathen. Rejoice and be glad, O daughter of Edom, that dwellest in the land of Uz; the cup also shall pass through unto thee: thou shalt be drunken, and shalt make thyself naked. The punishment of thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion; he will no more carry thee away into captivity: he will visit thine iniquity, O daughter of Edom; he will discover thy sins. Lamentations 4:17-22

Thus saith the Lord GOD; Because that Edom hath dealt against the house of Judah by taking vengeance, and hath greatly offended, and revenged himself upon them; Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; I will also stretch out mine hand upon Edom, and will cut off man and beast from it; and I will make it desolate from Teman; and they of Dedan shall fall by the sword. And I will lay my vengeance upon Edom by the hand of my people Israel: and they shall do in Edom according to mine anger and according to my fury; and they shall know my vengeance, saith the Lord GOD. Ezekiel 25:12-14

Moreover the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against mount Seir, and prophesy against it, And say unto it, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O mount Seir, I am against thee, and I will stretch out mine hand against thee, and I will make thee most desolate. I will lay thy cities waste, and thou shalt be desolate, and thou shalt know that I am the LORD. Because thou hast had a perpetual hatred, and hast shed the blood of the children of Israel by the force of the sword in the time of their calamity, in the time that their iniquity had an end: Ezekiel 35:1-5

I favour the pre-exilic view that Obadiah lived and wrote during or soon after Edomite rebellion in the reign of King Jehoram (c. 852-841 BCE) but the dominant opinion among modern scholars is that the Book of Obadiah was written sometime in the 6th century BCE, probably in the early years of the Babylonian exile. This assumes that the occasion when Edom gloated over Jerusalem was its destruction by the Babylonians. Psalm 137:7 strongly supports that view. Its proponents, however tend to ignore Jeremiah 40:11, which indicates that people from Judah fled from the Babylonians to other territories; a number of them finding refuge in Edom.

PROPHETIC PARALLELS

The book of Obadiah contains obvious parallels with other Old Testament prophetic writings; especially Jer 49:7-16. The other passages are Lam 4:21; Joel 1:15; 2:32; Ezek 25:12-14; 35:5; also compare Psa 137:7; Mal 1:2-5.

BACKGROUND

Read: Gen 25-33

According to the Old Testament the nations of Edom and Israel traced their roots to a common ancestor. This was the patriarch Isaac, son of Abraham. Isaac fathered twin sons named Esau and Jacob. From Esau came the nation of Edom and from Jacob the nation of Israel.

According to the biblical account the twin brothers were rivals from before birth (Gen 25:19-34). Verse 22 of Gen 25 notes that in their mother Rebekah’s womb ‘the children struggled together within her.’ Concerned by this she inquired of YHWH and in reply received a significant prophecy:

And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. Gen 25:23

Genesis does not clarify whether the prophecy relates to the two individuals (Esau and Jacob) or to the future nations (Edom and Israel) that would descend from them.

The rivalry between the twin brothers continued into adulthood but it the Genesis record would indicate that later on they more or less patched up their differences; which would lead one to the conclusion that the prophecy pointed to future national affairs. The brothers may have reached an accommodation of sorts but that was not the case with Edom and Israel. Despite the fact that the two nations had a common ancestor and were thus related by kinship, their history is marked by mutual hatred and hostility. The nation of Israel expected Edom to behave towards it as a brother should, unfortunately Edom did not share those same sentiments (Deut 23:7; Num 20:14-21).

The brotherhood of Edom and Israel is referred to several times in the Old Testament. It is stressed even in the account of the birth of the twin brothers Esau and Jacob with the comment that immediately after Esau was born ‘his brother came out’ (Gen 25:26). Other references to this kinship are in Num 2:14; Deut 2:4, 23:7; Amos 1:11; Obad 10, 12; Mal 1:2.

The treatment of Esau and Edom in the Pentateuch is comparatively neutral in tone but in the prophets they are referred to with hostility. The main reasons are 1) Edom’s history of aggression towards Israel, often in cahoots with other Canaanite nations that were unrelated by kinship and also 2) Edom’s expansion into Judean territory in the Negev (Ezek 35:10; 36:5; Obad 19-20, cp. 1 Esdras 4:50).

The bad press continues in the New Testament where Esau is viewed negatively in Rom 9:13 as regards election and in Heb 12:16-17 is cited as a negative example of someone who prefers the gratification of fleshly appetites to the blessing of God. There is no direct quotation from Obadiah in the New Testament.

