Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 28: Prophecy Against Tyre’s Prince

WHAT IS THE BACKGROUND TO EZEKIEL CHAPTER 28?

Chapters 25-32 of Ezekiel form a unit composed of oracles against Judah’s neighbours, These oracles lie between the prophecies given before the fall of Jerusalem (chps.1-24) and those spoken after the fall of the city (chps. 33-48). They fill the gap between the announcement that the siege of Jerusalem has begun (24:1-2) and word of the fall of the city (33:21).

Chapter 25 deals with Ammon, Moab, Edom and Philistia. Next comes almost three chapters on Tyre (26:1-28:19), a short section on Sidon (28:20-26), then four chapters on Egypt (29:1-32:32).

Chapter 26 contains four short prophecies against Tyre (vv.3-6; 7-14; 15-18; 19-21) which are followed by a funeral lament over Tyre in chapter 27. Ezekiel continues with a similar arrangement in chapter 28 which contains a prophecy against the Prince of Tyre (vv.1-10) followed by a funeral lament over the King of Tyre (vv.11-19).

WHAT IS THE STRUCTURE OF EZEKIEL CHAPTER 28?

1-10 – A PROPHECY AGAINST THE PRINCE OF TYRE

11-19 – A DIRGE OVER THE KING OF TYRE

20-24 – A PROPHECY AGAINST SIDON

25-26 – A SHORT PROPHECY ABOUT THE FUTURE OF JUDAH.

WHAT IS EZEKIEL CHAPTER 28 ABOUT?

1-10 – A PROPHECY AGAINST THE PRINCE OF TYRE

(1) The prophetic word formula ‘The word of the Lord came unto me again, saying,’ indicates that what follows is a new oracle. Since no start date is given, this must still relate to 586/587 BCE, the eleventh year on the first of the month mentioned in 26:1. The particular month is not specified.

(2) Ezekiel, once more addressed as ‘Son of Adam’ (mortal), is instructed to address YHWH’s message directly to the Prince (leader) of Tyre who, as its ruler, represents the city of Tyre. The word nagid (translated ‘prince’ or ‘captain’) is sometimes used as a synonym for melek (king), e.g.1 Sam 9:16; 2 Sam 6:21;1 Kings 1:35; 2 Kings 20:5).

Who is the Prince of Tyre?

There now follows a pronouncement of judgement (vv.2-10) beginning, as usual, with ‘because’ (vv.2, 6) followed by ‘therefore’ (v.6). Tyre is first of all accused of arrogance towards God. The Prince (or Leader) of Tyre, is its king who like other ancient monarchs may have claimed to be divine (cf. King of Babylon Isa 14:13-14,), and boasts that he is a [local] god. Tyre was an island kingdom always associated with the sea and seafaring. Its ruler therefore thought himself to be like Elohim (God or gods) who presided over the primordial waters (Gen 1:2). Verse 2 emphasises that the ruler of Tyre is a man; he is not divine.

(3-5) These verses are heavy with sarcasm as YHWH castigates the Leader of Tyre for the worldly wisdom that has brought great wealth through international trade. Tyre owes its prosperity to YHWH but has failed to recognise this. In v.3 YHWH sarcastically suggests that the Prince of Tyre is wiser than Daniel (a man famed for his wisdom) and thinks that no secret is hidden from him. By way of explanation about Daniel I quote my own comments on Ezekiel 14:14:

Daniel – This likely refers to Ezekiel’s older contemporary the Daniel of the Babylonian exile who, though still a young man . . . at this time, had already gained a reputation for righteousness. . . Modern scholars tend to argue that this is not the Daniel of the book of Daniel but the righteous Ugaritic Daniel (Dn’il) of The Tale of Aqhat. Their arguments centre on the fact that the spelling of ‘Daniel’ in the book of Ezekiel differs from that in the book of Daniel, that Dn’il was a figure of antiquity as were Noah and Job but not the contemporary Daniel and the chronological argument that the Daniel of the book of Daniel was too young to have achieved fame at the time this oracle was given. Arguments for Dn’il in the article by ‘Day, J. (1980). The Daniel of Ugarit and Ezekiel and the Hero of the Book of Daniel. Vetus Testamentum30(2), pp. 174–184′ may be read online free of charge by logging into JSTOR. ‘The Tale of Aqhat’ may be read in J. B. Pritchard’s ‘Ancient Near Eastern Texts’ at archive.org.’

Through worldly wisdom the Prince of Tyre has acquired great wealth and has precious metals in his treasuries. Admittedly, through his shrewdness and understanding of trading, the city has become very rich – but also very proud.

(6) ‘Therefore’ followed by the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God (sovereign Lord)’ introduces the pronouncement of judgement. It commences with ‘Because’ and first of all sets out the accusation against Tyre. Verse 6b is basically a summary of what has already been stated in vv.2-5 that the ruler of Tyre is arrogant and blasphemous because he claims to be divine and as wise as God.

(7-8) Verse 7 repeats the more specific prediction of chapter 26:7 but couches it in vaguer and more general terms – the most ruthless of the Gentile nations will come up against Tyre. In chapter 26 the prophet has already identified those invaders as the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar. They will destroy the ‘beauty of the ruler’s wisdom’ (i.e. Tyre’s commercial success) and ‘profane his radiance’ (i.e. destroy any resemblance of deity). He (i.e. Tyre) will die a violent death at their hands ‘in the midst of the seas.’ Tyre’s position as an island fortress will not be secure at all.

(9) Verse 9 is a sarcastic rhetorical question that reminds the ruler of Tyre that he is merely a human being and emphasises the futility of his claims to divinity in the face of a violent death.

