Tag: Zedekiah

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 21:18-32 – The Third Oracle Concerning YHWH’s Sword

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

This is the third and last of the oracles concerning YHWH’s sword in Ezekiel chapter 21. The oracle commences by focusing on the approach of the king of Babylon to a fork in the road and his use of divination to decide his path of conquest. Which branch of the road should he take – the one to Rabbath the capital of Ammon or the one to Jerusalem? Although seemingly guided by the omens, it is ultimately YHWH who directs him to go and lay siege to Jerusalem.

YHWH then directly addresses Zedekiah, the ‘profane and wicked prince of Israel,’ and prophesies his downfall. After that the focus shifts to the Ammonites and the judgement that will come upon them.

DIVISION

18-23 The sword at the crossroads.

24-27 Judgement upon Judah and its king.

28-32 Judgement upon the Ammonites

EXPOSITION

THE SWORD AT THE CROSSROADS (18-23)

(18-20) The oracle starts with the usual prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me again, saying’ followed by a reference to the prophet as ‘son of Adam.’ Ezekiel is given instructions that are reminiscent of chapter 4 where he was told to portray the siege of Jerusalem on a clay tile. Now he is told to draw a diagram representing the path that ‘the sword of the king of Babylon’ will take on a journey to deal with revolts by the kingdoms of Judah and Ammon. Nebuchadnezzar is thus identified as ‘the slayer’ of v.11.

Ezekiel is to sketch two routes that Nebuchadnezzar could follow. The road out of ‘one land’ (Babylonia) forks (cf. ‘the head of the way’ 16:25, 31) near a certain city (possibly Damascus). At this fork/crossroads Ezekiel is to ‘choose a place’ (place = hand, index, direction – Num 2:17; Jer 6:3), i.e. draw a signpost. The signpost indicates that one branch of the road leads to Rabbath Ammon (Deut 3:11) and the other to fortified Jerusalem. The sword (Nebuchadnezzar) will smite both destinations but which one will he go to first? The Ammonites seem to think that they will not be attacked (cf. v.29) but Jer 4:5 suggests that in Judah preparations were in place for the people to gather in ‘fortified’ Jerusalem for safety.

(21-23) Verses 21-22 explain the drawing. The crossroads represents a location at which King Nebuchadnezzar’s army comes to a standstill while the king and his soothsayers use three techniques of ancient divination to decide which city to attack first:

Omens appearing on the right side of the liver were considered auspicious and those on the left unlucky. Verse 22 represents Nebuchadnezzar as receiving favourable omens and, on that basis, deciding to invade Judah first.

The Babylonians will attack Jerusalem, set up battering rams, cause slaughter, sound a war cry, and prepare to storm the city. Similar preparations for siege warfare are described in Ezek 4:2.

(23) And it shall be unto them as a false divination in their sight, to them that have sworn oaths: but he will call to remembrance the iniquity, that they may be taken.

‘Them’ and ‘their’ refers to the Judeans (exiles and those in Judah) who will view as false the omens that Ezekiel predicts Nebuchadnezzar will get. This is because they are depending on their covenant with YHWH and thus expect him to protect them and send Nebuchadnezzar to punish the heathen Ammonites. YHWH, however, will remember that the people of Judah have not adhered to the stipulations of the Sinai covenant; with the result that he will judge them by allowing them to be seized (by the Babylonians).

JUDGEMENT UPON JUDAH AND ITS KING (24-27)

(24) Verse 24 refers back (‘therefore’) to v.23 and says much the same thing. The people of Judah are guilty and their iniquity has so attracted YHWH’s attention that he recalls all their wrongdoings and as punishment will deliver them to Nebuchadnezzar. They will be ‘taken with the hand,’ i.e. grasped by the hand of the slayer of v.11.

The divination rituals used by Nebuchadnezzar, although superstitious and forbidden to the Israelites, are sovereignly used by YHWH to bring about the attack on Jerusalem as an act of divine punishment. Prov 16:33 says: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

(25-27) In these verses Ezekiel directly addresses King Zedekiah and describes him as the ‘profane wicked prince of Israel.’ Ezekiel uses ‘prince,’ meaning ‘chieftain’ or ‘leader,’ instead of the term ‘king.’ It is possible that ‘prince of Israel’ was a title adopted by the Davidic kings of Judah once the northern kingdom came to an end. Zedekiah’s day of doom, on which his wrongdoing will cease, is close at hand. YHWH makes a proclamation to him: ‘thus saith the Lord God.’

Remove the turban and take off the crown. Things shall not remain as they are. Exalt that which is low, and bring low that which is exalted. Ezekiel 21:26 ESV

In v.26 four infinitive absolutes are translated as imperatives: remove, take off, exalt, abase. The cessation of Zedekiah’s reign is characterised by the removal of his turban and his crown – symbols of justice (Job 29:14) and dignity (Job 19:9). Things will not remain as they are; it is time his reign came to an end.

Note: Since the word for turban is also that used for the High Priest’s mitre (Exod. 28:4, 37, 39; 29:6; 39:28, 31; Lev. 8:9; 16:4) some commentators view the turban as belonging to the High Priest rather than the king and thus have YHWH proclaiming the overthrow of Judah’s religious and political institutions.

The inversion of the current state of affairs is summed up in the saying: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. These words are probably better known from the New Testament where Jesus said : And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted (Mt 23:12; Lk 14:11; 18:14). Similar thoughts, however, are expressed in 1 Sam 2:6-7; Job 5:11-13; Psa 75:7; Mk 10:43-44 and Lk 1:52.

A relevant example of someone of that era who was abased and then exalted is the prophet Jeremiah. He was badly treated under Zedekiah’s regime but later held in high regard by the Babylonians (Jer 40:1-6).

The severity of the coming upheaval is emphasised in v.27a by the threefold use of ‘overturn.’ This repetition expresses the superlative – e.g. ‘Holy, Holy, Holy’ Isa 6:3. The distortion and overthrow of everything is poetically described by Jeremiah in Jer 4:23-26:

I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.
I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger.

Verse 27b is an obvious reference to the famous prophecy of Gen 49:10: The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

Ezek 21:27b says; and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him. This verse is generally interpreted in one of three ways: a) as referring to the Messiah, or b) as referring to Jehoiachin, or c) as referring to Nebuchadnezzar.

a) MESSIAH. Zedekiah will fall and for an unspecified period of time there will not be another Davidic king until Messiah comes (‘it shall be no more, until). God will give the kingdom to him because it is rightfully his. Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning right or due as in KJV.

b) JEHOIACHIN – Temporarily there will be no Davidic ruler in Judah until the kingdom is restored to a legitimate king, i.e. Jehoiachin or one of his descendants. Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning a legal claim.

c) NEBUCHADNEZZAR – Proponents of this view interpret mišpāṭ as meaning punishing or judgement. Greenberg (1997, Ezekiel 21-37 : a New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, p. 434) explains:

punishing (mispat) … entrust [it] to him… mispat (usually “judgment”) here, as in 16:38 (plural); 5:8 (plural); 23:45; 39:21, means “punishment, punishing.” Combination with the verb ntn recurs in 23:24: “I will entrust judgment/punishing to them…and they will judge/punish you.”…Eliezer of Beaugency gives the sense: “Until Nebuchadnezzar, into whose hand I have committed my punishing, comes to punish him (Zedekiah).”

According to this view Ezekiel alludes to the Gen 49:10 prophecy but reinterprets it for the current situation. Those in Judah and Ezekiel’s fellow exiles doubtless interpret the prophecy messianically but the prophet turns it back on them; telling them that they can expect a slayer (Nebuchadnezzar), not a saviour (Messiah).

JUDGEMENT UPON THE AMMONITES (28-32)

Note: There are several interpretations of Ezekiel 21:28-29. Some see the entire section as a pronouncement of judgement upon the Ammonites, others view the entire section as pronouncing judgement upon the sword of YHWH, with the Ammonites as an audience.

(28-29) Again addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ YHWH instructs him to prophesy (who to is not specified) concerning the Ammonites and concerning their reproach. The focus shifts from Judah to Ammon using language that is similar to that in vv.9-10. As in vv.9-10 concerning Judah, verse 28 concerning Ammon begins with Ezekiel being told to ‘say.’ It also contains a repetition of the word ‘sword’ (sword, sword), and an observation that the sword is ‘furbished.’ It is already drawn (opened, exposed) and polished in order to flash and be adequate to slaughter Ammonites. The Ammonites will taunt the people of Judah when they see the devastation that the sword (Babylonians) wreaks on the land of Israel (25:3, 6). Their rejoicing will be premature, however, because the sword will come against them as well.

It seems from v.29 that the Ammonite prophets and soothsayers were wrongly advising their citizens that they had nothing to fear from the Babylonians. Ezekiel says that these Ammonite diviners ‘see vanity’ and ‘divine a lie’ and thus mislead their people. The prophet Jeremiah also said this in a message he sent to the kings of five surrounding nations, including the Ammonites (Jer 27:3):

Therefore hearken not ye to your prophets, nor to your diviners, nor to your dreamers, nor to your enchanters, nor to your sorcerers, which speak unto you, saying, Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon: For they prophesy a lie unto you, Jer 27:9-10a

The inhabitants of the land of Ammon will be added to the number of slain Judahites, who have brought the sword (Nebuchadnezzar and his army) to the area because of their iniquity (vv. 23, 25, 29). The sword will conquer the Ammonites as well as the Judahites, both nations will share that same fate.

(30) ‘Return it to its sheath’- another infinitive absolute that translates as an imperative. This is either a command (to an unknown third party) to put the sword of the Lord back into its scabbard because its work is done or it is advice to the Ammonites that it is pointless for them to attempt to defend themselves because judgement upon them is certain. The Ammonites will be judged in their own land, the land of their origin. Unlike Israel/Judah, which will be exiled, Ammon will face destruction at home.

(31) YHWH’s anger will be poured out upon the Ammonites like a fiery flood. The fire of God’s wrath will blow against them like bellows fanning a fire (cf. Isa 54:16). YHWH will deliver them into the hands of brutish (i.e. cruel) men for whom destruction is an art form. They are craftsmen, expert at what they do. This probably refers to the efficient warriors of the Babylonian army.

