Tag: prophets

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 24:15-27: The Death of Ezekiel’s Wife

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 24 opens with YHWH revealing to the prophet on 15 January, 588 BCE that the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem has begun that very day. Ezekiel then delivers the parable of the cooking pot to his fellow-exiles. It depicts Jerusalem as a cauldron filled with ‘choice cuts’ (its inhabitants) set on a blazing fire (the siege). The pot has corrosion (the bloodguilt and violence that characterises the city). Its contents must be emptied into the fire; then the pot will be heated until red hot in order to be purified.

This next section (24:15-27) transforms the metaphor of the cooking pot into a tragic living reality for Ezekiel. Just as the siege is announced to Ezekiel in 24:1 by a word from YHWH likewise he is informed of his forthcoming personal loss by a specific divine word in 24:15. That word commands Ezekiel to use his personal grief to perform a prophetic sign-act to the exiles.

DIVISION

15-18 YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE
19-24 EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION
25-27 YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY

EXPOSITION

YHWH ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF EZEKIEL’S WIFE (15-18)

This section (24:15-27) begins with YHWH addressing Ezekiel using the customary prophetic word formula ‘son of Adam.’ The oracle that follows focuses on a tragic personal loss for Ezekiel. YHWH will suddenly (‘at a blow’) take away the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ but Ezekiel is forbidden to mourn, weep, shed tears, sigh aloud, cover his beard, eat the bread of men, or sit barefoot and bareheaded.

It is unclear whether that which is forbidden is petitionary mourning (as in Joel 1:13-14) in response to the announcement – i.e. asking the Lord to reverse his decision – or posthumous mourning; after the ‘delight of Ezekiel’s eyes’ has died. The traditional view is that posthumous mourning is in view. Once the ‘delight of his eyes’ is taken away Ezekiel is not to engage in a traditional public show of grief. The acts of mourning which are forbidden are ritual rather than emotional. Emotional mourning is permitted; he can mourn inwardly and sigh softly but must eat, drink and dress as normal.

It is only when we come to v.18 that we learn that Ezekiel’s ‘dearest treasure’ (NLT) is his wife: So I spake unto the people in the morning: and at even my wife died; and I did in the morning as I was commanded. This is reported in the first person (‘I’) but Ezekiel does not tell us his wife’s name or age and does not indicate how he felt or thought when his loved one’s imminent death was announced.

The fulfilment of the prophecy is swift but the timeline is unclear. Do the two mentions of ‘morning’ refer to the same morning or two different mornings?

  • Ezekiel delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning and immediately complies with YHWH’s instructions (that same morning). Then his wife dies that evening. OR
  • He delivers the prophecy to the exiles in the morning, his wife dies that evening and he obeys YHWH’s command the following morning.

The second possibility is the most commonly accepted. In either case he has little time to process his grief. I did . . . as I was commanded is a striking example of immediate and total obedience to the word of the Lord – at great personal cost.

EZEKIEL ANSWERS THE EXILES’ QUESTION (19-24)

Doubtless aware of Ezekiel’s love for his wife the exiles are shocked by his violation of the expected social and religious norms of mourning. They realise that this is a symbolic act and so they ask him for an interpretation of the sign and how it applies to them: And the people said unto me, Wilt thou not tell us what these things are to us, that thou doest so? This is the only occasion in the book when the exiles directly address the prophet Ezekiel – normally what they say is quoted to Ezekiel by YHWH.

Ezekiel answers their brief question by telling them that a word from YHWH came to him, telling him what he was to communicate to the people. The thrust of the message is that Ezekiel’s behaviour in the aftermath of his wife’s death is a prescriptive sign to the exiles. It shows how they ought to respond to the fall of the city of Jerusalem and specifically the temple. The death of Ezekiel’s wife is an analogy for the ‘death’ of the temple. The exiles’ response to that ought to mirror Ezekiel’s response to his wife’s death.

YHWH (v.21) intends to desecrate his sanctuary (by the blood of Judah’s slain sons and daughters and the presence of foreigners). The temple is the pride of the people’s power (cf. Lev 26:19), the desire of their eyes and that with which they have sympathy – i.e. they cherish the temple because to them it represents the glory and strength of the nation.

Notice that in vv.22-24 the collective response of the exiles to the fall of the sanctuary is to mirror the individual response of Ezekiel to the death of his wife. There are obvious parallels;

  • in v.17 Ezekiel’s wife is the delight of his eyes, in v.21 the sanctuary is the delight of the people’s eyes.
  • Like Ezekiel in vv.16-17 the people (vv.22-23) are not to publicly mourn, weep, cover their lips, eat the bread of men or go about bareheaded and barefoot.

Covering the upper lip seems to have been a sign of shame and sorrow, cf. Lev 13:45; Mic3:7. ‘The bread of men’ refers to food brought to the bereaved by family and friends. Other descriptions of mourning occur in Ezekiel 7:18 and 27:30-31.

The exiles are to imitate Ezekiel – he is a sign to them:

  • And ye shall do as I have done: Ezek 24:22
  • according to all that he hath done shall ye do: Ezek 24:24

In addition (v.23), they are to pine away (cf. 4:17; 33:10) for (on account of) their iniquities and groan one to another. Their grief will be compounded by the recognition that they have brought this disaster upon themselves because of their sin. They are not to make a public display of mourning but rather groan because of conviction of their guilt. The exiles share responsibility with those in Judah for the destruction of the city and the temple.

When the disaster comes the people of Judah and the exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord

YHWH ADDRESSES EZEKIEL PERSONALLY (25-27)

Addressing himself to Ezekiel personally – thou son of man – YHWH refers to the false hope that the Judahites have placed in the temple, the city and future generations. They have considered these to be their strength (stronghold), joy, glory, delight and heart’s desire. Soon all will be taken from them.

As for Ezekiel, an eyewitness will escape the destruction of the city of Jerusalem and bring confirmation of its fall to him in Babylonia. Since his call Ezekiel has been mute (3:26-27), speaking only when he receives a direct oracle from YHWH, but on the day the messenger arrives Ezekiel’s speech will be restored, his silent mourning will end and his ministry enter a new phase. That too will be a sign to the exiles and they will recognise the presence of YHWH. This prophecy is fulfilled in 33:21-22.

SUMMATION

The death of Ezekiel’s wife symbolises the impending destruction of the Jerusalem temple by the Babylonian forces of Nebuchadnezzar and emphasises the severity and finality of the coming judgement. The prophet’s personal tragedy demonstrates that YHWH’s judgement is irrevocable and his muted grief is a prophetic sign of how the people should and would react to the coming destruction.

Up to this point Ezekiel has been proclaiming YHWH’s judgement upon Jerusalem and Judah. The fall of the city and the temple will confirm that he is indeed a true prophet and that YHWH has been in control of events throughout as Ezekiel has said. With the fall of Jerusalem the old era will pass and the lifting of Ezekiel’s silence mark a new phase in his ministry. The exiles will recognise that YHWH is the Sovereign Lord and on that basis future restoration can be built. With his status as a true prophet confirmed the people will listen to Ezekiel, whose ministry will transition from one that proclaims judgement to one that offers hope. But before moving on to the restoration section of his book (chapters 33-48) Ezekiel records oracles against some of Judah’s hostile neighbours (chapters 25-32).

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 22:23-31 – The Moral Failures of Judah’s Leaders

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In the two previous oracles in chapter 22 YHWH confronts the bloodshed and idolatrous practices of the people of Jerusalem (22:1-16) and, using the metallurgical imagery of smelting, compares impure Israel to dross that has no value (22:17-22). This third oracle of chapter 22 focuses on the dysfunctional leaders of Judah – prophets, priests, government officials and landed gentry – and shows that every layer of authority is corrupt.

STRUCTURE

23-24 Instruction to Ezekiel to address the land of Judah.

25-39 A catalogue of corruption

30-31 YHWH’s unsuccessful search for a man who could prevent the coming destruction.

INSTRUCTION TO EZEKIEL TO ADDRESS THE LAND OF JUDAH (23-24)

After the familiar prophetic word formula and the designation of Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ there comes an instruction to the prophet to directly address the land of Judah. In the first oracle in chapter 22 Ezekiel speaks about ‘the city’ (22:2), in the second about ‘the house’ and in this third oracle about ‘the land.’ All of these represent the people of Jerusalem/Judah.

He is to say: ‘thou art a land not cleansed nor rained upon in the day of indignation.’ The word ‘indignation can mean anger, denunciation or curse. This statement is effectively a declaration of judgement and possibly a prophecy that literal drought will occur at the time of the forthcoming Babylonian siege of Jerusalem (588-586 BCE). It may however, refer metaphorically to current spiritual drought (without cleansing rain the land is impure) and the desolation (punishment) which that will bring about. Rain, followed by food abundance, was guaranteed for obedience to YHWH’s statutes and commandments (Lev 26:3-5) but desolation of the land for unfaithfulness (Deut 28:38-41; Isa 24:1-6; Hos 4:3). Judah is not just suffering misfortune, it is under divine judgement.

A CATALOGUE OF CORRUPTION (25-29)

Verses 25-29 give the basis for judgement and concentrate on the sins of four leading classes in society: prophets, priests, princes and the ‘people of the land.’ Similar sentiments are expressed in Micah 3:11 and Zeph 3:3-4.

(25) THE CONSPIRACY OF THE PROPHETS

‘There is a conspiracy of her prophets’ – The word ‘her’ occurs four times (vv. 25, 26, 27, 28). The prophets have made a pact, thus becoming a significant power bloc in the land. They use this power and influence for personal enrichment – like a roaring lion tearing prey they extort payment for their prophecies; seizing ‘treasures and wealth’ (cf. Jer 20:5). There may also be a suggestion here that the prophets in Judah are involved in murder for material gain (‘they have made her many widows’) but most likely the thought is that their false predictions of peace will lead to the deaths of many of the residents of Judah.

Although the Hebrew Masoretic text has ‘conspiracy of prophets’ in v.25 some translators (see NLT, NIV, NET, RSV, NRSV), in their infinite wisdom, emend this to read ‘conspiracy of princes.’ They reason that:
a) the metaphor of a roaring lion that tears its prey and devours men has already been used of the royal family in Ezek 19:6.
b) the types of crimes listed are more likely to be committed by political leaders than prophets.
c) prophets are mentioned later in the oracle (v.28).
d) In the similar passages in Micah (3:10-11) and Zephaniah (3:3-4) princes are mentioned first.

Like the KJV, other translations (e.g. DBY, ESV, CSB, NKJV, NASB) have retained ‘conspiracy of prophets.’

(26) THE CORRUPTION OF THE PRIESTS

a) They violate the Law.

The priests, whose responsibility it is to teach the torah (Lev 10:11; Hos 4:6), violate (harm, strip, lay waste) its teachings (cf. Zeph 3:4; Mal 2:8). As well as deliberately misinterpreting and perverting divine ordinances they desecrate holy things (e.g. eating the offerings in a state of ritual impurity, Lev 22:1-9).

b) They blur the distinctions between sacred and profane.

The priests also neglect their responsibility to ‘put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean’ (Lev 10:10). In a later vision Ezekiel includes this requirement in a list of obligations expected of the Zadokite priesthood in the new temple (44:23). ‘Holy’ refers to things dedicated to YHWH, ‘unholy’ to items in everyday use. They fail to show the people what is clean or unclean for sacrifice and do not explain what foods are clean or forbidden to be eaten.

c) They fail to observe the Sabbath.

The priests turn a blind eye to desecration of the Sabbath by the people, thus blatantly disregarding God’s commandment. Jeremiah comments on this in Jer 17:27.

d) God himself is profaned among them (i.e. among the priests). Those responsible for maintaining YHWH’s holiness do not honour it. YHWH is the object of the verb ḥālal (to pollute or profane) in Ezek 13:19 also.

(27) THE CRIMES OF THE PRINCES

The word sarim (chiefs, leaders, rulers), here translated ‘princes,’ refers to officials like top civil servants and judges. They are described as ‘fierce wolves’ – predators lower down the food chain than the ‘roaring lion’ of v.25 – but no less cruel and voracious. Instead of protecting the rights of the people they utilise violence and murder for dishonest gain.

(28) PROPHETS (again)

The prophets are mentioned again because of their complicity with ‘them’ (the officials in the previous verse). They ‘whitewash’ the evil deeds of the officials, making them appear legitimate, and cover up their abuses by proclaiming false visions and uttering divinations that are lies (cf. 13:7-10. They say: ‘Thus saith the Lord God, when the Lord hath not spoken’ (cf. Mic 3:9-1; Zeph 3:3-4).

(29) THE CHARACTER OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND

Many commentators take ‘the people of the land’ as referring to the common people, thus indicating that that corruption has spread throughout Judahite society from the top down. It is possible, however, that am ha-aretz is used in a technical sense for a particular social group – the landed gentry – that Ezekiel lists with other parties (prophets, princes and priests) as culpable for systemic corruption in Judah. This wealthy group seems to have been politically influential (2 Kgs 11:14, 18; 21:24; 23:30, 35) and in a position to perpetrate economic crimes against the most vulnerable members of society. They are said to have oppressed, extorted, robbed and ill-treated the poor and needy; including resident foreigners. This kind of behaviour is forbidden in Exod 22:21-23; Lev 19:13-15, 33; Deut 24:17.

YHWH’S UNSUCCESSFUL SEARCH FOR A MAN WHO COULD PREVENT THE COMING DESTRUCTION (30-31)

(30) Having catalogued the sins of the four most powerful groups in Judahite society – prophets, priests, princes and the people of the land – YHWH declares that he searched for a man among them who would ‘build up the wall and stand in the gap’ before him in order to avert judgement – but he found no-one. These four groups have opposed the Lord and have led society into sin.

‘Build up the wall’ and ‘stand in the gap’ are metaphors for repairing moral and spiritual defences and for standing in the breach (by intercession or strong spiritual leadership) in order to prevent coming disaster. The image is that of a gap in the protecting wall of a city with the result that someone must stand in that breach in order to defend it. In Ezek 13:5 it is just the prophets who are accused of failing to ‘stand in the gaps or make up the wall’ but in chapter 22 this applies to all levels of society. There is a failure of leadership; those who are meant to protect and guide would rather extort and exploit.

Since there is total moral collapse in Jerusalem not a single person has the credibility or courage to lead the nation back to faithfulness to YHWH and his covenant. This passage is disturbingly relevant to our modern societies. Corruption filters down when political leaders pursue power and influence at the expense of truth and justice and religious leaders sacrifice biblical convictions on the altar of political expediency. No doubt God is still looking for intercessors and righteous individuals who will make themselves available to repair what is broken and stand between society and disaster.

Is there one convicted enough to take on the challenge of building up God’s wall?

Is there one compassionate enough to care for others?

Is there one courageous enough to go against the flow?

Is there one consecrated enough to surrender talents, time, and treasures for the glory of God?

Unfortunately, in Jerusalem’s case YHWH’s search was unsuccessful. Tragically, YHWH reports: ‘but I found none.’

(31) In the absence of a single person who can ‘build up the wall’ and ‘stand in the gap’ judgement is inevitable, there is no reason for delay. This verse presents YHWH’s acts of judgement as if they have already taken place. He will consume the people of Jerusalem/Judah with the fire of his wrath; in this they will suffer the consequences of their own actions. Like the two previous oracles in Ezekiel chapter 22 this third one ends with a pronouncement of judgement.

SUMMATION

This oracle portrays a society in total moral collapse. Every level of society in Jerusalem is corrupt and guilty of violence, oppression and blatant disregard for the law of God. The extent of the rot is revealed in God’s search for a single person to ‘stand in the gap’ and defend or repair the city’s spiritual and moral defences. That search ends with the declaration: ‘but I found none.’ The nation must therefore face the fire of God’s wrath, a direct consequence of its corruption.

Posted in General

Jeremiah 8:20-22 – A missed opportunity, a shared sorrow and a required remedy.

Posted on by writtenexposition


The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.
For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me.
Is there no balm in Gilead; is there no physician there? why then is not the health of the daughter of my people recovered? Jeremiah 8:20-22

INTRODUCTION

The prophet Jeremiah (c. 650-570 BCE) was was born into a priestly family in Anathoth, a village near Jerusalem, during the reign of King Manasseh of Judah. He lived during, and beyond, the reigns of the last six kings of Judah – Manasseh (c. 686 to 642 BCE), Amon (642-640), Josiah (c. 640–609 BCE), Jehoahaz (609 BCE), Jehoiakim (609-598 BCE), Jehoiachin (598-597 BCE) and Zedekiah (597-586 BCE). According to Jer 1:2 his ministry as a prophet commenced during the thirteenth year of King Josiah, i.e. 626 BCE.

He prophesied at a traumatic time in history. Three superpowers; Egypt, Assyria and the emerging Babylonian empire were jockeying for supremacy. After the death of Ashurbanipal c.630 BCE the Assyrian empire went into decline and Nineveh eventually fell to Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians in 612 BCE. Nebuchadnezzar defeated Egypt at the battle of Carchemish in 605 BCE (Jer 46:2), achieving Babylonian control of the Near East.

Judah sought alliances with neighbouring states at this time, which led to tolerance of foreign religious cults and an increase in idolatrous worship. Jeremiah in Judah, like Ezekiel in Babylon, faithfully proclaimed a message of warning about judgement coming on Jerusalem because of the people’s sin. He was badly treated by the ruling authorities in Jerusalem – put in stocks, imprisoned and branded a traitor.

Jeremiah was a sensitive man who, saddened by the enormity of the pain, suffering and horror that the people of Judah would experience during the Babylonian siege and devastation of Jerusalem, wept over their spiritual state and their obstinacy in spite of repeated warnings. He is known as ‘the weeping prophet’ because his ministry was marked not only by proclamation but by deep lamentation. His heart broke for the people as he saw them wallowing in sin and rebellion against the Lord. In these verses Jeremiah voices three great realities: a missed opportunity, a shared sorrow, and a required remedy.