Will you then boast, ‘I am a god!’ to those who kill you? To them you will be no god but merely a man! Ezekiel 28:9 (NLT)

(10) Thou shalt die the deaths of the uncircumcised by the hand of strangers: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD. Ezekiel 28:10

The ancient Greek historian Herodotus (Herodotus, Histories 2.104) recorded c.440 BCE that the Phoenicians, like other West Semitic peoples, traditionally practised circumcision. The Babylonians did not circumcise. Although the Israelites were not the only people to practise circumcision they linked the practice with the covenant with their God YHWH. Most likely that is what Ezekiel has in mind here. Although the ruler of Tyre would not literally be uncircumcised he would die a shameful death outside YHWH’s covenant; just like the foreign, godless, uncircumcised, Gentile Babylonians.

11-19 – A DIRGE OVER THE KING OF TYRE

(11-12a) Once more the prophetic word formula ‘The word of the Lord came unto me again, saying,’ introduces a new oracle, which occupies vv.12-19. Ezekiel, as usual called ‘Son of Adam,’ is to address a ‘lament’ (dirge, funeral song) to the ruler of Tyre, now called ‘King’ (melek), using the prophetic word formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’ The funeral lament for someone who is still alive indicates that he is doomed. For ‘taking up a lamentation’ cf. 19:1, 14; 26:17; 27:32; 32:16).

Who is the King of Tyre?

In this dirge Ezekiel draws upon imagery from Ancient Near Eastern mythology (possibly Ugaritic and Phoenician) about El or Baal or a semi-divine figure/hero. He also brings in imagery from the biblical stories of Creation, the Garden of Eden, and the Israelite Tabernacle/Temple. Using highly symbolic cosmic language Ezekiel weaves these ideas together to represent the King of Tyre as someone who embodied all the qualities that God would expect of the ideal human being but whose initial perfection has been marred by pride and corruption. Although highly intelligent he sinned and profaned sacred space that God intended as a sanctuary.

Historians generally agree that the King of Tyre at that time was Ethbaal III. Ezekiel is targeting him as a symbol of the city of Tyre. It is important to bear in mind that Ezekiel is using symbolic language. In chapter 28 Ethbaal III is no more literally in the Garden of Eden or a Cherub than the city of Tyre in chapter 27 is literally a ship.

Having said that, some theologians see a dual aspect in this passage. There is an Adam tradition and a Satan tradition, both based on the motifs in the passage of original perfection, wisdom, pride and a fall. Commenting on the Adam tradition which connects Ezekiel 27 with the account of the Fall of Man in Genesis 2-3 McKenzie (1956, p.326) observes:


I thus summed up the points of contact between the two passages: “There are some indisputably common features in the two passages: Eden, the garden of God, primeval perfection and bliss, a fall. But there are some even more remarkable divergences: in Ezekiel the garden is full of precious stones; there are no trees; the being is clothed, he is endowed with marvelous attributes; he does not keep and till the garden, which is located on the mountain of God; there is no serpent; and, most important of all, there is no woman. To this I should have added that the motif of “likeness to Elohim” does not appear in Ezekiel.

The Satan tradition links this passage with otherwise unrelated verses in Isa 14:12; Luke 10:18; 1 Jn 3:8; Rev 12:19. Patmore (pp.65-67) cites Tertullian (c. 200 CE) as the earliest Christian writer to propound this view and proceeds to explain the thinking of the church fathers on this subject:

The argument is relatively straightforward: God created the Devil, but not as the Devil, rather as a glorious angel, to serve as his right hand man. This angel was, like humankind, created good, and was also entrusted with free will (liberi arbitrii institutus: cf. Jas 1:13–14). This angel sinned and caused man to sin too, but in order to give humankind a chance to crush evil with that same free will and win an even greater reward, God postponed his destruction. Ezekiel 28 forms the entire structure for this argument, with each component of the argument being pinned down to the text. Pride, claims of equality with God, and fiery expulsion from heaven: these are the qualities that the fathers saw in Ezekiel 28:12–19 that convinced them that this oracle was not just about a bad prince. They found support in the Old Testament too, often using Isa 14:12 to support their argument (“How art thou fallen, O Lucifer, son of the morning!”) However, it is ultimately the New Testament that prompts the fathers’ reading of the oracle: “I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven” (Luke 10:18) primarily; “that the devil sinneth from the beginning” (1 John 3:8) to a lesser extent.

(12b-13a) HIS CREDENTIALS

‘the sealing of the pattern’ – You were the sealing of the pattern i.e. the model of perfection

‘full of wisdom’ – a superabundance of wisdom.

‘exquisite in beauty’ – perfect

‘You were in Eden the Garden of God’

‘Every precious stone was your covering’

In these verses Ezekiel uses language reminiscent of Genesis 2-3 although the details are different. A character placed in the Garden of Eden, who was once perfect and wise but who became corrupt and was driven out (v.16). A cherubim is also mentioned. It seems that Ezekiel is sardonically portraying the King of Tyre as the ideal human being. Note that the inner sanctuary of Solomon’s Temple was designed to resemble a garden with carvings of trees and flowers, it also had cherubim (1 Kgs 6:29,32) – see vv.14, 16.

(13b) HIS COVERING

Still having the primeval human being in mind with the mention of covering Ezekiel here mentions the riches that the King of Tyre had enjoyed from the very beginning. The covering is said to have been composed of precious stones, nine of which were on the breastplate of the the Israelite High Priest (Exod 28:11-29; 39:6-21). The settings and mountings (KJV has musical instruments ‘tabrets and pipes’) were prepared in the day he was created. Some speculate that this refers to a statue in the Tyrian temple overlaid with jewels. The King of Tyre may also have had a religious function, probably in the worship of Tyre’s patron deity Melqart (Tyrian Baal) .

(14) HIS CALLING

Ezekiel idealises the King of Tyre as a cherub (composite creature half human, half animal) who has been anointed as a guardian (‘cherub who covers’) on the holy mountain of Elohim – where God dwells (see also v.16). Representations of such overshadowed the Ark in the sanctuary of the Jerusalem temple (which at the time Ezekiel delivered this lament had recently been destroyed) – see Exod 25:20; 37:9; 1 Kings 8:7; 1 Chron 28:18.