(32) God’s fiery wrath will consume the Ammonites who will be like like fuel for a fire. Their blood will flow over all the land, this speaks of total military defeat.

‘No more remembered’ (cf. Psa 83:4; Jer 11:19; Zech13:2). The ultimate result of their judgement is oblivion. The nation that gloats and scorns the Lord’s people will suffer humiliation and obliteration. Unlike the Israelites who will retain their national identity and return from exile the Ammonites will never again exist as an independent nation. This nation that is so opposed to YHWH will eventually fade from history. Ezekiel goes into more dtail about the future of the Ammonites in chapter 25.

‘I the Lord have spoken.’ The oracle does not end with a maybe but with YHWH’s guarantee. These things will come to pass, God’s word is final.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

  • The Lord is sovereign and will judge all nations.
  • It is dangerous to take pleasure in the misfortune or downfall of others, especially the Lord’s people. This is a sin that invites judgement.
  • Be wary about who you trust. There are still false prophets and teachers about. It is better to hear the truth rather than trust in flattering and comforting lies.
  • God is true to his word. What he says, he will do.

Posted in Exposition

A Lament for the Princes of Israel: Ezekiel 19:1-14

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 19:1-14

CHAPTER DIVISION

1-9 THE ALLEGORY OF A LIONESS AND HER CUBS

10-14 THE ALLEGORY OF AN UPROOTED VINE

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel chapter 19 continues the oracle of YHWH about ‘the land of Israel’ which commenced at 18:2. Ezekiel, instructed by YHWH, now presents a powerful lamentation for the ‘princes of Israel.’ The lament is in the form of two allegories: a lioness with her cubs and an uprooted vine. Ezekiel uses these to reflect upon the downfall of the Davidic kings of Judah. As with all parables, not just Ezekiel’s, it is unhelpful to speculate upon the meaning of every small detail. There are a variety of views on what different features of the parables represent.

When composing this dirge Ezekiel may have had in mind Jacob’s blessing upon Judah in Genesis 49. It mentions ‘a lion’s whelp’ and ‘the vine:’

…Judah is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be. Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass’s colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes… Gen 49:9-11

THE ALLEGORY OF A LIONESS AND HER CUBS (1-9)

(1) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to present a lamentation for ‘the princes of Israel.’ A lamentation (qiynāh) is a funeral song, elegy or dirge. The word is first used in 2 Sam 1:17 to describe David’s famous lament for Saul and Jonathan. This one in Ezekiel 19 is the first of six in the book of Ezekiel.

19:1-14 – A lament for Israel’s princes.
26:17 – A lament for Tyre
27:2-31 – A lament for Tyre
27:32-36 – A lament for Tyre
28:12-19 – A lament for the king of Tyre
32:2-16 – A lament for Pharaoh, King of Egypt

The ‘princes of Israel’ refers to the chieftains /rulers of Israel and in particular to the last few Davidic kings of Judah (see 12:10). Ezekiel does not call them kings; possibly to emphasise their subservience to foreign powers. Compare Jeremiah’s sorrowful prophecy about the Davidic kings in Jer 22:10-30.

(2) THE MOTHER LIONESS

Several words for lion occur in this passage: leḇiyyā’ – lioness; ’aryēh – lion (the animal); kep̱iyr – a lion, young lion (i.e. fierce).

Many commentators view the lioness as pointing to Judah (cf. Gen 49:9; Num 23:24; 24:9; Isa 29:1 – Ariel means lion of God; Rev 5:5) and her cubs as representing the royal house of Judah. In this allegory Judah the lioness lay down among other lions (the superpowers) and reared her cubs (the royal house) among young lions (the surrounding nations).

Others maintain that the reference is to Hamutal, a wife of King Josiah, whom the prophet Jeremiah referred to as queen [mother] in Jer 13:18. She was the mother of two of the last four kings of Judah; Jehoahaz (2 Kgs 23:31) and Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24:18; Jer 52:1).

(3-4) THE FIRST LION CUB

The mother lion raised her cubs in a politically dangerous environment. One in particular grew into a young lion and learned how to catch prey and devour men i.e. grew fierce and aggressive like those around it. The first lion cub is usually identified as Jehoahaz, son of Josiah and Hamutal (2 Kgs 23:31-34). The people chose him to succeed his father at age twenty-three but after a reign of just three months in 609 BCE ‘the nations also heard of him; he was taken in their pit (trap), and they brought him with chains (hooks) unto the land of Egypt.’ Jehoahaz was deported to Egypt by Pharoah Necho and his vassals, there he died. ‘Pit’ and ‘hook’ are vivid images that relate to the capture of wild animals. Despite his predatory nature Jehoahaz was easily subdued by Egypt.

(5-9) THE SECOND LION CUB

Disappointed by the fate of the first cub the mother (i.e. Judah), in desperation, took ‘another cub’ and reared him as young lion (i.e. to be aggressive). Some suggest that the second cub jointly represents Jehoiakim (605-598 BCE) and his son Jehoiachin (3 months in 597 BCE), 2 Kgs 24:8). Jehoiakim, however, was not chosen by the people of Judah but was installed by Pharaoh Necho as a puppet ruler. In addition, since Jehoiakim was not deported to Babylon but died at Jerusalem (Jer 22:18-19), it seems more likely that Ezekiel bypasses him and in this parable speaks of his son Jehoiachin (2 Kgs 24:8-16).

According to vv. 6-7 Jehoiachin too took his place among the other young lions (kings) and was ruthless, rapacious and cruel. His cruelty was not just exercised abroad but at home in Judah where he ‘knew’ (i.e. dishonoured) the nation’s defenceless widows (almanot) and laid towns to waste. Regarding widows, this may mean either that he made many women widows or that he took the wives of men he had killed into his harem. Instead of ‘widows’ many translations read ‘palaces’ (armonot), thus referring to the destruction of fortified citadels. The two words are textually similar. In either case the picture is one of ruin and desolation brought about by Jehoiachin’s oppressive rule. His ‘roaring’ represents the terror he inspired among his subjects,

As with the first cub, the nations (under Nebuchadnezzar’s rule) attacked and subjugated Jehoiachin – the net was spread over him, he was trapped in their pit, put in a cage in chains and sent to Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon, where he was imprisoned (Ezekiel was one of the aristocracy deported along with him at this time – 597 BCE). The result of the deportation was ‘that his voice should no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel.’ Jehoiachin’s rule, therefore, was brought to an end and his growl wasn’t heard again. Jehoiachin was released (2 Kgs 25:27-30) soon after the death of Nebuchadnezzar some thirty-seven years later but by that time any hope of his restoration to the throne of Judah in Jerusalem was long gone. He died in Babylon.

Note: The phrase ‘mountains of Israel’ occurs 17 times in the book of Ezekiel. See my previous post AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO THE MOUNTAINS OF ISRAEL – EZEKIEL 6:1-14. Ezekiel chapter 36:1-38 contains another oracle, this time of blessing, addressed to ‘the mountains of Israel.’

THE ALLEGORY OF AN UPROOTED VINE (10-14)

(10) The allegory now changes from a lion to a vine. The image of the nation as a vine is a common one (e.g. Psa 80; Isa 5) and Ezekiel has already used it twice: see: Ezekiel’s Vine Allegory: a Prophecy about Jerusalem – 15:1-8 and Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine. Most commentators agree that ‘in your blood’ (dam) is meaningless so there are many conjectures as to what Ezekiel might actually have meant. Some suggestions are:

  • ‘Blood’ refers to the juice of the grape therefore Ezekiel was thinking of sap, thus ‘full of vigour.’ Wine and the blood of grapes is mentioned also in Jacob’s blessing of Judah in Gen 49:11.
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘rest,’ thus Darby.
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘life.’
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘freshness.’
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘bloodline,’ thus NKJB
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘vineyard,’ thus HCSB, ESV, NASB, NIV, NRSV, NCV
  • ‘Blood’ refers to ‘fruitfulness.’
  • dam (blood) ought to read dama (to be like) thus ERV 1885 gives ‘in thy likeness’ as a marginal reading.

‘Your mother is a vine.’ Again, the mother is likely to represent the nation of Israel/Judah which has produced the kings. The description of a vine ‘planted by the waters’ (17:5,8) and ‘fruitful and full of branches’ evokes a time of prosperity, perhaps alluding to the reigns of David and Solomon which were considered a golden age, when Israel was strong and enjoyed God’s favour and blessings.

(11) The vine sent out strong shoots or branches that were suitable for rulers’ sceptres and its stature was exalted among the thick branches (lit. ‘thicket of clouds,’ see 31:3,10,14). This suggests that Judah produced powerful kings and was prominent among the nations.

(12) Verse 12, which is similar to 17:10, prophesies the violent end of the vine. ‘Plucked up in fury and cast to the ground’ signifies the wrath of God; his judgement upon Judah resulting in the fall of Jerusalem and the end of the Davidic monarchy. The ‘east wind’ symbolises a destructive force, in this case an invading army that brings destruction and ruin. The drying up of its fruit represents the economic strain caused by the annual payment of huge sums in tribute to Babylon. The withering and consumption by fire of its ‘strong rods’ represent the desolation of the land, the death or exile of its leaders (the kings and nobles), and the widespread suffering of the people. Most likely Zedekiah’s reign and the final siege and destruction of Jerusalem are in view.

(13) The tall luxuriant vine planted by the waters has been forcibly uprooted and now finds itself transplanted in a dry and thirsty wilderness. This verse looks forward to the Babylonian Captivity (586-538 BCE) that began when a significant portion of the Judean population was deported to Babylonia by Nebuchadnezzar after the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BCE. However, it also describes the current situation of Ezekiel and the Jehoiachin exiles who had already been exiled to Babylon in 597 BCE.