1. A Missed Opportunity (v. 20)

The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.

This is the season when many churches celebrate Harvest. It is a time of thankfulness for God’s grace and blessing – a joyful occasion. But happiness was not in Jeremiah’s mind here. In that agricultural society, harvest and summer represented opportunity and provision. The people laboured through the growing season with the expectation of gathering crops to sustain them throughout the year ahead. A failed harvest spelt disaster – no food, no income and utter ruin. They were season dependent, certain things had to be done at certain times. Summer was the time to be busy, some things couldn’t be put off. Autumn would soon come, the leaves would fall and growth would end.

Jeremiah applies this imagery spiritually. God had given the people time to repent. He had sent prophets with warnings. Yet they hardened their hearts. Now, the time of opportunity is slipping away. Jeremiah anticipates the lament of a nation that had missed the opportunity to repent, for whom time had passed by so quickly and who had made no preparation for the coming judgement.

How many today are living as if there will always be another chance? One day, however, the harvest will be past, the summer ended, and all opportunities gone. Have you let your opportunities to get right with God slip by? Day after day, season after season, year after year, perhaps decade after decade? How many times has the gospel been preached to you? How many opportunities have you spurned? Now the time to plant or grow – the time to prepare – has almost gone! The apostle Paul wrote in 2 Corinthians 6:2: Now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation. Do not let the words in Jeremiah 8:20 be wailed by you in the day of despair: The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.

2. A Shared Sorrow (v. 21)

For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me.

Jeremiah, as I have indicated, was a sensitive preacher. He wasn’t cold or detached. He wasn’t casually pronouncing judgment; his heart was broken over the sin and suffering of his people. ‘I am black’ refers to a mourning garment – he carried their sorrow as his own. Do we feel the weight of the lost? Do we ache for our families, friends, and associates who do not know Jesus Christ? Too often we are indifferent. Have we grown numb? If Jeremiah could weep for his nation, surely we can grieve for the lost around us.

3. A Required Remedy (v.22)

Is there no balm in Gilead; is there no physician there? Why then is not the health of the daughter of my people recovered?

In v.22 Jeremiah asks three rhetorical questions: beginning with Is?…Is?….Why? (Notice the same technique in v.19). The first question asks about medicine, the second about doctors, and the third about health. Health is something that interests and concerns us all. There seems to be so much illness about. Sometimes we wonder about the ability of our heath providers to cope with demand, and about how we will be treated when we are sick or old. The health in our text, however, is not physical but spiritual.

I wish to consider the questions in v.22 under three headings:

I. When The Balm Was Required
II. Where the Balm was Received
III. Why The Balm Was Refused?


I. When The Balm Was Required
The balm of Gilead was a popular substance celebrated for its medicinal qualities. The word ‘balm’ denotes the gum or resin of a tree that grew in the mountainous region of Gilead. It was a valuable commodity sold by Arab and Phoenician merchants. There are two other references to it in the Bible: Gen 37:23-25; Jer 46:11. In the story of Joseph being sold by his brothers to a caravan of Ishmaelites that passed by on the way to Egypt one of the valuable products they were carrying to Egypt was balm from Gilead (Genesis 37:25).

When the question was asked about this medicinal product, ‘Is there no balm in Gilead?’ the thought behind the metaphor was the spiritual health of the people of Judah. What does this balm represent? In the context of Jeremiah’s message, it symbolises the spiritual healing needed for a sinful heart. The people of Israel had turned away from God, worshipping false idols and engaging in practices that provoked his anger. In v.19 Jeremiah describes their idolatry as ‘strange vanities,’ highlighting the emptiness that sin brings.

Sin is like a sickness that affects us all. Just as physical ailments manifest in visible symptoms, our sins reveal themselves in various ways – pride, anger, greed, and gossip. While some people may have more obvious symptoms, the truth is that we all suffer from the same chronic illness: sin. This condition requires the healing balm of Gilead.

When is the balm required? It is needed when there is a sinful heart. We must recognise our need for healing and acknowledge that we cannot cure ourselves.


II. Where the Balm Was Received

The balm was available in Gilead. It was famous for its balm. When the question was asked, ‘Is there no balm in Gilead?’ everyone knew that the answer was ‘Yes!’ There is a balm in Gilead. There is a medicine for the sinful heart. There is provision in Gilead. The people of Judah knew this, and so should we. Spiritually, this balm represents the blood of Jesus Christ, which cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7). His sacrificial death is sufficient for every sin – past, present, and future.

Jeremiah also asked, ‘Is there no physician there?’ Again the answer is a resounding ‘yes!’ In Gilead, there were many physicians. Is there a doctor available to treat a sinful heart? Certainly there is! Spiritually, we have the Great Physician; Jesus Christ. If you have a spiritual need today, remember that there is a balm in Gilead and a Physician ready to heal your sin-sick soul. The prophet Malachi (4:2) speaks of the Lord Jesus as the ‘Sun of righteousness’ who brings healing. Jesus is the friend of sinners, ready to apply the healing balm to those who confess their sins and seek him as their Saviour.


III. Why The Balm Was Refused?
This is the crux of Jeremiah’s message: ‘Why then is not the health of the daughter of my people recovered?’ If there is a plentiful supply of balm and physicians, why do the people remain sick? The answer lies in their refusal to take advantage of the treatment that is available to them. The problem lies with the patients!

Are you burdened by sin and its effects? If so, why continue to carry that weight when healing is within reach? Maybe you believe you are just fine, but in the same way that a doctor cannot help those who think they are well, Jesus cannot help those who claim to be righteous. He came to save sinners (Matthew 9:12; Luke 5:31). The tragedy is not that there is no cure, but that many will not apply it.

To find healing for your heart, you must:

A. Go to the Right Place
The balm was found in Gilead. For us, healing is found at the cross of Christ. We must come to the place where help and healing can be found.

B. See the Right Person
You must come to the Lord Jesus. He is the only one who can heal a sinful heart.

C. Take the Right Prescription
It’s not enough to see the doctor; you must follow the prescription. We must believe in Jesus Christ for salvation (Acts 16:30). His prescription requires repentance; turning from sin and placing faith in him alone for salvation.

Conclusion

Jeremiah’s cry still echoes today: The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved. The time of opportunity is passing quickly but the good news is that, in Jesus Christ, there is still balm in Gilead. There is still a Physician who heals the sin-sick soul.

  • Missed opportunity → don’t delay, today is the day of salvation (2 Cor 6:2).
  • Shared sorrow → feel the burden of the lost and let compassion move you to prayer and witness.
  • Required remedy → Apply the remedy, get to Jesus Christ, the Balm of Gilead, who alone can save, heal and restore.
Posted in Exposition

The History of a Harlot: Jerusalem’s Early Years – Ezekiel 16:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

In chapter 16 Ezekiel continues to impress upon the Judahite exiles who are with him in Babylonia the fact that, contrary to the predictions of false prophets, things at home are not going to improve soon. Rather, such are the sins of Israel/Judah that there is now no hope of avoiding YHWH’s wrath. His judgement will fall upon the nation soon.

YHWH, through Ezekiel, uses shock tactics to convey how evil the nation appears in his sight. In an extended and elaborate metaphor (or, perhaps more accurately, two allegories that share the same ending) the prophet communicates a negative portrayal of the history of Israel’s relationship with YHWH. Using disturbing language that is vulgar, crude and charged with marital, sexual and violent imagery Ezekiel, speaking for YHWH, accuses the nation of unfaithfulness in the form of idolatry and inappropriate relations with foreign powers.

Jerusalem (representing Israel/Judah) is personified as a female infant who has been abandoned by her parents and is rescued by YHWH. He returns some years later to find that she has matured (breasts and pubic hair) and is ‘at the age for love’ (vv.7-8). He marries her (v.8), bestows many gifts upon her and beautifies her (vv.9-14), with the result that she becomes famous for her good looks. Proud and self-confident she becomes not just an adulteress but an insatiable nymphomaniac who lavishes the gifts she has received from YHWH upon men everywhere, including foreigners like the virile (‘great of flesh’) Egyptians, Assyrians and Chaldeans. She sacrifices her children to them and is even worse than her sisters Samaria and Sodom.

YHWH, acting as both accuser and judge, outlines Jerusalem’s crimes and then sentences her to some unusual punishments (stripping, stoning, cutting with swords and burning, all this in the presence of her former lovers) in order to appease his wrath and jealousy. Although unworthy, there is a promise of restoration for Jerusalem but she will remain silent (be shy) with embarrassment and shame.

OUTINE OF THE CHAPTER

1-3a – Preamble
3b-5 – Jerusalem’s humble origins
6-14 – YHWH’s dealings with Jerusalem
15-34 – Jerusalem’s prostitution
35-43 – Jerusalem’s judgement
44-52 – The allegory of Judah and her sinful sisters
53-59 – The sisters’ future
60-63 – A promise of restoration

PREAMBLE (1-3a)

In these verses which serve as an introduction to the oracle YHWH instructs Ezekiel to challenge Jerusalem about her abominations. The prophet duly reports YHWH’s thoughts on the subject using the metaphor of a woman to represent Jerusalem. As the capital of Judah the city symbolises Judah and (excluding vv.44-59) Israel as well.

(1) The chapter commences with the prophetic word (or ‘word-event’) formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying.’ This expression occurs 49 times in the book of Ezekiel and indicates that the message has come to the prophet directly from YHWH.

(2-3a) YHWH, as usual, addresses Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’, a formula that occurs 93 times in Ezekiel, and commands him to:

(a) make known to Jerusalem her abominations (offensive acts), and
(b) tell her ‘thus saith the Lord.’

The saying ‘thus saith the Lord’ re-emphasises that the message is from YHWH. It occurs again in this chapter in v. 36 and v.59. The three occurrences (3, 36, 59) could serve as an alternative way of dividing up the chapter, which would then fall into three main sections (1-34; 35-58; 59-63).

JERUSALEM’S HUMBLE ORIGINS (3b-5)

(3b) Addressing Jerusalem, which he personifies as a woman, YHWH casts aspersions on her origins and birth (‘diggings’ and ‘bringings forth,’ both plural) which he traces back to the land of Canaan. Her father and mother were the Amorite and the Hittite. These represent the Semitic and non-Semitic peoples who inhabited the land of Canaan before the patriarchs settled there. The words ‘Canaan’, ‘Amorite’ and ‘Hittite’ stress that Jerusalem was originally possessed by wicked and idolatrous pagan tribes (cf. Gen 15:16). There was therefore nothing holy about Jerusalem’s origins that would have commended her to YHWH.

(4) Repeating ‘thy birth’ YHWH proceeds to remind Jerusalem of the circumstances of her birth. Repetition for effect is a feature of this oracle. Notice that the phrase ‘the day thou wast born’ is repeated at the end of v.5. At birth, YHWH reminds her, the infant Jerusalem experienced a lack of basic medical care and attention.

  • her umbilical cord was not cut.
  • she was not washed with water.
  • she was not rubbed with salt, a natural healer.
  • She was not swaddled.

(5) No-one showed Jerusalem any pity or compassion. There was no-one to do ‘any of these unto thee.’ The plural demonstrative pronoun ‘these things’ refers back to the cutting, washing, salting and swaddling in v.4. No-one cared enough to do even one of these four things for Jerusalem. This was not a case of neglect; the infant Jerusalem (Israel) was abandoned because of deliberate rejection. She was treated with distain (‘to the loathing of thy person’) and cast away in an open field (cf. Deut 32:10). The idea of loathing appears again in v.45.

As regards historical period, this section of the oracle in which Jerusalem is depicted as an abandoned new-born baby, represents the patriarchal period, which extended from the days Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to the time of slavery in Egypt. During that period Israel was not quite a distinct, fully-fledged nation.

YHWH’S DEALINGS WITH JERUSALEM (6-14)

In this section YHWH explains what he has done for Jerusalem. He is the speaker throughout and Jerusalem has no opportunity to respond. Series of statements beginning with ‘I’  describe YHWH’s activity, these are interrupted occasionally by comments addressing Jerusalem as ‘you’ which note the affect of YHWH’s provision upon the girl.

(6) YHWH’S list in v.6 includes: ‘I passed by’; ‘I saw’; ‘I said’; ‘I have caused’. YHWH passed by, saw the abandoned child being trampled upon in its own blood and said to the infant ‘Live.’ In another example of repetition this command ‘I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live’ is repeated. The trampling may be a metaphorical reference to Israel’s treatment in Egypt.

At first reading it would seem that YHWH didn’t really do much more at this stage than tell the child to survive, as she remained naked until he passed by again some years later (v.7b) and remained unwashed until after her marriage (v.9). The next verse, however, shows that he had ensured her survival and development.

(7) In another clause beginning with ‘I’ YHWH says that he made her a myriad (10,000) ‘as the sprout of the field.’ This second mention of field is a much more positive image than the first in v.5. Jerusalem increased and became great. The word translated in KJV here as ‘increased’ means to be abundant, become numerous or great; it also occurs in vv. 25, 26, 29 and 51; translated as ‘increased’ or ‘multiplied’. This speaks of growth and may reference Exod 1:12 where the same verb is used of Israel’s population increase in Egypt: ‘But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew.’

Moving from the thought of growth to that of maturity YHWH says that she came with the finest ornaments (lit. ornaments of ornaments). What that means is unclear. Her breasts took shape and around the same time her (pubic) hair sprouted (same root as ‘sprout’ in v.7a). Jerusalem matured into a voluptuous, adolescent woman. YHWH adds ‘thou wast naked and bare’ which suggests that she had grown up as a young savage.

(8) Passing by once again YHWH sees that she has matured and he draws attention to the fact (‘behold’) that she was at the age for marriage (‘the time of love’). YHWH mentions five things about his reaction to Jerusalem’s maturity.

  • I spread my skirt (wing) over thee – this may indicate taking under protection (Deut 32:11) or perhaps betrothal (Ruth 3:9).
  • I covered thy nakedness – nakedness and covering are themes in this allegory. The infant was abandoned naked (‘not swaddled’ v.4), grew up naked (v.7), her nakedness was covered by YHWH (v.8), she failed to remember the time she was naked (v.22), she was naked with her lovers (v.36) and will be exposed naked by way of punishment (37, 39). YHWH covers her nakedness(v.8), he covered her with silk ((v.10), she used her fine clothes to cover idols (v.18), and YHWH will uncover her nakedness as punishment (v.37).
  • I sware unto thee – see next point
  • I entered a covenant with thee – in the context swearing and entering into a covenant must refer to marriage. The metaphor of marriage to describe God’s covenant relationship with Israel had previously been used by Hosea (e.g. Hos 2:19-20).
  • thou became mine -the emphasis is on possession rather than affection.

(9) The symbolism of rescue, nurture and a marital relationship may correspond to the period of the Exodus, the covenant at Mount Sinai and the giving of the Law (Exod 19-24) when Israel was established as the people of God. YHWH continues with his list of his provisions for Jerusalem during that time; a chain of ten statements beginning with ‘I.’ He claims: ‘I washed,’ ‘I washed,’ ‘I anointed,’ ‘I clothed,’ ‘I shod,’ ‘I girded,’ ‘I covered,’ ‘I decked,’ ‘I put,’ ‘I put.’

YHWH begins by saying that he washed her with water then repeats that he washed her, adding that he thoroughly washed her blood away from her. ‘Blood’ is plural – i.e. ‘bloods’. Then he anointed her with oil. The use of oil in connection with hygiene occurs also in Ruth 3:3; 2 Sam 12:20; 14:2; 2 Chron 28:15; Dan 10:3; Mic 6:15. YHWH therefore did some things for her that her parents, the Amorite and the Hittite (v.3), had failed to do when she was born (v4). He washed her and rubbed her with oil – but not until she had reached maturity.

(10) Also she had not been swaddled at birth but then, after their marriage, YHWH clothed her. In four clauses he describes how he dressed Jerusalem:

  • I clothed thee also with embroidered work, – embroidered cloth, repeated in v.13
  • and shod thee with badgers’ skin, – leather sandals.
  • and I girded thee about with fine linen, – repeated in v.13
  • and I covered thee with silk. – repeated in v.13

(11-12) Moving on from clothes YHWH reminds Jerusalem that he decked her out with jewellery and gives five examples: bracelets, a chain, nose ring, earrings and a beautiful crown (crown of glory). In the Ancient Near East these were symbols of wealth, status and royalty.

(13) In this verse YHWH reiterates his generosity towards Jerusalem after their marriage. She wore gold and silver jewellery and expensive clothes made of fine linen, silk and embroidered cloth. These are repeated from v.10. He adds that she also enjoyed the best of foods: fine flour, honey and oil. These appear again in v.19. She became very, very beautiful and achieved ed royal status.

All these gifts symbolise YHWH’s grace extended to Israel and the blessings, privileges and prosperity that the nation enjoyed on account of the special covenant relationship. Jerusalem’s rising to the status of queen represents Israel’s elevated status, prominence and influence among the surrounding nations.

(14) Jerusalem’s ‘renown’ for beauty went forth among the Gentile nations. This word ‘renown’ is repeated in the next verse, as is ‘beauty’ and together these serve as a link between this section of the allegory and the next. YHWH claims responsibility for Jerusalem’s beauty; it was all a result of his grace, she had no merit of her own. The section ends with a favourite formula of Ezekiel: ‘saith the Lord [God].’ It occurs 85 times in the book and 9 times in this chapter (vv.8, 14, 19, 23, 30, 43, 48, 58, 63).