‘Thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire’ – the meaning of this is unclear. Some suggest that it refers to the purity of God’s presence, to coals of fire on a temple altar or to the shining of precious stones in a temple. The historian Herodotus (Histories 2.44), who visited the Tyrian temple, wrote about seeing ‘an emerald stone of such size as to shine by night.’ There is no equivalent to the stones of fire in Gen 2-3.

What is the holy mountain of Elohim in this passage? Mt. Zaphon, the divine dwelling place in Ugaritic mythology, has been suggested, as has Mt. Sinai and also Mt. Zion – where the recently-demolished Temple of Solomon once stood. There is no mountain associated with the Garden of Eden in Gen 2-3.

Pett comments: Mountains were seen as the abode of the gods, and many a temple had within it an artificial mountain representing the home of the gods. Does this mean that the king had depicted himself as a guardian cherub, a demi-god committed to the protection of the gods, especially Baal Melkart the Tyrian god? Or is the idea that he claimed to be a god, even a personification of Melkart, protected by a guardian Cherub and that he is being reminded that he was set in the garden on the holy mountain by Yahweh, for all that is done, is done by Yahweh? Either way it represents his proud assumption of some kind of divinity as he walked in the temple garden on the mountain of the gods, so that Yahweh here has to remind him that anything he has, has come from Yahweh, for Yahweh is the Creator, and in all Yahweh is in control.

(15-17a) HIS CORRUPTION

The metaphor of the King of Tyre as a cherub is extended in these verses with repetition in v.16 of ‘mountain of Elohim,’ ‘covering cherub’ and ‘stones of fire’. He was blameless in all that he did until the day that iniquity was found in him. His initial perfection was marred by unrighteousness. He was intelligent and beautiful but because of his splendour became proud.

(17b-19) HIS CATASTROPHE

Initial perfection was followed by pride, then a fall – echoes of Genesis 2-3 again. Since the King of Tyre was polluted through widespread trade and violence God has banished him from his presence. Because of his economic crimes and unjust trading practices God will bring the King of Tyre down and humiliate and expose him before kings. Fire will spring up and consume him. He will be reduced to ashes on the ground. He will be no more and all the nations that traded with him will be appalled.

SUMMARY

In 28:2-10 God addresses the Prince of Tyre through the prophet Ezekiel and condemns him for his arrogance and pride in claiming to be a god although he is merely mortal. His commercial acumen has brought him immense wealth but has inflated his ego to the extent that he regards himself as divine. Because of this God will arrange for ruthless foreigners to to invade The Prince of Tyre, destroy his splendour and cause him to die a violent, shameful death ‘in the midst of the seas’; thus proving once and for all that he is only a man

In vv.11-19 the prophet delivers a funeral dirge over Tyre’s ruler, now called the King of Tyre, in which he draws together themes from early biblical history and Ancient Near Eastern mythology to portray Tyre in exalted terms as the model of perfection, full of wisdom and beauty, once dwelling in Eden the garden of God, adorned with jewels, serving as a guardian cherub on the holy mountain of Elohim among the fiery stones. Blameless until iniquity was found in him because of his widespread trade and violence, his pride in his splendour corrupted his wisdom. God will therefore expel him from his exalted location and cast him down as spectacle before the nations. He will come to a dreadful end and all his former trading partners will be appalled.

Both oracles concerning the Leader of Tyre in Ezekiel chapter 28 highlight the general biblical principle that prosperity and splendour can lead to pride and self-exaltation, which God opposes and will judge.

Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall. Proverbs 16:18

Do ye think that the Scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy? But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. James 4:5-6

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Joyce, P.M. (2007). Ezekiel. T & T Clark International, London

Patmore, H. M. (2011) ‘ADAM OR SATAN? THE IDENTITY OF THE KING OF TYRE IN LATE ANTIQUITY’ in Mein, A. and Joyce, P. M. (eds), After Ezekiel: Essays on the Reception of a Difficult Prophet, T & T Clark, London

Sweeney, M. A. (2013). Reading Ezekiel. Smyth & Helwys Publishing Inc. Macon, Georgia

JOURNAL ARTICLES

McKenzie, J. L. (1956). Mythological Allusions in Ezek 28:12-18. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 75, No., pp.322-327.

Saur, M. (2010). Ezekiel 26-28 and the History of Tyre. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, Vol. 24, No. 2 pp.208–221

ELECTRONIC RESOURCES

Herodotus, Histories 2.44. (2026) [online] Lexundria.com. Available at: https://lexundria.com/go?q=hdt.+2.44&v=mcly [Accessed 26 July 2026].

Herodotus, Histories 2.104. (2026). [online] Lexundria.com. Available at: https://lexundria.com/hdt/2.104/mcly [Accessed 26 July 2026].

Pett, P. (2026). Ezekiel 28. [online] StudyLight.org. Available at: https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/pet/ezekiel-28.html [Accessed 26 July 2026].

Posted in Exposition

The Sinking Ship of Tyre in Ezekiel 27

INTRODUCTION TO EZEKIEL 27

Ezekiel chapter 27 is an extended allegory about Tyre, the dominant maritime trading power of the ancient Mediterranean. It compares the wealthy, seafaring city-state to a luxury merchant ship that gets caught in a storm, breaks apart and sinks. This magnificent vessel has been built by superior craftsmen, constructed using the finest materials, is crewed by the best sailors and sails fully laden with goods sourced from all over the then-known world.

This allegory symbolises Tyre’s economic prowess, international reach and importance as the centre of the world economy. Ezekiel mourns the impending destruction of the city by commenting on its beauty and glory, global trade network and the variety of goods it trades by means of a dirge. A dirge is a funeral lament but this one is not sympathetic. It is satirical and is uttered while Tyre is still very much alive. This blog post will examine the historical context, symbolism and key lessons of Ezekiel 27, showing why this ancient ‘shipwreck’ still matters today.