(14) This verse further emphasises complete destruction. It is possible that the phrase ‘fire is gone out of a rod of her branches’ alludes either to internal conflict and corruption or to the devastation that was accelerated by the actions of one of the kings (referred to as ‘a rod’). One instantly thinks of Zedekiah’s breach of covenant and rebellion against Babylon (see 17:18).

There is ‘no strong rod to be a sceptre to rule’—the outcome is final and definitive. This statement effectively declares Judah’s demise as a sovereign state. The line of Davidic kings has come to a sad end.

The elegy formally closes with the words: ‘This is a lamentation, and shall be for a lamentation.’ Some of the details in the lament had already come to pass and some had yet to be fulfilled. This, therefore, is a lamentation for what has already happened and it will serve as a lamentation for what will soon happen.

SUMMATION

Ezekiel 19 laments the tragic downfall of the Davidic monarchy and the kingdom of Judah. It attributes this destruction not merely to external enemies, but to internal corruption and the unrighteousness of its own kings; who ultimately brought ruin upon themselves and the nation through cruelty and poor leadership. The lament emphasises the severe consequences of sin and the utter devastation that divine justice and judgement bring about.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 17:1-24 The Allegory of Two Eagles and a Vine

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading: Ezekiel 17:1-24

Background reading:
– King Jehoiachin’s exile to Babylon in 597 BCE, 2 Kgs 24:6-16; 2 Chron 36:9-10.
– Zedekiah’s installation as Nebuchadnezzar’s puppet king and his revolt against Babylonian rule, 2 Kgs 24:17-20; 2 Chron 36:11-16.
– The aftermath of Zedekiah’s revolt, 2 Kgs 25:1-30; 2 Chron 36:11-20.

THE ALLEGORY OF TWO EAGLES AND A VINE

DIVISION

1-10 The Imagery of the Allegory
11-21 The Interpretation of the Allegory
22-24 A Message of Hope

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 17 presents two further visions of Ezekiel in the section (chapters 4-24) that contains oracles of warning about the certainty of YHWH’s judgement upon Judah for crimes such as disobedience, violence, exploitation of the poor, foreign alliances and idolatry.

Already in exile in Babylon, Ezekiel prophesied to the people of Israel/Judah in the years leading up to and just after the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by Babylonian forces in 587/6 BCE.

In this chapter Ezekiel addresses the political crisis of the time which was King Zedekiah of Judah’s rebellion against Babylonian rule. This must have occurred about 590 BCE since it prompted Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Jerusalem that began in Zedekiah’s ninth regnal year, 589/8 BCE (Jer 39:1; 52:4; 2 Kgs 25:1).

THE IMAGERY OF THE ALLEGORY 1-10

(1) Ezekiel 17 begins with the standard prophetic word formula ‘and the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ which introduces a new revelation. This formula occurs again in v.11.

(2) As usual YHWH emphasises Ezekiel’s mortality by addressing him as ‘son of Adam’ and then issuing a double command: ‘pose a riddle (ḥiyḏāh) and tell an allegory (māšāl) to the house of Israel.’ The idea of a riddle or enigma is that it is difficult to understand whereas an allegory or fable is something that illuminates the understanding. Greenberg (Ezekiel I-XX, 1983, p. 309) comments: ‘While the two terms appear in parallelism (Ps 49:5, 78:2; Prov 1:6) they are not interchangeable (as Judg 14:12ff and 1 Kings 10:1 show )…’

(3) There follows the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ which cites the origin of the message and claims divine authority (also vv.9, 22).

FIRST GREAT EAGLE

The allegory begins with a great eagle that has powerful wings, long feathers and colourful plumage coming to Lebanon to the top branch of a cedar tree.

Comment – Nešer refers to a large bird of prey and can be translated as either ‘eagle’ or ‘vulture’ depending on the context. Most translations opt for ‘eagle,’ thus emphasising power, speed and dominance. Some scholars reckon that nešer here refers to the Great Griffon Vulture. Translating it thus would emphasise its scavenging behaviour and association with death and desolation.

great wings, long-winged, full of feathers, which had divers colours – a superpower which has widespread domination and influence over many peoples.

Lebanon – to the north of Israel but in the allegory it seems to represent Jerusalem, see v.12.

the highest branch – the aristocracy.

(4-6) Taking off the topmost twig from the highest branch of a cedar tree the eagle carries it to a land of commerce and sets it in a city of merchants. Then it takes a seedling from the ground and plants it in well-irrigated, fertile ground where it grows like a willow tree (a tree that loves water, cf. Isa 44:4). There it grows into ‘a spreading vine of low stature’ which produces branches and shoots and has its roots spread towards the eagle.

COMMENTS – He cropped off the top of his young twigs, carried it into a land of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants. – i.e. deported the king (Jehoiachin) to Babylon. The Babylonians were famous traders (Josh 7:21; Rev 18:10-16).

He took also of the seed of the land – Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah, a native of Judah, as a puppet ruler.

and planted it in a fruitful field; he placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree. – Zedekiah and Judah flourished under Babylonian rule – they were dependent upon Babylonia but the conditions for growth were excellent.

great waters – The Euphrates and the Tigris were the rivers of Babylon (cf. Psa 137).

And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs. – As a vassal state Judah was subservient to the Babylonians but was nevertheless thriving.

Vine – Often used for Israel, e.g. Psa 80:8-15; Isa 5:1-7; Jer 2:21; Hos 10:1.

(7) SECOND GREAT EAGLE

A second eagle with great wings and many feathers is introduced and the vine stretches its roots and branches towards this eagle hoping to obtain sustenance from it.

COMMENTS – The second great eagle is not quite as splendid as the first (cp. v.7a with v.3a). It has great wings and many feathers but they are not as long or colourful as those of the first eagle.

The vine tries to shift its loyalty, it stretches out its roots and branches towards the second eagle. Notice that, whereas in vv.3-5 the first great eagle takes the active role and the vine is passive, in v.7 the second great eagle is passive and the vine is active. It reaches out towards second eagle.

(8) The series of infinitives would suggest that v.8 is recapping the advantages the vine has enjoyed and could continue to enjoy (v.6) under the first eagle (it was planted: to bring forth branches, to bear fruit, to become a goodly vine). This emphasises the foolishness of turning towards the second eagle.

(9-10) Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 22) Ezekiel is told to ask his fellow exiles questions (featuring the words ‘shall it prosper’) and then supply the answers.

Q Shall it prosper? shall he not pull up the roots thereof, and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither?
A it shall wither in all the leaves of her spring, even without great power or many people to pluck it up by the roots thereof.

Q Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? shall it not utterly wither, when the east wind toucheth it?
A it shall wither in the furrows where it grew.

COMMENTS – these questions and answers are designed to show the utter futility of the vine changing its allegiance. The first eagle will uproot the vine (by applying great force) and cause it to wither (rot).

planted – some translations (e.g. NCB; NLT; RSV; NRSV) prefer ‘transplanted’ as the verb šāṯal  can mean either to plant or to transplant. In Ezek chapter 19 this same word is used of a vine’s first planting and again in v.13 of its second planting (transplanting).

east wind – a destructive hot wind (Job 27:21; Isa 27:8; Ezek 19:12; Hos 13:15).

the furrows (v.7 and v.10) – the River Nile and the irrigation canals that branch off from it.

THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ALLEGORY 11-21

(11-12a) In Ezek 17:11 the standard prophetic word formula ‘the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ introduces a new revelation that helpfully explains the previous one. Ezekiel is to communicate this to the exiles who are with him in Babylon; here referred to once again as ‘the rebellious house.’ This description occurs 12 times in the book of Ezekiel: 2:5, 6, 8; 3:9, 26, 27; 12:2, 3, 9, 25; 17:12; 24:3.

(12a-21) Explanation:

v.12 Behold, the king of Babylon is come to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and led them with him to Babylon;

COMMENT – Cp. vv. 3-4. The first great eagle is Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, who in 597 BCE besieged Jerusalem (Lebanon) and carried away the Judean king Jehoiachin, with the aristocracy and the elite of the land, to exile in Babylon (see 2 Kgs 24:10-16).

v.13-14 And hath taken of the king’s seed, and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath of him: he hath also taken the mighty of the land: That the kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand.

COMMENT- Cp. vv.5-6. Nebuchadnezzar appointed Zedekiah as his vassal king in Judah (2 Kgs 24:17). As part of this agreement Zedekiah swore an oath of allegiance to Nebuchadnezzar that would also have entailed a commitment to pay an annual tribute to the Babylonians. The Chronicler records that Nebuchadnezzar put him under oath; Zedekiah swore this in the name of YHWH (2 Chron 36:13). If this agreement was honoured Judah would survive and flourish as a Babylonian vassal state, YHWH had confirmed that this would be so in a word addressed to Zedekiah by the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 27:12-15).

vv.15-16 But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and much people. Shall he prosper? shall he escape that doeth such things? or shall he break the covenant, and be delivered? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he broke, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die.

COMMENT – Having decided to revolt against Babylonian rule Zedekiah sent diplomats to Egypt to request military support, which seems to have been forthcoming. Zedekiah then rebelled (2 Kgs 24:20), probably by withholding tribute. This action quickly backfired as Nebuchadnezzar marched on Jerusalem and laid siege to the city.

Echoing v.9 and v.10 YHWH asks ‘Shall he prosper?’ The alliance with Egypt will not work because YHWH is angry that Zedekiah broke the treaty with the Babylonians that was sworn in YHWH’s name. YHWH swears by himself that Zedekiah will die in Babylon.

v.17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company make for him in the war, by casting up mounts, and building forts, to cut off many persons:

COMMENT – Once the Babylonian siege apparatus is set up (ramps and bulwarks) Pharaoh and his army will be of no use (see Ezekiel’s description of Babylonian siege warfare against Tyre in 26:7-11). Jeremiah 37:4-11 indicates that Pharoah did send an army, causing the Babylonians to break the siege of Jerusalem for a short while in order to repulse that threat.

vv.18-19. Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head.