SUMMATION

Thus far the allegory has YHWH vividly portraying his grace toward Israel/Judah in lifting the nation from obscurity and insignificance, entering into a covenant with it and bringing it to a position of prominence and prosperity. The focus is on YHWH’s (dominant and possessive) relationship with Jerusalem and the good things that he has provided for her. The implication is that she ought to be grateful for the relationship and such abundant provision. The allegory continues with an exploration of her response and her relationships with others.

This section of Ezekiel 16 is sometimes used in evangelistic preaching to illustrate God’s gracious dealings with sinners. C. H. Spurgeon, for example, published a sermon entitled Ezekiel’s Deserted Infant in 1862. A gospel message would perhaps apply the following points:

THE SINNER’S CONDITION

  • v.4 uncut – still attached to the world
  • v.4 unclean – tainted with the filth of sin
  • v.4 unsalted – uncared for
  • v.4 unclothed – no covering of righteousness
  • v.5 unclaimed – left to die

GOD’S SALVATION

  • God covered – ‘I spread’ v. 8 – Phil 3:9
  • God claimed – ‘thou becamest mine’ v.8 – SS 2:16
  • God cleansed – ‘I throughly washed’ v.9 – Isa 1:18
  • God clothed – ‘I clothed’ v.10 – Rev 3:18

Posted in Exposition

AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO THE MOUNTAINS OF ISRAEL – EZEKIEL 6:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

Ezekiel Chapter 6:

The chapter may be simply divided as follows:

1-4 PREDICTION

5-7 DESOLATION

8-10 PRESERVATION

11-14 LAMENTATION

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter six, like chapters four, five and seven, predicts severe judgements on the people and land of Judah. The structure of this chapter is similar to that of chapters thirty-five and thirty-six, which are also addressed to mountains. Chapter thirty-five is addressed to Mount Seir and the mountains of Edom and chapter thirty-six to the mountains of Israel. All three chapters (6, 35 and 36) have the same basic structure:

  • The word of YHWH comes to the prophet.
  • A prophecy is addressed to the mountain(s).
  • Bloodshed, death and destruction are predicted.
  • The power of the Lord is recognized.

1-4 PREDICTION

In v.1 the word of YHWH comes to the prophet with an instruction (v.2) to ‘set thy face towards the mountains of Israel’ and address the oracle to them. The expression ‘set thy face’ most likely implies taking up an attitude of opposition. It might also mean that Ezekiel is not to be afraid when delivering the message or even that he is literally to face westwards while speaking (see also 13:17; 21:2; 25:2; 28:21; 38:2).

With the exception of Josh 11:21 the phrase ‘mountains of Israel’ is found only in Ezekiel. It stands for the land of Israel (Deut 11:11 ‘a land of hills and valleys’) and indicates that YHWH will not only judge Jerusalem but also the whole land.

Where there are hills or mountains one also finds valleys, ravines and watercourses and these are all addressed in v.3. Ezekiel, of course, was not asked to literally speak to geographic features. Rather, here we have a technique known as personification – attributing human qualities or characteristics to something that is not human. To the personified locations YHWH issues a threat of invasion (‘a sword upon you’). The purpose of this punishment is that the ‘high places,’ which have been associated with idolatrous worship, might be utterly destroyed.

The cultic practices at the high places were syncretic in that the people worshipped YHWH there but combined this with rituals associated with other deities, such as Baal, Asherah and the planets (2 Kgs 23:4; Ezek 8:16). In connection with this v.4 mentions altars, images and idols.

Altar (mizbēaḥ) – this word is derived from a verb meaning to slaughter and refers to a raised location where sacrifices are offered.

Image (ḥammān) – solar pillar (Isa17:8; 2 Chron 34;4,7) or incense altar.

Idols (gillûlim) – Always occurring in the plural, this is Ezekiel’s favourite word for the false deities worshipped by Israel and Judah. It is thought to have derived from the Hebrew for ‘dung’ and is therefore derogatory and contemptuous. Ezekiel refers to deities other than YHWH as ‘dung-gods.’ YHWH will cast down the slain before the idols.

5-7 DESOLATION

The first half of v.5 repeats the end of v.4 that dead Israelite bodies will lie before their idols. V.5b adds that their bones will be scattered round about the altars. This emphasizes the futility of idolatry. The people would be slain as they sought help from their idols and their corpses would be lying uninterred on the ground as if offered as human sacrifices to those idols. Ironically, the Babylonians would show no mercy to the Israelite idol worshippers, even though they were idolaters too.

Verses 6-7 predict total desolation. Their towns will be waste and the high places ruined. The altars and idols will be cut down and their works wiped out. ‘Your altars,’ ‘your idols’ and ‘your works’ stress that not only did the useless idols belong to the people of Judah but also that they had manufactured these images themselves. Everything relating to the idol worship would be obliterated. That these should be destroyed is the stated purpose for total destruction.

‘high places’ Before the construction of Solomon’s temple as the central shrine for the worship of YHWH rites and sacrifices were conducted at local shrines called high places (e.g. 1 Sam 9:13, 19, 25; 10:5; 1 Kgs 3:2). We read of them first in Lev 26:30 and especially in the Kings, Chronicles and the Prophets. According to Deut 12:2-3 these locations ought to have been destroyed once the Israelites entered the Promised Land but the Israelites, whose God had appeared to Moses at Mount Sinai, easily adopted the Canaanite custom of conducting religious rites on hills and worshipped YHWH in such locations. Unfortunately, they adopted heathen practices as well, especially those associated with the fertility cults, such as male and female sacred prostitution.

The Old Testament uses the following words in this connection:

qāḏēš / qeḏēšāh Deut 23:17-18; 1 Kgs 14:24; 15:12; 22:46; 2 Kgs 23:7; Hos 4:4

zōnāh Gen 38:15; Lev 21:7; Deut 23:18; Prov 7:10; Jer 2:20; Ezek 23:44; Hos 2:5

possibly also ‘ministering women’ Ex 38:8; 1 Sam 2:22

Three of Judah’s kings – Asa (1Kgs 15:12-14), Hezekiah (2 Chron 32:12) and Josiah (2 Kgs 23:4-20) – attempted to quash idolatry, with varying degrees of success.

V.7. Still addressing the personified mountains of Israel YHWH says to them that when they see the fallen corpses ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’ This expression is repeated in vv. 7, 10, 13, 14.

8-10 PRESERVATION

YHWH via Ezekiel prophesies that a remnant will survive the siege of Jerusalem and will eventually remember him (cf. Zech 10:9)and repent of their evil ways (see also 12:16;14:22). This idea of a remnant featured in the symbolic act of 5:3-4. Although the message is mainly one of desolation a glimmer of hope lies in the fact that the nation will not be totally wiped out. That God will preserve some is an indication of grace.

Many commentators take the verb in v.9 as passive and translate as ‘I am broken.’ YHWH, like a husband whose wife has been unfaithful, is grief-stricken and broken-hearted by their ‘whorish heart’ and by the severity of the punishment that he must inflict upon them. The use of ‘whorish’ and ‘whoring’ may reference the link between idolatry and impure sexual practices.

Others take the verb as reflexive and translate as ‘ when I will break’ or ‘when I shall have broken for myself’ (i.e. for my own glory or reputation) – ‘their whorish heart and their eyes’. ‘Break their eyes’ is an unusual expression that might mean ‘destroy their pride’ (cf. Lev 26:19). This would cause them to realise that their idolatrous practices provoked YHWH and cause them to ‘loathe themselves’ and repent (36:31-32). V.9 emphasizes the emotions that will be felt by both YHWH and the people.

V.10 repeats the expression ‘they shall know that I am the the Lord.’ This will be because he will keep his word and carry out the punishment. This prophecy is not an idle threat.

11-14 LAMENTATION

Ezekiel is instructed to clap his hands, stamp his feet and wail ‘Alas!’ over the fate of the house of Israel. These extravagant gestures express deep emotion at the draconian punishment to come upon Jerusalem. It is unlikely that the emotion is joy (as in 25:6 where clapping and stamping are linked as well) at the prospect of God’s righteous judgement upon idolators but is more likely to be grief or regret at what the people will have to suffer (21:12-14). Jeremiah also wept over the fate of the people (Jer 9:1).

Verse 11 ends with a further prediction of the three main causes of death that will come upon the people: sword, famine and pestilence. These correspond to the portions into which Ezekiel’s shaved hair was symbolically divided (5:2, 12). Sword equals war, famine equals hunger and pestilence equals disease. Verse 12 explains that these disasters will prevail in different places and in different circumstances: those afar off will die by plague, those near will be killed by the sword and those that remain will die of starvation in the siege. The use of ‘far off, ‘near’ and ‘remains’ makes the point that everyone will be affected. God’s wrath will come upon them wherever they are. Although he was physically located in Babylon Ezekiel in v.12 seems to be speaking as if he were at Jerusalem, since the location of those that will remain and undergo siege is Jerusalem. It is interesting that plague, war and famine are the same penalties which were specified in Lev 26:25-26 for violation of the covenant. ‘Fury’ at the end of v.12 reiterates YHWH’s anger at idolatry. He will certainly carry out these threats.

Verse 13 repeats the picture in v.5 of dead bodies strewn about in front of the idols at their idolatrous shrines and again repeats ‘then shall they know that I am the Lord.’ The verse lists types of location at which altars to idols were typically situated – hills, mountains, trees – and mentions the oak tree in particular. Hosea 4:13 adds poplar and elm.

‘upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree‘

This phrase upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree is drawn upon by various Old Testament authors when describing the high places and groves at which idolatrous worship in Israel took place. Some include all three locations (mountain, hill, tree), others just one or two. I have found the following examples, perhaps there are more.

MOUNTAIN, HILL, TREE

Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree: Deuteronomy Ezekiel 12:2

Then shall ye know that I am the LORD, when their slain men shall be among their idols round about their altars, upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree, and under every thick oak, the place where they did offer sweet savour to all their idols. Ezekiel 6:13

They sacrifice upon the tops of the mountains, and burn incense upon the hills, under oaks and poplars and elms, because the shadow thereof is good: therefore your daughters shall commit whoredom, and your spouses shall commit adultery. Hosea 4:13

HILL and TREE

For they also built them high places, and images, and groves, on every high hill, and under every green tree. 1 Kings 14:23

And they set them up images and groves in every high hill, and under every green tree: 2 Kings 17:10

And he sacrificed and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree. 2 Kings 16:4

He sacrificed also and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree. 2 Chronicles 28:4

For of old time I have broken thy yoke, and burst thy bands; and thou saidst, I will not transgress; when upon every high hill and under every green tree thou wanderest, playing the harlot. Jeremiah 2:20

Whilst their children remember their altars and their groves by the green trees upon the high hills. Jeremiah 17:2

For when I had brought them into the land, for the which I lifted up mine hand to give it to them, then they saw every high hill, and all the thick trees, and they offered there their sacrifices, and there they presented the provocation of their offering: there also they made their sweet savour, and poured out there their drink offerings. Ezekiel 20:28

MOUNTAIN and TREE

Inflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clefts of the rocks? Among the smooth stones of the stream is thy portion; they, they are thy lot: even to them hast thou poured a drink offering, thou hast offered a meat offering. Should I receive comfort in these? Upon a lofty and high mountain hast thou set thy bed: even thither wentest thou up to offer sacrifice. Isaiah 57:5-7

The LORD said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot. Jeremiah 3:6

MOUNTAIN AND HILL

And there shall be upon every high mountain, and upon every high hill, rivers and streams of waters in the day of the great slaughter, when the towers fall. Isaiah 30:25

Your iniquities, and the iniquities of your fathers together, saith the LORD, which have burned incense upon the mountains, and blasphemed me upon the hills: therefore will I measure their former work into their bosom. Isaiah 65:7

My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them. Ezekiel 34:6

TREE

Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the LORD thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the LORD. Jeremiah 3:13

MOUNTAIN

And hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, neither hath defiled his neighbour’s wife, neither hath come near to a menstruous woman, Ezekiel 18:6

And that doeth not any of those duties, but even hath eaten upon the mountains, and defiled his neighbour’s wife, Ezekiel 18:11

That hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, hath not defiled his neighbour’s wife, Ezekiel 18:15

Verse 14 promises that the Lord will ‘stretch out his hand’ in judgement. The result will be desolation and waste wherever they live. The desolation will be worse than that of ‘the wilderness toward Diblath.’ This most likely refers to the Arabian desert which lies to the east and south of the Dead Sea.

The location of Diblath is not known. Various unlikely suggestions have been put forward including;

Almon Diblathaim / Beth Diblathaim – in Moab, east of the Red Sea – Num 33:46-47; Jer 48:22

Riblah – on the Orontes river – 2 Kgs 25:6-7, 18-21; Jer 39:5-6; 52:9-11, 24-27

The oracle concludes with a further repetition of the recognition formula ‘they shall know that I am the LORD’ (vv. 7, 10, 13, 14).

SUMMATION

In this chapter the prophet Ezekiel receives a message from YHWH. He is to address this to the mountains of Israel and inform them that YHWH will bring devastation upon the high places, altars, and sacred pillars where the people have practised idolatry and worshipped false gods. The oracular speech describes how the people of Judah will be slain, their idols destroyed, and their land left desolate as punishment for their disobedience and rebellion against God. Despite this severe judgement, the Lord will leave a remnant who will remember him and acknowledge his sovereignty.

Posted in Exposition

FOUR SYMBOLIC ACTS IN EZEKIEL 4:1-5:4

Posted on by writtenexposition

The Siege of Jerusalem: Contextual Background

Ezekiel chapter 4:1-5:4 is a continuation of the spirit’s speech to Ezekiel which commenced in 3:24. In it he receives instructions concerning his first messages to his fellow exiles in Babylon. He is to enact four dramatic performances which together represent YHWH’s judgement that is soon to come upon Judah. The drama relates to its capital city Jerusalem and the consequences of the forthcoming siege of the city by Nebuchadnezzar II.

At that time, of course, Ezekiel’s fellow exiles did not expect anything like that to happen. These prophecies are delivered by Ezekiel early in the period commencing with his call to the prophetic ministry (c. 593 BCE) and ending with the fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE). In 597 BCE Nebuchadnezzar had deposed Jehoiachin of Judah and exiled him along with ten thousand of his subjects (2 Kgs 24:8-16), including Ezekiel (1:1-3). He then installed Jehoiachin’s uncle Zedekiah as a puppet king. With this relatively stable government in Judah the exiles were doubtless looking forward to a soon return to their homeland. They could not have known then that Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24-25; 2 Chron 36; Jer 3) would cast off his allegiance to the Babylonians; provoking a violent response by Nebuchadnezzar. In order to quell the revolt by his Judaean vassal Nebuchadnezzar marched to Riblah in Syria where he established campaign headquarters (2 Kgs 25:6, 20; Jer 39:5; 52:9, 26). From that base his army invaded Judah and destroyed its fortified towns (Jer 44:2) before besieging Jerusalem in the ninth year of Zedekiah. Eventually, after a two and a half year siege, the city fell to the Babylonians in 586 BCE. Zedekiah’s family and the nobles of Jerusalem were executed, after which Zedekiah himself was blinded and transported to Babylon as a prisoner of war (2 Kgs 25:6-7).

Ezekiel’s dramatic performances feature:

4:1-3 A model of a siege – representing the siege of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A number of days spent lying on his left and right sides – representing the duration of judgement .

4:9-17 Consumption of small amounts of bread and water – representing a famine in Jerusalem.

5:1-4 A haircut and shave – representing the fate of Israel.

Some scholars are of the opinion that because Ezekiel does not explicitly state ‘I did this’ for each drama he may have just described the details of his vision to the people without physically acting out these scenarios. However, I take that Ezekiel literally carried out YHWH’s instructions since 4:12 makes it clear that the bread was to be baked in the sight of the people. In addition, impressive symbolic actions by Israel’s prophets were not unusual in that era (1 Kgs 11:30, 22:11; 2 Kgs 13:17; Isa 20:2-4; Jer 13:1-11, 19:1-10).

4:1-3 A MODEL OF A SIEGE

Ezekiel, once again addressed as ‘thou, son of man,’ is instructed to get a (clay) brick, set it before him, and inscribe a diagram of Jerusalem on it. He is then to impersonate the Babylonians by enacting a siege of the city. In practice, Ezekiel may have depicted siege warfare by drawing but the verbs (lay, build, cast, set, take) suggest it is more likely that he made little models and moved them towards his clay brick. These models were of:

a fort – siege works or a tower, manned by archers and slingers (2 Kgs 25:1).

a mount – mounds or ramps constructed of debris (earth, wood, stone) which were built against the walls of a besieged city. Siege towers and battering rams could be pushed up these ramps and from them attack troops could scale the walls using siege ladders. They would then fight their way to the city gates and open them.

a camp – living quarters of an army contingent. As well as fighting men this would have included sappers (who tunnelled under the walls to collapse them) and siege engineers.

battering rams – these wheeled vehicles had a heavy ram suspended from the roof by ropes, one of its ends being a large metal blade. The operators repeatedly slammed this into city gates and walls in order to breach them. These prefabricated machines were generally transported flat pack and assembled on site.

From the details in these three verses one can easily imagine the noise, mayhem and devastation of ancient siege warfare. Men shouting, rams battering, slingers and archers from both sides raining down stones and arrows at one another, the defenders throwing down flaming torches to set the attacking war engines and troops alight. Ezekiel’s enactment of such a siege that would soon be experienced by Jerusalem must have shocked his fellow countrymen.