TYRE

Tyre was an important port for Phoenicia, a federation of independent city states famous in ancient times for seafaring and commerce. Just as the Arabs with their camel trains dominated the transportation of goods overland so the Phoenician merchant navy dominated the shipping routes; conveying goods to and from the three continents (Africa, Asia and Europe) bordering the Mediterranean. The prowess of the Phoenicians (Tyre, Sidon and Byblos) as merchants and human traffickers is acknowledged by the Old Testament Hebrew prophets (Isa 23:1-8, 17-18; Ezekiel 27:1-36; 28:1-5; Joel 3:4-7; Amos 1:9). Ezekiel chapter 27 is of special historical interest because it not only gives a list of commodities traded by the Tyrians but also details the many and widespread locations where they did business.

THE STRUCTURE OF EZEKIEL 27

1-3 INTRODUCTION TO THE DIRGE ABOUT TYRE

4-7 THE BEAUTY OF TYRE’S CONSTRUCTION

8-9 THE PROFESSIONALISM OF TYRE’S CREW

10-11 THE STRENGTH OF TYRE’S MERCENARIES

12-25 TYRE’S TRADING NETWORK AND GOODS

26-36 TYRE’S SHIPWRECK AND THE AFTERMATH

EZEKIEL 27 EXPLAINED

INTRODUCTION TO THE DIRGE ABOUT TYRE (1-3)

(1) The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying,

Chapter 27 begins with the prophetic word formula ‘The word of the Lord came unto me again, saying’ which is also at 26:1; 28:1 and 28:11. Ezekiel gives no date here or at 28:1 so chapters 27 and 28 must relate to the date given at 26:1 (the first day of an unspecified month in the eleventh year of Jehoiachin’s exile in Babylon and Zedekiah’s reign in Judah, i.e. 587/586 BCE). Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Tyre was from 585-573 BCE so that was still future when Ezekiel prophesied chapters 26-28.

(2) Now, thou son of man, take up a lamentation for Tyrus;

Addressing Ezekiel as usual by the title ‘son of Adam’ the Lord emphatically says ‘And you,’ which the KJV translates ‘Now, thou…’ This refers Ezekiel back to 26:17 which predicts that the princes of the sea will ‘take up a lamentation’ for Tyre when the city falls. As well as those princes Ezekiel too is to raise a dirge (qiynāh – funeral lamentation) but he is to do that now, when the city is still very much alive.

(3) And say unto Tyrus, O thou that art situate at the entry of the sea, which art a merchant of the people for many isles, Thus saith the Lord GOD; O Tyrus, thou hast said, I am of perfect beauty.

Ezekiel is to address the city of Tyre directly and present first of all the Lord’s view of her and then her view of herself (‘O you who sit’ is feminine).

The Lord’s view:

  • ‘you who sit (as queen?) at the gateway to the sea’ – the city controlled access to the Mediterranean Sea
  • ‘you are a merchant to the peoples on many coasts’ – Tyre was the centre of world trade

Tyre’s view of herself:

‘You have said, ‘I am perfect in beauty.’ Tyre, full of vanity, claimed for herself (see repetition of ‘beauty’ in vv. 3, 4, 11) what could only truly be said of Jerusalem (Psa 48:2; Lam 2:15; Ezek 16:14).

4-7 THE BEAUTY OF TYRE’S CONSTRUCTION

(4) Thy borders are in the midst of the seas, thy builders have perfected thy beauty.

There is no doubt that Tyre is beautiful. Ezekiel recognises and repeats that fact in v.4. Tyre’s domain is in the high seas – she is a great maritime power – the expression ‘in the midst of the seas’ occurs 4 times in chapter 27 – in vv.4, 25, 26, 27. Her builders have made her beauty perfect.

(5) They have made all thy ship boards of fir trees of Senir: they have taken cedars from Lebanon to make masts for thee.

Verse 5 clarifies that the builders referred to in v.4 are shipbuilders. Tyre is being metaphorically portrayed as a beautiful, well-crafted merchant ship that has been constructed using the finest materials. Ship boards probably refers to the hull, deck and cabin. These planks were ‘of fir trees,’ probably cypress, from Senir – according to Deut 3:8-9 Senir was the Amorite name for Mt. Hermon: And we took at that time out of the hand of the two kings of the Amorites the land that was on this side Jordan, from the river of Arnon unto mount Hermon; (Which Hermon the Sidonians call Sirion; and the Amorites call it Shenir). The masts are made of cedar – tall, straight, strong trees – from Lebanon. Regarding the word for masts MacLaurin (1978, p.80) comments:

‘toren: this word is found also in Is 30:17; 33:23. . . Is 30: 17 seems to refer to a solitary tree-trunk set as a signal on a hill. The word may occur in Job 39:23 with the meaning spear but this is uncertain. One thing is clear from the Hebrew, the word does not specifically mean mast; it seems rather to denote something which could serve as a flagpole or even perhaps the long stem of a spear.’

(6) Of the oaks of Bashan have they made thine oars; the company of the Ashurites have made thy benches of ivory, brought out of the isles of Chittim.

Propulsion was by oars of strong oak from Bashan. This symbolises the ability to reach far-flung places quickly. Extravagance and opulence are again emphasised with the ‘benches’ or perhaps decks (a different word for boards to that in v.5 ) inlaid with ivory from the Tyrian colony of Chittim (Cyprus). Modern translations, whether rightly or wrongly, tend to update ‘company of Ashurites’ to ‘decks of boxwood.’ Ivory was regarded as a luxury construction material (1 Kgs 22:39; Amos 3:15).

(7) Fine linen with embroidered work from Egypt was that which thou spreadest forth to be thy sail; blue and purple from the isles of Elishah was that which covered thee.