COMMENT – Zedekiah had ‘given his hand’ (this gesture must have meant ‘I promise’ cf. Ezra 30:8; Lam 5:6).

v.19, which I have shown in bold print, is the key verse in the chapter. It is the whole point of the allegory. Zedekiah swore an oath and made a treaty with a secular ruler, but did not honour its terms because he despised the oath (the word ‘oath’ also means ‘curse’). However, he swore it in YHWH’s name so it has religious significance. It is binding. Notice ‘mine oath’ and ‘my covenant.’ The oath and covenant that Zedekiah made with Nebuchadnezzar is also viewed as YHWH’s oath and covenant. Zedekiah violated that agreement and will suffer the consequences. Notice that YHWH himself makes an oath (‘as I live’) to punish Zedekiah.

v.20 predicts Zedekiah’s capture, exile to Babylon and judgement there for violating his duty and v.21 predicts that his soldiers will be pursued and either slain or dispersed. All this without any mention of Nebuchadnezzar! YHWH is in control. Nebuchadnezzar is his agent. Nebuchadnezzar is his instrument.

The fulfilment of these consequences will prove that YHWH indeed has spoken – ye shall know that I the LORD have spoken it.

A MESSAGE OF HOPE 22-24

The first 21 verses of Ezekiel 17 have been about judgement, the closing verses are about restoration. Utilising the earlier imagery of the chapter Ezekiel predicts the restoration of the Davidic line. Many interpret this passage as messianic.

Again employing the prophetic messenger formula ‘Thus saith the Lord God’ (also vv.3, 9) Ezekiel prophesies that YHWH will act to take a new tender sprig from the top of the high cedar in Babylon and plant it upon a high and eminent mountain in Israel. There it will thrive and become a place of shade and security for ‘all fowl of every wing.’ All the trees of the field will know that that YHWH has spoken this and has brought it about.

No explanation of this metaphor is given but based on the earlier explanation in the chapter where the top of the twigs represented Jehoiachin then this tender twig (from the top of the high cedar tree in Babylon) that YHWH will plant upon a high mountain in Israel refers to a future king of the Davidic line who will reign in Israel/Judah. Mt. Zion springs immediately to mind but ‘high and eminent mountain’ probably refers to this king’s greatness. He will flourish and be a blessing to all kinds of people – or perhaps v.23b (under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell) implies universal rule. This future Davidic ruler will have worldwide influence and significance (cf. Isa 9:6-7; Jer 23:5-6; Ezek 34:23; 37:24).

Ezekiel may have been hoping for the eventual restoration of King Jehoiachin with whom he was in exile in Babylon. Jehoiachin was released after Nebuchadnezzar’s death in 562 BCE (2 Kgs 25:27-30; Jer 52:3-4) but he was not the fulfilment of the prophecy. Nor was Zerubbabel, a later Governor of Judea under the First Persian Empire, although he was of the Davidic line and his name means ‘seed of Babylon.’

The chapter closes with ‘all the trees of the field’ (i.e. the nations) recognising that it is YHWH who has brought Judah down to nothing and who will restore and exalt the new king. YHWH makes the low high and brings the high low.

PREACTICAL LESSONS FROM EZEKIEL 17

a) The necessity of keeping one’s word. Breaking promises and betraying trust, whether in personal or business relationships or in the political sphere, matters to God. Integrity is important and actions have consequences. Do I honour my commitments, or shift loyalties if it seems more beneficial to do so?

b) The folly of placing dependence upon others rather than God. Zedekiah relied on Egypt’s prowess rather than trust God’s sovereignty. True security lies in trusting God, not others. Am I entangled in worldly alliances?

c) Although we live in uncertain times God is actively working out his purposes in world affairs. No matter how bad a situation seems he is in control. God can reverse national fortunes (bring the high low and make the low high, v.24) and ultimately his plans will prevail.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 13:1-16 The Danger of False Prophets

Posted on by writtenexposition

Reading Ezekiel 13: 1-23

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel 13 is a significant passage in Ezekiel because it addresses the danger posed by false prophets whose messages originate in their own ‘hearts.’ In this chapter Ezekiel denounces counterfeit prophets who mislead the people by falsely claiming to speak for YHWH.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Ezekiel prophesied during a time of great turmoil for Israel. In 597 BCE the Chaldean king Nebuchadnezzar II subdued Jerusalem and placed a puppet king (Zedekiah) on the throne of Judah. He also deported the deposed king Jehoiachin to Babylonia (2 Kgs 24:15-17) along with many of the elite citizens of Judah, including Ezekiel. There YHWH called and commissioned Ezekiel as his prophet.

Although living in Babylonia at a place called Tel-Abib near the River Chebar Ezekiel directed many of his prophecies towards the people of Jerusalem. The situation there was deteriorating after King Zedekiah’s abortive attempt to revolt against Babylonian rule (2 Kgs 25:1-2). Interestingly, that revolt was supported and encouraged by false prophets in Judah (Jer 27:9-10,14-16). Soon the city was besieged by Nebuchadnezzar’s forces and eventually devastated by them in 586/7 BCE.

Meanwhile over in Babylonia Ezekiel condemned Israel and Judah because of their sin and idolatry; prophesying impending judgement upon them. At the same time other Israelite men and women in Babylonia were delivering prophecies which contradicted Ezekiel’s message of doom.

Instead of prophesying punishment, they offered false comfort to the people; assuring them that the situation at Jerusalem would soon be resolved peacefully and thus building up their hopes of a soon return from exile. Ezekiel as a true prophet of YHWH found it necessary to denounce these false prophets and confront their lies.

Chapter 13 of Ezekiel is situated within a section (12:21-14:11) that deals with various issues relating to prophecy. The chapter contains two parallel woe oracles which are similar in structure, content and style. One is against male prophets and the other against women who prophesy, The context (13:9) would indicate that these people, like Ezekiel, were Israelite exiles in Babylonia. Back in the homeland Jeremiah too was denouncing false prophets and prophecy. It is worth comparing his oracle in Jer 23:9-40 with those of Ezekiel in Ezek 13.

CHAPTER DIVISION

13:1-16 – An oracle addressed to male prophets.


13:17-23 – An oracle addressed to women who prophesy.

AN ORACLE ADDRESSED TO MALE PROPHETS (1-16)

(1) ‘And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying’ – This phrase is often used in Ezekiel to introduce a new oracle (e.g. 11:14; 12:1; 15:1; 17:1; 18:1). In 13:1 it covers both oracles in chapter 13 (2-16; 17-23) and is particularly relevant since it emphasizes the fact that Ezekiel speaks the word of YHWH, unlike the false prophets whom he condemns. This oracle against male prophets is mirrored by that against the female prophets in vv.17-23. The structure and language are similar.

STRUCTURE

  • A preamble – vv.1-3a and vv.17-18a.
  • Ezekiel addressed as ‘Son of Man’ – v.2 and v.17.
  • An accusation – vv.3b-7 and vv.18b-19.
  • A forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord’ – vv.8-9 and vv.20-21.
  • A second forecast of judgment that ends with a divine recognition formula – vv.10-14 and vv.22-23.

LANGUAGE

Although the content is different the language used in each of the two oracles is similar:

  • v.2 – ‘Son of Man, prophesy against’ and v.17 – ‘Son of man, set thy face against.’
  • v.2 – ‘that prophesy’ and v.16 – ‘which prophesy.’
  • v.2 – ‘say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own hearts’ and v.17 – ‘which prophesy out of their own heart; and prophesy thou against them.’
  • v.3 – ‘thus saith the Lord God’ and v.18 – ‘thus saith the Lord God.’
  • v.3 – ‘woe unto’ and v.18 – ‘woe to.’
  • v.8 – ‘therefore saith the Lord God’ and v.20 – ‘wherefore saith the Lord God.’
  • v.8 – ‘behold I am against’ and v.20 – ‘behold I am against.’
  • v.9 – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ and v.21 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’
  • v.10 – ‘because…’ and v.22 – ‘because…’
  • v.13 – ‘therefore…’ and v.23 – ‘therefore.’
  • v.14 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord’ and v.23 – ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

(2) Addressing Ezekiel as ‘son of Adam’ (stressing human weakness in light of God’s greatness) YHWH instructs him to deliver this message ‘against’ (’el; 2, 8, 9, 17, 20) the false prophets. They are called ‘the prophets of Israel,’ a description unique to Ezekiel (13:2,16; 38:17, cf. 13:4). These men are in exile with Ezekiel but the term ‘prophets of Israel’ may suggest that he views them as part of a larger group that would include false prophets back in Israel/Judah. The latter are described by Jeremiah as ‘the prophets of Samaria’ (Jer 23:13) and ‘the prophets of Jerusalem’ (Jer 23:14). Ezekiel’s opponents are not prophets of other gods but men working within the Israelite religious system.

(3) The pronouncement of a ‘woe’ on these ‘foolish (nāḇāl) prophets’ hints at the severe consequences of prophesying lies while claiming to speak for YHWH; these will be set out in vv.8-9. The men are fools; what they say is empty and futile. In the Old Testament a fool (nāḇāl) is someone who denies or disrespects God (Job 2:10; Psa 14:1; 74:18, 22; Isa 32:5-6). These prophets do not follow the Spirit of God but their own spirits, they perceive nothing.

There are several changes in person within these verses which some people might find confusing:

  • In vv. 2-3, YHWH directly addresses Ezekiel in the second person ‘thou’.
  • In v. 4-5, YHWH directly addresses Israel in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In verse 6, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.
  • In vv. 7-8, YHWH directly addresses the false prophets in the second person ‘ye’.
  • In v. 9, YHWH speaks about the false prophets in the third person ‘they’.

(4) YHWH addresses Israel and compares their false prophets to foxes or jackals among the ruins. Such animals survive in desolate places (Lam 5:18) by scavenging and are known to be opportunistic and destructive (Song 2:15). The simile implies that Judah is a society in ruins. It is morally desolate but these prophets thrive and capitalise on the chaos, exploiting the people’s vulnerability. They further undermine the ruins rather than try to build them up.