Ezekiel was also to set up a flat iron pan or griddle between him and his model of the city and glare (‘direct your face forward’) at it. This obstruction probably represented the barrier between YHWH and the house of Israel and the stare represented God’s angry intentions towards Jerusalem. The visual demonstration of a siege serves as a prophetic ‘sign’ to the house of Israel of the impending destruction of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A NUMBER OF DAYS SPENT LYING ON HIS LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES

Ezekiel is then commanded to lie on his left and right sides for a specific number of days, symbolically bearing the sin of the people of Israel. Each day probably represents a year of punishment for Israel’s iniquity. This act serves as a vivid illustration of the consequences of Israel’s rebellion against God.

Having impersonated the Babylonians in the first episode Ezekiel now has to play the part of Israel. He is instructed to lie on his left side for 390 days and after that lie on his right side for 40 days. The first period relates to the ‘house of Israel,’ the second to the ‘house of Judah. Ezekiel is told that each day represents one year (vv. 5-6).

Apparently in the Ancient Near East directions were indicated from a position facing east. North (the northern kingdom of Israel) was therefore on the left side and South (the southern kingdom of Judah) on the right. Another example of this in Ezekiel is 16:46: ‘And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters that dwell at thy left hand: and thy younger sister, that dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters.’

Concerning the years, we have no idea what dates are referred to. In fact, even the number of years for the house of Israel is unclear for although the Hebrew Masoretic text reads 390 years the Greek LXX says 190 years. Scholars and commentators have fertile imaginations and many ingenious suggestions have been put forward.

Since 390+40=430 (the period of time spent by the children of Israel in Egypt) some see this as symbolic of years of oppression or wilderness experience for Israel. See also Ex12:40 and Gal 3:17.

There is some disagreement as to whether the days represent years of sin or the years of punishment for sin. The first would look back to years of iniquity, the other point forward to years of judgement. Basing their opinion on v.9b some commentators maintain that the 390 years and the 40 years run concurrently, although v.6 says ‘when thou hast accomplished them (390), lie again (40)…’ which strongly suggests that they are consecutive.

There also seems to be no agreement on a terminus a quo (start date). For the 390 years of iniquity a popular choice is the period from the the division of Israel in 931 BCE to the fall of Babylon in 539 BCE. Others think that the period is 390 years from the construction of Solomon’s temple in the tenth century BCE. A valid point made by several commentators is that the dates in the book of Ezekiel are based on the deportation of Jehoiachin in 597 BCE, on this basis they speculate that the 390 and 40 years of punishment run consecutively from then until the Maccabean Revolt in 167 BCE.

As regards the 40 year period of Judah’s iniquity some say it began during the reign of King Josiah (640 -609 BCE) and ended with the Fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE), others that it commenced during the long (2 Kgs 21:1), evil (2 Kgs 21:10-16; 23:26-27) reign of Manasseh (lived c. 697-642 BCE).

A few of the commentators I have read give the 430 years a future application, maintaining that because the northern tribes would not have received Ezekiel’s prophecy then these days have yet to be fulfilled. They assert that Ezekiel is portraying judgement that will fall on all Israel (5:4). This, in their view, will occur at the end of the age.

It therefore seems that this is to be a long drawn out drama. Ezekiel is to lie first on his left side for 390 days and then on his right for 40 days ‘to bear the iniquity’ of the house of Israel and the house of Judah. This bearing of the nation’s iniquity is not vicarious but rather Ezekiel’s period of suffering and discomfort symbolizes the pain that Israel will endure at the hands of the Babylonians. During this display YHWH will ‘put ropes on’ Ezekiel, perhaps inflicting him with some kind of temporary paralysis, in order to prevent him from turning from one side to the other.

Again (v.7) Ezekiel is instructed to stare/glare at his siege model while he is lying on his side with his arm uncovered (see v.4). This may symbolize an unimpeded warrior ready for battle (cp. Isa 52:10). He is also to prophesy against Jerusalem. Perhaps, however, there is one crumb of hope in Ezekiel’s message in that the judgement is for a set period and will one day come to an end.

Possibly Ezekiel did not lie immobile 24-7 but just lay for several hours per day as the passage represents him carrying out other activities like enacting the siege, baking bread, drinking water, shaving etc.

4:9-17 CONSUMPTION OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF BREAD AND WATER

In these verses Ezekiel is instructed to eat a specific ration of food, prepared from a mixture of grains and legumes. This is limited by weight and represents the scarcity of food that the people of Jerusalem would experience during a siege. This action demonstrates the severity of the impending judgment upon Israel.

He is directed to mix flour from six types of grain in one vessel and prepare enough bread to eat ‘ from time to time’ (v.10, i.e. at a set time each day) during the 390 day period that he would lie on one side or the other. These grains are: wheat, barley, beans (see also 2 Sam 17:28), lentils, millet and fitches (a species of wheat). This unusual mixture of cereals was to be baked in full view of his fellow exiles (v.12), using human excrement as fuel. The amount of Ezekiel’s daily allocation of this disgusting food is 20 (Babylonian) shekels – approximately 8 ounces or 227 grams – and his intake of water is restricted to one sixth of a hin – about 0.6 litres. That the quantities are to be precisely measured out (cp. Lev 26:26) emphasizes that these are starvation rations. Ezekiel’s general state of health will deteriorate on such an unbalanced diet. The main point of this symbolic action is that siege, starvation and famine will soon be the lot of the residents of Jerusalem. There will be a shortage of food and water therefore rationing will apply (vv.16-17). Rationing is described in Isa 30:20 as ‘the bread of adversity and the water of affliction’ (see also 1 Kgs 22:27).

Ezekiel is instructed to eat the bread ‘as barley cakes.’ The idea seems to be that of eating them with enjoyment or enthusiasm thus suggesting that during the siege of Jerusalem people will be delighted to have something to eat, even if it is polluted.

In verse 13 the Lord says ‘thus shall the children of Israel eat defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them’ (for YHWH driving the Israelites out see Jer 8:3; 16:15; 24:9; 27:10,15), Ezekiel’s starvation diet teaches his fellow Israelites a double lesson: it predicts the forthcoming siege of Jerusalem and also the defilement of the exile that would follow it. The may mean that the food they will eat abroad is defiled since it will not be slaughtered, produced, handled and prepared in accordance with the dietary laws in the Torah. It could also mean that they will be defiled by adopting heathen manners and customs during the Exile (cp. Hos 9:3-4 for a similar sentiment).

Even though Ezekiel was receiving these directions while in a prophetic trance his priestly upbringing seems to have automatically triggered an immediate protest at the instructions concerning the bread. That his problem concerns the use of human excrement as fuel is clear from YHWH’s response in v.15: ‘Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.’ Bread baked over dried cow manure will still be defiled but perhaps to Ezekiel it seems a little less revolting. In any case, it will still sound disgusting and memorably make the point to his audience.

Ezekiel’s request for relief begins with a passionate outburst ‘Ah Lord God!’ and he goes on to explain that thus far his life has not been ‘polluted.’ One would think that Ezekiel’s objection is based on either the regulations concerning unlawful mixing (Lev 19:19; Deut 22:9) or on the strict rules about the disposal of human waste (Deut 23:12-14). However, he mentions neither of these but gives as his reason (‘for’ v.14) the fact that he had never done the following things:

  • Eaten an animal that died of itself (Lev 11:39; 17:15; 22:8; Deut 14:21, cp. Ezek 44:31).
  • Eaten an animal that was torn in pieces (Ex 22:31; Lev 22:8).
  • Eaten abominable flesh – this was meat left over from peace offerings and not eaten by the third day (Lev19:7).

These things bear no relation to baking bread over human excrement but Ezekiel seems to be asserting that he has kept all the dietary regulations since his youth, and cites these three cases in point. It is commendable that Ezekiel lived a blameless life before his prophetic call and that during his ministry his conscience was so sensitive that he instinctively wanted to live his life in obedience to God’s requirements. What a great lesson and example for us today!

After granting Ezekiel a concession on the fuel YHWH further declares: ‘Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem: and they shall eat bread by weight, and with care; and they shall drink water by measure, and with astonishment: That they may want bread and water, and be astonished one with another, and consume away for their iniquity.’ Ezekiel 4:16-17

‘staff of bread’ – means supply of bread, that which human beings depend on for survival. See also Lev 26:26; Psa 105:16; Isa 3:1; Ezek 5:16; 14:13. The siege of Jerusalem will result in the rationing of food and water. Bread will be doled out by weight and water by measure. The people will partake of their daily rations ‘with astonishment’ (extreme fear and apprehension) and will ‘consume away for their iniquity,’ i.e. they will waste away. Ezekiel uses this same expression three times when prophesying YHWH’s judgement (4:17; 24:23; 33:10).

This drama symbolizes and emphasizes the severity of the judgement that will befall Jerusalem. The scarcity of food and water will lead to desperation and despair among the people. This judgment is portrayed as a consequence of the people’s sin and disobedience.

5:1-4 A HAIRCUT AND SHAVE

Again addressing him as ‘Mortal’ YHWH reveals to Ezekiel details of the fourth drama that he must enact. He is to take a sharp knife and shave his head and beard. Using a knife as a razor is a powerful depiction of the judgement that will come upon the people of Jerusalem. The shaving of the head and beard was a sign of mourning (Isa 22:12; Jer 16:6) or disgrace (2 Sam 10:4; Mic 1:16) in ancient Near Eastern cultures and Israelites were forbidden by the law (Lev 19:27; 21:5; Deut 14:1) to practise this custom.

Using balances Ezekiel is to weigh and divide the hair that he has shaved off. This intimates that God is supervising the judgements (see 5:12; 6:12). Unlike the previous three dramas (chapter 4), in this case Ezekiel is to perform the symbolic actions AFTER the set number of days he has to lie on one side or the other (‘when the days of the (mock) siege are fulfilled,’ 5:2).

  • He is to burn one third of the hair ‘in the midst of the city,’ i.e. on his brick representing Jerusalem. This symbolizes the destruction of Jerusalem by fire and of its inhabitants by famine and pestilence (5:12).
  • He is to strike another third of the hair with a sword symbolizing that many people will suffer a violent death in battle.
  • He is to throw the remaining third to the winds, symbolizing the dispersion of the people of Judah.
  • He is to take a small number of the scattered hairs and bind them in the hem of his garment. He then has to take some of these and burn them in the fire. This indicates that even a remnant (symbolizing either those who survive the Babylonian invasion and siege or those who remain faithful to YHWH) will not be spared from God’s judgement but will find themselves in desperate circumstances. This action emphasizes the severity of the consequences of disobedience.

We now move into the next section which begins with an oracle against Jerusalem (5:5-17) in which YHWH explains the symbolism of the haircut and shave in 5:1-4.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

‘AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

Posted on by writtenexposition

EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1- 3:15

BACKGROUND

In chapter one Ezekiel has a vision of YHWH (Yahweh – the Lord) coming from the direction of the north in a storm cloud, borne along by a strange chariot composed of four living creatures and with wheels which travelled in all directions at once. Above the living creatures is a crystal dome upon which he sees YHWH in human form sitting upon a throne, surrounded by a brightness resembling a rainbow. Overcome by this sight of ‘the glory of YHWH’ Ezekiel falls upon his face and hears a voice speaking to him.

In 2:1- 3:15 Ezekiel reports the speech in which YHWH calls him to be a prophet, authorised to speak on YHWH’s behalf. The speech divides into five sections, all of which are introduced with the formula ‘and he said to me.’

2:1-2 ‘And he said to me‘- Ezekiel is commanded to stand.

Ezekiel receives a direct command from YHWH to stand on his feet; signifying a readiness to receive the message that the Lord is about to communicate to him. YHWH addresses him as ‘son of man’ (son of Adam; son of a human). ‘Son of’ denotes membership of a particular class; e.g. ‘prophet’s son’ in Amos 7:14. In Ezekiel this form of address is used only by YHWH and is a key phrase in the book. Referring to Ezekiel as ‘mortal’ or ‘human being’ emphasizes his weakness and insignificance in light of the glory and majesty of YHWH that he is witnessing in the vision.

When YHWH speaks to him Ezekiel is set upon his feet by the ‘spirit.’ This again emphasizes Ezekiel’s weakness, he can do nothing apart from the power of God. In the call narrative the spirit lifts and set him on his feet (2:2), a hand holds out the scroll (2:9) and the Lord feeds him the scroll (3:2). Ezekiel’s only action, if one might call it that, is to eat the scroll (3:3). The Spirit entering into Ezekiel symbolizes divine transformation and empowerment, preparing him for the task ahead. As a prophet he will have to rely totally upon the Lord.

2:3-10 ‘And he said to me‘ – Ezekiel is sent to rebellious Israel.

God commissions Ezekiel as a prophet to the rebellious ‘sons of Israel.’ Although Ezekiel’s ministry would be to the people from Judah who were with him in exile yet throughout the book he often addresses Israel as a whole (the other tribes had already been exiled for more than 120 years) and characterizes them as rebellious. This is a reminder that misfortune befalls them because they have failed YHWH, not because YHWH has failed them.

The fact of YHWH’s displeasure is driven home by use of the word ‘nation’ (gôyim), also used for the heathen, pagan Gentile nations around (Ex 9:24; 34:10; Ezek 5:6-8). God does not say here that they are his people, in fact, in 3:11 he just refers to them as Ezekiel’s people (‘thy people’).

‘They and their fathers have transgressed against me…’ (2:3). Israel’s rebellious attitude can be traced back a long way. It was a characteristic their ancestors and could thus be almost viewed as hereditary. It is to these impudent (hard of face, obstinate) and stiffhearted (hard hearted) people that YHWH is sending Ezekiel. He is to tell them ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (2:4). This messenger formula is another key phrase in the book. The messages that Ezekiel delivers do not originate in his own mind but are directly from YHWH, delivered via Ezekiel acting as a conduit.

Since the people are rebellious they may refuse to listen to what Ezekiel says but whether or not they heed the message they ‘shall know that there hath been a prophet among them’ (2:5). That which Ezekiel predicts will come to pass.

Ezekiel is not to be afraid of these people who are characterized by harshness but is to be courageous in the face of opposition. The briers, thorns and scorpions (2:6) are usually viewed as describing the challenging and hostile environment in which Ezekiel will carry out his prophetic ministry (since the first two are plants it is likely that ‘scorpion’ also refers to a thorny plant, e.g. 1 Kgs 12:11). Ezekiel will be rejected and humiliated by the people. On the other hand, the idea may be that Ezekiel will be metaphorically surrounded by briers, thorns and scorpions, which will serve to protect him from the hostility of his fellow countrymen. Ezekiel is commanded to speak the Lord’s words boldly, regardless of whether the reaction is positive or negative (2:7).

In 2:8 Ezekiel is rather strangely exhorted not to be ‘rebellious like that rebellious house.’ Israel has been called ‘rebellious’ in vv. 5, 6 and 7 and now in v. 8 there is repetition of the word ‘rebellious.’ The focus is therefore on Israel’s rebelliousness; it is because of this that Ezekiel is being sent to them as a prophet. Ezekiel, however, is not to be like them, he is to open his mouth and eat whatever YHWH gives him. This command to eat is repeated in 3:1. Ezekiel at this stage has no idea what he is to eat.

In 2:9-10 Ezekiel sees a hand hold out a scroll which is then spread out before him so that he can glance at it. He notices that the writing covers both back and front of the scroll and that it contains ‘lamentations and mourning and woe.’ It would seem that the message written on it is one of judgement.

3:1-3 ‘And he said to me‘ - Ezekiel is commanded to eat the scroll.

YHWH repeats the command to Ezekiel to eat whatever he finds; that turns out to be the scroll, an inedible object. Fortunately for Ezekiel, he did not have to eat a physical scroll, this was happening in his trance-like state. Even at this point Ezekiel does not protest, in fact, he does not speak at all throughout the entire inaugural vision. Exercising unconditional obedience, he receives and consumes the scroll, symbolizing the word of God. He thus fills his ‘belly’ and ‘bowels’ (his innermost being) with it. The act of eating is also symbolic; it emphasizes the need for Ezekiel to fully digest, assimilate and comprehend YHWH’s message before sharing it with others.

Ezekiel reports that the scroll tastes as sweet as honey. The prophet Jeremiah (15:16) also reported that (metaphorically) feeding upon God’s word brought him joy: ‘Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.’ (See also Psa 19:10)

3:4-9 ‘And he said to me‘ - Ezekiel is formally commissioned as YHWH’s prophet to Israel.

Ezekiel is now commissioned to go and deliver God’s words to the house (family) of Israel. He is not to speak his own thoughts but to convey the divine message faithfully and accurately. His Israelite audience speaks the same language as him so communication ought to be fairly easy. The message, however, will meet with resistance and rejection. This is emphasized with a comparison. Were YHWH to send Ezekiel to many foreign nations which speak an unintelligible language (like the Babylonian overlords/invaders) they would readily receive the message, in contrast to rebellious Israel, who will reject it.

Unlike the other prophets Ezekiel is not sent with a message of hope that would enable Israel to repent and avoid judgement. He just has to deliver God’s words verbatim in spite of the fact that there will be no response. YHWH already knows (3:7) that the message will be rejected. Israel does not heed YHWH so they certainly will not heed Ezekiel. The success of Ezekiel’s ministry will not be measured by results but by his obedience in proclaiming what YHWH tells him to say.

Verses 8 and 9 return to the thought of Israel’s hardness already mentioned in 2:4. Israel is tough but YHWH will make Ezekiel equally tough. Verse 8 says he will be tough-browed; i.e. brazen (see Jer 3:3). Similarly in v. 9 Ezekiel’s brow will be like an adamant (unbreakable material) harder than flint; i.e. diamond (see Jer 17:1). Again Ezekiel is told not to be afraid and again Israel is described as a ‘rebellious house.’