The impression of luxury continues with the sails and awnings made of the finest textiles such as woven or embroidered Egyptian linen. These have been prepared with great craftmanship and using high quality dyes from the isles of Elishah – thought to refer to southern Greece, including part of Cyprus. For blue and purple as luxury fabrics cf. Judg 8:26; Esther 1:6; 8:15; Prov 31:22; Song of Sol 3:10; 7:5; Jer 10:9; Ezek 23:6; 27:7, 16, 24.

8-9 THE PROFESSIONALISM OF TYRE’S CREW

(8) The inhabitants of Zidon and Arvad were thy mariners: thy wise men, O Tyrus, that were in thee, were thy pilots.

Tyre outsourced labour from neighbouring city-states like Sidon and Arvad but her own skilled men (nobility and senators) retained overall strategic control. Arvad, located on a island, was the most northerly Phoenician town. Peckham (2014, pp.110-111) writes concerning the history of Arvad:

‘Arvad is an island slightly to the northwest of ʿAmrit. In the Amarna period, it had no king but was a community, “the people of Arvad,” consistently aligned with Sidon in its resistance to Egyptian authority. It is mentioned together with Sidon, along with ʿArqa and Sumur, in a few biblical texts (Gen 10:17–18, Ezek 27:8) and, according to Strabo, it was resettled by Sidonians following the invasion of the Sea Peoples. Together with Sidon and Byblos, it paid tribute to Tiglath-pileser I (1114–1076 B.C.E.), and from that time on it was known to the Assyrians as an exotic place worth visiting. . . The town supplied 200 troops to the anti-Assyrian coalition at the battle of Qarqar in 853 B.C.E., and it is still noted as a source of mercenaries in Ezekiel’s description of Tyre’s dominions. . . By the mid-ninth century, Arvad was an independent kingdom, ruled by a king with the good Phoenician name Mattinbaʿl (“Gift of Baʿal”), and his successors in the eighth and seventh century (whose names were the same as his or were similarly composed with the name or epithet of the God Baʿal) saw to the survival and prosperity of the island by submitting to Assyria. . . Arvad, like Sidon, cooperated with the Assyrians and became one of their ports and eventually a formidable naval power but, unlike Sidon, it was unpretentious and easygoing and outlasted both the Assyrian and the Persian Empires.’

(9) The ancients of Gebal and the wise men thereof were in thee thy caulkers: all the ships of the sea with their mariners were in thee to occupy thy merchandise.

Tyre was able to draw upon the best talent available for every aspect of its maritime business. The elders of Gebal and its wise men are said to be ‘caulkers.’ This tells us that the ship Ezekiel envisages is carvel-built (although clinker-built ships were appearing around that time in history). Unlike clinker-built vessels, where planks overlap, carvel planks meet flush at the seams and are traditionally sealed with caulking to prevent water ingress. In Ezekiel’s time the small gap between planks would have been caulked with cotton or hemp soaked in tar and then sealed over with pitch. Gebal is another name for Byblos – a Phoenician town famous for its very clever people – they invented the Phoenician alphabet, from which most modern alphabets have descended (see Peckham (2014, p.461).

10-11 THE STRENGTH OF TYRE’S MERCENARIES

(10-11) They of Persia and of Lud and of Phut were in thine army, thy men of war: they hanged the shield and helmet in thee; they set forth thy comeliness. The men of Arvad with thine army were upon thy walls round about, and the Gammadims were in thy towers: they hanged their shields upon thy walls round about; they have made thy beauty perfect.

Tyre could afford to recruit foreign mercenaries as soldiers (army) and as security guards (upon thy walls). These are pictured as occupants of the ship. Lud is Lydia in Anatolia, Asia Minor and Put is thought to be an area on the African coast of the Red Sea (Gen 10:6; Nah 3:9). ‘Shield and helmet’ – see Ezek 23:24; 27:10; 38:5). For Arvad see comments on v.8. The location of Gammad is unknown.

Ezekiel turns from Tyre itself to give a list of those with whom Tyre does business and the goods traded.

12-25 TYRE’S TRADING NETWORK AND GOODS

Huebscher (2015, p.24) comments that the section vv.12-15 contains a list of the trading partners and the wares that were loaded on the metaphorical ship of Tyre. They are generally arranged by geographical concerns: vv 12–15, Mediterranean areas and Asia Minor; vv 16–17, Palestinian regions from south to north; vv 18–19, Syria; vv 20–22, Arabia; and vv 23–24, Mesopotamia.

(12) Tarshish – Because of the mention of metals (silver, iron, tin and lead) and the implication in Psa 72:10 that Tarshish is in the far west this may well refer to Tartessus – a Phoenician colony in Spain that was rich in metals.

(13) Javan, Tubal, and Meshech. Javan represents the Ionians or ancient Greeks (Isa 66:19; Dan 8:21, 10:20, 11:2). Tubal and Meshech were regions in central and western Asia Minor. They appear together 5 times in Ezekiel (Ezek 27:13: 32:26; 38:2, 3; 39:21). Human beings are listed, along with bronze, as a commodity.

(14) According to Huebscher (2015, p.29) Beth-Togarmah means “House of Togarmah” in Hebrew. This people group, which is mentioned in Gen 10:3, is descended from Noah’s son Japheth and grandson Gomar. They lived in Asia Minor east of Tubal, in the area of the upper Euphrates River.They were well known for their horse breeding, as evidenced by the records of the Neo-Assyrian kings Ashurbanipal and Sargon II.

(15) There are several possibilities for Dedan (mentioned again in v.20). It is generally identified as Rhodes but Huebscher (2015, p.31) concludes that it is Danuna in Anatolia. Dedan gave horns of ivory and ebony wood as payment or as ‘presents’ to Tyre. The only other occurrence of the word ’eškār is in Psa 72:10 where it describes gifts brought to Solomon from the kings of Sheba and Seba.

(16) Syria (Aram) traded with Tyre in precious stones (emeralds, coral, agate) as well as dyed fabrics and luxury textiles.