(5) Directly addressing the false prophets YHWH accuses them of failure to repair breaches in the wall (KJV ‘hedge’). The word gāḏēr refers to a protective wall, e.g. around a vineyard (Psa 80:12; Isa 5:5), or a city wall (Ezra 9:9; Mic &:11). Rather than rising to their responsibility for the defence of the people (e.g. by warnings, intercession, teaching) the false prophets contribute to their decline. Therefore the people will be defenceless in the Day of YHWH (Ezek 30:3, cf. 7:19) when his anger will come upon them (Ezek 5:13; 7:8; 9:8; 13:13; 16:42; 20:21, 34; 21:31; 20:20, 22, 31; 36:6; 38:19; 43:8).

(6-7) Vain visions and lying divination.

Verses 6 and 7 say much the same thing. Both highlight the deceitful arrogance of the false prophets who fabricate visions and use means of divination that YHWH has not authorised.

As well as seeing vain (empty, deceitful, false) visions they make lying divinations (predictions made by reading omens or by various rituals), practices forbidden in Deut 18:9-14. In Israelite religion the only sacred objects authorised for discerning God’s will in specific circumstances were the Urim and Thummim (Ex 28:30; Lev 8:8; Num 27:21; Deut 33:8; 1 Sam 28:6; Ezra 2:63; Neh 7:65).

Even worse is the false prophets’ habit of ascribing their lies to YHWH, hoping that this public declaration of authority would somehow obligate YHWH to fulfil their prophecies. V.6 ‘the Lord hath not sent them’ and v.7 ‘albeit I have not spoken’ emphasise that what they said did not have divine authorisation. Thus their predictions were not only false and deceitful but also blasphemous.

(8-9) Forecast of judgment upon the false prophets.

The word ‘therefore’ introduces details of the punishment due to the false prophets and a summary of the reasons why they deserve it – which is because they ‘have spoken vanity and seen lies.’ The prophets are informed that YHWH has had enough of their lies. He is already ‘against’ them and his hand will be raised up against (KJV ‘upon’) them. (’el – against – see 2, 8, 9, 17, 20). In Ezekiel YHWH’s outstretched hand is an indicator of punishment and judgment (6:14; 14:9,13; 16:27; 20:33,34; 25:7,13,16; 35:3). Their punishment will be three-fold:

1. They will lose membership of the assembly of YHWH’s people.

‘Assembly’ or ‘council’ (sôḏ) is an association of people who are closely connected, who have something in common (Gen 49:6; Job 19:19; Psa 64:3; 111:1; Jer 6:11; 15:17). This punishment has been interpreted as signifying a loss of leadership, honour or status in the community.

It has also been suggested that it may refer to exclusion from the select group who are confidants of YHWH (Psa 89:8; Jer 23:18,22); which would include true prophets (Amos 3:7). The meaning is probably even stronger: they would no longer be regarded as members of God’s earthly people – the community of faith.

2. They will not be listed in the register of the house of Israel.

These false prophets would not be listed in the genealogical register (keṯāb, writing) of Israelites. The existence and importance of this list for those returning from exile is clear from Ezra chapter 2 and Nehemiah chapter 7. For the false prophets exclusion would mean a loss of citizen rights. Notice that Jeremiah pronounced a similar punishment upon Shemaiah the Nehelamite (Jer 29:31-32).

Some commentators contend that this register is YHWH’s book (Ex 32:33; Psa 69:28; 87:6; 139:16; Dan 12:1). The Old Testament, however, is fairly vague about what is recorded in that book, whereas this document mentioned in Ezekiel 13:9 is specifically said to be the ‘register of the house of Israel.’ It seems more sensible to interpret it literally as a secular civil census list.

3. They will not be able to enter the land of Israel.

This flows logically from the previous two. Excision from the register would lead to serious consequences for the false prophets and their descendants; probably with respect to claims to ancestral land or the purchase of property.

The same word keṯāb meaning ‘register’ occurs in Ezra 2:62 and Neh 7:64. These twin passages illustrate the problems that exclusion from the register, in this case the record of priestly genealogies, could bring:

Another group returned at this time from the towns of Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Kerub, Addan, and Immer. However, they could not prove that they or their families were descendants of Israel. This group included the families of Delaiah, Tobiah, and Nekoda— a total of 652 people. Three families of priests — Hobaiah, Hakkoz, and Barzillai — also returned. (This Barzillai had married a woman who was a descendant of Barzillai of Gilead, and he had taken her family name.) They searched for their names in the genealogical records, but they were not found, so they were disqualified from serving as priests. Ezra 2:59-62 NLT

This first forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets ends with the divine recognition formula ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord God.’

(10-14) A second forecast of judgment.

Verse 10 begins with a doubling of ya‘an (‘on account of’ or because’) which the KJV translates here as ‘because, even because’; meaning ‘for the very good reason.’ This phrase ya’an ub’ ya’an also occurs in Lev 26:43 and Ezek 36:3.

Punishment is due because they have misled (caused to go astray) the people saying ‘peace’ when there is no peace. Rather than warning them about the consequences of their sinful behaviour, the false prophets give an assurance of safety that is not rooted in reality. They intentionally lull the people into a false sense of security.

The image of a wall, used earlier in v.5 to represent the spiritual and moral state of the people of Judah, is taken up again in v.10. The word for ‘wall’ (ḥayiṣ) in v.10 is a hapax legomenon (a word that only occurs once) in the Old Testament and means a dry wall or party wall; an unimproved flimsy or crumbling wall built of mud-brick or loose stones and liable to collapse under stress. A different word (qiyrāh) is used for ‘wall’ in vv.12-15. The ‘wall’ in v.10 is not literal but metaphorical.

It is said to have been daubed or smeared with untempered mortar. The word tāp̱ēl translated ‘untempered’ (KJV) is an adjective meaning ‘unseasoned’ or ‘tasteless.’ The thought is that of lacking an essential ingredient; here the mortar is just mud to which a binding agent such as straw has not been added. It covers the wall but does not strengthen it. To emphasise that the product is insubstantial modern translations tend to replace the KJV translation’s ‘untempered [mortar]’ with ”whitewash.’ This conveys the thought of deceit and hypocrisy on the part of the false prophets.

(11-14) These verses continue with the figure of a whitewashed wall and the effect bad weather has on it. Flooding rain, great hailstones and stormy winds will cause it to fall. The futility of the false prophets’ assurances will be exposed and they will be held accountable. When judgement comes and the wall collapses people will ask (v.12) ‘Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it?’

Greenberg (1983, p.238) comments: ‘As said expressly in 22:8, “they” who daubed the wall were the prophets: the people built the dry wall – a figure of their unfounded optimism, while the prophets daubed it with worthless stuff – their self-inspired predictions of well-being.’

V.13 clarifies that the destructive forces represent YHWH’s anger against sin as well as the lies of the false prophets. His fury will be so intense that the prophets will not survive (vv.15b-16).

Scholars suggest that in v.14 the image of the wall changes. The wall which YHWH will break down is said to refer now to Jerusalem and the fall of the city. To quote Greenberg (1983, p.238) again, he says of the phrase leveling it to the ground in v.14:

‘The language of this clause is more appropriate to massive demolition than to the fall of a mere wall; it facilitates the intrusion, in the next clause, of the reference to Jerusalem. When it (fem.) falls and you perish within it (fem.).’

In other words proof for the assertion that in v.14 Ezekiel is thinking of the impending fall of Jerusalem is that the word ‘wall’ is masculine whereas ‘it shall fall’ and ‘in the midst thereof’ are feminine; therefore the reference cannot be to the metaphorical wall but to the city of Jerusalem.

This second forecast of judgment upon the male false prophets also ends with the divine recognition formula ‘and ye shall know that I am the Lord God’ (vv. 9, 14, 21, 23)

(15) YHWH asserts that he will accomplish his wrath upon the wall (the false assurances) and upon those that have smeared it with ‘whitewash’ (the false prophets).

(16) This verse summarises vv.10-15: the main lie of the false prophets is that they promise peace when there is no peace.

SUMMATION

This woe oracle denounces Israelite false prophets for failing to address the nation’s sin and instead spreading lies and details of false visions, claiming divine authority which they do not possess. They offer the people false hope by declaring ‘peace’ when there is no peace. The passage highlights God’s anger against deceit and spiritual negligence.

Posted in Exposition

Ezekiel 12: Prophecies of Exile and Judgment

Posted on by writtenexposition

INTRODUCTION

Ezekiel gives no new date marker at the beginning of chapter 12. The next one is not until 20:1 so in the absence of chronological data for chapters 12-19 one must assume that the messages they contain were delivered soon after the prophecies of chapters 8-11, during 592 BCE (8:1).

Since it would seem that the account of a trance which Ezekiel had communicated to his fellow-exiles (11:25) had had no effect upon them it was therefore essential that the theme of judgment upon Jerusalem and Judah be further developed, this is the main point of chapters 12-19. In chapter 12 Ezekiel emphasises the certainty of that impending judgment.

CHAPTER 12

1-2 A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE

3-7 THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED

8-16 THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD

17-20 THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED

21-28 THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED

A REBELLIOUS PEOPLE (1-2)

1 The word of the LORD also came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house. Ezekiel 12:1-2

(1) The phrase ‘the word of the Lord came unto me saying’ signifies the commencement of a new message from YHWH.

(2) YHWH again addresses Ezekiel as ‘Son of man (adam)’ thus emphasising Ezekiel’s humanity in contrast to the Lord’s divinity. He says that Ezekiel dwells in the midst of a ‘rebellious house.’ This refers to the exiles who are already in Babylon along with Ezekiel. They are rebellious because they refuse to see or hear the truth (cp. Deut 29:3-4; Isa 6:9; Jer 5:21; Mk 8:18; Acts 28:27). The exiles probably shared the vain sentiments of the people back home in Judah whom Jeremiah (Jer 7:4) warned about misplaced trust in the temple. They thought that because the temple of the Lord was in Jerusalem the city would not fall to invading forces. Ezekiel needed to powerfully drive home the lesson that Jerusalem would indeed fall and that its inhabitants would be taken into exile.