3:10-11 ‘And he said to me‘ - Ezekiel is commanded to go to his fellow exiles

These verses sum up Ezekiel’s task. When Ezekiel hears all the words that the Lord will speak to him he is to lay them to heart and go and announce them to the exiles (‘them of the captivity’). All the other prophets of YHWH lived in the land of Israel and prophesied to the people there but Ezekiel is commissioned to directly address his fellow exiles; both he and they have been deported along with King Jehoiachin c. 597 BCE (1:2) and are now on foreign soil, far from the land of Israel. The message he has for them does not originate with him but comes from the Lord: ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’

3:12-15 Ezekiel describes his departure from YHWH’s presence and his arrival at Tel-Abib.

Ezekiel describes how that, still in his prophetic trance and experiencing the vision of God, the wind (or the Spirit of God) metaphorically (not physically, see 8:3; 11:1, 24) levitates and teleports him to Tel-Abib. That Ezekiel was still experiencing the vision is clear from his report that he heard the great rumbling sound (of an earthquake) and that the noise he heard was from the wings of the living creatures, the wheels, and the overall movement associated with the divine presence (3:13). The great rumbling sound which he hears symbolises the powerful presence of God. The declaration, “Blessed be the glory of the Lord from its place,” expresses praise for God’s majestic and glorious presence. Possibly it was sung by the cherubim.

Ezekiel describes his state of mind while he is carried away as ‘bitter.’ At what we are not told. He may have been bitter at the adamance of Israel or bitter because he has been called to be God’s spokesman to the people, with no likelihood of them paying attention to his message. In spite of his internal struggles he feels the strength of the Lord’s hand upon him, providing divine empowerment for his prophetic mission, . Jeremiah (Jer 15:17) seems to have have had a similar melancholy reaction to the grievous message he would announce.

Back in Tel-Abib (3:15) with the exiles Ezekiel says that he ‘sat where they sat.’ Sitting among them is a demonstration of Ezekiel’s identification with the people to whom he is sent, sharing in their experiences and challenges. Apparently he is so shocked and overwhelmed by the vision that he sits in stunned silence for seven days.

SUMMATION

In this section of the call narrative (2:1-3:15), Ezekiel receives a divine commission and is made aware of the difficulty of the task ahead. However, he receives assurance of God’s protection and empowerment. The stage is now set for Ezekiel’s prophetic ministry to the rebellious house of Israel.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in Exposition

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

Posted on by writtenexposition

1. Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God. 2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king Jehoiachin’s captivity, 3. The word of the LORD came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the hand of the LORD was there upon him.

INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

These verses introduce the book of Ezekiel and provide historical background, as well as some information about the prophet Ezekiel and his message. They indicate when and where he was active; thus situating his visions within a specific historical and cultural context.

1:1 Ezekiel’s prophetic ministry is said to have begun ‘in the thirtieth year.’ The significance of the ‘thirtieth year’ is not explained but it is usually understood to mean that Ezekiel was thirty years of age at the time. The date given is the fifth day of the fourth month. This would have been the month of Tammuz and therefore the time of year was late June/early July.

The vision occurred while Ezekiel was among the exiles by the Chebar, which was most likely a canal near Babylon. It seems that many exiled Jews had been settled in this area. Ezekiel’s location by the canal underscores the fact that he was living among the exiles and sharing in their experiences and struggles.

1:2 Verse 2 provides more detailed historical context by specifying that it was the fifth year of King Jehoiachin’s exile. This information dates Ezekiel’s inaugural vision (592 BCE) and places it within the larger context of the Babylonian exile.

King Jehoiachin (2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10, also known as Jeconiah (Jer 24:1; 27:20; 28:4; 29:2) and Coniah (Jer 22:24, 28; 37:1), was the son of King Jehoiakim of Judah and a grandson of King Josiah. Jehoiachin became king of Judah at the age of eighteen (2 Kgs 24:8). His short reign was marked by political instability and conflict with the Babylonians. According to the Chronicler he ‘did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord’ (2 Chron 36:9). Jeremiah 22:24-30 has the Lord directly addressing Jehoiachin, prophesying his captivity and exile in Babylon. The Lord also declared that Jehoiachin’s descendants would neither prosper nor sit on the throne of David, thus signifying the end of the dynasty.

In 597 BCE King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon deported King Jehoiachin of Judah along with many of the leading citizens of Jerusalem (2 Kgs 24:15-16); including Ezekiel, who would have been twenty-five years of age at that time. Jehoiachin’s captivity in Babylon lasted for thirty-seven years. During that time, he was reportedly well-treated by the Babylonians and eventually released from captivity by King Evil-Merodach, who succeeded Nebuchadnezzar as ruler of Babylon. According to 2 Kings 25:27-30, Jehoiachin was then given a high position at the Babylonian court (new clothes, a daily allowance for the rest of his life, and allowed to dine at the king’s table).

Despite his short troubled reign and his captivity in Babylon, Jehoiachin was an important figure in the history of Judah. His deposition and deportation marked the beginning of the Babylonian Exile, a period of great spiritual and cultural significance for the Israelites. The Exile came to an end in 538 BCE.

During this difficult time Ezekiel, himself taken into captivity during Jehoiachin’s reign, provided spiritual guidance and hope to the exiles over a period of twenty years. The date of his inaugural vision in verse 2 is the first chronological marker in the book. The others are:

8:1 The vision of idols and abominations in the temple.

20:1 Ezekiel’s response to the elders.

24:1 The parable of a cooking pot

26:1 Threats against Tyre.

29:1 Prophecy against Egypt.

29:17 Desolation of Egypt.

30:20 Pharaoh’s defeat.

31:1 The cedar of Lebanon.

32:1 Lament over Pharoah..

32:17 Lament over Egypt.

33:21 News of the Fall of Jerusalem.

40:1 Vision of a new temple.

1:3 Verse 3 identifies Ezekiel as a member of the priestly class. This would suggest that his prophetic message was informed by his knowledge of Jewish ritual and tradition, which gave him religious authority to speak on behalf of God. Note that many respected commentators confidently assert that Ezekiel was a Zadokite priest. This they assume purely on the basis that Ezekiel speaks highly of the Zadokites in chapters 40-48, which contain his vision of how a future ideal temple might look and operate. In these chapters Ezekiel assigns a dominant role to the Zadokites (43:18-27; 44:15-16; 45:4; 46:19-24), presumably as a reward for remaining relatively (22:26) faithful (44:10-11, 15-16; 48:11) during the Exile. There is zero scriptural evidence for Ezekiel having a Zadokite heritage.

The reference to the “hand of the Lord” being upon him indicates that Ezekiel was divinely inspired and empowered to deliver God’s message to the exiles. The ‘land of the Chaldeans’ refers to the Neo-Babylonian empire ruled over by Nebopolassar (627-605 BCE) and his son Nebuchadnezzar (605-562 BCE).

SUMMATION

The opening verses of Ezekiel set the stage for the prophetic message that follows. The fact that Ezekiel received his vision among the exiles by the Chebar canal underscores the fact that his message is directed to the Israelite community in exile. The political and social upheaval of the time is also reflected in the references to King Jehoiachin’s exile and the Babylonian conquest.

Ezekiel 1:1-3 offers spiritual lessons that are still relevant today:

First, we see that God is not limited by our circumstances. Even in the midst of exile and captivity, God can still reveal himself and speak to his people.

Second, we see that God chooses ordinary people to do extraordinary things. Ezekiel was a priest, but God called him to be a prophet and to deliver his message to the exiles.

Finally, we see that God’s word is powerful and authoritative. Ezekiel’s prophetic message was not his own, but rather it came directly from God.

As we read the book of Ezekiel, we are reminded that God is sovereign over all of history, and that his word has the power to transform our lives and to give us hope even in the midst of difficult situations.

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27

Posted in General

NATHAN : PROBABLY THE MOST INFLUENTIAL PROPHET MOST PEOPLE HAVE NEVER HEARD OF

Posted on by writtenexposition

Although it was still seven months to the coronation of King Charles III at the time of publication, the British tabloid newspaper Daily Mail printed ‘An A to Z guide to the Coronation’ by Claudia Connell on Saturday, October 15, 2022. The following was listed under N:

Nathan the Prophet

Perhaps not the most familiar of prophets but next May he’s going to be name-checked by the Archbishop of Canterbury in front of millions of TV viewers around the world. During the anointing of the King, the Archbishop will recall ‘as Solomon was anointed King by Zadok the Priest and Nathan the Prophet.’

Who was Nathan the prophet and what was his legacy?

INTRODUCTION

Nathan the Prophet is a biblical character who was active in the political and religious life of Israel during the reign of King David c. 1000 BCE. He is the second of two prominent prophets in the Books of Samuel each of whom had a strong influence on King David. These two prophets lived during a period of great social, political and religious change; Samuel, who preceded Nathan, identified more with the earlier way of life, Nathan with the latest developments.

In the years leading up to 1000 BCE there was a growing trend in the Ancient Near East away from loose tribal confederacies towards the centralisation of political power. This produced a gradual change from a pastoral, nomadic existence to a more settled urban way of life, with the economy based on agriculture rather than herding. Territory (where one lived) rather than tribe (who one was) began to take precedence. Monarchy, rather than chiefdom, became the political norm. In spite of the inevitable loss of freedom and additional expense involved the Israelites desired this type of arrangement. Ignoring warnings by Samuel (1 Sam 8:11-18) they insisted that they too wanted government by a king – a system that had already been adopted by Edom (1 Chron 1:43) and Ammon (1 Sam 12:12). Samuel eventually succumbed to pressure (1 Sam 12:1) and reluctantly anointed Saul as the first king of Israel. Later he also anointed David (1 Sam 16:13), the second king.

Nathan the prophet had a close relationship with David and was considered one of his most trusted advisors. He is connected with several important events in David’s reign, including the confrontation with David over his affair with Bathsheba and the anointing of Solomon as David’s successor.

2 Samuel 7:1-29 & 1 Chron 17:1-27 A ‘HOUSE’ FOR GOD AND A ‘HOUSE’ FOR DAVID.

Nathan’s role in these chapters is significant for he delivers a message from God to King David regarding the building of the Jerusalem temple.

Having built a ‘house’ (palace) for himself in Jerusalem David expressed to Nathan his desire to build a ‘house’ (temple) for Yahweh. Nathan, rather presumptuously and without consulting Yahweh, told David to go ahead with the building project. However, Yahweh spoke to Nathan and instructed him to tell David that he would not build the temple, but that his son would do that. Nathan mediated this message to David, emphasizing that it was God’s plan and that David should not be discouraged since God would establish a ‘house’ (dynasty) for David. His offspring would reign over Israel and, by implication, the kingdom would last forever. Christians view this as a prophecy of the coming of Jesus Christ, who would be a descendant of David and establish an eternal kingdom.

2 Samuel 12:1-25 NATHAN, DAVID, BATHSHEBA AND URIAH

In 2 Samuel chapter 12, the prophet Nathan again plays a crucial role in delivering a message from God, this time to confront King David about his sin with Bathsheba and the murder of her husband Uriah.

The story of David, Bathsheba, Uriah, and Nathan in 2 Samuel 11 is a complex and interesting narrative that highlights themes of power, lust, betrayal, and repentance. It concerns King David’s sexual liaison with Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah, one of David’s elite soldiers. It also details the role of Nathan the prophet, who is sent by God to confront David with his sin and call him to repentance.

David is described as staying behind in Jerusalem while his army goes out to battle. From his rooftop, he sees Bathsheba bathing and is overcome with lust for her. He sends for her and sleeps with her, even though she is married to Uriah, who is away fighting in the war against the Ammonites.

When Bathsheba becomes pregnant and send word to David, he tries to cover up his sin by bringing Uriah back from the front lines and encouraging him to go home and sleep with his wife. Uriah refuses to go to his house, saying that it would be unfair to enjoy home comforts while his fellow soldiers are still at war. David then sends Uriah back to the battlefield with a letter to Joab, the commanding officer of the army, instructing him to put Uriah in the front lines of battle and then withdraw so that Uriah will be killed. Uriah dies as planned, and David then takes Bathsheba as his wife.

Displeased with David’s actions YHWH sends Nathan the prophet to confront him. Nathan approaches David with a parable about a rich man who had taken a poor man’s only lamb, which the poor man loved and cared for like a daughter. In spite of the fact that he had many animals of his own, the rich man slaughtered the poor man’s lamb in order to feed a visitor. Outraged by the rich man’s actions David declares that he deserves to die for his cruelty. At this point, Nathan reveals that the rich man in the parable is David, who had committed a much greater injustice by taking Bathsheba (another man’s wife) and killing her husband.

Convicted by Nathan’s words David confesses his sin, acknowledging his guilt before God. Nathan tells David that God has forgiven him but warns him that there will be consequences for his actions, including the death of the child that Bathsheba is carrying. In addition, members of David’s own family would rebel against him and try to oust him as king.

The story of David, Bathsheba, Uriah, and Nathan is a cautionary tale about the dangers of power and lust, and the importance of accountability and repentance. It highlights the role of the prophet as a messenger of God speaking truth to the wealthy and influential and calling for justice and righteousness. It also underscores the idea that powerful leaders are not above the law and that all actions have consequences, both for the individual and for those around them.

1 Kgs 1:1-46; 4:5 SOLOMONS’S ACCESSION NARRATIVE

Nathan played a significant role in the succession of Solomon as king of Israel after David. As had been prophesied following David’s sin with Bathsheba, much strife and conflict took place within David’s family. David had many sons, and there seemed to be no clear line of succession. Adonijah, one of the sons, assumed that he was next in the line of succession and took steps to appoint himself co-regent with David, who was then in old age.

Nathan, however, intervened to ensure that Yahweh’s plan for the throne of Israel was fulfilled. He advised Bathsheba to go to David and remind him of a promise made to her that her son, Solomon, would succeed him on the throne (1 Kings 1:11-14). Nathan also supported Bathsheba’s claim by approaching David and confirming that Solomon was indeed the one to succeed him. Thus, through Nathan’s intervention, Solomon was anointed as king with David’s blessing, ensuring a relatively peaceful and orderly transition of power.

1 Chron 29:29 & 2 Chron 9:29 THE BOOK OF NATHAN THE PROPHET

The Book of Nathan the Prophet is mentioned in both 1 Chronicles 29:29 and 2 Chronicles 9:29. These verses suggest that Nathan wrote a historical account of King David’s reign, and that this account was preserved as a written record and was a source available to the compiler(s) of the Books of Kings and Chronicles. Material from it may also have been used in the Books of Samuel.

The mention of the Book of Nathan the Prophet in these verses reminds us that other texts and traditions existed as part of the religious and cultural landscape of ancient Israel, but did not become part of the biblical canon and have not survived.

2 Chron 29:25 NATHAN ASSISTED DAVID IN THE ORGANIZATION OF PUBLIC WORSHIP

2 Chronicles 29:25 describes the actions of Hezekiah, the thirteenth king of Judah, as he restores the worship practices of the temple in Jerusalem. The verse states:

‘And he set the Levites in the house of the LORD with cymbals, with psalteries, and with harps, according to the commandment of David, and of Gad the king’s seer, and Nathan the prophet: for so was the commandment of the LORD by his prophets.’

From this verse we learn that temple worship traditions and instructions handed down by earlier generations, in this case from David, Gad, and Nathan, were observed for centuries. Three hundred years after their institution Hezekiah honoured these traditions and instructions; ensuring the continuity of religious practices for which Nathan the prophet had been partly responsible.

SUMMATION

Nathan the Prophet played an important role in the lives of two kings and in the development of Israelite religion and literature. He was important as a prophet of Yahweh and for his good interpersonal, political and organisational skills. He is credited with having prophesied to David about the future of his dynasty and the construction of the temple in Jerusalem. He also confronted David about his affair with Bathsheba and helped to facilitate the succession of David’s son, Solomon, to the throne.

In addition to his role as an advisor to the king, it seems that Nathan was also a writer and historian. According to 1 Chronicles 29:29 and 2 Chronicles 9:29, he wrote a history of the reigns of David and Solomon, called the ‘Book of Nathan the Prophet’.

Overall, Nathan’s historical significance lies in his role as a key figure in the history of ancient Israel. As prophet and counsellor to kings he played an important role in the political and religious affairs of the Israelites, and his writings and prophecies helped to shape their religious and cultural identity.

BIBLIOGRAPHIES

1) GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Alter, R. (2009). The David Story: A Translation with Commentary of 1 and 2 Samuel. W. W. Norton & Company.

Alter, R. (2013). Ancient Israel : the Former Prophets : Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings : a Translation with Commentary. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Anderson, A. A. (1989). 2 Samuel. Paternoster.

‌Auld, A. G. (2011). I & II Samuel : a Commentary. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press.

‌Baretz, J. (2015). The Bible on Location. U of Nebraska Press.

Barron, R. (2017). 2 Samuel. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Brazos Press, A Division Of Baker Publishing Group.

‌Brenner, A (1994). A Feminist Companion to Samuel and Kings. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

Beal, L. W. (2014). 1 & 2 Kings. InterVarsity Press.

Brueggemann, W. (2000). 1 & 2 Kings. Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. Eerdmans.

‌Brueggemann, W. (2012). First and Second Samuel. Louisville, Kentucky: John Knox Press.

Cartledge, T.W. (2001). 1 & 2 Samuel. Macon, Ga.: Smyth & Helwys Pub.

Chisholm, R.B. (2013). 1 and 2 Samuel. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

Franke, J. R. and Oden, T. C. (2014). Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1-2 Samuel. InterVarsity Press.

Fox, E. (2014). The Early Prophets : Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings : a New Translation with Introductions, Commentary, and Notes. New York: Schocken Books.

Galil, G. Levwinson-Gilboa, E. Maeir, A. M. and Kahn, D. (2012). The Ancient Near East in the 12th-10th centuries BCE : Culture and History : proceedings of the international conference, held at the University of Haifa, 2-5 May, 2010. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.