(17) Even then, just before the Babylonian conquest, Judah and the land of Israel were trading agricultural products with Tyre. Wheat of Minnith – located in in the Trans-Jordan territory of Ammon (Judg 11:33), pannag – an unknown ‘meal’ translated as millet – plus honey, oil and balm. The latter was used for medicine (cf. my post on the Balm of Gilead – Jeremiah 8:20-22). Ezekiel is still referring to ‘the land of Israel’ even though the Northern kingdom of Israel had been dismantled and thousands of inhabitants forcibly deported and relocated throughout the Assyrian empire more than 130 years earlier.

(18) Aram has already been mentioned in v.16 but this verse concentrates on premium luxury goods (white wool and fine wine of Helbon) from the area around Damascus.

(19) More luxury items from Damascus are listed; aromatic substances such as Cassia (Exod 30:24) and Calamus (Exod 30:23; Isa 43:24; Jer 6:20 ‘sweet cane’ is calamus reed) as well as wrought iron products. Note: there is a difficulty with the text at the beginning of v.19 – for technical discussion see Huebscher (2015, pp.35-36). The places Dan, Javan and Uzal have been transposed over what should have been products.

(20) Dedan (previously mentioned in v.15) is mentioned again, this time for the supply of saddlecloths for riding. This, however, may be Dedan in Arabia.

(21-24) These verses list nomadic tribes/people groups in the southern part of the Arabian Peninsula and in Mesopotamia along with the products they traded. Arabia and Kedar traded livestock; lambs, rams and goats. Sheba and Raamah traded spices, precious stones and gold. In Mesopotamia the merchants of Haran (capital of Assyria after the fall of Nineveh), Canneh, Eden, Sheba, Asshur (Assyria) and Chilmad traded all kinds of luxury goods; such as purple clothing, embroidered garments and what is reckoned to be multicoloured carpets bound in ropes and shipped in wooden boxes made of cedar. Verse 24 brings the list of trading partners and wares to a conclusion.

(25) ‘Ship of Tarshish’ is a specific term for a type of large, long-distance ocean-going vessel (1 Kgs 10:22; 22:48; Psa 48:7; Isa 2:16; 23:1, 14; 60:9). These impressive boats transported Tyre’s merchandise with the result that it was filled and ‘made very glorious’ (heavily laden) in the midst of the seas. This phrase ‘in the midst of the sea’ occurs in vv. 25, 26 and 27.

26-36 TYRE’S SHIPWRECK AND THE AFTERMATH

Tyre’s state of fullness and glory sets the stage for its shipwreck and destruction when the east wind blows and breaks it apart.

(26) DISASTER STRIKES – Thy rowers have brought thee into great waters: the east wind hath broken thee in the midst of the seas.

Guided by its own efforts (your oarsmen) Tyre meets a power that is beyond its control. The ‘east wind’ is a biblical metaphor for divine judgement (e.g. Exod 14:21; Ezek 17:10; 19:12). In this case the ‘east wind’ will come in the form of the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar.

(27) TOTAL LOSS – Thy riches, and thy fairs, thy merchandise, thy mariners, and thy pilots, thy caulkers, and the occupiers of thy merchandise, and all thy men of war, that are in thee, and in all thy company which is in the midst of thee, shall fall into the midst of the seas in the day of thy ruin.

Everyone and everything on board will sink into the ‘heart’ of the seas. All her workers, warriors and wares will perish. Tyre’s commercial empire will be broken up and her economy totally destroyed.

(28-31) THE REACTION – The suburbs shall shake at the sound of the cry of thy pilots. And all that handle the oar, the mariners, and all the pilots of the sea, shall come down from their ships, they shall stand upon the land; And shall cause their voice to be heard against thee, and shall cry bitterly, and shall cast up dust upon their heads, they shall wallow themselves in the ashes: And they shall make themselves utterly bald for thee, and gird them with sackcloth, and they shall weep for thee with bitterness of heart and bitter wailing.

The coastal areas of the mainland near Tyre will be shocked. They depend economically on Tyre so their sailors and merchants will mourn and cry bitterly, not so much out of sympathy for Tyre as for their lost profits and the financial problems Tyre’s ruin will cause for them. They are depicted as performing traditional mourning rites: casting dust on their heads, wallowing in ashes, shaving their heads, putting on sackcloth and wailing aloud. For dust/ashes cf. Job 2:12; 42:6; Jer 6:26; 25:34.

(32) A LAMENT WITHIN A LAMENT – And in their wailing they shall take up a lamentation for thee, and lament over thee, saying, What city is like Tyrus, like the destroyed in the midst of the sea?

Here we have a lament within a lament. The fall of such a powerful maritime trading empire is unprecedented. The basis of Tyre’s wealth is the sea but, ironically, that is where she will be destroyed.

(33-34) A STARK CONTRAST – When thy wares went forth out of the seas, thou filledst many people; thou didst enrich the kings of the earth with the multitude of thy riches and of thy merchandise. In the time when thou shalt be broken by the seas in the depths of the waters thy merchandise and all thy company in the midst of thee shall fall.

Verses 33-34 contrast what Tyre was with what it will soon be. It once satisfied many peoples and enriched the kings of the earth with its wares but soon, when shipwrecked, its merchandise and crew will sink into the depths of the ocean.

(35-36) THE WORLD’S REACTION AND THE FINAL VERDICT – All the inhabitants of the isles shall be astonished at thee, and their kings shall be sore afraid, they shall be troubled in their countenance. The merchants among the people shall hiss at thee; thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt be any more.

The wider world will hiss in shock, astonishment and derision at the judgement that Tyre will suffer. The nations will be relieved that they seem to have escaped but at the same time fearful lest the same doom should come upon them all. Tyre will become a byword among the nations.

The final words of Ezekiel’s lament aptly sum up Tyre’s situation: thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt be any more. (‘You will come to a dreadful end and shall be no more forever.’) This description of Tyre also occurs in Ezek 26:21 and 28:19.