THE PREDICTION OF EXILE ENACTED (3-7)

3 Therefore, thou son of man, prepare thee stuff for removing, and remove by day in their sight; and thou shalt remove from thy place to another place in their sight: it may be they will consider, though they be a rebellious house.
4 Then shalt thou bring forth thy stuff by day in their sight, as stuff for removing: and thou shalt go forth at even in their sight, as they that go forth into captivity.
5 Dig thou through the wall in their sight, and carry out thereby.
6 In their sight shalt thou bear it upon thy shoulders, and carry it forth in the twilight: thou shalt cover thy face, that thou see not the ground: for I have set thee for a sign unto the house of Israel.
7 And I did so as I was commanded: I brought forth my stuff by day, as stuff for captivity, and in the even I digged through the wall with mine hand; I brought it forth in the twilight, and I bore it upon my shoulder in their sight.

(3-7) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to enact a drama of someone going into exile. Referring back to ‘which have eyes to see, and see not’ in v.2 notice the seven-fold repetition of ‘in their sight’ in vv. 3-7. Also, the words ‘by day’ are mentioned three times in these verses. Ezekiel is to make sure that his actions get the attention of his audience. Notice also ‘remove’ and ‘removing’ – these are from a word meaning captivity or going into exile.

Ezekiel receives specific instructions regarding the drama he is to act out.

a. He is to ‘prepare his stuff’ by day for going into exile (v.4). ‘Stuff’ – According to Strongs H3627 this word can refer both to a vessel or receptacle and also to utensils or items of equipment. Most translations say something akin to ‘pack your baggage’ but here the reference is more likely to the bag or knapsack itself rather than to the few basic items (e.g. clothing, bedding, cooking utensils, food) an exile would put in it. Thus the Christian Standard Bible translates ‘prepare thee stuff for removing’ as: ‘get your bags ready for exile.’ Ezekiel’s fellow exiles in Babylonia would have no problem recognising what he was portraying; they had done this very thing for real a few years earlier, in 597 BCE.

b. He is to go out in the evening as if escaping like an exile (v.4).

c. He is to dig a hole in the wall (of his house, the courtyard or the town?) and take his baggage (stuff) out through it (v.5).

d. He is to carry his bag on his shoulder into the pitch darkness with his face covered so that he cannot see the ground (v.6). Note that the word translated ‘twilight’ in KJV means thick darkness. It occurs in vv. 6, 7, 12 and Gen 15:17.

Perhaps this performance will enable his rebellious fellow-exiles to understand (v.3) that this will soon be the situation in Jerusalem. People there will soon be fleeing as emigrants, never to return. YHWH tells Ezekiel (v. 6b) that by acting out this scenario he will serve as a sign or portent to the house of Israel (see also v.11). Isaiah is another prophet said to have been a sign (Isa 20:3).

‘I did so as I was commanded.’ In v.7 Ezekiel confirms that that he has faithfully complied with YHWH’s instructions. He adds that he excavated the hole in the wall by hand; thus avoiding the noise of a pick or other instrument that in a real life escape might alert the enemy. The main emphasis, however, is on his exile’s pack; its significance is revealed in v.10.

THE FLIGHT OF THE PRINCE FORETOLD (8-16)

8 And in the morning came the word of the LORD unto me, saying,
9 Son of man, hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?
10 Say thou unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; This burden concerneth the prince in Jerusalem, and all the house of Israel that are among them.
11 Say, I am your sign: like as I have done, so shall it be done unto them: they shall remove and go into captivity.
12 And the prince that is among them shall bear upon his shoulder in the twilight, and shall go forth: they shall dig through the wall to carry out thereby: he shall cover his face, that he see not the ground with his eyes.
13 My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare: and I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.
14 And I will scatter toward every wind all that are about him to help him, and all his bands; and I will draw out the sword after them.
15 And they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall scatter them among the nations, and disperse them in the countries.
16 But I will leave a few men of them from the sword, from the famine, and from the pestilence; that they may declare all their abominations among the heathen whither they come; and they shall know that I am the LORD.

(8-9) The following morning Ezekiel receives further communication from YHWH in the form of a negative question: ‘hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou?’ Ezekiel’s strange behaviour has caught the attention of his fellow-exiles who have asked about it. This presents an opportunity for him to explain the significance of his symbolic act.

(10-11) YHWH instructs Ezekiel to give the explanation in the form of an authoritative prophetic message. It begins with ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ followed by a summary statement of the point of the drama. It is a message of impending disaster both for King Zedekiah and for all who remain with him in Jerusalem. Ezekiel uses ‘house of Israel’ in two different senses. Note that v.9 refers to the ‘house of Israel’ in Babylonia (cp. 11:15) and v.10 to the ‘house of Israel’ in Judah.

King Zedekiah of Judah is not mentioned by name but it is obvious that he is the person referred to. He is not called ‘the king’ (meleḵ) but ‘the prince’ (or chief). The Hebrew word for ‘prince’ is nasi.’ Many commentators point out that there is word play here on ‘prince’ (nasi) and ‘burden’ (maśśā). Greenberg (1983, p. 211) comments ‘The chief is this burden. Hebrew hannaśi hammaśśa hazze; this alliterative phrase is patterned after Jer 23:33.’ As well as a play on sound there seems also to be a pun on meaning. Ezekiel’s ‘burden’ was lifted up and borne on his shoulder, the term ‘prince’ refers to someone who is elevated or lifted up.

Some take ‘burden’ here to mean a threatening message, the word is used in that sense by other Old Testament prophets, but it only occurs here in Ezekiel and in the context must refer to the bag containing Ezekiel’s ‘stuff’ (v.4). Greenberg (1983, p. 212) explains: ‘The meaning of the sentence is: this burden – the exile’s pack – represents the chief and the Israelites of Jerusalem; they will be taken out of the city into exile. Two things are unexpected: the reference to two subjects, the chief (king) and the people, and the symbolic character of the exile’s pack (maśśā is linked to naśa ‘al katef “carry [the pack] on the shoulder” in vss.6f….’

Ezekiel’s message is that Zedekiah and his subjects will be carried into exile. Ezekiel himself is a ‘sign’ in that his actions represented the destiny and fate of King Zedekiah of Judah and the people of Judah. Note that the thought of Ezekiel as a sign reappears in 24:18-27 where he is forbidden to formally mourn the death of his wife; symbolising YHWH’s refusal to grieve for Jerusalem at the time of its destruction (24:24).

(12-14) Returning to the subject of the prince Ezekiel expands on his symbolic action. He predicts in detail Zedekiah’s flight from Jerusalem by night with his pack upon his shoulder and his eyes covered; probably to avoid recognition – but perhaps this also symbolises shame (cp. Jer 9:19).

Ezekiel predicts additional details that do not feature in his drama: Zedekiah will be pursued, apprehended, blinded and taken into captivity in Babylon. His supporters and troops will scatter in all directions and be pursued by the Babylonian forces. YHWH claims responsibility for these forthcoming events, saying (v.13) that Zedekiah will be metaphorically caught in his snare and trap.

The literal fulfilment of Ezekiel’s specific and accurate predictions is recorded in 2 Kgs 25:1-7; Jer 39:1-7; 52:1-11. These passages tell us that Zedekiah fled Jerusalem at night through a gap between  two walls, was captured by the Babylonians near Jericho and taken to Riblah to meet Nebuchadnezzar. As punishment for his revolt Nebuchadnezzar had Zedekiah watch the murder of his family before blinding him and transporting him to Babylon.

The abovementioned accounts (e.g. Jer 39:7) explain the riddle or apparent enigma in Ezek 12:13: ‘I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there.’ Zedekiah would be blinded before being transported to Babylon.

King Zedekiah himself may have been aware of this prophecy but failed to appreciate its significance. According to the first century CE historian Flavius Josephus, in his work ‘Antiquities of the Jews,’ Ezekiel wrote down this prophecy and sent a copy to King Hezekiah. He compared the prophecies of Jeremiah and Ezekiel and reckoned that these contradicted one another. He therefore decided not to believe either of them.

Josephus, living more than 600 years after this event, is the only source of this interesting but possibly unreliable piece of information:

Now as to Zedekiah himself, while he heard the prophet [Jeremiah] speak, he believed him, and agreed to every thing as true, and supposed it was for his advantage; but then his friends perverted him, and dissuaded him from what the prophet advised, and obliged him to do what they pleased. Ezekiel also foretold in Babylon what calamities were coming upon the people, which when he heard, he sent accounts of them unto Jerusalem. But Zedekiah did not believe their prophecies, for the reason following: It happened that the two prophets agreed with one another in what they said as in all other things, that the city should be taken, and Zedekiah himself should be taken captive; but Ezekiel disagreed with him, and said that Zedekiah should not see Babylon, while Jeremiah said to him, that the king of Babylon should carry him away thither in bonds….

For background it is worth reading all of chapter 7 in Book X of Josephus’ ‘Antiquities of the Jews’ (Ant. X. 7. 2)

(15-16) Now the prophet raises a faint note of hope with the mention of a ‘a few men’ of Judah (the remnant) who will be spared for the purpose of testifying to YHWH’s sovereignty. These people will recognise that it is their own idolatry that has brought the judgment upon them.

THE TREPIDATION OF THE JUDAHITES ENACTED (17-20)

17 Moreover the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
18 Son of man, eat thy bread with quaking, and drink thy water with trembling and with carefulness;
19 And say unto the people of the land, Thus saith the Lord GOD of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and of the land of Israel; They shall eat their bread with carefulness, and drink their water with astonishment, that her land may be desolate from all that is therein, because of the violence of all them that dwell therein.
20 And the cities that are inhabited shall be laid waste, and the land shall be desolate; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

(17-20) Ezekiel receives a further communication directly from YHWH, instructing him to perform another symbolic action. He is to eat his food and drink water in a manner that portrays fear and anxiety. By shaking and trembling as he eats and drinks Ezekiel will visually convey the fear that the people of Judah will experience during the siege of Jerusalem. His actions will symbolise the people’s anxiety and deep distress in the face of that calamity. This prophetic sign suggests that even basic tasks like eating and drinking will be carried out with fear.