Gordon, R.P. (1984). 1 & 2 Samuel. Sheffield: JSOT.

‌Huffmon, H. B. (2008). A Tale of the Prophet and the Courtier: A Responsive Reading of the Nathan Texts. In S. Dolansky (Ed.), Sacred History, Sacred Literature: Essays on Ancient Israel, the Bible, and Religion in Honor of R. E. Friedman on His Sixtieth Birthday (pp. 33–42). Penn State University Press.

Japhet, S. (2009). Kingship. In The Ideology of the Book of Chronicles and Its Place in Biblical Thought  (pp. 308–383). Penn State University Press.

Jones, G.H. (1990). The Nathan Narratives. Sheffield: Jsot Press.

Laffey, A. L. (1988). An Introduction to the Old Testament : a Feminist Perspective. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

‌Lamb, D.T. (2021). 1–2 Kings. Zondervan Academic.

Lipinski, E. (2020). JERUSALEM IN THE BRONZE AGE AND IRON AGE I. In A History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem and Judah (Vol. 287, pp. 7–26). Peeters Publishers.

McKenzie, S. L. (2000). King David : a Biography. New York: Oxford University Press.

‌McShane, A. (1990). Lessons for Leaders. John Ritchie Ltd. Kilmarnock

McShane, A. (2002). I & II Kings. John Ritchie Ltd. Kilmarnock

MacLeod, F. (2016). 1 & 2 Kings: A Devotional Look at the Kings of Israel and Judah. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.

Mann, T. W. (2011). 2 Samuel. In The Book of the Former Prophets (1st ed., pp. 171–242). The Lutterworth Press.

‌Nelson, C. M. (1982). 1 & 2 Kings, Interpretation : a Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching, Old Testament. Atlanta: John Knox Press.

Newsome, J.D. (1982). 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel. Atlanta (Ga.): Knox Pr.

Peters, F. E. (1985). Holy Land, Holy City. In Jerusalem: The Holy City in the Eyes of Chroniclers, Visitors, Pilgrims, and Prophets from the Days of Abraham to the Beginnings of Modern Times (pp. 3–41). Princeton University Press.

Petroelje, S.L. (2012). Discover 2 Samuel. Faith Alive Christian Resources

Rosenberg, J. (1986). King and Kin : Political Allegory in the Hebrew Bible. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

‌Rossier, H.L. (2015). Meditations on 1 Kings. Irving Risch.

Rossier, H.L. (2015). Meditations on 2 Samuel. Irving Risch.

Segal, A. F. (2012). No Peace in the Royal Family. In Sinning in the Hebrew Bible: How The Worst Stories Speak for Its Truth (pp. 180–221). Columbia University Press.

Taylor, W. M. (1875). David, King of Israel: His Life and its Lessons, New York: Harper & Brothers

Willis, J. T., Graham P. M., Marrs, R. R. and Mckenzie, S. L. (1999). Worship and the Hebrew Bible : Essays in Honour of John T. Willis. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Press.

Witherington, B. (2014). Courting the Prophets: Prophets and the Early Monarchy. In Jesus the Seer: The Progress of Prophecy (pp. 62–103). 1517 Media.

Woodhouse, J. and Hughes, R.K. (2015). 2 Samuel : Your Kingdom Come. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway.

‌JOURNAL ARTICLES

Bishop, E. F. F. (1935). Why ‘Son of David’?. The Expository Times, 47(1), pp.21–25.

Bodner, K. (2001). Nathan: Prophet, Politician and Novelist? Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 26(1), pp.43–54.

Bosworth, D. A. (2006). Evaluating King David: Old Problems and Recent Scholarship. CBQ, 68(2), pp. 191–210.

Bowman, J. (1989). David, Jesus Son of David and Son of Man. Ancient Near Eastern Studies, 27(0), pp.1–22.

Brown, R. M. (1984). The Nathan Syndrome: Stories with a Moral Intention. Religion & Literature, 16 (1), pp. 49–59.

Haran, M. (1999). The Books of the Chronicles ‘of the Kings of Judah’ and ‘of the Kings of Israel’: What Sort of Books were they?. Vetus Testamentum, 49(2), pp.156–164.

Harper, W. R. (1904). Constructive Studies in the Prophetic Element in the Old Testament. IV. Prophecy and Prophetism during the Davidic Period. The Biblical World, 24(1), pp. 47–58.

Harrington, D. J. (1991). ‘Jesus, the Son of David, the Son of Abraham …’; Christology and Second Temple Judaism. Irish Theological Quarterly, 57(3), pp.185–195.

Kalimi, I. (2016). Reexamining 2 Samuel 10-12: Redaction History versus Compositional Unity. CBQ, 78(1), pp. 24–46.

Kingsbury, J.D. (1976). The Title ‘Son of David’ in Matthew’s Gospel. Journal of Biblical Literature, 95(4), p.591.

Levin, Y. (2006). Jesus, ‘Son of God’ and ‘Son of David’: The ‘Adoption’ of Jesus into the Davidic Line. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 28(4), pp.415–442.

Pagani, S. (2017). « Roi ou serviteur » ? La tentation du Prophète, ou le choix d’un modèle. Archives de Sciences Sociales Des Religions, 62(178), pp.43–68.

Reich, K.H. (2003). Teaching Genesis: A Present‐Day Approach Inspired by the Prophet Nathan. Zygon®, 38(3), pp .633–641.

Smith, S.H. (1996). The Function of the Son of David Tradition in Mark’s Gospel. New Testament Studies, 42(4), pp.523–539.

Van der Bergh, R. H. (2008) Deadly Traits: A Narratological Analysis of Character in 2 Samuel 11. Old Testament Essays, 21, pp.180-192.

Wantaate, F. (2019), Nathan as a Courageous Follower: An Inner Texture Analysis of 2 Samuel:1-14, American Journal of Biblical Theology, Vol. 19 (10)

2) BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR 2 Samuel 7:1-29 & 1 Chron 17:1-27 A ‘HOUSE’ FOR GOD AND A ‘HOUSE’ FOR DAVID.

BOOKS

Avioz, M. (2006). Nathan’s Oracle (2 Samuel 7) and its Interpreters. Bern ; Oxford: Peter Lang.

Eslinger, L. (1994). House of God or House of David. Sheffield Academic Press.

Janthial, D. (2013). L’oracle de Nathan et l’unité du livre d’Isaïe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Knoppers G. N. (2007). ‘Changing History: Nathan’s Oracle and the Structure of the Davidic Monarchy in Chronicles’, In M. Bar-Asher et al (eds), Shai le-Sara Japhet: Studies in the Bible, its Exegesis and its Language, (pp. 99-123). Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute

MacDonald, N. (2015). Covenant and Election in Exilic and Post-Exilic Judaism. Tübingen, Germany, Mohr Siebeck.

Schniedewind, W.M. (1999). Society and the Promise to David : the Reception History of 2 Samuel 7:1-17. New York: Oxford University Press.

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Avioz, M. (2004). Nathan’s Prophecy in II Sam 7 and in I Chr 17: Text, Context, and Meaning. Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 116(4). pp. 542-554

Avioz, M. (2006). Josephus’ Retelling of Nathan’s Oracle (2 Samuel 7). Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, 20(1), pp. 9–17.

‌Cudworth, T.D. (2016). Yahweh’s Promise to David in the Books of Kings. Vetus Testamentum, 66(2), pp.194–216.

Johnston, G. H. (2011). The Nature of the Davidic Covenant in the Light of Intertextual Analysis. A Paper Presented to the Old Testament Narrative Literature Study Group National Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society: San Francisco.

Knoppers, G. N. (1996). Ancient Near Eastern Royal Grants and the Davidic Covenant: A Parallel? Journal of the American Oriental Society, 116(4), pp. 670–697.

Kruse, H. (1985). David’s Covenant. Vetus Testamentum, 35(2), pp. 139–164.

Mroczek, E. (2015). How Not to Build a Temple: Jacob, David, and the Unbuilt Ideal in Ancient Judaism. Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period, 46(4/5), pp. 512–546.

Phillips, A. (1966). The Interpretation of 2 Samuel xii 5-6. Vetus Testamentum, 16 (2), pp.242–244.

Sergi, O. (2010). The Composition of Nathan’s Oracle to David (2 Samuel 7:1–17) as a Reflection of Royal Judahite Ideology. Journal of Biblical Literature, 129(2), pp. 261–279.

Ttsevat, M. (1963). STUDIES IN THE BOOK OF SAMUEL: III The Steadfast House: What Was David Promised in II Sam. 7:11b—16? Hebrew Union College Annual, 34, 71–82.

Tsevat, M. (1965). The House of David in Nathan’s Prophecy. Biblica, 46(3), pp. 353–356.

Tsumura, D. T. (2010). Tense and Aspect of Hebrew Verbs in 2 Samuel 7:8-16—from the Point of View of Discourse Grammar. Vetus Testamentum, 60 (4), pp. 641–654.

Zimran, Y. (2014). “The Covenant Made with David”: The King and the Kingdom in 2 Chronicles 21. Vetus Testamentum, 64 (2), pp. 305–325.

‌3) BIBLIOGRAPGY FOR 2 Samuel 12:1-25 NATHAN, DAVID, BATHSHEBA AND URIAH

BOOKS

Afoakwah, J. D. (2015). The Nathan-David confrontation (2 Sam 12:1-15a) : a Slap in the Face of the Deuteronomistic Hero? New York: Peter Lang Edition.

Boda, M.J. (2021). A Severe Mercy : Sin and Its Remedy in the Old Testament. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

Karras, R. M. (2021). I Have Sinned Against the Lord: Sex and Penitence. In Thou Art the Man: The Masculinity of David in the Christian and Jewish Middle Ages (pp. 101–135). University of Pennsylvania Press.

McLaughlin, J. L. (2021). ‘Collateral Damage: Divine Punishment of Others for David’s Sins in 2 Samuel.’ In J. L. McLaughlin & C. Carvalho (Eds.), God and Gods in the Deuteronomistic History (pp. 143–159). Catholic University of America Press.

Koenig, S. M. (2018). Bathsheba Survives. University of South Carolina Press.

Mohammed, K. (2015). David in the Muslim tradition : the Bathsheba affair. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.

Salisbury, J.E. (2001). Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Abc-Clio.

‌The (2019). LIFE Women of the Bible. Time.

Widmer, M. (2015). David: Repentant Sinner, Priestly Intercessor, and Yhwh’s Change of Mind (2 Samuel 24). In Standing in the Breach: An Old Testament Theology and Spirituality of Intercessory Prayer (Vol. 13, pp. 224–250). Penn State University

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Abasili, A. I. (2011). Was it Rape? The David and Bathsheba Pericope Re-examined. Vetus Testamentum, 61(1), pp.1–15.

Berger, Y. (2009). Ruth and the David—Bathsheba Story: Allusions and Contrasts. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 33(4), pp. 433–452.

Berman, J. (2013). Double Meaning in the Parable of the Poor Man’s Ewe (2 Sam 12:1–4). Journal of Hebrew Scriptures, Vol. 13. Article 14.

Buford, M. A. (2009). The Nathan Factor: The Art of Speaking Truth to Power. Journal of Biblical Perspectives in Leadership, 2(2), 95-113.

Cohen, H.H. (1965). David and Bathsheba. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, XXXIII(2), pp.142–148.

Daube, D. (1982). Nathan’s Parable. Novum Testamentum, 24(3), 275–288.

Dorn, L. O. (1999). Untranslatable Features in the David and Bathsheba Story (2 Samuel 11–12). The Bible Translator, 50(4), pp. 406–411.

Firth, D. (2008). David and Uriah (With an Occasional Appearance by Uriah’s Wife) – Reading and Re-Reading 2 Samuel 11. 21. Old Testament Essays, 20/2, pp. 310-328

Garsiel, M. (1993). The Story of David and Bathsheba: A Different Approach. CBQ, 55(2), pp. 244–262

Jacobs, J. (2013). The Death of David’s Son by Bathsheba (II Sam 12:13-25): A Narrative in Context. Vetus Testamentum, 63(4), pp. 566–576.

Lasine, S. (1984). Melodrama as Parable: The Story of the Poor Man’s Ewe-Lamb and the Unmasking of David’s Topsy-Turvy Emotions. Research affiliated with Wichita State University

‌Létourneau, A. (2018). Beauty, Bath and Beyond: Framing Bathsheba as a Royal Fantasy in 2 Sam 11,1-5. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, 32(1), pp.72–91.

Nicol G. G. (1998) David, Abigail and Bathsheba, Nabal and Uriah: Transformations within a Triangle, Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, 12 (1), pp. 130-145.

Schipper, J. (2007). Did David Overinterpret Nathan’s Parable in 2 Samuel 12:1-6? Journal of Biblical Literature, 126(2), pp. 383–391.

Van der Bergh, R. H. (2008). Is Bathsheba Guilty? The Septuagint’s Perspective. Journal for Semitics 17, no. 1 182-193.

4) BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR 1 Kgs 1:1-46; 4:5 SOLOMONS’S ACCESSION NARRATIVE

BOOKS

Finkelstein, I. and Silberman, N. A. (2007). David and Solomon. Simon and Schuster.

‌Kalimi, I. (2018). Writing and Rewriting the Story of Solomon in Ancient Israel. Cambridge University Press.

Miller, V. (2019). A King and a Fool?: The Succession Narrative as a Satire. Leiden, The Netherlands, Brill.

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Ball, E. (1977). The Co-Regency of David and Solomon (1 Kings I). Vetus Testamentum, 27(3), pp.268–279.

Frolov, S. (2002). Succession Narrative: A “Document” or a Phantom? Journal of Biblical Literature, 121(1), 81–104.

Langlamet, F. (1982). DAVID, FILS DE JESSÉ: UNE ÉDITION PRÉDEUTÉRONOMISTE DE L’« HISTOIRE DE LA SUCCESSION ». Revue Biblique (1946-), 89(1), pp. 5–47.

Willis, J., Pleffer, A., & Llewelyn, S. (2011). Conversation in the Succession Narrative of Solomon. Vetus Testamentum, 61(1), pp. 133–147.

Posted in Exposition

OUTLINE OF THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL

Posted on by writtenexposition

The precise dates given throughout the book of Ezekiel show that his prophecies centred on a specific major event in the history of Judah, that is, the Fall of Jerusalem in 587 BCE. The book therefore divides into two main sections: prophecies relating to the ten years leading up to the Fall of Jerusalem ( chapters 1-32) and prophecies relating to time after the Fall of Jerusalem (chapters 33-48).

The material is arranged in five blocks:

PART 1 – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO THE PROPHETIC MINISTRY – CHAPTERS 1-3

1:1-3 – Introduction and superscription

1:4-28 – Vision of the glory of YHWH

2:1 – 3:27 – Ezekiel’s Commission

PART 2 – ORACLES OF WARNING TO ISRAEL AND JUDAH – CHAPTERS 4-24

4:1-5:4 – The siege of Jerusalem portrayed in symbolic acts

5:5 – 17 – A prophetic sermon directed against Jerusalem

6:1 – 7: 27 – A prophecy of judgement on the land of Israel

8:1 – 11:25 – A vision of God’s glory leaving the Temple

12:1 – 14:23 – False Prophets

15:1-8 – Jerusalem as a useless charred vine

16:1-63 – Jerusalem as Yahweh’s adulterous wife

17:1-24 – The allegory of two eagles and a vine

18:1-32 – Individual responsibility

19: 1-14 – A lament over the rulers of Israel

20: 1-49 – A review of Israel’s history

21:1-32 – The sword of destruction

22:1- 31 – Sinful Jerusalem

23:1-49 – Two unfaithful sisters

24:1-14 – Sayings on the cooking pot

24:15-27 – The death of Ezekiel’s wife

PART 3 – ORACLES AGAINST THE SURROUNDING NATIONS – CHAPTERS 25-32

25:1-7 – Against Ammon

25:8-11 – Against Moab

25:12-14 – Against Edom

25:15-17 – Against the Philistines

26:1 – 28: 19 – Against Tyre

28:20 -26 – Against Sidon

29:1 – 32:16 – Against Egypt

PART 4 – A MESSAGE OF HOPE AND RESTORATION -CHAPTERS 33-39

33:1-20 – The prophet as watchman

33:21-22 – News of the Fall of Jerusalem

33:23-29 – Prophecy against those who remained in Jerusalem

33:30-33 – God addresses Ezekiel: a prophet whose predictions had been fulfilled

34:1-31 – The false shepherds of Israel and the true shepherd

35:1-15 – Oracle against Edom

36:1-38 – Renewal promised to Israel

37:1 -14 – The valley of dry bones

37: 15-28 – Two sticks – reunification

38:1-39:29 – Oracle against Gog of Magog

PART 5 – THE NEW ISRAEL – CHAPTERS 40-48

40:1 – 43:12 – The vision of a new temple

43:13 – 46:24 – The worship in the new temple

47:1-12 – The life-giving river

47:13-48:35 – The Land and the City

Posted in Exposition

WELCOME TO THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL!

Posted on by writtenexposition

Welcome to Ezekiel! What are today’s readers to make of this strange book, and of this weird prophet – someone who saw visions of fire, wheels and creatures with multiple wings and faces, and who shaved off his hair with a sword and did not mourn his own wife’s death? 

He was one of the writing prophets, men who were convinced that God spoke to them and through them. Their all-holy God controlled not just his own people but also the surrounding pagan nations and would definitely judge sin. Eventually, however, he would restore his people and all creation. When did they write?

These prophets were active for several centuries after the time of King Solomon. Following his death in 931 BCE the kingdom divided into two territories: Israel to the North and Judah in the South.