THEMES AND PURPOSE

The Book of Obadiah has two main themes. One is the overthrow and destruction of Edom, Israel’s inveterate enemy. The other is the eventual glory of Israel/Judah in the Day of YHWH. The purpose of the book is therefore to prophesy Edom’s doom because of its pride and hatred of Israel/Judah and to encourage the Israelites/Judeans in the fact that a bright future lies ahead. The book divides as follows:

1-14 Declaration of Judgement on Edom

15-21 Deliverance for Israel in the Day of YHWH

KEY VERSE

…as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head. Obadiah 15

KEY PHRASE

the kingdom shall be the LORD’s. Obadiah 21

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted on by writtenexposition

Introduction

Ezekiel 3:16 begins with a standard prophetic word formula (c. 50 times) that will become familiar as we progress through the book: ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying.’ It next occurs at 6:1 which would suggest that that 3:16-5:17 is one unit. This unit consists of several addresses by YHWH to Ezekiel and also includes a couple of Ezekiel’s reactions/responses to YHWH’s words (3:16; 4:14).

3:16-21 The Watchman Parable

After a seven day period of stunned anticipation Ezekiel receives a message from the Lord informing him that he has been given the specific role of watchman to the house of Israel. The parable of Ezekiel as a watchman occurs in two chapters of the book (3:17-21 and 33:1-9) but falls into three parts:

Part 1 – Found only in chapter 33.

1 Again the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, speak to the children of thy people, and say unto them, When I bring the sword upon a land, if the people of the land take a man of their coasts, and set him for their watchman:
3 If when he seeth the sword come upon the land, he blow the trumpet, and warn the people;
4 Then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the sword come, and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head.
5 He heard the sound of the trumpet, and took not warning; his blood shall be upon him. But he that taketh warning shall deliver his soul.
6 But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand. Ezekiel 33:1-6

Part 2 – Found in both chapter 3 and chapter 33

16 And it came to pass at the end of seven days, that the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
17 Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.
18 When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.
20 Again, When a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul. Ezekiel 3:16-21 and also 33:7-9

PART 3 – Found only in chapter 3.

20 Again, When a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul. Ezekiel 3:20-21

In this article we shall only deal with material found in Ezekiel 3:16-21.

Speaking in the first person the Lord addresses Ezekiel not by name but as ‘mortal’ and makes him watchman for the house of Israel. In ancient times, a watchman patrolled the walls of a city (2 Sam 18:24-27; 2 Kgs 9:17-20) and was responsible for keeping guard and for alerting the citizens to approaching dangers. Similarly, Ezekiel is appointed by the Lord as a spiritual watchman for the ‘house of Israel.’ Whenever he hears a message from YHWH it is his responsibility to convey that message and warn the people about impending consequences (3:17).

The Weight of Prophetic Responsibility – Illustrating the Prophet’s Task as a Watchman and the Consequences of Silence

In vv.18-21 YHWH introduces the idea of prophetic responsibility and elaborates on the role of watchman by outlining various scenarios involving a word from the Lord (‘when I say’) and possible prophetic responses to it. It is notable that YHWH does not use military style language (Isa 21:6-8; Jer 6:17), which one might expect, when expanding upon the role of watchman but rather expresses himself in legal terms more appropriate to the courtroom. The language is that of a judge addressing ‘the wicked man’ (in the second person ‘you’) while pronouncing the death sentence upon him: ‘When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die’ (3:18).

Four cases are set out in two sets of two. The grammar is not quite parallel but the meaning is. In each of the two sets we have one example of the prophetic watchman not fulfilling his role and one example of him fulfilling that role, and the consequences of each.

Case 1 (3:18) The prophet is made aware that the death sentence has been passed but does not warn the wicked man. The consequences are two-fold: a) the wicked man will die in his sin. b) the prophet will be held responsible for the wicked man’s death, because he failed to warn him.

Case 2 (3:19) The prophet is made aware that the death sentence has been passed and does warn the wicked man, who does not turn from his sin. The consequences are two-fold: a) the wicked man will die in his sin. b) the life of the prophet will be preserved.

Case 3 (3:20) ‘The righteous man’ turns from his righteousness and commits iniquity and the prophet does not warn him. The consequences are two-fold: a) The man’s former righteousness will not be remembered so he will die in his sin. b) because he did not warn the man the prophet will be held responsible for his death.