Ezekiel is to impart this message to ‘the people of the land,’ here a reference to the exiles who are with Ezekiel in Babylonia. It is about Jerusalem and the land of Israel. It is especially about those who live in Jerusalem and in ‘her land’ i.e. the territory surrounding the city, since they would be the ones enduring the siege and destruction first-hand.

Vv. 19b and 20 further explain Ezekiel’s symbolic act. The word translated ‘carefulness’ used with reference to how they will drink their water (v.19) and how they will eat their food (v.20) means ‘anxiety.’ It also occurs in 4:16 where in the context the anxiety is about running out of food. That fear of scarcity and famine that will be experienced during the siege seems to be in view here too.

The people of Jerusalem and Judah will also feel terror because their towns will be laid waste and the land will be stripped of everything. The Babylonians will pursue a scorched-earth policy; they will leave no people, animals, crops or infrastructure. There will be total devastation. The reason for this is once again said to be the unrestrained violence of the people of Judah (7:11, 23; 8:17).

As has already been said in v.16, the purpose of the desolation is so that the people will recognise the authority and sovereignty of YHWH – ‘ye shall know that I am the Lord.’

THE OBJECTIONS OF SCOFFERS REFUTED (21-28)

21 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
22 Son of man, what is that proverb that ye have in the land of Israel, saying, The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth?
23 Tell them therefore, Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will make this proverb to cease, and they shall no more use it as a proverb in Israel; but say unto them, The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.
24 For there shall be no more any vain vision nor flattering divination within the house of Israel.
25 For I am the LORD: I will speak, and the word that I shall speak shall come to pass; it shall be no more prolonged: for in your days, O rebellious house, will I say the word, and will perform it, saith the Lord GOD.
26 Again the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
27 Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.
28 Therefore say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; There shall none of my words be prolonged any more, but the word which I have spoken shall be done, saith the Lord GOD.

(21-25) Verses 21-28 address the people’s doubt and scepticism that Ezekiel’s prophecies will be fulfilled.

Ezekiel receives a new message from YHWH which is introduced by the usual formula ‘the word of the LORD came unto me, saying.’  As elsewhere, Ezekiel is addressed as ‘Son of man’ then YHWH highlights a saying that was popular in the land of Israel. This proverb (māšāl) mocks the prophets and reflects a general belief that the judgment they predict will never come to pass: ‘The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth’ (Cp. Ecc 8:11; 2 Pet 3:3-4). Despite the passing of time none of their prophecies of doom have come to fruition.

YHWH instructs Ezekiel to inform the Israelites that he will cause this proverb to cease – because the course of events will prove the proverb wrong. In fact it will be replaced by a new proverb: ‘The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision.’ i.e. the time is not far off and every vision will come to pass.

In addition, all false prophecies that flatter the people of Israel will cease. They are described as ‘vain visions and smooth divinations.’ These prophecies obtained through occult practices are by false prophets who flatter the people by predicting peace, security and the return of the Jehoiachin exiles from Babylon (for an example of this read Jer 28:1-17).

The coming judgment will expose their deceptive lies and bring their false assurances to an end. True predictions by genuine prophets of YHWH like Jeremiah and Ezekiel will come to pass but those expressed by the false prophets will fail. (Note that false prophecy is the subject of the next chapter -Ezekiel 13.)

In v.25 YHWH asserts his sovereign right to speak (declare judgment). Unlike the false prophets his words are truth and will be fulfilled soon. Through Ezekiel he declares that the judgment will come upon the current generation – ‘in your days.’ Once again he describes them as a ‘rebellious house’ (12:2, 3, 9, 25).

(26-28) Another communication from YHWH to Ezekiel is introduced by ‘the word of the Lord came to me saying.’ The prophecy that follows is similar but slightly different to that in the previous segment. Verses 20-25 relate to a proverb that denies that the prophecies of judgment would ever be fulfilled. In verses 26-28, however, YHWH quotes another proverb (‘they of the house of Israel say’) which promotes the equally erroneous view that that Ezekiel’s prophecies may well be fulfilled, but not for a very long time (‘the vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.’). YHWH, however, confirms that Ezekiel’s prophecies will  be fulfilled soon.

SUMMATION

This chapter underscores the certainty of YHWH’s judgment. In it Ezekiel enacts the flight of a refugee. This sign-act is explained as predicting the attempted escape of King Zedekiah, and others, from Jerusalem. Ezekiel then enacts another drama, demonstrating the terror that the Jerusalemites will experience while the city is under siege. The remainder of the chapter addresses the apparent failure of Ezekiel’s visions of destruction. YHWH says that those prophecies will soon be fulfilled. Ezekiel is not a false prophet, his predictions will certainly come to pass.

Posted in Exposition

FOUR SYMBOLIC ACTS IN EZEKIEL 4:1-5:4

Posted on by writtenexposition

The Siege of Jerusalem: Contextual Background

Ezekiel chapter 4:1-5:4 is a continuation of the spirit’s speech to Ezekiel which commenced in 3:24. In it he receives instructions concerning his first messages to his fellow exiles in Babylon. He is to enact four dramatic performances which together represent YHWH’s judgement that is soon to come upon Judah. The drama relates to its capital city Jerusalem and the consequences of the forthcoming siege of the city by Nebuchadnezzar II.

At that time, of course, Ezekiel’s fellow exiles did not expect anything like that to happen. These prophecies are delivered by Ezekiel early in the period commencing with his call to the prophetic ministry (c. 593 BCE) and ending with the fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE). In 597 BCE Nebuchadnezzar had deposed Jehoiachin of Judah and exiled him along with ten thousand of his subjects (2 Kgs 24:8-16), including Ezekiel (1:1-3). He then installed Jehoiachin’s uncle Zedekiah as a puppet king. With this relatively stable government in Judah the exiles were doubtless looking forward to a soon return to their homeland. They could not have known then that Zedekiah (2 Kgs 24-25; 2 Chron 36; Jer 3) would cast off his allegiance to the Babylonians; provoking a violent response by Nebuchadnezzar. In order to quell the revolt by his Judaean vassal Nebuchadnezzar marched to Riblah in Syria where he established campaign headquarters (2 Kgs 25:6, 20; Jer 39:5; 52:9, 26). From that base his army invaded Judah and destroyed its fortified towns (Jer 44:2) before besieging Jerusalem in the ninth year of Zedekiah. Eventually, after a two and a half year siege, the city fell to the Babylonians in 586 BCE. Zedekiah’s family and the nobles of Jerusalem were executed, after which Zedekiah himself was blinded and transported to Babylon as a prisoner of war (2 Kgs 25:6-7).

Ezekiel’s dramatic performances feature:

4:1-3 A model of a siege – representing the siege of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A number of days spent lying on his left and right sides – representing the duration of judgement .

4:9-17 Consumption of small amounts of bread and water – representing a famine in Jerusalem.

5:1-4 A haircut and shave – representing the fate of Israel.

Some scholars are of the opinion that because Ezekiel does not explicitly state ‘I did this’ for each drama he may have just described the details of his vision to the people without physically acting out these scenarios. However, I take that Ezekiel literally carried out YHWH’s instructions since 4:12 makes it clear that the bread was to be baked in the sight of the people. In addition, impressive symbolic actions by Israel’s prophets were not unusual in that era (1 Kgs 11:30, 22:11; 2 Kgs 13:17; Isa 20:2-4; Jer 13:1-11, 19:1-10).

4:1-3 A MODEL OF A SIEGE

Ezekiel, once again addressed as ‘thou, son of man,’ is instructed to get a (clay) brick, set it before him, and inscribe a diagram of Jerusalem on it. He is then to impersonate the Babylonians by enacting a siege of the city. In practice, Ezekiel may have depicted siege warfare by drawing but the verbs (lay, build, cast, set, take) suggest it is more likely that he made little models and moved them towards his clay brick. These models were of:

a fort – siege works or a tower, manned by archers and slingers (2 Kgs 25:1).

a mount – mounds or ramps constructed of debris (earth, wood, stone) which were built against the walls of a besieged city. Siege towers and battering rams could be pushed up these ramps and from them attack troops could scale the walls using siege ladders. They would then fight their way to the city gates and open them.

a camp – living quarters of an army contingent. As well as fighting men this would have included sappers (who tunnelled under the walls to collapse them) and siege engineers.

battering rams – these wheeled vehicles had a heavy ram suspended from the roof by ropes, one of its ends being a large metal blade. The operators repeatedly slammed this into city gates and walls in order to breach them. These prefabricated machines were generally transported flat pack and assembled on site.

From the details in these three verses one can easily imagine the noise, mayhem and devastation of ancient siege warfare. Men shouting, rams battering, slingers and archers from both sides raining down stones and arrows at one another, the defenders throwing down flaming torches to set the attacking war engines and troops alight. Ezekiel’s enactment of such a siege that would soon be experienced by Jerusalem must have shocked his fellow countrymen.

Ezekiel was also to set up a flat iron pan or griddle between him and his model of the city and glare (‘direct your face forward’) at it. This obstruction probably represented the barrier between YHWH and the house of Israel and the stare represented God’s angry intentions towards Jerusalem. The visual demonstration of a siege serves as a prophetic ‘sign’ to the house of Israel of the impending destruction of Jerusalem.

4:4-8 A NUMBER OF DAYS SPENT LYING ON HIS LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES

Ezekiel is then commanded to lie on his left and right sides for a specific number of days, symbolically bearing the sin of the people of Israel. Each day probably represents a year of punishment for Israel’s iniquity. This act serves as a vivid illustration of the consequences of Israel’s rebellion against God.

Having impersonated the Babylonians in the first episode Ezekiel now has to play the part of Israel. He is instructed to lie on his left side for 390 days and after that lie on his right side for 40 days. The first period relates to the ‘house of Israel,’ the second to the ‘house of Judah. Ezekiel is told that each day represents one year (vv. 5-6).

Apparently in the Ancient Near East directions were indicated from a position facing east. North (the northern kingdom of Israel) was therefore on the left side and South (the southern kingdom of Judah) on the right. Another example of this in Ezekiel is 16:46: ‘And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters that dwell at thy left hand: and thy younger sister, that dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters.’