THE PRE-EXILIC PROPHETS

The prophets addressing Israel (and the approximate dates of their ministries) were;

Jonah c. 780 -753 BCE

Amos c. 765-753 BCE

Hosea c. 755-725 BCE

 In 722/721 BCE the Northern nation Israel was taken into captivity in Assyria and the Southern nation, Judah, continued as an independent state.

The early pre-exilic prophets in Judah were:

Micah c. 735-690 BCE

Isaiah c. 740-680 BCE

The late pre-exilic prophets in Judah were:

Nahum c. 630 BCE

Zephaniah c. 625 BCE

Habakkuk c. 607 BCE

Joel c. 590 BCE

Jeremiah c. 627-580 BCE

In 587/586 BCE the city of Jerusalem fell to the Babylonian army and there was a mass deportation of Jews to Babylon .

THE EXILIC PROPHETS

Obadiah ? c. 585 BCE – we do not know when he prophesied.

Ezekiel c. 593-571 BCE

Daniel c. 605-535 BCE

THE POST-EXILIC PROPHETS

Haggai 520 BCE

Zechariah c. 520-500 BCE

Malachi c 420 BCE

Daniel (Dan chp. 1) had been taken to Babylon in 605 BCE when Nebuchadnezzar invaded Judah under King Jehoiakim after defeating the Egyptians at the battle of Carchemish (see Jer 46.) Some years later (597 BCE), ten years before the fall of Jerusalem in 587 and the Exile, Nebuchadnezzar deported King Jehoiachin of Judah and ten thousand of the political and religious elite into captivity in Babylon. Ezekiel was one of those elite. 2 Kings 24:8-16:

8 Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother’s name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem.

9 And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father had done.

10 At that time the servants of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up against Jerusalem, and the city was besieged.

11 And Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came against the city, and his servants did besiege it.

12 And Jehoiachin the king of Judah went out to the king of Babylon, he, and his mother, and his servants, and his princes, and his officers: and the king of Babylon took him in the eighth year of his reign.

13 And he carried out thence all the treasures of the house of the LORD, and the treasures of the king’s house, and cut in pieces all the vessels of gold which Solomon king of Israel had made in the temple of the LORD, as the LORD had said.

14 And he carried away all Jerusalem, and all the princes, and all the mighty men of valour, even ten thousand captives, and all the craftsmen and smiths: none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of the land.

15 And he carried away Jehoiachin to Babylon, and the king’s mother, and the king’s wives, and his officers, and the mighty of the land, those carried he into captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon.

16 And all the men of might, even seven thousand, and craftsmen and smiths a thousand, all that were strong and apt for war, even them the king of Babylon brought captive to Babylon.

Ezekiel was therefore in exile in Babylon during the final siege and fall of Jerusalem. Although based far away in Babylon, he prophesied to the people living back in the homeland, Judah.

Ezekiel wrote in the first person throughout his long and complex book which is is grim and intimidating. He experienced strange visions and often dwelt on God’s wrath. The Book of Ezekiel, however, is quite easy to follow as it is highly organized and precise. The prophet records the dates of sixteen revelations and for eleven of those he gives the year, the month and the day (1:2; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 29:1; 29:17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:21; 33:21; 40:1).

Posted in Roman names

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 3)

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Acts 26:1-32

PAUL’S DEFENCE BEFORE KING HEROD AGRIPPA II

Luke’s account of Paul’s ‘apologia’ (defence) in Acts 26 consists of a speech by Paul and an interruption by Festus, followed by a closing dialogue between Paul and Agrippa.

26:1-23 Paul’s defence speech.

26:24-26 Festus’ interruption.

26:27-29 Closing dialogue.

26:1-12 Paul addresses the first charge.

After Agrippa invited him to speak Paul stretched out his hand in ancient oratorical style and ‘answered for himself’ (26:1). The same verb – ‘I shall answer for myself’ – occurs in verse 2. This verb is apologéomai, meaning: to defend or plead for oneself. Although the noun is not used in Acts chapter 26 the usual description of this speech as a ‘defence’ before Agrippa is justified because of Paul’s use of the verb ‘to defend’.

Paul began by courteously addressing Agrippa and saying that he considered himself blessed to be making his defence before him because the king was a recognized expert on Jewish affairs. Paul refers to ‘all the things’ of which he ‘is being accused’ by the Jews. These accusations are the two sets of charges that have been previously identified:

A) That he was anti-Jewish, teaching against the law and the people and profaning the Temple (21:28-29; 25:8).

B) Political agitation and disturbance of the Roman peace (24:5; 25:8).

Paul maintained, and continued to maintain before Agrippa (26:8), that in reality the first set of charges boiled down to the question of belief in resurrection. He explained that he was well-known in Jerusalem where he had lived from his youth. He was famous as a Pharisee, following the rules of the strictest sect in Judaism. The Jews who had been accusing him knew very well that there was no chance of him desecrating the temple or preaching against Judaism. That, according to Paul, was not the real issue. He was being judged for ‘the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers.’

Agrippa would have been aware that ‘the promise’ was the Messianic hope. Paul later clarified (26:8) that this hope included the resurrection of Jesus as proof that he really was the promised Messiah (26:23). It had been promised to the patriarchs (26:6) and been predicted by the prophets and in the torah (26:23). The strange thing was that the Jews, who had this ‘hope’, did not accept Paul’s message that ‘the hope’ had been fulfilled.

Although Jews, of all people, ought to have recognized this fulfilment Paul himself had made the same mistake. He was a Pharisee, and therefore theoretically a believer in resurrection, but had not accepted the fact that Jesus had risen from the dead. Paul had been so strongly opposed to the idea that he actively undertook an obsessive personal campaign of persecution against Christian believers. Chapter 26:9-11 details his involvement.

Thus, in this first part of his speech (26:4-12), Paul addressed the charge that he was anti-Jewish by outlining his past life as a strict Jew and by asserting that the resurrection (of Jesus) is compatible with Jewish messianic teaching. By using such expressions as ‘mine own nation’ (v. 4), ‘our religion’ (v. 5), ‘our fathers’ (v.6), and ‘our twelve tribes’ Paul emphasized that he still considered himself to be a Jew.

26:13-23 Paul addresses the second charge.

Paul’s response to the second charge (that he was a political revolutionary) was to ‘tell the story of his conversion’, explain his mission and give a potted history of his evangelistic activity up to that point in time (‘unto this day’ v. 22). Verses 13-23 may be divided into three sections:

A Christophany (13-15)

A Commission (15-18)

A Change (19-23)

A CHRISTOPHANY – OUTSIDE DAMASCUS (vv. 13-15)

Just as Luke records three accounts of the conversion of Cornelius (Acts 10:1-44; 11:5-17; 15:7-11) in the Acts of the Apostles so he also includes three accounts (9: 9-19; 22: 4-16; 26:12-18) of what we commonly refer to as ‘Paul’s ‘conversion’. This is the third of the three. Paul himself did not use the term ‘conversion.’ What Paul relates was by no means a typical experience and strictly speaking not even a conversion (since he did not begin to worship a different God or leave his ancestral faith). Strangely, however, Paul later wrote that it was a ‘pattern’ (1 Tim 1:16) for ensuing conversions. He referred to the Damascus Road experience five times in his epistles (1 Cor 9:1; 15:8; 2 Cor 4:6; Gal 1:11-17; Phil 3:6-8).

Here Paul relates a vivid story which includes exciting details of:

  • The Journey: Paul travelling to Damascus with authority from the Jewish religious leaders to persecute Christians (26:12).
  • The Light: A light at noon that was brighter than the sun (26:13).
  • The Voice: A voice asking why he kept persecuting him (Jesus). The voice addressed him by name in Aramaic: ‘Saoúl, Saoúl’. This is the third of three names for the apostle in the Greek text of the book of Acts. The other names are Saúlos (which is a transliteration of his Hebrew name Sha’ūl) and the Hellenistic name Paúlos. (N.B. Contrary to what one might think the name change from Saul to Paul was not due to his conversion but occurs at Acts 13:9 when Paul was in Cyprus before the Roman proconsul Sergius Paulus. The name change signified the change in priority from Jews to Gentiles.)

A COMMISSION – TO EVANGELIZE JEWS AND GENTILES (vv. 15-18)

Addressing the issue of stirring up political unrest, Paul told Agrippa that Jesus had confronted him in a vision outside Damascus in order to appoint (procheirízomai) him ‘a minister’ (hupērétēs) and a witness (márturos).’

These terms would have been familiar to Festus and Agrippa as there would have been several of each in any courtroom. Note that an ‘assistant’ (minister) worked with documents (i.e. handling and delivering them e.g. Luke 4:20). John Mark is called this in Acts 13:5.

Paul claimed that since the Christophany his sole motivation in life had been obedience to Christ’s instructions which had been accompanied by a promise of deliverance from hostile Jews and Gentiles. Paul had been given a special commission to go to the Gentiles in order:

  • to open their eyes
  • to turn them from darkness to light
  • to turn them from the power of Satan to God
  • that they might receive forgiveness of sins
  • that they might obtain a place among them who are made holy (set apart to do God’s will) through faith in Jesus.

A CHANGE – IN PAUL’S LIFE (vv. 19-23)

Paul’s told Agrippa that his life had dramatically changed as a result of the vision of a heavenly being and gave a short account of his activities as a preacher and of the message he preached. That he was preoccupied with preaching the gospel across a wide geographical area answered the second charge levied against him; that he was a political agitator and disturber of the peace (25:8). He was motivated by the heavenly vision, not by political fervour.

Just like that of the earlier Christians in 1:8 there are four geographic divisions in Paul’s programme of outreach. His differs slightly in that his ministry began in Damascus where he was just after his conversion. He preached there (9:19-20) and in Jerusalem (9:28-29) but Acts does not record a preaching tour of Judaea, although such could possibly fit into 15:3-4. The summary of Paul’s missionary career in Galatians 1 gives no details of a period of ministry in Judaea but rather states (Gal 1:22) that Paul was personally unknown to the churches in Judaea. In an interesting article Lewis (1899, pp. 244-248) suggests that Paul’s ministry was not in person but through writing the Letter to the Hebrews during his time of imprisonment in Caesarea and arranging for it to be circulated throughout Judaea. Lewis identifies similarities in the thought and language of Acts 26 and the Letter to the Hebrews. Paul’s missionary activity began with Jews and then extended to the Gentile pagans.

Paul’s message was that his hearers were to repent, turn to God and do works ‘meet for repentance’. The idea is that their repentance could be viewed as sincere if it resulted in changed lives.

26:21 It was ‘for these causes’ that Jews sought to kill Paul. This might be a reference to what Paul had outlined in vv.16-20 but is more likely a reference to the charges that had been brought against him. In any case, with help from God, he had continued with his mission right up to that present time and was convinced that what he preached to everyone (both small and great) was nothing less, or more, than the message of the Old Testament (the prophets and Moses). He then summarizes this message in v. 23:

  • That the Messiah was to suffer
  • That the Messiah would be the first to rise from the dead
  • That the Messiah would show light to Israel and the Gentiles

Note that the unusual order ‘the prophets and Moses’ is the order of the Letter to the Hebrews (Heb 1:1; 3:2), as is ‘small and great’ (Heb 8:11).

FESTUS’ INTERRUPTION (vv. 24-26)

Although Paul’s speech had come to a close the outburst by Festus is usually treated as an interruption. This is because Paul had addressed his remarks to King Agrippa (26:4-23) but it was the Roman procurator Festus who spoke up loudly, telling Paul that great learning had driven him mad. Obviously Festus had been listening carefully but did not understand about resurrection. There had already been a hint of this in Acts 25:19. Festus reckoned that lit ‘many writings’ (possibly a reference to the Old Testament) had driven Paul insane.

Paul courteously addressed Festus as ‘most noble’ and assured him of his sanity and that the words he spoke were truthful and sound. Referring to Agrippa who had a good understanding of the Jewish religion (26:3) Paul said that the King knew that the death and resurrection of Jesus and associated events were public knowledge (‘not done in a corner’) and thus true and verifiable.

CLOSING DIALOGUE (vv. 27-29)

Turning from indirect to direct speech Paul called upon Agrippa as an expert witness and as one who knew that the prophets had prophesied the death and resurrection of the Messiah to confirm his belief in those prophecies.

‘King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets? I know that thou believest.’

Unfortunately Agrippa sidestepped the question with a frivolous and humorous comment: ‘Soon you will convince me to play (theatrical term) the Christian’. Since it was clear that Agrippa had not come to faith in Christ Paul had the last word and said that he wished that all those present were like himself, apart from the chains. Barrett (2002, p. 393) comments: ‘Paul’s desire to make Christians applies to the least and to the greatest, to the king himself. Paul wishes for all his hearers the election, the call and the commission he himself has.’

At that point King Agrippa, Festus, Bernice and their legal advisers rose and left. Luke reports that as they talked together about the day’s proceedings Agrippa spoke positively of Paul and explained to Festus that had Paul not already appealed to Caesar he could have been released. The New Testament has nothing further to say about Festus or Agrippa.

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 1)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Part 2)

KING HEROD AGRIPPA II (Bibliography)

Posted in Exposition

2 PETER 3:1-18 THE LORD’S RETURN

Posted on by writtenexposition

THE CERTAINTY OF THE LORD’S RETURN

3:1-2 COMMANDMENT

3:3-7 CONTEMPT

3:8-9 CONSTRAINT

3:10-13 CATASTROPHE

3:14-18 COUNSEL

‘This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance: That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour: 2 Pet 3:1-2

3:1-2 COMMANDMENT

Peter now turns from his tirade against false teachers to focus his attention on his readers and encourage them by addressing the disturbing topic of the delay of the Parousia. This seems to have been a problem for the early Christians, as they expected the return of the Lord during their lifetime.

[1] Peter addresses his readers as ‘beloved’ (agapētoí). This term was used by the New Testament writers to denote believers. It must, therefore, have been encouraging for Peter’s suffering readers to realise that they were loved with God’s deep unconditional love. The word occurs here in v.1 for the first time in 2 Peter but is used three more times in this same chapter; in vv.8, 14 and 17.

We learn that this is the second letter that he has written to them, the first must have been 1 Peter. The purpose of his writing is by way of reminder, he has already told them this in 1:13. He wants to stir up their ‘pure minds’ (sincere disposition). Diánoia means intellect or the thinking faculty. The idea is that of ‘true discernment.’

He wishes to remind them of topics addressed in his first letter which would include living a holy life, avoiding immorality, a glorious future for believers and doom for the wicked.

[2] He wants them to recall the words previously spoken by the holy prophets and the apostles of the Lord and Saviour.

‘prophets’ The reference could be to New Testament prophets but is more likely to be to Old Testament prophets since the prophets in 1 Peter (1:10-12) were clearly Old Testament as they lived before Christ.

‘apostles’ This is probably a reference to the missionaries who evangelised their part of Asia Minor. Peter associates himself with them.

‘the commandment’ In the context this may refer to a command to watch for the Lord’s return e.g. Mk 13:33-37.

‘Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished. But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.‘ 2 Pet 3:3-7

3:3-7 CONTEMPT

[3] Peter singles out what he views as the main point (‘understanding this first’ – same phrase as 1:20a) of the message of the Old Testament prophets and the New Testament apostles; that in the last days there will be ‘scoffers with scoffing’. Those who deny prophecy are themselves the subject of prophecy. This expression ‘scoffers will come to scoff’ emphasizes the activity of the false teachers. He goes on to say that they will not only be irreverent but also immoral, as they will ‘walk after their own lusts’ (see 2:10a). ‘walking’ is used to denote behaviour. The word ‘scoffer’ (empaíktēs) occurs only here and in Jude 1:18 in the New Testament.

‘in the last days’ This is a biblical term for the final days (usually thought of by Christians as the time between Christ’s ascension and second coming) e.g. Isa 2:2; Dan 2:28; Hos 3:5; Mic 4:1; Acts 2:17; Heb 1:2.

[4] ‘Where is?’ i.e ‘What has happened to?’ This expresses skepticism (Psa 42:10; Jer 17:15; Mal 2:17).

‘promise’ This is a key word in this chapter: vv. 4, 9, 13, see also 1:4.

‘coming’ parousía

‘fathers’ ancestors. This possibly refers to the first generation Christians who had died, or probably to the Old Testament patriarchs (Jn 6:31; Rom 9:5; Heb 1:1).

‘fell asleep’ – This is a metaphorical way of saying ‘died’ (Mt 27:52; 1 Cor 15:6,18).

The scoffers had decided that since nothing had changed since the beginning of the world they were free to indulge their own passions (v.3b).

[5-7] Peter answers these two objections of the scoffers in reverse order. In vv.5-7 he addresses their view that all things have remained stable since the beginning (4b) and then in vv. 8-10 addresses the question ‘Where is the promise of his coming?’ (4a).

Objection 1. All things have remained stable since the beginning.

According to Peter the scoffers deliberately ignore the fact that the heavens and the earth (i.e the universe) were created by the word of God and that, far from allowing them to continue unchanged, he has intervened and destroyed them once already by the Flood (see also 1 Pet. 3:20-21; 2 Pet 2:5). Drawing upon Genesis 1:2, 6-7, according to which only water existed before the formation of the universe, Peter says that the heavens and earth were formed ‘out of water’ and ‘by means of water’. They (the heavens and the earth meaning: ‘the world that then existed’) were therefore destroyed by the very element from which they were formed.

‘whereby” by which. This is usually taken to refer to the water but since ‘which’ is in the plural the antecedent might be ‘word’ as well as ‘water’, in that case we have ‘the two agents of creation cooperating in destruction’ (C. Bigg cited by J.N.D. Kelly, 1969, P.360).