Case 4 ((3:21) The prophet warns the righteous man not to sin and the righteous man does not sin. The consequences are two-fold: a) the righteous man will live. b) the prophet’s life is preserved.

In summary, Ezekiel 3:16-21 depicts the prophet’s role as a watchman, emphasizing the weighty responsibility of delivering God’s warnings and messages to the people. Ezekiel’s task as a watchman is to ensure that he communicates to the people exactly what he hears from YHWH. The warnings will be solemn. What Ezekiel will be announcing is a legal decision that has already been taken and will not be revoked.

3:22-27 EZEKIEL’S CONFINEMENT AND DUMBNESS

In 3:22-23 we have Ezekiel as narrator introducing a series of three messages from YHWH, all of which begin with the words: ‘And thou, o son of man’ (3:25; 4:1; 5:1). The first message (3:24b-27) reveals to him further information about the conduct of his ministry. The second (4:1-17) orders him to symbolically represent the siege of Jerusalem and in the third (5:1-17) he is told to symbolically represent the fate of the inhabitants after fall of the city.

A Valley Encounter: The Glory of YHWH Revisited – Ezekiel’s Solitude and the Renewal of Divine Encounter

Ezekiel records (vv.22-24) that he was told to leave the Israelites among whom he found himself and go out into the solitude of a valley, presumably near Tel-Abib (3:15). When he had complied with this instruction the glory of YHWH appeared to him just as it had in his inaugural vision by the river of Chebar (1:1-3:14).

Bound with Cords: The Symbolism of Confinement

Again (see 2:2) the spirit enters him and sets him on his feet, telling him that he is to go back to his house and remain shut up there. Using the ‘son of man’ formula the spirit proceeds to emphasize the strictness of this confinement using the imagery of being bound with cords. As a result Ezekiel will not be able to go out among the people, they will have to come to him (8:1; 14:1; 20:1; 33:30). Although the text says that ‘they’ will bind Ezekiel it is generally understood that the binding will be done by YHWH, especially in light of 4:8. It is not the action of the Israelites.

Silenced Tongue: Understanding the Impact of Muteness on the Prophet’s Role

In vv. 26-27 Ezekiel is informed that his tongue will cleave to the roof of his mouth with the result that he will be speechless except when YHWH commands him to speak. Even then he will only be able to say what YHWH wants him to say and must begin his messages with ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’ The purpose/result of Ezekiel’s dumbness is that he will not be ‘a reprover’ to rebellious Israel.’ What is meant by ‘one who chides,’ ‘one who rebukes’ (compare Prov 9:7; 24:25; 25:12; 28:23)?

Some suggest that the idea of a reprover here is a legal concept. To reprove may perhaps mean to conduct a legal case (Job 40:2), or to preside or arbitrate at a trial (Job 9:33 daysman) and thus ensure a fair hearing. Trials took place at the gate of a city, which is where the reprover would exercise his role (Isa 29:21; Amos 5:10). This view seems to fit well what we have said about vv.16b-21 where the role of the watchman is expressed in legal terms.

The legal dispute in view is therefore that between YHWH and Israel. Ezekiel is not permitted to become involved. He is confined to his house and cannot go out among the people or sit with the elders at the city gate. He cannot see what is going on and react to it but can only speak what he is told to say by YHWH. He is dumb and therefore cannot exercise a mediatorial role between YHWH and Israel. He cannot intercede for them because the trial is already over, No negotiation or dialogue is possible. Communication is only one way; from YHWH to Israel. The decision has been made and the verdict pronounced. Ezekiel’s role is to proclaim the coming judgement.

Ezekiel’s Silent Years

Three passages refer to the onset of Ezekiel’s dumbness and its removal (3:22-27; 24:25-27; 33:21-22). The chronology of the book of Ezekiel would indicate that the limitations of confinement and the state of silence imposed upon him by the Lord may have lasted from the time of his call (c. 593 BCE) for a period of about seven years; ending only the evening prior to Ezekiel hearing the news (from a refugee one year following the event i.e. 585 BCE) that his prophecies of judgment have been fulfilled by the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians (586 BCE).

21 And it came to pass in the twelfth year of our captivity, in the tenth month, in the fifth day of the month, that one that had escaped out of Jerusalem came unto me, saying, The city is smitten.
22 Now the hand of the LORD was upon me in the evening, before he that was escaped came; and had opened my mouth, until he came to me in the morning; and my mouth was opened, and I was no more dumb. Ezekiel 33:21-22

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

‘AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15