Concerning the years, we have no idea what dates are referred to. In fact, even the number of years for the house of Israel is unclear for although the Hebrew Masoretic text reads 390 years the Greek LXX says 190 years. Scholars and commentators have fertile imaginations and many ingenious suggestions have been put forward.

Since 390+40=430 (the period of time spent by the children of Israel in Egypt) some see this as symbolic of years of oppression or wilderness experience for Israel. See also Ex12:40 and Gal 3:17.

There is some disagreement as to whether the days represent years of sin or the years of punishment for sin. The first would look back to years of iniquity, the other point forward to years of judgement. Basing their opinion on v.9b some commentators maintain that the 390 years and the 40 years run concurrently, although v.6 says ‘when thou hast accomplished them (390), lie again (40)…’ which strongly suggests that they are consecutive.

There also seems to be no agreement on a terminus a quo (start date). For the 390 years of iniquity a popular choice is the period from the the division of Israel in 931 BCE to the fall of Babylon in 539 BCE. Others think that the period is 390 years from the construction of Solomon’s temple in the tenth century BCE. A valid point made by several commentators is that the dates in the book of Ezekiel are based on the deportation of Jehoiachin in 597 BCE, on this basis they speculate that the 390 and 40 years of punishment run consecutively from then until the Maccabean Revolt in 167 BCE.

As regards the 40 year period of Judah’s iniquity some say it began during the reign of King Josiah (640 -609 BCE) and ended with the Fall of Jerusalem (586 BCE), others that it commenced during the long (2 Kgs 21:1), evil (2 Kgs 21:10-16; 23:26-27) reign of Manasseh (lived c. 697-642 BCE).

A few of the commentators I have read give the 430 years a future application, maintaining that because the northern tribes would not have received Ezekiel’s prophecy then these days have yet to be fulfilled. They assert that Ezekiel is portraying judgement that will fall on all Israel (5:4). This, in their view, will occur at the end of the age.

It therefore seems that this is to be a long drawn out drama. Ezekiel is to lie first on his left side for 390 days and then on his right for 40 days ‘to bear the iniquity’ of the house of Israel and the house of Judah. This bearing of the nation’s iniquity is not vicarious but rather Ezekiel’s period of suffering and discomfort symbolizes the pain that Israel will endure at the hands of the Babylonians. During this display YHWH will ‘put ropes on’ Ezekiel, perhaps inflicting him with some kind of temporary paralysis, in order to prevent him from turning from one side to the other.

Again (v.7) Ezekiel is instructed to stare/glare at his siege model while he is lying on his side with his arm uncovered (see v.4). This may symbolize an unimpeded warrior ready for battle (cp. Isa 52:10). He is also to prophesy against Jerusalem. Perhaps, however, there is one crumb of hope in Ezekiel’s message in that the judgement is for a set period and will one day come to an end.

Possibly Ezekiel did not lie immobile 24-7 but just lay for several hours per day as the passage represents him carrying out other activities like enacting the siege, baking bread, drinking water, shaving etc.

4:9-17 CONSUMPTION OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF BREAD AND WATER

In these verses Ezekiel is instructed to eat a specific ration of food, prepared from a mixture of grains and legumes. This is limited by weight and represents the scarcity of food that the people of Jerusalem would experience during a siege. This action demonstrates the severity of the impending judgment upon Israel.

He is directed to mix flour from six types of grain in one vessel and prepare enough bread to eat ‘ from time to time’ (v.10, i.e. at a set time each day) during the 390 day period that he would lie on one side or the other. These grains are: wheat, barley, beans (see also 2 Sam 17:28), lentils, millet and fitches (a species of wheat). This unusual mixture of cereals was to be baked in full view of his fellow exiles (v.12), using human excrement as fuel. The amount of Ezekiel’s daily allocation of this disgusting food is 20 (Babylonian) shekels – approximately 8 ounces or 227 grams – and his intake of water is restricted to one sixth of a hin – about 0.6 litres. That the quantities are to be precisely measured out (cp. Lev 26:26) emphasizes that these are starvation rations. Ezekiel’s general state of health will deteriorate on such an unbalanced diet. The main point of this symbolic action is that siege, starvation and famine will soon be the lot of the residents of Jerusalem. There will be a shortage of food and water therefore rationing will apply (vv.16-17). Rationing is described in Isa 30:20 as ‘the bread of adversity and the water of affliction’ (see also 1 Kgs 22:27).

Ezekiel is instructed to eat the bread ‘as barley cakes.’ The idea seems to be that of eating them with enjoyment or enthusiasm thus suggesting that during the siege of Jerusalem people will be delighted to have something to eat, even if it is polluted.

In verse 13 the Lord says ‘thus shall the children of Israel eat defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them’ (for YHWH driving the Israelites out see Jer 8:3; 16:15; 24:9; 27:10,15), Ezekiel’s starvation diet teaches his fellow Israelites a double lesson: it predicts the forthcoming siege of Jerusalem and also the defilement of the exile that would follow it. The may mean that the food they will eat abroad is defiled since it will not be slaughtered, produced, handled and prepared in accordance with the dietary laws in the Torah. It could also mean that they will be defiled by adopting heathen manners and customs during the Exile (cp. Hos 9:3-4 for a similar sentiment).

Even though Ezekiel was receiving these directions while in a prophetic trance his priestly upbringing seems to have automatically triggered an immediate protest at the instructions concerning the bread. That his problem concerns the use of human excrement as fuel is clear from YHWH’s response in v.15: ‘Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.’ Bread baked over dried cow manure will still be defiled but perhaps to Ezekiel it seems a little less revolting. In any case, it will still sound disgusting and memorably make the point to his audience.

Ezekiel’s request for relief begins with a passionate outburst ‘Ah Lord God!’ and he goes on to explain that thus far his life has not been ‘polluted.’ One would think that Ezekiel’s objection is based on either the regulations concerning unlawful mixing (Lev 19:19; Deut 22:9) or on the strict rules about the disposal of human waste (Deut 23:12-14). However, he mentions neither of these but gives as his reason (‘for’ v.14) the fact that he had never done the following things:

  • Eaten an animal that died of itself (Lev 11:39; 17:15; 22:8; Deut 14:21, cp. Ezek 44:31).
  • Eaten an animal that was torn in pieces (Ex 22:31; Lev 22:8).
  • Eaten abominable flesh – this was meat left over from peace offerings and not eaten by the third day (Lev19:7).

These things bear no relation to baking bread over human excrement but Ezekiel seems to be asserting that he has kept all the dietary regulations since his youth, and cites these three cases in point. It is commendable that Ezekiel lived a blameless life before his prophetic call and that during his ministry his conscience was so sensitive that he instinctively wanted to live his life in obedience to God’s requirements. What a great lesson and example for us today!

After granting Ezekiel a concession on the fuel YHWH further declares: ‘Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem: and they shall eat bread by weight, and with care; and they shall drink water by measure, and with astonishment: That they may want bread and water, and be astonished one with another, and consume away for their iniquity.’ Ezekiel 4:16-17

‘staff of bread’ – means supply of bread, that which human beings depend on for survival. See also Lev 26:26; Psa 105:16; Isa 3:1; Ezek 5:16; 14:13. The siege of Jerusalem will result in the rationing of food and water. Bread will be doled out by weight and water by measure. The people will partake of their daily rations ‘with astonishment’ (extreme fear and apprehension) and will ‘consume away for their iniquity,’ i.e. they will waste away. Ezekiel uses this same expression three times when prophesying YHWH’s judgement (4:17; 24:23; 33:10).

This drama symbolizes and emphasizes the severity of the judgement that will befall Jerusalem. The scarcity of food and water will lead to desperation and despair among the people. This judgment is portrayed as a consequence of the people’s sin and disobedience.

5:1-4 A HAIRCUT AND SHAVE

Again addressing him as ‘Mortal’ YHWH reveals to Ezekiel details of the fourth drama that he must enact. He is to take a sharp knife and shave his head and beard. Using a knife as a razor is a powerful depiction of the judgement that will come upon the people of Jerusalem. The shaving of the head and beard was a sign of mourning (Isa 22:12; Jer 16:6) or disgrace (2 Sam 10:4; Mic 1:16) in ancient Near Eastern cultures and Israelites were forbidden by the law (Lev 19:27; 21:5; Deut 14:1) to practise this custom.

Using balances Ezekiel is to weigh and divide the hair that he has shaved off. This intimates that God is supervising the judgements (see 5:12; 6:12). Unlike the previous three dramas (chapter 4), in this case Ezekiel is to perform the symbolic actions AFTER the set number of days he has to lie on one side or the other (‘when the days of the (mock) siege are fulfilled,’ 5:2).

  • He is to burn one third of the hair ‘in the midst of the city,’ i.e. on his brick representing Jerusalem. This symbolizes the destruction of Jerusalem by fire and of its inhabitants by famine and pestilence (5:12).
  • He is to strike another third of the hair with a sword symbolizing that many people will suffer a violent death in battle.
  • He is to throw the remaining third to the winds, symbolizing the dispersion of the people of Judah.
  • He is to take a small number of the scattered hairs and bind them in the hem of his garment. He then has to take some of these and burn them in the fire. This indicates that even a remnant (symbolizing either those who survive the Babylonian invasion and siege or those who remain faithful to YHWH) will not be spared from God’s judgement but will find themselves in desperate circumstances. This action emphasizes the severity of the consequences of disobedience.

We now move into the next section which begins with an oracle against Jerusalem (5:5-17) in which YHWH explains the symbolism of the haircut and shave in 5:1-4.

EZEKIEL 1:1-3 – INTRODUCTION AND SUPERSCRIPTION

EZEKIEL’S VISION OF THE GLORY OF YAHWEH (1:4-28)

AND HE SAID TO ME’ – EZEKIEL’S CALL TO BE A PROPHET – 2:1-3:15

EZEKIEL’S WATCHMAN ROLE: A PROPHETIC CALL TO RESPONSIBILITY- 3:16-27