Note: A question remains whether Ezekiel’s prophecies about Tyre were actually fulfilled but I hope to address that when considering chapter 29.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel 27 provides one of the most detailed descriptions of trade networks found in ancient literature but why would the Lord be interested in Tyre’s trade logs and shipping routes? Ezekiel’s catalogue of Tyre’s trading partners and wares demonstrates how the city built an empire on self-sufficiency, influence and luxury rather than righteousness for, as well as trading raw materials, agricultural products, metals, precious stones and textiles, Tyre was involved in the trafficking of slaves. The poetic funeral dirge uses the metaphor of a shipwreck to illustrate the judgement that the Lord will bring upon the city. This cautionary tale serves as a warning to all nations that even the most powerful political and commercial empires are under God’s control. It is a reminder to us all that self-glorification and the relentless pursuit of wealth without regard for God ends in ruin.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Dowler, A. and Galvin, E.R. (2011). Money, Trade and Trade Routes in Pre-Islamic North Africa. London: The British Museum.

Fleming, W. B. (1915), The History of Tyre, Columbia University Press, New York

Holt E. K., Chul, H. and Mein, A. (2015). Concerning the Nations: Essays on the Oracles Against the Nations in Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel. Bloomsbury, London

Launderville, D. (2007). Spirit and Reason: the Embodied Character of Ezekiel’s Symbolic Thinking. Baylor University Press, Waco, Texas

Lee, L. (2016). Mapping Judah’s Fate in Ezekiel’s Oracles Against the Nations. SBL Press, Atlanta

Liverani, M. (2013). The Ancient Near East: History, Society and Economy, Routledge, Oxon

Middlemas, J. (2012), ‘Ships and other Seafaring Vessels in the Old Testament,’ in Provan, I and Boda, M.J. (eds.). Let us go up to Zion: Essays in Honour of H.G.M. Williamson on the Occasion of his Sixty-fifth Birthday, Brill, Leiden, pp. 407-421

Peckham, B. (2014). Phoenicia: Episodes and Anecdotes from the Ancient Mediterranean, Eisenbrauns. Winona Lake, Indiana

Sader, H. (2019). The History and Archaeology of Phoenicia. SBL Press, Atlanta

Scheidel, W., Morris, I. and Saller, R.P. (2007). The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Schoff, W.H. (1920). The Ship “Tyre” – a Symbol of the Fate of Conquerors as Prophesied by Isaiah, Ezekiel and John and Fulfilled at Nineveh, Babylon and Rome: a Study in the Commerce of the Bible, Longmans, Green & Co, London

Van Dijk, H. J. (1968). Ezekiel’s Prophecy on Tyre (26,1-28,19): A New Approach, Pontifical Biblical Institute, Rome

Von, A., Radner, K., Moeller, N., Potts, D.T. (2023). The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East, Volume IV. Oxford University Press, USA.

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Katz, H. (2008) The Ship from Uluburun and the Ship from Tyre: An International Trade Network in the Ancient Near East, Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins, Vol.. 124, No. 2, pp. 128-142

Leonard-Fleckman, M, (2022) Lamenting Tyre (Ezekiel 27): A Unique Perspective on Judah’s Proximate Other, Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel, Vol. 11. No. 2, pp.134-151

MacLaurin, E. C. B. (1978). The Phoenician Ship from Tyre Described in Ezekiel 27. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol.7, No.1, pp.80–83

Saur, M. (2010). Ezekiel 26-28 and the History of Tyre. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, Vol.24, No2, pp.208–221

Udd, K.J. (2005). Prediction and Foreknowledge in Ezekiel’s Prophecy against Tyre. Tyndale Bulletin. Vol. 56, Issue 1

Vayntrub, J. (2020) Tyre’s Glory and Demise: Totalizing Description in Ezekiel 27. CBQ, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp.214– 236.

ELECTRONIC RESOURCES

Bradshaw, R.I. (2026). The City of Tyre in History and Prophecy. [online] Biblicalstudies.org.uk. Available at: https://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/article_tyre.html [Accessed 01 June 2026].

Huebscher, S.L. (2015). The Lament over Tyre in Ezekiel 27:1-25. [online] Academia.edu. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/7125003/2015_The_lament_over_Tyre_in_Ezekiel_27_1_25 [Accessed 01 June 2026].

Rich, S. (2013). Ship Timber as Symbol? Dendro-provenancing & Contextualizing Ancient Cedar Ship Remains from the East Mediterranean / Near East. [online] Available at: https://kuleuven.limo.libis.be/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=lirias1816006&context=SearchWebhook&vid=32KUL_KUL:Lirias&lang=en&search_scope=lirias_profile&adaptor=SearchWebhook&tab=LIRIAS&query=any,contains,LIRIAS1816006&offset=0 [Accessed 01 June 2026].

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 16:44-52: The Allegory of Jerusalem and Her Sinful Sisters

INTRODUCTION

In 16:1-43 Ezekiel has YHWH speak a lengthy allegory in which Jerusalem is personified as a woman. YHWH describes how he found her as an abandoned infant. He rescued her and, once she reached ‘the age for love,’ he married her. Abusing the gifts that he had given her, Jerusalem subsequently turned to idolatry and immorality; for which YHWH sentences her to harsh punishment. At this point one would expect a conclusion to the allegory but that does not come until v.60.

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14
The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Prostitution – Ezekiel 16:15-34
The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Judgement – Ezekiel 16:35-43

Commentators disagree as to whether the section (16:44-59) is an extension of the allegory of 16:1-43 or a further allegory which, although closely linked with the preceding one, is not a continuation of it. I would contend that it is indeed a new allegory but one which shares the ending with the previous one.