In v.7 Peter accepts a tradition found in Jewish apocalyptic writings that the universe will be destroyed by fire. This is the only biblical reference to that, although there are many that speak of fire as the instrument of God to destroy his enemies. The universe is reserved by the same word for future judgement by fire. Peter’s emphasis is not on the fire but on the judgement. This will fall on ‘ungodly men’, undoubtedly this is a sideways swipe at the false teachers and scoffers.

Peter’s answer to the claim that all things have continued undisturbed from the beginning is that the world has not always remained stable. God does intervene and has done so at the Flood. This gives good grounds for believing that he will do so again in the future (see Mt 24:37-39).

‘But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.’ 2 Pet 3:8-9

CONSTRAINT

[8-9]

‘You must not fail to notice’ Again addressing them as ‘beloved’ (see v.1), Peter uses the same expression as that in v.5 (‘are ignorant of’) – with the ‘you’ in v.8 standing in contrast to the ‘they’ of v.5.

Objection 2. ‘Where is the promise of his coming?’

Peter now answers that question and makes three main points in his explanation of the delay:

1. The Lord does not calculate time the way we do (v.8).

God does not distinguish between one day and a thousand years. He bases this upon Psa 90:4 (‘For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night’) to show that the time of the Parousia and Day of the Lord cannot be predicted accurately. He is NOT hinting that in scripture one day equals a thousand years

2. The Lord is patient and gives opportunity for people to repent (v.9).

The Lord (i.e. God as in v.8) is not slow (in the sense of ‘slack’ – bradúnō ) about his ‘promise’ (same word as v.4), as some (the scoffers and those who have been influenced by them) reckon slowness (i.e. due to negligence) but the delay is due to his forbearance (makrothuméō – long anger). He delays judgement because he desires that all should repent and none perish ( e.g. 1 Pet 3:20)

3. The Day of the Lord will come suddenly (v.10)

God’s patience does not mean that the judgement will never come and, in fact, the delay will have intensified divine judgement (v.10).

‘But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.’ 2 Pet 3:10-13

3:10-13 CATASTROPHE

[10] Despite what seems like a long delay (v.9) the Day of the Lord (Jer 46:10; Joel 2:1–11; Amos 5:18–20) will certainly come (Acts 17:30-31); like a ‘thief in the night’ (Mt 24:43; Lk12:39; 1Thess 5:2; Rev 3:3; 16:15). It will be sudden and unexpected, but not for believers, 1 Thess 5:4.

The Day of the Lord will bring catastrophe for the universe because ‘the heavens will pass away with a rushing sound, the celestial bodies will will be set ablaze and disintegrate’ (translation by J.N. D. Kelly, 1969, p.364)

‘Elements’ (stoicheíon – one of a row, plural – series) can mean either the basic elements of which everything in the universe is composed (earth, air, fire, water) or celestial bodies like stars. ‘Earth’ here probably refers to the planet rather than the people who live on it. All that humans have done on it will be done away with. The Old Testament background is probably Isa 34:4. See Rev 14:13 for what happens to the works of Christians.

[11] Peter maintains that this prediction of a future catastrophe ought to stimulate Christians to holy living in the here and now. They should not get overly attached to the things of this world, for those will not last. He presents this in the form of a question (vv.11-12) containing the challenging and memorable phrase: ‘What manner of persons ought ye to be?’

[12] Unlike the false teachers and scoffers, who deny the reality of the Lord’s second coming, believers should look forward to it, and even hasten it. Speúdō can either mean ‘earnestly desiring’ (Isa 16:5) or ‘urge on, hasten on.’ Since the Lord desires that all should come to repentance presumably the acceleration of the ‘Day of God’ can be brought about through prayer and evangelism, resulting in people repenting and converting. Peter had earlier preached this idea of repentance and conversion speeding up Christ’s return in a sermon recorded in Acts chapter 3:

‘Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord, and that he may send the Messiah, who has been appointed for you—even Jesus. Heaven must receive him until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago through his holy prophets.’ Acts 3:19-21 NIV

The ‘coming’ (parousía) of the Day of God. Here parousía does not refer to a person, as in v.4a, but a day.

That Day of God (see Rev 16:14), also known as the ‘Day of the Lord’, will generate cosmic destruction. The heavens will be destroyed (loosed or broken up) and the elements will melt.

[13] The positive thing, according to Peter, is that the universe will not be annihilated but remodelled. The idea seems to be that of purification rather than total destruction. The transformation will inaugurate a new era.

The intensity of divine judgement should not cause the Christians to despair but rather cause them to hope as they can look forward to new heavens and a new earth. Two things are said about this new creation:

1. Righteousness dwells in it.

At present the believers face opposition from false teachers and scoffers but they can look forward to the future state in which unrighteous people like those will be excluded.

2. It is ‘according to his promise’.

‘his’ i.e. God’s, refers back to ‘[Day of]God’ v.12

The promise referred to is Isa 65:17 (see also Isa 66:22; Rev 20:11; 21:1):

‘For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.’

‘Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless. And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own steadfastness. But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen.’ 2 Pet 3:14-18

3:14-18 COUNSEL

[14] Since they have ‘these things’ (new heavens and a new earth) to look forward to Peter again emphasizes the need for the Christians to live a holy life.

‘look forward to’ – the same verb (prosdokáō) as in v.12 and v.13.

‘be diligent’ – make an effort, also 2 Pet 1:10,15.

‘at peace’ – The state of reconciliation with God, 1 Pet 1:2, 2 Pet 1:2.

‘without spot or blemish’ This contrasts with the scoffers who in 2:13 are said to be ‘spots and blemishes.’ This means that the Christians are to be eager to be like Christ himself (1 Pet 1:19; Eph 1:4; 5:27).

‘to be found of him’ i.e. in the sight of the Lord (judgement) at his Coming.

[15] Unlike the scoffers who considered it slackness (v.9) the Christians are to ‘reckon’ that God’s (‘the Lord’ vv. 8,9,10 + Day of God v.12)) forbearance is salvation. This is a repetition of the idea in v.9 that God delays the parousia and judgement because he desires that all repent.

Peter uses Paul for further confirmation and says that he counts Paul ‘a beloved brother.’ He refers to Paul’s correspondence which was circulating among the churches and says that Paul had written something similar, ‘in virtue of the wisdom given to him’ (1 Cor 2:6-16; Col 1:28). Peter may have had Rom 2:4 or Rom 3:25-26 in mind, but what epistles and what passages he means is left rather vague.

In more general terms, Peter must have felt that Paul’s teaching supported his own exhortations to Christians to lead holy lives in view of the Second Coming.

[16] It is unclear from 2 Peter (3:1) exactly what group of Christians this letter is addressed to. It is also impossible for us to know what, if anything, Paul had written specifically to them. Peter mentions ‘all’ Paul’s letters, which would suggest that the Christians in Asia Minor had access to a collection. This may have been more than just the three addressed to churches in Asia Minor; Galatians, Ephesians and Colossians.

Peter notes that Paul’s letters are difficult and easily misunderstood. He was concerned about false teachers taking parts of Paul’s letters out of context and using them to back up their version of Christian freedom, i.e. license. The false teachers twist Paul’s letters to their own perdition, as they do the other scriptures. What are ‘the other writings’ Peter refers to? They were probably the Old Testament books and the New Testament Gospels. Peter is certainly saying that the false teachers distort these in the same way as they do Paul’s writings. Some commentators, however, go further and maintain that Peter is denoting Paul’s letters as authoritative and inspired and that here he is putting them on a par with the other writings.

[17-18] In these two verses Peter repeats his warning against false teachers, encourages the Christians to grow in grace and knowledge and concludes his letter with a doxology to Jesus Christ. He reminds the believers that since they have been forewarned they are to ‘beware’. They are ‘to be on guard’ (phulássō keep watch), this is the same verb as ‘saved’ in 2:5. They are to take care:

negatively:

a. Not to be carried away by the error of lawless or unprincipled people.

b. Not to fall from their own stability (he has already told them that they are stable in 1:12)

positively:

i. They are to grow in grace (God’s favour) and

ii. They are to grow in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

‘to him [be or belongs – there is no verb in the original] glory now and to the day of eternity (lit. the day of the age).’ All the glory is to go to Christ alone for forever. Amen.

Posted in Exposition

2 PETER 1:12-21 COMMENTARY

Posted on by writtenexposition

PETER’S TESTAMENT AND THE INTEGRITY OF THE APOSTLES AND PROPHETS

‘Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the present truth. Yea, I think it meet, as long as I am in this tabernacle, to stir you up by putting you in remembrance; Knowing that shortly I must put off this my tabernacle, even as our Lord Jesus Christ hath showed me. Moreover I will endeavour that ye may be able after my decease to have these things always in remembrance. For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty. For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. And this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him in the holy mount. We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.’ 2 Pet 1:12-21

[12-15] PETER’S TESTAMENT

There are two main themes in these four verses; remembrance and Peter’s forthcoming death. The fact that he will die soon makes it important that the believers keep his teaching in mind. Each of the themes is mentioned three times.

REMEMBRANCE (12, 13, 15)

  • v.12 ‘Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things’.
  • v.13 ‘I think it meet, __ to stir you up by putting you in remembrance.’
  • v.15 ‘that ye may be able__ to have these things always in remembrance.’

PETER’S DEATH (13, 14, 15)

  • v.13 ‘as long as I am in this tabernacle.’
  • v.14 ‘shortly I must put off my tabernacle’
  • v.15 ‘after my decease.’

These verses are an example of a genre known as ‘testament.’ This is a written farewell speech in which the author predicts his death, emphasizes his legacy as a teacher and warns that some will come after his death and attack his memory and teachings. For other New Testament examples see: Jn 15;1-17:26; Acts 20:17-38; Phil 1:12-30.

[12] ‘these things’ i.e. Peter’s teaching in the previous section.

‘I intend to keep on reminding you of these things’ Since Peter will soon be dead, he must mean that his letter will be an ongoing reminder of him and his teaching. He encourages his readers by saying that they are already familiar with the truth and need to be established in it. The other uses of words in the same group (from sterixo, ‘to make fast’) at 2:14; 3:16,17 suggest that some of these believers were vulnerable and unsteady.

[13-14] In 2 Peter ‘tabernacle’ or ‘tent’ is a metaphor for ‘body’ (1:13-14), the word only occurs elsewhere in the NT in Acts 7:43, 46. The use here conveys the thought that our lives on earth are transitory.

This reminds me of the refrain of hymn No. 48 in The Believer’s Hymnbook:

Here in the body pent,
Absent from Him I roam,
Yet nightly pitch my moving tent
A day’s march nearer home.

Peter, too, was aware that he would soon die, in fact he says that the Lord Jesus Christ had made it clear to him. Two other references relating to predictions about Peter’s death are Jn 13:36-38 and Jn 21:18-19.

[15] Peter speaks of his death as an ‘exodus’. Within the space of just a few verses we learn that for the believer death is not just an éxodos (departure 1:15) from this life but also an eísodos (entrance 1:11) into the eternal kingdom.

[16-18] THE INTEGRITY OF THE APOSTLES

In this section Peter uses the Transfiguration as proof of the reliability of Christ’s future power and coming and emphasizes that he, with other apostles, was present:

  • v. 16 ‘we were eyewitnesses (epóptēs -only occurs here in NT)
  • v. 18 ‘we heard this voice’
  • v.18 ‘we were with him’

They saw Christ’s ‘majesty.’ Verses 17-18 expand on this vision of Christ’s megaleiótēs (‘greatness’)

Peter maintains that the Transfiguration was not a cleverly devised fable but a genuine historical event that foreshadowed Christ’s parousia. The teaching about Christ’s power (dúnamis) and coming (parousía) is therefore said to be reliable. ‘Power’ is linked with Christ’s resurrection in Rom 1:4. In the New Testament ‘parousia’ never refers to Christ’s first coming (Incarnation) but always to his Second Coming, e.g. Mt 24:3. 37, 39; 1 Thess 2:19; 3:13; 4:15; 5:23; 2 Thess 2:1, 8; Jas 5:7,8; 1 Jn 2:28.

[17] ‘excellent (majestic) glory’ i.e . God.

[18] ‘voice which came from heaven’ i.e. the voice of God.

The above are examples of a type of synecdoche known as abstractum pro concreto, when an abstract concept is used for something concrete.

[19-21] THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROPHETS

Not only does the trustworthy testimony of apostles who have seen Christ’s majesty and heard God’s voice declare that Jesus is the Son of God confirm the reliability of the teaching about the parousia but the teaching is also founded upon the reliability of scripture.

[19] ‘We have also a more sure word of prophecy’ What Peter had seen and heard on the mountain is confirmed by the Scriptures. The identity of the Prophetic Word is not given. The term may refer to the Old Testament scriptures as a whole, because they speak of Christ. Verse 20, however, would imply that a particular prophecy is in mind. Since it is not specified it must have been well-known to the original readers of the letter. A couple of possibilities are Num 24:17 and Dan 7:13-14.

‘I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Scepter shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth.’ Num 24:17

‘I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.’ Dan 7:13-14

The latter passage is used eschatologically in Mt 26:64; Mk 13:26; 14:62; Rev 1:7, so it may be the most likely candidate.

The Christians in Asia Minor to whom Peter is writing are advised to pay attention to the message of prophecy as it is like a lamp shining in a dark world ‘until day dawns’ and the morning star arises in their hearts. Since there is no article preceding ‘day’ the reference is not to a specific day (e.g. The Day of the Lord) but just a contrast between darkness and dawn. When day dawns darkness will vanish!

In Lk 1:78 Jesus is called ‘the dawn from on high’ and in Rev 22:16 ‘the bright morning star.’

‘in your hearts’ Peter talks about the effect the parousia will have on believers. It will banish all doubt and uncertainty and for them the light from the lamp of the prophetic word will give way to the glorious illumination of eternal day. A new future age will begin.

[20-21] These verses emphasize that scripture is divinely inspired.

‘no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation’ Who is the individual doing the interpreting? The reader or the prophet? Both are possible.

1. The reader: no individual is permitted to interpret scripture according to their own ideas but in accordance with what is intended by the Holy Spirit.

2. The prophet: what any genuine prophet prophesies does not come from himself but God.

The reason is given in v. 21. Prophecy came via human beings, but they were moved by the Holy Spirit. What the prophets spoke and wrote was prompted by God.

Peter stresses the reliability of the teaching of the apostolic witnesses and of the Old Testament scriptures about the Lord’s parousia and coming judgement because he is about to deal with the topic of false teachers who scornfully reject these promises.

Posted in Exposition

(3) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

Posted on by writtenexposition



‘the fact that the light has never been quenched is proved by the witness of the prophets, above all by the witness of John the Baptist, the last of the prophets and the herald of Christ. But his function as a witness has to be clearly distinguished from that to which witness is given – the light, which became flesh in Jesus Christ.’

The Fourth Gospel identifies the purpose of John the Baptist’s appearance and ministry as that of ‘witness’. In the Prologue the two mentions of John as witness are inserted at strategic points, reinforcing what has been said. Verse seven (‘to bear witness of the light’) harks back to what is said in verse five about the coming of the light and verse fifteen to what is said in verse fourteen about what Ridderbos (1997, p.42) calls ‘Jesus’ antecedent transcendent glory.’


Trites (2004, p.78ff.) argues convincingly that the Fourth Gospel ‘presents a sustained use of juridical metaphor’. She maintains that ‘in the Fourth Gospel God Incarnate has a lawsuit with the world’ (p.79). She indicates that in the first twelve chapters, which deal mainly with the conflict between Jesus and “the Jews”, John is stating a case, advancing his arguments, challenging his opponents and presenting his witnesses. She understands the idea of witness in John’s gospel in terms of Old Testament legal language and points out that other juridical words such as judge, judgement, cause, accuse and convince are also used in a context of debate or hostility.


Her assessment of John the Baptist as witness (p.91) is insightful:


‘John is the first and one of the most important witnesses to Jesus and his testimony is a threefold one, as the Prologue makes clear: (1) He is not the Light. (2) He is sent to bear witness to the Light. (3) The purpose of his witness-bearing is that all may believe in Christ (1:6-8). This pattern is followed in subsequent sections dealing with the Baptist. John is mentioned at the beginning of the Fourth Gospel , for he is the first to point his fellow men to Jesus, and in that sense all believers have been brought to Christ through him (1:7b). While there had been other men sent from God, John’s task was unique. He bore witness to the incarnate Word, to his superiority to himself, and to his prior existence.’


Others said to be witnesses in the Fourth Gospel include: Jesus Himself (3:11; 5:31; 8:13-14; 18:37), the Samaritan woman (4:39), God the Father (5:32,34,37; 8:18; I John 5:9), Scripture (John 5:39), the works of Christ (5:36), the crowd at the raising of Lazarus (John 12:17), the Spirit (15:26-27; I John 5:10,11), the disciples (John 15:27; 19:35; I John 1:2; 4:14), and the author himself (John 21:24).

Although John the Baptist was sent from God as a witness to the Light he is portrayed as insignificant in comparison with the Light itself. Jesus called him a ‘lamp’ (5:35) but he was certainly not the Light. The writer of the Gospel asserts John’s subordination to Jesus (1:20, 27, 29, 33, 36) and strongly denies that John the Baptist is the Messiah. According to Luke 3:15 some people thought that John the Baptist might be the Messiah’. In the Prologue John gives no information on John the Baptist but concentrates only on his function as a witness to the Light.



‘It is employed with two different nuances in this verse. In the first two instances the reference is to the created world, the world that constitutes humanity’s environment and that includes humanity itself. In the third instance – the world did not know him- the reference is to the world of humanity that by its response reveals its devastating plight of having become alienated from and hostile to the Word/Light that sustains it. It is this second negative connotation of ‘world’ that will become dominant in the Fourth Gospel.’

(1) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(2) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(4) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(5) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.

(6) THEMES IN THE PROLOGUE TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.