The allegory in vv.1-43, while addressed to Jerusalem, clearly covers the history of Israel as a whole, not just Judah. In this new allegory, however, Judah and Israel are distinct. Jerusalem stands for the southern kingdom of Judah and Samaria represents the northern kingdom of Israel. In this second allegory YHWH compares Jerusalem with her ‘sisters’ Samaria and Sodom and concludes that Jerusalem has turned out much worse than either of them.

THE ALLEGORY OF THE SINFUL SISTERS

(44) Verse 44 begins with the word ‘behold’ which directs the reader’s attention to the new allegory and to the comparison of Jerusalem with Sodom and Samaria (the theme of Samaria and Jerusalem as sisters is developed more fully in chapter 23). YHWH says that everyone who quotes a proverb (cf. Num 21:27) will say of Jerusalem: ‘like mother, like daughter.’ With this short (two words in Hebrew) saying YHWH refers back to v.3 and sarcastically reminds Jerusalem that she has foreign ancestry.

(45-46) In v.3 the Amorite father is mentioned first but here the order is inverted. The Hittite mother is placed first now because this allegory focuses on female family members. Ezekiel is again referring to the Canaanite origins of the city of Jerusalem (Jebusites, Josh 15:63; Judge 1:21). This is by no means a compliment since Hittites and Amorites were two of the seven nations which the Israelites were commanded to drive out of the Promised Land ( Deut 7:1-2; Josh 3:10; 24:11) and with whom they were forbidden to intermarry (Deut 7:3).

Ezekiel paints a picture of a truly dysfunctional family. Jerusalem resembles her Hittite mother because just as her mother had shown contempt for her Amorite husband and their children (3 daughters) so Jerusalem had shown contempt for her husband and children (16:20-21, 31, 32). Her sisters, Samaria and Sodom, had likewise shown contempt for their husbands and daughters.

The husbands are not mentioned again, they don’t really feature in this allegory nor does the mother appear again after v.45. In this section Ezekiel concentrates on two important relationships; sister and daughter.

Daughter – vv. 44, 45, 46(x2), 48 (x2), 49, 53(x2), 55(x3), 57(x2), 61.
Sister – vv. 45(x2), 46(x2), 48, 49, 51, 52(x2), 55, 56, 61.

(46) YHWH begins a quite convoluted negative comparison between Jerusalem and her two sisters in which Samaria is described as the ‘elder’ sister and Sodom as the ‘younger.’ In fact, Jerusalem and Sodom had long histories whereas Samaria was much younger than either of them, having only been established (1 Kgs 16:23-24) by King Omri of Israel (884-873 BCE) almost 300 years before Ezekiel’s time. ‘Elder’ and ‘younger’ only make sense if interpreted in terms of greatness of geographical/territorial size, military power or historical importance. ‘Daughters’ probably refers to dependent satellite towns and villages, or perhaps to the inhabitants of the three cities.

Geographically Jerusalem is situated between the sites of the two cities. As one faces East the city of Samaria is to the left (North) and Sodom to the right (South). Samaria was the former capital of the northern kingdom of Israel and in patriarchal times Sodom had been the most important city of the Jordan valley (Gen 18-19).

(47) Jerusalem was not content with equalling the ways and abominations of Samaria and Sodom but became much more corrupt than they. As if despising their sinful deeds as small scale (‘a very little thing’ or ‘a thing of disgust’) Jerusalem outdid them by sinning on a much grander scale. Ezekiel’s hearers would have been greatly shocked to hear YHWH linking Jerusalem with Sodom and Samaria; cities that were notorious for sin and idolatry.

THE INIQUITY OF SODOM

(48-50) In v.48 YHWH stresses that Judah’s sins outstripped those of Sodom. In the next two verses he elaborates on the greatness of Judah’s guilt compared to that of Sodom. In v.49 YHWH specifies the ‘iniquity’ (guilt from conscious wrongdoing) of Sodom. The sins of Sodom and her daughters (the towns Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim – Gen 10:19) are enumerated as follows:

Pride – an example of success inflating the ego.

Satiety – because of an over-abundance of food – they were gluttonous.

‘Abundance of idleness’ KJV. – This means careless rest or security. The people of Sodom were so prosperous that they became complacent.

They were indifferent to the poor and needy.

They were ‘haughty’ (arrogant).

They committed abomination (cf. Lev 18:22) in the presence of YHWH (Gen 18:21).

YHWH says that when he saw the iniquity of Sodom and her daughters he removed them. The word ‘good’ is in italics, it is not in the original and has been supplied by translators. Without the word ‘good’ the phrase means ‘when I saw it’.

Ancient writers viewed Sodom as notorious for sexual sin, social injustice, arrogance and hostility towards strangers, for example: Isa 1:9-17; Jeremiah 23:14; 2 Pet 2:6-10; Jude 7; 2 Esdras 2:8-9; 3 Maccabees 2:5; Sirach 16:8; Wisdom of Solomon 19:13-17.

(51-52) YHWH states that Samaria did not sin half as much as Jerusalem. He does not spell out Samaria’s iniquity but Ezekiel’s audience are well aware that it was idolatry. Jerusalem has multiplied the sins of Sodom and Samaria to such an extent that she has ‘justified’ those cities. In other words, Jerusalem’s sins are so evil that she makes Sodom and Samaria look righteous. These two sinful cities had so angered YHWH that he had punished them severely.

Jerusalem, having privileges like the the Law, the Temple and YHWH’s presence, had behaved worse than Sodom and Samaria. She (v.52 ‘thou also’), who had ‘given judgement’ on her sisters (i.e. agreed that their punishment was well-deserved) but had behaved more abominably than they, could therefore expect to suffer a similar fate. It is appropriate that Jerusalem be punished because her sins make the other sisters look righteous.

Many centuries later a similar thought was expressed by Jesus Christ: But into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you not, go your ways out into the streets of the same, and say, Even the very dust of your city, which cleaveth on us, we do wipe off against you: notwithstanding be ye sure of this, that the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you. But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city. Luke 10:10-12

The next section of Ezekiel chapter 16 will deal with the sisters’ future.